Next Article in Journal
Calmodulin Contributes to Lipolysis and Inflammatory Responses in Clinical Ketosis Cows through the TLR4/IKK/NF-κB Pathway
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Pediococcus pentosaceus GT001 on Performance, Meat Quality, Immune Function, Antioxidant and Cecum Microbial in Broiler Chickens Challenged by Salmonella typhimurium
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Simulated Swine Digestion and Gut Microbiota Fermentation of Hydrolyzed Copra Meal

Animals 2024, 14(11), 1677; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111677
by Jurairat Rungruangsaphakun 1, Francis Ayimbila 1,2, Massalin Nakphaichit 1,2 and Suttipun Keawsompong 1,2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Animals 2024, 14(11), 1677; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14111677
Submission received: 25 April 2024 / Revised: 20 May 2024 / Accepted: 22 May 2024 / Published: 4 June 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Pigs)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Introduction- I suggest expanding the introduction with more information about MOS health benefits and their impact on modulation of the gut microbiota

56  I suggest change from  “According to [8] copra […]” to “According to Prayoonthien  et al., 2018 copra […]KUB-E010 growth [8,9].”

115 Please, rewrite „ 2.5 Feces collection and analysis of intestinal microbiota structure” in more understandable English

How did the authors ensure that the samples were not additionally contaminated (i.e  by the collector) from the collection process to the inoculation stage?

NGS sequencing/library preparation/bioinformatics – was it outsourced or done directly by the authors ?

References – many references used by authors are older than 5 year old, if possible please use more up-to-date references

From my point of view I would like to suggest two ideas for the authors for the further research.

a) trying some kind of symbiotic preparation
b) testing how HCM affects wanted and unwanted microbiota

Comments on the Quality of English Language

115 Please, rewrite „ 2.5 Feces collection and analysis of intestinal microbiota structure” in more understandable English

Author Response

We already revised our manuscript accordingly in the PDF file attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

Strictly follow my comments/corrections in the attached file, my general comments are as follows:

1. In the introduction section, the need for the study should be ideally raised followed by the hypothesis of the study.

2. In statistical analysis, add a mathematical model for a better understanding of data analysis.

3. In the results and discussion section, add logical reasoning for each result before discussing with the previous studies. 

4. In the conclusion section, add the limitations and implications of the study. 

 

Thank You!

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We already revised our manuscript accordingly in the PDF file attached

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Good manuscript.

Back to TopTop