Next Article in Journal
Low Cost, Lightweight Gravity Coring and Improved Epoxy Impregnation Applied to Laminated Maar Sediment in Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Mapping the Loss of Mt. Kenya’s Glaciers: An Example of the Challenges of Satellite Monitoring of Very Small Glaciers
Article Menu
Issue 5 (May) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Geosciences 2018, 8(5), 175;

Numerically Calculated 3D Space-Weighting Functions to Image Crustal Volcanic Structures Using Diffuse Coda Waves

Instituto Andaluz de Geofisica, University of Granada, Campus de Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, sezione di Napoli, Via Diocleziano 328, 80125 Napoli, Italy
Departamento de Teoria de la Senal Telematica y Comunicaciones, C/Periodista Daniel Saucedo Aranda, s/n, Universidad de Granada, Campus de Cartuja, 18071 Granada, Spain
Department of Geology and Petroleum Geology, School of Geosciences, University of Aberdeen, AB24 3UE, Aberdeen, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 2 April 2018 / Revised: 30 April 2018 / Accepted: 4 May 2018 / Published: 11 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Volcano Seismology)
PDF [3986 KB, uploaded 11 May 2018]


Seismic coda measurements retrieve parameters linked to the physical characteristics of rock volumes illuminated by high frequency scattered waves. Space weighting functions (SWF) and kernels are different tools that model the spatial sensitivity of coda envelopes to scattering and absorption anomalies in these rock matrices, allowing coda-wave attenuation ( Q c o d a ) imaging. This note clarifies the difference between SWF and sensitivity kernels developed for coda wave imaging. It extends the SWF previously developed in 2D to the third dimension by using radiative transfer and the diffusion equation, based on the assumption that variations of Q c o d a depend solely on variations of the extinction length. When applied to active data (Deception Island, Antarctica), 3D SWF images strongly resemble 2D images, making this 3D extension redundant. On the other hand, diffusion does not efficiently model coda waveforms when using earthquake datasets spanning depths between 0 and 20 km, such as at Mount St. Helens volcano. In this setting, scattering attenuation and absorption suffer tradeoffs and cannot be separated by fitting a single seismogram energy envelope for SWF imaging. We propose that an approximate analytical 3D SWF, similar in shape to the common coda kernels used in literature, can still be used in a space weighted back-projection approach. While Q c o d a is not a physical parameter of the propagation medium, its spatially-dependent modeling allows improved reconstruction of crustal-scale tectonic and geological features. It is even more efficient as a velocity independent imaging tool for magma and fluid storage when applied to deep volcanism. View Full-Text
Keywords: seismic attenuation; seismic coda; seismic scattering; diffusion; coda imaging seismic attenuation; seismic coda; seismic scattering; diffusion; coda imaging

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Del Pezzo, E.; De La Torre, A.; Bianco, F.; Ibanez, J.; Gabrielli, S.; De Siena, L. Numerically Calculated 3D Space-Weighting Functions to Image Crustal Volcanic Structures Using Diffuse Coda Waves. Geosciences 2018, 8, 175.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Geosciences EISSN 2076-3263 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top