1. Introduction
Sperm cryopreservation in stallions is becoming an increasingly established technique; however, it continues to face significant inefficiencies, primarily due to variability among individuals in terms of their sperm’s resilience to cryogenic stress [
1]. This resilience, known as cryotolerance or freezability, can be estimated by comparing the functional parameters of sperm before and after they have undergone the freezing process. Although many studies have classified stallions as either “good” or “poor” freezers [
2,
3,
4], there is currently no universally accepted criterion for defining freezability. This lack of standardization limits its practical use in the selection of stallions for breeding and impedes research into the factors—beyond individual variation—that may influence cryotolerance. Ebel and colleagues [
5] proposed a freezability index based on the reduction observed in sperm viability after thawing compared to pre-freezing levels as a potential criterion for distinguishing between good and poor freezers. Unlike other sperm parameters, including total motility, this index was able to differentiate stallions’ freezability between the breeding and non-breeding seasons. However, assessing sperm viability often requires specific markers and specialized equipment, which are not always available under field conditions. Therefore, extending the investigation to include additional sperm kinematic parameters would be advantageous, as sperm kinetics is typically strongly correlated with viability [
6,
7] and can be readily assessed on-site [
8]. Accordingly, sperm kinematic parameters could serve as practical and accessible alternatives for evaluating sperm freezability.
To address the issue of poor freezability in some stallions, commercial companies have developed customized freezing extenders. The use of such extenders is most effective when poor freezability is a consistent trait in an individual, rather than a transient condition influenced by fluctuating or temporary environmental factors, as demonstrated by Janet et al. [
9], who found seasonal variations to affect both sperm quality and freezability. An analysis of the repeatability of parameters related to semen quality could clarify whether individual variability in response to freezing is a condition that persists over time in the same subject, as well as clarifying the potential leeway afforded by the use of customized freezing extenders.
Repeatability is the proportion of the total variance in multiple measurements of a trait that is due to differences among individuals. It is a useful tool for quantifying the extent to which an individual’s performance or behavior remains consistent over time, and can set the upper limit to heritability [
10]. Generally, repeatability can be classified as low, moderate, or high if the value is <0.4, is between 0.4 and 0.7, or is >0.7, respectively [
11]. In Lusitano stallions, using an Animal Model for genetic analysis, the estimated heritability (h
2) (and repeatability,
r) of various semen variables was 0.27 (0.35) for gel-free volume, 0.02 (0.38) for sperm concentration, 0.24 (0.44) for sperm motility, 0.29 (0.39) for total number of spermatozoa, and 0.41 (0.41) for total number of motile spermatozoa per ejaculate [
12]. In German Warmblood stallions, Gottschalk and colleagues [
13] estimated that h
2 = 0.28 for gel-free semen volume, 0.21 for sperm concentration, 0.14 for sperm motility, 0.14 for the total number of spermatozoa, and 0.13 for the total number of motile sperm. Later, in frozen–thawed stallion sperm, the same team of researchers [
14] estimated that h
2 = 0.45 for the DNA fragmentation index, 0.13 for progressive motility, and 0.11 for non-viable sperm counts. These results suggest that it is possible to improve semen quality through selection, and that some properties of the semen produced by a stallion tend to remain consistent throughout the animal’s lifetime.
This study aimed to evaluate the repeatability of selected sperm physiological parameters related to sperm kinetics, bioenergetics and oxidative/nitrosative stress markers across multiple semen samples collected from Salernitano stallions. These parameters were evaluated before and after freezing the sperm using two different extenders: a commercial extender with a patented, undisclosed composition, and another extender with a known formulation that was prepared in our laboratory [
15]. In addition, by comparing each parameter before and after freezing, new freezability indices were developed and analyzed.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Unless otherwise indicated, all the materials used for this study were purchased from Merck Life Science (Milan, Italy) and were cell culture-tested.
2.2. Animal Collection and Breeding Care
From February to May 2025 (late winter to spring), four ejaculates were collected weekly from each of eleven stallions used for semen production. These animals were of the Salernitano breed, had ages ranging from 4 to 18 years old (11.2 ± 5.9 years), and were of proven fertility. All the stallions were clinically healthy and were fed a standard diet consisting of approximately 10 kg of mixed hay and 2–2.5 kg of basic concentrate (on a dry-matter basis: crude protein 13.5%, fat 4.0%, crude fiber 6.8%), without antioxidant supplementation, and had ad libitum access to water. They were housed in individual paddocks at the Regional Center of Equine Improvement (Centro Regionale di Incremento Ippico-S. Maria Capua Vetere, Caserta, Italy). This center is approved for equine semen collection by the Regional Government of Campania, Italy (authorization number: U 1500083 CE000642004), and operates under rigorous health and animal welfare protocols.
All the animal procedures conducted complied with the European Union guidelines (Directive 2010/63/EU and D. Lgs. 4/03/2014 n. 26) on the protection of animals used for scientific purposes, and focus was placed on minimizing the number of animals used and reducing any pain or stress.
2.3. Experimental Design
Semen was collected once weekly from each of the eleven stallions, with the collection proceeding in groups of two or three stallions at a time and being repeated up to the fourth sampling before moving on to a new group of stallions. During the study period, no additional semen collections were performed outside of the trial. The collected samples were grossly evaluated for volume, sperm concentration, and motility. Then, the semen was diluted 1:2 and subjected to a gradual decrease in temperature during its transport to the laboratory. There, the semen samples were analyzed for sperm concentration, motility, and selected physiological parameters for assessing sperm bioenergetics—mitochondrial membrane potential, MMP—and oxidative/nitrosative markers—hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO) contents and lipoperoxidation (LPO). Meanwhile, the semen was diluted using two different freezing extenders and subsequently frozen. After thawing, sperm motility and physiological parameters were re-evaluated using the same methods as used before freezing. Freezability was assessed by comparing the post-thaw values of kinematic and physiological parameters with their corresponding pre-freezing values. The repeatability of each measured variable was then estimated.
2.4. Sperm Collection, Dilution, and Shipping
Semen collection was performed following exposure to a teaser mare using a Missouri artificial vagina fitted with an in-line sterile gauze to filter out the gel fraction of the ejaculate. Before sampling, each stallion underwent at least three preliminary semen collections to empty the sperm epididymal reservoir. Each ejaculate gel-free volume was evaluated using a 20 mL syringe, and then diluted 1:2 (volume of semen to volume of extender) with INRA 96
® (DLM Meazza, Lodi, Italy) [
16] that was heated to 37 °C before semen collection. The tubes containing diluted sperm were placed in a jar filled with one liter of water at 37 °C, which was positioned inside a polystyrene box together with frozen eutectic plates placed around the outside of the jar. This setup allowed the sample temperature to progressively decrease to room temperature (RT = 20 °C) within the shipping period (approximately two hours) after semen collection, ensuring a cooling rate of approximately 0.10–0.15 °C/min.
2.5. Sperm Concentration and Kinetics
Upon arrival at the Laboratory of Biology and Technology of Animal Reproduction at the University of Basilicata, Potenza, all the semen samples were assessed for sperm concentration and kinetics using a Makler chamber (Sefi-Medical Instruments, Haifa, Israel) and computer-assisted sperm analysis (SCA 5.0 system, Microptic, Barcelona, Spain), as previously reported [
17]. Briefly, following the evaluation of sperm concentration, each sample was diluted with INRA96
® to achieve a concentration of 30 × 10
6 sperm mL
−1 for SCA analysis. The samples were equilibrated for 2 min at 37 °C on a heated microscope stage. Spermatozoa with an average velocity of less than 10 μm s
−1 were considered immotile. The sperm kinematic parameters assessed included the following: (i) the percentage of total motile spermatozoa (TM); (ii) the percentage of progressive spermatozoa (PM), defined as those with an average path velocity greater than 30 μm s
−1 and a track straightness greater than 80%; (iii) curvilinear velocity (VCL, μm s
−1) is the average velocity along the actual trajectory; (iv) straight-line velocity (VSL, μm s
−1) is the velocity measured as a straight line between start and end points; and (v) average path velocity (VAP, μm s
−1) is the velocity along a smoothed path of progression. For each sample, the tracks of at least one thousand spermatozoa were acquired.
2.6. Sperm Mitochondrial Membrane Potential (MMP)
Sperm samples (1 × 10
6 spermatozoa) were stained with 1.5 μM JC-1, a potential-sensitive fluorescent dye that accumulates in mitochondria. Upon excitation at 488 nm, it emits at wavelengths of ~535 nm (J
0A) and ~595 nm (J
0B); the J
0B/J
0A ratio indicates the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) [
18,
19]. Samples were washed with phosphate-buffer saline supplemented with 0.1% polyvinyl alcohol (PBS-PVA) by centrifugation (300×
g for 5 min), resuspended in 200 μL PBS-PVA, and incubated with JC-1 in the dark at RT for 30 min. After a second wash, the sperm pellets were resuspended in 700 μL PBS-PVA and incubated for another 30 min. Fluorescent spectra from 500 to 620 nm were recorded in duplicate using a spectrofluorometer (Cary Eclipse, Agilent Technologies, Rome, Italy).
2.7. Lipid Peroxidation (LPO) in Sperm Cells
Lipid peroxidation was measured using C11-BODIPY
581/591 the fluorescence emission of which shifts from ~590 nm to ~520 nm upon oxidation [
19]. Sperm samples (1 × 10
6 cells) were incubated with 2 μM C11-BODIPY
581/591 for 30 min at RT, centrifuged at 300×
g for 5 min, resuspended in 700 μL of PBS-PVA, and incubated for another 30 min. Fluorescence was recorded using a spectrofluorometer, as described above. Lipid peroxidation was expressed as the ratio of the fluorescence peak at ~520 nm (C
0A) to the sum of the peaks at ~520 nm and ~590 nm (C
0A + C
0B).
2.8. Intracellular Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Content
The intracellular hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) content was assessed with 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H
2DCFDA) [
20]. After a double wash with PBS-PVA by centrifugation (300×
g for 5 min), sperm aliquots of 1 × 10
6 sperm cells were stained with 10 μM H
2DCFDA for 30 min in the dark at RT, washed, and then further incubated for 30 min in 700 μL PBS-PVA. After incubation, the samples were analyzed with a spectrofluorometer, as described above. The peak fluorescence intensity at ~525 nm following excitation at a wavelength of 488 nm is proportional to intracellular H
2O
2 levels, and is measured as arbitrary units (a.u.).
2.9. Intracellular Nitric Oxide (NO) Content
Intracellular nitric oxide (NO) was measured using 10 μM 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM) [
21]. Sperm samples (1 × 10
6 cells) were stained for 30 min at RT in the dark, washed, and incubated in 700 μL PBS-PVA for another 30 min. Fluorescence was then measured (~525 nm emission, 488 nm excitation) with a spectrofluorometer, as described above. NO levels were expressed in arbitrary units (a.u.).
2.10. Sperm Freezing
The freezing extenders used in this trial were INRA Freeze
® (DLM Meazza, Lodi, Italy) [
16] and HF-20 [
15]. INRA Freeze
® is a patented commercial product with an undisclosed formulation, derived from INRA96. It contains electrolytes, buffers, sugars, cryoprotectants (glycerol), purified milk micellar proteins, egg yolk plasma, and antimicrobial agents (penicillin, gentamicin, amphotericin B). HF-20 is a semi-defined medium composed of 5 g glucose, 0.3 g lactose, 0.3 g raffinose, 0.15 g sodium citrate, 0.05 g sodium phosphate, 0.05 g potassium sodium tartrate, 25,000 IU penicillin, 0.08 g streptomycin, 3% glycerol, and ultrapure water to a final volume of 100 mL. To this base, 10% (
v/
v) fresh egg yolk (EY) was added, representing the only undefined component. To minimize biological variability, the EY was pooled prior to incorporation into the medium during preparation [
17]. This freezing extender was stored at −30 °C in aliquots until it was ready to be used. After assessing sperm concentration, an adequate volume of diluted semen, assuring the packaging of seven straws for each freezing extender, was centrifuged at 400×
g for 10 min. The sperm pellets were resuspended and the sperm was distributed in 3.5 mL of both INRA freeze and HF-20 to achieve a sperm concentration of 100 × 10
6 sperm mL
−1. The samples were placed in tubes and cooled gradually from +20 °C to +4 °C over 60 min, then moved to a +4 °C cold cabinet for straw packaging. The packaged doses were kept at +4 °C for 15 min before exposure to LN
2 vapors [
17].
2.11. Sperm Packaging, Freezing, and Thawing
Semen doses were filled into individually labeled 0.5 mL polyvinyl chloride straws (IMV-Technologies, L’Aigle, France) which had been pre-cooled to +4 °C. The straws were sealed with blue sealing powder (Poudre de bouchage bleue, IMV-Technologies, Cremona, Italy) and placed horizontally on a freezing rack (40-straw distribution block, IMV-Technologies). For the freezing process, the rack was placed in a polystyrene container filled with liquid nitrogen (LN2), with the straws held 4 cm above the LN2 surface for 10 min before being fully submerged for storage. One week after freezing, seven straws per extender per stallion were thawed—first for 10 s in air, and then for 30 s in a 37 °C water bath—immediately before semen analysis. An initial centrifugation step was performed to reduce the semen volume. Each sample was then layered onto a 60/40 discontinuous Percoll gradient and centrifuged at 800× g for 10 min to eliminate egg yolk residues that could interfere with subsequent sperm analyses. The resulting pellet was resuspended in a small volume of PBS-PVA and divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was diluted in INRA96® and analyzed microscopically for sperm kinetics. The second aliquot was washed with PBS-PVA and used to evaluate mitochondrial activity, lipid peroxidation (LPO), and the levels of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and nitric oxide (NO).
2.12. Statistical Analysis
The data were analyzed with ANOVA for repeated measurements (independent variables: stallion, extender, and age) using Systat (Systat 11.0 release, Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to compare sperm function in refrigerated and frozen/thawed samples; the regression model included stallion, extender, and age effects. Before the analyses were carried out, percentage values were transformed in arcsine. Normal data distribution and homogeneity of variance were assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test and Levene’s test, respectively. Pairwise comparisons of the means were performed with Tukey’s test. A threshold of p < 0.05 was used as the minimum level of statistical significance. The data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). The linear regression procedure (Systat 11.0 release) was applied to calculate the coefficients of correlation (R). Principal component analysis was performed using the open-source software JASP 0.18.3 (University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
Repeatability (
r) was estimated by partitioning the total phenotypic variance of semen traits among stallions into additive genetic, permanent, and temporary environmental components [
22]. The permanent environmental variance represents the proportion of variance that is attributable to environmental factors that exert consistent and long-term effects on individual stallions. The temporary environmental variance represents transitional effects that vary from one period to the next. To extract the sources of variance among stallions associated with housing conditions, season and nutrition, and the date of samplings, the order of sampling, a progressive number from the 1st to the 15th sampling session was included in the model. The residual variance reflects the variance observed within stallions. Hence, repeatability for semen traits was estimated as
r = σ
2a + σ
2p/(σ
2a + σ
2p + σ
2t + σ
2e), where
σ2a = additive genetic variance among stallions;
σ2p = permanent environmental variance among stallions;
σ2t = temporary environmental variance among stallions;
σ2e = residual variance.
3. Results
The mean results of the four repeated weekly semen collections from the 11 evaluated Salernitano stallions are presented in
Table 1. Significant individual variability was observed in the volume of gel-free semen, as well as in the total motility, VCL, and lipoperoxidation of the freshly collected sperm. The repeatability of these parameters fell within a range that can be described as low to slightly below moderate. In contrast, all of the other assessed parameters related to the kinematic, bioenergetic, and oxidative/nitrosative stress-related properties of the spermatozoa showed no significant variability among stallions. Stallion age did not show statistically significant effects on any of the parameters considered in the analysis of variance, except for semen volume (
p = 0.004), total motility (
p < 0.001), and lipid peroxidation level (
p = 0.007). However, in the regression analysis used to assess correlations, statistically significant results emerged for semen volume, which was positively correlated with age (R = +0.669,
p = 0.001), and for total and progressive motility, which were negatively correlated with age (TM: R = −0.707,
p < 0.001; PM: R = −0.565,
p = 0.023) (
Table S1).
Table 2 shows the physiological parameters related to sperm kinetics, bioenergetics, and oxidative/nitrosative stress markers measured after the thawing sperm samples frozen with the two different extenders, HF-20 and INRA Freeze. Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between the extenders across most parameters, except for higher H
2O
2 (
p = 0.05) and NO (
p < 0.01) levels in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze. However, significant variability among stallions and low-to-moderate repeatability were detected for all kinematic parameters, mitochondrial membrane potential, lipoperoxidation, and NO content in sperm samples frozen with INRA Freeze. Sperm samples frozen with HF-20 exhibited significant differences among stallions and low repeatability only in relation to progressive motility and H
2O
2 content. In principal component analysis, component 1, which captures the greatest variance in the data and combines the variables with the highest dispersion, contains most of the kinematic data (VCL, VSL, VAP, PM) and age. Among these variables, however, the predominant role of the kinematic variables related to sperm velocity (VCL, VSL, and VAP) is clearly evident. On the contrary, the effect of the two freezing extenders appears to be negligible. Comparison of the results obtained before freezing (
Table 1) and after freezing (
Table 2) revealed a significant reduction (
p < 0.001) in all sperm kinematic parameters and in mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) for both extenders. Following cryopreservation, the levels of lipid peroxidation (LPO), H
2O
2, and NO increased significantly (
p < 0.001) in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze. In contrast, spermatozoa frozen with HF-20 showed a significant increase in LPO levels (
p = 0.04), while their H
2O
2 levels increased and their NO levels decreased compared to the fresh samples; however, these latter two changes were not statistically significant. Significant effects of stallion age on sperm parameters were observed for LPO and H
2O
2 content in spermatozoa cryopreserved with HF-20, whereas in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze, age effects were observed for sperm kinematic parameters, LPO, and NO content. In addition, numerous significant correlations were observed between age and each of the parameters measured in spermatozoa frozen with both extenders (
Table S1).
Table 3 presents the analysis of the ratios between post-thaw and pre-freezing values of the evaluated parameters, which are used as indices of sperm freezability encompassing all measured aspects of sperm physiology. High individual variability and low-to-moderate repeatability were observed for all kinematic parameters, except progressive motility (PM), in sperm frozen with INRA Freeze. In contrast, sperm frozen with HF-20 showed no significant differences in their freezability indices among stallions. Neither intracellular H
2O
2 levels nor NO levels showed significant variation among stallions, and both exhibited very low repeatability. Stallion age did not influence freezability based on the selected sperm parameters, except for VCL in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze. However, significant correlations between age and freezability were observed in sperm frozen with both HF-20 and INRA Freeze
® (
Table S2). When stallions were grouped into two age categories (≤10 and >10 years old), significant differences were detected in semen volume and sperm concentration, as well as in the total motility and NO content in fresh semen (
Table S3). Significant age-related differences were also observed in VCL and H
2O
2 content in semen frozen with HF-20, and in kinematic parameters (VCL, VSL, and VAP) in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze
® (
Table S4).
Potential associations between sperm physiological parameters measured pre-freezing the semen and their corresponding freezability indices, calculated as the ratio of post-thaw to pre-freezing values, are presented in
Table 4. This analysis provides an estimate of the predictive value of the sperm’s pre-freezing parameters in relation to their cryotolerance. For both freezing extenders tested, the results clearly show that total and progressive motility are not reliable predictors of freezability. In contrast, significant correlations were observed for sperm kinematic parameters (VCL, VSL, and VAP), as well as for mitochondrial activity and lipoperoxidation. Although the differences were modest, significant correlations for H
2O
2 and NO content were found only in spermatozoa cryopreserved with HF-20.
Finally, all the physiological parameters assessed in Salernitano stallion sperm were analyzed for pairwise correlations, and the corresponding correlation coefficients, along with their statistical significance, are presented in
Table 5. All the sperm kinematic parameters exhibited strong and statistically significant correlations with one another. Similarly, mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) showed strong and significant correlations with all the sperm kinematic parameters. Lipoperoxidation (LPO) was significantly negatively correlated with most of the sperm kinematic parameters, except for total motility. Additionally, LPO showed a strong positive correlation with nitric oxide (NO) levels. In contrast, H
2O
2 and NO levels did not display significant correlations with most of the other sperm functional parameters; however, a strong and significant positive correlation was observed between them.
4. Discussion
The low semen freezability observed in some stallions highlights the need for specialized freezing extenders to enhance the cryotolerance of sperm cells. This approach could be successful if cryotolerance is primarily influenced by temporary and reversible environmental factors, rather than by genetic traits or permanent environmental conditions. Our analysis of the repeatability of selected sperm quality parameters in fresh and frozen–thawed spermatozoa, as well as of freezability, yielded informative results. The magnitude of variation among stallions, together with the degree of variation among repeated measurements within the same stallion, determines the corresponding value of trait repeatability [
23]. The low-to-moderate repeatability observed in most of the selected sperm physiological parameters indicates, on the one hand, the limited capacity of individual stallions to maintain consistent values of a given parameter over time, and on the other hand, the substantial influence of transient environmental variance on each parameter. This suggests that these traits are not strongly constrained by genetic or permanent environmental factors, and could, therefore, be modulated through targeted interventions, offering considerable scope for the use of freezing extenders tailored to individual stallion requirements.
In the present study, the overall reduction observed in all sperm kinematic parameters and mitochondrial activity in spermatozoa frozen with both extenders compared to fresh semen, accompanied by an increase in oxidative and nitrosative stress markers, was an expected outcome, and is consistent with findings reported in previous studies [
24]. Similarly, the absence of significant differences in freezing efficiency and sperm function between sperm frozen with the two extenders is also consistent with previous research [
17]. However, the results obtained from repeated semen sampling in the same animals revealed novel and noteworthy findings. Through comparing the post- and pre-freezing values for each parameter, a panel of sperm freezability assessments was obtained. The analyses conducted allowed us to verify the degree of variability in each parameter among the stallions, as well as its repeatability. In particular, semen volume varied considerably among stallions, a difference that may be attributable to the large age range of the animals, as shown in
Table S3, and which is consistent with the findings of Dowsett and Knott [
25]. The low repeatability (0.32) of this characteristic is consistent with the findings of a previous study on Lusitano stallions [
12], which reported a repeatability value of 0.35. However, compared to that study, we observed lower repeatability values for sperm concentration (0.15 vs. 0.38) and the total number of spermatozoa per ejaculate (0.08 vs. 0.41).
Total motility (TM) and progressive motility (PM) are among the most commonly used sperm parameters due to their ease of measurement and perceived reliability [
26]. However, their usefulness as indicators of fertility and sperm freezability is uncertain. In fresh semen, only weak correlations were observed between fertility and the percentages of total motile (R = 0.40) and progressively motile (R = 0.46) spermatozoa [
27]. Similarly, in frozen semen, the predictive value of these assessments remains limited; however, it may be enhanced when combined with additional evaluations, such as sperm morphology and viability, membrane integrity, DNA fragmentation, or novel biomarkers like proAKAP4 [
28,
29]. In our study, in fresh semen, TM exhibited significant individual variability, whereas PM did not. Spermatozoa frozen with both extenders showed significant variability in PM among stallions, together with low repeatability, whereas TM showed significant individual variation and low repeatability only in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze. Analysis of the freezability index based on these parameters revealed a significant stallion effect, together with low repeatability, only for TM in samples frozen with INRA Freeze. Moreover, the correlations between the pre-freezing values of TM and PM and their respective freezability indices were low and not statistically significant. As such, these kinematic sperm parameters have limited predictive value for assessing the individual freezability potential of stallion semen. This finding aligns with observations in heavy draft stallions whose semen were evaluated across reproductive seasons [
5]. In that study, no significant differences were found in sperm kinematic parameters between in-season and out-of-season collections; however, significant season-related differences occurred only in the freezability index related to sperm viability.
Interesting findings were also obtained for additional sperm kinematic indices associated with velocity, such as VCL, VSL, and VAP. These sperm parameters are obtainable through computerized tracking of individual spermatozoa over very short periods of time. This method of sperm evaluation is accurate and is no longer subjective, and as such, it is widely used for sperm analysis in humans, as well as in many animal species [
30], including equines [
31]. In stallions, as in other animal species, this methodology has progressively improved the repeatability of accuracy, but its reproducibility between laboratories remains questionable due to differences in settings [
32]. In the present study, these parameters were strongly correlated with each other and also showed significant associations with other kinematic parameters (TM and PM), mitochondrial activity, and lipoperoxidation. In fresh sperm, however, only VCL showed statistically significant differences between stallions, and even then, with low repeatability. In samples frozen using INRA Freeze, however, all three kinematic parameters (VCL, VSL, and VAP) exhibited significant inter-stallion differences with moderate repeatability. This pattern was not observed in samples frozen with HF-20. When freezability indices based on these parameters were analyzed, sperm frozen with INRA Freeze again demonstrated significant differences with low-to-moderate repeatability. Moreover, significant correlations were found between the pre-freezing values of these parameters and the freezability index for both extenders. The ability of INRA Freeze to yield more homogeneous and repeatable outcomes in certain stallions suggests that sperm freezability depends on both individual stallion characteristics and the choice of freezing extender. While INRA Freeze and HF-20 performed similarly in preserving kinematic parameters, mitochondrial activity, and lipoperoxidation levels, they differed in their effects on sperm H
2O
2 and NO content. The freezability index indicated greater variability and repeatability in the parameters of sperm frozen with INRA Freeze, implying stronger discrimination between stallions, whereas HF-20 produced more uniform results across individuals. These findings align with the results of a previous study [
17], which reported no overall statistical differences among extenders, but highlighted superior outcomes in specific extender–stallion combinations. Also in principal component analysis, these kinematic parameters exhibit the highest variance and greatest data dispersion, while the variance attributable to the freezing extender remains comparatively low. To date, the predictive value of sperm kinematic parameters for field fertility has shown inconsistent outcomes. During the breeding season, stallions classified as “fertile” exhibited significantly higher VAP and VCL values compared to sub-fertile stallions; however, these differences were not observed outside the breeding season [
33]. Furthermore, a review of frozen stallion semen revealed only weak correlations between sperm kinematic parameters and pregnancy rates [
34]. In contrast, sperm kinematic parameters have yielded more consistent results in other species, such as cattle. A large-scale insemination study on bull semen identified VAP as the most reliable kinematic parameter for predicting fertility [
35]. Based on the findings of the present study and supporting evidence from other species, the predictive value of these kinematic parameters in stallion spermatozoa may need to be reconsidered.
Mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP) is widely used as an indicator of sperm bioenergetic activity [
36], as it dynamically reflects the cell’s metabolic state. Rather than capturing a progressive change, MMP provides a snapshot of the metabolic status at the precise moment of measurement. However, this feature can lead to inaccurate or inconsistent results if the evaluation is conducted under suboptimal conditions or if analysis times are prolonged. As a result, reproducibility across laboratories may vary depending on the specific protocols and settings used [
37]. In the present study, MMP was significantly correlated with all sperm kinematic parameters, consistent with previous findings in cattle [
18,
20,
38], but only partially in agreement with studies on warmblood stallions, where MMP correlated significantly only with PM, superoxide anion content, and ATP content [
39]. MMP did not differ significantly among stallions in fresh spermatozoa; however, inter-stallion differences emerged in frozen–thawed samples. The absence of variation in fresh semen cannot be attributed to age effects (
Tables S1 and S3), whereas the differences in frozen samples may reflect the distinct freezing responses of stallions with low versus high freezability [
40]. Nevertheless, when evaluated as an indicator of freezability, MMP did not vary significantly among stallions, in agreement with earlier studies comparing pre- and post-freezing results in stallion spermatozoa [
17], which reported no significant differences between individuals or between freezing extenders, apart from the effects of the freezing itself. Nevertheless, the correlation coefficient between MMP in fresh spermatozoa and the corresponding freezability index was high and statistically significant for both freezing extenders. This suggests that MMP levels in fresh semen have good predictive value for assessing sperm freezability, at least with respect to this specific sperm function.
Owing to their high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which are essential for maintaining membrane fluidity, sperm plasma membranes are particularly susceptible to reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (ROS and RNS), which can trigger lipid peroxidation (LPO) [
41,
42]. In particular, certain ROS, such as hydrogen peroxide, target these fatty acids, generating reactive peroxyl and alkoxyl radicals. In order to stabilize, these radicals extract hydrogen atoms from neighboring lipids, producing lipid acids or alcohols and generating new carbon-centered radicals. These, in turn, react with oxygen to form additional lipid peroxides, initiating a chain reaction that exacerbates membrane damage [
43,
44]. LPO poses a serious threat to membrane fluidity and can significantly impair sperm motility [
20,
45]. The sperm cell’s minimal cytoplasmic volume and limited antioxidant defenses, particularly when seminal plasma is removed or diluted during equine sperm cryopreservation [
46], further contribute to its high susceptibility to oxidative damage [
47,
48]. In the present study, hydrogen peroxide (H
2O
2) and nitric oxide (NO) were measured as representatives of ROS and RNS, respectively. LPO was assessed using a fluorescent probe, providing a snapshot of membrane damage that has already occurred, regardless of the current levels of ROS or RNS [
49,
50]. While the presence of these radicals can signal both oxidative stress risk and sperm metabolic activity, their concentrations can be misleading [
51]. A self-reinforcing cycle may develop in which elevated sperm metabolism increases free radical production, ultimately impairing the metabolism itself. Without sufficient antioxidant protection, this can lead to a progressive decline in free radical levels, not due to recovery, but as a result of metabolic collapse. Consequently, high LPO levels may coexist with reduced ROS concentrations, indicating prior oxidative damage. In this study, the LPO levels in fresh semen varied significantly among stallions, while intracellular H
2O
2 and NO concentrations remained relatively stable. Although LPO levels increased significantly after cryopreservation with both freezing extenders, significant inter-stallion differences and moderate repeatability were found in spermatozoa frozen with INRA Freeze. However, no significant differences between stallions were detected with either freezing extender when the corresponding freezability indices were considered. In contrast, spermatozoa cryopreserved with HF-20 showed a significant correlation between pre-freezing H
2O
2 and NO levels and their respective freezability values, an outcome not observed with INRA Freeze.
Stallion age, a permanent environmental factor that can influence sperm quality and freezability, affected semen quality in both fresh samples and samples frozen with both extenders, although its impact on freezability was modest. This finding is consistent with a previous study on different equine breeds subjected to semen freezing [
52], which found that stallions over 9 years of age were significantly more likely to be excluded from insemination programs due to their sperm exhibiting a post-thaw progressive motility value below 35%. Moreover, in that study, the importance of age as an independent variable for predicting the percentage of acceptable ejaculates, defined as 100% for total motility, declined to 19%.