Next Article in Journal
The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors in PGF2α-Induced Luteolysis in the Bovine Corpus Luteum
Previous Article in Journal
The Distribution Characteristics of Aerosol Bacteria in Different Types of Pig Houses
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/ani12121541
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Association Study for Lactation Performance in the Early and Peak Stages of Lactation in Holstein Dairy Cows

by
Mahsa Zare
1,
Hadi Atashi
1 and
Miel Hostens
2,*
1
Department of Animal Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz 7144113131, Iran
2
Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utrecht, Yalelaan 7, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(12), 1541; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121541
Submission received: 3 April 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 10 June 2022 / Published: 14 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Cattle)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been carried out within a variety of cattle breeds, they are mainly based on the accumulated 305-day lactation yield traits estimated by summing the test-day recorded every day during the lactation period, or combining the weekly or monthly test-day records by linear interpolation. Since the additive genetic variance for milk yield and composition changes during lactation, the genetic effects of QTL related to these traits are not constant during the lactation period. Therefore, a better understanding of the genetic architecture of milk production traits in different lactation stages (e.g., beginning, peak, and end stages of lactation) is needed. The aim of this study was to detect genomic loci associated with lactation performance during 9 to 50 days in milk (DIM) in Holstein dairy cows. Candidate genes identified for milk production traits showed contrasting results between the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that in any genomic study it should be taken into account that the genetic effects of genes related to the lactation performance are not constant during the lactation period.

Abstract

This study aimed to detect genomic loci associated with the lactation performance during 9 to 50 days in milk (DIM) in Holstein dairy cows. Daily milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), and protein yield (PY) during 9 to 50 DIM were recorded on 134 multiparous Holstein dairy cows distributed in four research herds. Fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), fat-corrected milk (FCM), and energy-corrected milk (ECM) were predicted. The records collected during 9 to 25 DIM were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY) and those collected during 26 to 50 DIM were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). Then, the mean of traits in each cow included in each lactation stage (EARLY and PEAK) were estimated and used as phenotypic observations for the genome-wide association study. The included animals were genotyped with the Illumina BovineHD Genotyping BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for a total of 777,962 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). After quality control, 585,109 variants were analyzed using GEMMA software in a mixed linear model. Although there was no SNP associated with traits included at the 5% genome-wide significance threshold, 18 SNPs were identified to be associated with milk yield and composition at the suggestive genome-wide significance threshold. Candidate genes identified for milk production traits showed contrasting results between the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation. This suggests that differential sets of candidate genes underlie the phenotypic expression of the considered traits in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation. Although further functional studies are needed to validate our findings in independent populations, it can be concluded that in any genomic study it should be taken into account that the genetic effects of genes related to the lactation performance are not constant during the lactation period.

1. Introduction

Milk performance traits are among complex traits affecting profitability in dairy cattle. These traits are influenced by management strategies, environmental conditions, physiological stages, and genetic merit of the animal [1,2]. Over the last decades, advances in genome sequencing technologies and availability of a huge number of genetic variants in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) make it possible to identify genome regions underlying complex traits such as lactation performance in dairy cattle [3,4]. Although genome-wide association studies (GWAS) carried out on a variety of cattle breeds identified many genomic regions and candidate genes associated with milk production traits, they are mainly based on the estimated breeding value, daughter yield deviation, and deregressed proof for the 305-day lactation yield traits [5,6,7,8,9]. The 305-day milk yield is estimated by summing the test-day recorded every day during the lactation period, or combining the monthly test-day records by linear interpolation [10]. It has been well documented that the additive genetic variance for milk yield and composition changes during lactation [11,12,13]; therefore, the genetic effects of genomic regions associated with these traits are not constant during the lactation period. Hence, many genomic regions whose genetic effects change during the lactation might not be detected in this approach [1,14]. Therefore, a better understanding of the genetic architecture of milk production traits in different lactation stages (e.g., beginning, peak, and end stages of the lactation) is needed. Previous studies indicated that heritability in the peak of lactation is higher than in other lactation phases; therefore, a comparison of the main genomic regions associated with the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation would promote useful information about the genetic architecture of milk production traits [13,15]. The aim of this study was to detect genomic loci associated with lactation performance during 9 to 50 days in milk (DIM) in Holstein dairy cows.

2. Materials and Methods

Animals and Phenotype

The used dataset consisted of daily milk yield (MY), fat yield (FY), protein yield (PY), fat percentage (FP), and protein percentage (PP) recorded during 9 to 50 days in milk (DIM) on 134 multiparous Holstein dairy cows in 4 research herds (Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; UCD Lyons Research farm, University College Dublin, Ireland; Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Belfast, UK; and Leibniz Institute for Farm Animal Biology, Dummerstorf, Germany). The diet, fed as a total mixed ration (TMR), consisted of corn silage, alfalfa hay, barley grain, fat powder, beet pulp, and feed additives. The included animals were milked two times daily (morning and evening). Daily milk yield was estimated as the sum of the morning and evening milk yields. The milk sample used for measuring fat and protein contents was composed of 50% morning milk and 50% evening milk. Milk samples were analyzed for composition of protein and fat content by mid-infrared analysis (Foss, Hillerød, Denmark). Fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM) yield was predicted as: FPCM   kg = MY   kg   × ( 0.337 + 0.116   FP % + 0.06 ×   PP % ) . Energy-corrected milk (ECM) yield was predicted as: ECM   kg = MY   kg   × ( 0.25 + 0.122 × FP % + 0.077 × PP % ) [16]. Fat-corrected milk (FCM) yield was predicted as: FCM   kg = 0.40 × MY   kg + 15 × FY   kg [17]. The records collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 DIM were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY) and those collected during 26 to 50 DIM were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). Then, means of traits in each cow included in each lactation stage (EARLY and PEAK) were estimated and used as phenotypic observations for the genome-wide association study.

3. Genome-Wide Association Study

The included animals were genotyped using the Illumina BovineHD Genotyping BeadChip (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) for more than 777,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). Quality control for SNPs was performed using PLINK [18]. Non-mapped SNPs, and those with minor allele frequency (MAF) less than 5% were excluded. SNPs with call rate less than 95%, or a Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium p value less than 6.4 × 10−8 were excluded. In total, 585,109 SNPs were kept for the analyses. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed as described by Tetens et al. [19] using a linear mixed model approach through GEMMA [20]. The centered relatedness matrix was created using all SNPs. The association test was then performed with phenotype, genotype, and the centered relatedness matrix files. Univariate linear mixed models were used, and each SNP was fitted as a covariate. The likelihood ratio test was used for each SNP against the null hypothesis of g = 0 using the following statistical model.
y = W α + x β + u + ε
where y is a n × 1 vector of phenotype values for the individuals (milk yield and composition); W is an n × c matrix of the included fixed effect (mean, herd, parity, calving year, calving season, and age at the first calving (AFC, three classes)); α is an c × 1 vector of the corresponding coefficients including the intercept; x is a vector of marker genotypes; β is the vector of marker effects; u is the vector of random polygenic effects with a covariance structure as u∼N(0, KVg), where K is genomic based additive genetic relationship matrix, and Vg is the polygenic additive variance; and ɛ is the vector of residuals with a covariance stricter as ɛ∼N(0, IVe), where I is an identity matrix and Ve is the residual variance. The Bonferroni method was used to account for multiple comparisons [21]. The thresholds of the Bonferroni corrected p values for suggestive and 5% genome-wide significance association were set as 1.74 × 10−6 (1 divided by the number of SNPs) and 8.68 × 10−6 (0.05 divided by the number of SNPs), respectively [22].

4. Gene Prospection

In a post-GWAS study, gene ontology enrichment analysis can be performed to investigate pathways and biological processes that are shared by candidate genes identified for a given trait [23]. In this study, to identify possible candidate genes associated with studied milk production traits, genes located within the 100 kb flanking regions of associated SNPs were identified using the Biomart tool [24] embedded in the Ensembl Genes database version 93 (https://www.ensembl.org/index.html, accessed on 15 October 2018). The bovine genome UMD 3.1 (https://oct2018.archive.ensembl.org/Bos_taurus/Info/Index, accessed on 15 October 2018) was used as the reference genome. The list of candidate genes identified for each trait was uploaded to Enrichr to perform gene ontology (GO) enrichment analyses [25,26]. Significantly enriched terms were identified based on the retrieved adjusted p value.

5. Results

Descriptive statistics for the included traits in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation are presented in Table 1. The cows were genotyped for a total of 777,962 SNPs, of which 585,109 passed all quality control criteria and were used for the GWAS analysis. Manhattan and Q-Q plots of SNPs associated with the considered traits in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation are presented, respectively, in Figure 1 and Figure 2. Although there was no SNP associated with included traits at the 5% genome-wide significance threshold, 18 SNPs were identified to be associated with milk yield and composition at the suggestive genome-wide significance threshold.
The identified SNPs, along with their position, and 100 kb flanking genes are presented in Table 2 (Assembly UMD3. 1, annotation release 103). Four SNPs (BTA5 (n = 2), BTA16, and BTA26) were identified to be associated with daily MY at the PEAK stage of lactation; however, no SNP was found to be associated with MY at the EARLY stage of lactation. There was one SNP on BTA21 and one SNP on BTA19 associated with daily ECM, FPCM, and FCM yields at the EARLY and the PEAK stages of lactation, respectively. Six SNPs (BTA19, BTA27, BTA28 (n = 4)) were identified to be associated with daily FY at the EARLY stage of lactation; however, no SNP was found to be associated with daily FY at the PEAK stage of lactation. Four SNPs (BTA3 and BTA4 (3)) and two SNPs (BTA26) were identified to be associated with PY at the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation, respectively.
Significantly enriched biological processes enriched by candidate genes identified for considered traits are presented in Table 3. Functional genes identified as candidate genes for MY at the PEAK stage of lactation were VWF, ANO2, XCL2, XCL1, and MYOF, which participate in terms related to regulation of T cell chemotaxis and regulation of T cell migration. Genes including UBB, PIGL, TRPV2, CENPV, ZMAT4, ZNF37A, and ZNF33B were identified as candidate genes for FY at the EARLY stage of lactation. Establishment of mitochondrion localization and microtubule-mediated and regulation of the intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by the p53 class mediator are among the most important terms enriched by the candidate gene identified for FY. ATF6 and ELMO1 were identified as candidate genes for PY at the EARLY stage, and MYOF was the only candidate gene identified for PY at the PEAK stage of lactation. Candidate genes identified for PY enriched terms related to regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter in response to stress.

6. Discussion

Genes including VWF, ANO2, XCL2, XCL1, and MYOF were identified as candidate genes for MY in the PEAK stage of lactation. The association between ANO2 and VWF and MY has been reported by previous studies [27,28,29]. It has been reported that an increased expression level of VWF is associated with increased MY in Holstein dairy cows [27]. In addition, VWF and ANO2 have been reported as candidate genes for metabolic body weight in dairy cows [30]. Positive regulation of T cell chemotaxis and positive regulation of T cell migration were identified as the most important terms enriched by VWF, XCL1, and XCL2 genes. Regulation of T cell chemotaxis and migration may have an important role on mammary gland immunity, decreasing the rate of mastitis and improving MY [31,32]. Previous studies reported that XCL1 and XCL2 are associated with inflammation, immunity mechanisms, and environmental adaptation in cattle [33], as well as heat tolerance in buffalo [34]. It has been reported that MYOF is associated with female fertility in dairy cattle [35].
We identified WFIKKN2 and LUC7L3 as candidate genes for FPCM, ECM, and FCM yields in the EARLY stage of lactation. The results showed that terms related to the regulation of transforming growth factor are enriched by WFIKKN2 and LUC7L3 genes. The WFIKKN2 gene has been previously reported to be associated with growth and skeletal muscle [36,37], but there is no report on the effect of variation in WFIKKN2 or LUC7L3 on the lactation performance in cattle.
Functional genes associated with FY at the EARLY stage of lactation were UBB, PIGL, TRPV2, CENPV, ZMAT4, ZNF33B, and ZNF37A. Buzanskas et al. [38] reported that ZMAT4 participates in the apoptotic, biological, developmental, and metabolic processes and is associated with reproductive performance in cattle. It has been reported that ZMAT4 is associated with milk yield at the beginning of lactation, milking speed, and temperament in dairy cattle [39,40]. Previous studies showed that ELMO and TRPV2 are associated with resistance to mastitis in dairy cattle [41,42].
Functional genes associated with PY in the EARLY stage of lactation were ATF6 and ELMO1, while MYOF was associated with PY at the PEAK stage of lactation. Galliou et al. [43] reported that ATF6 is associated with the number of inseminations per conception and first service conception in Holstein dairy cows. This study showed that candidate genes found for PY participate in the regulation of transcription from the RNA polymerase II promoter in response to stress, which can be considered as a mechanism to relieve the stress caused by a negative energy balance in the EARLY stage of lactation.

7. Conclusions

Candidate genes identified for considered traits showed contrasting results between the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation. This suggests that differential sets of candidate genes underlie the phenotypic expression of the analyzed traits in different stages of lactation. Because few animals were used, the findings of this study need to be interpreted with caution; furthermore, further reverse transcription quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) studies are needed to validate our findings in independent populations.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.Z., M.H. and H.A.; methodology, H.A., M.Z. and M.H.; formal analysis, M.Z. and H.A., data curation, M.H. and H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, H.A. and M.H.; supervision, M.H. and H.A.; project administration, M.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Program for research, technological development, and demonstration under grant agreement no. 613689.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support provided by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Program for the GplusE Projects. However, the views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission. The following is a list of authors within the GplusE consortium: Mark Crowe, Niamh McLoughlin, Alan Fahey, Fiona Carter, Elizabeth Matthews, Andreia Santoro, Colin Byrne, Pauline Rudd, Roisin O’Flaherty, Sinead Hallinan, Claire Wathes, Mazdak Salavati, Zhangrui Cheng, Ali Fouladi, Geoff Pollott, Dirk Werling, Beatriz Sanz Bernardo, Conrad Ferris, Alistair Wylie, Matt Bell, Mieke Vaneetvelde, Kristof Hermans, Miel Hostens, Geert Opsomer, Sander Moerman, Jenne De Koster, Hannes Bogaert, Jan Vandepitte, Leila Vandevelde, Bonny Vanranst, Klaus Ingvartsen, Martin Tang Sorensen, Johanna Hoglund, Susanne Dahl, Soren Ostergaard, Janne Rothmann, Mogens Krogh, Else Meyer, Leslie Foldager, Charlotte Gaillard, Jehan Ettema, Tine Rousing, Torben Larsen, Victor Silva de Oliveira, Cinzia Marchitelli, Federica Signorelli, Francesco Napolitano, Bianca Moioli, Alessandra Crisà, Luca Buttazzoni, Jennifer McClure, Daragh Matthews, Francis Kearney, Andrew Cromie, Matt McClure, Shujun Zhang, Xing Chen, Huanchun Chen, Junlong Zhao, Liguo Yang, Guohua Hua, Chen Tan, Guiqiang Wang, Michel Bonneau, Marlène Sciarretta, Armin Pearn, Arnold Evertson, Linda Kosten, Anders Fogh, Thomas Andersen, Matthew Lucy, Chris Elsik, Gavin Conant, Jerry Taylor, Deborah Triant, Nicolas Gengler, Michel Georges, Frédéric Colinet, Marilou Ramos Pamplona, Hedi Hammami, Catherine Bastin, Haruko Takeda, Aurelie Laine, Anne-Sophie Van Laere, Rodrigo Mota, Saied Naderi Darbagshahi, Frederic Dehareng, Clement Grelet, Amelie Vanlierde, Eric Froidmont, Frank Becker, Martin Schulze, and Sergio Palma Vera.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest associated with this research.

References

  1. Lund, M.S.; Sorensen, P.; Madsen, P.; Jaffrézic, F. Detection and modelling of time-dependent QTL in animal populations. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2008, 40, 177–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oliveira, H.; Cant, J.; Brito, L.; Feitosa, F.; Chud, T.; Fonseca, P.; Jamrozik, J.; Silva, F.; Lourenco, D.; Schenkel, F. Genome-wide association for milk production traits and somatic cell score in different lactation stages of Ayrshire, Holstein, and Jersey dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 8159–8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Khatkar, M.S.; Nicholas, F.W.; Collins, A.R.; Zenger, K.R.; Cavanagh, J.A.; Barris, W.; Schnabel, R.D.; Taylor, J.F.; Raadsma, H.W. Extent of genome-wide linkage disequilibrium in Australian Holstein-Friesian cattle based on a high-density SNP panel. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Goddard, M.E.; Hayes, B.J. Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10, 381–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, L.; Liu, J.; Sun, D.; Ma, P.; Ding, X.; Yu, Y.; Zhang, Q. Genome wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein population. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e13661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Cole, J.B.; Wiggans, G.R.; Ma, L.; Sonstegard, T.S.; Lawlor, T.J.; Crooker, B.A.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Yang, J.; Wang, S.; Matukumalli, L.K. Genome-wide association analysis of thirty one production, health, reproduction and body conformation traits in contemporary US Holstein cows. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Meredith, B.K.; Kearney, F.J.; Finlay, E.K.; Bradley, D.G.; Fahey, A.G.; Berry, D.P.; Lynn, D.J. Genome-wide associations for milk production and somatic cell score in Holstein-Friesian cattle in Ireland. BMC Genet. 2012, 13, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Iso-Touru, T.; Sahana, G.; Guldbrandtsen, B.; Lund, M.; Vilkki, J. Genome-wide association analysis of milk yield traits in Nordic Red Cattle using imputed whole genome sequence variants. BMC Genet. 2016, 17, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Nayeri, S.; Sargolzaei, M.; Abo-Ismail, M.K.; May, N.; Miller, S.P.; Schenkel, F.; Moore, S.S.; Stothard, P. Genome-wide association for milk production and female fertility traits in Canadian dairy Holstein cattle. BMC Genet. 2016, 17, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Schaeffer, L. Random Regression Models; University of Guelph: Guelph, Canada, 2016; Available online: http://animalbiosciences.uoguelph.ca/~lrs/BOOKS/rrmbook.pdf (accessed on 20 October 2016).
  11. Bignardi, A.B.; El Faro, L.; Cardoso, V.L.; Machado, P.F.; de Albuquerque, L.G. Random regression models to estimate test-day milk yield genetic parameters Holstein cows in Southeastern Brazil. Livest. Sci. 2009, 123, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Singh, A.; Singh, A.; Singh, M.; Prakash, V.; Ambhore, G.; Sahoo, S.; Dash, S. Estimation of genetic parameters for first lactation monthly test-day milk yields using random regression test day model in Karan fries cattle. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 29, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Atashi, H.; Salavati, M.; De Koster, J.; Ehrlich, J.; Crowe, M.; Opsomer, G.; GplusE Consortium; Hostens, M. Genome-wide association for milk production and lactation curve parameters in Holstein dairy cows. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 2020, 137, 292–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ning, C.; Wang, D.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, S.; Mrode, R.; Liu, J.-F. Eigen decomposition expedites longitudinal genome-wide association studies for milk production traits in Chinese Holstein. Genet. Sel. Evol. 2018, 50, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Atashi, H.; Wilmot, H.; Vanderick, S.; Hubin, X.; Gengler, N. Genome-wide association study for milk production traits in Dual-Purpose Belgian Blue cows. Livest. Sci. 2022, 256, 104831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yan, M.-J.; Humphreys, J.; Holden, N.M. An evaluation of life cycle assessment of European milk production. J. Environ. Manag. 2011, 92, 372–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, L.; Gengler, N.; Dehareng, F.; Colinet, F.; Froidmont, E.; Soyeurt, H. Can we observe expected behaviors at large and individual scales for feed efficiency-related traits predicted partly from milk mid-infrared spectra? Animals 2020, 10, 873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Purcell, S.; Neale, B.; Todd-Brown, K.; Thomas, L.; Ferreira, M.A.; Bender, D.; Maller, J.; Sklar, P.; De Bakker, P.I.; Daly, M.J. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2007, 81, 559–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Tetens, J.; Thaller, G.; Krattenmacher, N. Genetic and genomic dissection of dry matter intake at different lactation stages in primiparous Holstein cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2014, 97, 520–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Zhou, X.; Stephens, M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet. 2012, 44, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Gelman, A.; Hill, J.; Yajima, M. Why we (usually) don’t have to worry about multiple comparisons. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 2012, 5, 189–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lander, E.; Kruglyak, L. Genetic dissection of complex traits: Guidelines for interpreting and reporting linkage results. Nat. Genet. 1995, 11, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Verardo, L.; Silva, F.; Varona, L.; Resende, M.; Bastiaansen, J.; Lopes, P.; Guimarães, S. Bayesian GWAS and network analysis revealed new candidate genes for number of teats in pigs. J. Appl. Genet. 2015, 56, 123–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Kinsella, R.J.; Kähäri, A.; Haider, S.; Zamora, J.; Proctor, G.; Spudich, G.; Almeida-King, J.; Staines, D.; Derwent, P.; Kerhornou, A. Ensembl BioMarts: A hub for data retrieval across taxonomic space. Database 2011, 2011, bar030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Chen, H.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Li, X.; Sun, G.; Yuan, X.; Lei, L.; Liu, J.; Yin, L.; Deng, Q. Adiponectin activates the AMPK signaling pathway to regulate lipid metabolism in bovine hepatocytes. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2013, 138, 445–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kuleshov, M.V.; Jones, M.R.; Rouillard, A.D.; Fernandez, N.F.; Duan, Q.; Wang, Z.; Koplev, S.; Jenkins, S.L.; Jagodnik, K.M.; Lachmann, A. Enrichr: A comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web server 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, W90–W97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Connor, E.E.; Siferd, S.; Elsasser, T.H.; Evock-Clover, C.M.; Van Tassell, C.P.; Sonstegard, T.S.; Fernandes, V.M.; Capuco, A.V. Effects of increased milking frequency on gene expression in the bovine mammary gland. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Flori, L.; Fritz, S.; Jaffrézic, F.; Boussaha, M.; Gut, I.; Heath, S.; Foulley, J.-L.; Gautier, M. The genome response to artificial selection: A case study in dairy cattle. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e6595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Jiang, J.; Ma, L.; Prakapenka, D.; VanRaden, P.M.; Cole, J.B.; Da, Y. A large-scale genome-wide association study in US Holstein cattle. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hardie, L.; VandeHaar, M.; Tempelman, R.; Weigel, K.; Armentano, L.; Wiggans, G.; Veerkamp, R.; de Haas, Y.; Coffey, M.; Connor, E. The genetic and biological basis of feed efficiency in mid-lactation Holstein dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2017, 100, 9061–9075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Rajala-Schultz, P.; Gröhn, Y.; McCulloch, C.; Guard, C. Effects of clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82, 1213–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Souza, F.; Blagitz, M.; Batista, C.; Takano, P.; Gargano, R.; Diniz, S.; Silva, M.; Ferronatto, J.; Santos, K.; Heinemann, M. Immune response in nonspecific mastitis: What can it tell us? J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 5376–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Braz, C.U.; Rowan, T.N.; Schnabel, R.D.; Decker, J.E. Genome-wide association analyses identify genotype-by-environment interactions of growth traits in Simmental cattle. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 13335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, S.; Ye, T.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Jamil, A.M.; Zhou, Y.; Hua, G.; Liang, A.; Deng, T.; Yang, L. Identifying hub genes for heat tolerance in water buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) using transcriptome data. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Abdollahi-Arpanahi, R.; Carvalho, M.R.; Ribeiro, E.S.; Peñagaricano, F. Association of lipid-related genes implicated in conceptus elongation with female fertility traits in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 10020–10029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, H.; Misztal, I.; Aguilar, I.; Legarra, A.; Fernando, R.L.; Vitezica, Z.; Okimoto, R.; Wing, T.; Hawken, R.; Muir, W.M. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes in a single-step (ssGWAS) for 6-week body weight in broiler chickens. Front. Genet. 2014, 5, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Carreño, L.O.D.; da Conceição Pessoa, M.; Espigolan, R.; Takada, L.; Bresolin, T.; Cavani, L.; Baldi, F.; Carvalheiro, R.; De Albuquerque, L.G.; Da Fonseca, R. Genome association study for visual scores in Nellore cattle measured at weaning. BMC Genom. 2019, 20, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Buzanskas, M.E.; Grossi, D.d.A.; Ventura, R.V.; Schenkel, F.S.; Chud, T.C.S.; Stafuzza, N.B.; Rola, L.D.; Meirelles, S.L.C.; Mokry, F.B.; Mudadu, M.d.A. Candidate genes for male and female reproductive traits in Canchim beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 8, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Yodklaew, P.; Koonawootrittriron, S.; Elzo, M.A.; Suwanasopee, T.; Laodim, T. Genome-wide association study for lactation characteristics, milk yield and age at first calving in a Thai multibreed dairy cattle population. Agric. Nat. Resour. 2017, 51, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chen, S.-Y.; Oliveira, H.R.; Schenkel, F.S.; Pedrosa, V.B.; Melka, M.G.; Brito, L.F. Using imputed whole-genome sequence variants to uncover candidate mutations and genes affecting milking speed and temperament in Holstein cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2020, 103, 10383–10398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cai, Z.; Guldbrandtsen, B.; Lund, M.S.; Sahana, G. Prioritizing candidate genes post-GWAS using multiple sources of data for mastitis resistance in dairy cattle. BMC Genom. 2018, 19, 656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kour, A.; Deb, S.M.; Nayee, N.; Raina, V.S.; Yadav, V.; Niranjan, S.K. Understanding the genomic architecture of clinical mastitis in Bos indicus. 3 Biotech 2021, 11, 466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Galliou, J.M.; Kiser, J.N.; Oliver, K.F.; Seabury, C.M.; Moraes, J.G.; Burns, G.W.; Spencer, T.E.; Dalton, J.; Neibergs, H.L. Identification of loci and pathways associated with heifer conception rate in US Holsteins. Genes 2020, 11, 767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Animals 12 01541 g001 550
Figure 1. Manhattan and Q-Q plots of SNPs associated with milk yield and composition collected (predicted) for the EARLY stage of lactation. The horizontal red and blue lines in the Manhattan plots indicate the genome-wide significance threshold (−log10(8.7 × 10−8)), and the suggestive significance threshold (−log10(1.74 × 10−6)). Chromosomes are shown in red (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and 28), blue (2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, and 29), or green (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30). The records of the traits collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 days in milk were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY). FPCM = fat- and protein-corrected milk yield; FCM = fat-corrected milk yield; ECM = energy-corrected milk yield.
Figure 1. Manhattan and Q-Q plots of SNPs associated with milk yield and composition collected (predicted) for the EARLY stage of lactation. The horizontal red and blue lines in the Manhattan plots indicate the genome-wide significance threshold (−log10(8.7 × 10−8)), and the suggestive significance threshold (−log10(1.74 × 10−6)). Chromosomes are shown in red (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and 28), blue (2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, and 29), or green (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30). The records of the traits collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 days in milk were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY). FPCM = fat- and protein-corrected milk yield; FCM = fat-corrected milk yield; ECM = energy-corrected milk yield.
Animals 12 01541 g001
Animals 12 01541 g002 550
Figure 2. Manhattan and Q-Q plots of SNPs associated with milk yield and composition collected (predicted) for the PEAK stage of lactation. The horizontal red and blue lines in the Manhattan plots indicate the genome-wide significance threshold (−log10(8.7 × 10−8)), and the suggestive significance threshold (−log10(1.74 × 10−6)). Chromosomes are shown in red (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and 28), blue (2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, and 29), or green (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30). The records of the traits collected (predicted) during 26 to 50 days in milk were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). FPCM = fat- and protein-corrected milk yield; FCM = fat-corrected milk yield; ECM = energy-corrected milk yield.
Figure 2. Manhattan and Q-Q plots of SNPs associated with milk yield and composition collected (predicted) for the PEAK stage of lactation. The horizontal red and blue lines in the Manhattan plots indicate the genome-wide significance threshold (−log10(8.7 × 10−8)), and the suggestive significance threshold (−log10(1.74 × 10−6)). Chromosomes are shown in red (1, 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, and 28), blue (2, 5, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, and 29), or green (3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 27, and 30). The records of the traits collected (predicted) during 26 to 50 days in milk were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). FPCM = fat- and protein-corrected milk yield; FCM = fat-corrected milk yield; ECM = energy-corrected milk yield.
Animals 12 01541 g002
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for milk yield and composition in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1 (n = 137).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics for milk yield and composition in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1 (n = 137).
EARLYPEAK
Trait 2MeanSDMeanSD
Daily milk yield (kg)35.25.5739.616.97
Daily FPCM yield (kg) 337.36.2738.676.25
Daily FCM yield (kg) 437.76.3439.446.20
Daily ECM yield (kg) 540.26.7741.416.69
Daily fat yield (kg)1.580.301.580.26
Daily protein yield (kg)1.200.231.180.24
Daily fat percentage (%)4.510.564.10 0.51
Daily protein percentage (%)3.430.313.010.22
1 The records collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 (mean = 17 d) and 26 to 50 (mean = 38 d) days in milk were put into the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation, respectively. 2 The examined traits included daily milk yield (MY), daily fat- and protein-corrected milk (FPCM), daily fat-corrected milk (FCM), energy-corrected milk (ECM), daily fat yield (FY), and protein yield (PY). 3 FPCM   kg = MY   kg   × ( 0.337 + 0.116 ×   FP   % + 0.06 ×   PP   % ) . 4 FCM   kg = 0.4 × MY   kg + 15 × FY   kg . 5 ECM   kg = MY   kg   × ( 0.25 + 0.122 × FP % + 0.077 × PP   % ) .
Table
Table 2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) detected by genome-wide association study (GWAS) for daily milk yield and composition collected (predicted) during EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1.
Table 2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) detected by genome-wide association study (GWAS) for daily milk yield and composition collected (predicted) during EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1.
TraitLactation StageSNP 2BTA 3Position 4p5100 kb Flanking Genes 6
Daily milk yield (kg)EARLY-----
Daily milk yield (kg)PEAKBovineHD050002998651047287671.43 × 10−6LOC100297751, VWF, ANO2
BovineHD050002998751047313965.00 × 10−7LOC100297751, VWF, ANO2
BovineHD160001060016370088411.48 × 10−6XCL2, LOC104974416, XCL1
BovineHD260000377226147752911.24 × 10−6LOC104976766, MYOF
Daily FPCM yield (kg) 7EARLYBovineHD190001059019365769991.53 × 10−6LOC101902244, LOC104975057, LOC512899, WFIKKN2, LUC7L3
Daily FPCM yield (kg)PEAKBovineHD210000434321159039998.25 × 10−7LOC104975331
Daily FCM yield (kg) 8EARLYBovineHD190001059019365769991.07 × 10−6LOC101902244, LOC104975057, LOC512899, WFIKKN2, LUC7L3
Daily FCM yield (kg)PEAKBovineHD210000434321159039996.71 × 10−7LOC104975331
Daily ECM yield (kg) 9EARLYBovineHD190001059019365769991.57 × 10−6LOC101902244, LOC104975057, LOC512899, WFIKKN2, LUC7L3
Daily ECM yield (kg)PEAKBovineHD210000434321159039998.20 × 10−7LOC104975331
Daily fat yield (kg)EARLYBovineHD190000996819338660941.50 × 10−6LOC100296637, LOC101907886, LOC104975044, UBB, PIGL, TRPV2, CENPV
BovineHD270001000927352833071.62 × 10−6LOC104976121, ZMAT4
BovineHD280000372728129691711.58 × 10−6LOC101905153, LOC104970905, ZNF37A, LOC104970929, ZNF33B
BovineHD280000372828129701031.24 × 10−6LOC101905153, LOC104970905, ZNF37A, LOC104970929, ZNF33B
BovineHD280000373928129991081.51 × 10−6LOC101905153, LOC104970905, ZNF37A, LOC104970929, ZNF33B
BovineHD280000374728130370816.93 × 10−7LOC101905153, LOC104970905, ZNF37A, LOC104970929, ZNF33B
Daily fat yield (kg)PEAK-----
Daily protein yield (kg)EARLYBovineHD0300002517377614141.16 × 10−6ATF6
BovineHD04000164554605556501.40 × 10−6ELMO1
BovineHD04000164584605611871.40 × 10−6ELMO1
BovineHD04000164614605667651.44 × 10−6ELMO1
Daily protein yield (kg)PEAKBovineHD260000377126147738361.12 × 10−6LOC104976766, MYOF
BovineHD260000377226147752912.62 × 10−7LOC104976766, MYOF
1 The records of the traits collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 days in milk were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY) and those collected during 26 to 50 days in milk were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). 2 Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) name. 3 Bos taurus chromosome number. 4 Position of the SNP on the chromosome. 5 P value of the mixed model for single SNP association analysis. 6 Genes in 100 kb flanking regions of SNP position. Official gene symbol (Assembly UMD3.1, annotation release 103). 7 FPCM = fat- and protein-corrected milk yield 8 FCM = fat-corrected milk yield. 9 ECM = energy-corrected milk yield.
Table
Table 3. Gene ontologies (GO) terms enriched by 100 kb flanking genes for SNPs associated with milk production traits in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1.
Table 3. Gene ontologies (GO) terms enriched by 100 kb flanking genes for SNPs associated with milk production traits in the EARLY and PEAK stages of lactation 1.
EARLYPEAK
TraitGO Term DescriptionGenesGO Term DescriptionGenes
MY 2 Positive regulation of T cell chemotaxis (GO:0010820)
Regulation of T cell chemotaxis (GO:0010819)
Positive regulation of T cell migration (GO:2000406)		VWF, XCL1, XCL2
FCMY 3
FPCMY 4
ECMY 5		Negative regulation of cellular response to transforming growth factor beta stimulus (GO:1903845)
Negative regulation of transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway (GO:0030512)
Transforming growth factor beta receptor signaling pathway (GO:0007179)		WFIKKN2, LUC7L3
FY 6Establishment of mitochondrion localization, microtubule mediated (GO:0034643)
Regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway by p53 class mediator (GO:1902253)		PIGL, TRPV2, CENPV
PY 7Positive regulation of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter in response to stress (GO:0036003)
Positive of transcription from RNA polymerase II promoter in response to endoplasmic reticulum stress (GO:1990440)		ATF6, ELMO1
1 The records collected (predicted) during 9 to 25 days in milk were put into the early stage of lactation (EARLY) and those collected during 26 to 50 days in milk were put into the peak stage of lactation (PEAK). 2 Daily milk yield. 3 FPCM = daily fat- and protein-corrected milk yield. 4 FCM = daily fat-corrected milk yield. 5 ECM = daily energy-corrected milk yield. 6 Daily fat yield. 7 Daily protein yield.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zare, M.; Atashi, H.; Hostens, M. Genome-Wide Association Study for Lactation Performance in the Early and Peak Stages of Lactation in Holstein Dairy Cows. Animals 2022, 12, 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121541

AMA Style

Zare M, Atashi H, Hostens M. Genome-Wide Association Study for Lactation Performance in the Early and Peak Stages of Lactation in Holstein Dairy Cows. Animals. 2022; 12(12):1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121541

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zare, Mahsa, Hadi Atashi, and Miel Hostens. 2022. "Genome-Wide Association Study for Lactation Performance in the Early and Peak Stages of Lactation in Holstein Dairy Cows" Animals 12, no. 12: 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121541

APA Style

Zare, M., Atashi, H., & Hostens, M. (2022). Genome-Wide Association Study for Lactation Performance in the Early and Peak Stages of Lactation in Holstein Dairy Cows. Animals, 12(12), 1541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121541

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop