Next Article in Journal
Nasal Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes in Taiwan
Next Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology of Multidrug-Resistant Uropathogenic Escherichia coli O25b Strains Associated with Complicated Urinary Tract Infection in Children
Previous Article in Journal
Beneficial Insects Deliver Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterial Endophytes between Tomato Plants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Molecular Epidemiology and Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolated from Urine at a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms9061295
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Virulence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan

by
Noor Andryan Ilsan
1,2,
Yuarn-Jang Lee
3,4,
Shu-Chen Kuo
5,
I-Hui Lee
2,6 and
Tzu-Wen Huang
2,6,*
1
International Master/Ph.D. Program in Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
2
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
5
National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan 35053, Taiwan
6
Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 11031, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(6), 1295; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061295
Submission received: 24 May 2021 / Revised: 11 June 2021 / Accepted: 12 June 2021 / Published: 14 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Antimicrobial Resistance in Nosocomial Clinical Microorganisms: from Vitro to Molecular)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Acinetobacter baumannii, a Gram-negative bacterium, is an important nosocomial pathogen. Colistin-resistant A. baumannii is becoming a new concern, since colistin is one of the last-line antibiotics for infections by carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii. From 452 carbapenem-resistant isolates collected in a teaching hospital in Taipei, Taiwan, we identified seven that were resistant to colistin. Carbapenem resistance in these isolates is attributed to the presence of carbapenemase gene blaOXA-23 in their genomes. Colistin resistance is presumably conferred by mutations in the sensor kinase domain of PmrB found in these isolates, which are known to result in modification of colistin target lipid A via the PmrB–PmrA–PmrC signal transduction pathway. Overexpression of pmrC, eptA, and naxD was observed in all seven isolates. Colistin resistance mediated by pmrB mutations has never been reported in Taiwan. One of the seven isolates contained three mutations in lpxD and exhibited an altered lipopolysaccharide profile, which may contribute to its colistin resistance. No significant difference in growth rates was observed between the isolates and the reference strain, suggesting no fitness cost of colistin resistance. Biofilm formation abilities of the isolates were lower than that of the reference. Interestingly, one of the isolates was heteroresistant to colistin. Four of the isolates were significantly more virulent to wax moth larvae than the reference.

1. Introduction

The global increase in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among pathogenic bacteria threatens human health. Deaths caused by antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are expected to exceed deaths caused by cancers in 2050 if the increase of AMR is not controlled [1,2]. Currently, many pathogenic bacteria are highly prevalent on antimicrobial resistance in many countries. Clinical doctors are frequently forced to use second-line or last-line antibiotics for bacterial infections. Consequently, more multidrug- or even pandrug-resistant bacteria have emerged [3]. Carbapenem resistance is a particularly critical case. The World Health Organization has listed carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli including Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacteriaceae as critical pathogens for which discovery and development of new antibiotics are of urgent priority due to limited treatment options available for infection by these bacteria [4].
A. baumannii is a predominant pathogen associated with nosocomial and community infections at various body sites including the bloodstream, respiratory tract, urinary tract, surgical sites, and wounds [5]. Due to the difficulty in species identification, three clinically relevant species, A. baumannii, Acinetobacter nosocomialis, and Acinetobacter pittii, are grouped with an environmental species, Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, into the A. calcoaceticus–A. baumannii (Acb) complex [6]. This group of bacteria pose a high challenge in clinical settings because of their high AMR [6]. The development of multidrug resistance (MDR) in A. baumannii is mediated through genomic mutations or acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. Carbapenem treatment for MDR A. baumannii infections leads to an increase in the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB). A longitudinal surveillance program in Taiwan showed an increase of CRAB prevalence from 3.4% in 2002 to 58.7% in 2012 [7]. The frequency of CRAB was approximately 70% in the Acb complex isolated from hospitals in Taiwan [8]. A 2019 report from the Centers for Disease Control in the United States listed CRAB as an urgent threat to public health [9]. Because of the significant increase in CRAB, colistin has been used to treat CRAB infections despite its nephrotoxicity. Eventually and not unexpectedly, the emergence of colistin- and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CCR-AB) was reported [10,11,12].
Colistin is a cationic lipopeptide that interacts directly with lipid A of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Insertion of colistin inside the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria results in membrane disruption and cell death [13]. Mechanisms of colistin resistance in A. baumannii are mainly caused by chemical modifications of LPS mediated through dysregulation or acquisition of LPS modifying enzymes [14,15,16]. Mutations in the two-component system, pmrA (response regulator) and pmrB (kinase sensor), result in upregulation of the downstream gene pmrC, which encodes a lipid A phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) transferase. Overproduction of PmrC increases the addition of pEtN to lipid A, lowering its affinity to colistin [17,18,19,20]. Overexpression of other LPS modifying enzymes, such as EptA (PmrC homolog) and NaxD (acetyl-galactosamine deacetylase), which are under pmrAB regulation, has also been reported to confer colistin resistance [19,21]. Recently, plasmid-borne pEtN transferases, Mcr-1 and Mcr-4.3, were found in A. baumannii [14,15]. Mutations in LPS biosynthesis genes, such as lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD (lipid A) [22,23] or lpsB or lptD (non-lipid A) [24,25], may also confer colistin resistance. Other colistin resistance mechanisms include reduction of biosynthesis of osmoprotective amino acids or expression of efflux pumps [24,26,27].
Alteration of LPS structure may change the fitness of the CCR-AB cultures and their virulence. Impaired virulence and in vivo fitness were observed in a laboratory-evolved colistin-resistant strain of A. baumannii with a pmrB mutation [28] or in a clinical isolate from a patient without signs of infection [29]. A strong cost of fitness and virulence was found in colistin resistance with LPS loss rather than with LPS modification in A. baumannii [30,31]. In contrast, there have been reports showing no reduction in the growth or virulence in colistin-resistant A. baumannii [32,33].
A meta-analysis showed that the highest prevalence of colistin resistance in A. baumannii was in Lebanon (17.5%) followed by China (12%) among 41 countries surveyed [34]. The increasing trend of colistin resistance from 2000 to 2017 was higher in South-East Asia and the Eastern Mediterranean than in Europe and Africa [34]. The prevalence of colistin-resistant A. baumannii in Taiwan was 2.5% according to a meta-analysis spanning from 2013 to 2016 [34]. Different collections from Taiwan showed various degrees of colistin-resistant A. baumannii. A national surveillance from Intensive Care Units in Taiwan reported the prevalence as 6% in 2005 and 10.1% in 2016 [35,36]. Another study in 2007 showed the prevalence was 10.4% across Eastern, Southern, and Northern Taiwan [37]. None of these reports have explored the molecular characteristics and resistance mechanisms of the colistin-resistant A. baumannii isolates.
In this study, we collected CRAB from a teaching hospital in Taiwan from 2017 to 2018. The prevalence of colistin resistance was 1.5% among the CRAB isolates. Seven CCR-AB isolates were identified and chosen for characterization at the molecular level including multilocus sequence types, capsule types, and resistome profiles. In addition, mechanisms of colistin resistance were investigated. Heteroresistance to colistin was found in one of the seven isolates. Virulence-associated phenotypes such as growth, biofilm formation, and virulence in a wax moth infection model were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection of Clinical Isolates, Species Identification, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

Carbapenem-resistant Acb isolates were collected at Taipei Medical University Hospital from 2017 to 2018. From them, seven isolates resistant to colistin and carbapenem were further characterized. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) was performed using BD PhoenixTM Automated Identification and Susceptibility Testing System (BD Diagnostics System, Sparks, MD, USA). Validation of colistin resistance was performed using the broth microdilution method in cation-adjusted Mueller–Hinton broth. Interpretation of AST was based on the criteria of Clinical & Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline 2018 [38]. Species identification was based on gyrB multiplex PCR [39] supplemented by rpoB PCR and sequencing. Detection of oxacillinase genes including blaOXA-51, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-24, and blaOXA-58 was performed using PCR. The PCR primers are listed in Table S1.

2.2. Whole-Genome Sequencing and Molecular Characterization

Genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures in tryptic soy broth at 37 °C using a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). Whole-genome sequencing was performed using the Illumina platform with a read length of 150 bp in pairs. The depth of each isolate was over 30. The obtained short reads of each isolate were assembled de novo using CLC Genome Workbench (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The numbers of contigs for each isolate ranged from 187 to 494. The assembled draft genomes were used to determine molecular features. Two schemes of MLSTs, Pasteur [40] and Oxford [41], were analyzed using MLST 2.0 (https://cge.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MLST/, accessed on 21 July 2020). Capsule types were determined using Kaptive [42]. Acquired antimicrobial resistance genes were detected with coverage >60% and identity >90% using ResFinder 3.2 [43]. Draft genomes of these isolates have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information with the following accession numbers: JAENTF000000000 (T1060317), JAENTE000000000 (T1060361), JAENTD000000000 (T1060578), JAENTC000000000 (T1060580), JAENTB000000000 (T1070171), JAENTA000000000 (T1070213), and JAENSZ000000000 (T1070678).

2.3. Sequence Analysis of Genes Related to Colistin Resistance and Virulence

Sequences of genes related to virulence and colistin resistance in each isolate were compared pairwise with the reference strain (A. baumannii ACICU). Common genes related to colistin resistance including pmrCAB operon, lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD were analyzed by BLAST and validated by PCR sequencing (primers listed in Table S1). Other reported genes (pheS, pldA, vacJ, lpsB, and miaA) were also examined by sequence comparison with the reference strain. Virulence genes were detected on the Virulence Factors Database (VFDB) server [44]. The criteria of BLASTN analysis were score >100 and identity >90%.

2.4. Detection of Gene Expression Levels

The expression levels of pmrC, eptA, and naxD were determined using reverse transcriptase quantitative PCR. Bacterial cultures in exponential phase (OD600 of 0.5~0.7) were harvested and treated with RNAlaterTM solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for one hour at room temperature. Total RNA was extracted using PureLinkTM RNA Mini Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA was eliminated by DNase I (Lucigen Corporation, Middleton, WI, USA) treatment. RNA was further purified using RNA Clean and ConcentratorTM-5 (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA). Concentration of total RNA was measured using NanoDrop® ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and integrity of RNA was evaluated using agarose gel electrophoresis. Complementary DNA was synthesized using High-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kits (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA). Three targeted genes (eptA, naxD, and pmrC) and the reference gene (rpoB) were quantified using SensiFASTTM SYBR® Hi-ROX Kit (Meridian Bioscience, Cincinnati, OH, USA) with respective primer pairs (listed in Table S1) in Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR System (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Relative expression levels were determined using the 2-∆∆Ct method [45]. A. baumannii ATCC 19606 was chosen as the reference. Statistical significances between the CCR-AB isolates and the reference were calculated using one-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses and graphs were produced using GraphPad Prism 5.

2.5. Lipopolysaccharide Analysis by SDS-PAGE

LPS extraction from overnight bacterial cultures on LB agar was performed using an LPS Extraction Kit (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). The extracted LPS was mixed in 2X SDS loading buffer, boiled for 15 min, and subjected to SDS-PAGE in 15% acrylamide gels. After electrophoresis, the gel was stained with silver stain.

2.6. Measurement of Generation Time

An overnight bacterial culture in Mueller–Hinton broth (MHB) was harvested and adjusted to OD600 0.1. The 250 μL of diluted suspension was inoculated into 50 mL MHB in a 250-mL flask and shaken at 150 r.p.m. at 37 °C. OD600 value was measured every 30 min until the end of the exponential phase. Log phase determinations were used to calculate the generation time [46].

2.7. Biofilm Formation Ability

Biofilm formation was assessed either by static culture in a 96-well polystyrene microplate or aerated culture with a plate covered by a lid with pegs. Biofilm was measured using the crystal violet method [47]. For measurement of biofilm production in static cultures, each isolate was cultured in 3 mL MHB for 16 h at 37 °C. The cultures were adjusted to OD600 of 0.01, and 100 µL of the dilution was transferred into a 96-well polystyrene microplate (eight replicate wells per isolate) and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h without shaking. After removal of the bacterial cultures, the wells were washed with sterile water, stained with 150 µL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet at room temperature for 30 min, washed three times with water, and then air-dried. For measurement of biofilm formation in aerated cultures, 200 µL of diluted suspension was aliquoted into an MBEC assay® biofilm inoculator with a 96-well base (Innovotech, Edmonton, Canada) and shaken at 110 r.p.m. for 16 h in a 37 °C incubator. Biofilm formed on the pegs was rinsed with water three times, stained in 200 µL of 0.1% (w/v) crystal violet at room temperature for 30 min, washed with water, and dried. The stained biofilm was dissolved in 33% acetic acid solution and absorbance at 550 nm was measured in a spectrophotometer. ATCC 19606 served as a positive control and MHB blank as a negative control. Statistical significances were determined by one-way ANOVA. Statistical analyses and graphs were constructed using GraphPad Prime 5.

2.8. Determination of Colistin Heteroresistance

Bacterial isolates were cultured in 3 mL LB broth in an orbital shaker at 150 r.p.m. at 37 °C for 16–20 h. The overnight cultures were serially diluted from 101 to 107 folds. The diluted suspensions were spread onto LB agar plates containing colistin in concentrations ranging from 0 to 128 mg/L in 2-fold increments and incubated at 37 °C for 16 h. Colony formation units (CFU) on the agar plates were counted. The fraction of colistin-resistant bacteria at each concentration was determined by dividing them into CFU on colistin-free agars. Isolates that exhibited a resistance fraction between 10−7 and 5 × 10−1 at 16 mg/L of colistin were designated heteroresistant [48].

2.9. Virulence Analysis in Galleria Mellonella Infection Model

A 1.5 mL aliquot of overnight culture in LB was centrifuged and the pellet was resuspended into 500 μL PBS. The suspension was adjusted to OD600 of 0.01 (approximately 107 CFU/mL). Late-stage larvae of wax moth Galleria mellonella reared in-house at 28 °C were harvested. Fifteen larvae weighing 250–350 mg were injected at the last left proleg with 10 μL of the bacterial suspension using a needle syringe [49]. Survival of the larvae was scored after 24, 48, and 72 h. A reference strain, A. baumannii AYE, and PBS solution were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. The Kaplan–Meier survival curve and statistical analysis were constructed using GraphPad Prism 5.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Epidemiology of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant A. baumannii (CCR-AB)

Seven of our 452 CRAB isolates from 2017 to 2018 collected from sputum specimens of five hospitalized patients were resistant to colistin. The CCR-AB prevalence (1.5%) was significantly lower than that previously reported in Taiwan (10.4% in 2007 [37] and 10.1% in 2016 [36]) and in Greece (32.8% in 2015–2017) [50]. The antimicrobial susceptibility of the seven isolates is shown in Table 1. While one isolate (T1060587) exhibited multidrug resistance (MDR), the remaining six were extensively drug-resistant (XDR). All were sensitive to minocycline and resistant to colistin, imipenem, meropenem, gentamicin, and ciprofloxacin. Minimal inhibitory concentration of colistin ranging from 0.5 to 16 mg/L was reported for previous isolates in Taiwan [36]. However, high resistance to colistin, i.e., at least an eight-fold increase in the breakpoint, was observed in our isolates.

3.2. Molecular Characterizations of CCR-AB Isolates

Draft genomes of the seven isolates were determined from which molecular typing and resistome analysis were performed (Table 2). Three groups may be classified based on their molecular characteristics. Sequence types (STs) of the six XDR isolates were ST2 (Pasteur) or alternatively global clone 2 (GC2), with KL2 capsule type. Among them, two isolates (T1060317 and T1060361) from the same patient were ST544 and unknown ST, and the other four were ST208 and ST1806 due to the presence of two gdhB alleles in the Oxford MLST scheme. The MDR isolate was ST136 (Pasteur) with KL107 capsule type, but a novel sequence type was identified near ST460 or ST1092 in the Oxford MLST scheme.
Acquired resistome analysis showed the presence of OXA-23 oxacillinase hydrolyzing carbapenems in all seven isolates. In addition, all six GC2 isolates except T1070213 harbored nearly identical antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) for β-lactams, aminoglycosides, macrolides, phenicols, sulfonamides, and tetracyclines. T1070213 lacked the ARGs for macrolides and phenicols. However, the ST136 (Pasteur) isolate only contained ARGs for β-lactams and aminoglycosides. This finding was consistent with its MDR phenotype. In addition, this MDR isolate possesses three β-lactamases genes including a blaOXA-51 variant (blaOXA-317), blaOXA-23, and blaADC-25 but not blaTEM-1D.

3.3. Mutation Analysis of Genes Conferring Colistin Resistance

The PmrAB two-component system mediates colistin resistance in many Gram-negative bacteria including A. baumannii [51]. It regulates several genes encoding LPS modifying enzymes including pmrC, naxD, and eptA. Non-synonymous mutations in pmrAB may dysregulate its downstream genes. Compared to the reference strain, the seven isolates harbored a number of non-synonymous mutations in the histidine kinase domain of pmrB (Figure 1A). Three of the resulted amino acid substitutions (P233S, R263H, and Q270P) in PmrB are known to confer colistin resistance [17,52,53]. Two isolates, T1060578 and T1070213, harbored additional new substitutions outside the histidine kinase domain of PmrB, the effects of which are not known. No mutation was found in pmrA in the seven isolates. New mutations in pmrC were found in two isolates, where T1060578 (ST136, Pasteur) harbored three non-synonymous mutations in pmrC and one mutation in its promoter region. An L108S substitution in PmrC was found in T1070213. Pre-existing mutations in the population or mutations generated from antibiotic-induced stress responses are known to be selected under antibiotic treatments [54,55]. Indeed, our five patients, from whom the seven isolates were collected, had previously received colistin treatment.
Mutations in LPS biosynthesis genes such as lpxA, lpxC, and lpxD may also result in colistin resistance [22,23]. Six of the seven isolates did not possess any mutation in these three genes, while T1060578 contained three non-synonymous mutations in lpxD. One of the substitutions (K117E) is at the lipid binding site, which has been associated with colistin resistance (Figure 1B). No mutation was found in other genes associated with colistin resistance including pldA, pheS, vacJ, lpsB, and miaA. These findings are consistent with previous reports showing that mutations in the histidine kinase domain of pmrB were mainly responsible for colistin resistance in clinical A. baumannii isolates [17,18,19].

3.4. Effects of PmrB and LpxD Mutations

Activation mutations in pmrB (histidine kinase) result in constitutive expression of its downstream genes through the action of pmrA (response regulator). Two of the pmrB-regulated genes, pmrC and eptA, encode phosphoethanolamine transferases, which add phosphoethanolamine (pEtN) to neutralize the negative charge on lipid A. Another pmrB-regulated gene, naxD, encodes an acetyl-galactosamine deacetylase, which modifies lipid A with galactosamine. Expression levels of these three genes in the seven isolates (Figure 2) were significantly increased compared to those in the reference culture. In each isolate, the expression of naxD was highest, followed by that of pmrC and eptA. T1070213, which was highly resistant to colistin, exhibited lower expression of these three genes than the other isolates with similar or lower colistin resistance. Comparison of T1070171 and T1070213 (from the same patient) showed an additional A138S substitution in PmrB in T1070213. It is possible that A138S attenuates the kinase activity of PmrB, resulting in reduced expression of the downstream genes.
Mutations in lpxA, lpxC, or lpxD result in deficiency of LPS biosynthesis. The LPS profiling of the seven isolates was analyzed to evaluate the effect of mutations in LPS synthesis enzymes (Figure 3). Only T1060578 isolate with a K117E substitution in LpxD displayed a different LPS pattern compared to the reference and other CCR-AB isolates, all of which do not have an LpxD mutation. A single strong band near the bottom of the analyzed gel was observed in T1060578 but not the others.
These results indicate that colistin resistance in the CCR-AB isolates may involve either modifications of LPS or alterations in LPS biosynthesis. In particular, T1060578 appears to possess both mechanisms.

3.5. Fitness, Biofilm Formation, and Heteroresistance to Colistin

Alterations in LPS biosynthesis may affect bacterial growth and biofilm formation [47,56]. To understand the possible effects of activated pmrB on the growth of the seven isolates, generation time was determined for each isolate. No significant difference in generation time was observed among them and the reference (Table S2), indicating no fitness cost was exerted on these isolates. Biofilm formation under aerated or non-aerated conditions was lower in the isolates than that in the reference (Figure 4): not detectable in the three GC2 isolates (T1060317, T1070213, and T1070678) and reduced formation in the remaining four. Interestingly, members of the two pairs of isolates (T1060317/T1060316, T1070171/T1070213) each from the same patient, differed significantly in biofilm production despite their highly similar genotypes.
Deficiency in biofilm formation has been reported in clinically isolated colistin-resistant A. baumannii, which either contained mutations in lpx alone or mutations in pmrB and other biofilm-associated genes [57]. In silico analysis of biofilm-associated genes showed partial or complete deletion of csu fimbrial operon, a known biofilm-associated gene cluster in two of the three isolates (T1070213 and T1070678) deficient in biofilm formation (Table 3).
A 33% prevalence of colistin heteroresistance in Acinetobacter spp. based on a meta-analysis has been reported [58]. In the seven CCR-AB isolates, six displayed stable resistance to colistin with a higher than 40% survival rate at the highest colistin concentration tested (64 mg/L). The other isolate, T1070678, displayed heteroresistance with 3.8 × 10−2 survival at 16 mg/L of colistin (Figure 5). T1070678 contains a P233S substitution in PmrB, which is known to be associated with stable resistance [59]. No reported mutations in pmrA or pmrB are known to be involved in heteroresistance. It is possible that colistin heteroresistance in T1070678 may be attributed to elevated efflux pumps, as has been previously reported [60].

3.6. Virulence to Wax Moth

Colistin resistance in A. baumannii isolates has been shown to be associated with virulence reduction [30,61]. Virulence of the CCR-AB isolates was analyzed using the wax moth infection model. Most of our CCR-AB isolates were more virulent to different degrees than the reference strain A. baumannii AYE (Figure 6). Three (T1060580, T1070171, and T1070213) out of four isolates classified as ST208 and ST1806 (Oxford) killed more than 60% of larvae 72 h post-injection. The most virulent isolate, T1070213, killed more than 80% of larvae 48 h post-injection. Such virulence of T1070213 is comparable to that of a known virulent strain AB5057 using the same test model [62]. Interestingly, T1070213, isolated from the same patient as T1070171 but two weeks later, exhibited significantly higher virulence than the latter. The high virulence of T1070213 is of interest. While hypervirulent CRAB isolates outside of ST208 have been described [63], no hypervirulent ST208 isolate has been reported. It is possible that the high virulence of T1070213 is due to higher resistance to the complement system in the innate immunity in wax moth.

3.7. In Silico Analysis of Virulence Factors

In silico analysis of 39 known virulence factors from the draft genomes shows high similarities (Table 3). Identities and coverage in these virulence factors were nearly the same among the GC2 isolates, although the ST208 and ST1806 (Oxford) isolates were more virulent to moth larvae than the ST544 (Oxford) isolates. It implies that other factors contribute to the higher virulence of the ST208 and ST1806 (Oxford) isolates. One isolate (T1070678) in ST208 and ST1806 (Oxford) has lost the csu fimbriae operon and part of the acinetobactin biosynthesis gene cluster and exhibited the avirulent phenotype, suggesting that the missing genes are required for virulence. Interestingly, T1070213, despite lacking complete csu operon (encoding a virulent factor), is more virulent than its paired isolate, T1070171. We suspect that T1070213 may contain one or more novel virulence factors.

3.8. Potentially Alternative Therapies against MDR Bacteria

The need to discover new approaches against MDR bacteria is urgent. Combination therapies with compounds to increase membrane permeability or to reduce efflux pump activity have been proposed [64]. The use of efflux pump inhibitors as antibiotic adjuvants may elevate the efficacy of antibiotics. Many natural and synthetic compounds acting as efflux pump inhibitors have been found to be effective against Gram-positive and Gram-negative MDR bacteria [65,66]. Some plant products such as essential oils have shown broad-spectrum activities against bacteria and fungi [67,68]. In particular, oregano essential oil has been shown to inhibit the growth of MDR A. baumannii and function synergistically with polymyxin B [69]. Another essential oil from Zingiber cassumunar Roxb exhibited antibacterial activities and enhancing effects for several classes of antibiotics against A. baumannii, including XDR isolates [70]. Alternative therapies such as these may aid our continuing fight against MDR bacteria.

4. Conclusions

In this study, we collected seven CCR-AB isolates from a teaching hospital in Taiwan and performed genomic epidemiology to uncover their molecular features and resistome profiles. Most of the isolates were endemic GC2 clones and acquired multiple antimicrobial resistance determinants. Carbapenemase OXA-23 is responsible for carbapenem resistance, while colistin resistance was mediated through pmrB mutations that alter lipid A and/or LPS in our isolates. Colistin heteroresistance was found in one isolate. Different biofilm formation abilities and virulence were found among GC2 isolates and between paired isolates from the same patients, implying other genetic traits may be involved in these phenomena.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms9061295/s1. Table S1. Oligonucleotide sequences used in this study. Table S2. Generation time of colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii isolates.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: N.A.I., Y.-J.L., and T.-W.H.; data curation: S.-C.K., N.A.I., and T.-W.H.; methodology: N.A.I., I.-H.L., and T.-W.H.; writing—original draft: N.A.I. and T.-W.H.; writing—review and editing: Y.-J.L., S.-C.K., and T.-W.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Health Research Institutes (Grant Numbers MG-108-GP-07 and MG-109-GP-01) and the Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant Number MOST 109-2320-B-038-051).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Taipei Medical University—Joint Institutional Review Board (N201609001, date of approval: 2016/09/03).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to the retrospective study with anonymous clinical data.

Data Availability Statement

Data are provided in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank College of Medicine in Taipei Medical University for supporting the long-term collection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and the staff of Taipei Medical University Hospital for assistance in bacterial collection. We acknowledge the Genomics Center for Clinical and Biotechnological Applications of National Core Facility for Biopharmaceuticals, Taiwan (MOST 109-2740-B-010-002) for sequencing service. We thank Carton W. Chen for critical reading of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. O’Neill, J. Antimicrobial Resistance: Tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. In Review on Antimicrobial Resistance; Wellcome Trust: London, UK, 2014; pp. 1–16. Available online: http://www.jpiamr.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/AMR-Review-Paper-Tackling-a-crisis-for-the-health-and-wealth-of-nations_1-2.pdf (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  2. World Health Organization. Global priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria-To guide research, discovery, and development of new antibiotics. 2017. Available online: https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/global-priority-list-antibiotic-resistant-bacteria/en/ (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  3. Kanj, S.S.; Kanafani, Z.A. Current concepts in antimicrobial therapy against resistant Gram-negative organisms: extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2011, 86, 250–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Tacconelli, E.; Carrara, E.; Savoldi, A.; Harbarth, S.; Mendelson, M.; Monnet, D.L.; Pulcini, C.; Kahlmeter, G.; Kluytmans, J.; Carmeli, Y.; et al. Discovery, research, and development of new antibiotics: the WHO priority list of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and tuberculosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sievert, D.M.; Ricks, P.; Edwards, J.R.; Schneider, A.; Patel, J.; Srinivasan, A.; Kallen, A.; Limbago, B.; Fridkin, S. National Healthcare Safety Network, T., et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2013, 34, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Dijkshoorn, L.; Nemec, A.; Seifert, H. An increasing threat in hospitals: multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 939–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kuo, S.C.; Chang, S.C.; Wang, H.Y.; Lai, J.F.; Chen, P.C.; Shiau, Y.R.; Huang, I.W.; Lauderdale, T.L. TSAR Hospitals. Emergence of extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii complex over 10 years: nationwide data from the Taiwan Surveillance of Antimicrobial Resistance (TSAR) program. BMC Infect. Dis. 2012, 12, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Taiwan Centers for Disease Control. Annual report of nosocomial infections surveillance system (2016). Taiwan Nosocomial Infections. Surveillance system. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov.tw/En/Category/Page/J63NmsvevBg2u3I2qYBenw (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/DrugResistance/Biggest-Threats.html (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  10. Bakour, S.; Olaitan, A.O.; Ammari, H.; Touati, A.; Saoudi, S.; Saoudi, K.; Rolain, J.M. Emergence of colistin- and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii ST2 clinical isolate in Algeria: first case report. Microb. Drug Resist. 2015, 21, 279–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Oikonomou, O.; Sarrou, S.; Papagiannitsis, C.C.; Georgiadou, S.; Mantzarlis, K.; Zakynthinos, E.; Dalekos, G.N.; Petinaki, E. Rapid dissemination of colistin and carbapenem resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in Central Greece: mechanisms of resistance, molecular identification and epidemiological data. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Qureshi, Z.A.; Hittle, L.E.; O’Hara, J.A.; Rivera, J.I.; Syed, A.; Shields, R.K.; Pasculle, A.W.; Ernst, R.K.; Doi, Y. Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: beyond carbapenem resistance. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2015, 60, 1295–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Li, J.; Nation, R.L.; Turnidge, J.D.; Milne, R.W.; Coulthard, K.; Rayner, C.R.; Paterson, D.L. Colistin: the re-emerging antibiotic for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 589–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hameed, F.; Khan, M.A.; Muhammad, H.; Sarwar, T.; Bilal, H.; Rehman, T.U. Plasmid-mediated mcr-1 gene in Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: first report from Pakistan. Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop. 2019, 52, e20190237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Ma, F.; Shen, C.; Zheng, X.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhong, L.; Liang, Y.; Liao, K.; Xia, Y.; Tian, G.B.; et al. Identification of a novel plasmid carrying mcr-4.3 in an Acinetobacter baumannii strain in China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2019, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Martins-Sorenson, N.; Snesrud, E.; Xavier, D.E.; Cacci, L.C.; Iavarone, A.T.; McGann, P.; Riley, L.W.; Moreira, B.M. A novel plasmid-encoded mcr-4.3 gene in a colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strain. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2020, 75, 60–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Arroyo, L.A.; Herrera, C.M.; Fernandez, L.; Hankins, J.V.; Trent, M.S.; Hancock, R.E. The pmrCAB operon mediates polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 17978 and clinical isolates through phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3743–3751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Beceiro, A.; Llobet, E.; Aranda, J.; Bengoechea, J.A.; Doumith, M.; Hornsey, M.; Dhanji, H.; Chart, H.; Bou, G.; Livermore, D.M.; et al. Phosphoethanolamine modification of lipid A in colistin-resistant variants of Acinetobacter baumannii mediated by the pmrAB two-component regulatory system. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3370–3379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Lesho, E.; Yoon, E.J.; McGann, P.; Snesrud, E.; Kwak, Y.; Milillo, M.; Onmus-Leone, F.; Preston, L.; St Clair, K.; Nikolich, M.; et al. Emergence of colistin-resistance in extremely drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii containing a novel pmrCAB operon during colistin therapy of wound infections. J. Infect. Dis. 2013, 208, 1142–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. De Silva, P.M.; Kumar, A. Signal transduction proteins in Acinetobacter baumannii: role in antibiotic resistance, virulence, and potential as drug targets. Front. Microbiol. 2019, 10, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  21. Chin, C.Y.; Gregg, K.A.; Napier, B.A.; Ernst, R.K.; Weiss, D.S. A PmrB-regulated deacetylase required for lipid A modification and polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 7911–7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Moffatt, J.H.; Harper, M.; Harrison, P.; Hale, J.D.; Vinogradov, E.; Seemann, T.; Henry, R.; Crane, B.; St Michael, F.; Cox, A.D.; et al. Colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii is mediated by complete loss of lipopolysaccharide production. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2010, 54, 4971–4977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Moffatt, J.H.; Harper, M.; Adler, B.; Nation, R.L.; Li, J.; Boyce, J.D. Insertion sequence ISAba11 is involved in colistin resistance and loss of lipopolysaccharide in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011, 55, 3022–3024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Hood, M.I.; Becker, K.W.; Roux, C.M.; Dunman, P.M.; Skaar, E.P. Genetic determinants of intrinsic colistin tolerance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Infect. Immun. 2013, 81, 542–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Bojkovic, J.; Richie, D.L.; Six, D.A.; Rath, C.M.; Sawyer, W.S.; Hu, Q.; Dean, C.R. Characterization of an Acinetobacter baumannii lptD deletion strain: permeability defects and response to inhibition of lipopolysaccharide and fatty acid biosynthesis. J. Bacteriol. 2015, 198, 731–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Thi Khanh Nhu, N.; Riordan, D.W.; Do Hoang Nhu, T.; Thanh, D.P.; Thwaites, G.; Huong Lan, N.P.; Wren, B.W.; Baker, S.; Stabler, R.A. The induction and identification of novel colistin resistance mutations in Acinetobacter baumannii and their implications. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 28291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lin, M.F.; Lin, Y.Y.; Lan, C.Y. Contribution of EmrAB efflux pumps to colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Microbiol. 2017, 55, 130–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lopez-Rojas, R.; Dominguez-Herrera, J.; McConnell, M.J.; Docobo-Perez, F.; Smani, Y.; Fernandez-Reyes, M.; Rivas, L.; Pachon, J. Impaired virulence and in vivo fitness of colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 203, 545–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Rolain, J.M.; Roch, A.; Castanier, M.; Papazian, L.; Raoult, D. Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to colistin with impaired virulence: a case report from France. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 1146–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Beceiro, A.; Moreno, A.; Fernandez, N.; Vallejo, J.A.; Aranda, J.; Adler, B.; Harper, M.; Boyce, J.D.; Bou, G. Biological cost of different mechanisms of colistin resistance and their impact on virulence in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014, 58, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Carretero-Ledesma, M.; Garcia-Quintanilla, M.; Martin-Pena, R.; Pulido, M.R.; Pachon, J.; McConnell, M.J. Phenotypic changes associated with colistin resistance due to lipopolysaccharide loss in Acinetobacter baumannii. Virulence 2018, 9, 930–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Lopez-Rojas, R.; Jimenez-Mejias, M.E.; Lepe, J.A.; Pachon, J. Acinetobacter baumannii resistant to colistin alters its antibiotic resistance profile: a case report from Spain. J. Infect. Dis. 2011, 204, 1147–1148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Durante-Mangoni, E.; Del Franco, M.; Andini, R.; Bernardo, M.; Giannouli, M.; Zarrilli, R. Emergence of colistin resistance without loss of fitness and virulence after prolonged colistin administration in a patient with extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 82, 222–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Pormohammad, A.; Mehdinejadiani, K.; Gholizadeh, P.; Nasiri, M.J.; Mohtavinejad, N.; Dadashi, M.; Karimaei, S.; Safari, H.; Azimi, T. Global prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb. Pathog. 2020, 139, 103887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jean, S.S.; Hsueh, P.R.; Lee, W.S.; Chang, H.T.; Chou, M.Y.; Chen, I.S.; Wang, J.H.; Lin, C.F.; Shyr, J.M.; Ko, W.C.; et al. Nationwide surveillance of antimicrobial resistance among non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria in Intensive Care Units in Taiwan: SMART programme data 2005. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2009, 33, 266–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lai, C.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Lee, N.Y.; Tang, H.J.; Lee, S.S.; Lin, C.F.; Lu, P.L.; Wu, J.J.; Ko, W.C.; Lee, W.S.; et al. Susceptibility rates of clinically important bacteria collected from intensive care units against colistin, carbapenems, and other comparative agents: results from Surveillance of Multicenter Antimicrobial Resistance in Taiwan (SMART). Infect. Drug Resist. 2019, 12, 627–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Chang, K.C.; Lin, M.F.; Lin, N.T.; Wu, W.J.; Kuo, H.Y.; Lin, T.Y.; Yang, T.L.; Chen, Y.C.; Liou, M.L. Clonal spread of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in eastern Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 2012, 45, 37–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 28 ed.; Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute: Wayne, Pennsylvania, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  39. Higgins, P.G.; Lehmann, M.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Seifert, H. gyrB multiplex PCR to differentiate between Acinetobacter calcoaceticus and Acinetobacter genomic species 3. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 4592–4594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Diancourt, L.; Passet, V.; Nemec, A.; Dijkshoorn, L.; Brisse, S. The population structure of Acinetobacter baumannii: expanding multiresistant clones from an ancestral susceptible genetic pool. PLoS One 2010, 5, e10034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bartual, S.G.; Seifert, H.; Hippler, C.; Luzon, M.A.; Wisplinghoff, H.; Rodriguez-Valera, F. Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for characterization of clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2005, 43, 4382–4390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wyres, K.L.; Cahill, S.M.; Holt, K.E.; Hall, R.M.; Kenyon, J.J. Identification of Acinetobacter baumannii loci for capsular polysaccharide (KL) and lipooligosaccharide outer core (OCL) synthesis in genome assemblies using curated reference databases compatible with Kaptive. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Larsen, M.V.; Cosentino, S.; Rasmussen, S.; Friis, C.; Hasman, H.; Marvig, R.L.; Jelsbak, L.; Sicheritz-Ponten, T.; Ussery, D.W.; Aarestrup, F.M.; et al. Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2012, 50, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Liu, B.; Zheng, D.; Jin, Q.; Chen, L.; Yang, J. VFDB 2019: a comparative pathogenomic platform with an interactive web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D687–D692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Hall, B.G.; Acar, H.; Nandipati, A.; Barlow, M. Growth rates made easy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014, 31, 232–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Dafopoulou, K.; Xavier, B.B.; Hotterbeekx, A.; Janssens, L.; Lammens, C.; De, E.; Goossens, H.; Tsakris, A.; Malhotra-Kumar, S.; Pournaras, S. Colistin-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical strains with deficient biofilm formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 60, 1892–1895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Sherman, E.X.; Wozniak, J.E.; Weiss, D.S. Methods to evaluate colistin heteroresistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Methods Mol. Biol. 2019, 1946, 39–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Peleg, A.Y.; Jara, S.; Monga, D.; Eliopoulos, G.M.; Moellering, R.C., Jr.; Mylonakis, E. Galleria mellonella as a model system to study Acinetobacter baumannii pathogenesis and therapeutics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2009, 53, 2605–2609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Palmieri, M.; D’Andrea, M.M.; Pelegrin, A.C.; Perrot, N.; Mirande, C.; Blanc, B.; Legakis, N.; Goossens, H.; Rossolini, G.M.; van Belkum, A. Abundance of colistin-resistant, OXA-23- and ArmA-producing Acinetobacter baumannii belonging to international clone 2 in Greece. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Olaitan, A.O.; Morand, S.; Rolain, J.M. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 2014, 5, 643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Cafiso, V.; Stracquadanio, S.; Lo Verde, F.; Gabriele, G.; Mezzatesta, M.L.; Caio, C.; Pigola, G.; Ferro, A.; Stefani, S. Colistin resistant A. baumannii: genomic and transcriptomic traits acquired under colistin therapy. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 3195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sun, B.; Liu, H.; Jiang, Y.; Shao, L.; Yang, S.; Chen, D. New mutations involved in colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. mSphere 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Poole, K. Bacterial stress responses as determinants of antimicrobial resistance. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2012, 67, 2069–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Andersson, D.I.; Hughes, D. Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Da Silva, G.J.; Domingues, S. Interplay between colistin resistance, virulence and fitness in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antibiotics 2017, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Farshadzadeh, Z.; Taheri, B.; Rahimi, S.; Shoja, S.; Pourhajibagher, M.; Haghighi, M.A.; Bahador, A. Growth rate and biofilm formation ability of clinical and laboratory-evolved colistin-resistant strains of Acinetobacter baumannii. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Karakonstantis, S.; Saridakis, I. Colistin heteroresistance in Acinetobacter spp.: systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence and discussion of the mechanisms and potential therapeutic implications. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 106065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Charretier, Y.; Diene, S.M.; Baud, D.; Chatellier, S.; Santiago-Allexant, E.; van Belkum, A.; Guigon, G.; Schrenzel, J. Colistin heteroresistance and involvement of the PmrAB regulatory system in Acinetobacter baumannii. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2018, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Machado, D.; Antunes, J.; Simoes, A.; Perdigao, J.; Couto, I.; McCusker, M.; Martins, M.; Portugal, I.; Pacheco, T.; Batista, J.; et al. Contribution of efflux to colistin heteroresistance in a multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii clinical isolate. J. Med. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 740–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hraiech, S.; Roch, A.; Lepidi, H.; Atieh, T.; Audoly, G.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D.; Brunel, J.M.; Papazian, L.; Bregeon, F. Impaired virulence and fitness of a colistin-resistant clinical isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii in a rat model of pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2013, 57, 5120–5121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Jacobs, A.C.; Thompson, M.G.; Black, C.C.; Kessler, J.L.; Clark, L.P.; McQueary, C.N.; Gancz, H.Y.; Corey, B.W.; Moon, J.K.; Si, Y.; et al. AB5075, a highly virulent isolate of Acinetobacter baumannii, as a model strain for the evaluation of pathogenesis and antimicrobial treatments. mBio 2014, 5, e01076-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Li, J.; Yu, T.; Luo, Y.; Peng, J.-Y.; Li, Y.-J.; Tao, X.-Y.; Hu, Y.-M.; Wang, H.-C.; Zou, M.-X. Characterization of carbapenem-resistant hypervirulent Acinetobacter baumannii strains isolated from hospitalized patients in the mid-south region of China. BMC Microbiol. 2020, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, C.H.; Hsieh, Y.H.; Powers, Z.M.; Kao, C.Y. Defeating antibiotic-resistant bacteria: exploring alternative therapies for a post-antibiotic era. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Usai, D.; Donadu, M.; Bua, A.; Molicotti, P.; Zanetti, S.; Piras, S.; Corona, P.; Ibba, R.; Carta, A. Enhancement of antimicrobial activity of pump inhibitors associating drugs. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2019, 13, 162–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Monteiro, K.L.C.; de Aquino, T.M.; Mendonca Junior, F.J.B. An update on Staphylococcus aureus NorA efflux pump inhibitors. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 2168–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Trong Le, N.; Viet Ho, D.; Quoc Doan, T.; Tuan Le, A.; Raal, A.; Usai, D.; Sanna, G.; Carta, A.; Rappelli, P.; Diaz, N.; et al. Biological activities of essential oils from leaves of Paramignya trimera (Oliv.) Guillaum and Limnocitrus littoralis (Miq.) Swingle. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Le, N.T.; Donadu, M.G.; Ho, D.V.; Doan, T.Q.; Le, A.T.; Raal, A.; Usai, D.; Sanna, G.; Marchetti, M.; Usai, M.; et al. Biological activities of essential oil extracted from leaves of Atalantia sessiflora Guillauminin Vietnam. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 2020, 14, 1054–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Amaral, S.C.; Pruski, B.B.; de Freitas, S.B.; Allend, S.O.; Ferreira, M.R.A.; Moreira, C., Jr.; Pereira, D.I.B.; Junior, A.S.V.; Hartwig, D.D. Origanum vulgare essential oil: antibacterial activities and synergistic effect with polymyxin B against multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2020, 47, 9615–9625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Boonyanugomol, W.; Kraisriwattana, K.; Rukseree, K.; Boonsam, K.; Narachai, P. In vitro synergistic antibacterial activity of the essential oil from Zingiber cassumunar Roxb against extensively drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii strains. J. Infect. Public Health 2017, 10, 586–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Microorganisms 09 01295 g001 550
Figure 1. Amino acid substitutions in PmrC, PmrA, PmrB (A), and LpxD (B) in the CCR-AB isolates. The genetic map of the reference strain, ACICU, is displayed on the top with nucleotide numbers indicated. The open arrows depict the relevant genes with the names and size (in amino acid) shown. The functional domains in PmrB and LpxD are colored in orange and blue, respectively. Amino acid substitutions in the CCR-AB isolates are pictured below. Previously reported mutations are marked in red. Newly identified mutations are marked in black.
Figure 1. Amino acid substitutions in PmrC, PmrA, PmrB (A), and LpxD (B) in the CCR-AB isolates. The genetic map of the reference strain, ACICU, is displayed on the top with nucleotide numbers indicated. The open arrows depict the relevant genes with the names and size (in amino acid) shown. The functional domains in PmrB and LpxD are colored in orange and blue, respectively. Amino acid substitutions in the CCR-AB isolates are pictured below. Previously reported mutations are marked in red. Newly identified mutations are marked in black.
Microorganisms 09 01295 g001
Microorganisms 09 01295 g002 550
Figure 2. Gene expression levels of LPS modifying enzymes in the CCR-AB isolates. Expression of pmrC, eptA, and naxD was compared to that of the reference strain ATCC 19606. The result was expressed in folds of changes in log2 scale. rpoB was used as an internal reference for each isolate. The error bars indicate standard errors from three replicate determinations. Statistical analysis was conducted by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test for comparison of individual isolate and the reference. **, 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.
Figure 2. Gene expression levels of LPS modifying enzymes in the CCR-AB isolates. Expression of pmrC, eptA, and naxD was compared to that of the reference strain ATCC 19606. The result was expressed in folds of changes in log2 scale. rpoB was used as an internal reference for each isolate. The error bars indicate standard errors from three replicate determinations. Statistical analysis was conducted by one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test for comparison of individual isolate and the reference. **, 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01; ***, p ≤ 0.001.
Microorganisms 09 01295 g002
Microorganisms 09 01295 g003 550
Figure 3. LPS profiles of the CCR-AB isolates. LPS extracted from each isolate was electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide gel and silver stained. The sizes of protein markers are shown to the left. The reference strain, ATCC 19606, represents a wild-type profile for comparison.
Figure 3. LPS profiles of the CCR-AB isolates. LPS extracted from each isolate was electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide gel and silver stained. The sizes of protein markers are shown to the left. The reference strain, ATCC 19606, represents a wild-type profile for comparison.
Microorganisms 09 01295 g003
Microorganisms 09 01295 g004 550
Figure 4. Biofilm formation abilities of the CCR-AB isolates. Individual bacterial suspension was cultured overnight in conventional 96-well plates (‘No peg’; open bars) or in 96-wells with lid pegs (filled bar). Biofilms were measured by crystal violet staining. The ordinate represents measured absorbance at 550 nm. The error bars indicate standard errors from three replicate determinations. Statistical analysis was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test for comparison to the reference, ATCC 19606. Numbers of asterisks indicate significant difference in different levels with p ≤ 0.001 (***), 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01 (**), and 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05 (*).
Figure 4. Biofilm formation abilities of the CCR-AB isolates. Individual bacterial suspension was cultured overnight in conventional 96-well plates (‘No peg’; open bars) or in 96-wells with lid pegs (filled bar). Biofilms were measured by crystal violet staining. The ordinate represents measured absorbance at 550 nm. The error bars indicate standard errors from three replicate determinations. Statistical analysis was calculated using one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s test for comparison to the reference, ATCC 19606. Numbers of asterisks indicate significant difference in different levels with p ≤ 0.001 (***), 0.001 < p ≤ 0.01 (**), and 0.01 < p ≤ 0.05 (*).
Microorganisms 09 01295 g004
Microorganisms 09 01295 g005 550
Figure 5. Population analysis profiles of the CCR-AB isolates. An overnight culture of each isolate was serial diluted 10-fold. The diluted bacterial suspension was plated onto LB agar, with colistin concentration ranging from 0 to 64 mg/L. CFU was counted in each agar. The survival fraction in each colistin concentration was calculated by comparing it to CFU on colistin-free medium. The results present the average of three replicates with standard errors depicted by the error bars.
Figure 5. Population analysis profiles of the CCR-AB isolates. An overnight culture of each isolate was serial diluted 10-fold. The diluted bacterial suspension was plated onto LB agar, with colistin concentration ranging from 0 to 64 mg/L. CFU was counted in each agar. The survival fraction in each colistin concentration was calculated by comparing it to CFU on colistin-free medium. The results present the average of three replicates with standard errors depicted by the error bars.
Microorganisms 09 01295 g005
Microorganisms 09 01295 g006 550
Figure 6. Survival curve of wax moth larvae after injection of the CCR-AB isolates. Fifteen larvae at the late larva stage were injected with 105 CFU of each isolate culture. Survival of the injected larvae after 24, 48, and 72 h were scored. The survival curves were plotted using Kaplan–Meier analysis. PBS solution injection (as a negative control) exhibited no lethality during the observation period. A. baumannii AYE was used as a reference for comparison. Representative results from three independent replicates are shown. The asterisks (*) indicate the significant difference (p < 0.01) between the reference and tested isolate.
Figure 6. Survival curve of wax moth larvae after injection of the CCR-AB isolates. Fifteen larvae at the late larva stage were injected with 105 CFU of each isolate culture. Survival of the injected larvae after 24, 48, and 72 h were scored. The survival curves were plotted using Kaplan–Meier analysis. PBS solution injection (as a negative control) exhibited no lethality during the observation period. A. baumannii AYE was used as a reference for comparison. Representative results from three independent replicates are shown. The asterisks (*) indicate the significant difference (p < 0.01) between the reference and tested isolate.
Microorganisms 09 01295 g006
Table
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the CCR-AB isolates.
Table 1. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of the CCR-AB isolates.
IsolateIsolation DatePatient IDMinimal Inhibition Concentration (mg/L) 1
IMPMEMCTXCAZCROFEPSAMTZPGENAMKCIPLVXSXTCOL 2MIN
T106031711 July 2017PT0044>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>16/8 (R)>64/4 (R)>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38
(R)		>128
(R)		4
(S)
T106036125 July 2017PT0044>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>16/8 (R)>64/4 (R)>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38 (R)128
(R)		4
(S)
T106057810 November 2017PT0345>4
(R)		>4
(R)		8
(S)		2
(S)		4
(S)		8
(S)		8/4
(S)		64/4
(I)		>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)4
(I)		≤0.5/9.5 (S)64
(R)		4
(S)
T106058013 November 2017PT0348>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		16
(I)		>32
(R)		16
(I)		8/4
(S)		64/4
(I)		>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38
(R)		>128
(R)		4
(S)
T107017113 March 2018PT0512>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>16/8 (R)>64/4 (R)>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38
(R)		>128
(R)		4
(S)
T107021330 March 2018PT0512>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>16/8 (R)>64/4 (R)>8
(R)		≤ 8
(S)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38
(R)		>128
(R)		4
(S)
T107067823 October 2018PT0712>4
(R)		>4
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		>32
(R)		>16
(R)		8/4
(S)		>64/4 (R)>8
(R)		>32
(R)		>2 (R)>4
(R)		>2/38
(R)		64
(R)		4
(S)
1 Abbreviations of tested antibiotics: IMP, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; SAM, ampicillin-sulbactam; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; GEN, gentamicin; AMK, amikacin; CIP, ciprofloxacin; LVX, levofloxacin; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; COL, colistin; MIN, minocycline. 2 Minimal inhibition concentration of colistin was confirmed using the broth microdilution method.
Table
Table 2. Molecular characterizations and acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in the CCR-AB isolates.
Table 2. Molecular characterizations and acquired antimicrobial resistance genes in the CCR-AB isolates.
IsolatePatient IDST 1
(Pasteur/Oxford)		Capsule TypeAcquired Resistance Genes
β-lactamsAminoglycosidesMacrolidesPhenicolsSulfonamidesTetracyclines
T1060317PT00442/544 and unknownKL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daac(6’)-Ib3, aadA1, aph(3”)-Ib, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(6’)-Id, armAmph(E), msr(E)catB8sul1, sul2tet(B)
T1060361PT00442/544 and unknownKL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daac(6’)-Ib3, aadA1, aph(3”)-Ib, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(6’)-Id, armAmph(E), msr(E)catB8sul1, sul2tet(B)
T1060578PT0345136/~460 or 1092 2KL107blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-317ant(2”)-Ia, aph(3’)-VI----
T1060580PT03482/208 and 1806KL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daac(6’)-Ib3, aadA1, aph(3”)-Ib, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(6’)-Id, armA, ant(2”)-Ia, aph(3’)-VImph(E), msr(E)catB8sul1, sul2tet(B)
T1070171PT05122/208 and 1806KL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daac(6’)-Ib3, aadA1, aph(3”)-Ib, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(6’)-Id, armAmph(E), msr(E)catB8sul1, sul2tet(B)
T1070213PT05122/208 and 1806KL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daph(3”)-Ib, aph(6’)-Id ant(2”)-Ia, aph(3’)-VI,--sul2tet(B)
T1070678PT07122/208 and 1806KL2blaADC-25, blaOXA-23, blaOXA-66, blaTEM-1Daac(6’)-Ib3, aadA1, aph(3”)-Ib, aph(3’)-Ia, aph(6’)-Id, armAmph(E), msr(E)catB8sul1, sul2tet(B)
1 ST: Sequence types from both Pasteur and Oxford schemes of multilocus sequence types in A. baumannii. 2 The symbol “~” means the nearest ST.
Table
Table 3. In silico detection of virulence factors in the CCR-AB isolates.
Table 3. In silico detection of virulence factors in the CCR-AB isolates.
CategoryGeneProductST2/ST544ST2/ST208&1806ST136
T1060317T1060361T1060580T1070171T1070213T1070678T1060578
AdherenceompAOuter membrane protein OmpA100/100 1100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10098/100
Quorum sensingabaRDNA-binding HTH domain-containing protein98/10098/10098/10098/10098/10098/10098/100
abaIN-acyl-L-homoserine lactone synthetase98/10098/10098/10098/10098/10098/10098/100
EnzymesplcDPhospholipase99/99.899/99.898/99.899/99.899/99.899/99.895/99.8
plcPhospholipase C100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
plcPhospholipase C99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/100
Biofilm -Csu fimbriaecsuCCsu pilus chaperone protein CsuC100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found98/100
csuA/BCsu pilus major pilin subunit CsuA/B100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found99/100
csuBCsu pilus subunit CsuB100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found98/100
csuDCsu pilus subunit CsuD99/10099/10099/10099/100100/20.8Not found98/100
csuACsu pilus usher protein CsuA100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found98/100
csuECsu pilus tip adhesin CsuE99/10099/10099/10099/97.9Not foundNot found95/100
Ade efflux pumpsadeGCation/multidrug efflux pump AdeG100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10095/100
adeHOuter membrane protein AdeH100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10098/100
adeFMembrane-fusion protein AdeF100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10098/100
Biofilm-PAGN 2pgaBPNAG N-deacetylase PgaB99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10097/100
pgaAPNAG export porin PgaA98/99.898/99.898/99.898/99.898/99.898/99.897/100
pgaCPNAG synthase100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
pgaDPNAG biosynthesis protein PgaD100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
RegulationbfmSSignal transduction histidine kinase BfmS100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10098/100
bfmRBiofilm-controlling response regulator BfmR100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10099/100
Iron uptakebarASiderophore efflux system of the ABC superfamily BarA100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found97/100
barBSiderophore efflux system of the ABC superfamily BarB99/99.999/99.999/99.999/99.999/99.9Not found97/99.9
basAAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BarA100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10096/100
basBNon-ribosomal peptide synthetase BarB99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10096/100
basCAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BasC100/99.2100/99.2100/99.2100/99.2100/99.2100/99.297/99.2
basDAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BasD99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10096/100
basFAryl carrier protein BasF100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
basGAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BasF100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found97/100
basHNon-ribosomal peptide biosynthesis thioesterase BasH100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100Not found96/100
basIAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BasI97/98.897/98.897/98.897/98.897/98.8Not found93/98.8
basJAcinetobactin biosynthesis protein BasJ98/10098/10098/10098/10098/100Not found98/100
entENon-ribosomal peptide synthetase EntE100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10096/100
bauATonB-dependent siderophore receptor BauA99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/100
bauBFerric siderophore ABC transporter, periplasmic siderophore-binding protein BauB100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
bauCFerric siderophore ABC transporter, permease protein BauC98/10098/10098/10098/10098/10098/10095/83.1
bauDFerric siderophore ABC transporter, permease protein BauD99/10099/10099/10099/10099/10099/10096/99.9
bauEFerric siderophore ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein BauE100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10099/100
bauFSiderophore-interacting protein100/100100/100100/100100/100100/100100/10097/100
1 Values represent identities and coverages of nucleotide sequence comparison between our isolates and the reference A. baumannii ACICU. The gray color indicates 100% identity to the reference in both identity and coverage. 2 PNAG: Poly-beta-1,6-N-acetyl-D-glucosamine.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ilsan, N.A.; Lee, Y.-J.; Kuo, S.-C.; Lee, I.-H.; Huang, T.-W. Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Virulence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061295

AMA Style

Ilsan NA, Lee Y-J, Kuo S-C, Lee I-H, Huang T-W. Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Virulence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(6):1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061295

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ilsan, Noor Andryan, Yuarn-Jang Lee, Shu-Chen Kuo, I-Hui Lee, and Tzu-Wen Huang. 2021. "Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Virulence of Colistin- and Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Isolated from a Teaching Hospital in Taiwan" Microorganisms 9, no. 6: 1295. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9061295

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop