Next Article in Journal
Use of Undigested NDF for Estimation of Diet Digestibility in Growing Pigs
Next Article in Special Issue
Twin Pregnancies in Dairy Cattle: Observations in a Large Herd of Holstein-Friesian Dairy Cows
Previous Article in Journal
Associations between Mammary Gland Echotexture and Milk Composition in Cows
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Commentary

Twins in Dairy Herds. Is It Better to Maintain or Reduce a Pregnancy?

1
Bovine Reproduction SLu, 22300 Barbastro, Spain
2
Agrotecnio Centre, 25198 Lleida, Spain
Animals 2020, 10(11), 2006; https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112006
Submission received: 7 October 2020 / Revised: 27 October 2020 / Accepted: 28 October 2020 / Published: 31 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Therapeutics of Twin Pregnancies in Dairy Cattle)

Abstract

:

Simple Summary

In dairy herds, twin or other multiple pregnancies are not desirable as they compromise the health and productive lifespan of the cows. The mean productive lifespan of primiparous and secundiparous dairy cows delivering twins is about 300 and 200 days shorter, respectively, than that of cows delivering singletons. In addition, the long-term negative effects of twinning are not limited to the early lactation but continue for a period of up to 800 days after calving. Herd management options after diagnosing a twin pregnancy are discussed from an animal health and economic perspective.

Abstract

Multiple ovulations and so multiple pregnancies have increased recently in dairy cattle. The incidence of the double ovulation impact in high producers at insemination may be over 20%. Twin pregnancies are undesirable as they seriously compromise the welfare and productive lifespan of the cow and herd economy. Clinical problems extend from the time of pregnancy diagnosis to pregnancy loss, abortion or parturition. Early pregnancy loss or abortion of multiple pregnancies lead in most cases to culling. In cows reaching their term, mean productive lifespan is up to about 300 days shorter for cows delivering twins than for cows delivering singletons. While there is an urgent need to address multiple pregnancy prevention procedures in the foreseeable future, the incidence of twin pregnancies continues to rise in parallel with increased milk production. Herein, we review two contrasting measures proposed for the time of twin pregnancy diagnosis: (1) gonadotropin-releasing hormone treatment for pregnancy maintenance, or (2) embryo reduction. These options are discussed in terms of their implications for individual animal health and herd economy. Our main conclusions find that manual twin reduction has proven to be the best management option, whereas the use of prostaglandin F for inducing abortion may be a better option than doing nothing.

1. Introduction

The birth of twins is a historic symbol of human fertility [1]. Even today, there are cultures that consider having twins will bring good fortune [2,3]. For the beef cattle farmer, twinning is also a very welcome event [4,5]; however, it is highly undesirable in dairy cattle. Clinical problems associated with twin pregnancies affecting dairy cows from pregnancy diagnosis to parturition have been extensively reviewed. Despite reported spontaneous embryo reduction rates of 11.2% to 28.4% occurring at around days 28–40 of gestation and usually detected at the time of pregnancy diagnosis [6,7,8], twin pregnancy losses can exceed 50%, especially during the warmer seasons [9,10]. Thus, the risk of pregnancy loss during the late embryonic/early fetal period in cows carrying twins is three to nine times greater than in cows carrying singletons. The economic burden of a dairy cow twin pregnancy in the United States has been estimated at USD 97 to USD 225 depending on the type of twin pregnancy (unilateral vs. bilateral), parity and days in milk at the time of conception; estimates of annual costs run at USD 96 million [11].
From the cow’s perspective, twinning means a high risk of being culled when pregnancy fails [11,12]. Most pregnancy losses occur within the first 60 days of gestation [13,14,15]. This is likely because this is the period in which placentation is established [16,17] and this event is also highly sensitive to any kind of stress [14,17]. Losses can be the outcome either of embryo death due to post-ovulatory oocyte ageing before fertilization, as it has been described in single ovulating cows [18], or of the inappropriate progesterone intake to two or more embryos in certain circumstances [8]. A second peak of abortions has been also described averaging at the middle of the gestation period [19]. The metabolic stress of milk production linked to a lack of space and mechanical stress may explain why the risk of abortion is greater in the middle than at the end of the lactation period. Across both these lost pregnancy peaks, unilateral twin pregnancies are the most vulnerable. In effect, losses are five to nine times higher for unilateral than bilateral twins during the late embryo/early fetal period [14,20] and abortion is 50 times more likely in cows with unilateral than bilateral twins in the middle of gestation [19]. In addition, in cows delivering twins, a very high incidence has been reported of peripartum disorders such as dystocia, stillbirth and retained placenta [21,22,23]. Each of these twinning-related disorders impairs fertility and determines a higher risk of culling after calving. For example, in an extensive study of 12,587 calving events over a period of 11 years [23], mean productive lifespan was about 300 and 200 days shorter for primiparous and secundiparous cows delivering twins, respectively, than for cows delivering singletons. Further, the long-term detrimental impacts of twinning were not limited to the early lactation but continued up to 800 days after calving.
Rather than twin pregnancy, the use of the general term multiple pregnancy would be more correct in the context of this article. However, given the numbers of triplets and quadruplets are too small to make any observable difference [24], we will only consider twin pregnancies. In fact, pregnancies with three or more embryos usually do not make it to term [25].

2. Management Options after Diagnosing a Twin Pregnancy

Although the decision to eliminate a cow from the herd is heavily influenced by the farmer, pregnant cows are more likely to remain in the herd. However, once a twin pregnancy has been diagnosed, the decision of what to do becomes more difficult. Veterinarians responsible for reproductive control programs should be more directly involved in decision making after diagnosing a twin pregnancy. Below, we discuss the options available. All the results and procedures described here are based on the use of ultrasonography.

2.1. Maintaining a Twin Pregnancy

Since inducing embryo reduction may increase the risk of pregnancy loss, cows of high genetic value or close to the culling threshold (i.e., advanced lactation) may be candidates for pursuing pregnancy maintenance. Although studies have shown that gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) or human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatment given within 40 days of gestation seems not to affect the subsequent pregnancy loss rate in studies including all pregnant cows [26,27], GnRH treatment at pregnancy diagnosis promotes pregnancy maintenance, yet it has been linked to an increased rate of spontaneous twin reduction in cows carrying twins [28]. In an extensive study involving 1054 cows carrying singletons and 379 cows carrying unilateral twins, the latter were 3.2 times more likely to experience pregnancy failure than the remaining cows, whilst in cows carrying twins treated with GnRH, treatment returned similar pregnancy loss rates to those recorded in control cows carrying singletons. In this study, it was also found that GnRH-treated cows were seven times more likely to show twin reduction than control cows, with a twin reduction rate of 9.2% [28]. This effectiveness of GnRH treatment is probably attributable to the fact that either it improves luteal activity or, following the death of a co-twin, it reduces pro-inflammatory and luteolytic responses to the remains of the dead embryo, thus decreasing the pregnancy loss rate [20,28].

2.2. Twin Reduction

Induced embryo reduction is successful in multiple pregnancies in women [29,30,31] and mares [32,33,34]. While sophisticated techniques such as intracardiac or intrathoracic embryo/fetus puncture with or without injection of a toxic agent are used in humans, a widespread strategy among equine medicine practitioners is manual crushing of one embryo vesicle to avoid a twin pregnancy [32,33]. However, in contrast to human and equine multiple pregnancies, in twin pregnant cows, vascular embryonic fusion has occurred already before the early fetal period [25,35]. This important process of placental anastomosis is probably the reason for a high incidence of pregnancy loss after natural or induced reduction of twins in cattle. Methods proposed for twin reduction in cows on day 28–40 of gestation are manual crushing of the amniotic vesicle or transvaginal ultrasound-guided suction of allanto-amniotic fluid [20].
Before any attempt at embryo reduction, it must first be checked that both twins are alive. The presence of a dead co-twin may be detected at the time of pregnancy diagnosis and its incidence could be as high as 16% [6]. Similar results have been obtained for the methods transvaginal allanto-amniotic fluid aspiration and manual amnion rupture [10,36]. Since the aspiration-based method is ultrasound guided and requires two people, we prefer to induce embryo reduction by manual rupture of the amniotic vesicle of bilateral and some unilateral twin pregnancies within our weekly visit program in controlling reproduction. Immediately following reduction, cows receive an anti-prostaglandin treatment such as 1250 mg flunixin meglumine plus a dose of GnRH or an analogue thereof such as dephereline (i.e., 100 μg gonadorelin acetate [6-D-Phe] i.m; Gonavet Veyx, Ecuphar, Barcelona, Spain) [20]. Cumulative pregnancy loss is lower than 25% following rupture for bilateral twins and close to 40% for unilateral twins. Manual embryo reduction of twin pregnancies is today considered the most economic option to mitigate the negative impacts of twinning in dairy cows; the breakeven point for the minimum embryo reduction success rate being below 40% for multiparous and 30% for primiparous cows [11]. While there is much room for improving the results of induced embryo reduction, most current efforts target unilateral twin pregnancies.

3. Concluding Remarks

Twinning is considered undesirable in the dairy industry, yet from the perspective of the cow it may even be described as disastrous. In today’s world, improving the quality of life of animals has become a main focus [37,38,39]. The high incidence of dystocia, stillbirth and retained placenta should be perhaps considered a preventable consequence of management, as these disorders greatly compromise the welfare of a cow delivering twins. Manual embryo reduction has proven to be the best management option at the end of the breeding period as it diminishes the risk of late abortion and eliminates the consequences of twin births in cows that remain pregnant [11]. However, it is often difficult to balance animal welfare and our own perceptions. In some discussion forums on cow reproductive control, embryo reduction is considered both impractical and inadequate (unpublished data). For an operator with a certain amount of experience, the time between uterine horn manipulation and amnion rupture is no longer than five seconds and cows show no signs of discomfort throughout the procedure [20]. As manual embryo reduction is performed during the late embryonic period, between 28 and 40 days of pregnancy, this procedure is fully in line with European recommendations for animals used for scientific research purposes (EU Directive 2010/63/EU, 22 September 2010) and, of course, with good veterinary practices under farm conditions. In fact, as noted above, embryo reduction methods are extensively used in multiple pregnancies in women [29,30,31] and mares [32,33,34]. Last but not least, when maintaining the pregnancy is too risky and twin reduction is not feasible, the use of prostaglandin F for inducing abortion may be a better option upon diagnosis of twins than doing nothing [11]. This is reinforced by a recent survival analysis demonstrating the enormous negative effect of transition diseases on subsequent reproductive performance [40]. Twining is not a transition disease but is the gateway for transition diseases.
During the last decades, multiple ovulations and subsequent multiple pregnancy rates have increased in parallel with milk production [20]. Although 14–15% is a common figure of dairy cows experiencing double ovulation following spontaneous estrus [41,42], the impact of double ovulation in high producers may exceed 20% [43,44,45]. This trend for the increased multiple ovulation rate over time will likely continue into the future [20]. Having discussed management options after diagnosing a twin pregnancy, the best option would still be a well-designed twin pregnancy prevention program. Promising candidate strategies for this purpose are drainage without suction of co-dominant follicles at the time of insemination or transfer of a single embryo [46,47].

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Ana Burton for editorial assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Fertility, fecundity and the creative instinct. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 47, 581–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Oruene, T.O. Cultic powers of Yoruba twins: Manifestation of traditional and religious beliefs of the Yoruba. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 1983, 32, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Imperato, G.H.; Imperato, P.J. Beliefs and practices concerning twins, hermaphrodites, and albinos among the Bamana and Maninka of Mali. J. Community Health 2006, 31, 198–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Echternkamp, S.E.; Roberts, A.J.; Lunstra, D.D.; Wise, T.; Spicer, L.J. Ovarian follicular development in cattle selected for twin ovulations and births. J. Anim. Sci. 2004, 82, 459–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Hashiyada, Y. The contribution of efficient production of monozygotic twins to beef cattle breeding. J. Reprod. Dev. 2017, 63, 527–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Spontaneous reduction of advanced twin embryos: Its occurrence and clinical relevance in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Silva-del-Río, N.; Colloton, J.D.; Fricke, P.M. Factors affecting pregnancy loss for single and twin pregnancies in a high-producing dairy herd. Theriogenology 2009, 71, 1462–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. López-Gatius, F.; García-Ispierto, I.; Hunter, R.H.F. Factors affecting spontaneous reduction of corpora lutea and twin embryos during the late embryonic/early fetal period in multiple-ovulating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2010, 73, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. López-Gatius, F.; Santolaria, P.; Yaniz, J.L.; Garbayo, J.M.; Hunter, R.H.F. Timing of early foetal loss for single and twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2004, 39, 429–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Lopez-Bejar, M.; de Sousa, N.M.; Beckers, J.F.; Lopez-Gatius, F. Clinical implications of induced twin reduction in dairy cattle. Theriogenology 2011, 76, 512–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mur-Novales, R.; López-Gatius, F.; Fricke, P.M.; Cabrera, V.E. An economic evaluation of management strategies to mitigate the negative effect of twinning in dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 8335–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Day, J.D.; Weaver, L.D.; Franti, C.E. Twin pregnancy diagnosis in Holstein cows: Discriminatory powers and accuracy of diagnosis by transrectal palpation and outcome of twin pregnancies. Can. Vet. J. 1995, 36, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Grimard, B.; Freret, S.; Chevallier, A.; Pinto, A.; Ponsart, C.; Humblot, P. Genetic and environmental factors influencing first service conception rate and late embryonic/foetal mortality in low fertility dairy herds. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2006, 91, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. López-Gatius, F.; García-Ispierto, I. Ultrasound and endocrine findings that help to assess the risk of late embryo/early foetal loss by non-infectious cause in dairy cattle. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2010, 45, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ealy, A.D.; Seekford, Z.K. Predicting pregnancy loss in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 11798–11804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Curran, S.; Pierson, R.A.; Ginther, O.J. Ultrasonographic appearance of the bovine conceptus from days 20 through 60. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 1986, 189, 1295–1302. [Google Scholar]
  17. Riding, G.A.; Lehnert, S.A.; French, A.J.; Hill, J.R. Conceptus-related measurements during the first trimester of bovine pregnancy. Vet. J. 2008, 175, 266–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hunter, R.H.F. Ageing of the unfertilised cow egg in vivo: How soon is fertility compromised? Vet. Rec. 1989, 124, 489–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Abortion in dairy cattle with advanced twin pregnancies: Incidence and timing. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2019, 54, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. López-Gatius, F.; Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Mur-Novales, R.; Cabrera, V.E.; Hunter, R.H.F. The dilemma of twin pregnancies in dairy cattle. A review of practical prospects. Liv. Sci. 2017, 197, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nielen, M.; Schukken, Y.H.; Scholl, D.T.; Wilbrink, H.J.; Brand, A. Twinning in dairy cattle: A study of risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 1989, 32, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Echternkamp, S.E.; Gregory, K.E. Effects of twinning on gestation length, retained placenta, and dystocia. J. Anim. Sci. 1999, 77, 39–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; Ganau, S.; Fricke, P.M.; López-Gatius, F. Effects of twinning on the subsequent reproductive performance and productive lifespan of high-producing dairy cows. Theriogenology 2012, 78, 2061–2070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Jones, S.V.H.; Rouse, J.R. The relation of age of dam to observed fecundity in domesticated animals. I. Multiple births in cattle and sheep. J. Dairy Sci. 1920, 3, 260–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Echternkamp, S.E. Fetal development in cattle with multiple ovulations. J. Anim. Sci. 1992, 70, 2309–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Bartolome, J.A.; Kamimura, S.; Silvestre, F.; Arteche, A.C.M.; Trigg, T.; Thatcher, W.W. The use of a deslorelin implant (GnRH agonist) during the late embryonic period to reduce pregnancy loss. Theriogenology 2006, 65, 1443–1453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Stevenson, J.S.; Tiffany, S.M.; Inskeep, E.K. Maintenance of pregnancy in dairy cattle after treatment with human chorionic gonadotropin or gonadotropin-releasing hormone. J. Dairy Sci. 2008, 91, 3092–3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. The effects of a single or double GnRH dose on pregnancy survival in high producing dairy cows carrying singletons or twins. J. Reprod. Dev. 2018, 64, 523–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Iberico, G.; Navarro, J.; Blasco, L.; Simon, C.; Pellicer, A.; Remohi, J. Embryo reduction of multifetal pregnancies following assisted reproduction treatment: A modification of the transvaginal ultrasound-guided technique. Hum. Reprod. 2000, 15, 2228–2233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Stone, J.; Ferrara, L.; Kamrath, J.; Getrajdman, J.; Berkowitz, R.; Moshier, E.; Eddleman, M.S. Contemporary outcomes with the latest 1000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction (MPR). Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2008, 199, 406.e1–406.e3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yilanlioglu, N.C.; Semiz, A.; Arisoy, R.; Kahraman, S.; Gürkan, A.A. The outcome of the multifetal pregnancy reduction in a single centre: A report of 202 completed cases. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2018, 230, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Macpherson, M.L.; Reimer, J.M. Twin reduction in the mare: Current options. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2000, 60–61, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davies Morel, M.C.G.; Newcombe, J.R.; Lauber, M. Manual reduction of multiple embryos in the mare: The effect on subsequent pregnancy outcome. Vet. J. 2012, 192, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tan, D.K.S.; Krekeler, N. Success rates of various techniques for reduction of twin pregnancy in mares. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 2014, 245, 70–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Williams, G.; Gordon, I.; Edwards, J. Observations on the frequency of fused foetal circulations in twin-bearing cattle. Brit. Vet. J. 1963, 119, 467–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Andreu-Vázquez, C.; Garcia-Ispierto, I.; López-Gatius, F. Manual rupture versus transvaginal ultrasound-guided aspiration of allanto-amniotic fluid in multiple pregnancies: A clinical approach to embryo reduction in dairy cattle. J. Reprod. Dev. 2012, 58, 420–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ingenbleek, P.T.M.; Harvey, D.; Ilieski, V.; Immink, V.M.; De Roest, K.; Schmid, O. The European Market for Animal-Friendly Products in a Societal Context. Animals 2013, 3, 808–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nalon, E.; Stevenson, P. Protection of Dairy Cattle in the EU: State of Play and Directions for Policymaking from a Legal and Animal Advocacy Perspective. Animals 2019, 9, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Morton, R.; Hebart, M.L.; Whittaker, A.L. Explaining the Gap Between the Ambitious Goals and Practical Reality of Animal Welfare Law Enforcement: A Review of the Enforcement Gap in Australia. Animals 2020, 10, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Bogado Pascottini, O.; Probo, M.; LeBlanc, S.J.; Opsomer, G.; Hostens, M. Assessment of associations between transition diseases and reproductive performance of dairy cows using survival analysis and decision tree algorithms. Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 176, 104908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. López-Gatius, F.; López-Béjar, M.; Fenech, M.; Hunter, R.H.F. Ovulation failure and double ovulation in dairy cattle: Risk factors and effects. Theriogenology 2005, 63, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bleach, E.C.; Glencross, R.G.; Knight, P.G. Association between ovarian follicle development and pregnancy rates in dairy cows undergoing spontaneous oestrous cycles. Reproduction 2004, 127, 621–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Effect of milk production on the incidence of double ovulation in dairy cows. Theriogenology 1999, 52, 1133–1143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lopez, H.; Caraviello, D.Z.; Satter, L.D.; Fricke, P.M.; Wiltbank, M.C. Relationship between level of milk production and multiple ovulations in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2005, 88, 2783–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kusaka, H.; Miura, H.; Kikuchi, M.; Sakaguchi, M. Incidence of double ovulation during the early postpartum period in lactating dairy cows. Theriogenology 2017, 91, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. López-Gatius, F.; Hunter, R.H.F. Preventing twin pregnancies in dairy cattle, turning the odds into reality. Liv. Sci. 2019, 229, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. López-Gatius, F.; Garcia-Ispierto, I. Transfer of a single embryo versus drainage of subordinate follicles to prevent twin pregnancies in dairy cows. Why not both? J. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 66, 287–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

López-Gatius, F. Twins in Dairy Herds. Is It Better to Maintain or Reduce a Pregnancy? Animals 2020, 10, 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112006

AMA Style

López-Gatius F. Twins in Dairy Herds. Is It Better to Maintain or Reduce a Pregnancy? Animals. 2020; 10(11):2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112006

Chicago/Turabian Style

López-Gatius, Fernando. 2020. "Twins in Dairy Herds. Is It Better to Maintain or Reduce a Pregnancy?" Animals 10, no. 11: 2006. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10112006

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop