Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics of the Uterine Microbiota in Postpartum Beef Cows Supplemented with Grape Pomace
Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Experimental Design
2.2. Uterine Sample Collection
2.3. Amplicon-Based Sequencing of Bacterial (16S) and Fungal (ITS2) Communities
2.4. Bioinformatics and Quantification
3. Results
3.1. Microbial Composition of Uterine Microbiotas of Beef Cows
3.2. Analysis of Bacterial Phyla–Structure and Significance in the Bovine Microbiota
3.3. Fungal Composition of the Uterine Microbiota in Beef Cows
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Adnane, M.; Chapwanya, A. A review of the diversity of the genital tract microbiome and implications for fertility of cattle. Animals 2022, 12, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Çömlekcioğlu, U.; Jezierska, S.; Opsomer, G.; Pascottini, O.B. Uterine microbial ecology and disease in cattle: A review. Theriogenology 2024, 213, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Molina Morales, N.; Sola Leyva, A.; Sáez Lara, M.J.; Plaza Díaz, J.; Romero, B.; Clavero Gilabert, A.; Mozas Moreno, J.; Fontes, J.; Altmae, S. New Opportunities for Endometrial Health by Modifying Uterine Microbial Composition: Present or Future? Biomolecules 2020, 10, 593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poole, R.K.; Soffa, D.R.; McAnally, B.E.; Smith, M.S.; Hickman-Brown, K.J.; Stockland, E.L. Reproductive microbiomes in domestic livestock: Insights utilizing 16S rRNA gene amplicon community sequencing. Animals 2023, 13, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Poole, R.K.; Pickett, A.T.; Oliveira Filho, R.V.; de Melo, G.D.; Palanisamy, V.; Dass, S.C.; Cooke, R.F.; Pohler, K.G. Shifts in uterine bacterial communities associated with endogenous progesterone and 17β-estradiol concentrations in beef cattle. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 2023, 82, 106766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karstrup, C.C.; Klitgaard, K.; Jensen, T.K.; Agerholm, J.S.; Pedersen, H.G. Presence of bacteria in the endometrium and placentomes of pregnant cows. Theriogenology 2017, 99, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murga Valderrama, N.L.; Segura Portocarrero, G.T.; Romani Vasquez, A.C.; Frias Torres, H.; Flores Durand, G.J.; Cornejo Villanueva, V.G.; Del Solar, J.C.; Costa Polveiro, R.; da Silva Vieira, D.; Bardales Escalante, W. Exploring the microbiome of two uterine sites in cows. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 18768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galvão, K.N.; Bicalho, R.C.; Jeon, S.J. Symposium review: The uterine microbiome associated with the development of uterine disease in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 11786–11797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Santos, T.; Gilbert, R.O.; Bicalho, R.C. Metagenomic analysis of the uterine bacterial microbiota in healthy and metritic postpartum dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94, 291–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ault-Seay, T.B.; Moorey, S.E.; Mathew, D.J.; Schrick, F.N.; Pohler, K.G.; McLean, K.J.; Myer, P.R. Importance of the female reproductive tract microbiome and its relationship with the uterine environment for health and productivity in cattle: A review. Front. Anim. Sci. 2023, 4, 1111636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Carli, S.; Lopes, C.E.; Breyer, G.M.; Dias, M.E.; Saggin, B.F.; Varela, A.P.M.; Mayer, F.Q.; Siqueira, F.M. Cows’ reproductive performances and parity order influences the cervicovaginal fungal community. Microb. Pathog. 2022, 162, 105351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pal, M.; Tariku, F.; Rebuma, T.; Seth, D.; Patel, K.B. Growing role of fungi in the reproductive disorders of animals. J. Adv. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 5, 37–42. [Google Scholar]
- Saini, P.; Singh, M.; Kumar, P. Fungal endometritis in bovines. Open Vet. J. 2019, 9, 94–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, S.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Gao, Z.; Li, B.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, Z.; Jiang, X.; Liu, Z.; Meng, L. Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract ameliorates diabetic bladder dysfunction via the activation of the Nrf2 pathway. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cheng, X.; Yang, S.; Xu, C.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, P.; Long, M.; He, J. Proanthocyanidins protect against β-hydroxybutyrate-induced oxidative damage in bovine endometrial cells. Molecules 2019, 24, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pascottini, O.B.; Van Schyndel, S.J.; Spricigo, J.W.; Rousseau, J.; Weese, J.S.; LeBlanc, S.J. Dynamics of uterine microbiota in postpartum dairy cows with clinical or subclinical endometritis. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 12353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miranda-CasoLuengo, R.; Lu, J.; Williams, E.J.; Miranda-CasoLuengo, A.A.; Carrington, S.D.; Evans, A.C.; Meijer, W.G. Delayed differentiation of vaginal and uterine microbiomes in dairy cows developing postpartum endometritis. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0200974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Directive 2010/63/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2010 on the Protection of Animals Used for Scientific Purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L 276/33, 20 October 2010. Available online: https://eurlex.europa.eu/homepage.html (accessed on 2 December 2025).
- Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. The Provisions of the Republic of Lithuania (2012-10-03) for Animal Welfare and Handling: Vilnius, Lithuania. 2012. Available online: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/legalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.434660 (accessed on 2 December 2025).
- State Food and Veterinary Service of Lithuania. Sub-Statutory Act by the State Food and Veterinary Service of Lithuanian Republic Regarding the Confirmation of the Requirements for Keeping, Maintenance and Use of Animals Intended for Science and Education Purposes: Vilnius, Lithuania 2012. Available online: https://e-seimas.lrs.lt/portal/lgalAct/lt/TAD/TAIS.437081/asr (accessed on 2 December 2025).
- Callahan, B.J.; McMurdie, P.J.; Rosen, M.J.; Han, A.W.; Johnson, A.J.; Holmes, S.P. DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 2016, 13, 581–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caporaso, J.G.; Kuczynski, J.; Stombaugh, J.; Bittinger, K.; Bushman, F.D.; Costello, E.K.; Fierer, N.; Peña, A.G.; Goodrich, J.K.; Gordon, J.I. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2010, 7, 335–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Segata, N.; Izard, J.; Waldron, L.; Gevers, D.; Miropolsky, L.; Garrett, W.S.; Huttenhower, C. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011, 12, R60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sheldon, I.M.; Cronin, J.; Goetze, L.; Donofrio, G.; Schuberth, H.J. Defining postpartum uterine disease and the mechanisms of infection and immunity in the female reproductive tract in cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2009, 81, 1025–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Clemmons, B.A.; Reese, S.T.; Dantas, F.G.; Franco, G.A.; Smith, T.P.; Adeyosoye, O.I.; Pohler, K.G.; Myer, P.R. Vaginal and uterine bacterial communities in postpartum lactating cows. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poole, R.K.; Ault-Seay, T.B.; Payton, R.R.; Myer, P.R.; Lear, A.S.; Pohler, K.G. Evaluation of reproductive tract cytokines in post-partum beef cows relating to reproductive microbiota and fertility outcomes. Front. Anim. Sci. 2021, 2, 704714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Knudsen, L.R.V.; Karstrup, C.C.; Pedersen, H.G.; Angen, Ø.; Agerholm, J.S.; Rasmussen, E.L.; Jensen, T.K.; Klitgaard, K. An investigation of the microbiota in uterine flush samples and endometrial biopsies from dairy cows during the first 7 weeks postpartum. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 642–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Viveros, A.; Chamorro, S.; Pizarro, M.; Arija, I.; Centeno, C.; Brenes, A. Effects of dietary polyphenol-rich grape products on intestinal microflora and gut morphology in broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 566–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pasqualone, A.; Bianco, A.M.; Paradiso, V.M.; Summo, C.; Gambacorta, G.; Caponio, F. Physico-chemical, sensory and volatile profiles of biscuits enriched with grape marc extract. Food Res. Int. 2014, 65, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdal, T.; Sela, D.A.; Xiao, J.; Boyacioglu, D.; Chen, F.; Capanoglu, E. The reciprocal interactions between polyphenols and gut microbiota and effects on bioaccessibility. Nutrients 2016, 8, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shokri, H.; Yadollahi, M. Isolation and identification of fungal microbiota from genital tract of ewes. Rev. Médecine Vétérinaire 2017, 168, 81–86. [Google Scholar]
- Niyazov, H.; Abdiev, S.; Eshkuvatov, K.; Ruziev, A.; Ruziboev, A. Clinical symptoms of cows with purulent-catarrhal endometritis of fungal etiology, fungal species and their sensitivity to drugs. In E3S Web of Conferences; EDP Sciences: Les Ulis, France, 2024; Volume 510, p. 01043. [Google Scholar]
- Sudipa, P.H.; Mahatmi, H.; Gelgel, K.T.P.; Suarjana, I.G.K.; Besung, I.N.K.; Mufa, R.M.D.; Sukernayasa, I.W. Isolation and identification of fungi from reproductive tract of healthy bali cows. J. Anim. Health Prod. 2023, 11, 337–343. [Google Scholar]
- Gärtner, M.A.; Bondzio, A.; Braun, N.; Jung, M.; Einspanier, R.; Gabler, C. Detection and characterisation of Lactobacillus spp. in the bovine uterus and their influence on bovine endometrial epithelial cells in vitro. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0119793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genís, S.; Bach, À.; Arís, A. Effects of intravaginal lactic acid bacteria on bovine endometrium: Implications in uterine health. Vet. Microbiol. 2017, 204, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]














Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Merkelytė, I.; Marašinskienė, Š.; Nainienė, R.; Pelenė, U.; Šakarnytė, L.; Šiukščius, A. Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics of the Uterine Microbiota in Postpartum Beef Cows Supplemented with Grape Pomace. Animals 2026, 16, 810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050810
Merkelytė I, Marašinskienė Š, Nainienė R, Pelenė U, Šakarnytė L, Šiukščius A. Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics of the Uterine Microbiota in Postpartum Beef Cows Supplemented with Grape Pomace. Animals. 2026; 16(5):810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050810
Chicago/Turabian StyleMerkelytė, Inga, Šarūnė Marašinskienė, Rasa Nainienė, Urtė Pelenė, Laura Šakarnytė, and Artūras Šiukščius. 2026. "Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics of the Uterine Microbiota in Postpartum Beef Cows Supplemented with Grape Pomace" Animals 16, no. 5: 810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050810
APA StyleMerkelytė, I., Marašinskienė, Š., Nainienė, R., Pelenė, U., Šakarnytė, L., & Šiukščius, A. (2026). Bacterial and Fungal Dynamics of the Uterine Microbiota in Postpartum Beef Cows Supplemented with Grape Pomace. Animals, 16(5), 810. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16050810

