Next Article in Journal
Main Husbandry Practices and Health Conditions That Affect Welfare in Calves: A Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Chelated Trace Mineral Supplementation in the Form of Proteinates on Broiler Performance Parameters and Mineral Excretion: A Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs and Immune-Related Proteins Provides Insights into Antiviral Adaptations in Common Vampire Bat

1
School of Artificial Intelligence, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2
School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(21), 3063; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213063
Submission received: 16 August 2025 / Revised: 16 October 2025 / Accepted: 21 October 2025 / Published: 22 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Genetics and Genomics)

Simple Summary

The common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) harbors many viruses but rarely develops disease, suggesting unique immune strategies. In this study, we combined genomic comparison, protein annotation, and microRNA analysis to investigate its antiviral mechanisms. We identified conserved interferon regulators, immune-related proteins, and novel miRNAs targeting genes involved in apoptosis, stress response, and infection pathways. Network analysis further highlighted key hub genes controlling immune balance. Our findings show that D. rotundus relies on finely tuned gene regulation to tolerate viruses without pathology.

Abstract

Bats are natural reservoirs for diverse viruses, yet they rarely develop disease, suggesting unique antiviral adaptations. In this study, we performed a comprehensive genome-wide analysis in the common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus), integrating comparative genomics, functional annotation, microRNA (miRNA) discovery, target prediction, and network-based analyses. Comparative genomic analysis revealed that Phyllostomus discolor exhibits the highest protein homology (97.4%) with D. rotundus. Alignment of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) indicated strong conservation of IRF1, IRF5, and IRF8, while IRF4 and IRF7 showed divergence, reflecting bat-specific modulation of interferon signaling. Functional annotation of previously uncharacterized proteins identified immune-related elements, including toll-like receptor 4, syncytin-1, and endogenous retroviral sequences, highlighting the integration of viral components into host immunity. We further identified 19 novel miRNAs in D. rotundus, with high-confidence target genes such as SOD2, TRIM28, and FGFR1 involved in antiviral defense, apoptosis regulation, and oxidative stress response. Functional enrichment analyses revealed processes associated with wound healing, apoptosis suppression, infection response, and longevity. Network entropy analysis highlighted central regulatory hubs, including MYC, BCL2, and KIF1B, influencing cell cycle, survival, and immune balance. Collectively, these results demonstrate that D. rotundus employs an integrated regulatory network combining conserved immune factors, lineage-specific gene divergence, and miRNA-mediated fine-tuning to achieve viral tolerance without pathology. This study expands our understanding of bat antiviral biology and provides candidate molecular targets for future functional and translational research.

1. Introduction

Bats, belonging to the order Chiroptera, exhibit several unique physiological and immunological characteristics compared to other mammals. Desmodus rotundus, commonly known as the common vampire bat, is a leaf-nosed species that feeds exclusively on the blood of mammals [1]. This species possesses notable adaptations such as powered flight and an unusually long lifespan for its body size [2]. Importantly, D. rotundus serves as an asymptomatic reservoir for numerous pathogenic viruses that are often lethal to other mammals. Multiple viruses, including coronaviruses, have been previously identified in D. rotundus, highlighting the species-specific nature of bat–virus interactions [3]. Therefore, understanding the antiviral mechanisms in D. rotundus is of great clinical relevance for improving the prevention, diagnosis, and control of zoonotic viral infections.
Research on bat antiviral immunity has revealed that many bat species, including D. rotundus, possess enhanced innate immune defenses that allow them to tolerate high viral loads without developing overt disease. For example, certain bat lineages display constitutive expression of type I and III interferons, which prime downstream interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) even in the absence of infection [4]. In addition, bats often exhibit attenuated inflammatory signaling, such as dampened NLRP3 inflammasome activation, reducing immunopathology during viral replication [5]. Although specific functional studies on D. rotundus remain limited, transcriptomic analyses suggest that vampire bats may similarly leverage a tightly regulated interferon response—balancing viral clearance with minimal tissue damage. Moreover, the RNA interference (RNAi) pathway in bats appears to be more active than in many other mammals, potentially contributing to post-transcriptional suppression of viral genomes [6]. Collectively, these mechanisms enable D. rotundus to act as an asymptomatic viral reservoir, maintaining persistent infections while avoiding the pathological consequences observed in other hosts.
The latest assembled genome version (HLdesRot8A.1) of D. rotundus was released by Blumer et al. [7] and the latest annotation release GCF_022682495.2 was published in February 2025. However, a considerable number of proteins in this genome remain annotated only as “uncharacterized proteins” (UCPs). Traditional annotation methods rely on similarity searches against the non-redundant (nr) reference database, which itself contains many UCPs, complicating accurate functional annotation. Because previous studies indicate UCPs can contribute to species-specific adaptations and evolution [8], we hypothesize that some uncharacterized proteins in D. rotundus contribute to antiviral responses. Identifying and characterizing these proteins may thus uncover novel antiviral factors and expand our understanding of the bat proteome.
In addition, the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in D. rotundus remains largely unexplored. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) and are typically 18–25 nucleotides in length. These molecules play critical roles in regulating immune responses and have been widely implicated in antiviral defense, including the suppression of viral replication [9]. Recent work by Dai et al. [6] demonstrated that small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) produced in bats can guide the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to specifically degrade viral genomes, offering a low-inflammatory and energy-efficient antiviral strategy. Given the structural and functional similarities between siRNAs and miRNAs, we hypothesize that miRNAs may also play a key role in the antiviral mechanisms of D. rotundus. Advances in bioinformatics have facilitated the discovery of novel miRNAs from transcriptomic data in various non-model organisms, such as Mentha piperita [10] and Wuchereria bancrofti [11], suggesting that similar approaches can be effectively applied to study miRNA-mediated antiviral regulation in D. rotundus.
In this study, we performed a genome-wide analysis to identify novel proteins and miRNAs in D. rotundus. We conducted functional annotation of previously uncharacterized proteins and investigated their potential antiviral roles. In parallel, species-specific miRNAs were identified, and their possible functions in immune regulation were explored. Our findings provide new insights into the molecular basis of viral tolerance in bats and may contribute to the broader understanding of host–virus coevolution.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Protein Comparison with Other Bats

The latest genome annotation of D. rotundus (GCF_022682495.2-RS_2025_02) and genome assemblies of ten additional bat species were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database [12] in June 2025. The comparative panel included Eptesicus fuscus, Hipposideros armiger, Miniopterus natalensis, Myotis brandtii, Myotis davidii, Myotis lucifugus, Phyllostomus discolor, Pteropus alecto, Pteropus vampyrus, and Rousettus aegyptiacus. To evaluate conservation and divergence, all D. rotundus protein sequences were aligned against each reference proteomes using BLASTp (version 2.16) with an E-value threshold of ≤1 × 10−5 and a minimum identity of 50%. For broader evolutionary context, the same alignment criteria were applied to three representative model organisms (human, mouse, and rat).

2.2. Functional Annotation of Uncharacterized Proteins (UCPs)

In the latest genome assembly of D. rotundus (GCF_022682495.2-RS_2025_02), several proteins remain annotated as “uncharacterized proteins” (UCPs), which may conceal important functional factors. To infer putative functions, we first identified homologous proteins as described in Section 2.1 and transferred functional annotations from these homologs to the corresponding UCPs. To ensure reliability, all annotation results were subsequently examined and manually curated, thereby improving the accuracy and biological relevance of the functional assignments. Considering the unique immune adaptations of bats, particular attention was given to UCPs potentially associated with antiviral defense, immune regulation, and host–virus interactions.

2.3. Analysis of Interferon Regulatory Factor

Given that D. rotundus harbors numerous viruses but typically remains asymptomatic, we hypothesized that lineage-specific adaptations in antiviral proteins may underlie this tolerance. Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) are key transcriptional regulators that play critical roles in antiviral defense and immune modulation, and recent studies have highlighted their unique evolutionary patterns in bats [13,14]. To investigate this, we retrieved all annotated IRF protein sequences from D. rotundus, ten additional bat species, and three representative model organisms (human, mouse, and rat). Pairwise sequence alignments were performed, and identity values were calculated to assess conservation and divergence of IRFs across species.

2.4. New miRNA Identification

Because miRNAs form characteristic stem–loop secondary structures, we employed a structure-based prediction pipeline [10,11] to identify novel miRNAs in D. rotundus. First, 48,885 mature miRNA sequences were downloaded from miRBase [15] in June 2025, of which 38,371 were annotated as animal miRNAs. All non-coding RNA (ncRNA) sequences of D. rotundus were aligned against this reference set using BLASTn (version 2.16). Candidate alignments were filtered using the following criteria: (1) alignment length ≥ 18 nucleotides; (2) mismatch number ≤ 2; and (3) no gaps. For each candidate, 50 nucleotides upstream and downstream of the mapped region were extracted from the ncRNA sequence. These extended sequences were folded with ViennaRNA (version 2.7.0) [16] to calculate the minimum free energy (MFE). Only candidates with MFE ≤ −20 kcal/mol and Ensemble Diversity (ED) ≥ 15 were retained as putative novel miRNAs, as these thresholds ensure both thermodynamic stability and sufficient structural diversity of the predicted stem–loop precursors.

2.5. miRNA Target Prediction and Network Construction

We used the miRWalk2.0 database and applied stringent criteria to predict the target genes of the newly identified D. rotundus miRNAs. Specifically, only interactions meeting the following thresholds were retained: (1) miRWalk binding score = 1; (2) binding position restricted to the 3′-UTR; and (3) a validated accession number is available. The resulting miRNA–gene interactions were visualized and analyzed as a regulatory network using Cytoscape (version 3.9.1) [17], in which each miRNA was connected to its predicted high-confidence targets. To capture downstream molecular interactions and provide broader functional context, protein–protein association data were retrieved from the STRING database [18] and integrated into the network, thereby enabling a combined view of miRNA-mediated regulation and gene–gene connectivity.

2.6. Functional Enrichment of miRNA-Targeted Genes

Functional enrichment of the predicted D. rotundus miRNA target genes was performed using the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.8 (https://davidbioinformatics.nih.gov/, accessed on 30 June 2025) [19]. Official gene symbols were uploaded as the input list and performed with default parameters. We selected four annotation categories for analysis: GOTERM_BP_DIRECT (Gene Ontology Biological Process), GOTERM_MF_DIRECT (Gene Ontology Molecular Function), GAD_DISEASE (Genetic Association Database disease terms), and KEGG_PATHWAY. Enrichment statistics were computed using DAVID’s built-in modified Fisher’s exact test, with p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant. For each category, the top significant terms were retained for further interpretation, with emphasis on processes and pathways relevant to bat biology, immunity, and antiviral responses.

2.7. Genomic Feature Analysis of miRNA-Targeted Genes

The genomic characteristics of miRNA target genes were analyzed using ShinyGO 0.82 (https://bioinformatics.sdstate.edu/go/, accessed on 30 June 2025) [20]. This tool compares user-defined gene sets against the genomic background to assess differences in sequence features such as coding sequence (CDS) length, transcript length, genome span, 3′-UTR length, and GC content. Statistical significance was evaluated using Chi-square and Student’s t-tests as implemented in ShinyGO. For each feature, density plots were generated to visualize distribution differences between the miRNA target set and the full genome.

2.8. Network Entropy Analysis of Genes

In previous studies, Liu et al. proposed a theory called sample-specific network (SSN) [21] to analyze entropy of individual sample. Inspired by their theory, we introduced a new method called single-factor network to evaluate the importance of individual genes in disease development by calculating the network entropy. Specifically, we removed nodes one at a time, recalculated the network entropy after each removal, and observed changes in the network structure to assess each node’s sensitivity and importance. The network entropy H can be calculated by the following Formulas (1) and (2):
H = Σ k = 1 N p k log ( p k )
p k = n k N
H: network entropy.
N: total number of node degree.
n k : number of nodes with degree k.
p k : the degree probability distribution of the node.

3. Results

3.1. Protein Homolog Distribution

We compared the proteome of D. rotundus (annotation version GCF_022682495.2-RS_2025_02) against those of ten other bat species, finding that about 92–98% of D. rotundus proteins have identifiable homologs (Figure 1). Specifically, Phyllostomus discolor exhibited the highest proteome overlap (97.4%), whereas Myotis lucifugus showed the lowest (92.3%). This gradient of homology correlates with known phylogenetic relationships. P. discolor is also a New World leaf-nosed bat sharing ecological niches with D. rotundus, whereas M. lucifugus, a vespertilionid bat widely distributed across Asia, diverged earlier from D. rotundus’s lineage [22,23]. Overall, the variation in protein conservation among bat species suggests differing evolutionary pressures, potentially linked to each species’ ecology, such as dietary specialization and roosting behavior. When D. rotundus proteins were aligned against those of three model mammals (human, mouse, and rat), only approximately 92–96% of proteins had recognizable homologs, indicating substantial lineage-specific diversification within Chiroptera. Such divergence may underpin bats’ unique immunological adaptations by modifying protein families involved in innate immunity and metabolism.

3.2. Function Annotation of UCPs

In the GCF_022682495.2-RS_2025_02 genome annotation release, 540 proteins were initially annotated as “uncharacterized protein”. Through comparative sequence analysis with 10 bats and three model mammals, we successfully annotated 29 previously uncharacterized proteins (UCPs) in D. rotundus, converting their generic “uncharacterized” designation into reliable functional assignments (Table 1). All newly annotated proteins exhibited highly significant alignments (E-value ≤ 1 × 10−8), with five (XP_045053599.2, XP_071076900.1, XP_024421750.2, XP_053775687.1, XP_053784895.1) matching reference proteins at E = 0. Many of these newly annotated proteins are directly relevant to immune regulation and antiviral defense. Notably, we identified toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) with high sequence identity (88.57% identity to Eptesicus fuscus), a pivotal pattern recognition receptor in sensing bacterial lipopolysaccharide and modulating cross-talk with antiviral interferon pathways [24]. Similarly, the presence of syncytin-1 (94.25% identity to Phyllostomus discolor) and endogenous retrovirus group K member 25 (58.58% identity to Miniopterus natalensis) underscores the integration of retroviral-derived sequences into the bat genome, which may contribute to placental development and possibly to immune modulation against viral pathogens [25,26]. The identification of both conserved immune effectors TLR4 and retrovirus-derived proteins (syncytin-1, ERVK members) provides new candidates for experimental investigation into the molecular basis of vampire bat viral resilience. These findings will help bridge the gap between genomic annotation and functional immunology, offering a foundation for future studies into bat-specific antiviral strategies.

3.3. Similarity of Interferon Regulatory Factor in Mammals

Previous studies [13,14] have shown the importance of interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) in the antiviral mechanisms; thus, we specifically analyzed this protein family. Based on sequence alignment between Desmodus rotundus and 13 other mammals, the eight IRFs display a clear split between broadly conserved and highly variable members. The alignment identity of eight IRFs was shown in Table 2. We found their evolution patterns are informative for antiviral specialization in the vampire bat. IRF1, IRF5 and IRF8 are the most conserved: across all species, average identity values are 90.0% (IRF1), 91.7% (IRF5) and 93.6% (IRF8), and several bat lineages show ≥95% identity for these factors. The phyllostomid Phyllostomus discolor, phylogenetically closest to D. rotundus in our panel, exhibits the highest overall similarity (IRF1 = 99.4%, IRF8 = 96.7%, IRF9 = 94.9%), underscoring strong conservation of core regulatory circuitry within New World leaf-nosed bats. By contrast, more distant non-bat mammals show lower values, particularly for IRF4 and IRF7 (human IRF4 = 42.9%, IRF7 = 64.3%; mouse IRF4 = 39.5%, IRF7 = 58.2%). The antiviral sentinels IRF2, IRF3 and IRF9 are moderately conserved on average, with most bats clustering near the 80–90% range.
In addition, IRF7 is known as the master amplifier of type I interferon responses [27] and shows the greatest cross-species divergence (overall mean = 59.9%) and extreme depressions in several Myotis species (26.4–28.8%). IRF4 is also unusually variable (overall mean = 76.4%), with strikingly low identities in some taxa (Myotis lucifugus = 37.7%, human = 42.9%). The exceptionally low cross-species identities for IRF7 and IRF4 pinpoint these factors as priority targets for functional assays in D. rotundus. In addition, isolated outliers appear in otherwise conserved genes (Rousettus aegyptiacus IRF1 = 44.6%, Myotis davidii IRF2 = 45.3%, Pteropus vampyrus IRF2 = 49.8%), suggesting lineage-specific divergence in bat evolution. These results indicate that several antiviral modulators of D. rotundus exhibit notable sequence divergence and exhibit enhanced sequence plasticity across mammals.

3.4. Analysis of New miRNAs

Using our structure-based pipeline, we identified 19 previously unannotated miRNAs in D. rotundus, each met stringent sequence and structural criteria (Table 3). The combination of rigorous filtering parameters, structural verification via ViennaRNA folding, and cross-species conservation strongly supports the authenticity of these predictions. The predicted precursor sequences exhibited minimal free energies (MFE) below −20 kcal/mol, consistent with stable stem-loop secondary structures characteristic of authentic miRNAs, while the calculated ensemble diversities were within expected ranges, supporting reliable secondary structure prediction. In addition, dro-miR-3620-5p and dro-miR-6988-5p displayed strong sequence conservation and highly negative MFE values (−26.6 kcal/mol and −33.1 kcal/mol, respectively), indicating robust stem-loop stability and a high likelihood of functional relevance.
Several identified sequences correspond to highly conserved and functionally important miRNAs known from other vertebrates. For example, dro-let-7-5p, a member of the let-7 family, is widely conserved across mammals and is implicated in antiviral immunity by modulating interferon-stimulated genes [28]. Similarly, dro-miR-296-5p has been reported in previous study as a regulator of inflammatory responses and viral replication [29]. The presence of conserved immune-related miRNAs alongside potentially unique D. rotundus sequences offers valuable candidates for functional investigation. These findings provide a strong foundation for exploring miRNA-mediated antiviral regulation in vampire bats.

3.5. miRNA Targets and Network Construction

We identified high-confidence targets for the newly discovered D. rotundus miRNAs using miRWalk2.0 and stringent filtering criteria. The top 20 targets were shown in Table 4, and the predicted miRNA–gene interactions network is shown in Figure 2.
Our analysis yielded several key miRNA–gene pairs with strong thermodynamic favorability (binding energies ranging from −17.9 to −37.6 kcal/mol), sufficient seed pairing, and accessible binding sites, underscoring the reliability of our predictions. Several target genes are notably connected to immune or antiviral functions; for example, SOD2 (targeted by dro-miR-1302; binding energy −17.9 kcal/mol) plays a well-established role in countering oxidative stress during viral infection [30]. TRIM28 (targeted by dro-miR-1587; −33.6 kcal/mol) and RNF4 (same miRNA; −33.8 kcal/mol) are involved in antiviral innate defense as regulators of transcriptional silencing and ubiquitination pathways [31]. FGFR1 (targets of dro-miR-296-5p; −32.0 kcal/mol) is implicated in cellular growth and neuronal response pathways that can intersect with antiviral defense and inflammatory regulation [32]. The inclusion of genes such as SOD2, TRIM28, and FGFR1 underscores the potential of vampire bat–specific miRNAs to regulate pathways relevant to immune modulation and viral resilience. These findings provide a strong foundation for functional validation of miRNA-mediated antiviral regulation in D. rotundus.

3.6. Functional Enrichment Analysis of miRNA-Target Genes

Functional enrichment analysis of the miRNA target genes using DAVID revealed several biological processes and pathways that align with known adaptive traits of bats (Table 5). In the biological process (BP) category, significant enrichment was observed for “angiogenesis involved in wound healing” (p-value = 8.00 × 10−5), and “negative regulation of apoptotic process” (p-value = 7.50 × 10−4). These processes may contribute to bats’ remarkable tissue repair capacity, which is critical for mitigating damage caused by viral infections. In the molecular function (MF) category, the most enriched term was “protein binding” (85.8%, p-value = 1.10 × 10−7), alongside more specific functions such as “fibronectin binding” (p-value = 2.60 × 10−3), and “mRNA binding” (p-value = 9.30 × 10−3). These functions reflect complex post-transcriptional and extracellular matrix interactions that could support rapid immune modulation and tissue remodeling.
Disease association analysis (GAD) highlighted “aging and longevity” (p = 0.021) and the disease class “Infection” (p-value = 0.026), consistent with the unusual lifespan and high pathogen tolerance documented in bats. KEGG pathway analysis further identified “Human papillomavirus infection” (p-value = 3.00 × 10−4), which, while human-specific in name, encompasses antiviral defense and cell cycle control mechanisms that are broadly relevant to bat-virus interactions.

3.7. Genomic Feature of miRNA-Targeted Genes

To explore the genomic characteristics of the miRNA target genes, we performed gene plot analysis using ShinyGO 0.82 (Figure 3). This approach compares the distribution of various sequence features in our gene set against all annotated genes in the genome, applying the Chi-square test and Student’s t-tests for statistical assessment. Our analysis revealed that several genomic features of the target genes differ significantly from the genome-wide background, indicating potential selective constraints and functional specialization.
While coding sequence (CDS) length showed no significant difference (p-value = 0.8) between miRNA targets and the genome background, transcript length was markedly longer in the target set (p-value = 3 × 10−12), suggesting that miRNAs preferentially regulate genes with more extended transcribed regions. This trend was even more pronounced in 3′-UTR length, which was significantly longer in the target genes (p-value = 7.9 × 10−39), consistent with the canonical miRNA targeting preference for regulatory elements located in extended 3′-UTRs. GC content showed a modest but statistically significant difference (p = 0.00015), suggesting potential sequence composition biases in miRNA-regulated genes that could influence mRNA stability or secondary structure. The number of exons also differed significantly between the two groups (p-value = 5.6 × 10−5), indicating that overall exon size is a major distinguishing factor.
Collectively, these results demonstrate that the D. rotundus miRNA target genes are not a random subset of the genome but instead exhibit distinctive sequence characteristics, particularly extended transcript and UTR lengths. Such features are consistent with patterns reported in other mammals and may enhance regulatory plasticity, enabling fine-tuned immune and antiviral responses in vampire bats.

3.8. Network Entropy Influenced by Each Gene

Network entropy analysis of the miRNA–gene interaction network identified a subset of genes whose removal produced the largest changes in network entropy, indicating high centrality and functional sensitivity within the regulatory system (Table 6). The top-ranked gene, MYC (ΔH = −0.0562), is a master transcription factor regulating cell proliferation, apoptosis, and immune activation, and has been implicated in controlling viral replication and immune cell metabolism [33]. BCL2 (ΔH = −0.0405) functions as a key anti-apoptotic regulator, potentially contributing to the fine-tuning of cell death during antiviral responses—an adaptation that may help bats limit immunopathology while tolerating persistent viral infections [34]. Other high-impact node KIF1B, participates in intracellular transport—a process often targeted by viruses to hijack host machinery [35]. DNA repair and replication control genes such as RAD54L2, CDC6, and DEK also ranked highly, suggesting that genome stability and replication checkpoint regulation are central features in the bat antiviral network [36].
The network entropy results point to a core set of genes integrating cell cycle regulation, apoptosis control, and genome maintenance. These processes are central to balancing viral tolerance and immune defense. These findings align with the known immunological adaptations of bats, highlighting candidate molecular hubs for experimental validation in future antiviral research.

4. Discussion

The Desmodus rotundus (common vampire bat) exhibits a unique combination of ecological, physiological, and immunological traits that distinguish it from other mammals. As an obligate sanguivore, it is chronically exposed to diverse blood-borne pathogens, including a wide range of viruses, yet it rarely develops overt disease. This adaptability is underpinned by specialized antiviral mechanisms, including constitutively active interferon pathways, positive selection in key immune regulators, and dampened inflammatory responses [6,37]. D. rotundus also appears to co-opt endogenous retroviral elements and modulate immune signaling through finely tuned gene regulation, enabling a balance between pathogen control with tissue homeostasis. These adaptations support a tolerance-based antiviral strategy, allowing long-term viral persistence without compromising host fitness. Our multi-layered investigation into D. rotundus genomic and regulatory features reveals specific adaptations in bat antiviral immunity, supported by emerging comparative studies.
The functions of 29 uncharacterized proteins were identified in this study. Our annotation of these UCPs, including TLR4, syncytin-1, and ERVK, aligns with the broader notion that bats co-opt viral elements and innate immune receptors to bolster antiviral defenses while dampening inflammatory damage. Indeed, bats are known for dampened inflammasome responses and unique inflammasome sensor loss, which supports tolerance rather than hyperinflammation [38]. The observed high conservation of IRF1, IRF5, and IRF8, contrasted with notable divergence in IRF4 and IRF7, echoes findings by Irving et al. [39], showing elevated basal levels of IRF1/3/7 across bat tissues, which support potent yet controlled interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) responses. Similarly, IRF7’s unique expression patterns and preserved functional domains suggest that bats maintain regulatory flexibility in interferon pathways [14]. Positive selection signatures in IRF family members, including IRF4 and IRF9, have also been observed across bat species, reinforcing their adaptive immunological roles [40].
We also identified 19 novel miRNAs in the genome of D. rotundus by applying a set of stringent criteria. This work has highlighted novel miRNAs with homology to immune regulators (dro-let-7-5p, dro-miR-296-5p), converges with global trends where miRNAs mediate host–virus interactions by modulating inflammation, apoptosis, and proliferation. Our target prediction uncovered miRNA regulation of genes, such as SOD2, TRIM28, and FGFR1. These genes were previously implicated in antiviral and oxidative stress pathways. This resonates with studies showing bat immune tolerance involves fine-tuning oxidative stress and DNA repair systems to prevent immunopathology, while maintaining viral resistance. Network entropy analysis spotlighted central hubs (MYC, BCL2 and KIF1B), which emerged as key regulators of cell cycle, apoptosis, and signaling. These mirror bat-specific antiviral features, where controlled cell proliferation and survival are balanced to support viral co-existence without disease. Such regulatory resilience echoes proposed mechanisms of bat infection tolerance and longevity [41].
Our integrated results, including sequence evolution, miRNA-mediated regulation, and network centrality, converge with existing literature portraying bats as immunologically adapted species. They retain potent interferon regulation, attenuate inflammatory triggers, leverage endogenous retroelements, and orchestrate precision post-transcriptional regulation. These adaptations allow D. rotundus to effectively host viruses while avoiding pathology. Future experimental validation of these miRNAs, IRFs, and hub genes will be crucial to unraveling bat-specific antiviral strategies and their translational potential.

5. Conclusions

In summary, our genome-wide analysis of the common vampire bat provides integrative evidence that this species achieves viral tolerance through the combined action of conserved immune factors, lineage-specific protein divergence, and miRNA-mediated fine-tuning of gene expression. The identified immune-related proteins (such as TLR4, syncytin-1, and ERVK members) and newly discovered miRNAs (including dro-miR-296-5p and dro-let-7-5p) represent promising molecular candidates for future functional validation in bat cell systems. Understanding how these regulators maintain immune balance without triggering excessive inflammation may inspire the design of novel antiviral and anti-inflammatory strategies in other mammals. Overall, this study expands current knowledge of bat immunology and provides a foundation for developing bat-informed approaches to enhance viral resistance and immune tolerance in biomedical research.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani15213063/s1: Table S1: Full table of miRNA-gene interaction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: Z.Y.; methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, visualization: Y.Y., T.L. and X.H.; writing—review and editing and supervision: Z.Y. and M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study because no biological experiments involving humans or animals were performed.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in this study are openly available in Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17351716.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chong-Guzmán, L.A.; Aréchiga-Ceballos, N.; Ballados-Gonzáles, G.G.; Miranda-Caballero, C.I.; Grostieta, E.; Aguilar-Domínguez, M.; Romero-Salas, D.; Hernández-Herrera, R.I.; San Martín-del Ángel, P.; Lammoglia-Villagómez, M.A. Leptospira interrogans Associated with the Common Vampire Bat (Desmodus rotundus) from the Neotropical Region of Mexico. Microbiol. Res. 2025, 16, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gonzalez, V.; Banerjee, A. Molecular, ecological, and behavioral drivers of the bat-virus relationship. Iscience 2022, 25, 104779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Albuquerque, N.K.; Silva, S.P.; Aragão, C.F.; Cunha, T.C.A.; Paiva, F.A.; Coelho, T.F.; Cruz, A.C.R. Virome analysis of Desmodus rotundus tissue samples from the Amazon region. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kellner, M.J.; Monteil, V.M.; Zelger, P.; Pei, G.; Jiao, J.; Onji, M.; Nayak, K.; Zilbauer, M.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; Dorhoi, A. Bat organoids reveal antiviral responses at epithelial surfaces. Nat. Immunol. 2025, 26, 934–946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ahn, M.; Anderson, D.E.; Zhang, Q.; Tan, C.W.; Lim, B.L.; Luko, K.; Wen, M.; Chia, W.N.; Mani, S.; Wang, L.C. Dampened NLRP3-mediated inflammation in bats and implications for a special viral reservoir host. Nat. Microbiol. 2019, 4, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dai, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; Wei, X.; Liu, X.; Che, X.; Li, J.; Ng, W.L.; Wang, L.-F.; Li, Y. Increased viral tolerance mediates by antiviral RNA interference in bat cells. Cell Rep. 2024, 43, 114581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Blumer, M.; Brown, T.; Freitas, M.B.; Destro, A.L.; Oliveira, J.A.; Morales, A.E.; Schell, T.; Greve, C.; Pippel, M.; Jebb, D.; et al. Gene losses in the common vampire bat illuminate molecular adaptations to blood feeding. Sci. Adv. 2022, 8, eabm6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yang, Z.; Shi, M.; Zhang, X.; Yao, D. Genome-Wide Screening for Pathogenic Proteins and microRNAs Associated with Parasite-Host Interactions in Trypanosoma brucei. Insects 2022, 13, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yao, J.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, G.; Zhou, X.; Shang, H.; Li, L.; Xu, T. Action mechanisms and characteristics of miRNAs to regulate virus replication. Virology 2024, 590, 109966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Selvaraj, D.; Mugunthan, S.P.; Chandra, H.M.; Govindasamy, C.; Al-Numair, K.S.; Balasubramani, R. In silico identification of novel and conserved microRNAs and targets in peppermint (Mentha piperita) using expressed sequence tags (ESTs). J. King Saud Univ.-Sci. 2023, 35, 102604. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhu, C.; Yan, Y.; Feng, Y.; Sun, J.; Mu, M.; Yang, Z. Genome-Wide Analysis Reveals Key Genes and MicroRNAs Related to Pathogenic Mechanism in Wuchereria bancrofti. Pathogens 2024, 13, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sayers, E.W.; Beck, J.; Bolton, E.E.; Brister, J.R.; Chan, J.; Connor, R.; Feldgarden, M.; Fine, A.M.; Funk, K.; Hoffman, J. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information in 2025. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D20–D29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gonzalez, V.; Lobb, B.; Côté, J.; Bhuinya, A.; Tubb, A.G.; Nuthalapati, S.S.; Asavajaru, A.; Zhou, Y.; Misra, V.; Falzarano, D. Bat-specific adaptations in interferon signaling and GBP1 contribute to enhanced antiviral capacity. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 5735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Xu, C.; Fu, F.; Shao, Q.; Fu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Ma, J.; Wang, H.; Yan, Y. Conserved function of bat IRF7 in activating antiviral innate immunity: Insights into the innate immune response in bats. Vet. Res. 2025, 56, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kozomara, A.; Birgaoanu, M.; Griffiths-Jones, S. miRBase: From microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D155–D162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Varenyk, Y.; Spicher, T.; Hofacker, I.L.; Lorenz, R. Modified RNAs and predictions with the ViennaRNA Package. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Franz, M.; Lopes, C.T.; Fong, D.; Kucera, M.; Cheung, M.; Siper, M.C.; Huck, G.; Dong, Y.; Sumer, O.; Bader, G.D. Cytoscape. js 2023 update: A graph theory library for visualization and analysis. Bioinformatics 2023, 39, btad031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Szklarczyk, D.; Nastou, K.; Koutrouli, M.; Kirsch, R.; Mehryary, F.; Hachilif, R.; Hu, D.; Peluso, M.E.; Huang, Q.; Fang, T. The STRING database in 2025: Protein networks with directionality of regulation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2025, 53, D730–D737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sherman, B.T.; Hao, M.; Qiu, J.; Jiao, X.; Baseler, M.W.; Lane, H.C.; Imamichi, T.; Chang, W. DAVID: A web server for functional enrichment analysis and functional annotation of gene lists (2021 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 2022, 50, W216–W221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ge, S.X.; Jung, D.M.; Yao, R.A. ShinyGO: A graphical gene-set enrichment tool for animals and plants. Bioinformatics 2020, 36, 2628–2629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, X.; Wang, Y.; Ji, H.; Aihara, K.; Chen, L. Personalized characterization of diseases using sample-specific networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, e164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kazakov, D.V.; Kruskop, S.V.; Kawai, K.; Gorban, A.A.; Gorobeyko, U.V. Phylogeography, morphometry and the species distribution modelling in Myotis longicaudatus (Chiroptera, Vespertilionidae) in the Eastern Palaearctic. Mammal Res. 2025, 70, 127–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Y.; Li, Y.; Hu, H.; Jiao, H.; Zhao, H. Genomic and functional insights into dietary diversification in New World leaf-nosed bats (Phyllostomidae). J. Syst. Evol. 2024, 62, 928–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Gerber-Tichet, E.; Blanchet, F.P.; Majzoub, K.; Kremer, E.J. Toll-like receptor 4–a multifunctional virus recognition receptor. Trends Microbiol. 2025, 33, 34–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Russ, E.; Mikhalkevich, N.; Iordanskiy, S. Expression of human endogenous retrovirus group K (HERV-K) HML-2 correlates with immune activation of macrophages and type I interferon response. Microbiol. Spectr. 2023, 11, e04438-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Priščáková, P.; Svoboda, M.; Feketová, Z.; Hutník, J.; Repiská, V.; Gbelcová, H.; Gergely, L. Syncytin-1, syncytin-2 and suppressyn in human health and disease. J. Mol. Med. 2023, 101, 1527–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ma, W.; Huang, G.; Wang, Z.; Wang, L.; Gao, Q. IRF7: Role and regulation in immunity and autoimmunity. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1236923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Letafati, A.; Najafi, S.; Mottahedi, M.; Karimzadeh, M.; Shahini, A.; Garousi, S.; Abbasi-Kolli, M.; Sadri Nahand, J.; Tamehri Zadeh, S.S.; Hamblin, M.R. MicroRNA let-7 and viral infections: Focus on mechanisms of action. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett. 2022, 27, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zheng, Z.; Ke, X.; Wang, M.; He, S.; Li, Q.; Zheng, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H. Human microRNA hsa-miR-296-5p suppresses enterovirus 71 replication by targeting the viral genome. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 5645–5656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Wang, W.; Jin, Y.; Zeng, N.; Ruan, Q.; Qian, F. SOD2 facilitates the antiviral innate immune response by scavenging reactive oxygen species. Viral Immunol. 2017, 30, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Koepke, L.; Gack, M.U.; Sparrer, K.M. The antiviral activities of TRIM proteins. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Liu, X.; Lai, C.; Wang, K.; Xing, L.; Yang, P.; Duan, Q.; Wang, X. A functional role of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) in the suppression of influenza A virus replication. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0124651. [Google Scholar]
  33. Thai, M.; Thaker, S.K.; Feng, J.; Du, Y.; Hu, H.; Ting Wu, T.; Graeber, T.G.; Braas, D.; Christofk, H.R. MYC-induced reprogramming of glutamine catabolism supports optimal virus replication. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 8873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bulanova, D.; Ianevski, A.; Bugai, A.; Akimov, Y.; Kuivanen, S.; Paavilainen, H.; Kakkola, L.; Nandania, J.; Turunen, L.; Ohman, T. Antiviral properties of chemical inhibitors of cellular anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins. Viruses 2017, 9, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hirokawa, N.; Noda, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Niwa, S. Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Bio. 2009, 10, 682–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhang, H.; Xiong, Y.; Sun, Y.; Park, J.-M.; Su, D.; Feng, X.; Keast, S.; Tang, M.; Huang, M.; Wang, C. RAD54L2-mediated DNA damage avoidance pathway specifically preserves genome integrity in response to topoisomerase 2 poisons. Sci. Adv. 2023, 9, eadi6681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Tisoncik-Go, J.; Gale, M., Jr. Enhanced antiviral innate immunity supports the bat reservoir of Marburg virus: Antiviral responses. Nat. Immunol. 2025, 26, 812–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Clayton, E.; Munir, M. Fundamental characteristics of bat interferon systems. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 527921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Irving, A.T.; Zhang, Q.; Kong, P.-S.; Luko, K.; Rozario, P.; Wen, M.; Zhu, F.; Zhou, P.; Ng, J.H.; Sobota, R.M. Interferon regulatory factors IRF1 and IRF7 directly regulate gene expression in bats in response to viral infection. Cell Rep. 2020, 33, 108345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gutierrez, E.G.; Ortega, J. Uncovering selection pressures on the IRF gene family in bats’ immune system. Immunogenetics 2025, 77, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pei, G.; Balkema-Buschmann, A.; Dorhoi, A. Disease tolerance as immune defense strategy in bats: One size fits all? PLoS Pathog. 2024, 20, e1012471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Comparison of D. rotundus protein homologs with other species. Ten bats and three model organisms (human, mouse, rat) were compared in this study.
Figure 1. Comparison of D. rotundus protein homologs with other species. Ten bats and three model organisms (human, mouse, rat) were compared in this study.
Animals 15 03063 g001
Figure 2. The identified miRNA-gene network in D. rotundus. A red node represents a miRNA, while a green node represents a gene.
Figure 2. The identified miRNA-gene network in D. rotundus. A red node represents a miRNA, while a green node represents a gene.
Animals 15 03063 g002
Figure 3. Genomic feature analysis of miRNA target genes. (A) Comparison of 3′-UTR length; (B) Comparison of GC content; (C) Comparison of number of exons. Three consecutive asterisks (***) indicated extremely low p-value in statistical test.
Figure 3. Genomic feature analysis of miRNA target genes. (A) Comparison of 3′-UTR length; (B) Comparison of GC content; (C) Comparison of number of exons. Three consecutive asterisks (***) indicated extremely low p-value in statistical test.
Animals 15 03063 g003
Table 1. Newly annotated UCPs in D. rotundus. Currently, these proteins are annotated as “uncharacterized protein” in NCBI database.
Table 1. Newly annotated UCPs in D. rotundus. Currently, these proteins are annotated as “uncharacterized protein” in NCBI database.
DRO AccessionHomolog SpeciesOur AnnotationIdentity(%)E-Value
XP_045053599.2mousePDZ and pleckstrin homology domains 157.21 0
XP_071076900.1Rousettus aegyptiacusneuronal-specific septin-3 isoform X169.84 0
XP_024421750.2Phyllostomus discolornascent polypeptide-associated complex subunit alpha79.30 0
XP_053775687.1Rousettus aegyptiacusorofacial cleft 1 candidate gene 1 protein80.74 0
XP_053784895.1Phyllostomus discolorsyncytin-194.25 0
XP_045054974.2Pteropus vampyrusPH domain-containing protein 176.39 8.34 × 10−166
XP_053784149.1Myotis brandtiiproline-rich receptor-like protein kinase PERK980.26 3.66 × 10−152
XP_053785850.1Miniopterus natalensisendogenous retrovirus group K (ERVK) member 2558.58 2.39 × 10−142
XP_045047497.1Eptesicus fuscustoll-like receptor 488.57 4.03 × 10−134
XP_071076901.1Myotis lucifuguskelch domain-containing protein 7B75.07 7.86 × 10−132
XP_053786695.1Pteropus alectoEF-hand calcium-binding domain-containing protein 353.98 9.15 × 10−132
XP_024430562.2Myotis davidiivesicle-associated membrane protein 790.34 1.05 × 10−118
XP_024407409.2Rousettus aegyptiacusmitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein MAD2A90.45 2.24 × 10−116
XP_024414427.2mousethioesterase superfamily member 777.39 1.72 × 10−113
XP_045052948.3Hipposideros armigerPolyadenylation specificity factor subunit 574.44 6.70 × 10−110
XP_045051350.1Myotis brandtiikeratin-associated protein 1097.84 5.94 × 10−93
XP_045058910.2Hipposideros armigerphospholipase A2 inhibitor 69.49 9.20 × 10−82
XP_053771141.1Myotis davidiiprotein NYNRIN-like54.65 2.65 × 10−76
XP_053779447.1Miniopterus natalensiscyclic nucleotide-binding domain-containing protein 276.39 7.15 × 10−69
XP_053773395.1Rousettus aegyptiacusdoublesex- and mab-3-related transcription factor C252.11 4.26 × 10−53
XP_045053117.2Hipposideros armigersorbin and SH3 domain-containing protein 270.73 2.75 × 10−44
XP_053766423.1Eptesicus fuscusribosomal protein L1886.42 3.66 × 10−41
XP_053779458.1Phyllostomus discolortranslation initiation factor IF-262.90 1.94 × 10−34
XP_071075791.1Myotis brandtiisperm acrosome membrane-associated protein 477.33 2.14 × 10−33
XP_045044110.2Eptesicus fuscusspermatid nuclear transition protein 374.19 7.99 × 10−29
XP_071076697.1Pteropus vampyrusvegetative cell wall protein gp182.55 1.90 × 10−22
XP_053772343.1Hipposideros armigerLIM domain only protein 92.86 3.28 × 10−17
XP_053769798.1Phyllostomus discolorcollagen alpha-1(I) chain-like85.00 3.23 × 10−15
XP_045047205.2humanDMRT like family C168.18 9.33 × 10−9
Table 2. The identity value of IRFs in the sequence alignment between D. rotundus and other mammals.
Table 2. The identity value of IRFs in the sequence alignment between D. rotundus and other mammals.
SpeciesIRF1IRF2IRF3IRF4IRF5IRF7IRF8IRF9
Eptesicus fuscus93.9%95.1%83.1%97.3%93.7%73.7%92.5%87.5%
Hipposideros armiger95.4%97.5%82.4%96.3%93.4%72.5%93.9%80.9%
Miniopterus natalensis96.9%96.0%81.5%81.5%94.6%75.2%96.0%86.2%
Myotis brandtii94.8%98.7%81.5%97.8%91.9%28.8%95.1%83.8%
Myotis davidii93.9%45.3%79.8%97.8%91.5%28.6%95.3%83.8%
Myotis lucifugus94.8%49.5%81.0%37.7%92.3%26.4%95.1%83.0%
Phyllostomus discolor99.4%96.3%89.7%89.8%95.2%82.0%96.7%94.9%
Pteropus alecto96.7%97.8%82.4%96.9%92.8%70.1%95.1%86.6%
Pteropus vampyrus96.7%49.8%82.2%78.1%93.0%69.8%94.6%86.6%
Rousettus aegyptiacus44.6%96.4%78.6%97.1%92.2%70.1%95.1%85.9%
human94.8%96.4%79.5%42.9%87.1%64.3%91.3%78.9%
mouse83.7%91.7%68.6%39.5%86.9%58.2%89.7%64.1%
rat84.6%86.1%71.1%39.9%87.5%58.6%87.1%63.9%
All species average90.0%84.3%80.1%76.4%91.7%59.9%93.6%82.0%
Table 3. New identified miRNAs in D. rotundus. MFE: minimal free energy; ED: Ensemble Diver-sity. The unit of MFE is kcal/mol.
Table 3. New identified miRNAs in D. rotundus. MFE: minimal free energy; ED: Ensemble Diver-sity. The unit of MFE is kcal/mol.
miRNASequenceLengthMismatchMFEED
dro-let-7-5pTGAGGTAGTAGGTTGTATAGTTT230−23.39.55
dro-miR-1271-3pTGCCTGGCACACAGCAGGCAC210−28.63.82
dro-miR-1291bGGCCCTGAATCAAGGCCAGCAGT231−21.33.93
dro-miR-1302TTGGGACATACTTATACTAAA210−20.92.22
dro-miR-133a-5pAGCTGGTAAAATGGAACCAAAT220−21.24.08
dro-miR-2309GAGGGTGGTGGAAGGCAGGG201−27.04.81
dro-miR-296-5pGAGGGCCTCCCTCAACCCTG200−30.314.7
dro-miR-3072GAAGGCTTCCTGGAGGGGG190−20.44.17
dro-miR-3173GGCCTGCCTGTGTCCTCCT191−34.92.11
dro-miR-3596TGAGGTAGTAGGTTGTGTGGTT220−25.34.20
dro-miR-3620-5pGGCCCAGCCCAGCCCAGCCC200−26.612.38
dro-miR-544-5pGAATCTGCCTTTTAACAAG190−22.55.59
dro-miR-6732-3pGGGAGGGGGAGGACAGGGTT201−22.44.58
dro-miR-6736-5pCTGGGTGAGGGCTTCTGTGG201−20.15.46
dro-miR-6988-5pGGGCCTCAGCTCACCACCC191−33.110.24
dro-miR-7033-5pCCAGGGGTCTGAGGGGCA181−22.46.91
dro-miR-8839TTGGCAGAGCCAGGGTTCAA201−22.03.36
dro-miR-9222TAGAAGTCCAAACTCAAGGTG211−21.28.38
dro-miR-9993b-3pTGGAGGCCCCAGCGAGAT180−20.513.67
Table 4. miRNA target prediction by miRWalk2.0. The validated ID is retrieved from miRTarBase database. This table only showed top 20 interaction. The full table was provided in Table S1.
Table 4. miRNA target prediction by miRWalk2.0. The validated ID is retrieved from miRTarBase database. This table only showed top 20 interaction. The full table was provided in Table S1.
miRNATargeted GeneCoding ProteinBinding EnergyValidated ID
dro-let-7c-5pTUBB4ANM_006087−25.7MIRT735640
dro-let-7c-5pABT1NM_013375−23.4MIRT100093
dro-let-7c-5pCHST6NM_021615−24.9MIRT051817
dro-miR-1271-3pCPMNM_198320−36.4MIRT514569
dro-miR-1271-3pLSM11NM_173491−32.3MIRT522699
dro-miR-1271-3pNT5C1BNM_033253−30.7MIRT451045
dro-miR-1302DNAL1NM_001201366−20.3MIRT688422
dro-miR-1302SOD2NM_001322814−17.9MIRT525780
dro-miR-133a-5pRUNX3NM_004350−18.6MIRT561635
dro-miR-133a-5pNR3C1NM_001364184−18.5MIRT687439
dro-miR-1587RNF4NM_001185009−33.8MIRT121369
dro-miR-1587TRIM28NM_005762−33.6MIRT737922
dro-miR-296-5pELAVL3NM_032281−37.6MIRT624037
dro-miR-296-5pFGFR1NM_001354368−32MIRT734669
dro-miR-3620-5pSLC12A7XM_047416640−37.1MIRT766116
dro-miR-3620-5pTAF8XM_017010241−35.5MIRT560359
dro-miR-6732-3pALKBH4NM_017621−35.2MIRT648662
dro-miR-6732-3pTMEM9BNM_001286094−31MIRT446991
dro-miR-6736-5pSPRYD4NM_207344−32.2MIRT607891
dro-miR-6736-5pFAM83FNM_138435−30.5MIRT542970
Table 5. Function enrichment of miRNA target genes by DAVID.
Table 5. Function enrichment of miRNA target genes by DAVID.
CategoryTermCountPercentp-Value
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTangiogenesis involved in wound healing42.2%8.00 × 10−5
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTG1/S transition of mitotic cell cycle73.8%9.30 × 10−5
GOTERM_BP_DIRECTnegative regulation of apoptotic process147.7%7.50 × 10−4
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTprotein binding15785.8%1.10 × 10−7
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTfibronectin binding42.2%2.60 × 10−3
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTmolecular adaptor activity73.8%9.20 × 10−3
GOTERM_MF_DIRECTmRNA binding84.4%9.30 × 10−3
GAD_DISEASEaging and longevity21.1%2.10 × 10−2
GAD_DISEASE_CLASSInfection3318.0%2.60 × 10−2
KEGG_PATHWAYHuman papillomavirus infection137.1%3.00 × 10−4
Table 6. Network entropy analysis of each gene. New entropy was calculated by removing the corresponding genes in the original network.
Table 6. Network entropy analysis of each gene. New entropy was calculated by removing the corresponding genes in the original network.
NodeDegreeDegree
Distribution
Original EntropyNew
Entropy
Entropy Change
MYC110.0104 1.2716 1.2154 −0.0562
BCL2110.0104 1.2716 1.2311 −0.0405
UBA5270.0208 1.2716 1.2471 −0.0245
KIF1B30.0885 1.2716 1.2486 −0.0230
THBS140.0573 1.2716 1.2496 −0.0220
STX1640.0573 1.2716 1.2496 −0.0220
VAMP140.0573 1.2716 1.2496 −0.0220
RAD54L230.0885 1.2716 1.2506 −0.0210
DEK30.0885 1.2716 1.2514 −0.0202
CDC640.0573 1.2716 1.2518 −0.0199
FGFR130.0885 1.2716 1.2528 −0.0188
TRA2B40.0573 1.2716 1.2541 −0.0176
CDKN1B70.0208 1.2716 1.2544 −0.0173
GNL3L30.0885 1.2716 1.2546 −0.0171
CCNF20.1354 1.2716 1.2551 −0.0166
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Y.; Liu, T.; He, X.; Mu, M.; Yang, Z. Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs and Immune-Related Proteins Provides Insights into Antiviral Adaptations in Common Vampire Bat. Animals 2025, 15, 3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213063

AMA Style

Yan Y, Liu T, He X, Mu M, Yang Z. Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs and Immune-Related Proteins Provides Insights into Antiviral Adaptations in Common Vampire Bat. Animals. 2025; 15(21):3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213063

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Yicheng, Tianyi Liu, Xiaopeng He, Mingdao Mu, and Zhiyuan Yang. 2025. "Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs and Immune-Related Proteins Provides Insights into Antiviral Adaptations in Common Vampire Bat" Animals 15, no. 21: 3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213063

APA Style

Yan, Y., Liu, T., He, X., Mu, M., & Yang, Z. (2025). Genome-Wide Identification of MicroRNAs and Immune-Related Proteins Provides Insights into Antiviral Adaptations in Common Vampire Bat. Animals, 15(21), 3063. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15213063

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop