Next Article in Journal
Survey of Veterinarians Using a Novel Physical Compression Squeeze Procedure in the Management of Neonatal Maladjustment Syndrome in Foals
Previous Article in Journal
Characteristics and Outcomes of Dogs Admitted into Queensland RSPCA Shelters
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Animals 2017, 7(9), 68; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani7090068

The Use of a Virtual Online Debating Platform to Facilitate Student Discussion of Potentially Polarising Topics

1
Sydney School of Veterinary Science, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, NSW, Australia
2
Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2006, NSW, Australia
3
Biz Hub Australia Pty Ltd., 1 Northcote St, Torrensville 5031, SA, Australia
4
Centre for Animal Welfare and Ethics, School of Veterinary Science, University of Queensland, Gatton 4343, QLD, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 17 July 2017 / Revised: 23 August 2017 / Accepted: 28 August 2017 / Published: 2 September 2017
Full-Text   |   PDF [1796 KB, uploaded 2 September 2017]   |  

Abstract

The merits of students exchanging views through the so-called human continuum exercise (HCE) are well established. The current article describes the creation of the virtual human continuum (VHC), an online platform that facilitates the same teaching exercise. It also reports feedback on the VHC from veterinary science students (n = 38). First-year Doctor of Veterinary Medicine students at the University of Sydney, Australia, trialed the platform and provided feedback. Most students agreed or strongly agreed that the VHC offered: a non-threatening environment for discussing emotive and challenging issues; and an opportunity to see how other people form ideas. It also made them think about how to express their ideas and make arguments; and left them feeling more comfortable about expressing their views using it than they would discussing ideas face-to-face (98%, 84%, 79% and 76%, respectively). All respondents agreed or strongly agreed that the VHC encouraged them to consider other opinions. These data suggest that the transition of the HCE to an online platform facilitates dialogue on difficult ethical issues in a supportive environment. View Full-Text
Keywords: discussion tool; ethical frameworks; safe learning; online debating; virtual human continuum discussion tool; ethical frameworks; safe learning; online debating; virtual human continuum
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

McGreevy, P.D.; Tzioumis, V.; Degeling, C.; Johnson, J.; Brown, R.; Sands, M.; Starling, M.J.; Phillips, C.J.C. The Use of a Virtual Online Debating Platform to Facilitate Student Discussion of Potentially Polarising Topics. Animals 2017, 7, 68.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Animals EISSN 2076-2615 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top