Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform with the SOR Model: A Case Study of China’s “Xiaohongshu” App
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. An Overview of Community E-commerce
2.1.1. Basic Concept of Community E-commerce
2.1.2. A Summary of Research on Community E-commerce
2.2. Overview of Consumers’ Purchase Intention
2.2.1. Definition of Consumers’ Purchase Intention
2.2.2. Research on Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions and Social E-commerce Consumers’ Purchase Intentions
2.3. Research on Relevant Theories and Models
2.3.1. Stimulation-Organism-Response Model
2.3.2. Perceived-Value Theory
2.4. Summary
3. Model Hypothesis and Construction
3.1. Research Hypothesis
3.1.1. Influence of Product Features on Perceived Value
3.1.2. The Impact of Content Marketing on Perceived Value
3.1.3. Influence of Community Factors on Perceived Value
3.1.4. The Influence of Perceived Value on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions
3.2. Construction of Models
4. Questionnaire Design
4.1. Measurements
4.2. Design of Research Scheme
4.3. Collection of the Questionnaire Data
5. Statistical Analysis on Influencing Factors of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform
5.1. Descriptive Analysis
5.2. Reliability Analysis
5.3. Validity Analysis
5.3.1. Test of Exploratory Factors
5.3.2. Convergent-Validity Test
5.4. Correlation Analysis
5.5. Structural-Model Analysis
5.5.1. Fitting Analysis of the Structural Model
5.5.2. Test of the Structural Model
6. Conclusions and Management Inspiration
6.1. Research Conclusions
6.1.1. Product Features, Content Marketing, and Community Factors Have a Positive Impact on Consumers’ Perceived Value
6.1.2. Consumer Perceived-Value has a Positive Influence on Consumers’ Purchase Intentions
6.2. Implications for Management
6.2.1. Create Utmost Cost–Performance to Make Products Stand Out, thus Enhancing the Perceived Value
6.2.2. Emphasize Precision-Marketing to Enhance the Authenticity and Effectiveness of the Content and Form of Word-Of-Mouth Propagation
6.2.3. Enliven the Platform to Improve Community Connection and Initiative
6.2.4. Gain User Trust by Supervising the Platform
6.3. Research Limitations and Prospects
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- China Internet Network Information Center. The 49th Statistical Report on Internet Development in China; China Internet Network Information Center: Beijing, China, 2022.
- iiMedia New Retail Industry Research Center. Research Report (2020–2021) on China’s Imported Cross-Border E-commerce Industry; iiMedia New Retail Industry Research Center: Guangzhou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Wu, C.; Lai, C. A social recommender mechanism for e-commerce: Combining similarity, trust, and relationship. Decis. Support Syst. 2013, 55, 740–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luo, M.; Li, L. Business Model Innovation in the Internet Era from the Perspective of Value Creation. China Ind. Econ. 2015, 31, 95–107. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.; Wang, X. Socialization, Traffic Distribution and E-commerce Trends: An Interpretation of the Phenomenon of “Pingduoduo”. China Soft Sci. 2019, 34, 47–59. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, H.; Liu, M. Differences between Mobile Community E-commerce and Traditional E-commerce, and the Collaborative Innovation Development Model. J. Commer. Econ. 2019, 38, 91–94. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J.; Shi, L.; Yu, Y.; Gonzalezc, E.; Hao, W.; Su, L.; Zhang, Y. Evaluation of precision marketing effectiveness of community e-commerce—An AISAS based model. Sustain. Oper. Comput. 2021, 2, 200–205. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, J. Business Model Research of Community E-commerce Platform about Xiaohongshu; Zhenzhou University: Zhenzhou, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Jia, Y.; Liu, I. Do consumers always follow “useful” reviews? The interaction effect of review valence and review usefulness on consumers’ purchase decisions. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2018, 69, 1304–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dodds, W.B.; Monroe, K.B.; Grewal, D. Effects of Price, Brand and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluation. J. Mark. Res. 1991, 28, 307–319. [Google Scholar]
- Lai, L.; Peng, L. Research on Influencing Factors of Online Purchase Intention of Agricultural Products Based on Two-factor Analysis. Price Theory Pract. 2020, 40, 99–102+163. [Google Scholar]
- Onofrei, G.; Filieri, R.; Kennedy, L. Social media interactions, purchase intention, and behavioural engagement: The mediating role of source and content factors. J. Bus. Res. 2022, 142, 100–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Xu, L. A Study on the Effects of Price Judgement and Perceived Quality on Consumer Purchase Intention. J. Account. Econ. 2019, 33, 103–115. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.; Oh, K.W. Effects of Perceived Sustainability Level of Sportswear Product on Purchase Intention: Exploring the Roles of Perceived Skepticism and Perceived Brand Reputation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Waston, J.B. A Survey of Twentieth-Century Psychology: Behaviorism; Zhejiang Education Press: Hangzhou, China, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Tolman, E.C. Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 1932. [Google Scholar]
- Mehrabian, A.; Russell, J.A. A Verbal Measure of Information Rate for Studies in Environmental Psychology. Environ. Behav. 1974, 6, 233–252. [Google Scholar]
- Chiles, T.H.; McMacklin, J.F. Integrating variable risk preferences, trust and transaction costs. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1996, 21, 73–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeithaml, V.A. Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence. J. Mark. 1988, 52, 2–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Soutar, G.N. Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. J. Retail. 2001, 77, 203–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steiner, B. French Wines on the Decline? Econometric Evidence from Britain. J. Agric. Econ. 2004, 52, 267–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Chen, D. Study of Community Relationship of Multi-Dimension Factors Influencing Consumer Purchase Decision-making in O2O Mode. Chin. J. Manag. Sci. 2019, 27, 110–119. [Google Scholar]
- Han, W.; Zhang, H. The Influence of Product Service Portfolio on Perceived Value. Nankai Bus. Rev. 2019, 22, 95–102. [Google Scholar]
- Peters, L.D.; Pressey, A.D.; Vanharanta, M.; Johnston, W.J. Theoretical developments in industrial marketing management: Multidisciplinary perspectives. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2013, 42, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, W. Analysis of the relationship of Content Marketing, Customer-Brand Participation and Brand Loyalty. J. Commer. Econ. 2020, 39, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
- He, A.; Cai, L.; Gao, J. The Influence of Brand Owned Media Content Marketing on Consumer Brand Attitudes. Chin. J. Manag. 2016, 13, 1534–1545. [Google Scholar]
- Lieb, R. What is content marketing? Advert. Age 2012, 83, 65. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.; Fesenmaier, D.R. Modeling Participation in an Online Travel Community. J. Travel Res. 2004, 42, 261–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Shi, Y.; Lin, B. The Impact of Community Interaction Information on Users’ Purchase Intention under the Background of E-commerce Livestreaming. J. Enterp. Econ. 2020, 39, 72–79. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, J.; Zhao, X.; Feng, L. The Influence and Research of Data Sharing in Virtual Communities on the Brand Information Recognition. Inf. Sci. 2018, 36, 32–38. [Google Scholar]
- Zhi, J. Advantages, Challenges, and Responses of Community Marketing of Fresh Agricultural Products. J. Agric. Econ. 2021, 41, 135–137. [Google Scholar]
- Ponte, E.B.; Carvajalo, E.; Escobar, T. Influence of trust and perceived value on the intention to purchase travel online: Integrating the effects of assurance on trust antecedents. Tour. Manag. 2015, 47, 286–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.; Wang, Y. Impacts of the Multidimensional Image of GI Labels on Consumers’ Online Purchase Intentions of Products with Geographical Indication-A Perceived Value Perspective. J. Jiangsu Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2022, 24, 57–69. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, W. A Study on the Impact of Influencers on Fans’ Purchase Intention in Live Broadcasting Platform. China Bus. Mark. 2020, 34, 28–37. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, T. A Study of the Influencing Factors of Community Consumers’ Purchase Intention Based on SOR Model; Shanghai University of Finance and Economics: Shanghai, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Richmond, A. Enticing Online Shoppers to Buy—A Human Behavior Study. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 1996, 28, 1469–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Hu, Q.; Pei, X. The Mechanism Model of Brand Community Identification Formation: A Case Study of Xiaomi Company. Chin. J. Manag. 2017, 14, 1737–1746. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, J.; Fan, L.; Lin, X. A Case Study on the Influence of Product Features on Private Brand Buying Intention. Commer. Times 2013, 32, 34–36. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, C. A Study on the Willingness of Purchasing Consumers Based on AISAS Mode; Xidian University: Xi’an, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, B.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, C. The Influence of Webcast Characteristics on Consumers’ Purchase Intention under E-commerce Live Broadcasting Mode—The Mediating Role of Consumer Perception. China Bus. Mark. 2021, 35, 52–61. [Google Scholar]
- Pavlou, P.A. Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 2003, 7, 101–134. [Google Scholar]
Measurement Dimension | No. | Items | Reference Source |
---|---|---|---|
Product feature | PF1 | I think the product quality on the Xiaohongshu platform is guaranteed | Xu and Richmond [35,36] |
PF2 | I think the products on the Xiaohongshu platform are cheaper than those offline | ||
PF3 | I think the products on the Xiaohongshu platform are trustworthy | ||
PF4 | I think the products on Xiaohongshu are unique and attractive | ||
Content marketing | CM1 | I think consumers are interested in the entertainment information (travel notes, practical and credible content-sharing, live broadcast, etc.) of the Xiaohongshu platform | Zhou [25] |
CM2 | I think consumers will like the social interaction on the Xiaohongshu platform | ||
CM3 | I think consumers are interested in the functional information of the Xiaohongshu platform (product-function introduction, usage method, etc.) | ||
Community factor | CF1 | I have observed that consumers are willing to accept the opinions of community leaders on the Xiaohongshu platform | Xu and Yang et al. [35,37] |
CF2 | I am happy to share the experience of using products and services with others on the Xiaohongshu platform | ||
CF3 | I have used the Xiaohongshu platform for a long time (3 years) | ||
Perceived value | PV1 | The products purchased on the Xiaohongshu platform are worth the money | Wei et al. and Zhang [38,39] |
PV2 | The products purchased on the Xiaohongshu platform can meet my expectations | ||
PV3 | I can get help with the choices of the right product on the Xiaohongshu platform | ||
PV4 | The products purchased on the Xiaohongshu platform can help me establish a good personal image | ||
PV5 | The products on the Xiaohongshu platform are more pleasant to the eye | ||
Purchase intention | PI1 | I am ready to open the product page of the Xiaohongshu platform | Xu, Zhang et al. and Pavlou [35,40,41] |
PI2 | Among all the community platforms, I prefer to buy goods on the Xiaohongshu platform | ||
PI3 | The information on the Xiaohongshu platform easily arouses my purchase intention | ||
PI4 | I often buy things on the Xiaohongshu platform |
Item | Options | Frequency | Ratio (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 144 | 47.84% |
Female | 157 | 52.16% | |
Age | Below 20 | 55 | 18.27% |
20–29 | 125 | 41.53% | |
30–39 | 77 | 25.58% | |
40-years-old and above | 44 | 14.62% | |
Educational background | Junior high-school and below | 17 | 5.65% |
High school | 40 | 13.29% | |
Junior-college education | 88 | 29.24% | |
Undergraduate | 127 | 42.19% | |
Postgraduate or above | 29 | 9.63% | |
Monthly income (monthly living-expenses for students) (Yuan) | 1500 and below | 49 | 16.28% |
1501–2500 | 73 | 24.25% | |
2501–3500 | 57 | 18.94% | |
3501 or above | 122 | 40.53% | |
Occupation | Students | 125 | 41.53% |
Government officials | 27 | 8.97% | |
Employees | 40 | 13.29% | |
Self-employed | 38 | 12.62% | |
Other | 71 | 23.59% | |
Contact time (Year) | Below 1 | 40 | 13.29% |
1–2 | 91 | 30.23% | |
2–5 | 136 | 45.18% | |
More than 5 | 34 | 11.3% |
Variables | No. | Total Correlation of Corrected Items | Items with Deleted Cronbach’s-Alpha Values | Cronbach’s Alpha Coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|
Product features | PF1 | 0.696 | 0.790 | 0.842 |
PF2 | 0.667 | 0.803 | ||
PF3 | 0.713 | 0.783 | ||
PF4 | 0.627 | 0.820 | ||
Content marketing | CM1 | 0.673 | 0.706 | 0.803 |
CM2 | 0.602 | 0.779 | ||
CM3 | 0.674 | 0.705 | ||
Community factor | CF1 | 0.667 | 0.597 | 0.763 |
CF2 | 0.625 | 0.646 | ||
CF3 | 0.497 | 0.787 | ||
Perceived value | PV1 | 0.693 | 0.815 | 0.853 |
PV2 | 0.704 | 0.812 | ||
PV3 | 0.673 | 0.821 | ||
PV4 | 0.595 | 0.840 | ||
PV5 | 0.661 | 0.824 | ||
Purchase intention | PI1 | 0.596 | 0.737 | 0.788 |
PI2 | 0.585 | 0.747 | ||
PI3 | 0.586 | 0.742 | ||
PI4 | 0.628 | 0.721 | ||
Total measurements | 0.942 |
Take Samples with Adequate KMO-Measurements | 0.917 | |
---|---|---|
Bartlett’s test of sphericity | Approximate chi-square | 1462.215 |
Degree of freedom | 45 | |
Significance | 0.000 |
No. | Component | Rotated Square and Load | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | Total | % of the Variance | Cumulative Percent | |
PF2 | 0.845 | 2.549 | 25.494 | 25.494 | ||
PF3 | 0.759 | |||||
PF1 | 0.723 | |||||
PF4 | 0.542 | |||||
CM1 | 0.806 | 2.457 | 24.575 | 50.068 | ||
CM3 | 0.802 | |||||
CM2 | 0.685 | |||||
CF3 | 0.834 | 2.000 | 20.001 | 70.070 | ||
CF1 | 0.681 | |||||
CF2 | 0.600 |
Route | Estimate | AVE | CR |
---|---|---|---|
PF1 <--- Product feature | 0.775 | 0.572 | 0.842 |
PF2 <--- Product feature | 0.715 | ||
PF3 <--- Product feature | 0.793 | ||
PF4 <--- Product feature | 0.739 | ||
CM1 <--- Content marketing | 0.788 | 0.580 | 0.805 |
CM2 <--- Content marketing | 0.713 | ||
CM3 <--- Content marketing | 0.782 | ||
CF1 <--- Community factor | 0.791 | 0.538 | 0.775 |
CF2 <--- Community factor | 0.799 | ||
CF3 <--- Community factor | 0.592 | ||
PV1 <--- Perceived value | 0.722 | 0.534 | 0.852 |
PV2 <--- Perceived value | 0.751 | ||
PV3 <--- Perceived value | 0.735 | ||
PV4 <--- Perceived value | 0.709 | ||
PV5 <--- Purchase intention | 0.737 | ||
PI1 <--- Purchase intention | 0.716 | 0.486 | 0.791 |
PI2 <--- Purchase intention | 0.656 | ||
PI3 <--- Purchase intention | 0.699 | ||
PI4 <--- Purchase intention | 0.716 |
Product Feature | Content Marketing | Community Factor | Perceived Value | Purchase Intention | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product feature | 1 | ||||
Content marketing | 0.665 ** | 1 | |||
Community factor | 0.676 ** | 0.652 ** | 1 | ||
Perceived value | 0.700 ** | 0.687 ** | 0.706 ** | 1 | |
Purchase intention | 0.692 ** | 0.571 ** | 0.643 ** | 0.758 ** | 1 |
Sample Quantity | X2/df | RNSEA | GFI | NFI | CFI | IFI | TLI |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Test data | 1.907 | 0.055 | 0.910 | 0.913 | 0.956 | 0.957 | 0.949 |
Adaptation critical-value | <3.00 | <0.08 | >0.8 | >0.90 | >0.9 | >0.90 | >0.90 |
Relations between Variables | Path Coefficient | p | Hypothesis Test | Result |
---|---|---|---|---|
Product feature→perceived value | 0.317 | 0.004 | H1 | Pass |
Content marketing→perceived value | 0.198 | 0.028 | H2 | Pass |
Community factor→perceived value | 0.484 | *** | H3 | Pass |
Perceived value→purchase intention | 0.932 | *** | H4 | Pass |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lin, B.; Shen, B. Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform with the SOR Model: A Case Study of China’s “Xiaohongshu” App. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020103
Lin B, Shen B. Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform with the SOR Model: A Case Study of China’s “Xiaohongshu” App. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(2):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020103
Chicago/Turabian StyleLin, Baodeng, and Binqiang Shen. 2023. "Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform with the SOR Model: A Case Study of China’s “Xiaohongshu” App" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 2: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020103
APA StyleLin, B., & Shen, B. (2023). Study of Consumers’ Purchase Intentions on Community E-commerce Platform with the SOR Model: A Case Study of China’s “Xiaohongshu” App. Behavioral Sciences, 13(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13020103