Next Article in Journal
Short-Term Effects of Temperature and Thyrotropin-Releasing Hormone Stimulation on Adrenocorticotropin Stability in Horses
Next Article in Special Issue
Sperm Gone Smart: A Portable Device (iSperm®) to Assess Semen Concentration and Motility in Dogs
Previous Article in Journal
Compound Probiotics Improve the Diarrhea Rate and Intestinal Microbiota of Newborn Calves
Previous Article in Special Issue
Canine and Feline Testicular Preservation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Potential Semen Quality Biomarker in Stud Dogs?

1
Department of Internal Medicine, Reproduction and Population Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
2
Department of Reproduction and Clinic of Farm Animals, University of Environmental Science, Grundwaldzki Square 49, 50-357 Wroclaw, Poland
3
Veterinary Physiology and Biochemistry, Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(3), 323; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323
Submission received: 31 December 2021 / Revised: 24 January 2022 / Accepted: 26 January 2022 / Published: 28 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biotechnology and Reproduction in Companion Animals)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Assessing semen quality in dogs requires experience and specialized equipment. Therefore, this study investigates the potential value of measuring the blood concentration of Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), a hormone produced by Sertoli cells, to predict semen quality in dogs. Forty-five healthy dogs were included in this study and their age as well as different semen parameters were correlated to blood AMH concentration. Moderate negative associations were found between AMH and semen motility and morphology indicating that high serum AMH may be a potential biomarker for identifying which dogs would require further semen investigation. Future research is however needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Abstract

Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) has been suggested to be involved in spermatogenesis. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between blood serum AMH concentration and semen quality in dogs. Moreover, this study sought to find the optimal cut-off point value of serum AMH with the greatest sensitivity and specificity to predict semen quality. Forty-five clinically healthy dogs were included in the study and their age as well as the following semen parameters were determined and correlated to serum AMH concentration: total sperm output, normal morphology, plasma membrane integrity, total motility, progressive motility, and velocity parameters. Statistical analysis for correlations were performed using Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Moderate negative associations were found between serum AMH and semen total motility (r = −0.38, p = 0.01), progressive motility (r = −0.36, p = 0.01), and normal morphology (r = −0.36, p= 0.02). Based on these associations, an AMH concentration of 5.54 µg/L was found to be the optimal cut-off point value to obtain the greatest summation of sensitivity (86%) and specificity (63%) to predict semen quality. The serum AMH assay may therefore be a potential hormonal marker to predict which dogs would require further semen analysis. Future research is however needed to confirm these preliminary results.

1. Introduction

Dog fertility is essential to avoid unsatisfactory breeding performance. In order to assess the potential fertility of a stud dog, a complete breeding soundness evaluation can be carried out. This evaluation consists of a detailed history, a thorough physical examination, ultrasonography of the genital tract, and semen evaluation [1,2]. Furthermore, hormonal testing can provide additional information in some cases [3]. However, semen collection is not always successful and semen analysis requires experience and specialized equipment, which is not available in all veterinary practices. For this reason, additional diagnostic tools such as the presence of particular biomarkers in a blood sample would be of interest for a general veterinary practitioner to evaluate gonadal function and to predict fertility in male dogs [4,5,6].
Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), also called Müllerian-inhibiting substance, is a glycoprotein of the transforming growth factor-β family secreted by Sertoli cells in males [7]. This family of proteins plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis in many different biological processes, including spermatogenesis [7,8,9]. During embryonic sex differentiation, immature Sertoli cells secrete a high concentration of AMH which induces the regression of Müllerian ducts, which otherwise would develop into female internal sex organs [9,10,11,12,13,14]. The immature population of Sertoli cells will then be responsible for the basal synthesis of AMH, which gradually decreases in concentration upon the onset of puberty [15,16,17]. At puberty, Sertoli cells acquire androgen receptors and AMH secretion decreases as a result of testosterone production, as demonstrated in humans [18], stallions [19], and bulls [20]. Besides testosterone, meiotic germinal cells have also been found to inhibit AMH secretion [21]. It is well-known that Sertoli cells exert an important role in fertility by providing protective and nutritive support to the meiotic germ cells. The assessment of AMH concentration has therefore been suggested to serve as a direct biomarker of Sertoli cell function and indirect biomarker of spermatogenesis [22,23,24,25,26,27].
The interest in AMH in the context of canine reproduction has significantly increased in recent years. In male dogs, serum AMH may be used to differentiate intact and cryptorchid dogs from castrated dogs. Intact dogs have a higher serum AMH concentration than castrated dogs but a lower serum AMH concentration than cryptorchid dogs [5,14,28,29]. The increased serum AMH concentration in cryptorchid dogs may be explained by the high amount of immature Sertoli cells in the retained gonad(s) [14]. Serum AMH serves also as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis of Sertoli cell tumor as a result of the increased AMH production from neoplastic Sertoli cells [4,6,30,31]. However, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, no research has yet been reported on the use of AMH as a biomarker to predict semen quality in dogs. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum AMH concentration and semen quality in dogs with the hypothesis that higher AMH concentration would be found in lower quality semen. The age of the dog was also considered to investigate its possible relation to serum AMH concentration. Finally, this study aimed to identify an ideal cut-off value for serum AMH concentration to determine which dogs would require further semen examination.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals

Sixty intact and privately owned male dogs took part in the present study between January and April 2021 at the teaching hospital of Ghent University. All dogs were at least 1 year old, clinically healthy, and had not been sick or given medication in the last 6 months. Exclusion criteria were abnormal clinical examination, blood admixture in the third fraction of the ejaculate (prostatic fluid), secretory or excretory azoospermia, and unsuccessful semen collection. During data collection, five dogs presented secretory azoospermia and ten had an unsuccessful semen collection. These dogs were therefore excluded from the study and 45 dogs from 21 breeds were finally included in the final dataset of the study.

2.2. Semen Quality Assessment

The sperm-rich fraction of the ejaculate of each dog was collected by digital manipulation into plastic vials as described by Linde-Forsberg [32]. After collection, the volume of the ejaculate was measured, and the semen was immediately placed in an incubator at 37 °C. Semen quality parameters were then assessed within 10 min by a single operator.

2.2.1. Concentration

Semen concentration was measured using the Nucleocounter-SP100 (ChemoMetec, A/S, Allerød, Denmark), according to the manufacturer’s instructions [33]. Briefly, a 10 µL aliquot of semen was diluted with 1 mL lysis reagent S100 (ChemoMetec, A/S, Allerød, Denmark) and, after mixing, was loaded into a cassette containing propidium iodide. The cassette was then inserted into the fluorescence detector of the machine and the semen concentration of the sample was reported. Total sperm output (TSO) was then obtained by multiplying the reported concentration by semen volume.

2.2.2. Motility and Velocity

Motility and velocity parameters were measured using the computer-assisted sperm analysis system ISAS®v1 (Proiser, Valencia, Spain) equipped with a heated stage set at 37 °C and a 10× negative phase-contrast objective. A video digital camera (Proiser 782C) was mounted on the microscope to capture images and transmit them to a computer. Thirty consecutive, digitized images were obtained at a frame rate of 60 fps. Tail detection was activated for ignoring non sperm particles and particle area was set between 12 and 80 µm2. The number of objects incorrectly identified as spermatozoa was minimized by using the playback function. A spermatozoon was considered immotile when presenting a VAP < 10 µm/s and spermatozoa which deviated <50% from a straight line were designated as progressive.
For each analysis, samples were diluted with physiological saline solution to a working concentration of 40 × 106 cells/mL [34,35]. A 4-µL droplet was then loaded in a pre-warmed ISAS®D4C20 disposable counting chamber (Proiser, Valencia, Spain) and five fields were captured and analyzed. For each field, five kinematic parameters were retained and the average was taken for the analysis: total motility (TM, %), progressive motility (PM, %), average path velocity (VAP, µm/s), straight line velocity (VSL, µm/s), and curvilinear velocity (VCL, µm/s).

2.2.3. Morphology and Plasma Membrane Integrity

Morphology and plasma membrane integrity of spermatozoa were assessed on eosin/nigrosin stained smears under bright-field microscopy at 1000× magnification (Olympus BX51TF, Tokyo, Japan). One hundred spermatozoa were evaluated for each parameter and classified according to their plasma membrane integrity (intact or damaged) and their morphology (normal, abnormal head, abnormal midpiece/tail, proximal protoplasmic droplet, and distal protoplasmic droplet) [36,37].

2.3. Hormone Analysis

After semen collection and analysis, blood samples were drawn from the cephalic vein, transferred into serum gel tubes with clot activator (Greiner Bio-one, Kremsmünster, Austria), and placed at 4 °C for 30 min to allow clot formation. Tubes were then centrifuged at 2000× g for 5 min and sera were immediately stored at −80 °C until analysis in an external specialized laboratory (Algemeen Medisch Laboratorium, Sonic Healthcare Benelux, Antwerp, Belgium). Serum AMH levels were quantified by electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) using the Elecsys AMH Plus immunoassay on the cobas e411 analyzer (Roche Diagnostics International Ltd., Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Results were determined via a calibration curve generated by 2-point calibration and a master curve provided by the manufacturer. The analyzer automatically provided the AMH concentration and controls were performed for each analysis. Samples with AMH concentrations above the measuring range (>23 mg/L) were diluted to obtain a definite value. The intra- and inter-assay precision were ≤1.3 and ≤4.1%, respectively. The limits of blank, quantitation, and detection were 0.007 ng/mL, 0.030 µg/L, and 0.010 µg/L, respectively. The method was standardized against the Beckman Coulter AMH Gen II ELISA assay.

2.4. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were performed using R v4.1.2, 2021 (R Inc., Boston, MA, USA). The normality of the distributions was verified using histograms and Shapiro–Wilks tests. The Spearman’s correlation coefficients (ρ) were used to assess the relationship between serum AMH and semen parameters or age of the dog. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all analyses. Correlations were considered as follows: less than 0.2 negligible association, 0.2 to 0.29 weak association, 0.3 to 0.39 moderate association, 0.4 to 0.69 strong association, and greater than 0.7 very strong association [38]. The optimal cut-off point value of serum AMH, representing the value associated with the greatest summation of sensitivity and specificity to predict semen quality, was obtained using the package cutpointr after dichotomization of the data [39]. Different threshold values for dichotomization have been tested to find out which one had the best association with serum AMH. The threshold values have been defined based on the principle that an ejaculate with a progressive motility of at least 70% and a normal morphology of at least 80% is of adequate quality [40,41]. Moreover, an ejaculate containing less than 60% of morphologically normal spermatozoa should be qualified of poor quality as it may reflect disturbances in testicular and/or epididymal function [40,41].

3. Results

The median age of the dogs included in the study was 3 years (inter-quartile range (IQR): 2–4.5 years, range: 1–13 years). Analyses of correlations between serum AMH concentration and investigated parameters are summarized in Table 1. Total motility (p = 0.01), progressive motility (p = 0.01), as well as the percentage of spermatozoa with normal morphology (p = 0.02) showed a negative correlation with serum AMH concentration. For the other semen parameters and the age of the dog, no significant associations with serum AMH concentration were found although a trend for a negative correlation regarding semen velocity parameters and a positive correlation regarding TSO can be observed (Table 1).
In view of the significant associations between serum AMH and some semen quality parameters, different threshold values were tested in this population to predict semen quality based on AMH concentration (Table 2). The inclusion of both morphology and progressive motility seemed to be the most effective to obtain the greatest summation of sensitivity and specificity. The prediction had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 63% when 5.54 µg/L was taken as cut-off value to predict that a sample would have minimum 60% of morphologically normal spermatozoa and 70% of progressively motile spermatozoa. Furthermore, 83% of samples would at least satisfy these threshold values if serum AMH concentration is lower than 5.54 µg/L. Figure 1 represents the accuracy of these predictions.

4. Discussion

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the relationship between serum AMH and semen quality in dogs. We found that serum AMH concentration had a moderate negative association with semen quality. Total motility, progressive motility, and normal morphology were all negatively correlated with serum AMH concentration indicating that an increased AMH production may reflect abnormal Sertoli cell function and thus compromised spermatogenesis.
The association between serum AMH and fertility has already been well-documented in men but with conflicting results. A Danish study investigating 970 healthy young men observed that a significantly higher serum AMH was associated with lower percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa [27]. However, this negative association between serum AMH concentration and semen quality was not reported consistently. Some studies found no differences [26,42,43,44,45,46], while others even reported a decrease in serum AMH in men suffering from subfertility and infertility in comparison to fertile men [47,48,49]. These conflicting results may be related to the reproductive disorder and the related Sertoli cell dysfunction encountered in men suffering from subfertility. A decrease in AMH concentration may results from a loss of functional Sertoli cells while an increased serum AMH concentration may result from a higher population of Sertoli cells that exhibit a prepubertal stage of development [42]. Such Sertoli cells with immature characteristics secrete AMH predominantly into the blood circulation through the basal layer instead of the seminiferous lumen [22,42]. Another explanation for an increased AMH may lie in the production of androgens given their role in the regulation of AMH production. Abnormal androgen production and/or absence or insensitivity of androgen receptors may impair AMH inhibition and explain the sustained high serum AMH production [17,50].
In the present study, higher serum AMH concentrations were associated with a lower percentage of morphologically normal spermatozoa, as previously described in men [27]. The absence of association between serum AMH and total semen output seems to be similar to men [26,27,43,44,45] but inter-species differences may be present as serum AMH also appeared to be negatively associated with semen motility, which has not been reported yet in men [27,45]. Interestingly, a positive correlation trend regarding TSO was found, which may reflect a compensation system to suboptimal semen quality in dogs. However, further research is required to confirm these results.
In view of the significant associations between serum AMH concentration and some semen parameters found in this study, the cut-off value with the best summation of sensitivity and specificity was sought for different threshold values in order to evaluate the relevance of serum AMH as a (practical) biomarker of semen quality. The results found in the present study indicate that the best values were obtained when considering the semen to have a minimum of 60% morphologically normal and 70% progressive motile spermatozoa. Under these conditions, the best cut-off value to classify the quality of an ejaculate based on serum AMH was 5.54 µg/L. The latter was associated with an area under the curve of 0.71, which made the diagnostic accuracy of the test acceptable [51]. Thus, a serum AMH concentration below 5.54 µg/L would correctly predict that the semen would at least meet the threshold values for morphology and progressive motility in 83% of cases. The measurement of serum AMH concentration could therefore be a useful diagnostic tool to predict semen quality in dogs in places where semen cannot be collected or analyzed. However, when serum AMH concentration is higher than 5.54 µg/L, semen quality would only be below (at least) one of the threshold values in 67% of cases. For this reason, the authors would advise to perform a thorough semen evaluation when serum AMH concentration is higher than 5.54 µg/L.

5. Conclusions

The negative associations between serum AMH and semen motility and morphology found in this study make AMH a potential biomarker of spermatogenesis and thus predictor of semen quality in dogs when serum AMH concentration is low. However, further research is needed to confirm these preliminary results.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D., J.B., E.W., W.N. and A.V.S.; methodology, G.D., J.B. and O.B.P.; investigation, G.D. and P.K.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D. and J.B.; writing—review and editing, P.K., E.W., P.B., W.N. and A.V.S.; visualization, G.D.; supervision, W.N. and A.V.S.; funding acquisition, G.D. and W.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO), Belgium (Grant No FWO 3s038019) and by the Polish National Agency for Academic Exchange (Grant No PPI/APM/2019/1/00044/U/00001). OBP was supported by FWO Grant No 12Y5220N.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee of Ghent University (protocol code 2020-066, date of approval: 1 October 2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fien Uyttersprot and Dino Dedic for their help in data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Memon, M.A. Common causes of male dog infertility. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 322–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Fontbonne, A. Infertility in male dogs: Recent advances. Rev. Bras. Reprod. Anim. 2011, 35, 266–273. [Google Scholar]
  3. de Souza, M.B.; England, G.C.; Mota Filho, A.C.; Ackermann, C.L.; Sousa, C.V.; de Carvalho, G.G.; Silva, H.V.; Pinto, J.N.; Linhares, J.C.; Oba, E.; et al. Semen quality, testicular B-mode and Doppler ultrasound, and serum testosterone concentrations in dogs with established infertility. Theriogenology 2015, 84, 805–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Holst, B.S.; Dreimanis, U. Anti-Mullerian hormone: A potentially useful biomarker for the diagnosis of canine Sertoli cell tumours. BMC Vet. Res. 2015, 11, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Themmen, A.P.N.; Kalra, B.; Visser, J.A.; Kumar, A.; Savjani, G.; de Gier, J.; Jaques, S. The use of anti-Mullerian hormone as diagnostic for gonadectomy status in dogs. Theriogenology 2016, 86, 1467–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Holst, B.S. Diagnostic possibilities from a serum sample-Clinical value of new methods within small animal reproduction, with focus on anti-Mullerian hormone. Reprod. Domest. Anim. Zuchthyg. 2017, 52 (Suppl. 2), 303–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Zec, I.; Tislaric-Medenjak, D.; Megla, Z.B.; Kucak, I. Anti-Mullerian hormone: A unique biochemical marker of gonadal development and fertility in humans. Biochem. Med. 2011, 21, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Josso, N.; di Clemente, N. TGF-beta Family Members and Gonadal Development. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. TEM 1999, 10, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, H.Y.; Zhang, H.X.; Xiao, Z.; Qiao, J.; Li, R. Regulation of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) in males and the associations of serum AMH with the disorders of male fertility. Asian J. Androl. 2019, 21, 109–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rajpert-De Meyts, E.; Jorgensen, N.; Graem, N.; Muller, J.; Cate, R.L.; Skakkebaek, N.E. Expression of anti-Mullerian hormone during normal and pathological gonadal development: Association with differentiation of Sertoli and granulosa cells. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999, 84, 3836–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rey, R.; Lukas-Croisier, C.; Lasala, C.; Bedecarras, P. AMH/MIS: What we know already about the gene, the protein and its regulation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2003, 211, 21–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Matuszczak, E.; Hermanowicz, A.; Komarowska, M.; Debek, W. Serum AMH in Physiology and Pathology of Male Gonads. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 2013, 128907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Kuiri-Hanninen, T.; Sankilampi, U.; Dunkel, L. Activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in infancy: Minipuberty. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2014, 82, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Walter, B. Anti-Mullerian hormone in dogs and cats reproduction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. Zuchthyg. 2020, 55 (Suppl. 2), 26–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Grinspon, R.P.; Rey, R.A. Anti-mullerian hormone and sertoli cell function in paediatric male hypogonadism. Horm. Res. Paediatr. 2010, 73, 81–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, M.M.; Misra, M.; Donahoe, P.K.; MacLaughlin, D.T. MIS/AMH in the assessment of cryptorchidism and intersex conditions. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2003, 211, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Josso, N.; Rey, R.A.; Picard, J.Y. Anti-mullerian hormone: A valuable addition to the toolbox of the pediatric endocrinologist. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 2013, 674105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Akdag, T.; Tiftik, A.M.; Sariyildiz, L. A comparative investigation of anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and various biochemical parameters in patients with cryptorchidism, oligospermia, or varicocele. Turk. J. Med. Sci 2012, 42, 411–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Claes, A.; Ball, B.A.; Almeida, J.; Corbin, C.J.; Conley, A.J. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in stallions: Developmental changes, seasonal variation, and differences between intact stallions, cryptorchid stallions, and geldings. Theriogenology 2013, 79, 1229–1235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rota, A.; Ballarin, C.; Vigier, B.; Cozzi, B.; Rey, R. Age dependent changes in plasma anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations in the bovine male, female, and freemartin from birth to puberty: Relationship between testosterone production and influence on sex differentiation. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 2002, 129, 39–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Attar, L.; Noel, K.; Dutertre, M.; Belville, C.; Forest, M.G.; Burgoyne, P.S.; Josso, N.; Rey, R. Hormonal and cellular regulation of Sertoli cell anti-Mullerian hormone production in the postnatal mouse. J. Clin. Investig. 1997, 100, 1335–1343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Fenichel, P.; Rey, R.; Poggioli, S.; Donzeau, M.; Chevallier, D.; Pointis, G. Anti-Mullerian hormone as a seminal marker for spermatogenesis in non-obstructive azoospermia. Hum. Reprod. 1999, 14, 2020–2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Fujisawa, M.; Yamasaki, T.; Okada, H.; Kamidono, S. The significance of anti-Mullerian hormone concentration in seminal plasma for spermatogenesis. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 17, 968–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Mostafa, T.; Amer, M.K.; Abdel-Malak, G.; Nsser, T.A.; Zohdy, W.; Ashour, S.; El-Gayar, D.; Awad, H.H. Seminal plasma anti-Mullerian hormone level correlates with semen parameters but does not predict success of testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Asian J. Androl. 2007, 9, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. La Marca, A.; Sighinolfi, G.; Radi, D.; Argento, C.; Baraldi, E.; Artenisio, A.C.; Stabile, G.; Volpe, A. Anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) as a predictive marker in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Hum. Reprod. Update 2010, 16, 113–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kucera, R.; Ulcova-Gallova, Z.; Windrichova, J.; Losan, P.; Topolcan, O. Anti-Mullerian hormone in serum and seminal plasma in comparison with other male fertility parameters. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2016, 62, 223–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Aksglaede, L.; Olesen, I.A.; Carlsen, E.; Petersen, J.H.; Juul, A.; Jorgensen, N. Serum concentration of anti-Mullerian hormone is not associated with semen quality. Andrology 2018, 6, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Gharagozlou, F.; Youssefi, R.; Akbarinejad, V.; Mohammadkhani, N.I.; Shahpoorzadeh, T. Anti-Mullerian hormone: A potential biomarker for differential diagnosis of cryptorchidism in dogs. Vet. Rec. 2014, 175, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hornakova, L.; Vrbovska, T.; Pavl’ak, M.; Valencakova-Agyagosova, A.; Halo, M.; Hajurka, J. The evaluation of blood concentrations of testosterone, 17beta-oestradiol and anti-Mu llerian hormone in dogs with cryptorchidism and testicular tumours. Pol. J. Vet. Sci. 2017, 20, 677–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Banco, B.; Veronesi, M.C.; Giudice, C.; Rota, A.; Grieco, V. Immunohistochemical evaluation of the expression of anti-Mullerian hormone in mature, immature and neoplastic canine Sertoli cells. J. Comp. Pathol. 2012, 146, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ano, H.; Hidaka, Y.; Katamoto, H. Evaluation of anti-Mullerian hormone in a dog with a Sertoli cell tumour. Vet. Dermatol. 2014, 25, 142–145.e141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Linde-Forsberg, C. Achieving canine pregnancy by using frozen or chilled extended semen. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Small Anim. Pract. 1991, 21, 467–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Morrell, J.M.; Johannisson, A.; Juntilla, L.; Rytty, K.; Backgren, L.; Dalin, A.M.; Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Stallion Sperm Viability, as Measured by the Nucleocounter SP-100, Is Affected by Extender and Enhanced by Single Layer Centrifugation. Vet. Med. Int. 2010, 2010, 659862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Rijsselaere, T.; Van Soom, A.; Maes, D.; de Kruif, A. Effect of technical settings on canine semen motility parameters measured by the Hamilton-Thorne analyzer. Theriogenology 2003, 60, 1553–1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hoogewijs, M.K.; de Vliegher, S.P.; Govaere, J.L.; de Schauwer, C.; de Kruif, A.; van Soom, A. Influence of counting chamber type on CASA outcomes of equine semen analysis. Equine Vet. J. 2012, 44, 542–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Rijsselaere, T.; Van Soom, A.; Maes, D.; de Kruif, A. Effect of centrifugation on in vitro survival of fresh diluted canine spermatozoa. Theriogenology 2002, 57, 1669–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Root Kustritz, M.V. The value of canine semen evaluation for practitioners. Theriogenology 2007, 68, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Leclezio, L.; Jansen, A.; Whittemore, V.H.; de Vries, P.J. Pilot validation of the tuberous sclerosis-associated neuropsychiatric disorders (TAND) checklist. Pediatric Neurol. 2015, 52, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Thiele, C.; Hirschfeld, G. Cutpointr: Improved Estimation and Validation of Optimal Cutpoints in R. J. Stat. Softw. 2021, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Johnston, S.D.; Root Kustritz, M.V.R.; Olson, P.N. Semen collection, evaluation and preservation. In Canine and Feline Theriogenology, 1st ed.; Kersey, R., Ed.; Saunders: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2001; pp. 287–306. [Google Scholar]
  41. Farstad, W.K. Artificial insemination in dogs. In BSAVA Manual of Canine and Feline Reproduction and Neonatology, 2nd ed.; England, G., von Heimendahl, A., Eds.; British Small Animal Veterinary Association: Gloucester, UK, 2010; pp. 80–88. [Google Scholar]
  42. Isikoglu, M.; Ozgur, K.; Oehninger, S.; Ozdem, S.; Seleker, M. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels do not predict the efficiency of testicular sperm retrieval in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Gynecol. Endocrinol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2006, 22, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Tuttelmann, F.; Dykstra, N.; Themmen, A.P.; Visser, J.A.; Nieschlag, E.; Simoni, M. Anti-Mullerian hormone in men with normal and reduced sperm concentration and men with maldescended testes. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 91, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. El-Halawaty, S.; Azab, H.; Said, T.; Bedaiwy, M.; Amer, M.; Kamal, M.; Al-Inany, H. Assessment of male serum anti-Mullerian hormone as a marker of spermatogenesis and ICSI outcome. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011, 27, 401–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Andersen, J.M.; Herning, H.; Witczak, O.; Haugen, T.B. Anti-Mullerian hormone in seminal plasma and serum: Association with sperm count and sperm motility. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 1662–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Hassan, M.H.; Ibrahim, H.M.; El-Taieb, M.A. 25-Hydroxy cholecalciferol, anti-Mullerian hormone, and thyroid profiles among infertile men. Aging Male 2020, 23, 513–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Al-Qahtani, A.; Muttukrishna, S.; Appasamy, M.; Johns, J.; Cranfield, M.; Visser, J.A.; Themmen, A.P.; Groome, N.P. Development of a sensitive enzyme immunoassay for anti-Mullerian hormone and the evaluation of potential clinical applications in males and females. Clin. Endocrinol. 2005, 63, 267–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Goulis, D.G.; Iliadou, P.K.; Tsametis, C.; Gerou, S.; Tarlatzis, B.C.; Bontis, I.N.; Papadimas, I. Serum anti-Mullerian hormone levels differentiate control from subfertile men but not men with different causes of subfertility. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2008, 24, 158–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tsametis, C.; Mintziori, G.; Iliadou, P.K.; Tarlatzis, B.C.; Papadimas, I.; Goulis, D.G. Dynamic endocrine test of inhibin B and anti-Mullerian hormone in men with non-obstructive azoospermia. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2011, 27, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hampl, R.; Snajderova, M.; Mardesic, T. Antimullerian hormone (AMH) not only a marker for prediction of ovarian reserve. Physiol. Res. 2011, 60, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Mandrekar, J.N. Receiver operating characteristic curve in diagnostic test assessment. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2010, 5, 1315–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Scatter plot showing the relationship between serum AMH and the percentage of spermatozoa with a normal morphology. The dashed line represents the optimal cut-off value considering 60% normal morphology and 70% progressive motility as threshold values. Full diamonds represent dogs above these threshold values and empty circles represent dogs with at least one of the two parameters below these threshold values.
Figure 1. Scatter plot showing the relationship between serum AMH and the percentage of spermatozoa with a normal morphology. The dashed line represents the optimal cut-off value considering 60% normal morphology and 70% progressive motility as threshold values. Full diamonds represent dogs above these threshold values and empty circles represent dogs with at least one of the two parameters below these threshold values.
Animals 12 00323 g001
Table 1. Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) between serum AMH concentration and different semen parameters.
Table 1. Spearman correlation coefficients (ρ) between serum AMH concentration and different semen parameters.
ParameterCorrelation (ρ)p-Value
Total motility (TM)−0.380.01
Progressive motility (PM)−0.360.01
Curvilinear velocity (VCL)−0.290.10
Straight line velocity (VSL)−0.300.08
Average path velocity (VAP)−0.320.06
Normal morphology (NM)−0.360.02
Plasma membrane integrity−0.060.70
Total sperm output (TSO)0.280.06
Age of the dog0.210.18
Table 2. Optimal cut-off point values with the greatest summation of sensitivity and specificity for different semen parameters.
Table 2. Optimal cut-off point values with the greatest summation of sensitivity and specificity for different semen parameters.
ParameterCut-off AMH (µg/L)AUCAccSeSpPPVNPV
NM ≥ 80%5.530.670.710.800.600.710.71
NM ≥ 60%4.630.660.581.000.440.371.00
NM ≥ 80% + PM ≥ 70%5.530.710.730.810.630.750.71
NM ≥ 60% + PM ≥ 70%5.540.710.730.860.630.670.83
Assuming positive value are values above the cut-off value. Abbreviations: NM, normal morphology; PM, progressive motility; AUC, area under the ROC curve; Acc, accuracy; Se, sensitivity; Sp, specificity; PPV, positive predicted value; NPV, negative predicted value.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Domain, G.; Buczkowska, J.; Kalak, P.; Wydooghe, E.; Banchi, P.; Pascottini, O.B.; Niżański, W.; Van Soom, A. Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Potential Semen Quality Biomarker in Stud Dogs? Animals 2022, 12, 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323

AMA Style

Domain G, Buczkowska J, Kalak P, Wydooghe E, Banchi P, Pascottini OB, Niżański W, Van Soom A. Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Potential Semen Quality Biomarker in Stud Dogs? Animals. 2022; 12(3):323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Domain, Guillaume, Justyna Buczkowska, Patrycja Kalak, Eline Wydooghe, Penelope Banchi, Osvaldo Bogado Pascottini, Wojciech Niżański, and Ann Van Soom. 2022. "Serum Anti-Müllerian Hormone: A Potential Semen Quality Biomarker in Stud Dogs?" Animals 12, no. 3: 323. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12030323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop