Next Article in Journal
Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci in Nostrils and Buccal Mucosa of Healthy Camels Used for Recreational Purposes
Previous Article in Journal
Comparisons of Corn Stover Silages after Fresh- or Ripe-Corn Harvested: Effects on Digestibility and Rumen Fermentation in Growing Beef Cattle
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Animals
Volume 12
Issue 10
10.3390/ani12101254
animals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Helicobacter Species and Their Association with Gastric Pathology in a Cohort of Dogs with Chronic Gastrointestinal Signs

by
Roman Husnik
1,*,
Jiri Klimes
2,
Simona Kovarikova
3 and
Michal Kolorz
4
1
Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, 625 Harrison Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
Department of Biology and Wildlife Diseases, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
3
Department of Animal Protection, Welfare and Behavior, Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Palackeho 1/3, 612 42 Brno, Czech Republic
4
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Hospital Martin, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2022, 12(10), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101254
Submission received: 16 April 2022 / Revised: 10 May 2022 / Accepted: 11 May 2022 / Published: 13 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Clinical Studies)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Helicobacter spp. represent spiral-shaped Gram-negative bacteria that can live in the acidic environment of the stomach. While their association with peptic ulcers and gastric neoplasia in people has been clearly documented, their pathogenic potential in dogs is less well defined. Helicobacter pylori, the most prevalent Helicobacter infecting people, does not seem to represent a significant problem in small animals. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of individual gastric Helicobacter species in dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs, their association with gastric lesions, and to compare diagnostic techniques used to detect Helicobacter infection in dogs.

Abstract

Prevalence of individual Helicobacter species, data evaluating their association with gastric pathology and comparison of accuracy of diagnostic techniques are limited. The aims of this study were to determine the prevalence of gastric Helicobacter species, their association with gastric pathology, and to compare diagnostic techniques. Gastric biopsies from 84 privately-owned dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs were obtained endoscopically. Helicobacters were detected using PCR, cytology, urease test, and histopathology. PCR detected helicobacters in 71.4% of dogs. Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto (s.s.) was the predominant species. Mixed infection was detected in 40% of PCR positive dogs. Gastritis was diagnosed in 38.5% of Helicobacter positive and 47.4% of Helicobacter negative dogs. Mono-infection was associated with 2.4 times increased odds of having more severe inflammation compared to mixed infection. Erosions and ulcers were common endoscopic lesions. Cytology had sensitivity/specificity of 88.3/91.7%. Association between infection and lymphoid follicular hyperplasia was demonstrated.

1. Introduction

In humans and several animal species helicobacters have been recognized to cause chronic gastritis, gastric ulceration, and gastric neoplasia [1,2,3,4]. Helicobacter species other than H. pylori were initially referred to as “Gastrospirillum hominis” but were later reclassified under the provisional name “Helicobacter heilmannii”. Further genetic analyses revealed several types of “H. heilmannii” which in turn proved to be a group of species later described as H. suis, H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, H. salomonis, and “Candidatus H. heilmannii” [5,6]. This organism was cultivated from feline gastric mucosa and described as a valid novel species H. heilmannii [7]. The name Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto was proposed to distinguish it from Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato of earlier studies [8]. A closely related species was isolated from a dog and described as H. cynogastricus [6]. Except for H. suis, all the above-mentioned species other than H. pylori have been found in dogs. The gastric spiral bacteria that do not resemble H. pylori should be collectively referred to as gastric “non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters” (NHPH) [5,6]. The aforementioned changes in the taxonomy and nomenclature as well as the difficulty to cultivate in vitro, isolate and identify the species have caused confusion in the description of NHPH infections in both human and veterinary medicine [9,10,11]. In clinical practice, Helicobacter infection in dogs has usually been diagnosed by microscopy of cytology specimens, rapid urease test of a gastric mucosal sample, or histologic evaluation of biopsies [12]. However, none of these methods enables the species determination. Species identification usually relies on PCR using genus-specific and species-specific primers [6].
The pathogenic role of NHPH in dogs has not yet been convincingly documented [13]. Almost all dogs are naturally infected; therefore, it is difficult to find negative control animals for conclusive studies [14]. The pathologic changes are generally milder in dogs than in humans with the NHPH infection. Helicobacters are encountered at a similar prevalence in dogs with clinical signs of gastrointestinal (GI) disease, gastritis, and in normal dogs [15,16]. The improvement or resolution of clinical signs following treatment suggests a possible causal relationship between these bacteria and canine gastritis [17]. However, the gastric histological lesions usually persist even after clinically successful treatment [18,19]. The development of gastritis and vomiting in some infected dogs has been attributed to the loss of host tolerance to gastric NHPH rather than to the pathogenicity of NHPH [20]. Precise knowledge about the prevalence of individual Helicobacter species is essential to solve the questions concerning the pathogenicity and zoonotic potential of canine gastric helicobacters [21,22].
Since the prevalence of individual Helicobacter species may differ geographically [23,24,25], we conducted the present study to explore the situation in dogs in the Czech Republic. The aim of this study was to identify the prevalence of the individual Helicobacter species in a cohort of dogs with chronic GI signs from Central Europe, to evaluate the association of Helicobacter species with histologically confirmed gastritis, and to compare the accuracy of different diagnostic techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patient Selection, Clinical Evaluation

Privately owned dogs were prospectively enrolled in the study if they were referred for clinical work-up of chronic GI clinical signs (>3-week duration) after exclusion of non-GI diseases and GI foreign body between November 2010 and February 2012. Clinical signs included vomiting, diarrhea, anorexia, or weight loss. The minimal diagnostic evaluation included physical examination, complete blood count, serum biochemistry profile, urinalysis, fecal flotation, and abdominal ultrasonography. In some dogs, thoracic and/or abdominal radiographs, trypsin-like immunoreactivity, pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity, serum folate and cobalamin concentrations were performed alone or in some combination as deemed appropriate. All enrolled patients were fed a hypoallergenic diet (Hill’s Prescription Diet z/d Canine or Canine Hypoallergenic Dry Dog Food by Royal Canin) for at least 2 weeks and all medications were discontinued at least 2 weeks before the endoscopy. The study protocol was approved by the animal care committee of University of Veterinary Sciences Brno and informed consent was obtained from all dog owners.

2.2. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and Sampling

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy was performed in each dog. Pediatric gastroscope (Olympus XP 20) for toy and small and colonoscope (Olympus CF 40L) for medium and large breed dogs were used. After a 12-h fast each dog underwent general anesthesia using routine protocols. Multiple gastric biopsy samples were collected from the fundus, corpus, and antrum (usually 5 from each area). After each procedure the endoscope and biopsy forceps were cleaned and sterilized using an activated aldehyde solution (Cidex OPA, Johnson & Johnson, Irvine, CA, USA).

2.3. Helicobacter Status and Evaluation of Mucosal Inflammation

Helicobacter infection was documented in the gastric mucosa using a PCR assay of gastric biopsies, rapid urease test, cytological and histopathologic examination. PCR was considered to be the reference test in this study.
At least one (1–2) gastric mucosal biopsy sample from each dog was used to perform a rapid urease test. Two drops of solvent were added into a detection tube with dehydrated substrate (Itest plus, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic). After complete dissolution, the biopsy sample was submerged in the solution. The medium was evaluated for color change 24 h after submersion of the biopsy sample. At least one (1–2) biopsy sample per dog was used for the preparation of impression smears. These cytology specimens were stained with Giemsa-Romanowski and evaluated for presence of gastric spiral organisms under a 100x oil immersion lens.
DNA was isolated from one to two gastric mucosal biopsies using a tissue DNA isolation kit (QIAamp DNA Mini Kit®DNA, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR and nested PCR were used for the amplification of genus and species-specific sequences. Previously reported primer sequences and PCR protocols were used with modifications [26,27,28,29,30]. Primer sequences, genes detected, and size of amplification products are listed in Table 1.
Primer sequence specificity was confirmed by comparison with DNA sequences of individual Helicobacter species available in the GenBank database. PCR conditions and reaction selectivity were optimized and verified using positive DNA controls of available Helicobacter species and by DNA sequencing. The amplification parameters are listed in Supplementary file S1. Reaction volume was 20.0 μL. All PCR reactions were performed with 1U HotStarTaq® polymerase (HotStarTaq® polymerase, Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and 0.1 μL of primers (100 pmol/μL). Products of amplification were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel (Agarose, Amresco, Solon, OH, USA) and visualized with ethidium bromide under UV light.
The remaining gastric biopsies were prepared and processed for histopathological examination, fixed in buffered 10% neutral formalin, dehydrated, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned on a microtome at a thickness of 4 μm, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE) or with silver impregnation using the Warthin-Starry stain (WS). All slides were reviewed by one pathologist. Histological lesions were evaluated and screened for the presence of spiral bacteria in the surface mucus, gastric glands, and parietal cells. The severity of inflammatory changes was graded using a published system with scores from 0 (absent inflammation) to 3 (severe inflammation) [31,32]. The association between Helicobacter infection status and inflammatory infiltration, lymphatic follicular hyperplasia, epithelial injury, and presence of fibrosis was assessed.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The normality of data distribution was tested using the D’Agostino and Pearson omnibus normality test. Unless otherwise stated, data are reported as means and standard deviations. Student’s t-test was used to assess the difference in age and body weight of Helicobacter positive and negative dogs. Chi-squared test was used to assess the difference in sex distribution. The Fisher’s exact test was used to assess the association between Helicobacter infection status and any of the endoscopic findings, the presence of gastritis, epithelial injury, fibrosis, or lymphoid follicular hyperplasia and to evaluate the association between the presence of single Helicobacter species or mixed Helicobacter infection and degree of gastric inflammation. The proportional odds model was used to examine the effect of the presence of single or mixed infection on severity of gastric inflammation. Two statistical software programs were used as appropriate (GraphPad Prism, GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA; JMP Statistical Discovery, SAS, Cary, NC, USA) and a value of p < 0.05 was considered significant.

3. Results

Demographic data of 84 dogs (both Helicobacter positive and negative) enrolled into the study is given in Table 2. There was no significant difference in age (p = 0.58), body weight (p = 0.61), or sex (p = 0.11) between the two groups.
PCR detected Helicobacter DNA in 60 dogs (71.4%). Cytology of impression smears was positive in 55 of 84 dogs (65.5%). The rapid urease test was positive in 53 of 84 dogs (63.1%). Histopathologic examination of gastric biopsies revealed helicobacter in 53 of 84 dogs (63.1%) visible with both HE and WS. Comparison of different diagnostic techniques and result combination patterns for the Helicobacter spp. infection in dogs are given in Table 3.
Using a combination of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter including rapid urease test, cytology, histopathology, and PCR, 65 dogs (77.4%) had one or more positive results. Forty-two dogs (50%) were positive for all tests performed while 19 dogs (22.6%) were negative. Thus, the various diagnostic tests were concordant in 61 dogs (72.6%). Comparison of the diagnostic value of cytology, rapid urease test and histopathology to PCR is shown in Table 4.
H. heilmannii sensu stricto was detected in 38 dogs (63.3%), including mixed infections in 24 dogs, followed by H. bizzozeronii in 32 dogs (53.3%), including mixed infections in 23 dogs, H. salomonis in 4 dogs (6.7%), H. felis in 1 dog (1.7%), including mixed infection in 1 dog and undetermined Helicobacter species in 8 dogs (13.3%). Mixed infections were detected in 24 dogs (40%) with positive PCR assay. No H. pylori was found in any of the dogs. Prevalence of different Helicobacter species and associated histopathologic findings is given in Table 5.
In 22 (33.8%) positive and 6 (31.6%) negative dogs the endoscopic appearance of the gastric mucosa was normal. Overall, the most common endoscopic lesions were increased granularity of gastric mucosa and erosions or ulcers. Complete description of endoscopic findings is summarized in Table 6.
There was no correlation between Helicobacter infection status and any of the endoscopic findings. Gastritis was diagnosed histologically in 38.5% (25 of 65) of dogs positive and in 47.4% (9 of 19) of dogs negative for Helicobacter spp. Histologic gastritis score in dogs with or without Helicobacter infection is presented in Table 6. Most often, the bacteria were observed in the lumen of gastric glands or in the superficial part of the gastric mucus.
There was no association between Helicobacter infection status and the presence of gastritis and inflammatory infiltration (p = 0.30), epithelial injury (p = 0.69) or fibrosis (p = 1). Gastric lymphoid follicular hyperplasia was detected more frequently and was more extensive in Helicobacter infected than non-infected dogs (p = 0.034).
There was a significant difference in the degree of inflammation of dogs with single compared to mixed Helicobacter infection (p = 0.003). Helicobacter mono-infection was associated with 2.4 times increased odds of having more severe inflammation (p = 0.012).

4. Discussion

This study identified the prevalence of individual Helicobacter species and assessed their association with histologically confirmed gastritis in a large sample of dogs presented with chronic GI clinical signs. A significantly higher degree of inflammation in dogs with single compared to mixed Helicobacter infection was detected. Gastric lymphoid follicular hyperplasia was more frequently associated and was more extensive in Helicobacter infected than non-infected dogs. Although not statistically significant, common endoscopic lesions were erosions or ulcers. Diagnostic value of invasive tests was determined.
Using a combination of diagnostic tests, 77.4% dogs in this cohort were Helicobacter positive. Similar prevalence (74–95%) was reported in different groups of dogs with GI signs [33,34,35]. In dogs from random sources (with or without GI signs), Helicobacter was detected in 77–92% [10,24,36,37,38,39]. In healthy dogs (privately owned or laboratory dogs), the prevalence of gastric Helicobacter infection was 67–100% [1,21,40,41,42,43].
H. heilmannii sensu stricto was the predominant Helicobacter species in this study. This species was also frequently documented in other studies [21,24,33,39,44]. However, due to changes in the taxonomy of Helicobacter spp., it is difficult to compare the prevalence of H. heilmannii sensu stricto in this study with data from older studies in which a positive result for H. heilmannii may have included species such as H. felis, H. bizzozeronii, or H. salomonis in addition to H. heilmannii sensu stricto. In addition, geographic differences in the occurrence of NHPH species have been documented [24,44].
The second most prevalent Helicobacter in this study was H. bizzozeronii, which is generally considered the prevailing NHPH species in dogs [13,14,15,20,23,24,33]. It was identified in 55.6% of canine gastric biopsies [14], in 65% of infected dogs [33] and 70% of canine gastric samples (20% as single, 50% as mixed infections) [24]. H. bizzozeronii–like organisms was reported as the predominant species in colony-raised Beagle dogs [40].
H. salomonis has only sporadically been detected in dogs (8–9%) [15,24]. More than 50% of investigated Portuguese dogs harbored H. salomonis, mostly in mixed infections [39]. This species was the only Helicobacter sp. not found in mixed infections in this study.
Using PCR, H. felis was found in 4.8% of examined dogs [38], in 8.7% and 11.9% of infected dogs [33,45] and isolated from 22.2% of gastric biopsies [14]. More than 50% of the investigated Belgian dogs harboured H. felis, mostly in mixed infections [24].
In 13.3% of Helicobacter-positive dogs, the species remained undetermined. We have not attempted to demonstrate the recently described species H. cynogastricus or “H. rappini” and H. bilis that were previously isolated from the canine stomach [42,46].
No H. pylori was found in dogs examined in the study reported here. According to overwhelming majority of studies, H. pylori, the most prevalent species in humans, is virtually absent in dogs and thus it is unlikely that dogs play an important role in the transmission of this organism to humans. To our knowledge, there are only a few reports of H. pylori infection in dogs [29,44,47,48,49].
It is now a well-known fact that different Helicobacter species co-inhabit the same regions of the gastric mucosa [23]. Mixed infections were identified in gastric samples from 16.7% to 48.5% of dogs [24,33,39] and the fundic mucosa was co-infected with H. bizzozeronii and H. felis in all asymptomatic Beagle dogs [20]. This high rate of mixed infections detected in canine stomachs is in contrast to their low prevalence in human samples (16.3%) [24]. In the present study, a correlation between the presence of mixed infection (including H. heilmannii and H. bizzozeronii) and the lower degree of gastric inflammation compared to mono-infection was detected. Competitive inhibition may occur in gastric helicobacteriosis; the infection by one organism suppresses proliferation of other helicobacters. This phenomenon has been suggested as a reason for the rare occurrence of concurrent infection with NHPH and H. pylori in humans and nonhuman primates [50,51]. H. heilmannii infection might protect from infection with H. pylori [52]. Furthermore, when puppies with gastric H. salomonis were experimentally infected with H. bizzozeronii, infection by H. salomonis was suppressed [53].
Different Helicobacter species or even strains differ in their virulence factors and pathogenicity [10,15,22]. Due to taxonomic inconsistency and diagnostic difficulties, the majority of earlier studies usually did not discriminate between individual NHPH species. Notable exceptions are represented by several descriptions of a link between experimental or natural infection with certain NHPH species (now separated from the former “H. heilmannii”) and gastric pathology [5,6,22,33,37]. The most pronounced histopathologic lesions in the present study were found in association with H. bizzozeronii and H. heilmannii sensu stricto. The findings include severe LPG (11.1%) and acute purulent-necrotic gastritis in single H. bizzozeronii infections and moderate LPG (14.3%) in single H. heilmannii sensu stricto infection. H. bizzozeronii induced mild to moderate lymphocytic and neutrophilic infiltration in the gastric antrum of some Mongolian gerbils, which was sometimes accompanied by parietal cell loss [54]. Overall, H. bizzozeronii appears to be more host-adapted in dogs and associated with a lower pathogenicity than H. pylori or H. felis [20,55,56]. Infection with nine different H. heilmannii sensu stricto isolates in the Mongolian gerbil model showed that strains had different abilities to colonize the stomach. Furthermore, 78% of the strains induced chronic active gastritis and lymphocytic aggregation [22]. Overall, these studies demonstrate that not only are there differences in the bacterium-host interactions between diverse NHPH species, but there are also differences in the pathogenic potential in strains within the same species. Further studies are necessary to determine the virulence factors involved and their putative associations with disease [57].
Numerous detection methods for the presence of Helicobacter spp. have been developed. Each one has advantages and disadvantages [58]. There is a need for a reference method to be used as “gold diagnostic method.” Unfortunately, none of the currently used methods can meet this criterion. PCR based diagnosis may be considered as gold standard by designing primers specific to target genes-the approach used in this study. Another solution is to combine the results of two or more techniques and compare with results of each method being evaluated [58].
It is not possible to differentiate individual NHPH species by traditional bacteriological methods. In addition, it is also difficult using molecular techniques, since there is a high interspecies similarity in gene sequences which can lead to confusion between closely related species [9,59,60]. On the other hand, the genetic diversity within certain species can be very high [61]. PCR-based techniques are the preferred method for conclusive Helicobacter species identification [24,62]. However, the choice of the target gene is of major importance [6]. For example, 16S rDNA-based PCR assay targeting a 78-bp DNA fragment cannot discriminate between H. bizzozeronii, H. salomonis and H. felis, but detects these species as a group [27]. However, tests based on detection or sequencing of the hsp60 gene, the urease A and B genes or gyrB gene allow identification of NHPH to the species level [5]. For three dogs (3.6%) negative by all other diagnostic tests, PCR results were positive. This suggests that the degree of colonization might be too low to be detected by microscopy-based techniques. For three dogs (3.6%) positive by cytology and/or histologic examination, PCR results were negative. Perhaps these negative results were due to the patchy distribution of organisms within the stomach or Helicobacter spp. whose DNA our primers were unable to amplify.
In earlier studies, cytology was found to be reliable for detecting Helicobacter infection in dogs. It was more sensitive than histologic examination or the rapid urease test and can be therefore considered the method of choice for demonstrating NHPH [12,15,37]. However, the extent and intensity of concurrent gastritis cannot be evaluated [63]. Because of the patchy distribution of organisms within the stomach, examination of samples from multiple locations in the corpus and fundus increases sensitivity [64]. For exact species determination, cytology is unreliable [9,14,42,64,65,66].
Histopathologic examination is considered less sensitive than cytology; only 66% of stomachs were Helicobacter-positive on histopathology compared to 84% positivity of direct microscopic examination [37]. Its sensitivity (92%) is somewhat better than that of the urease test (85–87%) [12] or worse [37], based on selected literature. In this study, histology had the lowest sensitivity and specificity of all methods used. Helicobacters associated with the mucosal surface or localized within gastric pits are relatively easy to detect with routine HE staining of tissues [64]. However, bacteria in gastric glands and glandular epithelial cells should be more readily detected with a modified silver stain. The WS technique should be significantly more sensitive than HE staining [67]. Although some authors claim that silver stains are needed to identify these organisms, others state that the WS technique revealed NHPH in only one of the samples in which HE staining had failed to detect them [12]. In this study, both staining techniques yielded identical results. It may also be important to mention that organisms could be lost in the process of fixation/paraffin embedding.
The urease test is generally less sensitive than cytology; it was positive in 72% of examined canine stomachs compared to 84% positivity of direct microscopic observation [37]. It is also less sensitive than Helicobacter genus-specific PCR assay and histology [33,38,62]. Compared to PCR as a reference technique, the urease test had a sensitivity of 86.4% and a specificity of 66.7% [33]. This sensitivity of the rapid urease test is comparable with data in the present study; however, specificity in this study is substantially higher. In 12 dogs in this study (14.3%) the urease test was negative while some or all other tests yielded positive results. False negative results can be caused by the patchy distribution of bacteria within the stomach, bleeding or the use of drugs that decrease acid secretion, since increase in pH alters the activity of urease [26,58,64]. Negative results can also be associated with a small number of helicobacters in the sample [37] or with rare urease-negative Helicobacter spp. [58,63]. When the NHPH-count is low, the number of positive results increases with the time after which the test is read [12,16]. In one dog of 84 (1.2%) only the urease test was positive. A possible false positive cannot be excluded. Other bacteria which can occur in the stomach such as Proteus mirabilis or Pseudomonas aeruginosa produce urease that can lead to a false positive test result for Helicobacter spp. [12]. The urease test does not give any information about the species identity.
Direct association between Helicobacter colonization and the degree of gastric pathology was not found in the present study. This is in agreement with previous studies in which gastritis was not directly linked to the degree of colonization and no significant association was detected between the intensity of Helicobacter infection and degree of gastric inflammation [15,33,37,39,41,42,43,68,69]. In dogs with Helicobacter infection, normal gastric histologic findings were recorded for more clinically normal animals than for those with chronic vomiting [15].
Gastric NHPH infections in humans can cause chronic active gastritis with mainly focal, less severe lesions than those seen during H. pylori infection. Although NHPH are less frequently associated with erosions, ulceration, or neoplasia [70,71], infection with NHPH in humans has been associated with gastritis, peptic ulcer disease and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma [5,11,22,24,26,28,59,72]. In dogs, pathologic changes linked with the NHPH infection are generally even milder than those observed in humans. Therefore, the finding of erosions/ulcers as frequent endoscopic lesions, and frequently encountered microscopic epithelial injury and purulent-necrotic gastritis in Helicobacter-positive dogs encountered in this study was somewhat surprising. Although GI ulcers or neoplasia generally have not been associated with Helicobacter infection in dogs, and no association has been made between Helicobacter infection and GI ulcers [73] and erosions (they are found only rarely [74]), mucosal defects ranging from small erosions to ulceration have been reported in 2.2% of asymptomatic infected experimental Beagle dogs [40].
Gastric inflammation in NHPH infection is generally mononuclear in nature and ranges from mild to moderate in severity [20,21,34,42]. Gastric lymphoid follicular hyperplasia accompanies infection in some but not all animals [1,15,16,73,74]. Gastric lymphoid hyperplasia appears to be more common and more extensive in Helicobacter infected than uninfected dogs and cats [73,75], which is also supported by this study. Although fibrosis was found in 45–59% of examined canine stomachs, it did not seem to be associated with the presence of helicobacters [16]. No association between the presence of fibrosis and Helicobacter infection was found in the present study.
The high prevalence of gastric infection with NHPH in healthy and sick dogs indicates that there is no simple “infection-disease” relationship in dogs. Thus, it may be inferred that Helicobacter spp. are not pathogenic in dogs and are more commensals than pathogens. Therefore, the development of gastritis and vomiting in some infected dogs can perhaps be attributed to the loss of tolerance to gastric NHPH rather than to their pathogenicity. Using a mouse H. pylori-infection model, it has been reported that the development of tolerance to H. pylori protects from gastric cancer precursor lesions. Thus, different susceptibility of infected individuals to H. pylori might be associated with variable disease manifestations [76]. It has also been reported that despite a high level of colonization and ultrastructural findings, no clinical signs and only mild histological gastritis were observed in research colony dogs, suggesting that immune tolerance might be involved in canine Helicobacter spp. infection [20]. However, this view may be somewhat inaccurate as prevalence of H. pylori in humans is over 80% in some countries, but only a relatively small number (15–20%) of them have overt clinical signs of infection [4,73]. Additionally, although H. pylori is a well-adapted and highly abundant resident of the gastric environment in people, if present it is not alone. At least 262 different phylotypes have been identified in the human stomach [75,77,78,79], though H. pylori is dramatically more abundant than other members of the community, accounting for up to 97% of all sequences [75,77]. Also, H. pylori infection has been associated with distinct gastric microbial community structures [80], which may in part determine the outcome of H. pylori infection.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs are frequently infected by helicobacters other than H. pylori. PCR with suitable primers is the method of choice for detection, and that can differentiate between individual Helicobacter species. H. heilmannii sensu stricto was the predominant Helicobacter species in this study. Cytology and rapid urease test performed on gastric biopsy samples may be reliable diagnostic methods suitable for clinical practice. Helicobacter mono-infection was associated with an increased risk of having more severe inflammation. An association between infection and lymphoid follicular hyperplasia was demonstrated. NHPH infection should be considered in cases of gastric erosions and ulcers. An association between Helicobacter infection status and presence of gastritis was not found. NHPH species colonizing stomach of dogs and their zoonotic potential certainly deserve further research attention.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ani12101254/s1.

Author Contributions

Hypothesis generation and experimental design, R.H. and J.K.; organizing and conducting the experiment, R.H. and M.K. (PCR assay); interpreting and analyzing the results, R.H. and M.K. (PCR assay); writing and revising the manuscript, R.H., S.K., J.K. and M.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Internal Grant Agency of the University of Veterinary Sciences Brno (No. 31/2010/FVL).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study protocol was approved by the animal care committee of University of Veterinary Sciences Brno (IGA VFU Brno: 31/2010/FVL). All procedures were conducted in compliance with the ethical principles of good practice in animal experimentation and with previous informed consent from the owners.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all dog owners involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

Petr Fictum for histopathological examination. This has been presented in part as an abstract (poster) at the 2016 American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine Forum, Denver, Colorado.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Henry, G.A.; Long, P.H.; Burns, J.L.; Charbonneau, D.L. Gastric spirillosis in beagles. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1987, 48, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Marshall, B.J.; Warren, J.R. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet 1984, 1, 1311–1315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kusters, J.G.; van Vliet, A.H.; Kuipers, E.J. Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006, 19, 449–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Ingram, R.J.M. Peptic ulcer disease. In Yamada’s Textbook of Gastroenterology, 6th ed.; Podolsky, D.K., Camilleri, M., Fitz, J.G., Kalloo, A.N., Shanahan, F., Wang, T.C., Eds.; Wiley-Blackwell: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 1032–1077. [Google Scholar]
  5. Haesebrouck, F.; Pasmans, F.; Flahou, B.; Chiers, K.; Baele, M.; Meyns, T.; Decostere, A.; Ducatelle, R. Gastric helicobacters in domestic animals and nonhuman primates and their significance for human health. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2009, 22, 202–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Baele, M.; Pasmans, F.; Flahou, B.; Chiers, K.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacters detected in the stomach of humans comprise several naturally occurring Helicobacter species in animals. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 2009, 55, 306–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Smet, A.; Flahou, B.; D’Herde, K.; Vandamme, P.; Cleenwerck, I.; Ducatelle, R.; Pasmans, F.; Haesebrouck, F. Helicobacter heilmannii sp. Nov., isolated from feline gastric mucosa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Haesebrouck, F.; Pasmans, F.; Flahou, B.; Smet, A.; Vandamme, P.; Ducatelle, R. Non-Helicobacter pylori helicobacter species in the human gastric mucosa: A proposal to introduce the terms H. heilmannii sensu lato and sensu stricto. Helicobacter 2011, 16, 339–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Jalava, K.; Kaartinen, M.; Utriainen, M.; Happonen, I.; Hanninen, M.L. Helicobacter salomonis sp. Nov., a canine gastric Helicobacter sp. related to Helicobacter felis and Helicobacter bizzozeronii. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1997, 47, 975–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cattoli, G.; van Vugt, R.; Zanoni, R.G.; Sanguinetti, V.; Chiocchetti, R.; Gualtieri, M.; Vandenbroucke-Grauls, C.M.; Gaastra, W.; Kusters, J.G. Occurrence and characterization of gastric Helicobacter spp. in naturally infected dogs. Vet. Microbiol. 1999, 70, 239–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. De Groote, D.; Van Doorn, L.J.; Van den Bulck, K.; Vandamme, P.; Vieth, M.; Stolte, M.; Debongnie, J.C.; Burette, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. Detection of non-pylori helicobacter species in “Helicobacter heilmannii”-infected humans. Helicobacter 2005, 10, 398–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Happonen, I.; Saari, S.; Castren, L.; Tyni, O.; Hanninen, M.L.; Westermarck, E. Comparison of diagnostic methods for detecting gastric Helicobacter-like organisms in dogs and cats. J. Comp. Pathol. 1996, 115, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Recordati, C.; Gualdi, V.; Craven, M.; Sala, L.; Luini, M.; Lanzoni, A.; Rishniw, M.; Simpson, K.W.; Scanziani, E. Spatial distribution of Helicobacter spp. in the gastrointestinal tract of dogs. Helicobacter 2009, 14, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jalava, K.; On, S.L.; Vandamme, P.A.; Happonen, I.; Sukura, A.; Hanninen, M.L. Isolation and identification of Helicobacter spp. from canine and feline gastric mucosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1998, 64, 3998–4006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Happonen, I.; Linden, J.; Saari, S.; Karjalainen, M.; Hanninen, M.L.; Jalava, K.; Westermarck, E. Detection and effects of helicobacters in healthy dogs and dogs with signs of gastritis. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1998, 213, 1767–1774. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Yamasaki, K.; Suematsu, H.; Takahashi, T. Comparison of gastric lesions in dogs and cats with and without gastric spiral organisms. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1998, 212, 529–533. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Leib, M.S.; Duncan, R.B.; Ward, D.L. Triple antimicrobial therapy and acid suppression in dogs with chronic vomiting and gastric Helicobacter spp. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2007, 21, 1185–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Happonen, I.; Linden, J.; Westermarck, E. Effect of triple therapy on eradication of canine gastric helicobacters and gastric disease. J. Small Anim. Pract. 2000, 41, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Jergens, A.E.; Pressel, M.; Crandell, J.; Morrison, J.A.; Sorden, S.D.; Haynes, J.; Craven, M.; Baumgart, M.; Simpson, K.W. Fluorescence in situ hybridization confirms clearance of visible Helicobacter spp. associated with gastritis in dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2009, 23, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lanzoni, A.; Faustinelli, I.; Cristofori, P.; Luini, M.; Simpson, K.W.; Scanziani, E.; Recordati, C. Localization of Helicobacter spp. in the fundic mucosa of laboratory beagle dogs: An ultrastructural study. Vet. Res. 2011, 42, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Neiger, R.; Tschudi, M.E.; Burnens, A.; Göke, B.; Schmassmann, A. Diagnosis and identification of gastric Helicobacter species by polymerase chain reaction in dogs. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 1999, 11, 234–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Joosten, M.; Blaecher, C.; Flahou, B.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F.; Smet, A. Diversity in bacterium-host interactions within the species Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto. Vet. Res. 2013, 44, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Priestnall, S.L.; Wiinberg, B.; Spohr, A.; Neuhaus, B.; Kuffer, M.; Wiedmann, M.; Simpson, K.W. Evaluation of “Helicobacter heilmannii” subtypes in the gastric mucosas of cats and dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2144–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Van den Bulck, K.; Decostere, A.; Baele, M.; Driessen, A.; Debongnie, J.C.; Burette, A.; Stolte, M.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Identification of non-Helicobacter pylori spiral organisms in gastric samples from humans, dogs, and cats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 2256–2260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Fritz, E.L.; Slavik, T.; Delport, W.; Olivier, B.; van der Merwe, S.W. Incidence of Helicobacter felis and the effect of coinfection with Helicobacter pylori on the gastric mucosa in the african population. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 1692–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Neiger, R.; Dieterich, C.; Burnens, A.; Waldvogel, A.; Corthesy-Theulaz, I.; Halter, F.; Lauterburg, B.; Schmassmann, A. Detection and prevalence of Helicobacter infection in pet cats. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1998, 36, 634–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. De Groote, D.; Haesebrouck, F.; van Doorn, L.J.; Vandamme, P.; Ducatelle, R. Evaluation of a group-specific 16s ribosomal DNA-based PCR for detection of Helicobacter bizzozeronii, Helicobacter felis, and Helicobacter salomonis in fresh and paraffin-embedded gastric biopsy specimens. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 1197–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Trebesius, K.; Adler, K.; Vieth, M.; Stolte, M.; Haas, R. Specific detection and prevalence of Helicobacter heilmannii-like organisms in the human gastric mucosa by fluorescent in situ hybridization and partial 16s ribosomal DNA sequencing. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 1510–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Kubiak, K. Colonization of gastric mucosa in dogs and cats with microorganisms of Helicobacter spp.—clinical aspect. Zesz. Nauk. Akad. Rol. We Wroclawiu. Rozpr. CCXLII 2006, 543, 1–104. [Google Scholar]
  30. Smet, A.; Van Nieuwerburgh, F.; Ledesma, J.; Flahou, B.; Deforce, D.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Genome sequence of Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto asb1 isolated from the gastric mucosa of a kitten with severe gastritis. Genome Announc. 2013, 1, e00033-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Washabau, R.J.; Day, M.J.; Willard, M.D.; Hall, E.J.; Jergens, A.E.; Mansell, J.; Minami, T.; Bilzer, T.W.; Group, W.I.G.S. Endoscopic, biopsy, and histopathologic guidelines for the evaluation of gastrointestinal inflammation in companion animals. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2010, 24, 10–26. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Day, M.J.; Bilzer, T.; Mansell, J.; Wilcock, B.; Hall, E.J.; Jergens, A.; Minami, T.; Willard, M.; Washabau, R.; World Small Animal Veterinary Association Gastrointestinal Standardization Group. Histopathological standards for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal inflammation in endoscopic biopsy samples from the dog and cat: A report from the world small animal veterinary association gastrointestinal standardization group. J. Comp. Pathol. 2008, 138 (Suppl. 1), S1–S43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Wiinberg, B.; Spohr, A.; Dietz, H.H.; Egelund, T.; Greiter-Wilke, A.; McDonough, S.P.; Olsen, J.; Priestnall, S.; Chang, Y.F.; Simpson, K.W. Quantitative analysis of inflammatory and immune responses in dogs with gastritis and their relationship to Helicobacter spp. infection. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2005, 19, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hermanns, W.; Kregel, K.; Breuer, W.; Lechner, J. Helicobacter-like organisms: Histopathological examination of gastric biopsies from dogs and cats. J. Comp. Pathol. 1995, 112, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Polanco, R.; Salazar, V.; Reyes, N.; Garcia-Amado, M.A.; Michelangeli, F.; Contreras, M. High prevalence of DNA from non-H. pylori helicobacters in the gastric mucosa of venezuelan pet dogs and its histological alterations. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 2011, 53, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Strauss-Ayali, D.; Simpson, K.W.; Schein, A.H.; McDonough, P.L.; Jacobson, R.H.; Valentine, B.A.; Peacock, J. Serological discrimination of dogs infected with gastric Helicobacter spp. and uninfected dogs. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 1280–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Diker, K.S.; Haziroglu, R.; Akan, M.; Celik, S.; Kabakci, N. The prevalence, colonization sites and pathological effects of gastric helicobacters in dogs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2002, 26, 345–351. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hwang, C.Y.; Han, H.R.; Youn, H.Y. Prevalence and clinical characterization of gastric Helicobacter species infection of dogs and cats in Korea. J. Vet. Sci. 2002, 3, 123–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Amorim, I.; Smet, A.; Alves, O.; Teixeira, S.; Saraiva, A.L.; Taulescu, M.; Reis, C.; Haesebrouck, F.; Gartner, F. Presence and significance of Helicobacter spp. in the gastric mu.ucosa of Portuguese dogs. Gut Pathog. 2015, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Vajner, L.; Vortel, V.; Sýkorová, B.; Brejcha, A.; Zocova, J. Helicobacter gastritis in beagle dogs. Review of 33 cases in a breeding colony. Eur. J. Vet. Pathol. 2000, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  41. Gombac, M.; Tanja, S.; Manica, C.; Pogacnik, M. Histological changes in stomachs of apparently healthy dogs infected with Helicobacter. Acta Vet. Beogr. 2010, 60, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Eaton, K.A.; Dewhirst, F.E.; Paster, B.J.; Tzellas, N.; Coleman, B.E.; Paola, J.; Sherding, R. Prevalence and varieties of Helicobacter species in dogs from random sources and pet dogs: Animal and public health implications. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1996, 34, 3165–3170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Happonen, I.; Saari, S.; Castren, L.; Tyni, O.; Hanninen, M.L.; Westermarck, E. Occurrence and topographical mapping of gastric Helicobacter-like organisms and their association with histological changes in apparently healthy dogs and cats. J. Vet. Med. A 1996, 43, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Kubota-Aizawa, S.; Ohno, K.; Fukushima, K.; Kanemoto, H.; Nakashima, K.; Uchida, K.; Chambers, J.K.; Goto-Koshino, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Sekizaki, T.; et al. Epidemiological study of gastric Helicobacter spp. in dogs with gastrointestinal disease in Japan and diversity of Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto. Vet. J. 2017, 225, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Neiger, R.; Seiler, G.; Schmassmann, A. Use of a urea breath test to evaluate short-term treatments for cats naturally infected with Helicobacter heilmannii. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1999, 60, 880–883. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Van den Bulck, K.; Decostere, A.; Baele, M.; Vandamme, P.; Mast, J.; Ducatelle, R.; Haesebrouck, F. Helicobacter cynogastricus sp nov., isolated from the canine gastric mucosa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 2006, 56, 1559–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Buczolits, S.; Hirt, R.; Rosengarten, R.; Busse, H.J. PCR-based genetic evidence for occurrence of Helicobacter pylori and novel Helicobacter species in the canine gastric mucosa. Vet. Microbiol. 2003, 95, 259–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kubiak, K.; Jankowski, M.; Spuzak, J.; Glińska-Suchocka, K.; Skała, J.; Gościniak, G.; Nicpoń, J. Application of classical-PCR, nested-PCR and seminested-PCR in identification of Helicobacter species colonizing gastric mucosa in dogs with gastritis. In Proceedings of the 19th ECVIM-CA Congress, Porto, Portugal, 8–10 September 2009. Porto, poster No 7. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kubota, S.; Ohno, K.; Fukushima, K.; Kanemoto, H.; Goto-Koshino, Y.; Nakashima, K.; Uchida, K.; Sekizaki, T.; Tsujimoto, H. Prevalence of novel Helicobacter strains in Japan. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2015, 29, 1206. [Google Scholar]
  50. Dubois, A.; Fiala, N.; Hemanackah, L.M.; Drazek, E.S.; Tarnawski, A.; Fishbein, W.N.; Perezperez, G.I.; Blaser, M.J. Natural gastric infection with Helicobacter pylori in monkeys—A model for spiral bacteria infection in humans. Gastroenterology 1994, 106, 1405–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lee, A.; Fox, J.; Hazell, S. Pathogenicity of Helicobacter-pylori—A perspective. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 1601–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Stolte, M.; Wellens, E.; Bethke, B.; Ritter, M.; Eidt, H. Helicobacter heilmannii (formerly Gastrospirillum-hominis) gastritis—An infection transmitted by animals. Scand. J. Gastroentero 1994, 29, 1061–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Hanninen, M.L.; Happonen, I.; Jalava, K. Transmission of canine gastric Helicobacter salomonis infection from dam to offspring and between puppies. Vet. Microbiol. 1998, 62, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. De Bock, M.; D’Herde, K.; Duchateau, L.; Hellemans, A.; Decostere, A.; Haesebrouck, F.; Ducatelle, R. The effect of Helicobacter felis and Helicobacter bizzozeronii on the gastric mucosa in mongolian gerbils: A sequential pathological study. J. Comp. Pathol. 2006, 135, 226–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Schott, T.; Kondadi, P.K.; Hanninen, M.L.; Rossi, M. Comparative genomics of Helicobacter pylori and the human-derived Helicobacter bizzozeronii-1 strain reveal the molecular basis of the zoonotic nature of non-pylori gastric Helicobacter infections in humans. BMC Genom. 2011, 12, 534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Peyrol, S.; Lecoindre, P.; Berger, I.; Deleforge, J.; Chevallier, M. Differential pathogenic effect of two Helicobacter-like organisms in dog gastric mucosa. J. Submicrosc. Cytol. Pathol. 1998, 30, 425–433. [Google Scholar]
  57. Bento-Miranda, M.; Figueiredo, C. Helicobacter heilmannii sensu lato: An overview of the infection in humans. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 17779–17787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Patel, S.K.; Pratap, C.B.; Jain, A.K.; Gulati, A.K.; Nath, G. Diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori: What should be the gold standard? World J. Gastroentero 2014, 20, 12847–12859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. O’Rourke, J.L.; Solnick, J.V.; Neilan, B.A.; Seidel, K.; Hayter, R.; Hansen, L.M.; Lee, A. Description of ‘Candidatus Helicobacter heilmannii’ based on DNA sequence analysis of 16s rrna and urease genes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micr. 2004, 54, 2203–2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Dewhirst, F.E.; Shen, Z.L.; Scimeca, M.S.; Stokes, L.N.; Boumenna, T.; Chen, T.T.; Paster, B.J.; Fox, J.G. Discordant 16s and 23s rrna gene phylogenies for the genus Helicobacter: Implications for phylogenetic inference and systematics. J. Bacteriol. 2005, 187, 6106–6118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hanninen, M.L.; Hirvi, U. Genetic diversity of canine gastric helicobacters, Helicobacter bizzozeronii and H. salomonis studied by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. J. Med. Microbiol. 1999, 48, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Baele, M.; Van den Bulck, K.; Decostere, A.; Vandamme, P.; Hanninen, M.L.; Ducatelle, R.; HaeseBrouck, F. Multiplex PCR assay for differentiation of Helicobacter felis, H.bizzozeronii, and H. salomonis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 1115–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Neiger, R.; Simpson, K.W. Helicobacter infection in dogs and cats: Facts and fiction. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000, 14, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Leib, M.S.; Duncan, R.B. Gastric Helicobacter spp. and chronic vomiting in dogs. In Kirk’s Current Veterinary Therapy Xiv; Bonagura, J.D., Twedt, D.C., Eds.; Saunders: Saint Louis, MO, USA, 2009; pp. 492–497. [Google Scholar]
  65. Fawcett, P.T.; Gibney, K.M.; Vinette, K.M. Helicobacter pylori can be induced to assume the morphology of Helicobacter heilmannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1999, 37, 1045–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Shahamat, M.; Alavi, M.; Watts, J.E.; Gonzalez, J.M.; Sowers, K.R.; Maeder, D.W.; Robb, F.T. Development of two PCR-based techniques for detecting helical and coccoid forms of Helicobacter pylori. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3613–3619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Prachasilpchai, W.; Nuanualsuwan, S.; Chatsuwan, T.; Techangamsuwan, S.; Wangnaitham, S.; Sailasuta, A. Diagnosis of Helicobacter spp. infection in canine stomach. J. Vet. Sci. 2007, 8, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Ritchey, J.W.; Davis, M.S.; Breshears, M.A.; Willard, M.D.; Williamson, K.K.; Royer, C.M.; Payton, M.E.; Cragun, A.S. Gastritis in Alaskan racing sled dogs. J. Comp. Pathol. 2011, 145, 68–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Simpson, K.W.; McDonough, P.L.; Strauss-Ayali, D.; Chang, Y.F.; Harpending, P.; Valentine, B.A. Helicobacter felis infection in dogs: Effect on gastric structure and function. Vet. Pathol. 1999, 36, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Stolte, M.; Kroher, G.; Meining, A.; Morgner, A.; Bayerdorffer, E.; Bethke, B. A comparison of Helicobacter pylori and H. heilmannii gastritis. A matched control study involving 404 patients. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1997, 32, 28–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Morgner, A.; Bayerdorffer, E.; Meining, A.; Stolte, M.; Kroher, G. Helicobacter heilmannii and gastric-cancer. Lancet 1995, 346, 511–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Matsumoto, T.; Kawakubo, M.; Akamatsu, T.; Koide, N.; Ogiwara, N.; Kubota, S.; Sugano, M.; Kawakami, Y.; Katsuyama, T.; Ota, H. Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto-related gastric ulcers: A case report. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 3376–3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Simpson, K.; Neiger, R.; DeNovo, R.; Sherding, R. The relationship of Helicobacter spp. infection to gastric disease in dogs and cats. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2000, 14, 223–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Geyer, C.; Colbatzky, F.; Lechner, J.; Hermanns, W. Occurrence of spiral-shaped bacteria in gastric biopsies of dogs and cats. Vet. Rec. 1993, 133, 18–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Bienes, T.; Leal, R.O.; Dominguez-Ruiz, M.; De Carvalho, R.E.; Rodrigues, N.F.; Dally, C.; Husson, J.C.; Le Boedec, K.; Hernandez, J. Association of gastric lymphofollicular hyperplasia with Helicobacter-like organisms in dogs. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 2022, 36, 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Arnold, I.C.; Lee, J.Y.; Amieva, M.R.; Roers, A.; Flavell, R.A.; Sparwasser, T.; Muller, A. Tolerance rather than immunity protects from Helicobacter pylori-induced gastric preneoplasia. Gastroenterology 2011, 140, 199–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Bik, E.M.; Eckburg, P.B.; Gill, S.R.; Nelson, K.E.; Purdom, E.A.; Francois, F.; Perez-Perez, G.; Blaser, M.J.; Relman, D.A. Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiota in the human stomach. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 732–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Andersson, A.F.; Lindberg, M.; Jakobsson, H.; Backhed, F.; Nyren, P.; Engstrand, L. Comparative analysis of human gut microbiota by barcoded pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e2836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Li, X.X.; Wong, G.L.; To, K.F.; Wong, V.W.; Lai, L.H.; Chow, D.K.; Lau, J.Y.; Sung, J.J.; Ding, C. Bacterial microbiota profiling in gastritis without Helicobacter pylori infection or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e7985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Maldonado-Contreras, A.; Goldfarb, K.C.; Godoy-Vitorino, F.; Karaoz, U.; Contreras, M.; Blaser, M.J.; Brodie, E.L.; Dominguez-Bello, M.G. Structure of the human gastric bacterial community in relation to Helicobacter pylori status. ISME J. 2011, 5, 574–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Primer sequences for Helicobacter genus and species-specific PCR amplification used in the study of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
Table 1. Primer sequences for Helicobacter genus and species-specific PCR amplification used in the study of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
SpeciesPrimer Sequence and Direction (5′→3′)Gene TargetGenInfo IdentifierAmplified Fragment Size (bp)
Helicobacter spp.Hspp-FTACACCAAGAATTCCACCTA16S ribosomal RNA geneGi:373809908259
Hspp-RCGTGGAGGATGAAGGTTTTA
Helicobacter pyloriHP1-FATGAAAAAGATTAGCAGAAAAGH. pylori urease (ureA, ureB, ureC, ureD) genesGi:156446341668
HP1-RCCTAGAAAATGCTAAAGAGTTG
HP2-FGCGGCTGAAGAATATTCTATGA689
HP2-RCGCTGGGTTAATGGTGTATTTAG
Helicobacter felisHF1-FATGAAACTAACGCCTAAAGAACTAGH. felis urease (ureA and ureB) genesGi:3961601147
HF1-RGGAGAGATAAAGTGAATATGCGT
HF2-FCTCATTAGCGGGCGTGTGAT891
HF2-RCAATCTTGCCGTCTTTAATCCC
Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto ASB1.4HH-FTACACCAAGAATTCCACCTAH. heilmannii sensu stricto urease (ureA and ureB) genesGi:408906187220
HH-RAATTCCACCTACCTCTCCC
Helicobacter salomonisHS-FTGCGTAGGCGGGGTTGTAAG16S ribosomal RNAGi:191589675
HS-RCAGAGTTGTAGTTTCAAATGC
Helicobacter bizzozeroniiHB-FAACCAACAGCCCCAGCAGCCH. bizzozeronii urease (ureA and ureB) genesGi:27462193373
HB-RTGGTTTTAAGGTTCCAGCGC
F, forward; R, reverse.
Table
Table 2. Demographic data of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs enrolled into the study.
Table 2. Demographic data of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs enrolled into the study.
Helicobacter Positive Helicobacter Negative
Number of included dogs6519
Mean age5.4 ± 3.7 years5.9 ± 4.1 years
Age range6 months–13 years6 months–13 years
Mean body weight20.9 ± 14.3 kg19.1 ± 13.9 kg
Body weight range3.2–59 kg2.8–57 kg
Sex38 males (1 neutered)9 males (1 neutered)
27 females (4 spayed)10 females (4 spayed)
The most common breedsYorkshire Terrier (6 dogs),
German Shepherd (5 dogs),
Boxer, Golden Retriever (each 4 dogs),
Rhodesian Ridgeback, Bullterrier,
Mixed breed, West Highland White
Terrier (each 3 dogs),
Border Collie, Borzoi, Jack Russell Terrier,
Labrador Retriever (each 2 dogs)		Yorkshire Terrier, Mix breed (each 3 dogs)
Maltese and Vizsla (each 2 dogs)
Table
Table 3. Concordance of test results for Helicobacter infection in 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
Table 3. Concordance of test results for Helicobacter infection in 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
Combination Pattern Rapid Urease TestCytologyHistopathology
(Both HE and WS)		PCRNo. of Dogs with Pattern in the Cohort of 84 Dogs (%)
1.++++42 (50%)
2.−−−−19 (22.6%)
3.++−+5 (6%)
4.−+++4 (4.8%)
5.+−++3 (3.6%)
6.−−−+3 (3.6%)
7.+−+−2 (2.4%)
8.−+−+2 (2.4%)
9.−++−1 (1.2%)
10.−+−−1 (1.2%)
11.+−−+1 (1.2%)
12.−−+−1 (1.2%)
HE, hematoxylin, and eosin; WS, Warthin-Starry stain; +, positive; −, negative.
Table
Table 4. Comparison of the diagnostic value of cytology, rapid urease test and histopathology to PCR in the study of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
Table 4. Comparison of the diagnostic value of cytology, rapid urease test and histopathology to PCR in the study of 84 dogs with chronic gastrointestinal signs.
TestSensitivitySpecificityPositive Predictive ValueNegative Predictive Value
Cytology88.3%91.7%96.4%81.5%
Rapid urease test85%91.7%96.2%71%
Histopathology HE 81.7%83.3%92.5%64.5%
Histopathology WS81.7%83.3%92.5%64.5%
Table
Table 5. Histopathologic findings in 60 dogs infected with different Helicobacter species (detected by PCR).
Table 5. Histopathologic findings in 60 dogs infected with different Helicobacter species (detected by PCR).
LPG (Mild)LPG (Moderate)LPG (Severe)NeoplasiaNonspecific ChangesAcute Purulent-Necrotic GastritisNo. of Dogs with Result among 60 PCR Positive Dogs (%)
Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto6/142/14-1/145/14-14 (23.3%)
Helicobacter bizzozeronii6/9-1/9-1/91/99 (15.0%)
Helicobacter salomonis----3/41/44 (6.7%)
Helicobacter felis----1/1-1 (1.7%)
Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto + Helicobacter bizzozeronii1/232/23-2/2318/23-23 (38.3%)
Helicobacter heilmannii sensu stricto + Helicobacter felis----1/1-1 (1.7%)
Helicobacter-undetermined species2/8---6/8-8 (13.3%)
No. of dogs with result
(% of 60 PCR-positive dogs)		15
(25.0%)		4
(6.7%)		1
(1.7%)		3
(5.0)		35
(58.3%)		2
(3.3%)		60
(100%)
LPG, lymphocytic-plasmacytic gastritis.
Table
Table 6. Results of histopathology and endoscopic findings in 65 Helicobacter positive dogs (using a combination of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter spp. including rapid urease test, cytology, histopathology, and PCR) and 19 dogs negative for Helicobacter spp.
Table 6. Results of histopathology and endoscopic findings in 65 Helicobacter positive dogs (using a combination of diagnostic tests for Helicobacter spp. including rapid urease test, cytology, histopathology, and PCR) and 19 dogs negative for Helicobacter spp.
Helicobacter PositiveHelicobacter Negative
Histopathological description
LPG +18 (27.7%)4 (21.1%)
LPG ++4 (6.2%)2 (10.5%)
LPG +++1 (1.5%)1 (5.3%)
acute purulent gastritis2 (3.1%)-
eosinophilic gastritis-2 (10.5%)
epithelial injury58 (89.2%)16 (84.2%)
fibrosis18 (27.7%)5 (26.3%)
lymphoid follicular hyperplasia28 (43.1%)3 (15.8%)
non-specific37 (56.9%)8 (42.1%)
neoplasia3 (4.6%)2 (10.5%)
(lymphoma, gastric adenocarcinoma, GI stromal tumor)(gastric adenocarcinoma, leiomyoma)
Endoscopic findings
difficult to inflate lumen4 (6.15%)1 (5.3%)
edema4 (6.2%)1 (5.3%)
erosion/ulcer16/3 (29.2%)2/3 (26.3%)
friability3 (4.6%)1 (5.3%)
granularity29 (44.6%)10 (52.6%)
hyperemia5 (7.7%)1 (5.3%)
hypertrophy1 (1.5%)2 (10.5%)
irregularity1 (1.5%)1 (5.3%)
mass1 (1.5%)1 (5.3%)
normal finding22 (33.8%)6 (31.6%)
polyp2 (3.1%)3 (15.8%)
Nonspecific changes-mild edema and hyperemia of lamina propria; LPG, lymphocytic-plasmacytic gastritis.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Husnik, R.; Klimes, J.; Kovarikova, S.; Kolorz, M. Helicobacter Species and Their Association with Gastric Pathology in a Cohort of Dogs with Chronic Gastrointestinal Signs. Animals 2022, 12, 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101254

AMA Style

Husnik R, Klimes J, Kovarikova S, Kolorz M. Helicobacter Species and Their Association with Gastric Pathology in a Cohort of Dogs with Chronic Gastrointestinal Signs. Animals. 2022; 12(10):1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Husnik, Roman, Jiri Klimes, Simona Kovarikova, and Michal Kolorz. 2022. "Helicobacter Species and Their Association with Gastric Pathology in a Cohort of Dogs with Chronic Gastrointestinal Signs" Animals 12, no. 10: 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101254

APA Style

Husnik, R., Klimes, J., Kovarikova, S., & Kolorz, M. (2022). Helicobacter Species and Their Association with Gastric Pathology in a Cohort of Dogs with Chronic Gastrointestinal Signs. Animals, 12(10), 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12101254

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop