Next Article in Journal
Autoimmune Gastritis and Gastric Microbiota
Previous Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Association with Toxin Determinants in Clostridium perfringens Isolates from Chickens
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 8
Issue 11
10.3390/microorganisms8111826
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Proteomic Studies of the Biofilm Matrix including Outer Membrane Vesicles of Burkholderia multivorans C1576, a Strain of Clinical Importance for Cystic Fibrosis

by
Lucrecia C. Terán
†,
Marco Distefano
†,
Barbara Bellich
,
Sara Petrosino
,
Paolo Bertoncin
,
Paola Cescutti
and
Daniele Sblattero
*
Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, 34127 Trieste, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Microorganisms 2020, 8(11), 1826; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111826
Submission received: 29 October 2020 / Revised: 16 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 19 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Biofilm)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Biofilms are aggregates of microbial cells encased in a highly hydrated matrix made up of self-produced extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) which consist of polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids. While biofilm matrix polysaccharides are unraveled, there is still poor knowledge about the identity and function of matrix-associated proteins. With this work, we performed a comprehensive proteomic approach to disclose the identity of proteins associated with the matrix of biofilm-growing Burkholderia multivorans C1576 reference strain, a cystic fibrosis clinical isolate. Transmission electron microscopy showed that B. multivorans C1576 also releases outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) in the biofilm matrix, as already demonstrated for other Gram-negative species. The proteomic analysis revealed that cytoplasmic and membrane-bound proteins are widely represented in the matrix, while OMVs are highly enriched in outer membrane proteins and siderophores. Our data suggest that cell lysis and OMVs production are the most important sources of proteins for the B. multivorans C1576 biofilm matrix. Of note, some of the identified proteins are lytic enzymes, siderophores, and proteins involved in reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging. These proteins might help B. multivorans C1576 in host tissue invasion and defense towards immune system assaults.

1. Introduction

In natural settings and in man-made environments, many bacteria are generally found to live in highly complex communities referred to as biofilms, which are surface-associated aggregates of microbial cells embedded in a matrix consisting of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) [1,2,3,4]. Although the composition of the biofilm matrix varies with the bacterial species and the growth conditions under which biofilms develop, EPS generally include polysaccharides, proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids [5]. The biofilm lifestyle allows bacterial cells to experience a physical closeness which is the base for phenomena such as quorum sensing (QS) and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) [6]. Moreover, the biofilm matrix provides bacteria with protection towards dehydration, UV light, disinfectants, and toxic metal ions, some antimicrobial compounds, many protozoa, and attacks by the immune system of the host [6]. As a generality, the composition of the biofilm matrix consists of exopolysaccharides, proteins, and nucleic acids, although the components and their proportions are dependent on the microorganism and the conditions of their growth [5]. In floating activated sludge, the protein content can even exceed that of polysaccharides [7,8,9]. Matrix-associated proteins are represented by membrane surface adhesins, proteins building up extracellular appendages (flagella, pili, and fimbriae), proteins actively secreted, and proteins transported by outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) [5].
OMVs are recognized as biofilm matrix components [10] and their biological role has been related to protective mechanisms [11], as they are involved in a wide range of phenomena like pathogenesis, bacterial communication, bacteria-host interactions, nutrient capture, HGT, and competition [12,13]. OMVs are bi-layered structures with a diameter ranging from 20 to 200 nm, which gemmate from the outer membrane (OM) of many Gram-negative bacteria [14,15]. OMVs generally carry OM lipids, lipopolysaccharide, proteins, and nucleic acids [16].
Burkholderia multivorans is a Gram-negative opportunistic pathogen that can cause severe lung infections in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients [17]. It belongs to the so-called Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc), a group of at least 22 closely-related species widely distributed in natural environments and with the ability to infect plants, animals, and humans [18,19,20,21,22]. When grown in Petri dishes containing different solid culture media, Bcc species have been shown to produce various biofilm polysaccharides or exopolysaccharide (Epols), most often in mixtures [23]. Furthermore, the specific biofilm mode of growth may influence the production of distinct Epols [24].
In this work, we used B. multivorans strain C1576, a CF clinical isolate biofilm-growing species which was thoroughly investigated for Epol production in our laboratory. It produces cepacian, the most common Epol among both Bcc and non-Bcc species when grown on semipermeable nitrocellulose membranes deposited on solid yeast extract–mannitol culture medium [25]. When grown in the same way but using Mueller–Hinton medium, it synthesizes a different exopolysaccharide which has been named EpolC1576. The latter consists of a tetrasaccharide repeating unit containing equimolar amounts of D-mannose and D-rhamnose [25]; this polymer might be involved not only in biofilm formation and maintenance, but also in the diffusion of small nonpolar compounds like quorum sensing molecules, through the highly hydrated environment of the biofilm matrix [26].
The presence of proteins has been recognized in biofilms of many bacterial species, but their identification and functional characterization have been addressed only for a limited number of bacteria [27], including some Burkholderia species [28,29,30]. At the same time, Burkholderia OMVs have been investigated mainly in the frame of vaccine development [31,32,33], while there is little information about their proteome [34]. Therefore, the aim of this work was to elucidate the proteins associated with the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain and Culture Conditions

B. multivorans C1576 (LMG 16660), a reference strain that belongs to the panel of B. cepacia complex strains (EP1), was purchased from the BCCMTM bacteria collection. The biofilm was developed on cellulose membranes (Sigma, cut-off 12.400 Da) [35] that were prepared as follows: they were cut in circles to fit the Petri dish, boiled in 5% Na2CO3 solution for 15 min and then boiled in water for 15 min, subjected to autoclave sterilization, and laid on Petri dishes containing MH agar medium [36]. Membranes were extended all over the plate and the surplus of water was let evaporate under the hood. An overnight liquid culture of B. multivorans C1576 grown in MH medium was diluted to obtain a cell suspension having 0.13 OD at 600 nm (about 1 x106 CFU/mL), three aliquots of 10 µL of the cell dilution were transferred on the membranes deposited on the Petri dishes, and they were incubated at 30 °C for 7 days.

2.2. OMV Isolation and Proteins Preparations

After 7 days of growth, the biofilm formed by B. multivorans C1576 was recovered with sterile NaCl 0.9% (7 mL for each membrane) by scraping it from the membranes with a sterile spatula. During harvesting procedures, the cell suspension was kept on ice. To reduce contamination risks with cellular proteins, the cell suspension was vortexed for 2 min, avoiding chemical treatment and sonication for biofilm disruption. The cell suspension was then centrifuged at 24,000× g for 30 min at 4 °C (Beckman J2-21 M/E Centrifuge), the supernatant was filtered first, through a 0.45-µm pore size filter (Millex-HA Non-Sterile Syringe Filter) and then through a 0.22-µm pore size filter (KX Sterile Syringe Filter, Kinesis) to eliminate residual bacterial cells from the supernatant. Half of the filtered supernatant was frozen at −20 °C, whereas the other half filtered supernatant was ultra-centrifuged at 100,000× g for 3 h at 4 °C to pellet OMVs.
After centrifugation, the supernatant was considered for analysis as the “matrix” sample, while the pellet was resuspended with water and considered as the “OMVs” sample. Both samples were split in two aliquots, one stored at 4 °C and the other one at −20 °C.

2.3. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Imaging of OMVs

An aliquot of the stock solution and a 1:50 dilution of the pellet obtained after ultracentrifugation of the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576 were prepared for TEM imaging using the following procedure: a droplet of the sample was deposited on a carbon-coated copper grid (Electron Microscopy Science, CF 200-Cu Carbon film) to allow sample adsorption and then diluted with a droplet of water. Later, the sample was negatively stained by adding a droplet of 2% uranyl acetate. After the negative staining step (2–5 min), liquid excess was removed with filter paper and the sample was air-dried. Sample images were acquired with an EM208 TEM (Philips, Netherlands) equipped with a Quemesa camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions) using Radius software (EMSIS, Münster, Germany).

2.4. Protein Preparations for Liquid Chromatography coupled to Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)

Protein fraction of both B. multivorans C1576 matrix and OMVs were concentrated by using a Millipore Microcon centrifugal filter device with a 3 kDa molecular weight cut-off. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE using a 12% Tris Glycine polyacrylamide. Stock solutions were diluted 1:2 and 1:5, and 15 µL of both samples were mixed with 6x SDS loading buffer (0.25 M Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 8% SDS, 40% sucrose, 0.5% β-Mercaptoethanol, 0.2% bromophenol blue) and boiled for 5 min. The gel was electrophoresed at 80 V for 5 min and then at 120 V for 60 min in Tris-Glycine SDS buffer and stained with Coomassie Blue.
Subsequently, electrophoretic lanes were cut into five equivalent parts, and proteins were processed as previously described [37].

2.5. Protein Identification

Peptide masses and MS/MS spectra were exported as ‘.mgf’ files and database search was performed with the MASCOT MS/MS Ion Search option (www.matrixscience.com) with the following set up parameters: fixed modification: none; variable modification: none; peptide tol.: 1.2 Da; MS/MS tol.: 0.6 Da; peptide charge: 2 and 3; mass: monoisotopic; instrument: ESI-TRAP. On average, individual ions scores > 68 indicate identity or extensive homology (p < 0.05). The relative abundance was calculated according to the most frequent occurrence and higher scores during the LC-LC/MS identification.

2.6. Bioinformatic Analysis

All the identified proteins were classified following two different criteria. On one hand, the classification was done accordingly to the cluster of orthologous group (COG) categories with COGnitor [38] run by Operon Mapper [39] and on the other hand, they were classified according to the subcellular localization using the web-based software PsortDB version 3.0 [40]. Both classifications were performed for each of the identified proteins as well as for all the proteins that are codified in the genome of strain C1576 of B. multivorans (Genbank Accession Number: JAAKGD000000000.1). The identified proteins were searched in Uniprot Database for considering parameters such as isoelectric point and molecular weight.
The hypergeometric distribution was assayed to evaluate the enrichment of the different protein categories (in terms of both function and subcellular localization) encoded in the genome of B. multivorans C1576 compared to the ones identified in the matrix and in the OMVs. Interaction networks were constructed with STRING v11 [41] for the proteins identified in the Biofilm and in the OMVs using a moderate confidence level of 0.4. All types of protein–protein interactions present in STRING were selected for the analysis, including known interactions (from curated databases and experimentally determined), predicted interactions (gene neighborhood, fusions, and co-occurrence), and others interactions (text mining, coexpression, and protein homology). Additionally, the expected interactions between random proteins were estimated through STRING v11 [41]; comparing the number of edges of random proteins with the ones obtained in our set of proteins is meaningful since proteins that have more interactions than expected for a random set of proteins indicates that they are biologically related.

3. Results

3.1. Strategy for Biofilm Production and Protein Separation

B. multivorans C1576, a reference strain that belongs to the panel of B. cepacia complex strains (EP1), was selected for the identification of biofilm matrix-associated proteins. The general work scheme is shown in Figure 1. The protocol used a colony-based biofilm system in which B. multivorans C1576 was seeded on semipermeable nitrocellulose membranes deposited on solid Mueller Hinton plates [25] and grown for 7 days. The biofilm was recovered from nitrocellulose, separated from bacterial cell pellet, and finally divided by ultracentrifugation in 2 fractions identified as OMVs and matrix. Both fractions were then initially analyzed via 1D SDS-PAGE further coupled to Liquid Chromatography Tandem-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to disclose the identity of proteins of biofilm matrix samples.

3.2. Visualization of OMVs Produced by Biofilm-Growing B. multivorans C1576

The B. multivorans C1576 capability to produce OMVs was probed through observation via transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the resuspended pellet obtained after ultracentrifugation of the purified biofilm matrix. Many bi-layered spherical formations were observed (Figure 2) together with elongated structures that might represent contamination with bacterial appendages (flagella, pili, and/or fimbriae). The majority of OMVs released by B. multivorans C1576 showed diameters that ranged from 25 to 70 nm, while OMVs with a diameter exceeding 150 nm were only occasionally observed. The presence of OMV-like structures in the matrix of B. multivorans C1576 reinforces the hypothesis that proteins associated with OMVs are an integral part of the biofilm matrix proteome.

3.3. Identification of B. multivorans C1576 Proteins Associated with the Matrix and OMVs

The 1D SDS-PAGE analysis of OMV and matrix fractions (Figure 3A) revealed a different protein profile among the two samples. Both samples were subjected to mass spectrometry analysis and a total of 161 different proteins were found associated with the biofilm matrix (Table S1), whereas 64 proteins were identified from the OMV sample (Table S2). Out of these proteins, the twenty most abundant ones for both biofilm matrix and OMVs are listed in Table 1 and Table 2, respectively. When comparing the two proteomic datasets of B. multivorans C1576, it was interesting to notice that 29% of OMV-associated proteins (19 out of 64) were in common with the biofilm matrix proteome (Figure 3B and Table 3). On the other hand, when considering the twenty most abundant matrix-associated proteins, only five of these were shared with the ones found in OMVs: an acyl carrier protein (acpP—ACP_BURCA), a beta-ketoacyl-ACP reductase (Bmul_2181—AOL03371.1), a thiol: disulfide interchange protein DsbA/DsbL (dsbA—WP_006398112.1), a thioredoxin (Bmul_1445—ABC39250.1), and an endoribonuclease (Bmul_0927- WP_006398680.1), thus suggesting that OMVs do not represent an important source of proteins for the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576.

3.4. Functional Classification of the Identified Proteins from the Biofilm Matrix and OMVs

To determine the function of the identified proteins, they were classified into functional COG categories. These functional categories group proteins according to their function and are represented by letters. After classification of the 161 different proteins identified in the biofilm matrix, the category with the highest percentage of members, corresponding to 30 different proteins (19% of the total proteins) was the “energy production and conversion” one, represented by the letter C (Figure 4A). Other categories with a high frequency of protein members identified were the ones related to “metabolism and transport of amino acids” (letter E) and “posttranslational modifications” (letter O), represented by 21 and 19 proteins, respectively. Lower percentages were for the categories “translation” (J, 8%), “metabolism and transport of nucleotides” (Q, 6%), “lipid metabolism” (I, 5%), and “metabolism and transport of carbohydrates” (G, 5%). Finally, 19% of the proteins belonged to poorly characterized proteins and were distributed in the general prediction function (R) and unknown function (S) categories.
To study if there was an enrichment of some of the functional categories to which the identified proteins belonged, a hypergeometric distribution was performed: in this way, we could compare the identified proteins with the ones encoded in the whole genome of B. multivorans C1576. As shown in Figure 4B and Figure S1, the enriched categories were related with C, J, O, Q, and S, while the underrepresented categories corresponded to proteins belonging to the categories “cell wall structure, biogenesis, and outer membrane” (M), “transcription” (K), “transport of inorganic ions” (P), and “unknown function” (R).
When analyzing the 64 identified proteins of the OMV proteome, different results were obtained. In this set, the higher percentage of proteins identified were belonging to the categories of “unknown function” (S, 14%), “cell wall structure, biogenesis, and outer membrane” (M, 12%) transport and metabolism of aminoacids (E, 11%), production and conversion of energy (C, 9%), post-translational modifications (O, 5%), and transport of inorganic ions (P, 5%). When compared to the whole genome of B. multivorans C1576, as it is shown in Figure 4B, the enriched categories correspond to S, Q, M, O, and C, but the difference between enriched and underrepresented categories is narrower for the OMVs than for the identified matrix proteins. Noteworthy, the categories “transcription” (K) and “metabolism and transport of nucleotides” (F) categories were only represented in the identified proteins from the matrix, but not from OMVs.

3.5. Subcellular Localization of the Identified Proteins from the Biofilm Matrix and OMVs

In addition to their function, the identified proteins were classified according to the subcellular localization. Out of the 161 proteins of the matrix proteome, 90 were predicted to be cytoplasmic, 26 to be periplasmic, 3 to be extracellular, 2 to be located in the cytoplasmic membrane, and 1 in the outer membrane; the remaining 38 were of unknown subcellular localization (Figure 5A). According to the hypergeometric distribution proteins belonging to the subcellular localization of the cytoplasmic and periplasmic were enriched, those located in the cytoplasmic membrane were reduced, while the remaining categories cytoplasmic membrane, outer membrane, extracellular, and unknown were found as expected (Figure 5B and Figure S2).
The 64 proteins of the OMVs were also mainly represented by proteins predicted to be of cytoplasmic localization (29 proteins), while 13 proteins were of outer membrane origin and 8 periplasmic. The 14 proteins left were predicted as unknown localization. For this set of proteins, those from the outer membrane and periplasmic origin were enriched as their relative proportion was higher than among the proteins encoded by the whole genome of B. multivorans C1576.

3.6. Protein–Protein Interaction Networks of the Identified Proteins from the Biofilm Matrix and OMVs

Finally, we investigated the possible interactions among the identified proteins. Protein–protein interactive networks for the biofilm matrix as well as the OMVs of B. multivorans C1576 were found after applying the STRING v11 database. In each of the networks, proteins are represented with nodes and interactions with edges; the strongest the interaction, the thickest the line. As shown in Figure 6, 117 out of the 161 proteins identified in the biofilm matrix interact with each other through 285 edges with different strengths; it is calculated by STRING v11.0 database that random proteins would have 133 edges, these data indicate that the network has more than double the interactions expected (133 edges), suggesting a biological connection between these proteins. The remaining 44 proteins did not show any interaction. Eighteen proteins interacting with each other belong to the energy production and conversion category with 44 edges, in line with the data that this category is one of the enriched ones. Moreover, transcription and posttranslational modifications are enriched categories represented by 7 and 11 nodes, respectively, with strong interactions. Meanwhile, the category metabolism and transport of amino acids is represented by 8 proteins as expected in the hypergeometric aspect (Figure 5B).
Regarding the OMVs’ proteins, 24 out of the 64 identified proteins show no interactions within each other, while the remaining 40 proteins were predicted to exhibit interactions with each other through 52 edges. In addition, in this case, the network has more interactions than expected (21 edges) for a random set of proteins, strongly indicating that this group of proteins has a related biological role. The functional category of cell wall structure, biogenesis, and outer membrane (M) is represented by 5 nodes, which is also in accordance with the enrichment of this category in the OMVs, while in the biofilm matrix this category is impoverished. Additionally, the categories’ posttranslational modifications (O) and lipid metabolism (I) are enriched and represented in the network (Figure 7). This network supports the interaction of proteins related to the enriched categories in agreement with the hypergeometric distribution test.

4. Discussion

Even though extracellular proteins have been proposed to be of primary importance for the function of the biofilm matrix, there is still a lack of knowledge about the identity of many of them. In this work, matrix-associated proteins of biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576 have been identified. It has not been surprising to find that a large fraction of the matrix proteome of B. multivorans C1576 is made up of membrane-bound and cytoplasmic proteins. Membrane and cytoplasmic proteins have been recognized in the biofilm matrix of various bacterial species [42,43,44,45], even in those characterizing microbial communities of activated sludges and acid mine drainage [46,47]. Despite this, the reason why these proteins localize in the biofilm matrix is still elusive.
Biofilm production involves bacterial cell death, an event that is thought to be characteristic of developing biofilms [42], thus suggesting that cell lysis could explain the presence of membrane-bound and cytoplasmic proteins in the matrix. Another source of intracellular proteins for the matrix could be represented by spherical bilayered structures from the outer membrane, the OMVs, that planktonic and biofilm-growing Gram-negative bacteria have been shown to release [12]. Burkholderia thailandensis OMVs range in size from 20 to 100 nm and contain antimicrobials [34], while Burkholderia cepacia releases OMVs that range from 30–220 nm in diameter and contain virulence factors [48]. Similarly, our results showed that most of the OMVs of B. multivorans C1576 have a diameter that ranges between 25 and 70 nm and some of them reached 150 nm (Figure 2).
These spherical bilayered structures that gemmate from the outer membrane have been recognized to be a relevant component of the biofilm matrix of other Gram-negative bacteria such as P. aeruginosa [12]. The proteome of OMVs produced by biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576 consisted of 64 proteins. Many of them are outer membrane proteins and this is in good agreement with previous findings [16,49]. OMVs contain porins, siderophores, and enzymes scavenging reactive oxygen species. Proteomic data reveal that about 29% of OMV-associated proteins (19 out of 64) are in common with the matrix proteome (Figure 3), thus indicating that OMVs could represent a source of both membrane-bound and cytoplasmic proteins for the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576. As observed for other Gram-negative species [49,50], OMVs are greatly enriched in outer membrane proteins including porins (opcP; Bmul_4327; Bmul_4600), receptors (Bmul_1594; Bmul_3338; Bmul_4173) and lipoproteins (slyB). However, only 5 proteins out of the 20 most abundant matrix-associated proteins are found in OMVs.
Our data suggest that cell death and release of OMVs are mainly responsible for the composition of the extracellular proteome of biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576. It would be interesting to know whether some of these proteins possess enzymatic activity and/or a structural role that is crucial for the biofilm physiology. Not surprisingly, various lytic proteins that could be involved in the enzymatic degradation of different molecules have been identified, such as the peptidase S1 (Bmul_3442), the proteolytic subunit of the ATP-dependent Clp protease (Bmul_1349—clpP), and an endoribonuclease (Bmul_1781). Even though some of these proteins have not been characterized as virulence factors yet, it cannot be ruled out that they could support B. multivorans C1576 infections via the degradation of host tissues. These enzymes could also help B. multivorans C1576 to resist attacks perpetrated by phagocytic cells and other microorganisms.
It is interesting to note that a bacteriocin (Bmul_5413—lin) has also been found. Bacteriocins are powerful toxins with an antibacterial activity that mediate competition between different bacterial species [51]. Since P. aeruginosa and Bcc species can co-infect CF patients [52], it can be speculated that bacteriocins could help B. multivorans C1576 in shaping and defining the relationship with P. aeruginosa within CF lungs.
Among the matrix-associated proteins, the well-characterized virulence factor named ecotin (ecoT-WP_006405712.1) has been detected. The one produced by P. aeruginosa has been shown to inhibit the serine protease elastase synthesized by neutrophils [53], thus severely compromising the bactericidal efficiency of this enzyme. In the same way, ecotin produced by B. multivorans C1576 can protect the bacteria from killing activity of elastase secreted by neutrophils, thus enhancing bacterial tolerance towards the innate immune system.
Proteins responsible for detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a relevant fraction of both matrix- and OMVs-associated proteins. Proteins found to be involved in oxidative stress are four thiol peroxidases tpx (SMG02352.1, WP_006400399.1, WP_057926826.1, and WP_059465341.1), a superoxide dismutase sod (EGD01013.1), catalase HPII (katE, CATE_ECOLI), a peroxidase (Bmul_2571, OJD07310.1), and a thioredoxin (Bmul_1445, ABC39250.1). Since some of these detoxifying enzymes have been found associated with OMVs, it may be speculated that B. multivorans C1576 releases them via OMVs to cope with oxidative stresses. The presence of matrix-associated enzymes that inactivate ROS would allow bacteria to resist to those attacks from phagocytes based on hydrogen peroxide production [54].
It has been interesting to find that OMVs carry various proteins involved in iron acquisition, also referred to as siderophores. Acquisition of iron is crucial for bacterial survival and siderophores have been recognized as relevant virulence factors for many pathogens affecting CF patients [55,56]. Since, in body fluids iron is tightly bound to proteins such as transferrin, lactoferrin, and ferritin [57], bacterial pathogens have developed strategies to utilize these proteins as sources of iron. For example, in CF lungs B. cenocepacia can acquire iron after proteolytic degradation of ferritin [58]. In the same way, siderophores identified in B. multivorans C1576 could help this opportunistic pathogen to survive within the host environment where availability of free iron is strictly limited.
The biological role of the intracellular proteins associated with both the biofilm matrix and OMVs of B. multivorans C1576 is not known. There is experimental evidence that some intracellular proteins may have a function also outside the cell and for this reason they have been named moonlighting proteins [59]. Among these proteins, there is the elongation factor Tu which has been localized on the surface of P. aeruginosa where it helps bacteria to evade the human complement attack via interactions with host regulatory proteins [60]. The matrix proteome of B. multivorans C1576 has been found to contain various elongation factors (G, Ts, GreAB), but not the elongation factor Tu. The latter, together with chaperonin GroEL, has been also shown to enable lactobacilli to bind to mucin and epithelial cells of the human gastrointestinal tract [61,62]. Since some of these intracellular proteins have been demonstrated to be involved in host-pathogen interactions for other bacterial species, it can be speculated that one or more intracellular proteins localized in the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576 could play a role in bacterial pathogenesis. Moreover, the presence of the mentioned chaperons and elongation factors, plus ribosomal proteins (A9ADI4) of cytoplasmic origin in OMVs was also described for E. coli, suggesting that, as the translation of outer membrane proteins occurs simultaneously with the integration into the membrane, transcriptional and ribosomal proteins can be included into OMVs [49,63,64].
Many of the identified proteins are membrane-bound proteins and of cytoplasm origin, thus suggesting that cell lysis could represent a relevant source of proteins for the biofilm matrix. They are porins, ATP binding-cassette transporters (ABC), enzymes of the tricarboxylic acid cycles (TCA), proteins involved in fatty acids biosynthesis, cell redox homeostasis, and translation. Moreover, the presence of the bacterial DNA-binding proteins indicates that DNA molecules are components of the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576, as already seen for other bacterial species [65,66,67,68,69].
Extracellular DNA molecules (eDNA) have been recognized as a prominent constituent of the bacterial biofilm matrix [65,70]. For this reason, it has not been unexpected to find DNA-binding proteins in the proteome of the biofilm matrix of B. multivorans C1576. The DNA-binding protein HU-alpha hupA (DBHA_BURPS), which is a histone-like protein involved in DNA wrapping, has been found associated with OMVs, whereas the DNA-binding protein Bv3F (Bmul_0190, POM19719.1) and a single-stranded DNA-binding protein (Bmul_0538, SMG01792.1) have been localized in the biofilm matrix. Even though DNA-binding proteins affect DNA compactness and transcription [71], it is unknown whether they influence the structural and functional properties of eDNA in the context of the biofilm matrix.
Beyond exoenzymes, membrane-bound and DNA-binding proteins, the biofilm matrix of bacteria also contains lectins, proteins with no enzymatic activity, but showing specific carbohydrate-binding ability. Lectins are thought to take part in biofilm formation and development, but also to be responsible for its architecture and mechanical stability. Transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of mutants of B. cenocepacia H111 led to the identification of the quorum sensing-regulated operon bclACB which codes three lectins: BclA, BclC, and BclB [72]. B. cenocepacia H111-bclACB mutants produce biofilms with altered architecture with respect to the wild-type, thus suggesting that these three lectins are necessary for biofilm proper development [72]. In the search for proteins of B. multivorans C1576 that may interact with EpolC1576, no known carbohydrate-binding protein has been found.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, we have shown that biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576 produces OMVs and that these spherical bilayered structures represent a source of proteins for the biofilm matrix together with cell lysis. Our results also elucidate the proteome from a functional perspective of the biofilm matrix and OMVs of B. multivorans C1576. This work opens perspectives to disclose the role played by the OMVs within biofilms produced by B. multivorans C1576.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2607/8/11/1826/s1. Table S1: Proteins identified in the biofilm matrix of Burkholderia multivorans C1576 after 7 days of growth at 30 °C title. Table S2: List of proteins identified with LC-MS/MS in the OMVs of Burkholderia multivorans C1576 after 7 days of growth at 30 °C. Figure S1: Hypergeometric distribution of the probabilities Prob(x) of finding proteins from a determine COG category a certain number of times “x” of (A) Biofilm and (B) OMVs. Figure S2: Hypergeometric distribution of the probabilities Prob(x) of finding proteins from a determine subcellular localization a certain number of times “x” of (A) Biofilm and (B) OMVs.

Author Contributions

M.D. and B.B. performed the Biofilm experiment. S.P. performed the proteomic experiment. P.B. performed the TEM analysis. L.C.T. performed the database analysis, composed pictures, and wrote the manuscript. D.S. and P.C. designed the project, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was supported by an agreement with Cornell University, Food Science(s), under Prime Agreement 1R01GM123283-01 from US National Institutes of Health DHHS.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Costerton, J.W.; Lewandowski, Z.; Caldwell, D.E.; Korber, D.R.; Lappin-Scott, H.M. Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1995, 49, 711–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. O’Toole, G.; Kaplan, H.B.; Kolter, R. Biofilm formation as microbial development. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2000, 54, 49–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Allison, D.G. The biofilm matrix. Biofouling 2003, 19, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Branda, S.S.; Vik, S.; Friedman, L.; Kolter, R. Biofilms: The matrix revisited. Trends Microbiol. 2005, 13, 20–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fong, J.N.C.; Yildiz, F.H. Biofilm matrix proteins. Microbiol. Spectr. 2015, 3, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Flemming, H.C.; Wingender, J. The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 623–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Urban, V.; Block, J.C.; Manem, J. Bioflocculation in Activated- Sludge: An Analytic Approach. Water Res. 1993, 27, 829–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Etterer, T.; Wilderer, P.A. Generation and properties of aerobic granular sludge. Water Sci. Technol. 2001, 43, 19–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Frølund, P.H.N.B.; Palmgren, R.; Keiding, K. Extraction of extracellular polymers from activated sludge using a cation exchange resin. Water Res. 1996, 30, 1749–1758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schooling, S.R.; Beveridge, T.J. Membrane vesicles: An overlooked component of the matrices of biofilms. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 5945–5957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, W.; Chanda, W.; Zhong, M. The relationship between biofilm and outer membrane vesicles: A novel therapy overview. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2015, 362, fnv117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kulp, A.; Kuehn, M.J. Biological functions and biogenesis of secreted bacterial outer membrane vesicles. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 64, 163–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Jan, A.T. Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) of gram-negative bacteria: A perspective update. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mashburn-Warren, L.M.; Whiteley, M. Special delivery: Vesicle trafficking in prokaryotes. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61, 839–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tashiro, Y.; Uchiyama, H.; Nomura, N. Multifunctional membrane vesicles in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Microbiol. 2012, 14, 1349–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Toyofuku, M.; Roschitzki, B.; Riedel, K.; Eberl, L. Identification of proteins associated with the Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm extracellular matrix. J. Proteome Res. 2012, 11, 4906–4915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jones, A.; Dodd, M.; Govan, J.; Barcus, V.; Doherty, C.; Morris, J.; Webb, A.K. Burkholderia cenocepacia and Burkholderia multivorans: Influence on survival in cystic fibrosis. Thorax 2004, 59, 948–951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Vanlaere, E.; Baldwin, A.; Gevers, D.; Henry, D.; De Brandt, E.; LiPuma, J.J.; Mahenthiralingam, E.; Speert, D.E.; Dowson, C.; Vandammeet, P. Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2009, 59, 102–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. De Smet, B.; Mayo, M.; Peeters, C.; Zlosnik, J.E.; Spilker, T.; Hird, T.J.; LiPuma, J.J.; Kidd, T.J.; Kaestli, M.; Ginther, J.L.; et al. Burkholderia stagnalis sp. nov. and Burkholderia territorii sp. nov.; two novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species from environmental and human sources. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2015, 65, 2265–2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Depoorter, E.; Bull, M.J.; Peeters, C.; Coenye, T.; Vandamme, P.; Mahenthiralingam, E. Burkholderia: An update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 5215–5229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bach, E.; Sant’Anna, F.H.; Magrich dos Passos, J.F.; Balsanelli, E.; de Baura, V.A.; Pedrosa, F.d.O.; Maltempi de Souza, E.; Pereira Passaglia, L.M. Detection of misidentifications of species from the Burkholderia cepacia complex and description of a new member, the soil bacterium Burkholderia catarinensis sp. nov. Pathog. Dis. 2017, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Martina, P.; Leguizamon, M.; Prieto, C.I.; Sousa, S.A.; Montanaro, P.; Draghi, W.O.; Stämmler, M.; Bettiol, M.; de Carvalho, C.C.; Palau, J.; et al. Burkholderia puraquae sp. nov., a novel species of the Burkholderia cepacia complex isolated from hospital settings and agricultural soils. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2018, 68, 14–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Cuzzi, B.; Herasimenka, Y.; Silipo, A.; Lanzetta, R.; Liut, G.; Rizzo, R.; Cescutti, P. Versatility of the Burkholderia cepacia Complex for the biosynthesis of exopolysaccharides: A comparative structural investigation. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e94372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Pellizzoni, E.; Ravalico, F.; Scaini, D.; Delneri, A.; Rizzo, R.; Cescutti, P. Biofilms produced by Burkholderia cenocepacia: Influence of media and solid supports on composition of matrix exopolysaccharides. Microbiology 2016, 162, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dolfi, S.; Sveronis, A.; Silipo, A.; Rizzo, R.; Cescutti, P. A novel rhamno-mannan exopolysaccharide isolated from biofilms of Burkholderia multivorans C1576. Carbohydr. Res. 2015, 411, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Kuttel, M.M.; Cescutti, P.; Distefano, M.; Rizzo, R. Fluorescence and NMR spectroscopy together with molecular simulations reveal amphiphilic characteristics of a Burkholderia biofilm exopolysaccharide. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 11034–11042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Rani, A.; Babu, S. Environmental proteomic studies: Closer step to understand bacterial biofilms. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Van Acker, H.; Crabbé, A.; Jurėnas, D.; Ostyn, L.; Sass, A.; Daled, S.; Dhaenens, M.; Deforce, D.; Teirlinck, E.; De Keersmaecker, H.; et al. The role of small proteins in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 biofilm formation, persistence and intracellular growth. Biofilm 2019, 1, 100001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Khan, M.M.; Chattagul, S.; Tran, B.Q.; Freiberg, J.A.; Nita-Lazar, A.; Shirtliff, M.E.; Sermswan, R.W.; Ernst, R.; Goodlett, D.R. Temporal proteomic profiling reveals changes that support Burkholderia biofilms. Pathog. Dis. 2019, 77, ftz005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Reamtong, O.; Indrawattana, N.; Rungruengkitkun, A.; Thiangtrongjit, T.; Duangurai, T.; Chongsa-nguan, M.; Pumirat, P. Altered proteome of a Burkholderia pseudomallei mutant defective in short-chain dehydrogenase affects cell adhesion, biofilm formation and heat stress tolerance. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Baker, S.M.; Davitt, C.J.H.; Motyka, N.; Kikendall, N.L.; Russell-Lodrigue, K.; Roy, C.J.; Morici, L.A. A Burkholderia pseudomallei Outer Membrane Vesicle Vaccine Provides Cross Protection against Inhalational Glanders in Mice and Non-Human Primates. Vaccines 2017, 9, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Nieves, W.; Petersen, H.; Judy, B.M.; Blumentritt, C.A.; Russell-Lodrigue, K.; Roy, C.J.; Torres, A.G.; Morici, L.A. A Burkholderia pseudomallei outer membrane vesicle vaccine provides protection against lethal sepsis. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 2014, 21, 747–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Kim, S.Y.; Kim, M.H.; Son, J.H.; Kim, S.I.; Yun, S.H.; Kim, K.; Kim, S.; Shin, M.; Lee, J.C. Outer membrane vesicles produced by Burkholderia cepacia cultured with subinhibitory concentrations of ceftazidime enhance pro-inflammatory responses. Virulence 2020, 11, 995–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, Y.; Hoffmann, J.P.; Chou, C.W.; Höner, Z.; Bentrup, K.; Fuselier, J.A.; Bitoun, J.P.; Wimley, W.C.; Morici, L.A. Burkholderia thailandensis outer membrane vesicles exert antimicrobial activity against drug-resistant and competitor microbial species. J. Microbiol. 2020, 58, 550–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Merritt, J.H.; Kadouri, D.E.; O’Toole, G.A. Growing and analyzing static biofilms. Curr. Protoc. Microbiol. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Mueller, J.H.; Hinton, J. A protein-free medium for primary isolation of the Gonococcus and Meningococcus. Exp. Biol. Med. 1941, 48, 330–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Sgarra, R.; Furlan, C.; Zammitti, S.; Lo Sardo, A.; Maurizio, E.; Di Bernardo, J.; Giancotti, V.; Manfioletti, G. Interaction proteomics of the HMGA chromatin architectural factors. Proteomics 2008, 8, 4721–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Galperin, M.Y.; Makarova, K.; Wolf, Y.; Koonin, E. Expanded microbial genome coverage and improved protein family annotation in the COG database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, D261–D269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Taboada, B.; Estrada, K.; Ciria, R.; Merino, E. Operon-mapper: A web server for precise operon identification in bacterial and archaeal genomes. Bioinformatics 2018, 34, 4118–4120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Peabody, M.A.; Laird, M.R.; Vlasschaert, C.; Lo, R.; Brinkman, F.S. PSORTdb: Expanding the bacteria and archaea protein subcellular localization database to better reflect diversity in cell envelope structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D663–D668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Szklarczyk, D.; Gable, A.L.; Lyon, D.; Junge, A.; Wyder, S.; Huerta-Cepas, J.; Simonovic, M.; Doncheva, N.T.; Morris, J.H.; Bork, P.; et al. STRING v11: Protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D607–D613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Webb, J.S.; Thompson, L.S.; James, S.; Charlton, T.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Koch, B.; Givskov, M.; Kjelleberget, S. Cell death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 4585–4592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Gallaher, T.K.; Wu, S.; Webster, P.; Aguilera, R. Identification of biofilm proteins in non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae. BMC Microbiol. 2006, 6, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Curtis, P.D.; Atwood, J.; Orlando, R.; Shimkets, L.J. Proteins associated with the Myxococcus xanthus extracellular matrix. J. Bacteriol. 2007, 189, 7634–7642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Eboigbodin, K.E.; Biggs, C.A. Characterization of the extracellular polymeric substances produced by Escherichia coli using infrared spectroscopic, proteomic; aggregation studies. Biomacromolecules 2008, 9, 686–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Park, C.; Novak, J.T.; Helm, R.F.; Ahn, Y.O.; Esen, A. Evaluation of the extracellular proteins in full-scale activated sludges. Water Res. 2008, 42, 3879–3889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Jiao, Y.; D’haeseleer, P.; Dill, B.D.; Shah, M.; Verberkmoes, N.C.; Hettich, R.L.; Banfield, J.F.; Thelenet, M.P. Identification of biofilm matrix-associated proteins from an acid mine drainage microbial community. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 5230–5237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Allan, N.D.; Kooi, C.; Sokol, P.A.; Beveridge, T.J. Putative virulence factors are released in association with membrane vesicles from Burkholderia cepacia. Can. J. Microbiol. 2003, 49, 613–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lee, E.Y.; Bang, Y.B.; Park, G.W.; Choi, D.S.; Kang, J.S.; Kim, H.-J.; Park, K.-S.; Lee, J.-O.; Kwon, K.-H.; Kim, K.P.; et al. Global proteomic profiling of native outer membrane vesicles derived from Escherichia coli. Proteomics 2007, 7, 3143–3153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Choi, D.S.; Kim, D.K.; Choi, S.J.; Lee, J.; Choi, J.P.; Rho, S.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, Y.-K.; Hwang, D.; Gho, Y.S. Proteomic analysis of outer membrane vesicles derived from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3424–3429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Riley, M.A.; Gordon, D.M. The ecological role of bacteriocins in bacterial competition. Trends Microbiol. 1999, 7, 129–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bakkal, S.; Robinson, S.M.; Ordonez, C.L.; Waltz, D.A.; Riley, M.A. Role of bacteriocins in mediating interactions of bacterial isolates taken from cystic fibrosis patients. Microbiology 2010, 156, 2058–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Tseng, B.S.; Reichhardt, C.; Merrihew, G.E.; Araujo-Hernandez, S.A.; Harrison, J.J.; MacCoss, M.J.; Parsek, M.R. A biofilm matrix-associated protease inhibitor protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa from proteolytic attack. MBio 2018, 9, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Hassett, D.J.; Cohen, S. Bacterial adaptation to oxidative stress: Implications for pathogenesis and interaction with phagocytic cells. FASEB J. 1989, 3, 2574–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Thomas, M.S. Iron acquisition mechanisms of the Burkholderia cepacia complex. BioMetals 2007, 431–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cornelis, P.; Dingemans, J. Pseudomonas aeruginosa adapts its iron uptake strategies in function of the type of infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2013, 3, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Ganz, T. Iron and infection. Int. J. Hematol. 2018, 107, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Whitby, P.W.; VanWagoner, T.M.; Springer, J.M.; Morton, D.J.; Seale, T.W.; Stull, T.L. Burkholderia cenocepacia utilizes ferritin as an iron source. J. Med. Microbiol. 2016, 55, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Jeffery, C.J. Moonlighting proteins: Old proteins learning new tricks. Trends Genet. 2003, 19, 415–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kunert, A.; Losse, J.; Gruszin, C.; Huhn, M.; Kaendler, K.; Mikkat, S.; Volke, D.; Hoffmann, R.; Jokiranta, T.S.; Seeberger, H.; et al. Immune evasion of the human pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Elongation factor Tuf Is a factor H and plasminogen binding protein. J. Immunol. 2007, 179, 2979–2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Granato, D.; Bergonzelli, G.E.; Pridmore, R.D.; Marvin, L.; Rouvet, M.; Corthésy-Theulazet, I.E. Cell surface-associated elongation factor Tu mediates the attachment of Lactobacillus johnsonii NCC533 (La1) to Human intestinal cells and mucins. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 2160–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Bergonzelli, G.E.; Granato, D.; Pridmore, R.D.; Marvin-Guy, L.F.; Donnicola, D.; Corthésy-Theulaz, I.E. GroEL of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 (NCC 533) is cell surface associated: Potential role in interactions with the host and the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Infect. Immun. 2006, 74, 425–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  63. Kolling, G.L.; Matthews, K.R. Export of virulence genes and Shiga toxin by membrane vesicles of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1999, 65, 1843–1848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Yaron, S.; Kolling, G.L.; Simon, L.; Matthews, K.R. Vesicle-mediated transfer of virulence genes from Escherichia coli O157:H7 to other enteric bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 4414–4420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Whitchurch, C.B.; Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Ragas, P.C.; Mattick, J.S. Extracellular DNA required for bacterial biofilm formation. Science 2002, 295, 1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Mann, E.E.; Rice, K.C.; Boles, B.R.; Endres, J.L.; Ranjit, D.; Chandramohan, L.; Tsang, L.H.; Smeltzer, M.S.; Horswill, A.R.; Bayles, K.W. Modulation of eDNA release and degradation affects Staphylococcus aureus biofilm maturation. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Harmsen, M.; Lappann, M.; Knøchel, S.; Molin, S. Role of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation by Listeria monocytogenes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 2271–2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Lappann, M.; Claus, H.; Van Alen, T.; Harmsen, M.; Elias, J.; Molin, S.; Vogel, U. A dual role of extracellular DNA during biofilm formation of Neisseria meningitides. Mol. Microbiol. 2010, 75, 1355–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Seper, A.; Fengler, V.H.I.; Roier, S.; Wolinski, H.; Kohlwein, S.D.; Bishop, A.L.; Camilli, J.; Schild, S. Extracellular nucleases and extracellular DNA play important roles in Vibrio cholerae biofilm formation. Mol. Microbiol. 2011, 82, 1015–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Allesen-Holm, M.; Barken, K.B.; Yang, L.; Klausen, M.; Webb, J.S.; Kjelleberg, S.; Molin, S.; Givskon, M.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. A characterization of DNA release in Pseudomonas aeruginosa cultures and biofilms. Mol. Microbiol. 2016, 59, 1114–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dillon, S.C.; Dorman, C.J. Bacterial nucleoid-associated proteins, nucleoid structure and gene expression. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2010, 8, 185–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Inhülsen, S.; Aguilar, C.; Schmid, N.; Suppiger, A.; Riedel, K.; Eberl, L. Identification of functions linking quorum sensing with biofilm formation in Burkholderia cenocepacia H111. Microbiologyopen 2012, 1, 225–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 08 01826 g001 550
Figure 1. The general work scheme followed in the present work. Proteins from biofilm were separated into 2 fractions called Matrix and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs); both fractions were subjected to identification by LC-MS/MS and bioinformatics analysis. OMVs’ fraction was further analyzed by transmission electron microscope (TEM).
Figure 1. The general work scheme followed in the present work. Proteins from biofilm were separated into 2 fractions called Matrix and outer membrane vesicles (OMVs); both fractions were subjected to identification by LC-MS/MS and bioinformatics analysis. OMVs’ fraction was further analyzed by transmission electron microscope (TEM).
Microorganisms 08 01826 g001
Microorganisms 08 01826 g002 550
Figure 2. TEM visualization of OMVs produced by biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576. The upper micrographs show TEM imaging of OMVs of the stock sample; elongated structures could represent contaminations with bacterial appendages (white arrows). The lower micrographs show TEM imaging of OMVs coming from the 1:50 dilution of the stock sample. Scale bars: 100 nm (A), 200 nm (B), 20 nm (C), and 20 nm (D).
Figure 2. TEM visualization of OMVs produced by biofilm-growing B. multivorans C1576. The upper micrographs show TEM imaging of OMVs of the stock sample; elongated structures could represent contaminations with bacterial appendages (white arrows). The lower micrographs show TEM imaging of OMVs coming from the 1:50 dilution of the stock sample. Scale bars: 100 nm (A), 200 nm (B), 20 nm (C), and 20 nm (D).
Microorganisms 08 01826 g002
Microorganisms 08 01826 g003 550
Figure 3. (A) 12% SDS-PAGE protein profile of OMVs and the biofilm matrix produced by B. multivorans C1576; 15 µL of both samples were loaded at 1:2 (lane 1 and 2) and 1:5 (lane 3 and 4) dilution from stock concentration. (B) Venn diagram showing proteins of the biofilm matrix, the OMVs, and the ones that overlap between both samples.
Figure 3. (A) 12% SDS-PAGE protein profile of OMVs and the biofilm matrix produced by B. multivorans C1576; 15 µL of both samples were loaded at 1:2 (lane 1 and 2) and 1:5 (lane 3 and 4) dilution from stock concentration. (B) Venn diagram showing proteins of the biofilm matrix, the OMVs, and the ones that overlap between both samples.
Microorganisms 08 01826 g003
Microorganisms 08 01826 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) Percentage of the cluster of orthologous group (COG) functional categories of the identified proteins from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs. (B) Difference between the measured and the expected occurrence of the hypergeometric analysis. The positives values represent the enrichment of certain categories while the decrease of certain functional categories is represented by negatives values; when the expected value is identical to the measured one it is represented as zero. Letters represent the functional categories as follows: L: DNA replication, recombination and repair; E: metabolism and transport of amino acids; H: metabolism and transport of coenzymes; G: metabolism and transport of carbohydrates; C: production and conversion of energy; J: transcription; I: lipidic metabolism; M: Cell wall structure, biogenesis and outer membrane; O: posttranslational modifications; U: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; T: mechanisms of signal transduction; Q: metabolism and transport of nucleotides; P: transport of inorganic ions; N: cell motility; K: translation including ribosomes biogenesis; F: metabolism and transport of nucleotides; R: general prediction function only; S: function unknown; ND: not determined.
Figure 4. (A) Percentage of the cluster of orthologous group (COG) functional categories of the identified proteins from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs. (B) Difference between the measured and the expected occurrence of the hypergeometric analysis. The positives values represent the enrichment of certain categories while the decrease of certain functional categories is represented by negatives values; when the expected value is identical to the measured one it is represented as zero. Letters represent the functional categories as follows: L: DNA replication, recombination and repair; E: metabolism and transport of amino acids; H: metabolism and transport of coenzymes; G: metabolism and transport of carbohydrates; C: production and conversion of energy; J: transcription; I: lipidic metabolism; M: Cell wall structure, biogenesis and outer membrane; O: posttranslational modifications; U: Intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport; T: mechanisms of signal transduction; Q: metabolism and transport of nucleotides; P: transport of inorganic ions; N: cell motility; K: translation including ribosomes biogenesis; F: metabolism and transport of nucleotides; R: general prediction function only; S: function unknown; ND: not determined.
Microorganisms 08 01826 g004
Microorganisms 08 01826 g005 550
Figure 5. (A) Percentage of the subcellular localization of the identified proteins from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs. (B) Difference between measured and expected occurrence for the proteins of each subcellular localization. Zero represents no differences in occurrence and separates potentially enriched categories (positive values) from the potentially reduced categories (negative values).
Figure 5. (A) Percentage of the subcellular localization of the identified proteins from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs. (B) Difference between measured and expected occurrence for the proteins of each subcellular localization. Zero represents no differences in occurrence and separates potentially enriched categories (positive values) from the potentially reduced categories (negative values).
Microorganisms 08 01826 g005
Microorganisms 08 01826 g006 550
Figure 6. Protein–protein interaction network of the identified proteins of B. multivorans C1576 in the biofilm matrix. The circles highlight the proteins related with functional categories. C: energy production and conversion, J: translation, O: post-translational modification, E: transport and metabolism of aminoacids, P: transport and metabolism of inorganic ions, I: metabolism of lipids, and H: transport and metabolism of coenzymes. The proteins are represented by nodes, while the interactions among them are represented by edges. The strength of interactions is proportional to line thickness. The network was constructed with STRING v11.
Figure 6. Protein–protein interaction network of the identified proteins of B. multivorans C1576 in the biofilm matrix. The circles highlight the proteins related with functional categories. C: energy production and conversion, J: translation, O: post-translational modification, E: transport and metabolism of aminoacids, P: transport and metabolism of inorganic ions, I: metabolism of lipids, and H: transport and metabolism of coenzymes. The proteins are represented by nodes, while the interactions among them are represented by edges. The strength of interactions is proportional to line thickness. The network was constructed with STRING v11.
Microorganisms 08 01826 g006
Microorganisms 08 01826 g007 550
Figure 7. Protein–protein interaction network of the identified proteins of B. multivorans C1576 in the OMVs. The circles highlight the proteins related to functional categories. O: post-translational modification, E: transport and metabolism of aminoacids, I: metabolism of lipids, H: transport and metabolism of coenzymes, and M: cell wall structure, biogenesis and outer membrane. The proteins are represented by nodes while the interactions between them by edges. The strength of interactions is proportional to line thickness. The network was constructed with STRING v11.
Figure 7. Protein–protein interaction network of the identified proteins of B. multivorans C1576 in the OMVs. The circles highlight the proteins related to functional categories. O: post-translational modification, E: transport and metabolism of aminoacids, I: metabolism of lipids, H: transport and metabolism of coenzymes, and M: cell wall structure, biogenesis and outer membrane. The proteins are represented by nodes while the interactions between them by edges. The strength of interactions is proportional to line thickness. The network was constructed with STRING v11.
Microorganisms 08 01826 g007
Table
Table 1. List of the twenty most prevalent matrix-associated proteins.
Table 1. List of the twenty most prevalent matrix-associated proteins.
ProteinsGene Name/IdentifierAccession Number aNumber of Matches bSubcellular Localization c
Acyl carrier proteinacpPACP_BURCA35cytoplasm
thiol peroxidasetpxWP_006400399.130periplasmic space
carboxymuconolactone decarboxylaseahpDEGD01850.122cytoplasm
beta-ketoacyl-ACP reductaseBmul_2181AOL03371.117cytoplasm
branched-chain amino acid ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinlivK/Bmul_3623 WP_006396439.116periplasmic space
thiol: disulfide interchange protein DsbA/DsbLdsbAWP_006398112.115periplasmic space
Malate dehydrogenasemdhWP_006399543.113unknown
ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinBmul_3347WP_006397294.113periplasmic space
Fe(3+) ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinBmul_2093WP_035953191.111periplasmic space
glutamate/aspartate ABC transporter substrate-binding proteinBmul_2714WP_006408338.110periplasmic space
RNA chaperone Hfqhfq/Bmul_1468WP_063496600.110cytoplasm
thioredoxinBmul_1445ABC39250.19cytoplasm
ribosomal protein S1rpsAEJO59460.19cytoplasm
Protein-export protein SecBsecBSECB_BURCA8cytoplasm
hypothetical proteinBmul_2263SAK23673.18unknown
5-methyltetrahydropteroyltriglutamate-homocysteine S-methyltransferasemetEWP_060098089.18cytoplasm
NADP-dependent phosphogluconate dehydrogenasegndWP_006399510.18cytoplasm
Endoribonuclease L-PSPBmul_0927WP_006398680.17unknown
NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenaseBmul_0771WP_006398523.17cytoplsm
superoxide dismutasesodWP_006398503.16periplasmic space
a NCBI accession number of the proteins. b #matches: number of matching peptides during the identification. c Subcellular localization prediction for each of the proteins according to Psortdb v3.0.
Table
Table 2. List of the top twenty of the most prevalent OMV-associated proteins.
Table 2. List of the top twenty of the most prevalent OMV-associated proteins.
OMV ProteinsGene Name/IdentifierAccession Number aNumber of Matches bSubcellular Localization c
porinopcPWP_054315301.130outer membrane
OmpA-like proteinBmul_2265WP_006400736.117outer membrane
chaperonin GroELgroL/Bmul_2528WP_006400973.116cytoplasm
porinopcPWP_059451674.115outer membrane
iron complex outer membrane receptor proteinBmul_1594BAG43570.112outer membrane
glutamate/aspartate ABC transporter, periplasmic glutamate/aspartate-binding proteingltIEED98255.110unknown
hypothetical OmpA-like proteinopcPWP_059451674.19outer membrane
putative lipoproteinBmul_1389WP_006402280.17unknown
TonB-dependent hemoglobin/transferrin/lactoferrin family receptorBmul_3338WP_048804300.17outer membrane
aspartate/tyrosine/aromatic aminotransferaseaspCWP_038714441.14cytoplasm
adenosylhomocysteinaseahcYEEE03553.15cytoplasm
acyl carrier protein acpPACP_BURCA4cytoplasm
malate dehydrogenasemdhMDH_BURCJ4unknown
putative outer membrane proteinBmul_1507OJD05646.14outer membrane
enolaseenoENO_BURM14cytoplasm
aldehyde dehydrogenase family proteinBmul_3451WP_054317513.14cytoplasm
citrate synthaseBmul_4643OJD04157.13cytoplasm
redoxin family proteinBmul_1331KOS88719.13cytoplasm
phasin proteinBmul_1136WP_006401963.13unknown
bacterioferritinbfr/Bmul_1081 ABO01605.12cytoplasm
a NCBI accession number of the proteins. b #matches: number of matching peptides during the identification. c Subcellular localization prediction for each of the proteins according to Psortdb v3.0.
Table
Table 3. List of the proteins associated from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs.
Table 3. List of the proteins associated from the biofilm matrix and the OMVs.
ProteinGene Name/
Identifier		Accession Number aSubcellular localization b
PorinopcPWP_054315301.1Outer membrane
Chaperonin GroELgroLWP_006400973.1Cytoplasmic
Citrate (Si)-synthaseBmul_4643OJD04157.1Cytoplasmic
Aldehyde dehydrogenase family proteinBmul_3451WP_054317513.1Cytoplasmic
Malate dehydrogenasemdh WP_006399543.1Unknown
Leucine ABC transporter subunit substrate binding protein LivKBmul_3623OJD03740.1Periplasmic
Glycine dehydrogenasegcvPGCSP_BURM1Unknown
Beta-ketoacyl-ACP reductaseBmul_2181AOL03371.1Cytoplasmic
2,3,4,5- tetrahydropyridine-2,6- dicarboxylate N succinyltransferasedapDDAPD_BURCACytoplasmic
ATP-dependent Clp protease, proteolytic subunit ClpPclpP/Bmul_1349EED97471.1Cytoplasmic
YceI family proteinBmul_2669EED98206.1Unknown
Thiol: disulfide interchange protein DsbA/DsbLdsbAWP_006398112.1Periplasmic
Redoxin family proteinBmul_1331KOS88719.1Cytoplasmic
Hypothetical protein CA831_04455 partialBmul_4929OXH91981.1Unknown
Acyl carrier proteinacpPACP_BURCACytoplasmic
ThioredoxinBmul_1445ABC39250.1Cytoplasmic
Conserved hypothetical proteinBmul_0436EBA48742.1Unknown
Endoribonuclease L-PSPBmul_0927WP_006398680.1Unknown
50S ribosomal proteinrplLRL7_BURM1Cytoplasmic
a NCBI accession number of the proteins. b Subcellular localization prediction for each of the proteins according to Psortdb v3.0.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Terán, L.C.; Distefano, M.; Bellich, B.; Petrosino, S.; Bertoncin, P.; Cescutti, P.; Sblattero, D. Proteomic Studies of the Biofilm Matrix including Outer Membrane Vesicles of Burkholderia multivorans C1576, a Strain of Clinical Importance for Cystic Fibrosis. Microorganisms 2020, 8, 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111826

AMA Style

Terán LC, Distefano M, Bellich B, Petrosino S, Bertoncin P, Cescutti P, Sblattero D. Proteomic Studies of the Biofilm Matrix including Outer Membrane Vesicles of Burkholderia multivorans C1576, a Strain of Clinical Importance for Cystic Fibrosis. Microorganisms. 2020; 8(11):1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Terán, Lucrecia C., Marco Distefano, Barbara Bellich, Sara Petrosino, Paolo Bertoncin, Paola Cescutti, and Daniele Sblattero. 2020. "Proteomic Studies of the Biofilm Matrix including Outer Membrane Vesicles of Burkholderia multivorans C1576, a Strain of Clinical Importance for Cystic Fibrosis" Microorganisms 8, no. 11: 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111826

APA Style

Terán, L. C., Distefano, M., Bellich, B., Petrosino, S., Bertoncin, P., Cescutti, P., & Sblattero, D. (2020). Proteomic Studies of the Biofilm Matrix including Outer Membrane Vesicles of Burkholderia multivorans C1576, a Strain of Clinical Importance for Cystic Fibrosis. Microorganisms, 8(11), 1826. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8111826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop