Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Stress in Dogs Under Cancer Therapy via Faecal Cortisol Metabolite Analysis: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Optimization of Solid Lipid Microcapsule Matrix for Enhanced Release and Bioavailability of L-Lysine in Swine
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innovative Approaches to Avoid Antibiotic Use in Equine Semen Cryopreservation: Advancing Sustainable Reproductive Technologies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sperm Membrane: Molecular Implications and Strategies for Cryopreservation in Productive Species

1
Doctorado en Ciencias Aplicadas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile
2
Instituto de Ciencias Aplicadas, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Temuco 4810101, Chile
3
Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias y Medioambiente, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2025, 15(12), 1808; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808
Submission received: 26 May 2025 / Revised: 12 June 2025 / Accepted: 14 June 2025 / Published: 19 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Status and Advances in Semen Preservation—Second Edition)

Simple Summary

Sperm freezing is a fundamental technique in animal reproduction that enables the long-term storage of sperm cells, supporting the improvement of breeding programs and the preservation of valuable genetic traits. However, the freezing and thawing process can cause significant damage to sperm, reducing their ability to fertilize eggs. This damage primarily affects the cell membrane, DNA, and motility, and the extent of the harm can vary depending on the animal species. In this study, we reviewed how freezing impacts sperm from cattle, sheep, horses, and pigs, and explored why some species are more sensitive than others. We also highlighted new strategies scientists are using to minimize this damage, such as incorporating antioxidants and applying advanced tools to better understand molecular responses. Innovative approaches include the use of nanoparticles, exposure to magnetic fields, and a rapid freezing technique known as vitrification. These methods aim to preserve sperm health after thawing, thereby increasing the likelihood of successful fertilization. Enhancing cryopreservation techniques is crucial not only for improving livestock production and animal health but also for conserving endangered species and ensuring global food security.

Abstract

Sperm cryopreservation is a fundamental reproductive biotechnology, enabling the long-term storage of genetic material and supporting assisted reproduction programs. Despite its widespread application, the process is associated with significant limitations due to the cryo-induced cellular damage that occurs during freezing and thawing. These injuries primarily affect the plasma membrane, nuclear DNA, and motility, thereby compromising the fertilizing potential of spermatozoa. Furthermore, interspecies variability in terms of cryo-sensitivity poses a major challenge to the development of standardized cryopreservation protocols. Recent advances have focused on mitigating cryodamage through the use of various strategies. The inclusion of antioxidants in cryopreservation media has proven effective in reducing oxidative stress, thereby enhancing cellular protection. Similarly, the addition of lipid-based supplements contributes to membrane stabilization, improving post-thaw sperm viability and functionality. Moreover, the application of omics technologies, such as transcriptomics and proteomics, has facilitated a deeper understanding of molecular damage and protective responses, paving the way for the development of tailored, species-specific protocols. These integrated approaches optimize cryopreservation conditions, maximizing post-thaw survival and the fertilizing capacity of sperm. Enhancing cryopreservation techniques not only improves the outcomes of assisted reproductive technologies, but also plays a crucial role in the conservation of genetically valuable livestock species. In conclusion, the integration of biotechnological and molecular tools holds significant promise for overcoming the current limitations and advancing the efficacy of sperm cryopreservation.

1. Introduction

Sperm cryopreservation is a cornerstone procedure in the advancement of assisted reproductive biotechnologies. It plays a crucial role in both farm animal breeding and the preservation of endangered species, offering a powerful tool for maintaining genetic diversity. This process is inherently complex, involving various protocols, freezing media, and cryoprotective agents [1]. The long-term storage enabled by cryopreservation allows for the transport of sperm across vast distances, facilitates quarantine measures, and even ensures the availability of superior genetic material after the donor’s death, underscoring its significant impact on farm animal production [2].
Despite its advantages, sperm cryopreservation presents challenges, primarily due to heat shock, osmotic imbalance, and intracellular ice crystal formation [3]. Several cryobiological studies have demonstrated that these factors, which compromise sperm survival at low temperatures, often disrupt the integrity of the sperm membrane [4]. The most severe damage is typically seen in the plasma and outer acrosomal membranes during the freeze–thaw cycle, as these structures are most exposed to the cryogenic environment [5,6]. Cold shock-induced damage leads to ultrastructural alterations to the sperm membrane, which is reflected in decreased parameters, such as motility, viability, and membrane integrity, ultimately resulting in a reduction in the fertilization potential of the sperm [7,8].
To mitigate this damage, conventional strategies incorporate chemical additives, including traditional cryoprotectants like glycerol, along with antioxidants, fatty acids, sugars, amino acids, and membrane stabilizers [9]. After cryoprotectant incorporation, the sperm are subjected to controlled cooling, at a rate depending on the species, ultimately reaching subzero temperatures that induce the formation of a viscous cryoprotectant solution during the aqueous phase of the system involving the sperm cell. Subsequently, the cryopreserved sperm are stored at extremely low temperatures, in liquid nitrogen.
The use of frozen sperm in artificial insemination (AI) has become pivotal for improving domestic animal species production potential. However, despite more than 60 years of research, 40–50% of the sperm population does not survive cryopreservation, even when using “optimized” protocols [9,10,11]. Moreover, the extent of this loss varies among species. For instance, in cattle, approximately 60% of the sperm population fails to retain its functionality after thawing [12], while in horses, this proportion may be even higher, with loss rates exceeding 70% [13]. These differences reflect the varying capacity of sperm to adapt to cryopreservation and thawing processes, which differs between individuals within the same species, and even within the same individual within the same species [14]. The reduction in sperm viability negatively affects fertilization rates, resulting in lower conception rates. This loss of viability can have significant economic repercussions, as it requires additional insemination cycles and reduces embryo quality, thereby increasing the costs for farms and veterinary services.
Sperm cryopreservation in domestic animals is a complex procedure that requires the precise regulation of multiple factors to obtain optimal results. Therefore, a thorough understanding of species-specific sperm physiology is essential, as it varies significantly between species and even between individuals in the same species. This review focuses on the membrane damage induced by cryopreservation in key species, such as bovine, ovine, equine, and porcine species, and highlights possible techniques that could be employed to mitigate these detrimental effects.

2. Impact on the Sperm Membrane During Cryopreservation

Sperm processing, including cryopreservation, places considerable stress on sperm, primarily affecting sperm membranes [15]. The integrity of the plasma membrane (PM) and acrosomal membrane (AM) are two of the most studied parameters in sperm assessments, due to their crucial roles as cellular boundaries and their role in enabling effective cell–cell interactions, both in terms of morphological and functional integrity [16]. Hence, in regard to the structural evaluation of the spermatozoon, the assessment of the integrity of the PM is emphasized [17].
The sperm membrane is predominantly composed of a lipid bilayer, including phospholipids and cholesterol, as well as various proteins [18,19]. In mammals, the phospholipid composition of the plasma membrane is asymmetric, with phosphatidylcholine and sphingomyelin concentrated in the outer layer, and phosphatidylserine and phosphatidylethanolamine in the inner layer [20]. Glycerophospholipids (GPLs) constitute the most significant lipid fraction of the sperm plasma membrane, with phosphatidylcholine and phosphatidylethanolamine being the most abundant species, and no major qualitative differences observed between species [21,22]. However, significant quantitative differences exist, particularly in regard to the cholesterol-to-phospholipid ratio, the protein-to-phospholipid ratio, the lipid content of the bilayer, and the degree of fatty acid saturation within the GPLs [23]. Understanding the lipid composition and organization of the sperm membrane is essential in order to explain the interspecies variability in terms of its susceptibility to cryopreservation-induced damage. This knowledge not only enhances our basic understanding of sperm biology, but also paves the way for the development of more effective and tailored cryoprotective strategies.
Sperm membrane lipids can exist in a rigid and ordered state (gel type) or in a more flexible and relatively disordered state (fluid type) [21]. Membrane fluidity is essential for the proper functioning of sperm and is influenced by several factors, such as phospholipid and cholesterol concentrations, as well as membrane temperature.
Alterations in membrane composition or dynamics during cooling and freezing processes can compromise sperm function, leading to a reduction in the fertilizing capacity of sperm after thawing. During freezing, the liquid crystalline state transitions to a gel state, wherein fatty acid chains become disordered [24]. This reorganization results in a rigid structure, as fatty acid chains align in a parallel manner. The composition of the plasma membrane not only affects the membrane fluidity and fertilization capability of sperm, but also significantly contributes to the cell’s cryoresistance [25]. Potential membrane damage can lead to a loss of sperm viability. This means that while sperm may survive the freeze–thaw process, their ability to maintain their functionality and fertility may be compromised. Significant changes in sperm lipids occur during cryopreservation, with sperm losing considerable amounts of phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylethanolamine, and cholesterol post-freezing [26,27]. Furthermore, a decrease in sphingomyelin has been reported following cryopreservation, along with alterations in fatty acids, such as octadecanoate, which decreases, and an increase in polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as docosatetraenoic acid and arachidonate, in various phospholipids [28]. In addition, the freeze/thaw cycle can activate enzymes, such as phospholipase A2 and sphingomyelinase, which generate compounds, such as lysophosphatidylcholine and ceramides, negatively affecting membrane stability and functionality [29]. Membrane fluidity also determines sperm vulnerability during cryopreservation. Therefore, a deep understanding of membrane lipid dynamics enables the identification of key damage sites and potential biochemical targets for the development of more specific and effective cryoprotective agents.
Consequently, lipid–protein interactions, which are essential for proper membrane function, become disrupted [24]. In parallel, certain proteins undergo changes in their localization. For instance, the lectin, SL15, which plays key roles in sperm capacitation, motility, viability, oviductal reservoir formation, and the sperm–oocyte interaction, is reduced in llamas [30]. Similarly, heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), located in the apical region of the buffalo sperm head, plays a crucial role in mammalian fertilization and early embryonic development [31]. Moreover, the alpha 2 subunit of casein kinase 2 (CK2α′), identified in rams, has been associated with DNA damage and the loss of acrosomal integrity [32]. These alterations may lead to an irreversible loss of sperm functionality [33,34].
These alterations are also reflected in the decreased cholesterol content in the sperm plasma membrane (PM). During cryopreservation, temperature-induced phase transitions alter the lipid ordering of the bilayer, disrupting the affinity between cholesterol and membrane phospholipids. As a result, cholesterol becomes more mobile within the bilayer and redistributes toward destabilized regions. Once dislodged, it diffuses into the extracellular milieu.
At the molecular level, this cholesterol efflux is facilitated by membrane transporter proteins, particularly those of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) family, such as ABCA1 and ABCG1 [35]. These transporters utilize ATP hydrolysis to extract cholesterol from the lipid bilayer and transfer it to extracellular lipid acceptors. The loss of stable cholesterol–phospholipid interactions during cryopreservation increases membrane fluidity and enhances cholesterol mobility, thereby facilitating its recognition and transport by these proteins.
Cholesterol, the predominant lipid in cellular membranes, performs multiple essential functions: it stabilizes membrane structure, reduces permeability, maintains morphological integrity, and mediates cell-to-cell interactions [36]. Additionally, it regulates phase transitions and provides the appropriate physicochemical environment for the proper functioning of integral membrane proteins [37]. Following cryopreservation, cholesterol levels are significantly reduced compared to those in fresh sperm [22], contributing to the structural and functional destabilization of the sperm cell.
Following these modifications to the PM, the dysregulation of lipids occurs, shifting towards the crystalline phase with lateral segregation, which results in oxidative stress [38]. One of the possible mechanisms of sperm cryodamage is the development of oxidative stress, an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species in cells during cryopreservation and the antioxidant defense system. The level of ROS increases, and antioxidant defenses are diminished, due to the centrifugation process that removes seminal plasma before freezing. In addition, sperm cells have very limited cytoplasm, which restricts their intrinsic antioxidant capacity. This combination leads to oxidative damage to crucial biomolecules in reproductive cells, ultimately reducing sperm fertility [39].
ROS play a dual role in sperm physiology. At low and controlled levels, ROS trigger redox signaling, necessary for physiological processes that ensure fertilization [40,41]. ROS, such as the superoxide anion (O2), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and hydroxyl radical (•OH), act as second messengers in sperm physiology [42]. At physiological levels, they facilitate capacitation, and activate intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels, which, in turn, induce the activation of protein kinase A (PKA), which, in turn, phosphorylates MEK-like proteins (mitogen-activated protein kinases), threonine–glutamate–tyrosine, and fibrous sheath proteins [43,44]. These signaling cascades lead to final sperm capacitation, making the sperm fully prepared for the acrosome reaction [44,45]. However, at high concentrations, ROS induce oxidative stress, damaging lipids through lipid peroxidation, fragmenting sperm DNA, altering the mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), triggering apoptosis, and, consequently, leading to infertility [46,47,48,49,50]. When ROS exceed the cell’s antioxidant capacity (mainly in regard to reduced glutathione, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxiredoxins), a chain reaction is initiated that ultimately results in lipid peroxidation (LPO) [51]. During this process, free radicals extract a hydrogen atom from the side chain of a polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA), generating a carbon-centered radical [52]. This damage affects nearly 60% of membrane fatty acids, decreasing membrane fluidity, increasing nonspecific ion permeability, and inhibiting the function of membrane receptors and enzymes, perpetuating the damage [47] (Figure 1). These findings highlight that sperm damage is not only structural, but also profoundly functional and biochemical. The loss of key proteins, alterations in lipid dynamics, and oxidative stress, create a hostile environment for the sperm, even if it survives cryopreservation. Understanding these mechanisms enables the design of more precise antioxidant and cryoprotective strategies to preserve sperm fertility.

3. Specific Variations in Sperm Responses to Cryopreservation

In the following sections, we analyze how cryopreservation differentially affects sperm depending on the species of interest. Although all sperm cells are susceptible to cryodamage, each species exhibits unique particularities, due to the specific characteristics of their plasma membrane, lipid composition, and susceptibility to oxidative stress (Table 1). These differences determine how damage manifests in regard to sperm functionality and quality, impacting capacitation, the acrosome reaction, and fertilization. Therefore, interspecies variations highlight the need for tailored protocols to optimize cryopreservation and minimize its impact on embryo formation and development. Both ruminant and monogastric species are addressed, considering their distinct reproductive physiology and cryosensitivity.

3.1. Cryopreservation-Induced Damage in Ruminant Sperm: Focus on Bovine and Ovine Species

In bovines, cryopreservation represents a significant challenge in regard to preserving sperm functionality. Studies have shown that the PM of bovine sperm contains a lower proportion of cholesterol compared to more cold-resistant species, such as rabbits and humans, specifically the cholesterol/phospholipid molar ratio in bulls is only 0.45, compared to values close to 1.0 in species more tolerant to cooling [53]. This lower cholesterol proportion contributes to greater susceptibility to temperature changes during freezing and thawing.
This lipid composition directly affects protein interactions within the membrane, altering its functionality. During the cryogenic process, a significant portion of surface and membrane proteins is lost or redistributed, affecting their biological function [34]. Key proteins, like P25b and HSP70, which are crucial for fertilization and embryo development, are notably reduced after the freezing process [31,51,54]. The structural rearrangement of the membrane also facilitates the uncontrolled entry of calcium ions, activating the cAMP pathway and associated kinases, which leads to premature capacitation [55]. This early activation compromises the cellular energy balance, depleting the reserves needed to reach and fertilize the oocyte. As a result, a decrease in viability and motility of up to 50%, and damage to the acrosome, ultimately cause a reduction in fertility [56].
Cryopreservation induces an overproduction of ROS, such as O2, H2O2, and OH, which damage critical cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and sperm DNA [1,43]. The ROS generated during the freeze–thaw process cause LPO in the sperm plasma membrane, leading to the formation of toxic byproducts, such as malondialdehyde (MDA), conjugated dienes, and lipid hydroperoxides (including 4-hydroxynonenal [4-HNE] and various 2-alkenals), which exert deleterious effects on membrane integrity [57]. Moreover, these toxic byproducts can inhibit several essential cellular enzymes, such as glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (G-3-PDH) and adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase), negatively impacting energy metabolism and potentially compromising sperm motility [58].
These types of damage directly affect the membrane’s fluidity and lipid asymmetry, reduce MMP, and lead to cholesterol redistribution, thereby contributing to acrosomal destabilization and negatively impacting sperm functionality [59]. Furthermore, this leads to the activation of apoptotic pathways through caspases and the increased expression of cell stress proteins like HSP70 [60,61]. These cellular responses contribute to the loss of sperm viability after cryopreservation, negatively impacting reproductive success. For example, in bovines, the use of frozen sperm has been associated with pregnancy rates of 41%, compared to nearly 60% achieved with refrigerated sperm [62]. This lower pregnancy rate with frozen sperm can also be observed in other species (Table 2).
Cryopreservation in sheep presents significant limitations. Artificial insemination (AI) using frozen–thawed ram sperm is not as widely practiced as in other domestic species due to the low and variable fertility rates obtained, as well as the complexity involved in implementing certain technical improvements. Commercial artificial insemination protocols are generally categorized into two main types: those employing chilled sperm (maintained at 15 °C) for vaginal or intracervical insemination, and those utilizing thawed sperm for intrauterine deposition [63]. The latter is a minimally invasive procedure, but remains a surgical intervention that requires veterinary expertise and raises animal welfare concerns, as well as demanding specialized equipment and more manpower compared to cervical insemination [64].
Cryopreservation affects ovine sperm more significantly compared to bovine sperm. After thawing, sperm motility, acrosomal membrane integrity, and the cleavage rate are lower in sheep, with values of 40.3%, 89.0%, and 49.2%, respectively, while in cattle these values are 44.6%, 94.0%, and 62.9%, respectively. This indicates that ovine sperm are more sensitive to freezing-induced damage, negatively impacting their motility, acrosomal membrane integrity, and early embryonic development [65].
Other parameters are also adversely affected: up to 82% of sperm show compromised plasma membrane integrity [66], the mitochondrial function is reduced by 30% after thawing [12], and a slight increase (1.5%) has been observed in the proportion of viable sperm with elevated levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide (O2) [67]. Additionally, 14% of frozen–thawed sperm present DNA fragmentation, a value similar to that reported in equine sperm (12%) [68,69].
These findings highlight the need to optimize cryopreservation conditions and insemination techniques in regard to this species. This is even more relevant considering that sheep are seasonal breeders, which limits the availability of fresh sperm to specific periods of the year. In this context, cryopreservation represents a key tool to ensure the availability of high-quality sperm samples year round, allowing for more efficient and flexible reproductive planning.

3.2. Cryopreservation-Induced Damage in Ruminant Sperm: Focus on Equine and Porcine Species

The quality of frozen–thawed stallion sperm is lower than that of fresh or refrigerated sperm [70]. Although this phenomenon is observed across all species, what distinguishes horses from other species is that the percentage of viable sperm after thawing is considerably lower, usually ranging from 30% to 50%, compared to other species, such as cattle [71,72,73]. Additionally, the fatty acid composition in the sperm membrane varies according to the reproductive season, being more favorable during spring and early summer. During this period, there is an increase in the levels of PUFAs, which have been associated with higher cell viability and better tolerance to the cryopreservation process [74,75].
During cryopreservation, equine sperm undergoes oxidative stress, membrane damage, DNA fragmentation, a reduction in phospholipase C zeta 1 (PLCZ1) content, and, in some cases, cell death, factors that compromise its post-thaw viability [76,77]. Post-thaw motility ranges from 30% to 60%, and the sperm is frequently rendered unusable due to extremely low motility [13]. Additionally, there is high individual variability: approximately one-third of all stallions produce sperm that is nearly unusable due to low motility and viability after freezing and thawing. As a result, stallions are classified as “good” or “poor” freezers [76,78], with poor freezers showing a high proportion of dead, immotile, or slowly motile sperm (approximately 50%) and a low percentage of progressively motile sperm (<30%) [78]. When sperm exhibit low motility, and semen availability is limited in species wherein individuals have high economic value, such as horses, intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is recommended and commonly used to maximize the utilization of stallion sperm [79].
In boar, sensitivity to cryopreservation is particularly pronounced, which has limited its application to less than 1% of artificial inseminations worldwide [80]. This low utilization is due to the severe damage that the sperm suffer during the freezing process, affecting their function, quality, and post-insemination reproductive performance [81,82]. Porcine sperm cells possess a plasma membrane rich in PUFAs and low cholesterol levels, making them highly vulnerable to cold shock and oxidative stress [83,84]. These conditions cause alterations in membrane integrity, the dysregulation of intracellular calcium, acrosomal damage, and changes in lipid distribution [85,86]. At the intracellular level, damage to the perinuclear theca has also been observed, compromising mitochondrial function. This damage alters both the expression and localization of mitofusin-2, a key protein for mitochondrial fusion, as well as the actin network. Furthermore, tyrosine phosphorylation patterns are modified, affecting various fundamental cellular processes [87,88]. At the molecular level, cryopreservation, while useful for preserving cells and tissues, can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) by triggering the expression of pro-apoptotic proteins like BAX and reducing levels of anti-apoptotic proteins like BCL-2, ultimately compromising cell viability [89]. This process can lead to cell destruction and is a significant consideration in regard to the use of cryopreservation techniques. High levels of ROS and RNS, particularly (O2, H2O2, NO, and peroxynitrite (-ONOO), can negatively affect sperm motility, viability, and physiology by interacting with key cellular components, such as membrane lipids, proteins, and DNA [90,91,92,93]. In this context, H2O2 has been identified as one of the main ROS responsible for oxidative stress in boar sperm, reducing total sperm motility by 10%, inducing apoptosis in most cells, and causing a 55% decrease in viability, highlighting the high susceptibility of boar sperm to oxidative damage [94].
Alterations in the sperm membrane and ion channels during the freezing and thawing process trigger biochemical and functional changes characteristic of sperm capacitation, even before the sperm cells enter the female reproductive tract. This results in premature capacitation, characterized by early membrane depolarization and asynchronous hyperactivation relative to ovulation [86]. In this regard, it has been shown that piR-121380 regulates ERK2 phosphorylation via its interaction with PTPN7, inducing sperm cryo-capacitation and, ultimately, affecting motility and the fertilizing potential of thawed sperm [95]. Consequently, this entire set of structural, functional, and molecular alterations leads to cumulative damage that compromises sperm viability and fertilizing capacity. A study evaluated the conception rate and litter size in multiparous sows following fixed-time intrauterine insemination, using extended fresh sperm semen and frozen–thawed sperm. Sows inseminated with extended fresh sperm showed a conception rate of 88.9% and an average of 10.8 piglets per litter, whereas those inseminated with frozen–thawed sperm had a conception rate of 75.8% and an average of 9.0 piglets per litter [96].
These results indicate that, although insemination with frozen–thawed sperm may result in slightly lower conception rates and litter sizes compared to extended fresh sperm, it remains a viable option in swine reproduction programs, especially when appropriate insemination techniques and reproductive management are employed.
Table 2. Pregnancy rates with fresh and frozen–thawed sperm in farm animals.
Table 2. Pregnancy rates with fresh and frozen–thawed sperm in farm animals.
SpeciesPregnancy Rate with Fresh Sperm (%)Pregnancy Rate with Frozen–Thawed Sperm (%)Reference
Cattle70%40–50%[62,97]
Sheep65–75%58%[98,99]
Equine63%48.6%[100]
Porcine88.9%75.8%[96]
Goat70.4%59.1%[101]

4. Strategies to Combat Sperm Membrane Damage

In recent years, several studies have proposed innovative approaches to mitigate the damage associated with bovine sperm cryopreservation, particularly regarding sperm membrane integrity and post-thaw fertility. Recent research has evaluated the addition of the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). This pleiotropic cytokine is naturally present in the sperm of mammals, including livestock sperm [102,103,104]. Several studies have shown that GM-CSF can positively influence the resistance of ram sperm to environmental heat stress [102], as well as improve sperm motility in bovines and in men with oligoasthenoteratozoospermia [103,105]. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the incubation of frozen–thawed bovine sperm with GM-CSF may represent a promising biotechnological tool to enhance reproductive efficiency. This approach has been shown to significantly improve key parameters such as motility, capacitation, and the fertilization rate, in addition to promoting early embryonic development in cattle [106].
The substitution of egg yolk with a cholesterol–cyclodextrin complex represents a highly effective option, especially when the cyclodextrins are preloaded with cholesterol. These agents promote the insertion of cholesterol into cell membranes, due to the presence of a hydrophobic inner core and their high affinity for sterols [107]. Various studies have shown improved cryosurvival rates of sperm from bulls [108,109]. The preservation of PM integrity and in vitro fertilizing ability has also been observed, further supporting its potential as a substitute for egg yolk in cryopreservation protocols [110]. This alternative not only preserves sperm quality, but also represents a safer option from a biosecurity perspective, reducing the risk of the transmission of zoonotic diseases associated with the use of egg yolk.
The combined use of cyclodextrins with natural flavonoids, such as kaempferol (3,4′,5,7-tetrahydroxyflavone) or epicatechin (EPC), constitutes an innovative strategy to mitigate cryopreservation-induced damage in bovine sperm. Cyclodextrins provide structural stability to the PM by modulating its lipid content, while flavonoids act as potent antioxidants capable of neutralizing (ROS), thus reducing oxidative stress that compromises sperm viability. Recent studies have shown that the addition of kaempferol and epicatechin to freezing extenders significantly improves membrane integrity, motility, viability, and sperm morphology after thawing [111,112]. The ability of these compounds to preserve mitochondrial function has also been supported in regard to other species, such as boars, wherein their supplementation in sperm extenders helped maintain key biofunctional parameters during storage [113]. For future research and practical applications in artificial insemination programs, the implementation of these innovative advances in a complementary manner is recommended, aiming to enhance reproductive efficiency, while ensuring the safety and effectiveness of bovine sperm cryopreservation.
To help mitigate the damage caused by cryopreservation in ram sperm, some recent studies have suggested adjusting the sperm concentration and selecting appropriate commercial extenders. According to a study by Paucar Quito [114], lower sperm concentrations (200 and 400 × 10⁶/mL) achieved pregnancy rates of 57.5% and 54.4%, respectively, compared to a concentration of 800 × 10⁶/mL (45.5%). In the same study, three commercial extenders, Ovixcell, Andromed, and Triladyl, were evaluated. It was concluded that Triladyl was the most effective in preserving the functional characteristics of ovine sperm, protecting the plasma membrane and offering greater resistance to the harmful effects of cryopreservation. The ProAKAP4 protein, along with its precursor AKAP4, is one of the most abundant in the principal piece of the sperm flagellum and plays a fundamental role in motility. ProAKAP4 has already been validated as a molecular marker of sperm quality in several species, including mice, boars, and humans, due to its strong correlation with functional parameters, such as motility and fertility [115,116,117,118,119]. In rams, sperm samples from fresh, cooled, and cryopreserved conditions were evaluated, and the results showed that cryopreservation significantly reduced sperm quality, with a marked decrease in the ProAKAP4 concentration [120]. Based on the reviewed evidence, these strategies can be useful for improving post-thaw ovine sperm quality and viability, thereby optimizing outcomes of artificial insemination and fertilization programs. Incorporating ProAKAP4 assessments into routine ovine sperm quality analysis is recommended, especially for cold storage and cryopreservation protocols. This tool, combined with antioxidant strategies and the appropriate choice of extenders and sperm concentration, could significantly increase success rates in regard to ovine artificial insemination programs.
To improve the quality of frozen stallion sperm, various approaches have been explored, such as the use of antioxidants like hydroxytyrosol (HT) and resveratrol (RSV), which help reduce damage caused by oxidative stress, enhance plasma and acrosomal membrane integrity, and improve post-thaw motility [121,122]. However, individual stallion variation significantly influences sperm survival during cryopreservation, highlighting the importance of tailoring freezing protocols to each individual to optimize outcomes [123]. A key aspect is the sperm concentration, which directly impacts sperm quality after preservation. In this context, when sperm is highly concentrated, it must be adequately diluted to reach the optimal concentration before use [71]. The recommended minimum concentration of progressively motile sperm (PMS) for artificial insemination (AI) with frozen sperm is at least 250 × 10⁶ sperm per dose. An innovative alternative is the use of vitrification, a process that produces a glass-like solidification of living cells that completely prevents the formation of ice crystals during cooling. Equally important, the vitrification process completely prevents the formation of ice crystals in cryopreserved cells during heating, in order to recover the cells for biological applications. It is a process that enables the direct transition of an aqueous solution from a liquid to a glassy state, thereby avoiding ice crystal formation [124,125]. This rapid technique minimizes cold damage and has shown promising results in humans, dogs, and cats [1]. In humans, sperm vitrification has been studied and optimized for over a decade, showing greater cryoresistance compared to other species. In equines, vitrification represents an ideal alternative to conventional freezing. Recent studies have shown that vitrified sperm without permeable cryoprotectants, using 0.25 mL straws containing 100 μL of sperm at a concentration of 100 × 10⁶ sperm/mL and an extender with 100 mM trehalose, exhibit better post-thaw parameters than sperm conventionally frozen with glycerol [126]. Another study used the same straw technique (0.25 mL) with protective outer covers, ensuring sterile conditions during the process and reinforcing its practical applicability. In horses, significantly higher progressive motility was observed in vitrified sperm (48.2 ± 2.3%) compared to conventionally frozen sperm (37.3 ± 2.2%). Moreover, in donkeys, while pregnancy rates were similar between vitrified (22%) and frozen sperm (10%), uterine post-insemination inflammatory responses resolved more quickly when vitrified sperm was used [127]. These findings suggest that vitrification not only improves post-thaw sperm quality, but may also reduce adverse effects associated with artificial insemination in equines (Figure 2).
The cryopreservation of porcine sperm continues to face significant challenges, due to the sensitivity of the sperm to the physical and chemical changes induced by the freezing and thawing process. In this context, a direct correlation has been identified between post-thaw sperm quality and sensitivity to oxidative stress induced by hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) prior to freezing. This finding suggests that evaluating the sperm response to H2O2 could serve as a predictor of cryotolerance in porcine sperm [128]. To mitigate these negative effects, various strategies have been developed, with promising results. For example, the inclusion of glutamine in the sperm extender during storage at 17 °C prior to freezing has been shown to significantly improve post-thaw motility, viability, and the mitochondrial activity of sperm [129]. Likewise, the protective effects of betaine during liquid storage and sperm transport have been evaluated. Concentrations of 0.5 mg/mL significantly preserved sperm motility during storage at 17 °C for 3 to 5 days, while a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL improved sperm progressive motility during road transport. Furthermore, 0.4 mg/mL of betaine was found to enhance the mitochondrial activity, antioxidant capacity, and reduce lipid peroxidation damage [130]. Another innovative strategy involves exposing the freezing extender to magnetic fields of up to 6000 Gauss (G), which resulted in a significant reduction in sperm membrane damage and increased post-thaw motility [131]. In line with antioxidant-based approaches, the use of functionalized nanoparticles has also been explored. For example, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) was incorporated into a polydopamine (PDA). Thanks to their ability to disassemble into ultrasmall, bio-targeted particles (<10 nm), this rationally designed nanoprotector ensures prolonged antioxidant activity and specificity in regulating protein phosphorylation within boar semen preservation systems at 4 °C. Beyond enhancing antioxidant protection, these nanoparticles also modulate intracellular signaling pathways, such as the D2DR/cAMP/PKA cascade, thereby extending sperm viability from 3 to up to 10 days at 4 °C, a significant advancement compared to conventional antioxidants [132]. By simultaneously enhancing the antioxidant defense and modulating key intracellular signaling pathways, this approach represents a paradigm shift in the field of sperm cryobiology and liquid storage, opening new avenues for precision sperm preservation strategies across domestic species. From a molecular perspective, proteins such as α-amylase and epididymal sperm-binding protein 1 have been identified as potential biomarkers of boar sperm freezing resistance. Supplementation with α-amylase in regard to the cryoprotective extender has been shown to significantly enhance motility and sperm quality after thawing [129]. Finally, sperm storage at 4 °C using specialized extenders, such as AndroStar Premium, has been explored as an alternative to conventional storage at 16–18 °C. This method has been proven to be effective in maintaining DNA integrity and in vitro fertilizing capacity, opening up new possibilities for enhancing the functional longevity of stored sperm [133].

5. Future Projections

In the coming years, research is expected to increasingly focus on deciphering the molecular signatures that confer cryotolerance, particularly those related to sperm membrane stability. Proteomics will play a pivotal role in identifying membrane-associated proteins that either protect or compromise sperm viability during freezing and thawing processes. A promising avenue lies in modulating the lipid composition and in the targeted supplementation of cryoprotectants that specifically interact with membrane lipids and proteins to preserve their structure and function. Furthermore, the integration of proteomics with lipidomics and transcriptomics may lead to the development of customized extenders or nanoparticle-based delivery systems that enhance membrane resilience. These advancements hold the potential to revolutionize cryopreservation strategies, making them more species-specific and efficient, while also paving the way for precision breeding and the conservation of valuable genetic traits.

6. Conclusions

Sperm cryopreservation, while essential for reproductive biotechnologies, continues to face significant limitations, due to cellular damage induced by the freezing and thawing process. These effects vary across species, affecting everything from membrane integrity to fertilization capacity. However, recent advances in the use of antioxidants, lipid-based supplements, and omics technologies present new opportunities to optimize protocols and enhance post-thaw fertility. A deep understanding of the mechanisms of damage and protective strategies will enable the development of more effective and species-specific methods, contributing to the success of assisted reproduction programs and the genetic conservation of animals of zootechnical interest.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C. and K.L.; methodology, M.C. and K.L.; validation, M.C.; formal analysis, M.C.; research, M.C.; resources, M.J.C.; data curation, M.C.; original drafting-drafting, M.C., K.L., F.P. and M.J.C.; writing-revising and editing, M.C., K.L., F.P. and M.J.C.; visualization, M.C.; supervision, M.J.C.; project administration, M.J.C.; securing funding, M.J.C. and F.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FONDECYT INICIACION (11240632) and FONDECYT INICIACION (11250694), ANID, Chile.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kattia Núñez for providing access to Figure 1 and Figure 2 through BioRender.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Kumar, A.; Prasad, J.K.; Srivastava, N.; Ghosh, S.K. Strategies to minimize various stress-related freeze–thaw damages during conventional cryopreservation of mammalian spermatozoa. Biopreserv. Biobank. 2019, 17, 603–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bailey, J.L.; Bilodeau, J.F.; Cormier, N. Sperm cryopreservation in domestic animals: A damaging and capacitating phenomenon. J. Androl. 2000, 21, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Benko, F.; Fialková, V.; Žiarovská, J.; Ďuračka, M.; Lukáč, N.; Tvrdá, E. In Vitro versus Cryo-Induced Capacitation of Bovine Spermatozoa, Part 2: Changes in the Expression Patterns of Selected Transmembrane Channels and Protein Kinase A. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 14646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Grötter, L.G.; Cattaneo, L.; Marini, P.E.; Kjelland, M.E.; Ferré, L.B. Recent advances in bovine sperm cryopreservation techniques with a focus on sperm post-thaw quality optimization. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Barbas, J.P.; Mascarenhas, R.D. Cryopreservation of domestic animal sperm cells. Cell Tissue Bank. 2009, 10, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Khalil, W.A.; El-harairy, M.A.; Zeidan, A.E.B.; Hassan, M.A.E.; Mohey-Elsaeed, O. Evaluation of bull spermatozoa during and after cryopreservation: Structural and ultrastructural insights. Int. J. Vet. Sci. Med. 2018, 6, S49–S56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ozimic, S.; Ban-Frangez, H.; Stimpfel, M. Sperm Cryopreservation Today: Approaches, Efficiency, and Pitfalls. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2023, 45, 4716–4734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yánez-Ortiz, I.; Catalán, J.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Miró, J.; Yeste, M. Advances in sperm cryopreservation in farm animals: Cattle, horse, pig and sheep. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2022, 246, 106904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharafi, M.; Borghei-Rad, S.M.; Hezavehei, M.; Shahverdi, A.; Benson, J.D. Cryopreservation of sperm in domestic animals: A review of current challenges, applications, and prospective strategies. Animals 2022, 12, 3271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holt, W.V. Fundamental aspects of sperm cryobiology: The importance of species and individual differences. Theriogenology 2000, 53, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Watson, P.F. The causes of reduced fertility with cryopreserved sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 481–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. García, W.; Tabarez, A.; Palomo, M.J. Effect of type of egg yolk and removal of seminal plasma on donor age and ram sperm cryopreservation. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 145, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Catalán, J.; Llavanera, M.; Bonilla-Correal, S.; Papas, M.; Gacem, S.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Yeste, M.; Miró, J. Irradiating frozen-thawed stallion sperm with red-light increases their resilience to withstand post-thaw incubation at 38 °C. Theriogenology 2020, 157, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Fraser, L.; Zasiadczyk, L.; Mogielnicka-Brzozowska, M. Variaciones de las características de calidad del esperma de diferentes eyaculados entre verracos tras la congelación-descongelación. Cells 2025, 14, 212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Januskauskas, A.; Johannisson, A.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Subtle membrane changes in cryopreserved bull sperm in relation with sperm viability, chromatin structure, and field fertility. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 743–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rubio-Guillén, J.L.; Quintero-Moreno, A.A.; González Villalobos, D.M. Effect of cryopreservation on plasma membrane and acrosomal integrity of bull spermatozoa. Rev. Cient. 2009, 19, 382–389. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dias Maziero, R.R.; Guasti, P.N.; Monteiro, G.A.; Avanzi, B.R.; Hartwig, F.P.; Lisboa, F.P.; Papa, F.O. Evaluation of sperm kinetics and plasma membrane integrity of frozen equine sperm in different storage volumes and freezing conditions. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 165–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mocé, E.; Blanch, E.; Tomás, C.; Graham, J.K. Use of cholesterol in sperm cryopreservation: Present moment and perspectives to future. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45 (Suppl. 2), 57–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pini, T.; Leahy, T.; de Graaf, S.P. Sublethal sperm freezing damage: Manifestations and solutions. Theriogenology 2018, 118, 172–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bevers, E.M.; Comfurius, P.; Dekkers, D.W.; Zwaal, R.F. Lipid translocation across the plasma membrane of mammalian cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1999, 1439, 317–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Drobnis, E.Z.; Crowe, L.M.; Berger, T.; Anchordoguy, T.J.; Overstreet, J.W.; Crowe, J.H. Cold shock damage is due to lipid phase transitions in cell membranes: A demonstration using sperm as a model. J. Exp. Zool. 1993, 265, 432–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Parks, J.E.; Lynch, D.V. Lipid composition and thermotropic phase behavior of boar, bull, stallion, and rooster sperm membranes. Cryobiology 1992, 29, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Medeiros, C.M.; Forell, F.; Oliveira, A.T.; Rodrigues, J.L. Current status of sperm cryopreservation: Why isn’t it better? Theriogenology 2002, 57, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lemma, A. Effect of Cryopreservation on Sperm Quality and Fertility; Manafi, M., Ed.; Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals; InTech Europe: Debre Zeit, Ethiopia, 2011; pp. 191–216. [Google Scholar]
  25. Cabrera, T.; Ramires-Neto, C.; Belaz, K.R.A.; Freitas-Dell’aqua, C.P.; Zampieri, D.; Tata, A.; Eberlin, M.N.; Alvarenga, M.A.; Souza, F.F. Influence of spermatozoal lipidomic profile on the cryoresistance of frozen spermatozoa from stallions. Theriogenology 2018, 108, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Kadirvel, G.; Kumar, S.; Kumaresan, A.; Kathiravan, P. Capacitation status of fresh and frozen-thawed buffalo spermatozoa in relation to cholesterol level, membrane fluidity and intracellular calcium. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2009, 116, 244–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ushiyama, A.; Ishikawa, N.; Tajima, A.; Asano, A. Comparison of membrane characteristics between freshly ejaculated and cryopreserved sperm in the chicken. J. Poult. Sci. 2016, 53, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Buhr, M.M.; Curtis, E.F.; Kakuda, N.S. Composition and behavior of head membrane lipids of fresh and cryopreserved boar sperm. Cryobiology 1994, 31, 224–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schiller, J.; Arnhold, J.; Glander, H.-J.; Arnold, K. Lipid analysis of human spermatozoa and seminal plasma by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and NMR spectroscopy—effects of freezing and thawing. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2000, 106, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zampini, R.; Castro-González, X.A.; Scandura, M.; Sari, L.M.; Diaz, A.V.; Martin, A.; Argañaraz, M.E.; Apichela, S.A. Cryopreservation modifies the distribution of the prostate-derived lectin SL15 on the llama (Lama glama) sperm. Theriogenology 2023, 202, 93–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Varghese, T.; Divyashree, B.C.; Roy, S.C.; Roy, K.S. Loss of heat shock protein 70 from apical region of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) sperm head after freezing and thawing. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 828–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. He, Y.; Li, H.; Wang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X. Loss of protein kinase 2 subunit alpha 2 (CK2α’) effect ram sperm function after freezing and thawing process. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 181, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. De Leeuw, F.E.; Chen, H.C.; Colenbrander, B.; Verkleij, A.J. Cold-induced ultrastructural changes in bull and boar sperm plasma membranes. Cryobiology 1990, 27, 171–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Peris-Frau, P.; Soler, A.J.; Iniesta-Cuerda, M.; Martín-Maestro, A.; Sánchez-Ajofrín, I.; Medina Chávez, D.A.; Fernández-Santos, M.R.; García-Álvarez, O.; Maroto Morales, A.; Montoro, V.; et al. Sperm cryopreservation in ruminants: Understanding the molecular changes induced by the cryopreservation process to optimize sperm quality. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Leahy, T.; Gadella, B.M. New insights into the regulation of cholesterol efflux from the sperm membrane. Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 561–567. [Google Scholar]
  36. Ushiyama, A.; Tajima, A.; Ishikawa, N.; Asano, A. Modification of membrane cholesterol and desmosterol in chicken spermatozoa improves post-thaw survival and prevents impairment of sperm function after cryopreservation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2018, 30, 591–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Crockett, E.L. Cholesterol function in plasma membranes from ectotherms: Membrane-specific roles in adaptation to temperature. Am. Zool. 1998, 38, 291–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Karunakaran, M.; Devanathan, T.G. Evaluation of bull sperm for fertility- associated protein, in vitro characters and fertility. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2017, 45, 136–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kolyada, M.N.; Osipova, V.P.; Berberova, N.T. Use of cryoprotectors and antioxidants in sturgeon sperm cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2023, 111, 30–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. O’Flaherty, C.; De Lamirande Ey Gagnon, C. Función positiva de las especies reactivas de oxígeno en la capacitación espermática de mamíferos: Activación y modulación de eventos de fosforilación. Biol. Med. Radic. Libres 2006, 41, 528–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. O’Flaherty, C. Redox regulation of mammalian sperm capacitation. Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Du Plessis, S.S.; Agarwal, A.; Halabi, J.; Tvrda, E. Contemporary evidence on the physiological role of reactive oxygen species in human sperm function. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2015, 32, 509–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Aitken, R.J.; Ma, B.; Nixon, B. Are sperm capacitation and apoptosis the opposite ends of a continuum driven by oxidative stress? Asian J. Androl. 2015, 17, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Aitken, R.J. Reactive oxygen species as mediators of sperm capacitation and pathological damage. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 84, 1039–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Agarwal, A.; Virk, G.; Ong, C.; Du Plessis, S.S. Effect of oxidative stress on male reproduction. World J. Men’s Health 2014, 32, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Aitken, R.J.; Drevet, J.R.; Moazamian, A.; Gharagozloo, P. Male Infertility and Oxidative Stress: A Focus on the Underlying Mechanisms. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  47. Dutta, S.; Majzoub, A.; Agarwal, A. Oxidative stress and sperm function: A systematic review on evaluation and management. Arab. J. Urol. 2019, 17, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dutta, S.; Henkel, R.; Sengupta, P.; Agarwal, A. Rol Fisiológico de Las ROS en la Función Espermática. Infertilidad Masculina; Parekattil, S., Esteves, S., Agarwal, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  49. Hezavehei, M.; Sharafi, M.; Kouchesfahani, H.M.; Henkel, R.; Agarwal, A.; Esmaeili, V.; Shahverdi, A. Sperm cryopreservation: A review on current molecular cryobiology and advanced approaches. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2018, 37, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Said, T.M.; Gaglani, A.; Agarwal, A. Implication of apoptosis in sperm cryoinjury. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2010, 21, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Makker, K.; Agarwal, A.; Sharma, R. Oxidative stress & male infertility. Indian J. Med. Res. 2009, 129, 357–367. [Google Scholar]
  52. Avello, M.; Suwalsky, M. Radicales libres, antioxidantes naturales y mecanismos de protección. Atenea 2006, 494, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bennett, D.A.; White, I.G. Influence of the cholesterol content of mammalian spermatozoa on susceptibility to cold-shock. Cryobiology 2015, 14, 466–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Lessard, C.; Parent, S.; Leclerc, P.; Bailey, J.L.; Sullivan, R. Cryopreservation alters the levels of the bull sperm surface protein P25b. J. Androl. 2000, 21, 700–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Upadhyay, V.R.; Ramesh, V.; Dewry, R.K.; Kumar, G.; Raval, K.; Patoliya, P. Implications of cryopreservation on structural and functional attributes of bovine spermatozoa: An overview. Andrologia 2021, 53, e14154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ugur, M.R.; Saber Abdelrahman, A.; Evans, H.C.; Gilmore, A.A.; Hitit, M.; Arifiantini, R.I.; Purwantara, B.; Kaya, A.; Memili, E. Avances en la criopreservación de esperma de toro. Front. Vet. Sci. 2019, 6, 268. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bansal, A.K.; Bilaspuri, G.S. Impacts of oxidative stress and antioxidants on sperm functions. Vet. Med. Int. 2010, 2010, 686137. [Google Scholar]
  58. Pereira, R.; Sá, R.; Barros, A.; Sousa, M. Major regulatory mechanisms involved in sperm motility. Asian J. Androl. 2017, 19, 5–14. [Google Scholar]
  59. Santiago-Moreno, J.; Toledano-Díaz, A.; Castaño, C.; Velázquez, R.; Bóveda, P.; O’Brien, E.; Peris-Frau, P.; Pequeño, B.; Martínez-Madrid, B.; Esteso, M.C. Review: Sperm cryopreservation in wild small ruminants: Morphometric, endocrine and molecular basis of cryoresistance. Animal 2023, 17 (Suppl. 1), 100741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Maylem, E.R.S.; Rivera, S.M.; Ramos, G.E.; Atabay, E.C.; Venturina, E.V.; Atabay, E.P. Changes in heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) in water buffalo spermatozoa revealed a capacitation-like event upon cryopreservation. Asian J. Agric. Biol. 2021, 3, 202007412. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rosyada, Z.N.A.; Ulum, M.F.; Tumbelaka, L.I.T.A.; Solihin, D.D.; Purwantara, B.; Memili, E. Implications of sperm heat shock protein 70-2 in bull fertility. Vet. World 2022, 15, 1456–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Porras Vargas, J.L.; Maldonado Castro, G.A.; Rodriguez Molano, C.E. Evaluation Of IATF Protocols With Frozen Vs Refrigerated Sperm in Brahman Cattle. Cienc. Desarro. 2024, 15, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Anel, L.; Alvarez, M.; Martinez-Pastor, F.; Garcia-Macias, V.; Anel, E.; de Paz, P. Improvement Strategies in Ovine Artificial Insemination. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2006, 41 (Suppl. S2), 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Myers, A.; Kasimanickam, R. Laparoscopic artificial insemination in sheep: Review and cost benefit analysis. Clinical Theriogenology 2025, 17, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Sun, W.; Jiang, S.; Su, J.; Zhang, J.; Bao, X.; Ding, R.; Shi, P.; Li, S.; Wu, C.; Zhao, G.; et al. The effects of cryopreservation on the acrosome structure, enzyme activity, motility, and fertility of bovine, ovine, and goat sperm. Anim. Reprod. 2021, 17, e20200219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Salmon, V.M.; Castonguay, F.; Demers-Caron, V.; Leclerc, P.; Bailey, J.L. Cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin improves ram sperm cryoresistance in skim milk-extender. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2017, 177, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Falchi, L.; Galleri, G.; Zedda, M.T.; Pau, S.; Bogliolo, L.; Ariu, F.; Ledda, S. Liquid storage of ram sperm for 96 h: Effects on kinematic parameters, membranes and DNA integrity, and ROS production. Livest. Sci. 2018, 207, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Al-Essawe, E.M.; Johannisson, A.; Wulf, M.; Aurich, C.; Morrell, J.M. Addition of seminal plasma to thawed stallion spermatozoa did not repair cryoinjuries. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2018, 196, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Öztürk, A.E.; Bodu, M.; Bucak, M.N.; Ağır, V.; Özcan, A.; Keskin, N.; İli, P.; Topraggaleh, T.R.; Sidal, H.; Başpınar, N.; et al. The synergistic effect of trehalose and low concentrations of cryoprotectants can improve post-thaw ram sperm parameters. Cryobiology 2020, 95, 157–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Moore, A.I.; Squires, E.L.; y Graham, J.K. Efecto del plasma seminal en la criopreservación de +espermatozoides equinos. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 2372–2381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Aurich, J.; Kuhl, J.; Tichy, A.; Aurich, C. Efficiency of Sperm Cryopreservation in Stallions. Animals 2020, 10, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Oliveira RAde Wolf, C.A.; Viu MAde, O.; Gambarini, M.L. Addition of glutathione to an extender for frozen equine sperm. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2013, 33, 1148–1152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jimenez, S.; del Alamo, M.M.R.; Álvarez-Rodríguez, M.; Olegario Hidalgo, C.; Peña, A.I.; Muiño, R.; Mogas, T. In vitro assessment of egg yolk-, soya bean lecithin- and liposome-based extenders for cryopreservation of dairy bull sperm. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 215, 106315. [Google Scholar]
  74. Aurich, C.; Ortega Ferrusola, C.; Peña Vega, F.J.; Schrammel, N.; Morcuende, D.; Aurich, J. Seasonal changes in the sperm fatty acid composition of Shetland pony stallions. Theriogenology 2018, 107, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Gamboa, S.; Rodrigues, A.S.; Henriques, L.; Batista, C.; Ramalho-Santos, J. Seasonal functional relevance of sperm characteristics in equine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 950–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Contreras, M.J.; Arias, M.E.; Fuentes, F.; Muñoz, E.; Bernecic, N.; Fair, S.; Felmer, R. Cellular and Molecular Consequences of Stallion Sperm Cryopreservation: Recent Approaches to Improve Sperm Survival. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2023, 126, 104499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Gonzalez-Castro, R.A.; Whitcomb, L.A.; Pinsinski, E.C.; Carnevale, E.M. Cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa reduces plasma membrane integrity and phospholipase C zeta 1 content as associated with oocyte activation. Andrology 2024, 12, 918–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bubenickova, F.; Šichtař, J.; Nováčková, L.; Sirohi, J.; Šimoník, O. Structure of sperm subpopulations of stallion spermatozoa after thawing differs between good and bad freezers. Czech J. Animology 2020, 65, 403–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Hernández-Avilés, C.; Ramírez-Agámez, L.; Love, C.C. The relationship between post-thaw sperm quality parameters and blastocyst production following Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) of in vitro-matured equine oocytes. Theriogenology 2025, 244, 117500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yeste, M. Sperm cryopreservation update: Cryodamage, markers, and factors affecting the sperm freezability in pigs. Theriogenology 2016, 85, 47–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Knox, R.V. Fertility of frozen boar sperm when used for artificial insemination. Domest. Animat. Reprod. 2015, 50 (Suppl. 2), 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Yeste, M.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Bonet, S. Artificial insemination with frozen-thawed boar sperm. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 84, 802–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Casas, I.; Sancho, S.; Ballester, J.; Briz, M.; Pinart, E.; Bussalleu, E.; Yeste, M.; Fàbrega, A.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Bonet, S. The HSP90AA1 sperm content and the prediction of the boar ejaculate freezability. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Cerolini, S.; Maldjian, A.; Surai, P.; Noble, R. Viability, susceptibility to peroxidation and fatty acid composition of boar sperm during liquid storage. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 58, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Leahy, T.; Gadella, B.M. Sperm surface changes and physiological consequences induced by sperm handling and storage. Reproduction 2011, 142, 759–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Vadnais, M.L.; Althouse, G.C. Characterization of capacitation, cryoinjury, and the role of seminal plasma in porcine sperm. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 1508–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Flores, E.; Fernández-Novell, J.M.; Peña, A.; Rigau, T.; Rodríguez-Gil, J.E. Cryopreservation-induced alterations in boar spermatozoa mitochondrial function are related to changes in the expression and location of midpiece mitofusin-2 and actin network. Theriogenology 2010, 74, 354–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kumaresan, A.; Siqueira, A.P.; Hossain, M.S.; Johannisson, A.; Eriksson, I.; Wallgren, M.; Bergqvist, A.S. Quantification of kinetic changes in protein tyrosine phosphorylation and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration in boar spermatozoa during cryopreservation. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2012, 24, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Qian, S.; Wei, Z.; Yang, W.; Huang, J.; Yang, Y.; Wang, J. The role of BCL-2 family proteins in regulating apoptosis and cancer therapy. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 985363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Moran, J.M.; Madejon, L.; Ortega Ferrusola, C.; Pena, F.J. Nitric oxide induces caspase activity in boar spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2008, 70, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pezo, F.; Yeste, M.; Zambrano, F.; Uribe, P.; Risopatrón, J.; Sánchez, R. Antioxidants and their effect on the oxidative/nitrosative stress of frozen-thawed boar sperm. Cryobiology 2021, 98, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Santiso, R.; Tamayo, M.; Gosálvez, J.; Johnston, S.; Mari, A.; Fernández, C.; Losada, C.; Fernández, J.L. Mutation Research/Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis DNA Fragmentation Dynamics Allows the Assessment of Cryptic Sperm Damage in Human: Evaluation of Exposure to Ionizing Radiation, Hyperthermia, Acidic pH and Nitric Oxide. Mutat. Res. 2012, 734, 41–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Uribe, P.; Boguen, R.; Treulen, F.; Sanchez, R.; Villegas, J.V. Peroxynitrite-mediated nitrosative stress decreases motility and mitochondral membrane potential in human spermatozoa. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2015, 21, 237–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Pilane, C.M.; Bopape, M.A.; Mapeka, M.H.; Netshirovha, T.R. Assessment of the Susceptibility of Boar Sperm to Oxidative Stress. Open J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 6, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, Y.; Yuan, X.; Ali, M.A.; Qin, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, C. piR-121380 Is Involved in Cryo-Capacitation and Regulates Post-Thawed Boar Sperm Quality Through Phosphorylation of ERK2 via Targeting PTPN7. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2022, 9, 792994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Chanapiwat, P.; Olanratmanee, E.O.; Kaeoket, K.; Tummaruk, P. Conception rate and litter size in multiparous sows after intrauterine insemination using frozen-thawed boar sperm in a commercial swine herd in Thailand. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2014, 76, 1347–1351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pytlík, J.; Stádník, L.; Ducháček, J.; Codl, R. Comparative study of pregnancy rate of dairy cows inseminated with fresh or frozen-thawed sperm. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2020, 68, 573–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Donovan, A.; Hanrahan, J.P.; Kummen, E.; Duffy, P.; Boland, M.P. Fertility in the ewe following cervical insemination with fresh or frozen–thawed sperm at a natural or synchronised oestrus. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2004, 84, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Olesen, I. Effects of cervical insemination with frozen sperm on fertility and litter size of Norwegian sheep. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1993, 37, 169–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Lewis, N.; Morganti, M.; Collingwood, F.; Grove-White, D.H.; McGregor Argo, C. Use of a single dose of frozen–thawed sperm for post-ovulatory mating at a commercial artificial insemination centre: Pregnancy rates and post-mating intrauterine fluid accumulation compared with chilled or fresh sperm insemination. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2015, 35, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Karatzas, G.; Karagiannidis, A.; Varsakeli, S.; Brikas, P. Fertility of fresh and frozen-thawed goat sperm during the nonbreeding season. Theriogenology 1997, 48, 1049–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Rodríguez-Gil, J.E.; Silvers, G.; Flores, E.; Jesús Palomo, M.; Ramírez, A.; Montserrat Rivera, M.; Castro, M.; Brito, M.; Bücher, D.; Correa, J.; et al. Expression of the GM-CSF receptor in ovine spermatozoa: GM-CSF effect on sperm viability and motility of sperm subpopulations after the freezing-thawing process. Theriogenology 2007, 67, 1359–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Vilanova, L.T.; Rauch, M.C.; Mansilla, A.; Zambrano, A.; Brito, M.; Werner, E.; Alfaro, V.; Cox, J.F.; Concha, I.I. Expression of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in male germ cells: GM-CSF enhances sperm motility. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1083–1095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zambrano, A.; Noli, C.; Rauch, M.C.; Werner, E.; Brito, M.; Amthauer, R.; Slebe, J.C.; Vera, J.C.; Concha, I.I. Expression of GM-CSF receptors in male germ cells and their role in signaling for increased glucose and vitamin C transport. J. Cell Biochem. 2001, 80, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Tanhaye Kalate Sabz, F.; Amjadi, F.S.; Zandieh, Z.; Hosseini, E.; Aflatoonian, R.; Tabatabaei, M.; Mohammadian, M.; Ashrafi, M. GM-CSF (granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor) treatment improves sperm parameters in men with oligoasthenoteratospermia via PI3K/AKT pathway. Andrologia 2022, 54, 1618–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Whitty, A.L.; Kind, K.L.; Dunning, K.R.; McPherson, N.O.; Nottle, M.B. Treatment with GM-CSF of frozen bovine sperm improves function, fertilization, and subsequent embryo development. Theriogenology 2025, 235, 46–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Navratil, A.M.; Bliss, S.P.; Berghorn, K.A.; Haughian, J.M.; Farmerie, T.A.; Graham, J.K.; Clay, C.M.; Roberson, M.S. Constitutive localization of the gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor in low-density membrane microdomains is necessary for GnRH signaling to ERK. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 31593–31602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Purdy, P.H.; Graham, J.K. Effect of cholesterol addition to bull sperm membranes on sperm capacitation, acrosome reaction, and fertility. Biol. Reprod. 2004, 71, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Yadav, H.P.; Kumar, A.; Shah, N.; Chauhan, D.S.; Saxena, A.; Yadav, S.; Swain, D.K. Effect of cholesterol-loaded cyclodextrin supplementation on tyrosine phosphorylation and apoptosis-like changes in frozen-thawed Hariana bull spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2017, 96, 164–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Anzar, M.; Rajapaksha, K.; Boswall, L. Egg yolk-free cryopreservation of bull sperm. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Baňas, Š.; Benko, F.; Ďuračka, M.; Lukáč, N.; Tvrdá, E. Epicatechin Prevents Cryocapacitation of Bovine Spermatozoa through Antioxidant Activity and Stabilization of Transmembrane Ion Channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Baňas, Š.; Tvrdá, E.; Benko, F.; Ďuračka, M.; Čmiková, N.; Lukáč, N.; Kačániová, M. Kaempferol as an alternative cryosupplement for bovine spermatozoa: Cytoprotective and membrane-stabilizing effects. Rev. Int. Cienc. Mol. 2024, 25, 4129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Ďuračka, M.; Debacker, M.; Bučko, O.; Lukáč, N.; Tvrdá, E. The effect of kaempferol and naringenin may improve in vitro quality of stored porcine sperm. J. Cent. Eur. Agric. 2019, 20, 1069–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Paucar Quito, J.E.; Alvarado Alvarado, J.C.; Moscoso Piedra, A.L.; Maldonado Cornejo, M.E. Evaluation of three commercial diluents on post-thaw ram sperm. Polo Conoc. 2015, 10, 2542–2566. [Google Scholar]
  115. Fang, X.; Huang, L.L.; Xu, J.; Ma, C.Q.; Chen, Z.H.; Zhang, Z.; Liao, C.H.; Zheng, S.X.; Huang, P.; Xu, W.M.; et al. Proteomics and single-cell RNA analysis of Akap4-knockout mice model confirm indispensable role of Akap4 in spermatogenesis. Dev. Biol. 2019, 454, 118–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Blommaert, D.; Sergeant, N.; Delehedde, M.; Jouy, N.; Mitchell, V.; Franck, T.; Donnay, I.; Lejeune, J.P.; Serteyn, D. Expression, localization, and concentration of A-kinase anchor protein 4 (AKAP4) and its precursor (proAKAP4) in equine sperm: Promising marker correlated to the total and progressive motility in thawed spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2019, 131, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Kwon, W.S.; Oh, S.A.; Kim, Y.J.; Rahman, M.S.; Park, Y.J.; Pang, M.G. Proteomic approaches for profiling negative fertility markers in inferior boar spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rahamim Ben-Navi, L.; Almog, T.; Yao, Z.; Seger, R.; Naor, Z. A-Kinase Anchoring Protein 4 (AKAP4) is an ERK1/2 substrate and a switch molecule between cAMP/PKA and PKC/ERK1/2 in human spermatozoa. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 37922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Nixon, B.; Bernstein, I.R.; Cafe, S.L.; Delehedde, M.; Sergeant, N.; Anderson, A.L.; Trigg, N.A.; Eamens, A.L.; Lord, T.; Dun, M.D.; et al. A Kinase Anchor Protein 4 Is Vulnerable to Oxidative Adduction in Male Germ Cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2019, 7, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Riesco, M.F.; Anel-López, L.; Neila-Montero, M.; Palacín-Martínez, C.; Montes-Garrido, R.; Álvarez, M.; de Paz, P.; Anel, L. ProAKAP4 as novel molecular marker of sperm quality in ram: An integrative study in fresh, cooled and cryopreserved sperm. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Alharbi, Y.M.; Ali, M.; Alharbi, M.S. Impact of the Antioxidant Hydroxytyrosol on the Quality of Post-Thawed Stallion Sperm. Vet. Med. Int. 2024, 2024, 6558480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Du, M.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Wang, N.; He, Q.; Cao, J.; Zhao, B.; Shi, Y.; Li, B.; et al. The effect of resveratrol on the cryopreservation of Mongolian horse sperm. Arch. Anim. Breed. 2025, 68, 27–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Loomis, P.R.; Graham, E.F. Effects of cryopreservation on sperm quality and fertility in horses. Theriogenology 2008, 69, 468–475. [Google Scholar]
  124. Kuleshova, L.L.; Lopata, A. Vitrification can be more favorable than slow cooling. Fertil. Steril. 2002, 78, 449–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wowk, B. Thermodynamic aspects of vitrification. Cryobiology 2010, 60, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Consuegra, C.; Crespo, F.; Dorado, J.; Diaz-Jimenez, M.; Pereira, B.; Ortiz, I.; Hidalgo, M. Vitrification of stallion sperm using 0.25 ml straws: Effect of volume, concentration and carbohydrates (sucrose/trehalose/raffinose). Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 206, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Hidalgo, M. Sperm vitrification in horses and donkeys. J. Equine Vet. Sci. 2025, 145, 105340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wang, S.C.; Wu, Y.Y.; Chen, M.C. Predicting the cryotolerance of boar sperm through antioxidant stress. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2024, 59, e14554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wang, K.; Jiao, H.; Cheng, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, S.; Liu, G.; Meng, F.; Zhan, F.; Yang, F. Proteomic Analysis of Differences in the Freezability of Porcine Sperm Identifies α-Amylase As a Key Protein. J. Proteome Res. 2024, 23, 2641–2650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Li, C.; Liu, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Tan, M.; He, B. Protective Effects of Betaine on Boar Sperm Quality during Liquid Storage and Transport. Animals 2024, 14, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Lee, S.; Kim, Y.M.; Cheong, H.T.; Park, C.K.; Lee, S.H. Effect of Magnetized Freezing Extender on Membrane Damages, Motility, and Fertility of Boar Sperm Following Cryopreservation. Animals 2023, 13, 634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Wang, L.; Xiong, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Ma, S.; Jiang, S.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X. Polydopamine-based nano-protectant for prolonged boar sperm preservation by eliminating ROS and regulating protein phosphorylation via D2DR-mediated cAMP/PKA signaling pathway. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2025, 23, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hallberg, H.; Eklund, M.; Sundell, L.; Wången, G. Evaluation of AndroStar Premium for sperm storage at 4 °C and its effects on DNA integrity and fertilizing ability. J. Reprod. Biotechnol. 2024, 29, 112–120. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Comparison of the plasma membrane structure of sperm before and after freezing. On the left, a plasma membrane before freezing, with a homogeneous lipid bilayer. On the right, it can be seen how freezing causes structural alterations, such as alteration of membrane fluidity, rupture of the lipid bilayer, and loss of proteins and cholesterol. The elements in the figure are numbered as follows: 1—cholesterol, 2—peripheral protein, 3—integral protein, and 4—phospholipids (including both heads and tails, which together compose the lipid bilayer). Created using BioRender.com.
Figure 1. Comparison of the plasma membrane structure of sperm before and after freezing. On the left, a plasma membrane before freezing, with a homogeneous lipid bilayer. On the right, it can be seen how freezing causes structural alterations, such as alteration of membrane fluidity, rupture of the lipid bilayer, and loss of proteins and cholesterol. The elements in the figure are numbered as follows: 1—cholesterol, 2—peripheral protein, 3—integral protein, and 4—phospholipids (including both heads and tails, which together compose the lipid bilayer). Created using BioRender.com.
Animals 15 01808 g001
Figure 2. Sperm vitrification process step by step: (1) preparation of the cryoprotectant solution, (2) deposit the sperm sample in the straw horizontally, (3) place this straw inside a larger straw and seal the edges to prevent contamination, (4) use forceps in the center to handle the straw, (5) deposit the straw in a container with liquid nitrogen for rapid freezing, and (6) store the straw at −196 °C for long-term preservation. This procedure ensures efficient preservation of the sperm. Created using BioRender.com.
Figure 2. Sperm vitrification process step by step: (1) preparation of the cryoprotectant solution, (2) deposit the sperm sample in the straw horizontally, (3) place this straw inside a larger straw and seal the edges to prevent contamination, (4) use forceps in the center to handle the straw, (5) deposit the straw in a container with liquid nitrogen for rapid freezing, and (6) store the straw at −196 °C for long-term preservation. This procedure ensures efficient preservation of the sperm. Created using BioRender.com.
Animals 15 01808 g002
Table 1. Interspecies comparison of sperm membrane properties and cryopreservation-induced damage in domestic species.
Table 1. Interspecies comparison of sperm membrane properties and cryopreservation-induced damage in domestic species.
SpeciesCholesterol/PhospholipidMembrane FluiditySusceptibility to Cold ShockPost-Thaw Motility (%)Main Cryopreservation Damage
Bovine+++++>50–70%Minimal functional changes
Ovine++++++40–60%Membrane fragmentation, loss of acrosome
Stallion++++++30–60%Oxidative stress, membrane and DNA damage
Boar+++++++<30%Cold shock, apoptosis, mitochondrial damage
The data in this table were extracted and summarized from the main text for clarity and comparative purposes. The relative levels of cholesterol/phospholipid ratio, membrane fluidity, and susceptibility to cold shock are indicated using the following scale: +++ = high, ++ = intermediate, + = low.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castro, M.; Leal, K.; Pezo, F.; Contreras, M.J. Sperm Membrane: Molecular Implications and Strategies for Cryopreservation in Productive Species. Animals 2025, 15, 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808

AMA Style

Castro M, Leal K, Pezo F, Contreras MJ. Sperm Membrane: Molecular Implications and Strategies for Cryopreservation in Productive Species. Animals. 2025; 15(12):1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castro, Macarena, Karla Leal, Felipe Pezo, and María José Contreras. 2025. "Sperm Membrane: Molecular Implications and Strategies for Cryopreservation in Productive Species" Animals 15, no. 12: 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808

APA Style

Castro, M., Leal, K., Pezo, F., & Contreras, M. J. (2025). Sperm Membrane: Molecular Implications and Strategies for Cryopreservation in Productive Species. Animals, 15(12), 1808. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15121808

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop