Next Article in Journal
Effects of Sources or Formulations of Vitamin K3 on Its Stability during Extrusion or Pelleting in Swine Feed
Next Article in Special Issue
How to Improve Meat Quality and Welfare in Entire Male Pigs by Genetics
Previous Article in Journal
Microbiological Hazards in Dry Dog Chews and Feeds
Previous Article in Special Issue
Examining Alternatives to Painful Piglet Castration Within the Contexts of Markets and Stakeholders: A Comparison of Four EU Countries
Article

Long-Term Immunocastration Protocols Successfully Reduce Testicles’ Size in Bísaro Pigs

1
Animal and Veterinary Research Centre (CECAV), Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
2
MED-Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development & Department de Medicina Veterinária, Universidade de Évora, Pólo da Mitra, 7002-554 Évora, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Maria Font-i-Furnols, Igor Tomasevic and Michel Bonneau
Animals 2021, 11(3), 632; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030632
Received: 31 December 2020 / Revised: 14 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 27 February 2021
Surgical castration is an ongoing problem in pig production, especially in breeds reared until older ages, like the Bísaro pig. To avoid this technique, three immunocastration protocols with different numbers of injections and times of inoculation were tested. Scrotal measurements were used to attest their effectiveness. The best protocol was the one with three administrations starting at three months old. It was able to maintain the testis size below puberty size for 16 weeks following the last injection.

Abstract

This study aimed to find a suitable immunocastration protocol for male Bísaro pigs (BP) due to the breed and production system particularities. Twenty-five male BP were treated with Improvac® according to three protocols: using two (GrpE2 and L2) or three vaccinations (GrpL3) and starting at 9 (GrpE2) or 13 weeks old (GrpL2 and L3). Eleven animals were kept as intact males (GrpC). Scrotal measurements and the morphometry of the testes and epididymides collected at slaughter were used to survey the effectiveness of the immunocastration compared with the age-matched intact controls. Animals in groups E2 and L3 were kept until 57 weeks, after a second vaccination cycle at 49 and 53 weeks of age. Scrotal dimensions decreased to almost initial values in treated animals until 17 (GrpE2) and 21 weeks (GrpL2 and L3), thereafter increasing to post-pubertal values until around 29 or 37 weeks of age for groups E2 and L2, respectively, but only at 41 weeks in group L3. Between 41 and 49 weeks, scrotal dimensions were similar in treated and control animals, decreasing to the predicted pre-puberty size after the second cycle of vaccination. This study suggests the most suited protocol for males slaughtered at older ages includes three administrations of Improvac® starting at 3 months of age, followed by a second vaccination cycle.
Keywords: boar; improvac; scrotal dimensions; immunosuppression; pork boar; improvac; scrotal dimensions; immunosuppression; pork

1. Introduction

Animal welfare, in particular surgical castration, has been a major concern for the European pork industry in the last decade. In 2010, the European Commission issued a declaration on alternatives to the surgical castration of pigs [1] and committed to stopping castration by 2018. Goals from this declaration are far from being met [2], and the EU has not yet banned pig castration. As this procedure is traditionally done without anesthesia or analgesia, it is undeniably associated with pain, stress, and the risk of infection, thus promoting the use of alternatives [3,4,5,6]. Consumers also share similar welfare concerns [7]. A promising alternative is immunocastration, which is known for suppressing gonadal activity and producing carcasses without boar taint [8,9]. This procedure is based on the administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) conjugated to a protein [10], which drives the formation of antibodies against GnRH, thereby preventing luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) secretion [11]. Consequently, the secretion of testicular steroids, such as androstenone, one of the main compounds responsible for boar taint [12], is reduced. Another compound is skatole, produced in the hindgut by microbial activity from tryptophan and its metabolism modulated by gonadal steroids in the liver [13]. Besides this, immunocastrated animals will have reduced fat accumulation compared to surgically castrated ones. The differences in fat accumulation have been recently associated with FSH regulation of the genes balancing lipogenesis/lipolysis. In surgically castrated pigs, high FSH levels drive a reduction of lipolysis, favoring fat accumulation, while in immunocastrated pigs, the reduced FSH levels have the opposite effect [14]. This technique appears to be broadly accepted as a valid alternative for local breeds [15,16] preferred by consumers regarding their perceived health-related risks [17,18], with no significant consequences for the meat quality or cured products [16,19,20].
Even so, immunocastration still presents many uncertainties. In the case of Bísaro pigs (BP), like some other breeds produced in traditional extensive systems in the Mediterranean area, the animals are usually reared up to ages of more than a year old, often in mixed gender groups. Moreover, many systems are based on or include periods of extensive grazing [21]. These periods entail limited handling facilities and the risk of the unintentional mating of females with male cohorts or wild boars. These factors suggest that immunocastration should start as early as is required and be maintained for longer periods, in contrast with the manufacturer’s short-term protocol for industrial systems.
The reproductive capability of male pigs can be predicted by scrotal measurements [15,22,23]. Puberty is a period characterized by rapid reproductive development and may be perceived by the increase in testicular growth. On the other hand, the effectiveness of immunocastration can be predicted indirectly through testicular measurements [24,25,26] or the development of sexual accessory glands [27], as immunocastrated animals have less developed genital organs [28]. The morphometric analysis of scrotal gonads, considering pre- and post-pubertal values, can then be a useful tool when evaluating the effectiveness of immunocastration protocols.
The Bísaro pig is one of the most representative Portuguese autochthonous breeds [29,30] and is known for its robustness and reported meat quality [31]. The BP is sexually precocious, reaching puberty between 14 and 17 weeks old [32]. If intended for the industry of cured value-added products, it is mainly reared up to 13 months old. Yet today, a major limitation for the growth of this industry is that an increasing number of animals are slaughtered at younger ages, before or shortly after weaning (approx. 45 d) [21], as a result of various difficulties in complying with the castration restrictions introduced by the EU in 2008 and thus in rearing animals to older ages. This essay aims to define an appropriate immunocastration protocol to overcome this issue, allowing for an extended suppression period of testicular function with a minimal number of administrations. It will also allow the establishment of extended protocols suited for other autochthonous breeds reared in similar non-industrial systems.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Vaccination Protocols

Thirty-nine male Bísaro pigs were used in this study. Twenty-eight were randomly assigned to three treatment groups and one control group. Animals in the treatment group were vaccinated against GnRH with Improvac® (Zoetis) with the standard dosing regimen (2 mL subcutaneous) using different protocols (Figure 1). In group E2, two animals died at the beginning of the trial and one was excluded after an accident. Priming started at 9 weeks in the early (E) group (GrpE2; n = 8) and at 13 weeks of age for the late (L) starters (GrpL3; n = 11 and GrpL2; n = 6). The booster was performed with one (GrpE2 and L2) or two injections (GrpL3) 4 weeks apart. Animals in groups E2 and L3 had a second vaccination cycle (2 shots) starting at 49 weeks of age (8 weeks before slaughter at 57 weeks of age). Animals in group L2 only had one vaccination cycle and were slaughtered at 37 weeks of age.
Litters were only selected from animals registered in the herdbook. The Bísaro pig is an indigenous breed with significant genetic variability and, consequently, phenotypic variability. Animals were from different litters and might have presented differences in the absolute values at the beginning of the experiment. Comparison of the relative change in scrotal dimensions of the three groups allows for the inference of the suppressive effects of the vaccine on the testicular function of the treated animals.
Eleven animals were kept as intact males throughout the whole experiment (GrpC; n = 11) to establish age-match scrotal dimensions. Animals in the control group were also maintained until 57 weeks old.
Animals were reared indoors in groups of 5–6 animals until 29 weeks old, and thereafter in outdoor pens with approximately 1000 m2 each, and fed ad libitum. All premises complied with the welfare requirements established in the Council Directive of 2008 [33].
The study was approved by the Animal Care and Ethical Committee of the University of Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro (Protocol number 657-e-DZ-2018).

2.2. Measurements

Scrotal dimensions (total width, plus the height and width of the left and right scrotal sac) were measured every 4 weeks from the first injection (FI) until the 44th (GrpE2 and L3) and 24th (GrpL2) week post-administration. Due to operational issues at the experimental farm, measurements from the control group were not taken at 33 weeks old or from groups E2 and L3 at 37 weeks old. Measurements were performed based on the Davis and Hines method [34] using a vernier caliper. Briefly, with the animal standing, the total width was obtained at the largest horizontal transversal axis of the scrotum, the height of the scrotal sac was obtained at the higher vertical length of each scrotal sac, while the maximum horizontal diameter provided the scrotal sac width. A single operator conducted the procedures in order to minimize inter-operator biases. Animals were contained in a specially made handling crate, where they were simultaneously weighted.
Additionally, the testis and epididymis were collected after slaughter and the testicular and epididymal morphometric values were then taken (aggregated weight of testis and epididymis, testis weight, width and length; epididymal weight).
Absolute dimensions from in vivo and post-mortem measurements were compared to the expected pubertal dimensions of this specific breed [32].

2.3. Statistical Analysis

Gonadal measurements were grouped by animal. Thus, average values for both organs were calculated throughout the experiment [35]. The Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess the normality of variables of interest.
Descriptive analysis was firstly performed to characterize the evolution of the scrotal size. The variation between each measurement in relation to the previous measurement was calculated to survey the immunosuppressive effects of the vaccination protocols. The variation was then compared between groups. Since the variables were not normally distributed, group differences were identified using a Wilcoxon rank test. A confidence level of 99% was used to minimize potential inaccuracies from in vivo measurements. The variation in normal scrotal growth (GrpC) was also compared with the treatment groups. A least squares model was used in the post-mortem analysis. Carcass weight and group were included as factors. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP 7 software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Absolute Dimensions of the Scrotal Sacs

Figure 2 and Figure 3 show the scrotal sac height and width evolution throughout the study. At the priming dose, values started at around 4 cm in height in nine-week-old animals and increased until they were 13 weeks old (GrpE2) or 17 weeks old (GrpL2, L3 and C). After the second administration, measurements decreased to values close to initial values in all treated animals until weeks 17 and 21 (GrpE2 vs. GrpL2 and L3). By then, the scrotal sac measurements increased and approximated the expected size of sexually mature animals. This process was slower in group L3, taking almost 16 weeks. The pre-established pubertal height and width were surpassed at 21 weeks of age in the control group, 29 weeks of age in group E2, and 37 weeks of age in group L2. Group L3 only overtook this value at 41 weeks old. Between weeks 41 and 49, scrotal dimensions in the treated animals became closer to those of the control group.
From the 49th week (first dose of the second vaccination cycle), scrotal dimensions from both treated groups decreased to values close to the predicted puberty mark. The total scrotal width followed the same pattern (data not shown). From the 53rd week (4 weeks after the first administration in the second vaccination cycle) until the last observation of the study, scrotal dimensions from the control group remained higher than in the re-treated groups E2 and L3.

3.2. Variation of Scrotal Dimensions

Variation of all scrotal dimensions did not differ significantly between the treatment groups after the first injection (p > 0.01) (4 weeks post FI) or from the onset of the treatment to the second administration of the vaccine, 8 weeks after FI (Table 1). At the 12th week post FI, however, the variation in all the measurements differed between the groups (p ≤ 0.01), as groups E2 and L2 were already reverting to the negative variation and group L3 was still on a negative tendency. While groups E2 and L2 already registered a considerable positive variation, group L3 still registered a negative variation. At 16 weeks after FI, there were still significant differences in the variation of the scrotal sac height and scrotal sac width (p ≤ 0.01), although less pronounced. From the 20th week from FI onwards, the predominantly positive variation in measurements became similar between the groups (p > 0.01).
Both group E2 and group L3 inverted the positive variation after the second vaccination cycle at 49 and 53 weeks of age, respectively. Responses did not differ significantly between the treated groups (Table 1).

3.3. Post-Mortem Morphometry

Table 2 summarizes the morphometric values taken after gonadal excision at slaughter. The average carcass weight at slaughter of the treated animals was 117.7 kg. Animals in group E2 were 8% and 5% heavier than animals in groups L2 and L3, respectively. Between the three treatment groups, no significant differences were found regarding testicular and epididymal post-mortem morphometry (p > 0.01), even though testis weight registered the most noticeable difference (p = 0.065). Aggregated weight, testis width, and epididymal weight differed slightly between the treated groups, but not statistically. When comparing with the control group, the differences became evident (p < 0.01). Testicular and epididymal dimensions were approximately 31% larger in intact animals than in treated animals. Gonads from entire males were 66% heavier than in treated animals. Animals in the control group also had heavier carcasses (12%).

4. Discussion

The present assay is the first, to our knowledge, to test immunocastration protocols in male Bísaro pigs and to demonstrate that this procedure could be an alternative method for the castration of these animals. All tested protocols achieved a reduction in the scrotal dimensions to pre-pubertal sizes, suggesting the success of the immunocastration process. A second cycle of Improvac® was needed to sustain the inhibition of the reproductive function until slaughter, close to one year of age.
Earlier vaccination protocols have been studied and compared to the one recommended by the manufacturer to enhance the suppression of reproductive function. Some of the advantages are a distinct reduction in the reproductive organs’ size, a reduction in testicular activity and controlled boar taint [4,36]. Similarly to the results of Sladek et al. [36] and Brunius et al. [4], in this assay, the early vaccination performed in group E2, starting at 9 weeks of age, did not interfere with the vaccine’s efficacy. For sexually precocious breeds, like BP, this is of major importance.
For local breeds reared in non-industrial systems, keeping male pigs asexual during an extended rearing and fattening period is imperative. Therefore, the efficacy needs to be evaluated not only at earlier stages and at slaughter but also during the entire growing phase after puberty, which for BP starts as early as 14 weeks old [32]. Longer and post-pubertal protocols have been tested in autochthonous breeds, as they have different characteristics than industrial crosses. For example, Hernandez-Garcia et al. [37] successfully adapted a protocol for Iberian sows/gilts with three inoculations of Improvac® at 10.5, 12, and 13.5 months, with slaughter at 16 months old. Gogic et al. [27] also succeeded in adapting the manufacturer’s protocol to a local breed, the Mangulica; the first vaccination was given to 275-day-old pigs and the second to approximately 320-day-old pigs (85 and 40 days prior to slaughter, respectively). In our study, the three-dose protocol kept gonads below pre-pubertal dimensions for a longer period of time compared to the two dose protocol, whether it started at around two or at around three months of age. Animals from group L2 were slaughtered earlier (37 weeks old); however, the post-mortem morphometric analysis showed that the testicles’ dimensions stayed below or near average pubertal values. However, for the treated groups kept in the farm, a second vaccination cycle was needed in order to have an immunocastration effect by slaughter time. This cycle started when the scrotal dimensions were above the predicted pubertal mark.
To evaluate the scrotal dimensions and their relationship with spermatogenesis and puberty, we used the predicted testicular dimensions at puberty and a control group of age-matched intact pigs. Paixão et al. [32] used post-mortem testicular measurements combined with histological evaluation to create a model that inferred testicular dimensions at the onset of puberty and sexual capability. Scrotal measurements include muscular fasciae, membranes, skin, and variable portions of epididymal tissue, besides the testicular dimensions. Therefore, surveilling the scrotum dimensions will allow to follow the changes in testicular size in response to immunocastration. Comparing the scrotal measurements with the predicted post-mortem testicular dimensions strengthens the information provided in this study.
It seems that male pigs recover gonadal dimensions faster than females. With a three-dose protocol at 19, 23, and 39 weeks old, Hernández-García et al. [37] were able to keep female gonads at pre-pubertal dimensions until slaughter at 68 weeks of age. This protocol kept the gilts immunocastrated for more than 6 months after the last injection. In our assay, the dimensions from male pigs fully inverted the negative variation 4 months after the last injection and recovered to similar gonadal dimensions of contemporaneous entire pigs in less than 20 weeks. It also confirms that immunocastration can be reversed, as theorized, once the antibody levels decrease to a minimum [38]. Whether or not sequela of spermatogenesis will remain is still uncertain. To optimize the vaccine’s potential, minimizing the costs and animal handling, other variations to the proposed protocol could also be tested. Given the data collected in this study, in particular, the marked negative scrotal dimension variation at 4 weeks post-FI in the second vaccination cycle, it appears that the second administration in the second vaccination cycle could be avoided. Perhaps it could be reserved for animals that do not respond adequately to the first injection. The 8 week period in which the scrotal dimensions of the treated animals were close to those of the non-treated animals could be considered a problem in alternative systems. To overcome this issue, we could have postponed the third injection or brought forward the second cycle to the 33rd or 37th week of age. Data analysis shows that an effective protocol for BP should start in 3-month-old male pigs with three injections of Improvac®, adding a second cycle of one or two administrations at 33/37 weeks of age. This protocol would better match the practices of the Bísaro production system, where producers seek to attain one-year-old animals at the time of slaughter, allowing them to maintain pre-pubertal testicular dimensions throughout most of the growing and fattening phase.
For locally bred pigs in non-industrial systems, sexual steroids are important not only at slaughter, but also for the suppression of sexual activity during all growing and fattening phases. Therefore, other alternatives to surgical castration, such as feeding strategies, breeding programs, or gene editing for leveling skatole and androstenone, seem insufficient for these particular systems. Nonetheless, steroid hormones and skatole leveling, along with histological analysis, should be performed to confirm the efficacy of the tested protocols. Carcass evaluation and meat quality comparison is also foreseen to validate the absence of boar taint at slaughter. These assays will allow for a better understanding of the protocols’ differences and how they should be implemented with local farmers.

5. Conclusions

All tested protocols successfully reduced testicles’ sizes compared to entire animals. For variable periods of time, dimensions were kept below those predicted in pubertal animals. In male Bísaro pigs, the immunocastration protocol with three inoculations of Improvac® kept testicles below pubertal dimensions for a longer period of time, implying a more consistent and prolonged effect.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.P., S.B.F. and R.P.-C.; methodology, R.P.-C.; investigation, S.B.F, J.M. and R.C.; data curation, G.P.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P. and S.B.F.; writing—review and editing, G.P., R.P.-C and R.C.; supervision, R.P.-C., A.E. and R.C.; project administration, R.P.-C. and A.E.; funding acquisition, R.P.-C., A.E. and R.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript

Funding

This work was co-funded through the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and the Portuguese Government within the PDR 2020 1.01 Operating Groups initiative, under the project ICas Bísaro (reference no. PDR2020-101-031029). This study was also funded by National Funds through FCT-Foundation for Science and Technology under the project UIDB/05183/2020 and project UIDB/CVT/00772/2020. Gustavo Paixão holds a PhD grant from the Animal Science Doctoral Program (AniSci), operation number NORTE-08-5369-FSE-000040, co-funded by European Social Fund through the Regional Operational Programme NORTE 2020.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in Mendeley Data at (doi:10.17632/399rpcc49r.2).

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank ANCSUB (Bísaro pig breeders association), particularly to its technicians Cristiana Castelo, Paulo Santarém and Luis Filipe Santos for their support during pig handling and data collection. Moreover, we are thankful to Zoetis for providing Improvac@.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. European Comission. European Declaration on Alternatives to Surgical Castration of Pigs; Affairs Directorate G—Veterinary and International Affairs: Brussels, Belgium, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  2. De Briyne, N.; Berg, C.; Blaha, T.; Temple, D. Pig castration: Will the EU manage to ban pig castration by 2018? Porc. Health Manag. 2016, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Prunier, A.; Bonneau, M.; von Borell, E.H.; Cinotti, S.; Gunn, M.; Fredriksen, B.; Giersing, M.; Morton, D.B.; Tuyttens, F.A.M.; Velarde, A. A review of the welfare consequences of surgical castration in piglets and the evaluation of non-surgical methods. Anim. Welf. 2006, 15, 277–289. [Google Scholar]
  4. Brunius, C.; Zamaratskaia, G.; Andersson, K.; Chen, G.; Norrby, M.; Madej, A.; Lundstrom, K. Early immunocastration of male pigs with Improvac®—Effect on boar taint, hormones and reproductive organs. Vaccine 2011, 29, 9514–9520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Von Borell, E.; Baumgartner, J.; Giersing, M.; Jaggin, N.; Prunier, A.; Tuyttens, F.A.; Edwards, S.A. Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs. Animal 2009, 3, 1488–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fredriksen, B.; Furnols, M.F.I.; Lundstrom, K.; Migdal, W.; Prunier, A.; Tuyttens, F.A.M.; Bonneau, M. Practice on castration of piglets in europe. Animal 2009, 3, 1480–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tomasevic, I.; Bahelka, I.; Čandek-Potokar, M.; Čítek, J.; Djekić, I.; Djurkin Kušec, I.; Getya, A.; Guerrero, L.; Iordăchescu, G.; Ivanova, S.; et al. Attitudes and beliefs of eastern european consumers towards piglet castration and meat from castrated pigs. Meat Sci. 2020, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Aluwe, M.; Tuyttens, F.A.; Millet, S. Field experience with surgical castration with anaesthesia, analgesia, immunocastration and production of entire male pigs: Performance, carcass traits and boar taint prevalence. Animal 2015, 9, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Backus, G.; Støier, S.; Courat, M.; Bonneau, M.; Higuera, M. First Progress Report from the European Declaration on Alternatives to Surgical Castration of Pigs; Affairs Directorate G—Veterinary and International Affairs: Brussels, Belgium, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hennessy, D. Improvac® mode of action. In Technical Bulletin; Pfizer Animal Health: Parkvile, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zamaratskaia, G.; Rydhmer, L.; Andersson, H.K.; Chen, G.; Lowagie, S.; Andersson, K.; Lundström, K. Long-term effect of vaccination against gonadotropin-releasing hormone, using Improvac™, on hormonal profile and behaviour of male pigs. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2008, 108, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zamaratskaia, G.; Andersson, H.K.; Chen, G.; Andersson, K.; Madej, A.; Lundstrom, K. Effect of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccine (Improvac) on steroid hormones, boar taint compounds and performance in entire male pigs. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2008, 43, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zamaratskaia, G.; Squires, E.J. Biochemical, nutritional and genetic effects on boar taint in entire male pigs. Animal 2009, 3, 1508–1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Han, X.; Meng, F.; Cao, X.; Du, X.; Bu, G.; Kong, F.; Huang, A.; Zeng, X. Fsh promotes fat accumulation by activating pparγ signaling in surgically castrated, but not immunocastrated, male pigs. Theriogenology 2021, 160, 10–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hernández-García, F.I.; Izquierdo, M.; Del Rosario, A.I.; Montero, A.; Pérez, M.A.; García-Gudiño, J.; Garrido, N. Adaptation of immunocastration treatment to montanera system for male iberian pigs: Effects on reproductive organs and carcass traits. Arch. de Zootec. 2018, 67, 97–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Martinez-Macipe, M.; Rodríguez, P.; Izquierdo, M.; Gispert, M.; Manteca, X.; Mainau, E.; Hernández, F.I.; Claret, A.; Guerrero, L.; Dalmau, A. Comparison of meat quality parameters in surgical castrated versus vaccinated against gonadotrophin-releasing factor male and female iberian pigs reared in free-ranging conditions. Meat Sci. 2016, 111, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Pasquale, J.D.; Vecchio, Y.; Martelli, G.; Sardi, L. Health risk perception, consumption intention, and willingness to pay for pig products obtained by immunocastration. Animals 2020, 10, 1548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Vanhonacker, F.; Verbeke, W. Consumer response to the possible use of a vaccine method to control boar taint v. Physical piglet castration with anaesthesia: A quantitative study in four european countries. Animal 2011, 5, 1107–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Daza, A.; Latorre, M.A.; Olivares, A.; Bote, C.J.L. The effects of male and female immunocastration on growth performances and carcass and meat quality of pigs intended for dry-cured ham production: A preliminary study. Livest. Sci. 2016, 190, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Aluwe, M.; Degezelle, I.; Depuydt, L.; Fremaut, D.; Van den Broeke, A.; Millet, S. Immunocastrated male pigs: Effect of 4 v. 6 weeks time post second injection on performance, carcass quality and meat quality. Animal 2016, 10, 1466–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Paixão, G.; Esteves, A.; Payan-Carreira, R. Characterization of a non-industrial pig production system: The case of bísaro breed. R. Bras. Zootec. 2018, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ugwu, S.O.C.; Onyimonyi, A.E.; Foleng, H. Testicular development and relationship between body weight, testis size and sperm output in tropical boars. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2009, 8, 1165–1169. [Google Scholar]
  23. Bekaert, K.M.; Aluwé, M.; Millet, S.; Goethals, K.; Nijs, G.; Isebaert, S.; De Brabander, D.L.; Verheyden, K.; De Brabander, H.F.; Vanhaecke, L.; et al. Predicting the likelihood of developing boar taint: Early physical indicators in entire male pigs. Meat Sci. 2012, 92, 382–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Font-i-Furnols, M.; Carabus, A.; Munoz, I.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Gispert, M. Evolution of testes characteristics in entire and immunocastrated male pigs from 30 to 120 kg live weight as assessed by computed tomography with perspective on boar taint. Meat Sci. 2016, 116, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Stojanovic, S.; Uscebrka, G.; Zikic, D.; Stukelj, M. Histological and morphometric examination of the testes of boars and male pigs immunocastrated with Improvac®. Acta Sci. Vet. 2017, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lugar, D.W.; Rhoads, M.L.; Clark-Deener, S.G.; Callahan, S.R.; Revercomb, A.K.; Prusa, K.J.; Estienne, M.J. Immunological castration temporarily reduces testis size and function without long-term effects on libido and sperm quality in boars. Animal 2017, 11, 643–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Gogic, M.; Radovic, C.; Candek-Potokar, M.; Petrovic, M.; Radojkovic, D.; Parunovic, N.; Savic, R. Effect of immunocastration on sex glands of male mangulica (swallow-bellied mangalitsa) pigs. Braz. J. Vet. Res. Anim. Sci. 2019, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mitjana, O.; Bonastre, C.; Tejedor, M.T.; Garza, L.; Latorre, M.A.; Moreno, B.; Falceto, M.V. Immuno-castration of female and male pigs with anti-gonadotrophin releasing hormone vaccine: Morphometric, histopathological and functional studies of the reproductive system. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2020, 221, 106599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Paixao, G.; Esteves, A.; Payan-Carreira, R.; Carolino, N. Demographic structure and genetic diversity of the endangered bísaro pig: Evolution and current status. Czech. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 63, 452–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Paixão, G.; Martins, Â.; Esteves, A.; Payan-Carreira, R.; Carolino, N. Genetic parameters for reproductive, longevity and lifetime production traits in bísaro pigs. Livest. Sci. 2019, 225, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martins, J.; Fialho, R.; Albuquerque, A.; Neves, J.; Freitas, A.; Nunes, J.; Charneca, R. Portuguese local pig breeds: Genotype effects on meat and fat quality traits. Animals 2020, 10, 905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Paixão, G.; Esteves, A.; Carolino, N.; dos Anjos Pires, M.; Payan-Carreira, R. Evaluation of gonadal macroscopic and microscopic morphometry reveals precocious puberty in bísaro pig. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2020, 55, 1706–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. European Union. Council directive 2008/120/ec of 18 december 2008 laying down minimum standards for the protection of pigs. Off. J. Eur. Union 2009, 47, 5–13. [Google Scholar]
  34. Davis, D.L.; Hines, R.H. Scrotal measurements and visual scores of boar testicle size correlated with testicle weight. Kans. Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Rep. 1977, 10, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paixão, G. Immunocastration protocol testing—In vivo and post-mortem measurements. Mendeley Data 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sladek, Z.; Prudikova, M.; Knoll, A.; Kulich, P.; Steinhauserova, I.; Borilova, G. Effect of early immunocastration on testicular histology in pigs. Vet. Med. 2018, 63, 18–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hernández-García, F.; Duarte, J.L.; Pérez, M.A.; Raboso, C.; del Rosario, A.I.; Izquierdo, M. Successful long-term pre-pubertal immunocastration of purebred Iberian gilts reared in extensive systems. In Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on the Mediterranean Pig, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 10–12 October 2013; pp. 123–126. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bailly-Chouriberry, L.; Loup, B.; Popot, M.-A.; Dreau, M.-L.; Garcia, P.; Bruyas, J.-F.; Bonnaire, Y. Two complementary methods to control gonadotropin-releasing hormone vaccination (Improvac®) misuse in horseracing: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test in plasma and steroidomics in urine. Drug Test. Anal. 2017, 9, 1432–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Scheme of the vaccination protocols (weeks). Arrow: injection; Star: slaughter.
Figure 1. Scheme of the vaccination protocols (weeks). Arrow: injection; Star: slaughter.
Animals 11 00632 g001
Figure 2. Evolution of scrotal sac height (cm) over experimental time. Red solid and dashed lines correspond to the predicted testicular length at puberty (95% confidence level) [32]. Dimensions from groups E2 and L3 in the 37th week and from the control group in the 33rd week were estimated.
Figure 2. Evolution of scrotal sac height (cm) over experimental time. Red solid and dashed lines correspond to the predicted testicular length at puberty (95% confidence level) [32]. Dimensions from groups E2 and L3 in the 37th week and from the control group in the 33rd week were estimated.
Animals 11 00632 g002
Figure 3. Evolution of scrotal sac width (cm) over experimental time. Red solid and dashed lines correspond to the predicted testicular width at puberty (95% confidence level) [32]. Dimensions from groups E2 and L3 in the 37th week and from the control group in the 33rd week are estimated.
Figure 3. Evolution of scrotal sac width (cm) over experimental time. Red solid and dashed lines correspond to the predicted testicular width at puberty (95% confidence level) [32]. Dimensions from groups E2 and L3 in the 37th week and from the control group in the 33rd week are estimated.
Animals 11 00632 g003
Table 1. Mean variation of scrotal sac height and width over time (weeks after first injection).
Table 1. Mean variation of scrotal sac height and width over time (weeks after first injection).
Weeks after FIScrotal Sac HeightScrotal Sac Width
Grp E2Grp L2Grp L3p-ValueGrp E2Grp L2Grp L3p-Value
40.380.200.480.0200.470.260.610.216
8−0.21−0.22−0.170.714−0.14−0.26−0.110.053
120.08 b0.33 c−0.29 a0.0010.13 a0.23 a−0.26 b<0.001
160.69 a−0.13 b0.04 b0.0050.530.040.110.009
200.260.160.240.6740.370.090.170.073
280.510.211.200.0200.350.191.000.039
320.07-0.180.186−0.06-0.210.001
360.00-0.000.7100.11-−0.070.001
380.04-- 0.00--
Second Vaccination Cycle
4−0.24-−0.230.934−0.13-−0.140.804
8−0.22-−0.170.509−0.17-−0.090.186
For each dimension, the different superscript letters in the same row represent significant differences between the means.
Table 2. Comparison of post-mortem morphometry between groups (mean ± SEM) (least squares model).
Table 2. Comparison of post-mortem morphometry between groups (mean ± SEM) (least squares model).
ItemGroup CGroup E2Group L2Group L3p-Value 1
n = 11 (57w)n = 8 (57w)n = 6 (37w)n = 11 (57w)
Carcass weight (kg)132.6 ± 4.7123.1 ± 6.1113.0 ± 4.4117.2 ± 3.80.412
Aggregated weight (g)829.7 ± 42.5259.6 ± 45.9375.7 ± 48.2227.3 ± 38.30.103
Testis weight (g)314.4 ± 17.185.6 ± 18.5140.0 ± 19.577.0 ± 15.50.065
Epididymal weight (g)10.5 ± 4.644.3 ± 4.942.6 ± 5.236.6 ± 4.10.741
Testis length (cm)12.4 ± 0.48.0 ± 0.58.5 ± 0.57.8 ± 0.40.320
Testis width (cm)7.7 ± 0.35.9 ± 0.34.7 ± 0.35.6 ± 0.20.132
Epididimal length (cm)20.0 ± 0.714.2 ± 0.716.0 ± 0.713.7 ± 0.60.133
Aggregated weight represents the weight of the testicle and appended structures retrieved from the visceral layer of the vaginal tunica. 1 Comparison between the treated groups only.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Back to TopTop