Next Article in Journal
Optimizing Recovery in Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols and Clinical Outcomes
Previous Article in Journal
Artificial Intelligence and Extended Reality in the Training of Vascular Surgeons: A Narrative Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter?

by
Adam Siebieszuk
1,*,
Adam Filip Płoński
2 and
Marcin Baranowski
1
1
Department of Physiology, Medical University of Białystok, Mickiewicza 2c, 15-222 Białystok, Poland
2
Department of Gastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Białystok, M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 24a, 15-276 Białystok, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 127; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030127
Submission received: 19 June 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 10 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025

Abstract

Modern society faces a growing prevalence of mental disorders, with stress emerging as a critical factor affecting mental well-being. In recent years, breathwork has gained public and scientific recognition as a promising approach for enhancing psychological health. Despite the rapid growth in research, the field remains fragmented due to the diversity of breathing techniques. Moreover, recent findings have challenged several foundational concepts traditionally believed to underlie the therapeutic effects of breathwork. This review offers a comprehensive overview and comparison of the most widely practiced breathing techniques, with a focus on addressing key theoretical issues. We examine the primary psychophysiological pathways and mechanisms of breathwork, highlighting its influence on the nervous system as central to its effectiveness. We critically evaluate the role of breathing variables, including pace, ratio, breathing route, attention, and the use of biofeedback, in promoting the long-term neurobiological changes that have been associated with improved mental health. We argue that most breathwork techniques share core neurophysiological mechanisms that benefit well-being, regardless of the theoretical differences between specific techniques. Accumulating evidence suggests breathwork may serve as both a preventive and adjunctive therapy for chronic stress, anxiety, and depression, given its potential to target key risk factors and produce clinically relevant outcomes. Contemporary breathwork research, however, is limited by inconsistent study quality and methodological heterogeneity. By synthesizing current evidence and identifying critical knowledge gaps, this review aims to guide future research and advance understanding of breathwork’s therapeutic potential.

1. Introduction

Ventilation is generally an automatic process controlled by the respiratory center in the brainstem, primarily responsible for gas exchange [1]. Beyond its physiological function, breathing is closely linked to emotions and psychological states [2,3,4]. Respiratory rate increases under heightened cognitive load [5], as well as during mental stress [6,7]. Furthermore, the way a person breathes has been shown to provide valuable insights into one’s fitness level and general health [8,9]. Changes in breathing patterns may indicate pain and serve as early signs of deteriorating health in various medical conditions [7,10,11].
What makes breathing unique among other vital functions is humans’ ability to voluntarily control it for various health, performance, and psychological benefits [12,13]. This distinctive characteristic of breathing has fascinated humanity since ancient times [14,15,16]. Among early civilizations, Chinese culture emphasized the importance of proper breathing, while in India, pranayama, the practice of conscious breath control, was being developed [13,17,18].
Today, the diverse range of breathing techniques, encompassing the intentional regulation of respiration biomechanics and parameters, is collectively known as “breathwork” [16,19]. Recently, breathwork has gained widespread public recognition and growing interest in academic research, reflecting a rising trend of people actively seeking innovative ways to alleviate stress and enhance their mental health [20,21,22].
Previous research has indicated breathwork’s promising role in promoting overall mental well-being [13,19,23,24]. However, despite numerous studies, many aspects and mechanisms associated with its positive effects remain unexplored. One of the most important questions is which specific parameters and their associated mechanisms yield the most pronounced effects on physiological outcomes. Given the vast diversity of breathwork techniques—which vary in breathing pace, pattern, pathway, attentional focus, and modality usage—identifying the key factors driving their effectiveness is crucial for proper standardization and broader clinical application.
This review explores the potential of voluntary breath regulation as a preventive and therapeutic strategy for addressing mental health problems. We highlight the detrimental influence of allostatic load, discussing how breathwork may regulate psychophysiological responses to stress and improve psychological well-being. The article provides an in-depth analysis of the pathways and physiological processes through which breathwork impacts human health, focusing on its effects on the nervous and cardiovascular systems. By examining the shared foundations underlying the positive outcomes of different techniques, we aim to uncover whether specific breathwork techniques or the broader act of regulating breathing holds greater significance in achieving these benefits. Finally, we discuss the role of breathwork in clinical practice.

2. Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The literature search was conducted using the Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed databases, covering all articles published up to and including January 2025. The search was restricted to full-text articles published in English that were relevant to the scope of this review, with priority given based on their level of evidence, with particular emphasis placed on studies published within the last decade. Additional references were identified by reviewing the reference sections of relevant publications by leading experts in the field. The search included the following terms, along with their variants and combinations: “breathwork,” “breathing,” “pranayama,” “slow,” “deep,” “resonant,” “coherent,” “fast,” “stress,” “mental health,” “HRVB,” “mindfulness,” “anxiety,” “depression,” and “mental disorders”.

3. The Influence of Chronic Stress on Mental Health

One in eight people worldwide suffers from some mental disorder (MD), which ranks among the leading causes of disease and disability globally [25]. Modern lifestyle plays a central role in the development of MD [26,27]. Key factors affecting mental health include uncertainty and the anticipation of future stress, intensified by constant access to distressing global news [28,29]. The COVID-19 pandemic has markedly increased stress levels, further straining the mental health of the entire population and underscoring the urgent need for robust and accessible psychological interventions [30].
Contemporary social environments expose individuals to a much broader range of stressors compared to ancestral times, overwhelming human cognitive and coping capacities, leading to heightened psychological strain (Figure 1). Unlike past threats, which were rather tied to immediate physical danger, modern stressors primarily arise from professional, financial, social, and lifestyle pressures [31,32,33,34]. Consequently, many psychological disorders might be seen as diseases resulting from evolutionary mismatch [26,35,36]. Anxiety, depression, and various other mental conditions may once have served as adaptive responses to specific challenges or threats, but in today’s stress-laden world, they often become intensified and maladaptive [37,38,39,40].
Basically, stress is a normal psychophysiological response to conditions that disrupt the body’s balance and homeostasis [41,42]. Acute stress activates the “fight-or-flight” response, a fundamental survival mechanism. Through increased activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, acute stress response triggers a cascade of physiological reactions that optimize physical and mental performance [43,44,45,46]. However, when stress-related changes persist over time, chronic stress emerges as a pathological state where negative emotional and physiological reactions continue even after the initial stressor is no longer present [43,47]. Prolonged stress disrupts the body’s balance, leading to the dysregulation of vital physiological processes, including sleep and metabolism, as well as cardiovascular, immune, and endocrine functions [43,48,49,50]. The impact on the brain and cognitive function is also profound and multifaceted (Figure 1). Chronic stress has been linked to structural brain damage—affecting memory, emotional regulation, and decision-making [51,52,53]. Consequently, chronic stress is a crucial factor in the development and progression of both physical and mental lifestyle diseases [51,52,54,55].
The cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events that exceeds an individual’s coping capacity, leading to unhealthy behaviors and increased susceptibility to disease, is known as allostatic overload (Figure 1). Manifesting in irritability, feeling overwhelmed, and difficulty relaxing, allostatic overload results from prolonged activation of the stress response, which suppresses the activity of the parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) and disrupts homeostasis [56,57,58]. Chronic stress may also induce dysfunctional breathing (DB), a condition characterized by persistent and detrimental alterations in natural biomechanical breathing patterns, most commonly associated with hyperventilation, thoracic breathing, and diaphragm inhibition. The resulting symptoms of respiratory effort and dyspnea co-occur in numerous pulmonary and cardiac conditions and have been associated with reduced quality of life [59,60].
Chronic stress affects a vast number of people across all age groups, populations, and professions, imposing a substantial economic burden [61,62,63,64]. Moreover, stress is increasingly recognized as an issue impacting both patients and healthcare professionals, making it an emerging public health concern [65,66,67]. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify stress management methods that are safe, affordable, easy to use independently, and, most important, scientifically proven to be effective. Such interventions could offer valuable alternatives to pharmacotherapy and other methods that carry the risk of side effects [23,68].

4. Breathwork Mechanism of Action in Theory and Research

4.1. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia

A key biomarker of chronic stress and allostatic load is heart rate variability (HRV) [69,70]. HRV is a measure of the variation in the time interval between consecutive heartbeats, representing a natural physiological phenomenon influenced by the overlapping activity of both branches of the ANS [71,72]. HRV is an indicator of health and resilience, as it reflects the body’s complex physiological responses to a wide range of stimuli [73,74]. Chronically reduced HRV indicates a diminished ability to adapt to internal and environmental factors, serving as a marker of ANS dysfunction. Low HRV values are predictors of many lifestyle diseases, poor mental health, and all-cause mortality [69,73,75,76].
One fundamental mechanism contributing to HRV is Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia (RSA). RSA refers to the natural fluctuations in heart rate (HR) during the breathing cycle, reflecting how respiration influences vagal outflow through both central and peripheral regulatory mechanisms [77,78,79]. HR increases during inhalation as a result of parasympathetic inhibition. Conversely, exhalation restores vagal activity, causing HR to decrease [78,79].
RSA is influenced by central respiratory rhythms in the brainstem and feedback mechanisms, including pulmonary stretch and baroreflex inputs, which work collectively to adapt RSA to changing respiratory and cardiovascular conditions [77,80,81]. Slow-paced breathwork techniques have been shown to amplify these processes, greatly improving RSA and enhancing parasympathetic function (Figure 2).
One of the recently proposed models suggests that the activation of slowly adapting pulmonary receptors (SARs) during deep inhalations contributes to vagal tone inhibition and increases sympathetic activation. Conversely, the cessation of SARs activity combined with baroreceptor stimulation during slow exhalation has been associated with a rebound in parasympathetic activity, which may promote positive HRV changes and a relaxation response [13,82]. According to the proposed model, the rhythmic engagement of SARs and baroreceptors during slow, deep breathing has been hypothesized to support the synchronization of respiratory and cardiovascular rhythms, optimizing ventilation-perfusion matching and reducing stress-related impact [82,83]. SARs and baroreceptors may also be integral to the beneficial psychological effects of breathwork, as their afferent signals to the nucleus of the solitary tract (NTS) have been proposed to modulate the central autonomic network, which is interconnected with higher cortical areas (Figure 2) [13,82,84].

4.2. Heart Rate Variability

A substantial portion of the positive effects of breathwork on stress and health has been attributed to improvements in HRV parameters [12,13,85,86]. HRV can be assessed through time and frequency domain analysis [71]. In the case of time-domain parameters, the Root Mean Square of the Successive Differences (RMSSDs) is considered a valid marker of parasympathetic activity that is not affected by respiratory influences [12,87,88]. However, some evidence shows that RMSSD may not reliably capture key features of HRV during slow deep breathing, indicating that measuring RSA might offer a more nuanced insight into parasympathetic reactivity [79,89]. The standard deviation of normal-to-normal interbeat intervals (SDNN) is also a commonly used parameter in breathwork studies during short-term HRV recordings [87].
Regarding the interpretation of frequency domain analysis, it remains somewhat unclear and often yields contradictory results [13,90]. The relationship between various HRV frequency bands, the activity of different branches of the ANS, and the influence of other physiological factors is still not fully understood [71]. Particularly controversial is the interpretation of the low-frequency (LF) to high-frequency (HF) HRV ratio as an indicator of sympathovagal balance, which is currently discouraged in studies involving slow-paced breathwork measurements [71,89,91,92]. With a breathing frequency below 9 bpm (breaths per minute), LF alone appears to be a reliable marker of vagal activity [12], further confirmed by a study comparing pharmacological sympathetic and parasympathetic blockades [86]. HF represents parasympathetic activity at spontaneous breathing rates, which may explain the ambiguity behind the LF/HF ratio [89].
Evidence shows that vagally mediated HRV parameters, including RMSSD, SDNN, and LF, improve during slow deep breathing, suggesting that vagus nerve involvement may be the unifying pathway behind the physiological benefits of various breathwork techniques [12,93,94,95,96,97]. Approximately 80% of vagal fibers are afferent, and when stimulated by breathing, they have been thought to alter the activity of numerous brain areas via connections with the NTS. The NTS, which receives signals almost exclusively from the vagus nerve, relays them to various functionally connected brain regions central to cognitive functioning, mood regulation, emotional processing, and autonomic control [98,99,100,101] (Figure 2). These regions include the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, insular cortex, hippocampus, orbitofrontal cortex, the largest serotonergic nucleus (dorsal raphe nucleus), and the primary noradrenergic nucleus (locus coeruleus) [82,99,100,101,102,103,104].
For techniques based on high-frequency breathing (fast breathing), such as Kapalbhati pranayama [105], an inverse reaction of HRV parameters and vagal withdrawal has been observed. Characterized by a reduction in SDNN, RMSSD, and HF power, along with an increase in LF power, fast breathing seems to primarily involve sympathetic activation [105,106] but may ultimately lead to a subsequent parasympathetic rebound after the intervention [106].

4.3. Cardiorespiratory Coupling

Coherent breathing, performed at a characteristic rate of ~6 bpm, is currently considered the most effective breathing technique for enhancing HRV. At this frequency (0.1 Hz), temporal coherence has been observed among three main oscillators: variations in HR, respiration, and blood pressure (BP) [103]. It is hypothesized that a key phenomenon here is baroreflex resonance, a negative feedback mechanism in which HR and BP fluctuate in antiphase within a closed-loop system, creating cardiac oscillations at a frequency of approximately 0.1 Hz [103,107,108]. These oscillations, however, diminish over time during spontaneous breathing due to a natural delay in BP response to HR change caused by vascular dynamics (a detailed description of this phenomenon can be found in [103]). When respiratory rate adopts ~6 bpm, the delay diminishes, and coupling between cardiac and breathing rhythms has been demonstrated to occur, sustaining baroreflex resonance and reinforcing cardiac oscillations [103,107]. Additionally, slow breathing provides sufficient time (~5 s of exhalation) for acetylcholine produced by vagal efferents to be fully released and hydrolyzed, potentially imposing a maximal vagal effect on the heart. As a combined result, RSA amplitude and HRV are maximally elevated (Figure 2) [103]. Interestingly, Hinterberger et al. have also demonstrated the highest synchronization of slow cortical potentials in the frontal and central brain regions at a breathing rate of 6 bpm compared to other rates. Thus, coherent breathing may synchronize not only respiration, HR, and BP, but also brain activity [109].
Closely related to coherent breathing is resonant breathing, although these terms are often used interchangeably. A respiratory rate of 0.1 Hz could be generally referred to as the resonant frequency [103]. Nevertheless, each individual has slightly different delays in the reaction of BP and HR changes, which enables the determination of a personal baroreflex resonance frequency. By using HRV biofeedback (HRVB), it is possible to identify the frequency at which PNS activity parameters are at their highest [107]. HRVB appears to be a more personalized intervention, as it focuses on finding the individual’s specific breathing frequency that creates an ideal synchrony between the cardiovascular and respiratory systems [97,103,110].

4.4. Breath-Brain Communication

Breathing is essential for brain function. By providing rhythmic sensory input, breathing synchronizes cortical activity across multiple brain regions, extending beyond those directly linked to respiration [111,112]. More than 30 years ago, early electroencephalographic (EEG) research observed that various pranayama techniques, as well as simply slowing the respiratory rhythm, change the dynamics of CNS activity [113,114]. Since then, multiple EEG studies have associated breathwork practices, such as HRVB, diaphragmatic breathing, and paced breathing, with calmness and reductions in arousal, as indicated by decreased beta power [115,116,117,118], alpha variability [113], and frontal alpha asymmetry [119]. Decreases in theta power [13] and substantial increases in alpha power [13,104,115,118,120] in brain regions associated with ANS modulation, stress regulation, and relaxation are also frequently reported [115,118,119]. Some findings also show increased frontal theta power during slow breathing [117,118,119]. Increased theta activity has been associated with focused attention and deeper meditative states, which enhance parasympathetic function, promote relaxed alertness, and help alleviate symptoms of anxiety [117,118,119]. It is noteworthy that the phrenic nerve, which innervates the diaphragm, has sensory fibers that project to key brain areas, including the limbic system. External phrenic nerve stimulation in critically ill patients enhances brain connectivity and cortical activity in the frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices, mirroring the effects of diaphragmatic breathing and suggesting an additional pathway through which breathwork may influence cognition [121].
Unfortunately, there is a lack of research on the impact of higher breathing frequencies on brain function. A recent study [122], which employed a high-density EEG during fast breathing (1 Hz), observed increased alpha power and a notable rise in gamma oscillations across the fronto-temporal-occipital brain regions. The authors suggest that these changes may be associated with enhanced cognitive abilities, improved attention and emotional regulation, and also promote higher cognitive states [122]. Herrero et al., in their intracranial EEG study, demonstrated that cortical and limbic neuronal activity in the gamma band is phase-locked to specific phases of the breathing cycle [112]. It was observed that when participants volitionally increased their breathing rate, respiration-locked oscillations also increased in frequency and spatial extent. In contrast, during spontaneous automatic breathing, both phase-locking and coherence were reduced.
Notably, the olfactory bulb emerges as an important structure involved in propagating respiration-locked oscillations [112]. This observation is particularly intriguing, as a frequently discussed factor in the context of breathwork’s impact on brain activity and the ANS is the preferred breathing route. Nasal breathing is traditionally considered superior to mouth breathing in many breathwork techniques and meditative practices [13,123,124]. Mechanical stimulation of the olfactory epithelium affects key brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, and amygdala [123,125,126]. The effects of nasal breathing are independent of mouth and thoracic respiration [13,126]. Nasal breathing facilitates an increase in theta, delta, and high-beta power and synchrony, suggesting heightened activation of the olfactory system as a potential explanation for the altered states of consciousness often experienced during meditation and breathwork [123,125,126]. Nasal breathing promotes synchronization of brain circuits in the piriform cortex, medial prefrontal cortex, posterior areas, and limbic-related brain regions, with this effect diminishing significantly when shifted to mouth breathing [123,126]. Rhythmic activation of olfactory pathways has been associated with memory-related hippocampal rhythms and synchronization of brain activity, fostering calm and emotional balance [112,127,128,129].
Another highly influential factor in the functioning of the CNS may be the sole act of observing or counting breathing [130]. Mindful breathing, where one attentively focuses on breathing sensations, is central to meditative practices and many breathwork techniques [131,132]. However, breath awareness and voluntary breath control activate different but overlapping neural circuits. Attention to breathing enhances respiration-locked oscillations, particularly in the anterior cingulate cortex, while volitional breathing engages broader cortical and limbic regions [112].
In summary, breathwork not only has been shown to modulate ANS activity through vagal stimulation but also has been associated with enhanced neural oscillation coherence, potentially improving communication between brain regions involved in emotional regulation, behavior, and cognition [123,126]. The dynamic interplay between the executive function network and both vagus nerve activity and the limbic system appears to be particularly important. The prefrontal cortex, which is integral to stress regulation and directly linked to HRV, plays a central role in mediating the effects of breathwork (Figure 2) [15].

5. The (Paradoxical) Diversity of Breathing Techniques

There are countless ways to alter one’s respiration, making breathwork encompass a wide array of breathing techniques and exercises, each emphasizing different theoretical mechanisms of action. Nearly every breathing technique is attributed to its distinct properties and effects, which contribute to the high heterogeneity of research findings (Table 1). This variability complicates the task of conducting comparative analyses of these techniques. Additionally, breathwork studies often face numerous challenges, such as methodological inconsistencies, small sample sizes, and a lack of standardized protocols.
Consequently, most recent research has focused on identifying the actual mechanisms through which breathwork may produce its positive effects. In the following subsections, we will critically explore key variables that are considered to shape and differentiate specific breathing techniques. We propose, in the context of long-term mental health outcomes, that various breathwork techniques are closely linked through their shared influence on ANS modulation and cognitive factors, ultimately converging toward similar psychological benefits. However, this does not imply that there are no differences between techniques or their physiological mechanisms of action, especially in the short term. Rather, emerging evidence suggests that the final, long-term subjective experiences and psychological impact most commonly associated with relaxation and stress reduction may be similar for most techniques [16,133,134].
Table 1. A selection of the most recognized breathing techniques demonstrating the diversity of breathwork techniques, research approaches, and potential mechanisms of action. Some techniques are not included due to limited research.
Table 1. A selection of the most recognized breathing techniques demonstrating the diversity of breathwork techniques, research approaches, and potential mechanisms of action. Some techniques are not included due to limited research.
Examples of Techniques with short descriptionResearch, reference   Benefits of practice
1. Psychological
2. Physiological
Proposed mechanisms and pathways of actionLimitations
Breathing Pace
Fast breathing
Kapalbhati pranayama;
Skullshining breath;
Breath offire
Within-subject design, immediate effects in yoga practitioners [105]; RCTs [106,122]
  • Feeling of joy, energizing [105,106]:
  • Initial SNS activation (↑ HR, ↑ BP, ↑ LF) with PNS withdrawal (↓ HF, ↓ RMSSD, ↓ SDNN); subsequent PNS rebound (↑ HF, ↑ RMSSD, ↓ HR) [105,106]; ↑ alpha waves power in frontal and temporal brain regions, ↑ gamma wave power in frontal, temporal, and occipital regions [122]
  • Beneficial modulation of ANS:
    -
    SNS activation due to rapid breathing
    -
    post-intervention PNS dominance (strong vagal reactivation)
  • Strong exhalations lead to ↓ CO2 and a loss of hypercapnic drive
  • ↑ alpha activity suppresses irrelevant sensory inputs through top-down regulation of attention
  • Strong olfactory stimulation impacts limbic and cortical areas
Small sample sizes, very short interventions (5 min) [105,106], small sample sizes restricted to healthy young males, and lack of post-intervention measurements [122]
60 to 120 bpm; short and forceful exhalations with a strong engagement of abdominal muscles and passive inhalations
Conscious connected breathingWithin-subject design in healthy adults during practice [135]
  • ↓ negative affect states (tension, confusion, depression, anger), ↑ self-esteem
  • ↓ delta, ↓ theta power in frontotemporal and parietal regions, ↓ low-beta power in parietotemporal areas, ↑ gamma power
Changes in brain activity related to subjective feelings of altered states of consciousness (resembling moderate-to-high dose psilocybin experiences)Small sample size of experienced practitioners, lack of control group
Deliberate, fast, deep cyclical breathing without a pause between inhale and exhale, high diaphragm engagement
Slow Breathing
Coherent breathingWithin-subject design comparing acute effects of two breathing ratios [97]; fMRI study with experimental manipulation of breathing rate and oxygen levels [136]; experiment during acute stress and paced breathing [137]
  • ↑ feelings of relaxation [97]; ↑ alertness [136];
  • ↑ SDNN, ↑ LF [97]; ↑ tidal volume, increased activity of multiple brain and brainstem areas n (hypothalamus, hippocampus, insula, dorsal pons) [136]; increased physiological coherence measured in signals synchronization (derived from HRV, PTT, and respiration) [137]
  • Cardiorespiratory coupling
  • ↑ cardiac vagal activity (high baroreflex and vagal afferent activity)
  • Recruitment of brainstem and cortical structures involved in physiological response
  • Induction of a contemplative mental state
Small sample sizes, lack of actual RR and breathing ratio control [97]; discomfort associated with experimental settings, confounding non-neural effects [136]; important markers of stress (cortisol) were not measured [137]
~5.5 bpm with equal inhalation and exhalation durations
Resonant breathing;
HRV biofeedback
RCT involving young adults practicing for 4 weeks [138]
  • ↑ cognitive performance, ↓ perceived stress
  • Improvements in resting HRV parameters including SDNN, pNN50, LF, LF/HF and total power
  • High baroreflex resonance and increased vagal tone improve sympathovagal balance
Improved functional relationship between the prefrontal cortex and the central autonomic network
Limited sample of young male adults
Breathing at individualized resonance frequency focused on maximizing RSA (~ 6 bpm)
Diaphragmatic breathingSystematic review of one RCT and two quasi-experimental studies [68]
  • ↓ self-perceived stress, ↑ sustained attention, ↓ negative affect
  • ↓ RR, ↓ salivary cortisol levels, ↓ BP
↑ vagal activity, ↓ SNS activity, HPA axis modulation, improved attention and cognitive functions Outcome measures and methodological heterogeneity, low quality of evidence, small sample sizes
Involved deep inhalation concentrating on maximal diaphragm engagement and lateral rib movement (3–7 bpm)
Zen tanden breathingWithin-subject quasi-experimental design, participants unexperienced of Zen meditation [104]
  • Feeling of vigor-activity, ↓ anxiety
  • ↑ urinary serotonin levels, ↑ high-frequency alpha activity
Activation of serotonergic neurons in the dorsal raphe nucleus contributes to the observed EEG changesSmall sample size, narrow range of measured parameters
Prolonged rhythmic contraction of abdominal muscles during exhalation (3–4 bpm)
Okinaga, extreme prolongation of expirationWithin-subject quasi-experimental design, 5 male experienced practitioners, acute effects of 31-min intervention [118]
  • ↑ relaxation
  • ↑ theta and alpha waves, ↓ beta waves, ↓ HF (although there is inconsistency between the text and figure representing HF values over time), ↓ in LF/HF ratio
  • PNS dominance during practice and decrease in beta power
  • ↑ frontal theta power potentially indicating greater focused attention
  • ↑ alpha 2 power linked with relaxation
Small sample size of 5 experienced practitioners;
EEG limited to forehead;
ambiguity in LF/HF ratio interpretation
Emphasis placed on long exhalations (~1 bpm)
Breathing Pattern
Box breathing;
Tactical breathing;
Sama Vritti pranayama
Remote, 4-week long RCT comparing breathwork techniques to mindfulness [139];
Within-subject design comparing box breathing to prolonged expiration (2 s I, 8 s E) during stress task [140]
  • Improvements in physiological arousal and mood, ↓ state anxiety and negative emotions [139];
  • ↓ RR [139]; ↓ physiological arousal (↓ HR, ↓ RR) compared to the second prolonged exhalation both during training and stress coping task [140]
  • Modulation of brain function by vagus nerve pathways, enhancement of interoceptive awareness, enhanced self-regulation and stress perception through modulation of brain regions involved in emotional processing
  • The diving response increases PNS activity during breath holds
  • Focused attention associated with better distraction from stressors
Remote study with daily self-reports [139];
lack of a control group without breathing, low sample size, short training duration [140]
Equal durations of inhalation, breath hold, exhalation, and breath hold, e.g., 4-4-4-4 s;
Typically used in high-stress professions (e.g., military)
4-7-8 breathingQuasi-experimental study, immediate effects after one intervention [141];
randomized controlled experimental design with a pretest–posttest control—patients after bariatric surgery [142];
  • ↓ state anxiety levels [142];
  • ↑ PNS activity: ↓ SBP, ↓ HR, ↑ HF, ↓ LF/HF; ↓ sympathetic activity: ↓ LF, ↓ SDNN [141]
Enhanced parasympathetic activity post-intervention due to:
  • Low inhale/exhale ratio and slow breathing pace (3 bpm) resulting in ↑ RSA amplitudes
  • ↓ peripheral chemoreceptor stimulation due to increased arterial oxygen saturation during breath holds
  • Attention modulation and relaxation through oxygenation and CO2 expulsion
Small sample size with high female-to-male ratio, ambiguity in HRV interpretation [141]; small sample size, narrow clinical population [142];
4-7-8-0 pattern: 4 s inhalation, 7 s breath hold, 8 s exhalation
CyclicsighingRemote, 4-week long RCT comparing breathwork techniques to mindfulness [139]
  • ↑ positive affect, ↓ negative emotions
  • ↓ RR
  • ANS regulation by the enhancement of vagal tone via extended exhalations
Remote nature of study, daily self-reports
(1 + 0.25):2 ratio pattern—double inhale with long exhalation
Breathing Route
Slow nasal/mouth
breathing
Randomized, within-subjects crossover design; study comparing mouth vs. nasal breathing in 12 experienced meditators [123]Improvements in nasal compared to mouth breathing:
  • Perception of being in an altered state of consciousness, ↓ anxiety levels, ↑ positive affect (heightened feeling of joy);
  • Comparable effects on HRV and brain rhythms modulation in posterior areas (indicating similar vagal contribution);
↑ theta, ↑ delta, ↑ high-beta powers and connectivity in prefrontal and frontal areas unique to nasal breathing
  • Nasal breathing stimulates mechanoreceptors within the olfactory epithelium—the olfactory bulb projects to the piriform cortex and (via the mediodorsal thalamic nuclei) to the prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and other cortical and limbic areas relevant for emotional regulation
  • Heightened theta and high-beta coupling in default mode network areas supports both local and long-range communication between brain regions
  • Slowing of cortical rhythms (delta-theta) important for non-ordinary states of consciousness
Low sample size, healthy meditative practitioners (limiting applicability to clinical and general populations), unequal gender distribution,
2.5 bpm nasal breathing with 6-6-6-6 s pattern
Pursed lip breathingRCT, hypertensive urgency patients [143], systematic review and meta-analysis of 15 RCTs combining pursed lip and diaphragmatic breathing in COPD patients [144]; quasi-experimental study, COPD subjects [145]2. ↓ SBP, ↓ DBP, ↓ HR [143]; improved pulmonary function (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC ratio) and exercise capacity (6-min walk test distance) [144]; ↑ pulse oxygen saturation, ↑ RMSSD, ↓ RR [145]
  • ↑ PNS activity influences autonomic cardiac modulation
  • Time counting increases mindfulness buffering anxiety and stress
  • ↑ expiratory resistance leads to ↓ airway resistance and residual volume, enhancing lung emptying, gas exchange, ventilation efficiency, tidal volume, and expiratory muscle recruitment
Limited generalizability of the findings, low methodological quality, narrow clinical populations [143,144], small sample size, lack of control group [145]
Inhalation through the nose (2 s), followed by slow, controlled exhalation through puckered or pursed lips (4 s), involving number counting. Typically used in older patients with COPD
Sheetali pranayama;
Cooling breath
Parallel-group randomized trial comparing 12 weeks of Bhramari vs. Sheetali, hypertensive patients [146]; single blinded RCT, hypertensive patients, 3 months practice [147]2. ↓ serum cortisol, ↑ serum nitric oxide, ↓ BP, improvements in physical fitness (sit-to-stand test) and quality of life [146]; improvements in various BP variables, ↑ HRV parameters (↑ SDNN, ↑ RMSSD, ↑ pNN50, ↑ HF, ↓ LF, ↓ LF/HF ratio) [147]↑ PNS activity through vagus nerve and baroreceptors stimulation, high influence on HPA axis, improved baroreceptor sensitivity Limited sample size, lack of control group, hypertensive elderly population limiting generalizability [146]; possible placebo effect [147]
Involves curling the tongue to form a “straw,” inhaling fully through the rolled tongue, closing the mouth, holding the breath briefly, then exhaling slowly through the nose
Alternate nostril breathing;
Anulom-Vilom pranayama; Nadi-shodhana pranayama
Systematic review including 44 RCTs [148]
  • Enhanced cognitive performance, improved memory; ↓ self-reported anxiety and depression scores after regular practice
  • Improved autonomic modulation and increased vagal activity: ↑ HRV parameters, ↓ SBP, ↓ DBP, ↓ HR, ↓ pulse rate; improved pulmonary function parameters (peak expiratory flow rate, forced expiratory flow, FVC, FEV1, maximum voluntary ventilation, vital capacity)
  • Alternating nostril flow restores ANS balance—right nostril associated with ↑ SNS activity, left nostril with ↑ PNS
  • Mechanical receptors in nasal mucosa stimulate hypothalamic pathways influencing autonomic balance
  • ↑ vagus nerve activity promotes neuroplasticity through release of acetylcholine, epinephrine, and brain-derived neurotrophic factor
  • Breath awareness promotes mindfulness effects: improving self-regulation, stress coping strategies, cortical-subcortical connectivity, ↓ stress-related physiological responses
Methodological heterogeneity including wide variation regarding nostril sequence, breath retention duration, and I:E ratio, limited studies on clinical populations, diverse outcome measures, lack of standardization
Involves breathing through one nostril at a time while manually closing the other nostril. The technique has variations in nostril switching, inhalation/exhalation duration, and breath retention
Breathing Sound
Ujjayi pranayama;
Ocean breath
Within-subject design comparing various breathing paces with or without ujjayi in young healthy participants [149]; within-subject design of immediate effects among university students [150]
  • ↓ anxiety scores, ↑ sustained and selective attention [150];
  • ↑ oxygen saturation, ↑ HR, ↓ chemoreflex sensitivity, ambiguous effect on baroreflex sensitivity [149]
  • Contraction of the glottis muscles increases the intrathoracic pressure intensifying vagal activity, baroreflex sensitivity, and oxygen saturation
  • Increased respiratory effort potentially
    ↑ SNS activation, counterbalancing some effects of PNS activation
  • Improved attention due to enhanced cognitive control and response inhibition to unnecessary stimuli, regulation of brain regions involved in emotion processing
Small sample size, narrow range of parameters, lack of HRV measurements [149]; small sample size with experienced practitioners (2 years of pranayama practice) [150]
Deep breathing involving slight contraction of the glottis to produce a gentle hissing (ocean) sound during nasal inhalation and exhalation;
typically slow-paced with equal I:E ratio
Bumble bee breath;
Bhramari pranayama
Pilot, cross-sectional, observational study with Holter-based HRV measurement comparing various activities [151]; systematic review [152]
  • ↓ stress index [151]; feeling of “bliss” [152]
  • ↑ in total HRV power and SDNN compared to other activities (physical activity, emotional stress, sleep); ↓ HR during breathwork compared to stress and physical activity; high LF/HF ratio [151]; ↓ BP, ↑ gamma wave activity [152]
  • Prolonged exhalations enhance RSA, ↑ PNS and ↓ SNS activation
  • Generation of low-frequency respiratory oscillations (acoustic vibrations), which may stimulate baroreflex sensitivity and optimize heart-lung coupling
  • ↑ nasal nitric oxide levels during the humming
  • Potential of sound vibrations in influencing cerebrospinal fluid flow
Small sample size, lack of placebo control group [151]; lack of RCTs, high heterogeneity, no cross-cultural validation, general low quality of analyzed studies [152]
Generation of humming sound during nasal exhalation, ~4–6 bpm, with exhalation twice longer than inhalation
Combined Techniques
Bhastrika pranayama;
Bellows breath
RCT, fMRI analysis of brain activity and psychological assessment after regular 30 days pranayama practice [153]
  • ↓ state anxiety, ↓ negative affect, along with ↑ positive affect and awareness; enhanced emotional regulation, particularly during exposure to emotionally laden stimuli;
  • Modulation in activity and connectivity of neural circuits (amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and prefrontal cortex)
  • ↓ functional connectivity between the right anterior insula and lateral prefrontal cortex correlated with reduced anxiety
  • ↑ activity in the right amygdala and anterior insula was linked to the least reduction in negative affect and anxiety
  • Activity changes in anterior cingulate cortex and anterior insula related to emotional awareness
Small sample size, lack of ANS assessments, daily practice not monitored, additional maneuvers along breathing
30 cycles: combination of 30 rapid breaths, followed by Surya Bedhana (inspiration through right nostril—breath hold—expiration through left nostril) with muscle activation
Sudarshan kriya yoga(SKY) breathingPilot feasibility study with a single arm pre-post design, 4-days practice and 40 days follow-up [154]; RCT, 6-week intervention, military veterans with PTSD [155]
  • ↓ stress levels, ↓ anxiety, ↓ depression, and improvement in resilience, life satisfaction, and sleep quality score [154]; improved self-reported emotion regulation [155]
  • ↑ HR min-max, ↑ normalized HF, ↓ LF/HF; nonsignificant improvements of other HRV parameters (RMSSD, SDNN, absolute HF-HRV, LF) [155]
  • Improved ANS regulation and balance
  • Enhanced emotional regulation
  • Changes in RSA and RR
  • Parasympathetic activation
Lack of a control group and randomization, selection bias, low follow-up sample [154]; poor data quality, ambulatory HRV measurement [155]
~30 min. long typically consisting of 4–5 breathing techniques varying in pace (e.g., ujjayi, ANB, Bhastrika, cyclical SKY breathing with ascending pace)
Wim Hof breathing methodRCTs [156,157];
Systematic review [158]
  • Decreases in perceived stress [157]; increased energy, mental focus, and attention [156], psychically challenging [158]
  • Anti-inflammatory effect (↑ interleukin-10, ↓ pro-inflammatory cytokines), ↑ epinephrine levels [158]
Combined Wim Hof method (with cold water exposure and meditation) lead to superior results than breathing alone
  • ↑ pH levels, ↑ oxygen saturation, ↑ HR, increase in plasma epinephrine levels
  • Strong SNS activation
  • Epinephrine release, and diminished innate immune response due to decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokines
Low sample size, large proportion of males, potential influence of placebo effect due to expectations and surroundings, high risk of bias across studies [158]
Cyclic hyperventilation, 30–40 fast and deep forceful nasal inhalations with light exhalations through mouth, followed by long breath hold (60–120 s) with subsequent inhalation and shorter (15 s) breath hold
Abbreviations: ANB (alternate nostril breathing), ANS (autonomic nervous system), BP (blood pressure), bpm (breaths per minute), CO2 (carbon dioxide) COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), DBP (diastolic blood pressure), E (exhalation), EEG (electroencephalography), FEV1 (forced expiratory volume in one second), FVC (forced vital capacity), fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging), HF (high frequency HRV), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), I (inhalation), LF (low frequency HRV), pNN50 (percentage of successive RR intervals that differ by more than 50 ms), PNS (parasympathetic nervous system), PTT (pulse transit time), PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder), RCT (randomized controlled trial), RMSSD (root mean square of successive difference), RR (respiratory rate), RSA (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), SBP (systolic blood pressure), SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), ↑ (increase), ↓ (decrease).

5.1. Breathing Pace

In breathwork research, special attention is given to slow-paced breathing, as its short-term physiological effects are considered a potential foundation for achieving long-term mental health benefits [13,21,95,159,160]. However, despite promising results, the high heterogeneity of study methodologies, the limited number of longitudinal studies with follow-ups, and the lack of comparisons to well-designed placebo controls all restrict the ability to draw definitive conclusions about the correlation between breathing pace, its psychophysiological mechanisms, and long-term mental well-being [13,90,103].
Recently, Fincham et al. conducted a rigorously designed, blinded, randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effects of coherent breathing (5.5 bpm) on stress with a placebo intervention paced at spontaneous breathing frequency (12 bpm) [16]. The study recruited 400 adults from the general population who engaged in breathwork for 10 min daily over a four-week period. The authors did not inform participants of any potential advantages or superiority of a particular breathing technique, thereby eliminating the influence of specific expectations—an omnipresent factor in breathwork research [16]. Notably, after the intervention and at the four-week follow-up, participants in both groups demonstrated statistically significant improvements in self-reported measures of stress, anxiety, depression, and general well-being, with no significant differences observed between groups (only a significant effect of time was observed for both groups, p < 0.001). Despite the fact that coherent breathing appears to have the highest potential physiological impact (Figure 2), the largest and most well-designed study on this technique has not shown superiority over a well-designed placebo [16]. Similarly, Bentley et al., in their recent systematic review, found that in the context of slow-paced breathwork, specific breathing rates are not particularly crucial for long-term effectiveness in reducing stress and anxiety [20]. These findings highlight a critical gap in breathwork research, suggesting that the psychological effects of breathwork are likely influenced by numerous confounding variables.
The ambiguous long-term effects of breathwork extend even to research on two contrasting practices—fast and slow breathing. For instance, a 12-week study performed in India by Sharma et al. (n = 90), which compared two sets of three rapid and slow pranayama breathing techniques practiced for 30 min, three times a week, found similar reductions in perceived stress among healthcare students in comparison to inactive controls (p < 0.001), despite statistically significant within-group changes in certain cardiovascular parameters in favor of slow pranayama [134]. Furthermore, a recent, remote, rigorous, blinded RCT by Fincham et al., involving 182 participants, compared brief, remotely delivered fast breathwork with an active placebo control in the form of paced breathing at 15 bpm to assess the subjective mental health effects [133]. After three weeks of daily 20-min-long practice and a follow-up period, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of stress levels, affect, anxiety, depression, mental well-being, or sleep-related impairment [133].
Unfortunately, there is currently little evidence explaining these findings. While fast and slow breathwork have been shown to exert their effects through distinct acute neurophysiological mechanisms, over time, they have also been observed to converge in their effects on ANS function and subjective mental well-being. The deliberate activation of the SNS in fast breathwork may contribute to subsequent positive ANS modulation and delayed positive stimulation of the PNS, fostering mental resilience to stress in the long-term [20,23]. One study on the immediate effects of fast-paced Kapalbhati pranayama, which included 50 healthy volunteers with a spontaneous breathing control group, has demonstrated that despite an initial surge in sympathetic activation and parasympathetic withdrawal during or immediately after practice, ANS activity shifts toward parasympathetic dominance 20 min post-exercise [106].
The comparison between different breathing paces, specifically fast and slow breathwork, remains a critical area of research that warrants further exploration, given the widespread popularity and long-standing traditions of these two contrasting breathing styles [161].

5.2. Breathing Ratio

One of the most debated aspects of breathwork, marked by numerous conflicting findings, is the impact of different breathing ratios (the proportion of inhalation (I) to exhalation (E)) in the case of slow breathwork [162]. Theoretical perspectives suggest that lower ratios, such as 1:2 (I to E), naturally seem to offer greater health benefits, particularly in the short-term [13,82,103,159,163].
Many studies have been conducted on this topic. The review by Meehan & Shaffer revealed somewhat contradictory results [162]. Three studies found no effects of I:E ratios, while others showed benefits: E = I (1 study), E > I (4 studies), or I > E (1 study). After identifying key methodological issues and challenges in these studies, the authors conducted their own RCT and compared the effects of 1:1 and 1:2 IE ratios (6 bpm) on various HRV measures [162]. In both the original and replication experiments, no differences were found in HRV time-domain and frequency-domain measures. The population of undergraduate students represents an important limitation of this study due to the absence of clinical populations or individuals exposed to high stress with low baseline HRV values [162].
Another single-blinded RCT with 79 participants compared two slow deep breathing techniques (4:2 and 4:4 IE ratios) to spontaneous breathing on stress markers in response to a virtual reality active shooter drill (VR-ASD)—an acute high-stress exposure [164]. The first group had an average of 5 bpm, while the second group had 10 bpm. Both slow breathing interventions, despite differing exhale durations, were equally effective in preventing significant increases in salivary α-amylase five- and thirty-minutes post-VR-ASD in comparison to the control group (p < 0.01). No differences were found between the two interventions regarding their effect on HR or state anxiety inventory scores [164].
Furthermore, Birdee et al. recently conducted a well-designed single-blinded RCT with 97 healthy individuals, comparing yoga-based slow breathing between the I = E group and the E > I group [159]. After 12 weeks (five breathing sessions per week with a 3 bpm pace), no statistically significant differences were found between the groups in terms of the positive impact on mental health and stress reduction. While improvements were observed in the psychological measure (PROMIS Anxiety questionnaire), no such changes were seen in the physiological one (HRV). Although not statistically significant, it should be noted that when comparing the groups, both measures showed better improvement in the E > I group [159]. To date, this is the only study of such high quality examining the effects of different exhale-to-inhale ratios on mental health and stress reduction over a longer period. However, further research is needed to validate these findings, especially considering methodological challenges such as sample size, control groups, and long-term follow-ups.
In summary, most recent robust studies with well-designed control conditions indicate that while different breathing techniques, varying in pace or breathing ratio/pattern, offer mental health benefits, the long-term effects are largely similar across these techniques.

5.3. Mindful Breathing

To what extent could the benefits of breathwork be attributed solely to breath awareness [16,103]? Both mindfulness-based techniques and those involving intentional breathing control appear fundamentally related.
To change the breathing rhythm, one must consciously control their breath, and conversely, mindful observation of the act of breathing decreases the frequency of respiration [89,112,165,166]. On the other hand, slow breathing techniques are associated with an increase in tidal volume to ensure adequate oxygen delivery [103,167]. To accommodate this demand, lower respiratory rates naturally involve greater diaphragm engagement, which provides extensive sensory feedback to the ANS and CNS regarding changes in breathing rhythm [21]. As a result, greater diaphragm engagement is observed during meditation, where a larger belly respiratory amplitude and a decreased respiratory rate are driven by increased activation of PNS pathways [166].
However, given its well-documented effects on key physiological processes described in the previous section, breathwork seems to offer greater potential to influence the body than mindfulness meditation [168]. For example, there is some ambiguity regarding the impact of mindfulness on HRV. Some studies have found positive effects [89,169,170], while others, including two meta-analyses comparing mindfulness to active controls, found no such effects [171,172]. In contrast, research strongly supports the positive effect of breathwork on modulating PNS activity [12]. Additionally, as breathwork represents a more active intervention, it may offer a greater sense of control and yield more immediate effects compared to a passive approach to mindfulness [139]. What about the long-term impact of these two practices on mental health?
Balban et al. recruited 114 participants to compare the effects of a daily 5-min mindfulness practice over 4 weeks with three different types of breathwork [139]. The results of this RCT indicated reductions in the state of anxiety and negative affect for both types of interventions. However, the breathwork groups showed significantly better improvements in positive affect and greater reductions in respiratory rate [139]. Surprisingly, the authors did not observe any statistically significant changes in HRV or resting HR in any group, despite daily monitoring. However, the remote nature of the study, the absence of further follow-ups, and the relatively small sample size are key limitations that restrict drawing definitive conclusions [139].
In another study, researchers compared HRVB and mindfulness interventions, both conducted daily for 6 weeks, to a wait-list control group. At the end of the intervention and at a 12-week follow-up, no group differences were observed across a wide range of psychological and physiological stress reduction measures. Although not statistically significant, the intervention groups appeared to be more effective overall, with more stressed individuals benefiting the most. It is important to note that this study had a small sample size and potential confounding factors, such as participants’ expectations and socio-psychological influences [173]. The findings of other studies regarding the differences in the long-term effects of these two practices also remain ambiguous [174,175]. Certainly, further research is needed to clarify how mindfulness and breathwork compare in their effects. While deliberate attention to breathing is a key factor for improving mental health through breathwork, its role as a central mechanism has yet to be confirmed.

5.4. The Route of Breathing

Another important aspect to consider is the preferred breathing pathway of a given technique. Some breathwork practices employ mouth breathing [147,176], although the majority utilize nasal breathing. In contrast, pronounced differences in brain activity have been observed between nasal and mouth breathing [112,123,126,177]. At rest, nasal breathing seems to offer modest cardiovascular benefits and shifts the autonomic balance toward parasympathetic dominance in the HRV frequency domain compared to mouth breathing [178]. It is important to emphasize that nasal breathing is the primary, natural respiratory pathway, and the negative effects of chronic mouth breathing, associated with the development of various disorders, are particularly evident in children [179,180].
Rhythmic, regular stimulation of the olfactory centers may be an important and, potentially, one of the commonly shared pathways through which various breathwork techniques exert their effects, alongside their influence on the vagus nerve [123]. Unfortunately, there is a lack of studies comparing these two breathing routes in the context of breathwork. In one study, Zaccaro et al. compared mouth versus nasal breathing (2.5 bpm) in 12 experienced meditators, aiming to highlight differences between the short-term effects of olfactory epithelium stimulation and those associated with vagus nerve activation [123]. As expected, both techniques had similar effects on ANS stimulation, as measured by HRV analysis. However, the groups differed regarding cortical activity. While the enhancement of slow brain rhythms in posterior areas (indicating a vagal contribution) was similar, the increase in power in prefrontal regions and the enhanced connectivity in both theta and high-beta frequencies were observed only during nasal breathing [123]. These findings suggest that nasal breathing is key in breathwork for inducing altered states that may benefit mental health. Nevertheless, a longitudinal study comparing nasal and mouth breathing with proper control would be valuable. Would the long-term psychological effects differ significantly?
Among nasal breathing techniques, one may encounter techniques that focus on breathing through specific nostrils. According to traditional yogic concepts, left nostril breathing (LNB) is believed to activate the PNS, promoting relaxation and a calming effect, whereas right nostril breathing (RNB) is associated with increased SNS activity, leading to heightened psychophysiological arousal [181]. Several early studies have reported differential effects of LNB and RNB on autonomic modulation [182,183,184,185,186]. However, more recent studies, characterized by generally higher methodological quality, have found no significant differences between RNB and LNB in their effects on HRV, BP, or oxygen consumption. Instead, the authors suggest that vagal nerve activity and brain processes related to attentional and volitional breathing may be the primary mechanisms underlying the observed changes [181,187,188,189,190]. Some recent studies have also reported differences in brain activity between RNB and LNB [188,191], but the significance of these changes in terms of their practical relevance remains an open question. The general scarcity of longitudinal studies on RNB and LNB prevents drawing firm conclusions regarding their distinct long-term impacts.
Another widely practiced nostril-based technique is alternate-nostril breathing (ANB), which involves inhaling through one nostril, exhaling through the other, then switching sides and repeating [192]. Two recent systematic reviews have supported the effectiveness of ANB in producing positive psychophysiological effects on human health [148,193]. However, studies directly comparing the long-term effects of ANB with placebo interventions or other breathwork techniques remain limited. One study comparing ANB with a control, paced-breathing condition using the same respiratory rate found similar effects on autonomic modulation in both interventions [192]. Another study, also using a comparable breathing pace (~10 bpm), found that diaphragmatic breathing produced significantly greater increases in HRV parameters than ANB (specifically in RMSSD and HF, p < 0.01) [194]. Further well-controlled studies are needed to clarify differences between nostril-based and other breathwork techniques.

5.5. Biofeedback and Resonance Frequency

HRVB has been designed to optimize and maximize the efficiency of breathwork by focusing on reaching an individual’s resonance frequency (but it may also serve only as visual feedback of RSA, respiratory rate, or HR) [195]. However, determining the exact resonance frequency remains a controversial issue, particularly regarding its stability over time [196,197,198] and the fact that the phase relationship between breathing and HR appears to deviate from theoretical models in older individuals [199]. Moreover, severe methodological discrepancies persist in HRVB research, with many studies failing to provide sufficient detail or monitor crucial parameters such as breathing rate and ratio. As a result, replicating findings and establishing a “gold standard” for HRVB interventions remains challenging [196].
Nevertheless, this does not diminish the existing evidence supporting HRVB’s effectiveness in influencing both physiology and mental health but rather raises the question of whether HRVB is truly more effective than simple slow-paced breathing without additional equipment [200,201].
Two early reports on this subject [202,203] indicated a slight advantage of HRVB over control conditions based on slow breathing, whereas one study found no such difference [204]. Further work by Laborde et al. [195] has found no psychophysiological differences between a short, five-minute coherent breathing intervention with or without biofeedback, although biofeedback served only as HR visualization. In contrast, the most recent study, which utilized HRVB biofeedback to determine resonance frequency, has shown this intervention to have advantages over coherent breathing in reducing BP, enhancing autonomic regulation, and strengthening brain-cardiovascular interactions. Notably, resonance breathing induced the strongest cardiorespiratory coupling and greater activation in the prefrontal cortex and alpha wave modulation, associated with parasympathetic control [205]. However, the two most recent meta-analyses did not confirm the superiority of biofeedback-assisted resonance breathing for treating anxiety [201], nor did they find generally stronger effects on mental health compared to coherent breathing [206]. More long-term studies directly comparing resonance frequency breathing with placebo controls are needed to definitively determine whether HRVB offers any advantage over simple paced breathing, as current evidence suggests rather similar effects [95].

6. Mental Health Disorders

6.1. Background

Allostatic load contributes to the development of MD by destabilizing the ANS and affecting the HPA axis. These disturbances have been associated with excessive release of stress hormones and neurotransmitter imbalances, which alter brain function [57,207,208,209,210,211,212]. Under stress, the CNS negatively affects the baroreflex, reducing baseline vagus nerve activity and RSA amplitudes [103]. Impaired autonomic function in anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder, as well as during periods of stress, is reflected in reduced HRV [69,213,214,215,216]. Low HRV and higher allostatic load have been associated with greater intolerance to uncertainty and negative thinking, further driving the deterioration of mental health [217,218].
Moreover, there is a strong link between depression and cardiovascular disease, with low RMSSD values (25–35 ms) having emerged as a promising biomarker indicating and predicting the increased risk of both conditions [219]. While pharmacological treatments and psychotherapy have been shown to have a positive effect on depressive disorder symptoms, they have not been shown to improve HRV [220,221]. Depression and anxiety are also bidirectional risk factors for one another, further reducing psychological resilience to social factors [222].

6.2. Aiming at Risk Factors

Emerging evidence suggests that breathwork may be associated with improvements in psychological well-being through its effects on physiological responses, HRV, brain activity, cognitive function, and mood (Figure 3) [13,90]. For instance, the increase in HRV has been associated with enhanced oscillatory activity in brain regions associated with emotional regulation [223]. Therefore, maintaining high HRV levels, even under chronic stress, may help individuals manage uncertainty more effectively, likely due to improved autonomic regulation that enhances resilience to stress [217,223].
Furthermore, breathwork has been conceptualized to address key risk factors of depression and anxiety by enhancing attention and interoceptive awareness and improving self-regulation. By consciously adjusting breath patterns, individuals may gain a greater sense of control over physiological responses to stress, reducing emotional reactivity, interrupting cycles of rumination, and promoting a more adaptive regulation of arousal in challenging situations [139,168].
In an 8-week RCT conducted in China by Ma et al., involving 40 participants, the experimental group performed 20 sessions of 15-min slow (~4 bpm) mindful diaphragmatic breathing, while the control group performed normal breathing. Compared to baseline, statistically significant reductions in cortisol levels and negative affect were observed, along with substantial improvements in sustained attention in the diaphragmatic breathing group [224]. Sustained attention, a crucial cognitive function, is often impaired in individuals with depression and anxiety. Despite the severe impact of attentional deficits on quality of life, they remain largely unaddressed by pharmacological treatments [225,226].
It could be assumed that all breathwork techniques fundamentally rely on the direction and maintenance of sustained focused attention toward changing bodily reactions, thus showing preventive potential [112]. A pilot RCT study conducted in the United States among university students (novice practitioners), comparing the effects of two components of yoga (movement-focused and breath-focused practices), demonstrated reductions in perceived stress and cortisol levels after an 8-week program [227]. However, only the breath-focused group showed improvements in sustained attention. An intriguing finding from the study is the correlation between improved sustained attention and reduced perceived stress, though no such link was found with lowered cortisol levels. This may suggest that physiological responses are not the sole measurable pathway linking the effectiveness of breathing techniques to enhanced mental well-being. Cognitive factors may play an important role in these improvements [227]. The limitation of this study, however, lies in the single-day pre- and post-intervention sampling and the use of a varied set of breathwork exercises, which affect the generalizability of the results [227].
Novaes et al. [153] conducted an RCT in Brazil, investigating the effects of a one-month, thrice-weekly Bhastrika pranayama practice (a combination of slow ANB, fast breathing, and muscle contractions) on functional magnetic resonance imaging outcomes and psychometric measures in healthy individuals [153]. Compared to the active control group (engaged in various cognitive activities), the breathing group exhibited statistically significant changes in brain functional activity and connectivity in regions such as the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex, anterior insula, and prefrontal cortex. These areas, involved in attention, emotion processing, and self-awareness, were modulated in ways that promoted positive affect while reducing anxiety and negative affect [153]. Notably, the least reductions in negative affect were linked to higher activity in the right amygdala and anterior insula, a pattern characteristic of more anxious individuals [153,228].
It is important to recognize that higher breathing rates may induce neural responses similar to those observed in anxiety and should therefore be used cautiously in patients with MD [112]. In contrast, slow-paced breathwork may reduce anxiety by decreasing anterior insula and amygdala activity, reshaping habitual responses to anticipated stress [82,139]. Increased anterior insula activity is negatively correlated with HRV [136]. Overactivation of this brain region during expected stress has been linked to lower perceived control in anxious individuals [229].
Increased amygdala activity has also been implicated in pain perception, where the relationship between pain and anxiety is bidirectional and mutually reinforcing [230]. A study of 169 individuals with chronic pain from Poland and Spain found that a single session of diaphragmatic breathing significantly reduced perceived pain and anxiety, with stronger effects observed in participants with higher baseline levels [230]. Notably, significant differences between the two nationalities were observed, suggesting that cultural factors influence the consistency and effectiveness of the practice. The authors emphasized that experience with breathwork, including the ability to maintain focus and attentional control, is particularly important, as distractions during practice negatively impact outcomes [230].
Since both anxiety disorders and depression are associated with reduced HRV, and limbic structures mediate this relationship [216,231], breathwork represents a promising approach to addressing this key risk factor [232]. Additionally, breathwork helps individuals manage stress by enhancing body and mind awareness, fostering acceptance of anxiety symptoms, and ultimately leading to better control over stress reactions [201].
Even brief, five-minute sessions of various breathwork techniques have been shown to enhance parasympathetic activation, reduce physiological arousal and perceived anxiety levels, and positively impact brain activity, HRV, and mood [93,117,139,233,234]. These effects may be particularly beneficial for older individuals [234] and those experiencing higher stress levels [235]. Importantly, for effective stress reduction, maintaining regular and consistent practice appears to be more important than extending the duration of individual sessions [20,93], though certain benefits of longer sessions have also been observed [93,233].

6.3. The Use of Breathwork for Stress and Mental Health: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

Recently, the first meta-analysis of RCTs identified breathwork as a promising and effective approach for alleviating stress [19]. Fincham et al. have analyzed data from 12 RCTs involving 785 adults, revealing that breathwork significantly reduces subjective psychological distress (p = 0.0009), with small to medium effect sizes observed post-intervention compared to control groups. Two subsequent meta-analyses, including a total of 38 studies, also indicated that breathwork interventions significantly (p < 0.0001) improve mental health by alleviating symptoms of anxiety and depression. The effect sizes were small to medium, though the results may have been influenced by variables other than breathwork itself. Despite these findings, the moderate risk of bias across studies, cross-cultural differences, the insufficient number of clinical samples, and the lack of comparisons to non-breathwork controls highlight the need for further research with well-defined participant groups, larger sample sizes, and standardized objective measures [19].
Malviya et al. have reached similar conclusions in their systematic review, both regarding breathwork’s impact on mental health and the methodological limitations found in reviewed studies. Among the 15 included studies, eight examined the effects of breathwork on anxiety and consistently reported statistically significant reductions in symptoms. Depression was also investigated in eight studies; although all observed reductions in depressive symptoms, statistical significance was achieved in only five [236]. It is worth noting that among the 11 RCTs utilizing breathwork, six were conducted in India, four in the United States, and one in Iran. Notably, 75% of the U.S.-based studies had a sample size below 30 participants. Breathwork effectiveness has been demonstrated across all included studies, regardless of participants’ religious or spiritual affiliation. However, the influence of such affiliation cannot be entirely ruled out, as it was not assessed as a variable in any of the studies [236].
Another systematic review conducted by Bentley et al. and including 58 clinical studies has recognized the effectiveness (at a statistical significance of p < 0.05) of breathwork in reducing anxiety and/or stress in most (54) of the 72 analyzed interventions, both in healthy and clinical populations, highlighting its potential benefits for young and high-anxiety individuals. In their framework for designing effective breathwork interventions, the authors emphasize the importance of long-term practice, multiple sessions, and initial human-guided training in the initial sessions. They have also demonstrated the low effectiveness of very short (<5 min) practices and those based exclusively on fast breathing, while showing that breathing pace itself is less critical, with combined interventions yielding significant positive outcomes [20].
Regarding HRVB, three meta-analyses have shown significant effects of this technique in improving mental health. Lehrer et al. reviewed 58 papers, indicating that HRVB, as well as coherent breathing, had the most pronounced effects in treating anxiety, depression, and anger, with smaller effects on stress, sleep, and quality of life [206]. The study found small to medium overall effect sizes, which were notably inflated by three outlying studies; when removed, the effect size was smaller but remained significant [206]. Goessl et al., in their analysis of 24 studies involving 484 participants, found that HRVB was associated with substantial reductions in self-reported stress and anxiety. The reported effect sizes for both within-group and between-group (matched against conditions including wait-list controls, standard care, treatment as usual, sham biofeedback, and progressive muscle relaxation) comparisons were large (p < 0.001) [237]. Pizzoli et al., based on 14 RCTs, demonstrated that HRVB has a moderate, statistically significant effect in reducing depressive symptoms in adults compared to control and active treatment conditions, with effect sizes comparable to other broadly applied approaches such as cognitive behavioral therapies. The authors observed higher effectiveness in more recent research due to advancements in biofeedback technology and research methodologies [238].
In conclusion, the highest level of evidence indicates that breathwork may serve as a complementary intervention for mental health issues, while emphasizing the need for further research in clinical populations.

6.4. Clinical Context

Recently, Kavitha et al. conducted an RCT in India involving 140 patients (112 participants completed the study) with anxiety, investigating the effects of incorporating a 20-min slow pranayama session followed by a 10-min relaxation pose (savasana) into a standard psychiatric care routine [232]. After eight weeks of regular practice, the majority of cardiovascular parameters showed statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvements in the pranayama group compared to the control group (routine psychiatric care). These improvements included decreases in resting HR, BP, and LF power, as well as increases in resting HRV parameters such as RMSSD, SDNN, and HF power, indicating better sympathovagal balance and autonomic reactivity with greater PNS activity [232].
Given the limited effectiveness of standard depression treatments in improving HRV, Caldwell et al. examined the impact of adding HRVB to psychotherapy. After six weeks, the combined intervention group showed a greater reduction in depressive symptoms and a significant increase in HRV compared to control groups, suggesting HRVB as an effective supplementary intervention [221]. In another study, Blades et al. compared the Wim Hof Method (WHM), which is based on fast breathwork, with an active control intervention incorporating slow-paced breathing in 84 women with severe depressive symptoms and at risk of clinical depression [239]. After a three-week intervention and at a three-month follow-up, both groups showed reductions in depression, anxiety, and perceived stress, as well as lower cortisol reactivity to acute stress. However, while the WHM group exhibited significantly less daily rumination after stress exposure, participants reported lower satisfaction with the high-frequency breathing technique. This dissatisfaction may have stemmed from the incorporation of cold showers in the WHM protocol [239]. It is possible that fast breathwork, which initially induces higher SNS activity, may help prepare individuals for real-life stress by intentionally triggering a controlled stress response [133]. However, such techniques should be practiced in a safe environment, as they carry the risk of adverse effects. Sharma et al., in their RCT, examined the effectiveness of breathwork in 25 patients with major depressive disorder who had not responded to antidepressant treatment. The application of the Sudarshan Kriya Yoga (SKY) program, a combination of slow and fast breathing techniques, over eight weeks resulted in statistically significant improvements in symptoms of depression and anxiety compared to a wait-list control group [240]. However, it is noteworthy that, while the aforementioned findings are promising, they are based on a relatively small sample size (n = 25), requiring further replication in larger trials.
Lastly, anxiety and panic disorder have been interrelated with abnormal respiratory patterns and DB [201,241,242]. The positive feedback loop between anxiety, increased sympathetic activity, and thoracic dominant breathing may worsen ventilation and reduce oxygen availability, potentially leading to cognitive impairment and heightened panic and anxiety symptoms [168,201]. Furthermore, numerous studies have highlighted a possible association between respiratory and olfactory dysfunctions, particularly those related to nasal obstruction and comorbid psychiatric symptoms [60,165,243]. Therefore, addressing DB appears to be highly beneficial in managing MD.
Leyro et al. conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 40 RCTs exploring the potential of respiratory interventions targeting DB for anxiety treatment [201]. They reported medium to large improvements in anxiety symptoms compared to controls, particularly inactive ones, with notable effects on dimensional anxiety and panic symptoms. By correcting respiratory dysfunctions, breathwork techniques were found to be effective in alleviating somatic symptoms and reducing physiological arousal [201]. However, the effects were smaller when compared to active controls, and most of the analyzed studies had a high risk of bias, underscoring the need for further research to refine and standardize these interventions. Additionally, the findings highlight the potential of breathwork to enhance anxiety sensitivity and reduce intolerance to uncertainty by fostering a greater sense of control. This suggests that breathwork could possibly serve as a promising approach not only for anxiety management but also for addressing broader comorbid symptoms in both clinical and general populations [201]. One RCT examining the use of a 10-day breathing exercise program in older hospitalized patients with acute COPD exacerbation found that practicing breathwork significantly improved dyspnea, anxiety, and depression compared to the control group [244].
Therefore, the incorporation of breathwork into treatment may be particularly effective for individuals with pre-existing respiratory conditions, who are also more susceptible to co-occurring DB and MD, as exemplified by individuals with asthma [165,168,201,245,246].

7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives

In today’s fast-paced world, breathwork has emerged as a simple and valuable tool for enhancing psychological resilience. Growing evidence has recognized its effectiveness as a safe, non-pharmacological approach for managing stress and improving mental health. Based on its strong psychophysiological foundations, breathwork has the potential to effectively target symptoms of anxiety and depression, offering a viable adjunctive intervention that may be seamlessly integrated with standard therapeutic treatments for various mental disorders [160,165,236].
However, certain precautions must be considered, particularly with fast breathing techniques. While controlled hyperventilation has the potential to induce altered states of consciousness that may aid emotional processing, it also carries risks, especially for vulnerable clinical populations. Under controlled therapeutic conditions—and balanced with slow-paced techniques—fast breathwork might help individuals gain better control over their autonomic responses and help reduce stress in critical situations [20,135,247]. Their careful application in supportive settings could be beneficial, particularly for treatment-resistant anxiety and depression [247].
Looking broadly at breathwork, the associated health benefits appear to be extensive, regardless of the specific technique. Based on the latest findings and in line with some authors’ claims, we argue that its long-term effectiveness depends more on volitional breathing regulation in a structured, regularly paced manner than on the often minimal theoretical and methodological differences between techniques [20,133]. The effectiveness of most breathing techniques has been associated with their positive modulatory effects on the PNS, on neurophysiological changes related to stress appraisal, and on the enhancement of attention. While various techniques may yield different short-term psychophysiological effects, their distinctive long-term significance diminishes over time. It is systematic, consistent practice that enables individuals to recognize and interrupt habitual, maladaptive thought patterns and increase overall stress resilience. However, the power of breathwork’s short-term effects should not be underestimated. The ability to regulate acute stress responses situationally may be crucial for preventing chronic stress and reducing risk factors associated with declining mental well-being.
Despite its promise, current research on breathwork is not without limitations, including methodological inconsistencies, small sample sizes, and inadequate control conditions, which make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, some claims may reflect a reliance on traditional practices rather than rigorous scientific validation. Future investigation should address these gaps by incorporating diverse samples and active control groups while exploring additional variables such as participant expectations, individual characteristics, and socio-cultural influences.
The broader implementation of breathwork into daily life holds great promise from both economic and practical perspectives. Its inherent simplicity allows effective practice without the need for expensive equipment or specialized training. While HRVB devices may enhance the practice, evidence suggests that simple, slow-paced techniques can offer comparable benefits. Further comparative studies are needed to evaluate breathwork’s efficacy relative to conventional therapies and other non-pharmacological treatments, such as mindfulness and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Additionally, research should explore potential synergies when these interventions are combined.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.S., A.F.P. and M.B.; investigation, A.S. and A.F.P.; writing—original draft preparation, A.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S. and M.B.; visualization, A.S.; supervision, M.B.; funding acquisition, A.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The APC was funded by the Medical University of Białystok (grant B.SUB.24.135/01.S).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Yackle, K. Transformation of Our Understanding of Breathing Control by Molecular Tools. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2023, 85, 93–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jerath, R.; Beveridge, C. Respiratory Rhythm, Autonomic Modulation, and the Spectrum of Emotions: The Future of Emotion Recognition and Modulation. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Masaoka, Y.; Izumizaki, M.; Homma, I. Where Is the Rhythm Generator for Emotional Breathing? Prog. Brain Res. 2014, 209, 367–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fuchs, S.; Rochet-Capellan, A. The Respiratory Foundations of Spoken Language. Annu. Rev. Linguist. 2021, 7, 13–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Grassmann, M.; Vlemincx, E.; von Leupoldt, A.; Mittelstädt, J.M.; Van den Bergh, O. Respiratory Changes in Response to Cognitive Load: A Systematic Review. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 8146809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Widjaja, D.; Orini, M.; Vlemincx, E.; Van Huffel, S. Cardiorespiratory Dynamic Response to Mental Stress: A Multivariate Time-Frequency Analysis. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2013, 2013, 451857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tipton, M.J.; Harper, A.; Paton, J.F.R.; Costello, J.T. The Human Ventilatory Response to Stress: Rate or Depth? J. Physiol. 2017, 595, 5729–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nicolò, A.; Massaroni, C.; Passfield, L. Respiratory Frequency during Exercise: The Neglected Physiological Measure. Front. Physiol. 2017, 8, 922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nicolò, A.; Massaroni, C.; Schena, E.; Sacchetti, M. The Importance of Respiratory Rate Monitoring: From Healthcare to Sport and Exercise. Sensors 2020, 20, 6396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Cretikos, M.A.; Bellomo, R.; Hillman, K.; Chen, J.; Finfer, S.; Flabouris, A. Respiratory Rate: The Neglected Vital Sign. Med. J. Aust. 2008, 188, 657–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rolfe, S. The Importance of Respiratory Rate Monitoring. Br. J. Nurs. 2019, 28, 504–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Laborde, S.; Allen, M.S.; Borges, U.; Dosseville, F.; Hosang, T.J.; Iskra, M.; Mosley, E.; Salvotti, C.; Spolverato, L.; Zammit, N.; et al. Effects of Voluntary Slow Breathing on Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 138, 104711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zaccaro, A.; Piarulli, A.; Laurino, M.; Garbella, E.; Menicucci, D.; Neri, B.; Gemignani, A. How Breath-Control Can Change Your Life: A Systematic Review on Psycho-Physiological Correlates of Slow Breathing. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Fitting, J.-W. From Breathing to Respiration. Respiration 2015, 89, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gerritsen, R.J.S.; Band, G.P.H. Breath of Life: The Respiratory Vagal Stimulation Model of Contemplative Activity. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2018, 12, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Fincham, G.W.; Strauss, C.; Cavanagh, K. Effect of Coherent Breathing on Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 22141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fitzgerald, R.S.; Cherniack, N.S. Historical Perspectives on the Control of Breathing. Compr. Physiol. 2012, 2, 915–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tobe, M.; Saito, S. Analogy between Classical Yoga/Zen Breathing and Modern Clinical Respiratory Therapy. J. Anesth. 2020, 34, 944–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fincham, G.W.; Strauss, C.; Montero-Marin, J.; Cavanagh, K. Effect of Breathwork on Stress and Mental Health: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised-Controlled Trials. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bentley, T.G.K.; D’Andrea-Penna, G.; Rakic, M.; Arce, N.; LaFaille, M.; Berman, R.; Cooley, K.; Sprimont, P. Breathing Practices for Stress and Anxiety Reduction: Conceptual Framework of Implementation Guidelines Based on a Systematic Review of the Published Literature. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Russo, M.A.; Santarelli, D.M.; O’Rourke, D. The Physiological Effects of Slow Breathing in the Healthy Human. Breathe 2017, 13, 298–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nestor, J. Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art; Penguin: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Banushi, B.; Brendle, M.; Ragnhildstveit, A.; Murphy, T.; Moore, C.; Egberts, J.; Robison, R. Breathwork Interventions for Adults with Clinically Diagnosed Anxiety Disorders: A Scoping Review. Brain Sci. 2023, 13, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Zou, Y.; Zhao, X.; Hou, Y.-Y.; Liu, T.; Wu, Q.; Huang, Y.-H.; Wang, X.-H. Meta-Analysis of Effects of Voluntary Slow Breathing Exercises for Control of Heart Rate and Blood Pressure in Patients With Cardiovascular Diseases. Am. J. Cardiol. 2017, 120, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ferrari, A.; Santomauro, D.; Herrera, A.; Shadid, J.; Ashbaugh, C.; Erskine, H.; Charlson, F.; Degenhardt, L.; Scott, J.; McGrath, J.; et al. Global, Regional, and National Burden of 12 Mental Disorders in 204 Countries and Territories, 1990–2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Psychiatry 2022, 9, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Hidaka, B.H. Depression as a Disease of Modernity: Explanations for Increasing Prevalence. J. Affect. Disord. 2012, 140, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wallensten, J.; Ljunggren, G.; Nager, A.; Wachtler, C.; Bogdanovic, N.; Petrovic, P.; Carlsson, A.C. Stress, Depression, and Risk of Dementia—A Cohort Study in the Total Population between 18 and 65 Years Old in Region Stockholm. Alzheimers Res. Ther. 2023, 15, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kellerman, J.K.; Hamilton, J.L.; Selby, E.A.; Kleiman, E.M. The Mental Health Impact of Daily News Exposure During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Ment. Health 2022, 9, e36966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Peters, A.; McEwen, B.S.; Friston, K. Uncertainty and Stress: Why It Causes Diseases and How It Is Mastered by the Brain. Prog. Neurobiol. 2017, 156, 164–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Salari, N.; Hosseinian-Far, A.; Jalali, R.; Vaisi-Raygani, A.; Rasoulpoor, S.; Mohammadi, M.; Rasoulpoor, S.; Khaledi-Paveh, B. Prevalence of Stress, Anxiety, Depression among the General Population during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Glob. Health 2020, 16, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ryu, S.; Fan, L. The Relationship Between Financial Worries and Psychological Distress Among U.S. Adults. J. Fam. Econ. Issues 2023, 44, 16–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Katsampouris, E.; Turner-Cobb, J.M.; Barnett, J.C.; Arnold, R.S. Can Ancient and Modern Stressors Be Distinguished? A Mixed-Methods Exploration of Psychosocial Characteristics and Health Symptoms in Young and Older Adults. J. Health Psychol. 2022, 27, 624–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Lim, A.J.; Tan, E. Social Media Ills and Evolutionary Mismatches: A Conceptual Framework. Evol. Psychol. Sci. 2024, 10, 212–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hutmacher, F. Putting Stress in Historical Context: Why It Is Important That Being Stressed Out Was Not a Way to Be a Person 2,000 Years Ago. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 539799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Santarelli, S.; Lesuis, S.L.; Wang, X.-D.; Wagner, K.V.; Hartmann, J.; Labermaier, C.; Scharf, S.H.; Müller, M.B.; Holsboer, F.; Schmidt, M.V. Evidence Supporting the Match/Mismatch Hypothesis of Psychiatric Disorders. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014, 24, 907–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Nunn, C.L.; Samson, D.R.; Krystal, A.D. Shining Evolutionary Light on Human Sleep and Sleep Disorders. Evol. Med. Public Health 2016, 2016, 227–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Durisko, Z.; Mulsant, B.H.; McKenzie, K.; Andrews, P.W. Using Evolutionary Theory to Guide Mental Health Research. Can. J. Psychiatry 2016, 61, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bateson, M.; Brilot, B.; Nettle, D. Anxiety: An Evolutionary Approach. Can. J. Psychiatry 2011, 56, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Price, J.S. Evolutionary Aspects of Anxiety Disorders. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 2003, 5, 223–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nettle, D. Evolutionary Origins of Depression: A Review and Reformulation. J. Affect. Disord. 2004, 81, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Salleh, M.R. Life Event, Stress and Illness. Malays. J. Med. Sci. 2008, 15, 9–18. [Google Scholar]
  42. Lu, S.; Wei, F.; Li, G. The Evolution of the Concept of Stress and the Framework of the Stress System. Cell Stress 2021, 5, 76–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Dhabhar, F.S. The Short-Term Stress Response—Mother Nature’s Mechanism for Enhancing Protection and Performance Under Conditions of Threat, Challenge, and Opportunity. Front. Neuroendocrinol. 2018, 49, 175–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Russell, G.; Lightman, S. The Human Stress Response. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2019, 15, 525–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Dhabhar, F.S. A Hassle a Day May Keep the Pathogens Away: The Fight-or-Flight Stress Response and the Augmentation of Immune Function. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2009, 49, 215–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. McCorry, L.K. Physiology of the Autonomic Nervous System. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2007, 71, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Baum, A. Stress, Intrusive Imagery, and Chronic Distress. Health Psychol. 1990, 9, 653–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. McEwen, B.S. Stressed or Stressed out: What Is the Difference? J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2005, 30, 315–318. [Google Scholar]
  49. O’Connor, D.B.; Thayer, J.F.; Vedhara, K. Stress and Health: A Review of Psychobiological Processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2021, 72, 663–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yaribeygi, H.; Panahi, Y.; Sahraei, H.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. The Impact of Stress on Body Function: A Review. EXCLI J. 2017, 16, 1057–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Roberts, B.L.; Karatsoreos, I.N. Brain–Body Responses to Chronic Stress: A Brief Review. Fac. Rev. 2021, 10, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. McEwen, B.S. Central Effects of Stress Hormones in Health and Disease: Understanding the Protective and Damaging Effects of Stress and Stress Mediators. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2008, 583, 174–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. McManus, E.; Haroon, H.; Duncan, N.W.; Elliott, R.; Muhlert, N. The Effects of Stress across the Lifespan on the Brain, Cognition and Mental Health: A UK Biobank Study. Neurobiol. Stress 2022, 18, 100447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Mariotti, A. The Effects of Chronic Stress on Health: New Insights into the Molecular Mechanisms of Brain–Body Communication. Future Sci. OA 2015, 1, FSO23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Renzaho, A.M.N.; Houng, B.; Oldroyd, J.; Nicholson, J.M.; D’Esposito, F.; Oldenburg, B. Stressful Life Events and the Onset of Chronic Diseases among Australian Adults: Findings from a Longitudinal Survey. Eur. J. Public Health 2014, 24, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. McEwen, B.S. Physiology and Neurobiology of Stress and Adaptation: Central Role of the Brain. Physiol. Rev. 2007, 87, 873–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Won, E.; Kim, Y.-K. Stress, the Autonomic Nervous System, and the Immune-Kynurenine Pathway in the Etiology of Depression. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2016, 14, 665–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Fava, G.A.; McEwen, B.S.; Guidi, J.; Gostoli, S.; Offidani, E.; Sonino, N. Clinical Characterization of Allostatic Overload. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019, 108, 94–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Barker, N.; Everard, M.L. Getting to Grips with “Dysfunctional Breathing”. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2015, 16, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vidotto, L.S.; de Carvalho, C.R.F.; Harvey, A.; Jones, M. Dysfunctional Breathing: What Do We Know? J. Bras. Pneumol. 2019, 45, e20170347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hassard, J.; Teoh, K.R.H.; Visockaite, G.; Dewe, P.; Cox, T. The Cost of Work-Related Stress to Society: A Systematic Review. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2018, 23, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Fawzy, M.; Hamed, S.A. Prevalence of Psychological Stress, Depression and Anxiety among Medical Students in Egypt. Psychiatry Res. 2017, 255, 186–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rudolphi, J.M.; Berg, R.L.; Parsaik, A. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Among Young Farmers and Ranchers: A Pilot Study. Community Ment. Health J. 2020, 56, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Karami, N.; Kazeminia, M.; Karami, A.; Salimi, Y.; Ziapour, A.; Janjani, P. Global Prevalence of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in Cardiac Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2023, 324, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ford, D.M.; Budworth, L.; Lawton, R.; Teale, E.A.; O’Connor, D.B. In-Hospital Stress and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0282789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Çelmeçe, N.; Menekay, M. The Effect of Stress, Anxiety and Burnout Levels of Healthcare Professionals Caring for COVID-19 Patients on Their Quality of Life. Front. Psychol. 2020, 11, 597624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Arnsten, A.F.T.; Shanafelt, T. Physician Distress and Burnout: The Neurobiological Perspective. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2021, 96, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Hopper, S.I.; Murray, S.L.; Ferrara, L.R.; Singleton, J.K. Effectiveness of Diaphragmatic Breathing for Reducing Physiological and Psychological Stress in Adults: A Quantitative Systematic Review. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2019, 17, 1855–1876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kim, H.-G.; Cheon, E.-J.; Bai, D.-S.; Lee, Y.H.; Koo, B.-H. Stress and Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature. Psychiatry Investig. 2018, 15, 235–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Viljoen, M.; Claassen, N. Allostatic Load and Heart Rate Variability as Health Risk Indicators. Afr. Health Sci. 2017, 17, 428–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Shaffer, F.; Ginsberg, J.P. An Overview of Heart Rate Variability Metrics and Norms. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Johnston, B.W.; Barrett-Jolley, R.; Krige, A.; Welters, I.D. Heart Rate Variability: Measurement and Emerging Use in Critical Care Medicine. J. Intensive Care Soc. 2020, 21, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tiwari, R.; Kumar, R.; Malik, S.; Raj, T.; Kumar, P. Analysis of Heart Rate Variability and Implication of Different Factors on Heart Rate Variability. Curr. Cardiol. Rev. 2021, 17, e160721189770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. An, E.; Nolty, A.A.T.; Amano, S.S.; Rizzo, A.A.; Buckwalter, J.G.; Rensberger, J. Heart Rate Variability as an Index of Resilience. Mil. Med. 2020, 185, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Thayer, J.F.; Yamamoto, S.S.; Brosschot, J.F. The Relationship of Autonomic Imbalance, Heart Rate Variability and Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors. Int. J. Cardiol. 2010, 141, 122–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cygankiewicz, I.; Zareba, W. Heart Rate Variability. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 117, 379–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Draghici, A.E.; Taylor, J.A. The Physiological Basis and Measurement of Heart Rate Variability in Humans. J. Physiol. Anthropol. 2016, 35, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yasuma, F.; Hayano, J.-I. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia: Why Does the Heartbeat Synchronize with Respiratory Rhythm? Chest 2004, 125, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Ali, M.K.; Liu, L.; Hussain, A.; Zheng, D.; Alam, M.; Chen, J.-H.; Huizinga, J.D. Root Mean Square of Successive Differences Is Not a Valid Measure of Parasympathetic Reactivity during Slow Deep Breathing. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2023, 324, R446–R456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Clemson, P.T.; Hoag, J.B.; Cooke, W.H.; Eckberg, D.L.; Stefanovska, A. Beyond the Baroreflex: A New Measure of Autonomic Regulation Based on the Time-Frequency Assessment of Variability, Phase Coherence and Couplings. Front. Netw. Physiol. 2022, 2, 891604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Skytioti, M.; Elstad, M. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Is Mainly Driven by Central Feedforward Mechanisms in Healthy Humans. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 768465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Noble, D.J.; Hochman, S. Hypothesis: Pulmonary Afferent Activity Patterns During Slow, Deep Breathing Contribute to the Neural Induction of Physiological Relaxation. Front. Physiol. 2019, 10, 1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lehrer, P.M.; Gevirtz, R. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback: How and Why Does It Work? Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Jerath, R.; Edry, J.W.; Barnes, V.A.; Jerath, V. Physiology of Long Pranayamic Breathing: Neural Respiratory Elements May Provide a Mechanism That Explains How Slow Deep Breathing Shifts the Autonomic Nervous System. Med. Hypotheses 2006, 67, 566–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Laborde, S.; Mosley, E.; Thayer, J.F. Heart Rate Variability and Cardiac Vagal Tone in Psychophysiological Research—Recommendations for Experiment Planning, Data Analysis, and Data Reporting. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Kromenacker, B.W.; Sanova, A.A.; Marcus, F.I.; Allen, J.J.B.; Lane, R.D. Vagal Mediation of Low-Frequency Heart Rate Variability During Slow Yogic Breathing. Psychosom. Med. 2018, 80, 581–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Shaffer, F.; McCraty, R.; Zerr, C.L. A Healthy Heart Is Not a Metronome: An Integrative Review of the Heart’s Anatomy and Heart Rate Variability. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Penttilä, J.; Helminen, A.; Jartti, T.; Kuusela, T.; Huikuri, H.V.; Tulppo, M.P.; Coffeng, R.; Scheinin, H. Time Domain, Geometrical and Frequency Domain Analysis of Cardiac Vagal Outflow: Effects of Various Respiratory Patterns. Clin. Physiol. 2001, 21, 365–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Natarajan, A. Heart Rate Variability during Mindful Breathing Meditation. Front. Physiol. 2023, 13, 1017350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Shao, R.; Man, I.S.C.; Lee, T.M.C. The Effect of Slow-Paced Breathing on Cardiovascular and Emotion Functions: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review. Mindfulness 2024, 15, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Quintana, D.S.; Heathers, J.A.J. Considerations in the Assessment of Heart Rate Variability in Biobehavioral Research. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Billman, G.E. The LF/HF Ratio Does Not Accurately Measure Cardiac Sympatho-Vagal Balance. Front. Physiol. 2013, 4, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. You, M.; Laborde, S.; Zammit, N.; Iskra, M.; Borges, U.; Dosseville, F. Single Slow-Paced Breathing Session at Six Cycles per Minute: Investigation of Dose-Response Relationship on Cardiac Vagal Activity. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mauro, M.; Cegolon, L.; Bestiaco, N.; Zulian, E.; Filon, F.L. Heart Rate Variability Modulation Through Slow-Paced Breathing in Health Care Workers with Long COVID: A Case-Control Study. Am. J. Med. 2025, 138, 870–883.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. You, M.; Laborde, S.; Ackermann, S.; Borges, U.; Dosseville, F.; Mosley, E. Influence of Respiratory Frequency of Slow-Paced Breathing on Vagally-Mediated Heart Rate Variability. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2024, 49, 133–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Sharpe, E.; Lacombe, A.; Sadowski, A.; Phipps, J.; Heer, R.; Rajurkar, S.; Hanes, D.; Jindal, R.D.; Bradley, R. Investigating Components of Pranayama for Effects on Heart Rate Variability. J. Psychosom. Res. 2021, 148, 110569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Lin, I.M.; Tai, L.Y.; Fan, S.Y. Breathing at a Rate of 5.5 Breaths per Minute with Equal Inhalation-to-Exhalation Ratio Increases Heart Rate Variability. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2014, 91, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Butt, M.F.; Albusoda, A.; Farmer, A.D.; Aziz, Q. The Anatomical Basis for Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation. J. Anat. 2020, 236, 588–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Chae, J.-H.; Nahas, Z.; Lomarev, M.; Denslow, S.; Lorberbaum, J.P.; Bohning, D.E.; George, M.S. A Review of Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS). J. Psychiatr. Res. 2003, 37, 443–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Howland, R.H. Vagus Nerve Stimulation. Curr. Behav. Neurosci. Rep. 2014, 1, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Thayer, J.F.; Sternberg, E. Beyond Heart Rate Variability: Vagal Regulation of Allostatic Systems. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1088, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Komisaruk, B.R.; Frangos, E. Vagus Nerve Afferent Stimulation: Projection into the Brain, Reflexive Physiological, Perceptual, and Behavioral Responses, and Clinical Relevance. Auton. Neurosci. 2022, 237, 102908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sevoz-Couche, C.; Laborde, S. Heart Rate Variability and Slow-Paced Breathing:When Coherence Meets Resonance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2022, 135, 104576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Fumoto, M.; Sato-Suzuki, I.; Seki, Y.; Mohri, Y.; Arita, H. Appearance of High-Frequency Alpha Band with Disappearance of Low-Frequency Alpha Band in EEG Is Produced during Voluntary Abdominal Breathing in an Eyes-Closed Condition. Neurosci. Res. 2004, 50, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Malhotra, V.; Javed, D.; Wakode, S.; Bharshankar, R.; Soni, N.; Porter, P.K. Study of Immediate Neurological and Autonomic Changes during Kapalbhati Pranayama in Yoga Practitioners. J. Family Med. Prim. Care 2022, 11, 720–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Lalitha, S.; Maheshkumar, K.; Shobana, R.; Deepika, C. Immediate Effect of Kapalbhathi Pranayama on Short Term Heart Rate Variability (HRV) in Healthy Volunteers. J. Complement. Integr. Med. 2020, 18, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Shaffer, F.; Meehan, Z.M. A Practical Guide to Resonance Frequency Assessment for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Front. Neurosci. 2020, 14, 570400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Dick, T.E.; Hsieh, Y.-H.; Dhingra, R.R.; Baekey, D.M.; Galán, R.F.; Wehrwein, E.; Morris, K.F. Cardiorespiratory Coupling: Common Rhythms in Cardiac, Sympathetic, and Respiratory Activities. Prog. Brain Res. 2014, 209, 191–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hinterberger, T.; Walter, N.; Doliwa, C.; Loew, T. The Brain’s Resonance with Breathing-Decelerated Breathing Synchronizes Heart Rate and Slow Cortical Potentials. J. Breath Res. 2019, 13, 046003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gitler, A.; Vanacker, L.; De Couck, M.; De Leeuw, I.; Gidron, Y. Neuromodulation Applied to Diseases: The Case of HRV Biofeedback. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Heck, D.H.; McAfee, S.S.; Liu, Y.; Babajani-Feremi, A.; Rezaie, R.; Freeman, W.J.; Wheless, J.W.; Papanicolaou, A.C.; Ruszinkó, M.; Sokolov, Y.; et al. Breathing as a Fundamental Rhythm of Brain Function. Front. Neural Circuits 2017, 10, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Herrero, J.L.; Khuvis, S.; Yeagle, E.; Cerf, M.; Mehta, A.D. Breathing above the Brain Stem: Volitional Control and Attentional Modulation in Humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2018, 119, 145–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Stancák, A.; Pfeffer, D.; Hrudová, L.; Sovka, P.; Dostálek, C. Electroencephalographic Correlates of Paced Breathing. Neuroreport 1993, 4, 723–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Srinivasan, T.M. Pranayama and brain correlates. Anc. Sci. Life 1991, 11, 2–6. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  115. Sherlin, L.; Muench, F.; Wyckoff, S. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Feedback in a Stressed Population Exposed to a Brief Stressor Demonstrated by Quantitative EEG and sLORETA. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2010, 35, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Prinsloo, G.E.; Rauch, H.G.L.; Karpul, D.; Derman, W.E. The Effect of a Single Session of Short Duration Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback on EEG: A Pilot Study. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2013, 38, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Cheng, K.S.; Han, R.P.S.; Lee, P.F. Neurophysiological Study on the Effect of Various Short Durations of Deep Breathing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2018, 249, 23–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Komori, T. Extreme Prolongation of Expiration Breathing: Effects on Electroencephalogram and Autonomic Nervous Function. Ment. Illn. 2018, 10, 7881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Dziembowska, I.; Izdebski, P.; Rasmus, A.; Brudny, J.; Grzelczak, M.; Cysewski, P. Effects of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback on EEG Alpha Asymmetry and Anxiety Symptoms in Male Athletes: A Pilot Study. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2016, 41, 141–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lee, S.-H.; Lee, H.-J.; Park, D.-S. Effects of Deep and Slow Breathing on Stress Stimulation Caused by High-Intensity Exercise in Healthy Adults. Psychol. Health Med. 2021, 26, 1079–1090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bassi, T.; Rohrs, E.E.; Parfait, M.; Hannigan, B.C.; Reynolds, S.; Mayaux, J.; Decavèle, M.; Herrero, J.; Demoule, A.; Similowski, T.; et al. Restoring Brain Connectivity by Phrenic Nerve Stimulation in Sedated and Mechanically Ventilated Patients. Commun. Med. 2024, 4, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Budhi, R.B.; Singh, D.; Goswami, J.; Manjunath, N.K.; Vinchurkar, S. Influence of High-Frequency Yoga Breathing (Kapalabhati) on States Changes in Gamma Oscillation. Int. J. Yoga 2024, 17, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Zaccaro, A.; Piarulli, A.; Melosini, L.; Menicucci, D.; Gemignani, A. Neural Correlates of Non-Ordinary States of Consciousness in Pranayama Practitioners: The Role of Slow Nasal Breathing. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 803904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Folschweiller, S.; Sauer, J.-F. Respiration-Driven Brain Oscillations in Emotional Cognition. Front. Neural Circuits 2021, 15, 761812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Piarulli, A.; Zaccaro, A.; Laurino, M.; Menicucci, D.; De Vito, A.; Bruschini, L.; Berrettini, S.; Bergamasco, M.; Laureys, S.; Gemignani, A. Ultra-Slow Mechanical Stimulation of Olfactory Epithelium Modulates Consciousness by Slowing Cerebral Rhythms in Humans. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 6581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Zelano, C.; Jiang, H.; Zhou, G.; Arora, N.; Schuele, S.; Rosenow, J.; Gottfried, J.A. Nasal Respiration Entrains Human Limbic Oscillations and Modulates Cognitive Function. J. Neurosci. 2016, 36, 12448–12467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Hsu, S.-M.; Tseng, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Hsieh, C.-W. Slow-Paced Inspiration Regularizes Alpha Phase Dynamics in the Human Brain. J. Neurophysiol. 2020, 123, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lutz, A.; Greischar, L.L.; Rawlings, N.B.; Ricard, M.; Davidson, R.J. Long-Term Meditators Self-Induce High-Amplitude Gamma Synchrony during Mental Practice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 16369–16373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Heck, D.H.; Kozma, R.; Kay, L.M. The Rhythm of Memory: How Breathing Shapes Memory Function. J. Neurophysiol. 2019, 122, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Levinson, D.B.; Stoll, E.L.; Kindy, S.D.; Merry, H.L.; Davidson, R.J. A Mind You Can Count on: Validating Breath Counting as a Behavioral Measure of Mindfulness. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Kabat-Zinn, J. Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2003, 10, 144–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Kirk, U.; Axelsen, J.L. Heart Rate Variability Is Enhanced during Mindfulness Practice: A Randomized Controlled Trial Involving a 10-Day Online-Based Mindfulness Intervention. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0243488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Fincham, G.W.; Epel, E.; Colasanti, A.; Strauss, C.; Cavanagh, K. Effects of Brief Remote High Ventilation Breathwork with Retention on Mental Health and Wellbeing: A Randomised Placebo-Controlled Trial. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 16893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Sharma, V.K.; Trakroo, M.; Subramaniam, V.; Rajajeyakumar, M.; Bhavanani, A.B.; Sahai, A. Effect of Fast and Slow Pranayama on Perceived Stress and Cardiovascular Parameters in Young Health-Care Students. Int. J. Yoga 2013, 6, 104–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Bahi, C.; Irrmischer, M.; Franken, K.; Fejer, G.; Schlenker, A.; Deijen, J.B.; Engelbregt, H. Effects of Conscious Connected Breathing on Cortical Brain Activity, Mood and State of Consciousness in Healthy Adults. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 10578–10589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Critchley, H.D.; Nicotra, A.; Chiesa, P.A.; Nagai, Y.; Gray, M.A.; Minati, L.; Bernardi, L. Slow Breathing and Hypoxic Challenge: Cardiorespiratory Consequences and Their Central Neural Substrates. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0127082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Mejía-Mejía, E.; Torres, R.; Restrepo, D. Physiological Coherence in Healthy Volunteers during Laboratory-Induced Stress and Controlled Breathing. Psychophysiology 2018, 55, e13046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Chaitanya, S.; Datta, A.; Bhandari, B.; Sharma, V.K. Effect of Resonance Breathing on Heart Rate Variability and Cognitive Functions in Young Adults: A Randomised Controlled Study. Cureus 2022, 14, e22187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Balban, M.Y.; Neri, E.; Kogon, M.M.; Weed, L.; Nouriani, B.; Jo, B.; Holl, G.; Zeitzer, J.M.; Spiegel, D.; Huberman, A.D. Brief Structured Respiration Practices Enhance Mood and Reduce Physiological Arousal. Cell Rep. Med. 2023, 4, 100895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Röttger, S.; Theobald, D.A.; Abendroth, J.; Jacobsen, T. The Effectiveness of Combat Tactical Breathing as Compared with Prolonged Exhalation. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2021, 46, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Vierra, J.; Boonla, O.; Prasertsri, P. Effects of Sleep Deprivation and 4-7-8 Breathing Control on Heart Rate Variability, Blood Pressure, Blood Glucose, and Endothelial Function in Healthy Young Adults. Physiol. Rep. 2022, 10, e15389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Aktaş, G.K.; İlgin, V.E. The Effect of Deep Breathing Exercise and 4-7-8 Breathing Techniques Applied to Patients After Bariatric Surgery on Anxiety and Quality of Life. Obes. Surg. 2023, 33, 920–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Mitsungnern, T.; Srimookda, N.; Imoun, S.; Wansupong, S.; Kotruchin, P. The Effect of Pursed-lip Breathing Combined with Number Counting on Blood Pressure and Heart Rate in Hypertensive Urgency Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J. Clin. Hypertens. 2021, 23, 672–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Yang, Y.; Wei, L.; Wang, S.; Ke, L.; Zhao, H.; Mao, J.; Li, J.; Mao, Z. The Effects of Pursed Lip Breathing Combined with Diaphragmatic Breathing on Pulmonary Function and Exercise Capacity in Patients with COPD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2022, 38, 847–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Ramos, E.M.C.; Vanderlei, L.C.M.; Ramos, D.; Teixeira, L.M.; Pitta, F.; Veloso, M. Influence of Pursed-Lip Breathing on Heart Rate Variability and Cardiorespiratory Parameters in Subjects with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Braz. J. Phys. Ther. 2009, 13, 288–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Elsheikh, S.; Elnahas, N.; Soliman, A.W.; Ismail, A. Effect of Bhramari versus Sheetali Pranayama on Quality of Life in Hypertensive Patients. Adv. Rehabil. 2023, 37, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Thanalakshmi, J.; Maheshkumar, K.; Kannan, R.; Sundareswaran, L.; Venugopal, V.; Poonguzhali, S. Effect of Sheetali Pranayama on Cardiac Autonomic Function among Patients with Primary Hypertension—A Randomized Controlled Trial. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2020, 39, 101138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Ghiya, S. Alternate Nostril Breathing: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Int. J. Res. Med. Sci. 2017, 5, 3273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Mason, H.; Vandoni, M.; deBarbieri, G.; Codrons, E.; Ugargol, V.; Bernardi, L. Cardiovascular and Respiratory Effect of Yogic Slow Breathing in the Yoga Beginner: What Is the Best Approach? Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013, 2013, 743504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Niranjan, P.; Balaram, P. Immediate Effect of Ujjayi Pranayama on Attention and Anxiety among University Students: A Randomised Self-Control Study. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2022, 16, VC01–VC04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Trivedi, G.; Sharma, K.; Saboo, B.; Kathirvel, S.; Konat, A.; Zapadia, V.; Prajapati, P.J.; Benani, U.; Patel, K.; Shah, S. Humming (Simple Bhramari Pranayama) as a Stress Buster: A Holter-Based Study to Analyze Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Parameters During Bhramari, Physical Activity, Emotional Stress, and Sleep. Cureus 2023, 15, e37527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Kuppusamy, M.; Kamaldeen, D.; Pitani, R.; Amaldas, J.; Shanmugam, P. Effects of Bhramari Pranayama on Health—A Systematic Review. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2017, 8, 11–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Novaes, M.M.; Palhano-Fontes, F.; Onias, H.; Andrade, K.C.; Lobão-Soares, B.; Arruda-Sanchez, T.; Kozasa, E.H.; Santaella, D.F.; de Araujo, D.B. Effects of Yoga Respiratory Practice (Bhastrika Pranayama) on Anxiety, Affect, and Brain Functional Connectivity and Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Kanchibhotla, D.; Saisudha, B.; Ramrakhyani, S.; Mehta, D.H. Impact of a Yogic Breathing Technique on the Well-Being of Healthcare Professionals During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Glob. Adv. Health Med. 2021, 10, 2164956120982956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Mathersul, D.C.; Dixit, K.; Schulz-Heik, R.J.; Avery, T.J.; Zeitzer, J.M.; Bayley, P.J. Emotion Dysregulation and Heart Rate Variability Improve in US Veterans Undergoing Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Secondary Exploratory Analyses from a Randomised Controlled Trial. BMC Psychiatry 2022, 22, 268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Zwaag, J.; Naaktgeboren, R.; van Herwaarden, A.E.; Pickkers, P.; Kox, M. The Effects of Cold Exposure Training and a Breathing Exercise on the Inflammatory Response in Humans: A Pilot Study. Biopsychosoc. Sci. Med. 2022, 84, 457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Kopplin, C.S.; Rosenthal, L. The Positive Effects of Combined Breathing Techniques and Cold Exposure on Perceived Stress: A Randomised Trial. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 27058–27070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Almahayni, O.; Hammond, L. Does the Wim Hof Method Have a Beneficial Impact on Physiological and Psychological Outcomes in Healthy and Non-Healthy Participants? A Systematic Review. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0286933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Birdee, G.; Nelson, K.; Wallston, K.; Nian, H.; Diedrich, A.; Paranjape, S.; Abraham, R.; Gamboa, A. Slow Breathing for Reducing Stress: The Effect of Extending Exhale. Complement. Ther. Med. 2023, 73, 102937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Jerath, R.; Crawford, M.W.; Barnes, V.A.; Harden, K. Self-Regulation of Breathing as a Primary Treatment for Anxiety. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2015, 40, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Fincham, G.W.; Kartar, A.; Uthaug, M.V.; Anderson, B.; Hall, L.; Nagai, Y.; Critchley, H.; Colasanti, A. High Ventilation Breathwork Practices: An Overview of Their Effects, Mechanisms, and Considerations for Clinical Applications. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2023, 155, 105453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Meehan, Z.M.; Shaffer, F. Do Longer Exhalations Increase HRV During Slow-Paced Breathing? Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2024, 49, 407–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Van Diest, I.; Verstappen, K.; Aubert, A.E.; Widjaja, D.; Vansteenwegen, D.; Vlemincx, E. Inhalation/Exhalation Ratio Modulates the Effect of Slow Breathing on Heart Rate Variability and Relaxation. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2014, 39, 171–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Dillard, C.C.; Martaindale, H.; Hunter, S.D.; McAllister, M.J. Slow Breathing Reduces Biomarkers of Stress in Response to a Virtual Reality Active Shooter Training Drill. Healthcare 2023, 11, 2351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Maric, V.; Ramanathan, D.; Mishra, J. Respiratory Regulation & Interactions with Neuro-Cognitive Circuitry. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020, 112, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Tang, Y.-Y.; Ma, Y.; Fan, Y.; Feng, H.; Wang, J.; Feng, S.; Lu, Q.; Hu, B.; Lin, Y.; Li, J.; et al. Central and Autonomic Nervous System Interaction Is Altered by Short-Term Meditation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 8865–8870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Anderson, D.E.; McNeely, J.D.; Windham, B.G. Device-Guided Slow-Breathing Effects on End-Tidal CO(2) and Heart-Rate Variability. Psychol. Health Med. 2009, 14, 667–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Lalande, L.; Bambling, M.; King, R.; Lowe, R. Breathwork: An Additional Treatment Option for Depression and Anxiety? J. Contemp. Psychother. 2012, 42, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Heckenberg, R.A.; Eddy, P.; Kent, S.; Wright, B.J. Do Workplace-Based Mindfulness Meditation Programs Improve Physiological Indices of Stress? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Psychosom. Res. 2018, 114, 62–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nijjar, P.S.; Puppala, V.K.; Dickinson, O.; Duval, S.; Duprez, D.; Kreitzer, M.J.; Benditt, D.G. Modulation of the Autonomic Nervous System Assessed through Heart Rate Variability by a Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Program. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 177, 557–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Rådmark, L.; Sidorchuk, A.; Osika, W.; Niemi, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Mindfulness Based Interventions on Heart Rate Variability and Inflammatory Markers. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Brown, L.; Rando, A.A.; Eichel, K.; Van Dam, N.T.; Celano, C.M.; Huffman, J.C.; Morris, M.E. The Effects of Mindfulness and Meditation on Vagally-Mediated Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis. Psychosom. Med. 2021, 83, 631–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Brinkmann, A.E.; Press, S.A.; Helmert, E.; Hautzinger, M.; Khazan, I.; Vagedes, J. Comparing Effectiveness of HRV-Biofeedback and Mindfulness for Workplace Stress Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2020, 45, 307–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. van der Zwan, J.E.; de Vente, W.; Huizink, A.C.; Bögels, S.M.; de Bruin, E.I. Physical Activity, Mindfulness Meditation, or Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback for Stress Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2015, 40, 257–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ratanasiripong, P.; Park, J.F.; Ratanasiripong, N.; Kathalae, D. Stress and Anxiety Management in Nursing Students: Biofeedback and Mindfulness Meditation. J. Nurs. Educ. 2015, 54, 520–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Dinesh, T.; Gaur, G.; Sharma, V.; Madanmohan, T.; Harichandra Kumar, K.; Bhavanani, A. Comparative Effect of 12 Weeks of Slow and Fast Pranayama Training on Pulmonary Function in Young, Healthy Volunteers: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Int. J. Yoga 2015, 8, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Jung, J.-Y.; Kang, C.-K. Investigation on the Effect of Oral Breathing on Cognitive Activity Using Functional Brain Imaging. Healthcare 2021, 9, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Watso, J.C.; Cuba, J.N.; Boutwell, S.L.; Moss, J.E.; Bowerfind, A.K.; Fernandez, I.M.; Cassette, J.M.; May, A.M.; Kirk, K.F. Acute Nasal Breathing Lowers Diastolic Blood Pressure and Increases Parasympathetic Contributions to Heart Rate Variability in Young Adults. Am. J. Physiol.-Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2023, 325, R797–R808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Harari, D.; Redlich, M.; Miri, S.; Hamud, T.; Gross, M. The Effect of Mouth Breathing versus Nasal Breathing on Dentofacial and Craniofacial Development in Orthodontic Patients. Laryngoscope 2010, 120, 2089–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Grippaudo, C.; Paolantonio, E.G.; Antonini, G.; Saulle, R.; La Torre, G.; Deli, R. Association between Oral Habits, Mouth Breathing and Malocclusion. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 2016, 36, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Malhotra, V.; Srivastava, R.; Parasuraman, P.; Javed, D.; Wakode, S.; Thakare, A.; Sampath, A.; Kumari, A. Immediate Autonomic Changes during Right Nostril Breathing and Left Nostril Breathing in Regular Yoga Practitioners. J. Educ. Health Promot. 2022, 11, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Telles, S.; Nagarathna, R.; Nagendra, H.R. Physiological Measures of Right Nostril Breathing. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 1996, 2, 479–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Raghuraj, P.; Telles, S. Immediate Effect of Specific Nostril Manipulating Yoga Breathing Practices on Autonomic and Respiratory Variables. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2008, 33, 65–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Telles, S.; Nagarathna, R.; Nagendra, H.R. Breathing through a Particular Nostril Can Alter Metabolism and Autonomic Activities. Indian. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 1994, 38, 133–137. [Google Scholar]
  185. Bhavanani, A.B.; Ramanathan, M.; Balaji, R.; Pushpa, D. Differential Effects of Uninostril and Alternate Nostril Pranayamas on Cardiovascular Parameters and Reaction Time. Int. J. Yoga 2014, 7, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Pal, G.K.; Agarwal, A.; Karthik, S.; Pal, P.; Nanda, N. Slow Yogic Breathing Through Right and Left Nostril Influences Sympathovagal Balance, Heart Rate Variability, and Cardiovascular Risks in Young Adults. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2014, 6, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Singh, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Telles, S.; Balkrishna, A. Traditional Nostril Yoga Breathing Practices and Oxygen Consumption: A Randomized, Cross-over Study. Int. J. Yoga 2024, 17, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Frohlich, A.B.; Frohlich, F.; Sklerov, M. Neuronal Oscillations and Functional Connectivity of Paced Nostril Breathing: A High-Density EEG Study. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0316125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Pai, V.; Borkar, N.; Nirvan, M.; Verma, M. Immediate Hemodynamic Changes during Slow Uninostril and Alternate Nostril Breathing Patterns in Normotensive Adults. Int. J. Yoga 2024, 17, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Telles, S.; Singh, A.; Sharma, S.K.; Balkrishna, A. Heart Rate Variability during Nostril-Regulated Yoga Breathing: A Randomized Crossover Study. Int. J. Yoga 2024, 17, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Niazi, I.K.; Navid, M.S.; Bartley, J.; Shepherd, D.; Pedersen, M.; Burns, G.; Taylor, D.; White, D.E. EEG Signatures Change during Unilateral Yogi Nasal Breathing. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ghiya, S.; Lee, C.M. Influence of Alternate Nostril Breathing on Heart Rate Variability in Non-Practitioners of Yogic Breathing. Int. J. Yoga 2012, 5, 66–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Nam, T.G.; Jeong, H.; Kim, K.H.; Jang, I. Effectiveness of Alternative Nostril Breathing on Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Complement. Med. Res. 2024, 31, 449–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Levin, C.J.; Swoap, S.J. The Impact of Deep Breathing and Alternate Nostril Breathing on Heart Rate Variability: A Human Physiology Laboratory. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2019, 43, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Laborde, S.; Allen, M.S.; Borges, U.; Iskra, M.; Zammit, N.; You, M.; Hosang, T.; Mosley, E.; Dosseville, F. Psychophysiological Effects of Slow-Paced Breathing at Six Cycles per Minute with or without Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback. Psychophysiology 2022, 59, e13952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Lalanza, J.F.; Lorente, S.; Bullich, R.; García, C.; Losilla, J.-M.; Capdevila, L. Methods for Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback (HRVB): A Systematic Review and Guidelines. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2023, 48, 275–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Capdevila, L.; Parrado, E.; Ramos-Castro, J.; Zapata-Lamana, R.; Lalanza, J.F. Resonance Frequency Is Not Always Stable over Time and Could Be Related to the Inter-Beat Interval. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Capdevila, L. Reply to Lehrer’s Letter Concerning “Incorrect Conclusions in L. Capdevila et al., Resonance Frequency Is Not Always Stable over Time and Could Be Related to the Inter-Beat Interval, Scientific Reports, 11, 8400 (2021).”. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2021, 46, 319–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Lehrer, P.M.; Vaschillo, E.G.; Vidali, V. Heart Rate and Breathing Are Not Always in Phase During Resonance Frequency Breathing. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2020, 45, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lehrer, P. My Life in HRV Biofeedback Research. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2022, 47, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Leyro, T.M.; Versella, M.; Yang, M.-J.; Brinkman, H.R.; Hoyt, D.L.; Lehrer, P. Respiratory Therapy for the Treatment of Anxiety: Meta-Analytic Review and Regression. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2021, 84, 101980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Lin, G.; Xiang, Q.; Fu, X.; Wang, S.; Wang, S.; Chen, S.; Shao, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, T. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Decreases Blood Pressure in Prehypertensive Subjects by Improving Autonomic Function and Baroreflex. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2012, 18, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Steffen, P.R.; Austin, T.; DeBarros, A.; Brown, T. The Impact of Resonance Frequency Breathing on Measures of Heart Rate Variability, Blood Pressure, and Mood. Front. Public Health 2017, 5, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Wells, R.; Outhred, T.; Heathers, J.A.J.; Quintana, D.S.; Kemp, A.H. Matter Over Mind: A Randomised-Controlled Trial of Single-Session Biofeedback Training on Performance Anxiety and Heart Rate Variability in Musicians. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e46597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Wang, X.; Nie, J.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J. The Effects of Resonance Frequency Breathing on Cardiovascular System and Brain-Cardiopulmonary Interactions. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2025, 50, 107–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Lehrer, P.; Kaur, K.; Sharma, A.; Shah, K.; Huseby, R.; Bhavsar, J.; Sgobba, P.; Zhang, Y. Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Improves Emotional and Physical Health and Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 2020, 45, 109–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Staufenbiel, S.M.; Penninx, B.W.J.H.; Spijker, A.T.; Elzinga, B.M.; van Rossum, E.F.C. Hair Cortisol, Stress Exposure, and Mental Health in Humans: A Systematic Review. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2013, 38, 1220–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Marin, M.-F.; Lord, C.; Andrews, J.; Juster, R.-P.; Sindi, S.; Arsenault-Lapierre, G.; Fiocco, A.J.; Lupien, S.J. Chronic Stress, Cognitive Functioning and Mental Health. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 2011, 96, 583–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Tafet, G.E.; Nemeroff, C.B. The Links Between Stress and Depression: Psychoneuroendocrinological, Genetic, and Environmental Interactions. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2016, 28, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. D’Alessio, L.; Korman, G.P.; Sarudiansky, M.; Guelman, L.R.; Scévola, L.; Pastore, A.; Obregón, A.; Roldán, E.J.A. Reducing Allostatic Load in Depression and Anxiety Disorders: Physical Activity and Yoga Practice as Add-On Therapies. Front. Psychiatry 2020, 11, 501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Holwerda, S.W.; Luehrs, R.E.; Gremaud, A.L.; Wooldridge, N.A.; Stroud, A.K.; Fiedorowicz, J.G.; Abboud, F.M.; Pierce, G.L. Relative Burst Amplitude of Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity Is an Indicator of Altered Sympathetic Outflow in Chronic Anxiety. J. Neurophysiol. 2018, 120, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Schneider, M.; Schwerdtfeger, A. Autonomic Dysfunction in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Indexed by Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Med. 2020, 50, 1937–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Alvares, G.A.; Quintana, D.S.; Hickie, I.B.; Guastella, A.J. Autonomic Nervous System Dysfunction in Psychiatric Disorders and the Impact of Psychotropic Medications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2016, 41, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Hartmann, R.; Schmidt, F.M.; Sander, C.; Hegerl, U. Heart Rate Variability as Indicator of Clinical State in Depression. Front. Psychiatry 2018, 9, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Sammito, S.; Thielmann, B.; Böckelmann, I. Update: Factors Influencing Heart Rate Variability-a Narrative Review. Front. Physiol. 2024, 15, 1430458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Chalmers, J.A.; Quintana, D.S.; Abbott, M.J.-A.; Kemp, A.H. Anxiety Disorders Are Associated with Reduced Heart Rate Variability: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Psychiatry 2014, 5, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Jiryis, T.; Magal, N.; Fructher, E.; Hertz, U.; Admon, R. Resting-State Heart Rate Variability (HRV) Mediates the Association between Perceived Chronic Stress and Ambiguity Avoidance. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Bourdon, O.; Raymond, C.; Marin, M.-F.; Olivera-Figueroa, L.; Lupien, S.J.; Juster, R.-P. A Time to Be Chronically Stressed? Maladaptive Time Perspectives Are Associated with Allostatic Load. Biol. Psychol. 2020, 152, 107871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Watanabe, D.K.; Jarczok, M.N.; Williams, D.P.; Koenig, J.; Thayer, J.F. Evaluation of Low Vagally-Mediated Heart Rate Variability as an Early Marker of Depression Risk. J. Affect. Disord. 2024, 365, 146–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Kemp, A.H.; Quintana, D.S.; Gray, M.A.; Felmingham, K.L.; Brown, K.; Gatt, J.M. Impact of Depression and Antidepressant Treatment on Heart Rate Variability: A Review and Meta-Analysis. Biol. Psychiatry 2010, 67, 1067–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Caldwell, Y.T.; Steffen, P.R. Adding HRV Biofeedback to Psychotherapy Increases Heart Rate Variability and Improves the Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2018, 131, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Jacobson, N.C.; Newman, M.G. Anxiety and Depression as Bidirectional Risk Factors for One Another: A Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. Psychol. Bull. 2017, 143, 1155–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Mather, M.; Thayer, J. How Heart Rate Variability Affects Emotion Regulation Brain Networks. Curr. Opin. Behav. Sci. 2018, 19, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Ma, X.; Yue, Z.-Q.; Gong, Z.-Q.; Zhang, H.; Duan, N.-Y.; Shi, Y.-T.; Wei, G.-X.; Li, Y.-F. The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect and Stress in Healthy Adults. Front. Psychol. 2017, 8, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Keller, A.S.; Leikauf, J.E.; Holt-Gosselin, B.; Staveland, B.R.; Williams, L.M. Paying Attention to Attention in Depression. Transl. Psychiatry 2019, 9, 279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  226. Wang, H.; Mo, C.; Fang, F. Dissociated Deficits in Attentional Networks in Social Anxiety and Depression. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 1071–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  227. Schmalzl, L.; Powers, C.; Zanesco, A.P.; Yetz, N.; Groessl, E.J.; Saron, C.D. The Effect of Movement-Focused and Breath-Focused Yoga Practice on Stress Parameters and Sustained Attention: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study. Conscious. Cogn. 2018, 65, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Harrison, O.K.; Köchli, L.; Marino, S.; Luechinger, R.; Hennel, F.; Brand, K.; Hess, A.J.; Frässle, S.; Iglesias, S.; Vinckier, F.; et al. Interoception of Breathing and Its Relationship with Anxiety. Neuron 2021, 109, 4080–4093.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Alvarez, R.P.; Kirlic, N.; Misaki, M.; Bodurka, J.; Rhudy, J.L.; Paulus, M.P.; Drevets, W.C. Increased Anterior Insula Activity in Anxious Individuals Is Linked to Diminished Perceived Control. Transl. Psychiatry 2015, 5, e591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Serrano-Ibáñez, E.R.; Czub, M.; Ortega Cordero, C.; López-Martínez, A.E.; Ramírez-Maestre, C.; Piskorz, J.; Zarazaga, R.E. Effect of a Controlled Diaphragmatic Breathing Session on Perceived Pain and State Anxiety in People with Chronic Pain. Curr. Psychol. 2024, 43, 31650–31660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Galin, S.; Keren, H. The Predictive Potential of Heart Rate Variability for Depression. Neuroscience 2024, 546, 88–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Kavitha, N.; Pal, P.; Pal, G.K.; Bharadwaj, B.; Nanda, N. Effects of Slow Breathing Exercises on Cardiac Autonomic Functions in Anxiety Disorder—A Randomised Control Trial. Ann. Neurosci. 2024, 09727531241266094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Cheng, K.S.; Croarkin, P.E.; Lee, P.F. Heart Rate Variability of Various Video-Aided Mindful Deep Breathing Durations and Its Impact on Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Symptom Severity. Mindfulness 2019, 10, 2082–2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Magnon, V.; Dutheil, F.; Vallet, G.T. Benefits from One Session of Deep and Slow Breathing on Vagal Tone and Anxiety in Young and Older Adults. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 19267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Blaser, B.L.; Weymar, M.; Wendt, J. The Effect of a Single-Session Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback on Attentional Control: Does Stress. Matter? Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 1292983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Malviya, S.; Meredith, P.; Zupan, B.; Kerley, L. Identifying Alternative Mental Health Interventions: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials of Chanting and Breathwork. J. Spiritual. Ment. Health 2022, 24, 191–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Goessl, V.C.; Curtiss, J.E.; Hofmann, S.G. The Effect of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training on Stress and Anxiety: A Meta-Analysis. Psychol. Med. 2017, 47, 2578–2586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Pizzoli, S.F.M.; Marzorati, C.; Gatti, D.; Monzani, D.; Mazzocco, K.; Pravettoni, G. A Meta-Analysis on Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback and Depressive Symptoms. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 6650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Blades, R.; Mendes, W.B.; Don, B.P.; Mayer, S.E.; Dileo, R.; O’Bryan, J.; Fromer, E.; Guan, J.Y.; Cheng, S.S.; Mason, A.E.; et al. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of a Wim Hof Method Intervention in Women with High Depressive Symptoms. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2024, 20, 100272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Sharma, A.; Barrett, M.S.; Cucchiara, A.J.; Gooneratne, N.S.; Thase, M.E. A Breathing-Based Meditation Intervention for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder Following Inadequate Response to Antidepressants: A Randomized Pilot Study. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2017, 78, e59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Masaoka, Y.; Homma, I. Anxiety and Respiratory Patterns: Their Relationship during Mental Stress and Physical Load. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 1997, 27, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Grassi, M.; Caldirola, D.; Vanni, G.; Guerriero, G.; Piccinni, M.; Valchera, A.; Perna, G. Baseline Respiratory Parameters in Panic Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2013, 146, 158–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Denton, E.; Bondarenko, J.; Tay, T.; Lee, J.; Radhakrishna, N.; Hore-Lacy, F.; Martin, C.; Hoy, R.; O’Hehir, R.; Dabscheck, E.; et al. Factors Associated with Dysfunctional Breathing in Patients with Difficult to Treat Asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. Pract. 2019, 7, 1471–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Valenza, M.C.; Valenza-Peña, G.; Torres-Sánchez, I.; González-Jiménez, E.; Conde-Valero, A.; Valenza-Demet, G. Effectiveness of Controlled Breathing Techniques on Anxiety and Depression in Hospitalized Patients with COPD: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Respir. Care 2014, 59, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Courtney, R. Breathing Training for Dysfunctional Breathing in Asthma: Taking a Multidimensional Approach. ERJ Open Res. 2017, 3, 00065–2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Hagman, C.; Janson, C.; Emtner, M. A Comparison between Patients with Dysfunctional Breathing and Patients with Asthma. Clin. Respir. J. 2008, 2, 86–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Rhinewine, J.P.; Williams, O.J. Holotropic Breathwork: The Potential Role of a Prolonged, Voluntary Hyperventilation Procedure as an Adjunct to Psychotherapy. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2007, 13, 771–776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The development of allostatic overload. Note: this figure illustrates how acute stress responses progress into chronic stress, leading to allostatic load and, if unresolved, culminating in allostatic overload. The first panel highlights the effects of acute stress on both physiological responses and cognitive changes. The second panel presents modern stress factors that contribute to cumulative wear and tear on health. The third panel depicts the resulting allostatic load, while the final panel illustrates the ultimate consequence of allostatic overload—an increased risk of mental disorders and disease progression. Abbreviations: BP (blood pressure), CAN (central autonomic network), CNS (central nervous system), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), RR (respiratory rate), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), S (stress, yellow circle), R (rest, blue circle), A (adaptation, green circle), W (wear and tear, orange circle), D (disease progression, black circle), and ↑ (increase). Selected artwork used in this figure (lung, heart, brain, body outline, kidney) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/ accessed on 17 March 2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Figure 1. The development of allostatic overload. Note: this figure illustrates how acute stress responses progress into chronic stress, leading to allostatic load and, if unresolved, culminating in allostatic overload. The first panel highlights the effects of acute stress on both physiological responses and cognitive changes. The second panel presents modern stress factors that contribute to cumulative wear and tear on health. The third panel depicts the resulting allostatic load, while the final panel illustrates the ultimate consequence of allostatic overload—an increased risk of mental disorders and disease progression. Abbreviations: BP (blood pressure), CAN (central autonomic network), CNS (central nervous system), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), RR (respiratory rate), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), S (stress, yellow circle), R (rest, blue circle), A (adaptation, green circle), W (wear and tear, orange circle), D (disease progression, black circle), and ↑ (increase). Selected artwork used in this figure (lung, heart, brain, body outline, kidney) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/ accessed on 17 March 2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Medsci 13 00127 g001
Figure 2. A detailed representation of the theoretical physiological and neurophysiological pathways involved in coherent breathing. Note: Current proposed mechanisms of influence on the brain and heart through resonance/coherent breathing are based on the formation of cardiorespiratory coupling and interaction with key neuronal structures involved in emotional regulation. Rhythmic breathing at a frequency of 0.1 Hz is the basis for the formation of coherence between heart, breathing, and blood pressure oscillations. Inhalation (indicated by blue arrows), based on mechanical and neural reactions, is associated with an acceleration of the heart rate. Prolonged exhalation (black arrows) causes strong engagement of baroreceptors and increased activity of the vagus nerve, which has the potential to maximally affect the heart’s pacemaker due to prolonged hydrolysis of acetylcholine in vagal efferents. Volitional coherent breathing may also impact brain structures via the nucleus tractus solitarius and olfactory bulb stimulation, affecting limbic and paralimbic regions and the central autonomic network, which leads to the propagation of oscillatory activity in the cerebral cortex. EEG recordings often show an increase in alpha-wave power, accompanied by a decrease in beta- and theta-wave power (though in some cases, theta activity may also increase). There is also a functional connection between the NTS and the locus coeruleus, which is not shown in the figure for the sake of clarity. The overall psychophysiological effect includes higher heart rate variability, a subjective sense of relaxation, and reduced arousal. Selected artwork used in this figure (lungs, heart, brain) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/), accessed on 17 March 2025. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Abbreviations: Upward arrows (↑) indicate an increase, downward arrows (↓) indicate a decrease, a minus sign (–) denotes reduced activity, and a plus sign (+) denotes increased activity. Abbreviations: ACC (anterior cingulate cortex), ACh (acetylcholine), AM (amygdala), AI (anterior insula), BP (blood pressure), HI (hippocampus), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), HT (hypothalamus), IP (intrathoracic pressure), L-IBI (long interbeat interval), LF power (low-frequency power), NTS (nucleus tractus solitarius), OB (olfactory bulb), PCC (posterior cingulate cortex), PFC (prefrontal cortex), RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences), RSA (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), SARs (slowly adapting pulmonary receptors), S-IBI (short interbeat interval), SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), sVR (systemic venous return), TH (thalamus).
Figure 2. A detailed representation of the theoretical physiological and neurophysiological pathways involved in coherent breathing. Note: Current proposed mechanisms of influence on the brain and heart through resonance/coherent breathing are based on the formation of cardiorespiratory coupling and interaction with key neuronal structures involved in emotional regulation. Rhythmic breathing at a frequency of 0.1 Hz is the basis for the formation of coherence between heart, breathing, and blood pressure oscillations. Inhalation (indicated by blue arrows), based on mechanical and neural reactions, is associated with an acceleration of the heart rate. Prolonged exhalation (black arrows) causes strong engagement of baroreceptors and increased activity of the vagus nerve, which has the potential to maximally affect the heart’s pacemaker due to prolonged hydrolysis of acetylcholine in vagal efferents. Volitional coherent breathing may also impact brain structures via the nucleus tractus solitarius and olfactory bulb stimulation, affecting limbic and paralimbic regions and the central autonomic network, which leads to the propagation of oscillatory activity in the cerebral cortex. EEG recordings often show an increase in alpha-wave power, accompanied by a decrease in beta- and theta-wave power (though in some cases, theta activity may also increase). There is also a functional connection between the NTS and the locus coeruleus, which is not shown in the figure for the sake of clarity. The overall psychophysiological effect includes higher heart rate variability, a subjective sense of relaxation, and reduced arousal. Selected artwork used in this figure (lungs, heart, brain) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/), accessed on 17 March 2025. Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. Abbreviations: Upward arrows (↑) indicate an increase, downward arrows (↓) indicate a decrease, a minus sign (–) denotes reduced activity, and a plus sign (+) denotes increased activity. Abbreviations: ACC (anterior cingulate cortex), ACh (acetylcholine), AM (amygdala), AI (anterior insula), BP (blood pressure), HI (hippocampus), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), HT (hypothalamus), IP (intrathoracic pressure), L-IBI (long interbeat interval), LF power (low-frequency power), NTS (nucleus tractus solitarius), OB (olfactory bulb), PCC (posterior cingulate cortex), PFC (prefrontal cortex), RMSSD (root mean square of successive differences), RSA (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), SARs (slowly adapting pulmonary receptors), S-IBI (short interbeat interval), SDNN (standard deviation of NN intervals), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), sVR (systemic venous return), TH (thalamus).
Medsci 13 00127 g002
Figure 3. The effects of slow-paced breathwork on mental health. Note: This figure outlines the progression from the immediate psychophysiological effects of slow-paced breathwork to chronic stress prevention and the emergence of adaptive factors, ultimately leading to long-term health benefits. Conscious, slow breathing elicits favorable cognitive and physiological responses, which promote a rapid return to homeostasis when stressors subside. By practicing breathwork regularly, individuals may develop preventive factors against chronic stress, buffering the negative effects of ongoing stressors. Prolonged engagement in breathwork fosters both psychological and physiological resilience, ultimately supporting stress reduction and general resilience, preventing mental disorders. Abbreviations: A (adaptation, green circle), B (breathing technique, blue circle), BP (blood pressure), D (disease progression, black circle), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), RR (respiratory rate), RSA (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), S (stress, orange circle), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), ↑ (increase), ↓ (decrease). Selected artwork used in this figure (lung, heart, brain, body outline) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/), (accessed on 17 March 2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Figure 3. The effects of slow-paced breathwork on mental health. Note: This figure outlines the progression from the immediate psychophysiological effects of slow-paced breathwork to chronic stress prevention and the emergence of adaptive factors, ultimately leading to long-term health benefits. Conscious, slow breathing elicits favorable cognitive and physiological responses, which promote a rapid return to homeostasis when stressors subside. By practicing breathwork regularly, individuals may develop preventive factors against chronic stress, buffering the negative effects of ongoing stressors. Prolonged engagement in breathwork fosters both psychological and physiological resilience, ultimately supporting stress reduction and general resilience, preventing mental disorders. Abbreviations: A (adaptation, green circle), B (breathing technique, blue circle), BP (blood pressure), D (disease progression, black circle), HPA (hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis), HR (heart rate), HRV (heart rate variability), RR (respiratory rate), RSA (respiratory sinus arrhythmia), S (stress, orange circle), SNS (sympathetic nervous system), ↑ (increase), ↓ (decrease). Selected artwork used in this figure (lung, heart, brain, body outline) was adapted from pictures provided by Servier Medical Art (Servier; https://smart.servier.com/), (accessed on 17 March 2025). Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
Medsci 13 00127 g003
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Siebieszuk, A.; Płoński, A.F.; Baranowski, M. Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter? Med. Sci. 2025, 13, 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030127

AMA Style

Siebieszuk A, Płoński AF, Baranowski M. Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter? Medical Sciences. 2025; 13(3):127. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030127

Chicago/Turabian Style

Siebieszuk, Adam, Adam Filip Płoński, and Marcin Baranowski. 2025. "Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter?" Medical Sciences 13, no. 3: 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030127

APA Style

Siebieszuk, A., Płoński, A. F., & Baranowski, M. (2025). Breathwork for Chronic Stress and Mental Health: Does Choosing a Specific Technique Matter? Medical Sciences, 13(3), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030127

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop