Next Article in Journal
Dynamics of Carbonates in Soils under Different Land Use in Forest-Steppe Area of Russia Using Stable and Radiogenic Carbon Isotope Data
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Applicability of Molodensky’s Concept of Heights in Planetary Sciences
Previous Article in Journal
Site Effect Assessment of the Gros-Morne Hill Area in Port-au-Prince, Haiti, Part A: Geophysical-Seismological Survey Results

Topographic Effects in Geoid Determinations

Division of Geodesy and Satellite Positioning, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden
Geosciences 2018, 8(4), 143;
Received: 1 April 2018 / Revised: 15 April 2018 / Accepted: 17 April 2018 / Published: 23 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gravity Field Determination and Its Temporal Variation)
Traditionally, geoid determination is applied by Stokes’ formula with gravity anomalies after removal of the attraction of the topography by a simple or refined Bouguer correction, and restoration of topography by the primary indirect topographic effect (PITE) after integration. This technique leads to an error of the order of the quasigeoid-to-geoid separation, which is mainly due to an incomplete downward continuation of gravity from the surface to the geoid. Alternatively, one may start from the modern surface gravity anomaly and apply the direct topographic effect on the anomaly, yielding the no-topography gravity anomaly. After downward continuation of this anomaly to sea-level and Stokes integration, a theoretically correct geoid height is obtained after the restoration of the topography by the PITE. The difference between the Bouguer and no-topography gravity anomalies (on the geoid or in space) is the “secondary indirect topographic effect”, which is a necessary correction in removing all topographic signals. In modern applications of an Earth gravitational model (EGM) in geoid determination a topographic correction is also needed in continental regions. Without the correction the error can range to a few metres in the highest mountains. The remove-compute-restore and Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) techniques for geoid determinations usually employ a combination of Stokes’ formula and an EGM. Both techniques require direct and indirect topographic corrections, but in the latter method these corrections are merged as a combined topographic effect on the geoid height. Finally, we consider that any uncertainty in the topographic density distribution leads to the same error in gravimetric and geometric geoid estimates, deteriorating GNSS-levelling as a tool for validating the topographic mass distribution correction in a gravimetric geoid model. View Full-Text
Keywords: Bouguer gravity anomaly; geoid; no-topography gravity anomaly; secondary indirect topographic effect; topographic correction Bouguer gravity anomaly; geoid; no-topography gravity anomaly; secondary indirect topographic effect; topographic correction
MDPI and ACS Style

Sjöberg, L.E. Topographic Effects in Geoid Determinations. Geosciences 2018, 8, 143.

AMA Style

Sjöberg LE. Topographic Effects in Geoid Determinations. Geosciences. 2018; 8(4):143.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sjöberg, Lars E. 2018. "Topographic Effects in Geoid Determinations" Geosciences 8, no. 4: 143.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop