Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Identification with Hanfu
2.2. Cultural Motivation
2.3. Object-Based Authenticity and Existential Authenticity
2.4. Mediating Effect
3. Methodology
3.1. Sample and Procedure
3.2. Measures
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Normality, Non-Response Bias, and Common Method Bias
4.2. Overall Model Assessment
4.3. Evaluation of the Measurement Model
4.4. Structural Model Evaluation
4.5. Results of the Mediation Test
5. Conclusions
6. Discussions
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Constructs | Measuring Items |
---|---|
Identification with Product (IP) | IP1: Wearing Hanfu is one way to express myself. |
IP2: Hanfu fits with my style. | |
IP3: I can identify with Hanfu. | |
IP4: Hanfu fit with my life. | |
Cultural Motivation (CM) | CM1: I can increase my historical knowledge by wearing or purchasing Hanfu |
CM2: Wearing Hanfu is my way to show my interest in history. | |
CM3: I can have a good time with my friends who also like Hanfu. | |
CM4: I felt confident when I wear Hanfu. | |
CM5: I can feel connected with the past of my country by wearing Hanfu. | |
Existential Authenticity (EA) | EA1: I felt connected with human history and civilization when I wear Hanfu. |
EA2: Wearing Hanfu enriched me as a person. | |
EA3: By wearing Hanfu, I felt the related history and culture. | |
EA4: Wearing Hanfu provided me a deeper insight of Chinese history and culture. | |
EA5: I like the traditional design and cultural elements of Hanfu. | |
Object-based Authenticity (OA) | OA1: I like the historical meaning connected to the Hanfu. |
OA2: I like the peculiarities of Hanfu. | |
OA3: The Hanfu I wear is truly historical and cultural clothing. | |
OA4: The Hanfu I wear was correctly designed and produced. | |
OA5: The overall Hanfu inspired me. | |
Purchase Intention (PI) | PI1: I will (further) purchase Hanfu in the future. |
PI2: I am planning to purchase Hanfu more frequently. | |
PI3: The probability I would consider buying Hanfu is high | |
PI4: I will continue purchasing and wearing Hanfu. | |
PI5: I am planning to purchase Hanfu once I have a chance. |
Appendix B
Identification with Product | Cultural Motivation | Object-Based Authenticity | Existential Authenticity | Purchase Intention | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM1 | 0.255 | 0.788 | 0.402 | 0.390 | 0.460 |
CM2 | 0.350 | 0.774 | 0.419 | 0.413 | 0.446 |
CM3 | 0.212 | 0.634 | 0.382 | 0.411 | 0.392 |
CM4 | 0.213 | 0.655 | 0.522 | 0.410 | 0.447 |
CM5 | 0.349 | 0.826 | 0.478 | 0.450 | 0.499 |
EA1 | 0.274 | 0.409 | 0.332 | 0.723 | 0.421 |
EA2 | 0.362 | 0.405 | 0.369 | 0.661 | 0.372 |
EA3 | 0.244 | 0.413 | 0.319 | 0.800 | 0.467 |
EA4 | 0.249 | 0.368 | 0.372 | 0.648 | 0.415 |
EA5 | 0.292 | 0.453 | 0.384 | 0.798 | 0.437 |
IP1 | 0.815 | 0.299 | 0.205 | 0.318 | 0.298 |
IP2 | 0.829 | 0.317 | 0.213 | 0.324 | 0.326 |
IP4 | 0.737 | 0.281 | 0.353 | 0.290 | 0.382 |
OA1 | 0.279 | 0.453 | 0.817 | 0.340 | 0.485 |
OA2 | 0.223 | 0.416 | 0.687 | 0.337 | 0.391 |
OA3 | 0.215 | 0.436 | 0.706 | 0.378 | 0.539 |
OA4 | 0.286 | 0.492 | 0.776 | 0.403 | 0.593 |
OA5 | 0.251 | 0.469 | 0.787 | 0.382 | 0.474 |
PI1 | 0.286 | 0.457 | 0.415 | 0.352 | 0.786 |
PI2 | 0.358 | 0.412 | 0.403 | 0.358 | 0.729 |
PI3 | 0.268 | 0.399 | 0.490 | 0.499 | 0.642 |
PI4 | 0.251 | 0.455 | 0.575 | 0.470 | 0.624 |
PI5 | 0.362 | 0.440 | 0.445 | 0.360 | 0.777 |
References
- Zhang, H.; Huang, K.; Feng, W.Y.; Zhu, J.J. Authentic well-being in the third space among Hanfu-wearing Chinese tourists: A PERMA analysis. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2023, 47, 101106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, P.; Liu, Q.; Qi, Y. Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 63, 152–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, H.; Dou, W.; Chen, Z. Research on the Hanfu Movement in New Media Environment. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2021), Qingdao, China, 23–25 April 2021; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, Atlantis, 2021; pp. 1280–1283. [Google Scholar]
- iiMedia Report. iiMedia Report: White Paper on the Development of China’s New Hanfu Industry in 2022. Available online: https://report.iimedia.cn/repo7-0/43260.html (accessed on 5 September 2022).
- Fan, C.; Ip, P.T.T. When showing Hanfu to foreigners, I feel very proud’: The imagined community and affective economies of Hanfu (Chinese traditional couture) among Chinese migrant youth in the United Kingdom. Eur. J. Cult. Stud. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, X.; Colbert, F.; Legoux, R. From niche interest to fashion trend: Hanfu clothing is a rising industry in China. Int. J. Arts Manag. 2020, 23, 79–89. [Google Scholar]
- Rixom, J.M.; Rixom, B.A. Perceived brand authenticity: Examining the effects of inferred dedication and anticipated quality on consumers’ purchase intentions and actual choices. J. Consum. Behav. 2023, 22, 721–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Neal, G.S. African American women’s professional dress as an expression of ethnicity. J. Fam. Consum. Sci. 1998, 90, 28. [Google Scholar]
- Dittmar, H. Perceived material wealth and first impressions. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 1992, 31, 379–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sirgy, M.J. Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. J. Consum. Behav. 1982, 9, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, J.; Tang, L.; Lee, J.Y.; Bosselman, R.H. Understanding customer behavior in name-brand Korean coffee shops: The role of self-congruity and functional congruity. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2012, 31, 809–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, A.J.; Kerr, G.N.; Moore, K. Attitudes and intentions towards purchasing GM food. J. Econ. Psych. 2002, 23, 557–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Laura Sidali, K.; Hemmerling, S. Developing an authenticity model of traditional food specialties: Does consumers’ self-concept matter? Br. Food J. 2014, 116, 1692–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tong, L.; Toppinen, A.; Wang, L. Cultural motives affecting tea purchase behavior under two usage situations in China: A study of renting, mianzi, collectivism, and man-nature unity culture. J. Ethn. Foods 2021, 8, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreuzbauer, R.; Keller, J. The authenticity of cultural products: A psychological perspective. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 26, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Newman, G.E.; Bloom, P. Art and authenticity: The importance of originals in judgments of value. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141, 558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Littrell, M.A.; Anderson, L.F.; Brown, P.J. What makes a craft souvenir authentic? Ann. Tour. Res. 1993, 20, 197–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamzah, H.; Ab Karim, M.S.; Othman, M.; Hamzah, A. Dimensions of authenticity in Malay cuisine from experts’ perspectives. Acad. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 2013, 2, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sukalakamala, P.; Boyce, J.B. Customer perceptions for expectations and acceptance of an authentic dining experience in Thai restaurants. J. Foodserv. 2007, 18, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeoman, I.; Brass, D.; McMahon-Beattie, U. Current issue in tourism: The authentic tourist. Tour. Manag. 2007, 28, 1128–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pronschinske, M.; Groza, M.D.; Walker, M. Attracting Facebook fans: The importance of authenticity and engagement as a social networking strategy for professional sports teams. Sport Mark. Q. 2012, 21, 221. [Google Scholar]
- Ko, E.; Lee, S.; Whang, H. Authenticity in traditional culture marketing: Consumers’ perceptions of Korean traditional culture. J. Glob. Fash. Mark. 2013, 4, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kolar, T.; Zabkar, V. A consumer-based model of authenticity: An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing? Tour. Manag. 2010, 31, 652–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIntosh, A.J.; Prentice, R.C. Affirming authenticity consuming cultural heritage. In The Political Nature of Cultural Heritage and Tourism; Routledge: England, UK, 2017; pp. 305–328. [Google Scholar]
- Tan, W.K.; Huang, S.Y. Why visit theme parks? A leisure constraints and perceived authenticity perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 57, 102194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uotila, M. Image of clothing–the ways of being. In Clothing and Its Social Psychological, Cultural, Environmental, Aspects, Proceedings of Textiles, Clothing and Craft Design; Vintage: Helsinki, Finland, 1995; pp. 93–105. [Google Scholar]
- Niinimäki, K. Eco-clothing, consumer identity, and ideology. Sustain. Dev. 2010, 18, 150–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishii, K.; Numazaki, M.; Tado’oka, Y. The effect of pink/blue clothing on implicit and explicit gender-related self-cognition and attitudes among men. Jpn. Psychol. Res. 2019, 61, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van der Laan, E.; Velthuis, O. Inconspicuous dressing: A critique of the construction-through-consumption paradigm in the sociology of clothing. J. Consum. Cult. 2016, 16, 22–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fleeson, W.; Wilt, J. The relevance of Big Five trait content in behavior to subjective authenticity: Do high levels of within-person behavioral variability undermine or enable authenticity achievement? J. Personal. 2010, 78, 1353–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheldon, K.M.; Ryan, R.M.; Rawsthorne, L.J.; Ilardi, B. Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 73, 1380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strohminger, N.; Knobe, J.; Newman, G. The true self: A psychological concept distinct from the self. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 12, 551–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, S.L.; Hsu, C.P. Role of authenticity in massively multiplayer online role-playing games (MMORPGs): Determinants of virtual item purchase intention. J. Bus Res. 2018, 92, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, C.; Lee, S.G.; Kang, M. I became an attractive person in the virtual world: Users’ identification with virtual communities and avatars. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 1663–1669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, Y.; Ma, J.; Zhang, P. Perceived authenticity of hallmark event brands: Conceptualization, measurement, and an integrative framework. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2023, 27, 100766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramkissoon, H.; Uysal, M.S. The effects of perceived authenticity, information search behavior, motivation, and destination imagery on cultural and behavioral intentions of tourists. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 14, 537–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. Proc. 1991, 50, 179–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, Y.; Uysal, M. An examination of the effects of motivation and satisfaction on destination loyalty: A structural model. Tour. Manag. 2005, 26, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gnoth, J. Tourism motivation and expectation formation. Ann. Tour. Res. 1997, 24, 283–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yildiz, N.; Öncüer, M.E.; Tanrisevdi, A. Examining multiple mediations of authenticity in the relationship between cultural motivation pattern and satisfaction: A case study of Şirince in Turkey. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grayson, K.; Martinec, R. Consumer perceptions of iconicity and indexicality influence assessments of authentic market offerings. J. Consum. Res. 2004, 31, 296–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kreuzbauer, R.; King, D.; Basu, S. The mind in the object—Psychological valuation of materialized human expression. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2015, 144, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bae, B.R. Effects of service authenticity, customer participation, and customer-perceived service climate on customers’ service evaluation. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2021, 33, 1239–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dwivedi, A.; McDonald, R. Building brand authenticity in fast-moving consumer goods via consumer perceptions of brand marketing communications. Eur. J. Mark. 2018, 52, 1387–1411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N. Rethinking authenticity in tourism experience. Ann. Tour. Res. 1999, 26, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bunce, L. Appreciation of authenticity promotes curiosity: Implications for object-based learning in museums. J. Mus. Educ. 2016, 41, 230–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reisinger, Y.; Steiner, C.J. Reconceptualizing object authenticity. Ann. Tour. Res. 2006, 33, 65–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stepchenkova, S.; Belyaeva, V. The effect of authenticity orientation on existential authenticity and post-visitation intended behavior. J. Travel Res. 2021, 60, 401–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atzeni, M.; Del Chiappa, G.; Mei Pung, J. Enhancing visit intention in heritage tourism: The role of object-based and existential authenticity in non-immersive virtual reality heritage experiences. Int. J. Travel. Res. 2022, 24, 240–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yi, X.; Fu, X.; Yu, L.; Jiang, L. Authenticity and loyalty at heritage sites: The moderation effect of postmodern authenticity. Tour. Manag. 2018, 67, 411–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, J.H.; Song, H.; Youn, H. The chain of effects from authenticity cues to purchase intention: The role of emotions and restaurant image. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 85, 102354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çelik, S.; Dedeoğlu, B.B. Psychological factors affecting the behavioral intention of the tourist visiting Southeastern Anatolia. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2019, 2, 425–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Das, G.; Khatwani, G. E-tailer personality and behavioral intentions: The application of self-congruity theory. J. Strat. Mark. 2018, 26, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biraglia, A.; Gerrath, M.H.; Usrey, B. Examining how companies’ support of tourist attractions affects visiting intentions: The mediating role of perceived authenticity. J. Travel Res. 2018, 57, 811–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shoenberger, H.; Kim, E. Explaining purchase intent via expressed reasons to follow an influencer, perceived homophily, and perceived authenticity. Int. J. Advert. 2023, 42, 368–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheng, G.; Xie, F.; Gong, S.; Pan, H. The role of cultural values in green purchasing intention: Empirical evidence from Chinese consumers. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2019, 43, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sultan, P.; Wong, H.Y.; Azam, M.S. How perceived communication source and food value stimulate purchase intention of organic food: Examining the stimulus-organism-response (SOR) model. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kivela, J.; Reece, J.; Inbakaran, R. Consumer research in the restaurant environment. Part 2: Research design and analytical methods. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 1999, 11, 269–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Fauconnier, M.L.; Bi, J. Characterization and discrimination of apples by Flash GC E-Nose: Geographical regions and botanical origins studies in China. Foods 2022, 11, 1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poria, Y.; Reichel, A.; Biran, A. Heritage site perceptions and motivations to visit. J. Trav. Res. 2006, 44, 318–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aucouturier, J.J.; Fujita, M.; Sumikura, H. Experiential response and intention to purchase in the creative consumption of music: The Nine Inch Nails experiment. J. Consum. Behav. 2015, 14, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bian, Q.; Forsythe, S. Purchase intention for luxury brands: A cross cultural comparison. J. Bus. Res. 2012, 65, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed, a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical literature review and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fowler, F.J., Jr. Survey Research Methods; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Tenenhaus, M.; Vinzi, V.E.; Chatelin, Y.M.; Lauro, C. PLS path modeling. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2005, 48, 159–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fornell, C.; Larcker, D.F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Mark. Res. 1981, 18, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, S. Perceived Stress in a Probability Sample of the United States; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Hult, G.T.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM); Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Benitez, J.; Henseler, J.; Castillo, A.; Schuberth, F. How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research. Inf. Manag. 2020, 57, 103168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Henseler, J.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2015, 43, 115–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chin, W.W. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Mod. Methods Bus. Res. 1998, 295, 295–336. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F., Jr.; Sarstedt, M.; Ringle, C.M.; Gudergan, S.P. Advanced Issues in Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Hair, J.F.; Babin, B.J.; Anderson, R.E.; Black, W.C. Multivariate Data Analysis, 8th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Nitzl, C.; Roldan, J.L.; Cepeda, G. Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2016, 116, 1849–1864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morhart, F.; Malär, L.; Guèvremont, A.; Girardin, F.; Grohmann, B. Brand authenticity: An integrative framework and measurement scale. J. Consum. Psychol. 2015, 25, 200–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, E.; Choi, B.K.; Lee, T.J. The role and dimensions of authenticity in heritage tourism. Tour. Manag. 2019, 74, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, E.; Ki, C.W.C.; Kim, Y.K. Ethnic-inspired design consumption as a means of enhancing self-view confidence. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 2019, 47, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grauel, J. Being authentic or being responsible? Food consumption, morality and the presentation of self. J. Consum. Cult. 2016, 16, 852–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berger, P.L. Sincerity and authenticity in modern society. Public Interest 1973, 31, 81. [Google Scholar]
- Leigh, T.W.; Peters, C.; Shelton, J. The consumer quest for authenticity: The multiplicity of meanings within the MG subculture of consumption. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 2006, 34, 481–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Categories | Frequency | Percentage% |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 250 | 30.40% |
Female | 573 | 69.60% | |
Age | 18–24 years | 118 | 14.30% |
25–34 years | 560 | 68.00% | |
35–44 years | 113 | 13.70% | |
45–54 years | 26 | 3.20% | |
55 years or above | 6 | 0.70% | |
Educational Level | High school or below | 7 | 0.90% |
Diploma | 9 | 1.10% | |
Bachelor | 647 | 78.60% | |
Master or above | 160 | 19.40% | |
Occupation | Government officials or institution workers | 57 | 6.90% |
Company employee | 667 | 81.00% | |
Businessman | 2 | 0.20% | |
Students | 83 | 10.10% | |
Freelancer | 10 | 1.20% | |
Others | 4 | 0.50% | |
Monthly Income (CNY) | 3500 or below | 71 | 8.60% |
3500–5999 | 70 | 8.50% | |
6000–8499 | 125 | 15.20% | |
8500–10,999 | 167 | 20.30% | |
11,000–14,999 | 128 | 15.60% | |
15,000 or above | 262 | 31.80% | |
Areas | North China | 123 | 14.78% |
Northeast China | 58 | 6.97% | |
East China | 213 | 25.60% | |
Central China | 121 | 14.54% | |
South China | 99 | 11.90% | |
Northeast China | 132 | 15.87% | |
Southwest China | 86 | 10.34% |
Constructs | No. of Items | References |
---|---|---|
Product Identification | 4 | [13,33] |
Cultural Motivation | 5 | [23,60] |
Existential Authenticity | 5 | [13,23,49] |
Object-based Authenticity | 5 | [13,23] |
Purchase Intention | 5 | [61,62] |
CA | rho_A | CR | AVE | IP | CM | OA | EA | PI | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IP | 0.709 | 0.705 | 0.837 | 0.632 | 0.795 | (0.501) | (0.425) | (0.527) | (0.576) |
CM | 0.788 | 0.792 | 0.856 | 0.547 | 0.377 | 0.739 | (0.747) | (0.721) | (0.785) |
OA | 0.812 | 0.816 | 0.869 | 0.572 | 0.333 | 0.601 | 0.756 | (0.614) | (0.827) |
EA | 0.776 | 0.778 | 0.849 | 0.531 | 0.392 | 0.564 | 0.489 | 0.729 | (0.749) |
PI | 0.757 | 0.752 | 0.838 | 0.511 | 0.428 | 0.611 | 0.663 | 0.581 | 0.715 |
Constructs | R2 | R2adj | Q2 |
---|---|---|---|
Object-based Authenticity | 0.375 | 0.373 | 0.212 |
Existential Authenticity | 0.381 | 0.379 | 0.198 |
Behavioral Intention | 0.568 | 0.566 | 0.273 |
Hypotheses | f2 | t-Value | p-Value | Result | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
H1a: IP → OA | 0.125 | 0.021 | 3.170 | 0.002 | Accepted |
H1b: IP → EA | 0.183 | 0.046 | 4.279 | <0.001 | Accepted |
H1c: IP → PI | 0.135 | 0.034 | 2.420 | 0.016 | Accepted |
H2a: CM → OA | 0.554 | 0.422 | 16.794 | <0.001 | Accepted |
H2b: CM → EA | 0.372 | 0.135 | 8.020 | <0.001 | Accepted |
H2c: CM → PI | 0.200 | 0.049 | 2.924 | 0.003 | Accepted |
H3a: OA → EA | 0.204 | 0.042 | 4.130 | <0.001 | Accepted |
H3b: OA → PI | 0.388 | 0.209 | 7.271 | <0.001 | Accepted |
H4: EA → PI | 0.226 | 0.073 | 4.841 | <0.001 | Accepted |
Hypothesized Relationships | Direct Effect | Indirect Effect | VAF (%) | Result | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β | t-Value | p-Values | ||||
H5a IP → OA → PI | β = 0.135, t = 2.420, p = 0.016 | 0.048 | 2.689 | 0.007 | 20.87 | partial mediation |
H6a IP → EA → PI | 0.041 | 2.758 | 0.006 | 17.83 | no mediation | |
H5b CM → OA → PI | β = 0.200, t = 2.924, p = 0.003 | 0.215 | 6.527 | <0.001 | 40.95 | partial mediation |
H6b CM → EA → PI | 0.084 | 3.797 | <0.001 | 16.00 | no mediation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, X.; Niu, Y.; Xu, J. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080689
Li X, Niu Y, Xu J. Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(8):689. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080689
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Xianyue, Yongge Niu, and Jiuping Xu. 2023. "Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 8: 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080689
APA StyleLi, X., Niu, Y., & Xu, J. (2023). Factors Affecting Purchase Intention of Hanfu: Considering Product Identification, Cultural Motivation, and Perceived Authenticity. Behavioral Sciences, 13(8), 689. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13080689