Next Article in Journal
Backyard Poultry Flocks in Morocco: Demographic Characteristics, Husbandry Practices, and Disease and Biosecurity Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Is the Integration between Corn and Grass under Different Sowing Modalities a Viable Alternative for Silage?
Previous Article in Journal
Effects of Various Feed Additives on Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Neem (Azadirachta indica) Leaf Powder Supplementation on Rumen Fermentation, Feed Intake, Apparent Digestibility and Performance in Omani Sheep
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Antiparasitic Tannin-Rich Plants from the South of Europe for Grazing Livestock: A Review

by
Pablo Rodríguez-Hernández
1,†,
Carolina Reyes-Palomo
1,†,
Santos Sanz-Fernández
1,
Pablo José Rufino-Moya
2,
Rafael Zafra
2,
Francisco Javier Martínez-Moreno
2,
Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez
1,* and
Cipriano Díaz-Gaona
1
1
Department of Animal Production, Cátedra de Producción Ecológica Ecovalia-Clemente Mata, UIC ENZOEM, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Agrifood Campus of Excellence (ceiA3), University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
2
Animal Health Department (Parasitology and Parasitic Diseases), UIC ENZOEM, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, International Agrifood Campus of Excellence (ceiA3), University of Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, 14071 Córdoba, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Animals 2023, 13(2), 201; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020201
Submission received: 14 October 2022 / Revised: 21 December 2022 / Accepted: 3 January 2023 / Published: 5 January 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The systematic use of different antiparasitic products over time has led to several problems, such as drug resistances and biodiversity loss, which directly affect extensive livestock farming. Considering the current scenario, alternative approaches for parasite control are needed. This review study presents different Mediterranean tannin-rich plants with anthelmintic effect, which can be used as fodder or voluntarily grazed by livestock as a strategy to reduce the use of antiparasitic drugs.

Abstract

Internal parasites are one of the main causes of health threats in livestock production, especially in extensive livestock farming. Despite the environmental toxic effects (loss of dung beetles, biodiversity, and other issues) and resistance phenomenon derived from their prolonged use, anti-parasitic chemical pharmaceuticals are frequently used, even in organic farming. Such a situation within the context of climate change requires urgent exploration of alternative compounds to solve these problems and apparent conflicts between organic farming objectives regarding the environment, public health, and animal health. This review is focused on some plants (Artemisia spp., Cichorium intybus L., Ericaceae family, Hedysarum coronarium L., Lotus spp., Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.) that are well known for their antiparasitic effect, are voluntarily grazed and ingested, and can be spontaneously found or cultivated in southern Europe and other regions with a Mediterranean climate. The differences found between effectiveness, parasite species affected, in vitro/in vivo experiments, and active compounds are explored. A total of 87 papers where antiparasitic activity of those plants have been studied are included in this review; 75% studied the effect on ruminant parasites, where gastrointestinal nematodes were the parasite group most studied (70%), and these included natural (31%) and experimental (37%) infections.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Parasites constitute a serious problem for and a major threat to animal production, health, and welfare in both intensive and extensive livestock systems throughout the world, and parasite infections strongly affect livestock, especially in grazing ruminants [1,2]. These infections have an impact on the immune system [3], resulting in lower efficiency due to the reduction of voluntary intake, lower productivity indexes (live weight gain, milk yield, wool production, etc.) [4], lower quality products as a result of considerable protein losses [5], and protein synthesis redirection away from skeletal muscles [6]. All these effects eventually affect animal welfare and farm profitability, leading to serious economic losses and animal deaths [7,8]. The economic burden of major parasitic helminth infections on the ruminant livestock industry in Europe has been estimated at €1.8 billion [9].
In recent decades, parasitic disease control has been mainly achieved by chemotherapy and chemoprophylaxis, through the strategic and repeated administration of antiparasitic drugs [10,11], even in organic farming [12], where these veterinary drugs are allowed [13]. In the particular case of gastrointestinal nematodes (GIN), there exists a worldwide phenomenon of resistance to anthelmintics (AH) due to the exclusive use and reliance on a small range of commercial molecules [14,15,16,17,18]. The rapid development of resistance in GIN populations to synthetic molecules [19] can be seen in the example of monepantel (a relatively new class of AH included between amino acetyl derivates) [20], with cases of resistance described after a few years of commercialisation [21,22]. Furthermore, there has been an increasing number of reports on multidrug resistance to the most commonly used anthelmintic families benzimidazoles, macrocyclic lactones, including moxidectin in sheep, cattle and horses, as well as imidazothiazoles in sheep and tetrahydropyrimidine pyrantel in horses, which all cause concern [23].
In addition to the problem of resistance, the parasite control approach has become a source of public concern in terms of the use of chemical treatments in farm production [24], the potential risk of residues in food such as milk and meat products, and environmental contamination [25,26,27]. A special mention must be made of antiparasitic drugs and their impact on soil and dung fauna biodiversity [28], which also implies an increase in greenhouse gas emissions from grazing livestock faeces [29]. The European project LIFE LiveAdapt pointed out the use of alternative antiparasitic products as one of the best practices towards climate change adaptation for extensive livestock farming [30,31].
All these issues have increased societal demands to reduce the use of chemical compounds in agriculture and livestock breeding [18]. Options for research in alternative approaches to AH drugs include the use of bioactive plants [32], especially in organic farming and sustainable agriculture systems [25,33]. Some in vivo and in vitro studies have shown that bioactive plants containing different types of secondary metabolites, such as condensed tannins (CT), sesquiterpene lactones, and flavonol glycosides, are a promising option for use in integrated nematode control in farm production systems [34,35,36,37,38,39]. In Mediterranean rangelands, there are many plant species containing secondary metabolites antiparasitic activities, such as sainfoin, sulla, Lotus spp., Cichorium intybus L., and the Ericaceae family rich in CT, and Artermisia spp. rich in santonin [39,40,41,42,43,44].
Several studies have described the grazing and browsing behaviour of small ruminants, suggesting prophylactic self-medication behaviour in areas with heterogeneous vegetation [45,46]. This strategy is focused on the intake of natural vegetation with its secondary compounds, seeking a lower dependence on conventional chemotherapy in livestock farming [47,48]. In contrast to synthetic anthelmintic drugs, forages or nutraceutical fodders are not imposed but offered to the animals, and can also be used as additives within unifeed rations.
Hence, this review is focused on some plant species, wild or cultivated, and present in European regions with Mediterranean climate which have high content in CT and have been shown to provide some antiparasitic effects in livestock (mainly in ruminants): Artemisia spp., Cichorium intybus L., Ericaceae family, Hedysarum coronarium L., Lotus spp., and Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.). The criteria to select these species are the following: that they have scientific evidence of their antiparasitic effects from experimental procedures, both in vitro and in vivo with promising potential to be used for parasite control in farms; they are voluntarily grazed and ingested; they are common or widespread; or they have seeds of different cultivars in the market to be cultivated as fodder.

2. Plants Containing Secondary Metabolites (PSM) in the Mediterranean Region

PSMs are compounds associated with secondary metabolic pathways, which are non-essential for plant development [49]. Most PSMs serve defence functions, their biosynthesis being linked to biotic or abiotic stimuli [50,51].
This review is mainly focused on CT due to the evidence of antiparasitic activity of tannins-rich forages both in vivo and in vitro experiences. There are other PSMs implicated, although less information is available on such compounds. Flavanol monomers, flavonol glycosides [52,53], and other phenolic compounds [54] might be involved. Molan et al. [55] showed that flavan-3-ols and flavan-3-ol gallates, the basic units of CT polymers, present an inhibitory activity on egg hatching, larval development, and the viability of Trichostrongylus colubriformis third-stage larvae (L3). For example, in sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), a possible action has been attributed to three flavonol glycosides: rutin, narcissin, and nicotiflorin [52]. This is consistent with studies suggesting that the CT present in plant extracts were only partially responsible for the inhibitory effects [56].

2.1. Condensed Tannins (CT)

In the tannins group, there exist hydrolyzable tannins, such as galic acid [57], and CT, which are polyphenolic compounds contained in various parts of the plant belonging to the flavonoid groups [58]. These molecules have the ability to reversibly bind proteins and other macromolecules [2].
Desrues et al. [59] investigated which structural features of CT determine the anti-parasitic effects against the main cattle nematodes (Ostertagia ostertagi and Cooperia oncophora). They found that the mean degree of polymerization of CT (i.e., average size) and the percentage of PDs within CT seemed to be the most important parameters that influence anti-parasitic activity. Therefore, not only the CT concentration, but also the CT structure influence anthelmintic properties against different life cycle stages of the most important GIN species.

2.1.1. Factors Involved in the Antiparasitic Effect of Condensed Tannins

Evidence by different authors has accumulated over recent decades, suggesting that some bioactive tannin-rich plants have AH effects [44,60]. In addition, other types of parasites, such as coccidia, have been evaluated and it has also been found that the consumption of tanniferous plants, such as lentisk foliage (Pistacia lentiscus L.), sainfoin (Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.), and sericea lespedeza or sericea (Lespedeza cuneata Dum.Cours.) is associated with a reduced number of oocysts per gramme of faeces [61,62,63,64].
In several experiments, the consumption of tanniferous forages was associated with reduced levels of GIN parasites and improved animal performance [65], even when the tannin-rich forages are given as hays or silages [37]. Many studies focused on the AH effects of tannin-rich plants and forages in small ruminants have been published in recent years [1,18,54,66,67,68]. Among these studies, there are interesting findings: a decrease in the establishment of third-stage nematode larvae (L3) or a reduction in worm fertility and egg output in naturally infected goats consuming a moderate concentration of tannin-rich plants [47,69], and a significant and prolonged reduction in nematode egg excretion in naturally infected indoor goats due to a short-term distribution of tannin-rich plants hay [70].
It has been hypothesised that the effect of CTs against GIN might be indirect; improvement of the host performance being due to increased protein availability or, directly, by short-term affection of several biological key processes of parasites [71]. This direct influence has been highlighted by many authors both in vivo and in vitro: CT-containing extracts that could inhibit key parasite enzymes which lead to inhibiting larval development [55,72], larval exsheathment [73,74,75,76,77], larval motility and migration [52,78], egg hatching [55,72], larval feeding [77], and motility of adults [79]. However, the modes of action of CT compounds are currently being studied, and few of them have been elucidated.
In vitro assays have the main advantages of providing easy performance, high reproducibility, rapid results, and low costs. They may also target different stages of the parasite life cycle [80]. In addition, purified compounds isolated from plants can be tested without interference from other plant components or nutrients [81,82].
It is important to emphasise that the results of in vitro conditions are not directly applicable to in vivo conditions [83]. The gastrointestinal tract activity may substantially modify the active compound of plants, reducing its desirable activity. For example, ruminal conditions could affect tannins because of bacteria degradation [84] and/or the formation of complexes with proteins [54]. Notwithstanding the above, inconsistent results are sometimes obtained from in vivo assays, which is why it is important that in vitro results are always later evaluated in vivo before making general conclusions about antiparasitic properties [83,85].
In the study carried out by Bahuaud et al. [73], the results suggest that the delay or inhibition of the exsheathment of infective larvae (L3) of trichostrongyle nematodes may be related either to the fixation of tannins on proteins of the sheath, disturbing the action of enzymes, or to the complexation with the enzymes themselves. This constitutes an interesting finding, considering that exsheathment is a crucial step in the life cycle, since it represents the transition from the free-living to the parasitic stages [86]. In the case of the experiment in vitro conducted by Hansen et al. [87], it was demonstrated that CT inhibited glutathione-S-transferase activity in GIN. Moreover, a direct influence of CTs against parasites is supported by the use of inhibiting substances in many studies. Kabasa et al. [88] observed that the addition of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to the diet of browsing goats, which effectively binds to tannins and inactivates them, led to significant increases in egg excretion and negative effects on growth, suggesting that tannins were involved in the antiparasitic effect. Molan et al. [56] reported the capacity of PEG to partially reverse the antiparasitic effects of a sulla (Hedysarum coronarium L.) extract and suggested that CT interfered with the larvae, affecting neurophysiology or neuromuscular coordination. Additionally, AH effects of CT extracts disappear in the presence of polyvinyl polypyrrolidone, a tannin inhibitor, further supporting the conclusion that CTs are AH-active compounds [44,74,75].

2.1.2. Factors Affecting the Condensed Tannins Content

Although the grazing of pastures seeded with tanniferous plants has been proposed as a natural way to reduce nematode parasitism, there are also several drawbacks to consider. The effects of CT depend on their concentrations [2] and are influenced by different factors, such as: the type of forage species; the stage of plant maturity [89]; the part of the plant (i.e., leaves vs. stems) [90,91,92]; the leaf:stem ratio, which varies with age and phenological stage [89,93] because most CTs are found in leaves, flowers, and fruits [94]; forage preservation [95]; the season, because environmental factors such as high temperatures, water stress, and extreme light intensities also affect TC concentrations [96]; cultivar and other agronomical factors which alter plant growth and production [2,10]; and even the region [97]. In addition, these plants have differences in the fractions of extractable CT (ECT), protein-bound CT (PBCT), and fibre-bound CT (FBCT), which influence the bioactivity of the CT from legume forage [98]. CTs have been alleged to be responsible for decreases in feed intake, growth rate, feed efficiency, nutrient digestibility [99,100,101], and it might be difficult to ensure that the tanninferous plants contain the optimal levels of CT during peaks of parasitic infections [10]. Furthermore, the efficacy of CT should be confirmed through in vivo experiments, not only under controlled laboratory conditions [102]. Therefore, there are many important factors to evaluate before practicing this innovative approach.

2.1.3. Other Effects of Condensed Tannins

Traditionally, CT have been considered anti-nutrient factors because, at high doses, they may have negative effects on feed intake, protein and dry matter digestibilities, live weight gains, milk yield, and wool growth [94,103]. Nevertheless, in recent years, when consumed in moderate concentrations, CT have been recognised as useful phytochemicals for modulating improving growth, milk yields, fertility, and tolerance to some intestinal parasites and arise from the protection of dietary protein from excessive fermentation in the rumen, reducing proteolysis [103,104]. The latter results in a lower concentration of ammonia in the ruminal fluid [105].
However, the CT effect will be considered favourable or detrimental depending on whether or not the positive AH action of these PSMs outweighs their negative nutritional cost to the host [106]. The review by Nawab et al. [107] regarding tannin supplementation in animal feeding shows mitigation strategies by which to overcome the toxic effects of tannins on animal health. Other benefits include bloat prevention [108], which is associated with tannins reducing the stability of a foam that traps ruminal fermentation gases, the effects of tannins on enrichment of conjugated linoleic acids in meat and milk from ruminants, and the inhibition of methanogenesis [89,109]. Moreover, diets with tannins are considered a best practice by which to reduce methane emissions from ruminants [110,111,112].
Therefore, the possible antinutritional consequences of tannin consumption should be simultaneously considered with their positive and antiparasitic effects [113], as well as confirmation in farm-based trials showing reliable economic benefits [102]. The review by Nawab et al. [107] regarding tannin supplementation in animal feeding shows mitigation strategies by which to overcome the toxic effects of tannins on animal health.

2.1.4. Other Factors Affecting Tannin Action

Along with the evaluation of the tannin’s mechanism, many authors have highlighted the influence of different factors and variables in the CT antiparasitic effect.
The parasite and host species and the parasite stage are some of the most evaluated [56,79]. For example, when established adult nematodes were exposed to CT in sheep, a reduction in worm fecundity and worm numbers was observed for the intestinal species Nematodirus battus and T. colubriformis, whereas no changes were recorded for the species that reside in the abomasum (Teladorsagia circumcincta and Haemonchus contortus) [113,114,115]. However, in goats, the effects on adult worms were restricted to reductions in worm fecundity of H. contortus and T. colubriformis [10,116], but not of T. circumcincta [116]. By contrast, the effects described by Hoskin et al. [117] in red deer suggest that Trichostrongylus axei is more susceptible to CT than Teladorsagia type nematodes present in the abomasum. This inconclusive and sometimes contradictory background makes it important to test local plants or forages with the most pathogenic or prevalent parasites species of each area to apply this knowledge to practical conditions [118].
The bioactivity of CT in vivo against GIN of different livestock species, such as small ruminants, is known to be highly variable depending on the plant source [26], another important factor. The concentration and the structure of the CT present in the different plant species seem to be two major factors modulating efficacy against nematodes. An overview of in vivo studies in sheep, goats, and deer involving plants containing CT suggests that a threshold of at least 30–40 g of CT per kg dry matter (DM) (3–4% DM) must be reached to observe antiparasitic activity [26]. Min and Hart [64] also suggested that the observed reduction in faecal egg count (FEC) was generally related to the CT content of forages.
There have also been studies focused on the structure of monomers of CTs. Molan et al. [55,119] demonstrated that the structure of CT monomers is an important factor in the modulation of their inhibitory effect on the development and the motility of T. colubriformis larvae. A similar conclusion was proposed by Brunet and Hoste [53], a hypothesis that is also supported by results from in vivo studies which suggested that the tanniniferous plants containing a high prodelphinidin/procyanidin (PD/PC) ratio were most active against gastrointestinal nematodes in ruminants [55,56,65]. In particular, sainfoin is considered to present a high PD/PC ratio [52,120,121].
The influence of forage preservation processes, such as ensiling or pelleting (high temperature and high-pressure treatment), remains unclear. While an alteration of the binding to proteins has been suggested for pelleting [36], it has also been noted that it may also positively influence AH activity [2]. However, in a trial carried out by Gaudin et al. [18] with sainfoin pellets, the efficacy obtained against parasites confirms that the pelleting process of sainfoin does not affect its AH properties, despite possible changes in the binding to proteins. These findings are consistent with results obtained in studies focused on other plant species, such as Sericea Lespedeza [36,63,122]. Continuing with sainfoin, different studies have suggested that its AH effect is also maintained in hay and silage [10,69,123]. The preservation of sainfoin, particularly in the form of silage, seems very promising because it can be used for the control of GIN, regardless of the season; more of the plant leaves, which are particularly rich in CTs, are retained than during the drying and conditioning involved in hay-making [123,124].

3. Antiparasitic Mechanism of Plants Rich in Secondary Compounds

Although the mechanisms involved in the response of the parasites to the diets containing plants with PSMs are yet unresolved and are currently being investigated, it seems that the bioactive properties of these plants directly arise from their content of PSMs, reducing the level of parasitism and improving the performance of different animal species, such as domestic ruminants [125]. Two potential hypotheses have been put forward to account for the reduction of the adverse effects of parasitism in ruminants grazing, such as forages; while the first hypothesis suggests that PSMs may have direct AH effects on larval and/or adult parasites, interfering in its development through altering the environment in which the nematode is grown [126], the second proposes that the consumption of certain PSMs have host-mediated effects that influence animal biology and improve the immune response to reduce parasitic infestation [126,127]. An example of this mechanism is that the increase in protein availability to the host through protein supplementation via forage during the course of a parasitic infestation can lead to a reduction in the number of nematodes in sheep due to the improvement of their immunity to parasites [104,128,129].
However, the response to the consumption of bioactive forages on parasite infections shows great variability due to, among other factors, nematode species, development stages, concentration of PSMs in the plant, prevailing conditions in the digestive tract, and the presence of additional active compounds [54,60,130]. In most of the studies that have compared the value of forages for parasitised animals, it becomes difficult to determine whether the improved physiological response (resilience) is due to improved nutrition or to the role of specific biochemical compounds [26]. However, there is more information supporting the role of some plant metabolites in observed antiparasitic effects [82,131]; unfortunately, most of the studies that have investigated potential antiparasitic effects do not contain sufficient information on the chemical characterisation of the suspected active compounds, making it difficult to accurately attribute activity to specific compounds [26].
The beneficial effects of PSMs on host physiology and performance under parasitic challenge have generally been related to the consumption of such bioactive plants when compared with control herbage, such as ryegrass (Lolium perenne), white clover (Trifolium repens), or lucerne (Medicago sativa) [132,133,134]. This effect has been evaluated by: (i) comparison of the clinical status of animals; (ii) pathophysiological measurements; and (iii) assessment of the impact of parasitism on the production of many species, such as sheep, goats, or deer [135,136].
Supplementation with bioactive plants can enhance animals’ ability to regulate the biology of parasite worm populations (resistance), as well as their ability to withstand the negative pathophysiological effects of nematode infections (resilience) [8,137]. The positive effect of these compounds on animal resilience has been underlined in different animal species [36,105,138,139].

4. Anti-Parasite Plants in Mediterranean Region

The following plant species, wild or cultivated, are present in European regions with a Mediterranean climate, have high content in CT and have an antiparasitic effect on livestock (mainly in ruminants), and are common or widespread or there are commercial seeds of different cultivars in the market to be cultivated as fodder.
The nutritional value is summarised for the species cultivated.

4.1. Arthemisia spp.

The genus Artemisia belongs to the family Asteraceae and is found around the world as a wild plant, but some experiences with “domesticated” and cultivated plants have been carried out [140] and have shown a broad spectrum of medicinal activity, including antiparasitic action [141]. In an Ethnobotany study, Agelet [142] showed A. absinthium L. infusion as anthelmintic for livestock.
The active compounds of Artemisia have been characterised [140,141], and some of them have been used in some experiments to demonstrate the activity of each one [131,143]. Artemisinin and its derivates (artemether) are the main compounds studied in antiparasitic effect trials [131,143]. Very high concentrations of pro-anthocyanidins have been found in Artemisia afra (1990 mg/100 g) [92] and in A. herba alba (2100 mg/100 g) [91]; however, 340 mg/100 g have been found in A. annua leaves and only 30 mg/100 g in stems [90]. A paper from Turkey showed 420 mg/100 g of CT in A. absinthium [144]. A study from Algeria compared the total extractable tannin content in some browse plant species and found 5700 mg/100 g for A. campestris and 3600 mg/100 g for A. herba alba [145]. CT in A. absinthium significantly varies from one region in Tunisia to another, from 40 to 150 mg/g [97].
No effect on livestock performance has been reported for Artemisia spp.
The genus Artemisia has an antiparasitic effect not only against nematodes but also against Fasciola, and some protozoa are also affected [131,140,141]. The description of trials for antiparasitic activity of Artemisia spp. are summarised in Table 1. The main way to provide Artemisia to animals is via oral application; however, in fighting against Fasciola hepatica, oral application seems not to be effective, while a single intramuscular dose application of extracts of artemether in sheep reduced the egg burden by a 64.9% and worm burden by 91.3% [131].
In the case of protozoa, such as Leishmania spp. and Trypanosoma cruzi, only in vitro experiments have been performed [140,141,146]. Gonzalez-Coloma et al. [140] tried to establish the antiparasitic effect of pure compounds, but they found that the pure compounds had no antiparasitic effect and only extracts from these species had any effect, which may be because of some synergistic components.
Another parasite which is affected by Artemisia consumption is Trichinella spiralis, which affects free range pigs. One study reported its activity against the enteral and parenteral phases of T. spiralis [147].
Table 1. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic effect of Artemisia spp.
Table 1. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic effect of Artemisia spp.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitro---ProtozoaLeishmania infantum, Trypanosoma cruzi800, 400, 100 μg/mL[140]
L. infantum, Trypanosoma cruzi800, 400, and 100 μg/mL[141]
Leishmania aethiopica and Leishmania donovani0.0097–0.1565 μL/mL and EC50 0.24–42.00 nl/mL[146]
Goat--GINHaemonchus contortus0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL[81]
Sheep--GINH. contortus0.34% DM[126]
25 mg/mL and 50 mg/mL[148]
CAE 25 mg/mL and CME 25 mg/mL[149]
CAE 25 mg/mL and CME 25 mg/mL[150]
In vivo--Natural infectionGIN-50 mL/P.O. of A. campestris macerate as single dose[151]
CattleOutdoorNatural infectionGIN-100–150 mg/kg per subject twice in two weeks[11]
Gerbil--GINH. contortus160 mg/mL[143]
GoatOutdoorNatural infectionGINH. contortus and Teladorsagia circumcincta4 mg/kg of n-hexane extract of A. cina (Acn-h)[81]
MiceIndoor-GINHymenolepis nana, Aspiculuris tetraptera, Syphacia obvelata150 mg/kg[152]
Rat--GINTrichinella spiralis300 and 600 mg/kg[147]
Sheep--GINH. contortus, Trichostrongylus colubriformis, Trichostrongylus axei, Oesophagostomum columbianum, Strongyloides papillosus and Trichuris ovisCAE and CME 2.0 and 3.0 g [149]
H. contortus, T. ovis, Chabertia ovina, Bunostomum trigonocephalum y O. columbianumCAE and CEE at 1.0 and 2.0 g kg−1 BW [150]
PlatelmintFasciola hepatica160 mg/kg (intramuscular dose)[131]
Natural infectionGIN-4, 6 and 8% DM[148]
IndoorExperimental infectionGINH. contortus0.34% DM[126]
-: Not specified. DM: dry matter EC50: Half maximal effective concentration CAE: crude aqueous extracts CEE: crude ethanolic extracts CME: crude methanol extracts.

4.2. Cichorium intybus L.

Chicory (C. intybus L.) is a perennial plant of the Asteraceae family from the Mediterranean basin, but today it is widely distributed in temperate and semiarid areas around the world. It can be wild or cultivated, and was historically used for multiple purposes, including human consumption [130,153]. There is a review by Li and Kemp [154] about chicory forage yield and animal production. The Puna cultivar of chicory can grow at a rate of >150 kg DM per ha per day in favourable conditions, and herbage production of 7–9 t per ha per year is very common for pure chicory stands for the first two or three years under good grazing conditions [154].
Livestock performance seems to be unaffected by chicory consumption; it can be similar to legume fodder consumption and it can increase yields if it used as a supplement to milk livestock [155], but, at the same time, the compounds (alkaloids, terpenes, saponins, lactones, glycosides, and phenolic compounds) that provoke benefits in animals in higher doses can have antinutritional or detrimental effects [156].
Most of its antiparasitic active compounds have been identified and well-described, e.g., 8-deoxylactucin has been described as a main molecule with antiparasitic activity [130], and other compounds, such as some anthocyanins or flavonoids, have been reported with antiparasitic effects [157].
In vivo experiments of chicory have been mainly conducted in sheep, and few in cattle and deer; however, goat in vivo studies have not been found for this review. The activity of the chicory produces a reduction in faecal eggs excretion in young animals [33,134,158] and reduces the viability of eggs and larvae stages of different GIN [82,159,160,161]. Although most of the research on the antiparasitic effect of chicory has been conducted against GIN (the description of trials for antiparasitic activity of C. intybus are summarised in Table 2), Woolsey et al. [162] found in vitro inhibitory effects against Cryptosporidium parvum, a protozoon causing production losses and health problems in livestock. This is therefore a promising line of action requiring further research.
The nutritional value and CT content of C. intybus are summarised in Table 3.

4.3. Ericaceae Family

Heather species (Erica spp., Calluna vulgaris (L.) Hull, and others) belong to the Ericaceae family and are frequent in the natural vegetation of mountains in humid temperate areas. These species have low nutritive value [94] and a relatively high content of CT (from 30 to 100 g tannic acid equivalents per kg DM) [47].
Grazing has been a traditional management method of European heathlands [170]. Heather species have been successfully used in the diets of different livestock species, such as goats, without substantial nutritional cost [105]. Hence, goats seem to be the main species able to include high proportions of heather in their diets [171]. However, López et al. [136] showed that heather-dominated heathlands are unable to maintain profitable grazing systems and to cover the nutritional needs of other species, such as horses. The low nutritive quality of the main plant components of these communities in autumn requires animal access to other more nutritious plant communities or feeding supplementation, in order to enhance foal growth and maintain sustainable horse grazing systems.
The anthelmintic effects of three Ericaceae species (C. vulgaris (L.) Hull, Erica cinerea L., and Erica umbellata L.) on different T. colubriformis development stages have been shown in vitro [54].
Furthermore, in vivo assays have shown interesting results. Moreno-Gonzalo et al. [172] suggested that heather consumption by goats reduces incoming larvae establishment if it is consumed during the infection of T. colubriformis, and reduces FEC by means of a combination between worm burden and female worm fecundity reduction. What is more, studies focused on the supplementation of heather for grazing goats have shown a reduction in the levels of GIN egg excretion associated with a decrease in worm fertility and/or a reduction in the establishment of incoming L3, as well as an apparent greater resilience of goats against gastrointestinal nematode infections [105,132,173,174,175]. However, some limitations associated with these trials should be addressed, such as the lack of heather consumption recorded per animal, the ignorance of total worm burden, and nematode stages involved and/or the strong dependence of weather conditions in the GIN infection dynamics. Additionally, as these studies were conducted in grazing conditions, it was not possible to distinguish whether the reduced worm burden in heather-supplemented goats was due to the reduced degree of pasture contamination (because of the lower levels of egg excretion in faeces) or the direct effect of heather consumption on the mortality and fertility of parasites. The description of trials for antiparasitic activity of Ericaceae family is summarised in Table 4.
The inclusion of these plant species, together with areas of improved pastures with tannin-rich grass-legumes, could become an effective tool in achieving the sustainability of animal production systems [176] and animal health in marginal mountain areas.

4.4. Hedysarum coronarium L.

Sulla (H. coronarium L.) is a short-lived perennial legume native to the Mediterranean basin where it is grown as a two-year forage crop for grazing and/or hay or silage production [177]. Grazing on sulla forage has been shown to have a positive impact on the productivity of different animal species, such as sheep [178,179,180,181] and goats [182]. These effects have been attributed to its high protein content, degradable-to-structural carbohydrate ratio [183], and moderate content of CT. Its CT content shows large variability, from 8 to 50 g/kg of whole plant DM, depending on the environment, growth stage, and genotype [184]; although these CTs have been pointed out as being responsible for its AH effect, there are studies suggesting that other compounds would also be able to affect the viability of parasites [56]. The description of trials for the antiparasitic activity of the Ericaceae family is summarised in Table 5.
This plant is a difficult herbage to agronomically manage because it requires a very specific Rhizobium as a nitrogen-fixing bacterial symbiont. In addition, although sulla could be used as a complete diet, it seems feasible to extend the usefulness of a specific pasture by only intermittently grazing it during short periods (at intervals), as it would require some exposure to it, at least on a monthly basis [185]. What is more, it is unlikely that any farm could have a sufficient quantity of this plant for continuous grazing for all animals; hence, pasture plots with a high density of sulla should be managed with rotational grazing.
Table 5. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Hedysarum coronarium L.
Table 5. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Hedysarum coronarium L.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitroDeer--Lung wormsDictyocaulus stages viviparus1200 μg/mL[78]
Sheep--GINHaemonchus contortus, Ostertagia circumcincta and Trichostrongylus colubriformis50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1000 mg CT/mL[56]
T. colubriformis200, 400 μg/mL[72]
H. contortus3.3% DM[126]
O. circumcincta; T. colubriformis3.13, 3.51% DM[133]
T. colubriformis400, 800, 1000 μg/mL[186]
In vivoDeerIndoorExperimental infectionGIN-3.49% DM[117]
Lung wormsDictyocaulus sp3.49% DM[117]
GoatIndoorNatural infectionGINTeladorsagia circumcincta, T.colubriformis, T. vitrinus and Trichuris spp.26 g/kg free CT, 18 g/kg protein-bound CT and 1 g/kg fibre-bound CT[185]
SheepIndoorExperimental infectionGINH. contortus3.3% DM[126]
O. circumcincta; T. colubriformis3.13, 3.51% DM[133]
T. colubriformis3% DM[135]
O. circumcincta and T. colubriformis-[187]
OutdoorExperimental infectionGINT. axei, O. circumcincta and T. colubriformis (experimento 2)9.93 and 12.05% DM[4]
T. colubriformis15.8% DM[125]
O. circumcincta; T. colubriformis3.13, 3.51% DM[133]
T. circumcincta36.9 g/kg DM[167]
T. circumcincta15.8 g/kg DM[168]
T. colubriformis and O. circumcincta-[188]
Natural infectionGINT. axei, O. circumcincta and T. colubriformis (experimento 2)9.93 and 12.05% DM[4]
Ostertagia, Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Cooperia-[137]
T. colubriformis and O. circumcincta-[188]
--[189]
-: Not specified. DM: dry matter CT: condensed tannins.
The nutritional value and CT content of H. coronarium is summarised in Table 6.

4.5. Lotus spp.

The genus Lotus is formed by perennial legumes adapted to a wide range of weather conditions, including low soil quality and drought [76]. It is usually found as a wild plant, but it can be grown.
The main active compounds identified in Lotus spp. are CT [192,193].
The most studied species is birdsfoot trefoil (L. corniculatus L.), but other species such as greater bird’s-foot-trefoil (L. pedunculatus Cav.) have been included in some experiments [74]. The antiparasitic effect of birdsfoot trefoil has been studied in several experiments, its consumption showing a positive effect in the reduction of FEC or parasite loads when it is consumed fresh (directly grazed or harvested) with a crescent effect depending on the numbers of days eating it [160,193,194]. For example, in the experiment by Cireșan et al. [194], the parasite load was reduced from 1.2% after 7 days to 89.39% after 28 days of consumption. In vitro experiments have shown effects on exsheathment inhibition of L3 [76], but it could not be replicated in in vivo experiments [83], which implies that more research should be conducted to determine the ways of action and the antiparasitic activity of the Lotus genus against GIN. The description of trials for antiparasitic activity of Lotus spp. is summarised in Table 7.
The nutritional value and CT content of L. corniculatus are summarised in Table 8.

4.6. Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.

Sainfoin (O. viciifolia Scop.) is a fodder legume forage which can be found in temperate zones, which tolerates drought, cold, and low nutrient status [198]. This fodder is characterised by its appealing features such as high palatability and protein levels [2]. It is widespread in southern Europe and its properties make it very popular on Middle Eastern plateaus and some areas of Spain, Italy, and other countries of Eastern Europe [199]. It has been the subject of renewed interest because it exhibits good nutritional (Table 9) and agronomic qualities beyond its AH properties in such climate conditions [37,123,199,200,201]. Furthermore, sainfoins’ ability to withstand grazing [202] makes it an ideal candidate to provide a therapeutic or preventive antiparasitic treatment.
Its antiparasitic effects have been ascribed to the nature of its secondary metabolites, especially its CT [37,60,123,201]. However, although CT have been its most studied molecules, sainfoin produces other phenolic compounds, such as hydroxybenzoic acids, hydroxycinnamic acids, dihydroflavonols, flavones, flavonols, and flavonol glycosides [203].
Sainfoin has shown positive effects against various parasitic nematode species in field studies [70,204]. In general, positive antiparasitic effects have been achieved in intestinal worms, where sainfoin consumption resulted in lower FEC, total egg output [10,70,138,205], and inhibitory activity against L3 of GIN, as measured by larval migration inhibition assay [79,186]. In the case of abomasal parasites, there have been contradictory results; although Paolini et al. [69] found no effect of the intake of sainfoin in goats, Heckendorn et al. [123,200] showed an effect of sainfoin on the same parasite in sheep, when animals were offered sainfoin from 27–28 days post-infection. Sainfoin consumption has been associated with a decrease in nematode fertility or counts in sheep [123,126] and goats [138]. However, the results obtained by Collas et al. [206] in horses do not support any effect of this species on strongyle worm counts or FEC. According to Paolini et al., [138] a repeated distribution of sainfoin hay to grazing dairy goats might be a valuable alternative to reduce nematode infections.
It has been shown that sainfoin extracts not only have an effect against different GIN species in a dose-dependent manner [44,53,201], but also that there are variable CT contents and composition among different sainfoin accessions [207]. This is consistent with different studies which highlighted a lower action of sainfoin against parasites when CT levels were lower than 2% of DM intake [44,123,125,138,208]. However, in a study where different tanniferous plants (Cichorium intybus L., Lotus corniculatus L.) were tested as antiparasitic against GIN in lambs, sainfoin had the highest content of CT, allowed a higher daily weight gain than the control diet, and, such as the other fodder included in the study, showed antiparasitic activity [60]. The description of trials for antiparasitic activity of O. viciifolia is summarised in Table 10.
Future sainfoin cultivation programmes are necessary to evaluate its CT content and composition in order to exploit its full potential as AH forage legume [201].

5. Future Research and Conclusions

Overall, the information collected in the present review suggests that future studies must be focused on the investigation of individual parasite species responses towards individual bioactive compounds of different plants in order to learn more about their specific direct action [26]. Moreover, further studies carried out under controlled conditions are needed to determine these changes more precisely. Therefore, it is essential that the first investigations into the effects of an antiparasitic plant be carried out against the most important parasites. Furthermore, the first investigations should be carried out on indicator parasites that serve as laboratory models.
In contrast to synthetic anthelmintic drugs, forages are not imposed but browsed, and can be offered to animals or even used as tannin additives in unified rations to ensure the necessary dose intake.
Different factors and variables such as the estimation of the daily voluntary pasture intake, the optimal dosages for antiparasitic effect, the days of treatment or intake, and a clarification of the exact action mechanisms must be clarified in order to explain the effects of PSM on livestock nutrition and performance. What is more, the anthelmintic effects of CT-containing fodder used as nutraceuticals depend first on voluntary feed intake, which should be studied to design anthelmintic grazing strategies.
Torres-Fajardo et al. [215] suggested that the identification of the nutraceutical value of plant species would be a key factor in order to consider developing feeding strategies and management schemes for the sustainable use of pastures. This alternative approach indicates that different natural or cultivated herbages could be used within farm grazing rotations or as fresh or conservated fodders to reduce anthelmintic usage.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.R.-H., C.R.-P. and V.R.-E.; methodology, P.R.-H., C.R.-P., C.D.-G.; investigation, P.R.-H., C.R.-P., S.S.-F.; resources, S.S.-F., C.D.-G., V.R.-E.; data curation, P.R.-H., C.R.-P.; writing—original draft preparation, P.R.-H., C.R.-P., V.R.-E.; writing—review and editing, S.S.-F., C.D.-G., P.J.R.-M., R.Z., F.J.M.-M., V.R.-E.; visualization, C.R.-P., P.R.-H.; supervision, V.R.-E.; project administration, S.S.-F., C.D.-G.; funding acquisition, V.R.-E., C.D.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the EU project LIFE17 CCA/ES/000035—LiveAdapt “Adapting Livestock farming to climate change in the South of Europe”. Carolina Reyes-Palomo and Santos Sanz-Fernández are supported by this LIFE project (LIFE17 CCA/ES/000035), and Pablo Rodríguez-Hernández holds a predoctoral contract (Submodality 2.2 ‘Predoctoral research staff’) funded by University of Córdoba, Spain.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Arroyo-Lopez, C.; Manolaraki, F.; Saratsis, A.; Saratsi, K.; Stefanakis, A.; Skampardonis, V.; Voutzourakis, N.; Hoste, H.; Sotiraki, S. Anthelmintic Effect of Carob Pods and Sainfoin Hay When Fed to Lambs after Experimental Trickle Infections with Haemonchus Contortus and Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Parasite 2014, 21, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Desrues, O.; Peña-Espinoza, M.; Hansen, T.V.A.; Enemark, H.L.; Thamsborg, S.M. Anti-Parasitic Activity of Pelleted Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) against Ostertagia Ostertagi and Cooperia Oncophora in Calves. Parasites Vectors 2016, 9, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Supali, T.; Verweij, J.J.; Wiria, A.E.; Djuardi, Y.; Hamid, F.; Kaisar, M.M.M.; Wammes, L.J.; van Lieshout, L.; Luty, A.J.F.; Sartono, E.; et al. Polyparasitism and Its Impact on the Immune System. Int. J. Parasitol. 2010, 40, 1171–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Niezen, J.H.; Waghorn, T.S.; Charleston, W.A.G.; Waghorn, G.C. Growth and Gastrointestinal Nematode Parasitism in Lambs Grazing Either Lucerne (Medicago Sativa) or Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) Which Contains Condensed Tannins. J. Agric. Sci. 1995, 125, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kimambo, A.E.; MacRae, J.C.; Walker, A.; Watt, C.F.; Coop, R.L. Effect of Prolonged Subclinical Infection with Trichostrongylus Colubriformis on the Performance and Nitrogen Metabolism of Growing Lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 1988, 28, 191–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. MacRae, J.C. Metabolic Consequences of Intestinal Parasitism. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1993, 52, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Coop, R.L.; Kyriazakis, I. Influence of Host Nutrition on the Development and Consequences of Nematode Parasitism in Ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2001, 17, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.; Paolini, V.; Aguilar-Caballero, A.; Etter, E.; Lefrileux, Y.; Chartier, C.; Broqua, C. Interactions between Nutrition and Gastrointestinal Infections with Parasitic Nematodes in Goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2005, 60, 141–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Charlier, J.; Rinaldi, L.; Musella, V.; Ploeger, H.W.; Chartier, C.; Vineer, H.R.; Hinney, B.; von Samson-Himmelstjerna, G.; Băcescu, B.; Mickiewicz, M.; et al. Initial Assessment of the Economic Burden of Major Parasitic Helminth Infections to the Ruminant Livestock Industry in Europe. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 182, 105103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Paolini, V.; Bergeaud, J.P.; Grisez, C.; Prevot, F.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H. Effects of Condensed Tannins on Goats Experimentally Infected with Haemonchus Contortus. J. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 113, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Anagonou, S.I.N.; Adenile, D.A.; Daga, D.F.; Odoumbourou, M.S.; Akouedegni, C.G.; Hounzangbe-Adote, S. Comparative Study of the Effects of Albendazole and Annual Mug Wort (Artemisia Annua) Powder on Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Cattle. World J. Biol. Pharm. Health Sci. 2022, 10, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hovi, M.; Sundrum, A.; Thamsborg, S.M. Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Livestock Production in Europe: Current State and Future Challenges. Livest. Prod. Sci. 2003, 80, 41–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. European Parlament; European Council Regulation (EU). 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on Organic Production and Labelling of Organic Products and Repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 834/2007; European Parlament: Strasbourg, France, 2018; pp. 1–92. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hughes, P.L.; Dowling, A.F.; Callinan, A.P.L. Resistance to Macrocyclic Lactone Anthelmintics and Associated Risk Factors on Sheep Farms in the Lower North Island of New Zealand. New Zealand Vet. J. 2007, 55, 177–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jackson, F.; Varady, M.; Bartley, D.J. Managing Anthelmintic Resistance in Goats—Can We Learn Lessons from Sheep? Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 103, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kaplan, R.M.; Vidyashankar, A.N. An Inconvenient Truth: Global Worming and Anthelmintic Resistance. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Demeler, J.; Enemark, H.L. Field Efficacy of Four Anthelmintics and Confirmation of Drug-Resistant Nematodes by Controlled Efficacy Test and Pyrosequencing on a Sheep and Goat Farm in Denmark. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 206, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gaudin, E.; Simon, M.; Quijada, J.; Schelcher, F.; Sutra, J.F.; Lespine, A.; Hoste, H. Efficacy of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Pellets against Multi Resistant Haemonchus Contortus and Interaction with Oral Ivermectin: Implications for on-Farm Control. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 227, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waller, P.J. From Discovery to Development: Current Industry Perspectives for the Development of Novel Methods of Helminth Control in Livestock. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kaminsky, R.; Ducray, P.; Jung, M.; Clover, R.; Rufener, L.; Bouvier, J.; Weber, S.S.; Wenger, A.; Wieland-Berghausen, S.; Goebel, T.; et al. A New Class of Anthelmintics Effective against Drug-Resistant Nematodes. Nature 2008, 452, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Scott, I.; Pomroy, W.E.; Kenyon, P.R.; Smith, G.; Adlington, B.; Moss, A. Lack of Efficacy of Monepantel against Teladorsagia Circumcincta and Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Van den Brom, R.; Moll, L.; Kappert, C.; Vellema, P. Haemonchus Contortus Resistance to Monepantel in Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 209, 278–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez-Valladares, M.; Geurden, T.; Bartram, D.J.; Martínez-Pérez, J.M.; Robles-Pérez, D.; Bohórquez, A.; Florez, E.; Meana, A.; Rojo-Vázquez, F.A. Resistance of Gastrointestinal Nematodes to the Most Commonly Used Anthelmintics in Sheep, Cattle and Horses in Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 211, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Stampa, E.; Schipmann-Schwarze, C.; Hamm, U. Consumer Perceptions, Preferences, and Behavior Regarding Pasture-Raised Livestock Products: A Review. Food Qual. Prefer. 2020, 82, 103872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Waller, P.J.; Thamsborg, S.M. Nematode Control in ‘Green’ Ruminant Production Systems. Trends Parasitol. 2004, 20, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hoste, H.; Jackson, F.; Athanasiadou, S.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Hoskin, S.O. The Effects of Tannin-Rich Plants on Parasitic Nematodes in Ruminants. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22, 253–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. McKellar, Q.A. Ecotoxicology and Residues of Anthelmintic Compounds. Vet. Parasitol. 1997, 72, 413–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lumaret, J.P.; Errouissi, F. Use of Anthelmintics in Herbivores and Evaluation of Risks for the Non Target Fauna of Pastures. Vet. Res. 2002, 33, 547–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Verdú, J.R.; Lobo, J.M.; Sánchez-Piñero, F.; Gallego, B.; Numa, C.; Lumaret, J.P.; Cortez, V.; Ortiz, A.J.; Tonelli, M.; García-Teba, J.P.; et al. Ivermectin Residues Disrupt Dung Beetle Diversity, Soil Properties and Ecosystem Functioning: An Interdisciplinary Field Study. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 618, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sanz-Fernández, S.; Reyes-Palomo, C.; Díaz-Gaona, C.; Rodríguez Estévez, V. Antiparasitarios Alternativos. Fertil. De La Tierra Rev. De Agric. Ecológica 2020, 81, 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  31. Sanz-Fernández, S.; Reyes-Palomo, C.; Díaz-Gaona, C.; Rodríguez-Estévez, V. Plantas Antiparasitarias Para La Ganadería Extensiva. AE Rev. Agroecol. Divulg. 2019, 38, 47. [Google Scholar]
  32. Rochfort, S.; Parker, A.J.; Dunshea, F.R. Plant Bioactives for Ruminant Health and Productivity. Phytochemistry 2008, 69, 299–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Athanasiadou, S.; Gray, D.; Younie, D.; Tzamaloukas, O.; Jackson, F.; Kyriazakis, I. The Use of Chicory for Parasite Control in Organic Ewes and Their Lambs. Parasitology 2007, 134, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jayawardene, K.D.; Palombo, E.A.; Boag, P.R. Natural Products Are a Promising Source for Anthelmintic Drug Discovery. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Terrill, T.H.; Dykes, G.S.; Shaik, S.A.; Miller, J.E.; Kouakou, B.; Kannan, G.; Burke, J.M.; Mosjidis, J.A. Efficacy of Sericea Lespedeza Hay as a Natural Dewormer in Goats: Dose Titration Study. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 163, 52–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Terrill, T.H.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Moore, D.A.; Shaik, S.A.; Miller, J.E.; Burke, J.M.; Muir, J.P.; Wolfe, R. Effect of Pelleting on Efficacy of Sericea Lespedeza Hay as a Natural Dewormer in Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 146, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Brunet, S.; Jackson, F.; Hoste, H. Effects of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Extract and Monomers of Condensed Tannins on the Association of Abomasal Nematode Larvae with Fundic Explants. Int. J. Parasitol. 2008, 38, 783–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brunet, S.; De Montellano, C.M.O.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Aguilar-Caballero, A.J.; Capetillo-Leal, C.; Hoste, H. Effect of the Consumption of Lysiloma Latisiliquum on the Larval Establishment of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 157, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Garcia-Bustos, J.F.; Sleebs, B.E.; Gasser, R.B. An Appraisal of Natural Products Active against Parasitic Nematodes of Animals. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Githiori, J.B.; Athanasiadou, S.; Thamsborg, S.M. Use of Plants in Novel Approaches for Control of Gastrointestinal Helminths in Livestock with Emphasis on Small Ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mueller-Harvey, I.; Bee, G.; Dohme-Meier, F.; Hoste, H.; Karonen, M.; Kölliker, R.; Lüscher, A.; Niderkorn, V.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Salminen, J.P.; et al. Benefits of Condensed Tannins in Forage Legumes Fed to Ruminants: Importance of Structure, Concentration, and Diet Composition. Crop Sci. 2019, 59, 861–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Oliveira Santos, F.; Ponce Morais Cerqueira, A.; Branco, A.; José Moreira Batatinha, M.; Borges Botura, M. Anthelmintic Activity of Plants against Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Goats: A Review. Parasitology 2019, 146, 1233–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Al-Snafi, A.E. Antiparasitic Effects of Medicinal Plants (Part 1)-A Review. J. Pharm. 2016, 6, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
  44. Manolaraki, F.; Sotiraki, S.; Stefanakis, A.; Skampardonis, V.; Volanis, M.; Hoste, H. Anthelmintic Activity of Some Mediterranean Browse Plants against Parasitic Nematodes. Parasitology 2010, 137, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Villalba, J.J.; Miller, J.; Ungar, E.D.; Landau, S.Y.; Glendinning, J. Ruminant Self-Medication against Gastrointestinal Nematodes: Evidence, Mechanism, and Origins. Parasite 2014, 21, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Torres-Fajardo, R.A.; González-Pech, P.G.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Ventura-Cordero, J.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J. Criollo Goats Limit Their Grass Intake in the Early Morning Suggesting a Prophylactic Self-Medication Behaviour in a Heterogeneous Vegetation. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2019, 51, 2473–2479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Ferre, I.; Celaya, R.; Frutos, P.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Hervás, G.; García, U.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Osoro, K. Potential Use of Heather to Control Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2012, 103, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Mayer, M.; Vogl, C.R.; Amorena, M.; Hamburger, M.; Walkenhorst, M. Treatment of Organic Livestock with Medicinal Plants: A Systematic Review of European Ethnoveterinary Research. Forsch. Komplementmed. 2014, 21, 375–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Yang, W.; Zhang, D.; Cai, X.; Xia, L.; Luo, Y.; Cheng, X.; An, S. Significant Alterations in Soil Fungal Communities along a Chronosequence of Spartina Alterniflora Invasion in a Chinese Yellow Sea Coastal Wetland. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 693, 133548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Acamovic, T.; Brooker, J.D. Biochemistry of Plant Secondary Metabolites and Their Effects in Animals. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2005, 64, 403–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Bodas, R.; Prieto, N.; García-González, R.; Andrés, S.; Giráldez, F.J.; López, S. Manipulation of Rumen Fermentation and Methane Production with Plant Secondary Metabolites. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2012, 176, 78–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Barrau, E.; Fabre, N.; Fouraste, I.; Hoste, H. Effect of Bioactive Compounds from Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia Scop.) on the in Vitro Larval Migration of Haemonchus Contortus: Role of Tannins and Flavonol Glycosides. Parasitology 2005, 131, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Brunet, S.; Hoste, H. Monomers of Condensed Tannins Affect the Larval Exsheathment of Parasitic Nematodes of Ruminants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 7481–7487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Manolaraki, F.; Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Celaya, R.; Osoro, K.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Hoste, H.; Ferre, I. In Vitro Effect of Heather (Ericaceae) Extracts on Different Development Stages of Teladorsagia Circumcincta and Haemonchus Contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Molan, A.L.; Meagher, L.P.; Spencer, P.A.; Sivakumaran, S. Effect of Flavan-3-Ols on in Vitro Egg Hatching, Larval Development and Viability of Infective Larvae of Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 1691–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Molan, A.L.; Alexander, R.A.; Brookes, I.M.; McNabb, W.C. Effects of an Extract from Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) Containing Condensed Tannins on the Migration of Three Sheep Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Vitro. Proc. New Zealand Soc. Anim. Prod. 2000, 60, 21–25. [Google Scholar]
  57. Rufino-Moya, P.J. Influencia Del Tipo de Forraje y de La Presencia de Taninos Condensados En La Fermentación in Vitro de Las Dietas de Ovino En El Área Mediterránea. Uso de Biomarcadores Para La Trazabilidad Del Sistema de Alimentación. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  58. Mueller-Harvey, I.; McAllan, A.B. Tannins: Their Biochemistry and Nutritional Properties. Adv. Plant Cell Biochem. Biotechnol. 1992, 1, 151–217. [Google Scholar]
  59. Desrues, O.; Fryganas, C.; Ropiak, H.M.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Enemark, H.L.; Thamsborg, S.M. Impact of Chemical Structure of Flavanol Monomers and Condensed Tannins on in Vitro Anthelmintic Activity against Bovine Nematodes. Parasitology 2016, 143, 444–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  60. Heckendorn, F.; Häring, D.A.; Maurer, V.; Senn, M.; Hertzberg, H. Individual Administration of Three Tanniferous Forage Plants to Lambs Artificially Infected with Haemonchus Contortus and Cooperia Curticei. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 146, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Saratsis, A.; Regos, I.; Tzanidakis, N.; Voutzourakis, N.; Stefanakis, A.; Treuter, D.; Joachim, A.; Sotiraki, S. In Vivo and in Vitro Efficacy of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) against Eimeria Spp in Lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 188, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Markovics, A.; Cohen, I.; Muklada, H.; Glasser, T.A.; Dvash, L.; Ungar, E.D.; Azaizeh, H.; Landau, S.Y. Consumption of Pistacia Lentiscus Foliage Alleviates Coccidiosis in Young Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 186, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Burke, J.; Miller, J.E.; Terrill, T.H.; Orlik, S.T.; Acharya, M.; Garza, J.J.; Mosjidis, J.A. Sericea Lespdeza as an Aid in the Control of Emeria Spp. in Lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 193, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Kommuru, D.S.; Barker, T.; Desai, S.; Burke, J.M.; Ramsay, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Miller, J.E.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Kamisetti, N.; Terrill, T.H. Use of Pelleted Sericea Lespedeza (Lespedeza Cuneata) for Natural Control of Coccidia and Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Weaned Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 204, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Min, B.R.; Hart, S.P. Tannins for Suppression of Internal Parasites. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81, E102–E109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Tedeschi, L.O.; Muir, J.P.; Naumann, H.D.; Norris, A.B.; Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A.; Mertens-Talcott, S.U. Nutritional Aspects of Ecologically Relevant Phytochemicals in Ruminant Production. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gaudin, E.; Costes-Thiré, M.; Villalba, J.J.; Hoste, H.; Gerfault, V.; Ginane, C. Relative Abilities of Young Sheep and Goats to Self-Medicate with Tannin-Rich Sainfoin When Infected with Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Animal 2019, 13, 1498–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Osoro, K.; García, U.; Frutos, P.; Celaya, R.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Ferre, I. Effect of the Consumption of Heather on Incoming Larvae and Established Population of Teladorsagia Circumcincta in Experimentally Infected Cashmere Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 196, 124–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Paolini, V.; Prevot, F.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H. Lack of Effects of Quebracho and Sainfoin Hay on Incoming Third-Stage Larvae of Haemonchus Contortus in Goats. Vet. J. 2005, 170, 260–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Paolini, V.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H.; Paolini, V.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H. Effects of sainfoin hay on gastrointestinal infection with nematodes in goats. Vet. Rec. 2003, 152, 600–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kidane, A.; Houdijk, J.G.M.; Athanasiadou, S.; Tolkamp, B.J.; Kyriazakis, I. Effects of Maternal Protein Nutrition and Subsequent Grazing on Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) on Parasitism and Performance of Lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2010, 88, 1513–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Molan, A.L.; Waghorn, G.C.; McNabb, W.C. Effect of Condensed Tannins on Egg Hatching and Larval Development of Trichostrongylus Colubriformis in Vitro. Vet. Rec. 2002, 150, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Bahuaud, D.; Martinez-Ortiz De Montellano, C.; Chauveau, S.; Prevot, F.; Torres-Acosta, F.; Fouraste, I.; Hoste, H. Effects of Four Tanniferous Plant Extracts on the in Vitro Exsheathment of Third-Stage Larvae of Parasitic Nematodes. Parasitology 2006, 132, 545–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Novobilský, A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Thamsborg, S.M. Condensed Tannins Act against Cattle Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 182, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Alonso-Díaz, M.A.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Capetillo-Leal, C.; Brunet, S.; Hoste, H. Effects of Four Tropical Tanniniferous Plant Extracts on the Inhibition of Larval Migration and the Exsheathment Process of Trichostrongylus Colubriformis Infective Stage. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 153, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Barone, C.D.; Zajac, A.M.; Ferguson, S.M.; Brown, R.N.; Reed, J.D.; Krueger, C.G.; Petersson, K.H. In Vitro Screening of 51 Birdsfoot Trefoil (Lotus Corniculatus L.; Fabaceae) Strains for Anti-Parasitic Effects against Haemonchus Contortus. Parasitology 2019, 146, 828–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Brunet, S.; Aufrere, J.; El Babili, F.; Fouraste, I.; Hoste, H. The Kinetics of Exsheathment of Infective Nematode Larvae Is Disturbed in the Presence of a Tannin-Rich Plant Extract (Sainfoin) Both in Vitro and in Vivo. Parasitology 2007, 134, 1253–1262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Molan, A.L.; Hoskin, S.O.; Barry, T.N.; McNabb, W.C. Effect of Condensed Tannins Extracted from Four Forages on the Viability of the Larvae of Deer Lungworms and Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Vet. Rec. 2000, 147, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Paolini, V.; Fouraste, I.; Koste, H. In Vitro Effects of Three Woody Plant and Sainfoin Extracts on 3rd-Stage Larvae and Adult Worms of Three Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Parasitology 2004, 129, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.; Alonso-diaz, M.Á.; Brunet, S.; Sandoval-Castro, C.; Adote, S.H. Identification and Validation of Bioactive Plants for the Control of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Small Ruminants. Trop. Biomed. 2008, 25, 56–72. [Google Scholar]
  81. Higuera-Piedrahita, R.I.; Dolores-Hernández, M.; de la-Cruz-Cruz, H.A.; Andrade-Montemayor, H.M.; Zamilpa, A.; López-Arellano, R.; González-Garduño, R.; Cuéllar-Ordaz, J.A.; Mendoza-de-Gives, P.; López-Arellano, M.E. An Artemisia Cina N-Hexane Extract Reduces the Haemonchus Contortus and Teladorsagia Circumcincta Fecal Egg Count in Naturally Infected Periparturient Goats. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2022, 54, 95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Boas, U.; Williams, A.R.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Simonsen, H.T.; Enemark, H.L. Sesquiterpene Lactone Containing Extracts from Two Cultivars of Forage Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) Show Distinctive Chemical Profiles and in Vitro Activity against Ostertagia Ostertagi. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2015, 5, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Lonngren, K.J.; Barone, C.D.; Zajac, A.M.; Brown, R.N.; Reed, J.D.; Krueger, C.G.; Petersson, K.H. Effect of Birdsfoot Trefoil Cultivars on Exsheathment of Haemonchus Contortus in Fistulated Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 287, 109271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Makkar, H.P.S. Effects and Fate of Tannins in Ruminant Animals, Adaptation to Tannins, and Strategies to Overcome Detrimental Effects of Feeding Tannin-Rich Feeds. Small Rumin. Res. 2003, 49, 241–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I. Plant Secondary Metabolites: Antiparasitic Effects and Their Role in Ruminant Production Systems. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2004, 63, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Hertzberg, H.; Huwyler, U.; Kohler, L.; Rehbein, S.; Wanner, M. Kinetics of Exsheathment of Infective Ovine and Bovine Strongylid Larvae in Vivo and in Vitro. Parasitology 2002, 125, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Hansen, T.V.A.; Fryganas, C.; Acevedo, N.; Caraballo, L.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Williams, A.R. Proanthocyanidins Inhibit Ascaris Suum Glutathione-S-Transferase Activity and Increase Susceptibility of Larvae to Levamisole in Vitro. Parasitol. Int. 2016, 65, 336–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kabasa, J.D.; Opuda-Asibo, J.; Ter Meulen, U. The Effect of Oral Administration of Polyethylene Glycol on Faecal Helminth Egg Counts in Pregnant Goats Grazed on Browse Containing Condensed Tannins. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2000, 32, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rufino-Moya, P.J.; Blanco, M.; Bertolín, J.R.; Joy, M. Methane Production of Fresh Sainfoin, with or without PEG, and Fresh Alfalfa at Different Stages of Maturity Is Similar but the Fermentation End Products Vary. Animals 2019, 9, 197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Mazandarani, M.; Majidi, Z.; Zarghami-Moghaddam, P.; Abrodi, M.; Hemati, H.; Fathiazad, F. Essential Oil Composition, Total Phenol, Flavonoid, Anthocyanin and Antioxidant Activities in Different Parts of Artemisia Annua L. in Two Localities (North of Iran). J. Med. Plants By-Prod. 2012, 1, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Salah, L.; Eddine, L.S.; Redha, O.M.; Ladjel, S. Influence of Solvent Extraction on Phenolic Content, Antioxidant and Anti-Inflammatory Activities of Aerial Parts Extract from Algerian Artemisia Herba-Alba. J. Pharm. Res. 2016, 10, 58–64. [Google Scholar]
  92. Sunmonu, T.O.; Afolayan, A.J. Evaluation of Polyphenolic Content and Antioxidant Activity of Artemisia Afra Jacq. Ex Willd. Aqueous Extract. Pak. J. Nutr. 2012, 11, 520–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Theodoridou, K.; Aufrère, J.; Niderkorn, V.; Andueza, D.; Le Morvan, A.; Picard, F.; Baumont, R. In Vitro Study of the Effects of Condensed Tannins in Sainfoin on the Digestive Process in the Rumen at Two Vegetation Cycles. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 170, 147–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Ramos, G.; Giráldez, F.J.; Mantecón, A.R. Condensed Tannin Content of Several Shrub Species from a Mountain Area in Northern Spain, and Its Relationship to Various Indicators of Nutritive Value. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2002, 95, 215–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Rufino-Moya, P.J.; Blanco, M.; Bertolín, J.R.; Joy, M. Effect of the Method of Preservation on the Chemical Composition and in Vitro Fermentation Characteristics in Two Legumes Rich in Condensed Tannins. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2019, 251, 12–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Giráldez, F.J.; Mantecón, A.R. An in Vitro Study on the Ability of Polyethylene Glycol to Inhibit the Effect of Quebracho Tannins and Tannic Acid on Rumen Fermentation in Sheep, Goats, Cows, and Deer. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 2004, 55, 1125–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Msaada, K.; Salem, N.; Bachrouch, O.; Bousselmi, S.; Tammar, S.; Alfaify, A.; Al Sane, K.; Ben Ammar, W.; Azeiz, S.; Haj Brahim, A.; et al. Chemical Composition and Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Activities of Wormwood (Artemisia Absinthium L.) Essential Oils and Phenolics. J. Chem. 2015, 2015, 804658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Jonker, A.; Yu, P. The Occurrence, Biosynthesis, and Molecular Structure of Proanthocyanidins and Their Effects on Legume Forage Protein Precipitation, Digestion and Absorption in the Ruminant Digestive Tract. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Deshpande, S.S.; Sathe, S.K.; Salunkhe, D.K. Chemistry and Safety of Plant Polyphenols. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1984, 177, 457–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Min, B.R.; Barry, T.N.; Attwood, G.T.; McNabb, W.C. The Effect of Condensed Tannins on the Nutrition and Health of Ruminants Fed Fresh Temperate Forages: A Review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2003, 106, 3–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Waghorn, G.C.; McNabb, W.C. Consequences of Plant Phenolic Compounds for Productivity and Health of Ruminants. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2003, 62, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ketzis, J.K.; Vercruysse, J.; Stromberg, B.E.; Larsen, M.; Athanasiadou, S.; Houdijk, J.G.M. Evaluation of Efficacy Expectations for Novel and Non-Chemical Helminth Control Strategies in Ruminants. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 139, 321–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mueller-Harvey, I. Unravelling the Conundrum of Tannins in Animal Nutrition and Health. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2006, 86, 2010–2037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Barry, T.N.; McNabb, W.C. The Implications of Condensed Tannins on the Nutritive Value of Temperate Forages Fed to Ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 1999, 81, 263–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Frutos, P.; Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Hervás, G.; García, U.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Celaya, R.; Toral, P.G.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Ferre, I.; Osoro, K. Is the Anthelmintic Effect of Heather Supplementation to Grazing Goats Always Accompanied by Anti-Nutritional Effects? Animal 2008, 2, 1449–1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Houdijk, J.G.M.; Athanasiadou, S. Direct and Indirect Effects of Host Nutrition on Ruminant Gastrointestinal Nematodes. In Proceedings of the VI International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores, Mérida, México, October 2003; Universidad Autónoma de Yucatán: Mérida, México, 2003; pp. 213–236. [Google Scholar]
  107. Nawab, A.; Tang, S.; Gao, W.; Li, G.; Xiao, M.; An, L.; Wu, J.; Liu, W. Tannin Supplementation in Animal Feeding; Mitigation Strategies to Overcome the Toxic Effects of Tannins on Animal Health: A Review. J. Agric. Sci. 2020, 12, p217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Lees, G.L. Condensed Tannins in Some Forage Legumes: Their Role in the Prevention of Ruminant Pasture Bloat. Basic Life Sci. 1992, 59, 915–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Patra, A.K.; Saxena, J. Exploitation of Dietary Tannins to Improve Rumen Metabolism and Ruminant Nutrition. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2011, 91, 24–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Goel, G.; Makkar, H.P.S. Methane Mitigation from Ruminants Using Tannins and Saponins. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2012, 44, 729–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Jayanegara, A.; Leiber, F.; Kreuzer, M. Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Dietary Tannin Level and Methane Formation in Ruminants from in Vivo and in Vitro Experiments. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2012, 96, 365–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Aboagye, I.A.; Beauchemin, K.A. Potential of Molecular Weight and Structure of Tannins to Reduce Methane Emissions from Ruminants: A Review. Animals 2019, 9, 856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. Direct Anthelmintic Effects of Condensed Tannins towards Different Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Sheep: In Vitro and in Vivo Studies. Vet. Parasitol. 2001, 99, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. Effects of Short-Term Exposure to Condensed Tannins on Adult Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Vet. Rec. 2000, 146, 728–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. Consequences of Long-Term Feeding with Condensed Tannins on Sheep Parasitised with Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 1025–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Paolini, V.; Frayssines, A.; De La Farge, F.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H. Effects of Condensed Tannins on Established Populations and on Incoming Larvae of Trichostrongylus Colubriformis and Teladorsagia Circumcincta in Goats. Vet. Res. 2003, 34, 331–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Hoskin, S.O.; Wilson, P.R.; Barry, T.N.; Charleston, W.A.G.; Waghorn, G.C. Effect of Forage Legumes Containing Condensed Tannins on Lungworm (Dictyocaulus Sp.) and Gastrointestinal Parasitism in Young Red Deer (Cervus Elaphus). Res. Vet. Sci. 2000, 68, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Manolaraki, F.; Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Celaya, R.; Osoro, K.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Hoste, H.; Ferre, I. In Vitro Effect of Heather Extracts on Trichostrongylus Colubriformis Eggs, Larvae and Adults. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 197, 586–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Molan, A.L.; Sivakumaran, S.; Spencer, P.A.; Meagher, L.P. Green Tea Flavan-3-Ols and Oligomeric Proanthocyanidins Inhibit the Motility of Infective Larvae of Teladorsagia Circumcincta and Trichostrongylus Colubriformis in Vitro. Res. Vet. Sci. 2004, 77, 239–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Koupai-Abyazani, M.R.; Muir, A.D.; Bohm, B.A.; Towers, G.H.N.; Gruber, M.Y. The Proanthocyanidin Polymers in Some Species of Onobrychis. Phytochemistry 1993, 34, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Marais, J.P.J.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Brandt, E.V.; Ferreira, D. Polyphenols, Condensed Tannins, and Other Natural Products in Onobrychis Viciifolia (Sainfoin). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 3440–3447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Gujja, S.; Terrill, T.H.; Mosjidis, J.A.; Miller, J.E.; Mechineni, A.; Kommuru, D.S.; Shaik, S.A.; Lambert, B.D.; Cherry, N.M.; Burke, J.M. Effect of Supplemental Sericea Lespedeza Leaf Meal Pellets on Gastrointestinal Nematode Infection in Grazing Goats. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 191, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Heckendorn, F.; Häring, D.A.; Maurer, V.; Zinsstag, J.; Langhans, W.; Hertzberg, H. Effect of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Silage and Hay on Established Populations of Haemonchus Contortus and Cooperia Curticei in Lambs. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 142, 293–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Häring, D.A.; Suter, D.; Amrhein, N.; Lüscher, A. Biomass Allocation Is an Important Determinant of the Tannin Concentration in Growing Plants. Ann. Bot. 2007, 99, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Athanasiadou, S.; Tzamaloukas, O.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. Testing for Direct Anthelmintic Effects of Bioactive Forages against Trichostrongylus Colubriformis in Grazing Sheep. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 127, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Valderrábano, J.; Calvete, C.; Uriarte, J. Effect of Feeding Bioactive Forages on Infection and Subsequent Development of Haemonchus Contortus in Lamb Faeces. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 172, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fitch, G.; Figueroa, L.L.; Koch, H.; Stevenson, P.C.; Adler, L.S. Understanding Effects of Floral Products on Bee Parasites: Mechanisms, Synergism, and Ecological Complexity. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2022, 17, 244–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Houdijk, J.G.M.; Jessop, N.S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Houdijk, J.G.M. Nutrient Partitioning between Reproductive and Immune Functions in Animals. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 2001, 60, 515–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Van Houtert, M.F.J.; Barger, I.A.; Steel, J.W. Dietary Protein for Young Grazing Sheep: Interactions with Gastrointestinal Parasitism. Vet. Parasitol. 1995, 60, 283–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Valente, A.H.; de Roode, M.; Ernst, M.; Peña-Espinoza, M.; Bornancin, L.; Bonde, C.S.; Martínez-Valladares, M.; Ramünke, S.; Krücken, J.; Simonsen, H.T.; et al. Identification of Compounds Responsible for the Anthelmintic Effects of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) by Molecular Networking and Bio-Guided Fractionation. Int. J. Parasitol. Drugs Drug Resist. 2021, 15, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Keiser, J.; Rinaldi, L.; Veneziano, V.; Mezzino, L.; Tanner, M.; Utzinger, J.; Cringoli, G. Efficacy and Safety of Artemether against a Natural Fasciola Hepatica Infection in Sheep. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Osoro, K.; Mateos-Sanz, A.; Frutos, P.; García, U.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Celaya, R.; Ferre, I. Anthelmintic and Nutritional Effects of Heather Supplementation on Cashmere Goats Grazing Perennial Ryegrass-White Clover Pastures. J. Anim. Sci. 2007, 85, 861–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Niezen, J.H.; Charleston, W.A.G.; Robertson, H.A.; Shelton, D.; Waghorn, G.C.; Green, R. The Effect of Feeding Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) or Lucerne (Medicago Sativa) on Lamb Parasite Burdens and Development of Immunity to Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 105, 229–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hoskin, S.O.; Barry, T.N.; Wilson, P.R.; Charleston, W.A.G.; Hodgson, J. Effects of Reducing Anthelmintic Input upon Growth and Faecal Egg and Larval Counts in Young Farmed Deer Grazing Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) and Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne)/White Clover (Trifolium Repens) Pasture. J. Agric. Sci. 1999, 132, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Niezen, J.H.; Waghorn, G.C.; Graham, T.; Carter, J.L.; Leathwick, D.M. The Effect of Diet Fed to Lambs on Subsequent Development of Trichostrongylus Colubriformis Larvae in Vitro and on Pasture. Vet. Parasitol. 2002, 105, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. López, C.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; García, U.; Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Rodrigues, M.A.M.; Osoro, K.; Ferre, I.; Celaya, R. Diet Selection and Performance of Horses Grazing on Different Heathland Types. Animal 2017, 11, 1708–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Niezen, J.H.; Robertson, H.A.; Waghorn, G.C.; Charleston, W.A.G. Production, Faecal Egg Counts and Worm Burdens of Ewe Lambs Which Grazed Six Contrasting Forages. Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 80, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Paolini, V.; De La Farge, F.; Prevot, F.; Dorchies, P.; Hoste, H. Effects of the Repeated Distribution of Sainfoin Hay on the Resistance and the Resilience of Goats Naturally Infected with Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2005, 127, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Hoste, H.; Torres-Acosta, J.F.J.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Sotiraki, S.; Louvandini, H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Terrill, T.H. Tannin Containing Legumes as a Model for Nutraceuticals against Digestive Parasites in Livestock. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 212, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Gonzalez-Coloma, A.; Bailen, M.; Diaz, C.E.; Fraga, B.M.; Martínez-Díaz, R.; Zuñiga, G.E.; Contreras, R.A.; Cabrera, R.; Burillo, J. Major Components of Spanish Cultivated Artemisia Absinthium Populations: Antifeedant, Antiparasitic, and Antioxidant Effects. Ind. Crops Prod. 2012, 37, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Bailen, M.; Julio, L.F.; Diaz, C.E.; Sanz, J.; Martínez-Díaz, R.A.; Cabrera, R.; Burillo, J.; Gonzalez-Coloma, A. Chemical Composition and Biological Effects of Essential Oils from Artemisia Absinthium L. Cultivated under Different Environmental Conditions. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 49, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  142. Agelet, A. Estudis d’etnobotànica Farmacèutica Al Pallars. Rev. D’etnologia De Catalunya 2000, 17, 120–123. [Google Scholar]
  143. Squires, J.M.; Ferreira, J.F.S.; Lindsay, D.S.; Zajac, A.M. Effects of Artemisinin and Artemisia Extracts on Haemonchus Contortus in Gerbils (Meriones Unguiculatus). Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 175, 103–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Lutgen, P. Tannins in Artemisia: The Hidden Treasure of Prophylaxis. Pharm. Pharmacol. Int. J. 2018, 6, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  145. Boufennara, S.; Lopez, S.; Bousseboua, H.; Bodas Rodríguez, R.; Bouazza, L. Chemical Composition and Digestibility of Some Browse Plant Species Collected from Algerian Arid Rangelands. Span. J. Agric. Res. 2012, 10, 88–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Tariku, Y.; Hymete, A.; Hailu, A.; Rohloff, J. In Vitro Evaluation of Antileishmanial Activity and Toxicity of Essential Oils of Artemisia Absinthium and Echinops Kebericho. Chem. Biodivers. 2011, 8, 614–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Caner, A.; Döşkaya, M.; Deǧirmenci, A.; Can, H.; Baykan, Ş.; Üner, A.; Başdemir, G.; Zeybek, U.; Gürüz, Y. Comparison of the Effects of Artemisia Vulgaris and Artemisia Absinthium Growing in Western Anatolia against Trichinellosis (Trichinella Spiralis) in Rats. Exp. Parasitol. 2008, 119, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Hassan, A.I.; Osman, S.A.; Al-Gaabary; El-Soud, M.H.; Abo, K.M. Effects of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) and Artemisia Absenthium Extracts Against Ovine Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Int. J. Food Agric. Vet. Sci. 2014, 4, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  149. Iqbal, Z.; Lateef, M.; Ashraf, M.; Jabbar, A. Anthelmintic Activity of Artemisia Brevifolia in Sheep. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2004, 93, 265–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Tariq, K.A.; Chishti, M.Z.; Ahmad, F.; Shawl, A.S. Anthelmintic Activity of Extracts of Artemisia Absinthium against Ovine Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 160, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Castagna, F.; Piras, C.; Palma, E.; Musolino, V.; Lupia, C.; Bosco, A.; Rinaldi, L.; Cringoli, G.; Musella, V.; Britti, D. Green Veterinary Pharmacology Applied to Parasite Control: Evaluation of Punica Granatum, Artemisia Campestris, Salix Caprea Aqueous Macerates against Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Sheep. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Amirmohammadi, M.; Khajoenia, S.; Bahmani, M.; Rafieian-Kopaei, M.; Eftekhari, Z.; Qorbani, M. In Vivo Evaluation of Antiparasitic Effects of Artemisia Abrotanum and Salvia Officinalis Extracts on Syphacia Obvelata, Aspiculoris Tetrapetra and Hymenolepis Nana Parasites. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis. 2014, 4, S250–S254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Valente, A.H.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Simonsen, H.T.; Boas, U.; Enemark, H.L.; López-Muñoz, R.; Williams, A.R. Antiparasitic Activity of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) and Its Natural Bioactive Compounds in Livestock: A Review. Parasites Vectors 2018, 11, 475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  154. Li, G.; Kemp, P.D. Forage Chicory (Cichorium Intybus L.): A Review of Its Agronomy and Animal Production. Adv. Agron. 2005, 88, 187–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Nwafor, I.C.; Shale, K.; Achilonu, M.C. Chemical Composition and Nutritive Benefits of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) as an Ideal Complementary and/or Alternative Livestock Feed Supplement. Sci. World J. 2017, 2017, 7343928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Athanasiadou, S.; Githiori, J.; Kyriazakis, I. Medicinal Plants for Helminth Parasite Control: Facts and Fiction. Animal 2007, 1, 1392–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  157. Rees, S.B.; Harborne, J.B. The Role of Sesquiterpene Lactones and Phenolics in the Chemical Defence of the Chicory Plant. Phytochemistry 1985, 24, 2225–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Scales, G.H.; Knight, T.L.; Saville, D.J. Effect of Herbage Species and Feeding Level on Internal Parasites and Production Performance of Grazing Lambs. New Zealand J. Agric. Res. 1995, 38, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Marley, C.L.; Cook, R.; Barrett, J.; Keatinge, R.; Lampkin, N.H.; McBride, S.D. The Effect of Dietary Forage on the Development and Survival of Helminth Parasites in Ovine Faeces. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 118, 93–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Marley, C.L.; Cook, R.; Keatinge, R.; Barrett, J.; Lampkin, N.H. The Effect of Birdsfoot Trefoil (Lotus Corniculatus) and Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) on Parasite Intensities and Performance of Lambs Naturally Infected with Helminth Parasites. Vet. Parasitol. 2003, 112, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Valente, A.H.; Bornancin, L.; Simonsen, H.T.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Williams, A.R.; López-Muñoz, R. Anthelmintic and Metabolomic Analyses of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) Identify an Industrial by-Product with Potent in Vitro Antinematodal Activity. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 280, 109088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Woolsey, I.D.; Valente, A.H.; Williams, A.R.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Simonsen, H.T.; Enemark, H.L. Anti-Protozoal Activity of Extracts from Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) against Cryptosporidium Parvum in Cell Culture. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 20414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Williams, A.R.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Simonsen, H.T.; Enemark, H.L. Anthelmintic Effects of Forage Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) against Free-Living and Parasitic Stages of Cooperia Oncophora. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 243, 204–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  164. Williams, A.R.; Peña-Espinoza, M.A.; Boas, U.; Simonsen, H.T.; Enemark, H.L.; Thamsborg, S.M. Anthelmintic Activity of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus): In Vitro Effects on Swine Nematodes and Relationship to Sesquiterpene Lactone Composition. Parasitology 2016, 143, 770–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  165. Foster, J.G.; Cassida, K.A.; Turner, K.E. In Vitro Analysis of the Anthelmintic Activity of Forage Chicory (Cichorium Intybus L.) Sesquiterpene Lactones against a Predominantly Haemonchus Contortus Egg Population. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 180, 298–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Peña-Espinoza, M.; Thamsborg, S.M.; Desrues, O.; Hansen, T.V.A.; Enemark, H.L. Anthelmintic Effects of Forage Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) against Gastrointestinal Nematode Parasites in Experimentally Infected Cattle. Parasitology 2016, 143, 1279–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  167. Tzamaloukas, O.; Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Huntley, J.F.; Jackson, F. The Effect of Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) and Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) on Larval Development and Mucosal Cell Responses of Growing Lambs Challenged with Teladorsagia Circumcincta. Parasitology 2006, 132, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Tzamaloukas, O.; Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F.; Coop, R.L. The Consequences of Short-Term Grazing of Bioactive Forages on Established Adult and Incoming Larvae Populations of Teladorsagia Circumcincta in Lambs. Int. J. Parasitol. 2005, 35, 329–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Kidane, A.; Parissi, Z.M.; Houdijk, J.G.M.; Athanasiadou, S.; Tolkamp, B.J.; Kyriazakis, I. Chicory (Cichorium Intybus) as Promising Bioactive Forage for Sheep Production Feed-a-Gene View Project COST Action CA16208 for Enhancing Management of European Riparian Ecosystems and Services View Project. Grassl. Sci. Eur. 2009, 14, 394–397. [Google Scholar]
  170. Webb, N.R. The Traditional Management of European Heathlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 1998, 35, 987–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Celaya, R.; Oliván, M.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Martínez, A.; García, U.; Osoro, K. Comparison of Grazing Behaviour, Dietary Overlap and Performance in Non-Lactating Domestic Ruminants Grazing on Marginal Heathland Areas. Livest. Sci. 2007, 106, 271–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Osoro, K.; García, U.; Frutos, P.; Celaya, R.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Ferre, I. Anthelmintic Effect of Heather in Goats Experimentally Infected with Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Parasitol. Res. 2014, 113, 693–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Osoro, K.; Celaya, R.; Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; García, U.; Frutos, P.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Ferre, I. Effects of Stocking Rate and Heather Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Nematode Infections and Host Performance in Naturally-Infected Cashmere Goats. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2009, 62, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Celaya, R.; Ferreira, L.M.M.; Moreno-Gonzalo, J.; Frutos, P.; Hervás, G.; Ferre, I.; García, U.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Osoro, K. Effects of Heather and Oat Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Nematode Infections and Performance of Grazing Cashmere Goats. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 91, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Osoro, K.; Benito-Peña, A.; Frutos, P.; García, U.; Ortega-Mora, L.M.; Celaya, R.; Ferre, I. The Effect of Heather Supplementation on Gastrointestinal Nematode Infections and Performance in Cashmere and Local Celtiberic Goats on Pasture. Small Rumin. Res. 2007, 67, 184–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Osoro, K.; Oliván, M.; Celaya, R.; Martínez, A. Effects of Genotype on the Performance and Intake Characteristics of Sheep Grazing Contrasting Hill Vegetation Communities. Anim. Sci. 1999, 69, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  177. Ruisi, P.; Siragusa, M.; Di Giorgio, G.; Graziano, D.; Amato, G.; Carimi, F.; Giambalvo, D. Pheno-Morphological, Agronomic and Genetic Diversity among Natural Populations of Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium L.) Collected in Sicily, Italy. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2011, 58, 245–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Burke, J.L.; Waghorn, G.C.; Brookes, I.M. An Evaluation of Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) with Pasture, White Clover and Lucerne for Lambs; New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Palmerston North, New Zealand, 2002; Volume 62, pp. 152–156. [Google Scholar]
  179. Bonanno, A.; Di Grigoli, A.; Miceli, G.; Giambalvo, D. Grazing Sulla and/or Ryegrass Forage for 8 or 24 Hours Daily. Effects on Ewes Feeding Behaviour. In Proceedings of the Permanent and Temporary Grassland Plant, Environment and Economy, Ghent, Belgium, 3–5 September 2007. [Google Scholar]
  180. Molle, G.; Decandia, M.; Giovanetti, V.; Cabiddu, A.; Fois, N.; Sitzia, M. Responses to Condensed Tannins of Flowering Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium L.) Grazed by Dairy Sheep: Part 1: Effects on Feeding Behaviour, Intake, Diet Digestibility and Performance. Livest. Sci. 2009, 123, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Bonanno, A.; Di Miceli, G.; Di Grigoli, A.; Frenda, A.S.; Tornambè, G.; Giambalvo, D.; Amato, G. Effects of Feeding Green Forage of Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium L.) on Lamb Growth and Carcass and Meat Quality. Animal 2011, 5, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  182. Bonanno, A.; Di Grigoli, A.; Stringi, L.; Di Miceli, G.; Giambalvo, D.; Tornambè, G.; Vargetto, D.; Alicata, M.L. Intake and Milk Production of Goats Grazing Sulla Forage under Different Stocking Rates. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 6, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Burke, J.L.; Brookes, I.M.; McNabb, W.C.; Waghorn, G.C. The Potential of Sulla in Pasture-Based Systems. Sci. Access 2004, 1, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  184. Amato, G.; Di Miceli, G.; Giambalvo, D.; Scarpello, C.; Stringi, L. Condensed Tannins Content in Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium L.) as Affected by Environment, Genotype and Growth Stage. In Bioactive Compounds in Pasture Species for Phytotherapy and Animal Welfare; CNR-ISPAAM: Sassari, Italy, 2005; pp. 41–54. [Google Scholar]
  185. Pomroy, W.E.; Adlington, B.A. Efficacy of Short-Term Feeding of Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium) to Young Goats against a Mixed Burden of Gastrointestinal Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 136, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Molan, A.L.; Waghorn, G.C.; Min, B.R.; Mcnabb, W.C. The Effect of Condensed Tannins from Seven Herbages on Trichostrongylus Colubriformis Larval Migration in Vitro. Folia Parasitol. 2000, 47, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Neizen, J.H.; Waghorn, T.S.; Waghorn, G.C.; Charleston, W.A.G. Internal Parasites and Lamb Production: A Role for Plants Containing Condensed Tannins? New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Palmerston North, New Zealand; Volume 53, p. 235. 1993. [Google Scholar]
  188. Niezen, J.J.; Waghorn, T.S.; Raufaut, K.; Robertson, H.A. Lamb Weight Gain and Faecal Egg Count When Grazing One of Seven Herbages and Dosed with Larvae for Six Weeks; New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1994; Volume 54, p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  189. Robertson, H.A.; Niezen, J.H.; Waghorn, G.C.; Charleston, W.A.G. The Effect of Six Herbages on Liveweight Gain, Wool Growth and Faecal Egg Count of Parasitised Ewe Lambs; New Zealand Society of Animal Production: Palmerston North, New Zealand, 1995; Volume 55, p. 199. [Google Scholar]
  190. Feedipedia Feedipedia: An on-Line Encyclopedia of Animal Feeds|Feedipedia. Available online: https://www.feedipedia.org/ (accessed on 19 September 2022).
  191. D’Addabbo, T.; Tava, A.; Argentieri, M.P.; Biazzi, E.; Candido, V.; Avato, P. Nematicidal Potential of Sulla (Hedysarum Coronarium L.) against the Root-Knot Nematode Meloidogyne Incognita. Plants 2022, 11, 2550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Waghorn, G.C.; Shelton, I.D. Effect of Condensed Tannins in Lotus Corniculatus on the Nutritive Value of Pasture for Sheep. J. Agric. Sci. 1997, 128, 365–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ramírez-Restrepo, C.A.; Barry, T.N.; López-Villalobos, N.; Kemp, P.D.; McNabb, W.C. Use of Lotus Corniculatus Containing Condensed Tannins to Increase Lamb and Wool Production under Commercial Dryland Farming Conditions without the Use of Anthelmintics. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 117, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Cireșan, C.-A.; Oprescu, I.; Imre, M.; Suici, T.; Carpinișan, L.; Dărăbuș, G. Preliminary Research on the Control of Gastrointestinal Strongyles in Sheep, Using Lotus Corniculatus. Sci. Parasitol. 2021, 22, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
  195. Acharya, J.; Hildreth, M.B.; Reese, R.N. In Vitro Screening of Forty Medicinal Plant Extracts from the United States Northern Great Plains for Anthelmintic Activity against Haemonchus Contortus. Vet. Parasitol. 2014, 201, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Niezen, J.H.; Waghorn, G.C.; Charleston, W.A.G. Establishment and Fecundity of Ostertagia Circumcincta and Trichostrongylus Colubriformis in Lambs Fed Lotus (Lotus Pedunculatus) or Perennial Ryegrass (Lolium Perenne). Vet. Parasitol. 1998, 78, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Mata-Padrino, D.J.; Belesky, D.P.; Crawford, C.D.; Walsh, B.; MacAdam, J.W.; Bowdridge, S.A. Effects of Grazing Birdsfoot Trefoil–Enriched Pasture on Managing Haemonchus Contortus Infection in Suffolk Crossbred Lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 97, 172–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Saratsis, A.; Voutzourakis, N.; Theodosiou, T.; Stefanakis, A.; Sotiraki, S. The Effect of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) and Carob Pods (Ceratonia Siliqua) Feeding Regimes on the Control of Lamb Coccidiosis. Parasitol. Res. 2016, 115, 2233–2242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Hayot Carbonero, C.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Brown, T.A.; Smith, L. Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia): A Beneficial Forage Legume. Plant Genet. Resour. 2011, 9, 70–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Heckendorn, F.; Häring, D.A.; Maurer, V.; Langhans, W.; Hertzberg, H. Effect of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Silage and Hay against Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Lambs. In Proceedings of the Zwischen Tradition und Globalisierung—9. Wissenschaftstagung Ökologischer Landbau, Stuttgart, Germany, 20–23 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
  201. Novobilský, A.; Stringano, E.; Hayot Carbonero, C.; Smith, L.M.J.; Enemark, H.L.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Thamsborg, S.M. In Vitro Effects of Extracts and Purified Tannins of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) against Two Cattle Nematodes. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 196, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Lane, G.P.F.; Koivisto, J.M. A Re-Assessment of the Potential of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia Scop.) as a Forage Crop for the United Kingdom. In Proceedings of the 37th North American Alfalfa Improvement Conference, Madison, WI, USA, 16–19 July 2000; pp. 202–205. [Google Scholar]
  203. Regos, I.; Urbanella, A.; Treutter, D. Identification and Quantification of Phenolic Compounds from the Forage Legume Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5843–5852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Thamsborg, S.M.; Mejer, H.; Bandier, M.; Larsen, M. Influence of Different Forages on Gastrointestinal Namatode Infections in Grazing Lambs. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology, New Orleans, LA, USA, 10–14 August 2003. [Google Scholar]
  205. Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Jackson, F. The Effects of Feeding Sainfoin Hay in Sheep Parasitised with Trichostrongylus Colubriformis. Proc. Br. Soc. Anim. Sci. 2005, 2005, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Collas, C.; Sallé, G.; Dumont, B.; Cabaret, J.; Cortet, J.; Martin-Rosset, W.; Wimel, L.; Fleurance, G. Are Sainfoin or Protein Supplements Alternatives to Control Small Strongyle Infection in Horses? Animal 2018, 12, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Stringano, E.; Hayot Carbonero, C.; Smith, L.M.J.; Brown, R.H.; Mueller-Harvey, I. Proanthocyanidin Diversity in the EU ‘HealthyHay’ Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Germplasm Collection. Phytochemistry 2012, 77, 197–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Werne, S.; Isensee, A.; Maurer, V.; Perler, E.; Drewek, A.; Heckendorn, F. Integrated Control of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Lambs Using a Bioactive Feed × Breed Approach. Vet. Parasitol. 2013, 198, 298–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Brunet, S.; Fourquaux, I.; Hoste, H. Ultrastructural Changes in the Third-Stage, Infective Larvae of Ruminant Nematodes Treated with Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Extract. Parasitol. Int. 2011, 60, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Desrues, O.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Pellikaan, W.F.; Enemark, H.L.; Thamsborg, S.M. Condensed Tannins in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Cattle after Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Intake and Their Possible Relationship with Anthelmintic Effects. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 1420–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Legendre, H.; Hoste, H.; Gidenne, T. Nutritive Value and Anthelmintic Effect of Sainfoin Pellets Fed to Experimentally Infected Growing Rabbits. Animal 2017, 11, 1464–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Azuhnwi, B.N.; Hertzberg, H.; Arrigo, Y.; Gutzwiller, A.; Hess, H.D.; Mueller-Harvey, I.; Torgerson, P.R.; Kreuzer, M.; Dohme-Meier, F. Investigation of Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) Cultivar Differences on Nitrogen Balance and Fecal Egg Count in Artificially Infected Lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 2013, 91, 2343–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Ríos-De Álvarez, L.; Greer, A.W.; Jackson, F.; Athanasiadou, S.; Kyriazakis, I.; Huntley, J.F. The Effect of Dietary Sainfoin (Onobrychis Viciifolia) on Local Cellular Responses to Trichostrongylus Colubriformis in Sheep. Parasitology 2008, 135, 1117–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  214. Rivaroli, D.; Prunier, A.; Meteau, K.; Do Prado, I.N.; Prache, S. Tannin-Rich Sainfoin Pellet Supplementation Reduces Fat Volatile Indoles Content and Delays Digestive Parasitism in Lambs Grazing Alfalfa. Animal 2019, 13, 1883–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Torres-Fajardo, R.A.; González-Pech, P.G.; Sandoval-Castro, C.A.; de Jesús Torres-Acosta, J.F. Small Ruminant Production Based on Rangelands to Optimize Animal Nutrition and Health: Building an Interdisciplinary Approach to Evaluate Nutraceutical Plants. Animals 2020, 10, 1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 2. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Cichorium intybus L.
Table 2. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Cichorium intybus L.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitro---CoccidiaCryptosporidium parvum300, 150, 75, 37.5, 18.75 and 9.375 μg/mL[162]
GINOstertagia ostertagi1000, 500, 250, 100, 50 and 10 µg/mL[82]
Teladorsagia circumcincta, Cooperia oncophora and Ascaris suum7.8 and 500 μg/mL; 1 mg/mL [130]
Caenorhabditis elegans and A. suum15.6 to 20,000 μg/mL[161]
C. oncophoraEgg hatch assay: 2500, 1250, 625, 313 and 156 μg/mL Adult motility inhibition assay: 1000, 500, 250, 125, 60 and 30 μg/mL[163]
A. suum and Oesophagostomum dentatum-[164]
Haemonchus contortus1.67–10.03 mg/mL[165]
Sheep--GINH. contortus, Trichostrongylus species, Trichostrongylus axei, Strongyloides and Bunstomum12.5, 25 and 50 mg/mL[148]
In vivoCattleIndoorExperimental infectionGINO. ostertagi and C. oncophoraad libitum[166]
OutdoorExperimental infectionGINO. ostertagiad libitum[166]
DeerOutdoorNatural infectionGIN-0.17 and 0.26% DM[134]
Lung worms-0.17 and 0.26% DM[134]
Sheep-Experimental infectionGINOstertagia, Trichostrongylus, Oesophagostomu, Cooperia, and Nematodirus spp.2 or 4 kg DM/head per day (green)[158]
Natural infectionGINH. contortus, Trichostrongylus species, T. axei, Strongyloides and Bunstomum12.5, 25 and 50 mg/mL[148]
IndoorExperimental infectionGINH. contortus and Cooperia curticei3.4 g/kg DM[60]
OutdoorExperimental infectionGINTrichostrongylus colubriformis1.49 kg DM/day[125]
T. circumcincta8.3 g/kg DM[167]
T. circumcinctatotal phenolic: 262 g/kg DM[168]
Natural infectionGINT. circumcincta, Trichostrongylus vitrinus, T. axei, C. oncophora and Nematodirus battus.total phenolic: 18 and 27 g/kg DM[33]
T. circumcincta-[71]
T. circumcita, H. contortus, C. curticei, Trichostrongylus spp., Chabertia ovina, Oesophagostomum spp.-[159]
--[160,169]
-: Not specified. DM: dry matter.
Table 3. Nutritional value of Cichorium intybus L. [147].
Table 3. Nutritional value of Cichorium intybus L. [147].
UnitAverage
Crude protein%DM24.3
Crude fibre%DM16.9
Lignin%DM0.33
Ash%DM18.8
Condensed tannins%DM0.17
Sesquiterpene lactones%DM0.36
Table 4. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Ericaceae.
Table 4. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Ericaceae.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitroGoat--GINTeladorsagia circumcincta and Haemonchus contortusEC50: 450 μg/mL[54]
H. contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis19% DM[73]
T. colubriformisEC50: 120.9, 335.7, 521.6 and 791.3 μg/mL[118]
In vivoGoatIndoorExperimental infectionGINT. circumcincta48.2 g tannin acid equivalent/kg DM[68]
T. colubriformis64 g tannin acid equivalent/kg DM[172]
OutdoorNatural infectionGINTrichostrongylus, Teladorsagia and Oesophagostomum64 g/kg DM[105]
T. circumcincta, Trichostrongylus spp., and Chabertia ovina.7–8.6% DM[132]
Trichostrongylus spp., T. circumcincta, Oesophagostomum columbianum, Chabertia ovina and H. contortus84 g tannin acid equivalent/kg DM[173]
Teladorsagia, Trichostrongylus and Oesophagostomum genera30.2–47.2 g tannin acid equivalent/kg DM[174]
T. circumcincta, Teladorsagia trifurcata, Trichostrongylus axei, Trichostrongylus spp., C. ovina, O. columbianum, Trichuris ovis61–97 g tannin acid equivalent/kg DM[175]
HorseOutdoorNatural infectionGIN--[136]
-: Not specified. DM:dry matter EC50: Half maximal effective.
Table 6. Nutritional value of Hedysarum coronarium L. [190].
Table 6. Nutritional value of Hedysarum coronarium L. [190].
UnitAverageSD
Dry matter% as fed12.32.5
Crude protein%DM20.23.1
Crude fibre%DM24.34.1
NDF%DM36.85.8
ADF%DM28.85.4
Lignin%DM8.52.0
Ether extract%DM2.50.4
Ash%DM11.41.7
Starch%DM2.4
Condensed tannins [191]%DM11.970.43
Table 7. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Lotus spp.
Table 7. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Lotus spp.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitro---GINOstertagia ostertagi or Cooperia oncophora600, 1200, 1400 μg/mL[74]
Haemonchus contortusEC50: 0.66–9.36 mg/mL EC90: 1.48–97.15 mg/mL[76]
H. contortus50 mg/mL[195]
Sheep--GINTrichostrongylus colubriformis1.6 and 5.5% DM[135]
In vivoDeerIndoorExperimental infectionGIN-1.9% DM[117]
Lung wormsDictyocaulus sp1.9% DM[117]
SheepIndoorExperimental infectionGINH. contortus and Cooperia curticei15.2 g/kg DM[60]
H. contortus1.8–1.93 kg DM/animal day[83]
T. colubriformis1.6 and 5.5% DM[135]
Ostertagia circumcincta and T. colubriformis-[187]
O. circumcincta and T. colubriformisad libitum[196]
Natural infectionGIN-ad libitum[194]
OutdoorExperimental infectionGINT. colubriformis15.9 g/kg DM[125]
Teladorsagia circumcincta16 g/kg DM[168]
H. contortus13.3–17.4% DM[197]
Natural infectionGINOstertagia, Haemonchus, Trichostrongylus, Nematodirus, Cooperia-[137]
T. circumcita, H. contortus, C. curticei, Trichostrongylus spp., Chabertia ovina, Oesophagostomum spp.-[159]
--[160]
-25 g/kg DM[193]
-: Not specified. DM: dry matter EC50: Half maximal effective concentration EC90: 90% effective concentration.
Table 8. Nutritional value of Lotus corniculatus L. [190].
Table 8. Nutritional value of Lotus corniculatus L. [190].
UnitAverageSD
Dry matter% as fed23.16.8
Crude protein%DM21.14.2
Crude fibre%DM26.4
NDF%DM38.38.14
ADF%DM28.25.5
Lignin%DM9.93.5
Ether extract%DM4.10.8
Ash%DM9.61.9
Condensed tannins%DM4.962.7
Table 9. Nutritional value of Onobrychis viciifolia Scop [190].
Table 9. Nutritional value of Onobrychis viciifolia Scop [190].
UnitAverageSD
Dry matter% as fed22.33.6
Crude protein%DM16.92.7
Crude fibre%DM25.84.9
NDF%DM35.45.7
ADF%DM30.14.0
Lignin%DM9.41.3
Ether extract%DM4.10.2
Ash%DM8.01.2
Condensed tannins%DM3.0
Table 10. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.
Table 10. Brief description of trials for the antiparasitic plant: Onobrychis viciifolia Scop.
In Vivo/In VitroAnimal SpeciesIndoor/OutdoorNatural Infection/Experimental InfectionParasitesSpecific ParasiteDosageReferences
In vitro---GINOstertagia ostertagi or Cooperia oncophora600, 1200, 1400 μg/mL[74]
Cattle--GINC. oncophora and O. ostertagi10, 40 μg/mL[201]
Deer--GIN 1200 μg/mL[78]
Lung wormsDictyocaulus stages viviparus1200 μg/mL[78]
Goat--GINHaemonchus contortus (mainly) and Teladorsagia circumcincta1.2 lg/mL[37,52,209]
H. contortus and Trichostrongylus colubriformis1200 μg/mL[77]
T. circumcincta, H. contortus and T. colubriformis1200 μg/mL[79]
Horse--GIN--[206]
Sheep--CoccidiaEimeria crandallis150, 300, 1200 μg/mL[61]
GINT. colubriformis200, 400 μg/mL[72,186]
T. circumcincta, H. contortus and T. colubriformis1200 μg/mL[79]
H. contortus-[126]
T. colubriformis400, 800 and 1000 μg/mL[186]
In vivoCattleIndoorExperimental infectionGINO. ostertagi and C. oncophora-[2]
2.3% DM[210]
GoatIndoorExperimental infectionGINH. contortus3.5% DM[69]
Natural infectionGINTrichostrongyle [70]
OutdoorNatural infectionGINH. contortus, T. circumcincta and T. colubriformis1.5 kg sainfoin hay/day[138]
HorseIndoorNatural infectionGIN--[206]
RabbitIndoorExperimental infectionGINT. colubriformis1.8 g/day[211]
Sheep-Experimental infectionCoccidiaE. crandallis150, 300, 1200 μg/mL[61]
Natural infectionCoccidiaE. crandallis150, 300, 1200 μg/mL[61]
IndoorNatural infectionCoccidiaEimeria spp.-[198]
Experimental infectionGINH. contortus and T. colubriformis-[1]
H. contortus600, 1200 and 2400 μg/mL[18]
H. contortus and Cooperia curticei26.1 g/kg DM[60]
H. contortus and T. colubriformis1200 μg/mL[77]
H. contortus [126]
H. contortus and C. curticei0.13% DM[200]
Haemonchus spp., Teladorsagia spp., Nema-todirus spp. and Trichostrongylus spp.59.71 and 106.62 g/animal day[208]
H. contortus8.1 and 9.7% DM[212]
T. colubriformis1.211 kg/day of sainfoin[213]
Natural infectionGIN-15.1 g/kg DM[214]
OutdoorExperimental infectionGINT. colubriformis14.9 g/kg DM[125]
Natural infectionCoccidia-15.1 g/kg DM[214]
GIN-15.1 g/kg DM[214]
-: Not specified. DM: dry matter.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rodríguez-Hernández, P.; Reyes-Palomo, C.; Sanz-Fernández, S.; Rufino-Moya, P.J.; Zafra, R.; Martínez-Moreno, F.J.; Rodríguez-Estévez, V.; Díaz-Gaona, C. Antiparasitic Tannin-Rich Plants from the South of Europe for Grazing Livestock: A Review. Animals 2023, 13, 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020201

AMA Style

Rodríguez-Hernández P, Reyes-Palomo C, Sanz-Fernández S, Rufino-Moya PJ, Zafra R, Martínez-Moreno FJ, Rodríguez-Estévez V, Díaz-Gaona C. Antiparasitic Tannin-Rich Plants from the South of Europe for Grazing Livestock: A Review. Animals. 2023; 13(2):201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020201

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rodríguez-Hernández, Pablo, Carolina Reyes-Palomo, Santos Sanz-Fernández, Pablo José Rufino-Moya, Rafael Zafra, Francisco Javier Martínez-Moreno, Vicente Rodríguez-Estévez, and Cipriano Díaz-Gaona. 2023. "Antiparasitic Tannin-Rich Plants from the South of Europe for Grazing Livestock: A Review" Animals 13, no. 2: 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13020201

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop