Figure 1.
Photograph of the study area within the Del Cerro Fire. The image orientation faces northeast from the transect area on the hillslope down toward Alvarado Creek. Both Washingtonia spp. (tall burned trunks in background) and Arundo donax (grass-like vegetation in the left foreground) are visible.
Figure 1.
Photograph of the study area within the Del Cerro Fire. The image orientation faces northeast from the transect area on the hillslope down toward Alvarado Creek. Both Washingtonia spp. (tall burned trunks in background) and Arundo donax (grass-like vegetation in the left foreground) are visible.
Figure 2.
Distribution of burn severity (A) and land classifications (B) for the 2018 Del Cerro Fire. Google Earth imagery over the burned areas on (C) December 7, 2017, (D) August 13, 2018, and (E) April 6, 2019. (F) Del Cerro study area transect; the upland and riparian land zones are highlighted in orange and green, respectively. The white dashed line symbolizes the extent of the 62 m transect that was repeatedly surveyed, which covers both upland and riparian area. The monument location is marked by ‘X’. The box highlighted in gray symbolizes the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) area, which encompasses both the southern upland hillslope and riparian area.
Figure 2.
Distribution of burn severity (A) and land classifications (B) for the 2018 Del Cerro Fire. Google Earth imagery over the burned areas on (C) December 7, 2017, (D) August 13, 2018, and (E) April 6, 2019. (F) Del Cerro study area transect; the upland and riparian land zones are highlighted in orange and green, respectively. The white dashed line symbolizes the extent of the 62 m transect that was repeatedly surveyed, which covers both upland and riparian area. The monument location is marked by ‘X’. The box highlighted in gray symbolizes the terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) area, which encompasses both the southern upland hillslope and riparian area.
Figure 3.
Temporal and spatial distribution of vegetation indices for the Del Cerro Fire. The 0-year dNBR, a proxy for burn severity (A), 0-year dNDVI, a proxy for canopy loss (B), and the change in canopy over (NDVI) for each vegetation class over one year (C); the * denotes statistically different. The 0-year dNDVI for May 2018 to June 2018 (D1), June 2018 to July 2018 (D2), July 2018 to November 2018 (D3), and November 2018 to June 2019 (D4) distribution of canopy loss between NDVI estimates (C). The Arundo donax regrowth in the riparian area of Alvarado Creek observed on June 8, 2018 (E1), June 29, 2018 (E2), and July 23, 2018 (E3).
Figure 3.
Temporal and spatial distribution of vegetation indices for the Del Cerro Fire. The 0-year dNBR, a proxy for burn severity (A), 0-year dNDVI, a proxy for canopy loss (B), and the change in canopy over (NDVI) for each vegetation class over one year (C); the * denotes statistically different. The 0-year dNDVI for May 2018 to June 2018 (D1), June 2018 to July 2018 (D2), July 2018 to November 2018 (D3), and November 2018 to June 2019 (D4) distribution of canopy loss between NDVI estimates (C). The Arundo donax regrowth in the riparian area of Alvarado Creek observed on June 8, 2018 (E1), June 29, 2018 (E2), and July 23, 2018 (E3).
Figure 4.
Four successive cross-sectional surveys looking downstream from June 2018 to March 2019 all normalized to the local benchmark as a datum. The maximum seasonal topographic change (∆HMaximum) at each point on the transect is shown on the secondary axis. The dark gray region represents a 75th percentile change in topographic height or greater. The transition from upland and riparian zones is denoted by the vertical black line, and secondary channels and Alvarado Creek are denoted by white and blue portions of the transect, respectively.
Figure 4.
Four successive cross-sectional surveys looking downstream from June 2018 to March 2019 all normalized to the local benchmark as a datum. The maximum seasonal topographic change (∆HMaximum) at each point on the transect is shown on the secondary axis. The dark gray region represents a 75th percentile change in topographic height or greater. The transition from upland and riparian zones is denoted by the vertical black line, and secondary channels and Alvarado Creek are denoted by white and blue portions of the transect, respectively.
Figure 5.
The average maximum seasonal topographic change is shown by ground cover classification (A). The percent of maximum seasonal topographic change measurements for each ground cover class that was 75th percentile or larger is shown on the secondary axis (dark gray). Event-based topographic change in height (∆HEvent) is shown by ground cover between CS1 and CS2 (June 2018 to October 2018), CS2 and CS3 (October 2018 and December 2018), and CS3 and CS4 (December 2018 to March 2019). Positive mean elevation change represents a gain in elevation, while negative is a loss in elevation from the preceding measurement (B). Gray shading indicates a 75th percentile change.
Figure 5.
The average maximum seasonal topographic change is shown by ground cover classification (A). The percent of maximum seasonal topographic change measurements for each ground cover class that was 75th percentile or larger is shown on the secondary axis (dark gray). Event-based topographic change in height (∆HEvent) is shown by ground cover between CS1 and CS2 (June 2018 to October 2018), CS2 and CS3 (October 2018 and December 2018), and CS3 and CS4 (December 2018 to March 2019). Positive mean elevation change represents a gain in elevation, while negative is a loss in elevation from the preceding measurement (B). Gray shading indicates a 75th percentile change.
Figure 6.
The volumetric density of vegetation per square meter in both the upland and riparian areas during four scans: June 29, 2018, July 23, 2018, January 19, 2019, and May 24, 2019. The June 2018 and July 2018 scans represent vegetation volumetric density before any storm events. The January 2019 scan represents vegetation after Storms 1–6. The riparian area (*) did not have sufficient scan point density in January 2019. The May 2019 scan represents the vegetation volumetric density approximately one-year post-fire.
Figure 6.
The volumetric density of vegetation per square meter in both the upland and riparian areas during four scans: June 29, 2018, July 23, 2018, January 19, 2019, and May 24, 2019. The June 2018 and July 2018 scans represent vegetation volumetric density before any storm events. The January 2019 scan represents vegetation after Storms 1–6. The riparian area (*) did not have sufficient scan point density in January 2019. The May 2019 scan represents the vegetation volumetric density approximately one-year post-fire.
Figure 7.
Topsoil cover on the upland hillslope was photographed on July 23, 2018, before the first storm event (A) and after the first storm on October 31, 2018 (B). The dark appearance is due to the soils being wet from the storm.
Figure 7.
Topsoil cover on the upland hillslope was photographed on July 23, 2018, before the first storm event (A) and after the first storm on October 31, 2018 (B). The dark appearance is due to the soils being wet from the storm.
Figure 8.
Undercutting of an Arundo donax stand on the south bank of Alvarado Creek on March 2019. Shallow Arundo donax root structure or rhizome (A) and undercut area with exposed palm roots imbedded in the structure of the streambank wall (B).
Figure 8.
Undercutting of an Arundo donax stand on the south bank of Alvarado Creek on March 2019. Shallow Arundo donax root structure or rhizome (A) and undercut area with exposed palm roots imbedded in the structure of the streambank wall (B).
Figure 9.
The incision of Alvarado Creek was documented through photographs for three time-points: (A) October 20, 2018—following Storm 1, (B) January 19, 2019—following Storms 2–6, and (C) March 12, 2019—following Storms 6–9. All three photographs were taken looking upstream, and a fallen palm tree is used as a landmark for comparison between photographs.
Figure 9.
The incision of Alvarado Creek was documented through photographs for three time-points: (A) October 20, 2018—following Storm 1, (B) January 19, 2019—following Storms 2–6, and (C) March 12, 2019—following Storms 6–9. All three photographs were taken looking upstream, and a fallen palm tree is used as a landmark for comparison between photographs.
Table 1.
Summary of the significant 2018–2019 wet season precipitation events and characteristics (maximum 15-min intensity (I15), recurrence interval, and total).
Table 1.
Summary of the significant 2018–2019 wet season precipitation events and characteristics (maximum 15-min intensity (I15), recurrence interval, and total).
Storm Event | Date [mm/dd/yyyy] | Max I15 [mm h−1] | Recurrence Interval | Total Rainfall [mm] |
---|
Start | End |
---|
1 | 10/12/2018 | 10/13/2018 | 1.3 | <1 | 6.1 |
2 | 11/28/2018 | 11/30/2018 | 4.1 | <1 | 34.5 |
3 | 12/5/2018 | 12/7/2018 | 6.3 | 1 | 62 |
4 | 1/12/2019 | 1/12/2019 | 2.7 | <1 | 8.1 |
5 | 1/5/2019 | 1/6/2019 | 3 | <1 | 17.3 |
6 | 1/14/2019 | 1/16/2019 | 2 | <1 | 31.5 |
7 | 1/31/2019 | 1/31/2019 | 3.4 | <1 | 21.3 |
8 | 2/2/2019 | 2/6/2019 | 3.3 | <1 | 50.8 |
9 | 2/13/2019 | 2/22/2019 | 3.3 | <1 | 21.3 |
Table 2.
Landsat imagery dates used to derive Normalized Burn Ratio and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index.
Table 2.
Landsat imagery dates used to derive Normalized Burn Ratio and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index.
Landsat Image | Date | Time-Point Condition |
---|
1 | May 16, 2018 | Immediately pre-fire |
2 | June 21, 2018 | Immediately post-fire |
3 | July 23, 2018 | One month post-fire |
4 | November 12, 2018 | Five months post-fire |
5 | June 19, 2019 | One-year post-fire |
Table 3.
Cross-section (CS) and vegetation survey dates after the Del Cerro Fire and the associated 2018–2019 precipitation events.
Table 3.
Cross-section (CS) and vegetation survey dates after the Del Cerro Fire and the associated 2018–2019 precipitation events.
Survey No. | Date | Preceding Precipitation Event(s) |
---|
CS1 | 6/30/2018 | Pre-Wet Season (no storm) |
CS2 | 10/26/2018 | Storm 1 |
CS3 | 12/2/2018 | Storms 2 |
CS4 | 3/15/2019 | Storms 3–9 |
Table 4.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with differenced Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (dNDVI) satellite-based data. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05). dNBR: differenced Normalized Burn Ratio.
Table 4.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with differenced Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (dNDVI) satellite-based data. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05). dNBR: differenced Normalized Burn Ratio.
| Hypotheses | p-Value | t-Statistic |
---|
dNBR | May 2018–July 2018 (Immediate) | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 1.20 × 10−1 | 1.57 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 2.45 × 10−2 | 2.27 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 1.18 × 10−3 | 3.33 |
dNDVI | May 2018–July 2018 (Immediate) | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 1.62 × 10−1 | 4.41 × 10−1 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 4.71 × 10−3 | 2.87 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 5.39 × 10−4 | 6.58 × 10−1 |
July 2018–November 2018 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 4.79 × 10−1 | 1.00 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 7.08 × 10−1 | 5.36 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 5.91 × 10−1 | 4.63 |
November 2018–June 2019 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 6.89 × 10−2 | 6.14 × 10−1 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 3.04 × 10−10 | 4.57 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 1.66 × 10−8 | 3.39 |
Invasive | May–July 2018 ≠ July–November 2018 | 5.33 × 10−8 | 5.02 × 10−1 |
May–July 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 3.21 × 10−8 | 7.42 × 10−1 |
July–November 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 8.99 × 10−2 | 3.13 × 10−1 |
Riparian | May–July 2018 ≠ July–November 2018 | 8.13 × 10−26 | 1.33 × 10−1 |
May–July 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 2.92 × 10−32 | 9.70 × 10−1 |
July–November 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 6.61 × 10−8 | 1.27 |
Upland | May–July 2018 ≠ July–November 2018 | 2.96 × 10−46 | 1.58 × 10−1 |
May–July 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 3.50 × 10−82 | 7.90 × 10−1 |
July–November 2018 ≠ November 2018–June 2019 | 6.26 × 10−46 | 3.88 |
Table 5.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with NDVI satellite-based data. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05).
Table 5.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with NDVI satellite-based data. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05).
| Hypothesis | p-Value | t-Statistic |
---|
May-18 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 6.61 × 10−1 | 4.41 × 10−1 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 4.71 × 10−3 | 2.87 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 5.12 × 10−1 | 6.58 × 10−1 |
Jul-18 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 3.19 × 10−1 | 1.00 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 2.84 × 10−7 | 5.36 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 9.39 × 10−6 | 4.63 |
Nov-18 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 5.42 × 10−1 | 6.14 × 10−1 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 9.86 × 10−6 | 4.57 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 9.49 × 10−4 | 3.39 |
Jun-19 | Riparian ≠ Invasive | 6.17 × 10−1 | 5.02 × 10−1 |
Riparian ≠ Upland | 4.59 × 10−1 | 7.42 × 10−1 |
Upland ≠ Invasive | 7.55 × 10−1 | 3.13 × 10−1 |
Invasive ≠ Invasive | Jul-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 8.96 × 10−1 | 1.33 × 10−1 |
Jun-19 ≠ Nov-18 | 3.42 × 10−1 | 9.70 × 10−1 |
May-18 ≠ Jul-18 | 2.15 × 10−1 | 1.27 |
May-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 8.76 × 10−1 | 1.58 × 10−1 |
May-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 2.66 × 10−1 | 1.14 |
Jul-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 2.80 × 10−1 | 1.10 |
Riparian ≠ Riparian | Jul-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 4.31 × 10−1 | 7.90 × 10−1 |
Jun-19 ≠ Nov-18 | 1.77 × 10−4 | 3.88 |
May-18 ≠ Jul-18 | 4.37 × 10−6 | 4.84 |
May-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 7.45 × 10−1 | 3.26 × 10−1 |
May-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 1.55 × 10−4 | 3.92 |
Jul-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 3.48 × 10−6 | 4.89 |
Upland ≠ Upland | Jul-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 2.82 × 10−1 | 1.08 |
Jun-19 ≠ Nov-18 | 1.74 × 10−28 | 1.29 × 10+1 |
May-18 ≠ Jul-18 | 2.45 × 10−25 | 1.19 × 10+1 |
May-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 1.03 × 10−1 | 1.64 |
May-18 ≠ Nov-18 | 2.42 × 10−18 | 9.61 |
Jul-18 ≠ Jun-19 | 1.72 × 10−40 | 1.67 × 10+1 |
Table 6.
Vegetation and substrate cover classes and their descriptions.
Table 6.
Vegetation and substrate cover classes and their descriptions.
Cover Class | Geomorphology | Substrate Description | Vegetation Description |
---|
Upland hillslope | Upland hillslope | Cobble and sand | No vegetation–burnt chaparral roots |
Invasive I | Over-bank | Sand and root masses | Arundo donax and Washingtonia spp. |
Alvarado Creek | Creek | Cobble and sand | N/A |
Forbes and cobbles | Flood plain | Cobble, sand, and sparse cover of forbes | Erigeron sp., Brassica nigra and Foeniculum sp. |
Secondary channels | Secondary channel | Cobble and sand | N/A |
Invasive II | Over-bank | Sand | Arundo donax |
Table 7.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with topographic analysis data by cover class. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05).
Table 7.
p-values and t-statistics for all hypotheses associated with topographic analysis data by cover class. The shaded p-value denotes rejected null hypotheses (p < 0.05).
Hypothesis | p-Value | t-Statistic |
---|
Hillslope ≠ Arundo donax | 1.05 × 10−13 | 9.40 |
Hillslope ≠ Secondary Channel | 2.37 × 10−9 | 6.41 |
Hillslope ≠ A. donax and Washingtonia spp. | 1.29 × 10−1 | 1.15 |
Hillslope ≠ Gravel and Forbes | 7.75 × 10−6 | 4.83 |
Hillslope ≠ Alvarado Creek | 4.01 × 10−2 | 1.78 |
Arundo donax ≠ Secondary Channel | 4.13 × 10−2 | 1.75 |
Arundo donax ≠ A. donax and Washingtonia spp. | 2.22 × 10−40 | 1.53 × 10+1 |
Arundo donax ≠ Gravel and Forbes | 6.54 × 10−20 | 9.79 × 10+1 |
Arundo donax ≠ Alvarado Creek | 1.58 × 10−21 | 1.12 × 10+1 |
Secondary Channel ≠ A. donax and Washingtonia spp. | 4.06 × 10−12 | 7.62 |
Secondary Channel ≠ Gravel and Forbes | 1.07 × 10−4 | 3.84 |
Secondary Channel ≠ Alvarado Creek | 3.82 × 10−9 | 6.17 |
Gravel and Forbes ≠ Alvarado Creek | 5.71 × 10−6 | 4.68 |
Gravel and Forbes ≠ A. donax and Washingtonia spp. | 2.22 × 10−15 | 8.35 |
A. donax and Washingtonia spp. ≠ Alvarado Creek | 1.11 × 10−1 | 1.23 |