Teacher Agency in Ghanaian Schools: Impact of Career Choice Motivations and Perceptions of the Teaching Profession
Abstract
1. Introduction
- (a)
- How do motivation and perception factors influence teacher agency among Ghanaian basic school teachers?
- (b)
- How does perception mediate the relationship between motivation factors and teacher agency?
- (c)
- How does gender and age moderate the influence of the proposed predictors on teacher agency among Ghanaian basic school teachers?
2. Literature Review
2.1. Ghana’s Education System
2.2. Teacher Agency
2.3. Theoretical Review
3. Hypothesis Development and Conceptual Development
3.1. The Relationship Between Motivation Factors and Teacher Agency
3.2. The Relationship Between Perception Factors and Teacher Agency
3.3. The Mediating Role of Perception Factors
3.4. The Moderating Influence of Gender
3.5. The Moderating Influence of Age
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Participants and Procedure
4.2. Measures
5. Results
5.1. Preliminary Analyses
- Teacher agency (χ2/df = 4.778, p = 0.00, IFI = 0.977, TLI = 0.962, CFI = 0.977, RMSEA = 0.081, SRMR = 0.033, PClose = 0.016);
- Motivation factors (χ2/df = 3.394, p = 0.00, IFI = 0.958, TLI = 0.939, CFI = 0.958, RMSEA = 0.065, SRMR = 0.057, PClose = 0.024);
- Perception factors (χ2/df = 2.436, p = 0.00, IFI = 0.972, TLI = 0.961, CFI = 0.971, RMSEA = 0.050, SRMR = 0.042, PClose = 0.480).
5.2. Hypotheses Testing
5.3. Mediation Analysis
5.4. Moderating Influence of Gender and Age
6. Discussion
Implications
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Agaj, D., Tufina, S., Pepkolaj, L., Arnal-Palacián, M., & Dibra, E. (2023). Motives that drive young people to pursue a teaching career: Case of Albania using the fit choice scale. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13, 67–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Agbonna, R. O., Oluyode, Q. N., & Yakubu, A. O. (2023). Assessment of the relationship between fringe benefits and staff job satisfaction in public universities in Ogun state. Sapientia Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Development Studies, 6(1), 57–69. [Google Scholar]
- Agboola, B., & Offong, D. E. (2018). Occupational incentives and teacher retention in private secondary schools in Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 7(3), 263–277. [Google Scholar]
- Ahmad, H., & Shah, S. R. (2022). Teacher agency and professional development: A study on Cambridge English teacher program in the Arabian Gulf. Cogent Education, 9(1), 2080352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmadi Deh Qutbuddini, M., Zaydabad, H., & Mahmoodabadi, E. (2022). The effect of perception of the integration of ICT in the teaching process on acceptance and application of ICT in learning: The mediating role of beliefs, attitude, and intention use of ICT of students. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 16(2), 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhtar, S. N., Hashmi, M. A., & Naqvi, S. I. H. (2010). A comparative study of job satisfaction in public and private school teachers at secondary level. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4222–4228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akinci, Z., Yurcu, G., & Kasalak, M. A. (2018). The mediating role of perception in the relationship between expectation and satisfaction in terms of sustainability in tourism education. Sustainability, 10(7), 2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anamuah-Mensah, J., & Benneh, M. (n.d.). Particular issues of teacher education in Ghana (high level expert meeting on UNESCO, 7–9 March 2006). Available online: www.unesco.org (accessed on 18 June 2025).
- Anderson, L. (2010). Embedded, emboldened, and (net) working for change: Support-seeking and teacher agency in urban, high-needs schools. Harvard Educational Review, 80(4), 541–573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babad, E. (2009). The social psychology of the classroom. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bellibaş, M. Ş., Gümüş, S., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2020). Principals supporting teacher leadership: The effects of learning-centred leadership on teacher leadership practices with the mediating role of teacher agency. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 200–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bienkowski, M., Feng, M., & Means, B. (2012). Enhancing teaching and learning through educational data mining and learning analytics: An issue brief. Office of Educational Technology, U.S. Department of Education.
- Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brezicha, K. F., Ikoma, S., Park, H., & LeTendre, G. K. (2020). The ownership perception gap: Exploring teacher job satisfaction and its relationship to teachers’ and principals’ perception of decision-making opportunities. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 23(4), 428–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buabeng, I., Ntow, F. D., & Otami, C. D. (2020). Teacher education in Ghana: Policies and practices. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 9(1), 86–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clarke, M., & Kennedy, A. (2024). A psychosocial reading of teacher agency. In Teachers and teaching (pp. 1–16). Taylor & Francis. [Google Scholar]
- Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social-emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Day, C. (2004). A passion for teaching. Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Ellemers, N. (2018). Gender stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 275–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eren, A., & Çetin, G. (2019). Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about the teaching profession, curriculum orientations, and personal responsibility. Curriculum Perspectives, 39, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ersöz, A. (2021). The mediating role of teacher agency on the relationship between job satisfaction and readiness for change among public school teachers [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. [Google Scholar]
- Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ertürk, R. (2023). The effect of teacher autonomy on teachers’ professional dedication. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 10(2), 494–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathi, J., Zhang, L. J., & Arefian, M. H. (2023). Testing a model of EFL teachers’ work engagement: The roles of teachers’ professional identity, L2 grit, and foreign language teaching enjoyment. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(4), 2087–2119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodall, J., & Montgomery, C. (2014). Parental involvement to parental engagement: A continuum. Educational Review, 66(4), 399–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guilloteaux, M. J. (2007). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of teachers’ motivational practices and students’ motivation [Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Nottingham]. [Google Scholar]
- Hadar, L. L., & Benish-Weisman, M. (2019). Teachers’ agency: Do their values make a difference? British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 137–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hagenauer, G., Muehlbacher, F., & Ivanova, M. (2023). “It’s where learning and teaching begins–is this relationship”—Insights on the teacher-student relationship at university from the teachers’ perspective. Higher Education, 85(4), 819–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Hult, G. T. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). SAGE. [Google Scholar]
- Han, S. W., Borgonovi, F., & Guerriero, S. (2020). Why don’t more boys want to become teachers? The effect of a gendered profession on students’ career expectations. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hawthorne-Kocak, C. (2021). Investigating the relationship between teacher agency, student engagement, and student achievement. University of Rhode Island. [Google Scholar]
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hyllegard, K. H., Rambo-Hernandez, K., & Ogle, J. P. (2017). Fashion fundamentals: Building Middle School girls’ self-esteem and interest in stem. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 23(1), 87–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Inman, D., & Marlow, L. (2004). Teacher retention: Why do beginning teachers remain in the profession? Education, 124(4), 605. [Google Scholar]
- Jackson, D., & Tomlinson, M. (2019). Career values and proactive career behaviour among contemporary higher education students. Journal of Education and Work, 32(5), 449–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jugovic, I. P., Maskalan, A., & Pavin Ivanec, T. (2022). Gender differences and motivation for the teaching profession: Why do men choose (not) to teach? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(9), 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Juutilainen, M., Metsäpelto, R. L., Mäensivu, M., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2024). Beginning student teachers’ agency in teacher identity negotiations. Teacher Development, 28(2), 178–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaplan, A. (2014). Section commentary: Theory and research on teachers’ motivation: Mapping an emerging conceptual train. In P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, & H. M. Watt (Eds.), Teacher motivation: Theory and practice (pp. 52–66). Routledge. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, I., Rahman, Z., & Fatma, M. (2016). The role of customer brand engagement and brand experience in online banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 34(7), 1025–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kogan, L. R., Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Hellyer, P. W. (2010). Student evaluations of teaching: Perceptions of faculty based on gender, position, and rank. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 623–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kondakci, Y., Beycioglu, K., Sincar, M., & Ugurlu, C. T. (2017). Readiness of teachers for change in schools. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 20(2), 176–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J. (2023). Influence of motivation on teachers’ job performance. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kusters, M., van der Rijst, R., de Vetten, A., & Admiraal, W. (2023). University lecturers as change agents: How do they perceive their professional agency? Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leal, P., & Crookes, G. V. (2018). “Most of my students kept saying, ‘I never met a gay person’”: A queer English language teacher’s agency for social justice. System, 79, 38–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, W. O. (2014). Lifelong learning and learning to learn: An enabler of new voices for the new times. International Review of Education, 60, 463–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S., Hallinger, P., & Feng, D. (2016). Supporting the professional learning of teachers in China: Does principal leadership make a difference? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 79–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, C., Graven, M., Sayed, Y., & Lampen, E. (2017). Enabling and constraining conditions of professional teacher agency: The South African context. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 14(1), 5–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loughran, J. (2012). What expert teachers do: Enhancing professional knowledge for classroom practice. Routledge. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masath, F. B. (2015). ‘Teacher job satisfaction’ and ‘intention to leave the profession’: Does age matter? Journal of Education, Humanities and Sciences, 4(2), 66–75. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer, D. K., & Turner, J. C. (2006). Re-conceptualizing emotion and motivation to learn in classroom contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Education. (2012). Pre-tertiary teacher professional development and management in Ghana: Policy framework. Ghana Education Service. Available online: https://media.unesco.org/sites/default/files/webform/r2e002/fcf3eec084df6148f1a026e55c326c915658999f.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2025).
- Ministry of Education. (2018). The education sector analysis report. Available online: https://planipolis.iiep.unesco.org/sites/planipolis/files/ressources/ghana_education_sector_analysis_2018.pdf (accessed on 18 June 2025).
- Moitra, N. (2024). Participation, assertion and aspiration-indigenous teacher agency in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(7), 1813–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molla, T., & Nolan, A. (2020). Teacher agency and professional practice. Teachers and Teaching, 26(1), 67–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nagy, G., Garrett, J., Trautwein, U., Cortina, K. S., Baumert, J., & Eccles, J. S. (2008). Gendered high school course selection as a precursor of gendered careers: The mediating role of self-concept and intrinsic value. APA. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Namgung, W., Moate, J., & Ruohotie-Lyhty, M. (2020). Investigating the professional agency of secondary school English teachers in South Korea. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nida, I. L., & Ningsih, S. K. (2023). Investigating EFL Teachers’ Perceptions Towards Professional Engagement. JETAL: Journal of English Teaching & Applied Linguistic, 4(2), 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The assessment of reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248–292. [Google Scholar]
- Oberhauser, L., & Hertel, S. (2023). Choosing connection: Relational values as a career choice motivation predict teachers’ relational goal setting. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1147276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ololube, N. P. (2006). Teachers job satisfaction and motivation for school effectiveness: An assessment. Essays in Education, 18(1), 9. [Google Scholar]
- Oolbekkink-Marchand, H. W., Hadar, L. L., Smith, K., Helleve, I., & Ulvik, M. (2017). Teachers’ perceived professional space and their agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 62, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pietarinen, J., Pyhältö, K., Soini, T., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Reducing teacher burnout: A socio-contextual approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podolsky, A., Kini, T., Bishop, J., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Solving the teacher shortage: How to attract and retain excellent educators. Learning Policy Institute. [Google Scholar]
- Polatcan, M., Arslan, P., & Balci, A. (2023). The mediating effect of teacher self-efficacy regarding the relationship between transformational school leadership and teacher agency. Educational Studies, 49(5), 823–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Publishing. [Google Scholar]
- Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2012). Teachers as agents of change: An exploration of the concept of teacher agency. University of Stirling. [Google Scholar]
- Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2012). Do comprehensive school teachers perceive themselves as active professional agents in school reforms? Journal of Educational Change, 13, 95–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pyhältö, K., Pietarinen, J., & Soini, T. (2014). Comprehensive school teachers’ professional agency in large-scale educational change. Journal of Educational Change, 15(3), 303–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reichert, F., Chen, J., & Torney-Purta, J. (2018). Profiles of adolescents’ perceptions of democratic classroom climate and students’ influence: The effect of school and community contexts. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1279–1298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Richards, L., Maharani, A., & Präg, P. (2023). Subjective social status and allostatic load among older people in England: A longitudinal analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 320, 115749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roth, G., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Kaplan, H. (2007). Autonomous motivation for teaching: How self-determined teaching may lead to self-determined learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 761–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rushton, E. A., & Bird, A. (2024). Space as a lens for teacher agency: A case study of three beginning teachers in England, UK. The Curriculum Journal, 35(2), 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications. [Google Scholar]
- Sahlberg, P. (2011). The fourth way of Finland. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 173–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sario, M. B., & Villocino, R. P. (2023). Teamwork and teachers’ engagement: A mediating roles of work condition and professional development in public schools. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 8(5), 2728–2743. [Google Scholar]
- Shah, D. B., & Bhattarai, P. C. (2023). Factors contributing to teachers’ self-efficacy: A case of Nepal. Education Sciences, 13(1), 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, X. Y. (2015). Institutional legitimacy, teacher agency, and the development of teacher teaching expertise [Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Beijing Normal University]. [Google Scholar]
- Shrestha, M. (2019). Influence of age group on job satisfaction in academia. SEISENSE Journal of Management, 2(3), 30–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD. [Google Scholar]
- Svartefoss, S. M., Jungblut, J., Aksnes, D. W., Kolltveit, K., & van Leeuwen, T. (2024). Explaining research performance: Investigating the importance of motivation. SN Social Sciences, 4(6), 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taylor, I. M., Ntoumanis, N., & Standage, M. (2008). A self-determination theory approach to understanding the antecedents of teachers’ motivational strategies in physical education. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30(1), 75–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thornton, M., Bricheno, P., & Reid, I. (2002). Students’ reasons for wanting to teach in primary school. Research in Education, 67(1), 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toom, A., Pyhältö, K., & Rust, F. O. C. (2015). Teachers’ professional agency in contradictory times. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 615–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- T-TEL. (2018). Endline survey report—T-TEL phase 1. T-TEL. [Google Scholar]
- Van der Heijden, H. R. M. A., Geldens, J. J., Beijaard, D., & Popeijus, H. L. (2015). Characteristics of teachers as change agents. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 681–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Droogenbroeck, F., Spruyt, B., & Vanroelen, C. (2014). Burnout among senior teachers: Investigating the role of workload and interpersonal relationships at work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vähäsantanen, K. (2015). Professional agency in the stream of change: Understanding educational change and teachers’ professional identities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 47, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vu, T. N. (2020). Examining teacher agency among teacher educators: An action research in Vietnam. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(7), 94–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Watt, H. M., & Richardson, P. W. (2007). Motivational factors influencing teaching as a career choice: Development and validation of the FIT-Choice scale. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 167–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wyatt-Smith, C., Du Plessis, A., Wang, J., Hand, K., Alexander, C., & Colbert, P. (2017). Why choose teaching. A matter of choice: Evidence from the field. A report prepared for the Queensland College of Teachers. Learning Sciences Institute Australia. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H. (2015). Teacher mediated agency in educational reform in China. Springer International Publishing. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaragoza, A., Seidel, T., & Hiebert, J. (2023). Exploring pre-service teachers’ abilities to connect professional knowledge with lesson planning and observation. European Journal of Teacher Education, 47(1), 120–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Frequency (n) | Percent (%) | |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||
Male | 350 | 61.0 | |
Female | 224 | 39.0 | |
Age | |||
21–30 | 250 | 43.6 | |
31–40 | 179 | 31.2 | |
41–50 | 93 | 16.2 | |
51–60 | 52 | 9.1 | |
Marital status | |||
Married | 286 | 49.8 | |
Divorced | 25 | 4.4 | |
Single | 239 | 41.6 | |
Separated | 24 | 4.2 | |
Academic/Professional Qualifications | |||
Diploma | 256 | 44.6 | |
Bachelor’s degree | 259 | 45.1 | |
Master’s degree | 59 | 10.3 | |
Number of years in service | |||
1–5 | 257 | 44.8 | |
6–10 | 160 | 27.9 | |
11–15 | 83 | 14.5 | |
Above 16 | 74 | 12.9 |
Construct and Measurement Items | β | t-Value (Significance) | CR | AVE | α |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Teacher agency (TA) | 0.875 | 0.538 | 0.874 | ||
TE1 | 0.698 | 15.039 *** | |||
TE2 | 0.787 | 16.724 *** | |||
TE3 | 0.727 | 15.609 *** | |||
TE4 | 0.754 | 16.115 *** | |||
TE5 | 0.744 | 15.927 *** | |||
TE6 | 0.686 | Fixed | |||
Motivation factors | |||||
Intrinsic Career Value (I.C.) | 0.853 | 0.660 | 0.851 | ||
IF7 | 0.808 | Fixed | |||
IF1 | 0.766 | 19.462 *** | |||
IF11 | 0.861 | 22.102 *** | |||
Fallback career (F.C.) | 0.751 | 0.501 | 0.752 | ||
IF27 | 0.748 | Fixed | |||
IF10 | 0.683 | 13.787 *** | |||
IF35 | 0.692 | 13.923 *** | |||
Job security (J.S.) | 0.672 | 0.508 | 0.666 | ||
IF23 | 0.772 | Fixed | |||
IF30 | 0.648 | 12.459 *** | |||
Social influences (SI) | 0.725 | 0.468 | 0.724 | ||
IF21 | 0.682 | Fixed | |||
IF3 | 0.659 | 13.383 *** | |||
IF32 | 0.709 | 14.197 *** | |||
Perception factors | |||||
Expertise (E.C.) | 0.842 | 0.640 | 0.841 | ||
BT9 | 0.791 | 19.603 *** | |||
BT14 | 0.796 | 19.709 *** | |||
BT13 | 0.814 | Fixed | |||
Social Status (S.S.) | 0.808 | 0.513 | 0.807 | ||
BT11 | 0.701 | 14.907 *** | |||
BT7 | 0.712 | 15.122 *** | |||
BT12 | 0.749 | 15.800 *** | |||
BT8 | 0.701 | Fixed | |||
Salary (S) | 0.832 | 0.713 | 0.832 | ||
BT3 | 0.820 | 19.307 *** | |||
BT1 | 0.868 | Fixed | |||
Social Dissuasion (SD) | 0.798 | 0.570 | 0.790 | ||
TD2 | 0.639 | 14.363 *** | |||
TD6 | 0.802 | 16.929 *** | |||
TD4 | 0.812 | Fixed | |||
Satisfaction with Choice (SWC) | 0.794 | 0.658 | 0.792 | ||
TD5 | 0.778 | 18.339 *** | |||
TD3 | 0.843 | Fixed |
Variables | M | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. IC | 4.70 | 1.32 | 0.813 | |||||||||
2. FC | 3.99 | 1.41 | −0.269 *** | 0.708 | ||||||||
3. JS | 4.83 | 1.41 | 0.008 | 0.568 *** | 0.713 | |||||||
4. SI | 4.25 | 1.27 | 0.481 *** | 0.406 *** | 0.570 *** | 0.684 | ||||||
5. EC | 5.46 | 1.21 | 0.492 *** | −0.168 ** | 0.240 *** | 0.176 ** | 0.800 | |||||
6. SS | 4.60 | 1.19 | 0.404 *** | 0.175 ** | 0.439 *** | 0.644 *** | 0.426 *** | 0.716 | ||||
7. S | 3.86 | 1.47 | 0.050 | 0.304 *** | 0.266 *** | 0.505 *** | −0.250 *** | 0.578 *** | 0.844 | |||
8. SD | 4.91 | 1.30 | −0.065 | 0.358 *** | 0.430 *** | 0.115 * | 0.262 *** | 0.205 *** | 0.093 † | 0.755 | ||
9. SWC | 4.88 | 1.20 | 0.617 *** | 0.007 | 0.486 *** | 0.627 *** | 0.489 *** | 0.620 *** | 0.301 *** | 0.247 *** | 0.811 | |
10. TA | 3.91 | 0.72 | 0.486 *** | 0.007 | 0.258 *** | 0.086 | 0.511 *** | 0.302 *** | −0.137 ** | 0.365 *** | 0.429 *** | 0.734 |
Construct | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Intrinsic career value | _ | |||||||||
2. Fallback career | 0.266 | _ | ||||||||
3. Job security | 0.045 | 0.570 | _ | |||||||
4. Social influences | 0.478 | 0.396 | 0.562 | _ | ||||||
5. Expert | 0.495 | 0.166 | 0.250 | 0.181 | _ | |||||
6. Social status | 0.402 | 0.169 | 0.418 | 0.645 | 0.426 | _ | ||||
7. Salary | 0.044 | 0.296 | 0.228 | 0.513 | 0.240 | 0.585 | _ | |||
8. Social dissuasion | 0.061 | 0.392 | 0.457 | 0.130 | 0.280 | 0.212 | 0.097 | _ | ||
9. Satisfaction with choice | 0.628 | 0.002 | 0.501 | 0.631 | 0.495 | 0.615 | 0.292 | 0.251 | _ | |
10. Teacher agency | 0.492 | 0.015 | 0.308 | 0.087 | 0.512 | 0.305 | 0.129 | 0.380 | 0.430 | _ |
Hypothesis | Path Description | β | t-Value (Significance) | Results |
---|---|---|---|---|
Motivation factors | ||||
H1 | Intrinsic career value → Teacher agency | 0.449 | 9.866 *** | Supported |
H2 | Fallback career → Teacher agency | 0.115 | 2.785 ** | Supported |
H3 | Job security → Teacher agency | 0.150 | 4.792 *** | Supported |
H4 | Social influences → Teacher agency | −0.315 | −6.635 *** | Supported |
Perception factors | ||||
H5 | Expert career → Teacher agency | 0.156 | 3.938 *** | Supported |
H6 | Social status → Teacher agency | 0.178 | 4.349 *** | Supported |
H7 | Salary → Teacher agency | −0.157 | −4.193 *** | Supported |
H8 | Social dissuasion → Teacher agency | 0.265 | 6.072 *** | Supported |
H9 | Satisfaction with choice → Teacher agency | 0.118 | 2.742 ** | Supported |
Effect | Path | β | Confidence Interval | Conclusion | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
Total | Motivation→ teacher agency | 0.314 * | 0.087 | 0.499 | |
Direct | Motivation→ teacher agency | −0.958 ** | −3.888 | −0.497 | |
Indirect | Motivation → perception → teacher agency | 1.273 *** | 0.066 | 0.271 | Partial Mediation |
Male | Female | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Path Description | β | p | β | p | z-Score | Results |
Intrinsic career value → Teacher agency | 0.189 | 0.000 | 0.280 | 0.000 | 2.466 ** | Supported |
Fallback career → Teacher agency | 0.034 | 0.088 | 0.050 | 0.078 | 0.472 | Not supported |
Job security → Teacher agency | 0.065 | 0.001 | 0.067 | 0.015 | 0.072 | Not supported |
Social influences → Teacher agency | −0.128 | 0.000 | −0.158 | 0.000 | −0.792 | Not supported |
Expert career → Teacher agency | 0.060 | 0.017 | 0.092 | 0.002 | 0.832 | Not supported |
Social status → Teacher agency | 0.066 | 0.005 | 0.093 | 0.005 | 0.644 | Not supported |
Salary → Teacher agency | −0.070 | 0.000 | −0.065 | 0.013 | 0.145 | Not supported |
Social dissuasion → Teacher agency | 0.139 | 0.000 | 0.114 | 0.000 | −0.689 | Not supported |
Satisfaction with choice → Teacher agency | 0.072 | 0.004 | 0.037 | 0.228 | −0.876 | Not supported |
Age 21–30 | Age 31–40 | Age 41–50 | Age 51–60 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Path Description | β Value (t-Value) | β Value (t-Value) | β Value (t-Value) | β Value (t-Value) | χ2 Difference | Result |
Intrinsic career value → Teacher agency | 0.291 (5.487 ***) | 0.504 (9.034 ***) | 0.498 (7.195 ***) | 0.451 (4.790 ***) | 10.321 * | Supported |
Fallback career → Teacher agency | 0.020 (0.382) | 0.190 (3.400 ***) | 0.079 (1.146) | 0.108 (1.150) | 3.819 | Not supported |
Job security → Teacher agency | 0.054 (1.017) | 0.128 (2.291 *) | 0.219 (3.160 **) | 0.232 (2.463 *) | 3.414 | Not supported |
Social influences → Teacher agency | −0.247 (−4.661 **) | −0.253 (−4.543 ***) | −0.286 (−4.132 ***) | −0.352 (−3.732 ***) | 1.154 | Not supported |
Expert career → Teacher agency | 0.105 (1.988 *) | −0.043 (−0.762) | 0.240 (3.459 ***) | 0.216 (2.294 *) | 5.682 | Not supported |
Social status → Teacher agency | 0.175 (3.303 ***) | 0.141 (2.526 *) | 0.102 (1.476) | 0.079 (0.836) | 0.199 | Not supported |
Salary → Teacher agency | −0.135 (−2.539 *) | −0.207 (−3.711 ***) | −0.152 (−2.194 *) | −0.069 (−0.733) | 1.402 | Not supported |
Social dissuasion → Teacher agency | 0.246 (4.637 ***) | 0.105 (1.877) | 0.241 (3.480 ***) | 0.300 (3.184 ***) | 3.324 | Not supported |
Satisfaction with choice → Teacher agency | 0.182 (3.424 ***) | 0.023 (0.406) | 0.153 (2.203 *) | 0.020 (0.211) | 1.979 | Not supported |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Adams, F.; Li, Q.; Mu, H. Teacher Agency in Ghanaian Schools: Impact of Career Choice Motivations and Perceptions of the Teaching Profession. Behav. Sci. 2025, 15, 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070895
Adams F, Li Q, Mu H. Teacher Agency in Ghanaian Schools: Impact of Career Choice Motivations and Perceptions of the Teaching Profession. Behavioral Sciences. 2025; 15(7):895. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070895
Chicago/Turabian StyleAdams, Francis, Qiong Li, and Hu Mu. 2025. "Teacher Agency in Ghanaian Schools: Impact of Career Choice Motivations and Perceptions of the Teaching Profession" Behavioral Sciences 15, no. 7: 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070895
APA StyleAdams, F., Li, Q., & Mu, H. (2025). Teacher Agency in Ghanaian Schools: Impact of Career Choice Motivations and Perceptions of the Teaching Profession. Behavioral Sciences, 15(7), 895. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15070895