Next Article in Journal
Thermal Micro-Environment during Poultry Transportation in South Central United States
Next Article in Special Issue
Stocking Density Affects Stress and Anxious Behavior in the Laying Hen Chick During Rearing
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Tea Saponin Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility, Methanogenesis, and Ruminal Microbial Flora in Dorper Crossbred Ewe
Previous Article in Special Issue
Feeding Strategies Before and at Mixing: The Effect on Sow Aggression and Behavior
Article Menu
Issue 1 (January) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2019, 9(1), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9010030

The Effect of Virtual Fencing Stimuli on Stress Responses and Behavior in Sheep

1
School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
2
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization, Agriculture and Food, Locked Bag 1, Armidale, NSW 2350, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 4 December 2018 / Revised: 9 January 2019 / Accepted: 18 January 2019 / Published: 21 January 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impact of Environment and Stressors on Animal Welfare)
Full-Text   |   PDF [677 KB, uploaded 21 January 2019]   |  

Simple Summary

Virtual fencing is a new technology that uses audio signals and electrical stimuli to spatially control animals without the need for fixed fencing. It involves avoidance learning whereby the animals learn to respond to an audio cue (conditioning stimulus) to avoid receiving an aversive electrical stimulus (unconditioned stimulus). The audio cue is used to warn the animal that it is approaching the boundary and should be benign and not perceived as aversive to the animal. While a positive punishment stimulus is necessary for learning, it should not be so aversive to the animal that it impinges on its welfare. This study aimed to determine how the stimuli used in virtual fencing are perceived by the animal when they are first encountered. The audio and electrical stimuli were compared to other commonly encountered stimuli in normal sheep production systems, including a barking dog and a restraint procedure. The physiological and behavioral responses of sheep indicated that sheep were no more adversely impacted by virtual fencing stimuli than they were by other commonly encountered stimuli. The least to most aversive treatments were: Control < Beep < Barking Dog < Electrical stimulus < Restraint.

Abstract

To understand the animal welfare impact of virtual fencing stimuli (audio cue ‘beep’ and electrical stimulus) on naïve sheep, it is necessary to assess stress responses during the animal’s first encounters with these stimuli. Eighty Merino ewes were exposed to one of the following treatments (n = 16 animals per treatment): Control (no stimuli), beep, dog bark, manual restraint, and electrical stimulus. Collars were used to apply the audio and electrical stimuli. The restraint treatment showed an elevated cortisol response compared with the control (p < 0.05), but there were no differences between the other treatments and the control. There were no differences between treatments in vaginal temperature (p > 0.05). For behaviors, the sheep receiving the bark and beep treatments were more vigilant compared to the control (p < 0.05), there were more aversive responses observed in the electrical stimulus treatment compared to the control. Together, the responses showed that the beep stimuli were largely benign, the bark stimuli was minimally aversive, the electrical stimuli was acutely aversive, and the restraint was moderately aversive. These data suggest that, for sheep, their first exposure to the virtual fencing stimuli should be perceived as less aversive than a commonly used restraint procedure. View Full-Text
Keywords: Animal welfare; avoidance learning; behavior; body temperature; cortisol; ear postures; electric shock; livestock; stress; vigilance Animal welfare; avoidance learning; behavior; body temperature; cortisol; ear postures; electric shock; livestock; stress; vigilance
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Kearton, T.; Marini, D.; Cowley, F.; Belson, S.; Lee, C. The Effect of Virtual Fencing Stimuli on Stress Responses and Behavior in Sheep. Animals 2019, 9, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top