Next Article in Journal
Feather Pecking in Non-Beak-Trimmed and Beak-Trimmed Laying Hens on Commercial Farms with Aviaries
Next Article in Special Issue
Improving Gander Reproductive Efficacy in the Context of Globally Sustainable Goose Production
Previous Article in Journal
Performance and Egg Quality of Laying Hens Fed Diets Containing Raw, Hydrobarothermally-Treated and Fermented Rapeseed Cake
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Pantothenic Acid Supplementation on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Plasma Parameters of Starter White Pekin Ducks Fed a Corn–Soybean Meal Diet
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders

1
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil
2
Clinical Analysis Laboratory (LACVET), Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria 97105-900, Brazil
3
Animal Nutrition and Health South America, Kemin Industries Inc., Valinhos 13279-450, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Animals 2021, 11(11), 3084; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084
Submission received: 16 September 2021 / Revised: 17 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 28 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nutritional and Reproductive Efficiency in Poultry)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

Environmental conditions can generate heat stress in poultry production. Feed additives have been supplemented in diets for layers and broilers to improve their health status, immune system and nutrition, as well as productive performance. This paper shows the effects of probiotic Bacillus subtilis PB6 and chromium propionate diet supplementation on productive parameters, egg and eggshell quality, excreta moisture, cortisol and serum biochemistry of laying breeder hens. Diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6, chromium propionate or a combination of the two resulted in improved egg production, feed conversion ratio, eggshell quality and nutrient metabolizability, without modifying the main serum biochemical parameters of hens from 55 to 70 weeks of age. Highlighted improvements in hen performance and eggshell quality were observed when hens were fed diets supplemented with a combination of the probiotic and chromium. This study expands our understanding concerning the combined supplementation of probiotics and organic chromium for poultry.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtillis PB6, chromium propionate or a combination of the two on the performance, egg and eggshell quality, nutrient metabolizability and serum biochemistry of layer breeders. White Plymouth Rock and Red Rhodes Island breeder hens at 55 weeks of age were allocated in individual cages using a completely randomized block design with 16 replicates. Hens were fed control, control + probiotic (500 g/ton of Bacillus subtilis PB6), control + CrProp (50 g/ton of chromium propionate) and control + probiotic + CrProp diets from 55 to 70 weeks of age. Productive parameters and eggshell quality as well as cortisol and blood biochemistry were grouped each 28 d as well as for the overall period. The metabolizability of nutrients and energy was determined at 70 weeks of age. In the overall period, hens fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets had significantly higher egg production, egg mass, shell percentage, thickness and shell strength. The metabolizability of dry matter, nitrogen and energy increased in hens that were fed the control + probiotic + CrProp diet. In conclusion, diets supplemented with Bacillus subtillis PB6 and chromium propionate resulted in improved productive performance, eggshell quality and nutrient metabolizability of layer breeders, without modifying serum cortisol, albumin and triglycerides.

1. Introduction

Feed additives have been increasingly used in animal nutrition due to their remarkable benefits. The use of probiotics has aroused widespread interest in poultry farms, being related to improvements in the immune system of hens, while beneficially affecting the hosts by modifying their intestinal microbiome as well as improving feed efficiency, digestion and production performance [1,2,3].
Probiotic effectiveness for poultry may depend on several factors, including microbial species composition, diets, supplemental dose, combination with other additives and environmental stress factors [4]. Bacillus subtilis PB6 is a natural strain isolated from healthy chicken gut that produces antimicrobial components with broad activity against microorganisms [5,6]. In laying hens, Bacillus subtilis PB6 increased feed efficiency and reduced excreta moisture as well as cholesterol content in egg yolk and serum [7,8]. Other beneficial effects of this probiotic for hens were improvements in egg production, egg quality, nutrient digestibility and return on investment [9,10,11].
Heat stress is considered as one of the most important environmental stressors that modifies the oxidant/antioxidant system and compromises the health status of laying hens, resulting in their poor performance worldwide [12]. It has been reported that dietary Bacillus subtilis supplementation could reduce heat stress in birds [13]. However, organic chromium has been the main additive that has demonstrated positive effects against stress conditions in birds; several researchers have started exploring the effect of chromium on laying hens, breeders and broilers, for different requirements [14,15,16]. The US Food and Drug Administration approved chromium propionate (CrProp) as an additive for broiler feeds at concentrations up to 0.20 mg Cr/kg [17].
Chromium has been supplemented from different sources and levels, and it has been shown to present antioxidant properties, which help to attenuate the negative effects of oxidative stress, while contributing to lipid, protein and nucleic acid metabolism [18]. Furthermore, chromium has also been related to improvements in cell preservation and immune responses, which contribute to animal homeostasis and thermoregulatory capacity under heat stress conditions [19]. In laying hens, chromium propionate supplementation resulted in increased egg production, feed efficiency and egg quality, whereas it reduced egg cholesterol levels and serum cortisol [16,20,21].
The effect of Bacillus subtilis or chromium propionate on performance improvements in broilers is well-documented; however, more data are needed on when these additives are supplemented in diets for layer or breeder hens as well as when both additives are combined. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of Bacillus subtillis PB6, chromium propionate or a combination of the two on the performance, egg and eggshell quality, nutrient metabolizability and serum biochemistry of laying breeder hens of 55 to 70 weeks of age.

2. Materials and Methods

All procedures involving live-bird management and healthcare were approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil (approval number: 5404280717).

2.1. Birds and Treatments

A total of 32 White Plymouth Rock and 32 Red Rhodes Island laying breeder hens at 50 weeks of age, obtained from the Poultry Science Laboratory (LAVIC-UFSM, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil), were allocated in a conventional poultry house, weighed and placed in individual wire cages (0.33 m length × 0.46 m deep × 0.40 m height) until the end of the experiment at 70 weeks of age. Hens had free access to water and mash feeds. The lighting program was a 16L:8D cycle.
Hens were distributed by weight and egg production before starting the experiment in a completely randomized block design, where each treatment was composed of 8 White Plymouth Rock and 8 Red Rhodes Island breeder hens. Hens were subjected to a 4-week adjustment period to the experimental diets and then fed the experimental feeds from 55 to 70 weeks of age. Birds were fed 4 dietary treatments with 16 replicates, and the experimental unit was the individually caged hen. Measurements were done in 28 d periods, defined as 55 to 58, 59 to 62, 63 to 66 and 67 to 70 weeks of age.

2.2. Experimental Diets

All ingredients utilized during the study were from the same batch. A common control diet (Table 1), formulated of corn, soybean meal and wheat bran, was mixed, and afterwards the additives were supplemented to obtain the other dietary treatments. Treatments consisted of control (control; without additives); control + probiotic (control diet supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 probiotic); control + CrProp (control supplemented with chromium propionate); and control + probiotic + CrProp (supplemented with both the probiotic and chromium propionate) diets.
The probiotic was supplemented at 500 g/ton from a commercial Bacillus subtillis PB6, PTA-6737 + 98% calcium carbonate (CLOSTAT® Dry; Kemin Industries Inc., Des Moines, IA, USA) with 2.0 × 1011 CFU/g. The organic chromium was supplemented at 50 g/ton from a commercial product (KemTRACE® Chromium 0.4% Dry; Kemin Industries Inc., Des Moines, IA, USA), an organic-compliant form of chromium propionate.

2.3. Hen Performance and Egg Quality

Hens were fed twice a day and eggs were collected four times per day. Egg production by each hen was recorded daily. Feed intake (g/bird/day), feed conversion (kg feed/kg eggs and kg feed/dozen eggs), egg production (%), egg loss (%) and dirty eggs (%) were grouped per period of 28 d. The egg loss (%) was considered as eggs that were broken, cracked, porous or thin-shelled.
Daily egg mass was calculated by multiplying the laying rate (%) by the average weight of eggs (g) divided by 100. At the end of each 28 d period, average egg weight, specific weight, albumen height, percentage and shell thickness were measured for 4 consecutive days. All intact eggs from each hen were identified and individually weighed. The specific weight was determined using the flotation method in saline solution, where seven saline solutions were prepared, ranging from 1.070 to 1.094 g/cm3 with a variation of 0.004 g/cm3 for each solution. After the test, all eggs were used to determine the albumen height. Measurements in millimeters (mm) were related to egg weight to determine the Haugh unit: HU log 100(H + 7.57 − 1.7 W0.37), in which H = albumen height (mm) and W = egg weight (g).
Yolk and albumen weights were also obtained to determine yolk and albumen percentages of the entire egg. The yolk index (YI) was assessed by measuring yolk width (YW) and yolk height (YH), and was the ratio between these two parameters as YI = YH/YW. The percentage of moisture and total solids of yolks were determined using one egg per cage (method 950.46 [22]). The yolk samples were placed in individual plastic drying containers and taken to a forced-air oven with a temperature of 55 °C for 72 h (Marconi, MA035, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil). Then, total solids were evaluated in an oven at 105 °C for 24 h (method 934.01 [23]).
Shells were washed and dried at room temperature for 72 h, then weighed using a precision digital scale (0.001 g; Bioscale, São Paulo, SP, Brazil). Shell percentage was expressed relative to the egg weight. After weighing the shells, shell thickness was measured at 3 points in the central region of each shell without the external membrane using a digital micrometer (Mitutoyo Sul Americana, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil).
All intact eggs produced on day 28 of each period were used for the measurement of shell strength (N) and yolk strength (N), which were obtained with a texturometer, a TA.XT2 Texture Analyzer with a cylindrical, stainless steel 6 mm probe (Texture Technologies Corp. and Stable Micro Systems Ltd., Hamilton, MA, USA) following the methodology described by Stefanello et al. [24]. After shell strength evaluation, the egg was broken to measure the yolk vitelline membrane strength, which was also obtained with a texturometer, a TA.XT2 Texture Analyzer with a cylindrical, stainless steel 2 mm probe.

2.4. Blood Chemistry

Blood was collected from 10 random hens before the start of the experimental period. At the end of each 28 d period, blood was collected from the wing vein of 8 hens per treatment and centrifuged (3400 RPM for 20 min), and the obtained serum was stored at −80 °C. The serum was used to determine glucose, total cholesterol, albumin and triglycerides using a BS-120 automatic biochemical analyzer (Mindray Headquarters, Nanshan, Shenzhen, China). Commercial kits (Bioclin®, Quibasa, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil) were used following the methodology proposed by the manufacturer for albumin, cholesterol, triglycerides and glucose. Serum cortisol (n = 32 per period) was determined using a chemiluminescence immunoassay kit. Samples were automatically diluted by the biochemical analyzer in the proportion of 1:10 (sample to distilled water), reducing the effects of lipemia, hemolysis and jaundice that any sample could present.

2.5. Excreta Moisture

At the end of each 28 d period, excreta were collected on trays covered with plastic placed under the cages. Excreta samples from each experimental unit were pooled by cage, mixed and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Subsequently, excreta were weighed and dried in a forced-air oven at 55 °C until reaching constant weight and ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen (Tecnal, R-TE-648, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil). Moisture analysis of excreta was performed after oven-drying the samples at 105 °C for 16 h (method 934.01 [23]).

2.6. Total Tract Metabolizability

On the last day of the experiment (at 70 weeks of age), excreta were collected per cage to evaluate the apparent metabolizable energy (AME) and the apparent total tract metabolizability coefficients of dry matter (DM), nitrogen and energy. Celite at 1% was used in each experimental feed, and diets with markers were provided for 3 days before the excreta collection.
Excreta were collected twice daily for 2 days, immediately mixed and pooled by cage and stored at −20 °C until analysis. Prior to calorimetry, excreta were dried in a forced-air oven at 55 °C and ground to pass a 0.5 mm screen. Analysis of the concentration of dry matter of diets and excreta was performed after oven-drying the samples at 105 °C for 16 h. Diets and excreta were also analyzed for gross energy (GE) using an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (Parr Instrument Company, 6400 Calorimeter, Moline, IL, USA) with benzoic acid as a calibration standard. The nitrogen concentration of diets and excreta was determined via the dry combustion method using a CN analyzer (Thermo-Finnigan Flash EA 1112, Waltham, MA, USA). Acid insoluble ash concentrations in the diet and excreta samples were determined using the method described by Vogtmann et al. [25] and Choct and Annison [26].
Apparent total tract metabolizability coefficients of DM, nitrogen and energy were calculated using the following equation [27,28]:
Metabolizability coefficient = 1 − [(Mi/Mo) × (Eo/Ei)],
where Mi and Mo are the concentration of acid insoluble ash in diet and excreta (g/kg of DM) samples, respectively; Ei and Eo are the concentration of nitrogen or DM (g/kg of DM) or GE (kcal/kg of DM) in diet and excreta samples, respectively.
The AME (kcal/kg) of experimental feeds was calculated using the analyzed content of acid insoluble ash and GE as previously described by Kong and Adeola [27], Stefanello et al. [28] and Haetinger et al. [29].

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Data were submitted to the normality test and Levene’s test for homogeneity of variance and were transformed using the arcsine square root percentage (z = arcsine (sqrt (y/100)) whenever not normally distributed [30]. Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance using the MIXED procedure of SAS [31], and means were compared by the Tukey test at p < 0.05.

3. Results

Analysis of Bacillus subtilis PB6 in the experimental diets showed that the supplemental probiotic had in-feed concentration in agreement with the expected values. Bacillus subtilis PB6 was not detected in the control or control + CrProp feeds; however, the recovery of Bacillus subtilis in the control + probiotic feed was 6.8 × 107 CFU/g and the control + probiotic + CrProp feed had 7.0 × 107 CFU/g. Chromium was supplemented at 0.20 mg/kg of feed and it was not detected in water samples collected on the first and last day of the study.
No effect was observed between the two strains of layer breeders, previously blocked in the experimental design, and only treatments were considered as an independent variable. There were no effects (p > 0.05) of dietary treatments on body weight, feed intake, egg loss, dirty eggs and mortality evaluated per 28 d period or in the overall period.
Productive performance and excreta moisture of layer breeders are presented in Table 2 and demonstrate that the probiotic and organic chromium supplementation improved FCR, egg production and egg mass (p < 0.05). From 59 to 62 and 63 to 66 weeks of age, hens fed the control + probiotic + CrProp diet had lower excreta moisture compared to birds fed the control diet (p = 0.047 and p = 0.052, respectively); however, the excreta moisture was not different among treatments in the overall period from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
Egg production increased when layer breeders were fed the control + CrProp or control + probiotic + CrProp diets from 63 to 66 weeks of age (p = 0.042), and hens fed control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets presented higher egg mass (p = 0.059) and lower FCR (kg/kg) (p = 0.025) in this period. From 67 to 70 weeks of age, layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic, CrProp or both had higher egg production and egg mass than the non-supplemented hens (p < 0.05). The combination between the probiotic and chromium supplemented in hens’ diets resulted in the lowest FCR in kg/kg and kg/dz from 67 to 70 weeks of age.
In the overall period, egg production increased when hens were fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets compared to the control (p = 0.043). Additionally, layer breeders fed diets supplemented with probiotic, CrProp or both additives had higher egg mass and lower FCR (kg/kg) than the non-supplemented hens (p < 0.05).
Egg quality and eggshell quality results are presented in Table 3. There were no effects (p > 0.05) of dietary treatments on the Haugh unit, albumen and yolk percentage, yolk strength, yolk index and total solids evaluated per 28 d period or in the overall period. However, shell thickness increased when hens were fed diets supplemented with the probiotic, CrProp or both additives compared to the control in all periods as well as from 55 to 70 weeks of age (p < 0.05). Shell strength also increased in hens fed the control + CrProp and control + probiotic + CrProp diets compared to the control and control + probiotic diets (p < 0.05) in all 28 d periods as well as in the overall period. From 63 to 66, 67 to 70 and 55 to 70 weeks of age, diets supplemented with the additives individually or in combination resulted in higher (p < 0.05) specific weight and shell percentage compared to the non-supplemented control diet.
The results of serum albumin, cholesterol, glucose and triglycerides at 50 weeks of age (n = 10), before the start of the experimental period, were 2.70 g/dL, 176 mg/dL, 210 mg/dL and 2012 mg/dL, respectively. Serum cortisol (n = 32 per period) was determined each 28 d period and there were no differences (p > 0.05) between cortisol concentrations for all treatments and periods, and the obtained mean values were 0.05 mcg/dL or lower. In the experimental period, dietary treatments did not affect (p > 0.05) albumin and triglycerides (Table 4); however, in the overall period, cholesterol and glucose serum concentration decreased (p = 0.009 and p = 0.037, respectively) when hens were fed the control + probiotic or control + probiotic + CrProp diets compared to the control diet.
The total tract metabolizability and AME of layer breeders at 70 weeks of age are shown in Table 5. The AME was not significantly different among treatments; however, metabolizability coefficients of dry matter and energy increased when hens were fed diets supplemented with the probiotic or the probiotic + chromium propionate compared to the control diet (p < 0.05). Hens fed diets supplemented with the probiotic + CrProp had the highest total tract metabolizability of nitrogen (p = 0.001).

4. Discussion

Layer breeders fed diets supplemented with additives can provide useful results for commercial laying hens and broiler breeder hens. The present study had the objective of evaluating the effects that Bacillus subtilis PB6 and chromium propionate products would have on serum biochemical parameters, excreta moisture, energy utilization, egg quality and productive performance of late-phase laying breeder hens.
Although probiotics and chromium present different main functions when supplemented in poultry feeds, these additives have some similar actions on stress control, improving the health status and immune system of poultry, which may result in enhanced bird performance. Marked benefits in performance and egg quality were observed when hens’ diets were supplemented with both additives. Additionally, there are different genera of microorganisms commonly used as probiotics as well as variable sources of chromium, which may influence the obtained results when added in poultry feeds [32,33]. Therefore, Bacillus subtilis and organic chromium should be more explored for layers and breeder hens, because more data are needed considering the importance of these productions in the poultry industry.
The use of Bacillus subtilis PB6 (ATCC-PTA 6737) has been applied in the broiler feed industry, being well-documented in the literature [5,8]. For broilers, in addition to improving intestinal microflora, beneficial effects such as stimulated digestion, enhanced performance [8,34] and reduced mortality caused by disease [35] have been reported. There are also published data available on the effect of Bacillus subtilis on hen performance and egg quality [7,10,36]. However, little information is available on the role of Bacillus subtilis PB6 in layers’ or breeders’ production.
In the present study, Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation improved layer breeders’ performance, egg and eggshell quality. These results corroborated the study conducted by Darsi and Zhaghari [11], where 63-week-old broiler breeder hens fed diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (2 × 107 CFU/g) presented higher egg production compared to hens fed non-supplemented diets. These authors observed similar egg weight, but increased Haugh unit and shell thickness from 60 to 63 weeks of age.
Darsi and Zhaghari [11] also observed that Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplemented in diets for broiler breeders from 56 to 63 weeks of age resulted in a lower percentage of cracked and dirty eggs, obtaining a positive effect on settable eggs and hatchling healthiness. Additionally, other studies reported decreased broken, cracked and shell-less eggs when probiotics were used [4,32,37]. In the present study, Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation decreased dirty and cracked eggs by 3% compared to non-supplemented hens in the overall period; however, the small number of layer breeders available for this research did not permit detection of small, statistically significant differences. The same reason explains the absence of hatchability results.
The increased eggshell thickness was already associated with the reduction in the number of cracked eggs, and it was suggested that the decreased damaged eggs could be caused by the increased calcium retention in layers [11,32]. In the current study, layer breeders fed diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 probiotic presented higher specific weight and shell thickness as well as shell strength and shell percentage, mainly from 67 to 70 weeks of age or in the overall period.
In the study conducted by Sobczak and Kozłowski [10], increased percentage, thickness and strength of eggshells were obtained without modifying serum calcium, phosphorus, triglycerides and cholesterol in 42-week-old Lohmann Brown laying hens fed diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6 (1 × 108 CFU/kg feed) compared to the non-supplemented group. Fathi et al. [37] evaluated three different breeds of layers from 36 to 48 weeks of age fed 4 × 109 CFU/g of Bacillus subtilis, and reported increased eggshell percentage, thickness and strength with lower cholesterol compared to non-supplemented diets.
Some studies have shown that probiotic supplementation increased levels of calcium and decreased cholesterol levels in the serum of Brown laying hens [4,38,39]. Gilliland et al. [40] suggested that certain microorganisms present in probiotics might assimilate cholesterol from the gastrointestinal tract for their metabolism, thus reducing the amount of absorbed cholesterol. Probiotic bacterial strains are also able to inhibit the activity of hydroxymethyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A in the gastrointestinal tract [41] or modify the enterohepatic cycle and reduce cholesterol through assimilating dietary cholesterol into bacterial cells [42].
Data on the digestibility and metabolizability of energy and nutrients using Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplemented in hens’ feeds are scarce. In the present study, laying breeder hens fed diets supplemented with this probiotic from 55 to 70 weeks of age had improved egg production and eggshell quality, which were supported by increased energy, nitrogen and dry matter metabolizability. In broiler diets, probiotic supplementation has been related to improved performance along with increased AME and ileal digestibility of nutrients [43], because this additive may be able to enhance the maintenance and barrier function of the intestinal epithelium [1]. Dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis also allowed for a reduction in excreta moisture, thereby preventing problems caused by wet litter in poultry farms [7]. Excreta moisture was reduced in the current study, which was similar to findings by Ribeiro Jr. et al. [36], where lower excreta moisture was reported when 25- to 45-week-old layers were fed a Bacillus subtilis at 3 or 8 × 105 CFU/kg diet.
To further substantiate the use of probiotic and chromium as potential, more beneficial effects were obtained when hens were fed Bacillus subtilis PB6 + CrProp in the last period of age, where environmental temperatures were hotter. In the present study, a conventional poultry house was used, representing the climate and environmental conditions where hens have been raised in South and Southeastern regions of America, which is characterized by hot summers and mild winter temperatures. In these regions, hen producers do not prioritize investing in the environment of their farms. Additionally, the comparison of temperatures was not an objective of this study, and for this reason, it was not presented. Nevertheless, averaged maximum and minimum temperatures monitored on a daily basis inside the shed were 21.6 °C and 12.4 °C, 25.5 °C and 13.0 °C, 28.8 °C and 18.0 °C and 30.9 °C and 19.1 °C, respectively, from 55 to 58, 59 to 62, 63 to 66 and 67 to 70 weeks of age. The mean air humidity was 66.0%.
In the current study, CrProp supplementation improved the egg production, FCR (kg/kg) and egg mass of laying breeder hens. Ma et al. [21] supplemented increasing levels of CrProp in layers diets and observed enhanced egg production without affecting egg weight and FCR in late-phase brown laying hens. Egg production and FCR were also improved when CrProp was supplemented in diets for laying ducks under heat-stressed conditions without modifying FI, as reported by Chen et al. [16]. These authors also indicated that CrProp was probably effective in alleviating the negative effects of heat stress. Marked effects of CrProp were observed by the increased shell strength as well as shell thickness and percentage, with improved specific weight. Additionally, the majority of eggshell quality effects were observed after 67 weeks of age in the present study. Improved shell thickness was also reported by Ma et al. [21] in laying hens fed a 0 to 0.60 mg Cr/kg diet from 60 to 68 weeks of age.
Chromium supplementation was previously reported to decrease blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride [44,45]. In the present study, cholesterol and glucose decreased when hens were fed diets supplemented with CrProp from 55 to 70 weeks of age. However, albumin, triglycerides and cortisol were not affected. Bahrami et al. [46] observed reduced cortisol levels in the serum of broilers under heat stress conditions that were fed diets supplemented with high Cr supplementation (0, 0.80 or 1.20 mg). Since stress might have multiple origins, and cortisol could be a tool to evaluate stress tolerance, studies reported the association between chromium and stress metabolism through decreased sensitivity to stress and reduced concentration of cortisol in blood [47].
As mentioned above, along with stressful conditions and bird species, the results of probiotic supplementation in bird diets can be variable depending on factors related to microbial strains and supplemental doses. In the same context, contradictory results on performance, egg quality and blood biochemistry concentration can be expected due to chromium forms, sources and levels, as well as laying bird species, ages or production systems. The combination of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and chromium propionate seemed to beneficially affect the performance and eggshell quality of late-phase laying breeder hens.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, diets supplemented with Bacillus subtilis PB6, chromium propionate or a combination of the two resulted in improved egg production, feed conversion ratio and eggshell quality as well as nutrient metabolizability, without modifying the main serum biochemical parameters in laying breeder hens from 55 to 70 weeks of age. Highlighted improvements in hen performance and eggshell quality were observed when hens were fed diets supplemented with a combination of probiotic Bacillus subtilis PB6 + chromium propionate. This study expands our understanding concerning combined probiotic and organic chromium supplementation for laying breeder hens.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S. and K.Z.; methodology, A.K.; validation, O.S., C.A. and B.R.; formal analysis, O.S.; investigation, C.A. and B.R.; resources, C.S.; data curation, R.B.; writing—original draft preparation, C.S., A.K. and K.Z; writing—review and editing, C.S; supervision, C.S.; project administration, C.S.; funding acquisition, C.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil (protocol code: 5404280717, 15 August 2017).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES–Brasilia, DF, Brazil) for the partial scholarship paid to the first author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. There are no relevant financial or non-financial competing interests to report. Although the co-author Kelen Zavarize works at Kemin Industries Inc., Valinhos, SP, Brazil, this company did not provide financial support for this research.

References

  1. Awad, W.A.; Bohm, J.; Razzazi-Fazeli, E.; Ghapeeb, K.; Zentek, J. Effect of addition of a probiotic microorganism to broiler diets contaminated with deoxynivalenol on performance and histological alterations of intestinal villi of broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 974–979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mathivanan, R.; Kalaiarasi, K. Panchagavya and Andrographis paniculata as alternative to antibiotic growth promoters on haematological, serum biochemical parameters and immune status of broilers. J. Poult. Sci. 2007, 44, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Forte, C.; Acuti, G.; Manuali, E.; Proietti, P.C.; Pavonre, S.; Trabalza-Marinucci, M.; Moscati, L.; Onofri, A.; Lorenzetti, C.; Fraclosini, M. Effects of two different probiotics on microflora, morphology, and morphometry of gut in organic laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2016, 95, 2528–2535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mikulski, D.; Jankowski, J.; Naczmanski, J.; Mikulska, M.; Demey, V. Effects of dietary probiotic (Pediococcus acidilactici) supplementation on performance, nutrient digestibility, egg traits, egg yolk cholesterol, and fatty acid profile in laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2012, 91, 2691–2700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Teo, A.Y.; Tan, H.M. Inhibition of Clostridium perfringens by a novel strain of Bacillus subtilis isolated from the gastrointestinal tracts of healthy chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71, 4185–4190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Aljumaah, M.R.; Alkhulaifi, M.M.; Abudabos, A.M.; Aljumaah, R.S.; Alsaleh, A.N.; Stanley, D. Bacillus subtilis PB6 based probiotic supplementation plays a role in the recovery after the necrotic enteritis challenge. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0232781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, C.L.; Ji, C.; Ma, Q.; Hao, K.; Jin, Z.Y.; Li, K. Effects of a dried Bacillus subtilis culture on egg quality. Poult. Sci. 2006, 85, 364–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jayaraman, S.; Thangavel, G.; Kurian, H.; Mani, R.; Mukkalil, R.; Chirakkal, H. Bacillus subtilis PB6 improves intestinal health of broiler chickens challenged with Clostridium perfringens-induced necrotic enteritis. Poult. Sci. 2013, 92, 370–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chung, S.H.; Lee, J.; Kong, C. Effects of multi strain probiotics on egg production and quality in laying hens fed diets containing food waste product. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2015, 14, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Sobczak, A.; Kozlowski, K. The effect of a probiotic preparation containing Bacillus subtilis ATCC PTA-6737 on egg production and physiological parameters of laying hens. Ann. Anim. Sci. 2015, 15, 711–723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Darsi, E.; Zhaghari, M. Effects of Bacillus subtilis PB6 supplementation on productive performance, egg quality and hatchability in broiler breeder hens under commercial farm condition. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 2021, 49, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lara, L.J.; Rostagno, M.H. Impact of heat stress on poultry production. Animals 2013, 3, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zulkifli, I.; Abdulllah, N.; Azrin, N.M.; Ho, Y.W. Growth performance and immune response of two commercial broiler strains fed diets containing Lactobacillus cultures and oxytetracycline under heat stress conditions. Br. Poult. Sci. 2000, 41, 593–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rajalekshmi, M.; Sugumar, C.; Chirakkal, H.; Ramarao, S.V. Influence of chromium propionate on the carcass characteristics and immune response of commercial broiler birds under normal rearing conditions. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Spears, J.W.; Lloyd, K.E.; Pickworth, C.A.; Huang, Y.L.; Krafka, K.; Hyda, J.; Grimes, J.L. Chromium propionate in broilers: Human food and broiler safety. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 6579–6585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, X.L.; Zeng, Y.B.; Liu, L.X.; Song, Q.L.; Zou, Z.H.; Wei, Q.P.; Song, W.J. Effects of dietary chromium propionate on laying performance, egg quality, serum biochemical parameters and antioxidant status of laying ducks under heat stress. Animal 2021, 15, 100081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Food additives permitted in feed and drinking water of animals: Chromium propionate. Fed. Regist. 2020, 85, 48650–48651. [Google Scholar]
  18. Farag, M.R.; Alagawany, M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Arif, M.; Ayasan, T.; Dhama, K.; Patra, A.; Karthik, K. Role of chromium in poultry nutrition and health: Beneficial applications and toxic effects. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 13, 907–915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Dalolio, S.; Albino, L.F.T.; Silva, J.N.; Campos, P.H.R.F.; Lima, H.J.D.; Moreira, J.; Ribeiro, V., Jr. Dietary chromium supplementation forheat-stressed broilers. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 101–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yildiz, A.O.; Parlat, S.S.; Yazgan, O. The effects of organic chromium supplementation on production traits and some serum parameters of laying quails. Rev. Med. Vet. 2004, 155, 642–646. [Google Scholar]
  21. Ma, W.; Gu, Y.; Lu, J.; Yuan, L.; Zhao, R. Effects of chromium propionate on egg production, egg quality, plasma biochemical parameters, and egg chromium deposition in late-phase laying hens. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2014, 157, 113–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Official Methods of Analysis, 15th ed.; AOAC: Arlington, VA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  23. Association of Official Analytical Chemistry. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed.; Analytical Chemists: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  24. Stefanello, C.; Santos, T.C.; Murakami, A.E.; Martins, E.N.; Carneiro, T.C. Productive performance, eggshell quality, and eggshell ultrastructure of laying hens fed diets supplemented with organic trace minerals. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 104–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Vogtmann, H.; Pfirter, H.P.; Prabucki, A.L. A new method of determining metabolisability of energy and digestibility of fatty acids in broiler diets. Br. Poult. Sci. 1975, 16, 531–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Choct, M.; Annison, G. Anti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: Roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Br. Poult. Sci. 1992, 33, 821–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kong, C.; Adeola, O. Invited review—Evaluation of amino acid and energy utilization in feedstuff for swine and poultry diets. Asian Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 917–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Stefanello, C.; Vieira, S.L.; Soster, P.; Santos, B.M.; Dalmoro, Y.K.; Favero, A.; Cowieson, A. Utilization of corn-based diets supplemented with an exogenous a-amylase for broilers. Poult. Sci. 2019, 98, 5862–5869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Haetinger, V.S.; Dalmoro, Y.K.; Godoy, G.L.; Lang, M.B.; de Souza, O.F.; Aristimunha, P.; Stefanello, C. Optimizing cost, growth performance, and nutrient absorption with a bio-emulsifier based on lysophospholipids for broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Ahrens, W.H.; Cox, D.J.; Budhwar, G. Use of the arcsine and square root transformations for subjectively determined percentage data. Weed Sci. 1990, 38, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. SAS Institute. SAS User′s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.2; SAS Institute, Inc.: Cary, NC, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  32. Khan, R.U.; Naz, S.; Dhama, K.; Saminathan, M.; Tiwari, R.; Jeon, G.J.; Laudadio, V.; Tufarelli, V. Modes of action and beneficial applications of chromium in poultry nutrition, production and health: A review. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 10, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sjofjan, O.; Adli, D.N.; Sholikin, M.M.; Jayanegara, A.; Irawan, A. The effects of probiotics on the performance, egg quality and blood parameters of laying hens: A meta-analysis. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2021, 30, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abudabos, A.M.; Alyemni, A.H.; Al Marshad, M.B.A. Bacillus subtilis PB6 based probiotic (CLOSTATTM) improves intestinal morphological and microbiological status of broiler chicken under Clostridium perfringens challenge. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2013, 15, 978–982. [Google Scholar]
  35. Park, J.H.; Kim, I.H. Supplemental effect of probiotic Bacillus subtilis B2A on productivity, organ weight, intestinal Salmonella microflora, and breast meat quality of growing broiler chicks. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2054–2059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ribeiro, V., Jr.; Albino, L.F.T.; Rostagno, H.S.; Barreto, S.L.T.; Hannas, M.I.; Harrington, D.; de Araujo, F.A.; Ferreira, H.C., Jr.; Ferreira, M.A. Effects of the dietary supplementation of Bacillus subtilis levels on performance, egg quality and excreta moisture of layers. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2014, 195, 142–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Fathi, M.; Al-Homidan, I.; Al-Dokhail, A.; Ebeid, T.; Abou-Emera, O.; Alsagan, A. Effects of dietary probiotic (Bacillus subtilis) supplementation on productive performance, immune response and egg quality characteristics in laying hens under high ambient temperature. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2018, 17, 804–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Panda, A.K.; Rama Rao, S.S.; Raju, M.V.; Sharma, S.S. Effect of probiotic (Lactobacillus sporogenes) feeding on egg production and quality, yolk cholesterol and humoral immune response of white leghorn layer breeders. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2008, 88, 43–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mahdavi, A.H.; Rahmani, H.R.; Pourreza, J. Effect of probiotic supplements on egg quality and laying hen′s performance. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2005, 4, 488–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Gilliland, S.E.; Nelson, C.R.; Maxwell, C. Assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1985, 49, 377–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Fukushima, M.; Nakano, M. The effect of a probiotic on faecal and liver lipid classes in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1995, 73, 701–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Kalavathy, R.N.; Abdullah, N.; Jalaludin, S.; Ho, Y.W. Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 2003, 44, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Mountzouris, K.C.; Tsitrsikos, P.; Palamidi, I.; Arvaniti, A.; Mohnl, M.; Schatzmayr, G.; Fegeros, K. Effects of probiotic inclusion levels in broiler nutrition on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, plasma immunoglobulins, and cecal microflora composition. Poult. Sci. 2010, 89, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Anderson, R.A. Chromium, glucose tolerance, and lipid metabolism. J. Adv. Med. 1995, 8, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hanafy, M.M. Influence of adding organic chromium in diet on productive traits, serum constituents and immune status of Bandarah laying hens and semen physical properties for cocks in winter season. Egypt. Poult. Sci. J. 2011, 31, 203–216. [Google Scholar]
  46. Bahrami, A.; Moeini, M.; Ghazi, S.H.; Targhibi, M.R. The effect of different levels of organic and inorganic chromium supplementation on immune function of broiler chicken under heat-stress conditions. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2012, 21, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Chandrasekar, S.; Balakrishnan, U. Chromium nutrition in alleviating the effect of stressors in poultry production: A review. Int. J. Anim. Sci. 2019, 3, 1040. [Google Scholar]
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the control diet.
Table 1. Ingredient and nutrient composition of the control diet.
ItemControl Diet (55 to 70 Weeks of Age)
Ingredients, %
Corn58.52
Soybean meal, 46 % CP19.64
Wheat bran4.00
Soybean oil2.36
Dicalcium phosphate1.52
Limestone12.84
Salt0.43
DL-Methionine, 99%0.30
L-Lysine-HCl, 78%0.15
L-Threonine, 98.5%0.09
Mineral and vitamin premix 10.15
Nutrient and energy composition, % or as shown
AME, kcal/kg2750
Crude protein14.50
Calcium4.30
Available phosphorus0.35
Total phosphorus0.53
Sodium0.18
Potassium0.59
Chloride0.35
Dig. Lys 20.75
Dig. Met + Cys0.70
Dig. Thr0.58
Dig. Trp0.15
1 Composition per kilogram of feed: vitamin A, 8000 IU; vitamin D3, 2000 IU; vitamin E, 30 IU; vitamin K3, 2 mg; thiamine, 2 mg; riboflavin, 6 mg; pyridoxine, 2.5 mg; cyanocobalamin, 0.012 mg, pantothenic acid, 15 mg; niacin, 35 mg; folic acid, 1 mg; biotin, 0.08 mg; iron, 40 mg; zinc, 80 mg; manganese, 80 mg; copper, 10 mg; iodine, 0.7 mg; and selenium, 0.3 mg. 2 Digestible-amino-acids-to-digestible-Lys ratios were maintained at TSAA 0.94; Thr 0.77; Val 0.77; Trp 0.20; Arg 1.13; and Ile 0.67.
Table 2. Productive performance and excreta moisture of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
Table 2. Productive performance and excreta moisture of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
ItemBW, gEP 1, %FI 2, g/hen/dEgg Loss, %Dirty Eggs, %Egg Mass, gFCR 3, kg/kgFCR, kg/dzExcreta Moisture, %
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age
Control216369.913011.26.740.33.252.2279.9
Control + probiotic 4216172.61309.16.443.33.032.2079.6
Control + CrProp 5209571.91289.46.441.63.092.1579.2
Control + probiotic + CrProp211273.21293.96.442.43.042.0779.0
SEM22.80.881.71.60.90.520.050.040.19
p-value0.6480.5740.9180.3940.9740.2160.4640.6200.355
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age
Control214467.81316.78.539.13.432.4979.4 a
Control + probiotic215972.61293.75.342.93.072.1977.8 b
Control + CrProp206270.71274.57.241.93.052.1079.0 ab
Control + probiotic + CrProp207672.81302.83.742.43.092.0877.5 b
SEM23.01.191.62.01.30.700.060.060.29
p-value0.3450.4290.8580.5170.6210.2370.1020.0680.047
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age
Control214364.6 b1299.09.237.6 b3.49 a2.4179.0 a
Control + probiotic217768.9 ab1276.26.141.0 a3.13 b2.2577.3 ab
Control + CrProp206170.1 a1278.17.840.2 ab3.19 ab2.2177.3 ab
Control + probiotic + CrProp207872.3 a1232.87.141.9 a2.94 b2.1776.2 b
SEM24.70.991.901.41.30.610.070.050.40
p-value0.3010.0420.7180.3920.8620.0590.0250.3410.052
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age
Control209963.4 b1218.310.836.8 b3.39 a2.53 a77.4
Control + probiotic217069.2 a1236.27.341.0 a3.05 ab2.19 ab76.9
Control + CrProp200869.5 a1205.95.841.4 a2.89 b2.18 ab76.2
Control + probiotic + CrProp205970.8 a1225.95.542.4 a2.95 b2.10 b75.5
SEM25.81.042.131.11.50.650.070.080.43
p-value0.1500.0490.9330.8590.5730.0090.0590.1900.422
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age)
Control213866.4 b1288.88.838.4 b3.39 a2.41 a78.9
Control + probiotic216770.8 a1276.36.342.1 a3.07 b2.21 ab78.0
Control + CrProp205670.5 ab1256.57.041.3 a3.06 b2.16 b77.9
Control + probiotic + CrProp208172.3 a1265.73.942.3 a3.00 b2.10 b77.0
SEM22.30.771.420.990.860.460.050.040.26
p-value0.2790.0430.9140.7150.2300.0090.0120.0510.443
1 EP = egg production. 2 FI = feed intake. 3 FCR = feed conversion ratio. 4 Bacillus subtilis PB6, PTA-6737 supplemented at 500 g/ton. 5 Chromium propionate supplemented at 50 g/ton. a,b Means with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) based on the Tukey test.
Table 3. Egg and eggshell quality of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
Table 3. Egg and eggshell quality of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
ItemEgg Weight, gSpecific Weight, g/cm3Haugh UnitAlbumen, %Yolk, %Yolk Strength, NYolk IndexTotal Solids, %Shell, %Thickness, mmShell Strength, N
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age
Control57.1108489.162.228.87.90.4756.38.50.352 b26.3 b
Control + probiotic 159.7108689.662.629.07.90.4955.88.90.372 a26.4 b
Control + CrProp 258.0108590.464.528.37.80.4955.78.80.373 a29.6 a
Control + probiotic + CrProp58.2108489.762.628.57.80.4955.99.00.376 a29.7 a
SEM0.490.560.570.470.270.020.0030.230.090.0030.24
p-value0.2940.4190.8850.3300.8280.4280.4790.7810.2380.0160.001
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age
Control57.81079 b88.663.429.07.50.4754.28.10.343 b25.1 b
Control + probiotic59.11084 a89.063.429.17.60.4854.08.50.366 a25.3 b
Control + CrProp57.91084 a90.863.228.67.50.4954.98.70.365 a28.7 a
Control + probiotic + CrProp59.01083 a90.463.629.17.50.4854.58.70.360 a28.7 a
SEM0.490.650.710.410.220.010.0030.230.120.0030.26
p-value0.6950.0140.6480.9870.8070.7480.1360.5330.1720.0500.001
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age
Control58.21079 b88.961.629.97.40.4453.78.1 b0.347 b24.1 b
Control + probiotic59.61082 ab89.361.829.47.40.4554.58.7 a0.364 ab24.2 b
Control + CrProp57.61084 a91.062.628.97.40.4652.78.9 a0.365 a28.0 a
Control + probiotic + CrProp59.01081 ab89.462.629.27.50.4553.28.6 a0.367 a28.1 a
SEM0.510.550.590.250.210.010.0030.420.090.0040.28
p-value0.5350.0200.5990.2930.4250.8490.2090.4870.0100.0550.001
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age
Control58.11079 b88.162.429.97.50.4653.18.2 b0.345 b24.6 b
Control + probiotic60.51084 a88.062.129.47.50.4753.38.8 a0.366 a24.9 b
Control + CrProp58.31083 a90.263.428.97.60.4753.28.7 a0.369 a28.6 a
Control + probiotic + CrProp60.11083 a88.662.829.27.50.4653.58.7 a0.370 a28.6 a
SEM0.490.530.570.260.200.010.0030.140.090.0030.29
p-value0.1980.0080.4880.3500.3210.1120.5450.7130.0450.0030.001
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age)
Control57.81080 b88.762.429.47.60.4654.38.2 b0.347 b25.1 c
Control + probiotic59.71084 a88.962.529.27.60.4754.48.7 a0.367 a25.2 b
Control + CrProp57.91084 a90.663.428.77.60.4854.18.8 a0.368 a28.7 a
Control + probiotic + CrProp59.11083 a89.563.029.07.60.4754.38.8 a0.370 a28.8 a
SEM0.450.490.510.260.170.010.0030.140.080.0030.26
p-value0.3690.0140.5550.4460.4990.1600.1860.8920.0280.0030.001
1 Bacillus subtilis PB6, PTA-6737 supplemented at 500 g/ton. 2 Chromium propionate supplemented at 50 g/ton. a–c Means with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) based on the Tukey test.
Table 4. Blood biochemical results of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
Table 4. Blood biochemical results of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate from 55 to 70 weeks of age.
Item1Albumin, g/dLCholesterol, mg/dLGlucose, mg/dLTriglycerides, mg/dL
Period of 55 to 58 weeks of age
Control2.141492021887
Control + probiotic 22.181491931774
Control + CrProp 32.311481941902
Control + probiotic + CrProp2.101291901498
SEM0.046.632.33132.9
p-value0.2110.6220.3240.704
Period of 59 to 62 weeks of age
Control2.13157 a201 a1917
Control + probiotic2.16157 a186 b1978
Control + CrProp2.20132 ab181 b1551
Control + probiotic + CrProp2.08119 b188 ab1391
SEM0.035.442.54110.1
p-value0.3860.0200.0340.172
Period of 63 to 66 weeks of age
Control2.441281791626
Control + probiotic2.301151731308
Control + CrProp2.391231701404
Control + probiotic + CrProp2.301121811251
SEM0.035.551.7196.9
p-value0.3670.1430.0800.556
Period of 67 to 70 weeks of age
Control2.551471851648
Control + probiotic2.591341861591
Control + CrProp2.501181831196
Control + probiotic + CrProp2.511161791478
SEM0.045.442.33101.2
p-value0.9000.1570.7600.414
Overall period (55 to 70 weeks of age)
Control2.33149 a192 a1770
Control + probiotic2.33139 ab185 ab1663
Control + CrProp2.36129 bc182 b1514
Control + probiotic + CrProp2.25119 c183 b1404
SEM0.023.841.3267.3
p-value0.2310.0090.0370.235
1 Serum cortisol was determined each 28 d period and the obtained means were 0.05 mcg/dL or lower than the limit of detection for all experimental diets and periods (p > 0.05). The results of serum albumin, cholesterol, glucose and triglycerides at 50 weeks of age (n = 10) before the start of the experimental period were 2.70 g/dL, 176 mg/dL, 210 mg/dL and 2012 mg/dL, respectively. 2 Bacillus subtilis PB6, PTA-6737 supplemented at 500 g/ton. 3 Chromium propionate supplemented at 50 g/ton. a–c Means with different superscript letters differ significantly (p < 0.05) based on the Tukey test.
Table 5. Coefficient of total tract metabolizability and apparent metabolizable energy (AME) of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate at 70 weeks of age.
Table 5. Coefficient of total tract metabolizability and apparent metabolizable energy (AME) of layer breeders fed diets supplemented with the probiotic and chromium propionate at 70 weeks of age.
ItemDry MatterNitrogenEnergyAME, kcal/kg
Control0.67 b0.56 c0.80 b3155
Control + probiotic 10.72 a0.61 b0.84 a3215
Control + CrProp 20.71 a0.65 ab0.82 b3210
Control + probiotic + CrProp0.72 a0.68 a0.85 a3226
SEM0.0050.0100.00416.61
p-value0.0040.0010.0010.249
1 Bacillus subtilis PB6, PTA-6737 supplemented at 500 g/ton. 2 Chromium propionate supplemented at 50 g/ton. a–c Means with different superscript letters differ (p < 0.05) based on Tukey test.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Souza, O.; Adams, C.; Rodrigues, B.; Krause, A.; Bonamigo, R.; Zavarize, K.; Stefanello, C. The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals 2021, 11, 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084

AMA Style

Souza O, Adams C, Rodrigues B, Krause A, Bonamigo R, Zavarize K, Stefanello C. The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals. 2021; 11(11):3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084

Chicago/Turabian Style

Souza, Otoniel, Carine Adams, Beatriz Rodrigues, Alexandre Krause, Renata Bonamigo, Kelen Zavarize, and Catarina Stefanello. 2021. "The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders" Animals 11, no. 11: 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084

APA Style

Souza, O., Adams, C., Rodrigues, B., Krause, A., Bonamigo, R., Zavarize, K., & Stefanello, C. (2021). The Impact of Bacillus subtilis PB6 and Chromium Propionate on the Performance, Egg Quality and Nutrient Metabolizability of Layer Breeders. Animals, 11(11), 3084. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11113084

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop