The Influence of Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement on Consumers’ Continuous Participation in Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Consumers’ Participation in Virtual CSR Co-Creation
2.2. Self-Expansion Theory
Reference | Study Focus | Methods | Main Findings |
---|---|---|---|
Lewandowski and Ackerman (2006) [56] | Self-expansion as predictors of susceptibility to infidelity | Survey study Sample size: 109 participants | When a relationship was not able to fulfill needs or provide ample self-expansion for an individual, their susceptibility to infidelity increased. |
Mattingly and Lewandowski (2013) [57] | Benefits of individual self-expansion | Experimental study | Individuals who engaged in high self-expanding activities exerted more effort in cognitive and physical tasks than those who engaged in low self-expanding activities. |
Mclntyre et al., (2014) [58] | Workplace self-expansion | Survey study Sample size: Study 1:84 Study 2:73 | Greater workplace self-expansion was associated with greater job satisfaction and commitment and leaving a self-expanding job was associated with negative consequences for the self. |
Shedlosky-Shoemaker et al., (2014) [59] | Self-expansion through fictional characters | Survey study Sample size: 113 participants | Immersion into a narrative led to greater cognitive overlap with the character and perceived self-expansion. |
Hoffner et al., (2015) [24] | Self-expansion via mobile phones | Survey study Sample size: 272 participants | Self-expansion via mobile phones was associated with greater inclusion of the mobile phone in the self-concept and greater subjective well-being. |
Branand et al., (2015) [25] | Inclusion of college community in the self-concept | 4-year, six-wave longitudinal study of one cohort of college students | Inclusion of the college community in the self was a central, mediating link between involvement and satisfaction. |
Slotter and Kolarova (2019) [60] | Self-esteem and spontaneous self-expansion | Experimental study | When presented with a prospective romantic partner, higher self-esteem people would self-expand to adopt positive attributes, while lower self-esteem people would self-expand to adopt negative attributes. |
Lee et al., (2019) [61] | Pop star fans’ self-expansion that affects their travel behaviors | Survey study Sample size: 219 participants | Pop star fans’ self-expansion was a significant motivation to seek fan club membership and led to a positive relationship with their favorite pop star’s country. |
Harasymchuk et al., (2020) [23] | Antecedents of relational self-expansion | Survey study Sample size: 122 participants | Daily goals, particularly goals oriented toward achieving positive relationship outcomes, were associated with a greater likelihood of engaging in exciting activities occurring with a partner, which, in turn, led to higher daily relationship self-expansion. |
Gorlier and Michel (2020) [51] | Self-expansion in consumer–brand relationships | Experimental study | Compared to mundane rewards, special rewards produced higher self-expansion, which in turn led to positive brand evaluation. |
Michel et al., (2022) [22] | Self-expansion in consumer–brand relationships | Survey study Sample size: 2010 participants | Brands can generate self-expansion through the embodiment of personal ideals, which in turn leads to more favorable consumer responses to the brand. |
Apaolaza et al., (2022) [26] | Self-expansion through pets | Survey study Sample size: 326 participants | Self-expansion moderated the effect of pet anthropomorphism on the purchasing of fashion pet clothing. |
Niu et al., (2023) [27] | Internet self-expansion | Survey study Sample: Four groups of participants | A three-factor model with 16 items was developed and tested to measure internet self-expansion. |
Liu et al., (2022) [28] | Self-expansion through smartwatch usage | Survey study Sample size: 343 participants | Smartwatch use positively affected self-expansion and self-expansion positively affected user loyalty and user influence. |
2.3. Consumer Engagement through Social Media
3. Hypotheses Development and Conceptual Model
3.1. Self-Expansion and Consumers’ Continuous Participation
3.2. Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement
3.3. Consumer Engagement and Continuous Participation
4. Methods
4.1. Data Collection
4.2. Measures
4.3. Data Analysis
5. Results
5.1. Reliability and Validity Test
5.2. Autocorrelation and Multicollinearity
5.3. Common Method Variance
5.4. Structural Equation Model Analysis
5.5. Assessment of Mediating Effects of CE
6. Conclusions and Discussion
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
6.3. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Korschun, D.; Du, S.L. How virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value: A framework and propositions. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 1494–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jurietti, E.; Mandelli, A.; Fudurić, M. How do virtual corporate social responsibility dialogs generate value? A case study of the Unilever sustainable living lab. Corp. Soc. Resp. Env. Manag. 2017, 24, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, Y.; Jiang, S.B.; Deng, W.J. Research on the influence of customer engagement on knowledge sharing behavior in CSR co-creation of virtual community. Inf. Sci. 2019, 37, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, S.; Tian, Z.L.; Hu, X.Q. Research on consumer participation behaviors in virtual CSR co-creation from the perspective of psychological ownership. Chin. J. Manag. 2017, 3, 414–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Osei-Frimpong, K.; Appiah Otoo, B.A.; McLean, G.; Islam, N.; Soga, L.R. What keeps me engaging? A study of consumers’ continuous social media brand engagement practices. Inform. Technol. People 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiau, W.L.; Yuan, Y.; Pu, X.; Ray, S.; Chen, C.C. Understanding fintech continuance: Perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2020, 120, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolen, M.C. Exploring the determinants of users’ continuance intention in smart watches. Technol. Soc. 2020, 60, 101209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagozzi, R.P.; Dholakia, U.M. Open source software user communities: A study of participation in Linux user groups. Manag. Sci. 2006, 52, 1099–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, E. User acceptance of smart wearable devices: An expectation-confirmation model approach. Telemat. Inform. 2020, 47, 101318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, N.K.; Kaul, D.; Sanyal, P. What drives customers towards mobile shopping? An integrative technology continuance theory perspective. Asia Pacific J. Market. Logist. 2021, 34, 922–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mi, L.Y.; Xu, T.; Sun, Y.H.; Zhao, J.J.; Lv, T.; Gan, X.L.; Shang, K.; Qiao, L.J. Playing Ant Forest to promote online green behavior: A new perspective on uses and gratifications. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 278, 111544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.J.; Kong, X.C.; Sun, J.; Zhang, Y.L. Switching to Green Lifestyles: Behavior Change of Ant Forest Users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tang, Y.; Geng, L.; Schultz, P.W.; Zhou, K.; Xiang, P. The effects of mindful learning on pro-environmental behavior: A self-expansion perspective. Conscious Cogn. 2017, 51, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Eisingerich, A.B.; Marchand, A.; Fritze, M.P.; Dong, L. Hook vs. hope: How to enhance customer engagement through gamification. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2019, 36, 200–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Y.M.; Huang, J.X. Moral, Pleasure or Benefits Goal?—Research on the influence of gamification co-creation on users’ continuous participation intention. Collect. Essays Finan. Econ. 2021, 6, 101–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Hu, X.; Gu, M. Promote pro-environmental behaviour through social media: An empirical study based on Ant Forest. Environ. Sci. Policy 2022, 137, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aron, A.; Aron, E.N. Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction; Hemisphere: New York, NY, USA, 1986. [Google Scholar]
- Aron, A.; Lewandowski, G.W.; Mashek, D.; Aron, E.N. The self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships. In The Oxford Handbook of Close Relationships; Simpson, J., Campbell, L., Eds.; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 90–115. [Google Scholar]
- Hughes, E.K.; Slotter, E.B.; Lewandowski, G.W. Expanding Who I Am: Validating the Self-Expansion Preference Scale. J. Pers. Assesst. 2019, 102, 792–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aron, A.; Aron, E.N.; Norman, C. Self-expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In Handbook of Social Psychology; Clark, M., Fletcher, G., Eds.; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2001; pp. 478–501. [Google Scholar]
- Harasymchuk, C.; Walker, D.L.; Muise, A.; Impett, E.A. Planning date nights that promote closeness: The roles of relationship goals and self-expansion. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2021, 38, 1692–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Michel, G.; Torelli, C.J.; Fleck, N.; Hubert, B. Self-brand values congruity and incongruity: Their impacts on self-expansion and consumers’ responses to brands. J. Bus.Res. 2022, 142, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harasymchuk, C.; Muise, A.; Bacev-Giles, C.; Gere, J.; Impett, E.A. Broadening your horizon one day at a time: Relationship goals and exciting activities as daily antecedents of relational self-expansion. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 2020, 37, 1910–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoffner, C.A.; Lee, S.; Park, S.J. “I miss my mobile phone!”: Self-expansion via mobile phone and responses to phone loss. New Media Soc. 2015, 18, 2452–2468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Branand, B.; Mashek, D.; Wray-Lake, L.; Coffey, J.K. Inclusion of college community in the self: A longitudinal study of the role of self-expansion in students’ satisfaction. J. Coll. Student Dev. 2015, 56, 829–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apaolaza, V.; Hartmann, P.; Paredes, M.R.; Trujillo, A.; D’Souza, C. What motivates consumers to buy fashion pet clothing? The role of attachment, pet anthropomorphism, and self-expansion. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 141, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niu, G.F.; Wang, Y.P.; Li, Z.X.; Zhou, Z.K.; Ni, X.L.; Sun, X.J. Development and validation of a scale to measure internet self-expansion. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 6494–6500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, R.; Yang, J.; Yao, J. How smartwatch use drives user reciprocity: The mediating effects of self-expansion and self- extension. Front. Psychol. 2022, 11, 1041527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ashfaq, M.; Zhang, Q.Y.; Zafar, A.U.; Malik, M.; Waheed, A. Understanding Ant Forest continuance: Effects of user experience, personal attributes and motivational factors. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2022, 122, 471–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Z.; Chen, K. Understanding individuals’ engagement and continuance intention of MOOCs: The effect of interactivity and the role of gender. Internet Res. 2021, 31, 1262–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Tai, C.F.; Hu, H. Role of brand engagement and co-creation experience in online brand community continuance: A service-dominant logic perspective. Inform. Process. Manag. 2023, 60, 103136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, Q.; Du, H. How to achieve consumer continuance intention toward branded apps—From the consumer–brand engagement perspective. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 60, 102486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hepola, J.; Leppaniemi, M.; Karjaluoto, H. Is it all about consumer engagement? Explaining continuance intention for utilitarian and hedonic service consumption. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 57, 102232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aljuhmani, H.Y.; Elrehail, H.; Bayram, P.; Samarah, T. Linking social media marketing efforts with customer brand engagement in driving brand loyalty. Asia Pac. J. Market. Logist. 2022, 35, 1719–1738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.; Prentice, C.; Weaven, S.; Hisao, A. The influence of customer trust and artificial intelligence on customer engagement and loyalty—The case of the home-sharing industry. Front. Psychol. 2022, 8, 912339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, J.; Rahman, Z. The impact of online brand community characteristics on customer engagement: An application of Stimulus-Response paradigm. Telemat. Inform. 2017, 34, 96–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.L.; Guo, L.Y.; Hu, M.; Liu, W.H. Influence of customer engagement with company social networks on stickiness: Mediating effect of customer value creation. Int. J. Inform. Manag. 2017, 37, 229–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Storbacka, K.; Brodie, R.J.; Böhmann, T.; Maglio, P.P.; Nenonen, S. Actor engagement as a microfoundation for value co-creation. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 3008–3017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, D.M.; Han, X.Y. Assessing the influence of goal pursuit and emotional attachment on customer engagement behaviors. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 59, 102355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prentice, C.; Han, X.Y.; Hua, L.L.; Hu, L. The influence of identity-driven customer engagement on purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 47, 339–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morsing, M.; Schultz, M. Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Bus. Ethics 2006, 15, 323–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okazaki, S.; Menendez, H.D. Virtual corporate social responsibility dialog: Seeking a gap between proposed concepts and actual practices. In Handbook of Integrated CSR Communication; Diehl, S., Karmasin, M., Mueller, B., Terlutter, R., Weder, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 225–234. [Google Scholar]
- Jarvis, W.; Ouschan, R.; Burton, H.J.; Soutar, G.; O’Brien, I.M. Customer engagement in CSR: A utility theory model with moderating variables. J. Serv. Theor. Pract. 2017, 27, 833–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaakkola, E.; Alexander, M. The role of customer engagement behavior in value co-creation: A service system perspective. J. Serv. Res. 2014, 17, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jiao, J.N.; Fan, J. A Literature Review and Prospects of Customer-Enterprise Social Value Co-creation. Foreign Econ. Manag. 2019, 41, 72–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.; Xiao, S.; Zhou, G. User continuance of a green behavior mobile application in China: An empirical study of Ant Forest. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 242, 118497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, H. The influencing factors on the willingness to participate in virtual corporate social responsibility co-creation. Sci. Res. Manag. 2022, 8, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, G.; Liu, R.; Wang, J. Research on the Internal Mechanism of “Ant Forest” Users Migrating to Offline Green Consumption: Based on Behavioral Reasoning Theory. J. Manag. 2023, 36, 56–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Xing, J. The Impact of Gamification Motivation on Green Consumption Behavior—An Empirical Study Based on Ant Forest. Sustainability 2023, 15, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reimann, M.; Aron, A. Self-expansion motivation and inclusion of close brands in self: Towards a theory of brand relationships. In Handbook of Brand Relationships; Priester, J., MacInnis, D., Park, C., Eds.; M.E. Sharpe: New York, NY, USA, 2009; pp. 65–81. [Google Scholar]
- Gorlier, T.; Michel, G. How special rewards in loyalty programs enrich consumer–brand relationships: The role of self-expansion. Psychol. Market. 2020, 37, 588–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lawendowski, R.; Besta, T. Is participation in music festivals a self-expansion opportunity? Identity, self-perception, and the importance of music’s functions. Music. Sci. 2018, 24, 206–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattingly, B.A.; Lewandowski, G.W. Broadening horizons: Self-expansion in relational and non-relational contexts. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2014, 8, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besta, T.; Mattingly, B.; Błażek, M. When Membership Gives Strength to Act: Inclusion of the Group into the Self and Feeling of Personal Agency. J. Soc. Psychol. 2015, 156, 56–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.S.; Peng, M.; Lewandowski, G.W. Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese translation of the relational and individual self-expansion scales. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 42, 12671–12681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewandowski, G.W.; Ackerman, R.A. Something’s Missing: Need Fulfillment and Self-Expansion as Predictors of Susceptibility to Infidelity. J. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 146, 389–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattingly, B.A.; Lewandowski, G.W. The power of one: Benefits of individual self-expansion. J. Posit. Psychol. 2013, 8, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McIntyre, K.P.; Mattingly, B.A.; Lewandowski, G.W.; Simpson, A. Workplace Self-Expansion: Implications for Job Satisfaction, Commitment, Self-Concept Clarity, and Self-Esteem among the Employed and Unemployed. Basic Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 36, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shedlosky-Shoemaker, R.; Costabile, K.A.; Arkin, R.M. Self-Expansion through Fictional Characters. Self Identity 2014, 13, 556–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slotter, E.B.; Kolarova, L. Making Sure You See the Real Me: The Role of Self-Esteem in Spontaneous Self-Expansion. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2019, 11, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, S.J.; Bai, B.; Busser, J.A. Pop star fan tourists: An application of self-expansion theory. Tourism Manag. 2019, 72, 270–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, J.; Nayak, J.K. Brand engagement without brand ownership: A case of non-brand owner community members. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2019, 28, 216–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, G.; Deshwal, P.; Dangi, H.K. Customer engagement: A systematic review and future research agenda. Int. J. Internet Market. Advert. 2023, 18, 148–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Doorn, J.; Lemon, K.; Mittal, V.; Nass, S.; Doreen, P.; Pirner, P.; Verhoef, P. Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 2010, 13, 252–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Ilic, A.; Juric, B.; Hollebeek, L. Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Hollebeek, L.D.; Juric, B.; Ilic, A. Customer engagement: Conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. J. Serv. Res. 2011, 14, 252–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hollebeek, L.D.; Glynn, M.S.; Brodie, R.J. Consumer brand engagement in social media: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. J. Interact. Mark. 2014, 28, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowden, J.L.-H. The process of customer engagement: A conceptual framework. J. Market. Theory Pract. 2009, 17, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheung, C.M.K.; Shen, X.L.; Lee, Z.W.Y.; Chan, T.K.H. Promoting sales of online games through customer engagement. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2015, 14, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vivek, S.; Beatty, S.; Dalela, V.; Morga, R. A generalized multidimensional scale for measuring customer engagement. J. Market. Theory Pract. 2014, 22, 401–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molinillo, S.; Anaya-Sanchez, R.; Liebana-Cabanillas, F. Analyzing the effect of social support and community factors on customer engagement and its impact on loyalty behaviors toward social commerce websites. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 108, 105980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kozinets, R.V. Social Brand Engagement: A New Idea. Engagement 2014, 6, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graffigan, G.; Gambetti, R.C. Grounding consumer-brand engagement: A field-driven conceptualisation. Int. J. Market Res. 2015, 57, 605–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brodie, R.J.; Fehrer, J.A.; Jaakola, E.; Conduit, J. Actor engagement in networks: Defining the conceptual domain. J. Serv. Res. 2019, 22, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calder, B.J.; Malthouse, E.C.; Schaedel, U. An experimental study of the relationship between online engagement and advertising effectiveness. J. Interac. Mark. 2009, 23, 321–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dolan, R.; Conduit, J.; Fahy, J.; Goodman, S. Social media engagement behaviour: A uses and gratifications perspective. J. Strateg. Mark. 2016, 24, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Vivek, S.; Beatty, S.; Morgan, R. Customer engagement: Exploring customer relationships beyond purchase. J. Market. Theory Pract. 2012, 20, 127–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Lee, F.Y. Examining customer engagement and brand intimacy in social media context. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 54, 102035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, T.Z.; Bao, Z.S.; Li, Y. Why do players purchase in mobile social network games? An examination of customer engagement and of uses and gratifications theory. Program 2017, 51, 259–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, T.M. Building relationships through customer engagement in Facebook brand pages. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2020, 38, 713–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marbach, J.; Lages, C.R.; Nunan, D.; Ekinci, Y. Consumer engagement in online brand communities: The moderating role of personal values. Eur. J. Market. 2019, 53, 1671–1700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsai, W.S.; Men, L.R. Motivations and antecedents of consumer engagement with Brand pages on social networking sites. J. Interact. Advert. 2013, 13, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quach, S.; Shao, W. Customer engagement and co-created value in social media. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2020, 38, 730–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrigan, P.; Evers, U.; Miles, M.P.; Daly, T. Customer engagement and the relationship between involvement, engagement, self-brand connection and brand usage intention. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 88, 388–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollebeek, L.D.; Srivastava, R.K.; Chen, T. SD logic-informed customer engagement: Integrative framework, revised fundamental propositions, and application to CRM. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 2019, 47, 161–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roy, S.K.; Balaji, M.S.; Soutar, G.; Lassar, W.M.; Roy, R. Customer engagement behavior in individualistic and collectivistic markets. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 86, 281–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dessart, L.; Veloutsou, C.; Morgan-Thomas, A. Capturing consumer engagement: Duality, dimensionality and measurement. J. Market. Manag. 2016, 32, 399–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bazi, S.; Filieri, R.; Gorton, M. Social media content aesthetic quality and customer engagement: The mediating role of entertainment and impacts on brand love and loyalty. J. Bus. Res. 2023, 160, 113778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsieh, M.T.; Tsao, W.C. Reducing perceived online shopping risk to enhance loyalty: A website quality perspective. J. Risk Res. 2014, 17, 241–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Fan, S.K.; Zhao, J.L. Community engagement and online word of mouth: An empirical investigation. Inform. Manag. 2018, 55, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lusch, R.F.; Vargo, S.L. S-D logic: Accommodating, integrating, transdisciplinary. In Grand Service Challenge; University of Cambridge: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.H.; Gao, Y.L.; Pan, Y.Y. Research on the influence of customer engagement on customer satisfaction—The mediating role of perceived risk and the moderating role of self-efficacy. Res. Financ. Econ. Issues 2017, 6, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
- Park, C.W.; MacInnis, D.J.; Priester, J.R. Beyond attitudes: Attachment and customer behavior. Seoul Natl. J. 2006, 12, 3–36. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237448422 (accessed on 1 January 2007).
- Mikulincer, M.; Shaver, P.R. Mental Representations of Attachment Security: Theoretical Foundation for a Positive Social Psychology. In Interpersonal Cognition; Baldwin, M.W., Ed.; Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2005; pp. 233–266. [Google Scholar]
- McCormack, C.M.; Martin, J.K.; Williams, K.J.H. The full story: Understanding how films affect environmental change through the lens of narrative persuasion. People Nat. 2021, 3, 1193–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliver, M.B.; Raney, A.A.; Slater, M.D.; Appel, M.; Hartmann, T.; Bartsch, A.; Schneider, F.M.; Janicke Bowles, S.H.; Kramer, N.; Mares, M.L.; et al. Self-transcendent media experiences: Taking meaningful media to a higher level. J. Commun. 2018, 68, 380–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Malar, L.; Krohmer, H.; Hoyer, W.D.; Nyffenegger, B. Emotional brand attachment and brand personality: The relative importance of the actual and the ideal self. J. Market. 2011, 75, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torelli, C.J. Globalization, Culture, and Branding: How to Leverage Cultural Equity for Building Iconic Brands in the Era of Globalization; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Kumar, V.; Pansari, A. Competitive advantage through engagement. J. Market. Res. 2016, 53, 497–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewandowski, G.W.; Aron, A.P. Distinguishing arousal from novelty and challenge in initial romantic attraction between strangers. Soc. Behav. Personal. 2004, 32, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wright, S.C.; Aron, A.; Tropp, L.R. Including others (and groups) in the self: Self-expansion and intergroup relations. In The Social Self: Cognitive, Interpersonal and Intergroup Perspectives; Forgas, J.P., Williams, K., Eds.; Psychology Pres: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2002; pp. 343–363. [Google Scholar]
- Oishi, S.; Westgate, E.C. A Psychologically Rich Life: Beyond Happiness and Meaning. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 129, 790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parihar, P.; Dawra, J.; Sahay, V. The role of consumer engagement in the involvement-loyalty link. Mark. Intell. Plan. 2018, 37, 66–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, N.; Wang, Y.; Jin, C.H.; Ni, Y.; Zhang, M.L. Effects of socialization interactions on customer engagement in online travel communities. Int. Res. 2019, 29, 1509–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carlson, J.; Rahman, M.; Voola, R.; de Vries, N. Customer engagement behaviours in social media: Capturing innovation opportunities. J. Serv. Mark. 2018, 32, 83–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 1977, 84, 191–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khan, I.; Fatma, M.; Kumar, V.; Amoroso, S. Do experience and engagement matter to millennial consumers? Mark. Intell. Plan. 2020, 39, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, Z.W.; Guo, Y.; Lv, L.X.; Wu, Y.T. Literature Review and prospects of virtual CSR co-creation. Soft Sci. 2021, 35, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, N.; Zhang, S.K.; Zhao, Y.R. Research on the influence of the characteristics of leading users in online communities on the level of knowledge sharing. Manag. Rev. 2019, 31, 82–93. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, L.; Krasikova, D.V.; Liu, D. I can do it, so can you: The role of leader creative self-efficacy in facilitating follower creativity. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 2016, 132, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodas, M. The Self-Expanding Effect of Psychologically Enriching Brands. Available online: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/hpxmJpXcKhNTD_L6bd75lA (accessed on 22 March 2023).
- Islam, J.U.; Rahman, Z.; Hollebeek, L.D. Consumer engagement in online brand communities: A solicitation of congruity theory. Internet Res. 2018, 28, 23–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reitz, A.R. Online consumer engagement: Understanding the antecedents and outcomes. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, D.J.; Ferrin, D.L.; Rao, H.R. Trust and Satisfaction, Two Stepping Stones for Successful E-Commerce Relationships: A Longitudinal Exploration. Inform. Syst. Res. 2009, 20, 237–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cyr, D. Modeling Web Site Design across Cultures: Relationships to Trust, Satisfaction, and E-Loyalty. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 2008, 24, 47–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- So, K.K.; King, C.; Sparks, B. Customer engagement with tourism brands: Scale development and validation. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 2014, 38, 304–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Lange, P.A.; Rusbult, C.E.; Drigotas, S.M.; Arriaga, X.B.; Witcher, B.S.; Cox, C.L. Willingness to Sacrifice in Close Relationships. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 72, 1373–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pirolli, P.; Mohan, S.; Venkatakrishnan, A.; Nelson, L.; Silva, M.; Springer, A. Implementation intention and reminder effects on behavior change in a mobile health system: A predictive cognitive model. J. Med. Int. Res. 2017, 19, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- López, C.; Hartmann, P.; Apaolaza, V. Gratifications on social networking sites: The role of secondary school students’ individual differences in loneliness. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2019, 57, 58–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, S.; Min, J.; Lee, H. Antecedents of social presence and gratification of social connection needs in SNS: A study of Twitter users and their mobile and non-mobile usage. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2015, 35, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewandowski, G.W.; Aron, A. Self-expansion scale: Construction and validation. In Proceedings of the Third Annual Meeting of the Society of Personality and Social Psychology, Savannah, GA, USA, 10–11 January 2002. [Google Scholar]
- Gerbing, D.W.; Anderson, J.C. An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Mark. Res. 1988, 25, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.L. Practice of Questionnaire Statistical Analysis: Operation and Application of SPSS; Chongqing University Press: Chongqing, China, 2010; pp. 216–235. ISBN 978-7-5624-5088-7. [Google Scholar]
- Nunnally, J. Psychometric Theory; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1978; pp. 678–685. [Google Scholar]
- Churchill, G.A., Jr. A paradigm for developing better measures in marketing. J. Market. Res. 1979, 16, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, M.L. Structural Equation Model: Operation and Application of Amos; Chongqing University Press: Chongqing, China, 2009; ISBN 978-7-5624-4947-8. [Google Scholar]
- Zhou, J. Questionnaire Data Analysis; Publishing House of Electronics Industry: Beijing, China, 2020; pp. 53–55. [Google Scholar]
- Harman, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis, 3rd ed.; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Fuller, C.M.; Simmering, M.J.; Atinc, G.; Atinc, Y.; Babin, B.J. Common methods variance detection in business research. J. Bus. Res. 2016, 69, 3192–3198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moliner, M.A.; Monferrer, D.; Estrada, M. Consequences of customer engagement and customer self-brand connection. J. Serv. Mark. 2018, 32, 387–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdim, K.; Casalo, L.V.; Flavian, C. The role of utilitarian and hedonic aspects in the continuance intention to use social mobile apps. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 66, 102888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Item | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 138 | 41.07 |
Female | 198 | 58.93 | |
Age | 18–25 | 164 | 48.81 |
26–30 | 95 | 28.27 | |
31–40 | 55 | 16.37 | |
41–50 | 20 | 5.95 | |
51–60 | 2 | 0.60 | |
Education | Junior college or below | 5 | 1.49 |
Undergraduate course | 263 | 78.27 | |
Master’s degree | 56 | 16.67 | |
Doctorate and above | 12 | 3.57 | |
Monthly income | Less than CNY 2000 | 131 | 38.99 |
CNY 2000–5000 | 55 | 16.37 | |
CNY 5000–8000 | 89 | 26.49 | |
CNY 8000–10,000 | 42 | 12.50 | |
More than CNY 10,000 | 19 | 5.65 | |
Time using Ant Forest | 6 months–1 year | 28 | 8.33 |
1–2 years | 41 | 12.20 | |
2–3 years | 65 | 19.35 | |
3 years or more | 202 | 60.12 | |
Frequency of using Ant Forest | Once a day | 86 | 25.60 |
Several times a day | 45 | 13.39 | |
2–3 times a week | 167 | 49.70 | |
Several times a month | 31 | 9.23 | |
Once a month | 7 | 2.08 | |
Total | 336 | 100 |
KMO and Bartlett Testing | ||
---|---|---|
KMO value | 0.894 | |
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Approximate chi-square | 4860.458 |
Freedom | 325 | |
Significance | 0.000 |
Rotated Component Matrix | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factor loadings | |||||||
Factor 1 | Factor 2 | Factor 3 | Factor 4 | Factor 5 | Factor 6 | Factor 7 | |
EBE 1 | 0.209 | 0.169 | 0.844 | 0.156 | 0.136 | 0.073 | 0.120 |
EBE 2 | 0.235 | 0.111 | 0.803 | 0.218 | 0.168 | 0.167 | 0.138 |
EBE 3 | 0.210 | 0.159 | 0.847 | 0.124 | 0.116 | 0.156 | 0.172 |
EBE 4 | 0.219 | 0.119 | 0.836 | 0.146 | 0.136 | 0.182 | 0.139 |
CBE 1 | 0.045 | 0.897 | 0.099 | 0.114 | 0.105 | 0.041 | 0.105 |
CBE 2 | 0.108 | 0.870 | 0.114 | 0.076 | 0.111 | 0.072 | 0.099 |
CBE 3 | 0.101 | 0.878 | 0.154 | 0.052 | 0.135 | 0.064 | 0.095 |
CBE 4 | 0.080 | 0.878 | 0.101 | 0.114 | 0.044 | 0.125 | 0.125 |
IBE 1 | 0.833 | 0.120 | 0.185 | 0.205 | 0.030 | 0.116 | 0.105 |
IBE 2 | 0.851 | 0.089 | 0.155 | 0.197 | 0.087 | 0.116 | 0.097 |
IBE 3 | 0.797 | 0.039 | 0.195 | 0.181 | 0.178 | 0.128 | 0.115 |
IBE 4 | 0.803 | 0.120 | 0.155 | 0.210 | 0.148 | 0.152 | 0.203 |
IBE 5 | 0.799 | 0.056 | 0.236 | 0.165 | 0.171 | 0.082 | 0.224 |
CA 1 | 0.145 | 0.154 | 0.133 | 0.085 | 0.857 | 0.093 | 0.143 |
CA 2 | 0.121 | 0.081 | 0.138 | 0.045 | 0.887 | 0.084 | 0.158 |
CA 3 | 0.167 | 0.137 | 0.156 | 0.067 | 0.859 | 0.044 | 0.046 |
ENT 1 | 0.203 | 0.083 | 0.045 | 0.852 | 0.045 | 0.049 | 0.095 |
ENT 2 | 0.192 | 0.091 | 0.170 | 0.812 | 0.023 | 0.114 | 0.137 |
ENT 3 | 0.260 | 0.100 | 0.232 | 0.737 | 0.042 | 0.086 | 0.187 |
ENT 4 | 0.165 | 0.100 | 0.146 | 0.845 | 0.116 | −0.016 | 0.102 |
SC1 | 0.154 | 0.077 | 0.159 | 0.118 | 0.073 | 0.832 | 0.165 |
SC2 | 0.145 | 0.023 | 0.153 | 0.039 | 0.070 | 0.850 | 0.193 |
SC3 | 0.131 | 0.176 | 0.126 | 0.035 | 0.075 | 0.865 | 0.035 |
CP 1 | 0.268 | 0.177 | 0.221 | 0.247 | 0.116 | 0.176 | 0.735 |
CP 2 | 0.222 | 0.208 | 0.229 | 0.107 | 0.200 | 0.131 | 0.760 |
CP 3 | 0.216 | 0.144 | 0.134 | 0.262 | 0.137 | 0.215 | 0.703 |
Constructs | Measurement Items | Factor Loading | t-Value | CR | AVE | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBE (α = 0.940) | EBE1: Ant Forest provides me with new experiences. | 0.882 | - | 0.940 | 0.797 | |||||
EBE2: Ant Forest provides me with exciting experiences. | 0.879 | 19.085 | ||||||||
EBE3: Ant Forest provides me with a larger perspective on things. | 0.909 | 20.491 | ||||||||
EBE4: Ant Forest expands my understanding of external things. | 0.901 | 20.070 | ||||||||
CBE (α = 0.933) | CBE1: Ant Forest increases my ability to accomplish new things. | 0.897 | - | 0.933 | 0.776 | |||||
CBE2: I have learned new things through Ant Forest. | 0.863 | 18.668 | ||||||||
CBE3: Ant Forest increases my knowledge. | 0.882 | 19.524 | ||||||||
CBE4: With Ant Forest, I have the feeling of extending my possibilities. | 0.882 | 19.523 | ||||||||
IBE (α = 0.936) | IBE1: I have different identities and roles in Ant Forest, which are different from those in real life. | 0.857 | - | 0.937 | 0.747 | |||||
IBE2: I find different aspects of myself in Ant Forest. | 0.870 | 17.548 | ||||||||
IBE3: Ant Forest helps me to expand my sense of the kind of person I am. | 0.838 | 16.406 | ||||||||
IBE4: Ant Forest makes me rediscover myself. | 0.882 | 17.985 | ||||||||
IBE5: Being a member of Ant Forest has made me a better person. | 0.874 | 17.701 | ||||||||
CA (α = 0.901) | CA1: Anything related to Ant Forest grasps my attention. | 0.873 | - | 0.901 | 0.753 | |||||
CA2: I like to learn more about Ant Forest. | 0.900 | 17.447 | ||||||||
CA3: I pay a lot of attention to anything about Ant Forest. | 0.829 | 15.771 | ||||||||
ENT (α = 0.893) | ENT1: I spend a lot of my discretionary time on Ant Forest. | 0.834 | 14.461 | |||||||
ENT2: I am passionate about Ant Forest. | 0.839 | - | 0.874 | 0.698 | ||||||
ENT3: I am heavily into Ant Forest. | 0.845 | 14.185 | ||||||||
ENT4: My days would not be the same without Ant Forest. | 0.823 | 13.853 | ||||||||
SC (α = 0.873) | SC1: I love participating in Ant Forest with my friends. | 0.824 | - | 0.893 | 0.677 | |||||
SC2: I enjoy taking part in Ant Forest more when I am with others. | 0.828 | 14.321 | ||||||||
SC3: Participating in Ant Forest is more fun when other people around me do it too. | 0.804 | 13.763 | ||||||||
CP(α = 0.842) | CP1: I continuously use Ant Forest. | 0.864 | - | 0.846 | 0.647 | |||||
CP2: I continuously participate in the activities on Ant Forest. | 0.811 | 13.953 | ||||||||
CP3: I continuously participate in Ant Forest to enable me to reach personal goals. | 0.733 | 12.277 | ||||||||
Fit indices | χ2 | df | χ2/df | NFI | IFI | TLI | CFI | GFI | RMSEA | |
Fit of the model | 448.883 | 278 | 1.615 | 0.911 | 0.964 | 0.958 | 0.964 | 0.875 | 0.051 | |
Recommended value (Wu, 2009) [126] | / | / | <3 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | <0.080 |
EBE | CBE | IBE | CA | ENT | SC | CP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBE | 0.893 | ||||||
CBE | 0.349 ** | 0.881 | |||||
IBE | 0.524 ** | 0.269 ** | 0.864 | ||||
CA | 0.387 ** | 0.296 ** | 0.367 ** | 0.868 | |||
ENT | 0.431 ** | 0.268 ** | 0.504 ** | 0.231 ** | 0.835 | ||
SC | 0.397 ** | 0.245 ** | 0.369 ** | 0.241 ** | 0.234 ** | 0.823 | |
CP | 0.525 ** | 0.404 ** | 0.554 ** | 0.410 ** | 0.492 ** | 0.445 ** | 0.804 |
Path | Estimates | S.E. | C.R. | p | Standardization Coefficient | Result | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EBE | ---> | CA | 0.248 | 0.064 | 3.881 | *** | 0.255 | Supported | |||
CBE | ---> | CA | 0.157 | 0.058 | 2.719 | 0.007 | 0.159 | Supported | |||
IBE | ---> | CA | 0.202 | 0.062 | 3.244 | 0.001 | 0.206 | Supported | |||
EBE | ---> | ENT | 0.164 | 0.053 | 3.109 | 0.002 | 0.198 | Supported | |||
CBE | ---> | ENT | 0.098 | 0.047 | 2.053 | 0.040 | 0.117 | Supported | |||
IBE | ---> | ENT | 0.315 | 0.054 | 5.884 | *** | 0.378 | Supported | |||
IBE | ---> | SC | 0.187 | 0.052 | 3.585 | *** | 0.229 | Supported | |||
CBE | ---> | SC | 0.134 | 0.048 | 2.772 | 0.006 | 0.163 | Supported | |||
EBE | ---> | SC | 0.224 | 0.054 | 4.178 | *** | 0.276 | Supported | |||
EBE | ---> | CP | 0.168 | 0.053 | 3.150 | 0.002 | 0.191 | Supported | |||
CBE | ---> | CP | 0.132 | 0.046 | 2.867 | 0.004 | 0.149 | Supported | |||
IBE | ---> | CP | 0.150 | 0.054 | 2.771 | 0.006 | 0.170 | Supported | |||
CA | ---> | CP | 0.150 | 0.049 | 3.082 | 0.002 | 0.167 | Supported | |||
ENT | ---> | CP | 0.264 | 0.063 | 4.188 | *** | 0.249 | Supported | |||
SC | ---> | CP | 0.196 | 0.062 | 3.154 | 0.002 | 0.181 | Supported | |||
Fit indices | χ2 | df | χ2/df | NFI | IFI | TLI | CFI | GFI | RMSEA | ||
Fit of the model | 656.167 | 281 | 2.335 | 0.903 | 0.942 | 0.933 | 0.942 | 0.875 | 0.063 | ||
Recommended value (Wu, 2009) [126] | / | / | <3 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | >0.9 | <0.080 |
Path | Effect Values | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI |
---|---|---|---|---|
Total effects | ||||
EBE ---> CP | 0.333 | 0.070 | 0.197 | 0.468 |
CBE ---> CP | 0.234 | 0.059 | 0.114 | 0.345 |
IBE ---> CP | 0.340 | 0.073 | 0.196 | 0.481 |
Direct effects | ||||
EBE ---> CP | 0.191 | 0.076 | 0.046 | 0.342 |
CBE ---> CP | 0.149 | 0.055 | 0.035 | 0.251 |
IBE ---> CP | 0.170 | 0.076 | 0.018 | 0.317 |
Indirect effects | ||||
EBE ---> CA ---> CP | 0.043 | 0.022 | 0.009 | 0.100 |
EBE ---> ENT ---> CP | 0.049 | 0.021 | 0.017 | 0.099 |
EBE ---> SC ---> CP | 0.050 | 0.021 | 0.017 | 0.102 |
CBE ---> CA ---> CP | 0.027 | 0.016 | 0.004 | 0.070 |
CBE ---> ENT --> CP | 0.029 | 0.017 | 0.002 | 0.069 |
CBE ---> SC ---> CP | 0.030 | 0.018 | 0.005 | 0.076 |
IBE ---> CA ---> CP | 0.034 | 0.021 | 0.005 | 0.091 |
IBE ---> ENT ---> CP | 0.094 | 0.029 | 0.049 | 0.165 |
IBE ---> SC ---> CP | 0.041 | 0.022 | 0.009 | 0.104 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nie, J.; Wang, X.; Yang, C. The Influence of Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement on Consumers’ Continuous Participation in Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070545
Nie J, Wang X, Yang C. The Influence of Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement on Consumers’ Continuous Participation in Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(7):545. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070545
Chicago/Turabian StyleNie, Jinjun, Xiaoyi Wang, and Chan Yang. 2023. "The Influence of Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement on Consumers’ Continuous Participation in Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 7: 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070545
APA StyleNie, J., Wang, X., & Yang, C. (2023). The Influence of Self-Expansion and Consumer Engagement on Consumers’ Continuous Participation in Virtual Corporate Social Responsibility Co-Creation. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070545