Next Article in Journal
Enhancing Rearing of European Seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax) in Aquaponic Systems: Investigating the Effects of Enriched Black Soldier Fly (Hermetia illucens) Prepupae Meal on Fish Welfare and Quality Traits
Previous Article in Journal
Research Animal Behavioral Management Programs for the 21st Century
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

In Vitro Activity of Ozone/Oxygen Gaseous Mixture against a Caprine Herpesvirus Type 1 Strain Isolated from a Goat with Vaginitis

1
Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, S.P. per Casamassima km. 3, 70010 Valenzano, BA, Italy
2
Department of Prevention of Animal Health and Welfare, Local Health Authority of Matera, Via Montescaglioso, 75100 Matera, BA, Italy
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2023, 13(12), 1920; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121920
Submission received: 13 May 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 8 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Small Ruminants)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Alphaherpesviruses cause genital lesions in both animals and humans. Ozone (O3) has a strong virucidal action on enveloped and naked viruses. The aim of this study was to test the in vitro virucidal and antiviral activity of an ozone/oxygen (O3/O2) gaseous mixture against caprine herpesvirus type 1 (CpHV-1). To test the virucidal activity, the virus was exposed to different concentrations (20 and 50 μg/mL) of the gaseous mixture at different time points, and a decrease in the viral titer by up to 2.0 log10 TCID50/50 μL was observed. To test the antiviral activity, the virus was exposed to different non-cytotoxic concentrations of the gaseous mixture. When MDBK cell monolayers were treated with the gas mixture after infection with CpHV-1 at a concentration of 50 μg/mL, significant antiviral activity was observed with a decrease in viral titer of 2.0 log10 TCID50/50 μL. These findings aid future studies aimed at assessing if topical treatment of genital herpes lesions in vivo with O3/O2 gaseous mixture could be a valid and safe therapeutic option in an animal model, with possible translational applications in the therapy of human herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2), which shares several biological similarities with CpHV-1.

Abstract

Alphaherpesviruses cause genital lesions and reproductive failure in both humans and animals. Their control is mainly based on prevention using hygienic prophylactic measures due to the absence of vaccines and limitations of antiviral drug therapy. Ozone is an oxidating gas showing a strong microbicidal activity on bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa. The present study assessed the in vitro virucidal and antiviral activity of ozone against caprine herpesvirus type 1 (CpHV-1). The virucidal activity of a gaseous mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL was assessed against the virus at different contact times (30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 120 s, 180 s, and 300 s). Antiviral activity of a gaseous mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL was evaluated against the virus after 30 s and 60 s. Ozone displayed significant virucidal activity when used at all the tested concentrations whilst significant antiviral activity was observed using ozone at 50 μg/mL. The gaseous mixture, tested in the present study, showed virucidal and antiviral activity against CpHV-1 in a dose- and time contact-dependent fashion. Ozone therapy could be evaluated in vivo for the treatment of CpHV-1-induced genital lesions in goats using topical applications.

1. Introduction

Viral infections of the reproductive system are endemic in mammals and have negative repercussions on sexual and reproductive performances. Among them, the Alphaherpesviruses (family Herpesviridae, subfamily Alphaherpesvirinae) cause genital lesions and abortus in both humans and animals [1,2]. Alphaherpesviruses are large, enveloped DNA viruses characterized by rapid, lytic growth cycles [3]. Some herpesviruses infect the genital tract and subsequently establish a lifelong latent infection in the lumbosacral sensory ganglia that can be recurrently reactivated by stress, immunosuppression, or hormonal changes [4].
In humans, herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a major cause of genital infection, inducing painful genital ulcers, with 13% of the population aged 15–49 years being infected [2]. HSV-2 mainly causes genital herpes, which is the most common sexually transmitted ulcerative disease, and is considered a global health problem [5].
The control of HSV-2 is mainly based on prevention (through information and education) and on the use of viral DNA polymerase inhibitors [6]. These molecules can accelerate symptom resolution and lesion healing, but they cannot eradicate latent HSV infection and can induce drug resistance [7]. Resistance to antiviral drugs is a major problem in the fight against contagious diseases, such as influenza and hepatitis. The impact of resistance to antivirals can be important and fatal as it can affect drastically the effectiveness of therapy. This has driven the research to find alternative therapies.
Alphaherpesviruses also cause reproductive failure in farm animals and economic loss for the livestock industry [1]. Caprine herpesvirus type 1 (CpHV-1) is a widespread virus in goat herds and causes vulvovaginitis, balanoposthitis, infertility, abortions, and stillbirth [8]. Abortions associated with CpHV-1 occur during the second half of pregnancy and can be reproduced experimentally through intranasal and intravenous inoculation of pregnant goats [9]. CpHV-1 causes latent infections but, unlike other herpesviruses, its reactivation is extremely difficult both in natural and experimental conditions and has been reported very rarely. In natural infections, CpHV-1 is reactivated during the estrus phase but only in animals with low neutralizing antibody titers. In previous studies, reactivation of latent CpHV-1 has been experimentally induced in adult goats using administration of a high dose of dexamethasone for several days [8]. Interestingly, after reactivation or experimental infection, even when the virus has been inoculated intranasally, elimination via the genital route takes far longer than by the nasal route. The results of these studies indicate that CpHV-1 recognizes the genital tract as a target [8].
On goat farms, the control of CpHV-1 is based on prevention and eradication. Different types of vaccines have been investigated since the 2000s. However, vaccines for CpHV-1 have not been released as this pharmaceutical market is not economically profitable. Consequently, the control of this infection relies on hygienic prophylactic measures [10], and the research for alternative solutions is needed.
CpHV-1 has a significant biological similarity to HSV-2 considering its ability to induce latent infection in the sacral ganglia and similar genital lesions [8]. This has suggested the use of CpHV-1 infection in goat as a model for the study of HSV-2 infection in humans [11,12].
The immunosuppressive drug, mizoribine, when combined with aciclovir has been evaluated in vitro, proving effective against CpHV-1 [13]. The administration of cidofovir has also raised interest for the treatment of genital lesions in the caprine species based on in vivo and in vitro tests [12]. PHA767491, an anti-tumor drug, has been used against HSV-1, HSV-2 [14], and CpHV-1 [15]. Some natural substances, such as essential oils, have been tested for their anti-infective properties. Volatile oils of Melissa officinalis Lamiaceae effectively inhibited HSV-2 replication [16]. Ginger essential oil was found to have virucidal activity, inactivating CpHV-1 by up to 100% [17]. Moreover, fig latex has also shown efficacy against CpHV-1 in vivo and in vitro [11]. In addition, several essential oils have been tested against human viruses [18]. However, the use of essential oils in veterinary medical practice is limited.
Treatment with ozone (O3) is an alternative therapy that uses O3 in a mixture with oxygen (O2) for medical purposes [19]. O3 is an allotropic form of oxygen, composed by three oxygen atoms, organized in a relatively unstable cyclic structure that makes it a powerful oxidant agent [20]. Due to this feature, it shows microbicidal and antimicrobial properties against bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoa [19,21,22]. As for the effects against viruses, O3 causes structural damage by protein and lipid peroxidation of the envelope and capsid, respectively, and by the destruction of nucleic acids [23,24]. Nucleic acid damage is evident by the disruption of specific regions of the viral genome. Some authors exposed poliovirus type 1 to ozonized water, demonstrating a specific damage in the 5′-non-coding regions of the genome [24]. Protein peroxidation plays a key role in the inactivation of non-enveloped viruses. Thurston-Enriquez et al. [25] inactivated feline calicivirus and adenovirus type 40 using ozonized water at 300 and 60 µg/L, respectively. Encouraging results have been achieved by Dubuis et al. [26] on murine norovirus and phage viruses using O3 in air treatment at low concentrations (0.23 ppm equal to 230 µg/L). Lipid peroxidation is the main procedure used to inactivate enveloped viruses. In a study conducted by Wells et al. [27], human immunodeficiency virus type 1 was inactivated in vitro by O3 in a dose-dependent manner. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral titer on different materials (fleece, gauze, wood, glass, and plastic) significantly decreased after 30 min/2 h of exposure to O3 in a plexiglass chamber (0.2–4 ppm equal to 200–4000 µg/L) [28]. A gaseous mixture of 21% O3 in air for 80 min was able to trigger a 4-fold reduction of influenza A virus titer. Conversely, this mixture was ineffective against respiratory syncytial virus [29].
O3 displayed in vitro virucidal activity on HSV-1 and bovid herpesvirus type 1 (BoHV-1), inducing viral inhibition by more than 90% after 3 h of exposure [30]. Nevertheless, data regarding the virucidal efficacy of O3 against CpHV-1 and HSV-2 are not available.
In large animal veterinary medicine, O3 has been used for systemic treatment using auto-haemo [31,32] or topical [19] administration. Moreover, O3 has been used to treat postpartum pathologies [33] and to improve reproductive parameters in postpartum dairy cows [34,35] and to increase the fertility rates in cows affected by urovagina [36]. O3 therapy seemingly matched or outperformed antibiotics treatments, reducing the risks of antimicrobial resistance [34,37] and withdrawal times for meat and milk because it does not leave residue in biological tissue [37]. In goat medicine, few studies have been conducted on the application of O3 therapy, and they are mainly focused on reproductive [34] and milk production [38] performances.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro virucidal and antiviral effects of a medical O3/O2 gaseous mixture against CpHV-1.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. O3 Generator

An O3 medical generator (Vet-Ozone Medica srl-Italy, Bologna, Italy) was used to produce an ozone/oxygen (O3/O2) gas mixture. After connection to an electrical source and to an O2 cylinder, the generator produced electrical discharges that convert O2 (substrate) into O3. The generator can produce a gas mixture containing 20 and 50 µg of O3/mL.

2.2. Hermetic Box for Gas Flow

An in-house method was developed to expose the Petri dishes to the O3 gas flow, as previously described [22].
Two silicon tubes were assembled on the cover of a polypropylene hermetic box. The tube for the incoming flow was connected to the O3 generator and the output tube to a drainpipe.
After placing the uncovered Petry dishes inside the box, the box was hermetically sealed, and the ozone generator was switched on. The generated ozonized gas mixture entered the box through tube 1. Subsequently, the gas mixture came into contact with the Petri dishes and exited through tube 2, allowing a continuous gas flow (Figure 1). The box was disinfected between each test using sodium hypochlorite (1%) with a contact time of at least 1 min as suggested in the guidelines for “Disinfection and sterilization in healthcare facilities” [39].

2.3. Cells and Virus

Madin–Darby bovine kidney cells (MDBK) were kindly provided by the Cell Substrate Center of the Experimental Zooprofilactic Institute of Lombardy and Emilia–Romagna. The cells were cultured at 37 °C in a 5% carbon dioxide (CO2) atmosphere in Dulbecco minimum essential medium (D-MEM) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, 100 IU/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 2 mM l-glutamine. The same medium was used for the antiviral assays. The CpHV-1 strain Ba-1, previously isolated from vaginitis in goat, was cultured and titrated in MDBK cells. The virus stock with a titer of 7.25 log10 tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50)/50 μL was stored at −80 °C and used for the experiments. The CpHV-1 viral suspension used in the experiments underwent preliminary centrifugation at 4000× g for 15 min to separate cellular debris.

2.4. Cytotoxicity Assay

A cytotoxicity assay was carried out in order to determine the conditions of cell exposure to O3 (O3 concentration in the gas mixture and exposure time) for the antiviral activity tests. Confluent 24 h monolayers of MDBK cells grown in 35 mm Petri dishes and maintained in D-MEM were exposed to the O3/O2 gas mixture containing different concentrations of O3 (20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2), 90 s (T3), 120 s (T4), 180 s (T5), and 300 s (T6). Negative controls were prepared by adding cells inside the hermetic box at the same temperature and for the same time intervals without exposure to O3/O2 gas mixture. Cytotoxicity was assessed using both direct microscopic examination of cell morphology (loss of cell monolayer, granulation, cytoplasmic vacuolization, stretching and narrowing of cell extensions, and darkening of the cell borders) [40] and indirect measurement of cell viability with an in vitro toxicology assay kit (Sigma–Aldrich Srl, Milan, Italy) based on 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2 yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (XTT). The XTT test was carried out as previously described [40] by following the manufacturer’s instructions, and the obtained optical density (OD) values were used to calculate the percentage of cytotoxicity (percentage of dead cells) according to the formula: % Cytotoxicity = [(OD of control cells − OD of treated cells) × 100]/OD of control cells. The assay was performed in triplicate and the data were expressed as mean ± SD. The exposure conditions that did not reduce the viability of the treated MDBK cells by more than 20% (cytotoxicity threshold) were considered as non-cytotoxic and were selected for subsequent antiviral tests.

2.5. Cytophatic Effect

The cytophatic effect of CpHV-1 was evaluated on MDBK cells using an inverted microscope with live-cell imaging and hematoxylin eosin staining.

2.6. Virucidal Activity Assay

The virucidal activity of O3/O2 gaseous mixture against CpHV-1 was assessed at 20 and 50 μg/mL O3 concentration.
One mL of CpHV-1 stock virus was poured in a 35 mm Petri dishes and directly exposed to the O3/O2 gas mixture in the modified hermetic box at room temperature. At different time intervals (T1 to T6), 100 µL of the treated viral suspension was collected for subsequent viral titration.
A 1 mL aliquot of CpHV-1 stock virus was left untreated at room temperature and similarly sampled for viral titration, serving as virus control. The experiments were performed in triplicates.

2.7. Antiviral Assays

On the basis of the cytotoxicity assay results, the antiviral activity against the CpHV-1 strain Ba-1 was evaluated using the O3/O2 gaseous mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL for different exposure times (T1 and T2). To identify the step of viral inhibition by O3 against CpHV-1, two different protocols (A and B) were carried out as detailed below. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

2.7.1. Protocol A: Virus Infection of Cell Monolayers before Treatment with O3

Confluent monolayers of MDBK cells of 24 h in 24-well plates were used. Cells were infected with 100 μL of viral suspension containing 100 TCID50 CpHV-1. After virus adsorption for 1 h at 37 °C, the viral inoculum was removed, and cell monolayers were washed once with D-MEM before adding 1 mL of maintenance medium (D-MEM). Then, cell monolayers were treated with the O3/O2 gaseous mixture. Untreated infected cells were used as virus control. After 72 h, aliquots of the supernatants were collected for subsequent viral titration.

2.7.2. Protocol B: Virus Infection of Cell Monolayers after Treatment with O3

Confluent monolayers of MDBK cells of 24 h in 24-well plates were used. Cells were treated with the O3/O2 gaseous mixture. Then, the monolayers were washed once with D-MEM and infected with 100 μL viral suspension containing 100 TCID50 CpHV-1. After virus adsorption for 1 h at 37 °C, the inoculum was removed and the monolayers were washed with D-MEM before adding 1 mL of maintenance medium (D-MEM). Untreated infected cells were used as virus control. After 72 h, aliquots of each supernatants were collected for subsequent viral titration.

2.8. Viral Titration

Ten-fold dilutions (up to 10−8) of each supernatant were titrated in quadruplicates in 96-well plates containing MDBK cells. The plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells was evaluated using an inverted microscope with live-cell imaging or using haematoxylin eosin staining. Based on the cytopathic effect, TCID50/50 μL was calculated by following the Reed–Muench method [41]

2.9. Data Analysis

All data were expressed as mean ± SD and analyzed using GraphPad Prism (v 9.5.0) program (Intuitive Software for Science, San Diego, CA, USA). To assess the normality of distribution, Shapiro–Wilk test was performed. Two-way factorial ANOVA, with concentration * time as factors, and Tukey test as post hoc test were applied to cytotoxicity results. Student’s t tests for independent samples were performed on virucidal and antiviral activity results (p < 0.05).

3. Results

3.1. Cytotoxicity Assay

Direct exposure of MDBK cells to O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL did not produce any changes in cell morphology at T1 and T2, whereas morphological signs of cytotoxicity were consistently observed in cells exposed to O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL for longer time intervals (i.e., at T3 to T6).
Morphological observations overlapped indirect measurements of cytotoxicity using the XTT test. Cell exposure to O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL at different time intervals (T1 to T6) resulted in increasing cytotoxicity in a dose- and time contact-dependent fashion (Figure 2). O3 at 20 μg/mL at T1 and T2 induced cytotoxicity of 0.53% (±0.15) and 3.64% (±0.8), respectively, which was below the cytotoxic threshold. Higher cytotoxicity of 31.03% (±1.1), 36.78% (±1.2), 40.10% (±1.3), and 81.52% (±2.3) was observed at T3, T4, T5, and T6, respectively (Figure 2A).
O3 at 50 μg/mL at T1 and T2 produced cytotoxicity of 0.51% (±0.13) and 3.61 % (±0.95), respectively, which was below the cytotoxic threshold. Higher cytotoxicity of 59.77% (±1.3), 65.51% (±1.6), 82.57% (±1.8), and 85.39% (±2.6) was observed at T3, T4, T5, and T6, respectively (Figure 2B).
The ANOVA model showed a statistically significant decrease in cytotoxicity in MDBK cells treated with O3 at 20 (F = 1517, p < 0.0001) and 50 (F = 1822, p < 0.0001) μg/mL between different time intervals (T1–T6). Using a two-by-two comparison of cytotoxicity induced by O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL, a statistically significant decrease in cytotoxicity was consistently observed at different time intervals (T1–T6). Conversely, the comparison between O3 at 20 μg/mL at T4 and T5 and between O3 at 50 μg/mL at T5 and T6 lacked statistical significance (p > 0.05).
On the basis of these results, the antiviral activity assays were carried out using O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL at T1 and T2, which were below the cytotoxicity threshold.

3.2. Cytophatic Effect

Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells is displayed in Figure 3.

3.3. Virucidal Activity Assay

Data obtained were analyzed using Shapiro–Wilk test, confirming the normality of distribution (W = 0.8137, p > 0.05). Data from the virucidal activity assay showed that the O3/O2 gaseous mixture containing O3 at 20 μg/mL significantly reduced CpHV-1 titer by 1.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL (p < 0.05) at T1 and T2, 1.50 log10 TCID50/50 μL (p < 0.05) at T3 to T5, and 2.00 log10 TCID50/50 μL at T6 (p < 0.0001) when compared with the untreated control.
Data from the virucidal activity assay showed that the O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 50 μg/mL significantly reduced CpHV-1 titer by 1.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL (p < 0.05) at T1 and T2, 1.50 log10 TCID50/50 μL (p < 0.05) at T3 to T4, 1,75 log10 TCID50/50 μL (p < 0.05) at T5, and 2.00 log10 TCID50/50 μL at T6 (p < 0.0001) when compared with the untreated control (Figure 4).

3.4. Antiviral Assays

3.4.1. Protocol A: Virus Infection of Cell Monolayers before Treatment with O3

Comparing in terms of viral titer the untreated infected cells (7.25 ±0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL) with the infected cells treated with the O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 μg/mL at T1 and T2 (7.00 ± 0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL), a slight decrease in viral titer (0.25 log10) was observed, however, with no statistical significance (p > 0.05). Comparing the viral titer of the untreated infected cells (7.25 ± 0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL) and of the infected cells treated with O3 at 50 μg/mL at T1 and T2 (6.00 ±0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL), a significant decrease in the viral titer (1.25 log10) was observed (p < 0.05) (Figure 5).

3.4.2. Protocol B: Virus Infection of Cell Monolayers after Treatment with O3

Comparing the viral titer of the untreated infected cells (7.25 ± 0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL) with the viral titer of the infected cells pre-treated with the O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL at T1 and T2 (7.25 ± 0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL), no decrease in viral titer was observed (Figure 6).

4. Discussion

O3 therapy is largely used in veterinary medicine for its disinfectant, anti-inflammatory, immunostimulant, and antimicrobial effects [19].
In this study, we have focused on the activity of ozone therapy against the genital herpesvirus of goat (CpHV-1) to decipher a possible field application in veterinary and human medicine. Indeed, CpHV-1 and HSV-2 share important biological characteristics, and the infection by CpHV-1 in goats is considered a valid animal model for the study of infection of HSV-2 and its therapy in humans, [15].
There are several in vivo and in vitro studies published in the literature, addressing/demonstrating the therapeutic potential of O3 in treating genital infections of farm animals [22,35] and documenting the disinfectant, immunomodulatory, and anti-inflammatory actions of O3. Inoculation of O3 using foams into the vagina and uterus of cows affected by urovagina has been shown to decrease the “open days” and the number of artificial inseminations required to induce pregnancy in cows affected by urovagina. Moreover, the beneficial role of O3 in the repair process of the vaginal and cervical mucosa was observed [36]. The interest of clinical researchers in new therapies, such as ozone therapy, aid future studies aimed at the treatment of infectious pathologies that require the use of antibiotics.
The virucidal effect of O3 has been reported for different viruses. This gas has a potent oxidant action on microorganisms [23,24,25,26,27,28,29], damaging the lipidic envelope and protein capsid of viruses [23]. In addition, O3 could inactivate viruses by destroying guanine residues of nucleic acids [42] as demonstrated for poliovirus type 1 [24,43].
In this study, an O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL was evaluated against CpHV-1 at different time points (T1 to T6) to assess its virucidal properties. Furthermore, the in vitro antiviral activity of the O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL against CpHV-1 was evaluated at two different time points, T1 and T2. The concentrations of 20 and 50 μg/mL were chosen based on the cytotoxic activity obtained using XTT test on MDBK cells for different time points (T1–T6). Both O3 concentrations were regarded as non-cytotoxic (below the cytotoxicity threshold of 20%) at T1 and T2. At later time points, starting from T3, an increase in cytotoxicity was observed primarily at the concentration of 50 μg/mL (over 60%).
In other studies, concentrations from 10 to 20 μg/mL of O3 in O3/O2 gas mixture (generated with a medical ozone generator as in our study) were assessed in other cell lines, i.e., HeLa [44] and SH-SY5Y cells (a human neuroblastoma cell line), and did not display cytotoxic effect [45]. These concentrations did not induce significant alterations in cell viability, and cellular mortality was observed only when cells were treated with O3 at 100 μg/mL [45].
Eukaryotic cells demonstrate a certain resistance in vitro to the prooxidant effect of O3 because they are protected by the presence of albumin, which with its reducing group -SH is one of the most protective compounds [46]. Of course, the adopted O3 concentration is crucial as high concentrations could overwhelm this protective mechanism, leading to cell damage and death [47].
In the virucidal activity assay, exposure of CpHV-1 to the gas mixture was able to reduce significantly the viral titer in a time-dependent manner, leading to a decrease in viral titer of up to 2.00 log10 TCID50/50 μL at T6.
To evaluate the antiviral activity at the maximum non-cytotoxic dose of O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL at T1 and T2, in order to identify the phase in which viral replication might be inhibited, cells were infected with CpHV-1 before (protocol A) and after (protocol B) the treatment with O3.
In protocol A, when O3 was used at a concentration of 20 μg/mL, we observed a very slight and statistically insignificant reduction in viral titer (0.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL), suggesting that O3 was not able to inhibit virus replication. O3 at a 50 μg/mL concentration induced a statistically significant reduction of viral titer (1.25 log10 TCID50/50 μL).
Pre-treatment of the cells with O3 at 20 and 50 μg/mL (protocol B) did not reduce the viral titer, hinting a lack of inhibition of O3 in virus uptake and replication.
Overall, as significant results were obtained with short exposure times, the use of O3 in vivo could be implemented, primarily in the veterinary field. Future studies could address the use of O3 in CpHV-1-infected goats to gain more translational information for human herpesvirus genital infection. In a previous report, the inactivation of herpes viruses (HSV-1 and BoHV-1) with O3 was achieved by applying a long exposure time (1 to 3 h) [30]. Compared to other studies [15,17,28,29,30,31,32], the contact time of the O3/O2 gas mixture required to trigger significant effects against CpHV-1 was lower, and this could be an advantage for in vivo experiments. Long treatment times would not be ideal due to excessive stress induced to animals, mainly for ones in animal containment.

5. Conclusions

We reported the in vitro virucidal and antiviral activity of a medical O3/O2 gaseous mixture against CpHV-1. A short exposure of the virus to O3 at low concentration (20 μg /mL) was required to achieve partial virus inactivation. This study represents the first step to assess the clinical efficacy of O3 therapy for the treatment of genital herpes infection. Further essential steps will be the evaluation of the in vitro effects on vulvar and vaginal epithelial cells as well as of the efficacy of treatment of CpHV-1-associated genital lesions in infected goats in vivo. Furthermore, it might be interesting to test whether O3 is also effective on HSV-2 given the close biological similarity with CpHV-1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.L., F.P., A.R. and M.C.; methodology, E.L., F.P. and C.C.; software, V.M. and M.L.; validation, M.T. and G.L.; formal analysis, G.L., C.Z. and V.C.; data curation, G.L., C.Z., M.L. and V.M.; writing—original draft preparation, E.L., F.P., V.C. and C.C.; writing—review and editing, A.R., M.T. and M.C.; supervision, A.R., M.T. and M.C.; project administration, M.T.; funding acquisition, V.M. and M.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available within the article.

Acknowledgments

All the authors contributed to this study and have read and agreed to the publication of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Patel, J.R.; Didlick, S. Epidemiology, Disease and Control of Infections in Ruminants by Herpesviruses—An Overview. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2008, 79, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. James, C.; Harfouche, M.; Welton, N.J.; Turner, M.E.; Abu-Raddad, L.J. Herpes simplex virus: Global infection prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull. World Health Organ. 2020, 98, 315–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Engels, M.; Ackermann, M. Pathogenesis of Ruminant Herpesvirus Infections. Vet. Microbiol. 1996, 53, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gupta, R.; Warren, T.; Wald, A. Genital Herpes. Lancet 2007, 370, 2127–2137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Freeman, E.E.; Weiss, H.A.; Glynn, J.R.; Cross, P.L.; Whitworth, J.A.; Hayes, R.J. Herpes Simplex Virus 2 Infection Increases HIV Acquisition in Men and Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Longitudinal Studies. AIDS 2006, 20, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sadowski, L.A.; Upadhyay, R.; Greeley, Z.W.; Margulies, B.J. Current Drugs to Treat Infections with Herpes Simplex Viruses-1 and -2. Viruses 2021, 13, 1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Schalkwijk, H.H.; Snoeck, R.; Andrei, G. Acyclovir Resistance in Herpes Simplex Viruses: Prevalence and Therapeutic Alternatives. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2022, 206, 115322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tempesta, M.; Pratelli, A.; Greco, G.; Martella, V.; Buonavoglia, C. Detection of Caprine Herpesvirus 1 in Sacral Ganglia of Latently Infected Goats by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 1598–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Tempesta, M.; Camero, M.; Sciorsci, R.L.; Greco, G.; Minoia, R.; Martella, V.; Pratelli, A.; Buonavoglia, C. Experimental Infection of Goats at Different Stages of Pregnancy with Caprine Herpesvirus 1. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2004, 27, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Thiry, J.; Keuser, V.; Muylkens, B.; Meurens, F.; Gogev, S.; Vanderplasschen, A.; Thiry, E. Ruminant Alphaherpesviruses Related to Bovine Herpesvirus 1. Vet. Res. 2006, 37, 169–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Camero, M.; Marinaro, M.; Losurdo, M.; Larocca, V.; Bodnar, L.; Patruno, G.; Buonavoglia, C.; Tempesta, M. Caprine Herpesvirus 1 (CpHV-1) Vaginal Infection of Goats: Clinical Efficacy of Fig Latex. Nat. Prod. Res. 2016, 30, 605–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tempesta, M.; Crescenzo, G.; Camero, M.; Bellacicco, A.L.; Tarsitano, E.; Decaro, N.; Neyts, J.; Martella, V.; Buonavoglia, C. Assessing the Efficacy of Cidofovir against Herpesvirus-Induced Genital Lesions in Goats Using Different Therapeutic Regimens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 4064–4068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Camero, M.; Buonavoglia, D.; Lucente, M.S.; Losurdo, M.; Crescenzo, G.; Trerotoli, P.; Casalino, E.; Martella, V.; Elia, G.; Tempesta, M. Enhancement of the Antiviral Activity against Caprine Herpesvirus Type 1 of Acyclovir in Association with Mizoribine. Res. Vet. Sci. 2017, 111, 120–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hou, J.; Zhang, Z.; Huang, Q.; Yan, J.; Zhang, X.; Yu, X.; Tan, G.; Zheng, C.; Xu, F.; He, S. Antiviral Activity of PHA767491 against Human Herpes Simplex Virus in Vitro and in Vivo. BMC Infect. Dis. 2017, 17, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lanave, G.; Lucente, M.S.; Siciliano, P.; Zizzadoro, C.; Trerotoli, P.; Martella, V.; Buonavoglia, C.; Tempesta, M.; Camero, M. Antiviral Activity of PHA767491 on Caprine Alphaherpesvirus 1 in Vitro. Res. Vet. Sci. 2019, 126, 113–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Allahverdiyev, A.; Duran, N.; Ozguven, M.; Koltas, S. Antiviral Activity of the Volatile Oils of Melissa officinalis L. against Herpes simplex Virus Type-2. Phytomedicine 2004, 11, 657–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Camero, M.; Lanave, G.; Catella, C.; Capozza, P.; Gentile, A.; Fracchiolla, G.; Britti, D.; Martella, V.; Buonavoglia, C.; Tempesta, M. Virucidal Activity of Ginger Essential Oil against Caprine Alphaherpesvirus-1. Vet. Microbiol. 2019, 230, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schnitzler, P.; Schön, K.; Reichling, J. Antiviral Activity of Australian Tea Tree Oil and Eucalyptus Oil against Herpes Simplex Virus in Cell Culture. Pharmazie 2001, 56, 343–347. [Google Scholar]
  19. Sciorsci, R.L.; Lillo, E.; Occhiogrosso, L.; Rizzo, A. Ozone Therapy in Veterinary Medicine: A Review. Res. Vet. Sci. 2020, 130, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Braidy, N.; Izadi, M.; Sureda, A.; Jonaidi-Jafari, N.; Banki, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Nabavi, S.M. Therapeutic Relevance of Ozone Therapy in Degenerative Diseases: Focus on Diabetes and Spinal Pain. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233, 2705–2714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Azarpazhooh, A.; Limeback, H. The Application of Ozone in Dentistry: A Systematic Review of Literature. J. Dent. 2008, 36, 104–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lillo, E.; Cordisco, M.; Trotta, A.; Greco, G.; Carbonari, A.; Rizzo, A.; Sciorsci, R.L.; Corrente, M. Evaluation of Antibacterial Oxygen/Ozone Mixture in Vitro Activity on Bacteria Isolated from Cervico-Vaginal Mucus of Cows with Acute Metritis. Theriogenology 2023, 196, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Murray, B.K.; Ohmine, S.; Tomer, D.P.; Jensen, K.J.; Johnson, F.B.; Kirsi, J.J.; Robison, R.A.; O’Neill, K.L. Virion Disruption by Ozone-Mediated Reactive Oxygen Species. J. Virol. Methods 2008, 153, 74–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jiang, H.J.; Chen, N.; Shen, Z.Q.; Yin, J.; Qiu, Z.G.; Miao, J.; Yang, Z.W.; Shi, D.Y.; Wang, H.R.; Wang, X.W.; et al. Inactivation of Poliovirus by Ozone and the Impact of Ozone on the Viral Genome. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 2019, 32, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Thurston-Enriquez, J.A.; Haas, C.N.; Jacangelo, J.; Gerba, C.P. Inactivation of Enteric Adenovirus and Feline Calicivirus by Ozone. Water Res. 2005, 39, 3650–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Dubuis, M.-E.; Dumont-Leblond, N.; Laliberté, C.; Veillette, M.; Turgeon, N.; Jean, J.; Duchaine, C. Ozone Efficacy for the Control of Airborne Viruses: Bacteriophage and Norovirus Models. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0231164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Wells, K.; Latino, J.; Gavalchin, J.; Poiesz, B. Inactivation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 by Ozone in Vitro. Blood 1991, 78, 1882–1890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Criscuolo, E.; Diotti, R.A.; Ferrarese, R.; Alippi, C.; Viscardi, G.; Signorelli, C.; Mancini, N.; Clementi, M.; Clementi, N. Fast Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 by UV-C and Ozone Exposure on Different Materials. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2021, 10, 206–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dubuis, M.-E.; Racine, É.; Vyskocil, J.M.; Turgeon, N.; Tremblay, C.; Mukawera, E.; Boivin, G.; Grandvaux, N.; Duchaine, C. Ozone Inactivation of Airborne Influenza and Lack of Resistance of Respiratory Syncytial Virus to Aerosolization and Sampling Processes. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0253022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Petry, G.; Rossato, L.G.; Nespolo, J.; Kreutz, L.C.; Bertol, C.D. In Vitro Inactivation of Herpes Virus by Ozone. Ozone Sci. Eng. 2014, 36, 249–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ohtsuka, H.; Ogata, A.; Terasaki, N.; Koiwa, M.; Kawamura, S. Changes in Leukocyte Population after Ozonated Autohemoadministration in Cows with Inflammatory Diseases. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2006, 68, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Terasaki, N.; Ogata, A.; Ohtsuka, H.; Tamura, K.; Hoshi, F.; Koiwa, M.; Kawamura, S. Changes of Immunological Response after Experimentally Ozonated Autohemoadministration in Calves. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2001, 63, 1327–1330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Đuričić, D.; Valpotić, H.; Samardžija, M. Prophylaxis and Therapeutic Potential of Ozone in Buiatrics: Current Knowledge. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 159, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Djuricic, D.; Valpotic, H.; Samardzija, M. The Intrauterine Treatment of the Retained Foetal Membrane in Dairy Goats by Ozone: Novel Alternative to Antibiotic Therapy. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2015, 50, 236–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Escandón, B.M.; Espinoza, J.S.; Perea, F.P.; Quito, F.; Ochoa, R.; López, G.E.; Galarza, D.A.; Garzón, J.P. Intrauterine Therapy with Ozone Reduces Subclinical Endometritis and Improves Reproductive Performance in Postpartum Dairy Cows Managed in Pasture-Based Systems. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2020, 52, 2523–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zobel, R.; Tkalčić, S.; Štoković, I.; Pipal, I.; Buić, V. Efficacy of Ozone as a Novel Treatment Option for Urovagina in Dairy Cows. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. OGATA, A.; NAGAHATA, H. Intramammary Application of Ozone Therapy to Acute Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Cows. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2000, 62, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Suzuki, N.; Hirano, M.; Shinozuka, Y.; Kawai, K.; Okamoto, Y.; Isobe, N. Effects of Ozonized Glycerin on Inflammation of Mammary Glands Induced by Intramammary Lipopolysaccharide Infusion in Goats. Anim. Sci. J. 2022, 93, e13780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Rutala, W.A.; Weber, D.J. Disinfection, Sterilization, and Antisepsis: An Overview. Am. J. Infect. Control 2019, 47, A3–A9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lanave, G.; Cavalli, A.; Martella, V.; Fontana, T.; Losappio, R.; Tempesta, M.; Decaro, N.; Buonavoglia, D.; Camero, M. Ribavirin and Boceprevir Are Able to Reduce Canine Distemper Virus Growth in Vitro. J. Virol. Methods 2017, 248, 207–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reed, L.J.; Muench, H. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints12. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1938, 27, 493–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sawadaishi, K.; Miura, K.; Ohtsuka, E.; Ueda, T.; Shinriki, N.; Ishizaki, K. Structure- and Sequence-Specificity of Ozone Degradation of Supercoiled Plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1986, 14, 1159–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Roy, D.; Chian, E.S.K.; Engelbrecht, R.S. Kinetics of Enteroviral Inactivation by Ozone. J. Environ. Eng. Div. 1981, 107, 887–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Costanzo, M.; Cisterna, B.; Vella, A.; Cestari, T.; Covi, V.; Tabaracci, G.; Malatesta, M. Low Ozone Concentrations Stimulate Cytoskeletal Organization, Mitochondrial Activity and Nuclear Transcription. Eur. J. Histochem. 2015, 59, 2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Scassellati, C.; Costanzo, M.; Cisterna, B.; Nodari, A.; Galiè, M.; Cattaneo, A.; Covi, V.; Tabaracci, G.; Bonvicini, C.; Malatesta, M. Effects of Mild Ozonisation on Gene Expression and Nuclear Domains Organization in Vitro. Toxicol. In Vitro 2017, 44, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Bocci, V.; Borrelli, E.; Travagli, V.; Zanardi, I. The Ozone Paradox: Ozone Is a Strong Oxidant as Well as a Medical Drug. Med. Res. Rev. 2009, 29, 646–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mustafa, M.G. Biochemical Basis of Ozone Toxicity. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1990, 9, 245–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Modified hermetic box for continuous gas flow. The device is composed of two silicone tubes (one tube for gas entry (1) and one tube for gas exit (2)) and of a polypropylene hermetic box (3).
Figure 1. Modified hermetic box for continuous gas flow. The device is composed of two silicone tubes (one tube for gas entry (1) and one tube for gas exit (2)) and of a polypropylene hermetic box (3).
Animals 13 01920 g001
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of MDBK cells treated with O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 μg/mL (A) and 50 μg/mL (B) plotted against time of exposure. The horizontal dotted line indicates the threshold of cytotoxicity (20% of cell death).
Figure 2. Cytotoxicity of MDBK cells treated with O3/O2 gas mixture containing O3 at 20 μg/mL (A) and 50 μg/mL (B) plotted against time of exposure. The horizontal dotted line indicates the threshold of cytotoxicity (20% of cell death).
Animals 13 01920 g002
Figure 3. Twenty four-hour monolayer of Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells (magnification 10×) (A); Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells with live-cell imaging (magnification 40×) (B); Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells using hematoxylin-eosin staining (magnification 40×) (C).
Figure 3. Twenty four-hour monolayer of Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells (magnification 10×) (A); Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells with live-cell imaging (magnification 40×) (B); Cytopathic effect of CpHV-1 on MDBK cells using hematoxylin-eosin staining (magnification 40×) (C).
Animals 13 01920 g003
Figure 4. Viral titration on Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1) and not treated (Control) or treated with Ozone/Oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2), 90 s (T3), 120 s (T4), 180 s (T5), and 300 s (T6).
Figure 4. Viral titration on Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1) and not treated (Control) or treated with Ozone/Oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2), 90 s (T3), 120 s (T4), 180 s (T5), and 300 s (T6).
Animals 13 01920 g004
Figure 5. Viral titration on Madin–Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with Caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1), treated after virus inoculation with Ozone/Oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2), and untreated cells (Control).
Figure 5. Viral titration on Madin–Darby Bovine Kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with Caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1), treated after virus inoculation with Ozone/Oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2), and untreated cells (Control).
Animals 13 01920 g005
Figure 6. Viral titration on Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1) treated before inoculation with ozone/oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2) and untreated cells (Control).
Figure 6. Viral titration on Madin–Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells inoculated with caprine herpes virus 1 (CpHV-1) treated before inoculation with ozone/oxygen (O3/O2 20 and 50 μg/mL) at room temperature for 30 s (T1), 60 s (T2) and untreated cells (Control).
Animals 13 01920 g006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lillo, E.; Pellegrini, F.; Rizzo, A.; Lanave, G.; Zizzadoro, C.; Cicirelli, V.; Catella, C.; Losurdo, M.; Martella, V.; Tempesta, M.; et al. In Vitro Activity of Ozone/Oxygen Gaseous Mixture against a Caprine Herpesvirus Type 1 Strain Isolated from a Goat with Vaginitis. Animals 2023, 13, 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121920

AMA Style

Lillo E, Pellegrini F, Rizzo A, Lanave G, Zizzadoro C, Cicirelli V, Catella C, Losurdo M, Martella V, Tempesta M, et al. In Vitro Activity of Ozone/Oxygen Gaseous Mixture against a Caprine Herpesvirus Type 1 Strain Isolated from a Goat with Vaginitis. Animals. 2023; 13(12):1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121920

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lillo, Edoardo, Francesco Pellegrini, Annalisa Rizzo, Gianvito Lanave, Claudia Zizzadoro, Vincenzo Cicirelli, Cristiana Catella, Michele Losurdo, Vito Martella, Maria Tempesta, and et al. 2023. "In Vitro Activity of Ozone/Oxygen Gaseous Mixture against a Caprine Herpesvirus Type 1 Strain Isolated from a Goat with Vaginitis" Animals 13, no. 12: 1920. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13121920

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop