Next Article in Journal
Personality as a Predictor of Time-Activity Budget in Lion-Tailed Macaques (Macaca silenus)
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Enhancing Diet Quality or Dietary Supplementation of Flavor and Multi-Enzymes on Primiparous Lactating Sows
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 12
10.3390/ani12121494
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Measuring Annual Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals a Key Role of Maternal Body Condition in Determining the Size of Eggs in Snakes

by
Kun Guo
1,
Xiang-Mo Li
2,
Yan-Qing Wu
3,
Yan-Fu Qu
2,* and
Xiang Ji
1,*
1
Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Water Environment and Marine Biological Resources Protection, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China
2
Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Biodiversity and Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210042, China
3
Key Laboratory of Biosafety, Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Nanjing 210023, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(12), 1494; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121494
Submission received: 4 May 2022 / Revised: 27 May 2022 / Accepted: 7 June 2022 / Published: 8 June 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Herpetology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

We measured female reproductive traits of a colubrid snake (Lycodon rufozonatus) from Zhejiang, East China in four years (1999, 2010, 2011, and 2014). After removing the influence of female size, postpartum body mass was greater in 2010 than in 2014, clutch mass was greater in 2010 than in 2011 and 2014, and egg size was greater in 2010 than in the other three years. Egg size was positively related to postpartum body condition in each year. Females laid larger eggs in 2010 than in other three years after removing the influence of maternal size and body condition. Our study does not follow the prediction that reproductive females with different amounts of resources to invest should give priority to adjusting the number rather than size of offspring.

Abstract

Long-term studies are especially suited for disentangling the effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on both total reproductive investment and reproductive allocation in offspring number versus offspring size. Female reproductive traits of the red-banded wolf snake (Lycodon rufozonatus) from Zhejiang, East China were studied in four years between 1999 and 2014. Egg-laying dates overall extended from late June to late July, and varied among years. Postpartum body mass, clutch size, clutch mass, and egg size were positively related to female size (snout vent length, SVL) in each year. Postpartum body mass, clutch mass, and egg size differed among years after accounting for female SVL, whereas clutch size did not. Setting female SVL at the same level, postpartum body mass was greater in 2010 than in 2014, clutch mass was greater in 2010 than in 2011 and 2014, and egg size was greater in 2010 than in the other three years. Females did not trade off egg size against number. Egg size was positively related to postpartum body condition in each year. Females laid larger eggs in 2010 than in other three years after removing the influence of maternal body condition. Our study provides evidence for the traditional view that reproductive output is highly linked to maternal body size in snakes, but not following Smith and Fretwell’s (1974) classic prediction that females with different amounts of resources to invest in reproduction should give priority to adjusting the number rather than size of their offspring. Maternal body size and condition both are important sources of variation in egg size, but factors other than these two variables may also affect the size of eggs produced by female L. rufozonatus.

1. Introduction

The number and size of offspring produced by a female are of central interest in life history studies because they not only determine reproductive output but also influence microevolutionary fitness [1,2,3,4]. The classic theory of resource partitioning among individual offspring predicts that variation in resources available to females for reproduction should be reflected as changes in the number rather than the size of offspring [5]. Following this prediction, females with different amounts of resources to invest in reproduction should give priority to adjusting the number rather than size of their offspring, such that offspring size should be relatively invariant, or vary little among individuals of the same population. Contrary to this prediction, increasingly more empirical evidence from diverse animal taxa indicates that females can adjust offspring size by assessing the environment their offspring will encounter based on their own experience [6,7,8,9,10], or offspring size can vary in response to changes in total reproductive investment, fecundity, and maternal size and/or body condition [11,12,13,14].
Studies by experimentally manipulating clutch or litter size of squamate reptiles show that offspring (egg or neonate) size (mass) varies with offspring number in all species studied thus far [15,16,17,18,19,20], with only one exception of Takydromus septentrionalis [21], a lacertid lizard where females can produce up to nine clutches per breeding season [22]. Unlike females of other species reproducing less frequently, female T. septentrionalis tend to divert a fixed fraction of resources to individual offspring in a reproductive episode and channel current surplus resources into the next clutch, thereby maximizing the number of offspring produced per season [21,22,23,24]. Taken together, previous studies consistently suggest that life history trade-offs are the major constraint that conditions the resolution of resource allocation among competing demands and determines how resources allocated to reproduction are divided among individual offspring and between current and future reproductive events.
Long-term studies are especially suited for disentangling the effects of past and present, and extrinsic and intrinsic factors on both total reproductive investment and reproductive allocation in clutch or litter size versus offspring size. Squamate reptiles are well-suited for studies on offspring size variation because they often lack parental care and, in the vast majority of these animals, reproductive investment per offspring is completed at ovulation (for oviparous and viviparous species with lecithotrophy) or parturition (for viviparous species with various degrees of placentotrophy) [25]. However, as in other animal taxa, life history trade-offs in squamate reptiles are difficult to detect without measuring the traits in question over time or under contrasting environmental conditions [11,26,27]. Here, we reported data on female reproductive traits collected in four years (1999, 2010, 2011, and 2014) for an oviparous colubrid the red-banded wolf snake Lycodon (formerly Dinodon) rufozonatus (Colubridae) from Zhejiang Province, East China, paying particular attention to the traits that vary among years and factors that have a key role in determining egg size.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Species

Lycodon rufozonatus is a medium-sized (up to 1120 mm snout vent length, SVL) oviparous colubrid snake that can be found in most provinces including Taiwan of China, absent only from Inner Mongolia, Qinghai, Xinjiang, and Tibet; it also occurs in Korea, easternmost Russia, northern Laos and Vietnam, and the Ryukyu Archipelago [28]. The snake uses diverse habitats in the hilly and lowland countryside, displaying male-biased sexual size dimorphism [28]. From previous life history studies of L. rufozonatus, we know the following. First, females larger than 690 mm SVL lay a single clutch of 5–20 eggs per egg-laying season stretching from late June to late July [29]. Second, eggs can be successfully incubated at temperatures ranging from 24–30 °C, with mean incubation lengths varying from ~46 d at 30 °C and ~76 d at 24 °C [30,31]. Third, clutch size is determined about one month after winter dormancy, soon after the initiation of vitellogenesis in late April; larger females lay larger and heavier clutches than smaller ones do [29].

2.2. Animal Collection and Care

We collected 136 gravid females in mid-June of 1999 (N = 35), 2010 (N = 34), 2011 (N = 21), and 2014 (N = 48) from various localities (28°35′–30°16′ N, 119°15′–122°10′ E) in Zhejiang Province, East China. Two-way ANOVAs, with month and years as the fixed factors on climatic data (provincial mean values for daily minimal temperature, maximal temperature, mean temperature, and rainfall) downloaded from the website of China Meteorological Administration (http://www.cma.gov.cn; accessed on 28 February 2022) for the period (from April to July) soon after hibernation but before the end of the breeding season, revealed the following. First, monthly minimum, maximum, and mean temperatures varied among the four months (p < 0.001 in all cases) and among the four years (p < 0.01 in all cases). Second, monthly rainfall varied among months (F3,32 = 19.25, p < 0.001) but not among years (F3,32 = 0.09, p = 0.968). Third, the month × year interaction was a significant source of variation in monthly minimum temperature and rainfall (p < 0.05 in both cases) but not in the other two climatic variables (p > 0.05 in both cases) (Figure 1).
Females collected in each year were brought to our laboratory, where two or three individuals were housed together in each 500 × 450 × 350 mm (length × width × height) wire cage. We placed cages in a room where temperatures varied from 24–30 °C optimal for egg incubation [30]. We provided cricket frogs (Fejervarya limnocharis) and water enriched with multivitamins and minerals ad libitum. We collected and weighed eggs within 6 h post-laying and used clutch mean egg mass as a proxy for egg size throughout the text. Egg-laying date, SVL, and body mass were taken for each postpartum female. Eggs were incubated under multiple thermal conditions, and data have been [30,31] and will be reported elsewhere. We released females collected in each year at their point of capture in early August soon after the breeding season.

2.3. Data Analyses

Seven females (three in 1999, two in 2010, and two in 2014) that laid abnormal eggs with condensed yolk were excluded from analyses. Clutch mass was the total mass of eggs in a clutch, and relative clutch mass (RCM) was calculated by dividing clutch mass by postpartum body mass [32]. Maternal body condition (mass relative to SVL) was represented by residual score from the regression of loge (postpartum body mass) against loge (SVL) [26]. Within-clutch egg size variability was analyzed using the coefficient of variation [CV = 100 × (standard deviation/mean)], as was within-population variability in clutch size, clutch mass, and egg size.
All statistical analyses were performed with Statistica 8.0 (Tulsa, OK, USA). Before parametric analyses, data were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and for homogeneity of variances using Bartlett’s test. Data were loge transformed when necessary to meet the assumptions for parametric analysis. We used linear regression analysis, one-way ANOVA, one-way ANCOVA, or partial correlation analysis to analyze the data. Slope homogeneity was checked prior to ANCOVAs. Tukey’s post hoc test was performed on the traits that differed among years. Throughout this paper, values are presented as mean ± standard error (SE), and the significance level is set at p = 0.05.

3. Results

Reproductive female sizes ranged from 625–1065 mm SVL, with an overall mean SVL of 818.5 mm; mean female SVL did not differ among years (Table 1). Egg-laying dates overall extended from late June to late July and varied among years (one-way ANOVA: F3,127 = 4.89, p < 0.01), with females laying eggs significantly earlier in 2014 than in 2010 (advanced by a mean of ~3 days) and 2011 (advanced by a mean of ~5 days) (Figure 2).
Postpartum body mass (Figure 3A), clutch size (Figure 3B), and clutch mass (Figure 3C) were positively related to female SVL in each year (linear regression analysis; all p < 0.001). Egg size was positively related to female SVL, but the trend was significant only in 1999 and 2014 (linear regression analysis; both p < 0.05). The proportions of variation in egg size were explained by maternal SVL varied from 5% (2010) to 15% (1999), far smaller than the values for postpartum body mass (72–82%; Figure 3A), clutch size (47–72%; Figure 3B), and clutch mass (49–79%; Figure 3C). Postpartum body mass, clutch mass, and egg size differed among years after accounting for female SVL, whereas clutch size did not (Table 1). More specifically, SVL-adjusted mean postpartum body mass was greater in 2010 than in 2014, SVL-adjusted mean clutch mass was greater in 2010 than in 2011 and 2014, and SVL-adjusted mean egg size was greater in 2010 than in the other three years (Table 1). Mean RCM was significantly lower in 2011 than in other three years (Table 1).
Within-population clutch size variability varied from 22% (2010) to 44% (1999), with a mean of 31%. In none of the four years was the correlation between clutch size and postpartum body mass significant after controlling for maternal SVL (partial correlation analysis; all p > 0.05). Within-population clutch mass variability varied from 30% (2011) to 49% (1999), with a mean of 38%. The (positive) correlation between clutch mass and postpartum body mass was significant only in 2011 after controlling for maternal SVL (partial correlation analysis; r = 0.33, t = 1.47, df = 18, p = 0.160). Within-population egg size variability varied from 14% (2011) to 21% (2014), with a mean of 17%. Within-clutch egg size variability was much lower (varying from 2.8% to 20.1%, with a mean of 5.7%) and displayed no annual variation (Table 1). The positive correlation between egg size and postpartum body mass was significant in each year after controlling for maternal SVL (partial correlation analysis; all r > 0.38 and all p < 0.05). Females did not trade off egg size against number, as revealed by the fact that the negative correlation between clutch mean egg mass and clutch size was not significant in each year after controlling for maternal SVL (partial correlation analysis; all r > −0.31 and all p > 0.05). Mean values for egg mass differed among years after accounting for maternal body condition (ANCOVA; F3,126 = 20.87, p < 0.0001). Setting maternal body condition at the average level of 0, we found that the mean egg mass was significantly greater in 2010 (6.7 g) than in other three years (5.1–5.5 g) (Figure 4).

4. Discussion

Mean maternal SVL, SVL-adjusted mean clutch size, and mean CV of egg mass (within-clutch egg size variability) showed no significant annual variation over the four years of our study, whereas mean and SVL-adjusted mean values for all other examined traits varied substantially among years (Table 1, Figure 2). As in other ectotherms with indeterminate growth, body size and age are highly correlated in snakes [33,34,35]. Therefore, the constancy in mean maternal SVL among years presumably suggests that the age or size structure of reproductive females remains consistent from year to year in the Zhejiang meta-population of L. rufozonatus. Previtellogenic body condition, a trait highly associated with food availability [36,37,38], is crucial to the onset of vitellogenesis, with females with a poor body condition often producing fewer offspring or even skipping current opportunities for reproduction [25,39]. Therefore, one plausible explanation for the constancy in SVL-adjusted mean clutch size among years lies in the fact that previtellogenic body conditions show little or even no annual variation in L. rufozonatus. Alternatively, it might be possible that previtellogenic conditions vary substantially over the years but are always better than the lower threshold required to initiate vitellogenesis of a clutch predicted by female SVL in L. rufozonatus [29]. The constancy in CV of egg mass among years suggests that female L. rufozonatus tend to produce offspring of a similar size within individual clutches. Such a trend in maternal investment per offspring more often occurs in fairly constant or predictable environments, fitting with the prediction from the parent–offspring conflict theory for maternal investment in individual offspring [5,40].
The timing of egg laying in squamate reptiles is determined by a complex interplay of abiotic and biotic factors [37,41,42,43]. Substantial variation in reproductive timing can occur even within a single population, and may generate important fitness variation [43,44,45,46]. In the present study, the inconsistency in egg laying date among years resulted, at least partly, from annual variation in seasonal weather conditions, which are of importance for reproduction because of their influence on habitat quality, food availability, foraging performance, and thus the acquisition of capital resources for reproduction [11,26,27,47]. Here, we found that females generally laid eggs earlier in 1999 and 2014 than in other two years (Figure 2). However, as the mean date was advanced by a maximum of ~5 days, the observed yearly changes in egg-laying date would be ecologically less important.
All other factors being equal, body mass should be greater in snakes with more energy reserves. Accordingly, the inconsistency in SVL-adjusted mean postpartum body mass among years suggests that, as in the water python Liasis fuscus [39] and the Arafura filesnake Acrochordus arafurae [48], energy reserves in postpartum females vary among years in L. rufozonatus. By contrast, SVL-adjusted mean postpartum body mass remains remarkably constant in the keelback Tropidonophis mairii [26], the king ratsnake Elaphe carinata [42], the Chinese cobra Naja atra [16], the pygmy rattlesnake Sistrurus miliarius [49], and the short-tailed pit viper Gloydius brevicaudus [50], where females tend to retain a set amount of energy reserves after laying. We found that SVL-adjusted mean clutch mass varied among years (Table 1). This variation resulted primarily from annual variation in egg size, because SVL-adjusted mean clutch size showed no annual variation (Table 1). RCM is determined by two variables, postpartum body mass and clutch mass, both of which may change temporally [32]. All else being equal, females producing heavier clutches but retaining a smaller amount of energy reserves at laying would display a higher RCM. Within a single population, annual variation in RCM may be apparent if food availability varies among years [51,52]. In the following, we focus our discussion on sources of variation in egg size, which is a key source of annual variation in reproductive output in L. rufozonatus (Table 1).
It is generalizable to snakes that total energy allocated to reproduction is positively related to maternal body size, but reproductive investment per offspring varies both within and among species [25]. Larger female L. rufozonatus also laid larger and heavier clutches (Figure 3), and they did so primarily by allocating available resources to produce more rather than larger eggs, as revealed by the fact that maternal SVL explained a small proportion (up to 15%) of variation in egg size. We did not detect the egg size number trade-off in L. rufozonatum. This affirms the results reported for three colubrid snakes of the genus Ptyas, P. mucosus [53], P. korros [54], and P. dhumnades [29], where females do not trade off egg size against number. By contrast, the egg size number trade-off is significant in the king ratsnake Elaphe carinata [42] and the Chinese cobra Naja atra [37] but, in both species, there is a fixed upper limit (~1.4 times greater that the population mean egg size) to egg size not set by the maternal body volume [15,16]. Our study is the first to demonstrate that postpartum body condition is an important source of variation in egg size in L. rufozonatum, as revealed by the fact that in each year, females with a better postpartum body condition produced larger eggs (Figure 4). Females laid larger eggs in 2010 than in other three years after accounting for maternal SVL (Table 1) or postpartum body condition (Figure 4). This finding is of particular interest because it suggests that factors other than maternal body size and postpartum body condition also affect egg size in L. rufozonatus. One of the most likely factors is current food availability. In many animals, energetic costs necessary for maintenance and growth should firstly be met, with reproduction having the lowest priority in energy allocation [55]. SVL-adjusted mean postpartum body mass was greater in 2010, suggesting that reproductive females accumulated a greater amount of energy before and/or during the breeding season in that year and were therefore better able to divert their current surplus energy to the production of larger eggs.

5. Conclusions

Larger females of L. rufozonatus produced larger and heavier clutches. This provides evidence for the traditional view that reproductive output (clutch or litter mass) is highly linked to maternal body size in snakes [25,46]. Of the two variables that determine reproductive output, egg size was more variable than clutch size after removing the influence of maternal body size. Thus, our study does not follow Smith and Fretwell’s (1974) [5] prediction that females with different amounts of resources to invest in reproduction should give priority to adjusting the number rather than size of their offspring. We found that females did not trade off egg size against number. This finding suggests that in L. rufozonatus, clutch size is not a significant source of variation in egg size. Egg size was positively related to maternal body size, although such a trend was significant only in 1999 and 2014; egg size was positively related to maternal postpartum body condition in each of the four years of our study. These findings suggest that maternal body size and body condition both are important sources of variation in egg size. Interestingly, females laid larger eggs in 2010 than in the other three years after accounting for their body size or body condition. This finding suggests that factors other than maternal body size and body condition may also affect the size of eggs produced by female L. rufozonatus.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.G., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; methodology, K.G., X.-M.L., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; software, K.G., X.-M.L., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; validation, all authors; formal analysis, K.G., Y.-F.Q. and X.J., investigation, all authors; resources, Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; data curation, Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; writing—original draft preparation, K.G., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; writing—review and editing, K.G., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; visualization, K.G., Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; supervision, Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; project administration, Y.-F.Q. and X.J.; funding acquisition, Y.-F.Q., Y.-Q.W. and X.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31272294 and 32071493 to X.J., 32001111 to Y.-Q.W. and 31770443 to Y.-F.Q.) and the Zhejiang Provincial Foundation of Natural Science (RC97019 to X.J.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The work was carried out in compliance with laws on animal welfare and research in China, and approved by the Animal Research Ethical Committees of Nanjing Normal University (Approval number: IACUC-200422) and Wenzhou University (Approval number: AREC 1999-04-016). The snakes in this study were collected under the permits issued by the Zhejiang Provincial Forestry Department.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jian-Fang Gao, Long-Hui Lin, and Xue-Feng Xu for assistance in the field, and Ling Zhang for assistance in the laboratory.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Meiri, S.; Feldman, A.; Schwarz, R.; Shine, R. Viviparity does not affect the numbers and sizes of reptile offspring. J. Anim. Ecol. 2020, 89, 360–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Räsänen, K.; Söderman, F.; Laurila, A.; Merilä, J. Geographic variation in maternal investment: Acidity affects egg size and fecundity in Rana arvalis. Ecology 2008, 89, 2553–2562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Sinervo, B. The evolution of maternal investment in lizards: An experimental and comparative analysis of egg size and its effects on offspring performance. Evolution 1990, 44, 279–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Williams, T.D. Intraspecific variation in egg size and egg composition in birds: Effects on offspring fitness. Biol. Rev. 1994, 68, 35–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Smith, C.C.; Fretwell, S.D. The optimal balance between size and number of offspring. Am. Nat. 1974, 108, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bashey, F. Competition as a selective mechanism for larger offspring size in guppies. Oikos 2008, 117, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Johnston, T.A.; Leggett, W.C. Maternal and environmental gradients in the egg size of an iteroparous fish. Ecology 2002, 83, 1777–1791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jordan, M.A.; Snell, H.L. Variation in reproductive traits in a population of the lizard Lacerta vivipara. Oecologia 2002, 130, 44–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Swain, R.; Jones, S.M. Facultative placentotrophy: Half-way house or strategic solution? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 2000, 127, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Taborsky, B. Mothers determine offspring size in response to own juvenile growth conditions. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2, 225–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Bleu, J.; Massot, M.; Haussy, C.; Meylan, S. An experimental study of the gestation costs in a viviparous lizard: A hormonal manipulation. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 2013, 86, 690–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Caley, M.J.; Schwarzkopf, L.; Shine, R. Does total reproductive effort evolve independently of offspring size? Evolution 2001, 55, 1245–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Reznick, D.N.; Bryga, H.; Endler, J.A. Experimentally induced life history evolution in a natural population. Nature 1990, 346, 357–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Rollinson, N.; Brooks, R.J. Optimal offspring provisioning when egg is “constrained”: A case study with the painted turtle Chrysemys picta. Oikos 2008, 117, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ji, X.; Du, W.-G.; Li, H.; Lin, L.-H. Experimentally reducing clutch size reveals a fixed upper limit to egg size in snakes: Evidence from the king ratsnake (Elaphe carinata). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 2006, 144, 474–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ji, X.; Du, W.-G.; Qu, Y.-F.; Lin, L.-H. Nonlinear continuum of egg size-number trade-offs in a snake: Is egg-size variation fitness related? Oecologia 2009, 159, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sinervo, B.; Licht, P. Hormonal and physiological control of clutch size, egg size and egg shape in side-blotched lizards (Uta stansburiana): Constraints on the evolution of lizard life histories. J. Exp. Zool. 1991, 257, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sinervo, B.; Licht, P. Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Science 1991, 252, 1300–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Olsson, M.; Wapstra, E.; Olofsson, C. Offspring size-number strategies: Experimental manipulation of offspring size in a viviparous lizard (Lacerta vivipara). Funct. Ecol. 2002, 16, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, Z.; Xia, Y.; Ji, X. Clutch frequency affects the offspring size-number trade-off in lizards. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e16585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ji, X.; Diong, C.-H. Does follicle excision always result in enlargement of offspring size in lizards? J. Comp. Physiol. B 2006, 176, 521–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Luo, L.-G.; Ding, G.-H.; Ji, X. Income breeding and temperature-induced plasticity in reproductive traits in lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 2010, 213, 2073–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Du, W.-G.; Ji, X.; Shine, R. Does body-volume constrain reproductive output in lizards? Biol. Lett. 2005, 1, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Ji, X.; Du, W.-G.; Lin, Z.-H.; Luo, L.-G. Measuring temporal variation in reproductive output reveals optimal resource allocation to reproduction in the northern grass lizard, Takydromus septentrionalis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 91, 315–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shine, R. Life-history evolution in reptiles. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2005, 36, 23–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Brown, G.P.; Shine, R. Rain, prey and predators: Climatically driven shifts in frog abundance modify reproductive allometry in a tropical snake. Oecologia 2007, 154, 361–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tuttle, K.N.; Gregory, P.T. Reproduction of the plains garter snake, Thamnophis radix, near its northern range limit: More evidence for a “fast” life history. Copeia 2014, 2014, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, J.-P. Fauna Sinica Volume 3 (Squamata: Serpentes); Science Press: Beijing, China, 1998; pp. 130–172. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ji, X.; Sun, P.-Y.; Xu, X.-F.; Du, W.-G. Relationships among body size, clutch size, and egg size in five species of oviparous colubrid snakes from Zhoushan Islands, Zhejiang, China. Acta Zool. Sin. 2000, 46, 138–145. [Google Scholar]
  30. Ji, X.; Xu, X.-F.; Lin, Z.-H. Influence of incubation temperature on characteristics of Dinodon rufozonatum (Reptilia: Colubridae) hatchlings, with comments on the function of residual yolk. Zool. Res. 1999, 20, 342–346. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhang, Y.-P.; Ji, X. Further studies on egg incubation of an oviparous snake, Dinodon rufozonatum (Colubridae), with comments on the influence of hydric environments. Acta Zool. Sin. 2002, 48, 51–59. [Google Scholar]
  32. Shine, R. Relative clutch mass and body shape in lizards and snakes: It reproductive investment constrained or optimized? Evolution 1992, 46, 828–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Gignac, A.; Gregory, P.T. The effects of body size, age, and food intake during pregnancy on reproductive traits of a viviparous snake, Thamnophis ordinoides. Ecoscience 2005, 12, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shine, R.; Charnov, E.L. Patterns of survival, growth, and maturation in snakes and lizards. Am. Nat. 1992, 139, 1257–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Waye, H.L. Size and age structure of a population of western terrestrial garter snakes (Thamnophis elegans). Copeia 1999, 1999, 819–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ford, N.B.; Seigel, R.A. Phenotypic plasticity in reproductive traits: Evidence from a viviparous snake. Ecology 1989, 70, 1768–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ji, X.; Wang, Z.-W. Geographic variation in reproductive traits and trade-offs between size and number of eggs of the Chinese cobra (Naja atra). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2005, 85, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Seigel, R.A.; Ford, N.B. Effect of energy input on variation in clutch size and offspring size in a viviparous reptile. Funct. Ecol. 1992, 6, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Madsen, T.; Shine, R. The adjustment of reproductive threshold to prey abundance in a capital breeder. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Crespi, B.; Semeniuk, C. Parent-offspring conflict in the evolution of vertebrate reproductive mode. Am. Nat. 2004, 163, 635–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ma, L.; Liu, P.; Su, S.; Luo, L.-G.; Zhao, W.-G.; Ji, X. Life-history consequences of local adaptation in lizards: Takydromus wolteri (Lacertidae) as a model organism. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2019, 127, 88–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Qu, Y.-F.; Li, H.; Gao, J.-F.; Ji, X. Geographical variation in reproductive traits and trade-offs between size and number of eggs in the king ratsnake, Elaphe carinata. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2011, 104, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Olsson, M.; Shine, R. The seasonal timing of oviposition in sand lizards (Lacerta agilis): Why early clutches are better. J. Evol. Biol. 1997, 10, 369–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Farrell, T.M.; May, P.G.; Pilgrim, M.A. Reproduction in the rattlesnake, Sistrurus miliarius barbouri, in central Florida. J. Herpetol. 1995, 29, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Madsen, T.; Shine, R. Life-history consequences of nest-site variation in tropical pythons. Ecology 1999, 80, 989–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Shine, R. Reproductive strategies in snakes. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270, 995–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Le Galliard, J.F.; Massot, M.; Baron, J.P.; Clobert, J. Wildlife Conservation in a Changing Climate; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 2012; pp. 179–203. [Google Scholar]
  48. Madsen, T.; Shine, R. Conflicting conclusions from long-term versus short-term studies on growth and reproduction of a tropical snake. Herpetologica 2001, 59, 147–156. [Google Scholar]
  49. Farrell, T.M.; May, P.G.; Pilgrim, M.A. Repeatability of female reproductive traits in pigmy rattlesnakes (Sistrurus miliarius). J. Herpetol. 2009, 43, 332–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Gao, J.-F.; Qu, Y.-F.; Luo, L.-G.; Ji, X. Evolution of reptilian viviparity: A test of the maternal manipulation hypothesis in a temperate snake, Gloydius brevicaudus (Viperidae). Zool. Sci. 2010, 27, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seigel, R.A.; Fitch, H.S. Ecological patterns of relative clutch mass in snakes. Oecologia 1984, 61, 293–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Vitt, L.J.; Price, H.J. Ecological and evolutionary determinants of relative clutch mass in lizards. Herpetologica 1982, 38, 237–255. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lin, Z.-H.; Ji, X. Reproductive output and effects of incubation thermal environments on hatchling phenotypes of mucous ratsnake (Ptyas mucous). Acta Zool. Sin. 2004, 50, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lin, L.-H.; Mao, F.; Chen, C.; Ji, X. Reproductive traits of the gray ratsnake Ptyas korros from three geographically distinct populations. Curr. Zool. 2012, 58, 820–827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. McNab, B.K. The Physiological Ecology of Vertebrates: A View from Energetics; Comstock; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2002; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
Animals 12 01494 g001 550
Figure 1. Mean values (±SE) for monthly minimum (A), maximum (B) and mean (C) air temperatures and rainfall (D) over a four-month period from April to July in 1999 (●), 2010 (○), 2011 (▲), and 2014 (△) (http://www.cma.gov.cn; accessed on 28 February 2022).
Figure 1. Mean values (±SE) for monthly minimum (A), maximum (B) and mean (C) air temperatures and rainfall (D) over a four-month period from April to July in 1999 (●), 2010 (○), 2011 (▲), and 2014 (△) (http://www.cma.gov.cn; accessed on 28 February 2022).
Animals 12 01494 g001
Animals 12 01494 g002 550
Figure 2. Egg-laying dates in four different years. Numbers on the horizontal bars indicate the mean number of days starting from 20 June. Means with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
Figure 2. Egg-laying dates in four different years. Numbers on the horizontal bars indicate the mean number of days starting from 20 June. Means with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
Animals 12 01494 g002
Animals 12 01494 g003 550
Figure 3. Postpartum body mass (A), clutch size (B), and clutch mass (C) in relation to female snout vent length. Regression equations and coefficients are given in the figure. ◆: 1999; ◊: 2010; ▲: 2011; △: 2014.
Figure 3. Postpartum body mass (A), clutch size (B), and clutch mass (C) in relation to female snout vent length. Regression equations and coefficients are given in the figure. ◆: 1999; ◊: 2010; ▲: 2011; △: 2014.
Animals 12 01494 g003
Animals 12 01494 g004 550
Figure 4. Egg mass in relation to postpartum body condition (calculated as regression residual of postpartum body mass against SVL). All data were loge transformed. Regression lines were adjusted for the four years with a common slope (0.64) to facilitate comparisons. Years with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
Figure 4. Egg mass in relation to postpartum body condition (calculated as regression residual of postpartum body mass against SVL). All data were loge transformed. Regression lines were adjusted for the four years with a common slope (0.64) to facilitate comparisons. Years with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
Animals 12 01494 g004
Table
Table 1. Descriptive statistics, expressed as mean ± SE and range, for reproductive traits of female L. rufozonatus collected in 1999, 2010, 2011, and 2014, and results of one-way ANOVA [snout vent length (SVL) and coefficient of variation (CV) of egg mass] and ANCOVA (postpartum body mass, clutch size, clutch mass, and egg size with SVL as the covariate, and relative clutch mass with postpartum body mass as the covariate). Years with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
Table 1. Descriptive statistics, expressed as mean ± SE and range, for reproductive traits of female L. rufozonatus collected in 1999, 2010, 2011, and 2014, and results of one-way ANOVA [snout vent length (SVL) and coefficient of variation (CV) of egg mass] and ANCOVA (postpartum body mass, clutch size, clutch mass, and egg size with SVL as the covariate, and relative clutch mass with postpartum body mass as the covariate). Years with different superscripts differ significantly (Tukey’s post hoc test, α = 0.05, a > b).
YearANOVA or ANCOVA Results
1999201020112014
N32322146
Snout vent length (mm)822.6 ± 19.2
625–1065		829.4 ± 13.4
670–948		819.0 ± 16.5
693–958		807.9 ± 12.0
650–1005		F3,127 = 0.42, p = 0.742
Postpartum body mass (g)148.8 ± 12.9
47.3–378.2		161.6 ± 8.5
89.0–271.0		148.9 ± 10.5
78.0–256.5		128.1 ± 7.5
57.4–289.6		F3,126 = 4.19, p < 0.01
1999 ab, 2010 a, 2011 ab, 2014 b
Clutch size10.4 ± 0.8
3–24		9.6 ± 0.4
5–13		9.8 ± 0.6
6–18		9.6 ± 0.4
5–16		F3,126 = 0.41, p = 0.734
Clutch mass (g)58.1 ± 5.0
13.0–136.8		65.4 ± 3.7
26.1–118.6		50.3 ± 3.3
27.0–79.1		52.2 ± 3.1
20.6–106.1		F3,126 = 4.64, p < 0.01
1999 ab, 2010 a, 2011 b, 2014 b
Egg size (g)5.5 ± 0.2
4.0–7.5		6.8 ± 0.2
4.9–10.8		5.1 ± 0.2
4.0–6.3		5.4 ± 0.2
3.3–7.6		F3,126 = 14.78, p < 0.0001
1999 b, 2010 a, 2011 b, 2014 b
CV of egg size (%)6.8 ± 0.7
2.8–20.1		5.3 ± 0.5
1.7–12.8		5.0 ± 0.4
1.2–8.9		5.4 ± 0.3
2.1–11.0		F3,127 = 2.38, p = 0.073
Relative clutch mass0.40 ± 0.02
0.23–0.64		0.41 ± 0.01
0.28–0.61		0.34 ± 0.01
0.22–0.47		0.40 ± 0.01
0.20–0.73		F3,126 = 5.29, p < 0.01
1999 a, 2010 a, 2011 b, 2014 a
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, K.; Li, X.-M.; Wu, Y.-Q.; Qu, Y.-F.; Ji, X. Measuring Annual Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals a Key Role of Maternal Body Condition in Determining the Size of Eggs in Snakes. Animals 2022, 12, 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121494

AMA Style

Guo K, Li X-M, Wu Y-Q, Qu Y-F, Ji X. Measuring Annual Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals a Key Role of Maternal Body Condition in Determining the Size of Eggs in Snakes. Animals. 2022; 12(12):1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121494

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Kun, Xiang-Mo Li, Yan-Qing Wu, Yan-Fu Qu, and Xiang Ji. 2022. "Measuring Annual Variation in Reproductive Output Reveals a Key Role of Maternal Body Condition in Determining the Size of Eggs in Snakes" Animals 12, no. 12: 1494. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12121494

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop