Next Article in Journal
A Challenge for Palliative Psychology: Freedom of Choice at the End of Life among the Attitudes of Physicians and Nurses
Previous Article in Journal
Predicting Academic Achievement with Cognitive Abilities: Cross-Sectional Study across School Education
Open AccessArticle

Network Structure of Affective Communication and Shared Emotion in Teams

1
Department of Business Administration, Hongik University, Seoul 04066, Korea
2
Department of Economics, Finance, & Marketing, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, TN 38505, USA
3
Department of Business Administration, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Behav. Sci. 2020, 10(10), 159; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10100159
Received: 14 September 2020 / Revised: 13 October 2020 / Accepted: 15 October 2020 / Published: 17 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Organizational Behaviors)
This paper identifies the relative effectiveness of two mechanisms of emotional contagion on shared emotion in teams: explicit mechanism (active spreading of one’s emotion) and implicit mechanism (passive mimicry of others’ emotion). Using social network analysis, this paper analyzes affective communication networks involving or excluding a focal person in the process of emotional contagion by disaggregating team emotional contagion into individual acts of sending or receiving emotion-laden responses. Through an experiment with 38 pre-existing work teams, including undergraduate or MBA project teams and teams of student club or co-op officers, we found that the explicit emotional contagion mechanism was a more stable channel for emotional contagion than the implicit emotional contagion mechanism. Active participation in affective communication, measured by outdegree centrality in affective communication networks, was positively and significantly associated with emotional contagion with other members. In contrast, a team member’s passive observation of humor, measured by ego network density, led to emotional divergence when all other members engaged in humor communication. Our study sheds light on the micro-level process of emotional contagion. The individual-level process of emotional convergence varies with the relational pattern of affective networks, and emotion contagion in teams depends on the interplay of the active expresser and the passive spectator in affective networks. View Full-Text
Keywords: shared emotion; emotional contagion; affect; communication shared emotion; emotional contagion; affect; communication
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Rhee, S.-Y.; Park, H.; Bae, J. Network Structure of Affective Communication and Shared Emotion in Teams. Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 159.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop