Review of Snow Data Assimilation Methods for Hydrological, Land Surface, Meteorological and Climate Models: Results from a COST HarmoSnow Survey
AbstractThe European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ES1404 “HarmoSnow”, entitled, “A European network for a harmonized monitoring of snow for the benefit of climate change scenarios, hydrology and numerical weather prediction” (2014-2018) aims to coordinate efforts in Europe to harmonize approaches to validation, and methodologies of snow measurement practices, instrumentation, algorithms and data assimilation (DA) techniques. One of the key objectives of the action was “Advance the application of snow DA in numerical weather prediction (NWP) and hydrological models and show its benefit for weather and hydrological forecasting as well as other applications.” This paper reviews approaches used for assimilation of snow measurements such as remotely sensed and in situ observations into hydrological, land surface, meteorological and climate models based on a COST HarmoSnow survey exploring the common practices on the use of snow observation data in different modeling environments. The aim is to assess the current situation and understand the diversity of usage of snow observations in DA, forcing, monitoring, validation, or verification within NWP, hydrology, snow and climate models. Based on the responses from the community to the questionnaire and on literature review the status and requirements for the future evolution of conventional snow observations from national networks and satellite products, for data assimilation and model validation are derived and suggestions are formulated towards standardized and improved usage of snow observation data in snow DA. Results of the conducted survey showed that there is a fit between the snow macro-physical variables required for snow DA and those provided by the measurement networks, instruments, and techniques. Data availability and resources to integrate the data in the model environment are identified as the current barriers and limitations for the use of new or upcoming snow data sources. Broadening resources to integrate enhanced snow data would promote the future plans to make use of them in all model environments. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 220 KB)
Share & Cite This Article
Helmert, J.; Şensoy Şorman, A.; Alvarado Montero, R.; De Michele, C.; De Rosnay, P.; Dumont, M.; Finger, D.C.; Lange, M.; Picard, G.; Potopová, V.; Pullen, S.; Vikhamar-Schuler, D.; Arslan, A.N. Review of Snow Data Assimilation Methods for Hydrological, Land Surface, Meteorological and Climate Models: Results from a COST HarmoSnow Survey. Geosciences 2018, 8, 489.
Helmert J, Şensoy Şorman A, Alvarado Montero R, De Michele C, De Rosnay P, Dumont M, Finger DC, Lange M, Picard G, Potopová V, Pullen S, Vikhamar-Schuler D, Arslan AN. Review of Snow Data Assimilation Methods for Hydrological, Land Surface, Meteorological and Climate Models: Results from a COST HarmoSnow Survey. Geosciences. 2018; 8(12):489.Chicago/Turabian Style
Helmert, Jürgen; Şensoy Şorman, Aynur; Alvarado Montero, Rodolfo; De Michele, Carlo; De Rosnay, Patricia; Dumont, Marie; Finger, David C.; Lange, Martin; Picard, Ghislain; Potopová, Vera; Pullen, Samantha; Vikhamar-Schuler, Dagrun; Arslan, Ali N. 2018. "Review of Snow Data Assimilation Methods for Hydrological, Land Surface, Meteorological and Climate Models: Results from a COST HarmoSnow Survey." Geosciences 8, no. 12: 489.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.