Next Article in Journal
In Vitro Rapid Antigen Test Performance with the SARS-CoV-2 Variants of Concern B.1.1.7 (Alpha), B.1.351 (Beta), P.1 (Gamma), and B.1.617.2 (Delta)
Previous Article in Journal
Respiratory and Neurological Disease across Different Ethnic Groups Is Influenced by the Microbiome
Previous Article in Special Issue
Plasmodium matutinum Causing Avian Malaria in Lovebirds (Agapornis roseicollis) Hosted in an Italian Zoo
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue: Wildlife Microbiology

1
Department of Environmental Biology, Chubu University, Kasugai 487-8501, Japan
2
The Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, Hatfield AL9 7TA, UK
3
Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(9), 1968; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091968
Submission received: 13 September 2021 / Accepted: 14 September 2021 / Published: 16 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wildlife Microbiology 2.0)
Research on the effect of symbiotic microbes on the health of the host through their impact on digestion, the immune system, development, and behavior is accumulating. Host-associated communities can be disrupted by anthropogenic factors such as those that affect phenology (vegetation, life cycles, land-use, and climate), changing host pathogen dynamics (diseases), and environmental contamination. Seasonal and dietary factors also affect these microbial communities. The Anthropocene is characterized by dramatic and rapid systemic changes to global ecosystems, and a poorly understood aspect is the impact on microbial communities and balances between hosts and the myriad of organisms. It appears that emerging pathogens, in humans, are increasing relatively, and there is evidence this is not unique to the species. The need for microbiome research in an ecological context and as it applies to wildlife conservation is now urgent. The biodiversity of the host-associated microbiome should consequently be included as an essential component of wildlife management practices. The Special Issue “Wildlife Microbiology 2.0” of Microorganisms follows up on the Special Issue “Wildlife Microbiology” from 2018–2019.
“Wildlife Microbiology 1.0” included seven papers on gut microbiology in a range of different animals and birds, including: the cecal microbiome in wild Japanese rock ptarmigans [1], the effect of season and diet on fiber digestion and ruminal bacterial community structure in muskoxen in Alaska [2], the fecal bacterial community and potential zoonotic bacteria of muskoxen in Greenland and Norway [3], the gut microbiota of the marsupial carnivorous Australian quoll [4], bacterial isolates from captive and wild mountain gorillas in Uganda [5], shifting gut microbiomes in captive-reared endangered voles [6], and adaptations to a frugivore/folivore diet in gorillas, chimpanzees, and wild forest elephants [7].
“Wildlife Microbiology 2.0” gathers twelve research papers related to the symbiotic gut microflora and bacterial pathogens in wildlife, and how these are affected by both natural and anthropogenic factors in their environment. This Special Issue includes studies of the oral microbial community of the micro-endemic and critically endangered admirable red-belly toad in southern Brazil [8], the gut microbiome of the invasive small Indian mongoose, a pervasive predator disrupting the native ecology in the Caribbean islands [9], the fecal microbiota of the Egyptian mongoose, a medium-size carnivore in Iberia, Europe [10,11], and the bacterial microbiome in the small intestine of hooded seals, a monogastric carnivore that goes through extreme fasting and re-feeding in early life [12]. The environment and wildlife species can also be reservoirs of human and animal pathogens and antibiotic resistance. However, even though direct infection and zoonosis are rare from wildlife, many new organisms that evolve and spread have roots in nature, with about 43% of the last half century of human-emerging infectious diseases acquired in some way from wildlife species origins [13]. This Special Issue includes studies of avian malaria in lovebirds hosted in an Italian zoo [14], Mycobacterium bovis infection in red foxes in areas with animal tuberculosis in France [15], the detection of wood mice carrying non-tuberculous Mycobacteria able to infect cattle and interfere with the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis [16], and the phylogenetic relationship within the strongyloid nematode subfamily Phascolostrongylinae, a parasite found in the stomach and large intestine of Australian macropodid and vombatid marsupials [17]. It also includes studies of the antimicrobial activity of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis isolated from a Cuvier’s beaked whale stranded in Japan [18], studies of bacterial isolates and antimicrobial resistance in wildlife in Sicily in Southern Italy [19], and the characterization of multi-resistant ESBL-producing enterobacteria in fecal samples obtained from fruit bats in Gabon [20].
Altogether, these two Special Issues on Wildlife Microbiology present valuable data on the symbiotic gut microbiome, pathogens, and antimicrobial resistance in a range of animals and ecosystems not previously studied.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all authors who contributed their excellent papers to these two Special Issues on wildlife microbiology. We thank the reviewers for their valuable help in further improving all manuscripts to the highest standard of quality before being published. We are also grateful to all members of the Microorganisms Editorial Office for providing us with this opportunity and for continuous support in managing and organizing this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ueda, A.; Kobayashi, A.; Tsuchida, S.; Yamada, T.; Murata, K.; Nakamura, H.; Ushida, K. Cecal Microbiome Analyses on Wild Japanese Rock Ptarmigans (Lagopus muta japonica) Reveals High Level of Coexistence of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Lactate-Utilizing Bacteria. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Ungerfeld, E.M.; Leigh, M.B.; Forster, R.J.; Barboza, P.S. Influence of Season and Diet on Fiber Digestion and Bacterial Community Structure in the Rumen of Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus). Microorganisms 2018, 6, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Andersen-Ranberg, E.U.; Barnes, C.J.; Rasmussen, L.; Salgado-Flores, A.; Grøndahl, C.; Mosbacher, J.B.; Hansen, A.J.; Sundset, M.A.; Schmidt, N.M.; Sonne, C. A Comparative Study on the Faecal Bacterial Community and Potential Zoonotic Bacteria of Muskoxen (Ovibos moschatus) in Northeast Greenland, Northwest Greenland and Norway. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Burke, C.; Burnard, D.; Polkinghorne, A.; Webb, J.; Huston, W.M. Cloacal and Ocular Microbiota of the Endangered Australian Northern Quoll. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tsuchida, S.; Kakooza, S.; Nguema, P.P.M.; Wampande, E.M.; Ushida, K. Characteristics of Gorilla-Specific Lactobacillus Isolated from Captive and Wild Gorillas. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Allan, N.; Knotts, T.A.; Pesapane, R.; Ramsey, J.J.; Castle, S.; Clifford, D.; Foley, J. Conservation Implications of Shifting Gut Microbiomes in Captive-Reared Endangered Voles Intended for Reintroduction into the Wild. Microorganisms 2018, 6, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Segawa, T.; Fukuchi, S.; Bodington, D.; Tsuchida, S.; Nguema, P.P.M.; Mori, H.; Ushida, K. Genomic Analyses of Bifidobacterium moukalabense Reveal Adaptations to Frugivore/Folivore Feeding Behavior. Microorganisms 2019, 7, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Mann, M.; Prichula, J.; de Castro, Í.; Severo, J.; Abadie, M.; Lima, T.D.F.; Caorsi, V.; Borges-Martins, M.; Frazzon, J.; Frazzon, A. The Oral Bacterial Community in Melanophryniscus admirabilis (Admirable Red-Belly Toads): Implications for Conservation. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Becker, A.; Hill, K.; Butaye, P. Unraveling the Gut Microbiome of the Invasive Small Indian Mongoose (Urva auropunctata) in the Caribbean. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Pereira, A.C.; Bandeira, V.; Fonseca, C.; Cunha, M.V. Egyptian Mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) Gut Microbiota: Taxonomical and Functional Differences across Sex and Age Classes. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Pereira, A.C.; Bandeira, V.; Fonseca, C.; Cunha, M.V. Crosstalk Between Culturomics and Microbial Profiling of Egyptian Mongoose (Herpestes ichneumon) Gut Microbiome. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Acquarone, M.; Salgado-Flores, A.; Sundset, M. The Bacterial Microbiome in the Small Intestine of Hooded Seals (Cystophora cristata). Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. IUCN. Situation Analysis on the Roles and Risks of Wildlife in the Emergence of Human Infectious Diseases Publ; IUCN: Gland, Switzerland, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cocumelli, C.; Iurescia, M.; Diaconu, E.; Galietta, V.; Raso, C.; Buccella, C.; Stravino, F.; Grande, F.; Fiorucci, L.; De Liberato, C.; et al. Plasmodium matutinum Causing Avian Malaria in Lovebirds (Agapornis roseicollis) Hosted in an Italian Zoo. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Richomme, C.; Réveillaud, E.; Moyen, J.-L.; Sabatier, P.; De Cruz, K.; Michelet, L.; Boschiroli, M.L. Mycobacterium bovis Infection in Red Foxes in Four Animal Tuberculosis Endemic Areas in France. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Varela-Castro, L.; Torrontegi, O.; Sevilla, I.A.; Barral, M. Detection of Wood Mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) Carrying Non-Tuberculous Mycobacteria Able to Infect Cattle and Interfere with the Diagnosis of Bovine Tuberculosis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Sukee, T.; Beveridge, I.; Sabir, A.J.; Jabbar, A. Phylogenetic Relationships Within the Nematode Subfamily Phascolostrongylinae (Nematoda: Strongyloidea) from Australian Macropodid and Vombatid Marsupials. Microorganisms 2020, 9, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Suzuki, A.; Suzuki, M. Antimicrobial Activity of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis Isolated from a Stranded Cuvier’s Beaked Whale (Ziphius cavirostris) against Gram-Positive and -Negative Bacteria. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gambino, D.; Vicari, D.; Vitale, M.; Schirò, G.; Mira, F.; Giglia, M.; Riccardi, A.; Gentile, A.; Giardina, S.; Carrozzo, A.; et al. Study on Bacteria Isolates and Antimicrobial Resistance in Wildlife in Sicily, Southern Italy. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nguema, P.P.M.; Onanga, R.; Atome, G.R.N.; Mbeang, J.C.O.; Mabika, A.M.; Yaro, M.; Lounnas, M.; Dumont, Y.; Zohra, Z.F.; Godreuil, S.; et al. Characterization of ESBL-Producing Enterobacteria from Fruit Bats in an Unprotected Area of Makokou, Gabon. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ushida, K.; Kock, R.; Sundset, M.A. Special Issue: Wildlife Microbiology. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091968

AMA Style

Ushida K, Kock R, Sundset MA. Special Issue: Wildlife Microbiology. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(9):1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091968

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ushida, Kazunari, Richard Kock, and Monica A. Sundset. 2021. "Special Issue: Wildlife Microbiology" Microorganisms 9, no. 9: 1968. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9091968

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop