Next Article in Journal
Probiotics: If It Does Not Help It Does Not Do Any Harm. Really?
Previous Article in Journal
New R-Based Methodology to Optimize the Identification of Root Endophytes against Heterobasidion parviporum
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Microorganisms 2019, 7(4), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7040103

Review
Functional Genomics of Aspergillus oryzae: Strategies and Progress
Jiangxi Key Laboratory of Bioprocess Engineering and Co-Innovation Center for In-vitro Diagnostic Reagents and Devices of Jiangxi Province, College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Science & Technology Normal University, Nanchang 330013, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 27 February 2019 / Accepted: 6 April 2019 / Published: 10 April 2019

Abstract

:
Aspergillus oryzae has been used for the production of traditional fermentation and has promising potential to produce primary and secondary metabolites. Due to the tough cell walls and high drug resistance of A. oryzae, functional genomic characterization studies are relatively limited. The exploitation of selection markers and genetic transformation methods are critical for improving A. oryzae fermentative strains. In this review, we describe the genome sequencing of various A. oryzae strains. Recently developed selection markers and transformation strategies are also described in detail, and the advantages and disadvantages of transformation methods are presented. Lastly, we introduce the recent progress on highlighted topics in A. oryzae functional genomics including conidiation, protein secretion and expression, and secondary metabolites, which will be beneficial for improving the application of A. oryzae to industrial production.
Keywords:
Aspergillus oryzae; functional genomics; selection markers; transformation strategies

1. Introduction

Aspergillus oryzae (A. oryzae) has been used for the production of traditional fermentation such as soy sauce, miso, and douchi for more than ten centuries. The fermentation and post-processing technologies for A. oryzae have matured. Additionally, A. oryzae has been listed as “Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS)” by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and its safety has been supported by the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Due to its safety, A. oryzae is also used for the production of primary and secondary metabolites. Moreover, its strong capacity for the production of various hydrolytic enzymes makes it an ideal model for the research of gene expression and protein secretion [2]. However, the progress in A. oryzae functional genomics remains relatively limited. The main reasons are that few selection markers are available for A. oryzae, and it is not amenable to classical genetic manipulation procedures [3]. Therefore, the exploitation of effective selection markers and genetic transformation methods are of great significance. In this review, we describe the recent progress in selection markers and genetic transformation methods used for A. oryzae. The advantages and disadvantages of different transformation methods are also described in detail. Furthermore, the progress of highlighted topics in A. oryzae functional genomics such as conidiation, protein secretion and expression, and secondary metabolites are here reviewed.

2. Genome Sequencing of A. oryzae

With the development of next-generation sequencing technology, genome sequencing has become increasingly common—especially for fungi. Due to its small genome size and ease of sequencing and annotation, A. oryzae has been recognized as a model filamentous fungus of genomic research, which provides theoretical foundation for the research of functional genomics, expression regulation mechanism and evolution [4]. In 2005, sequencing of the A. oryzae RIB40 genome was accomplished by Japanese scientists through the whole-genome shotgun (WGS) approach [5]. The 37 Mb genome was predicted to contain eight chromosomes, which were comprised of 12,074 genes encoding proteins with a length greater than 100 amino acid residues. Comparing to Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus nidulans, A. oryzae has about 34% and 29% larger genome sizes, respectively. The unique genes mainly refer to secretory hydrolases, stress responses, as well as primary and secondary metabolism [6]. Since the release of the A. oryzae RIB40 genome sequence, more efforts have been involved in A. oryzae genome projects. Furthermore, third-generation sequencing technology has accelerated the progress of A. oryzae genome projects. This sequencing technology is characteristic of long reads, which can reduce the errors of genome assembly and improve the quality of genome annotation. To date, approximately ten A. oryzae strains have been sequenced and deposited in the public NCBI database. The genome sizes of these strains range from 35.42 to 41.16 Mb, and the GC content of most strains is approximately 48% (Table 1). Although the genomes of so many A. oryzae strains have been decoded, the functional genomics is still in its infancy for the breeding of industrial strains. Among the more than 10,000 genes, only around 200 genes are functionally verified, accounting for 1.7% of the whole genome.

3. Strategies for Functional Genomics of A. oryzae

3.1. Selection Markers

Effective selection markers are the basis of functional genomics research, which can reduce false positive rates and reduce the workload for screening. Drug resistance markers and auxotrophic markers are the two main selection markers used for transformation vectors in A. oryzae.

3.1.1. Drug Resistance Markers

Drug resistance markers are the most widely used markers for fungal genetic transformation, which do not require the host strain to be auxotrophic, and can be used as dominant selection markers. After transforming the vector with drug resistance genes, the host strain can grow in the presence of specific drug concentrations. However, there are very few foreign hetero gene markers that can be used as transformation markers in A. oryzae since it has high native drug resistance [3]. Hygromycin B resistance genes such as hph and hygr are the most widely used drug resistance markers in A. oryzae genetic transformation. For example, Fernandez et al. successfully constructed an interference vector for A. oryzae and repressed the expression of the wA gene involved in the color of spores using the hygromycin B resistance gene hph as a selection marker [13]. Besides, the bleomycin (Bm) resistance marker has also been used in the transformation of A. oryzae. Satoshi at al. established the transformation system by Bm selection for A. oryzae by increasing the susceptibility of A. oryzae to Bm [14]. Furthermore, pyrithiamine (PT) and phleomycin resistance genes have also been applied as dominant selection markers for the transformation of A. oryzae [15,16]. However, most transformation systems with drug resistance markers require expensive antibiotics. Meanwhile, some resistance genes have the risk of being transferred to the environment and other microorganisms. Therefore, the FDA has banned the use of drug resistance markers in food microorganisms, including A. oryzae [17].

3.1.2. Auxotrophic Markers

Auxotrophs show the same phenotype with the wild type after transforming the vector with the corresponding auxotrophic marker. pyrG is the most widely used drug resistance marker used for A. oryzae genetic transformation. In filamentous fungi, the pyrG gene encodes for orotidine-5’-monophosphate (OMP) decarboxylase, which is a key enzyme for the biosynthesis of uridine/uracil (necessary for fungal survival). Therefore, the pyrG mutants are unable to convert orotidine into uridine and require additional supplementation of uridine or uracil for their growth [18]. Yasuda et al. established an efficient gene knockout system using A. oryzae KBN630 as an original strain and pyrG as a selection marker [19]. Nguyen et al. confirmed that the pyrG selectable marker is a powerful tool for genetic transformation and recombinant gene expression studies in A. oryzae [20]. Maruyama et al. and Yoon et al. knocked out multiple genes through a pyrG selectable marker [21,22]. Other nutritional markers were also exploited for transformation systems of A. oryzae, such as niaD for nitrate assimilation, adeA for adenine, or argB for arginine biosynthesis, etc. (Table 2). The screening of transformants with auxotrophic markers is convenient and efficient, based on selective culture media. In summary, transformation systems for A. oryzae have mainly been developed based on auxotrophic markers for the complementation of auxotrophic mutant strains.

3.2. Strategies for the Transformation of A. oryzae

Efficient strategies for the transformation of A. oryzae are an important foundation for its functional genomic investigation. However, the transformation efficiency of A. oryzae is low when compared to Saccharomyces cerevisiae (S. cerevisiae). The cell wall of A. oryzae is the main obstacle to successful genetic transformation [32]. Various transformation methods for A. oryzae have been established, including protoplast-mediated transformation (PMT), Agrobacterium-mediated transformation (AMT), and electroporation (EP) (Table 3).

3.2.1. Protoplast-Mediated Transformation

The main strategy for introducing DNA into fungi is the PMT method, which has been successfully applied to a large number of fungal species [33]. This method has been successfully applied for the transformation of A. oryzae due to the ease of obtaining homozygotes. For example, Murakami et al. introduced an aspartic proteinase from Mucor pusillus into A. oryzae by PMT using the niaD gene as the selective marker [34]. In addition, Tada et al. transformed a neutral ceramidase orthologue into A. oryzae using the PMT method [35]. The procedure for A. oryzae is a modified version according to the method of other fungi [36]: (1) The pyrG strain is inoculated in 100 mL dextrin–peptone–yeast (DPY) liquid medium (2% dextrin, 1% polypeptone, 0.5% yeast extract, 0.5% KH2PO4, 0.05% MgSO4·7H2O, pH 5.5) containing 20 mM uridine and 0.2% uracil. (2) Protoplast formation is performed through incubation of the mycelia in 10 mL transformation (TF) Solution I (50 mM maleic acid, 1% Yatalase, 0.6 M (NH4)2SO4.) containing cell wall-lytic enzyme and checked by microscopic observation. (3) The DNA fragment containing the target gene is mixed with the protoplast suspension under PEG-CaCl2 conditions. (4) Transformants are visible on the agar medium after 3–4 days cultivation at 30 °C. They are inoculated onto new minimum+methionine (M+Met) agar medium (0.2% NH4Cl, 0.1% (NH4)2SO4, 0.05% KCl, 0.05% NaCl, 0.1% KH2PO4, 0.05% MgSO4⋅7H2O, 0.002% FeSO4⋅7H2O, 2% glucose, 0.15% methionine, pH 5.5) to obtain single colonies or axenic cultures (Figure 1). In this procedure, the key step is protoplast preparation, which requires removal of the cell wall. At present, cell wall-lytic enzymes are commonly used, while some other methods such as mechanical and other non-enzymatic methods have also been reported [37]. Therefore, the transformation rate is mainly affected by the efficiency of different batches of cell wall-degrading enzymes in filamentous fungi [38]. Furthermore, due to the varying cell wall composition and possible defense mechanisms, PMT protocols cannot be generalized across various fungi [39].

3.2.2. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation

Another strategy for gene targeting in A. oryzae is AMT, which is a fundamentally different method to PMT that is used for transformation. This method was traditionally used in plants and was later applied to yeast and filamentous fungi [40,41,42]. Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a Gram-negative bacterium that can transfer the T-DNA region of the Ti plasmid to the genome of the infected plant. The T-DNA region is bordered by two imperfect inverted repeats which interact with a set of virulence proteins (located in the Ti plasmid) that facilitate the DNA transference to the host. The T-DNA and the selection marker are integrated randomly in the genome of transformants [43]. Fungal spores, germlings, and mycelia have been reported to be successfully transformed using this method [44,45]. The first step of the AMT procedure for A. oryzae is the introduction of the PEX2B vector into A. tumefaciens cells. Then, a mixture of the spore suspension and the induced A. tumefaciens suspension are spread on the induction medium (IM) agar plate containing 200 μM AS, 0.05% uridine, and 0.05% uracil. Lastly, the membrane is transferred to the M+Met medium plate (Figure 2). Nguyen et al. constructed versatile binary vectors carrying pyrG auxotrophic marker and fluorescent reporter genes and transformed them into A. oryzae RIB40 using the AMT method [24]. In 2017, Nguyen et al. further confirmed that the use of AMT with the pyrG selectable marker is a powerful and efficient method for genetic transformation and recombinant gene expression studies in A. oryzae [20]. According to the AMT method introduced by Nguyen et al., our group established a dual selection marker transformation system using AMT for A. oryzae 3042 [23]. The AMT method is more efficient and simpler to implement due to the direct use of fungal spores as the material, avoiding the need to obtain protoplasts, which is laborious and requires a tricky procedure. Furthermore, the AMT method can improve the efficiency of gene deletion in some fungi in comparison with other transformation methods, and improves targeted integration. However, there are also some disadvantages: it is difficult to develop adequate binary vectors containing the vir genes and the heterologous DNA, and AMT protocols cannot be generalized across various fungi due to the varying parameters during Agrobacterium–fungi conjugation, which affects the transformation rate.

3.2.3. Electroporation

Electroporation is a method that applies a high-voltage electric pulse to a solution containing protoplasts and DNA. The electroporation of protoplasts has been achieved for several fungi, such as yeast and Aspergillus unguis [46,47]. However, the electroporation protocols need to be optimized across various fungi and are relatively complicated. Furthermore, although relatively fast and simple, electroporation provides a low DNA transfer efficiency (∼1–5 × 104 colonies/μg) in comparison with PMT (1 transformant per 105 spores) and AMT (10 transformants per 105 spores) methods [48]. Researchers have attempted to transform A. oryzae through electroporation, but failed. Therefore, there are no reports on the implication of electroporation methods for A. oryzae transformation.

3.3. Genetic Manipulations

To determine gene functions or enhance the ability of a strain to produce a certain component (e.g., protein production), it is important to generate a host with effective selection markers and high transformation rate applicable to genetic manipulations. However, compared with other fungi (e.g., yeasts and Aspergillus nidulans), only a few attempts to manipulate genes had been performed in A. oryzae. Xu et al. breed novel food-grade industrial koji molds with high activity of acid protease by interspecific genome recombination between A. oryzae and A. niger [49]. Bocking et al. generated highly branched mutants by UV or nitrous acid mutagenesis [50]. Moreover, Yamada et al. constructed an RNAi system for gene silencing in A. oryzae. In this system, compatible restriction enzyme sites and the Gateway system were used to create the hairpin RNA cassette [51]. Recently, the bacterial and archaeal immune mechanism CRISPR/Cas9 was engineered into a powerful gene editing system, which contained only two components: the Cas9 nuclease and a single guide RNA (sgRNA). The CRISPR/Cas9 system has been successfully adapted to filamentous fungi such as Aspergillus aculeatus, Aspergillus fumigatus, and A. oryzae [52,53]. The procedure of this system is simple and efficient. Firstly, codon usage of cas9 is optimized and then the optimized cas9 is inserted into expression vector. Secondly, the sgRNA sequence is fused with promoter and inserted into the expression vector containing cas9. Katayama et al. developed the CRISPR/Cas9 system in A. oryzae to knock out wA (polyketide synthase), pyrG, and yA (p-diphenol oxidase). Because the isolation of A. oryzae conidia containing only mutated nuclei is difficult, the mutational rates ranged from 10% to 20%, which was lower than those of A. fumigatus [54]. Therefore, this system for genome editing used in A. oryzae was still at beginning.

4. Advances in the Functional Genomics of A. oryzae

Based on the characteristics and industrial application of A. oryzae, the functional genomics of A. oryzae is mainly focused on three areas of study: conidiation, protein secretion and expression, and secondary metabolites.

4.1. Conidiation

Conidiation is a common event occurs in the asexual developmental process of Aspergillus species. In this process, more than 10,000 conidia can be produced in multicellular organs called conidiophores [55]. The conidia of A. oryzae are essential for the food industry, as they are often used as starters in the first step of fermentation to digest ingredients [56]. Therefore, increasing interest has been focusing on the investigation of the conidiation regulatory pathway. Conidiation is putatively induced by external or internal signals that activate a genetic program of sporulation. Studies have shown that conidiation is induced when nutrients in culture medium are limited, such as limitation of carbon and nitrogen sources [57]. Moreover, Hatakeyama et al. reported that conidiation is repressed by white and red light [58]. The conidiation regulatory mechanism has been well-studied in A. nidulans. Experimental evidence has shown that the regulatory mechanisms between A. nidulans and A. oryzae are conserved. BrlA is the most-investigated conidiation regulatory gene, which activates a central regulatory pathway controlling the expression of conidiation-specific genes such as abaA, wetA, stuA, medA, and vosA. BrlA disruptants of A. oryzae showed the inability to form conidiophores. Moreover, the fadA G-protein-dependent signaling pathway also regulates conidiation by suppressing brlA activation. The Fad-mediated signaling is regulated by FlbA, a specific regulator of G-protein signaling. The fadA mutant in A. oryzae causes reduction of intrinsic GTPase activity and results in uncontrolled vegetative growth and autolytic phenotypes. Additionally, the overexpression of Rim15p (a serine-threonine kinase) in A. oryzae showed reduced conidiation, and conidiation was completely abolished in the Rim15p deletion strain [59].

4.2. Protein Secretion and Expression

Compared to other eukaryotic expression systems, such as yeast, algae, or insect cells, A. oryzae possesses a high capacity for product secretion. Thus, A. oryzae is an excellent host for industrial protein production, including glucose oxidases, amylases, chymosin, pectinases, catalases, cellulases, proteases, phytases, lipases, and xylanases in food [60]. These products synthesized by A. oryzae are easier to accept than those produced by non-approved production hosts, since A. oryzae has been listed as GRAS by FDA [1]. Therefore, A. oryzae has been receiving increased attention as a host for expressing homologous and heterologous proteins. However, heterologous eukaryotic proteins are generally inefficiently produced compared to endogenous proteins. To date, several difficulties have been identified and overcome in the heterologous protein production process. Firstly, the most important factors are effective selection markers and efficient strategies for the transformation of A. oryzae, which have been described above. Secondly, proteolytic degradation by secreted proteases into the culture medium is another significant problem in heterologous protein production [61]. To overcome this problem, researchers constructed multiple protease gene disruptants to avoid proteolytic degradation, which increased the production yields of heterologous proteins [22,62]. Furthermore, the repression of vacuolar protein sorting (VPS) and autophagy genes, which play important roles in the secretory pathway, led to a significant improvement of heterologous protein production by A. oryzae [63,64]. Moreover, the genetic fusion of a target protein with endogenous carrier proteins—which are generally secreted enzymes—has also improved the yield of heterologous proteins [65]. Heterologous fusion protein is thought to improve the yields in transcription and posttranscriptional processes. A recently developed approach was based on the fusion proteins that increased the expression of heterologous protein by modulating endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi cargo receptors [62]. Lectin-type cargo receptors might affect the secretion of carrier-fused heterologous proteins and therefore improve heterologous protein production, as glycoproteins like α-amylase are commonly used as carrier proteins.

4.3. Secondary Metabolites

A. oryzae not only possesses a prominent secretory capacity, it also produces abundant secondary metabolites. A comparison of the A. oryzae genome with A. nidulans and A. fumigatus revealed that the additional genes are mainly involved into transporters, secretory hydrolases, and secondary metabolism genes, among which the expansion of secondary metabolism genes is most prominent. Fungal secondary metabolites are biosynthesized by gene clusters, most of which encode typical backbone enzymes, such as polyketide synthase (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthase (NRPS). The A. oryzae genome contains 56 gene clusters, which are enriched in regions lacking synteny with those in either A. fumigatus or A. nidulans [5]. Some of these secondary metabolites have many kinds of pharmacological activities. For example, Zhou et al. isolated nine isocoumarin derivatives from solid cultures of A. oryzae which showed moderate inhibitory activities against several human tumor cell lines [66]. In addition, many other secondary metabolites with pharmacological activity have also been identified from A. oryzae, such as aspirochlorine (antifungal activity), aspergillic acids (antifungal activity, antihypertensive), and aspergillomarasmine B (antiangiotensin) [67,68]. Furthermore, penicillin biosynthetic genes have been clustered in the A. oryzae genome. Marui et al. generated a strain that showed a greater than 100-fold overexpression of VeA utilizing a strong promoter [69]. However, some mycotoxins have also been isolated from A. oryzae, including kojic acid, β-nitropropionic acid (BNP), and cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) [70]. Some researchers reported that kojic acid has strong inhibitory activity against tyrosinase and antibacterial activity, while recent studies have shown that kojic acid has potential carcinogenicity [71]. The 14 genes involved in the biosynthesis of kojic acid formed a cluster in the genome from AO090113000132 to AO090113000145, including a Zn(II)2Cy6 transcription factor gene (kojR), an enzyme gene (kojA), and a transporter gene (kojT) [72]. BNP causes sugarcane disease, and is one of the mycotoxins reported from A. oryzae and A. flavus. However, the genetic basis for the biosynthesis of BNP is not completely understood [73]. CPA is an indol tetrameric acid that was originally isolated from A. flavus. It has also been isolated repeatedly from A. oryzae, and it is possible to remove the CPA gene cluster to avoid CPA biosynthesis in biotechnological processes [74]. Moreover, the gene cluster involved in aflatoxin biosynthesis in the A. oryzae genome has also been studied frequently, as A. oryzae was probably domesticated from A. flavus. The aflatoxin cluster contains about 30 genes, and the roles of these genes in aflatoxin synthesis have almost been clarified [75,76]. It has been shown that A. oryzae cannot produce aflatoxins due to a lack of the aflR gene, even under aflatoxin-conducing conditions [77,78].

5. Conclusions

A. oryzae has had widespread applications in traditional fermentation processes and has promising potential to produce primary and secondary metabolites. Recent progress in next-generation sequencing technology has boosted the research on the functional genomics of A. oryzae, which is helpful to the genetic improvement of A. oryzae fermentative strains. Two types of effective selection markers including drug resistance markers and auxotrophic markers have been exploited to screen positive strains. Due to their applicability and safety, auxotrophic markers are preferential to resistance markers. Furthermore, three transformation methods of A. oryzae have been established for functional genomics investigation, including protoplast-mediated transformation, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and electroporation (Table 3). We believe that the coupling of protoplast-mediated transformation with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation will be useful to enhance transformation efficiencies. Based on the optimized selection markers and transformation strategies, the current functional genomics of A. oryzae is mainly focused on conidiation, protein secretion, and expression as well as secondary metabolites, which will be beneficial for better application in industrial production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.H. and Y.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.J. and B.H.; writing—review and editing, Z.Z.; supervision, B.Z.; project administration, Y.L.; funding acquisition, B.Z. and B.H.

Funding

This research was funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Grant no. 31460447 and 31700068), International S&T Cooperation Project of Jiangxi Provincial (Grant no. 20142BDH80003), Doctor and master specific projects of Honghe University (XJ17B09), Science and Technology Research Project of Jiangxi Provincial Department of Education (GJJ180605), the Science Funds of Natural Science Foundation of Jiangxi Province (20114BAB205039).

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Wei Zhang and Jia Qin for critical reading of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. He, B.; Hu, Z.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Ai, M.; Han, J.; Zeng, B. Transcriptome analysis of different growth stages of Aspergillus oryzae reveals dynamic changes of distinct classes of genes during growth. BMC Microbiol. 2018, 18, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Machida, M.; Yamada, O.; Gomi, K. Genomics of Aspergillus oryzae: Learning from the history of Koji mold and exploration of its future. DNA Res. 2008, 15, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhong, Y.; Lu, X.; Xing, L.; Ho, S.W.A.; Kwan, H.S. Genomic and transcriptomic comparison of Aspergillus oryzae strains: A case study in soy sauce koji fermentation. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 45, 839–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brandl, J.; Andersen, M.R. Aspergilli: Models for Systems Biology in Filamentous Fungi. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 2017, 6, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Machida, M.; Asai, K.; Sano, M.; Tanaka, T.; Kumagai, T.; Terai, G.; Kusumoto, K.I.; Arima, T.; Akita, O.; Kashiwagi, Y. Genome sequencing and analysis of Aspergillus oryzae. Nature 2005, 438, 1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. He, B.; Tu, Y.; Hu, Z.; Ma, L.; Dai, J.; Cheng, X.; Li, H.; Liu, L.; Zeng, B. Genome-wide identification and expression profile analysis of the HOG gene family in Aspergillus oryzae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Zhao, G.; Yao, Y.; Qi, W.; Wang, C.; Hou, L.; Zeng, B.; Cao, X. Draft genome sequence of Aspergillus oryzae strain 3.042. Eukaryot. Cell 2012, 11, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lin, W.; Song, J.; Hu, W.; Miao, J.; Gao, X. Relationship Between Extracellular Cellulase, Pectinase and Xylanase Activity of Isolated Aspergillus oryzae Strains Grown on Koji and the Umami-Tasting Amino Acid Content of Soy Sauce. Food Biotechnol. 2016, 30, 278–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Umemura, M.; Koike, H.; Yamane, N.; Koyama, Y.; Satou, Y.; Kikuzato, I.; Teruya, M.; Tsukahara, M.; Imada, Y.; Wachi, Y.; et al. Comparative Genome Analysis Between Aspergillus oryzae Strains Reveals Close Relationship Between Sites of Mutation Localization and Regions of Highly Divergent Genes among Aspergillus Species. DNA Res. 2012, 19, 375–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, G.; Yao, Y.; Hou, L.; Wang, C.; Cao, X. Draft Genome Sequence of Aspergillus oryzae 100-8, an Increased Acid Protease Production Strain. Genome Announc. 2014, 2, e00548-14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Thammarongtham, C.; Nookaew, I.; Vorapreeda, T.; Srisuk, T.; Land, M.L.; Jeennor, S.; Laoteng, K. Genome Characterization of Oleaginous Aspergillus oryzae BCC7051: A Potential Fungal-Based Platform for Lipid Production. Curr. Microbiol. 2018, 75, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Deng, S.; Pomraning, K.R.; Bohutskyi, P.; Magnuson, J.K. Draft Genome Sequence of Aspergillus oryzae ATCC 12892. Genome Announc. 2018, 6, e00251-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Fernandez, E.Q.; Moyer, D.L.; Maiyuran, S.; Labaro, A.; Brody, H. Vector-initiated transitive RNA interference in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2012, 49, 294–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Suzuki, S.; Tada, S.; Fukuoka, M.; Taketani, H.; Tsukakoshi, Y.; Matsushita, M.; Oda, K.; Kusumoto, K.-I.; Kashiwagi, Y.; Sugiyama, M. A novel transformation system using a bleomycin resistance marker with chemosensitizers for Aspergillus oryzae. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2009, 383, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chou, T.H.; Tzean, S.S. Protoplasting, regeneration and transformation of medicinal mushroom Ganoderma multipileum using succinate dehydrogenase mutation gene as a selection marker. Ann. Microbiol. 2016, 66, 111–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, S.; Ban, A.; Ebara, N.; Mizutani, O.; Tanaka, M.; Shintani, T.; Gomi, K. Self-excising Cre/mutant lox marker recycling system for multiple gene integrations and consecutive gene deletions in Aspergillus oryzae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2017, 123, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Newsome, R.; Tran, N.; Paoli, G.M.; Jaykus, L.A.; Tompkin, B.; Miliotis, M.; Ruthman, T.; Hartnett, E.; Busta, F.F.; Petersen, B. Development of a risk-ranking framework to evaluate potential high-threat microorganisms, toxins, and chemicals in food. J. Food Sci. 2010, 74, R39–R45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhu, L.; Maruyama, J.; Kitamoto, K. Further enhanced production of heterologous proteins by double-gene disruption (ΔAosedD ΔAovps10) in a hyper-producing mutant of Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 6347–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Yoshino-Yasuda, S.; Mori, A.; Ishihara, N.; Hasegawa, O.; Kato, M.; Kitamoto, N. Development of a Highly Efficient Gene Replacement System for an Industrial Strain of Aspergillus oryzae Used in the Production of Miso, a Japanese Fermented Soybean Paste. Food Sci. Technol. Int. Tokyo 2011, 17, 161–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nguyen, K.T.; Ho, Q.N.; Do, L.T.B.X.; Mai, L.T.D.; Pham, D.N.; Tran, H.T.T.; Le, D.H.; Nguyen, H.Q.; Tran, V.T. A new and efficient approach for construction of uridine/uracil auxotrophic mutants in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae using Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. World J. Microb. Biotechnol. 2017, 33, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Maruyama, J.I.; Kitamoto, K. Multiple gene disruptions by marker recycling with highly efficient gene-targeting background (ΔligD) in Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 1811–1817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yoon, J.; Maruyama, J.; Kitamoto, K. Disruption of ten protease genes in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae highly improves production of heterologous proteins. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 89, 747–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, Y.; Niu, Y.; He, B.; Ma, L.; Li, G.; Tran, V.T.; Zeng, B.; Hu, Z. A dual selection marker transformation system using Agrobacterium tumefaciens for the industrial Aspergillus oryzae 3.042. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 29, 230–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, K.T.; Ho, Q.N.; Pham, T.H.; Phan, T.N.; Tran, V.T. The construction and use of versatile binary vectors carrying pyrG auxotrophic marker and fluorescent reporter genes for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of Aspergillus oryzae. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 32, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Tamano, K.; Bruno, K.S.; Koike, H.; Ishii, T.; Ai, M.; Umemura, M.; Culley, D.E.; Baker, S.E.; Machida, M. Increased production of free fatty acids in Aspergillus oryzae by disruption of a predicted acyl-CoA synthetase gene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 3103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jin, F.J.; Maruyama, J.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Arioka, M.; Kitamoto, K. Development of a novel quadruple auxotrophic host transformation system by argB gene disruption using adeA gene and exploiting adenine auxotrophy in Aspergillus oryzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 239, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nakamura, H.; Katayama, T.; Okabe, T.; Iwashita, K.; Fujii, W.; Kitamoto, K.; Maruyama, J.I. Highly efficient gene targeting in Aspergillus oryzae industrial strains under ligD mutation introduced by genome editing: Strain-specific differences in the effects of deleting EcdR, the negative regulator of sclerotia formation. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 63, 172–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jin, F.J.; Maruyama, J.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Arioka, M.; Kitamoto, K. Adenine auxotrophic mutants of Aspergillus oryzae: Development of a novel transformation system with triple auxotrophic hosts. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nemoto, T.; Watanabe, T.; Mizogami, Y.; Maruyama, J.-i.; Kitamoto, K. Isolation of Aspergillus oryzae mutants for heterologous protein production from a double proteinase gene disruptant. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 82, 1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Jin, F.J.; Katayama, T.; Maruyama, J.I.; Kitamoto, K. Comparative genomic analysis identified a mutation related to enhanced heterologous protein production in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9163–9174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Escaño, C.S.; Juvvadi, P.R.; Jin, F.J.; Takahashi, T.; Koyama, Y.; Yamashita, S.; Maruyama, J.; Kitamoto, K. Disruption of the Aopex11-1 gene involved in peroxisome proliferation leads to impaired Woronin body formation in Aspergillus oryzae. Eukaryot. Cell 2009, 8, 296–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, D.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Y.; Sun, C.; Zhang, K.-Q.; Yang, J. Molecular tools for functional genomics in filamentous fungi: Recent advances and new strategies. Biotechnol. Adv. 2013, 31, 1562–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Weyda, I.; Yang, L.; Vang, J.; Ahring, B.K.; Lübeck, M.; Lübeck, P.S. A comparison of Agrobacterium—Mediated transformation and protoplast-mediated transformation with CRISPR-Cas9 and bipartite gene targeting substrates, as effective gene targeting tools for Aspergillus carbonarius. J. Microbiol. Methods 2017, 135, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Murakami, K.; Aikawa, J.I.; Horinouchi, S.; Beppu, T. Characterization of an Aspartic Proteinase of Mucor pusillus expressed in Aspergillus oryzae. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 241, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tada, S.; Matsushita-Morita, M.; Suzuki, S.; Kusumoto, K.I.; Kashiwagi, Y. Characterization of a neutral ceramidase orthologue from Aspergillus oryzae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 298, 157–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Williams, J.A. Strain Engineering, 1st ed.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 447–455. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wang, S.; Chen, H.; Tang, X.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W.; Chen, Y.Q. Molecular tools for gene manipulation in filamentous fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 8063–8075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ulrich, K.; Birgit, H. New tools for the genetic manipulation of filamentous fungi. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 86, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  39. Van den Berg, M.A.; Maruthachalam, K. (Eds.) Genetic Transformation Systems in Fungi, Volume 1; Springer Nature: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  40. Li, S.; Cong, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T.; Shuai, Q.; Chen, N.; Gai, J.; Li, Y. Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation in Soybean. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Piers, K.L.; Heath, J.D.; Liang, X.; Stephens, K.M.; Nester, E.W. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated Transformation of Yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1996, 93, 1613–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, D.; Dan, H.; Li, G.; Song, G.; Lv, H.; Shan, Q.; Li, W. An efficient tool for random insertional mutagenesis: Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus terreus. J. Microbiol. Methods 2014, 98, 114–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Singh, R.K.; Prasad, M. Advances in Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of graminaceous crops. Protoplasma 2016, 253, 691–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Govender, N.T.; Wong, M.Y. Detection of oil palm root penetration by Agrobacterium-mediated transformed Ganoderma boninense expressing green fluorescent protein. Phytopathology 2017, 107, 483–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Wang, Y.; Wang, R.; Mao, W.J.; Gong, M.; Gao, Y.N.; Tang, L.H.; Yang, R.F.; Li, Y.; Zhou, C.L.; Bao, D.P. A simple and efficient transformation system for the edible mushroom Pleurotus eryngii. Mycoscience 2016, 57, 356–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Madhavan, A.; Pandey, A.; Sukumaran, R.K. Expression system for heterologous protein expression in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus unguis. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 245, 1334–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.; Jiao, X.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, W.; Wang, J.; Zhang, S.; Zhao, Z.K. Fast and efficient genetic transformation of oleaginous yeast Rhodosporidium toruloides by using electroporation. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017, 17, fox017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kotnik, T.; Frey, W.; Sack, M.; Meglič, S.H.; Peterka, M.; Miklavčič, D. Electroporation-based applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 480–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xu, D.; Pan, L.; Zhao, H.; Zhao, M.; Sun, J.; Liu, D. Breeding and identification of novel koji molds with high activity of acid protease by genome recombination between Aspergillus oryzae and Aspergillus niger. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38, 1255–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bocking, S.P.; Wiebe, M.G.; Robson, G.D.; Hansen, K.; Christiansen, L.H.; Trinci, A.P. Effect of branch frequency in Aspergillus oryzae on protein secretion and culture viscosity. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2015, 65, 638–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yamada, O.; Ohkita, R.I. Gene Silencing by RNA Interference in the Koji Mold Aspergillus oryzae. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2007, 71, 138–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nødvig, C.S.; Nielsen, J.B.; Kogle, M.E.; Mortensen, U.H. A CRISPR-Cas9 System for Genetic Engineering of Filamentous Fungi. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0133085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. El-Sayed, A.S.A.; Abdel-Ghany, S.E.; Ali, G.S. Genome editing approaches: manipulating of lovastatin and taxol synthesis of filamentous fungi by CRISPR/Cas9 system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 3953–3976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Katayama, T.; Tanaka, Y.; Okabe, T.; Nakamura, H.; Fujii, W.; Kitamoto, K.; Maruyama, J. Development of a genome editing technique using the CRISPR/Cas9 system in the industrial filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Biotechnol. Lett. 2015, 38, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kitamoto, K. Cell biology of the Koji mold Aspergillus oryzae. J. Agric Chem. Soc. Japan 2015, 79, 863–869. [Google Scholar]
  56. Masahiro, O.; Masafumi, T.; Jie, J.F.; Tadashi, T.; Yasuji, K. Genetic analysis of conidiation regulatory pathways in koji-mold Aspergillus oryzae. Fungal Genet. Biol. 2010, 47, 10–18. [Google Scholar]
  57. Krijgsheld, P.; Bleichrodt, R.; Veluw, G.J.V.; Wang, F.; Müller, W.H.; Dijksterhuis, J.; Wösten, H.A.B. Development in Aspergillus. Stud. Mycol. 2013, 74, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hatakeyama, R.; Nakahama, T.Y.; Kitamoto, K. Light represses conidiation in koji mold Aspergillus oryzae. J. Agric. Chem. Soc. Japan 2007, 71, 1844–1849. [Google Scholar]
  59. Nakamura, H.; Kikuma, T.; Jin, F.J.; Maruyama, J.I.; Kitamoto, K. AoRim15 is involved in conidial stress tolerance, conidiation and sclerotia formation in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2016, 121, 365–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fleißner, A.; Dersch, P. Expression and export: recombinant protein production systems for Aspergillus. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 87, 1255–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Yokota, J.I.; Shiro, D.; Tanaka, M.; Onozaki, Y.; Mizutani, O.; Kakizono, D.; Ichinose, S.; Shintani, T.; Gomi, K.; Shintani, T. Cellular responses to the expression of unstable secretory proteins in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 101, 2437–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Hoang, H.-D.; Maruyama, J.-i.; Kitamoto, K. Modulating endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi cargo receptors for improving secretion of carrier-fused heterologous proteins in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Yoon, J.; Aishan, T.; Maruyama, J.I.; Kitamoto, K. Enhanced Production and Secretion of Heterologous Proteins by the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae via Disruption of Vacuolar Protein Sorting Receptor Gene Aovps10. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 5718–5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Yoon, J.; Kikuma, T.; Maruyama, J.; Kitamoto, K. Enhanced Production of Bovine Chymosin by Autophagy Deficiency in the Filamentous Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Nakajima, K.; Asakura, T.; Maruyama, J.; Morita, Y.; Oike, H.; Shimizu-Ibuka, A.; Misaka, T.; Sorimachi, H.; Arai, S.; Kitamoto, K. Extracellular production of neoculin, a sweet-tasting heterodimeric protein with taste-modifying activity, by Aspergillus oryzae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 3716–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhou, M.; Zhou, K.; He, P.; Wang, K.M.; Zhu, R.Z.; Wang, Y.D.; Dong, W.; Li, G.P.; Yang, H.Y.; Ye, Y.Q. Antiviral and Cytotoxic Isocoumarin Derivatives from an Endophytic Fungus Aspergillus oryzae. Planta Med. 2016, 82, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Chankhamjon, P.; Boettgerschmidt, D.; Scherlach, K.; Urbansky, B.; Lackner, G.; Kalb, D.; Dahse, H.M.; Hoffmeister, D.; Hertweck, C. Biosynthesis of the halogenated mycotoxin aspirochlorine in koji mold involves a cryptic amino acid conversion. Angew. Chem. 2015, 53, 13409–13413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Nishimura, A.; Okamoto, S.; Yoshizako, F.; Morishima, I.; Ueno, T. Stimulatory effect of acetate and propionate on aspergillic acid formation by Aspergillus oryzae A 21. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1991, 72, 461–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Marui, J.; Ohashi-Kunihiro, S.; Ando, T.; Nishimura, M.; Koike, H.; Machida, M. Penicillin biosynthesis in Aspergillus oryzae and its overproduction by genetic engineering. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2010, 110, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Blumenthal, C.Z. Production of toxic metabolites in Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei: Justification of mycotoxin testing in food grade enzyme preparations derived from the three fungi. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2004, 39, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Marui, J.; Yamane, N.; Ohashikunihiro, S.; Ando, T.; Terabayashi, Y.; Sano, M.; Ohashi, S.; Ohshima, E.; Tachibana, K.; Higa, Y.; et al. Kojic acid biosynthesis in Aspergillus oryzae is regulated by a Zn(II)2Cys6 transcriptional activator and induced by kojic acid at the transcriptional level. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2011, 112, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yamada, R.; Yoshie, T.; Wakai, S.; Asainakashima, N.; Okazaki, F.; Ogino, C.; Hisada, H.; Tsutsumi, H.; Hata, Y.; Kondo, A. Aspergillus oryzae-based cell factory for direct kojic acid production from cellulose. Microb. Cell Fact. 2014, 13, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Frisvad, J.C.; Møller, L.L.H.; Larsen, T.O.; Kumar, R.; Arnau, J. Safety of the fungal workhorses of industrial biotechnology: Update on the mycotoxin and secondary metabolite potential of Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, and Trichoderma reesei. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 9481–9515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shaaban, M.; Elmetwally, M.M.; Nasr, H. A new diketopiperazine alkaloid from Aspergillus oryzae. Nat. Prod. Res. 2014, 28, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yao, G.; Yue, Y.; Fu, Y.; Fang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Ma, G.; Wang, S. Exploration of the Regulatory Mechanism of Secondary Metabolism by Comparative Transcriptomics in Aspergillus flavus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Yao, G.; Zhang, F.; Nie, X.; Wang, X.; Yuan, J.; Zhuang, Z.; Wang, S. Essential APSES Transcription Factors for Mycotoxin Synthesis, Fungal Development, and Pathogenicity in Aspergillus flavus. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Lee, J.H.; Jo, E.H.; Hong, E.J.; Kim, K.M.; Lee, I. Safety Evaluation of Filamentous Fungi Isolated from Industrial Doenjang Koji. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Tao, L.; Chung, S.H. Non-aflatoxigenicity of commercial Asepergillus oryzae strains due to genetic defects compared to aflatoxigenic Aspergillus flavus. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 1081–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Transformation process of A. oryzae using protoplasts. All procedures are performed in the presence of an osmotic stabilizer. DPY: dextrin–peptone–yeast medium. ura: uracil.
Figure 1. Transformation process of A. oryzae using protoplasts. All procedures are performed in the presence of an osmotic stabilizer. DPY: dextrin–peptone–yeast medium. ura: uracil.
Microorganisms 07 00103 g001
Figure 2. Transformation of auxotrophic A. oryzae using the AMT method. IM: induction medium.
Figure 2. Transformation of auxotrophic A. oryzae using the AMT method. IM: induction medium.
Microorganisms 07 00103 g002
Table 1. Aspergillus oryzae strains with completed genome sequences.
Table 1. Aspergillus oryzae strains with completed genome sequences.
StrainsAssemblyLevelSequencing StrategiesSize (Mb)GC%GeneRef.
RIB40GCA_000184455ChromosomeWhole-genome Shotgun37.9148.2612,074[5]
3042GCA_000269785ContigSolexa36.5748.2811,639[7]
AS 3.951GCA_000278405ContigIllumina36.3348.30/[8]
AS 3.863GCA_000278425ContigIllumina36.4048.30/[8]
RIB326GCA_000320905ContigSOLiD35.4248.40/[9]
100-8GCA_000691885ContigSolexa36.7648.3011,188[10]
BCC7051GCA_002007945ScaffoldPacBio38.5047.2011,456[11]
SRCM101975GCA_002214955ContigIon Torrent37.1248.30/[3]
SRCM101989GCA_002214965ContigIon Torrent36.9748.30/[3]
ATCC 12892GCA_002894705ScaffoldIllumina41.1647.60/[12]
Table 2. Different mutants of Aspergillus oryzae with auxotrophic markers.
Table 2. Different mutants of Aspergillus oryzae with auxotrophic markers.
Wild StrainsMutant StrainsSelection MarkerRef.
3042pyrG auxotrophpyrG[23]
RIB40pyrG auxotrophpyrG[20,24]
RIB40niaD300niaD[25]
RIB40NSR13argB, adeA[26]
RIB40NS4ligD, pyrG[27]
RIB40NSR1niaD, SC, adeA[28]
RIB40NSlD1niaD, SC, ligD[22]
RIB40NSPlD1niaD, SC, pyrG, ligD[21]
RIB40NS-tApEniaD, sC, adeA, argB[29,30]
RIB40NSRKu70-1-1AniaD, SC, argB, adeA, ku70[31]
Table 3. Three common strategies for the transformation of Aspergillus oryzae.
Table 3. Three common strategies for the transformation of Aspergillus oryzae.
MethodsPMT aAMT bEP c
PrinciplesUse cell-wall-degrading enzymes to prepare protoplasts.
Uptake the DNA by the addition of PEG and CaCl2.
Agrobacterium tumefaciens is able to transfer the T-DNA region of the Ti plasmid to the genome of A. oryzae.Uptake DNA is mediated by reversible membrane permeabilization induced by the local application of electric pulses.
Advantages1. It is easier to get homozygotes because of the large number of receptor cells.
2. Spores, germlings, and mycelium can be used.
1. Low copy number of inserted DNA.
2. Spores, germlings, and mycelium can be used.
3. Improves targeted integration.
1. Simple and cheap.
2. Spores and germlings can be used.
Disadvantages1. The transformation rate is affected by the efficiency of different batches of cell-wall-degrading enzymes.
2. Requires a regeneration procedure.
1. It is difficult to obtain adequate binary vectors containing the vir genes and the heterologous DNA.
2. Various parameters during co-cultivation affect the transformation rate.
1. The protocols need to be optimized and are relatively complicated.
2. Protoplast formation is needed.
a PMT: protoplast-mediated transformation; b AMT: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation; c EP: electroporation.

© 2019 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Microorganisms EISSN 2076-2607 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top