Next Article in Journal
Automatic Coastline Extraction Using Edge Detection and Optimization Procedures
Next Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Biochar Incorporation on Inorganic Nitrogen Fertilizer Plant Uptake; An Opportunity for Carbon Sequestration in Temperate Agriculture
Previous Article in Journal
3D Numerical Modelling and Sensitivity Analysis of the Processes Controlling Organic Matter Distribution and Heterogeneity—A Case Study from the Toarcian of the Paris Basin
Previous Article in Special Issue
CCS Risk Assessment: Groundwater Contamination Caused by CO2
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Ball Milling Effect on the CO2 Uptake of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review

by
Ioannis Rigopoulos
1,2,*,
Ioannis Ioannou
2,
Andreas Delimitis
3,
Angelos M. Efstathiou
4 and
Theodora Kyratsi
1
1
Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
3
Department of Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science, University of Stavanger, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
4
Department of Chemistry, Heterogeneous Catalysis Lab, University of Cyprus, 1678 Nicosia, Cyprus
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Geosciences 2018, 8(11), 406; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110406
Submission received: 14 September 2018 / Revised: 1 November 2018 / Accepted: 4 November 2018 / Published: 7 November 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Sequestration)

Abstract

:
Mineral carbonation is considered to be the most stable mechanism for the sequestration of CO2. This study comprises a comparative review of the effect of ball milling on the CO2 uptake of ultramafic/mafic lithologies, which are the most promising rocks for the mineralization of CO2. Samples of dunite, pyroxenite, olivine basalt and of a dolerite quarry waste material were previously subjected to ball milling to produce ultrafine powders with enhanced CO2 uptake. The optimum milling conditions were determined through selective CO2 chemisorption followed by temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) experiments, revealing that the CO2 uptake of the studied lithologies can be substantially enhanced via mechanical activation. Here, all these data are compared, demonstrating that the behavior of each rock under the effect of ball milling is predominantly controlled by the mineralogical composition of the starting rock materials. The ball-milled rock with the highest CO2 uptake is the dunite, followed by the olivine basalt, the pyroxenite and the dolerite. The increased CO2 uptake after ball milling is mainly attributed to the reduction of particle size to the nanoscale range, thus creating more adsorption sites per gram basis, as well as to the structural disordering of the constituent silicate minerals.

1. Introduction

The alleviation of the environmental impacts caused by the increasing levels of human CO2 emissions represents one of the greatest challenges of this century. This anthropogenic impact on the global carbon cycle is considered to be the main reason for the observed climate change over the past decades [1], which is probably irreversible on human timescales [2]. Therefore, the development of efficient technologies for carbon capture and storage (CCS) is crucial to alleviate the ongoing climate problem. This has stimulated research on the potential use of rocks that are abundant throughout the world for the removal of CO2 from the atmosphere [3,4,5,6].
Mineral carbonation is a CCS technology that was initially proposed by Seifritz [7], which includes the conversion of CO2 into carbonate minerals [8,9,10]. It requires the participation of divalent cations (Ca, Mg and Fe) that are mostly found in ultramafic and mafic rocks. These cations can react with CO2 to form carbonate minerals that are stable over geologic timescales (e.g., calcite, dolomite, magnesite, siderite—the formation of the latter is rare, but the presence of Fe can lead to the formation of ferro-magnesite (e.g., Santos et al. [11])). Mineral carbonation minimizes the risk of CO2 leakage and facilitates its long-term and safe storage [12]. The conversion of CO2 into carbonate minerals can be performed either in situ, by the injection of CO2 into mafic and ultramafic rock formations [4,13], or ex situ, as part of an industrial process, after the mining and crushing/grinding of the rock material [3,9,14]. Although the major challenges of ex situ mineral carbonation are the scale of mining operations and the high energy consumption involved in the process [3], this method could potentially be an economically viable option for small to medium emitters (≤2.5 Mt CO2) [15].
Mineral carbonation reactions are thermodynamically favored under natural conditions, but they are governed by their slow kinetics. Therefore, by accelerating these reactions, it will be possible to mitigate the atmospheric accumulation of CO2 over reasonable timescales. Ex situ carbonation reactions can be accelerated by (i) grinding the rock materials, (ii) increasing the reaction temperature, (iii) increasing the CO2 pressure, and (iv) dissolving the rock material in various solutions [16,17,18,19]. During the last decade, several studies have focused on the application of milling techniques to olivine [16,20,21,22,23,24]. However, only a few recent papers have focused on partially altered olivine-rich rocks [14,19,25,26], which are much more abundant on the Earth’s surface compared to pure olivine. In addition, a number of studies have focused on the ex situ carbon mineralization of industrial wastes (e.g., mine tailings, construction waste), which could further contribute to the reduction of atmospheric CO2 concentrations, thus economically benefiting many industries [10,27,28,29,30,31]. On the other hand, the mechanisms of mineral reactions in the presence of CO2 remain not very well understood to a large extent, particularly for ultramafic and mafic mineral assemblages.
Considering that most studies have focused on the CO2 sequestration properties of mechanically activated minerals rather than rocks, the aim of this paper is to compare the experimental results acquired by Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33] on the effect of ball milling on the CO2 uptake of a variety of ultramafic/mafic lithotypes, which can be found in large quantities around the world. The results are combined and discussed together in order to understand the optimum ball milling conditions of each lithology and their different reactivity towards CO2. The ultimate goal is to explain the different behavior of each rock type under the effect of mechanical activation and how this affects the CO2 uptake of the final ultrafine powders.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Selection and Preparation

A dunite, a pyroxenite, an olivine basalt and a dolerite have been studied in previous works [19,25,32,33]. All the samples originated from the Troodos ophiolite complex [34,35,36]. The dolerite was a waste material from an aggregate quarry.
The mineralogical and textural features of the dunite, pyroxenite and basalt were thoroughly studied by petrographic analysis of representative thin sections using a polarizing microscope. On the other hand, the mineralogical composition of the dolerite, which was collected in the form of quarry fines (grain size < 63 μm), was determined by powder X-ray diffraction analysis. Initially, the samples were ground with a stainless steel pulverizer (except for the dolerite, which was already fine-grained) and then sieved to obtain the 104–150 μm size fraction. A portion of this size fraction was used as starting material, while the remainder was ball-milled to further reduce its grain size. The non-ball-milled size fraction is henceforth referred to as “unmilled”.

2.2. Mechanical Activation

Mechanical activation was performed using a Fritsch Pulverisette 6 planetary mono mill; this was used to produce nanoscale rock materials (see Table 1 and Table 2). For scientific and engineering reasons, the term “nanoscale” signifies a size range of approximately 1 nm to 100 nm [37].

2.3. Characterization of Unmilled and Ball-Milled Samples

The unmilled and ball-milled rock materials were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction to investigate potential mineralogical transformations that might have occurred during ball milling, as well as by the BET method to determine their specific surface area (m2 g−1), specific pore volume (cm3 g−1) and average pore diameter (nm) (see Table 1 and Table 2). In addition, the studied samples were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), conventional and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM and HRTEM), in combination with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDXS).
Furthermore, the temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of CO2 in He carrier gas was performed in a specially designed gas flow system [38] in order to evaluate both the concentration (μmol g−1) of adsorbed CO2 on the basic (oxygen anionic) sites of the studied rock materials and the distribution of strength of CO2 adsorption due to the heterogeneity of the surface of the adsorbent material. The latter is related to the temperature of appearance of the CO2 desorption rate maximum in the TPD trace [39]. This technique was selected because it allows fast measurements of the CO2 uptake in a great variety of materials under different CO2 gas environments and temperatures. Furthermore, it provides the means to identify different adsorption states of CO2 and carbonate-types formed (surface/bulk) and quantify their respective amounts and binding strength with the solid. The applied CO2-TPD technique allows the measurement of CO2 uptake with 5% experimental error [38].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Petrography

The dunite is a partially serpentinized lithology, the primary mineralogical composition of which includes mainly olivine (Fo90–93) (>90%) and disseminated Cr-spinel. Hydrothermal alteration resulted in the development of serpentine (<10%), as well as of minor amounts of talc and chlorite.
The pyroxenite is mainly composed of almost equal amounts of clinopyroxene (diopside) and orthopyroxene (enstatite). In addition, a small amount of forsterite-rich olivine is present; thus, this sample is classified as olivine websterite [40]. This lithology has been slightly affected by alteration processes, as indicated by the presence of minor amounts of chlorite and actinolite. Small amounts of opaque minerals are also present.
The olivine basalt is mainly composed of subhedral to euhedral olivine (Fo88–90) phenocrysts (~40%). The groundmass is principally characterized by the presence of elongated laths of clinopyroxene (augite) and the absence of plagioclase phenocrysts. Additionally, the groundmass contains abundant opaque minerals, while the interstitial glass has been devitrified mainly to chlorite (~20%). The development of chlorite, talc, serpentine, tremolite and actinolite indicate that this rock has been affected by ocean-floor metamorphic processes.
The primary mineralogy of the dolerite quarry waste material includes residual clinopyroxene (augite) and anorthite. The secondary minerals include significant amounts of chlorite (~25%), as well as actinolite, epidote, albite, quartz and calcite. Small amounts of magnetite crystals are also present.

3.2. Powder X-ray Diffraction (PXRD)

Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) analyses were acquired for the unmilled and ball-milled rocks, indicating that there is no mineralogical transformation due to the ball milling process. However, milling caused a substantial reduction in the intensity of all powder XRD peaks (compare Figure 1a,b). This became more evident with increasing milling time, as demonstrated by the negative correlation between the ball milling duration and the ratio of maximum intensity to mean background intensity (Imax/Io) (Figure 2). This suggests the structural disordering of the constituent silicate minerals, which is considered to be one of the most important factors for enhancing carbonation reactions [14,18,20,23,41].
In addition, PXRD studies revealed the different behavior of each lithology under the effect of mechanical deformation. The correlation between the ball milling duration and the Imax/Io ratio revealed that the reduction in peak intensity during ball-milling is far more obvious in the pyroxenite, followed by the dunite, olivine basalt and dolerite (see Figure 2). It is suggested that the smallest reduction in peak intensity in the dolerite and basalt is attributed to the abundance of chlorite in these rock samples (see Section 3.1). Chlorite is a flexible mineral that tends to absorb the applied stress (e.g., see Rigopoulos et al. [42]), thereby increasing the resistance of the rock material to mechanical deformation. The dunite contains serpentine, the mechanical behavior of which is similar to that of chlorite [43]; however, its amount is notably smaller compared to that of chlorite in the basalt and dolerite (see Section 3.1). Regarding the pyroxenite, it shows the smallest degree of alteration (i.e., it contains only a minor amount of chlorite), which explains its high susceptibility to mechanical deformation. All the aforementioned factors clearly support the idea that the exact mineralogical composition of each rock type comprises the main factor controlling the structural and morphological characteristics of the final ultrafine powders.

3.3. Surface Texture

The specific surface area (BET, m2 g−1), the pore volume (cm3 g−1) and the average pore diameter (nm) of the unmilled and ball-milled samples are summarized in Table 1 and Table 2. Figure 3a–c shows the variation of these textural parameters, which clearly affects the CO2 uptake of rocks, with increasing milling duration, for the samples acquired after ball milling with 50 wt% ethanol as PCA. For all samples, the main increase of the BET specific surface area and pore volume occurred during the first 4 h of ball milling (Figure 3a,b), while longer milling times resulted in a smaller increase of these parameters or even in negative trends. The maximum value of the specific surface area for each rock type was acquired after different milling durations (Figure 3a); this is attributed to the distinct mineralogical and textural characteristics of each rock sample. Additionally, for the pyroxenite and basalt, an abrupt reduction of the BET specific surface area was observed after longer milling (Figure 3a); these negative trends are attributed to the agglomeration of nanoparticles that takes place after a few hours of ball milling [25,32]. Considering the abrupt reduction of specific surface area in the basalt after 8 h of ball-milling, longer milling was not performed in that case. Among the studied lithologies, only the dunite showed potential for a further increase of its specific surface area with additional milling (Figure 3a). However, this rock type was not subjected to milling beyond 20 h, since its high hardness could cause the contamination of the rock material from the vial and balls. Regarding the average pore diameter, a notable increase was recorded during the first few hours of milling; however, this parameter shows significant fluctuations over time (Figure 3c). This is likely attributed to the altered and multiphasic nature of the original rock samples, which are composed of primary and secondary minerals of different resistance to mechanical deformation.
In the dunite and pyroxenite samples, additional ball milling was performed using 10 wt% ethanol and/or water as PCA (see Table 1). Although the reduction in the content of PCA from 50 wt% to 10 wt% led to a faster increase of the BET specific surface area with increasing milling time (Figure 3d), shorter milling times were performed at 10 wt% PCA (up to 8 h for the dunite and up to 12 h for the pyroxenite) in order to avoid contamination of the rock materials from the vial and balls, taking into account the high hardness of ophiolitic lithologies. The trends acquired (Figure 3d) indicate that a lower content of PCA tends to increase the intensity of the ball milling process, and consequently the reduction rate of particle size [14,19,25].

3.4. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM)

SEM studies were performed on the mafic and ultramafic samples before and after the ball milling process. The unmilled rock materials are composed of large and angular particles (e.g., see Figure 4a), the size of which corresponds to the aperture size of the sieves (104–150 μm) that were used to acquire the fraction of the starting rock materials (see Section 2.1). The particles of the unmilled rock materials are covered by fine particles. The ball-milled materials are composed of particles that are substantially smaller, more rounded and uniform compared to the unmilled rocks (e.g., see Figure 4b). Detailed observations showed that the particle size of all samples decreases with increasing ball milling time (e.g., compare Figure 5a,b); this is in agreement with the notable increase of the specific surface area following mechanical activation (see Figure 3a). Furthermore, the milled samples usually contain agglomerated powder particles, the amount of which tends to increase with increasing ball milling duration (Figure 5c).

3.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM and HRTEM)

TEM studies were performed on the ball-milled dunite and olivine basalt samples with the highest specific surface areas (samples BM46 and BM11, respectively; see Table 1 and Table 2). These rocks are considered to be the most promising for mineral carbonation among the studied lithologies due to their high content in forsteritic olivine (see Section 3.1). Our observations confirmed the reduction of particle size down to the nanoscale range after ball milling (Figure 6a,b). Specifically, the majority of the particle sizes in the milled dunite and olivine basalt with the highest specific surface areas range between 15–20 nm and 20–35 nm, respectively. EDXS point analyses were also obtained from numerous areas of these ultrafine samples, indicating that the forsterite content in olivine crystals ranges between 90% and 93% in the dunite, and between 88% and 90% in the basalt. Additionally, detailed observations confirmed that a number of particles are actually composed of smaller nanoparticles, confirming the agglomeration that takes place during ball milling; this is also in agreement with the observations acquired by SEM (see Figure 5c). Furthermore, in the basaltic sample, most of the olivine particles are still crystalline after ball milling (Figure 6c), indicating the high resistance of olivine to mechanical deformation. A greater variation of the olivine crystallinity was observed in the milled dunite. This sample, which was acquired after longer milling (i.e., 20 h for sample BM46) compared to the milled basalt (i.e., 2 h for sample BM11), contains a large quantity of highly disordered to amorphous olivine nanoparticles (Figure 6a); this is likely responsible for the higher CO2 uptake of the milled dunite compared to the milled basalt (see Section 3.6). The higher degree of crystallinity of olivine in the basalt compared to the dunite is attributed to (i) the fact that the former has been subjected to a significantly shorter milling duration, and (ii) the presence of a significant amount of chlorite in the basaltic sample (see Section 3.1), which tends to absorb the applied stress during milling.

3.6. CO2 Selective Chemisorption Followed by TPD

CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) traces were acquired for the unmilled and ball-milled samples following the procedure described by Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]. For the dolerite samples, additional TPD traces were acquired without performing CO2 chemisorption in order to estimate the desorbed amount of CO2, which is attributed to the calcite phase that pre-exists in the dolerite quarry waste (see Section 3.1).
The temperatures at which maximum desorption rates (Tmax, °C) were observed and the total CO2 uptake (or the equivalent desorbed amount) of the starting rock materials and ball-milled samples with the highest CO2 uptake are summarized in Table 3 and Table 4 (detailed results for all samples can be found in Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]). The estimated CO2 uptake reflects the quantity of carbonate-type species (see Equation (1)) formed on the surface of each sample during chemisorption from a 5 vol% CO2/He gas mixture. Although the formation of these carbonate species usually takes place on the surface of each nanoparticle, this surface carbonation is the first critical step prior to bulk carbonation (i.e., diffusion of surface carbonates into the subsurface of the solid material).
CO2 (g) + On− ↔ CO3n−
The experimental results indicate that the unmilled dunite and basalt show a potential, albeit limited, CO2 adsorption capacity (dunite: 40.1 μmol g−1, basalt: 56.3 μmol g−1; Table 3). On the other hand, the estimated CO2 uptake for the unmilled pyroxenite and dolerite are negligible (pyroxenite: 3.8 μmol g−1; Table 3, dolerite: 0.8 μmol g−1; Table 4). This difference is attributed to the abundance of forsteritic olivine in the dunite and basalt (see Section 3.1). The pyroxenite, on the other hand, is mainly composed of enstatite and diopside, which are less reactive towards CO2 than olivine. Similarly, the negligible CO2 uptake of the unmilled dolerite is assigned to its high content in hydrous minerals (mainly chlorite and actinolite), which are characterized by slow reaction rates [8].
It is worth noting that, although the unmilled basalt contains a notably smaller quantity of forsteritic olivine compared to the unmilled dunite (see Section 3.1), the former shows a higher CO2 uptake (40.1 μmol g−1 for the unmilled dunite and 56.3 μmol g−1 for the unmilled basalt; Table 3). However, the ratio of the CO2 uptake (μmol g−1) to the BET specific surface area (m2 g−1) of these samples is similar (5.9 μmol m−2 for the unmilled dunite and 6.3 μmol m−2 for the unmilled basalt; Table 3), implying that their different values of CO2 uptake are mainly attributed to their different values of specific surface area and not of CO2 adsorption site density (number of sites per surface area). Considering that the grain size of both aforementioned samples is similar (i.e., 104–150 μm; see Section 2.1), it can be suggested that the higher BET value of the basalt is attributed to its multiphasic nature, which creates more complex grain boundaries compared to those of the dunite. These observations are also consistent with the experimental results reported by Sissman et al. [44].
The CO2 uptake of all samples was substantially enhanced after ball milling (Table 3 and Table 4). The correlation between the ball milling duration and the estimated CO2 uptake of the studied rock materials confirms that ball milling substantially improves the ability of the studied ultramafic and mafic lithotypes to adsorb CO2 (Figure 7). For the dunite, it is obvious that the addition of 50 wt% ethanol during the ball milling process results in higher CO2 uptakes compared to the addition of 10 wt% ethanol or water (Figure 7), despite the faster increase in specific surface area with the latter (Figure 3d). A similar behavior was also observed for the pyroxenite, implying that the use of 50 wt% ethanol during milling results in the development of ultrafine rock materials with the highest CO2 uptake (Figure 7). These findings are consistent with Ounoughene et al. [45], who reported that an increase of the ethanol/solid ratio results in an increase of the carbonation conversion. Furthermore, these results imply that the specific surface area is not the only parameter that controls the CO2 uptake. Thus, although the enhanced CO2 uptake of the ball-milled rock materials is attributed to a large extent to the reduction of their particle size to the nanoscale range, the structural disordering of their constituent silicate minerals should also be considered an additional reason for their improved CO2 adsorption properties (see also Section 3.2). This explains the values of CO2 uptake per unit surface area of solid (μmol m−2) reported in Table 3 and Table 4. From these results, it becomes evident that the increase of specific surface area during milling is generally not proportional to the formation of new basic sites that promote the adsorption of CO2. This is attributed to the fact that most of the rock materials under investigation here (i.e., basalt, pyroxenite and dolerite) are composed of a significant number of different mineral phases (see Section 3.1), the behavior of which under the effect of mechanical deformation varies. In addition, previous studies have shown that ball milling tends to create a significant number of crystal defects, many of which do not favor the formation of carbonates [25]. The number of crystal defects that promote carbonation mainly depends on the exact mineralogical composition of the starting rock materials. It is worth highlighting that the only rock material studied here showing a relatively proportional increase of CO2 uptake with increasing specific surface area is the dunite; this is attributed to the fact that this rock is primarily composed of only one mineral phase (i.e., forsteritic olivine).
After ball milling, the dunite showed the highest enhancement of CO2 uptake (278.1 μmol g−1 after 12 h of milling with 50 wt% ethanol), followed by the olivine basalt (222.1 μmol g−1 after 4 h of milling with 50 wt% ethanol), the pyroxenite (155.6 μmol g−1 after 4 h of milling with 50 wt% ethanol) and the dolerite waste material (96.9 μmol g−1 after 20 h of milling with 50 wt% ethanol) (Figure 7; Table 3 and Table 4). However, it should be underlined that the milled basalt with the highest CO2 uptake was acquired after a significantly shorter duration of ball milling (i.e., 4 h) compared to the milled dunite with the highest CO2 uptake (i.e., 12 h). The latter indicates that the use of similar basaltic lithologies for the ex situ mineralization of CO2 would result in a notably lower energy consumption.
Additionally, as can be seen in Figure 7, long hours of ball milling do not further improve the CO2 adsorption properties of the studied mafic and ultramafic lithotypes. This is primarily attributed to the fact that the agglomeration of rock particles becomes more evident after many hours of ball milling (e.g., see Rigopoulos et al. [14]). It should also be highlighted that the CO2 uptake of all samples decreases after a certain duration of ball milling (see Figure 7); this duration is not the same for all rock types, indicating that it mostly depends on their exact petrographic features.
The results of the CO2–TPD experiments further revealed that ball milling promotes the formation of strongly bound carbonate species, which generally tend to decompose at high temperatures (>600 °C). For example, Figure 8 shows that the main desorption peak of the milled dunite, the intensity of which is notably higher compared to the peak intensities of the unmilled rock material, appears at 772 °C (see also Table 3).
It should be underlined that the CO2 uptake values of the studied rock materials, given in Table 3 and Table 4, were acquired by performing gas–solid carbonation, where the reaction rates are very slow [8]. However, the CO2 storage capacity could be substantially enhanced by performing aqueous carbonation [3]. Recent studies proved that ball milling can substantially enhance the weathering rate of ultramafic rocks in seawater, promoting the permanent storage of CO2 as carbonate minerals [26]. These experiments resulted in a significant extent of mineral carbonation at ambient conditions.

4. Practical Significance of the Results

The energy required to reduce the grain size of the initial rock materials to the nanoscale can notably reduce the carbon sequestration efficiency of the entire approach adopted in this study. According to O’Connor et al. [46], the energy required for the initial crushing step is estimated to be 2 kWh/ton. Grinding down to 75 μm adds another 11 kWh/ton, while further grinding down to 38 μm using ball mills adds ~70 kWh/ton [3]. Haug et al. [16], who performed milling in a laboratory planetary ball mill, reported that the first 10 min of milling are the most energy consuming, while the consumption of energy slightly decreases with increasing milling time. They also found that the planetary ball mill has large energy losses that are not related to the actual movement of the mill; thus, the energetic efficiency ranges between 30% and 54%. As such, the high energy consumption and cost associated with the production of ultrafine rock powders may hinder the large-scale application of this ex situ mineral carbonation approach. However, the incorporation of the ball milling process in the production of aggregates and other raw materials, rather than its execution as an isolated step outside mines/quarries, could potentially reduce the operational energy consumption to practical levels [16]. Furthermore, the choice of certain lithologies with specific mineralogical composition (e.g., basalts) would lead to shorter durations of ball milling and subsequently to notably lower energy consumption, whilst the use of suitable quarry fines could further reduce the total energy required for the size reduction of the initial rock materials.
An advantage of the proposed carbon sequestration approach is that huge quantities of the studied ultramafic and mafic rock types can be found in many places throughout the world; this can substantially reduce the costs associated with the transportation of the feedstock. In addition, mafic and ultramafic rocks are considered as high-quality aggregate materials for the construction industry [47,48,49] and are quarried in many places around the globe. Therefore, the aggregate and construction industries could possibly use the fine waste material (original grain size < 63 μm) produced during mafic/ultramafic rock quarrying in order to sequester at least part of their own CO2 emissions. This could comprise a great financial advantage for these industries and would result in substantial environmental benefits. Subsequently, the end-products of mineral carbonation could be used by the construction industry as additives for the production of composite building materials (e.g., concretes, mortars), thereby increasing the efficiency of the overall approach.
An alternative option would be the use of ultrafine rock powders, before carbonation, as nano-additives in composite building materials, which rely on carbonation for hardening (e.g., mortars/renders). The enhancement of the carbonation reactions in the latter could result in the development of environmentally-friendly building materials with improved engineering properties; these will also have the potential to safely store CO2 in the form of carbonate minerals. It should also be underlined that the nano-sized mafic/ultramafic powders could be added in the building materials as a replacement to the cement or lime binder [50]; this would notably contribute to the reduction of human CO2 emissions, since huge quantities of CO2 are released into the atmosphere during the production of lime and cement [51,52]. Emphasis should be placed on the fact that the cement and lime industries could potentially integrate the development of ultrafine rock powders into their existing production lines, which already utilize ball mills; this would notably reduce the energy consumption related to the production of nanoscale rock materials.

5. Conclusions

The goal of this study was to compare and explain the different reactivity of a variety of ultrafine rock powders with CO2, since there have been very limited similar studies to our knowledge. In summary, the comparative study of the effect of ball milling on the CO2 adsorption properties of a dunite, a pyroxenite, an olivine basalt and a dolerite quarry waste material revealed the following:
  • Ball milling can be used for the development of ultrafine mafic/ultramafic powders with substantially enhanced CO2 uptake compared to the initial rock materials. This is due to the fact that the ball milling process modifies the crystal structure, surface morphology and size of the primary crystals of the minerals, thus increasing the number and strength of the surface basic sites that are responsible for the carbonation process;
  • Prolonged ball milling resulted in a reduction of the CO2 uptake due to the increased agglomeration of nanoparticles;
  • The use of 50 wt% ethanol as milling liquid resulted in the development of nanoscale powders with the highest CO2-storage capacity;
  • The optimum ball milling conditions, in terms of CO2 uptake, were not the same for all samples. The dunite showed the highest CO2 uptake after ball milling, followed by the olivine basalt, the pyroxenite and the dolerite;
  • Τhe exact petrographic characteristics (i.e., type of primary mafic minerals, degree of alteration, participation of flexible minerals) of each rock type are the main factors controlling the structural and morphological characteristics, as well as the carbon sequestration efficiency, of the final ultrafine powders;
  • The incorporation of the ball milling process in the production of aggregates and other raw materials, as well as the use of suitable quarry fines, could reduce to some extent the total energy required for the size reduction of the initial rock materials;
  • The end-products of mineral carbonation could be used by the construction industry as additives. Alternatively, the ultrafine rock powders could be used, before carbonation, as nano-additives in composite building materials (in replacement to cement or lime), in order to enhance their carbonation process.
Future studies should focus on the reduction of the energy consumption related to the development of ultrafine powders, as well as on the carbon sequestration efficiency of this approach, by performing aqueous carbonation experiments under low temperature and pressure conditions.

Author Contributions

I.R., T.K. and I.I. designed the research. I.R. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the paper. A.M.E. provided access to the heterogeneous catalysis lab (CO2 chemisorption/TPD) and contributed to the interpretation of the results. A.D. performed TEM studies along with EDXS analyses.

Funding

This work was carried out in the context of the Nanominerals Project, funded by the University of Cyprus, and the CO2NOR Project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 654091. Additional financial support was provided by the Republic of Cyprus and the European Committee through the Cyprus Research Promotion Foundation (Project KOINA/M-ERA.NET/0316/04).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK; New York, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  2. Solomon, S.; Plattner, G.K.; Knutti, R.; Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 1704–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gerdemann, S.J.; O’Connor, W.K.; Dahlin, D.C.; Panner, L.R.; Rush, H. Ex situ aqueous mineral carbonation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 2587–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Matter, J.M.; Stute, M.; Snæbjörnsdottir, S.Ó.; Oelkers, E.H.; Gislason, S.R.; Aradottir, E.S.; Sigfusson, B.; Gunnarsson, I.; Sigurdardottir, H.; Gunnlaugsson, E.; et al. Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions. Science 2016, 352, 1312–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Power, I.M.; Harrison, A.L.; Dipple, G.M. Accelerating mineral carbonation using carbonic anhydrase. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 2610–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Snæbjörnsdóttir, S.Ó.; Gislason, S.R.; Galeczka, I.M.; Oelkers, E.H. Reaction path modelling of in-situ mineralisation of CO2 at the CarbFix site at Hellisheidi, SW-Iceland. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2018, 220, 348–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Seifritz, W. CO2 disposal by means of silicates. Nature 1990, 345, 486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lackner, K.S.; Wendt, C.H.; Butt, D.P.; Joyce, E.L.; Sharp, D.H. Carbon dioxide disposal in carbonate minerals. Energy 1995, 20, 1153–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Oelkers, E.H.; Gislason, S.R.; Matter, J. Mineral carbonation of CO2. Elements 2008, 4, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sanna, A.; Uibu, M.; Caramanna, G.; Kuusik, R.; Maroto-Valer, M. A review of mineral carbonation technologies to sequester CO2. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 8049–8080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Santos, R.M.; Audenaerde, A.V.; Chiang, Y.W.; Iacobescu, R.I.; Knops, P.; Gerven, T.V. Nickel extraction from olivine: Effect of carbonation pre-treatment. Metals 2015, 5, 1620–1644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Gislason, S.R.; Oelkers, E.H. Carbon storage in basalt. Science 2014, 344, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Matter, J.M.; Kelemen, P.B. Permanent storage of carbon dioxide in geological reservoirs by mineral carbonation. Nat. Geosci. 2009, 2, 837–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rigopoulos, I.; Delimitis, A.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T. Effect of ball milling on the carbon sequestration efficiency of serpentinized peridotites. Miner. Eng. 2018, 120, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sanna, A.; Hall, M.R.; Maroto-Valer, M. Post-processing pathways in carbon capture and storage by mineral carbonation (CCSM) towards the introduction of carbon neutral materials. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 7781–7796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haug, A.H.; Kleiv, R.A.; Munz, I.A. Investigating dissolution of mechanically activated olivine for carbonation purposes. Appl. Geochem. 2010, 25, 1547–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Declercq, J.; Bosc, O.; Oelkers, E.H. Do organic ligands affect forsterite dissolution rates? Appl. Geochem. 2013, 39, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Characterization of the microstructure of mechanically-activated olivine using X-ray diffraction pattern analysis. Miner. Eng. 2016, 86, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rigopoulos, I.; Vasiliades, M.A.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Godelitsas, A.; Kyratsi, T. Enhancing the rate of ex situ mineral carbonation in dunites. Adv. Powder Technol. 2016, 27, 360–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kleiv, R.A.; Thornhill, M. Mechanical activation of olivine. Miner. Eng. 2006, 19, 340–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kleiv, R.A.; Thornhill, M. The effect of mechanical activation in the production of olivine surface area. Miner. Eng. 2016, 89, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Baláž, P.; Turianicová, E.; Fabián, M.; Kleiv, R.A.; Briančin, J.; Obut, A. Structural changes in olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 mechanically activated in high-energy mills. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2008, 88, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Turianicová, E.; Baláž, P.; Tuček, L.; Zorkovská, A.; Zeleňák, V.; Németh, Z.; Šatka, A.; Kováč, J. A comparison of the reactivity of activated and non-activated olivine with CO2. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2013, 123, 73–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Mechanical activation of magnesium silicates for mineral carbonation: A review. Miner. Eng. 2018, 128, 69–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rigopoulos, I.; Petallidou, K.C.; Vasiliades, M.A.; Delimitis, A.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T. Carbon dioxide storage in olivine basalts: Effect of ball milling process. Powder Technol. 2015, 273, 220–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Rigopoulos, I.; Harrison, A.L.; Delimitis, A.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T.; Oelkers, E.H. Carbon sequestration via enhanced weathering of peridotites and basalts in seawater. Appl. Geochem. 2018, 91, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Power, I.M.; Harrison, A.L.; Dipple, G.M.; Wilson, S.A.; Kelemen, P.B.; Hitch, M.; Southam, G. Carbon mineralization: from natural analogues to engineered systems. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 2013, 77, 305–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wilson, S.A.; Harrison, A.L.; Dipple, G.M.; Power, I.M.; Barker, S.L.L.; Ulrich Mayer, K.; Fallon, S.J.; Raudsepp, M.; Southam, G. Offsetting of CO2 emissions by air capture in mine tailings at the Mount Keith Nickel Mine, Western Australia: Rates, controls and prospects for carbon neutral mining. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2014, 25, 121–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Ultra-fine grinding and mechanical activation of mine waste rock using a planetary mill for mineral carbonation. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2017, 158, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, J.; Hitch, M. Structural and chemical changes in mine waste mechanically-activated in various milling environments. Powder Technol. 2017, 308, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, J.; Hitch, M.; Power, I.M.; Pan, Y. Integrated mineral carbonation of ultramafic mine deposits—A review. Minerals 2018, 8, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Rigopoulos, I.; Vasiliades, M.A.; Petallidou, K.C.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T. A method to enhance the CO2 storage capacity of pyroxenitic rocks. Greenh. Gas. Sci. Technol. 2015, 5, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rigopoulos, I.; Petallidou, K.C.; Vasiliades, M.A.; Delimitis, A.; Ioannou, I.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T. On the potential use of quarry waste material for CO2 sequestration. J. CO2 Util. 2016, 16, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mukasa, S.B.; Ludden, J.N. Uranium–lead ages of plagiogranites from the Troodos ophiolite, Cyprus, and their tectonic significance. Geology 1987, 1, 825–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Robinson, P.T.; Malpas, J. The Troodos Ophiolite of Cyprus: New perspectives on its origin and emplacement. In Ophiolites: Oceanic Crustal Analogues; Malpas, J., Moores, E.M., Panayiotou, A., Xenophontos, C., Eds.; Cyprus Geological Survey Department: Nicosia, Cyprus, 1990; pp. 13–36. [Google Scholar]
  36. Robertson, A.H.F. Overview of the genesis and emplacement of Mesozoic ophiolites in the Eastern Mediterranean Tethyan region. Lithos 2002, 65, 1–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hochella, M.F.J. Nanogeoscience: From origins to cutting-edge applications. Elements 2008, 4, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Costa, C.N.; Anastasiadou, T.; Efstathiou, A.M. The selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with methane over La2O3–CaO systems: Synergistic effects and surface reactivity studies of NO, CH4, O2, and CO2 by transient techniques. J. Catal. 2000, 194, 250–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Efstathiou, A.M.; Bennett, C.O. Enthalpy and entropy of H2 adsorption on Rh/Al2O3 measured by Temperature-Programmed Desorption. J. Catal. 1990, 124, 116–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Streckeisen, A.L. To each plutonic rock its proper name. Earth Sci. Rev. 1976, 12, 1–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Munz, I.A.; Brandvoll, Ø.; Haug, T.A.; Iden, K.; Smeets, R.; Kihle, J.; Johansen, H. Mechanisms and rates of plagioclase carbonation reactions. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 2012, 77, 27–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rigopoulos, I.; Tsikouras, B.; Pomonis, P.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. Petrographic investigation of microcrack initiation in mafic ophiolitic rocks under uniaxial compression. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2013, 46, 1061–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Rigopoulos, I.; Tsikouras, B.; Pomonis, P.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. Microcracks in ultrabasic rocks under uniaxial compressive stress. Eng. Geol. 2011, 117, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Sissmann, O.; Brunet, F.; Martinez, I.; Guyot, F.; Verlaguet, A.; Pinquier, Y.; Daval, D. Enhanced olivine carbonation within a basalt as compared to single-phase experiments: reevaluating the potential of CO2 mineral sequestration. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5512–5519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ounoughene, G.; Buskens, E.; Santos, R.M.; Cizer, Ö.; Gerven, T.V. Solvochemical carbonation of lime using ethanol: Mechanism and enhancement for direct atmospheric CO2 capture. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 26, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. O’Connor, W.K.; Dahlin, D.C.; Rush, G.E.; Gerdemann, S.J.; Penner, L.R.; Nilsen, D.N. Aqueous Mineral Carbonation: Mineral Availability, Pretreatment, Reaction Parameters, and Process Studies; United States Department of Energy: Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  47. Rigopoulos, I.; Tsikouras, B.; Pomonis, P.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. The influence of alteration on the engineering properties of dolerites: The examples from the Pindos and Vourinos ophiolites (northern Greece). Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 2010, 47, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rigopoulos, I.; Tsikouras, B.; Pomonis, P.; Hatzipanagiotou, K. Assessment of the engineering behavior of ultramafic and mafic rocks using chemical alteration indices. Eng. Geol. 2015, 196, 222–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Engidasew, T.A.; Barbieri, G. Geo-engineering evaluation of Termaber basalt rock mass for crushed stone aggregate and building stone from Central Ethiopia. J. Afr. Earth Sci. 2014, 99, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rigopoulos, I.; Török, Á.; Kyratsi, T.; Delimitis, A.; Ioannou, I. Sustainable exploitation of mafic rock quarry waste for carbon sequestration following ball milling. Resour. Policy 2018, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme: Hayama, Japan, 2006; Volume 3, Available online: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/3_Volume3/V3_2_Ch2_Mineral_Industry.pdf (accessed on 6 November 2018).
  52. Hills, T.P.; Sceats, M.; Rennie, D.; Fennell, P. LEILAC: Low cost CO2 capture for the cement and lime industries. Energy Proc. 2017, 114, 6166–6170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) unmilled dunite, and (b) dunite after 12 h of ball milling with 50 wt% ethanol as PCA (modified from Rigopoulos et al. [19]).
Figure 1. Powder X-ray diffraction patterns of (a) unmilled dunite, and (b) dunite after 12 h of ball milling with 50 wt% ethanol as PCA (modified from Rigopoulos et al. [19]).
Geosciences 08 00406 g001
Figure 2. Relationships between the ball milling time (h) and the ratio of maximum intensity (Imax) to mean background intensity (Io) acquired by the powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the unmilled and ball-milled rock samples (after milling with 50 wt% ethanol). The maximum intensity corresponds to the peak with the highest intensity in each XRD pattern, and the mean background intensity is the average of four background intensities (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Figure 2. Relationships between the ball milling time (h) and the ratio of maximum intensity (Imax) to mean background intensity (Io) acquired by the powder X-ray diffraction patterns of the unmilled and ball-milled rock samples (after milling with 50 wt% ethanol). The maximum intensity corresponds to the peak with the highest intensity in each XRD pattern, and the mean background intensity is the average of four background intensities (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Geosciences 08 00406 g002
Figure 3. (a) BET (m2 g−1) specific surface area, (b) pore volume (cm3 g−1) and (c) average pore diameter (nm) plotted versus the ball milling time (h), for the milled rocks acquired after ball milling with 50 wt% ethanol. (d) BET (m2 g−1) specific surface area plotted versus the ball milling time (h), for the dunite and pyroxenite samples acquired after milling with different types and quantities of PCA (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Figure 3. (a) BET (m2 g−1) specific surface area, (b) pore volume (cm3 g−1) and (c) average pore diameter (nm) plotted versus the ball milling time (h), for the milled rocks acquired after ball milling with 50 wt% ethanol. (d) BET (m2 g−1) specific surface area plotted versus the ball milling time (h), for the dunite and pyroxenite samples acquired after milling with different types and quantities of PCA (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Geosciences 08 00406 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of the studied (a) unmilled (SM1), and (b) ball-milled olivine basalt for 8 h (BM15). The magnification in Figure 4a is significantly lower compared to that in Figure 4b.
Figure 4. SEM images of the studied (a) unmilled (SM1), and (b) ball-milled olivine basalt for 8 h (BM15). The magnification in Figure 4a is significantly lower compared to that in Figure 4b.
Geosciences 08 00406 g004
Figure 5. SEM images of the studied pyroxenite: (a) ball-milled for 1 h (BM8); (b) ball-milled for 4 h (BM10); (c) ball-milled for 32 h (BM33).
Figure 5. SEM images of the studied pyroxenite: (a) ball-milled for 1 h (BM8); (b) ball-milled for 4 h (BM10); (c) ball-milled for 32 h (BM33).
Geosciences 08 00406 g005
Figure 6. TEM images of the ball-milled dunite (BM46) and basalt (BM11) with the highest specific surface areas, showing: (a) the structural disordering of olivine in the dunite sample, as indicated by the amorphous-like contrast of the nanoparticles; (b) nanoparticles of talc in the basaltic sample; and (c) the existence of highly crystalline olivine in the basalt, as indicated by the lattice fringes (Ol: olivine, Tc: talc).
Figure 6. TEM images of the ball-milled dunite (BM46) and basalt (BM11) with the highest specific surface areas, showing: (a) the structural disordering of olivine in the dunite sample, as indicated by the amorphous-like contrast of the nanoparticles; (b) nanoparticles of talc in the basaltic sample; and (c) the existence of highly crystalline olivine in the basalt, as indicated by the lattice fringes (Ol: olivine, Tc: talc).
Geosciences 08 00406 g006
Figure 7. Adsorbed CO2 (μmol g−1) versus ball milling time (h) for the unmilled and ball-milled dunite, pyroxenite, basalt and dolerite samples (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Figure 7. Adsorbed CO2 (μmol g−1) versus ball milling time (h) for the unmilled and ball-milled dunite, pyroxenite, basalt and dolerite samples (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,25,32,33]).
Geosciences 08 00406 g007
Figure 8. CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) traces obtained under He flow for the unmilled dunite (SM15) and the ball-milled rock material with the highest CO2 uptake (BM45). Adsorption conditions: 5 vol% CO2/He (50 N mL/min) at 500 °C for 30 min followed by cooling of the sample to 50 °C under the same gas mixture. Desorption conditions: QHe = 50 N mL/min, β = 30 °C/min (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19]).
Figure 8. CO2 temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) traces obtained under He flow for the unmilled dunite (SM15) and the ball-milled rock material with the highest CO2 uptake (BM45). Adsorption conditions: 5 vol% CO2/He (50 N mL/min) at 500 °C for 30 min followed by cooling of the sample to 50 °C under the same gas mixture. Desorption conditions: QHe = 50 N mL/min, β = 30 °C/min (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19]).
Geosciences 08 00406 g008
Table 1. Ball milling conditions and textural properties of the unmilled and ball-milled ultramafic rocks (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,32]).
Table 1. Ball milling conditions and textural properties of the unmilled and ball-milled ultramafic rocks (data from Rigopoulos et al. [19,32]).
Ball Milling ConditionsTextural Properties
Rock Type/Sample CodeMilling Time (h)Type of MillingBET (m2 g−1)Specific Pore Volume (cm3 g−1)Average Pore Diameter (nm)
Dunite
SM15 *--6.80.0115.4
BM301Wet (10 wt% H2O)24.50.0486.5
BM312Wet (10 wt% H2O)36.90.0554.9
BM414Wet (10 wt% H2O)45.90.0594.2
BM428Wet (10 wt% H2O)52.20.0523.9
BM261Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)29.50.09711.2
BM272Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)38.00.1049.3
BM344Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)47.70.1097.9
BM358Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)32.50.0899.0
BM441Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)25.20.08111.4
BM362Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)30.30.10412.2
BM384Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)35.70.12111.8
BM398Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)41.50.17013.7
BM4512Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)51.90.17311.4
BM4016Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)49.90.15710.9
BM4620Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)64.60.1799.3
Pyroxenite
SMP1 *--1.80.0059.7
BM31Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)12.80.0349.7
BM81Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)11.80.0175.3
BM92Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)17.70.0479.0
BM104Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)23.30.0679.5
BM132Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)15.10.0306.7
BM144Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)27.20.0446.7
BM168Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)32.70.0888.7
BM188Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)48.90.0714.8
BM2016Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)42.30.1239.9
BM2420Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)59.90.20911.2
BM2512Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)59.00.0925.1
BM3224Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)67.70.1808.4
BM3332Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)53.70.17510.5
* Starting materials.
Table 2. Ball milling conditions and textural properties of the unmilled and ball-milled mafic rocks (data from Rigopoulos et al. [25,33]).
Table 2. Ball milling conditions and textural properties of the unmilled and ball-milled mafic rocks (data from Rigopoulos et al. [25,33]).
Ball Milling ConditionsTextural Properties
Rock Type/Sample CodeMilling Time (h)Type of MillingBET (m2 g−1)Specific Pore Volume (cm3 g−1)Average Pore Diameter (nm)
Basalt
SM1 *--9.00.0146.4
BM11Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)40.20.0817.3
BM21Wet (10 wt% H2O)34.10.0414.1
BM51Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)31.20.0768.9
BM62Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)42.90.0786.4
BM74Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)58.90.1066.2
BM112Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)64.30.0854.6
BM124Wet (10 wt% Ethanol)55.00.0816.2
BM158Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)44.30.1048.7
Dolerite (quarry waste)
SM16 *--8.40.0157.0
BM471Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)16.30.0287.2
BM482Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)20.20.0468.3
BM494Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)27.00.11514.9
BM508Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)28.80.14518.1
BM5112Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)28.10.12114.1
BM5216Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)29.60.11513.7
BM5320Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)32.90.15116.0
BM5426Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)32.40.09410.9
BM5632Wet (50 wt% Ethanol)34.80.11111.3
* Starting materials.
Table 3. Peak maximum desorption temperatures (Tmax) and amounts of CO2 uptake (μmol g−1) (after chemisorption from a 5 vol% CO2/He gas mixture) estimated from CO2–TPD experiments for the starting dunite, basalt and pyroxenite, and the ball-milled samples with the highest CO2 uptake. The CO2 uptake per unit area of solid (μmol m−2) was also calculated after dividing the amount of CO2 uptake per gram basis (μmol g−1) to the BET specific surface area (m2 g−1) of each solid (BET values are given in Table 1 and Table 2).
Table 3. Peak maximum desorption temperatures (Tmax) and amounts of CO2 uptake (μmol g−1) (after chemisorption from a 5 vol% CO2/He gas mixture) estimated from CO2–TPD experiments for the starting dunite, basalt and pyroxenite, and the ball-milled samples with the highest CO2 uptake. The CO2 uptake per unit area of solid (μmol m−2) was also calculated after dividing the amount of CO2 uptake per gram basis (μmol g−1) to the BET specific surface area (m2 g−1) of each solid (BET values are given in Table 1 and Table 2).
Sample CodeTmax1 (°C)Tmax2 (°C)Tmax3 (°C)Tmax4 (°C)Tmax5 (°C)Tmax6 (°C)Tmax7 (°C)Tmax8 (°C)CO2 Uptake (μmol g−1)CO2 Uptake (μmol m−2)Reference
Dunite
SM15 1160654807824----40.15.9Rigopoulos et al. [19]
BM45 2134259664705772831--278.15.4Rigopoulos et al. [19]
Basalt
SM1 185720815875----56.36.3Rigopoulos et al. [25]
BM7 2143276390680699738812-222.13.8Rigopoulos et al. [25]
Pyroxenite
SMP1 11656026287007238058689033.82.1Rigopoulos et al. [32]
BM10 2150688765899931---155.66.7Rigopoulos et al. [32]
1 Starting material, 2 ball-milled sample with the highest CO2 uptake.
Table 4. Peak maximum desorption temperatures (Tmax) and amounts of desorbed CO2 (μmol g−1) (after chemisorption from a 5 vol% CO2/He gas mixture [Chem.], and without chemisorption [No chem.]) estimated from CO2–TPD experiments for the starting dolerite and the ball-milled dolerite with the highest CO2 uptake. The CO2 uptake (μmol g−1), which reflects the quantity of carbonate species formed on the surface of the samples following chemisorption, is the difference between the amounts of desorbed CO2 after chemisorption and without chemisorption. The CO2 uptake per unit area of solid (μmol m−2) was also calculated after dividing the amount of CO2 uptake per gram basis (μmol g−1) to the BET specific surface area (m2 g−1) of each solid (BET values are given in Table 2).
Table 4. Peak maximum desorption temperatures (Tmax) and amounts of desorbed CO2 (μmol g−1) (after chemisorption from a 5 vol% CO2/He gas mixture [Chem.], and without chemisorption [No chem.]) estimated from CO2–TPD experiments for the starting dolerite and the ball-milled dolerite with the highest CO2 uptake. The CO2 uptake (μmol g−1), which reflects the quantity of carbonate species formed on the surface of the samples following chemisorption, is the difference between the amounts of desorbed CO2 after chemisorption and without chemisorption. The CO2 uptake per unit area of solid (μmol m−2) was also calculated after dividing the amount of CO2 uptake per gram basis (μmol g−1) to the BET specific surface area (m2 g−1) of each solid (BET values are given in Table 2).
Sample Code Tmax1 (°C)Tmax2 (°C)Tmax3 (°C)Tmax4 (°C)Tmax5 (°C)Tmax6 (°C)Desorbed CO2 (μmol g−1)CO2 Uptake (μmol g−1)CO2 Uptake (μmol m−2)Reference
SM16 1Chem.133783----337.60.80.1Rigopoulos et al. [33]
No chem.770-----336.8
BM53 2Chem.138275677730790873541.996.92.9Rigopoulos et al. [33]
No chem.605727783880--445.0
1 Starting material, 2 ball-milled sample with the highest CO2 uptake.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rigopoulos, I.; Ioannou, I.; Delimitis, A.; Efstathiou, A.M.; Kyratsi, T. Ball Milling Effect on the CO2 Uptake of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review. Geosciences 2018, 8, 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110406

AMA Style

Rigopoulos I, Ioannou I, Delimitis A, Efstathiou AM, Kyratsi T. Ball Milling Effect on the CO2 Uptake of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review. Geosciences. 2018; 8(11):406. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rigopoulos, Ioannis, Ioannis Ioannou, Andreas Delimitis, Angelos M. Efstathiou, and Theodora Kyratsi. 2018. "Ball Milling Effect on the CO2 Uptake of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review" Geosciences 8, no. 11: 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110406

APA Style

Rigopoulos, I., Ioannou, I., Delimitis, A., Efstathiou, A. M., & Kyratsi, T. (2018). Ball Milling Effect on the CO2 Uptake of Mafic and Ultramafic Rocks: A Review. Geosciences, 8(11), 406. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110406

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop