Dynamics of Microbial Carbon Metabolism During Vegetation Restoration in Sandy Ecosystems
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area
2.2. Site Selection and Sample Collection
2.3. Experimental Methods
2.3.1. Biolog Carbon Source Utilization Analysis
2.3.2. Amplicon Sequencing
2.3.3. Metagenomic Sequencing and Analysis
2.4. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Changes in Microbial Community Diversity with Restoration Duration
3.2. Succession of Microbial Carbon Source Utilization Functions
| Carbon Source Category | Carbon Source Type | PC1 | PC2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbohydrates | β-Methyl-D-glucoside | −3.87 | −0.47 |
| D-Galactonic acid γ-lactone | 3.53 | −0.21 | |
| D-Xylose | 0.43 | 0.58 | |
| D-Galacturonic acid | 7.81 | 0.51 | |
| I-Erythritol | −1.43 | −0.78 | |
| D-Mannitol | 5.90 | 0.25 | |
| N-Acetyl-D-glucosamine | 1.57 | −0.46 | |
| Gluconamide | 2.98 | −0.49 | |
| D-Cellobiose | −0.66 | −0.57 | |
| L-Phosphate glucose | −3.95 | −0.91 | |
| α-D-Lactose | −2.09 | 0.51 | |
| D,L-α-Glycerol phosphate | −4.84 | −0.75 | |
| Amino acids | L-Arginine | 4.43 | −0.33 |
| L-Asparagine | 3.19 | 0.10 | |
| L-Phenylalanine | −1.97 | 0.90 | |
| L-Serine | −3.18 | 2.26 | |
| Glycyl-L-glutamic acid | −4.52 | −0.55 | |
| L-Threonine | −5.51 | −1.14 | |
| Carboxylic acids | Pyruvic acid methyl ester | 0.26 | 0.34 |
| γ-Hydroxybutyric acid | 2.79 | −0.02 | |
| Itaconic acid | 4.41 | −0.24 | |
| α-Ketobutyric acid | −5.02 | −0.48 | |
| D-Malic acid | 4.99 | −0.27 | |
| Polymers | Tween 40 | −1.74 | 0.09 |
| Tween 80 | −1.47 | 0.08 | |
| α-Cyclodextrin | 0.60 | −0.42 | |
| Glycogen | −3.93 | 0.81 | |
| Phenolic acids | 2-Hydroxybenzoic acid | −2.00 | 0.93 |
| 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid | 3.90 | −0.31 | |
| Amines | Phenylethylamine | −3.27 | 1.17 |
| Putrescine | 2.677 | −0.13 |
3.3. Formatting of Mathematical Components Stage-Specific Succession of Microbial Carbon Metabolism Pathways

4. Discussion
4.1. Stage-Dependent Shifts in Microbial Community Composition and Carbon Source Utilization Along the Restoration Chronosequence
4.2. Stage-Specific Succession of Carbon Metabolism Pathways and Functional Gene Expression
5. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Schmitz, L.; Yan, Z.; Schneijderberg, M.; de Roij, M.; Pijnenburg, R.; Zheng, Q.; Franken, C.; Dechesne, A.; Trindade, L.M.; van Velzen, R.; et al. Synthetic bacterial community derived from a desert rhizosphere confers salt stress resilience to tomato in the presence of a soil microbiome. ISME J. 2022, 16, 1907–1920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, J.Z.; Xue, K.; Xie, J.P.; Deng, Y.; Wu, L.; Cheng, X.L.; Fei, S.F.; Deng, S.P.; He, Z.L.; Van Nostrand, J.D.; et al. Microbial mediation of carbon-cycle feedbacks to climate warming. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2012, 2, 106–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, P.; Anderson, I.C.; Singh, B.K. Microbial modulators of soil carbon storage: Integrating genomic and metabolic knowledge for global prediction. Trends Microbiol. 2013, 21, 641–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmidt, M.W.I.; Torn, M.S.; Abiven, S.; Dittmar, T.; Guggenberger, G.; Janssens, I.A.; Kleber, M.; Kögel-Knabner, I.; Lehmann, J.; Manning, D.A.C.; et al. Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature 2011, 478, 49–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plaza, C.; Zaccone, C.; Sawicka, K.; Méndez, A.M.; Tarquis, A.; Gascó, G.; Cieslewicz, J.; Henryson, K.; Ramirez, M.D.; Centurion, M.A. Soil resources and element stocks in drylands to face global issues. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 13788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Poulter, B.; Frank, D.; Ciais, P.; Myneni, R.B.; Andela, N.; Bi, J.; Broquet, G.; Canadell, J.G.; Chevallier, F.; Liu, Y.Y.; et al. Contribution of semi-arid ecosystems to interannual variability of the global carbon cycle. Nature 2014, 509, 600–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, X.R.; Wang, T. Research on Sandy Land Ecosystems. In Review and Prospects of Ecology; Li, W.H., Ed.; China Meteorological Press: Beijing, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Li, T.J. Evaluation of Ecological Restoration in Sandy Land Ecosystems. Master’s Thesis, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, China, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Q.X.; Yang, D.F.; Jia, Z.Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, L.; He, L.; Yang, K.; Dai, J.; Chen, J.; et al. Changes in soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks in an age sequence of Caragana korshinskii plantations in the semi-arid Loess Plateau in China. Geoderma 2015, 133, 53–59. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.F.; Fu, B.J.; Lü, Y.H.; Chen, L.D. Effects of vegetation restoration on soil organic carbon sequestration at multiple scales in semi-arid Loess Plateau, China. Catena 2011, 85, 58–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.Y.; Qiu, K.Y.; He, Y.; Li, H.Q.; Liu, W.S.; Huang, Y.Y.; Xie, Y.Z.; Miao, H.; Zhao, X.J.; Su, Y. Response of plant diversity and biomass to water and nitrogen addition in Caragana sand-fixing restoration areas at the southern edge of Mu Us Sandy Land. Grassl. Turf 2022, 42, 10–20. [Google Scholar]
- Gou, Q.; Gao, M.; Wang, G. Multi-functional characteristics of artificial forests of Caragana korshinskii Kom with different plantation ages in the hilly and sandy area of Northwest Shanxi, China. Land Degrad. Dev. 2023, 34, 4195–4207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cezar, R.M.; Vezzani, F.M.; Joris, H.A.W.; Barth, G.; Kaschuk, G. Crop rotation restructures soil microbial communities in Subtropical Oxisol, South Brazil. Sci. Agric. 2025, 82, e20240134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, J.; Wang, R.X.; Wang, J.; Yu, S.; Yang, B.; Wang, W.Q.; Yang, J.L.; Li, X.W. Microbial community characteristics and influencing factors of Caragana sand-fixing forests with different restoration ages in Mu Us Sandy Land. Chin. J. Appl. Ecol. 2024, 35, 1807–1814. [Google Scholar]
- Allison, S.D.; Wallenstein, M.D.; Bradford, M.A. Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat. Geosci. 2010, 3, 336–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rogers, B.F.; Tate, R.L. Temporal analysis of the soil microbial community along a toposequence in Pineland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2001, 33, 1389–1401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nie, X.Q.; Wang, D.; Zhou, G.Y.; Xiong, F.; Du, Y.G. Soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and their stoichiometric characteristics in alpine wetlands of the Three-River Headwaters Region. Chin. J. Plant Ecol. 2021, 45, 996–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stone, M.M.; DeForest, J.L.; Plante, A.F. Changes in extracellular enzyme activity and microbial community structure with soil depth at the Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014, 75, 237–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez, E.J.; Delgado, J.A.; González, J.M. Persistence of microbial extracellular enzymes in soils under different temperatures and water availabilities. Ecol. Evol. 2020, 10, 10167–10176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.C.; Peng, C.Y.; Cao, H.M.; Song, J.J.; Gong, B.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; He, Y.; Liang, M.; Lin, J.C.; et al. Microbial functional assemblages predicted by the FAPROTAX analysis are impacted by physicochemical properties, but C, N and S cycling genes are not in mangrove soil in the Beibu Gulf, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 139, 108887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Streit, W.R.; Schmitz, R.A. Metagenomics-the key to the uncultured microbes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2004, 7, 492–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- He, X.J.; Abs, E.; Allison, S.D.; Tao, F.; Huang, Y.Y.; Manzoni, S.; Abramoff, R.; Bruni, E.; Bowring, S.P.K.; Chakrawal, A.; et al. Emerging multiscale insights on microbial carbon use efficiency in the land carbon cycle. Nat. Commun. 2024, 15, 8010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, R.R.; Yu, B.Q.; Zhang, J.W.; Lin, X.G.; Feng, Y.Z. BIOLOG-Based Analysis of Microbial Community Carbon Metabolic Function. Available online: https://www.bio-protocol.org/e2003577 (accessed on 25 November 2024).
- Yuan, C.; An, T.F.; Li, X.L.; Zou, J.; Lin, Z.; Gu, J.L.; Hu, R.X.; Fang, Z.Z. Genomic analysis of Ralstonia pickettii reveals the genetic features for potential pathogenicity and adaptive evolution in drinking water. Front. Microbiol. 2024, 14, 1272636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Murphy, B.R.; Hodkinson, T.R.; Doohan, F.M. Fungal endophytes for sustainable crop production. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2016, 92, fiw194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bhatti, A.A.; Haq, S.; Bhat, R.A. Actinomycetes benefaction role in soil and plant health. Microb. Pathog. 2017, 111, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bao, Y.Y.; Dolfing, J.; Guo, Z.Y.; Chen, R.R.; Wu, M.; Li, Z.P.; Lin, X.G.; Feng, Y.Z. Important ecophysiological roles of non-dominant Actinobacteria in plant residue decomposition, especially in less fertile soils. Microbiome 2021, 9, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leitão, A.L. Potential of Penicillium species in the bioremediation field. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1393–1417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Folman, L.B.; Klein, P.J.A.; Boddy, L.; De Boer, W. Impact of white-rot fungi on numbers and community composition of bacteria colonizing beech wood from forest soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 63, 181–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Klimek, D.; Herold, M.; Calusinska, M. Comparative genomic analysis of Planctomycetota potential for polysaccharide degradation identifies biotechnologically relevant microbes. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Waldrop, M.P.; Firestone, M.K. Altered utilization patterns of young and old soil C by microorganisms caused by temperature shifts and N additions. Biogeochemistry 2004, 67, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.L.; Dong, Y.; Friman, V.P.; Jousset, A.; Wei, Z.; Xu, Y.C.; Shen, Q.R. Carbon resource richness shapes bacterial competitive interactions by alleviating growth-antibiosis trade-off. Funct. Ecol. 2019, 33, 868–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koo, B.J.; Adriano, D.C.; Bolan, N.S.; Barton, D.C. Root Exudates and Microorganisms. In Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment; Hillel, D., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; pp. 421–428. [Google Scholar]
- Le, J.; Roger, P. Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 2001, 37, 25–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flamholz, A.; Noor, E.; Bar-Even, A.; Liebermeister, W.; Milo, R. Glycolytic strategy as a tradeoff between energy yield and protein cost. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 10039–10044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhou, Z.H.; Wang, C.K.; Jiang, L.F.; Luo, Y.Q. Trends in soil microbial communities during secondary succession. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2017, 115, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, J.; Zeng, X.M.; Zhang, Q.G.; Zhou, X.Q.; Liu, Y.R.; Huang, Q.Y. Soil microbial trait-based strategies drive metabolic efficiency along an altitude gradient. ISME Commun. 2021, 1, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yin, Q.D.; He, K.; Collins, G.; De Vrieze, J.D.; Wu, G.X. Microbial strategies driving low concentration substrate degradation for sustainable remediation solutions. npj Clean Water 2024, 7, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]





| Pathway | Restoration Duration | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 30 | 50 | 70 | |
| Glycolysis | pgm | gllk, GPI, aceE | porA | |
| Citrate cycle | frdA, sdhA, IDH1 | IDH3 | OGDH, aceE | porA, E4.2.1.A, ACO |
| Pentose phosphate pathway | E2.2.1.2, pgm | GPI, deoB | ||
| Starch and sucrose metabolism | pgm | GPI, gllk | ||
| Propanoate metabolism | pta | aceB, E2.3.1.9 | aceE, leuA | porA, E4.2.1.A |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | purU | E2.3.1.9, aceB, E4.1.3.1 | ACO, ttuC, gyaR | |
| Pyruvate metabolism | pta | E2.3.1.19, ACADM | mmsA | porA |
| Methane metabolism | E2.3.1.8 | fdhA, cofH, cofG | porA | |
| Carbon fixation pathways in prokaryotes | E2.3.1.8, IDH, frdA, sdhA | ccsA, E2.3.1.9 | porA, ACO, E4.2.1.2A | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Yang, J.; Yue, Y.; Li, X.; Lv, R. Dynamics of Microbial Carbon Metabolism During Vegetation Restoration in Sandy Ecosystems. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040873
Yang J, Yue Y, Li X, Lv R. Dynamics of Microbial Carbon Metabolism During Vegetation Restoration in Sandy Ecosystems. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(4):873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040873
Chicago/Turabian StyleYang, Jun, Yifan Yue, Xiaowei Li, and Ruiheng Lv. 2026. "Dynamics of Microbial Carbon Metabolism During Vegetation Restoration in Sandy Ecosystems" Microorganisms 14, no. 4: 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040873
APA StyleYang, J., Yue, Y., Li, X., & Lv, R. (2026). Dynamics of Microbial Carbon Metabolism During Vegetation Restoration in Sandy Ecosystems. Microorganisms, 14(4), 873. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040873

