Next Article in Journal
Intervention Effect of Group Sensory Integration Training on Social Responsiveness and N170 Event-Related Potential of Children with Autism
Previous Article in Journal
Self-Consciousness as a Construction All the Way Down
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China

School of Journalism and Communication, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030201
Submission received: 1 February 2024 / Revised: 26 February 2024 / Accepted: 28 February 2024 / Published: 2 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Topic Online User Behavior in the Context of Big Data)

Abstract

:
Objective: This study aims to identify content variables that theoretical research suggests should be considered as strategic approaches to facilitate science communication with the public and to assess their practical effects on user engagement metrics. Methods: Data were collected from the official Chinese TikTok account (Douyin) of the Nutrition Research Institute of China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corporation, China’s largest state-owned food processing conglomerate. Dependent variables included likes, shares, comments, subscription increases. Independent variables encompassed explanation of jargon (metaphor, personification, science visualization), communication remarks (conclusion presence, recommendation presence), and content themes. Descriptive analysis and negative binomial regression were employed, with statistical significance set at 0.05. Results: First, subscription increases were positively associated with personification (p < 0.05, 0.024) and science visualization (p < 0.01, 0.000). Second, a positive relationship existed between comments and communicator recommendations (p < 0.01, 0.000), while presenting conclusions negatively correlated with shares (p < 0.05, 0.012). Conclusions: Different strategies yielded improvements in various engagement metrics. This can provide practical guidance for communicators, emphasizing the need to balance scholarly presentation with sustaining appealing statistics.

1. Introduction

Public nutrition education in China represents a unique paradigm within the Global South, characterized by a centralized model for operationalizing public health initiatives [1]. The strategic emphasis on new media, particularly social media, has become pivotal following the central government’s commitment to enhancing nutritional literacy [2,3]. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic [4], TikTok has emerged as a prominent domain, boasting over 750 million daily active users with an average viewing duration of 2.5 h [5,6]. Within this digital landscape, nutrition communication is a leading video category with daily health popularization content attracting more than 200 million users [7]. Notably, content addressing low-sodium, low-sugar, and low-fat dietary practices has witnessed substantial annual increases in viewing numbers [8], reflecting a growing public demand for professional nutritional knowledge [9].
In response to the vital role assumed by nutrition professionals in ensuring the daily health care of the public, dietitians have initiated measures to disseminate information aimed at reaching and educating users. However, they face challenges conveying technical jargon to the public, expressing reservations about simplifying scientific concepts on TikTok [10]. Collaborative efforts between nutrition and communication experts have aimed to provide guidance, ensuring accurate information dissemination and comprehension among a broader audience. Strategies include abandoning insignificant terminology, contextualizing scientific data within individuals’ daily lives, specifying recommended intake frequency, and identifying target demographics [11]. Several studies have highlighted the effectiveness of figurative speech in simplifying technical terms by altering the relationships between designated concepts [12,13]. Additionally, the integration of science visualization has proven instrumental in enhancing audience perception by offering tangible interpretation of abstract notions [14,15], resulting in heightened engagement compared to traditional text formats [16].
Concerns about the misrepresentation of scientific findings are legitimate, yet it is crucial to recognize that scientists may inadvertently overlook the communication of scientific summaries and advice. This oversight often stems from their familiarity with the information [17], and instances of misrepresentations are comparatively rare, given the scrutiny of the scientific community and vigilant public oversight. Moreover, research findings underscore that content possessing practical utility and the potential for seamless integration into everyday life tends to garner heightened popularity [18]. This highlights the importance of addressing concerns about misrepresentation and emphasizing the practical relevance of scientific information for wider user engagement.
The existing literature extensively examines the favorable effects of social media on behavior intervention. In a controlled study targeting adult women with suboptimal fruit and vegetable consumption, exposure to healthy eating blogs demonstrated significant improvements in intervention outcomes. Specifically, the exposed group exhibited elevated diet knowledge, enhanced attitude, increased self-efficacy, and greater motivation to enact change. As a prevalent form of content on social media, particularly notable for their knowledge-translation capabilities, convenience and interactive features, blogs have proven instrumental in effecting positive lifestyle behavior changes [19]. This illustrative case aligns with a broader body of research [20], indicating that social media contributes to more successful intervention outcomes by fostering social norms and empowering individuals to embark on health improvements [21].
Recent scholarly inquiries underscore the critical role of user engagement metrics as an influencing factor of health intervention outcomes, encompassing number of likes, shares, comments, and subscriptions per video. The act of clicking ‘like’ as an instant impression imposes no effort burden on users; however, it serves as a key engagement metric indicating user interest, whereas sharing not only signifies viral reach [22] but also has the potential to influence those in the users’ social circle. Comments and subscriptions constitute active forms of engagement, with the former serving as a platform for active and public deliberation and the latter indicative of the audience’s long-term commitment [23]. Current research emphasizes discerning shared attributes among highly engaged posts [24], investigating the impact of stylistic and informational elements on popularity [25], and exploring the strategies employed by nutrition professionals on social media platforms [26].
While some attention has been given to content-based variables and their impact on user engagements, few studies have delved into the realm of nutritional knowledge dissemination and its effect evaluation. The COFCO (China National Cereals, Oils and Foodstuffs Corporation) Nutrition Research Institute has emerged as a noteworthy research target. As the inaugural enterprise research and development center dedicated to investigating the Chinese population’s nutritional needs and metabolic mechanisms, its parent company consistently ranks among the Fortune Global 500 companies [27]. The research institute, a pioneer in establishing a public account for disseminating nutrition knowledge, has garnered accolades, such as the Outstanding Group for Science Popularization, awarded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of China [28]. These distinctions, reflective of exemplary achievements, set benchmarks for other enterprises to emulate and align with national initiatives. Analyzing how the COFCO Research Institute communicates with the public on TikTok provides valuable insights into the evolving landscape of digital health and nutrition education in China.
This study endeavored to bridge existing gaps in the literature by addressing the following research questions. First, an exploration was conducted into the impact of employing metaphors, personification, and scientific visualization on the user engagement metrics of the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute. Second, an investigation delved into the influence of communication remarks, specifically presenting definitive scientific conclusions and offering recommendations, on user engagement metrics. Third, a detailed analysis was undertaken to discern how content themes contribute to variations in user engagement metrics. The conceptual framework illustrating these research inquiries is depicted in Figure 1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Account Selection

This study employed both descriptive and regression analyses, utilizing data extracted from the TikTok account of the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute. The selection of this particular account was deliberate and informed by several key considerations. First, the account stands out as one of the rapidly expanding official research channels dedicated to public nutrition popularization. Since its inception on 24 July 2022, within a year of operation, the account has disseminated 180 videos, accumulating over 4.5 million likes and amassing a follower base exceeding 150,000.
Second, the account’s objectives and published content align closely with promoting nutrition and health information pertinent to individuals’ daily lives. Notably, the selected account distinguishes itself by adhering to a consistent format, featuring a professional expert delivering monologues against a laboratory backdrop. This uniformity, with videos consistently ranging from 30 to 40 s, positions the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute as an optimal target for assessing the research questions posed in this study.

2.2. Data Collection

Data collection encompassed all content posted by the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute from 1 September 2022 to 30 June 2023, resulting in the acquisition of 126 videos. Following communication with the COFCO Research Institute, videos produced by a third-party Multi-Channel Network service provider were meticulously excluded. Subsequently, 81 videos, exclusively created and managed by the research institute, were retained for analysis.
The study aimed for data saturation, ensuring that the selected samples effectively represent and facilitate in-depth analysis of the research questions. Prioritizing the depth of analysis holds greater significance than pursuing a larger sample size, aligning with the study’s theoretical framework and objectives. Despite the limited sample size, the subsequent results section will demonstrate the study’s robust statistical power, offering meaningful findings.
Notably, this research pioneers the investigation of public digital nutrition education and its performance evaluation, with a strong emphasis on content-based variables. While the sample size is constrained, this pioneering approach lays a foundation for future explorations in this underexplored domain.
Access to data was authorized and facilitated through collaboration with the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute. The dataset comprised seven types of information: video title text, content of the video, posting time, number of likes, number of shares, number of comments, and number of subscription increases. Institutional Review Board approval was not required because of the nature of this study.

2.3. Operationalization of Variables

User engagement on the official TikTok account of the COFCO Nutrition Research Institute was assessed across four dimensions—number of likes, shares, comments, and subscription increases—all meticulously recorded.
Video title text was systematically collected by manually extracting complete titles and quantifying the word count using Excel. The posted time signifies the precise date and time of video upload to the TikTok platform for public viewing.
Jargon, defined here as using technical and disciplinary language rather than obscure or pretentious terms [29], was measured using metaphors, personification, and science visualization. The measure of metaphor involves explaining jargon through analogies to other things with similar characteristics, while personification entails attributing human attributes to illustrate terminology. The use of multiple metaphors in a video warranted a marking of 1, as does employing personification. Communication remarks were evaluated based on the presentation of definite scientific conclusions and offering recommendations, with more than one recommendation considered as 1.
Content themes were categorized into five distinct types: practical cooking skills, healthy diet, food nutrition, food and environment, and nutrition guidance for targeted groups. Two authors conducted a comprehensive review and inductively coded the videos to identify key themes. Each video was assigned a single theme code according to its primary focus. In cases where multiple themes seemed applicable, the authors deliberated until reaching a consensus on the primary focus. Practical cooking skills encompassed videos featuring cooking recipes, techniques, and ingredient preparation. Videos categorized under healthy diet provided information on fostering healthier eating habits. In contrast, food nutrition videos centered on abstract information regarding the benefits and risks of nutrients to the human body. Food and environment addressed food production, safety, responsible consumption, and food sustainability concerns. Nutrition guidance for targeted groups involved videos tailored to specific dietary needs, such as for the elderly or individuals with high blood pressure, aimed at promoting their health and well-being. See Table 1 for examples.

2.4. Coding Method

This study employed an iterative, open coding process, initially forming themes based on references and the latest research in nutrition science and public communication. The codebook underwent refinement and finalization through repeated coding checks and comparison with theoretical memos. Practically, content themes were identified by analyzing video titles and content. When a video encompassed more than one theme, the decision was guided by hashtags in the video title, emphasizing the central theme presented in the initial 10 s of the content. Communication remarks and the explanation of jargon were discerned through the identification of relevant specific phrases or images within the videos.

Coders and Reliability Test

Given the nutrition communication focus of the video content, two graduate students specializing in biology and communication studies were engaged in the coding process to ensure elevated coding validity. Before formal coding, 20% of the samples were randomly selected for initial coding without allowing communication between coders. The formal coding phase commenced only when the κ values reached 0.9 or higher, ensuring a consistent understanding of coding standards among the coders.
In cases where reliability thresholds were not met, additional training and codebook clarification were undertaken, specifically emphasizing contentious categories. Reliability was ultimately achieved through three rounds of meticulous training. The confidence coefficients derived from this reliability assurance process are presented in Table 1.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Armonk, NY, USA, 2020). The study first obtained a frequency table of counts and percentages and then ran descriptive analyses and binominal regressions to investigate the distribution of content themes, engagement metrics, and the relationships between techniques and engagement metrics. Statistical significance for all tests was set at 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Descriptive Analysis

3.1.1. Frequency Distribution of Content Themes

Table 2 comprehensively summarizes the content themes derived from the 81 validated samples. The analysis revealed that “Healthy Diet” emerged as the predominant theme, constituting 40.74% of the videos. Following closely were themes centered around “Food Nutrition” (17.28%) and “Food Environment” (16.05%). Additionally, 13.58% of the videos were dedicated to “Nutrition Guidance for Targeted Groups,” while “Practical Cooking Skills” accounted for 12.35%.

3.1.2. Descriptive Analysis of User Engagement

Table 3 provides a detailed descriptive statistical analysis of the user engagement metrics, revealing substantial variations in the collected data. Notably, the maximum values for likes, shares, comments, and subscription increases exhibit at least a hundredfold difference from the minimum values. The maximum values also surpass three standard deviations from the mean, underscoring the appropriateness of employing the median rather than the mean to portray overall performance accurately.
The analysis of frequency tables for engagement metrics unveils that 32.10% of videos (n = 15) garnered fewer than 20 shares, whereas 3.7% of videos (n = 4) secured 500 or more shares. Similarly, 9.88% of videos (n = 9) amassed over 200 comments. The pattern persists in likes, where 30.86% of videos received fewer than 300 likes (n = 22), with 12.35% (n = 7) acquiring fewer than 100 likes. Furthermore, 20.99% of videos (n = 17) garnered five or fewer subscription increases.
The comprehensive analysis presented in Table 4 reveals distinctive patterns across various themes and user engagement metrics. When considering median statistics, “Practical Cooking Skills” emerges as the leading theme in terms of the number of likes (median = 1529.5, SD = 2508.037), shares (median = 80.5, SD = 603.248), and subscription increases (median = 81, SD = 120.626). Conversely, the “Food and Environment” theme takes precedence in the number of comments (median = 114, SD = 249.23).
In contrast, “Food Nutrition” ranks lowest in the number of likes (median = 469.5, SD = 958.839) and shares (median = 22, SD = 39.224). “Healthy Diet” occupies the lowest position in the number of comments (median = 34, SD = 126.811), while “Nutrition Guidance for Targeted Groups” exhibits the lowest number of subscription increases (median = 11, SD = 170.418).

3.2. Negative Binomial Regression

3.2.1. Research Question 1

RQ1 delved into the impact of metaphor, personification, and science visualization to elucidate scientific concepts on user engagement metrics. In Model 1 (Table 5), it is evident that metaphor usage exhibits a negative association with the number of subscription increases at the 0.01 significance level (regression coefficient = −0.974, z = −3.647, p = 0.000 < 0.01). This implies that a one-unit increase in metaphor usage corresponds to a 0.378-times decrease in subscription decreases, as indicates by the odds ratio. Conversely, personification (regression coefficient = 0.441, z = 2.262) and science visualization (regression coefficient = 0.478, z = 3.534) demonstrate significant positive impacts on the number of subscription increases at the 0.05 and 0.01 significance levels, respectively. The odd ratio values are 1.554 and 1.613, signifying that a one-unit increase in personification and science visualization leads to 1.554- and 1.613-times increases in subscriptions.
Negative binomial regressions were also conducted to explore associations between these variables and the number of likes, shares, and comments, revealing no significant associations.

3.2.2. Research Question 2

RQ2 explored the influence of scientific conclusions and recommendations on user engagement metrics. In Model 2 (Table 5), presenting scientific conclusions exhibits a negative correlation with the number of shares (regression coefficient = −0.582, z = −2.511, p = 0.012 < 0.05). The odd ratio of 0.559 indicates that a one-unit increase in scientific conclusions corresponds to a 0.559-times share decrease. No significant relations are found between recommendations and the number of shares, signifying that suggestions did not impact the sharing count.
Regarding the number of comments (Model 3), offering recommendations displays a positive association, with statistical significance at the 0.01 level (regression coefficient = 0.924, z = 4.025, p = 0.000). The odd ratio of 2.518 suggests that a one-unit increase in recommendations leads to a 2.518-times increase in the number of comments.
Notably, the study reveals associations of these variables with the number of shares and comments, while no significant relations are identified with the number of likes and subscription increases.

3.2.3. Research Question 3

Table 6 presents the outcomes of negative binomial regression analysis, exploring the association between five content themes (practical cooking skills, healthy diet, food nutrition, food and environment, and nutrition guidance for targeted groups) and user engagement metrics (number of likes, shares, comments, and subscription increases). RQ3 investigated the relationship between content themes and these key user engagement metrics.
Table 6 focuses on subscription increases as the key metric. The regression analysis revealed that nutrition guidance for targeted groups and food nutrition did not significantly impact subscription increases (p > 0.05). However, practical cooking skills (regression coefficient = 2.010, z = 7.239, p = 0.000 < 0.01), healthy diet (regression coefficient = 0.772, z = 4.412, p = 0.000 < 0.01), and food and environment (regression coefficient = 1.395, z = 5.611, p = 0.000 < 0.01) demonstrated significance at the 0.01 level. Notably, an increase in practical cooking skills correlate with a 7.463-times rise in subscription increases, while food and environment and healthy diet themes led to 4.033- and 2.165-times increases, respectively.
Regarding the number of comments, the regression model indicated a noteworthy positive correlation for four themes, excluding food nutrition. The regression coefficients were healthy diet (0.398, z = 2.267, p = 0.023 < 0.05), practical cooking skills (1.064, z = 3.824, p = 0.000 < 0.01), food and environment (1.311, z = 5.269, p = 0.000 < 0.01), and nutrition guidance for targeted groups (0.772, z = 2.888, p = 0.004 < 0.01), exhibiting significance at the 0.01 and 0.05 levels, respectively. The odd ratio indicated that the food and environment theme had the most substantial impact on the increase in comments, suggesting a 3.710-times greater increase when environmental and food content increased by one unit.
Examining the association between content themes and the number of shares revealed statistical insignificance only for food nutrition (regression coefficient = −0.211, z = −0.907, p = 0.364 > 0.05). However, the other four themes showed significance at the 0.01 level: practical cooking skills (regression coefficient = 1.960, z = 7.051, p = 0.000 < 0.01), healthy diet (regression coefficient = 0.511, z = 2.909, p = 0.004 < 0.01), food and environment (regression coefficient = 0.782, z = 3.138, p = 0.002 < 0.01), and nutrition guidance for targeted groups (regression coefficient = 0.762, z = 2.848, p = 0.004 < 0.01). The odd ratio for practical cooking skills indicated the highest increase in sharing among the themes, with the number of 7.098.
All five themes demonstrated statistical significance at the 0.01 level regarding the number of likes. Practical cooking skills had the highest odd ratio among the themes, with a value of 6.595. This implies that the change (increase) in likes was 6.595 times greater when practical cooking skills were increased by one unit.

4. Discussion

This study explored how nutritional scientists communicate with the public on TikTok and empirically examined its user engagement, and placed emphasis on how content-related variables that were theoretically posited can better help the public’s understanding of science. Few studies have organically integrated practical guidance for science communicators into examining their actual audience effects. More importantly, the rationale for this study was situated in how to have appealing user engagement metrics while also complying with the broader goal of the public communication of science.
First, findings revealed that using personification and science visualization to explicate scientific jargon significantly correlated with increased account subscriptions. Conversely, adopting metaphors did not exhibit a positive association with user engagement metrics. This conclusion aligned with the insights offered by Borowiec et al.’s research [30], emphasizing the prerequisite for scientists to possess ample knowledge in replacing jargon with accessible terms before incorporating metaphors.
In the second key finding, the study elucidated that nutrition communicators presenting definite scientific conclusions to the audience negatively impact the number of shares. In contrast, a positive correlation was observed between the provision of recommendations and the number of comments. The conveyance of definite conclusions imparts a sense of finality, leaving minimal room for personal interpretation or engagement. This trend underscores the intricate dynamics of online sharing behavior, where engagements often stem from the inclination to initiate discussions or provide fresh perspectives within an ongoing public discourse [31]. Conversely, nutritional communicators who furnish recommendations serve as a bridge between abstract concepts and practical applications. This connection establishes a sense of personal relevance among the audience, compelling them to share their thoughts, experiences, and inquiries through comments.
In the third pivotal observation, it is noted that the theme centered around food and environment elicited the highest number of comments, suggesting that comments are likely spurred by the novelty and curiosity inherent in the video’s theme. A specific instance in our sample, focusing on the correlation between cow flatulence, greenhouse gas emissions, and climate change, garnered many comments. The surprising revelations about the digestive process of cows, a major contributor to methane emissions, challenged conventional assumptions, prompting viewers to express their astonishment or seek further clarification. This phenomenon indicated the significant impact of counterintuitive information, fostering a willingness among viewers to engage through comments. Moreover, such content aligned with the entertainment-centric nature of social media platforms [32]. This outcome underscored the substantial potential for the in-depth exploration of this theme. By amalgamating the innate curiosity of the public with research areas of governmental and international concern, particularly in the realm of sustainable and healthy food creation, this theme possesses considerable prospects for further investigation.
In the concluding insight, the theme around food nutrition exhibited no statistically significant association with the number of shares, comments, and subscription increases yet displayed a robust correlation with the number of likes. This discovery aligned with Bhattacharya et al. [33], indicating that audiences are more inclined to appreciate positive and reassuring content. However, considering nutritional information is relatively well-established, providing more predictable content tends to evoke less curiosity, resulting in lower engagement across other metrics. Surprisingly, the study observed that the theme of nutrition guidance for targeted groups generated high engagement metrics without significantly impacting subscription increases. This discrepancy suggested that viewers, having already obtained the sought-after information, experienced diminished motivation to subscribe for additional content, as their immediate informational needs were adequately addressed.

5. Conclusions

This investigation underscored the theoretical viability and practical efficacy of employing techniques such as explaining jargon and communication remarks to enhance audience engagement in nutritional science communication. However, it is crucial to note that while these variables demonstrated statistically significant associations with specific engagement metrics, they were not uniform across all dimensions.
A few limitations of the study should be addressed. Although the TikTok account of the COFCO Research Institute emerged as a suitable target for the current research, it should be noted that engagement metrics were influenced by subscriber demographics and target audience. Whether the results of this research are applicable to other nutrition communicators and in a global context is worthy of investigation [34,35]. Analyses grounded in cross-platform comparative studies between regions of the Global South and the Western Hemisphere, alongside the utilization of big data analysis, have the potential to yield more nuanced insights and enhance the broader applicability of the current study. In addition, a longer sampling time and larger dataset could yield more comprehensive results.
Given the nascent stage of nutritional communication and user engagement, ample room remains for further exploration. By establishing correlations between content variables and engagement metrics, this study lays the groundwork for future researchers to delve deeper into the operational dynamics of TikTok accounts. A qualitative approach in future research could unravel the intricacies of content selection processes, the strategic considerations guiding communicators’ choices, and their adherence to platform rules. By scrutinizing these factors, a more comprehensive understanding of the strategies employed by communicators to maximize engagement may emerge, contributing to a nuanced comprehension of the landscape of nutritional science communication on TikTok.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z.; methodology, S.C.; software, M.Z.; validation, M.Z.; formal analysis, M.Z.; investigation, M.Z.; resources, M.Z.; data curation, M.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, S.C.; visualization, M.Z.; supervision, S.C.; project administration, S.C.; funding acquisition, S.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This paper was supported by the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF under Grant Number GZC20231371.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets analyzed for this study would be available upon request with permission of the COFCO Research Institute.

Acknowledgments

We thank the COFCO Research Institute for providing the data that made this study possible.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gao, J.; Zhang, P. China’s Public Health Policies in Response to COVID-19: From an “Authoritarian” Perspective. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 756677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. State Council of PRC. Outline of the Healthy China 2030 Plan Issued by the State Council; State Council of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2016. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  3. State Council of PRC. Notice on Issuing the National Nutrition Plan (2017–2030); General Office of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2017; No. 000014349/2017-00138. Available online: https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/content/2017-07/13/content_5210134.htm (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  4. Che, S.P.; Zhang, S.N.; Kim, J.H. How public health agencies communicate with the public on TikTok under the normalization of COVID-19: A case of 2022 Shanghai’s outbreak. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1039405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Business of Apps. Available online: https://www.businessofapps.com/data/tik-tok-statistics/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  6. Wang, H.; Yin, H.; Feng, S.; Ren, D.Y.; Liu, L.; Liu, X.; Ji, H.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C.; et al. China Internet Audio & Video Research Development Report, 1st ed.; China Netcasting Services Association: Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  7. Global Times. TikTok Released the Health Science Popularization Data Report, and 35000 Certified Doctors Created 4.43 million Science Popularization Articles. Available online: https://m.huanqiu.com/article/4CRpUxR2rhf (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  8. Zou, P.; Yang, H.; Lin, W.; Jiang, L.; Bai, Z.; Pu, Y. Consumer demand and new changesL increasing health awareness. In 2021 China Emerging Brands Development Study, 1st ed.; Ocean Insights: Beijing, China, 2021; Volume 1, p. 10. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bian, D.; Shi, Y.; Tang, W.; Li, D.; Han, K.; Shi, C.; Li, G.; Zhu, F. The influencing factors of nutrition and diet health knowledge dissemination using the WeChat official account in health promotion. Front. Public Health 2021, 9, 775729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ho, S.S.; Looil, J.; Leung, Y.W.; Goh, T.J. Public engagement by researchers of different disciplines in Singapore: A qualitative comparison of macro- and meso-level concerns. Public Underst. Sci. 2020, 29, 211–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Miller, G.D.; Cohen, N.L.; Fulgoni, V.L.; Heymsfield, S.B.; Wellman, N.S. From nutrition scientist to nutrition communicator: Why you should take the leap. Am. J. Clin. 2006, 83, 1272–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liakopoulos, M. Pandora’s box or panacea? Using metaphors to create the public representations of biotechnology. Public Underst. Sci. 2022, 11, 5–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Black, M. More about metaphor. In Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed.; Ortony, A., Ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1993; pp. 19–41. [Google Scholar]
  14. Leggett, M.; Finlay, M. Science, story, and image: A new approach to crossing the communication barrier posed by scientific jargon. Public Underst. Sci. 2001, 10, 157–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Perra, M.; Brinkman, T. Seeing science: Using graphics to communicate research. Ecosphere 2021, 12, e03786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kearns, C.; Eathorne, A.; Semprini, A.; Braithwaite, I.; Beasley, R. Public engagement with clinical research on social media; which visual medium works best? A 5-year retrospective analysis. J. Vis. Commun. Med. 2021, 44, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Goldstein, C.M.; Murray, E.J.; Beard, J.; Schnoes, A.M.; Wang, M.L. Science Communication in the Age of Misinformation. Ann. Behav. Med. 2020, 54, 985–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Berger, J.; Milkman, K.L. What makes online content viral? J. Mark. Res. 2012, 49, 192–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Caplette, M.E.; Provencher, V.; Bissonnette-Maheux, V.; Dugrenier, M.; Lapointe, A.; Gagnon, M.; Straus, S.; Desroches, S. Increasing fruit and vegetable consumption through a healthy eating blog: A feasibility study. JMIR Res. Protocs 2016, 6, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Webb, T.; Joseph, J.; Yardley, L.; Michie, S. Using the internet to promote health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of theoretical basis, use of behavior change techniques, and mode of delivery on efficacy. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12, e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jane, M.; Hagger, M.; Foster, J.; Ho, S.; Kane, R.; Pal, S. Effects of a weight management program delivered by social media on weight and metabolic syndrome risk factors in overweight and obese adults: A randomised controlled trial. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0178326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Alhabash, S.; McAlister, A.R.; Hagerstrom, A.; Quilliam, E.T.; Rifon, N.J.; Richards, J.I. Between likes and shares: Effects of emotional appeal and virality on the persuasiveness of anticyberbullying messages on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2013, 16, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Shahbaznezhad, H.; Dolan, R.; Rashidirad, M. The role of social media content format and platform in users’ engagement behavior. J. Interact. Mark. 2021, 53, 47–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Barklamb, A.M.; Molenaar, A.; Brennan, L.; Evans, S.; Choong, J.; Herron, E.; Reid, M.; McCaffrey, T.A. Learning the language of social media: A comparison of engagement metrics and social media strategies used by food and nutrition-related social media accounts. Nutrients 2020, 12, 2839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Welbourne, D.J.; Grant, W.J. Science communication on YouTube: Factors that affect channel and video popularity. Public Underst. Sci. 2015, 25, 706–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Durbano, A.; Bert, F.; Pivi, A.; Moro, G.L.; Scaioli, G.; Siliquini, R. Use of TikTok by nutrition healthcare professionals: Analysis of the Italian context. Eur. J. Public Health 2022, 32, ckac131.333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fortune. Available online: https://fortune.com/company/cofco/global500/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  28. COFCO Nutrition Research Institute. Available online: http://www.cofconhri.com/Introduction.html (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  29. Baram-Tsabari, A.; Wolfson, O.; Yosef, R.; Chapnik, N.; Brill, A.; Segev, E. Jargon use in Public Understanding of Science papers over three decades. Public Underst. Sci. 2020, 29, 644–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Borowiec, B.G. Ten simple rules for scientists engaging in science communication. PLoS Comput. Biol. 2023, 19, e1011251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Rodríguez Estrada, F.C.; Davis, L.S. Improving visual communication of science through the incorporation of graphic design theories and practices into science communication. Sci. Commun. 2015, 37, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kessel, P.V.; Toor, S.; Smith, A. A Week in the Life of Popular YouTube Channels. Available online: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/07/25/a-week-in-the-life-of-popular-youtube-channels/ (accessed on 1 February 2024).
  33. Bhattacharya, S.; Srinivasan, P.; Polgreen, P. Social media engagement analysis of U.S. Federal health agencies on Facebook. MC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak. 2017, 17, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, Q.; Min, C.; Zhang, W.; Ma, X.; Evans, R. Factors Driving Citizen Engagement with Government TikTok Accounts During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Model Development and Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2021, 23, e21463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liang, J.; Wang, L.; Song, S.; Dong, M.; Xu, Y.; Zuo, X.; Zhang, J.; Adrian, S.A.; Ehsan, J.; Ma, J.; et al. Quality and Audience Engagement of Takotsubo Syndrome–Related Videos on TikTok: Content Analysis. J. Med. Internet Res. 2022, 24, e39360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Research model for evaluating the impact of nutrition knowledge dissemination on TikTok.
Figure 1. Research model for evaluating the impact of nutrition knowledge dissemination on TikTok.
Behavsci 14 00201 g001
Table 1. Operational definitions, examples and confidence coefficients to examine TikTok videos.
Table 1. Operational definitions, examples and confidence coefficients to examine TikTok videos.
VariablesOperational DefinitionExamplesIntercoder Reliability
Explanation of Jargon1.00
MetaphorUsing parallel concepts to help illustrate science terminologyLutein resides within the macula of the eye, serving as a shield that absorbs 40% to 90% of incoming blue light, similarly to equipping the eyes with a protective filter.1.00
PersonificationApplying human attributes to discuss a scientific termL-arabinose can compete with sucrose in the intestines, taking the enzyme that digests sucrose away from sucrose and preventing this absorption trip.1.00
Science Visualization Usage of visual tools such as infographics and images to illustrate jargonsN/A1.00
Scientific Message Attributes1.00
Conclusion PresenceScience communicator gives definite and scientific conclusionNatural vitamin E is better than synthetic vitamin E in every way.1.00
Recommendation PresenceScience communicator offers tangible advice to the audience The intake of natural vitamin E is also recommended in the daily diet.1.00
Content Themes1.00
Practical Cooking SkillsGiving recipes, cooking methods and culinary tipsHow do you determine the temperature of the oil for stir-frying without a thermometer?1.00
Healthy DietProviding knowledge about healthy eating habits, debunking myths, and encouraging diverse food intakeI’ve heard that the delicious taste you get from frying things in palm oil is something we trade for our health! Is this a rumor?1.00
Food NutritionEducating the public about functions of different nutrientsThe chemical structure of plant sterols and cholesterol is very similar, only because of the side chain structure of the C24 position on the extra group, the two on the human body’s role, is a world of difference.1.00
Food and EnvironmentThe impact of nutrients on the environment and the broader social context of sustainability eatingThe Green Magic of Biofuels: Why Ethanol Reduces Carbon Emissions1.00
Nutrition Guidance for Targeted groupsAddressing nutrition-related topics and giving tailored advice to a specific groupScientists have discovered klotho, a protein that may be able to awaken memories which could be a huge benefit for Alzheimer’s patients.1.00
Theme Unrelated to Food and Nutrition PopularizationContent unrelated to food, diet, nutrients and science popularizationDo sensory evaluators just keep tasting new foods?1.00
Table 2. Distribution of content themes on the TikTok account of COFCO Nutrition Research Institute.
Table 2. Distribution of content themes on the TikTok account of COFCO Nutrition Research Institute.
Content ThemesFrequencyPercent (%)
Practical Cooking Skills1012.35
Healthy Diet3340.74
Food Nutrition1417.28
Food and Environment1316.05
Nutrition Guidance for Targeted Groups1113.58
Total81100.00
Table 3. Descriptive distribution of user engagement metrics for coded videos.
Table 3. Descriptive distribution of user engagement metrics for coded videos.
Engagement MetricsCountMin.Max.SD.Median
Number of Likes8150.007207.0001423.941726.000
Number of Shares812.0001940.000236.99142.000
Number of Comments 814.000904.000172.64346.000
Number of Subscription Increases810.0003589.000567.36723.000
Table 4. Descriptive analysis of user engagement metrics on content themes.
Table 4. Descriptive analysis of user engagement metrics on content themes.
Content ThemeEngagement MetricsMin.Max.SD.Median
Practical Cooking SkillsNumber of Likes7772072508.0371529.5
Number of Shares41940603.24880.5
Number of Comments4800237.76558
Number of Subscription Increases43589120.62681
Healthy DietNumber of Likes5046311106.952561
Number of Shares321167.78445
Number of Comments7687126.81134
Number of Subscription Increases11461352.12220
Food NutritionNumber of Likes593017958.839469.5
Number of Shares515939.22422
Number of Comments10510129.97335
Number of Subscription Increases31143301.9916.5
Food and EnvironmentNumber of Likes10555721549.103929
Number of Shares2541150.67154
Number of Comments12904249.23114
Number of Subscription Increases12696751.94429
Nutrition Guidance for Targeted GroupsNumber of Likes592355755.548479
Number of Shares9518153.13029
Number of Comments6547158.26161
Number of Subscription Increases0576170.41811
Table 5. Predicting engagements with jargon explanation, presenting conclusions and recommendations.
Table 5. Predicting engagements with jargon explanation, presenting conclusions and recommendations.
VariablesModel 1: Number of
Subscription Increases
Model 2: Number of SharesModel 3: Number of
Comments
Regression
Coefficient
OR
Value
Regression
Coefficient
OR
Value
Regression
Coefficient
OR Value
Explanation of Jargon
Metaphor−0.974 **
(−3.647)
0.378--------
Personification0.441 *
(2.262)
1.554--------
Science Visualization0.478 **
(3.534)
1.613--------
Intercept5.20143.408--------
Likelihood RatioX2 (3) = 24.073
p = 0.000
--------
McFadden R20.023--------
Scientific Message Attributes
Conclusion Presence-------- −0.582 *
(−2.511)
0.5590.44
(1.876)
1.544
Recommendation
Presence
-------- 0.190 (0.830)1.2090.924 **
(4.025)
2.518
Intercept-------- 5.097 (9.690)163.5402.459 (4.663)11.698
Likelihood Ratio-------- X2 (2) = 7.670
p = 0.022
X2 (2) = 19.341
p = 0.000
McFadden R2-------- 0.008 0.021
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, z values in brackets, negative binominal regression.
Table 6. Negative binomial regression of content themes on engagement metrics.
Table 6. Negative binomial regression of content themes on engagement metrics.
Content ThemesNumber of LikesNumber of SharesNumber of CommentsNumber of Subscription Increases
Intercept5.894 ** (58.150)3.795 ** (37.227)3.909 ** (38.405)4.430 ** (43.581)
Practical Cooking Skills1.866 ** (6.799)
OR = 6.595
1.960 ** (7.051)
OR = 7.098
1.064 ** (3.824)
OR = 2.899
2.010 ** (7.239)
OR = 7.463
Healthy Diet0.959 ** (5.493)
OR = 2.610
0.511 ** (2.909)
OR = 1.667
0.398 * (2.267)
OR = 1.489
0.772 ** (4.412)
OR = 2.165
Food Nutrition0.915 ** (3.801)
OR = 2.497
−0.221 (−0.907)
OR = 0.802
0.363 (1.498)
OR = 1.437
0.414 (1.713)
OR = 1.513
Food and Environment1.357 ** (5.468)
OR = 3.884
0.782 ** (3.138)
OR = 2.187
1.311 ** (5.269)
OR = 3.710
1.395 ** (5.611)
OR = 4.033
Nutrition guidance for Targeted Group0.777 ** (2.916)
OR = 2.175
0.762 ** (2.848)
OR = 2.143
0.772 ** (2.888)
OR = 2.165
−0.161 (−0.600)
OR = 0.851
Likelihood ratio
McFadden R2
X2 (4) = 10.790,
p = 0.029
0.008
X2 (4) = 33.267,
p = 0.000
0.036
X2 (4) = 11.473,
p = 0.022
0.013
X2 (4)= 32.755,
p = 0.000
0.031
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, z values in brackets, negative binominal regression.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhu, M.; Che, S. Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China. Behav. Sci. 2024, 14, 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030201

AMA Style

Zhu M, Che S. Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China. Behavioral Sciences. 2024; 14(3):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhu, Min, and ShaoPeng Che. 2024. "Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China" Behavioral Sciences 14, no. 3: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030201

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop