Next Article in Journal
Optimized Two-Port Laparoscopic-Assisted Ovariohysterectomy for Hydrometra and Pyometra in Small-Sized Dogs
Next Article in Special Issue
The Role of the Norway Rat, Rattus norvegicus, as a Reservoir of Zoonotic Helminth Species in the City of Barcelona (Spain)
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Bovine Colostrum on Canine Immune Health
Previous Article in Special Issue
Gastrointestinal Parasites in Non-Human Primates in Zoological Gardens in Northern Italy
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 15
Issue 2
10.3390/ani15020186
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

First Report on the Frequency and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Extensively Reared Holstein-Friesian Cattle from Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal

by
Sara Gomes-Gonçalves
1,
Alexandra Silva
1,
Guilherme Moreira
1,
Nausicaa Gantois
2,
Rubén Garcia Dominguez
2,
Eric Viscogliosi
3,
Magali Chabé
3 and
João R. Mesquita
1,4,5,*
1
ICBAS—School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Porto University, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
2
Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo, CSIC, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, 41013 Sevilla, Spain
3
CNRS, Inserm, CHU Lille, Institut Pasteur de Lille, U1019–UMR 9017–CIIL–Centre d’Infection et d’Immunité de Lille, University of Lille, F-59000 Lille, France
4
Centro de Estudos de Ciência Animal (CECA), Instituto de Ciências, Tecnologias e Agroambiente (ICETA), Universidade do Porto (UP), Rua D. Manuel II, Apartado 55142, 4051-401 Porto, Portugal
5
Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Science (AL4AnimalS), 1300-477 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(2), 186; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020186
Submission received: 3 December 2024 / Revised: 7 January 2025 / Accepted: 9 January 2025 / Published: 11 January 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Parasitic Zoonoses: From a Public Health Perspective)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Simple Summary

This study reports the first detection of Blastocystis in dairy cattle on Terceira Island, highlighting its genetic diversity and zoonotic potential. The findings suggest a low risk of transmission from cattle to humans due to the region’s grazing practices. Further research is needed to better understand the role of Blastocystis in livestock and its implications for public health.

Abstract

This study is the first to report Blastocystis sp. in dairy cattle from Terceira Island, part of the Azores Archipelago. Blastocystis sp. is an enteric protozoan with high genetic diversity and is associated with both zoonotic and non-zoonotic subtypes (STs). The present survey aimed to fill the gap in knowledge regarding the occurrence and genetic characterization of Blastocystis sp. isolates in Holstein-Friesian cattle in this geographical area. A total of 116 stool samples were thus collected from dairy cows, and Blastocystis sp. DNA was detected using qPCR. The results revealed a 14.7% occurrence rate (17/116), with seven STs identified including ST3, ST5, ST7, ST10, ST14, ST25, and ST42, with variable frequency. Some of these STs (ST5, ST7, ST10, and ST14) are potentially zoonotic, underscoring their potential public health significance. However, the low frequency of Blastocystis sp. in this animal cohort possibly attributed to the extensive grazing system practiced on Terceira Island and the limited presence of zoonotic isolates, suggests a minimal risk of transmission from cattle to humans. This study highlights the importance of further research on the transmission dynamics of Blastocystis sp., particularly in regions with varying farming practices, to better understand its epidemiology and zoonotic potential.

1. Introduction

Blastocystis sp. is a stramenopile protozoa with significant genetic diversity and an uncertain pathogenicity. It is likely the most common enteric parasite inhabiting the human gut, with over one billion infections worldwide [1]. Its prevalence often exceeds 50% in developing countries, with an average infection rate of 20% in developed nations [2]. The primary transmission route for this protozoan is the fecal-oral route, where Blastocystis sp. can be transmitted through the accidental ingestion of environmentally resistant cysts. This can occur via direct contact with infected individuals or through indirect contact with contaminated food or water sources [3]. Although the presence of Blastocystis sp. is frequently asymptomatic, its infection has been associated with gastrointestinal illnesses and/or urticaria in numerous clinical cases [4].
In addition to humans, Blastocystis sp. has been reported in various animal hosts including non-human primates, birds, rodents, reptiles, amphibians, and other mammals [5]. Phylogenetic analysis based on small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene sequences has evidenced at least 44 legitimate STs, with 17 of these (ST1–ST10, ST12, ST14, ST16, ST23, ST26, ST35, and ST41) capable of infecting humans [6,7,8,9]. ST1–ST4 are the most common in humans worldwide and are considered as anthroponotic, accounting for approximately 90% of infections, despite the presence of other STs [10].
Blastocystis sp. is also commonly found in cattle, where at least 16 STs (ST1-ST7, ST10, ST12, ST14, ST17, ST21, ST23-ST26) have been identified, some of which are zoonotic [11]. The latest global systematic review and meta-analysis revealed that the most prevalent Blastocystis sp. STs in bovids are ST10 and ST14, with prevalence rates of 32.3% and 22.1%, respectively, which suggests that both STs are well adapted to cattle [11]. The zoonotic importance of these STs are supported as the recent identification of both STs in diverse human cohorts worldwide [12,13,14]. This supports the hypothesis that ruminants, particularly cattle, could serve as significant zoonotic reservoirs for humans, posing a risk to individuals with frequent contact, such as farmers and livestock breeders [15].
Close human–animal interactions increase the risk of zoonotic transmission. In particular, livestock breeders, veterinarians, and individuals in rural agricultural settings are more likely to acquire infections due to their prolonged and frequent exposure to animals, namely ST10 and ST14 associated and prevalent within cattle. [9,16,17,18]. Despite the zoonotic potential of Blastocystis, infections in cattle have not been linked to signs of disease, with most cases reported in healthy animals [4,19]. A study by Lee et al. (2018) found a higher prevalence of Blastocystis in cattle with normal feces (24.4%) compared to those with diarrhea (5.4%) [20].
Terceira Island, part of the Azores Archipelago in Portugal, covers an area of around 400 km² and operates as an autonomous region with its own political and administrative structures [21]. The Azores Archipelago experiences a stable climate, with temperatures typically ranging from 16 to 25 °C throughout most of the year [22]. Despite its temperate geographical location, this climate is characterized by consistently high relative humidity, resembling conditions found in tropical and subtropical regions [23]. This climate makes this island particularly well-suited for pasture-based dairy production, with milk and dairy products being the primary agricultural outputs. In contrast, the Azores climate differs from the Mediterranean climate that dominates the Portuguese mainland [23].
In 2023, milk production in Portugal totaled 1.996 billion liters, of which 603.43 million liters (30.4%) originated from the Azores Archipelago [24]. Within the archipelago, the islands of São Miguel and Terceira are the leading contributors, producing 405.67 million liters (20.3%) and 149.71 million liters (7.5%) of the total milk production in Portugal, respectively [25].
Despite the importance of the dairy industry in Azores, no studies have been conducted on the presence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle from the region, including Terceira Island, the second-largest producer of dairy products in the archipelago. Given the predominance of family-owned farms in the Azores, where close contact between farmers and cattle is common, there is an increasing risk of transmission from cattle harboring potentially zoonotic Blastocystis sp. STs. To address this gap, the present study aims to perform the first molecular identification of Blastocystis sp. isolates in dairy cattle from Terceira Island.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Sampling

A total of 116 stool samples were collected from healthy (non-diarreic) adult female Holstein-Friesian dairy cows between October and December 2023. The samples were obtained from 24 cattle farms located in the municipalities of Angra do Heroísmo (70 samples) and Praia da Vitória (46 samples) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The samples were collected either directly from the cows’ recta following transrectal palpation or immediately after defecation. After collection, the samples were refrigerated and transported at 4 °C to the laboratory, where they were stored at −20 °C until DNA extraction.

2.2. DNA Extraction and Molecular Detection of Blastocystis sp.

DNA was extracted from approximately 200 mg of stool samples using the NucleoSpin 96 Soil Kit (Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co. KG, Düren, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was eluted in 100 µL of the supplied elution buffer and stored at −20 °C until further analysis. For amplification, 2 µL of purified DNA was subjected to real-time PCR (qPCR) targeting a ~300 bp region of the SSU rRNA gene, employing the primer pair BL18SPPF1 (forward) and BL18SR2PP (reverse), which is specific to the Blastocystis genus, as outlined in previous studies [26]. Sequencing was performed on both strands using the same primer pair, by Genoscreen (Lille, France) using the 3730XL DNA Analyzer. The sequences obtained were processed, aligned, and examined using the BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor software V7.2.5 [27]. The resulting sequences were deposited in the GenBank database with unique accession numbers PQ423101–PQ423109.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The occurrence of Blastocystis sp. was assessed by calculating the proportion of positive samples relative to the total number of samples analyzed, along with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Data processing and preliminary analysis were carried out using Microsoft Excel® for Microsoft 365 MSO (Redmond, WA, USA) (version 2312 Build 16.0.17126.20132, 64-bit).

2.4. Phylogenetic Analysis and Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. Isolates

Full-length SSU rRNA gene sequences from representatives of the various Blastocystis sp. subtypes (STs) and subgroups available at the time of the analysis were retrieved from the GenBank database, serving as the primary reference framework. To improve the phylogenetic resolution for certain isolates, additional sequences were incorporated for ST30, ST21, ST25, and ST14 (5, 6, 8, and 8 additional sequences, respectively). Sequence alignment was performed using MAFFT v7.490, applying the L-INS-i method due to its robustness in aligning diverse sequences. While initial trimming using TrimAl at a threshold of 0.7 was explored, untrimmed alignments were ultimately preferred for maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analysis, as they provided better tree resolution and sample placements. The Maximum Likelihood tree was constructed using IQ-TREE v2.3.6 with 1000 bootstrap replicates, selecting the K2P + I + G4 substitution model to ensure consistency with prior studies [6,7,28]. Moreover, Proteromonas lacertae, a commensal flagellate found in reptiles and amphibians, was used as the outgroup due to its close phylogenetic relationship with Blastocystis in earlier studies [9,29,30]. The resulting phylogenetic tree was annotated and visualized using the Interactive Tree of Life (iTOL) platform, enabling in-depth representation of phylogenetic relationships [31].

3. Results

In the present study, 17 out of 116 samples tested by qPCR were found to be positive for Blastocystis sp., of those eight were mixed infection resulting in an overall occurrence of 14.7% (17/116; 95% CI: 8.78–22.42). Except for one sample (PQ423109) from Praia da Vitória (Santa Cruz), all positive samples identified as single infection (n = 9) were collected from animals of the Angra do Heroísmo municipality. BLASTn analysis of sequences from these nine samples confirmed the presence of Blastocystis sp. and the highest hits are displayed in Table 2.
The phylogenetic analysis including homologous sequences of all known STs of Blastocystis sp., enabled the unambiguous subtyping of 8 out of the 9 sequences obtained in the present study (Figure 2). Seven distinct subtypes were detected: ST3 (two sequences from Altares and Feteira), ST5 (one sequence from Santa Cruz), ST7 (one sequence from Feteira), ST10 (one sequence from Posto Santo), ST14 (one sequence from Feteira), ST25 (one sequence from Feteira), and ST42 (one sequence from São Mateus da Calheta). One sample (sequence PQ423107 from Feteira) could not be assigned to a specific ST but showed some similarity to ST30 and ST21. Most of the identified STs (ST5, ST7, ST10, and ST14) are considered zoonotic and have been reported in humans.

4. Discussion

This study represents the first molecular identification and ST distribution of Blastocystis sp. isolates colonizing Holstein-Friesian dairy cattle from Terceira Island, part of the Azores Archipelago. It provides new insights into the parasite’s occurrence, genetic diversity, and potential zoonotic risk within this geographically isolated region. Although a diverse range of Blastocystis sp. STs was identified, the overall occurrence rate of 14.7% is significantly lower than the global prevalence rate of 24.4% determined worldwide from cattle cohorts [11]. This comparatively low prevalence is also evident when compared to rates reported in other European countries, including Denmark, the UK, Spain, France, and mainland Portugal, as summarized in Table 3.
Notably, with the exception of Italy and Turkey, where lower occurrences were observed, epidemiological surveys conducted in cattle from other European regions reported higher occurrence rates of Blastocystis sp. [32,33,34,35,36,37,38]. This lower occurrence on Terceira Island suggests that factors unique to the region, such as environmental conditions and farming practices, may be limiting the transmission of the protozoan, in contrast to the higher occurrence observed on mainland Portugal [38], where environmental conditions and farming practices may be more conducive to its transmission. However, caution is needed when comparing these results with other studies, as differences in sample sizes and methodologies may influence the findings. Regarding the STs identified herein, all sequences corresponding to single infection were successfully classified except for one, which did not cluster with any reference sequence of known ST and was therefore assigned as undefined, as it does not fulfill the criteria for designation as a new ST, as outlined in the proposed guidelines by Maloney, J.G., & Santin, M. (2021) [30]. These criteria include having an almost complete SSU rRNA gene sequence (≥80% of the approximately 1800 bp) and a sequence divergence greater than 4% from any existing ST. In addition to subtype diversity, common mutations, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and insertions within the SSU rRNA gene, are frequently observed [30]. These variations play a role in defining subtypes and may influence host specificity, zoonotic potential, and virulence, although these relationships are still not fully understood. Some subtypes appear to be more commonly associated with particular hosts, such as ST1–ST4 with humans, ST5 with pigs, ST6 and ST7 with birds, and ST10 and ST14 with cattle [2,4,39]. Subtypes can also modulate the immune response in distinct ways, as exemplified by ST7 and ST1. ST7 has been shown to provoke a pro-inflammatory environment through its interaction with epithelial and dendritic cells, leading to a reduction in beneficial gut bacteria such as Bifidobacterium longum and Lactobacillus brevis [40,41,42]. Additionally, ST7 increases the production of proteases that can compromise the intestinal barrier, potentially contributing to gut dysfunction [43,44]. In contrast, ST1 is associated with an increased diversity of the gut microbiome and the promotion of an anti-inflammatory state in the intestinal mucosa, highlighting its potential role in maintaining intestinal homeostasis [43,45]. The lower-than-expected occurrence of Blastocystis sp. in cattle from Terceira Island contrasts with initial expectations. Indeed, cattle are commonly considered potential reservoirs for zoonotic Blastocystis sp. STs, such as ST10 and ST14, which are frequently observed in livestock populations [2]. However, in our study, the predominance of ST3, typically considered an anthroponotic (human-associated) ST, raises interesting possibilities about transmission dynamics. The slightly higher occurrence of ST3 suggests that there may be a greater degree of human-to-animal transmission than initially anticipated, particularly in settings like family-owned farms where closer interaction between humans and their cattle is more common. In such environments, the direct handling of cattle by farmers may contribute to the transmission of anthroponotic STs, such as ST3, from humans to animals. The presence of ST3 in cattle could thus reflect this close, potentially frequent contact, leading to a shift in the assumed source of the infection.
The detection of ST7 in our cohort of bovids further complicates the scenario, as its presence was not found in previous studies in European countries. ST7 is typically associated with birds [2], and its presence in cattle may be associated with possible transmission from ducks, hens, or other avian species. This likely implies a possible cross-species transmission pathway, where birds are contributing to the presence of this avian-adapted ST in the cattle population.
Furthermore, the identification of ST5, a zoonotic subtype commonly found in both humans and animals, adds another layer of complexity to understanding the potential zoonotic risk of Blastocystis on Terceira Island. While ST5 was found in this study, its low prevalence suggests a relatively minimal risk of zoonotic transmission from cattle to humans. Nevertheless, it highlights the need for further research into its distribution and zoonotic potential.
However, the overall low occurrence of Blastocystis sp., including zoonotic STs, could be attributed to the extensive grazing system practiced on Terceira Island. In this traditional system, cattle are widely dispersed across large pastures, which minimizes close contact between animals and, in turn, lowers the likelihood of parasite transmission within the cattle population. This finding is consistent with a study that reported higher occurrences of Blastocystis sp. in backyard cattle compared to those in more extensive farming systems [46], suggesting that farming practices significantly influence transmission rates. The traditional extensive grazing method on Terceira Island likely serves as a natural barrier to the spread of Blastocystis sp. whereas more intensive farming systems, in which cattle are confined and kept in closer proximity, tend to facilitate greater transmission of pathogens, including Blastocystis sp.
Although the pathogenic role of Blastocystis sp. in domestic and wild animals remains unclear, primarily because most studies have focused on non-diarrheic individuals, the primary concern lies in its potential zoonotic risk to humans [38]. In this study, zoonotic ST5, ST7, ST10, and ST14 were detected, but their low occurrence suggests a minimal risk of transmission from cattle to humans. Moreover, the identification of the two non-zoonotic ST25 and ST42b further supports the conclusion that Blastocystis sp. poses a limited threat to human health on Terceira Island.

5. Conclusions

This study presents the first molecular identification of Blastocystis sp. in dairy cattle from Terceira Island. The low prevalence of the parasite, coupled with the limited presence of zoonotic STs, indicates a minimal risk of transmission from cattle to humans in the region. Local farming practices, particularly the extensive grazing systems, are likely to mitigate both the spread of Blastocystis among cattle and the potential for human exposure. However, the study is subject to several limitations, including a small sample size, data collection confined to a single season, and the absence of a comparison of different farming practices. These limitations underscore the need for further research on the transmission dynamics of Blastocystis sp., to address these gaps and provide a more comprehensive understanding of its zoonotic risks.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.G.-G. and J.R.M.; methodology, S.G.-G., N.G., R.G.D., M.C., E.V. and J.R.M.; resources A.S., G.M. and J.R.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.G.-G.; writing—review and editing, S.G.-G., A.S., G.M., M.C., E.V. and J.R.M.; funding acquisition, J.R.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by Project no. PRR-C05-i03-I-000190 “RumiRes”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

This survey was conducted as part of the COST action grant CA21105 OneHealth Blastocystis, supported by European Cooperation in Science and Technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Scanlan, P.D.; Stensvold, C.R. Blastocystis: Getting to Grips with Our Guileful Guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013, 29, 523–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Greige, S.; El Safadi, D.; Khaled, S.; Gantois, N.; Baydoun, M.; Chemaly, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; Chabé, M.; Osman, M.; Certad, G. First Report on the Prevalence and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Dairy Cattle in Lebanon and Assessment of Zoonotic Transmission. Acta Trop. 2019, 194, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tantrawatpan, C.; Vaisusuk, K.; Thanchomnang, T.; Pilap, W.; Sankamethawee, W.; Suksavate, W.; Chatan, W.; Bunchom, N.; Kaewkla, O.; Stensvold, C.R.; et al. Distribution of Blastocystis Subtypes Isolated from Various Animal Hosts in Thailand. Res. Vet. Sci. 2023, 162, 104939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hublin, J.S.Y.; Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M. Blastocystis in Domesticated and Wild Mammals and Birds. Res. Vet. Sci. 2021, 135, 260–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barati, M.; KarimiPourSaryazdi, A.; Rahmanian, V.; Bahadory, S.; Abdoli, A.; Rezanezhad, H.; Solhjoo, K.; Taghipour, A. Global Prevalence and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Rodents, Birds, and Water Supplies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2022, 208, 105770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Koehler, A.V.; Herath, H.M.P.D.; Hall, R.S.; Wilcox, S.; Gasser, R.B. Marked Genetic Diversity within Blastocystis in Australian Wildlife Revealed Using a next Generation Sequencing-Phylogenetic Approach. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2024, 23, 100902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hernández-Castro, C.; Maloney, J.G.; Agudelo-López, S.P.; Toro-Londoño, M.A.; Botero-Garcés, J.H.; Orozco, M.C.; Quintero-Quinchia, Y.C.; Correa-Cote, J.C.; Múnera-Duque, A.; Ricaurte-Ciro, J.C.; et al. Identification and Validation of Novel Blastocystis Subtype ST41 in a Colombian Patient Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Screening. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2023, 70, e12978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Maloney, J.G.; Molokin, A.; Seguí, R.; Maravilla, P.; Martínez-Hernández, F.; Villalobos, G.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Gentekaki, E.; Muñoz-Antolí, C.; Klisiowicz, D.R.; et al. Identification and Molecular Characterization of Four New Blastocystis Subtypes Designated ST35-ST38. Microorganisms 2022, 11, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Šejnohová, A.; Koutenská, M.; Jirků, M.; Brožová, K.; Pavlíčková, Z.; Kadlecová, O.; Cinek, O.; Maloney, J.G.; Santín, M.; Petrželková, K.J.; et al. A Cross-Sectional Survey of Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis in Non-Human Primates and Their Caregivers in Czech Zoos. One Health 2024, 19, 100862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Stensvold, C.R.; Tan, K.S.W.; Clark, C.G. Blastocystis . Trends Parasitol. 2020, 36, 315–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shams, M.; Shamsi, L.; Sadrebazzaz, A.; Asghari, A.; Badali, R.; Omidian, M.; Hassanipour, S. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Global Prevalence and Subtypes Distribution of Blastocystis sp. Infection in Cattle: A Zoonotic Concern. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2021, 76, 101650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nguyen, L.D.N.; Gantois, N.; Hoang, T.T.; Do, B.T.; Desramaut, J.; Naguib, D.; Tran, T.N.; Truong, A.D.; Even, G.; Certad, G.; et al. First Epidemiological Survey on the Prevalence and Subtypes Distribution of the Enteric Parasite Blastocystis sp. in Vietnam. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Naguib, D.; Gantois, N.; Desramaut, J.; Arafat, N.; Mandour, M.; Abdelmaogood, A.K.K.; Mosa, A.F.; Denoyelle, C.; Even, G.; Certad, G.; et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Genetic Diversity of the Enteric Protozoan Parasite Blastocystis sp. in the Northern Egypt Population. Pathogens 2023, 12, 1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Khaled, S.; Gantois, N.; Ly, A.T.; Senghor, S.; Even, G.; Dautel, E.; Dejager, R.; Sawant, M.; Baydoun, M.; Benamrouz-Vanneste, S.; et al. Prevalence and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Senegalese School Children. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sheikh, S.; Asghari, A.; Sadraei, J.; Pirestani, M.; Zare, M. Blastocystis sp. Subtype 9: As the First Reported Subtype in Patients with Schizophrenia in Iran. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 2020, 2, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Heydarian, M.; Manouchehri Naeini, K.; Kheiri, S.; Abdizadeh, R. Prevalence and Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. in Ruminants in Southwestern, Iran. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 20254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rudzińska, M.; Kowalewska, B.; Waleron, M.; Kalicki, M.; Sikorska, K.; Szostakowska, B. Molecular Characterization of Blastocystis from Animals and Their Caregivers at the Gdańsk Zoo (Poland) and the Assessment of Zoonotic Transmission. Biology 2021, 10, 984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Jinatham, V.; Maxamhud, S.; Popluechai, S.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Gentekaki, E. Blastocystis One Health Approach in a Rural Community of Northern Thailand: Prevalence, Subtypes and Novel Transmission Routes. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 746340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fayer, R.; Santin, M.; Macarisin, D. Detection of Concurrent Infection of Dairy Cattle with Blastocystis, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and Enterocytozoon by Molecular and Microscopic Methods. Parasitol. Res. 2012, 111, 1349–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lee, H.; Lee, S.-H.; Seo, M.-G.; Kim, H.-Y.; Kim, J.W.; Lee, Y.-R.; Kim, J.H.; Kwon, O.-D.; Kwak, D. Occurrence and Genetic Diversity of Blastocystis in Korean Cattle. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 258, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Polido, A.; João, E.; Ramos, T.B. Strategic Environmental Assessment Practices in European Small Islands: Insights from Azores and Orkney Islands. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2016, 57, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Massot, A. A Agricultura Do Arquipélago Dos Açores; European Union: Directorate-General for Structural and Cohesion Policies, Thematic Department B: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; Volume 53, ISBN 9788578110796. [Google Scholar]
  23. de Almeida, A.M.; Alvarenga, P.; Fangueiro, D. The Dairy Sector in the Azores Islands: Possibilities and Main Constraints towards Increased Added Value. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 53, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Portal Do INE. Available online: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_indicadores&indOcorrCod=0000919&contexto=bd&selTab=tab2&xlang=pt (accessed on 16 October 2024).
  25. SREA. Available online: https://srea.azores.gov.pt/Conteudos/Media/file.aspx?ida=11411 (accessed on 16 October 2024).
  26. Poirier, P.; Wawrzyniak, I.; Albert, A.; El Alaoui, H.; Delbac, F.; Livrelli, V. Development and Evaluation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection and Quantification of Blastocystis Parasites in Human Stool Samples: Prospective Study of Patients with Hematological Malignancies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 975–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hall, T.A. BioEdit: A User-Friendly Biological Sequence Alignment Editor and Analysis Program for Windows 95/98/NT. In Proceedings of the Nucleic Acids Symposium Series; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1999; Volume 41, pp. 95–98. [Google Scholar]
  28. Santin, M.; Figueiredo, A.; Molokin, A.; George, N.S.; Köster, P.C.; Dashti, A.; González-Barrio, D.; Carmena, D.; Maloney, J.G. Division of Blastocystis ST10 into Three New Subtypes: ST42-ST44. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 2024, 71, e12998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Noël, C.; Dufernez, F.; Gerbod, D.; Edgcomb, V.P.; Delgado-Viscogliosi, P.; Ho, L.-C.; Singh, M.; Wintjens, R.; Sogin, M.L.; Capron, M.; et al. Molecular Phylogenies of Blastocystis Isolates from Different Hosts: Implications for Genetic Diversity, Identification of Species, and Zoonosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 348–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Maloney, J.G.; Santin, M. Mind the Gap: New Full-Length Sequences of Blastocystis Subtypes Generated via Oxford Nanopore Minion Sequencing Allow for Comparisons between Full-Length and Partial Sequences of the Small Subunit of the Ribosomal RNA Gene. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive Tree Of Life (ITOL) v5: An Online Tool for Phylogenetic Tree Display and Annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W293–W296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Gabrielli, S.; Palomba, M.; Furzi, F.; Brianti, E.; Gaglio, G.; Napoli, E.; Rinaldi, L.; Alburqueque, R.A.; Mattiucci, S. Molecular Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. Isolated from Farmed Animals in Southern Italy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Aynur, Z.E.; Güçlü, Ö.; Yıldız, İ.; Aynur, H.; Ertabaklar, H.; Bozdoğan, B.; Ertuğ, S. Molecular Characterization of Blastocystis in Cattle in Turkey. Parasitol. Res. 2019, 118, 1055–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stensvold, C.R.; Alfellani, M.A.; Nørskov-Lauritsen, S.; Prip, K.; Victory, E.L.; Maddox, C.; Nielsen, H.V.; Clark, C.G. Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis Isolates from Synanthropic and Zoo Animals and Identification of a New Subtype. Int. J. Parasitol. 2009, 39, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Alfellani, M.A.; Taner-Mulla, D.; Jacob, A.S.; Imeede, C.A.; Yoshikawa, H.; Stensvold, C.R.; Clark, C.G. Genetic Diversity of Blastocystis in Livestock and Zoo Animals. Protist 2013, 164, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Abarca, N.; Santín, M.; Ortega, S.; Maloney, J.G.; George, N.S.; Molokin, A.; Cardona, G.A.; Dashti, A.; Köster, P.C.; Bailo, B. Molecular Detection and Characterization of Blastocystis sp. and Enterocytozoon Bieneusi in Cattle in Northern Spain. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Audebert, C.; Gantois, N.; Ducrocq, S.; Darras, M.; Merlin, S.; Martel, S.; Viscogliosi, E.; Even, G.; Chabé, M. Animal, Herd and Feed Characteristics Associated with Blastocystis Prevalence and Molecular Diversity in Dairy Cattle from the North of France. Parasitologia 2022, 2, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Figueiredo, A.M.; Santín, M.; Köster, P.C.; Dashti, A.; Maloney, J.G.; Torres, R.T.; Fonseca, C.; Mysterud, A.; Carvalho, J.; Hipólito, D.; et al. Molecular Detection and Characterization of Blastocystis in Herbivore Livestock Species in Portugal. Vet. Parasitol. 2024, 327, 110147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gentekaki, E.; Curtis, B.A.; Stairs, C.W.; Klimeš, V.; Eliáš, M.; Salas-Leiva, D.E.; Herman, E.K.; Eme, L.; Arias, M.C.; Henrissat, B.; et al. Extreme Genome Diversity in the Hyper-Prevalent Parasitic Eukaryote Blastocystis. PLoS Biol. 2017, 15, e2003769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Yason, J.A.; Liang, Y.R.; Png, C.W.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, K.S.W. Interactions between a Pathogenic Blastocystis Subtype and Gut Microbiota: In Vitro and in Vivo Studies. Microbiome 2019, 7, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Walter, J. Ecological Role of Lactobacilli in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Implications for Fundamental and Biomedical Research. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 4985–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Sugahara, H.; Odamaki, T.; Fukuda, S.; Kato, T.; Xiao, J.; Abe, F.; Kikuchi, J.; Ohno, H. Probiotic Bifidobacterium Longum Alters Gut Luminal Metabolism through Modification of the Gut Microbial Community. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aykur, M.; Malatyalı, E.; Demirel, F.; Cömert-Koçak, B.; Gentekaki, E.; Tsaousis, A.D.; Dogruman-Al, F. Blastocystis: A Mysterious Member of the Gut Microbiome. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Deng, L.; Wojciech, L.; Gascoigne, N.R.J.; Peng, G.; Tan, K.S.W. New Insights into the Interactions between Blastocystis, the Gut Microbiota, and Host Immunity. PLoS Pathog. 2021, 17, e1009253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Deng, L.; Wojciech, L.; Png, C.W.; Kioh, Y.Q.D.; Ng, G.C.; Chan, E.C.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Gascoigne, N.R.J.; Tan, K.S.W. Colonization with Ubiquitous Protist Blastocystis ST1 Ameliorates DSS-Induced Colitis and Promotes Beneficial Microbiota and Immune Outcomes. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes 2023, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Abdo, S.M.; El-Adawy, H.; Farag, H.F.; El-Taweel, H.A.; Elhadad, H.; El-Badry, A.A.-M. Detection and Molecular Identification of Blastocystis Isolates from Humans and Cattle in Northern Egypt. J. Parasit. Dis. Off. organ Indian Soc. Parasitol. 2021, 45, 738–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 15 00186 g001
Figure 1. Detailed map of Terceira Island, part of the Azores Archipelago, showing the boundaries of its civil parishes, each labeled with their respective name. The municipalities are shaded in two different tones of grey: The lighter shade represents Angra do Heroísmo, while the darker shade represents Praia da Vitória. Cow icons indicate the locations of the sampling sites for this study. The map scale and coordinates are provided for spatial reference. The construction of the map was performed using QGIS software version 3.36.3.
Figure 1. Detailed map of Terceira Island, part of the Azores Archipelago, showing the boundaries of its civil parishes, each labeled with their respective name. The municipalities are shaded in two different tones of grey: The lighter shade represents Angra do Heroísmo, while the darker shade represents Praia da Vitória. Cow icons indicate the locations of the sampling sites for this study. The map scale and coordinates are provided for spatial reference. The construction of the map was performed using QGIS software version 3.36.3.
Animals 15 00186 g001
Animals 15 00186 g002
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Blastocystis sp. STs based on the comparison of SSU rRNA gene sequences. The tree was generated using IQ-TREE with the K2P + I + G4 substitution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Zoonotic, non-zoonotic, and undefined isolates are represented by red circles, green squares, and gray triangles, respectively, as indicated in the legend. Proteromonas lacertae was used as an outgroup, and bootstraps lower than 75% are not displayed.
Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree of Blastocystis sp. STs based on the comparison of SSU rRNA gene sequences. The tree was generated using IQ-TREE with the K2P + I + G4 substitution model and 1000 bootstrap replicates. Zoonotic, non-zoonotic, and undefined isolates are represented by red circles, green squares, and gray triangles, respectively, as indicated in the legend. Proteromonas lacertae was used as an outgroup, and bootstraps lower than 75% are not displayed.
Animals 15 00186 g002
Table 1. Distribution of the number of samples (n = 116) collected from adult female Holstein-Friesian dairy cows across different civil parishes within the municipalities of Angra do Heroísmo and Praia da Vitória. Each entry provides the name of the civil parish and the corresponding number of samples collected from that area.
Table 1. Distribution of the number of samples (n = 116) collected from adult female Holstein-Friesian dairy cows across different civil parishes within the municipalities of Angra do Heroísmo and Praia da Vitória. Each entry provides the name of the civil parish and the corresponding number of samples collected from that area.
MunicipalityCivil ParishNumber of Samples (n)
Angra do HeroísmoDoze Ribeiras2
Cinco Ribeiras6
Altares1
Feteira10
Posto Santo4
Porto Judeu7
Raminho5
Ribeirinha1
Santa Bárbara3
São Bartolomeu dos Regatos7
São Bento5
São Mateus da Calheta5
São Sebastião7
Serreta7
Praia da VitóriaAgualva5
Biscoitos2
Cabo da Praia2
Fonte do Bastardo2
Fontinhas9
Lajes6
Santa Cruz7
São Brás6
Vila Nova5
Quatro Ribeiras2
Total-116
Table 2. Summary of the Blastocystis sp. sequences obtained in this study, including the accession numbers from this study, the highest-hit accession numbers from reference BLAST database, the country of origin of the highest hit, percentage identity (%), and the host organism.
Table 2. Summary of the Blastocystis sp. sequences obtained in this study, including the accession numbers from this study, the highest-hit accession numbers from reference BLAST database, the country of origin of the highest hit, percentage identity (%), and the host organism.
Accession Number (This Study)Accession Number Highest HitCountryPerc. Identity (%)Host
PQ423101 MN326608 China98.95Human
PQ423102 OL981854China100Cattle
PQ423103OP716163Vietnam100Human
PQ423104MN326608 China100Human
PQ423105OM522176France100Cattle
PQ423106OM522189France99.66Cattle
PQ423107PP320637Egypt100Sheep
PQ423108OL981921China100Cattle
PQ423109MH883053Lebanon100Cattle
Table 3. Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and ST distribution in cattle cohorts from European countries. The same STs as those reported in the present study are highlighted in bold.
Table 3. Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. and ST distribution in cattle cohorts from European countries. The same STs as those reported in the present study are highlighted in bold.
Country% of Blastocystis sp. (no. pos/Total no.)% Blastocystis ST (no. pos)MethodReference
Italy7.69% (1/13)NA (no ST reported)PCR[32]
Turkey11.3% (9/80)ST10: 22.2% (2), ST14: 77.8% (7)PCR[33]
Denmark100% (25/25)ST5: 12% (3/25) ST10: 48% (12/25)PCR[34]
UK22.6% (7/31),ST1: 3.23% (1/31), ST5: 3.23% (1/31) ST10: 9.68% (3/31) MI: 6.45% (2/31)PCR[35]
Spain32.14% (108/336)ST1: 0.30% (1), ST3: 0.30% (1), ST5: 2.98% (10), ST10: 31.55% (106), ST14: 19.94% (67), ST21: 20.83% (70), ST23: 11.61% (39), ST24: 8.33% (28), ST25: 27.38% (92), ST26: 30.06% (101)PCR and NGS[36]
France54.79% (866/1581)ST2: 0.13% (2), ST10: 2.28% (36), ST14: 4.05% (64), Indefinite MI: 3.61% (57)qPCR[37]
Portugal32.18% (28/87)ST1: 1.15% (1), ST5: 6.90% (6), ST10a: 17.24% (15), ST10b: 2.30% (2), ST13: 1.15% (1), ST14: 5.75% (5), ST21: 18.39% (16), ST23: 3.45% (3), ST24a: 2.30% (2), ST24b: 1.15% (1), ST24c: 1.15% (1), ST25: 29.89% (26), ST26: 28.74% (25), ST30: 1.15% (1), ST42a: 27.59% (24), ST42b: 25.29% (22), ST43: 1.15% (1), ST44: 4.60% (4)PCR and NGS[38]
PCR—Conventional polymerase chain reaction; qPCR—Real-time polymerase chain reaction; NGS—Next Generation Sequencing, MI—Mixed Infection.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gomes-Gonçalves, S.; Silva, A.; Moreira, G.; Gantois, N.; Dominguez, R.G.; Viscogliosi, E.; Chabé, M.; Mesquita, J.R. First Report on the Frequency and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Extensively Reared Holstein-Friesian Cattle from Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal. Animals 2025, 15, 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020186

AMA Style

Gomes-Gonçalves S, Silva A, Moreira G, Gantois N, Dominguez RG, Viscogliosi E, Chabé M, Mesquita JR. First Report on the Frequency and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Extensively Reared Holstein-Friesian Cattle from Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal. Animals. 2025; 15(2):186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020186

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gomes-Gonçalves, Sara, Alexandra Silva, Guilherme Moreira, Nausicaa Gantois, Rubén Garcia Dominguez, Eric Viscogliosi, Magali Chabé, and João R. Mesquita. 2025. "First Report on the Frequency and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Extensively Reared Holstein-Friesian Cattle from Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal" Animals 15, no. 2: 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020186

APA Style

Gomes-Gonçalves, S., Silva, A., Moreira, G., Gantois, N., Dominguez, R. G., Viscogliosi, E., Chabé, M., & Mesquita, J. R. (2025). First Report on the Frequency and Subtype Distribution of Blastocystis sp. in Extensively Reared Holstein-Friesian Cattle from Terceira Island, Azores Archipelago, Portugal. Animals, 15(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15020186

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop