1. Introduction
Rabbits are at high risk of developing peri-anaesthetic complications, one of which is the overall incidence of anaesthetic-related death in this species of up to 1.38%, with this being higher than that reported for other small companion animals [
1].
Several factors contribute to increasing the peri-anaesthetic risk in rabbits; above all, the airway management is challenging due to their peculiar anatomic characteristics. In fact, rabbits are characterised by a temporomandibular joint with a limited range of motion, a long and narrow pharynx with a large tongue and big incisors which hinder the visualisation of the larynx [
2]. In addition, intubation attempts might induce laryngospasms or tracheal injury [
3]. In the case of severe damage, airway obstruction with subsequent respiratory complications up to sudden death have been reported [
3].
With the aim of overcoming these difficulties, extraglottic airway devices have been investigated for rabbit airway management as an alternative to orotracheal tubes [
4,
5,
6]. Several authors have evaluated the feasibility of insertion and the safety of laryngeal mask airway devices in rabbits [
5,
6,
7]. The laryngeal mask is an airway device originally designed to be used for humans, consisting of a mask attached to a tube which is blindly inserted into the hypopharynx. In rabbits, this device has some advantages over orotracheal intubation, namely, easier and faster insertion with less incidence of laryngeal and tracheal tissue injuries [
8,
9]. In addition, a supraglottic airway device has been designed specifically for rabbits (V-Gel
®) by adapting the human supraglottic airway device i-gel to obtain easy self-positioning over the laryngeal inlet of rabbits [
10,
11].
The Spritztube (ST) is an extraglottic airway device, which has recently been developed for airway management in human patients and was first described by De Rosa and colleagues [
12]. The ST is characterised by the presence of a distal cuff which is blindly placed in the oesophagus to seal it and a proximal cuff which seals the epiglottis, allowing patient ventilation. The two cuffs are maintained aligned with the aid of a central rigid guide. After its introduction and after patient stabilisation, the same device can be turned into a regular endotracheal tube by advancing it into the trachea under laryngoscopic guidance [
12,
13,
14].
The aim of the study was to design an ST suitable for rabbits. The study was therefore divided into two phases. Phase I was conceived as an anatomical study on rabbit cadavers in order to obtain measurements of the upper airway for developing a prototype of the ST for this species. In phase II, an in vivo study was carried out to evaluate the ease of insertion and the safety of the ST in rabbits undergoing general anaesthesia.
3. Results
3.1. Phase I
The mean IT and TO lengths were 5.3 ± 0.8 cm and 2.2 ± 0.8 cm, respectively. The mean EC length was 0.7 ± 0.1 cm, and the mean CT length was 0.9 ± 0.3 cm.
Based on these results, two ST were chosen to be used in the clinical part of the study: an 8 Ch and a 10 Ch device (
Figure S1).
3.2. Phase II
Thirteen rabbits were involved in the entire period of the study. One rabbit was removed from the study, because it developed respiratory distress after the first attempt at the ST placement. The ST was therefore removed, and the respiratory distress disappeared. The repositioning of the device was not feasible due to an insufficient anaesthetic depth, and therefore, general anaesthesia was maintained using a face mask. Of the remaining animals, the mean age was 9.4 ± 4.7 months, and their mean body weight was 1.6 ± 0.5 kg. The rabbits included in the study belonged to the following breeds: Dwarf rabbits (n = 7), Mini lop (n = 5) and Champagne Argent (n = 1). All the rabbits underwent ovariectomy or orchiectomy except for one, which underwent tooth trimming. The mean NT length was 9.7 ± 0.9 cm, and the mean NL length was 6.1 ± 1.4 cm.
The ST placement was feasible in all the remaining rabbits. Eight rabbits were intubated in the right lateral recumbency, and six were in left lateral recumbency. In 11 rabbits, a 10 Ch ST was used, while in 3 rabbits an 8 Ch ST was used. An average of 2.1 ± 1 attempts were necessary for completing the ST placement. Overall, a mean of 43 ± 21.4 s was necessary to complete the correct positioning of the ST. The correct positioning of the ST was confirmed by the direct visualisation of the proximal cuff at a visual inspection of the oral cavity (14/14), by the detection of the airflow in 9/14 rabbits and by the visualisation of a correct capnographic wave (14/14 rabbits). The oesophageal cuff was inflated with a median of 5 mL (range: 2–6 mL), and the proximal cuff was inflated with a median of 5 mL (range: 2–6 mL).
With the aim of confirming the correct positioning, an X-ray scan was taken in one rabbit, and a CT scan was performed in another rabbit. In detail, at the X-ray evaluation, the oesophageal cuff was detectable in the oesophagus as a circular radiolucent structure close to the thoracic inlet (
Figure 2). The proximal cuff appeared as a radiolucent structure cranial to the ramus of the mandible. The computed tomography scans confirmed the oesophageal positioning of the oesophageal cuff and the proximal cuff at the level of the laryngeal vestibule (
Figure 3).
All the cardiorespiratory variables monitored remained within normal limits. During anaesthesia or at recovery, bleeding or gross lesions were not observed.
In all the rabbits, recovery was uneventful, and they were discharged on the same day as soon as they were fully awake.
4. Discussion
In the present study, the technique for the ST placement was described for the first time. The results indicated that the ST is easy to place with minimal risk of trauma.
Respiratory complications are common in anaesthetised rabbits [
9], and the rapid control of the airways is advisable to prevent hypoventilation and hypoxemia. Endotracheal tube placement is challenging in this species. A face mask can be effective for quickly providing oxygen to the patient; however, it does not prevent airway obstruction and does not allow patient-assisted ventilation [
9]. Studies regarding rabbits have highlighted the superiority of a laryngeal mask over a face mask and over an endotracheal tube [
8,
9]. In fact, a laryngeal mask airway device is more easily and readily placed as compared with an endotracheal tube; it also provides qualitatively equivalent surgical anaesthesia [
8]. In addition, it is effective for the management of airway obstruction and for providing mechanical ventilation, thereby preventing hypercapnia and hypoxemia [
9]. Finally, the supraglottic airway device minimises the risks of creating laryngotracheal trauma associated with endotracheal intubation [
16]. Some authors have reported that a laryngeal mask is rapid to place and requires an average of 33 s (range: 14–38 s) for correct placement [
6]. In humans, the ST has been introduced as an alternative to the laryngeal mask airway device for managing airways [
13]. That study demonstrated that the insertion time and the success rate for the placement of the two devices was comparable [
13]. Similarly, in the present study, the ST placement required 43 ± 21.4 s. Therefore, the ST allowed achieving airway control in a shorter period of time as compared with an endotracheal tube for which the average insertion time was reported to be 59 s (range: 29–171 s) in a previous study [
6].
The technique for ST insertion described in the present study allowed correct positioning as confirmed by the diagnostic imaging. The positioning, however, required multiple attempts (up to 4), which is a higher rate than that reported for the laryngeal mask and endotracheal tube placement [
6]. However, the ST is a new device with a particular conformation, and experienced anaesthetists may therefore also require a learning period before developing a technique for easy insertion at the first attempt. In the present study, a single expert anaesthetist attempted the ST placement. In the future, the ease of the ST placement should also be evaluated for unexperienced operators. In addition, the positioning of the ST was attempted only in the lateral recumbency. In fact, this was judged to be the more suitable positioning for advancing the device and for the confirmation of the correct placement of the cuffs through external palpation. We cannot exclude that the placement of the ST with the rabbit in the sternal recumbency would provide a more rapid placement.
Compared with other devices, one of the advantages of the ST is that it is equipped with an oesophageal cuff which seals the oesophagus, which would help in correct positioning. Previously, other authors have described that oesophageal cannulisation could be used in rabbits as guidance for preventing endotracheal tube dislodgement in the oesophagus [
17].
The following complications were recorded in humans during the insertion of the ST: air leak, laryngospasm, obstruction after insertion, the presence of gastric insufflation and sore throat upon removal [
13]. In the present study, although multiple attempts were necessary for the ST placement, gross lesions or bleeding were not observed. Respiratory distress was observed in only one rabbit. On the contrary, an elevated incidence of respiratory complications and sub laryngeal lesions have been reported in rabbits, when an endotracheal tube was used [
3]. In fact, rabbits might develop respiratory rales or respiratory distress up to sudden death after endotracheal intubation [
3]. In the same study, the authors reported that the necroscopic and the histologic evaluations of the trachea disclose the presence of severe mucosal congestion, haemorrhage, oedema, mild bruising, stenosis and ulceration [
3,
6]. The use of the laryngeal mask airway device or of other supraglottic airway devices is also not without complications [
5]. In fact, when is the laryngeal mask is used in rabbits, they could develop cyanosis, haemorrhage, laryngeal oedema [
5,
7] or also gastric tympanism during the application of controlled ventilation [
9]. Another important limitation of the use of these devices is that they can be relatively easily displaced/dislodged during surgical procedures requiring changes in the recumbency of the animal or movements of the head. When this happens, a block of the airways may develop [
16]. In the present study, the ST was not secured to the head of the rabbit; however, we did not observe episodes of dislodgment. This advantage can be related not only to the lightweight of the ST, but also to the inflated oesophageal cuff, which prevent the dislodgment.
Another important advantage is associated with the use of the ST. In fact, in humans, the ST is designed to be used not only as an extraglottic airway device. In fact, as soon as patient stabilisation is achieved, the same device can be advanced into the trachea under laryngoscopic or fibreoptic guidance and can be used as a regular endotracheal tube. In addition, in rabbits, the fiberoptic or rigid (1.9 to 2.7 mm) endoscopes can be used for enabling ET insertion into the trachea by direct visualisation on the endoscopic screen [
18,
19]. However, the length and the conformation of the ST designed for rabbits did not allow applying this technique. In addition, these techniques involve the use of expensive materials not always available in clinical settings. However, the size of the rabbits included in the present study represented an important limitation. In fact, the insertion of the fibreoptic endoscope into the oral cavity, parallel to the ST or the inspection with a laryngoscope, would place the animal at high risk of developing lesions of the oral cavity and those of the larynx [
16]. For the same reason, visualisation of the device positioning or inspection of the laryngeal structure under fibroscopic guidance was not performed. It cannot be excluded that, in larger rabbits, in which the size of the oral cavity allows the introduction of instruments, the ST tube can be additionally advanced into the trachea, thereby turning into an endotracheal tube.
Overall, in humans, the application of a laryngeal mask is associated with a greater incidence of complications (19.1%) when compared with the insertion of an ST (6.0%) [
13]. Further studies are needed to evaluate the advantages of the ST over the use of a laryngeal mask airway device or that of other supraglottic airway devices (such as the V-Gel
®) in rabbits. There are several limitations regarding the present study. First of all, the airway seal was not evaluated. Therefore, additional studies are needed to evaluate whether the ST provides an adequate airway seal for allowing controlled ventilation. In addition, in rabbits, the laryngeal mask emits 33% more waste isoflurane emission as compared with the cuffed endotracheal tube when sampled at the oral commissure [
8]. In the present study, however, the extent of anaesthetic gas pollution was not evaluated. Therefore, this aspect is still to be evaluated, since in veterinary anaesthesia, exposure to inhalant anaesthetic pollution represents an important concern.