Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypothetical Development
2.1. Literature Review
2.1.1. Compensatory Control Theory
2.1.2. Conspicuous Consumption
2.1.3. Cyber-Ostracism
2.1.4. Sense of Control
2.1.5. Social Media Use Intensity
2.1.6. Implicit Personality
2.2. Hypothetical Development
2.2.1. Cyber-Ostracism and Conspicuous Consumption
2.2.2. Cyber-Ostracism and Sense of Control
2.2.3. Sense of Control and Conspicuous Consumption
2.2.4. The Mediating Role of the Sense of Control
2.2.5. The Moderating Role of the Social Media Use Intensity
2.2.6. The Moderating Role of the Implicit Personality
3. Methods
3.1. Procedures and Participants
3.2. Measures
3.2.1. Cyber-Ostracism
3.2.2. Conspicuous Consumption
3.2.3. Sense of Control
3.2.4. Social Media Use Intensity
3.2.5. Implicit Personality
3.2.6. Control Variables
3.3. Analytical Method
4. Results
4.1. Responses Bias Test
4.2. Descriptive Statistics and Correlation Analysis
4.3. Confirmatory Factor Analysis
4.4. Direct Effect Analysis
4.5. Mediating Effect Analysis
4.6. Moderated Mediation Effects Analysis
4.6.1. The Moderated Mediation Effect of Social Media Use Intensity
4.6.2. The Moderated Mediation Effect of Implicit Personality
5. Discussion
5.1. General Discussion
5.2. Theoretical Implications
5.3. Practical Implications
5.4. Limitations and Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Husain, R.; Paul, J.; Koles, B. The role of brand experience, brand resonance and brand trust in luxury consumption. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 66, 102895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, C.; Su, R.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y. Relation between narcissism and meaning in life: The role of conspicuous consumption. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bazi, S.; Filieri, R.; Gorton, M. Customers’ motivation to engage with luxury brands on social media. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 112, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bharti, M.; Suneja, V.; Bharti, M. Mindfulness as an antidote to conspicuous consumption: The mediating roles of self-esteem, self-concept clarity and normative influence. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2022, 184, 111215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shan, J.; Jiang, L.; Cui, A.P. A double-edged sword: How the dual characteristics of face motivate and prevent counterfeit luxury consumption. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 134, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siepmann, C.; Holthoff, L.C.; Kowalczuk, P. Conspicuous consumption of luxury experiences: An experimental investigation of status perceptions on social media. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2022, 31, 454–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, T.; Pitafi, A.H.; Akhtar, N.; Xiaobei, L. Determinants of purchase luxury counterfeit products in social commerce: The mediating role of compulsive internet use. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 62, 102596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pellegrino, A.; Abe, M.; Shannon, R. The Dark Side of Social Media: Content Effects on the Relationship Between Materialism and Consumption Behaviors. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 870614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burnasheva, R.; Suh, Y.G. The influence of social media usage, self-image congruity and self-esteem on conspicuous online consumption among millennials. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2021, 33, 1255–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahri-Ammari, N.; Coulibaly, D.; Ben Mimoun, M.S. The bandwagon luxury consumption in Tunisian case: The roles of independent and interdependent self concept. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 52, 101903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, E.; Buil, I.; Chernatony, L. ‘Consuming Good’ on Social Media: What Can Conspicuous Virtue Signalling on Facebook Tell Us About Prosocial and Unethical Intentions? J. Bus. Ethics 2020, 162, 577–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Taylor, D.G.; Strutton, D. Does Facebook usage lead to conspicuous consumption?: The role of envy, narcissism and self-promotion. J. Res. Interact. Mark. 2016, 10, 231–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thoumrungroje, A. The Influence of Social Media Intensity and EWOM on Conspicuous Consumption. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 148, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Niu, G.-F.; Zhou, Z.-K.; Sun, X.-J.; Yu, F.; Xie, X.-C.; Liu, Q.-Q.; Lian, S.-L. Cyber-ostracism and its relation to depression among Chinese adolescents: The moderating role of optimism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2018, 123, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.; Mu, W.; Wang, Y.; Xie, P.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, T. Different Roles of Rumination and Mindfulness among Cyber-Ostracized Adolescents’ Psychological Well-Being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 1222. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Covert, J.M.; Stefanone, M.A. Does Rejection Still Hurt? Examining the Effects of Network Attention and Exposure to Online Social Exclusion. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 2018, 38, 170–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, R.A.; Wesselmann, E.D.; Carr, C.T. When Nobody “Likes” You: Perceived Ostracism Through Paralinguistic Digital Affordances Within Social Media. Soc. Media Soc. 2018, 4, 2056305118800309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lutz, S.; Schneider, F.M. Is receiving Dislikes in social media still better than being ignored? The effects of ostracism and rejection on need threat and coping responses online. Media Psychol. 2021, 24, 741–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Büttner, C.M.; Rudert, S.C. Why didn’t you tag me?!: Social exclusion from Instagram posts hurts, especially those with a high need to belong. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2022, 127, 107062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, D.; Wesselmann, E.; Williams, K.D. Evidence for Another Response to Ostracism:Solitude Seeking. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2016, 7, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Mu, W.; Li, X.; Gu, X.; Duan, W. Cyber-ostracism and wellbeing: A moderated mediation model of need satisfaction and psychological stress. Curr. Psychol. 2022, 41, 4931–4941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, V.; Kaushal, V. Perceived brand authenticity and social exclusion as drivers of psychological brand ownership. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, F.; Wei, H.; Zhu, Z.; Chen, H. Warmth or competence: Brand anthropomorphism, social exclusion, and advertisement effectiveness. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 67, 103025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mandel, N.; Rucker, D.D.; Levav, J.; Galinsky, A.D. The Compensatory Consumer Behavior Model: How self-discrepancies drive consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2017, 27, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Zoonen, W.; Treem, J.W.; ter Hoeven, C.L. A tool and a tyrant: Social media and well-being in organizational contexts. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2022, 45, 101300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Z.K.; Lian, S.L.; Tian, Y.; Niu, G.F.; Sun, X.J. The Relationship between Social Network Sites Use and Life Satisfaction: A Moderated Mediation Model. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 2017, 33, 297–305. [Google Scholar]
- Mathur, P.; Yucel-Aybat, O.; Block, L.; Eisenstein, E.M. The effect of consumers’ implicit theory of personality and product feedback in self-directed consumer contexts. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2022, 190, 111526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheeler, S.C.; Omair, A. Potential growth areas for implicit theories research. J. Consum. Psychol. 2016, 26, 137–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, D.R.; Park, J.K. Mindsets matter: Implications for branding research and practice. J. Consum. Psychol. 2016, 26, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khenfer, J.; Cuny, C. Brand preference in the face of control loss and service failure: The role of the sound of brands. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2020, 55, 102132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Landau, M.J.; Kay, A.C.; Whitson, J.A. Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 141, 694–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zheng, X.; Ernest, B.; Peng, S. Feeling inferior, showing off: The effect of nonmaterial social comparisons on conspicuous consumption. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 90, 196–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belk, R.W. Possessions and the Extended Self. J. Consum. Res. 1988, 15, 139–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Oh, G. Social class, social self-esteem, and conspicuous consumption. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neave, L.; Tzemou, E.; Fastoso, F. Seeking attention versus seeking approval: How conspicuous consumption differs between grandiose and vulnerable narcissists. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 418–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nabi, N.; O’Cass, A.; Siahtiri, V. Status consumption in newly emerging countries: The influence of personality traits and the mediating role of motivation to consume conspicuously. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 46, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sinha, J.; Wang, J. How Time Horizon Perceptions and Relationship Deficits Affect Impulsive Consumption. J. Mark. Res. 2013, 50, 590–605. [Google Scholar]
- Brailovskaia, J.; Margraf, J. The relationship between burden caused by coronavirus (COVID-19), addictive social media use, sense of control and anxiety. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2021, 119, 106720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, D.; Duhachek, A.; Rucker, D.D. Distinct threats, common remedies: How consumers cope with psychological threat. J. Consum. Psychol. 2015, 25, 531–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, T.; Song, W.; Jin, X.; Cui, H.; Li, Y. Hedonism or self-growth? The influence of perceived control on individual product preferences for individuals under self-threat. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 2020, 32, 1343–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, L. Website interactivity may compensate for consumers’ reduced control in E-Commerce. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2019, 49, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steinfield, C.; Ellison, N.B.; Lampe, C. Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. J. Appl. Dev. Psychol. 2008, 29, 434–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Demircioglu, M.A. Examining the Effects of Social Media Use on Job Satisfaction in the Australian Public Service: Testing Self-Determination Theory. Public Perform. Manag. Rev. 2018, 41, 300–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sias, P.M.; Duncan, K.L. Not Just for Customers Anymore: Organization Facebook, Employee Social Capital, and Organizational Identification. Int. J. Bus. Commun. 2020, 57, 431–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ding, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, Z. The Effect of Social Network Site Usage on Envy:The Mediating Role of Upward Social Comparison and the Moderating Role of Self-Esteem. J. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 3, 618–624. [Google Scholar]
- Zafar, A.U.; Shen, J.; Ashfaq, M.; Shahzad, M. Social media and sustainable purchasing attitude: Role of trust in social media and environmental effectiveness. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 63, 102751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dang, J.; Liu, L. A growth mindset about human minds promotes positive responses to intelligent technology. Cognition 2022, 220, 104985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murphy, M.C.; Dweck, C.S. Mindsets shape consumer behavior. J. Consum. Psychol. 2016, 26, 127–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Shrum, L.J. Conspicuous Consumption versus Charitable Behavior in Response to Social Exclusion: A Differential Needs Explanation. J. Consum. Res. 2021, 39, 530–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wen, W.E.; Jing, X.; Ying, D. To Be or Not to Be Unique? The Effect of Social Exclusion on Consumer Choice. J. Consum. Res. 2014, 40, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schneider, F.M.; Zwillich, B.; Bindl, M.J.; Hopp, F.R.; Reich, S.; Vorderer, P. Social media ostracism: The effects of being excluded online. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 73, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.; Zheng, Y. The Impact of Loneliness on Consumer Preference of Uncertain Consumption: New Products, Product Packaging and Probabilistic Promotions. Acta Psychol. Sin. 2015, 47, 1067–1076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pantano, E.; Viassone, M.; Boardman, R.; Dennis, C. Inclusive or exclusive? Investigating how retail technology can reduce old consumers’ barriers to shopping. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 68, 103074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Friesen, J.P.; Kay, A.C.; Eibach, R.P.; Galinsky, A.D. Seeking Structure in Social Organization: Compensatory Control and the Psychological Advantages of Hierarchy. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2014, 106, 590–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, Y.J.; Ding, A.S.; Xu, C.H. The impact of paid social Q&A on panic buying and digital hoarding at the stage of coexistence with COVID-19: The moderating role of sensitivity to pain of payment. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2023, 84, 103472. [Google Scholar]
- Desmichel, P.; Ordabayeva, N.; Kocher, B. What if diamonds did not last forever? Signaling status achievement through ephemeral versus iconic luxury goods. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2020, 158, 49–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.H.; Lachman, M.E.; Charles, S.T.; Chen, Y.; Wilson, C.L.; Nakamura, J.S.; VanderWeele, T.J.; Kim, E.S. The positive influence of sense of control on physical, behavioral, and psychosocial health in older adults: An outcome-wide approach. Prev. Med. 2021, 149, 106612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yoon, S.; Kim, H.C. Feeling Economically Stuck: The Effect of Perceived Economic Mobility and Socioeconomic Status on Variety Seeking. J. Consum. Res. 2017, 44, 1141–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, L.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Dewall, C.N. Social Exclusion and Consumer Switching Behavior: A Control Restoration Mechanism. J. Consum. Res. 2017, 44, 99–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, J.A.; Liu, D. Social media use, social displacement, and well-being. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2022, 46, 101339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tobin, S.J.; Vanman, E.J.; Verreynne, M.; Saeri, A.K. Threats to belonging on Facebook: Lurking and ostracism. Soc. Influ. 2015, 10, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marcoux, J.S.; Filiatrault, P.; Chéron, E. The Attitudes Underlying Preferences of Young Urban Educated Polish Consumers Towards Products Made in Western Countries. J. Int. Consum. Mark. 1997, 9, 5–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- O’Cass, A.; McEwen, H. Exploring consumer status and conspicuous consumption. J. Consum. Behav. 2010, 4, 25–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niemeyer, H.; Bieda, A.; Michalak, J.; Schneider, S.; Margraf, J. Education and mental health: Do psychosocial resources matter? SSM Popul. Health 2019, 7, 100392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellison, N.B.; Steinfield, C.; Lampe, C. The Benefits of Facebook “Friends:” Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites. J. Comput. -Mediat. Commun. 2007, 12, 1143–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Levy, S.R.; Stroessner, S.J.; Dweck, C.S. Stereotype formation and endorsement: The role of implicit theories. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 74, 1421–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plaks, J.E.; Stroessner, S.J.; Dweck, C.S.; Sherman, J.W. Person Theories and Attention Allocation:Preferences for Stemtypic versus Counterstereotypic Information. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 80, 876–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hayes, A.F. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach; The Guilford Press: New York, NY, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The Moderator–mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Preacher, K.J.; Hayes, A.F. SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models. Behav. Res. Methods Instrum. Comput. 2004, 36, 717–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hayes, A.F. PROCESS: A Versatile Computational Tool for Observed Variable Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Modeling. Available online: http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf.2012 (accessed on 1 May 2022).
- Park, I.; Lee, J.; Lee, D.; Lee, C.; Chung, W.Y. Changes in consumption patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic: Analyzing the revenge spending motivations of different emotional groups. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2022, 65, 102874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masood, A.; Luqman, A.; Feng, Y.; Ali, A. Adverse consequences of excessive social networking site use on academic performance: Explaining underlying mechanism from stress perspective. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2020, 113, 106476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaei, S. Beyond explicit measures in marketing research: Methods, theoretical models, and applications. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2021, 61, 102545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Author | Antecedent Variable | Research Paths |
---|---|---|
Pellegrino et al. [8] | materialism | materialism → social media intensity → conspicuous consumption |
Islam et al. [7] | materialism | materialism → compulsive internet use → conspicuous consumption |
Siepmann et al. [6] | self-esteem | self-esteem → status perceptions → conspicuous consumption |
Burnasheva and Suh [9] | social media usage | social media usage → self-image congruity → conspicuous consumption |
Bazi et al. [3] | status signaling | status signaling → conspicuous consumption |
Bahri-Ammari et al. [10] | social comparison | social comparison → conspicuous consumption |
Wallace et al. [11] | need for uniqueness | need for uniqueness → conspicuous virtue signalling → conspicuous consumption |
Taylor and Strutton [12] | envy | envy → self-promotion → conspicuous consumption |
Thoumrungroje et al. [13] | social media intensity | social media intensity → reliance on EWOM → conspicuous consumption |
Current research | cyber-ostracism | cyber- ostracism → sense of control → conspicuous consumption |
Variable | Category | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 196 | 48.16 |
Female | 211 | 51.84 | |
Age | Less than 18 years old | 21 | 5.16 |
18~30 years old | 219 | 53.81 | |
31~40 years old | 135 | 33.17 | |
40 years or up | 32 | 7.86 | |
Education level | Technical secondary school graduation | 66 | 16.22 |
Vocation high school graduation | 110 | 27.03 | |
Undergraduate | 201 | 49.39 | |
Master or above | 30 | 7.37 | |
Monthly living expenses (RMB) | Less than 1000 | 39 | 9.58 |
1000~3000 | 214 | 52.58 | |
3000~5000 | 115 | 28.26 | |
Above 5000 | 39 | 9.58 |
Construct | Measure | |
---|---|---|
Cyber- Ostracism | I asked the other party to chat with me online and got no reply | Niu, et al. [14] |
When I ask for help online, the other party is full of impatience and perfunctory attitude | ||
During the online communication with the other party, the other party is really online, but it takes a long time to contact me | ||
I was in a bad mood and sought comfort from the other party online, but the other party replied me with some perfunctory words | ||
I chatted with the other party online and had difficulty getting a warm response | ||
I encountered problems and difficulties in consulting with each other online, and got no feedback | ||
I send notice in network group chat room (QQ group, WeChat group, etc.), they do not reply | ||
When I was upset, I seek help in the Internet chat room and they do not reply | ||
When I encounter problems or difficulties, I seek comfort in the Internet group chat room, and they ignore me | ||
In network group chat room where people participate in discussions, I cannot get a response to what I say as much as what they say | ||
When I encounter problems and difficulties, I ask for help on my personal space on the Internet and I don’t get any help | ||
I receive negative comments when I post sayings, logs, photos, etc. on my online personal space | ||
Commenting on each other’s dynamics on the network personal space, and not getting feedback from each other | ||
When I am in a bad mood, I seek comfort on my online personal space and get no comfort | ||
Conspicuous consumption | Before buying a product, it is essential to understand how your friends view different brands and categories | Marcoux, et al. [62], O’Cass and McEwen [63] |
Before buying a product, it is important to be clear about how others will perceive people who use the brand or category | ||
Before purchasing a product, it is important to know what brand or category can make a good impression on others | ||
I used to buy expensive brands just because I knew others would notice it | ||
I love the prestige that comes with buying a brand | ||
Sense of control | I often feel helpless in the process of using social media | Niemeyer, et al. [64] |
In the process of using social media, there are many things that happen that are often out of my control | ||
There are many things that get in the way of what I want to do in using social media | ||
Social media use intensity | Social media is a part of my daily activities | Ellison, et al. [65] |
When I use social media, I am proud to tell others | ||
I feel disconnected from the outside world because I haven’ t logged on to social media for a while | ||
I feel like I’ m integrated into the social media community | ||
I would feel bad if social media was blocked | ||
Implicit personality | People are born with their types and are hard to change | Levy, et al. [66] |
Although people may do things differently, their nature does not change | ||
Everyone is a person of a particular personality type, and it is difficult to change personality | ||
As much as I hate to admit that habits are hard to change, it’s true that people can’t really change their deepest traits | ||
People can change even their most fundamental traits | ||
People can transform themselves into a different personality type altogether | ||
Everyone can significantly change their basic personality traits | ||
No matter which personality type an individual is, they can often undergo large changes |
Variables | Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Gender | 0.563 | 0.504 | - | ||||||||
2 | Age | 32.248 | 9.536 | −0.032 | - | |||||||
3 | Education level | 16.825 | 1.767 | −0.086 | 0.034 | - | ||||||
4 | Monthly living expenses | 3.864 | 1.482 | −0.025 | 0.217 * | 0.036 | - | |||||
5 | Cyber-ostracism | 3.333 | 1.131 | 0.042 | 0.028 | −0.012 | −0.324 ** | - | ||||
6 | Conspicuous consumption | 3.779 | 0.818 | 0.024 | −0.012 | 0.016 | 0.216 * | 0.462 ** | - | |||
7 | Sense of control | 2.581 | 1.060 | 0.012 | 0.031 | 0.029 | −0.115 | −0.632 ** | −0.481 ** | - | ||
8 | Social media use intensity | 3.692 | 0.996 | 0.036 | 0.148 | 0.174 | 0.129 * | 0.064 | 0.241 ** | −0.018 | - | |
9 | Implicit personality | 0.287 | 1.486 | 0.026 | 0.035 | −0.043 | 0.113 | 0.125 * | −0.043 | −0.075 | 0.042 | - |
Model | χ2 (df) | CFI | TLI | RMSEA | SRMR | Δχ2 (df) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Theoretical five-factor model(CO, CC, SC, SM, IP) | 393.446 (254) | 0.975 | 0.972 | 0.037 | 0.042 | |
Four-factor model(CO and CC, SC, SM, IP) | 782.382 (258) | 0.886 | 0.872 | 0.052 | 0.073 | 373.226(4) *** |
Three-factor model(CO and CC, SC and SM, IP) | 1472.604 (262) | 0.792 | 0.769 | 0.094 | 0.124 | 1129.886(5) *** |
Two-factor model(CO and CC and SC and SM, IP) | 1825.863 (264) | 0.683 | 0.677 | 0.112 | 0.145 | 1358.323(7) *** |
One-factor model(CO and CC and SC and SM and IP) | 2120.334 (272) | 0.595 | 0.584 | 0.185 | 0.168 | 1522.306(8) *** |
Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Conspicuous Consumption | Sense of Control | Conspicuous Consumption | |||||||
β | SE | t | β | SE | t | β | SE | t | |
Gender | 0.005 | 0.089 | 0.057 | 0.011 | 0.076 | 0.140 | 0.008 | 0.086 | 0.097 |
Age | 0.051 | 0.064 | 0.795 | 0.079 | 0.055 | 1.436 | 0.075 | 0.062 | 1.208 |
Education level | −0.037 | 0.054 | −0.694 | 0.019 | 0.046 | 0.402 | −0.032 | 0.052 | −0.610 |
Monthly living expenses | 0.155 * | 0.063 | 2.455 | −0.233 *** | 0.054 | −4.282 | 0.084 | 0.062 | 1.351 |
Cyber-ostracism | 0.406 *** | 0.050 | 8.198 | −0.569 *** | 0.043 | −13.387 | 0.232 *** | 0.058 | 4.040 |
Sense of control | −0.304 *** | 0.056 | −5.423 | ||||||
R2 | 0.226 | 0.428 | 0.279 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.084 *** | 0.062 *** | 0.167 *** | ||||||
F | 23.445 *** | 59.993 *** | 25.822 *** |
Variables | Sense of Control | Conspicuous Consumption | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 | |||||||
β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | β | t | |
Gender | −0.039 | −0.847 | 0.005 | 0.140 | 0.005 | 0.139 | 0.006 | 0.160 | 0.022 | 0.013 | 0.005 | 0.104 |
Age | −0.041 | −0.886 | 0.056 | 1.435 | 0.055 | 1.382 | 0.054 | 1.373 | 0.034 | 0.047 | 0.103 | 0.015 |
Education level | 0.015 | 0.313 | 0.016 | 0.402 | 0.016 | 0.398 | −0.002 | −0.062 | 0.023 | 0.322 | 0.214 | 0.026 |
Monthly living expenses | −0.409 *** | −8.677 | −0.183 *** | −4.282 | −0.183 *** | −4.282 | −0.177 *** | −4.171 | 0.128 *** | 0.132 | 0.226 *** | 0.106 |
Cyber-ostracism | −0.233 ** | −6.386 | −0.337 *** | −5.342 | 0.247 *** | 3.221 | ||||||
Social media use intensity | 0.020 | 0.537 | ||||||||||
Sense of control | −0.119 *** | 0.116 | ||||||||||
Implicit personality | 0.113 | 0.025 | ||||||||||
Cyber-ostracism*Social media use intensity | −0.135 *** | −0.216 | ||||||||||
Sense of control*Implicit personality | −0.154 *** | −3.588 | ||||||||||
Cyber-ostracism*Implicit personality | 0.128 | 0.173 | ||||||||||
R2 | 0.172 | 0.375 | 0.428 | 0.442 | 0.239 | 0.144 | ||||||
ΔR2 | 0.084 *** | 0.062 *** | 0.167 *** | 0.058 *** | 0.031 *** | 0.072 *** | ||||||
F | 20.919 *** | 59.993 *** | 49.953 *** | 45.121 *** | 33.556 *** | 20.919 *** |
Task | Boot Indirect | Boot SE | 95% of Confidence Intervals | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complexity | Effect (β) | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |
Low level (−1 SD) | −0.6782 | 0.0551 | −0.3033 | −0.1384 |
Mean | −0.5643 | 0.0423 | −0.4272 | −0.2092 |
High level (+1 SD) | −0.4503 | 0.0572 | −0.1068 | −0.0243 |
Task | Boot Indirect | Boot SE | 95% of Confidence Intervals | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Complexity | Effect(β) | Boot LLCI | Boot ULCI | |
Entity theorist (−1 SD) | −0.3427 | 0.0674 | −0.2217 | −0.0391 |
Mean | −0.3183 | 0.0582 | −0.4552 | −0.2585 |
Incremental theorist (+1 SD) | −0.1712 | 0.0741 | −0.1856 | −0.0218 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Xu, C.; Yang, G.; Wang, Y.; Ding, A.S. Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model. Behav. Sci. 2023, 13, 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010006
Xu C, Yang G, Wang Y, Ding AS. Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model. Behavioral Sciences. 2023; 13(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010006
Chicago/Turabian StyleXu, Chonghuan, Guoqiang Yang, Yajuan Wang, and Austin Shijun Ding. 2023. "Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model" Behavioral Sciences 13, no. 1: 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010006
APA StyleXu, C., Yang, G., Wang, Y., & Ding, A. S. (2023). Is Conspicuous Consumption Influenced by Cyber-Ostracism? A Moderated Mediation Model. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010006