Next Article in Journal
Pharmacokinetic Variability and Target Attainment of Fluconazole in Critically Ill Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Pan-Genome Analysis of Effectors in Korean Strains of the Soybean Pathogen Xanthomonas citri pv. glycines
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 9
Issue 10
10.3390/microorganisms9102067
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development and Application of a gp60-Based Subtyping Tool for Cryptosporidium bovis

by
Weijian Wang
1,2,
Muchun Wan
1,
Fang Yang
1,
Na Li
1,
Lihua Xiao
1,2,
Yaoyu Feng
1,2,* and
Yaqiong Guo
1,2,*
1
Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510642, China
2
Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Wushan Road, Guangzhou 510642, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2021, 9(10), 2067; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102067
Submission received: 8 September 2021 / Revised: 25 September 2021 / Accepted: 28 September 2021 / Published: 30 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Veterinary Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cryptosporidium bovis is a common enteric pathogen in bovine animals. The research on transmission characteristics of the pathogen is hampered by the lack of subtyping tools. In this study, we retrieve the nucleotide sequence of the 60 kDa glycoprotein (GP60) from the whole genome sequences of C. bovis we obtained previously and analyze its sequence characteristics. Despite a typical structure of the GP60 protein, the GP60 of C. bovis had only 19.3–45.3% sequence identity to those of other Cryptosporidium species. On the basis of the gene sequence, a subtype typing tool was developed for C. bovis and used in the analysis of 486 C. bovis samples from dairy cattle, yaks, beef cattle, and water buffalos from China. Sixty-eight sequence types were identified from 260 subtyped samples, forming six subtype families, namely XXVIa to XXVIf. The mosaic sequence patterns among subtype families and the 121 potential recombination events identified among the sequences both suggest the occurrence of genetic recombination at the locus. No obvious host adaptation and geographic differences in the distribution of subtype families were observed. Most farms with more extensive sampling had more than one subtype family, and the dominant subtype families on a farm appeared to differ between pre- and post-weaned calves, indicating the likely occurrence of multiple episodes of C. bovis infections. There was an association between XXVId infection and occurrence of moderate diarrhea in dairy cattle. The subtyping tool developed and the data generated in the study might improve our knowledge of the genetic diversity and transmission of C. bovis.

1. Introduction

Cryptosporidium spp. are important enteric parasites in humans and a variety of animals [1,2,3]. Bovine animals are common hosts of the parasites. In pre-weaned calves, cryptosporidiosis is a major cause of outbreaks of diarrhea [4,5,6,7,8]. In post-weaned calves and adult cattle, subclinical cryptosporidiosis can lead to growth retardation and reduced milk production, respectively [9,10].
Cryptosporidium bovis is one of the four common Cryptosporidium species in cattle. Previous studies indicated that C. bovis mainly infected post-weaned calves in industrialized nations and generally caused asymptomatic infections [11,12]. However, in recent years, C. bovis has been commonly found in pre-weaned calves in some Asian and European countries and is responsible for moderate diarrhea [4,5,11,13,14,15]. This difference in the occurrence of C. bovis could reflect genetic heterogeneity in infectivity and pathogenicity. Nevertheless, due to the lack of a subtyping tool, little is known of the genetic diversity within the bovine-specific species.
Sequence analysis of the 60 kDa glycoprotein gene (gp60) is commonly used in subtyping Cryptosporidium spp. [16]. This tool has been used in the identification of infection sources and transmission dynamics of Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals [17,18,19,20]. Among the three common intestinal Cryptosporidium species in cattle, subtyping tools targeting the gp60 gene are available for C. parvum [21] and C. ryanae [22]. Despite the recent sequencing of the genome of C. bovis [23], a subtyping tool is yet to be developed for this species.
In this study, we identify the gp60 gene sequence from the whole genome sequences of C. bovis we obtained previously and develop a subtyping tool on the basis of it. The subtyping tool is used in the characterization of C. bovis from dairy cattle, beef cattle, yaks, and water buffalos.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Ethics Statement

All fecal samples used in this study were previously collected from cattle with the permission of the farm managers, using procedures in compliance with the Animal Ethics Procedures and Guidelines of the People’s Republic of China. The research protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the South China Agricultural University.

2.2. Samples

DNA preparations from 486 fecal samples of cattle were used in this study, including those from dairy cattle (n = 393), yaks (n = 73), beef cattle (n = 16), and water buffaloes (n = 4) (Table 1). These fecal samples were previously collected on 33 farms in nine provinces of China [5,24,25,26,27] and identified as C. bovis-positive by PCR and sequence analysis of the SSU rRNA gene [28]. The consistency of fecal samples was available from dairy cattle, except those collected from Farm Foshan (n = 20). Three categories were assigned to the samples: formed feces with no diarrhea (n = 266), loose feces with moderate diarrhea (n = 74) and liquid feces with watery diarrhea (n = 33). The DNA preparations from the fecal samples were stored at −80 °C until being analyzed by the C. bovis gp60 PCR.

2.3. Identification of the gp60 Sequence of C. bovis

To obtain the nucleotide sequence of the gp60 gene of C. bovis, the whole genome sequences (SRX6096269) of one C. bovis isolate ECUST 42482 from a dairy calf in Shanghai, China were downloaded from GenBank [23]. Using the gp60 sequence (cgd6_1080) of C. parvum as the reference, the gp60 gene of C. bovis was identified among the whole genome sequences by a blastn analysis. The coding region of the C. bovis gp60 gene was predicted using FGENESH (http://www.softberry.com/berry.phtml?topic=fgenesh&group=programs&subgroup=gfind, accessed on 9 December 2020) and confirmed by a blastp search of the NCBI database.

2.4. PCR of the gp60 Gene

On the basis of the nucleotide sequence of the gp60 gene, primers were designed to amplify a 1300-bp fragment of the gene using nested PCR. The sequences of primers used were 5′-ATGCGACTTACGCTCTACATTACTCT-3′ (Bovis-gp60-F1) and 5′-GACAAAATGAAGG CTGAGATAGATGGGA-3′ (Bovis-gp60-R1) in primary PCR, and 5′-CCTCTCGG CATTTATTGCCCT-3′ (Bovis-gp60-F2) and 5′-ATACCTAAGGCCAAATGCTGATGAA-3′ (Bovis-gp60-R2) in secondary PCR. The PCR reaction was 50 µL in volume, which contained 1 µL DNA (for primary PCR) or 2 µL primary PCR product (for secondary PCR), 0.25 µM primary primers or 0.5 µM secondary primers and 1 × PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). In addition, 400 ng/µL nonacetylated bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used in primary PCR to reduce PCR inhibitors. The amplification program consisted of a pre-denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 55 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The secondary PCR products were visualized under UV light after 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.5. Sequence Analysis

Positive secondary PCR products were sequenced bidirectionally on an ABI 3730 Genetic Analyzer at Sangon Biotech Co. (Shanghai, China). The raw sequences from each PCR product were assembled using the software Chromosol 1.5 (Technelysium Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Australia), and edited using the software BioEdit 7.05 (Bioedit Ltd, Manchester, UK). The sequences obtained were aligned with the reference sequence from the whole genome assembly using the software ClustalX 2.1 (Development supported by Science Foundation Ireland, http://www.clustal.org/, accessed on 6 May 2021). They were used to construct a maximum likelihood tree to assess their genetic relatedness using the software MEGA 7.0 (Development supported by National Institutes of Health (United States), https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 6 May 2021) and substitution rate was calculated on the basis of the general time-reversible model. The reliability of cluster formation was evaluated using the bootstrap method with 1000 replicates. The sequences in each well-supported cluster were considered as belonging to the same subtype family. Nucleotide sequence identity among subtype families was calculated using BioEdit 7.05 (Bioedit Ltd, Manchester, UK), and potential recombination events were identified on the basis of sequences of segregating sites (excluding insertions and deletions) using the software DnaSP 5.10 (Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain). The nucleotide sequences were further translated into amino acid (AA) sequences and aligned with GP60 sequences of C. hominis, C. parvum, C. viatorum, C. ubiquitum, C. ryanae, and C. xiaoi using ClustalX 2.1. The signal peptide and glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor in GP60 sequence were predicted using PSORT II (http://psort.hgc.jp/form2.html, accessed on 11 December 2020). N- and O- glycosylated sites were predicted using NetNGlyc 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/NetNGlyc/, accessed on 11 December 2020) and YinOYang 1.2 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/YinOYang/, accessed on 11 December 2020) servers, respectively. The furin cleavage site was predicted using ProP 1.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ProP/, accessed on 11 December 2020).

2.6. Nucleotide Sequence Accession Numbers

The complete gp60 gene of C. bovis and representative nucleotide sequences of 68 sequence types of the C. bovis gp60 gene obtained in this study were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MZ977132-MZ977200.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The Chi-square test implemented in the software IBM SPSS Statistics 25 (International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to compare differences in C. bovis subtype family occurrence between dairy cattle with or without diarrhea. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Characteristics of the gp60 Gene of C. bovis

The complete gp60 gene (GenBank No. MZ977200) was identified in contig_176 of the whole genome sequences of C. bovis. The coding region of the gene consisted of 1353 nucleotides encoding 450 amino acids. The GP60 of C. bovis had only 19.3–45.3% sequence identity to those of C. hominis (ACQ82748), C. parvum (AAF78281), C. viatorum (AJP62575), C. ubiquitum (XP_028874367), C. ryanae [23], and C. xiaoi (QXJ78680) (Figure 1). However, the GP60 of C. bovis possessed a signal peptide at the N-terminus and a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor at the C-terminus, which are common in GP60 proteins of other Cryptosporidium species. A conserved amino acid sequence RSRR for the furin cleavage site was present between the GP40 and GP15 fragments of the protein. In the GP40 fragment of C. bovis, there was a polyglutamine tract encoded by CAA/CAG trinucleotide repeats, instead of the polyserine tract encoded by TCA/TCG/TCT trinucleotide repeats in C. parvum and C. hominis. Altogether, three potential N-glycosylation sites and 36 O-glycosylation sites were identified in the GP60 of C. bovis (Figure 1).

3.2. Amplification Efficiency of the Subtyping Tool

Altogether, 294 (60.5%) of the 486 DNA preparations from C. bovis generated the expected gp60 PCR products, included 262 from dairy cattle, 27 from yaks, 4 from beef cattle, and one from water buffalo (Table 1). The amplification efficiency of the PCR using DNA preparations were stored for less than three years (samples from Heilongjiang, Hebei, Jiangsu, Yunnan, and Guangdong) (77.7% or 181/233) was much higher than that using DNA preparations that were stored for a longer period (samples from Qinghai, Henan, Shanghai, and Hunan) (44.7% or 113/253) (Table 1). Among the latter, 20 were randomly selected for re-analysis of the DNA using the SSU rRNA-based nested PCR [28], with only one being confirmed as still positive for C. bovis.

3.3. Sequence Polymorphism in the C. bovis gp60 Gene

Of the 294 gp60 PCR products, 260 were sequenced successfully using the secondary primers, which generated 68 sequence types, including one type identical to the reference from whole genome sequencing. Overall, nucleotide sequence differences of 0.1–49.3% were present among the sequence types. The sequence types differed from each other by both single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and length polymorphism (indel). The maximal difference in length among the sequence types was 138 bp. The SNPs and indel were scattered across the gp60 gene.

3.4. Nomenclature and Phylogenetic Relationship of C. bovis Subtype Families

On each farm, one representative of each gp60 sequence type was used in phylogenetic analysis. The 90 sequences selected formed six reliable clusters in a maximum likelihood tree. According to the nomenclature of gp60 subtype families, each cluster was designated as a subtype family and named as XXVIa, XXVIb, XXVIc, XXVId, XXVIe, and XXVIf (Figure 2). Among them, XXVIa and XXVIb formed a group divergent from the other group formed by the other four subtype families. In agreement with this, the nucleotide identity between XXVIa/XXVIb and other subtype families was low (50.7–59.9%) (Table 2). The nucleotide differences among the subtype families included SNPs and indels across the entire gp60 sequences. However, sequences at the 5′ and 3′ ends were more conserved among the subtype families. For examples, XXVIb had a high sequence identity to XXVIe and XXVIc at the 5′ and 3′ end of the sequence, respectively. XXVIe was very similar to XXVIf at the 3′ end of the sequence. This suggested the occurrence of genetic recombination among subtype families. In a DnaSP analysis, 121 potential recombination events were identified among all the six subtype families. At the amino acid level, sequence polymorphism among six of the subtype families was most obvious in the N-terminus of the GP40 fragment (Figure 3). In contrast, sequences were more conserved at the C-terminus of GP40 and the entire GP15 region. Except for XXVIa, the other subtype families did not have a polyglutamine tract encoded by CAA/CAG in GP40.

3.5. Distribution of Subtype Families by Host and Age

The six subtype families were all identified in dairy cattle in the order of XXVIc (55), XXVIe (50), XXVIb (45), XXVIa (44), XXVId (23), and XXVIf (12). In yaks, five of the six subtype families were detected, with XXVId absent (Table 1). The dominant subtype family in yaks was XXVIf (9/26), which was less common (12/229) in dairy cattle. In beef cattle, three subtype families were obtained from the four successfully subtyped samples, including XXVId (2), XXVIc (1), and XXVIe (1). The single sample from the water buffalo subtyped belonged to XXVIa.
Overall, the six subtype families were found in pre-weaned as well as in post-weaned dairy calves. However, on a particular farm, the distribution of subtype families in pre-weaned dairy calves appeared different from that in post-weaned dairy calves (Table 3). On Farm Dali-1, pre-weaned dairy calves were infected by XXVIb (6), XXVIf (4), XXVId (2), and XXVIa (1). However, in post-weaned dairy calves on the farm, XXVIf and XXVId disappeared, while XXVIc (4) emerged. Subtype family alteration was also observed on Farms Shijiazhuang-1, Xinghua, Guangzhou, and Yangjiang (Table 3). On some other farms, including Shanghai-1, Shanghai-4, and Foshan, the subtype families switched completely between pre-weaned and post-weaned dairy calves (Table 3).

3.6. Distribution of C. bovis Subtype Families by Farm and Location

One to five subtype families were identified on each of the 33 study farms, with nine farms having one subtype family, 12 farms having two, five farms having three, four farms having four, and three farms having five (Table 1). On the farms with one subtype family, only one to three samples were successfully subtyped, with the exception of Farm Dali-2 where nine samples were subtypes. In contrast, farms with multiple subtype families mostly had reasonable numbers of samples subtyped. Among the farms with one or two subtype families, some had the same distribution of subtype families, such as Farms Dali-2, Menyuan and Yueyang, which all had only XXVIa. On the farms with three or more subtype families, the distribution of C. bovis subtype families varied by farm (Table 1).
In each province, one to six subtype families were identified (Table 4). In Shanghai and Guangdong, all six subtype families were observed. However, the subtype family distribution in these two provinces was different, with XXVIc (41/63) being dominant in Shanghai and XXVIe (42/97) being dominant in Guangdong. A similar situation was observed in the provinces with five subtype families (Hebei, Qinghai, and Yunnan). One to four subtype families were present in Hunan, Jiangsu, Heilongjiang, and Henan.

3.7. Corrlation between C. bovis Subtype Families and Diarrhea Occurance in Dairy Cattle

Of the 373 fecal samples with data on fecal consistency, 214 were subtyped, including those from cattle with no diarrhea (n = 149), moderate diarrhea (n = 43), and watery diarrhea (n = 22) (Table 5). All six subtype families were observed in the three groups of dairy cattle. However, the frequency of XXIVd in dairy cattle with moderated diarrhea (18.6%, 8/43) was significantly higher than that in dairy cattle with no diarrhea (6.7%, 10/149; χ2 = 0.018, p = 0.018). In contrast, for the other five subtype families, the frequency of the subtype family in cattle with no diarrhea was not significantly different form that in dairy cattle with moderated diarrhea and watery diarrhea, respectively (Table 5).

4. Discussion

In this study, we identified the gp60 gene from a published genome of C. bovis and established a gp60-based subtyping tool. Using the tool, a highly genetic diversity was revealed in C. bovis from dairy cattle, beef cattle, yaks, and water buffalos. The data obtained suggest that there could be potential differences in C. bovis subtypes between pre-weaned and post-weaned dairy cattle.
Results of comparative analysis indicate that C. bovis is significantly different from other Cryptosporidium species at the gp60 gene. The length of gp60 gene in C. bovis was ~1353 bp, which is much longer than those in C. parvum, C. hominis, C. meleagridis, and other species (873–1089 bp) [21,29,30,31,32,33], but similar to those in the genetically related C. xiaoi (~1437 bp) and C. ryanae (~1548 bp) [18,22]. Although the GP60 of C. bovis is structurally similar to those of other species, its sequences for the N-terminal signal peptide and C-terminal GPI anchor are unique. This makes it difficult to use the gp60 primers for other species, which are generally based on sequences in the two regions, to amplify the gp60 gene of C. bovis by PCR. In addition, a large number of SNPs are present in the gp40 fragment between C. bovis and other Cryptosporidium species (Figure 1). Since GP40 targets host cell receptors during sporozoite invasion, the sequence differences in GP40 fragment could contribute to biological differences between C. bovis and other species [21].
The gp60 PCR assay developed here could be used in studies of the transmission of C. bovis. In the study, 294 of 486 C. bovis-positive DNA preparations produced expected amplicons using the gp60 PCR we developed. The overall amplification efficiency of the PCR is 60.5%. The true amplification efficiency could be much higher, as some DNA preparations used might have degraded during long storage. This was supported by the greatly reduced amplification efficiency of the PCR (44.7%) when DNA preparations stored for more than three years were used in PCR. The 20 randomly selected gp60 PCR-negative DNA preparations were mostly negative for Cryptosporidium in the re-analysis of the DNA using an SSU rRNA-based PCR. Importantly, a high genetic diversity was observed within C. bovis in sequence analysis of the gp60 PCR products, producing 68 sequence types from 260 samples. Therefore, the gp60 subtyping tool has high resolution, thus could be effective in genetic characterization of C. bovis.
The high genetic diversity within C. bovis is likely due to the wide occurrence of genetic recombination. In addition to the numerous SNPs among the six subtype families identified, mosaic sequences were observed, especially among XXVIb, XXVIc, and XXVIe. The 121 potential recombination events in the obtained gp60 sequences further supported the occurrence of frequent genetic recombination at the locus in C. bovis. The high prevalence and long duration of C. bovis infection and frequent occurrence of multiple subtype families on a single farm could greatly facilitate the occurrence of genetic recombination among isolates, leading to the emergence of new subtypes. This was in agreement with the observations in C. xiaoi and C. ryanae [18,22]. Several studies on other Cryptosporidium species also indicated the frequent genetic recombination at the gp60 locus [34,35].
No clear host adaption was observed within C. bovis. All six subtype families of C. bovis have been observed in dairy cattle. These subtype families have been mostly identified in other bovine animals. In yaks, only five subtype families were observed, but the number of samples examined was small and the absent subtype family XXVId was detected in beef cattle. In addition, the other two subtype families detected in beef cattle (XXVIc and XXVIe) are common subtype families in dairy cattle. The only subtype family in water buffalo, XXVIa, is also common in dairy cattle and yaks. Thus, no obvious differences were observed in the distribution of C. bovis gp60 subtype by host. This was different from the observations in other Cryptosporidium species, including the genetically related C. xiaoi and C. ryanae [18,22,36].
Differences in the transmission dynamics of C. bovis among geographic locations are not obvious currently. Among the three provinces with significant numbers of C. bovis samples (Yunnan, Shanghai, and Guangdong), the dominant subtype families identified were mostly similar (Table 4). In Yunnan, the dominant one among the five identified subtype families was XXVIa, which was identified at reasonable frequency in Guangdong and Shanghai. Although the most commonly identified subtype family in Guangdong, XXVIe, was not detected in dairy cattle in Yunnan, it has been detected in Shanghai and other areas. The lack of geographic segregation of subtype families is expected in view of the high prevalence of C. bovis and frequent genetic recombination at this locus.
There could be age-associated differences in the distribution of C. bovis subtype families on farms. On some farms, the dominant subtype family in pre-weaned calves disappeared or became less common in post-weaned calves. Accordingly, there were usually some new subtype families appearing in the post-weaned calves on these farms. As GP60 is an immunodominant antigen involved in the invasion of Cryptosporidium spp., the changes in gp60 subtype families between young and older calves could reflect the existence of subtype-specific immunity after an initial episode of C. bovis infection. Further studies involving longitudinal sampling of animals and subtyping of isolates from sequential episodes are needed to resolve this important issue.
Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families may have different degrees of associations with diarrhea. As indicated by results of the χ2 analysis, five of the six C. bovis subtype families were not significantly associated with moderate or watery diarrhea in dairy cattle. This was expected, as C. bovis infection had no obvious association with diarrhea in dairy cattle in most previous studies [13,25,37]. However, in the present study, the frequency of XXVId was significantly higher in dairy cattle with moderate diarrhea. This supports the observation in a few studies that C. bovis has modest pathogenicity in dairy cattle [38,39].

5. Conclusions

We identified the gp60 sequence of C. bovis and developed a subtyping tool for the pathogen on the basis of the sequence acquired. Using the tool, we showed a high genetic diversity within C. bovis, and a lack of host-associated differences in the distribution of the six subtype families were identified. The distribution of subtype families on a farm could be different between pre- and post-weaned calves, due to possible subtype-specific immunity. Future studies using more samples from different regions and hosts and sequence analyses of additional genetic loci are needed to further characterize the genetic diversity and transmission dynamics of C. bovis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.F. and Y.G.; methodology, W.W., L.X., Y.F. and Y.G.; validation M.W., F.Y. and N.L.; formal analysis, W.W., M.W. and N.L.; investigation, W.W. and F.Y.; resources, W.W., M.W. and F.Y.; data curation, W.W. and Y.G.; writing original draft preparation, W.W.; writing review and editing, all co-authors; visualization, W.W., M.W. and Y.G.; supervision, Y.F. and Y.G.; project administration, Y.F. and Y.G.; funding acquisition, Y.F. and Y.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 31972697 and U1901208; Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, grant number 2019A1515011979; 111 Project, grant number D20008; and Innovation Team Project of Guangdong Universities, grant number 2019KCXTD001. The APC was funded by South China Agricultural University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The representative nucleotide sequences obtained in this study are openly available in GenBank under the accession numbers MZ977132-MZ977200.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Khan, A.; Shaik, J.S.; Grigg, M.E. Genomics and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species. Acta Trop. 2018, 184, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Mmbaga, B.T.; Houpt, E.R. Cryptosporidium and Giardia infections in children: A review. Pediatr. Pediatric Clin. 2017, 64, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Santin, M. Cryptosporidium and Giardia in ruminants. Vet. Clin. N. Am. Food Anim. Pract. 2020, 36, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhang, Z.; Hu, S.; Zhao, W.; Guo, Y.; Li, N.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, L.; Kvac, M.; Xiao, L.; Feng, Y. Population structure and geographical segregation of Cryptosporidium parvum IId subtypes in cattle in China. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, N.; Wang, R.; Cai, M.; Jiang, W.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Outbreak of cryptosporidiosis due to Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIdA19G1 in neonatal calves on a dairy farm in China. Int. J. Parasitol. 2019, 49, 569–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Niine, T.; Dorbek-Kolin, E.; Lassen, B.; Orro, T. Cryptosporidium outbreak in calves on a large dairy farm: Effect of treatment and the association with the inflammatory response and short-term weight gain. Res. Vet. Sci. 2018, 117, 200–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Brar, A.P.S.; Sood, N.K.; Kaur, P.; Singla, L.D.; Sandhu, B.S.; Gupta, K.; Narang, D.; Singh, C.K.; Chandra, M. Periurban outbreaks of bovine calf scours in Northern India caused by Cryptosporidium in association with other enteropathogens. Epidemiol. Infect. 2017, 145, 2717–2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Randhawa, S.S.; Zahid, U.N.; Singla, L.D.; Juyal, P.D. Drug combination therapy in control of cryptosporidiosis in Ludhiana district of Punjab. J. Parasit. Dis. 2012, 36, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ralston, B.; Thompson, R.; Pethick, D.; McAllister, T.; Olson, M. Cryptosporidium andersoni in Western Australian feedlot cattle. Aust. Vet. J. 2010, 88, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Esteban, E.; Anderson, B.C. Cryptosporidium muris: Prevalence, persistency, and detrimental effect on milk production in a drylot dairy. J. Dairy Sci. 1995, 78, 1068–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Silverlas, C.; Naslund, K.; Bjorkman, C.; Mattsson, J.G. Molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium isolates from Swedish dairy cattle in relation to age, diarrhoea and region. Vet. Parasitol. 2010, 169, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Santin, M.; Trout, J.M.; Fayer, R. A longitudinal study of cryptosporidiosis in dairy cattle from birth to 2 years of age. Vet. Parasitol. 2008, 155, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Åberg, M.; Emanuelson, U.; Troell, K.; Björkman, C. Infection dynamics of Cryptosporidium bovis and Cryptosporidium ryanae in a Swedish dairy herd. Vet. Parasitol. 2019, 276, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Murakoshi, F.; Xiao, L.; Matsubara, R.; Sato, R.; Kato, Y.; Sasaki, T.; Fukuda, Y.; Tada, C.; Nakai, Y. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in grazing beef cattle in Japan. Vet. Parasitol. 2012, 187, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ng, J.; Yang, R.; McCarthy, S.; Gordon, C.; Hijjawi, N.; Ryan, U. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in pre-weaned calves in Western Australia and New South Wales. Vet. Parasitol. 2011, 176, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ryan, U.; Fayer, R.; Xiao, L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: Current understanding and research needs. Parasitology 2014, 141, 1667–1685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in China. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Fan, Y.; Huang, X.; Guo, S.; Yang, F.; Yang, X.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; Li, N. Subtyping Cryptosporidium xiaoi, a common pathogen in sheep and goats. Pathogens 2021, 10, 800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jiang, W.; Roellig, D.M.; Guo, Y.; Li, N.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Development of a subtyping tool for zoonotic pathogen Cryptosporidium canis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2021, 59, e02474-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rojas-Lopez, L.; Elwin, K.; Chalmers, R.M.; Enemark, H.L.; Beser, J.; Troell, K. Development of a gp60-subtyping method for Cryptosporidium felis. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Cevallos, A.M.; Zhang, X.; Waldor, M.K.; Jaison, S.; Zhou, X.; Tzipori, S.; Neutra, M.R.; Ward, H.D. Molecular cloning and expression of a gene encoding Cryptosporidium parvum glycoproteins gp40 and gp15. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4108–4116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yang, X.; Huang, N.; Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Kvac, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Subtyping Cryptosporidium ryanae: A common pathogen in bovine animals. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, Z.; Li, N.; Guo, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Comparative genomic analysis of three intestinal species reveals reductions in secreted pathogenesis determinants in bovine-specific and non-pathogenic Cryptosporidium species. Microb. Genom. 2020, 6, e000379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Feng, Y.; Gong, X.; Zhu, K.; Li, N.; Yu, Z.; Guo, Y.; Weng, Y.; Kvac, M.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Prevalence and genotypic identification of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in pre-weaned dairy calves in Guangdong, China. Parasites Vectors 2019, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cai, M.; Guo, Y.; Pan, B.; Li, N.; Wang, X.; Tang, C.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Longitudinal monitoring of Cryptosporidium species in pre-weaned dairy calves on five farms in Shanghai, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2017, 241, 14–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, P.; Cai, J.; Cai, M.; Wu, W.; Li, C.; Lei, M.; Xu, H.; Feng, L.; Ma, J.; Feng, Y.; et al. Distribution of Cryptosporidium species in Tibetan sheep and yaks in Qinghai, China. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 215, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ma, J.; Li, P.; Zhao, X.; Xu, H.; Wu, W.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, L.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Occurrence and molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy cattle, beef cattle and water buffaloes in China. Vet. Parasitol. 2015, 207, 220–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xiao, L.; Morgan, U.M.; Limor, J.; Escalante, A.; Arrowood, M.; Shulaw, W.; Thompson, R.; Fayer, R.; Lal, A.A. Genetic diversity within Cryptosporidium parvum and related Cryptosporidium species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 3386–3391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Strong, W.B.; Gut, J.; Nelson, R.G. Cloning and sequence analysis of a highly polymorphic Cryptosporidium parvum gene encoding a 60-kilodalton glycoprotein and characterization of its 15-and 45-kilodalton zoite surface antigen products. Infect. Immun. 2000, 68, 4117–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Li, N.; Xiao, L.; Alderisio, K.; Elwin, K.; Cebelinski, E.; Chalmers, R.; Santin, M.; Fayer, R.; Kvac, M.; Ryan, U.; et al. Subtyping Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, a zoonotic pathogen emerging in humans. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2014, 20, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Guo, Y.; Cebelinski, E.; Matusevich, C.; Alderisio, K.A.; Lebbad, M.; McEvoy, J.; Roellig, D.M.; Yang, C.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L.; et al. Subtyping novel zoonotic pathogen Cryptosporidium chipmunk genotype I. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 1648–1654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Stensvold, C.R.; Elwin, K.; Winiecka-Krusnell, J.; Chalmers, R.M.; Xiao, L.; Lebbad, M. Development and application of a gp60-based typing assay for Cryptosporidium viatorum. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 1891–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Yan, W.; Alderisio, K.; Roellig, D.M.; Elwin, K.; Chalmers, R.M.; Yang, F.; Wang, Y.; Feng, Y.; Xiao, L. Subtype analysis of zoonotic pathogen Cryptosporidium skunk genotype. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2017, 55, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Feng, Y.; Torres, E.; Li, N.; Wang, L.; Bowman, D.; Xiao, L. Population genetic characterisation of dominant Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1. Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 1141–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, Y.; Tiao, N.; Li, N.; Hlavsa, M.; Xiao, L.; Doern, G.V. Multilocus sequence typing of an emerging Cryptosporidium hominis subtype in the United States. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2013, 52, 524–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Feng, Y.; Ryan, U.M.; Xiao, L. Genetic diversity and population structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018, 34, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Qi, M.; Zhang, K.; Huang, M.; Wang, S.; Xu, C.; Wang, T.; Jing, B.; Li, J. Longitudinal detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in 1–10-week-old dairy calves on a farm in Xinjiang, China. Parasitol. Res. 2020, 119, 3839–3844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, S.-H.; VanBik, D.; Kim, H.-Y.; Lee, Y.-R.; Kim, J.W.; Chae, M.; Oh, S.-I.; Goo, Y.-K.; Kwon, O.-D.; Kwak, D. Multilocus typing of Cryptosporidium spp. in young calves with diarrhea in Korea. Vet. Parasitol. 2016, 229, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Silverlås, C.; Bosaeus-Reineck, H.; Näslund, K.; Björkman, C. Is there a need for improved Cryptosporidium diagnostics in Swedish calves? Int. J. Parasitol. 2013, 43, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 09 02067 g001 550
Figure 1. Alignment of the full GP60 sequence from Cryptosporidium bovis (this study) with those from C. hominis (ACQ82748), C. parvum (AAF78281), C. viatorum (AJP62575), C. ubiquitum (XP_028874367), C. ryanae [23], and C. xiaoi (QXJ78680). The signal peptide at the N-terminus and GPI anchor at the C-terminus are shaded in green and red, respectively. The putative furin cleavage site is shaded in gray. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites are marked in bold and italics, and O-linked glycosylation sites in bold with underline. The unique polyglutamine tract in C. bovis is highlighted in yellow. Dashes indicate amino acid deletions.
Figure 1. Alignment of the full GP60 sequence from Cryptosporidium bovis (this study) with those from C. hominis (ACQ82748), C. parvum (AAF78281), C. viatorum (AJP62575), C. ubiquitum (XP_028874367), C. ryanae [23], and C. xiaoi (QXJ78680). The signal peptide at the N-terminus and GPI anchor at the C-terminus are shaded in green and red, respectively. The putative furin cleavage site is shaded in gray. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites are marked in bold and italics, and O-linked glycosylation sites in bold with underline. The unique polyglutamine tract in C. bovis is highlighted in yellow. Dashes indicate amino acid deletions.
Microorganisms 09 02067 g001
Microorganisms 09 02067 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship among six Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families (XXIVa–XXIVf) inferred by a maximum likelihood analysis of partial sequences of the gp60 gene. Sequences from dairy cattle, beef, yaks, and water buffalo are indicated by black, green, red, and blue characters, respectively. Bootstrap values greater than 50% from 1000 replicates are shown on branches. The scale bar equals 5 nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationship among six Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families (XXIVa–XXIVf) inferred by a maximum likelihood analysis of partial sequences of the gp60 gene. Sequences from dairy cattle, beef, yaks, and water buffalo are indicated by black, green, red, and blue characters, respectively. Bootstrap values greater than 50% from 1000 replicates are shown on branches. The scale bar equals 5 nucleotide substitutions per 100 nucleotides.
Microorganisms 09 02067 g002
Microorganisms 09 02067 g003 550
Figure 3. Alignment of partial amino acid sequences of GP60 from six Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families. The putative furin cleavage site is shaded in gray. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites are marked in bold and italics, and O-linked glycosylation sites in bold with underline. The unique polyglutamine tract in XXIVa is highlighted in yellow. Dashes indicate amino acid deletions, except those at the N- and C-termini of the sequences.
Figure 3. Alignment of partial amino acid sequences of GP60 from six Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families. The putative furin cleavage site is shaded in gray. Potential N-linked glycosylation sites are marked in bold and italics, and O-linked glycosylation sites in bold with underline. The unique polyglutamine tract in XXIVa is highlighted in yellow. Dashes indicate amino acid deletions, except those at the N- and C-termini of the sequences.
Microorganisms 09 02067 g003
Table
Table 1. Sources and subtype family identity of Cryptosporidium bovis samples used in the study.
Table 1. Sources and subtype family identity of Cryptosporidium bovis samples used in the study.
HostProvinceFarmNo. of Samples AnalyzedNo. of Samples Positive by gp60 PCR (%)No. of Samples SubtypedSubtype Family (No. of Samples)
Dairy cattleHeilongjiangHarbin1010 (100.0)9XXVIa (8), XXVIb (1)
HebeiShijiazhuang-11411 (78.6)10XXVIb (3), XXVId (3), XXVIe (2), XXVIc (1), XXVIf (1)
Shijiazhuang-265 (83.3)4XXVIb (3), XXVIc (1)
Henan 1Yichuan-1142 (14.3)2XXVId (1), XXVIf (1)
Xinxiang-151 (20.0)1XXVId (1)
Xinxiang-241 (25.0)1XXVIf (1)
JiangsuXinghua1310 (76.9)10XXVIa (6), XXVIe (3), XXVIf (1)
Shanghai 1Shanghai-16138 (62.3)37XXVIc (35), XXVIb (1), XXVIe (1)
Shanghai-23017 (56.7)8XXVId (5), XXVIc (1), XXVIe (1), XXVIf (1)
Shanghai-3188 (44.4)7XXVIa (4), XXVIc (2), XXVId (1)
Shanghai-4168 (50.0)8XXVIb (7), XXVIc (1)
Shanghai-5126 (50.0)3XXVIc (2), XXVIe (1)
YunnanDali-14030 (75.0)23XXVIb (9), XXVIa (4), XXVIc (4), XXVIf (4), XXVId (2)
Dali-2109 (90.0)9XXVIa (9)
GuangdongZhaoqing2818 (64.3)17XXVIe (12), XXVIc (3), XXVIa (1), XXVIb (1)
Guangzhou2521 (84.0)17XXVIe (10), XXVIf (3), XXVId (2), XXVIa (1), XXVIc (1)
Yangjiang2017 (85.0)17XXVIe (8), XXVIb (5), XXVIc (3), XXVId (1)
Foshan2015 (75.0)15XXVIb (14), XXVId (1)
Qingyuan1813 (72.2)12XXVId (6), XXVIa (3), XXVIe (2), XXVIc (1)
Conghua1512 (80.0)11XXVIe (8), XXVIa (2), XXVIb (1)
Lianzhou1410 (71.4)8XXVIa (6), XXVIe (2)
subtotal 393262 (66.7)229XXVIc (55), XXVIe (50), XXVIb (45), XXVIa (44), XXVId (23), XXVIf (12)
YakQinghai 1Guoluo106 (60.0)6XXVIf (4), XXVIe (2)
Qilian-1134 (30.8)4XXVIb (2), XXVIc (2)
Qilian-2122 (16.7)1XXVIe (1)
Qilian-392 (22.2)2XXVIa (1), XXVIf (1)
Menyuan103 (30.0)3XXVIa (3)
Hainan-162 (33.3)2XXVIa (1), XXVIb (1)
Hainan-241 (25.0)1XXVIf (1)
Hainan-333 (100.0)3XXVIf (3)
Yushu64 (66.7)4XXVIc (3), XXVIa (1)
subtotal 7327 (37.0)26XXVIf (9), XXVIa (6), XXVIc (5), XXVIb (3), XXVIe (3)
Beef cattleHenan 1Yichuan-2113 (27.3)3XXVIc (1), XXVId (1), XXVIe (1)
Yichuan-351 (20.0)1XXVId (1)
subtotal 164 (25.0)4XXVId (2), XXVIc (1), XXVIe (1)
Water buffaloHunan 1Yueyang41 (25.0)1XXVIa (1)
Total 486294 (60.5)260 (53.5)XXVIc (61), XXVIe (54), XXVIa (51), XXVIb (48), XXVId (25), XXVIf (21)
1 The DNA preparations of these samples were stored for more than three years before being used in the study.
Table
Table 2. Percent nucleotide sequence identity among Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus.
Table 2. Percent nucleotide sequence identity among Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus.
XXVIaXXVIbXXVIcXXVIdXXVIeXXVIf
XXVIa-
XXVIb54.9–59.6-
XXVIc51.4–53.956.5–59.9-
XXVId53.7–56.752.1–56.375.3–77.7-
XXVIe51.2–54.352.1–57.159.2–64.458.1–62.3-
XXVIf50.7–54.051.9–55.162.1–65.858.0–62.662.8–65.8-
Table
Table 3. Distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus in pre- and post-weaned dairy calves on study farms.
Table 3. Distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus in pre- and post-weaned dairy calves on study farms.
FarmPre-Weaned Dairy CalvesPost-Weaned Dairy Calves
No. of Samples SubtypedSubtype Family (No. of Samples)No. of Samples AnalyzedSubtype Family (No. of Samples)
Harbin9XXVIa (8), XXVIb (1)-
Shijiazhuang-11XXVId (1)6XXVIb (3), XXVId (2), XXVIc (1)
Shijiazhuang-24XXVIb (3), XXVIc (1)-
Yichuan-1- 1XXVId (1)
Xinxiang-11XXVId (1)-
Xinxiang-21XXVIf (1)-
Xinghua1XXVIe (1)5XXVIa (3), XXVIe (2)
Shanghai-135XXVIc (35)2XXVIb (1), XXVIe (1)
Shanghai-28XXVId (5), XXVIc (1), XXVIf (1), XXVIe (1)-
Shanghai-37XXVIa (4), XXVIc (2), XXVId (1)-
Shanghai-47XXVIb (7)1XXVIc (1)
Shanghai-53XXVIc (2), XXVIe (1)-
Dali-113XXVIb (6), XXVIf (4), XXVId (2), XXVIa (1)10XXVIc (4), XXVIa (3), XXVIb (3)
Dali-29XXVIa (9)-
Zhaoqing17XXVIe (12), XXVIc (3), XXVIa (1), XXVIb (1)-
Guangzhou9XXVIe (8), XXVIc (1)8XXVIf (3), XXVId (2), XXVIe (2), XXVIa (1)
Yangjiang12XXVIe (6), XXVIb (3), XXVIc (3)5XXVIb (2), XXVIe (2), XXVId (1)
Foshan14XXVIb (14)1XXVId (1)
Qingyuan- 12XXVId (6), XXVIa (3), XXVIe (2), XXVIc (1)
Conghua11XXVIe (8), XXVIa (2), XXVIb (1)-
Lianzhou8XXVIa (6), XXVIe (2)-
Total170XXVIc (48), XXVIe (39), XXVIb (36), XXVIa (31), XXVId (10), XXVIf (6)51XXVId (13), XXVIa (10), XXVIe (9), XXVIb (9), XXVIc (7), XXVIf (3)
Table
Table 4. Distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus by location in China.
Table 4. Distribution of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families at the gp60 locus by location in China.
HostProvinceNo. of Samples SubtypedSubtype Family (No. of Samples)
Dairy cattleHeilongjiang9XXVIa (8), XXVIb (1)
Hebei14XXVIb (6), XXVId (3), XXVIe (2), XXVIc (2), XXVIf (1)
Henan4XXVId (2), XXVIf (2)
Jiangsu10XXVIa (6), XXVIe (3), XXVIf (1)
Shanghai63XXVIc (41), XXVIb (8), XXVId (6), XXVIa (4), XXVIe (3), XXVIf (1)
Yunnan32XXVIa (13), XXVIb (9), XXVIc (4), XXVIf (4), XXVId (2)
Guangdong97XXVIe (42), XXVIb (21), XXVIa (13), XXVId (10), XXVIc (8), XXVIf (3)
YakQinghai26XXVIf (9), XXVIa (6), XXVIc (5), XXVIb (3), XXVIe (3)
Beef cattleHenan4XXVId (2), XXVIc (1), XXVIe (1)
Water buffaloHunan1XXVIa (1)
Total-260XXVIc (61), XXVIe (54), XXVIa (51), XXVIb (48), XXVId (25), XXVIf (21)
Table
Table 5. Difference in the frequency of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families in dairy cattle with different diarrhea statues.
Table 5. Difference in the frequency of Cryptosporidium bovis subtype families in dairy cattle with different diarrhea statues.
Subtype
Family		No. of Samples SubtypedNo. of Samples without Diarrhea Moderate DiarrheaWatery Diarrhea
nχ 2OR (95% CI) 1pχ 2OR (95% CI)p
XXVIa443561.8070.528 (0.206–1.355)0.1791.0770.514 (0.144–1.841)0.299
XXVIb312280.3731.319 (0.541–3.218)0.5411.7200.275 (0.035–2.149)0.190
XXVIc5533152.8871.883 (0.901–3.934)0.0891.0001.640 (0.618–4.357)0.317
XXVId221085.5563.177 (1.168–8.644)0.018 23.3553.089 (0.877–10.881)0.067
XXVIe504154.6240.347 (0.128–0.942)0.0320.8610.585 (0.187–1.833)0.353
XXVIf12810.6920.420 (0.051–3.452)0.4062.1772.783 (0.679–11.407)0.140
Total21414943------
1 OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval. 2 Significant p value < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, W.; Wan, M.; Yang, F.; Li, N.; Xiao, L.; Feng, Y.; Guo, Y. Development and Application of a gp60-Based Subtyping Tool for Cryptosporidium bovis. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102067

AMA Style

Wang W, Wan M, Yang F, Li N, Xiao L, Feng Y, Guo Y. Development and Application of a gp60-Based Subtyping Tool for Cryptosporidium bovis. Microorganisms. 2021; 9(10):2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102067

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Weijian, Muchun Wan, Fang Yang, Na Li, Lihua Xiao, Yaoyu Feng, and Yaqiong Guo. 2021. "Development and Application of a gp60-Based Subtyping Tool for Cryptosporidium bovis" Microorganisms 9, no. 10: 2067. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9102067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop