Next Article in Journal
Potential New Therapeutic Approaches Based on Punica granatum Fruits Compared to Synthetic Anthelmintics for the Sustainable Control of Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Sheep
Next Article in Special Issue
Brown Seaweed (Padina australis) Extract can Promote Performance, Innate Immune Responses, Digestive Enzyme Activities, Intestinal Gene Expression and Resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)
Previous Article in Journal
Exosomes in Mastitis—Research Status, Opportunities, and Challenges
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 20
10.3390/ani12202882
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as a Prebiotic Supplement in the Diet of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.)

by
Clara Trullàs
1,
Mariya Sewaka
2,
Channarong Rodkhum
3,
Nantarika Chansue
4,
Surintorn Boonanuntanasarn
5,
Manoj Tukaram Kamble
1 and
Nopadon Pirarat
1,*
1
Wildlife, Exotic and Aquatic Animal Pathology Research Unit, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Faculty of Veterinary Science, Rajamangala University of Technology Srivijaya, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80240, Thailand
3
Center of Excellence in Fish Diseases (CE FID), Department of Veterinary Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
4
Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
5
Institute of Agricultural Technology, School of Animal Production Technology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(20), 2882; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202882
Submission received: 23 September 2022 / Revised: 16 October 2022 / Accepted: 18 October 2022 / Published: 21 October 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Second Edition of Feed Additives in Health and Immunity of Fish)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Factors such as changes in water quality, the transport and handling of the fish, the presence of pollutants, and the high densities used in intensive farming of red tilapia, among others, can cause oxidative stress in fish, which can lead to immune system suppression and increase the risk of opportunistic infections. The use of Jerusalem artichoke (JA) as an oligofructose-rich prebiotic dietary supplement in fish feed could enhance growth performance, hematological and immunological parameters, as well as disease resistance. However, the effect of JA in diets for red tilapia is poorly reported. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of a Jerusalem artichoke-supplemented diet on the blood chemistry, growth performance, intestinal morphology, expression of antioxidant-related genes, and disease resistance against Aeromonas veronii challenge in juvenile red tilapia. The results of JA-supplemented (JA5 and JA10) diets showed beneficial effects in terms of growth performance, blood chemistry, and intestinal morphology. Importantly, the prebiotic diets (JA5 and JA10) were associated with a significant increase in the expression of gpx1 and gst antioxidant-related genes and disease resistance against A. veronii. In conclusion, prebiotic diets have the potential to be employed as prospective supplements in sustainable red tilapia farming.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a Jerusalem artichoke-supplemented diet on the blood chemistry, growth performance, intestinal morphology, expression of antioxidant-related genes, and disease resistance against Aeromonas veronii challenge in juvenile red tilapia. A completely randomized design (CRD) was followed to feed red tilapias with three experimental diets: control, 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented (JA5), or 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented (JA10) diets in triplicates for 4 weeks. The results revealed that the growth performance, weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), and average daily gain (ADG) of fish fed diets JA5 and JA10 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of fish fed the control diet. Fish fed the control diet had significantly higher T-bilirubin, D-bilirubin, and ALT in blood serum than fish fed JA5 and JA10, as well as higher BUN than fish fed JA5. The number of goblet cells in the proximal and distal parts of the intestine revealed that the number of acid, neutral, and double-staining mucous cells of fish fed diets JA5 and JA10 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in fish fed the control diet. The diets including the prebiotic (JA5 and JA10) were associated with a significant increase in the expression of gpx1 and gst antioxidant-related genes and disease resistance against A. veronii in juvenile red tilapia. Therefore, JA5 and JA10 can be employed as promising prebiotics for sustainable red tilapia farming.

1. Introduction

Red tilapia is recognized as an important source of animal protein globally due to its fast growth, tolerance for poor water quality, and disease resistance [1,2]. The culture of this species has increased rapidly, and it is an economically important fish species worldwide. However, intensive red tilapia farming is associated with stressors such as poor water quality and hypoxia, which lead to oxidative stress in fish [3,4]. Thus, these factors play an important role in immune system suppression and increase the risk of opportunistic infections, which are the major cause of economic losses in red tilapia culture [5,6,7].
Prebiotics are naturally produced and environmentally friendly, and their administration has been cited as a potential method to prevent fish infections in the aquaculture industry [8,9,10]. Prebiotics are defined as non-digestible food ingredients that beneficially affect the host’s health by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of beneficial microflora in the colon. Food ingredients with prebiotic properties have unique characteristics such as limited hydrolysis and absorption in the upper gastrointestinal tract, as well as selective stimulation of beneficial intestinal bacteria [11]. Prebiotics are found in several foods such as Jerusalem artichokes (JA), leeks, asparagus, chicory, garlic, onions, wheat, oats, and soybeans [12].
The JA (Helianthus tuberosus) or Kantawan, a member of the family Asteraceae, is a root vegetable native to central-eastern North America [13] that contains inulin and fructooligosaccharides (FOS), two of the most common prebiotics [14,15]. Inulin is a carbohydrate with low digestibility that is highly used in feeds for livestock and aquatic animals [16,17,18]. The FOSs are also included in animal feeds and have been shown to significantly increase fecal bifidobacteria at relatively low levels of consumption [19]. As reported, the use of JA as a dietary supplement in fish feed could enhance growth performance, hematological, and immunological parameters, as well as disease resistance [19,20,21]. Moreover, JA tubers are composed of natural antioxidants, including phenolic compounds with potential free radical scavenging activity [22,23,24,25], which could improve immune function and balance the excessive production of reactive oxygen species during infections [26,27]. However, the effect of JA on diets for red tilapia is poorly reported. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of JA-supplemented diets on the blood chemistry, growth performance, intestinal morphology, and expression of antioxidant-related genes in juvenile red tilapia.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Experimental Diets

The JA samples were obtained from Phetchabun Research Station, Agro-Ecological System Research and Development Institute, Kasetsart University, Thailand. The JA tubers were cleaned and sliced into thin pieces. These slices were then ground into powder using a hammer grinder. The samples were dried at 50 °C for 24 h and kept at 4 °C until use. The chemical composition and oligosaccharide contents of the JA tubers, such as dry matter, crude protein, crude lipid, crude fiber, ash, and fructans, were 934.4, 57.8, 1.7, 126.0, and 80.8 g/kg (dry matter basis), respectively [20]. Three experimental diets were prepared as follows: a control diet (un-supplemented), a 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet (JA5), and a 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet (JA10). The experimental diets (JA5 and JA10) and the control diet were prepared by thoroughly mixing 1 mL of the Jerusalem artichoke (powder dissolved in distilled water) in diets JA5 and JA10 and 1 mL of distilled water with 1 g of feed in the case of the commercial diet (Hi-grade 9951 Tilapia feed, Charoen Pokphand Foods Public Company Limited (CPF PCL), Samut Sakhon, Thailand), air-dried, and stored at 4 °C until feeding. The proximate composition of the commercial feed was: protein (30%), fat (3%), ash (8%), and moisture (12%).

2.2. Experimental Design

Two hundred and seventy monosex red tilapias with an average initial body weight of 14.1 ± 0.53 g were obtained from a Good Aquaculture Practices certified farm (CPF PCL, Samut Sakhon, Thailand) and acclimatized for two weeks before being distributed into nine 1000-L tanks (30 fish per tank). The completely randomized design (CRD) was followed to feed red tilapias with three experimental diets for 4 weeks. Water temperature was maintained at 25–28 °C throughout the experimental period, dissolved oxygen concentration ranged from 5.24–5.98 mg/L and pH was within the range 7.48–8.16. Fish were hand-fed 5% of their body weight twice a day, and we observed that the fish had entirely consumed the provided quantity of feed. Every two days, 50% of the water in each tank was replaced. The experiment was done in triplicates. All the experimental protocols were approved by the ethics committee of Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (CUACUC; Approval No. 1731039).

2.3. Growth Performance

Fish were weighed at the start and end of the experimental period. The final weight, weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR), and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated according to the following standard equations [28]:
WG (%) = 100 × (final mean body weight – initial mean body weight)/initial mean body weight
SGR = [(ln (final body weight) – ln (initial body weight)/days] × 100
FCR = feed intake (g)/weight gain (g)
ADG = (% gain)/(number of days)

2.4. Blood Chemistry Analysis

After 4 weeks of feeding, six fish from each tank were randomly selected for blood sample collection. Samples were taken from the caudal vein using a hypodermic syringe and were allowed to clot at 4 °C for at least 3 h. Then, they were centrifuged at 2,600 × g for 10 min at room temperature to obtain the serum samples. Serum was analyzed for glucose, triglyceride, cholesterol, total protein, albumin, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), total bilirubin (T-bilirubin), direct bilirubin (D-bilirubin), serum alanine transaminase (ALT), and serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) using an automated chemistry analyzer (AU400, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

2.5. Measurement of Villous Height, Villous Width, Absorptive Area, and Mucous Cells

After 4 weeks of feeding, six fish from each tank were randomly selected and anesthetized with clove oil (0.04 mL/L). Three parts of the intestine, the proximal (between the pyloric part of the stomach and the spiral part of the intestines), middle (the spiral part of the intestines), and distal parts (from the spiral part to 2 cm before the anus) were collected. Samples were fixed in neutral buffered 10% formalin, processed, and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (5 µm thick) were cut with a microtome and fixed on slides. To measure the villous height, the 10 highest intact villi were selected per section, and their height was measured from the tip to the bottom. The average height was expressed as the mean villous height for each section. The absorptive area was calculated by using the following Equation (5) [29]:
absorptive area = villous height × villous width
The mucous cells in the intestine were counted and classified by means of three types of special staining: Alcian Blue (AB) (pH 2.5) for acid mucin, Periodic Acid-Schiff (PAS) for neutral mucin, and AB-PAS double-staining for mixed mucin. The mucous cells from each section were counted using a high-power field (400 × magnification) and calculated as follows: mucous cell numbers/high-power field.

2.6. Antioxidant Gene Expression

After 4 weeks of feeding, total RNA was extracted from the livers of six randomly selected fish from each tank using TRIzol™ Reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). The RNA was treated with the Ambion® DNA-free™ DNase treatment and removal reagents (Ambion, Foster, CA, USA). The total RNA quality was then checked using a Nanodrop® Lite spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at an absorbance ratio A260/280 and assessed in 1.5% agarose electrophoresis. The 0.5 µg of total RNA obtained were converted to first-strand cDNA using ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. All synthesized cDNA samples were preserved at −20 °C for quantitative PCR analysis.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) for analysis of gene expression was performed by a Rotor-Gen Q (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). The antioxidant-related genes gpx1, gst, gr, cat, and sod were used in this assay. The beta-actin gene (β-actin), a housekeeping gene, was applied as a reference gene for standardization of relative transcription levels. The primers are shown in Table 1.
The reaction mix consisted of 10 µL of KAPA SYBR® FAST qPCR Master Mix (2×) Kit (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA), 0.5 µM of forward and reverse primer, and 2 µL of cDNA and deionized water up to 20 mL of the final volume. All samples were analyzed in triplicate. The qRT-PCR cycling parameters were as follows: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95 °C for 3 s, annealing at 60 °C for 20 s, extension at 72 °C for 20 s for all genes. Melt curve analysis was conducted to validate the specificity of the PCR amplification. Each transcript was analyzed using pooled samples for each group. The relative expression of antioxidant-related genes in the liver of fish after being fed the experimental diets were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCt method using the Equation (6) [30]:
ΔΔCt = (Ct, target gene – Ct, β-actin) prebiotic – (Ct, target gene – Ct, β-actin) control

2.7. Challenge Test

After 4 weeks of prebiotic diet feeding, 30 fish from each group were intraperitoneally injected (100 µL) with A. veronii at a final concentration of 107 CFU/fish. A. veronii was isolated from naturally diseased Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) in Nong Khai Province, Northeastern Thailand and confirmed by a biochemical test and PCR assay [31]. After the challenge, clinical signs of infection or mortalities were recorded for 15 days. The cumulative survival rates were calculated by using the following Equation (7) [29]:
Cumulative survival (%) = [((total fish – dead fish) × 100)/total fish]

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SPSS (version 22, Armonk, NY, USA). The significance of the differences between means was tested by Duncan’s multiple range test. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves and a log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test were used to compare the groups based on the cumulative survival percentage. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Growth Performance

Red tilapia fed prebiotic diets showed better growth performance than those fed the control diet (Table 2).
The final weight, WG, SGR, and ADG of fish fed diets JA5 and JA10 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those of fish fed the control diet (Table 2). Moreover, the WG, SGR, and ADG results were higher in fish fed JA5 than in those fed JA10. In addition, fish fed JA5 or JA10 diets had significantly lower FCR (p < 0.05) than fish fed the control diet.

3.2. Blood Collection and Serum Chemistry Analysis

Results showed that fish fed JA5 had significantly higher (p < 0.05) glucose values than the control group (Table 3). Fish fed the control diet had the highest BUN value, which was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that of fish fed diet JA5. In addition, fish from the control group had the highest T-bilirubin, D-bilirubin, and ALT values (p < 0.05).

3.3. Measurement of Villous Height, Villous Width, Absorptive Area, and Mucous Cells

The villous height and width along the intestine of red tilapia fed the JA-supplemented diets were higher than those in fish fed the control diet, but this was not statistically significant (p > 0.05) (Table 4).
However, the absorptive area in the distal part of the intestine presented a significant difference (p < 0.05), being higher in fish fed the JA-supplemented diets than in those fed the control diet.
The number of goblet cells in the proximal (Figure 1) and distal intestines revealed that the numbers of acid, neutral, and double-staining mucous cells in fish fed the JA-supplemented diets were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in fish fed the control diet (Table 5). In the middle intestine, the number of neutral mucous cells in fish fed the JA10 diet and the number of double-stained mucous cells in fish fed JA5 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in fish fed the control diet.

3.4. Antioxidant Gene Expression

The gene expression profiles of the antioxidant-related genes gpx1, gst, gr, cat and sod are presented in Figure 2.
The JA5 prebiotic diet caused a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the expression of the gpx1 gene (2.69-fold and 1.36-fold) compared to the Control and JA10 diets, while the JA10 diet resulted in a significant increase in the expression of the gst (4.2-fold) and gr (3.17-fold) genes compared to the Control diet. The expression of cat in fish fed the JA10 prebiotic diet was significantly higher (p < 0.05) (1.96-fold) than that in fish from the control diet, while the expression of sod did not present significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05).

3.5. Challenge Test

The Kaplan-Meier analysis for the prebiotic diets found significant differences (X2(2) = 18.820, p < 0.01) compared to the control (Figure 3).
The cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the JA5 and JA10 groups, at 92% and 88%, respectively, when compared with the control (44%). After challenge with A. veronii, red tilapia mortality on day 1 occurred at rates of 12%, 4%, and 12% in the control, JA5, and JA10 groups, respectively. Moreover, fish mortality in the control, JA5, and JA10 groups stopped on day 13 (56%), day 6 (8%), and day 1 (12%), respectively.

4. Discussion

The beneficial effects of JA on the growth performance of Nile tilapia during the fingerling and juvenile stages has previously been reported [19,20]. In the present study, the higher WG, SGR, ADG, and FCR obtained in fish fed diets JA5 and JA10 compared to those of fish fed the control diet resulted similar to the results reported for juvenile Nile tilapia fed JA-supplemented diets for 56 days [19] and Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer) fed JA-supplemented diets for 45 days [29]. In addition, supplementing the diet with JA for 82 days improved the performance parameters of Nile tilapia during the fingerling stage [20]. The beneficial effects of JA on growth performance may be the result of compounds such as inulin, FOS, carbohydrate, protein, Vitamin C, and minerals [32]. In fact, previous studies reported that inulin improved the growth performance of Nile tilapia [19,20,33] and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), while FOS-supplemented diets improved the growth performance of rainbow trout [34] and turbot (Psetta maxima) [35].
Hematological and biochemical analysis is an inexpensive and useful tool for evaluating the physiological status and health of fish [36]. However, regarding the effects of prebiotics on such parameters, published results are often contradictory. As reported by Guerreiro et al. [37], the specific mechanisms of action responsible for the potential benefits of prebiotics are often difficult to elucidate due to the multiple modes of action and synergies that may occur. In the present study, even though fish fed the JA5 diet had a higher blood glucose level than the rest, fish fed the prebiotic diets had the lowest T-bilirubin, D-bilirubin, ALT, and BUN values, which could indicate a liver and kidney protective effect exerted by the prebiotic [38,39,40]. Regarding glucose, to the best of our knowledge, only Guerreiro et al. [41,42] have reported results on the effect of prebiotics on glucose metabolism in sea bass and sea bream. Regardless of their elucidations, prebiotics did not improve glucose tolerance in these two studies, and plasma glucose levels did not differ from those of the control group. As these same authors reported, there is scarce information on the effects of prebiotics on the glucose metabolism of fish; prebiotic effects on lipid metabolism have been more studied [37]. In spite of the lack of information on the potential protective effect of prebiotics on liver and kidney function, Yarahmadi et al. [43] reported the restoration of AST and ALT in rainbow trout fed a diet that included a combination of β-glucan and mannan oligosaccharides (MOS) and then infected with A. hydrophila. This indicated that the prebiotics had a protective effect on the fish with respect to disease. As described by Xu et al. [44] in rodents, the fermentation products of prebiotics can increase the production of mucin and regulate the action of hepatic lipogenic enzymes. Thus, prebiotics can exert synergistic effects together with the stimulated beneficial bacteria in the treatment of liver injury. The lack of significant differences in the rest of the blood parameters among the experimental groups indicated that the prebiotic-supplemented diets had no major effects on the blood serum biochemical parameters. This was in accordance with results reported by other authors for dietary prebiotics such as MOS [45,46,47,48], inulin [49], and FOS [50] in different fish species.
In terms of intestinal morphology, prebiotics may increase the absorptive area of the gastrointestinal tract based on changes in the microvillus height, among others [51,52,53]. Higher absorptive surface areas and higher microvilli densities in the intestine result in an increase in nutrient absorption [54], which may result in increased weight gain and feed efficiency [55]. The JA-supplemented diets had beneficial effects on the absorptive area in the distal part of the intestine of red tilapias. Previous studies have demonstrated that feeding JA-supplemented diets to juvenile Nile tilapia over 8 weeks improved the villous height in the proximal and middle parts of intestine [19], which was also observed in red drum fed dietary prebiotics for 8 weeks [53]. The fact that in our study differences were not present in the proximal and middle intestine could be due to the shorter duration of the experimental feeding compared to the aforementioned study. Hence, a longer experimental feeding period would be desired in order to assess the intestinal morphology.
Goblet cells, also known as mucous cells, are the first line of defense of the intestinal mucosa, as they produce and secrete mucin, which forms a layer that leads to the physical removal of attached pathogens or toxins [56]. Mucous cells can be acid or neutral depending on the type of mucin secreted [57,58]. Acid mucous cells protect against bacterial translocation [59], while neutral mucous cells are linked to the digestion process [60]. In our study, the higher amounts of acid, neutral, and double-staining mucous cells observed in the proximal and distal intestines of fish fed the prebiotic-supplemented diets was in accordance with previous results reported in Nile tilapia fingerlings fed a JA-supplemented diet [61]. The increase in the three different types of mucous cells in the presence of prebiotic indicated a reinforcement of the intestinal immune system.
Reactive oxygen species released by inflammatory cells can cause damage to cellular macromolecules such as DNA, lipids, and proteins, leading to cell and tissue damage. Oxidative stress can be induced by heat, water pollution, and UV light, and cells need to produce antioxidant enzymes to fight against it [26]. Several studies have shown that JA has bioactive molecules such as phenolic compounds that have radical scavenging activity and SOD-like activity [22,23,45]. Genes gpx1, gst, gr, cat, and sod are the common antioxidant-related genes in fish [61,62]. The significant increase in the expression of the gpx1, gst, and gr genes in fish fed dietary JA in the present study was in line with the upregulation in the expression of the gst gene in Nile tilapia fed a β-glucans-supplemented diet [63]. Overall, feeding tilapia with JA improved the expression of antioxidant-related genes, which might ultimately be related to the observed improvement in the growth performance and disease resistance against A. veronii.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of the present study revealed that JA-supplemented diets improved growth performance, the amount of intestinal mucous cells, the expression of antioxidant-related genes and the disease resistance against A. veronii in juvenile red tilapia. Differences in the effects between the two prebiotic diets were not significant in most cases. Therefore, Jerusalem artichoke can be included as a prebiotic in diets for red tilapia.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.T., M.S., C.R., N.C., S.B., and N.P.; methodology, C.T., M.S., C.R., N.C., S.B., and N.P.; software, C.T., M.S., C.R., N.C., S.B., M.T.K., and N.P.; validation, C.T., M.S., and N.P.; formal analysis, C.T., M.S., M.T.K., and N.P.; investigation, C.T., M.S., and N.P.; resources, C.R., S.B., and N.P.; data curation, C.T., M.S., and N.P.; writing—original draft preparation, C.T. and N.P.; writing—review and editing, C.T., C.R., M.T.K., and N.P.; visualization, C.T., C.R., M.T.K., and N.P.; supervision, C.T., M.S., C.R., N.C., S.B., and N.P.; project administration, C.R., S.B., and N.P.; funding acquisition, C.R., S.B., and N.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Ratchadaphisek Sompoch Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University, the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT: N42A650230), and Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund, Chulalongkorn University (FOOD66310013).

Institutional Review Board Statement

All the experimental protocols were approved by the ethics committee of the Chulalongkorn University Animal Care and Use Committee (CUACUC; Approval No. 1731039).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the Ratchadaphisek Sompoch Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University; the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT: N42A650230); Thailand Science Research and Innovation Fund, Chulalongkorn University (FOOD66310013) and the Departments of Pathology, Veterinary Microbiology, and Veterinary Medicine (Faculty of Veterinary Science), Chulalongkorn University, for all their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Haque, M.R.; Islam, M.A.; Wahab, M.A.; Hoq, M.E.; Rahman, M.M.; Azim, M.E. Evaluation of production performance and profitability of hybrid red tilapia and genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT) strains in the carbon/nitrogen controlled periphyton-based (C/N-CP) on-farm prawn culture system in Bangladesh. Aquac. Rep. 2016, 4, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Gupta, M.V.; Acosta, B.O. A review of global tilapia farming practices. Aquac. Asia 2004, 9, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  3. Slaninova, A.; Smutna, M.; Modra, H.; Svobodova, Z. A review: Oxidative stress in fish induced by pesticides. Neuroendocrinol. Lett. 2009, 30, 2. [Google Scholar]
  4. Derome, N.; Gauthier, J.; Boutin, S.; Llewellyn, M. Bacterial opportunistic pathogens of fish. In The Rasputin Effect: When Commensals and Symbionts Become Parasitic; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2016; pp. 81–108. [Google Scholar]
  5. Kayansamruaj, P.; Pirarat, N.; Hirono, I.; Rodkhum, C. Increasing of temperature induces pathogenicity of Streptococcus agalactiae and the up-regulation of inflammatory related genes in infected Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 172, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Beaz-Hidalgo, R.; Alperi, A.; Buján, N.; Romalde, J.L.; Figueras, M.J. Comparison of phenotypical and genetic identification of Aeromonas strains isolated from diseased fish. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 2010, 33, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Joseph, S.W.; Carnahan, A. The isolation, identification, and systematics of the motile Aeromonas species. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 1994, 4, 315–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hoseinifar, S.H.; Esteban, M.Á.; Cuesta, A.; Sun, Y.-Z. Prebiotics and fish immune response: A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Rev. Fish. Sci. Aquac. 2015, 23, 315–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Harikrishnan, R.; Devi, G.; Doan, H.V.; Gatphayak, K.; Balasundaram, C.; El-Haroun, E.; Soltan, M. Immunomulation effect of alginic acid and chitooligosaccharides in silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2022, 128, 592–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Issac, P.K.; Karan, R.; Guru, A.; Pachaiappan, R.; Arasu, M.V.; Al-Dhabi, N.A.; Choi, K.C.; Harikrishnan, R.; Arockia Raj, J. Insulin signaling pathway assessment by enhancing antioxidant activity due to morin using in vitro rat skeletal muscle L6 myotubes cells. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 5857–5872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Gibson, G.R.; Roberfroid, M.B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: Introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 1995, 125, 1401–1412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van Loo, J.; Coussement, P.; de Leenheer, L.; Hoebregs, H.; Smits, G. On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the western diet. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1995, 35, 525–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kleessen, B.; Schwarz, S.; Boehm, A.; Fuhrmann, H.; Richter, A.; Henle, T.; Krueger, M. Jerusalem artichoke and chicory inulin in bakery products affect faecal microbiota of healthy volunteers. Br. J. Nutr. 2007, 98, 540–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Moshfegh, A.J.; Friday, J.E.; Goldman, J.P.; Ahuja, J.K.C. Presence of inulin and oligofructose in the diets of Americans. J. Nutr. 1999, 129, 1407S–1411S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Lied, G.A.; Lillestøl, K.; Lind, R.; Valeur, J.; Morken, M.H.; Vaali, K.; Gregersen, K.; Florvaag, E.; Tangen, T.; Berstad, A. Perceived food hypersensitivity: A review of 10 years of interdisciplinary research at a reference center. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 2011, 46, 1169–1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Grabitske, H.A.; Slavin, J.L. Gastrointestinal effects of low-digestible carbohydrates. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 327–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Slavin, J. Fiber and prebiotics: Mechanisms and health benefits. Nutrients 2013, 5, 1417–1435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Costabile, A.; Kolida, S.; Klinder, A.; Gietl, E.; Bäuerlein, M.; Frohberg, C.; Landschütze, V.; Gibson, G.R. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study to establish the bifidogenic effect of a very-long-chain inulin extracted from globe artichoke (Cynara scolymus) in healthy human subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 2010, 104, 1007–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Tiengtam, N.; Khempaka, S.; Paengkoum, P.; Boonanuntanasarn, S. Effects of inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as prebiotic ingredients in the diet of juvenile Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2015, 207, 120–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tiengtam, N.; Paengkoum, P.; Sirivoharn, S.; Phonsiri, K.; Boonanuntanasarn, S. The effects of dietary inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) tuber on the growth performance, haematological, blood chemical and immune parameters of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Res. 2017, 48, 5280–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Boonanuntanasarn, S.; Tiengtam, N.; Pitaksong, T.; Piromyou, P.; Teaumroong, N. Effects of dietary inulin and Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) on intestinal microbiota community and morphology of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fingerlings. Aquac. Nutr. 2018, 24, 712–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Johansson, E.; Prade, T.; Angelidaki, I.; Svensson, S.-E.; Newson, W.R.; Gunnarsson, I.B.; Persson Hovmalm, H. Economically viable components from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) in a biorefinery concept. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 8997–9016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Kim, D.; Fan, J.P.; Chung, H.C.; Han, G.D. Changes in extractability and antioxidant activity of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers by various high hydrostatic pressure treatments. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2010, 19, 1365–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petkova, N.; Ivanov, I.; Denev, P.; Pavlov, A. Bioactive substance and free radical scavenging activities of flour from Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) tubers–a comparative study. Türk Tarım Doğa Bilimleri Derg. 2014, 1, 1773–1778. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dias, N.S.; Ferreira, J.F.; Liu, X.; Suarez, D.L. Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus, L.) maintains high inulin, tuber yield, and antioxidant capacity under moderately-saline irrigation waters. Ind. Crops Prod. 2016, 94, 1009–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Van den Ende, W.; Peshev, D.; de Gara, L. Disease prevention by natural antioxidants and prebiotics acting as ROS scavengers in the gastrointestinal tract. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 689–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Puertollano, M.A.; Puertollano, E.; Cienfuegos, G.A.D.; Pablo, M.A.d. Dietary antioxidants: Immunity and host defense. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2011, 11, 1752–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Kamble, M.T.; Yakupitiyage, A.; Salin, K.R.; Chavan, B.R. Effect of Psidium guajava and Phyllanthus acidus leaf extract on immunostimulant response of Nile tilapia against Streptococcus agalactiae infection. Isr. J. Aquac.—Bamidgeh 2018, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ali, S.S.R.; Ambasankar, K.; Musthafa, M.S.; Harikrishnan, R. Jerusalem artichoke enriched diet on growth performance, immuno-hematological changes and disease resistance against Aeromonas hydrophila in Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2017, 70, 335–342. [Google Scholar]
  30. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 − ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dong, H.T.; Nguyen, V.V.; Le, H.D.; Sangsuriya, P.; Jitrakorn, S.; Saksmerprome, V.; Senapin, S.; Rodkhum, C. Naturally concurrent infections of bacterial and viral pathogens in disease outbreaks in cultured Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) farms. Aquaculture 2015, 448, 427–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schneider, K.R. Review of Biology and Chemistry of Jerusalem Artichoke: Helianthus tuberosus L. J. Agric. Food Inf. 2009, 10, 352–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ibrahem, M.D.; Fathi, M.; Mesalhy, S.; Abd El-Aty, A. Effect of dietary supplementation of inulin and vitamin C on the growth, hematology, innate immunity, and resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2010, 29, 241–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ortiz, L.; Rebolé, A.; Velasco, S.; Rodríguez, M.; Treviño, J.; Tejedor, J.; Alzueta, C. Effects of inulin and fructooligosaccharides on growth performance, body chemical composition and intestinal microbiota of farmed rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquac. Nutr. 2013, 19, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Mahious, A.; Gatesoupe, F.; Hervi, M.; Metailler, R.; Ollevier, F. Effect of dietary inulin and oligosaccharides as prebiotics for weaning turbot, Psetta maxima (Linnaeus, C. 1758). Aquac. Int. 2006, 14, 219–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Witeska, M.; Kondera, E.; Ługowska, K.; Bojarski, B. Hematological methods in fish—Not only for beginners. Aquaculture 2022, 547, 737498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Guerreiro, I.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P. Prebiotics as functional ingredients: Focus on Mediterranean fish aquaculture. Rev. Aquac. 2017, 10, 800–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hassaan, M.; Soltan, M.; Ghonemy, M. Effect of synbiotics between Bacillus licheniformis and yeast extract on growth, hematological and biochemical indices of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Egypt. J. Aquat. Res. 2014, 40, 199–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kumar, V.; Makkar, H.; Becker, K. Nutritional, physiological and haematological responses in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) juveniles fed detoxified Jatropha curcas kernel meal. Aquac. Nutr. 2011, 17, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, C.-Y.; Wooster, G.A.; Getchell, R.G.; Bowser, P.R.; Timmons, M.B. Blood chemistry of healthy, nephrocalcinosis-affected and ozone-treated tilapia in a recirculation system, with application of discriminant analysis. Aquaculture 2003, 218, 89–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guerreiro, I.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, A.P. Improved glucose and lipid metabolism in European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed short-chain fructooligosaccharides and xylooligosaccharides. Aquaculture 2015, 441, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Guerreiro, I.; Serra, C.R.; Pousão-Ferreira, P.; Oliva-Teles, A.; Enes, P. Prebiotics effect on growth performance, hepatic intermediary metabolism, gut microbiota and digestive enzymes of white sea bream (Diplodus sargus). Aquac. Nutr. 2017, 24, 153–163. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yarahmadi, P.; Farsani, H.G.; Khazaei, A.; Khodadadi, M.; Rashidiyan, G.; Jalali, M.A. Protective effects of the prebiotic on the immunological indicators of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) infected with Aeromonas hydrophila. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2016, 54, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Xu, S.; Zhao, M.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Z.; Pan, B.; Xue, Y.; Dai, Z.; Wang, S.; Xue, Z.; Wang, F.; et al. Effectiveness of probioitcs and prebiotics against acute liver injury: A Meta-Analysis. Front. Med. 2021, 8, 739337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Welker, T.L.; Lim, C.; Yildirim-Aksoy, M.; Shelby, R.; Klesius, P.H. Immune response and resistance to stress 694 and Edwardsiella ictaluri challenge in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus, fed diets containing commercial whole-cell yeast or yeast subcomponents. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2007, 38, 24–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Sado, R.Y.; Bicudo, A.J.D.A.; Cyrino, J.P.E. Feeding dietary mannan oligosaccharides to juvenile Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, has no effect on hematological parameters and showed decreased feed consumption. J. World Aquac. Soc. 2008, 39, 821–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gultepe, N.; Hisar, O.; Salnur, S.; Hossu, B.; Tansel Tanrikul, T.; Aydm, S. Preliminary assessment of dietary mannanoligosaccharides on growth performance and health status of gilthead sea bream Sparus auratus. J. Aquat. Anim. Health 2012, 24, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Razeghi Mansour, M.; Akrami, R.; Ghobadi, S.H.; Amani Denji, K.; Ezatrahimi, N.; Gharaei, A. Effect of dietary mannan oligosaccharide on growth performance, survival, body composition and some hematological parameters in giant sturgeon juvenile (Huso huso Linnaeus, 1754). Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2012, 38, 829–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Reza, A.; Abdolmajid, H.; Abbas, M.; Abdolmohammad, A.K. Effect of dietary prebiotic inulin on growth performance, intestinal microflora, body composition and hematological parameters of juvenile beluga Huso huso (Linnaeus, 1758). J. World Aquac. Soc. 2009, 40, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hoseinifar, S.H.; Mirvaghefi, D.L.; Merrifield, B.M.; Amiri, S.; Yelghi, S.; Bastami, K.D. The study of some haematological and serum biochemical parameters of juvenile beluga (Huso huso) fed oligofructose. Fish Physiol. Biochem. 2011, 37, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Dimitroglou, A.; Davis, S.J.; Sweetman, J.; Duvanach, P.; Chatzifotis, S. Dietary supplementation of mannan oligosaccharide on white sea bream (Diplodus sargus L.) larvae: Effects on development, gut morphology and salinity tolerance. Aquac. Res. 2010, 41, e245–e251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Salze, G.; Mclean, E.; Schwarz, M.H.; Craig, S.R. Dietary mannan oligosaccharide enhances salinity tolerance and gut development of larval cobia. Aquaculture 2008, 274, 148–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhou, Q.-C.; Buentello, J.A.; Gatlin III, D.M. Effects of dietary prebiotics on growth performance, immune response and intestinalmorphology of red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus). Aquaculture 2010, 309, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Butt, R.L.; Volkoff, H. Gut microbiota and energy homoestasis in fish. Front. Endocrinol. 2019, 10, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Gatlin III, D.M.; Peredo, A. Prebiotics and Probiotics:Definitions and Applications; SRAC Publication—Southern Regional Aquaculture Center: Stoneville, MS, USA, 2012; p. 8. [Google Scholar]
  56. Jutfelt, F. Barrier function of the gut. In Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology: From Genome to Environment; Farrell, A.P., Stevens, E.D., Cech, J.J.J., Richards, J.G., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 1322–1331. [Google Scholar]
  57. Pelaseyed, T.; Bergström, J.H.; Gustafsson, J.K.; Ermund, A.; Birchenough, G.M.; Schütte, A.; van der Post, S.; Svensson, F.; Rodríguez-Piñeiro, A.M.; Nyström, E.E. The mucus and mucins of the goblet cells and enterocytes provide the first defense line of the gastrointestinal tract and interact with the immune system. Immunol. Rev. 2014, 260, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Tassell, M.L.V.; Miller, M.J. Lactobacillus adhesion to mucus. Nutrients 2011, 3, 613–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Caspary, W.F. Physiology and pathophysiology of intestinal absorption. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992, 55, 299S–308S. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Preidis, G.A.; Hill, C.; Guerrant, R.L.; Ramakrishna, B.; Tannock, G.W.; Versalovic, J. Probiotics, enteric and diarrheal diseases, and global health. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Meng, S.L.; Chen, J.Z.; Hu, G.D.; Song, C.; Fan, L.M.; Qiu, L.P.; Xu, P. Effects of chronic exposure of methomyl on the antioxidant system in liver of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2014, 101, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Afifi, M.; Alkaladi, A.; Zinada, O.A.A.; Couderchet, M. Alteration in antioxidant genes expression in some fish caught from Jeddah and Yanbu coast as a bio-indicator of oil hydrocarbons pollution. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2017, 24, 1580–1587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Salah, A.S.; El Nahas, A.F.; Mahmoud, S. Modulatory effect of different doses of β-1, 3/1, 6-glucan on the expression of antioxidant, inflammatory, stress and immune-related genes of Oreochromis niloticus challenged with Streptococcus iniae. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2017, 70, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Animals 12 02882 g001 550
Figure 1. The proximal intestinal goblet cells (arrows) of red tilapia fed the control (A–C), JA5 (D–F), and JA10 diets (G–I) after special staining into three types: AB staining (A,D,G), PAS staining (B,E,H), and AB-PAS double-staining (C,F,I). Bar 50 µm. AB: Alcian Blue; PAS: Periodic acid-Schiff.
Figure 1. The proximal intestinal goblet cells (arrows) of red tilapia fed the control (A–C), JA5 (D–F), and JA10 diets (G–I) after special staining into three types: AB staining (A,D,G), PAS staining (B,E,H), and AB-PAS double-staining (C,F,I). Bar 50 µm. AB: Alcian Blue; PAS: Periodic acid-Schiff.
Animals 12 02882 g001
Animals 12 02882 g002 550
Figure 2. Relative expression of gpx1, gst, gr, cat, and sod in the liver of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks. Results are means ± SD (n = 6). a, b Different superscript letters in each gene denote statistically significant differences between experimental diets (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet.
Figure 2. Relative expression of gpx1, gst, gr, cat, and sod in the liver of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks. Results are means ± SD (n = 6). a, b Different superscript letters in each gene denote statistically significant differences between experimental diets (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet.
Animals 12 02882 g002
Animals 12 02882 g003 550
Figure 3. The average cumulative survival rate of red tilapia fed the control diet, JA5-supplemented diet, and JA10-supplemented diet for 4 weeks following Aeromonas veronii challenge. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves over time (days) for red tilapia were plotted with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) statistical test to compare the experimental groups. a, b Different superscript letters in each treatment denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.01). Data represent the means ± SD (n = 30).
Figure 3. The average cumulative survival rate of red tilapia fed the control diet, JA5-supplemented diet, and JA10-supplemented diet for 4 weeks following Aeromonas veronii challenge. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves over time (days) for red tilapia were plotted with the log-rank (Mantel-Cox) statistical test to compare the experimental groups. a, b Different superscript letters in each treatment denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.01). Data represent the means ± SD (n = 30).
Animals 12 02882 g003
Table
Table 1. Tilapia primers used for qRT-PCR in the current study.
Table 1. Tilapia primers used for qRT-PCR in the current study.
Gene NameqPCR Primer, Forward/Reverse (5′–3′)Amplicon Size (bp)
β-actinAAGGACCTGTACGCCAACAC196
ACATCTGCTGGAAGGTGGAC
gpx1GGAACGACAACCAGGGACTA160
TCCCTGGACGGACATACTTC
gstCAAAGGATCCCAAAGAACGA184
AGGTACACGGGTCCAGTCAG
grGTTCCTCCCAGTAACGACCA160
TGTAGCAGTGCTCCCTTCCT
catTGTTCCCATCCTTCATCCAT182
GAAGGTGTGAGAGCCGTAGC
sodAAAGGCATGTTGGAGACCTG196
AGACGTCCACCAGCATTACC
Table
Table 2. Growth performance and feed utilization of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
Table 2. Growth performance and feed utilization of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
ParametersControlJA5JA10
Initial weight (g)14.68 ± 3.2613.68 ± 5.1513.88 ± 3.61
Final weight (g)24.52 ± 5.67 a28.76 ± 5.37 b27.73 ± 6.18 b
WG (%)67.03 ± 7.0 a125.70 ± 45.46 c106.38 ± 13.79 b
FCR2.32 ± 0.55 c1.36 ± 0.11 a1.61 ± 0.35 b
SGR (%/day)1.76 ± 0.14 a2.74 ± 0.70 c2.49 ± 0.23 b
ADG (% /day)2.31 ± 0.24 a4.34 ± 1.57 c3.67 ± 0.48 b
Results are means ± SD (n = 30); a, b, c Different superscript letters in a row denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; WG: weight gain; FCR: feed conversion ratio; SGR: specific growth rate; ADG: average daily gain.
Table
Table 3. Blood serum biochemical parameters of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
Table 3. Blood serum biochemical parameters of red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
ParametersControlJA5JA10
Glucose (mg/dl)45.17 ± 7.49 a75.67 ± 36.43 b50.67 ± 10.54 ab
Triglycerides (mg/dl)200.00 ± 97.51187.67 ± 81.41187.00 ± 48.53
Total cholesterol (mg/dl)161.33 ± 10.54 a163.83 ± 29.63 a227.83 ± 24.60 b
Total protein (g/dl)2.60 ± 0.222.52 ± 0.442.83 ± 0.38
Albumin (g/dl)0.97 ± 0.270.77 ± 0.120.97 ± 0.21
BUN (mg/dl)1.80 ± 0.40 b1.00 ± 0.00 a1.50 ± 0.55 b
Total bilirubin (mg/dl)0.02 ± 0.01 b0.01 ± 0.00 a0.01 ± 0.00 a
Direct bilirubin (mg/dl)0.015 ± 0.001 b0.003 ± 0.001 a0.002 ± 0.00 a
ALT (IU/l)9.50 ± 6.53 b3.20 ± 1.17 a3.33 ± 0.82 a
AST (IU/l)13.00 ± 2.7614.80 ± 5.3817.33 ± 7.69
Results are means ± SD (n = 6). a, b Different superscript letters in a row denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; BUN: blood urea nitrogen; ALT: alanine transferase; AST: aspartate aminotransferase.
Table
Table 4. Intestinal morphology of red tilapia fed the experimental diets for 4 weeks.
Table 4. Intestinal morphology of red tilapia fed the experimental diets for 4 weeks.
ParametersControlJA5JA10
Proximal part
Villi height (µm)288.22 ± 6.96293.82 ± 6.34295.23 ± 5.98
Villi width (µm)77.08 ± 3.2076.71 ± 3.2680.06 ± 1.45
Absorptive area (mm2)0.0222 ± 0.0010.0225 ± 0.00050.0235 ± 0.0002
Middle part
Villi height (µm)262.21 ± 2.72263.92 ± 9.47265.61 ± 8.39
Villi width (µm)91.58 ± 7.4294.29 ± 10.0791.87 ± 5.00
Absorptive area (mm2)0.0240 ± 0.00170.0248 ± 0.00170.0242 ± 0.0006
Distal part
Villi height (µm)172.96 ± 4.81182.66 ± 3.62178.89 ± 7.62
Villi width (µm)89.20 ± 4.73101.46 ± 4.66104.14 ± 5.37
Absorptive area (mm2)0.0154 ± 0.0006 a0.0185 ± 0.0005 b0.0185 ± 0.0009 b
Results are means ± SD (n = 6). a, b, Different superscript letters in a row denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet.
Table
Table 5. Average number of goblet cells for red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
Table 5. Average number of goblet cells for red tilapia fed experimental diets for 4 weeks.
ParametersControlJA5JA10
Proximal part
AB27.84 ± 4.51 a46.00 ± 2.68 b47.50 ± 2.07 b
PAS30.75 ± 3.88 a58.37 ± 4.78 b61.83 ± 1.72 b
AB-PAS double-staining14.55 ± 1.37 a30.97 ± 2.23 b30.63 ± 0.95 b
Middle part
AB57.00 ± 2.74 a56.80 ± 2.15 a56.80 ± 1.79 a
PAS56.60 ± 3.05 a57.40 ± 2.15 ab60.00 ± 1.58 b
AB-PAS double-staining48.00 ± 2.00 a51.00 ± 2.19 b49.50 ± 1.29 ab
Distal part
AB49.00 ± 3.54 a88.50 ± 3.73 b89.23 ± 7.03 b
PAS56.44 ± 3.43 a100.17 ± 3.92 b100.33 ± 2.94 b
AB-PAS double-staining30.40 ± 1.67 a53.04 ± 1.93 b52.20 ± 3.56 b
Results are means ± SD (n = 6). a, b Different superscript letters in a row denote statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). JA5: 5.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet; JA10: 10.0 g/kg JA-supplemented diet.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trullàs, C.; Sewaka, M.; Rodkhum, C.; Chansue, N.; Boonanuntanasarn, S.; Kamble, M.T.; Pirarat, N. Effects of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as a Prebiotic Supplement in the Diet of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Animals 2022, 12, 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202882

AMA Style

Trullàs C, Sewaka M, Rodkhum C, Chansue N, Boonanuntanasarn S, Kamble MT, Pirarat N. Effects of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as a Prebiotic Supplement in the Diet of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.). Animals. 2022; 12(20):2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202882

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trullàs, Clara, Mariya Sewaka, Channarong Rodkhum, Nantarika Chansue, Surintorn Boonanuntanasarn, Manoj Tukaram Kamble, and Nopadon Pirarat. 2022. "Effects of Jerusalem Artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus) as a Prebiotic Supplement in the Diet of Red Tilapia (Oreochromis spp.)" Animals 12, no. 20: 2882. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12202882

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop