Next Article in Journal
Use of Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines Algorithm to Predict Body Weight from Body Measurements of Anatolian buffaloes in Türkiye
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Dietary Hemp Cake Inclusion on the In Vivo and Post Mortem Performances of Holstein Veal Calves
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Bioavailability of Different Zinc Sources in Pigs 0–3 Weeks Post-Weaning

1
Department of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark
2
SEGES Innovation P/S, DK-1609 Copenhagen V, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(21), 2921; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212921
Submission received: 4 October 2022 / Revised: 14 October 2022 / Accepted: 17 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Nutrition)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

The bioavailability of dietary zinc (Zn) in pigs is of importance for the Zn supply to the pig but also for Zn excretion through manure to the environment. The bioavailability of added Zn may differ according to the source of Zn applied but is also affected by other dietary components. The aim of this study was to determine biomarkers of Zn bioavailability (Zn digestibility and serum Zn status) following six different sources of Zn added at 100 mg/kg feed (two of the sources were also provided at 1000 mg/kg) and their effect on the productivity and faecal consistency score in piglets 0–3 weeks after weaning day 28. The digestibility of Zn on day 14 post-weaning was negative for all six Zn sources when added at 100 mg Zn/kg, indicating insufficient Zn supply. The Zn digestibility at 100 mg Zn/kg was affected by the Zn source but was not lower for traditional inorganic Zn oxide and Zn sulphate compared with processed inorganic or chelated organic sources of Zn. However, there were no differences in the serum Zn status, feed intake, gain or probability of diarrhoea depending on the Zn source when supplied at 100 mg/kg.

Abstract

The bioavailability of dietary zinc (Zn) in pigs may differ according to the Zn source and is affected by other components in the diet. The aim was to determine the biomarkers of Zn bioavailability (apparent total tract digestibility of Zn and serum Zn status) following six different sources of added Zn and their effect on the performance and faecal consistency score in piglets 0–3 weeks after weaning on day 28. The sources of Zn were Zn oxide (ZnO), Zn sulfate (ZnSO4), porous ZnO, Zn-glycinate, amino acid-bound Zn and hydroxy covalent-bound Zn added at 100 mg/kg (ZnO and ZnSO4 also added at 1000 mg/kg), in a total of eight treatments (n = 12/treatment). Pigs were individually housed, and titanium dioxide was included as an indigestible marker in the feed. The digestibility of Zn on day 14 post-weaning was negative for all six Zn sources at 100 mg Zn/kg, indicating insufficient Zn supply. The digestibility of Zn differed according to the Zn source, but the digestibility of Zn from ZnO and ZnSO4 did not differ between processed inorganic or chelated organic sources of Zn. However, the differences in Zn digestibility between Zn sources were not reflected as differences in the serum Zn status, feed intake, gain or probability of diarrhoea.

1. Introduction

In order to reduce zinc (Zn) excretion through pig manure to the environment, only 150 mg total Zn/kg feed is now allowed in weaner diets in the European Union [1,2]. When dietary Zn becomes more limited for weaned pigs, the bioavailability of the dietary Zn will be increasingly more important to meet the requirement of the animals.
The bioavailability or absorbability of a micronutrient such as Zn can be defined as the proportion of the ingested amount of dietary Zn that is actually available for absorption into and across the enterocyte. The apparent digestibility of Zn in a diet is often used as an estimate of Zn bioavailability [3,4,5], as are measures of the Zn status in blood and/or body tissues.
The bioavailability of dietary Zn is influenced by a wide variety of components in the diet [6]. Most notably, data from human studies show that the quantity of dietary Zn itself determines the quantity of Zn absorbed and the efficiency of absorption, as the fractional zinc absorption decreases with increasing amounts of ingested zinc [7,8]. Furthermore, phytate is identified as a major dietary factor limiting Zn bioavailability in monogastrics, including humans [9,10], and microbial phytase inclusion in pig diets significantly increases Zn digestibility [11,12]. Among other dietary factors known to affect the bioavailability of Zn are protein quantity and quality, fibre type and level, the presence of other di-valent cations in the diet, as well as low-molecular-weight ligands and chelators such as amino acids and organic acids [6,13].
Inorganic zinc oxide (ZnO) and zinc sulphate (ZnSO4) continue to be the most abundant and cheap sources of added Zn to the diets of pigs, but the digestibility of Zn in ZnO is generally low and typically 20–40% in growing pigs [3,14]. In weaned pigs, the digestibility of Zn in ZnO may be even less than 10% [15]. Results from studies with human intestinal cells suggest that the controlling mechanisms of Zn absorption differ according to the cell developmental maturation level, indicating that ontogenesis also plays a role in the development of the Zn transporter system [16]. It is therefore possible that the enterocytes of newly weaned pigs are not yet fully developed to absorb Zn compared with older pigs, and this may be one of the explanations for the lower digestibility of Zn in ZnO in newly weaned compared with growing pigs.
Other formulations of Zn than ZnO exist on the market, and many of these products have been developed to improve the bioavailability of Zn, for example, through the modification of the physio-chemical structure of inorganic Zn, encapsulation, or the chelation of the Zn to organic molecules such as amino acids, peptides or protein in order to prevent the dissociation of the Zn as it passes through the digestive tract and to reduce complexation to phytic acid [17]. The Zn digestibility and/or production and the health-related effects of different inorganic, processed inorganic and chelated Zn sources have been well studied in weaned pigs [12,15,18,19,20,21]. However, differences in diet composition, ingredients, levels of inherent and added Zn and phytase dosage applied make it difficult to compare the Zn bioavailability of Zn sources across studies. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the Zn bioavailability of six Zn sources when added to the same diet at 100 mg Zn/kg (two of the sources were also provided at 1000 mg Zn/kg) in pigs weaned on day 28. This was done by evaluating their digestibility and effect on the serum zinc status, as well as their effect on productivity and faecal scores. We hypothesized that processed inorganic and organic chelated sources of Zn would exhibit higher Zn bioavailability compared with inorganic Zn sources (ZnO and ZnSO4) and would potentially also be beneficial in relation to post-weaning diarrhoea.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals, Housing and Experimental Diets

The experiment was conducted at the facilities of the Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Foulum, Denmark. Ninety-six crossbred ([Danish Landrace × Yorshire] × Duroc) female pigs weaned at 28 days of age (6.8 ± 0.7 kg) obtained from a commercial herd were randomly assigned to eight dietary Zn treatments (n = 12/treatment) according to body weight (BW), from day 0 to 21 post-weaning (PW). The experiment was conducted in three blocks of n = 32 pigs/block and n = 4 pigs/treatment/block. Pigs were housed individually in pens (1.5 × 2.4 m, 1/3 of the area of the slattered floor) with access to snout-contact to the neighbouring pig, robe as manipulative material, ad libitum access to feed and water and a 12 h light/dark cycle. If a pig lost 15% or more of its initial BW during the experimental period, it was euthanized by captive bolt pistol and bled from the jugular vein.
A standard basal diet (see Table 1) was formulated to meet Danish recommendations for nutrients and energy for pigs between 6 and 15 kg [22] but without added Zn in the vitamin-mineral mixture. Titanium dioxide was included (0.5%) as an indigestible marker. The grain ingredients were ground through a 3 mm screen before being mixed with the remaining ingredients. The basal diet was produced in three batches of 850 kg over two days and placed in three containers. The batches were mixed according to the Theory of Sampling (TOS) principles [23] before the Zn sources were added.
Six different sources of Zn, representing inorganic (zinc oxide; ZnO, zinc sulfate; ZnSO4), processed inorganic (potentiated ZnO; Pot-Zn) and organic chelated forms (Zn-glycinate; Gly-Zn, amino acid-bound Zn; AA-Zn, hydroxy covalent-bound Zn; OH-Zn) were added at a level of 100 mg Zn/kg to the basal diet to produce six diets containing approximately 150 ppm total Zn/kg feed (Table 2). Two additional diets containing 1000 ppm from ZnO or ZnSO4 were formulated for a total of eight different experimental treatments (Table 2). The ZnO and ZnSO4 were kindly provided by Vilofoss (Fredericia, Denmark), Zn-gly by Biochem Zusatzstoffe Handels-und Produktionsgesellschaft mbH (Lohne, Germany), AA-Zn by Zinpro Corp. (Eden Prairie, MN, USA), OH-Zn by Orffa Additives B.V. (Breda, The Netherlands) and Pot-Zn by Animine Co., Ltd. (Sillingy, France). Before being added to the basal diet, individual Zn sources were divided according to the TOS principles [23].
Fifty kg of basal diet from each of the three containers was placed in a stainless steel cone mixer. Ten kg basal diet from the cone mixer was then transferred to a bucket and the amount of Zn from the Zn source needed for the 150 kg diet was added and mixed. The 10 kg basal diet including the Zn was returned to the remaining 140 kg basal diet in the cone mixer and mixed for 20 min. This procedure was repeated to produce a total of 300 kg of each experimental diet. Diets were pelleted at 70 °C including steam into 2 mm pellets. The samples of diets for analysis were obtained with a cross-cut sampler mounted where pellets exited the production and were subsequently divided according to the TOS principles [23]. All diets were produced at Arhus University’s own feed production unit and stored for one month at room temperature until chemical analysis.

2.2. Registrations and Samples

Body weight and feed intake were recorded weekly. Faecal consistency was evaluated daily throughout the study according to the four-category visual scoring system described by Pedersen and Toft [24] with faecal score 1 and 2 classified as “normal” faeces and score 3 and 4 as “diarrhoea”. Antibiotic treatment was initiated immediately if a pig scored 4 and if the score was 3 for more than two days in a row. On day (d) 14, a grab faecal sample was obtained and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Blood from the jugular vein was obtained on d 0, 7, 14 and 21 in vacutainers specifically for trace mineral analysis (Becton Dickinson A/S, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark). Serum was obtained after centrifugation (1300× g, 10 min, 4 °C) and stored at −20 °C until analysis.

2.3. Analysis of Feed, Faeces and Blood

The dry matter (DM) content of the feed was determined by drying the samples at 103 °C to constant weight, and faeces were freeze-dried. The samples of the diets and faeces were milled at 1 mm before mineral and chemical analyses. The analyses of Zn and TiO2 in the diets were performed in quadruple and duplicate analyses, respectively, whereas the analyses of Zn and TiO2 in the faeces were performed in duplicate and single analyses, respectively. Prior to Zn analysis, feed, faeces and serum samples were digested with concentrated HNO3 (67–69%), followed by destruction using a microwave system (Ultra wave, single reaction chamber, Milestone Inc, Shelton, CT, USA). The Zn content was measured on an iCAP TQ ICP-MS (Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometer; Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) as described in detail by Hansen et al. [25]. Titanium oxide was analysed by the digestion of samples with sulphuric acid and by measuring the absorbance after the addition of hydrogen peroxide [26] with the modification that 15 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide was added instead of 10 mL, and before measuring the absorbance, five additional drops of hydrogen peroxide were added.

2.4. Calculation of the Total Tract Apparent Digestibility of Zn

The apparent digestibility of Zn was calculated as follows: Digestibility of Zn (%) = 100 − (TiO2 in feed (%))/(TiO2 in digesta/faeces (%)) × (Zn in faeces (%))/(Zn in feed (%)) × 100. Apparent digestibility determined in faeces was further considered to be the apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD). Digested Zn per kg ingested feed was calculated by multiplying the total Zn intake from d 0–14 by the ATTD of Zn divided by the total feed intake from d 0–14.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Data on BW, feed and Zn intake, weight gain, faecal Zn content, apparent total tract digestibility of Zn and the amount of Zn digested per kg DM were analysed using the generalized linear model (GLM) procedure of SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA) by the following simple two-way (treatment, block) ANOVA model including the adjustment for multiple comparisons by the Tukey-Kramer post hoc test:
X(ij) = µ + α(i) + β(j) + αβ(ij) + ε(ij),
where α(i) is the treatment (i = 1, 2, …, 8); β(j) is the effect of block (j = 1, 2, 3); αβ(ij) is the interaction between diet and block and ε(ij) denotes the residual error. The levels of significance were reported as being significant when p ≤ 0.05. Residuals were assumed to be normally distributed and independent, and their expectations were assumed to be zero.
Serum Zn concentrations, changes in serum Zn relative to day 0 and faecal scores were analysed using R studio version 4.1.1 (RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA, USA). Serum Zn concentrations and changes in serum Zn relative to day 0 were analysed by the same statistical model described above and under the same assumptions, except that the interaction between diet and block was omitted. For faecal scores, a generalized linear model with faecal score as a binomial variable was applied, including pig as a random effect. Faecal score 1 and 2 were combined to 0 (no diarrhoea) and faecal score 3 and 4 were combined to 1 (diarrhoea). Obtained values were square means of log odds, transformed to probabilities of transformed log odds.

3. Results

The calculated content of Zn in the basal diet without added Zn was 27 mg/kg (Table 1), but based on experience from previous pig studies with dietary Zn, the actual Zn content was expected to be approximately 50 mg/kg. The total Zn content in the six diets with 100 mg Zn/kg of the different Zn sources added also resulted in analysed Zn contents close to 150 mg/kg (Table 2). For the diet containing ZnSO4 at a dosage of 1000 mg Zn/kg added, the analysed total Zn content was slightly higher than expected (1108 mg Zn/kg; Table 2).
Bodyweight at weaning was similar across treatments (average 6.83 ± 0.7 kg (p = 1.0)), and treatment caused no differences in average daily feed intake or average daily gain from d 0–7, d 7–14 and d 14–21 or across the entire period (Table 3).
The average daily Zn intake was affected by treatment from d 0–7, d 7–14, d 14–21 and across the entire experimental period (p < 0.001; Table 4). Zinc sulphate added at 1000 mg/kg resulted in the highest average Zn intake from d 0–7 (105 mg/day) followed by ZnO at 1000 mg Zn/kg (50 mg/day), whereas all other diets containing 100 mg/kg added Zn resulted in similar Zn intakes (on average 15 mg Zn/day). This pattern was the same on days 7–14 and 14–21 and during the entire experimental period, except that the ZnSO4 and ZnO at 1000 mg Zn/kg resulted in similar daily Zn intakes from d 14–21. Faecal Zn was on average 5.6 times higher for pigs receiving 1000 mg added Zn/kg compared to 100 mg added Zn/kg (Table 4; p < 0.001).
The ATTD of Zn measured on d 14 PW differed according to treatment (Table 4, p < 0.001). For all treatments where 100 mg added Zn/kg was included, the ATTD of Zn was negative irrespective of Zn source. At an added level of 1000 mg Zn/kg, the ATTD of Zn in the ZnO and ZnSO4 groups was positive, with ZnSO4 resulting in the numerically highest ATTD of Zn (8.7%). Overall, when 100 mg Zn/kg was added, Zn-Gly resulted in a significantly lower ATTD of Zn (−16.48%) compared with AA-Zn and Pot-Zn (−0.55% and −4.07%, respectively), the other three sources of Zn being intermediate. The amounts of apparently digested Zn per kg of consumed feed were greater than zero when 1000 mg Zn/kg was added to the diet and highest for ZnSO4 (96.4 mg/kg feed intake, p < 0.001). At a dosage of 100 mg added Zn/kg diet, pigs lost between 0.9 and 22.9 mg Zn per kg of ingested feed in the period from weaning to d 14 PW (p < 0.001; Table 4).
The serum Zn status at different time points and the change in serum Zn relative to the day of weaning are shown in Table 5. At weaning (d 0), the average serum Zn level was 852 μg/L and similar for all treatments (p = 0.91). On d 7, d 14 and d 21, there was no difference in serum Zn in pigs receiving the 100 mg added Zn/kg irrespective of Zn source. On d 7, d 14 and d 21, a dosage of 1000 mg Zn/kg of ZnSO4 more efficiently increased serum Zn compared to ZnO (p < 0.001). The 100 mg Zn/kg was not enough to maintain the weaning serum Zn level during the periods between d 0–7, d 0–14 and d 0–21 irrespective of Zn source (p < 0.001). Zinc sulphate at 1000 mg Zn/kg most efficiently increased the serum Zn level relative to the weaning level during d 0–7 and d 0–14 PW compared with ZnO.
The probability of diarrhoea defined as faecal score 3 or 4 was generally low and ranged from 0.08–8.47% during all experimental weeks. Figure 1 shows the probability of diarrhoea in pigs receiving the different sources and levels of added Zn from d 0–21, ranging from 1.3–8.2%, with no differences between treatments (p = 0.56).

4. Discussion

In this study, the aim was to determine the bioavailability of six different Zn sources and their effect on the faecal score and productivity in newly weaned pigs. According to Brügger & Windish [4], a preferable parameter to estimate Zn availability but also requirement should reflect Zn homeostatic regulation in relation to changes in body Zn. The ATTD of dietary Zn was suggested to be such an indicator based on results from a Zn dose–response study (dietary Zn ranging from 28.1 to 88.0 mg/kg from ZnSO4) in pigs 14–22 days post-weaning [5]. Pigs under-supplied with Zn showed negative or low positive ATTD of Zn, whereas pigs sufficiently supplied or over-supplied with Zn exhibited ATTD of Zn at the plateau or post-plateau level [5]. According to the authors, this allows for a differentiation between animals fed diets with insufficient or sufficient Zn concentrations under experimental conditions. The negative or close to zero ATTD of Zn when supplied at 100 mg added/kg irrespective of Zn source in the present study therefore indicates that on day 14 PW, pigs were under supplied with Zn. This result is well in line with recent results by Hansen et al. [25]. They showed that 150 mg total Zn/kg feed was far from enough to provide weaned pigs the NRC recommended 46.8 mg Zn per day [27] and also not enough to ensure optimal feed intake, growth and serum Zn status during the first two weeks PW. In contrast, when 1000 mg/kg of added Zn from either ZnO or ZnSO4 was provided in the present study, the ATTD of Zn on PW day 14 was positive, indicating the Zn supply was closer to the requirement.
We showed that 100 mg/kg added Zn, irrespective of Zn source, resulted in an average daily Zn intake of only 15 mg during week one PW, which is approximately 1/3 of the NRC recommended Zn intake for pigs between 7 and 11 kg. The Zn intake increased to an average of 49 mg/day when the feed contained 100 mg added Zn/kg, irrespective of the Zn source, during the second week PW. However, a daily Zn intake of this quantity still did not result in positive ATTD values of Zn on day 14 PW, indicating that the NRC recommended daily intake of 46.8 mg Zn is not enough to fulfil the Zn requirement the first two weeks PW.
The average daily feed intake across treatments during the first week PW was slightly lower (118 g/day) than what we have previously observed in individually housed piglets fed similar types of diets (approximately 150 g/day) [25]. This is most likely caused by the lower initial weight at weaning (average 6.8 kg) compared to pigs in the study by Hansen et al. [25] (7.6 kg). Bruininx et al. [28] reported that individually fed group-housed pigs weaned at an average of 27 days of age with a BW of 6.7 kg had an average daily feed intake from d 0–13 PW of 168 g, which is well in line with feed intake results from another study in individually fed group-housed weaned pigs [29]. The average daily feed intake of our pigs 0–14 days PW was between 166 and 258 g depending on treatment. This indicates that the individual housing of pigs in the present study did not suppress feed intake, and therefore we do not expect that group-housed pigs under commercial conditions have a significantly higher Zn intake than what is reported in the present study.
The ATTD of Zn at 100 mg added Zn/kg varied in the present study according to the Zn source, with pigs in the Zn-Gly group exhibiting a more negative ATTD of Zn (−16.5%) compared to pigs in the AA-Zn and Pot-Zn groups (−0.6 and −4.1%, respectively), suggesting that Zn-Gly pigs were the most under supplied with Zn. In contrast to our results, Oh et al. [15] showed that the ATTD of Zn was positive and higher (48.4%) following 200 mg added Zn/kg from ZnO chelated with glycine (likely to correspond to our Zn-Gly), compared with 200 mg Zn/kg added from nanoparticle-sized ZnO (28.7%; likely to correspond to our Pot-Zn) on day 7–11 PW. However, the dietary Zn level was twice as high as our Zn level, the method by which Zn digestibility was determined was different (total collection of urine and faeces) and there was no precise indication (producer) of the ZnO-glycine and nanoparticle-sized ZnO provided by Oh et al. [15]. Therefore, it is difficult to compare with these results directly.
Both the Zn-Gly and Zn-AA products included in our study consist of Zn ions bound to amino acids. In the case of Zn-Gly, Zn is chelated to the smallest amino acid glycine, whereas in the Zn-AA product, one metal ion is bound to an unspecific amino acid ion through a manufacturing process using acid hydrolysis of soybean protein, followed by chelation with ZnO [30]. Zinc chelated to amino acids seem to be taken up by amino acid transporters in enterocytes, but the efficiency by which this occurs may depend on the amino acid (glutamate, lysine or methionine) [31]. Further, the specific production processes where inorganic Zn salts react with their bonding groups have significant impact on, for example, the pH stability of the products and performance in the animal [17]. Together, this may contribute to the observed differences in the ATTD of Zn following Zn–Gly and Zn-AA.
At a supplementary level of 100 mg Zn/kg, inorganic ZnO and ZnSO4 did not exhibit lower bioavailability based on Zn ATTD and serum Zn status compared to the organic (Zn-Gly, AA-Zn, OH-Zn) or processed inorganic (Pot-Zn) sources of Zn. Revy et al. [12] suggested that the lack of difference in bioavailability between inorganic and organic sources of Zn in some pig studies [32,33,34], including the present, in contrast to many poultry studies, may rely on the higher contents of phytate and calcium in poultry versus piglet diets. Thereby, poultry diets generally contain more dietary factors that can interact with and complex bind Zn ions in the gastrointestinal tract, and the beneficial effect of applying organic compared to inorganic sources of Zn on Zn bioavailability may be greater. Revy et al. [12] showed that the addition of phytase (1200 units/kg) considerably improved Zn bioavailability measured as plasma alkaline phosphatase activity and Zn content, bone Zn concentration and Zn retention, and the effect of phytase addition exceeded the effect of extra 20 mg Zn/kg in the diet of weaned pigs. In the present study, a high dose of phytase (200%, corresponding to 1000 FTU/kg feed) was applied, as it is standard practice on Danish pig farms. Due to the high dose of phytase, we speculate that the level of Zn-ion complex-binding phytate in our diets was relatively low, which may have contributed to the lack of difference in the ATTD of Zn between organic chelated sources and inorganic sources of Zn.
The observed differences in the ATTD of Zn between Zn sources when 100 mg Zn/kg was provided were not reflected as differences in serum Zn or differences in feed intake, gain or the probability of diarrhoea. Studies of bioavailability of Zn from different Zn sources in broilers have also shown that differences in Zn digestibility are not necessarily translated into differences in the serum Zn status [35,36,37]. Serum or plasma Zn concentration is recognized as a reliable measurement for estimating Zn status in humans [38,39] and is also used to assess Zn status in weaned pigs [25,40,41]. None of the Zn sources, when included at 100 mg Zn/kg, were able to maintain the serum Zn level at weaning (852 μg/L), at d 7, d 14 or d 21 post-weaning. Hansen et al. [25] showed that the relative risk of diarrhoea increased to 60% on day 7 and 14 post-weaning if serum Zn dropped below the weaning level (767 μg/L), and that it required approximately 1100 mg Zn/kg feed during post-weaning week one to maintain the serum Zn level at weaning. However, in the present study, the probability of diarrhoea was unaffected by the dietary Zn level (100 vs. 1000 mg/kg of ZnO and ZnSO4), and the generally low overall probability of diarrhoea among our individually housed pigs probably reflects a relatively high level of hygiene.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, 100 mg of added Zn/kg irrespective of Zn source seemed to be insufficient in the first two weeks post-weaning based on the negative digestibility of Zn. The degree of undersupply varied with the Zn source, but the differences in digestibility were not reflected as differences in the serum Zn level, feed intake, gain or probability of diarrhoea. Moreover, since the digestibility of Zn in ZnO and ZnSO4 did not differ from processed inorganic and chelated organic sources of Zn, there are no incentives to apply organic chelated sources of added Zn over ZnO and ZnSO4 to the diet of weaned pigs if the level of phytase addition is as high (1000 FTU/kg feed) as that in the current study.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.S.N. and H.M.; methodology, T.S.N. and H.M.; formal analysis, T.S.N., M.N.E. and S.V.H.; investigation, T.S.N.; resources, H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, T.S.N.; writing—review and editing, M.N.E., S.V.H. and H.M.; visualization, T.S.N. and S.V.H.; supervision, T.S.N.; project administration, H.M.; funding acquisition, H.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Danish Pig Levy Fund grant no. 1426.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal experimental procedures reported in this study were carried out in accordance with the Danish Ministry of Justice, Law no. 174/15.05.2014 concerning animal experiments and care and license, issued by the Danish Animal Experiments Inspectorate, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, the Danish Veterinary and Food Administration (Approval number: 2018-15-0201-01470).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable, as this research did not involve humans.

Data Availability Statement

Data used for this publication were not deposited in an official repository.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Anne Mette Viernfeldt Toft and Lis Sidelmann for the excellent care and sampling of the animals and analytical assistance in the laboratory, respectively.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. EU. Commission, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1334/2003 of 25 July 2003 amending the conditions for authorisation of a number of additives in feedingstuffs belonging to the group of trace elements. Off. J. Eur. Union 2003, 187, 11. [Google Scholar]
  2. EU. Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2016/1095 of 6 July 2016 concerning the authorization of zinc acetate dihydrate, zinc chloride anhydrous, zinx oxide, zinc sulphate heptahydrate, zinc sulphate monohydrate, zinc chelate of anmino acids hydrate, zinc chelate of protein hydrolysates, zinc chelate of glycine hydrate (solid) and zincchelate of glycine hydrate (liquid) as feed additives for all animal species and amending regulations (EC). No 1334/2003, (EC) No 479/2006, (EU) No 335/2010 and Implementing Regulations (EU) No 991/2012 and (EU) No 636/2013. Off. J. Eur. Union 2016, 182, 7–27. [Google Scholar]
  3. Poulsen, H.D.; Larsen, T. Zinc excretion and retention in growing pigs fed increasing levels of zinc oxide. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1995, 43, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brugger, D.; Windisch, W.M. Zn metabolism of monogastric species and consequences for the definition of feeding requirements and the estimation of feed Zn bioavailability. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2019, 20, 617–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Brugger, D.; Buffler, M.; Windisch, W. Development of an experimental model to assess the bioavailability of zinc in practical piglet diets. Arch. Anim. Nutr. 2014, 68, 73–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lönnerdal, B. Dietary factors influencing zinc absorption. J. Nutr. 2000, 130, 1378s–1383s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Hambidge, K.M.; Miller, L.V.; Westcott, J.E.; Sheng, X.; Krebs, N.F. Zinc bioavailability and homeostasis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 1478s–1483s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Ollig, J.; Kloubert, V.; Weßels, I.; Haase, H.; Rink, L. Parameters Influencing Zinc in Experimental Systems in Vivo and in Vitro. Metals 2016, 6, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Schlegel, P.; Nys, Y.; Jondreville, C. Zinc availability and digestive zinc solubility in piglets and broilers fed diets varying in their phytate contents, phytase activity and supplemented zinc source. Animal 2010, 4, 200–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Miller, L.V.; Krebs, N.F.; Hambidge, K.M. A mathematical model of zinc absorption in humans as a function of dietary zinc and phytate. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bikker, P.; Jongbloed, A.W.; Thissen, J.T. Meta-analysis of effects of microbial phytase on digestibility and bioavailability of copper and zinc in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90 (Suppl. 4), 134–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Revy, P.S.; Jondreville, C.; Dourmad, J.Y.; Nys, Y. Effect of zinc supplemented as either an organic or an inorganic source and of microbial phytase on zinc and other minerals utilisation by weanling pigs. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2004, 116, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lopez, H.W.; Levrat-Verny, M.-A.; Coudray, C.; Besson, C.; Krespine, V.; Messager, A.; Demigné, C.; RéMéSy, C. Class 2 resistant starches lower plasma and liver lipids and improve mineral retention in rats. J. Nutr. 2001, 131, 1283–1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Nitrayova, S.; Windisch, W.; von Heimendahl, E.; Müller, A.; Bartelt, J. Bioavailability of zinc from different sources in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 2012, 90 (Suppl. 4), 185–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Oh, H.-J.; Park, Y.-J.; Cho, J.H.; Song, M.-H.; Gu, B.-H.; Yun, W.; Lee, J.-H.; An, J.-S.; Kim, Y.-J.; Lee, J.-S.; et al. Changes in diarrhea score, nutrient digestibility, zinc utilization, intestinal immune profiles, and fecal microbiome in weaned piglets by different forms of zinc. Animals 2021, 11, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jou, M.Y.; Philipps, A.F.; Kelleher, S.L.; Lönnerdal, B. Effects of zinc exposure on zinc transporter expression in human intestinal cells of varying maturity. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2010, 50, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Byrne, L.; Hynes, M.J.; Connolly, C.D.; Murphy, R.A. Influence of the chelation process on the stability of organic trace mineral supplements used in animal nutrition. Animals 2021, 11, 1730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Diao, H.; Yan, J.; Li, S.; Kuang, S.; Wei, X.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, J.; Huang, C.; He, P.; Tang, W. Effects of dietary zinc sources on growth performance and gut health of weaned piglets. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 771617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Xie, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Cheng, Z.; Yang, Z.; Yang, W. The effects of partially or completely substituted dietary zinc sulfate by lower levels of zinc methionine on growth performance, apparent total tract igestibility, immune function, and visceral indices in weaned piglets. Animals 2019, 9, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Peng, P.; Chen, J.; Yao, K.; Yin, Y.; Long, L.; Fang, R. The effects of dietary supplementation with porous zinc oxide on growth performance, intestinal microbiota, morphology, and permeability in weaned piglets. Anim. Sci. J. 2019, 90, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Ward, T.L.; Ji, F.; Peng, C.; Zhu, L.; Gong, L.; Dong, B. Effects of zinc sources and levels of zinc amino acid complex on growth performance, hematological and biochemical parameters in weanling pigs. Asian-Australas J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 31, 1267–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Tybirk, P.; Sloth, N.M.; Kjeldsen, N.; Weber, N.R. Danish Nutrient Standards, 30th ed.; SEGES Svineproduktion: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  23. Petersen, L.; Minkkinen, P.; Esbensen, K.H. Representative sampling for reliable data analysis: Theory of Sampling. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2005, 77, 261–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pedersen, K.S.; Toft, N. Intra- and inter-observer agreement when using a descriptive classification scale for clinical assessment of faecal consistency in growing pigs. Prev. Vet. Med. 2011, 98, 288–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hansen, S.V.; Nørskov, N.P.; Nørgaard, J.V.; Woyengo, T.A.; Poulsen, H.D.; Nielsen, T.S. Determination of the optimal level of dietary zinc for newly weaned pigs: A dose-response study. Animals 2022, 12, 1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Myers, W.D.; Ludden, P.A.; Nayigihugu, V.; Hess, B.W. Technical note: A procedure for the preparation and quantitative analysis of samples for titanium dioxide. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 179–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. National Research Council; Committee on Nutrient Requirements of Swine; Board on Agriculture and Natural Resources; Division on Earth and Life Studies. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 11th ed.; The National Academics Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012; ISBN 978-0-309-22423-9. [Google Scholar]
  28. Bruininx, E.M.A.M.; van der Peet-Schwering, C.M.C.; Schrama, J.W.; Vereijken, P.F.G.; Vesseur, P.C.; Everts, H.; den Hartog, L.A.; Beynen, A.C. Individually measured feed intake characteristics and growth performance of group-housed weanling pigs: Effects of sex, initial body weight, and body weight distribution within groups. J. Anim. Sci. 2001, 79, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lynegaard, J.C.; Kjeldsen, N.J.; Bache, J.K.; Weber, N.R.; Hansen, C.F.; Nielsen, J.P.; Amdi, C. A very low CP level reduced diarrhoea and productivity in weaner pigs, but no differences between post-weaning diets including soybean meal or soy protein concentrate were found. Animals 2021, 11, 678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP). Scientific opinion on the characterisation of zinc compound ‘Zinc chelate of amino acids, hydrate (Availa®Zinc)’ as a feed additive for all animal species. EFSA J. 2013, 11, 3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Sauer, A.K.; Pfaender, S.; Hagmeyer, S.; Tarana, L.; Mattes, A.-K.; Briel, F.; Küry, S.; Boeckers, T.M.; Grabrucker, A.M. Characterization of zinc amino acid complexes for zinc delivery in vitro using Caco-2 cells and enterocytes from hiPSC. BioMetals 2017, 30, 643–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Hill, D.A.; Peo, E.R., Jr.; Lewis, A.J.; Crenshaw, J.D. Zinc-amino acid complexes for swine. J. Anim. Sci. 1986, 63, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wedekind, K.J.; Lewis, A.J.; Giesemann, M.A.; Miller, P.S. Bioavailability of zinc from inorganic and organic sources for pigs fed corn-soybean meal diets. J. Anim. Sci. 1994, 72, 2681–2689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dourmad, J.-Y.; Guinotte, F.O.; Nys, Y. Bioavailability of two sources of zinc in weanling pigs. Anim. Res. 2002, 51, 315–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Alkhtib, A.; Scholey, D.; Carter, N.; Cave, G.W.V.; Hanafy, B.I.I.; Kempster, S.R.J.; Mekapothula, S.; Roxborough, E.T.; Burton, E.J. Bioavailability of methionine-coated zinc nanoparticles as a dietary supplement leads to improved performance and bone strength in broiler chicken production. Animals 2020, 10, 1482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zakaria, H.A.; Jalal, M.; Al-Titi, H.H.; Souad, A. Effect of sources and levels of dietary zinc on the performance, carcass traits and blood parameters of broilers. Rev. Bras. Ciência Avícola 2017, 19, 519–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Salah, A.S.; Abdel-Latif, M.A.; Farghly, M.F.A. Effects of dietary supplementation of zinc oxide and zinc methionine on layer performance, egg quality, and blood serum indices. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 184, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. King, J.C.; Brown, K.H.; Gibson, R.S.; Krebs, N.F.; Lowe, N.M.; Siekmann, J.H.; Raiten, D.J. Biomarkers of nutrition for development (BOND)-Zinc review. J. Nutr. 2015, 146, 858s–885s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lowe, N.M.; Fekete, K.; Decsi, T. Methods of assessment of zinc status in humans: A systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2009, 89, 2040s–2051s. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Carlson, D.; Beattie, J.H.; Poulsen, H.D. Assessment of zinc and copper status in weaned piglets in relation to dietary zinc and copper supply. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2007, 91, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Burrough, E.R.; De Mille, C.; Gabler, N.K. Zinc overload in weaned pigs: Tissue accumulation, pathology, and growth impacts. J. Vet. Diagn. Investig. 2019, 31, 537–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The probability of diarrhoea in pigs receiving different sources and levels of added Zn in their diet from d 0–21 post-weaning. n = 11–12/treatment.
Figure 1. The probability of diarrhoea in pigs receiving different sources and levels of added Zn in their diet from d 0–21 post-weaning. n = 11–12/treatment.
Animals 12 02921 g001
Table 1. Ingredients in the basal diet and calculated content (as-fed) of selected nutrients and micro minerals.
Table 1. Ingredients in the basal diet and calculated content (as-fed) of selected nutrients and micro minerals.
IngredientsContent (g/kg, as-Fed Basis)
 Wheat563
 Barley200
 Premix 152
 Soy protein concentrate51
 Soybean meal50
 Fish meal30
 Potato protein27
 Soybean oil21
 Titanium dioxide5
 Aroma1
Calculated Composition
 Starch432
 Crude protein176
 Fat45
 Ash53
 Soluble fibre28
 Insoluble fibre99
 Zn (mg/kg)27
 Fe (mg/kg)226
 Cu (mg/kg)179
1 Zn-free vitamin-mineral mix providing the following per kilogram of diet: Phytase (200% = 1000 FTU/kg, Ronozyme HiPhos 20,000 GT), 9280 IU vitamin A, 930 IU vitamin D3, 151 mg vitamin E, 2.3 mg vitamin K3, 2.3 mg vitamin B1, 4.6 mg vitamin B2, 3.5 mg vitamin B6, 0.02 mg vitamin B12, 23 mg niacin, 0.23 mg biotin, 11.6 mg D-panthotenicacid, 1.74 mg folic acid (vitamin B9), 0.02 mg vitamin B12, 6 g Ca, 5.9 g P, 2.9 g Na, 6.0 g K, 1.07 g Mg, 226 mg Fe (FeSO4), 179 mg Cu (CuSO4), 46.4 mg Mn (MnO), 0.35 mg Se (Na2SeO3).
Table 2. Sources and levels of Zn tested, the declared Zn content in the Zn source and the total analysed Zn content in the eight diets.
Table 2. Sources and levels of Zn tested, the declared Zn content in the Zn source and the total analysed Zn content in the eight diets.
Diet12345678
Zn SourceZnOZnOZnSO4ZnSO4Zn-GlyAA-ZnOH-ZnPot-Zn
Declared Zn content in the source, %7272353525105675
Inclusion level, mg Zn/kg10010001001000100100100100
Analysed total Zn 1, mg/kg as-is14010441491108139162140145
1 Duplicate analysis of two samples per diet.
Table 3. Effect of different Zn sources and levels on feed intake and weight gain during d 0–7, d 7–14, d 14–21 and d 0–21. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/teatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Table 3. Effect of different Zn sources and levels on feed intake and weight gain during d 0–7, d 7–14, d 14–21 and d 0–21. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/teatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Zinc SourceZnOZnOZnSO4ZnSO4Zn-GlyAA-ZnOH-ZnPot-ZnSEMp-Value
Inclusion Level, mg/kg10010001001000100100100100
BW d 0, kg6.826.886.736.916.706.856.826.900.251.0
Feed intake, g/d
   d 0–71127915112578121131148230.16
   d 7–14323254346370330364376367350.19
   d 14–21573444583563506592543566420.19
   d 0–21336259360352317359350361290.17
Gain, g/d
   d 0–746−2995023567891370.50
   d 7–14295228297333330332323317330.27
   d 14–21504379490462442529387443450.22
   d 0–21282201295282277306263284280.21
Table 4. Effect of different Zn sources and levels on Zn intake during d 0–7, d 7–14, d 14–21 and d 0–21 and the faecal Zn content and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of Zn. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/treatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Table 4. Effect of different Zn sources and levels on Zn intake during d 0–7, d 7–14, d 14–21 and d 0–21 and the faecal Zn content and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of Zn. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/treatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Zinc SourceZnOZnOZnSO4ZnSO4Zn-GlyAA-ZnOH-ZnPot-ZnSEMp-Value
Inclusion Level, mg/kg10010001001000100100100100
Zn intake, mg/d
   d 0–7 110 c
[6;16]
50 b
[30;82]
20 c
[12;34]
105 a
[64;172]
10 c
[6;17]
18 c
[11;29]
14 c
[9;23]
18 c
[11;31]
<0.001
   d 7–14 143 c
[35;53]
230 b
[187;284]
50 c
[40;62]
393 a
[319;484]
43 c
[35;53]
58 c
[47;71]
48 c
[39;60]
51 c
[41;64]
<0.001
   d 14–21 180 b
[67;94]
422 a
[357;499]
86 b
[72;103]
594 a
[502;702]
69 b
[58;81]
95 b
[80;112]
71 b
[60;84]
81 b
[68;97]
<0.001
   d 0–21 146 c
[39;55]
246 b
[207;292]
53 c
[44;63]
375 a
[316;445]
41 c
[35;49]
58 c
[49;68]
45 c
[38;54]
51 c
[42;61]
<0.001
Faecal Zn (g/kg DM)
d 14
1.5 b6.4 a1.2 b6.8 a1.2 b1.1 b1.1 b1.0 b0.3<0.001
ATTD of Zn d 14, %−6.82 bcd3.42 ab−9.56 bcd8.70 a−16.48 d−0.55 abc−9.87 cd−4.07 bc2.8<0.001
Apparently digested Zn d 14, mg/kg feed intake−9.50 bc34.0 b−12.5 c96.4 a−22.9 c−0.90 bc−13.7 c−5.89 bc10.5<0.001
a,b,c,d Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05). 1 Presented as the least square (LS) means ± 95% confidence intervals due to logarithmic transformation of data.
Table 5. Serum Zn (μg/L) on d 0, d 7, d 14 and d 21 post-weaning and the change in serum Zn (Δ Serum Zn) from the day of weaning (d 0) to d 7, 14 or 21. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/treatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Table 5. Serum Zn (μg/L) on d 0, d 7, d 14 and d 21 post-weaning and the change in serum Zn (Δ Serum Zn) from the day of weaning (d 0) to d 7, 14 or 21. Least-square mean values with their standard errors, n = 12/treatment (n = 11 for ZnSO4 at 1000 mg/kg and Pot-Zn).
Zinc SourceZnOZnOZnSO4ZnSO4Zn-GlyAA-ZnOH-ZnPot-ZnSEMp-Value
Inclusion Level, mg/kg10010001001000100100100100
Serum Zn, μg/L
   d 0795869819867835882860890540.91
   d 7656 b883 b651 b1502 a610 b622 b630 b646 b83<0.001
   d 14679 c1137 b660 c1643 a665 c684 c655 c648 c87<0.001
   d 21757 c1754 b775 c2264 a788 c844 c811 c790 c117<0.001
Δ Serum Zn, μg/L
   d 0–7−139 b14 b−168 b635 a−224 b−261 b−230 b−244 b98<0.001
   d 0–14−117 bc268 b−159 bc776 a−170 c−198 c−206 c−242 c101<0.001
   d 0–21−39 b885 a−44 b1397 a−47 b−38 b−50 b−100 b127<0.001
a,b,c Means within a row with different letters are significantly different (p < 0.05).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Nielsen, T.S.; Engelsmann, M.N.; Hansen, S.V.; Maribo, H. Bioavailability of Different Zinc Sources in Pigs 0–3 Weeks Post-Weaning. Animals 2022, 12, 2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212921

AMA Style

Nielsen TS, Engelsmann MN, Hansen SV, Maribo H. Bioavailability of Different Zinc Sources in Pigs 0–3 Weeks Post-Weaning. Animals. 2022; 12(21):2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212921

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nielsen, Tina S., Maiken N. Engelsmann, Sally V. Hansen, and Hanne Maribo. 2022. "Bioavailability of Different Zinc Sources in Pigs 0–3 Weeks Post-Weaning" Animals 12, no. 21: 2921. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12212921

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop