Next Article in Journal
Meat Quality of Nellore Young Bulls—Effects of Different Days on Feed and Zilpaterol Hydrochloride Supplementation
Next Article in Special Issue
Training in the Dark: Using Target Training for Non-Invasive Application and Validation of Accelerometer Devices for an Endangered Primate (Nycticebus bengalensis)
Previous Article in Journal
Health Status and Stress in Different Categories of Racing Pigeons
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Racing Greyhound Path Following Dynamics Using a Tracking System

Animals 2021, 11(9), 2687; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092687
by David Eager 1,*,†, Imam Hossain 1,†, Karlos Ishac 1,† and Scott Robins 2,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Animals 2021, 11(9), 2687; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11092687
Submission received: 10 August 2021 / Revised: 9 September 2021 / Accepted: 9 September 2021 / Published: 14 September 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

This is a polished manuscript and I have few comments. The annotated PDF attached contains some markup corrections and some highlighted sections with notes. The notes are copied below in case they don't show up.

Figure 8 - Is there any way to mark on the plots where the turns are?

P12 "jerk" - Could this be explained in the Introduction?

Conclusions - Were the bends identical? 

Should tracks be changed to better support a running path that minimises jerk level?

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

File

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The manuscript is a well written article analyzing the path following dynamics of racing greyhounds in a 2-turn track model.

The methods section needs clarification on overall data size. There are eight dogs run at a given time for a given race and all races are recorded over a 6 month period. However, it is not clear how many individual dogs this data represents. Are the same eight dogs repeatedly used or are these multiple sets of eight dogs representing more than eight individuals across the data presented? Additionally, though the collection window for data spanned 6 months, what are the general number of races of each (525m, 600m, and 725m) that are represented across that period of time? 

The calculations, such as centrifugal acceleration and jerk, would benefit from showing the equations used. 

 Minor grammatical and formatting corrections needed in line 24 (omit "of"), line 38 (correct letter for number "t0"), line367 (omit repeated "several"), Figure 3. (orient both images in portrait), Figure 10. (add 600m to caption). 

Author Response

File

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop