The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders
Abstract
:Simple Summary
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Birds and Treatments
2.2. Experimental Diets
2.3. Hen Performance and Egg Quality
2.4. Blood Chemistry
2.5. Excreta Moisture
2.6. Total Tract Metabolizability
2.7. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Awad, W.A.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Ghapeeb, K.; Zentek, J. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mathivanan, R.; Kalaiarasi, K. Panchagavya and Andrographis paniculata as alternative to antibiotic growth promoters on haematological, serum biochemical parameters and immune status of broilers. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 44, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Forte, C.; Acuti, G.; Manuali, E.; Proietti, P.C.; Pavonre, S.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Moscati, L.; Onofri, A.; Lorenzetti, C.; Fraclosini, M. Effects of two different probiotics on microflora, morphology, and morphometry of gut in organic laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2528–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mikulski, D.; Jankowski, J.; Naczmanski, J.; Mikulska, M.; Demey, V. Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2691–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teo, A.Y.; Tan, H.M. Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a novel strain of Bacillus subtilis isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4185–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Aljumaah, M.R.; Alkhulaifi, M.M.; Abudabos, A.M.; Aljumaah, R.S.; Alsaleh, A.N.; Stanley, D. Bacillus subtilis PB6 based probiotic supplementation plays a role in the recovery after the necrotic enteritis challenge. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, C.L.; Ji, C.; Ma, Q.; Hao, K.; Jin, Z.Y.; Li, K. Effects of a dried Bacillus subtilis culture on egg quality. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jayaraman, S.; Thangavel, G.; Kurian, H.; Mani, R.; Mukkalil, R.; Chirakkal, H. Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chung, S.H.; Lee, J.; Kong, C. Effects of multi strain probiotics on egg production and quality in laying hens fed diets containing food waste product. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 14, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Sobczak, A.; Kozlowski, K. The effect of a probiotic preparation containing Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 on egg production and physiological parameters of laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015, 15, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Darsi, E.; Zhaghari, M. Effects of Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on productive performance, egg quality and hatchability in broiler breeder hens under commercial farm condition. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2021, 49, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lara, L.J.; Rostagno, M.H. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals 2013, 3, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zulkifli, I.; Abdulllah, N.; Azrin, N.M.; Ho, Y.W. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rajalekshmi, M.; Sugumar, C.; Chirakkal, H.; Ramarao, S.V. Influence of chromium propionate on the carcass characteristics and immune response of commercial broiler birds under normal rearing conditions. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spears, J.W.; Lloyd, K.E.; Pickworth, C.A.; Huang, Y.L.; Krafka, K.; Hyda, J.; Grimes, J.L. Chromium propionate in broilers: Human food and broiler safety. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6579–6585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, X.L.; Zeng, Y.B.; Liu, L.X.; Song, Q.L.; Zou, Z.H.; Wei, Q.P.; Song, W.J. Effects of dietary chromium propionate on laying performance, egg quality, serum biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of laying ducks under heat stress. Animal 2021, 15, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Food additives permitted in feed and drinking water of animals: Chromium propionate. Fed. Regist. 2020, 85, 48650–48651. [Google Scholar]
- Farag, M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Arif, M.; Ayasan, T.; Dhama, K.; Patra, A.; Karthik, K. Role of chromium in poultry nutrition and health: Beneficial applications and toxic effects. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 13, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dalolio, S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Silva, J.N.; Campos, P.H.R.F.; Lima, H.J.D.; Moreira, J.; Ribeiro, V., Jr. Dietary chromium supplementation forheat-stressed broilers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yildiz, A.O.; Parlat, S.S.; Yazgan, O. The effects of organic chromium supplementation on production traits and some serum parameters of laying quails. Rev. Med. Vet. 2004, 155, 642–646. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, W.; Gu, Y.; Lu, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhao, R. Effects of chromium propionate on egg production, egg quality, plasma biochemical parameters, and egg chromium deposition in late-phase laying hens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 157, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Stefanello, C.; Santos, T.C.; Murakami, A.E.; Martins, E.N.; Carneiro, T.C. Productive performance, eggshell quality, and eggshell ultrastructure of laying hens fed diets supplemented with organic trace minerals. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vogtmann, H.; Pfirter, H.P.; Prabucki, A.L. A new method of determining metabolisability of energy and digestibility of fatty acids in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 1975, 16, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choct, M.; Annison, G. Anti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: Roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Br. Poult. Sci. 1992, 33, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kong, C.; Adeola, O. Invited review—Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Stefanello, C.; Vieira, S.L.; Soster, P.; Santos, B.M.; Dalmoro, Y.K.; Favero, A.; Cowieson, A. Utilization of corn-based diets supplemented with an exogenous a-amylase for broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5862–5869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Haetinger, V.S.; Dalmoro, Y.K.; Godoy, G.L.; Lang, M.B.; de Souza, O.F.; Aristimunha, P.; Stefanello, C. Optimizing cost, growth performance, and nutrient absorption with a bio-emulsifier based on lysophospholipids for broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahrens, W.H.; Cox, D.J.; Budhwar, G. Use of the arcsine and square root transformations for subjectively determined percentage data. Weed Sci. 1990, 38, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- SAS Institute. SAS User′s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Dhama, K.; Saminathan, M.; Tiwari, R.; Jeon, G.J.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Modes of action and beneficial applications of chromium in poultry nutrition, production and health: A review. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 10, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sjofjan, O.; Adli, D.N.; Sholikin, M.M.; Jayanegara, A.; Irawan, A. The effects of probiotics on the performance, egg quality and blood parameters of laying hens: A meta-analysis. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2021, 30, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abudabos, A.M.; Alyemni, A.H.; Al Marshad, M.B.A. Bacillus subtilis PB6 based probiotic (CLOSTATTM) improves intestinal morphological and microbiological status of broiler chicken under Clostridium perfringens challenge. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 978–982. [Google Scholar]
- Park, J.H.; Kim, I.H. Supplemental effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis B2A on productivity, organ weight, intestinal Salmonella microflora, and breast meat quality of growing broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ribeiro, V., Jr.; Albino, L.F.T.; Rostagno, H.S.; Barreto, S.L.T.; Hannas, M.I.; Harrington, D.; de Araujo, F.A.; Ferreira, H.C., Jr.; Ferreira, M.A. Effects of the dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis levels on performance, egg quality and excreta moisture of layers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 195, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fathi, M.; Al-Homidan, I.; Al-Dokhail, A.; Ebeid, T.; Abou-Emera, O.; Alsagan, A. Effects of dietary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation on productive performance, immune response and egg quality characteristics in laying hens under high ambient temperature. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 17, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Panda, A.K.; Rama Rao, S.S.; Raju, M.V.; Sharma, S.S. Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of white leghorn layer breeders. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahdavi, A.H.; Rahmani, H.R.; Pourreza, J. Effect of probiotic supplements on egg quality and laying hen′s performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 4, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Gilliland, S.E.; Nelson, C.R.; Maxwell, C. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fukushima, M.; Nakano, M. The effect of a probiotic on faecal and liver lipid classes in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1995, 73, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalavathy, R.N.; Abdullah, N.; Jalaludin, S.; Ho, Y.W. Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mountzouris, K.C.; Tsitrsikos, P.; Palamidi, I.; Arvaniti, A.; Mohnl, M.; Schatzmayr, G.; Fegeros, K. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, R.A. Chromium, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism. J. Adv. Med. 1995, 8, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
- Hanafy, M.M. Influence of adding organic chromium in diet on productive traits, serum constituents and immune status of Bandarah laying hens and semen physical properties for cocks in winter season. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 31, 203–216. [Google Scholar]
- Bahrami, A.; Moeini, M.; Ghazi, S.H.; Targhibi, M.R. The effect of different levels of organic and inorganic chromium supplementation on immune function of broiler chicken under heat-stress conditions. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekar, S.; Balakrishnan, U. Chromium nutrition in alleviating the effect of stressors in poultry production: A review. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 1040. [Google Scholar]
Item | Control Diet (55 to 70 Weeks of Age) |
---|---|
Ingredients, % | |
Corn | 58.52 |
Soybean meal, 46 % CP | 19.64 |
Wheat bran | 4.00 |
Soybean oil | 2.36 |
Dicalcium phosphate | 1.52 |
Limestone | 12.84 |
Salt | 0.43 |
DL-Methionine, 99% | 0.30 |
L-Lysine-HCl, 78% | 0.15 |
L-Threonine, 98.5% | 0.09 |
Mineral and vitamin premix 1 | 0.15 |
Nutrient and energy composition, % or as shown | |
AME, kcal/kg | 2750 |
Crude protein | 14.50 |
Calcium | 4.30 |
Available phosphorus | 0.35 |
Total phosphorus | 0.53 |
Sodium | 0.18 |
Potassium | 0.59 |
Chloride | 0.35 |
Dig. Lys 2 | 0.75 |
Dig. Met + Cys | 0.70 |
Dig. Thr | 0.58 |
Dig. Trp | 0.15 |
Item | BW, g | EP 1, % | FI 2, g/hen/d | Egg Loss, % | Dirty Eggs, % | Egg Mass, g | FCR 3, kg/kg | FCR, kg/dz | Excreta Moisture, % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age | |||||||||
Control | 2163 | 69.9 | 130 | 11.2 | 6.7 | 40.3 | 3.25 | 2.22 | 79.9 |
Control + probiotic 4 | 2161 | 72.6 | 130 | 9.1 | 6.4 | 43.3 | 3.03 | 2.20 | 79.6 |
Control + CrProp 5 | 2095 | 71.9 | 128 | 9.4 | 6.4 | 41.6 | 3.09 | 2.15 | 79.2 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2112 | 73.2 | 129 | 3.9 | 6.4 | 42.4 | 3.04 | 2.07 | 79.0 |
SEM | 22.8 | 0.88 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 0.9 | 0.52 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.19 |
p-value | 0.648 | 0.574 | 0.918 | 0.394 | 0.974 | 0.216 | 0.464 | 0.620 | 0.355 |
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age | |||||||||
Control | 2144 | 67.8 | 131 | 6.7 | 8.5 | 39.1 | 3.43 | 2.49 | 79.4 a |
Control + probiotic | 2159 | 72.6 | 129 | 3.7 | 5.3 | 42.9 | 3.07 | 2.19 | 77.8 b |
Control + CrProp | 2062 | 70.7 | 127 | 4.5 | 7.2 | 41.9 | 3.05 | 2.10 | 79.0 ab |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2076 | 72.8 | 130 | 2.8 | 3.7 | 42.4 | 3.09 | 2.08 | 77.5 b |
SEM | 23.0 | 1.19 | 1.6 | 2.0 | 1.3 | 0.70 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.29 |
p-value | 0.345 | 0.429 | 0.858 | 0.517 | 0.621 | 0.237 | 0.102 | 0.068 | 0.047 |
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age | |||||||||
Control | 2143 | 64.6 b | 129 | 9.0 | 9.2 | 37.6 b | 3.49 a | 2.41 | 79.0 a |
Control + probiotic | 2177 | 68.9 ab | 127 | 6.2 | 6.1 | 41.0 a | 3.13 b | 2.25 | 77.3 ab |
Control + CrProp | 2061 | 70.1 a | 127 | 8.1 | 7.8 | 40.2 ab | 3.19 ab | 2.21 | 77.3 ab |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2078 | 72.3 a | 123 | 2.8 | 7.1 | 41.9 a | 2.94 b | 2.17 | 76.2 b |
SEM | 24.7 | 0.99 | 1.90 | 1.4 | 1.3 | 0.61 | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.40 |
p-value | 0.301 | 0.042 | 0.718 | 0.392 | 0.862 | 0.059 | 0.025 | 0.341 | 0.052 |
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age | |||||||||
Control | 2099 | 63.4 b | 121 | 8.3 | 10.8 | 36.8 b | 3.39 a | 2.53 a | 77.4 |
Control + probiotic | 2170 | 69.2 a | 123 | 6.2 | 7.3 | 41.0 a | 3.05 ab | 2.19 ab | 76.9 |
Control + CrProp | 2008 | 69.5 a | 120 | 5.9 | 5.8 | 41.4 a | 2.89 b | 2.18 ab | 76.2 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2059 | 70.8 a | 122 | 5.9 | 5.5 | 42.4 a | 2.95 b | 2.10 b | 75.5 |
SEM | 25.8 | 1.04 | 2.13 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 0.65 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.43 |
p-value | 0.150 | 0.049 | 0.933 | 0.859 | 0.573 | 0.009 | 0.059 | 0.190 | 0.422 |
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age) | |||||||||
Control | 2138 | 66.4 b | 128 | 8.8 | 8.8 | 38.4 b | 3.39 a | 2.41 a | 78.9 |
Control + probiotic | 2167 | 70.8 a | 127 | 6.3 | 6.3 | 42.1 a | 3.07 b | 2.21 ab | 78.0 |
Control + CrProp | 2056 | 70.5 ab | 125 | 6.5 | 7.0 | 41.3 a | 3.06 b | 2.16 b | 77.9 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2081 | 72.3 a | 126 | 5.7 | 3.9 | 42.3 a | 3.00 b | 2.10 b | 77.0 |
SEM | 22.3 | 0.77 | 1.42 | 0.99 | 0.86 | 0.46 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.26 |
p-value | 0.279 | 0.043 | 0.914 | 0.715 | 0.230 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.051 | 0.443 |
Item | Egg Weight, g | Specific Weight, g/cm3 | Haugh Unit | Albumen, % | Yolk, % | Yolk Strength, N | Yolk Index | Total Solids, % | Shell, % | Thickness, mm | Shell Strength, N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age | |||||||||||
Control | 57.1 | 1084 | 89.1 | 62.2 | 28.8 | 7.9 | 0.47 | 56.3 | 8.5 | 0.352 b | 26.3 b |
Control + probiotic 1 | 59.7 | 1086 | 89.6 | 62.6 | 29.0 | 7.9 | 0.49 | 55.8 | 8.9 | 0.372 a | 26.4 b |
Control + CrProp 2 | 58.0 | 1085 | 90.4 | 64.5 | 28.3 | 7.8 | 0.49 | 55.7 | 8.8 | 0.373 a | 29.6 a |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 58.2 | 1084 | 89.7 | 62.6 | 28.5 | 7.8 | 0.49 | 55.9 | 9.0 | 0.376 a | 29.7 a |
SEM | 0.49 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 0.47 | 0.27 | 0.02 | 0.003 | 0.23 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.24 |
p-value | 0.294 | 0.419 | 0.885 | 0.330 | 0.828 | 0.428 | 0.479 | 0.781 | 0.238 | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age | |||||||||||
Control | 57.8 | 1079 b | 88.6 | 63.4 | 29.0 | 7.5 | 0.47 | 54.2 | 8.1 | 0.343 b | 25.1 b |
Control + probiotic | 59.1 | 1084 a | 89.0 | 63.4 | 29.1 | 7.6 | 0.48 | 54.0 | 8.5 | 0.366 a | 25.3 b |
Control + CrProp | 57.9 | 1084 a | 90.8 | 63.2 | 28.6 | 7.5 | 0.49 | 54.9 | 8.7 | 0.365 a | 28.7 a |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 59.0 | 1083 a | 90.4 | 63.6 | 29.1 | 7.5 | 0.48 | 54.5 | 8.7 | 0.360 a | 28.7 a |
SEM | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.71 | 0.41 | 0.22 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.23 | 0.12 | 0.003 | 0.26 |
p-value | 0.695 | 0.014 | 0.648 | 0.987 | 0.807 | 0.748 | 0.136 | 0.533 | 0.172 | 0.050 | 0.001 |
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age | |||||||||||
Control | 58.2 | 1079 b | 88.9 | 61.6 | 29.9 | 7.4 | 0.44 | 53.7 | 8.1 b | 0.347 b | 24.1 b |
Control + probiotic | 59.6 | 1082 ab | 89.3 | 61.8 | 29.4 | 7.4 | 0.45 | 54.5 | 8.7 a | 0.364 ab | 24.2 b |
Control + CrProp | 57.6 | 1084 a | 91.0 | 62.6 | 28.9 | 7.4 | 0.46 | 52.7 | 8.9 a | 0.365 a | 28.0 a |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 59.0 | 1081 ab | 89.4 | 62.6 | 29.2 | 7.5 | 0.45 | 53.2 | 8.6 a | 0.367 a | 28.1 a |
SEM | 0.51 | 0.55 | 0.59 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.42 | 0.09 | 0.004 | 0.28 |
p-value | 0.535 | 0.020 | 0.599 | 0.293 | 0.425 | 0.849 | 0.209 | 0.487 | 0.010 | 0.055 | 0.001 |
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age | |||||||||||
Control | 58.1 | 1079 b | 88.1 | 62.4 | 29.9 | 7.5 | 0.46 | 53.1 | 8.2 b | 0.345 b | 24.6 b |
Control + probiotic | 60.5 | 1084 a | 88.0 | 62.1 | 29.4 | 7.5 | 0.47 | 53.3 | 8.8 a | 0.366 a | 24.9 b |
Control + CrProp | 58.3 | 1083 a | 90.2 | 63.4 | 28.9 | 7.6 | 0.47 | 53.2 | 8.7 a | 0.369 a | 28.6 a |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 60.1 | 1083 a | 88.6 | 62.8 | 29.2 | 7.5 | 0.46 | 53.5 | 8.7 a | 0.370 a | 28.6 a |
SEM | 0.49 | 0.53 | 0.57 | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.003 | 0.29 |
p-value | 0.198 | 0.008 | 0.488 | 0.350 | 0.321 | 0.112 | 0.545 | 0.713 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age) | |||||||||||
Control | 57.8 | 1080 b | 88.7 | 62.4 | 29.4 | 7.6 | 0.46 | 54.3 | 8.2 b | 0.347 b | 25.1 c |
Control + probiotic | 59.7 | 1084 a | 88.9 | 62.5 | 29.2 | 7.6 | 0.47 | 54.4 | 8.7 a | 0.367 a | 25.2 b |
Control + CrProp | 57.9 | 1084 a | 90.6 | 63.4 | 28.7 | 7.6 | 0.48 | 54.1 | 8.8 a | 0.368 a | 28.7 a |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 59.1 | 1083 a | 89.5 | 63.0 | 29.0 | 7.6 | 0.47 | 54.3 | 8.8 a | 0.370 a | 28.8 a |
SEM | 0.45 | 0.49 | 0.51 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.003 | 0.14 | 0.08 | 0.003 | 0.26 |
p-value | 0.369 | 0.014 | 0.555 | 0.446 | 0.499 | 0.160 | 0.186 | 0.892 | 0.028 | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Item1 | Albumin, g/dL | Cholesterol, mg/dL | Glucose, mg/dL | Triglycerides, mg/dL |
---|---|---|---|---|
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age | ||||
Control | 2.14 | 149 | 202 | 1887 |
Control + probiotic 2 | 2.18 | 149 | 193 | 1774 |
Control + CrProp 3 | 2.31 | 148 | 194 | 1902 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2.10 | 129 | 190 | 1498 |
SEM | 0.04 | 6.63 | 2.33 | 132.9 |
p-value | 0.211 | 0.622 | 0.324 | 0.704 |
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age | ||||
Control | 2.13 | 157 a | 201 a | 1917 |
Control + probiotic | 2.16 | 157 a | 186 b | 1978 |
Control + CrProp | 2.20 | 132 ab | 181 b | 1551 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2.08 | 119 b | 188 ab | 1391 |
SEM | 0.03 | 5.44 | 2.54 | 110.1 |
p-value | 0.386 | 0.020 | 0.034 | 0.172 |
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age | ||||
Control | 2.44 | 128 | 179 | 1626 |
Control + probiotic | 2.30 | 115 | 173 | 1308 |
Control + CrProp | 2.39 | 123 | 170 | 1404 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2.30 | 112 | 181 | 1251 |
SEM | 0.03 | 5.55 | 1.71 | 96.9 |
p-value | 0.367 | 0.143 | 0.080 | 0.556 |
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age | ||||
Control | 2.55 | 147 | 185 | 1648 |
Control + probiotic | 2.59 | 134 | 186 | 1591 |
Control + CrProp | 2.50 | 118 | 183 | 1196 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2.51 | 116 | 179 | 1478 |
SEM | 0.04 | 5.44 | 2.33 | 101.2 |
p-value | 0.900 | 0.157 | 0.760 | 0.414 |
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age) | ||||
Control | 2.33 | 149 a | 192 a | 1770 |
Control + probiotic | 2.33 | 139 ab | 185 ab | 1663 |
Control + CrProp | 2.36 | 129 bc | 182 b | 1514 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 2.25 | 119 c | 183 b | 1404 |
SEM | 0.02 | 3.84 | 1.32 | 67.3 |
p-value | 0.231 | 0.009 | 0.037 | 0.235 |
Item | Dry Matter | Nitrogen | Energy | AME, kcal/kg |
---|---|---|---|---|
Control | 0.67 b | 0.56 c | 0.80 b | 3155 |
Control + probiotic 1 | 0.72 a | 0.61 b | 0.84 a | 3215 |
Control + CrProp 2 | 0.71 a | 0.65 ab | 0.82 b | 3210 |
Control + probiotic + CrProp | 0.72 a | 0.68 a | 0.85 a | 3226 |
SEM | 0.005 | 0.010 | 0.004 | 16.61 |
p-value | 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.249 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Souza, O.; Adams, C.; Rodrigues, B.; Krause, A.; Bonamigo, R.; Zavarize, K.; Stefanello, C. The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals 2021, 11, 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084
Souza O, Adams C, Rodrigues B, Krause A, Bonamigo R, Zavarize K, Stefanello C. The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084
Chicago/Turabian StyleSouza, Otoniel, Carine Adams, Beatriz Rodrigues, Alexandre Krause, Renata Bonamigo, Kelen Zavarize, and Catarina Stefanello. 2021. "The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders" Animals 11, no. 11: 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084
APA StyleSouza, O., Adams, C., Rodrigues, B., Krause, A., Bonamigo, R., Zavarize, K., & Stefanello, C. (2021). The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals, 11(11), 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084