Next Article in Journal
Correction: Cai et al. Sex Reversal Induced by Dietary Supplementation with 17α-Methyltestosterone during the Critical Period of Sex Differentiation in Oriental River Prawn (Macrobrachium nipponense). Animals 2023, 13, 1369
Next Article in Special Issue
Microsporidia in Commercially Harvested Marine Fish: A Potential Health Risk for Consumers
Previous Article in Journal
A Retrospective Study on Canine and Feline Mortality during Anaesthesia at a University Clinic in Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Study of Zoonotic Pathogens in Alien Population of Veiled Chameleons (Chamaeleo calyptratus) in the Canary Islands (Spain)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Endangered Wild Felines (Felis silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain

by
Pablo Matas Méndez
1,
Isabel Fuentes Corripio
2,
Ana Montoya Matute
3,
Begoña Bailo Barroso
2,
Rebeca Grande Gómez
4,
Ariadna Apruzzese Rubio
4,
Francisco Ponce Gordo
5,* and
Marta Mateo Barrientos
5,*
1
Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Villanueva de la Cañada, 28691 Madrid, Spain
2
Laboratorio de Referencia e Investigación en Parasitología, Centro Nacional de Microbiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Majadahonda, 28220 Madrid, Spain
3
Departamento de Sanidad Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
4
Technical Assistence, General Direction of Natural Environment and Biodiversity, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Autonomous Community of Castilla-La Mancha, 45007 Toledo, Spain
5
Departamento de Microbiología y Parasitología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(15), 2488; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152488
Submission received: 15 June 2023 / Revised: 20 July 2023 / Accepted: 28 July 2023 / Published: 1 August 2023

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The wildcats (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) are species of special relevance in the Spanish fauna and are protected, as their populations are small and the lynx is classified as endangered. Both feline species can become infected by Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite that can cause morbidity and mortality in transplacentally infected or immunocompromised mammals. The data on the prevalence of this parasite in Spanish wild populations of wildcats and lynx were last reported 10 years ago, so the objective of this study is to update this information and assess the importance of these felines in the parasite’s epidemiology and the potential impact of the parasite on the conservation of these species. Wild populations show a high prevalence, necessitating the establishment of monitoring programs to assess the health status of these animals.

Abstract

The wildcat (Felis silvestris) and the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) are important species in Spain, considered as near-threatened and endangered, respectively. Both can be infected by Toxoplasma gondii, a parasite that can cause morbidity and mortality in transplacentally-infected or immunocompromised mammals. The data on the prevalence of this parasite in wild populations of these species in Spain are outdated. The objective of this study was to update information and evaluate the role of these felines in parasite epidemiology and the potential impact of the parasite on their conservation. Blood and fecal samples were collected from captured animals, as well as the tongue, diaphragm, and spleen, from animals killed in road accidents in central Spain. An indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) was used to detect parasite antibodies in serum, microscopy and molecular analysis were used to detect oocysts in feces, and molecular analysis was used to determine the existence of tissue cysts. Seroprevalence was 85% in wildcats and 45% in lynx, and parasite DNA was detected in the feces of one wildcat and in tissue samples from 10 wildcats and 11 Iberian lynxes. These results highlight the epidemiological importance and high risk of T. gondii infection in animals and humans in the studied areas. Considering feline susceptibility to infection, monitoring programs are needed to assess the health status of wild felines.

1. Introduction

Toxoplasma gondii is a parasite that affects warm-blooded vertebrates from different habitats and regions, from the Arctic to the tropics, in terrestrial, aquatic, and marine environments [1]. This protozoan parasite causes toxoplasmosis, a disease of significant zoonotic importance in both human and animal contexts. Toxoplasma gondii infections in immunocompetent adult hosts are asymptomatic or subclinical; however, in immunocompromised or otherwise more susceptible individuals, it can cause severe disease with anorexia, weight loss, lethargy, dyspnea, ocular manifestations (chorioretinitis, blindness), neurological and systemic disorders, abortion, and even death [2]. The parasite forms tissue cysts in all hosts, but the sexual cycle is completed only in primary-infected felines. Oocysts are released in feline feces during a short shedding period [3,4], contaminating water, soil, and/or food. The life cycle of T. gondii is complex as a consequence of the diverse routes of transmission between individuals of the same and different species [5]. Inter-species transmission occurs by the oral route, in which herbivores become infected after ingestion mainly of oocysts, whereas infection in carnivores and omnivores can also occur through ingestion of tissue cysts in infected prey. Intra-species transmission is also possible during fetal development, lactation, or through sperm [6]. In addition to domestic cats, nearly 20 species of wild felines belonging to Acinonyx (cheetah), Felis (“cats”), Leopardus (ocelot, Geoffroy’s cat, Pampa’s cat), Herpailurus (jaguarundi), Lynx (lynxes), Panthera (lion, tiger), and Puma (cougar) have been reported to shed oocysts of T. gondii [7,8]. As definitive hosts, felines (both domestic and wild) play a crucial role in the epidemiology of toxoplasmosis in all species and can be responsible (at least, domestic cats) for outbreaks [5,9], and it is essential to determine the prevalence of infection in these animals to implement appropriate control measures.
The majority of epidemiological studies in felines are based on determining seroprevalence in the analyzed population by detecting specific anti-Toxoplasma IgG antibodies [10,11,12]. This allows for the identification of infected individuals but does not determine whether they are in the acute phase (intestinal, with oocyst-release in feces) or in the chronic phase (with tissue cysts). In Spain, several studies have been carried out in domestic felines (stray and owned cats), revealing seroprevalence rates ranging from 12% to 84.7% [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]; however, oocysts have not been detected in any of the fecal analyses performed. Epidemiological information is more limited for the two native species of wild felines in Spain, namely the wildcat (Felis silvestris) and the Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) [21,22,23,24].
The wildcat has a wide distribution in Europe, and although its populations are increasing in certain Central European regions [25], the Iberian populations are declining [26] and are currently limited to a restricted geographical area [27]. The Iberian lynx is only found in the Iberian Peninsula and is an emblematic species of high ecological value. Although its population experienced a significant decline in the past, with only 93 individuals recorded in 2002 [28], thanks to various conservation projects, 1668 individuals were counted in 2022 [29]. Both feline species are listed as specially protected wild species under Spanish legislation (RD 139/2011 for the development of the List of Wild Species under Special Protection and the Spanish Catalog of Endangered Species), with the Iberian lynx classified as endangered. There are many potential threats to these species, including habitat destruction and fragmentation, decline of prey, hybridization, hunting, roadkill, and infectious and parasitic diseases [30,31,32,33,34]. Within parasitic infections, those caused by Toxoplasma gondii in wild felines seem to be rarely associated with disease, and no cases of clinical toxoplasmosis have been described in Iberian lynx or wildcats. However, clinical cases have been reported in Pallas’s cats (Otocolobus [Felis] manul), and neonatal toxoplasmosis has been documented in sand cats (Felis margarita) and bobcats (Lynx rufus) [35,36,37].
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the presence and prevalence of T. gondii in wild populations of Iberian lynx and wildcat in Spain in order to assess the epidemiological importance of these hosts and evaluate the potential impact of the parasite on the conservation of these protected species.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area and Animals

Over a period of 24 months (January 2021 to December 2022), a total of 69 samples from Iberian lynxes and 20 samples from wildcats were collected in 7 provinces of two autonomous communities (AC) in the central region of Spain (Figure 1). The majority of the wildcat samples were obtained from the AC of Castilla y León, located in the central–northern region with a climate characterized by temperate summers and the absence of a dry season in some provinces. The lynx samples were collected from the AC of Castilla-La Mancha, situated in the central–southern part of the country with a more extreme climate characterized by dry summers and high temperatures. As part of the LIFE 19NAT/ES001055 LINXCONNECT project (https://lifelynxconnect.eu/en/project/; accessed on 28 July 2023), nine of the analyzed lynxes were captured animals undergoing health evaluations according to the protocols approved in 2012 within the LIFE 10NAT/ES/570 IBERLINCE project (http://www.iberlince.eu/index.php/eng/; accessed on 28 July 2023) (protocols available in Spanish, Portuguese, and English at http://www.iberlince.eu/images/docs/3_InformesLIFE/ProtocolosSanitarios_M.Iberlince.pdf; accessed on 28 July 2023). These animals were handled by authorized veterinarians following the established protocols within the mentioned conservation program. The remaining sampled animals (60 lynxes and 20 wildcats) were individuals found dead due to road accidents and were collected and frozen within 24 h of the estimated time of death by wildlife recovery centers under the authority of the Regional Environmental Departments of the respective AC. The handling of the animals and collection of samples were conducted by authorized veterinarians from Regional Environmental Departments. The samples were provided to us in accordance with the conditions stipulated in the permits issued by each Regional Environmental Department (references DGPFEN/SEN/avp_21_103_bis in Castilla-La Mancha, AB/is. Exp.AUES/CYL/001/2021 in Castilla y León). The age of the felines was estimated based on size, weight, and dental wear and classified into juveniles (<1 year), adults (1–7 years), and seniors (>7 years) [28,38].

2.2. Sample Collection and Processing

Blood samples were collected from live animals through venipuncture and from deceased animals from the heart; in all cases, thoracic fluid was also collected in case it would be needed. Samples were centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 10 min, and the sera were stored at −20 °C until analysis. Fecal samples were collected from the rectum of live animals and from the final section of the large intestine in necropsied animals. In both cases, they were kept refrigerated (4 °C) until analysis. Additionally, samples of the tongue, diaphragm, and spleen were collected from the deceased animals. These samples were stored at −20 °C until analysis using molecular techniques.
To detect T. gondii-specific antibodies, the indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT) was conducted according to the method described by [40] using a commercial IFAT kit for anti-T. gondii IgG detection (MegaFLUO® Toxoplasma g., Megacor Diagnostik GmbH, Hörbranz, Austria) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The same kit was used in combination with anti-feline IgM conjugate (Fuller Laboratories, Fullerton, CA, USA) to determine IgM levels. The sera were screened at dilutions of 1/40, 1/80, 1/160, 1/320, and 1/640. An IgG or IgM titre of ≥1/80 was considered positive.
The fecal samples were processed using the modified Telemann method [41,42] for optical microscopy observation; molecular analysis was also performed. Using the Telemann method, approximately 3 g of feces were diluted in 20 mL of 5% acetic acid and filtered through gauze; the filtrate was mixed with 20 mL of ether and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min. One drop of the final sediment was observed in unstained preparations at magnifications of 400–1000×. For molecular analysis, DNA was extracted using the QIAamp® Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Parasite detection was performed using two methods: (1) a nested PCR (nPCR) was conducted to amplify a 97 bp fragment from the B1 gene of T. gondii, following the protocol described by [43] using 5 and 15 µL of DNA from each sample; (2) a real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed to amplify the non-coding repetitive DNA fragment of 529 bp (RE 529-bp) of T. gondii, following the protocol described by [44] using 5 µL of DNA from each sample. A positive result in either of the two techniques was considered positive.
The tissue samples were first subjected to enzymatic digestion to release bradyzoites from the tissue cysts in order to obtain more parasite DNA and reduce the risk of false negatives. Following the protocol described by [45], digestion was performed using Trypsin-EDTA 1X in PBS (Biowest, Nuaillé, France), using 2 g of each sample. Subsequently, DNA extraction was carried out using a robot (QIAcube) and the QIAamp® DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), following the manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was then used for nPCR and qPCR under the same conditions as indicated previously for fecal sample analysis.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

Seroprevalence was defined as the percentage of samples testing positive for antibodies to T. gondii, with 95% confidence intervals established. The Chi-square test was employed to determine significant associations between animal species (F. silvestris vs. L. pardinus). Comparisons were conducted for age groups (juvenile, adult, and senior), sex (male vs. female), and geographic area to assess differences in T. gondii seroprevalence among each species and as a combined group (wild felines). Differences were considered statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05. The concordance between serodiagnostic, coprological, and molecular analysis results was assessed using the kappa index. The statistical tests were performed using SPSS Statistics ver. 25 (IBM, New York, NY, USA).

3. Results

Of the 89 felines sampled, the majority were adult animals (84% and 100% in Iberian lynx and wildcats, respectively), and there were no wildcat juveniles. The proportion of males was higher (67 and 80%) than that of females (33 and 20%) in Iberian lynx and wildcats, respectively.
In the analyzed fecal samples of wildcats and Iberian lynx, oocysts compatible with T. gondii were found in one wildcat.
The analysis of the sera detected IgG antibodies against T. gondii in 53.9% (95% CI: 43.5–64.2) of the analyzed wild felines, with a significantly higher seroprevalence (p = 0.002) observed in wildcats (85%, 17/20; 95% CI: 69.3–100) compared to Iberian lynx (44.9%, 31/69; 95% CI: 33.1–56.6) (Table 1). IgM antibodies were detected in one wildcat, which also tested positive for IgG (IgM titre 1/160, IgG titre 1/640).
In the molecular analyses, parasite DNA was detected in the feces of one wildcat (the individual seropositive for IgM and also IgG and positive by microscopy) and in tissue samples from 10 wildcats and 11 Iberian lynxes (Table 2); no positive samples were found in seronegative animals. The detection of T. gondii in tissues was higher when considering the combined results of nPCR and qPCR, as there were many samples that tested positive with one technique and negative with the other; four samples from wildcats and one sample from Iberian lynx tested positive with both PCR methods. The highest overall number of PCR-positive samples was found in the tongue (11), followed by the spleen (9), and the diaphragm (4), with nPCR being the more sensitive molecular method (17 positives: 10 in the tongue, 6 in the spleen, and 3 in the diaphragm) compared to qPCR (9 positives: 5, 3, and 2, respectively). Most animals in which T. gondii was detected by PCR had an antibody titre equal to or greater than 1/640.
Regarding the analyzed demographic variables associated with T. gondii infection, statistically significant differences were found regarding age, with higher seroprevalence in the adult (56.4%, 44/78; 95% CI: 45.4–67.4) and senior groups (100%; 4/4), compared to the young group (0%; 0/7); however, no statistically significant difference was found in relation to sex (Table 3). The provinces with the highest number of samples were Burgos in Castilla y León (wildcats) and Toledo in Castilla-La Mancha (Iberian lynx) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This is the first study to report the prevalence of T. gondii in wildcats in Castilla y León, analyzing a larger number of animals compared to previous studies conducted in other regions of Spain [21,34]. Additionally, analyzed a greater number of lynxes in Castilla-La Mancha than in previous studies (Table 4). Furthermore, the availability of animals for epidemiological studies in these species is typically low and limited to specific territories. Most epidemiological studies on T. gondii in Iberian lynx focused on populations in Andalusia [22,23,24], with only one study conducted in Castilla-La Mancha [21]. Similarly, studies on the wildcat have been limited to a small number of animals (six to nine individuals) from the Cantabrian Mountains [21] and Castilla-La Mancha [34]. Our study provides updated data on T. gondii infection in the Iberian lynx, considering that more than 10 years have passed since the last published studies, and the estimated population size has changed, increasing from 213–241 individuals (2008–2009) to over 1500 individuals currently [29]. This increase in population size results in greater interaction among individuals and different territorial distribution.
Given the short patent period of T. gondii infections in felines (1–2 weeks following primary infection) [46], it is rare to find oocysts in fecal samples from these hosts. The low prevalence of positive fecal samples for oocysts found in this study (5%, 1/20, in wildcats) is similar to other studies on wild felines, including red lynx (Lynx rufus) (6.2%; 1/16) and cougars (Puma concolor) (1.9%; 1/52) in North America [8], jaguars (Puma yagouaroundi) (1.22%; 1/82) in a regional park in Brazil [47], and wildcats (F. silvestris) from Greece (1.6–4.3%) [48]. Oocysts can be difficult to differentiate from those of Hammondia hammondi and Besnoitia spp. [49,50,51]; therefore, identification should be confirmed through molecular analysis. In the present study, the positive fecal sample in a wildcat was confirmed through molecular analysis. All diagnostic results from this individual are suggestive of active infection with oocyst shedding. This is the first report in Spain of T. gondii oocysts in a wild feline (wildcat) in its natural environment. In the case of the Iberian lynx, the negative results for the presence of oocysts in feces or from PCR analysis of fecal samples prevent confirming this species as a definitive host of T. gondii. This negative result is not surprising; due to the short patent period, it is difficult to detect oocysts, even in cat feces [52]. However, the diversity of felid species accepted as definitive hosts, including congeneric species (L. lynx, L. rufus) [7,8] on that list, strongly suggests that the Iberian lynx may also be a definitive host. Further studies are needed to undoubtedly confirm this possibility.
There are few studies that assess the prevalence of T. gondii in wild felines worldwide, and most of them employ serology as a diagnostic method. Several methods have been used for the serological diagnosis of T. gondii in wild animals (ELISA, MAT, IFAT, IHA, latex agglutination test, and immunochromatographic tests) [53,54]. The IFAT method used in the present study has the same sensitivity and specificity of ELISA and is better than MAT [55]. The seroprevalence of T. gondii detected in wild felines is 59% globally and 67% in Europe [53]. These results are similar, although slightly higher, to those obtained in our study, where IgG antibodies against T. gondii were detected in 53.9% of the samples. However, comparing the results of different studies can be challenging in many cases due to differences in the techniques employed, including variations in sensitivity and specificity, sample size, variability in terms of the age, and origin of the analyzed felines, as well as geographical and habitat differences, even within the same country.
The seroprevalence detected in the samples of lynxes in our study (44.9%) is similar to that detected using the IHA technique in lynxes from Andalusia (44%) [22] but lower than that obtained in studies where the MAT (Modified Agglutination Test) technique was used (63–82%) [21,23,24]. The seroprevalence results obtained in the wildcats in our study are very high (85%) compared to the data published in other studies conducted in Spain (50–56%) [21,34]. The differences may be related to the small number of animals analyzed in these studies (Table 4) and the different geographical areas studied. The prevalence of this parasite in humid areas may be higher than in dry or desert regions due to the viability of oocysts in these environmental conditions [1,56]. We found a higher prevalence in animals inhabiting the northern regions, where a subhumid continental climate with milder temperatures and no dry season prevails, compared to the southern regions, where a warm continental climate with extreme temperatures and dry summers prevails. However, besides climate, there are other factors that need to be considered to explain the differences in prevalence, especially when comparing different host species. In the case of T. gondii, the definitive host can become infected through the ingestion of oocysts (whose viability depends on environmental factors). However, although possible, the ingestion of such a high number of oocysts would be required, making this route of infection highly inefficient [57]; it is considered that the parasite is primarily transmitted to the definitive host through predation [6,57]. In this case, it is necessary to take into account the differences in dietary preferences between wildcats and lynxes. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) is the preferred prey of the Iberian lynx [58]; although, in the absence of these animals, they may prey on other species (e.g., hares, Lepus sp.). In contrast, the diet of wildcats is not as specific and depends more on the availability of prey (rabbits or rodents) [59]. Additionally, the size of the prey is important for two reasons. Firstly, it affects the number of individuals that need to be captured for the predator to obtain an adequate amount of food, and more prey means a higher risk of infection. In the necropsy findings of this study, an average of 3–7 mice were found in the stomachs of wildcats, while in the stomachs of lynxes, which are strictly dependent on European rabbits, remains of 1–2 rabbits were found (P. Matas Méndez, personal observation). The wildcat, by preying on a greater number of intermediate hosts and consuming hundreds of rodents throughout its life, increases the probability of becoming infected. In fact, there are studies that have observed a correlation between prevalence rates in felines and the number of rodents consumed, which varies according to prey abundance, time of year, and local conditions [13]. Secondly, some authors have suggested that since the prevalence of infection increases with age, larger prey (rabbits, hares) with a longer lifespan than smaller prey (rodents) are more likely to be infected [60]. In addition to lifespan, the risk of infection also depends on the susceptibility of each species [61,62]. We have not found published studies on the seroprevalence of T. gondii in rodents in Spain; in other European countries, it varied in the range of 0–59.4% [63]. In other host species from Spain, seroprevalence varied in the range of 5.6–39.6% in ruminants (roe deer, fallow deer, red deer, Sothern chamois, mouflon, wild goat, and Barbary sheep) [64], 21.9% in free-ranging Iberian pigs [65], and 6.1–53.8% in wild rabbits [66].
Although the prevalences found in wildcats and Iberian lynxes were slightly higher in males than in females, the difference is not statistically significant. These results are consistent with other studies where this variable is also not considered significant, as both sexes have the same risk of exposure to infection sources [53]. However, some studies conducted in feral cats observed greater predation by males and, therefore, a higher risk for infection [60]. Only adult wildcats have been analyzed in this study, but lynxes from all three age groups were analyzed, although there was a predominance of adult individuals (58) compared to juveniles (7) and seniors (4). In lynxes, we observed a significant difference among age groups, with an increase in individuals over 1year old (adults and seniors). This result is common in all studies that consider this variable, as the definitive host also has a higher probability of having been infected with increasing age [1,60]. Regarding the geographical distribution, the significant disparity in the number of wildcats collected across different provinces, with only 1–3 animals sampled in most of them, precludes drawing conclusions regarding this variable in this host species. Furthermore, there is no reliable population census available, as wildcat is not considered an endangered species but rather classified as near-threatened, which diminishes official interest and the publication of studies. In the case of the Iberian lynx, the samples primarily originate from two areas, one in the province of Toledo and another in Ciudad Real, corresponding to the distribution of the populations reported in the latest census [29]. In the province of Albacete, only two lynxes were analyzed; however, considering that the estimated population in this province was six individuals, it represents a significant percentage of animals. Overall, the observed seroprevalence for lynx is similar across the different studied areas, averaging around 45%. This value is at the lower limit of the range reported in other studies in Spain (Table 4). To the best of our knowledge, there are no available published data from Portugal.
In this study, T. gondii infection in wild felines was confirmed by detecting parasite DNA in different tissues (tongue, diaphragm, and spleen) analyzed using nPCR and qPCR. Parasite DNA was detected in only 26.2% (21/80) of the analyzed felines (tissue samples were not obtained from nine felines as they were live animals captured for monitoring). Despite 53.9% (48/89) of the wild felines showing antibodies (IgG) against T. gondii (indicating past infection and the presence of cysts in their tissues), parasite DNA was only detected in 43.7% (21/48) of the seropositive felines. Other studies also reported higher prevalences by serology than by detection of parasite DNA [67,68]. It is challenging to determine the optimal tissue sample for PCR diagnosis, as cysts can be found in different tissues, with a particular tropism for the central nervous system and other highly oxygenated tissues. Some studies compared DNA detection in different tissues and indicated the heart and brain as the preferred tissues [55,69,70,71]. However, in other studies, higher detection was observed in tongue samples [72], brachiocephalic muscle, and even in the spleen, with the same frequency as the brain [73]. In this study, access to samples of certain tissues from the roadkill animals was not possible due to the condition in which some of the remains were found. Among the tissues/organs that could not be analyzed in all animals was the brain. The selection of the tongue and spleen was based on the literature, and the choice of the diaphragm was based on the well-oxygenated nature of this muscle. We detected a higher number of positives in the tongue, followed by the spleen and diaphragm. However, we believe that these results should be compared with findings from other tissues and that the sample size should be increased to assess the tropism and sensitivity in detecting T. gondii in the tissues of wild felines. The PCR positivity depends on the number of cysts in a single animal and in a single organ/tissue; in food animals, it is estimated that as few as one tissue cyst may be present in 100 g of meat [74]. In the present study, only 2 gr of each organ/tissue were analyzed; as a result, false negatives can occur due to a non-homogeneous distribution of T. gondii cysts in the tissues and/or a low number of cysts, so when using a small sample for DNA detection, there may not have been cysts in the processed fragment (and therefore no detectable parasitic DNA). Some authors propose to address this issue using the magnetic capture PCR (mcPCR) method, as it allows for the analysis of a larger amount of tissue than conventional methods, concentrating T. gondii DNA and increasing sensitivity [75,76,77].

5. Conclusions

This is the first study in which T. gondii oocysts were found in fecal samples from the wildcat, Felis silvestris, in Spain. Oocysts were not detected in the feces of Iberian lynxes, Lynx pardinus; this was an expected result even in cats, so it is not possible to confirm or deny at this time whether lynxes are definitive hosts of T. gondii. The T. gondii seroprevalence found in wildcats in this study is 85%, and in Iberian lynx, it is 45%; in this species, an increase in seroprevalence with the age of the individuals was observed. The higher seroprevalence in wildcats than in Iberian lynxes may be due to the different geographic locations of the two feline populations, as well as differences in their diet. The detection of the parasite in feces or in tissue samples was low compared to the high seroprevalence detected in the same individuals. The high number of infected animals alerts us to the potential degree of environmental contamination and the risk to other animals and humans. It is necessary to establish surveillance and control programs for these wild felines, as well as for the prey species that are part of their food chain, to protect the health of these feline populations, other animals, and public health. Studies comparing the sensitivity of different diagnostic techniques, as well as the tissues to be analyzed, are necessary to identify the tissues with a higher tropism in these host species, as it may be beneficial for future epidemiological studies.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.M.M. and M.M.B.; methodology, I.F.C., A.M.M. and M.M.B.; investigation, P.M.M., I.F.C., R.G.G., A.A.R. and B.B.B.; resources, P.M.M. and M.M.B.; data curation, A.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, P.M.M., I.F.C., A.M.M., F.P.G. and M.M.B.; writing—review and editing, I.F.C., A.M.M., F.P.G. and M.M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially funded by Alfonso X el Sabio Foundation, project number 1.010.119 and Health Research Fund, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Science and Innovation, project FIS AESI PI21CIII/00031.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with Spanish legislation guidelines (RD 8/2003 of Animal Health and RD 53/2013 of Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals). The animal study protocol was approved in 2012 as part of the LIFE 10NAT/ES/570 IBERLINCE project (http://www.iberlince.eu/images/docs/3_InformesLIFE/ProtocolosSanitarios_M.Iberlince.pdf; accessed on 28 July 2023) and was adopted in the LIFE 19NAT/ES001005 LINXCONNECT project (https://lifelynxconnect.eu/en/project/; accessed on 28 July 2023), in which sampling was carried out on live animals. Animals killed in road accidents and collected by the Wildlife Recovery Centres of the Regional Environmental Departments of the Autonomous Communities where this study was conducted were analyzed in accordance with the corresponding authorizations (reference DGPFEN/SEN/avp_21_103_bis in Castilla-La Mancha, AB/is. Exp.AUES/CYL/001/2021 in Castilla y León).

Data Availability Statement

All new data are presented in this study; data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

We should acknowledge the General Direction of Natural Environment and Biodiversity, Ministry of Sustainable Development, Autonomous Community of Castilla-La Mancha, the General Direction of Natural Heritage and Forest Policy, Ministry of Development and Environment, Autonomous Community of Castilla y León, and the Wildlife Recovery Centres of both regions, for their assistance and collaboration in the completion of this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasmosis of Animals and Humans, 3rd ed.; CRC Press: New York, NY, USA, 2021; p. 564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dardé, M.-L.; Peyron, F. Toxoplasma y Toxoplasmosis. EMC-Pediatr. 2013, 48, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dubey, J.P.; Cerqueira-Cézar, C.K.; Murata, F.H.A.; Kwok, O.C.H.; Yang, Y.R.; Su, C. All about toxoplasmosis in cats: The last decade. Vet. Parasitol. 2020, 283, 109145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhu, S.; Shapiro, K.; Van Wormer, E. Dynamics and epidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii oocyst shedding in domestic and wild felids. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2022, 69, 2412–2423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hill, D.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii: Transmission, diagnosis and prevention. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2002, 8, 634–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Tenter, A.M.; Heckeroth, A.R.; Weis, L.M. Toxoplasma gondii: From animals to humans. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 1217–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Scherrer, P.; Ryser-Degiorgis, M.P.; Marti, I.A.; Borel, S.; Frey, C.F.; Mueller, N.; Ruetten, M.; Basso, W. Exploring the epidemiological role of the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) in the life cycle of Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2023, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vanwormer, E.; Conrad, P.A.; Miller, M.A.; Melli, A.C.; Carpenter, T.E.; Mazet, J.A. Toxoplasma gondii, source to sea: Higher contribution of domestic felids to terrestrial parasite loading despite lower infection prevalence. Ecohealth 2013, 10, 277–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Teutsch, S.M.; Juranek, D.D.; Sulzer, A.; Dubey, J.P.; Sikes, R.K. Epidemic toxoplasmosis associated with infected cats. N. Engl. J. Med. 1979, 300, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Vollaire, M.R.; Radecki, S.V.; Lappin, M.R. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antiboides in clinically ill cats in the United States. Am. J. Vet. Res. 2005, 66, 874–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Opsteegh, M.; Haveman, R.; Swart, A.N.; Mensik-Beerepot, M.E.; Hofhuis, A.; Lagelaar, M.F.M.; van der Giessen, J.W.B. Seroprevalence and risk factors for Toxoplasma gondii infection in domestic catas in The Netherlands. Prev. Vet. Med. 2012, 104, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Ding, H.; Gao, Y.M.; Lamberton, P.H.L.; Lu, D.B. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in catas in mainland China. Parasit. Vectors 2017, 10, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Gauss, C.B.; Almería, S.; Ortuño, A.; Garcia, F.; Dubey, J.P. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in domestic cats from Barcelona, Spain. J. Parasitol. 2003, 89, 1067–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Montoya Matute, A. La Infección por Toxoplasma gondii en el Gato: Aspectos Epidemiológicos, Diagnóstico y Caracterización de Aislados Autóctonos. PhD. Thesis, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. Millán, J.; Cabezón, O.; Pabón, M.; Dubey, J.P.; Almería, S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum in feral cats (Felis silvestris catus) in Majorca, Balearic Islands, Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2009, 165, 323–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sherry, K.; Miró, G.; Trotta, M.; Miranda, C.; Montoya, A.; Espinosa, C.; Ribas, F.; Furlanello, T.; Solano-Gallego, L. A Serological and Molecular Study of Leishmania infantum Infection in Cats from the Island of Ibiza (Spain). Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2011, 11, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Miró, G.; Ruperez, C.; Checa, R.; Galvez, R.; Hernandez, L.; Garcia, M.; Canorea, I.; Marino, V.; Montoya, A. Current status of L. infantum infection in stray cats in the Madrid region (Spain): Implications for the recent outbreak of human leishmaniosis? Parasit. Vectors 2014, 7, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Montoya, A.; García, M.; Gálvez, R.; Checa, R.; Marino, V.; Sarquis, J.; Barrera, J.P.; Rupérez, C.; Caballero, L.; Chicharro, C.; et al. Implications of zoonotic and vector-borne parasites to free-roaming cats in central Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2018, 251, 125–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Candela, M.G.; Fanelli, A.; Carvalho, J.; Serrano, E.; Domenech, G.; Alonso, F.; Martínez-Carrasco, C. Urban landscape and infection risk in free-roaming cats. Zoonoses Public Health 2022, 69, 295–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Villanueva-Saz, S.; Martínez, M.; Giner, J.; González, A.; Tobajas, A.P.; Pérez, M.D.; Lira-Navarrete, E.; González-Ramírez, A.M.; Macías-León, J.; Verde, M.; et al. A cross-sectional serosurvey of SARS-CoV-2 and co-infections in stray cats from the second wave to the sixth wave of COVID-19 outbreaks in Spain. Vet. Res. Commun. 2023, 47, 615–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Sobrino, R.; Cabezón, O.; Millán, J.; Pabón, M.; Arnal, M.C.; Luco, D.F.; Gortázar, C.; Dubey, J.P.; Almeria, S. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii antibodies in wild carnivores from Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2007, 148, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Roelke, M.E.; Johnson, W.E.; Millán, J.; Palomares, F.; Revilla, E.; Rodríguez, A.; Calzada, J.; Ferreras, P.; León-Vizcaíno, L.; Delibes, M.; et al. Exposure to disease agents in the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Eur. J. Wildl. Res. 2008, 54, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Millán, J.; Candela, M.G.; Palomares, F.; Cubero, M.J.; Rodríguez, A.; Barral, M.; de la Fuente, J.; Almería, S.; León-Vizcaíno, L. Disease threats to the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Vet. J. 2009, 182, 114–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. García-Bocanegra, I.; Dubey, J.P.; Martínez, F.; Vargas, A.; Cabezón, O.; Zorrilla, I.; Arenas, A.; Almería, S. Factors affecting seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in the endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 167, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Anile, S.; Bizzarri, L.; Lacrimini, M.; Sforzi, A.; Ragni, B.; Devillard, S. Home-Range Size of the European Wildcat (Felis silvestris silvestris): A Report from Two Areas in Central Italy. Mammalia 2017, 82, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gil-Sanchez, J.M.; Barea-Azcon, J.M.; Jaramillo, J.; Virgos, E.; Herrera-Sanchez, F.J.; Jiménez, J.; Virgós, E. Fragmentation and low density as major conservation challenges for the southernmost populations of the European wildcat. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0227708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. López-Martín, J.M.; García, F.J.; Such, A.; Virgós, E.; Lozano, J.; Duarte, J.; España, A.J. Felis silvestris Schreber, 1777. In Atlas y Libro Rojo de los Mamíferos Terrestres de España; Palomo, L.J., Gisbert, J., Blanco, J.C., Eds.; Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  28. Guzmán, J.N.; García, F.J.; Garrote, G.; Pérez de Ayala, R.; Iglesias, M.C. El lince ibérico (Lynx pardinus) en España y Portugal. Censo-Diagnóstico de sus Poblaciónes; Dirección General para la Biodiversidad, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente: Madrid, Spain, 2004; p. 184. [Google Scholar]
  29. Anonymous. Censo de Lince Ibérico España y Portugal. 2022. Available online: https://lifelynxconnect.eu/en/census_en/ (accessed on 12 July 2023).
  30. Klar, N.; Herrmann, M.; Kramer-Schadt, S. Effects and mitigation of road impacts on individual movement behavior of wildcats. J. Wildl. Manag. 2009, 73, 631–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Meli, M.L.; Cattori, V.; Martínez, F.; López, G.; Vargas, A.; Simón, M.A.; Zorrilla, I.; Muñoz, A.; Palomares, F.; López-Bao, J.V.; et al. Feline leukemia virus and other pathogens as important threats to the survival of the critically endangered Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus). PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e4744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lozano, J.; Malo, A.F. Conservation of the European wildcat (Felis silvestris) in Mediterranean environments: A reassessment of current threats. In Mediterranean Ecosystems: Dynamics, Management and Conservation; Williams, G.S., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  33. Anile, S.; Devillard, S.; Ragni, B.; Rovero, F.; Mattucci, F.; Valvo, M.L. Habitat fragmentation and anthropogenic factors affect wildcat Felis silvestris silvestris occupancy and detectability on Mt Etna. Wildl. Biol. 2019, 1, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Candela, M.G.; Pardavila, X.; Ortega, N.; Lamosa, A.; Mangas, J.G.; Martínez-Carrasco, C. Canine distemper virus may affect European wild cat populations in Central Spain. Mamm. Biol. 2019, 97, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Girling, S.J.; Pizzi, R.; Naylor, A.D.; Richardson, D.; Richardson, U.; Harley, J.; Cole, G.; Brown, D.; Fraser, M.; Tillman, E.; et al. Use of clindamycin in Pallas’ cats (Otocolobus (Felis) manul) to reduce juvenile toxoplasmosis-associated mortality rates. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2020, 51, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Pas, A.; Dubey, J.P. Fatal toxoplasmosis in sand cats (Felis margarita). J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 2008, 39, 362–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Dubey, J.P.; Quinn, W.J.; Weinandy, D. Fatal neonatal toxoplasmosis in a bobcat (Lynx rufus). J. Wildl. Dis. 1987, 23, 324–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Lozano Mendoza, J. Ecología del Gato Montés (Felis silvestris) y su Relación con el Conejo de Monte (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Ph.D. Thesis, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gerngross, P.; Ambarli, H.; Angelici, F.M.; Anile, S.; Campbell, R.; Ferreras de Andres, P.; Gil-Sanchez, J.M.; Götz, M.; Jerosch, S.; Mengüllüoglu, D.; et al. Felis silvestris. The ICUM Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T181049859A181050999. Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/species/181049859/181050999 (accessed on 28 July 2023).
  40. Verhofstede, C.; Sabbe, L.; Van Renterghem, L. Ability of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays to detect early immunoglobulin G antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1987, 6, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Thienpont, D.; Rochette, F.; Vanparijs, F.J. Diagnostic de Verminose par Examen Coprologique; Janssen Research Foundation: Beerse, Belgium, 1979; pp. 35–36. [Google Scholar]
  42. European Scientific Counsel Companion Animal Parasites (ESCCAP). Parasitological Diagnosis in Cats, Dogs and Equines. In ESCCAP Guideline 04 First Edition; ESCCAP: Worcestershire, UK, 2022; p. 19. [Google Scholar]
  43. Fuentes, I.; Rodríguez, M.; Domingo, C.D.; del Castillo, F.; Juncosa, T.; Alvar, J. Urine sample used for congenital toxoplasmosis diagnosis by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 2368–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Homan, W.L.; Vercammen, M.; De Braekeleer, J.; Verschueren, H. Identification of a 200- to 300-fold repetitive 529 bp DNA fragment in Toxoplasma gondii, and its use for diagnostic and quantitative PCR. Int. J. Parasitol. 2000, 30, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, J.H.; Sohn, H.J.; Hwang, W.S.; Hwang, E.K.; Jean, Y.H.; Yamane, I.; Kim, D.Y. In vitro isolation and characterization of bovine Neospora caninum in Korea. Vet. Parasitol. 2000, 90, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dubey, J.P. Duration of immunity to shedding of Toxoplasma gondii oocysts by cats. J. Parasitol. 1995, 81, 410–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bolais, P.F.; Galal, L.; Cronemberger, C.M.; Pereira, F.A.; Barbosa, A.D.S.; Dib, L.V.; Amendoeira, M.R.R.; Dardé, M.L.; Mercier, A. Toxoplasma gondii in the faeces of wild felids from the Atlantic Forest, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 2022, 117, e210302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Diakou, A.; Migli, D.; Dimzas, D.; Morelli, S.; Di Cesare, A.; Youlatos, D.; Lymberakis, P.; Traversa, D. Endoparasites of European Wildcats (Felis silvestris) in Greece. Pathogens 2021, 10, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Dubey, J.P. The evolution of the knowledge of cat and dog coccidia. Parasitology 2009, 136, 1469–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Dubey, J.P.; Sreekumar, C. Redescription of Hammondia hammondi and its differentiation from Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol. 2003, 33, 1437–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Izadi, L.; Sarvi, S.; Hosseini, S.A.; Amouei, A.; Sharif, M.; Rahimi, M.T.; Nayeri, T.; Daryani, A. Copro-molecular diagnosis of the Toxoplasmatinae subfamily in dog and cat populations in northern Iran. Epidemiol. Health 2020, 42, e2020074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dabritz, H.A.; Miller, M.A.; Atwill, E.R.; Gardner, I.A.; Leutenegger, C.M.; Melli, A.C.; Conrad, P.A. Detection of Toxoplasma gondii-like oocysts in cat feces and estimates of the environmental oocyst burden. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2007, 231, 1676–1684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Montazeri, M.; Mikaeili Galeh, T.; Moosazadeh, M.; Sarvi, S.; Dodangeh, S.; Javidnia, J.; Sharif, M.; Daryani, A. The global serological prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in felids during the last five decades (1967–2017): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasit. Vectors 2020, 13, 82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sioutas, G.; Symeonidou, I.; Gelasakis, A.I.; Tzirinis, C.; Papadopoulos, E. Feline toxoplasmosis in Greece: A countrywide seroprevalence study and associated risk factors. Pathogens 2022, 11, 1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sharma, R.; Parker, S.; Al-Adhami, B.; Bachand, N.; Jenkins, E. Comparison of tissues (heart vs. brain) and serological tests (MAT, ELISA and IFAT) for detection of Toxoplasma gondii in naturally infected wolverines (Gulo gulo) from the Yukon, Canada. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2019, 15, e00046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Smith, D.D.; Frenkel, J.K. Prevalence of antibodies to Toxoplasma gondii in wild mammals of Missouri and east central Kansas: Biologic and ecologic considerations of transmission. J. Wildl. Dis. 1995, 31, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dubey, J.P. Comparative infectivity of oocysts and bradyzoites of Toxoplasma gondii for intermediate (mice) and definitive (cats) hosts. Vet. Parasitol. 2006, 140, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Calzada, J.; Guzmán, J.N.; Rodríguez, A. Lynx Pardinus (Temminck, 1827). In Atlas y Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Terrestres de España; Palomo, L.J., Gisbert, J., Blanco, J.C., Eds.; Dirección General para la Biodiversidad-SECEM-SECEMU: Madrid, Spain, 2007; pp. 342–347. [Google Scholar]
  59. Malo, A.F.; Lozano, J.; Huertas, D.L.; Virgos, E. A change of diet from rodents to rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus). Is the wildcat (Felis silvestris) a specialist predator? J. Zool. 2004, 263, 401–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Afonso, E.; Thulliez, P.; Pontier, D.; Gilot-Fromont, E. Toxoplasmosis in prey species and consequences for prevalence in feral cats: Not all prey species are equal. Parasitology 2007, 134, 1963–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gustafsson, K.; Uggla, A.; Järplid, B. Toxoplasma gondii infection in the mountain hare (Lepus timidus) and domestic rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus). I. Pathology. J. Comp. Pathol. 1997, 117, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Sedlák, K.; Literák, I.; Pavlásek, I.; Benák, J. Susceptibility of common voles to experimental toxoplasmosis. J. Wildl. Dis. 2001, 37, 640–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Galeh, T.M.; Sarvi, S.; Montazeri, M.; Moosazadeh, M.; Nakhaei, M.; Shariatzadeh, S.A.; Daryani, A. Global Status of Toxoplasma gondii Seroprevalence in Rodents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Castro-Scholten, S.; Cano-Terriza, D.; Jiménez-Ruiz, S.; Almería, S.; Risalde, M.A.; Vicente, J.; Acevedo, P.; Arnal, M.C.; Balseiro, A.; Gómez-Guillamón, F.; et al. Seroepidemiology of Toxoplasma gondii in wild ruminants in Spain. Zoonoses Public Health 2021, 68, 884–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Fernández-Escobar, M.; Calero-Bernal, R.; Regidor-Ceriillo, J.; Vallejo, R.; Benavides, J.; Collantes-Fernández, E.; Ortega-Mora, L.M. Isolation, genotyping, and mouse virulence characterization of Toxoplasma gondii from free ranging Iberian pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 604782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Almería, S.; Calvete, C.; Pagés, A.; Gauss, C.; Dubey, J.P. Factors affecting the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii infection in wild rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) from Spain. Vet. Parasitol. 2004, 123, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Kornacka, A.; Cybulska, A.; Bień, J.; Goździk, K.; Moskwa, B. The usefulness of direct agglutination test, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and polymerase chain reaction for the detection of Toxoplasma gondii in wild animals. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 228, 85–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Herrmann, D.C.; Maksimov, P.; Maksimov, A.; Sutor, A.; Schwarz, S.; Jaschke, W.; Schliephake, A.; Denzin, N.; Conraths, F.J.; Schares, G. Toxoplasma gondii in foxes and rodents from the German Federal States of Brandenburg and Saxony-Anhalt: Seroprevalence and genotypes. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 185, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Juránková, J.; Basso, W.; Neumayerová, H.; Baláž, V.; Jánová, E.; Sidler, X.; Deplazes, P.; Koudela, B. Brain is the predilection site of Toxoplasma gondii in experimentally inoculated pigs as revealed by magnetic capture and real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 2014, 38, 167–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Koethe, M.; Straubinger, R.K.; Pott, S.; Bangoura, B.; Geuthner, A.C.; Daugschies, A.; Ludewig, M. Quantitative detection of Toxoplasma gondii in tissues of experimentally infected turkeys and in retail turkey products by magnetic-capture PCR. Food Microbiol. 2015, 52, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gisbert Algaba, I.; Verhaegen, B.; Jennes, M.; Rahman, M.; Coucke, W.; Cox, E.; Dorny, P.; Dierick, K.; De Craeye, S. Pork as a source of transmission of Toxoplasma gondii to humans: A parasite burden study in pig tissues after infection with different strains of Toxoplasma gondii as a function of time and different parasite stages. Int. J. Parasitol. 2018, 48, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dubey, J.P. Persistence of Toxoplasma gondii in the tissues of chronically infected cats. J. Parasitol. 1997, 63, 156–157. [Google Scholar]
  73. Rico-Torres, C.P.; del Viento-Camacho, A.; Caballero-Ortega, H.; Besné-Mérida, A.; Luna-Pastén, H.; Correa, D.; Palma-García, J.M. First isolation of Toxoplasma gondii from cats of Colima, Mexico: Tissue distribution and genetic characterization. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 209, 125–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Hill, D.E.; Sreekumar, C.; Jones, J.; Dubey, J.P. Toxoplasma gondii. In Infectious Disease. Foodborne Diseases; Simjee, V.S., Ed.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2007; pp. 337–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Opsteegh, M.; Langelaar, M.; Sprong, H.; den Hartog, L.; De Craeye, S.; Bokken, G.; Ajzenberg, D.; Kijlstra, A.; van der Giessen, J. Direct detection and genotyping of Toxoplasma gondii in meat samples using magnetic capture and PCR. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Juránková, J.; Hůrková-Hofmannová, L.; Volf, J.; Baláž, V.; Piálek, J. Efficacy of magnetic capture in comparison with conventional DNA isolation in a survey of Toxoplasma gondii in wild house mice. Eur. J. Protistol. 2014, 50, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Nicholas, B.; Ravel, A.; Leighton, P.; Stephen, C.; Iqbal, A.; Ndao, M.; Konecsni, K.; Fernando, C.; Jenkins, E. Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) as sentinels for parasitic zoonoses, Toxoplasma gondii and Trichinella nativa, in the northeastern Canadian Arctic. Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2018, 7, 391–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Maps of the Iberian Peninsula showing the two Spanish autonomous communities where the samplings were conducted. The approximate location of origin of samples corresponding to wild cats (red circles, left map) and Iberian lynx (green circles, right map) obtained in each province are indicated. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of samples from that location. Distribution areas of wildcats (pale red) [39] and Iberian lynx (pale green) [29] are also shown.
Figure 1. Maps of the Iberian Peninsula showing the two Spanish autonomous communities where the samplings were conducted. The approximate location of origin of samples corresponding to wild cats (red circles, left map) and Iberian lynx (green circles, right map) obtained in each province are indicated. Circle sizes are proportional to the number of samples from that location. Distribution areas of wildcats (pale red) [39] and Iberian lynx (pale green) [29] are also shown.
Animals 13 02488 g001
Table 1. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) obtained by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT).
Table 1. Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) obtained by indirect immunofluorescence antibody test (IFAT).
IFAT IgGFelis silvestris
n (%; 95 CI 1)
Lynx pardinus
n (%; 95% CI)
p-Value
Negative3 (15.0; 0.0–30.6)38 (55.1; 26.5–49.4)0.001
Positive—any titre17 (85.0; 69.3–100.0)31 (44.9; 33.1–56.6)0.002
Positive—titre 1/80---4 (5.8; 0.4–11.6)0.006
Positive—titre 1/1601 (5.0; 0.0–14.5)5 (7.2; 0.9–13.0)0.724
Positive—titre 1/3204 (20.0; 0.0–12.6)6 (8.7; 2.2–15.7)0.158
Positive—titre ≥ 1/64012 (60.0; 38.5–81.5)16 (23.2; 13.1–32.9)0.001
1 Confidence interval.
Table 2. Comparison of the results for Toxoplasma gondii identification in samples from wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) using serology (indirect immunofluorescence antibody test, IFAT), coprology (Telemann, nPCR, and qPCR), and tissue analysis (nPCR and qPCR).
Table 2. Comparison of the results for Toxoplasma gondii identification in samples from wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) using serology (indirect immunofluorescence antibody test, IFAT), coprology (Telemann, nPCR, and qPCR), and tissue analysis (nPCR and qPCR).
Host SpeciesSerology
(n = 89)
Coprology (n = 89)Tissue Analysis (n = 80)
IFAT IgGIFAT IgMTelemannnPCRqPCRnPCR 1qPCR 1Total PCR+
(Any Method) 2
Felis silvestris17 31 31 31 31 38 3610
Lynx pardinus3100009311
Total (both species)48111117921
1 These columns indicate the number of animals found positive with each method. Some animals were found positive by both methods; due to this, the sum of the values of these columns is greater than the values provided in the last column (total number of animals found positive by PCR, any method). 2 The values in this column indicate the number of animals found positive in at least one of the PCR tests (qPCR and/or nPCR in fecal and/or tissue samples). 3 One animal tested positive in IFAT (both antibodies), microscopy, and molecular analysis (feces and tongue samples).
Table 3. Seroprevalence (positive by IFAT) in wild populations of wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) in relation to animal sex, age, and sample collection area.
Table 3. Seroprevalence (positive by IFAT) in wild populations of wildcat (Felis silvestris) and Iberian lynx (Lynx pardinus) in relation to animal sex, age, and sample collection area.
Felis silvestrisLynx pardinusCombined Data from
Both Species
Variablen+% Positivep-Valuen+% Positivep-Valuen+% Positivep-Value
Sex 0.347 0.864 0.795
 Male1381.2 (13/16) 2145.6 (21/46) 3454.8 (34/62)
 Female4100 (4/4) 1043.5 (10/23) 1451.9 (14/27)
Age n/a 0.002 0.003
 Juvenile------ 00.0(0/7) 00.0 (0/7)
 Adult1785.0 (17/20) 2746.5 (27/58) 4456.4 (44/78)
 Senior------ 4100.0 (4/4) 4100.0 (4/4)
Capture area 0.015
 Castilla-La Manchan/a 0.919
    Albacete------ 150.0 (1/2) 150.0 (1/2)
    Ciudad Real0--- 1041.6 (10/24) 1041.7 (10/24)
    Toledo00.0 (0/1) 2046.5 (20/43) 2145.5 (21/44)
    Total00.0 (0/1) 3144.9 (31/69) 3144.3 (31/70)
 Castilla y León<0.001 ---
    Burgos1392.9 (13/14) 0--- 1392.9 (13/14)
    Salamanca00.0 (0/1) 0--- 00.0 (0/1)
    Soria3100.0 (3/3) 0--- 3100 (3/3)
    Valladolid1100.0 (1/1) 0--- 1100 (1/1)
    Total1789.5 (17/19) 0 1789.5 (17/19)
Table 4. Studies on the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wild felines (Felix silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain.
Table 4. Studies on the seroprevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in wild felines (Felix silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain.
Host SpeciesRegionAnimals ExaminedSerological Method% PositiveReference
Felis silvestrisAndalusia, Castilla-La Mancha, Cantabrian region6MAT
(modified agglutination text)
50[21]
Castilla-La Mancha9ELISA56[34]
Castilla-La Mancha, Castilla y León20IFAT85Present study
Lynx pardinusAndalusia, Castilla-La Mancha27MAT82[21]
Andalusia48IHA
(indirect haemagglutination)
44[22]
Andalusia26MAT81[23]
Andalusia129MAT63[24]
Castilla-La Mancha69IFAT45Present study
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matas Méndez, P.; Fuentes Corripio, I.; Montoya Matute, A.; Bailo Barroso, B.; Grande Gómez, R.; Apruzzese Rubio, A.; Ponce Gordo, F.; Mateo Barrientos, M. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Endangered Wild Felines (Felis silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain. Animals 2023, 13, 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152488

AMA Style

Matas Méndez P, Fuentes Corripio I, Montoya Matute A, Bailo Barroso B, Grande Gómez R, Apruzzese Rubio A, Ponce Gordo F, Mateo Barrientos M. Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Endangered Wild Felines (Felis silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain. Animals. 2023; 13(15):2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152488

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matas Méndez, Pablo, Isabel Fuentes Corripio, Ana Montoya Matute, Begoña Bailo Barroso, Rebeca Grande Gómez, Ariadna Apruzzese Rubio, Francisco Ponce Gordo, and Marta Mateo Barrientos. 2023. "Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Endangered Wild Felines (Felis silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain" Animals 13, no. 15: 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152488

APA Style

Matas Méndez, P., Fuentes Corripio, I., Montoya Matute, A., Bailo Barroso, B., Grande Gómez, R., Apruzzese Rubio, A., Ponce Gordo, F., & Mateo Barrientos, M. (2023). Prevalence of Toxoplasma gondii in Endangered Wild Felines (Felis silvestris and Lynx pardinus) in Spain. Animals, 13(15), 2488. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13152488

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop