Next Article in Journal
Tenuipalpus Sensu Lato Donnadieu (Acari: Prostigmata: Tenuipalpidae); New Species Groups, a New Species, and Keys to the World Species
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Genetic Origin of Honeybees and Climate on Prevalence and Infestation Levels of Varroa
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Zoonotic Microparasites in Invasive Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from Small Islands in Central Italy

1
Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin, Largo Paolo Braccini, 2, 10095 Grugliasco, Italy
2
Directorate for Natural Capital, Latium Region, Parks and Protected Areas, Viale del Tintoretto 432, 00142 Rome, Italy
3
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Firenze, Via Madonna del Piano 6, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
4
Parco Nazionale Arcipelago Toscano, Loc. Enfola, 57037 Portoferraio, Italy
5
Nature and Environment Management Operators SRL (NEMO), Piazza Massimo D’Azeglio 11, 50121 Florence, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(20), 3279; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203279
Submission received: 29 September 2023 / Revised: 18 October 2023 / Accepted: 19 October 2023 / Published: 20 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Topic Zoonotic Vector-Borne Diseases of Companion Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Invasive species negatively affect native populations through predation, competition, and the potential introduction of health threats, such as parasites. Black rats (Rattus rattus) are among the worst invaders of islands, and a significant source of parasites infecting humans and other animals. This study conducted a screening for zoonotic and veterinary-relevant microparasites in wild rats from small islands in central Italy, including the Pontine Islands and Pianosa, where the primary hosts of the selected parasites were either absent or scarce. The aim was to investigate the potential role of rats as their host. Rats were kill-trapped and molecular analyses were performed on different tissues to identify microparasite presence. Results confirm that invasive species such as rats may contribute to an elevated parasitological threat to local wildlife and human communities in specific ecosystems. Notably, we documented the first record of Babesia divergens, typically associated with cattle and wild ungulates, in wild rats. Additionally, we confirmed the presence of Leishmania infantum on an island without dogs, which have traditionally been considered the primary hosts. Our study helps to document parasite distribution and interactions between parasites and introduced invasive hosts, and represents useful knowledge to inform public health and wildlife management policy.

Abstract

Invasive species have a detrimental impact on native populations, particularly in island ecosystems, and they pose a potential zoonotic and wildlife threat. Black rats (Rattus rattus) are invasive species that disrupt native flora and fauna on islands and serve as potential competent reservoirs for various pathogens and parasites. Microparasites screening was conducted in rat populations from small islands in central Italy (the Pontine Islands and Pianosa) with the aim of assessing the role of rats in maintaining infections, particularly in cases where key reservoir hosts were scarce or absent. We focused on microparasites of zoonotic and veterinary relevance. A total of 53 rats was kill-trapped and target tissues were analysed with molecular techniques. We observed the absence or very low prevalence of Anaplasma spp., while Babesia was found in rats from all locations, marking the first recorded instance of Babesia divergens in wild rats. Data from Pianosa strongly suggest the presence of an autochthonous Leishmania infantum cycle in the Tuscan archipelago islands. Neospora caninum was absent from all islands, even in areas where dogs, the main reservoirs, were present. Toxoplasma gondii was only recorded on the Pontine Islands, where genotyping is needed to shed light on infection dynamics. This study confirms that invasive species, such as rats, may be responsible for maintaining an increased parasitological threat to fauna and human communities in certain ecosystems.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Islands, and especially small islands, are privileged sites for epidemiological investigations. This is because of their isolation, the uniqueness of their host–parasite associations, and the generally detailed information regarding their biogeography. Furthermore, island ecosystems are especially prone to the negative consequences of alien species introductions [1,2]. Alien and invasive species may include parasites able to infect native species, leading to the establishment of new epidemiological dynamics [3]. In this context, invasive animal populations may also represent a threat to human health, either introducing new zoonotic parasites [4] or amplifying existing zoonotic threats [5,6]. Thus, increased knowledge related to parasitism and processes driving parasite distribution among native and introduced fauna is a conservation and public health issue.
Black rats (Rattus rattus Linnaeus, 1758) are known to be among the worst invaders of island ecosystems, negatively affecting flora, fauna and ecosystem functions [7,8]. This species displays a high reproductive potential, opportunistically exploits a wide range of food sources, and lacks significant predators as well as competitors [8]. For example, they heavily predate upon seabirds at all life stages including the eggs, nestlings and adults [9], and of a large range of other vertebrate, invertebrate and plant taxa [2,10,11]. This behaviour has been observed on Mediterranean islands [12], including Italian ones, where the black rat represents by far the most widespread terrestrial mammal, occurring on about 80% of the islands [13,14]. In addition, rats are an important source of pathogens for humans [15,16], targeted by several eradication programs, including on the small islands of central Italy, the region of focus in this study [17,18]. Rodent-borne pathogens comprise some of the most important emergent and re-emergent zoonoses. Rodents are one of the taxa with the highest zoonotic potential worldwide, representing a significant public health concern [19,20,21], most likely due to their life traits (e.g., early sexual maturity, high reproductive rate, large litters) [22]. In Italy, rats have been confirmed to be competent hosts of a wide range of potentially zoonotic pathogens and parasites: Hantavirus (cases of haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome—HFRS); Cryptosporidium parvum (cryptosporidiosis); Leishmania infantum (leishmaniosis); Leptospira interrogans (leptospirosis); Rickettsia conorii (Mediterranean spotted fever); Rickettsia typhi (murine typhus); Salmonella enteridis (salmonellosis); Streptobacillus moniliformis and Spirillum minus (rat-bite fever); Toxoplasma gondii (toxoplasmosis) [23].
Hence, invasive rats may be responsible for maintaining an increased parasitological threat to fauna and human communities on islands, as observed by the high prevalence and diversity of helminths harboured by rats on Christmas Island (Australia) [24]. On Montecristo island (Italy), rats were found to be a competent reservoir of L. infantum, able to maintain the epidemiological cycle in the absence of the main reservoir host (i.e., dog) [25]. T. gondii sampled from invasive black rats on a Brazilian island showed high genetic variability, suggesting that adaptations to new environmental conditions and hosts may also lead to variations in virulence and pathogenicity [26]. Understanding rat-associated pathogens and parasites is crucial for disease-control policy, especially on islands, where local epidemiological dynamics are altered by invasive rat populations and their parasites. Parasitological surveys of invasive species are also recommended in eradication frameworks; invasive parasites may survive the eradication of their invasive hosts, representing a potential threat to native populations [27].
Babesia spp. and Theileria spp. are protozoan parasites transmitted mainly by tick vectors, with a tropism for erythrocytes and/or leukocytes of a wide range of domestic and wildlife species [28]. Babesia spp. are among the most common parasites found in mammals’ blood [29], with reports of zoonotic infections not only from the most common B. divergens, but also from the rodent specific B. microti [30]. Some species of Theileria spp. are highly pathogenic to cattle and may cause significant mortality, while other are considered to be less pathogenic, but may cause clinical signs in stressed, immunodeficient, or malnourished individuals [28,31,32]. Although piroplasmosis is a frequent and disrupting disease in domestic animals [33], many uncertainties remain regarding its epidemiological dynamics in Ixodid tick vectors and vertebrate hosts, especially concerning wildlife host–vector–parasite dynamics [34,35,36].
Members of the genera Ehrlichia and Anaplasma are obligate intracellular bacteria, targeting host granulocytes or monocytes. Transmitted by Ixodid ticks, they are responsible for rickettsiosis, an infection of veterinary importance in livestock and companion animals [37]. Following the reorganisation of the Anaplasmatacea family, E. equi and E. phagocytophila, previously known as agents of human granulocytic ehrlichiosis, are now collectively referred to as A. phagocytophilum [38]. However, not all strains are pathogenic for humans, and the epidemiological cycle is still poorly understood due to a large number of potential reservoir hosts, the broad distribution and extensive niches of tick vector species and the various bacterial genotypes identified [39].
L. infantum (parasitic protozoan of the order Trypanosomatida) is the cause of leishmaniosis, a severe disease of domestic and wild animals transmitted by Phlebotomus sandflies [40]. Cells of the phagocytic mononuclear system represent the preferential niche of this parasite. Although widespread and highly prevalent in many areas, the transmission role of different mammalian host species of Leishmania spp. is still unclear [41]. It has been suggested that the black rat is a competent reservoir host for L. infantum, since recent studies support the hypothesis of sylvatic cycles of leishmaniosis independent from dogs; yet, the latter are still considered to be the main reservoir of infection [25,42].
T. gondii and Neospora caninum are coccidian parasites able to infect a wide range of warm-blooded vertebrates. The definitive hosts of the first are felids, while canids act as definitive hosts for the latter [43]. Small mammals, and rodents in particular, are essential intermediate hosts of both protozoa, representing a source of infections for final and paratenic hosts [44,45]. These parasites have a zoonotic, veterinary, and economic relevance. T. gondii is one of the most widespread zoonotic parasites, and it may cause clinical signs in humans, as well as domestic and wildlife species [26,46]. N. caninum is one of the primary causes of abortion in bovines. In addition, it causes reproductive disruption in small ruminant species and clinical manifestations in dogs [47].
In the context of eradication campaigns on small islands in central Italy (the Pontine Islands and Pianosa—Tuscan archipelago), an epidemiological screening was conducted to ascertain the presence and the prevalence of microparasites of zoonotic significance. The aim was to evaluate the potential reservoir role of rats in sustaining infections of directly borne and vector-borne microparasites in areas where the key reservoir species were absent or limited. Islands included in this study present different degrees of isolation, and different wildlife and domestic species communities. The Pontine Islands are inhabited and considered a popular tourist destination. Pianosa has not been permanently inhabited for the past 20 years, with no farming activities and a high degree of isolation. Zoonotic diseases are currently a significant threat to human health due to anthropogenic environmental changes. For example, in the context of vector-borne diseases, these changes alter vector distribution and the frequency of infection [48], and rodents play a major role in their life cycle [15,49]. Thus, microparasites of zoonotic and veterinary relevance were selected for screening purposes: Babesia spp., Theileria spp., Anaplasma spp., and Ehrlichia spp. (all the previously mentioned parasites transmitted by ticks); L. infantum (transmitted by sand-flies); and the directly transmitted T. gondii and Neospora caninum coccidia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

The study area included three small islands in the Pontine Islands (Ponza, Ventotene, and Palmarola), and the small island of Pianosa (Tuscan archipelago), all located in the Mediterranean sea off the coast of central Italy (Figure 1).
Ponza is the largest of the Pontine Islands, measuring 7.5 km2, and it is located 33 km south of Cape Circeo. It has been inhabited since the Neolithic, housing a current population of around 3300 people. It is characterised by maquis shrubland type vegetation cover, hosting several Mediterranean faunal species, notably resident and migratory birds. Ventotene has an area of 1.75 km2 and is located 33 km off the coast of the town of Gaeta; the current permanent human population is less than 1000 people. This island was originally covered by woodlands dominated by Quercus ilex together with maquis shrubland. Although the island is still a significant hotspot for migratory birds—e.g., Scopoli’s shearwater (Calonectris diomedea) and the Mediterranean shearwater (Puffinus yelkouan) —, the original habitats have been subjected to major anthropogenic disturbance. Palmarola is the third largest island in the archipelago, after Ponza and Ventotene, respectively, with an area of 1.36 km2. It is located 10 km west of Ponza and it entirely designated as a site of community importance (SIC) under the Habitat Directive (92/43/CEE), especially because of the significance of its bird species diversity (e.g., yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis), peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus), great cormorant (Phalacrocorax carbo)). While not permanently inhabited by humans, it hosts an established population of alien goats introduced in the 1990s, which have damaged the pristine habitats. Similarly to the goats, another invasive alien species has been disturbing native ones, not only on Palmarola but also on Ponza and Ventotene: the black rat (Rattus rattus). Species of wild terrestrial mammals are all extinct from these islands, while domestic species including dogs, cats, and rabbits are present.
Due to their naturalistic value, these islands were elected for black rat eradication. The European LIFE project “PonDerat” (LIFE14 NAT/IT/000544) was implemented, among other biosecurity and conservation aims, to eradicate rats and other invasive species from the Pontine Islands. Globally, the black rat has been recognised to negatively affect native species and their habitats [12,50], and locally it greatly impacts seabird populations, whose chicks are heavily predated upon [17].
Pianosa is an unpopulated island, part of the Tuscan archipelago, located 14 km southwest of the island of Elba. Only a few people per day are allowed to set foot on it, as it is a protected natural area (Tuscan Archipelago National Park). Rarely, small groups of tourists can stay overnight at the small inn managed by volunteers and convicted prisoners who reside on Elba. Pianosa is an island of 10.25 km2 which was used as a penal colony from 1856 until 1998. The vegetation is characterised by rockrose (Cistus monspeliensis), rosemary (Rosmarinus officinalis), germander (Teucrium fruticans and T. flavum), and bushy varieties of mastic (Pistacia lentiscus) and olive (Olea europea). Wildlife species includes several species of birds (resident and migratory) and bats of significant conservation value as well as the brown hare (Lepus europaeus); invasive alien species are represented by the black rat (Rattus rattus) and the house mouse (Mus musculus). While the penal colony was in operation, livestock was present.
Similarly to the Pontine, Pianosa and other islands in the same archipelago (designated as Natura 2000 sites) were prioritised for rat eradication (LIFE13 NAT/IT/000471—RESTO CON LIFE “Island conservation in Tuscany, restoring habitat not only for birds”). Indeed, black rats have been recognised to be extremely harmful to the ecosystems of this island [8,14].

2.2. Rat Sampling, DNA Extraction and PCR Analysis

Black rats were trapped using TRex snap rat traps (Bell Laboratories Inc., Madison, WI, USA) as part of preliminary work for their eradication in the context of the abovementioned LIFE projects (ethical approval and standardised methodologies are detailed in project reports (PonDerat (LIFE14 NAT/IT/000544) http://www.ponderat.eu/documenti/pagine/life14_nat_it_000544_definitivo_2.PDF [accessed on 25 September 2022]; RESTO CON LIFE (LIFE13 NAT/IT/000471) https://www.restoconlife.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PE_Ratti_Pianosa.pdf [accessed on 25 September 2022]). Sampling took place in spring 2017 on the Pontine Islands, and spring 2015 on Pianosa. Traps were placed randomly on the islands and set to be operational overnight, for a total of 5 trap nights per site. Captures were collected in the morning and stored at −20 °C until necropsy. Carcasses were thawed overnight at room temperature before necropsy, during which sex, age class, and external/internal abnormalities were recorded. Body condition was determined for each animal using the linear regression of body mass on total body length (tip of the nose to anus) [51]. To avoid cross-contamination, a sterile scalpel was used to collect each sample.
Total genomic DNA was extracted from each sample of the spleen (≈10 mg) [52], skeletal muscle (≈25 mg of quadriceps femoris), kidney (≈25 mg) and central nervous system (CNS) (≈25 mg of brain homogenate) [43] using a commercial kit (GenEluteTM Mammalian Genomic MiniPrepKit, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Spleen samples were tested for Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. PCR analysis was performed with the primer pair PER1/PER2, amplifying a 452 bp portion of the 16S rRNA of the Ehrlichia-Anaplasma group [53]. Spleen samples were tested for Babesia spp. with a PCR protocol targeting the V4 hyper-variable region of the 18S ribosomal RNA gene [28]. A constant and specific fragment of L. infantum kDNA was amplified from spleen samples using an mRV1–mRV2 primer pair [52]. The skeletal muscle, kidney, and CNS were tested for N. caninum and T. gondii. N. caninum DNA was detected using the Nsp6Plus–Nsp21Plus primer pair [43]. A specific 575bp-long fragment of the T. gondii ITS1 region was targeted using primers TOX3- and TOX4 [43] with regard to the samples from Pianosa, while samples from the Pontine Islands were analysed through the LAMP protocol described in [54], which amplifies a fragment of the SAG2 gene. The two methodologies were proven comparable in establishing the parasite prevalence [54]. Positive and negative control samples were included in each PCR assay and standard precautions were taken to avoid contamination. PCR positive samples were purified and sequenced (BMR Genomics, Padua, Italy). Obtained sequences were compared to the ones available in the GenBank to confirm the parasite’s identification. Only sequences returning with 100% identity and cover with those found in GenBank deposits are reported in this study.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Prevalence calculations and statistical analyses were performed using the R version 4.2.1 [55]. The statistical tests used were as follows: chi-square test to compare the frequency of infection on the Pontine Islands; logistic regression implemented using the glm function in the stats package with a binomial family and logit link, to investigate the significance of sex, weight, and other host biometric variables in determining individual infection risk.

3. Results

The total number of rats sampled was 53, including 38 on the three Pontine Islands (7 on Ponza, 18 on Ventotene and 13 on Palmarola), and 15 on Pianosa (Table 1). The male-to-female ratio was balanced (Table 1), and no relevant abnormalities were recorded. No rodents were found in poor body conditions. Five individuals (13.6%) from the Pontine Islands were infested by the flea Nosopsyllus fasciatus, while two individuals (13.3%) from Pianosa presented ticks of the genus Ixodes (no further identification as it was beyond the scope of the study).

3.1. Parasite Prevalence in Rats from the Pontine Islands

No individuals were found positive for Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. or N. caninum (0.00%; CI 95% 0.00–9.18%), while 14 rats, mainly trapped on Ventotene and Palmarola, tested positive for Babesia spp./Theileria spp. (36.84%; CI 95% 23.38–52.72%) (Table 1). However, there was no significant difference between the sites ( χ 2 = 0.25, df = 2, p = 0.88). All the sequences obtained were Babesia spp., belonging to the species B. microti and B. microti-like (100% homology and coverage with GenBank sequences). Logistic regression revealed that sex, weight, and other biometric variables were not significant in determining the infection risk. L. infantum was found in the spleen of two rats (5.26%; CI 95% 1.46–17.29%), both females from Ventotene (Table 1). T. gondii was found in the samples from 16 individuals (42.11%; CI 95% 27.85–57.81%) (Table 1). The skeletal muscle rather than CNS and kidney was the most reliable sample to detect positivity. In this case, the prevalence was higher in individuals from Palmarola and Ponza, but the difference in site prevalence was not significant ( χ 2 = 0.16, df = 2, p = 0.92). Similarly to Babesia, logistic regression revealed that no potential risk factor taken into account in the study was significant.

3.2. Parasite Prevalence in Rats from Pianosa

A single rat was found to test positive for Anaplasma spp./Ehrlichia spp. (6.67%; CI 95% 0.00–19.73%) (Table 1); sequencing results showed 100% homology and coverage with A. phagocytophilum. This rat was also positive for Babesia spp. (sequence showed 100% homology and coverage with GenBank sequences). Out of the 15 rodent spleens tested, 12 tested positive for Babesia spp./Theileria spp. (80.00%; CI 95% 59.05–100.00%) (Table 1). PCR positive samples were purified and sequenced, and the sequences included B. divergens (1 sample), Theileria sp. (1 sample), and B. microti/B. microti-like (10 samples). Leishmania sp. positive samples numbered 4 (26.67%; CI 95% 3.50–49.83%), of which sequencing confirmed to be L. infantum (Table 1). No individuals were found to test positive for N. caninum or T. gondii (0.00%; CI 95% 0.00–19.73%) (Table 1).

4. Discussion

In the context of black rat eradications on small islands, funded through European LIFE programmes, individuals were sampled on four small islands in central Italy, off the coast of Tuscany and Latium, three of which are part of the Pontine Islands (Ponza, Ventotene and Palmarola) and one belongs to the Tuscan archipelago (Pianosa). The number of individuals captured was comparable among the four islands and consistent with other trapping sessions conducted in the context of those rat eradication projects. In general, sampled rats exhibited a balanced male-to-female ratio and showed no signs of malnutrition or abnormalities.
No individuals from the Pontine Islands tested positive for Anaplasma spp., while only a single rat from Pianosa tested positive. Subsequent screenings reported no positive samples for Anaplasma spp. [56]. In Europe, Anaplasma spp. displays a great variation in prevalence among rodents and associated ticks (e.g., [39,57,58,59]). Its persistence seems to be determined by the presence of ungulates, considered the main reservoir hosts [35,58,60,61], and availability of preferred rodent and tick species [59,62]. However, similarly to what has been hypothesised for Borrelia sp. transmission, bird species may play a role in introducing and sustaining infection [58,63]. Hence, it is plausible that the positive rat on Pianosa may have been exposed to an infected tick carried by a migrating bird [64]. An alternative explanation for the absence or the low prevalence of these microparasites may be short-lived rodent infections [60,65]. In England, ticks, rather than rodents, seem to maintain the infection over winter, with high seasonally detectable rodent infections in summer and autumn [65]. This is associated with seasonal peaks of I. trianguliceps (small mammal specialist tick) nymphs and adults [65]. In this study, black rats were sampled in spring, and rodents may have already cleared the infection. Nevertheless, this cannot be confirmed and needs further investigation through sampling rats and relative ticks in different seasons on islands where eradication is still underway. Due to the very low prevalence of Anaplasma spp. recorded in hosts, priority should be given to tick sampling and screening as a better strategy to assess the zoonotic risk.
High positivity in all locations was found for Babesia spp./Theileria spp., with the highest prevalence of 80% on Pianosa. Interestingly, later rat screening on Pianosa showed no Babesia presence among the sampled rats [56]. On the Pontine Islands, the positivity was higher (although not statistically significant) on the more isolated islands, Ventotene and Palmarola. The reason may have been the presence of a goat population, able to amplify the tick population and increase transmission, or the abundance of migrating birds, potentially introducing infected ticks. Comparable high prevalences of B. microti were reported in field voles, where the infection is usually sub-clinical and persistent, with individuals remaining PCR positive for years [66,67]. Our sequencing results identified strains of B. divergens, Theileria sp., and B. microti on Pianosa while on Pontine, only B. microti and B. microti-like were recorded. These species are known to have records of zoonotic infections [30,68,69].
In Europe, B. divergens, whose main reservoir is cattle, is traditionally considered the major Babesia species of zoonotic relevance. Recently, the zoonotic significance of the rodent specific B. microti complex has been reassessed due to its increasing involvement in human babesiosis [69]. Cattle have been absent from Pianosa for 20 years, so we hypothesise that the rat found infected by B. divergens may have acquired it through a tick transported by a migrating bird. Alternatively, rats or other species occurring on the island such as hares (B. divergens has been isolated in Lagomorpha, e.g., [70]) could represent competent reservoir for this Babesia, able to maintain an autonomous cycle. Further investigation into ticks and alternative host species (e.g., xenodiagnoses) is needed to better understand host–vector–parasite associations. To our knowledge, this is the first record of B. divergens recorded in a rodent, although it was reported to be cultured in rat erythrocytes [71]. This is a significant and novel finding of this study, although no further speculation can be made on epidemiological dynamics. The sequence identified as Theileria sp. was not identified at a species level, but domestic and wild ungulates, a common reservoir of the Theileria species [72], were not present on Pianosa. It is hypothesised that an infected tick was introduced by a migrating bird, but further investigations are needed to draw definitive conclusions. B. microti and B. microti-like were reported in rats from all locations, posing a potentially significant zoonotic risk. More in-depth investigations of Babesia-vector dynamics are needed to assess this risk, as the parasite is mainly vectored by the small mammal specialist I. trianguliceps, whose ability (and frequency) to feed on humans is still debated [73].
On the Pontine Islands, L. infantum was recorded in ~5% of sampled rats, while prevalence of infection on Pianosa was five times higher. The presence of the protozoan at such a low prevalence in black rats from Pontine, compared to Pianosa, was somewhat unexpected. Firstly, the main reservoir is present (although limited) on the Pontine Islands, and secondly, these islands are in the proximity of hyperendemic areas [74,75]. On Pianosa, where black rats exhibited a much higher prevalence, dogs are absent. Analogously, on Montecristo, another island of the Tuscan archipelago targeted for rat eradication, high prevalence was recorded despite the absence of dogs [25]. Further investigations are needed to confirm the existence of an autonomous cycle of Leishmania on Tuscan archipelago islands, where the introduction of infected rats in recent years can be ruled out. A larger sample size and vector sampling are essential to evaluate the actual parasite circulation as well as xenodiagnostic studies to ascertain black rats as competent reservoir hosts [76,77,78]. Nevertheless, it has been observed that other species, including rats, are able to sustain a Leishmania sylvatic cycle, in the absence of or in the presence of a limited numbers of dogs [25,40,41]. Rodents have also been found to be responsible for the emergence of new foci of cutaneous leishmaniosis in different countries [79,80,81].
T. gondii was recorded at a high prevalence on Palmarola and Ponza, but no rats from Pianosa tested positive. This may corroborate the absence of the protozoan from isolated islands of the Tuscan archipelago (see [25]). On the Pontine Islands, the high prevalence suggests a wide circulation of the protozoan, although the mechanisms of transmission could not be investigated and this study could not link directly the infection status of cats and rats. The high parasite circulation may be due to the dynamics between black rats, intermediate hosts, and definitive hosts, i.e., cats. On a small island in Japan, the life cycle and sexual reproduction of T. gondii seemed to be accelerated by predator–prey interactions between cats and black rats, resulting in high local infection levels [82]. Alternatively, high local infections may be due to the abundance of other intermediate hosts capable of amplifying the infection, such as migratory birds. These are recognised as intermediate hosts of T. gondii [83,84] and are heavily preyed upon by black rats [8]. High genetic variability of this parasite observed in black rats from an island in Brazil demonstrated its high capacity for adaptation in an insular environment, which may influence virulence and pathogenicity [26]. Interestingly, Pianosa (as well as Montecristo [25]), where no T. gondii was recorded, is an equally important roosting site for seabirds and other migratory species [14,17]. In the Tuscan archipelago, the possible role of wild birds in T. gondii epidemiology remains to be evaluated. Different bird species assemblages and their relative abundance in different islands may determine these differences in parasite transmission. Identification of the circulating genotypes may clarify the geographic distribution and hosts specificity to formulate hypotheses on introduction and transmission pathways [85]. N. caninum was not recorded in any rat sampled in this study, although dogs, the common reservoir of this parasite, are present on the Pontine Islands. The reason could not be ascertained, as the main reservoir and other wildlife species considered able to host this protozoan [86] were not tested. Thus, the dynamics of N. caninum in our study area need to be further investigated.
In this study, two cases of co-infection were reported. A single rat from a Pontine island was co-infected by B. microti and Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (s.l.), namely the aetiological agent of Lyme disease (LD) in humans (results of B. burgdorferi s.l. infections were not presented in this study as they are part of another epidemiological screening). The second co-infection case was found on Pianosa, where the rat infected by Anaplasma was also positive for B. microti. The first co-infection is widely reported in the literature, and it has been linked not only to an increase in transmission and emergence of B. microti in the enzootic cycle, but also to a greater disease severity and duration of LD in humans [87,88]. Co-infections involving A. phagocytophilum are considered generally less common, and in small mammals co-infections with B. microti were not significant [89]. Nonetheless, the association with B. microti has been previously reported in Ixodes ticks [90], in Rattus [91], and in humans [92]. Concurrent circulation of multiple parasites (or pathogens) in host populations is common in nature and within-host dynamics affect parasite virulence [93]. Parasites may have agonistic or antagonistic effects, determining different outcomes in terms of infection patterns, increasing or decreasing each other’s prevalence at the population level [94]. Comprehending co-infections (and antagonistic interactions) is imperative because understanding microparasite dynamics leads to improved prediction and control of parasites and disease within natural populations [95]. In the case of a small, isolated island invaded by an alien species capable of disrupting host– (vector) –parasite dynamics, understanding co-infections is key from a conservation, public health and veterinary point of view. Parasites introduced with invasive hosts may spread to native species, interacting with native parasite/pathogens (and vice versa), increasing disease risk; and this effect may have the potential to persist in the system after the eradication of invasive species [27].

5. Conclusions

All protozoa documented in this study present a potential zoonotic risk, underscoring the significance of such screening not only from ecological and veterinary perspectives but also from a public health standpoint. Our primary findings provided support for the hypothesis of short-lived infections of Anaplasma spp. in wild rodents. We reported the first instance of B. divergens in wild rats and provided evidence for the presence of an autochthonous L. infantum cycle in the Tuscan archipelago islands. Additionally, we observed the absence of N. caninum across all islands, even in areas where dogs were present.
While our results provided valuable insights, they would have benefited from a larger sample size, particularly through sampling campaigns conducted throughout various seasons to capture short-lived infections like those from A. phagocytophilum. Furthermore, for future assessments of zoonotic risk, it is advisable to sample vectors and other potential hosts. Despite the relatively small sample size, co-infections were detected. These should be thoroughly investigated within the context of invasive species eradication on island ecosystems because introduced generalist parasites that can be shared between invasive and native hosts may affect the latter both before and after eradication [3,27].
This study reaffirms the theory that invasive species, such as rats, could be accountable for sustaining an elevated parasitological threat to fauna and human communities in specific ecosystems [24]. This concern may be further exacerbated by the current backdrop of environmental changes, including climate change, which can alter the distribution of parasites and their vectors [96]. Consequently, this study includes useful knowledge on parasite geographical distribution and host interactions, offering key insights to inform public health and wildlife management policies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Z. and E.F.; methodology, S.Z., D.C., P.S., S.F., F.G. and E.F.; data collection F.V., S.Z., D.C., P.S., S.F., F.G. and A.D.H.; data analysis, F.V., F.O. and A.D.H.; writing—original draft preparation, F.O.; writing—review and editing, F.O., S.Z. and E.F.; supervision, E.F.; funding acquisition, E.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Data collection was funded in the context of PonDerat (LIFE14 NAT/IT/000544) for the Pontine Islands and RESTO CON LIFE (LIFE13 NAT/IT/000471) for Pianosa. F.O. was funded by Finanziamento MIUR Dipartimenti di Eccellenza ‘18-’22 per il Dipartimento di Scienze Veterinarie. Data analyses were included in the activities of the project “One Health Basic and Translational Actions Addressing Unmet Needs on Emerging Infectious Diseases (INF-ACT)” funded under the National Recovery and Resilience Plan (NRRP), Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.3.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical approval for sample collection and analysis was given in the context of the LIFE projects PonDerat (LIFE14 NAT/IT/000544) www.ponderat.eu [accessed on 25 September 2022] and RESTO CON LIFE (LIFE13 NAT/IT/000471) www.restoconlife.eu [accessed on 25 September 2022].

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the logistic and technical support of the wardens, rangers, and officers of the Parco Nazionale dell’Arcipelago Toscano and the people of the Pontine Islands.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Manne, L.L.; Brooks, T.M.; Pimm, S.L. Relative Risk of Extinction of Passerine Birds on Continents and Islands. Nature 1999, 399, 258–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Clair, J.J.H.S. The Impacts of Invasive Rodents on Island Invertebrates. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144, 68–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Landaeta-Aqueveque, C.; Moreno Salas, L.; Henríquez, A.L.; Silva-de la Fuente, M.C.; González-Acuña, D. Parasites of Native and Invasive Rodents in Chile: Ecological and Human Health Needs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 643742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Panti-May, J.A.; Servían, A.; Ferrari, W.; Lorena, M.; Hernández-Mena, D.I.; Hernández-Betancourt, S.F.; Robles, R.; Machain-Williams, C. Morphological and Molecular Identification of Hymenolepidid Cestodes in Children and Synanthropic Rodents from Rural Mexico. Parasitol. Int. 2020, 75, 102042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hidalgo, A.; Becerra, V.; Soriano, C.; Melo, A.; Fonseca-salamanca, F. Trichinella Spiralis Infecting Wild Boars in Southern Chile: Evidence of an Underrated Risk. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 625–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ramirez-Pizarro, F.; Silva-de la Fuente, C.; Hernandez-Orellana, C.; Lopez, J.; Madrid, V.; Italo, F.; Martin, N.; Gonzales-Acuna, D.; Sandoval, D.; Ortega, R.; et al. Zoonotic Pathogens in the American Mink in Its Southernmost Distribution. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2019, 19, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Holmes, N.D.; Id, D.R.S.; Oppel, S.; Tershy, B.; Croll, D.A.; Keitt, B.; Genovesi, P.; Burfield, I.J.; Will, D.J.; Bond, A.L.; et al. Globally Important Islands Where Eradicating Invasive Mammals Will Benefit Highly Threatened Vertebrates. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0212128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Capizzi, D.; Baccetti, N.; Sposimo, P. Fifteen Years of Rat Eradication on Italian Islands. In Problematic Wildlife: A Cross-Disciplinary Approach; Angelici, F.M., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 205–227. ISBN 9783319222462. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jones, H.P.; Tershy, B.R.; Zavaleta, E.S.; Croll, D.A.; Keitt, B.S.; Finkelstein, M.E.; Howald, G.R. Severity of the Effects of Invasive Rats on Seabirds: A Global Review. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Harris, D.B. Review of Negative Effects of Introduced Rodents on Small Mammals on Islands. Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 1611–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Palmer, M.; Pons, G.X.; Palmer, M.; Pons, G.X. Predicting Rat Presence on Small Islands. Ecography 2001, 24, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Traveset, A.; Nogales, M.; Alcover, J.A.; Delgado, J.D.; López-Darias, M.; Godoy, D.; Igual, J.M.; Bover, P. A Review on the Effects of Alien Rodents in the Balearic (Western Mediterranean Sea) and Canary Islands (Eastern Atlantic Ocean). Biol. Invasions 2009, 11, 1653–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Loy, A.; Aloise, G.; Ancillotto, L.; Angelici, F.M.; Bertolino, S.; Capizzi, D.; Castiglia, R.; Colangelo, P.; Contoli, L.; Cozzi, B.; et al. Mammals of Italy: An Annotated Checklist. Hystrix Ital. J. Mammal. 2019, 30, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Baccetti, N.; Capizzi, D.; Corbi, F.; Massa, B.; Nissardi, S.; Spano, G.; Sposimo, P. Breeding Shearwaters on Italian Islands: Population Size, Island Selection and Co-Existence with Their Main Alien Predator, the Black Rat. Riv. Ital. Orn. 2009, 78, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  15. Morand, S.; Bordes, F.; Chen, H.; Claude, J. Global Parasite and Rattus Rodent Invasions: The Consequences for Rodent-Borne Diseases. Integr. Zool. 2015, 10, 409–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jones, B.A.; Grace, D.; Kock, R.; Alonso, S.; Rushton, J.; Said, M.Y.; McKeever, D.; Mutua, F.; Young, J.; McDermott, J.; et al. Zoonosis Emergence Linked to Agricultural Intensification and Environmental Change. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 8399–8404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sposimo, P.; Baccetti, N.; Gotti, C.; Giannini, F.; Castelli, C.; Cencetti, T.; Giunti, M. Piano per l’eradicazione Del Ratto Nero (Rattus Rattus) Nell’Isola Di Pianosa (Toscana). Progetto LIFE13 NAT/IT/000471-RESTO CON LIFE “Island Conservation in Tuscany, Restoring Habitat Not Only for Birds”; 2016. Available online: https://www.restoconlife.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/PE_Ratti_Pianosa.pdf (accessed on 25 September 2022).
  18. Il Layman’s Report—Il Racconto (in Breve) Del Life PonDerat. 2022. Available online: http://www.ponderat.eu/schede-327-uno_sguardo_layman_s_report (accessed on 25 September 2022).
  19. Cleaveland, S.; Laurenson, M.K.; Taylor, L.H. Diseases of Humans and Their Domestic Mammals: Pathogen Characteristics, Host Range and the Risk of Emergence. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2001, 356, 991–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Meerburg, B.G.; Singleton, G.R.; Kijlstra, A. Rodent-Borne Diseases and Their Risks for Public Health. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 35, 221–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Olival, K.J.; Hosseini, P.R.; Zambrana-Torrelio, C.; Ross, N.; Bogich, T.L.; Daszak, P. Host and Viral Traits Predict Zoonotic Spillover from Mammals. Nature 2017, 546, 646–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Han, B.A.; Schmidt, J.P.; Bowden, S.E.; Drake, J.M. Rodent Reservoirs of Future Zoonotic Diseases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 201501598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Capizzi, D.; Santini, L. I Roditori Italiani. Ecologia, Impatto Sulle Attività Umane e Sugli Ecosistemi, Gestione Delle Popolazioni. Ediz. Illustrata; Antonio Delfino Editore: Roma, Italy, 2007; ISBN 9788872873809. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dybing, N.A.; Jacobson, C.; Irwin, P.; Algar, D.; Adams, P.J. Challenging the Dogma of the ‘Island Syndrome’: A Study of Helminth Parasites of Feral Cats and Black Rats on Christmas Island. Australas. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 99–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zanet, S.; Sposimo, P.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Giannini, F.; Strumia, F.; Ferroglio, E. Epidemiology of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Rattus rattus in Absence of Domestic Reservoir and Definitive Hosts. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 199, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Costa Viegas de Lima, D.; de Melo, R.P.B.; Campos de Almeida, J.; Rodrigues Magalhães, F.J.; Ribeiro Andrade, M.; de Morais Pedrosa, C.; Vasconcelos de Oliveira, C.A.; Nascimento Porto, W.J.; Su, C.; Aparecido Mota, R. Toxoplasma Gondii in Invasive Animals on the Island of Fernando de Noronha in Brazil: Molecular Characterization and Mouse Virulence Studies of New Genotypes. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 67, 101347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Smith, K.F.; Carpenter, S.M. Potential Spread of Introduced Black Rat (Rattus rattus) Parasites to Endemic Deer Mice (Peromyscus Maniculatus) on the California Channel Islands. Divers. Distrib. 2006, 12, 742–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zanet, S.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Bottero, E.; De Mera, I.G.F.; Gortazar, C.; Carpignano, M.G.; Ferroglio, E. Piroplasmosis in Wildlife: Babesia and Theileria Affecting Free-Ranging Ungulates and Carnivores in the Italian Alps. Parasites Vectors 2014, 7, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yabsley, M.J.; Shock, B.C. Natural History of Zoonotic Babesia: Role of Wildlife Reservoirs. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2013, 2, 18–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arsuaga, M.; Gonzalez, L.M.; Lobo, C.A.; de la Calle, F.; Bautista, J.M.; Azcárate, I.G.; Puente, S.; Montero, E. First Report of Babesia Microti -Caused Babesiosis in Spain. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2016, 16, 677–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sawczuk, M.; Maciejewska, A.; Skotarczak, B. Identification and Molecular Characterization of Theileria Sp. Infecting Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus) in Northwestern Poland. Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2008, 54, 225–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Höfle, U.; Vicente, J.; Nagore, D.; Hurtado, A.; Peña, A.; De La Fuente, J.; Gortazar, C. The Risks of Translocating Wildlife: Pathogenic Infection with Theileria sp. and Elaeophora elaphi in an Imported Red Deer. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 126, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Schnittger, L.; Yin, H.; Gubbels, M.J.; Beyer, D.; Niemann, S.; Jongejan, F.; Ahmed, J.S. Phylogeny of Sheep and Goat Theileria and Babesia Parasites. Parasitol. Res. 2003, 91, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Schnittger, L.; Rodriguez, A.E.; Florin-Christensen, M.; Morrison, D.A. Babesia: A World Emerging. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2012, 12, 1788–1809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kazimírová, M.; Ham, Z.; Eva, Š.; Minichová, L.; Mahríková, L.; Caban, R.; Sprong, H.; Fonville, M.; Schnittger, L.; Kocianová, E. Diverse Tick-Borne Microorganisms Identified in Free-Living Ungulates in Slovakia. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zintl, A.; Finnerty, E.J.; Murphy, T.M.; De Waal, T.; Gray, J.S. Babesias of Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus) in Ireland. Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Burri, C.; Dupasquier, C.; Bastic, V.; Gern, L. Pathogens of Emerging Tick-Borne Diseases, Anaplasma Phagocytophilum, Rickettsia spp., and Babesia spp., in Ixodes Ticks Collected from Rodents at Four Sites in Switzerland (Canton of Bern). Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 939–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dumler, J.S.; Barbet, A.F.; Bekker, C.P.J.; Dasch, G.A.; Palmer, G.H.; Ray, S.C.; Rikihisa, Y.; Rurangirwa, F.R. Reorganization of Genera in the Families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in the Order Rickettsiales: Unification of Some Species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrlichia with Neorickettsia, Descriptions of Six New Species Combinations and Designation of Ehrlichia Equi and “HGE Agent” as Subjective Synonyms of Ehrlichia Phagocytophila. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 2145–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Rosso, F.; Tagliapietra, V.; Baráková, I.; Derdáková, M.; Konečný, A.; Hauffe, H.C.; Rizzoli, A. Prevalence and Genetic Variability of Anaplasma Phagocytophilum in Wild Rodents from the Italian Alps. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Millán, J.; Ferroglio, E.; Solano-Gallego, L. Role of Wildlife in the Epidemiology of Leishmania Infantum Infection in Europe. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 2005–2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roque, A.L.R.; Jansen, A.M. Wild and Synanthropic Reservoirs of Leishmania Species in the Americas. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2014, 3, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Millan, J.; Zanet, S.; Gomis, M.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Negre, N.; Ferroglio, E. An Investigation into Alternative Reservoirs of Canine Leishmaniasis on the Endemic Island of Mallorca (Spain). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2011, 58, 352–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zanet, S.; Palese, V.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Cantón Alonso, C.; Ferroglio, E. Encephalitozoon Cuniculi, Toxoplasma Gondii and Neospora Caninum Infection in Invasive Eastern Cottontail Rabbits Sylvilagus Floridanus in Northwestern Italy. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 682–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Vyas, A.; Kim, S.K.; Giacomini, N.; Boothroyd, J.C.; Sapolsky, R.M. Behavioral Changes Induced by Toxoplasma Infection of Rodents Are Highly Specific to Aversion of Cat Odors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 6442–6447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ferroglio, E.; Pasino, M.; Romano, A.; Grande, D.; Pregel, P.; Trisciuoglio, A. Evidence of Neospora Caninum DNA in Wild Rodents. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 148, 346–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Dărăbuş, G.; Afrenie, M.; Olariu, R.T.; Ilie, M.S.; Balint, A. Epidemiological Remarks on Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Timişoara Zoo Epidemiological Remarks on Toxoplasma Gondii Infection in Timişoara Zoo. Sci. Parasitol. 2011, 12, 33–37. [Google Scholar]
  47. Reichel, M.P.; Wahl, L.C.; Ellis, J.T. Research into Neospora Caninum—What Have We Learnt in the Last Thirty Years? Pathogens 2020, 9, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Daszak, P.; Cunningham, A.A.; Hyatt, A.D. Anthropogenic Environmental Change and the Emergence of Infectious Diseases in Wildlife. Acta Trop. 2001, 78, 103–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Maaz, D.; Krücken, J.; Blümke, J.; Richter, D.; McKay-Demeler, J.; Matuschka, F.-R.; Hartmann, S.; Von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G. Factors Associated with Diversity, Quantity and Zoonotic Potential of Ectoparasites on Urban Mice and Voles. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0199385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Towns, D.R.; Wardle, D.A.; Mulder, C.P.H.; Yeates, G.W.; Fitzgerald, M.; Parrish, G.R.; Bellingham, P.J.; Bonner, K.I.; Towns, R.; Wardle, D.A.; et al. Predation of Seabirds by Invasive Rats: Multiple Indirect Consequences for Invertebrate Communities. Oikos 2009, 118, 420–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Dobson, F.S.; Michener, G.R. Maternal Traits and Reproduction in Richardson’s Ground Squirrels. Ecology 1995, 76, 851–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ferroglio, E.; Romano, A.; Trisciuoglio, A.; Poggi, M.; Ghiggi, E.; Sacchi, P.; Biglino, A. Characterization of Leishmania Infantum Strains in Blood Samples from Infected Dogs and Humans by PCR-RFLP. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2006, 100, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Beninati, T.; Piccolo, G.; Rizzoli, A.; Genchi, C.; Bandi, C. Anaplasmataceae in Wild Rodents and Roe Deer from Trento Province (Northern Italy). Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2006, 25, 677–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Trisciuoglio, A.; Zanet, S.; Marello, G.; Chiesa, F.; Nucera, D.M.; Bergallo, M.; Gennero, M.S.; Ferroglio, E. The Use of Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification Improves Toxoplasma Gondii Detection in Wildlife. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2015, 27, 754–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2022. Available online: https://www.r-project.org (accessed on 25 September 2022).
  56. Obiegala, A.; Heuser, E.; Ryll, R.; Imholt, C.; Fürst, J.; Prautsch, L.; Plenge-Bönig, A.; Ulrich, R.G.; Pfeffer, M. Norway and Black Rats in Europe: Potential Reservoirs for Zoonotic Arthropod-Borne Pathogens? Pest Manag. Sci. 2019, 75, 1556–1563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Occhibove, F.; McKeown, N.J.; Risley, C.; Ironside, J.E. Eco-Epidemiological Screening of Multi-Host Wild Rodent Communities in the UK Reveals Pathogen Strains of Zoonotic Interest. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2022, 17, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Chvostáč, M.; Špitalská, E.; Václav, R.; Vaculová, T.; Minichová, L.; Derdáková, M. Seasonal Patterns in the Prevalence and Diversity of Tick-Borne Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Rickettsia Spp. in an Urban Temperate Forest in South Western Slovakia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Perez, G.; Bastian, S.; Chastagner, A.; Agoulon, A.; Rantier, Y.; Vourc’h, G.; Plantard, O.; Butet, A. Relationships between Landscape Structure and the Prevalence of Two Tick-Borne Infectious Agents, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Borrelia burgdorferi Sensu Lato, in Small Mammal Communities. Landsc. Ecol. 2020, 35, 435–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Stuen, S.; Granquist, E.G.; Silaghi, C. Anaplasma phagocytophilum—A Widespread Multi-Host Pathogen with Highly Adaptive Strategies. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Massung, R.F.; Levin, M.L.; Miller, N.J.; Mather, T.N. Reservoir Competency of Goats for Anaplasma Phagocytophilum. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 478, 476–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. McCoy, K.D.; Léger, E.; Dietrich, M. Host Specialization in Ticks and Transmission of Tick-Borne Diseases: A Review. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 4, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Baráková, I.; Derdáková, M.; Selyemová, D.; Chvostáč, M.; Špitalská, E.; Rosso, F.; Collini, M.; Rosà, R.; Tagliapietra, V.; Girardi, M.; et al. Tick-Borne Pathogens and Their Reservoir Hosts in Northern Italy. Ticks Tick. Borne Dis. 2018, 9, 164–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Seo, H.-J.; Noh, J.; Kim, H.-C.; Chong, S.-T.; Klein, T.A.; Park, C.-U.; Choi, C.Y.; Kwon, Y.-S.; Kim, M.; Min, S.; et al. Molecular Detection and Phylogenetic Analysis of Anaplasma and Borrelia Species in Ticks Collected from Migratory Birds at Heuksan, Hong, and Nan Islands, Republic of Korea. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2021, 21, 20–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bown, K.J.; Begon, M.; Bennett, M.; Woldehiwet, Z.; Ogden, N.H. Seasonal Dynamics of Anaplasma Phagocytophila in a Rodent-Tick United Kingdom. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2003, 9, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Bown, K.J.; Lambin, X.; Telford, G.R.; Ogden, N.H.; Telfer, S.; Woldehiwet, Z.; Birtles, R.J. Relative Importance of Ixodes Ricinus and Ixodes Trianguliceps as Vectors for Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti in Field Vole (Microtus agrestis) Populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 7118–7125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Telfer, S.; Birtles, R.; Bennett, M.; Lambin, X.; Paterson, S.; Begon, M. Parasite Interactions in Natural Populations: Insights from Longitudinal Data. Parasitology 2008, 135, 767–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Gray, J.S. Identity of the Causal Agents of Human Babesiosis in Europe. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 296, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Gray, J.; Zintl, A.; Hildebrandt, A.; Hunfeld, K.-P.; Weiss, L. Zoonotic Babesiosis: Overview of the Disease and Novel Aspects of Pathogen Identity. Ticks Tick. Borne Dis. 2010, 1, 3–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Goethert, H.K.; Telford, S.R.I. Enzootic transmission of Babesia divergens among cottontail rabbits on Nantucket Island, Massachusetts. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2003, 69, 455–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Ben Musa, N.; Phillips, R.S. The Adaptation of Three Isolates of Babesia divergens to Continuous Culture in Rat Erythrocytes. Parasitology 1991, 103, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Homer, M.J.; Aguilar-delfin, I.; Iii, S.A.M.R.T.; Krause, P.J.; Persing, D.H. Babesiosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2000, 13, 451–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bown, K.J.; Begon, M.; Bennett, M.; Birtles, R.J.; Burthe, S.; Lambin, X.; Telfer, S.; Woldehiwet, Z.; Ogden, N.H. Sympatric Ixodes trianguliceps and Ixodes ricinus Ticks Feeding on Field Voles (Microtus Agrestis): Potential for Increased Risk of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in the United Kingdom? Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2006, 6, 404–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Cringoli, G.; Rinaldi, L.; Capuano, F.; Baldi, L.; Veneziano, V.; Capelli, G. Serological Survey of Neospora Caninum and Leishmania Infantum Co-Infection in Dogs. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 106, 307–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Rossi, E.; Bongiorno, G.; Ciolli, E.; Di Muccio, T.; Scalone, A.; Gramiccia, M.; Gradoni, L.; Maroli, M. Seasonal Phenology, Host-Blood Feeding Preferences and Natural Leishmania Infection of Phlebotomus perniciosus (Diptera, Psychodidae) in a High-Endemic Focus of Canine Leishmaniasis in Rome Province, Italy. Acta Trop. 2008, 105, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Quinnell, R.J.; Courtenay, O. Transmission, Reservoir Hosts and Control of Zoonotic Visceral Leishmaniasis. Parasitology 2009, 136, 1915–1934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gradoni, L.; Pozio, E.; Gramiccia, M.; Maroli, M.; Bettini, S. Leishmaniasis in Tuscany (Italy): VII. Studies on the Role of the Black Rat, Rattus Rattus, in the Epidemiology of Visceral Leishmaniasis. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1983, 77, 427–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Pozio, E.; Maroli, M.; Gradoni, L.; Gramiccia, M. Laboratory Transmission of Leishmania Infantum to Rattus Rattus by the Bite of Experimentally Infected Phlebotomus Perniciosus. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1985, 79, 524–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cassan, C.; Diagne, C.A.; Tatard, C.; Gauthier, P.; Dalecky, A.; Bâ, K.; Kane, M.; Niang, Y.; Diallo, M.; Sow, A.; et al. Leishmania major and Trypanosoma lewisi Infection in Invasive and Native Rodents in Senegal. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2018, 12, e0006615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Ruiz-Fons, F.; Ferroglio, E.; Gortázar, C. Leishmania infantum in Free-Ranging Hares, Spain, 2004–2010. Eurosurveillance 2013, 18, 20541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. De Freitas, T.P.T.; D’Andrea, P.S.; De Paula, D.A.J.; Nakazato, L.; Dutra, V.; Bonvicino, C.R.; Parto Ferreira De Almeida, A.D.B.; Boa-Sorte, E.D.C.; Sousa, V.R.F. Natural Infection of Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in Mus musculus Captured in Mato Grosso, Brazil. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012, 12, 81–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Okada, S.; Shoshi, Y.; Takashima, Y.; Sanjoba, C.; Watari, Y.; Miyashita, T. Role of Landscape Context in Toxoplasma gondii Infection of Invasive Definitive and Intermediate Hosts on a World Heritage Island. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2022, 19, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Prestrud, K.W.; Åsbakk, K.; Fuglei, E.; Mørk, T.; Stien, A.; Ropstad, E.; Tryland, M.; Gabrielsen, G.W.; Lydersen, C.; Kovacs, K.M.; et al. Serosurvey for Toxoplasma gondii in Arctic Foxes and Possible Sources of Infection in the High Arctic of Svalbard. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 150, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dubey, J.P. A Review of Toxoplasmosis in Wild Birds. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 106, 121–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Fernández-Escobar, M.; Schares, G.; Maksimov, P.; Joeres, M.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Calero-Bernal, R. Toxoplasma gondii Genotyping: A Closer Look Into Europe. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2022, 12, 842595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Dubey, J.P.; Schares, G. Neosporosis in Animals—The Last Five Years. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 180, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Diuk-Wasser, M.A.; Vannier, E.; Krause, P.J. Coinfection by Ixodes Tick-Borne Pathogens: Ecological, Epidemiological, and Clinical Consequences. Trends Parasitol. 2016, 32, 30–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Piesman, J.; Mather, T.N.; Telford, S.R., 3rd; Spielman, A. Concurrent Borrelia burgdorferi and Babesia microti Infection in Nymphal Ixodes Damminit. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1986, 24, 446–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hersh, M.H.; Ostfeld, R.S.; McHenry, D.J.; Tibbetts, M.; Brunner, J.L.; Killilea, M.E.; LoGiudice, K.; Schmidt, K.A.; Keesing, F. Co-Infection of Blacklegged Ticks with Babesia microti and Borrelia burgdorferi Is Higher than Expected and Acquired from Small Mammal Hosts. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e99348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Prusinski, M.A.; Kokas, J.E.; Hukey, K.T.; Kogut, S.J.; Lee, J.; Backenson, P.B. Prevalence of Borrelia burgdorferi (Spirochaetales: Spirochaetaceae), Anaplasma phagocytophilum (Rickettsiales: Anaplasmataceae), and Babesia microti (Piroplasmida: Babesiidae) in Ixodes scapularis (Acari: Ixodidae) Collected from Recreational Lands in Th. J. Med. Entomol. 2014, 51, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Zhao, X.G.; Li, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Jiang, J.F.; Liu, W.; Cao, W.C. Dual Infection with Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia Microti in a Rattus Norvegicus, China. Ticks Tick. Borne Dis. 2013, 4, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Swanson, S.J.; Neitzel, D.; Reed, K.D.; Belongia, E.A. Coinfections Acquired from Ixodes Ticks. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 708–727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Choisy, M.; De Roode, J.C. Mixed Infections and the Evolution of Virulence: Effects of Resource Competition, Parasite Plasticity, and Impaired Host Immunity. Am. Nat. 2010, 175, E105–E118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Shen, S.S.; Qu, X.Y.; Zhang, W.Z.; Li, J.; Lv, Z.Y. Infection against Infection: Parasite Antagonism against Parasites, Viruses and Bacteria. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2019, 8, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Telfer, S.; Lambin, X.; Birtles, R.; Beldomenico, P.; Burthe, S.; Paterson, S.; Begon, M. Species Interactions in a Parasite Community Drive Infection Risk in a Wildlife Population. Science 2010, 330, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Semenza, J.C.; Suk, J.E. Vector-Borne Diseases and Climate Change: A European Perspective. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2018, 365, fnx244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Map of study areas: Pianosa (Tuscan archipelago) and Palmarola, Ponza and Ventotene (Pontine Islands).
Figure 1. Map of study areas: Pianosa (Tuscan archipelago) and Palmarola, Ponza and Ventotene (Pontine Islands).
Animals 13 03279 g001
Table 1. Summary of individuals sampled on each island, including absolute numbers of positive cases and the prevalence of the parasites of interest (95% confidence interval in brackets).
Table 1. Summary of individuals sampled on each island, including absolute numbers of positive cases and the prevalence of the parasites of interest (95% confidence interval in brackets).
R. rattusPositive Samples—Prevalence % (CI 95%)
MFTotalAnaplasma spp.Babesia spp./Theileria spp.Leishmania sp.N. caninumT. gondii
Palmarola76130–0.00 (0.00–24.71)5–38.46 (10.93–65.99)0–0.00 (0.00–24.71)0–0.00 (0.00–24.71)6–46.15 (19.22–74.87)
Ponza3470–0.00 (0.00–40.96)2–28.57 (0.00–64.72)0–0.00 (0.00–40.96)0–0.00 (0.00–40.96)3–42.86 (9.90–81.59)
Ventotene117180–0.00 (0.00–18.53)7–38.89 (15.71–62.06)2–5.26 (1.46–17.29)0–0.00 (0.00–18.53)7–38.89 (17.30–64.25)
Pianosa87151–6.67 (0.00–19.73)12–80.00 (59.05–100.00)4–26.67 (3.50–49.83)0–0.00 (0.00–19.73)0–0.00 (0.00–19.73)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zanet, S.; Occhibove, F.; Capizzi, D.; Fratini, S.; Giannini, F.; Hoida, A.D.; Sposimo, P.; Valentini, F.; Ferroglio, E. Zoonotic Microparasites in Invasive Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from Small Islands in Central Italy. Animals 2023, 13, 3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203279

AMA Style

Zanet S, Occhibove F, Capizzi D, Fratini S, Giannini F, Hoida AD, Sposimo P, Valentini F, Ferroglio E. Zoonotic Microparasites in Invasive Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from Small Islands in Central Italy. Animals. 2023; 13(20):3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zanet, Stefania, Flavia Occhibove, Dario Capizzi, Sara Fratini, Francesca Giannini, Avner Dan Hoida, Paolo Sposimo, Flaminia Valentini, and Ezio Ferroglio. 2023. "Zoonotic Microparasites in Invasive Black Rats (Rattus rattus) from Small Islands in Central Italy" Animals 13, no. 20: 3279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13203279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop