Revisiting the Antigen 85 Complex as a Target for Functional Antibody-Based Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. The Ag85 Complex: Structure, Localization, and Functional Accessibility
2.1. Structural Organization of Ag85 Enzymes
2.2. Localization and Secretion of Ag85 Proteins
2.3. Functional Accessibility and Implications for Antibody Targeting
3. Antibody Responses to Ag85: Immunodominance, Epitope Distribution, and Functional Limitations
3.1. Immunodominance, Epitope Distribution, and Cross-Reactivity
3.2. Functional Consequences of Antibody Binding to Ag85
4. Nanobodies as Tools to Access Functional Epitopes of Ag85
4.1. Structural and Biophysical Advantages of Nanobodies
4.2. Implications for Targeting Ag85 Enzymes
4.3. Accessibility and Extracellular Targeting
5. Toward Functional Selection Strategies
Combinatorial Strategies: Nanobodies as Adjuvants
6. Experimental and Conceptual Challenges
6.1. Target Accessibility and Spatial Context
6.2. Intracellular Localization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Macrophage Uptake Considerations
6.3. Distinguishing Binding from Functional Modulation
6.4. Model Systems and Translational Relevance
6.5. Resistance and Evolutionary Considerations
6.6. Stability and Persistence of Nanobodies in Biological Environments
7. Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- World Health Organization. Global Tuberculosis Report 2023; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Allué-Guardia, A.; García, J.I.; Torrelles, J.B. Evolution of Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Strains and Their Adaptation to the Human Lung Environment. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 612675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sachan, R.S.K.; Mistry, V.; Dholaria, M.; Rana, A.; Devgon, I.; Ali, I.; Iqbal, J.; Eldin, S.M.; Mohammad Said Al-Tawaha, A.R.; Bawazeer, S.; et al. Overcoming Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Drug Resistance: Novel Medications and Repositioning Strategies. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 32244–32257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daffé, M.; Marrakchi, H. Unraveling the Structure of the Mycobacterial Envelope. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019, 7, GPP3-0027-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Dulberger, C.L.; Rubin, E.J.; Boutte, C.C. The Mycobacterial Cell Envelope—A Moving Target. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 47–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kieser, K.J.; Rubin, E.J. How Sisters Grow Apart: Mycobacterial Growth and Division. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12, 550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Belisle, J.T.; Vissa, V.D.; Sievert, T.; Takayama, K.; Brennan, P.J.; Besra, G.S. Role of the Major Antigen of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Cell Wall Biogenesis. Science 1997, 276, 1420–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goins, C.M.; Dajnowicz, S.; Smith, M.D.; Parks, J.M.; Ronning, D.R. Mycolyltransferase from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis in Covalent Complex with Tetrahydrolipstatin Provides Insights into Antigen 85 Catalysis. J. Biol. Chem. 2018, 293, 3651–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaur, D.; Guerin, M.E.; Škovierová, H.; Brennan, P.J.; Jackson, M. Biogenesis of the Cell Wall and Other Glycoconjugates of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 69, 23–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, C.E.; Boshoff, H.I.; Dartois, V.; Dick, T.; Ehrt, S.; Flynn, J.A.; Schnappinger, D.; Wilkinson, R.J.; Young, D. The Spectrum of Latent Tuberculosis: Rethinking the Biology and Intervention Strategies. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2009, 7, 845–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Favrot, L.; Grzegorzewicz, A.E.; Lajiness, D.H.; Marvin, R.K.; Boucau, J.; Isailovic, D.; Jackson, M.; Ronning, D.R. Mechanism of Inhibition of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Antigen 85 by Ebselen. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Batt, S.M.; Minnikin, D.E.; Besra, G.S. The Thick Waxy Coat of Mycobacteria, a Protective Layer against Antibiotics and the Host’s Immune System. Biochem. J. 2020, 477, 1983–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Andersen, P.; Doherty, T.M. The Success and Failure of BCG-Implications for a Novel Tuberculosis Vaccine. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2005, 3, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huygen, K. The Immunodominant T-Cell Epitopes of the Mycolyl-Transferases of the Antigen 85 Complex of M. tuberculosis. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Skeiky, Y.A.W.; Lodes, M.J.; Guderian, J.A.; Mohamath, R.; Bement, T.; Alderson, M.R.; Reed, S.G. Cloning, Expression, and Immunological Evaluation of Two Putative Secreted Serine Protease Antigens of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Infect. Immun. 1999, 67, 3998–4007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aagaard, C.; Hoang, T.; Dietrich, J.; Cardona, P.J.; Izzo, A.; Dolganov, G.; Schoolnik, G.K.; Cassidy, J.P.; Billeskov, R.; Andersen, P. A Multistage Tuberculosis Vaccine That Confers Efficient Protection before and after Exposure. Nat. Med. 2011, 17, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schmelcher, M.; Donovan, D.M.; Loessner, M.J. Bacteriophage Endolysins as Novel Antimicrobials. Future Microbiol. 2012, 7, 1147–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Allué-Guardia, A.; Saranathan, R.; Chan, J.; Torrelles, J.B. Mycobacteriophages as Potential Therapeutic Agents against Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronning, D.M.; Vissa, V.; Besra, G.S.; Belisle, J.T.; Sacchettini, J.C. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Antigen 85A and 85C Structures Confirm Binding Orientation and Conserved Substrate Specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 36771–36777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zuniga, E.S.; Early, J.; Parish, T. The Future for Early-Stage Tuberculosis Drug Discovery. Future Microbiol. 2015, 10, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puech, V.; Guilhot, C.; Perez, E.; Tropis, M.; Armitige, L.Y.; Gicquel, B.; Daffé, M. Evidence for a Partial Redundancy of the Fibronectin-Binding Proteins for the Transfer of Mycoloyl Residues onto the Cell Wall Arabinogalactan Termini of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 44, 1109–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Målen, H.; Berven, F.S.; Fladmark, K.E.; Wiker, H.G. Comprehensive Analysis of Exported Proteins from Mycobacterium Tuberculosis H37Rv. Proteomics 2007, 7, 1702–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- de Souza, G.A.; Wiker, H.G. A Proteomic View of Mycobacteria. Proteomics 2011, 11, 3118–3127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cambier, C.J.; Takaki, K.K.; Larson, R.P.; Hernandez, R.E.; Tobin, D.M.; Urdahl, K.B.; Cosma, C.L.; Ramakrishnan, L. Mycobacteria Manipulate Macrophage Recruitment through Coordinated Use of Membrane Lipids. Nature 2014, 505, 218–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Beghein, E.; Gettemans, J. Nanobody Technology: A Versatile Toolkit for Microscopic Imaging, Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis, and Protein Function Exploration. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wiker, H.G.; Nagai, S.; Harboe, M.; Ljungqvist, L. A Family of Cross-Reacting Proteins Secreted by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 1992, 36, 307–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Vooren, J.P.; Drowart, A.; De Bruyn, J.; Launois, P.; Millan, J.; Delaporte, E.; Develoux, M.; Yernault, J.C.; Huygen, K. Humoral Responses against the 85A and 85B Antigens of Mycobacterium Bovis BCG in Patients with Leprosy and Tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1992, 30, 1608–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bothamley, G.H.; Schreuder, G.M.T. Human Leukocyte Antigen, Tuberculosis, and Mycobacterium Tuberculosis-Specific Antibody. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 165, 598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunnath-Velayudhan, S.; Salamon, H.; Wang, H.Y.; Davidow, A.L.; Molina, D.M.; Huynh, V.T.; Cirillo, D.M.; Michel, G.; Talbot, E.A.; Perkins, M.D.; et al. Dynamic Antibody Responses to the Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Proteome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 14703–14708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ravn, P.; Munk, M.E.; Andersen, Å.B.; Lundgren, B.; Lundgren, J.D.; Nielsen, L.N.; Kok-Jensen, A.; Andersen, P.; Weldingh, K. Prospective Evaluation of a Whole-Blood Test Using Mycobacterium Tuberculosis-Specific Antigens ESAT-6 and CFP-10 for Diagnosis of Active Tuberculosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2005, 12, 491–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, K.K.; Dong, Y.; Belisle, J.T.; Harder, J.; Arora, V.K.; Laal, S. Antigens of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis Recognized by Antibodies during Incipient, Subclinical Tuberculosis. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2005, 12, 354–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wiker, H.G.; Harboe, M. The Antigen 85 Complex: A Major Secretion Product of Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Microbiol. Rev. 1992, 56, 648–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muyldermans, S. Nanobodies: Natural Single-Domain Antibodies. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2013, 82, 775–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ortega, P.A.; Silva-Miranda, M.; Torres-Larios, A.; Campos-Chávez, E.; Franken, K.C.L.C.M.; Ottenhoff, T.H.M.; Ivanyi, J.; Espitia, C. Selection of a Single Domain Antibody, Specific for an HLA-Bound Epitope of the Mycobacterial Ag85B Antigen. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 577815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jin, B.K.; Odongo, S.; Radwanska, M.; Magez, S. NANOBODIES®: A Review of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Applications. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 5994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Salamouni, N.S.; Cater, J.H.; Spenkelink, L.M.; Yu, H. Nanobody Engineering: Computational Modelling and Design for Biomedical and Therapeutic Applications. FEBS Open Bio 2025, 15, 236–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexander, E.; Leong, K.W. Discovery of Nanobodies: A Comprehensive Review of Their Applications and Potential over the Past Five Years. J. Nanobiotechnol. 2024, 22, 661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Genst, E.; Silence, K.; Decanniere, K.; Conrath, K.; Loris, R.; Kinne, J.; Muyldermans, S.; Wyns, L. Molecular Basis for the Preferential Cleft Recognition by Dromedary Heavy-Chain Antibodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 4586–4591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bannas, P.; Hambach, J.; Koch-Nolte, F. Nanobodies and Nanobody-Based Human Heavy Chain Antibodies as Antitumor Therapeutics. Front. Immunol. 2017, 8, 1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lauwereys, M.; Ghahroudi, M.A.; Desmyter, A.; Kinne, J.; Hölzer, W.; De Genst, E.; Wyns, L.; Muyldermans, S. Potent Enzyme Inhibitors Derived from Dromedary Heavy-Chain Antibodies. EMBO J. 1998, 17, 3512–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmermann, I.; Egloff, P.; Hutter, C.A.J.; Kuhn, B.T.; Bräuer, P.; Newstead, S.; Dawson, R.J.P.; Geertsma, E.R.; Seeger, M.A. Generation of Synthetic Nanobodies against Delicate Proteins. Nat. Protoc. 2020, 15, 1707–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jarlier, V.; Nikaido, H. Mycobacterial Cell Wall: Structure and Role in Natural Resistance to Antibiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1994, 123, 11–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Payne, K.; Sun, Q.; Sacchettini, J.; Hatfull, G.F. Mycobacteriophage Lysin B Is a Novel Mycolylarabinogalactan Esterase. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 73, 367–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Singh, V. Editorial: Tuberculosis Drug Discovery & Development: Drug Targets, Chemical Matter, and Approaches. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2021, 11, 755459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shleider Carnero Canales, C.; Marquez Cazorla, J.; Furtado Torres, A.H.; Monteiro Filardi, E.T.; Di Filippo, L.D.; Costa, P.I.; Roque-Borda, C.A.; Pavan, F.R. Advances in Diagnostics and Drug Discovery against Resistant and Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Russell, D.G. Mycobacterium Tuberculosis: Here Today, and Here Tomorrow. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2001, 2, 569–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ivanyi, J. Function and Potentials of M. tuberc. Epitopes. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patton, J.S.; Byron, P.R. Inhaling Medicines: Delivering Drugs to the Body through the Lungs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2007, 6, 67–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labiris, N.R.; Dolovich, M.B. Pulmonary Drug Delivery. Part II: The Role of Inhalant Delivery Devices and Drug Formulations in Therapeutic Effectiveness of Aerosolized Medications. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2003, 56, 600–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jovčevska, I.; Muyldermans, S. The Therapeutic Potential of Nanobodies. Biodrugs 2019, 34, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Steeland, S.; Vandenbroucke, R.E.; Libert, C. Nanobodies as Therapeutics: Big Opportunities for Small Antibodies. Drug Discov. Today 2016, 21, 1076–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

| Ag85 Isoform | Primary Enzymatic Function | Localization | Immunogenicity | Evidence from Small-Molecule Inhibition | Accessibility to Antibodies | Implications for Nanobody Targeting | Key References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ag85A (FbpA) | Mycolyltransferase; transfer of mycolic acids from TMM to trehalose and arabinogalactan | Cell wall-associated; secreted | High | Chemical and genetic inhibition disrupts cell wall assembly | Partial, context-dependent | Potential for allosteric interference or disruption of enzyme–envelope interactions | [7,8,9] |
| Ag85B (FbpB) | Major mycolyltransferase; dominant contributor to TDM synthesis | Abundantly secreted; cell envelope-associated | Very high (immunodominant) | Validated target of multiple small-molecule inhibitors | Relatively high | Prime candidate for functional nanobody modulation and sensitization strategies | [11,12,14] |
| Ag85C (FbpC) | Mycolyltransferase; contributes to maintenance of cell wall integrity | Predominantly cell-associated | Moderate to high | Inhibition affects envelope permeability and growth | More restricted | Targeting may enhance cross-family or synergistic effects | [4,8] |
| Inhibitor/Compound Class | Target (Ag85 Isoform) | Mechanism of Interaction | Functional Effect on Ag85 | Structural Insight | Implications for Nanobody Strategy | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ebselen | Primarily Ag85C (also Ag85A/B) | Covalent interaction with catalytic residues; stabilization of inactive conformation | Inhibits mycolyltransferase activity; disrupts cell wall biosynthesis | Crystal structure shows binding outside catalytic center and conformational trapping | Supports feasibility of non-active-site inhibition and allosteric modulation by nanobodies | [11] |
| Tetrahydrolipstatin (THL, Orlistat) | Ag85A and Ag85C | Covalent binding to catalytic serine in active site | Blocks mycolyl transfer reactions; reduces mycolate incorporation | Structural data confirm active-site targeting and covalent inhibition | Provides reference for direct catalytic inhibition; contrasts with potential steric/allosteric nanobody effects | [8] |
| Trehalose analogs/substrate mimetics | Ag85A/B/C | Competitive inhibition via mimicry of TMM or trehalose substrates | Interferes with TDM formation and substrate processing | Indicates accessibility of substrate-binding groove | Suggests targeting of substrate-binding regions by nanobodies | [9] |
| Broad-spectrum cell wall inhibitors affecting mycolate pathways | Indirect effect on Ag85 (via substrate availability) | Disruption of mycolic acid biosynthesis upstream of Ag85 | Alters substrate pool and cell wall composition | Functional coupling between biosynthesis pathways | Highlights importance of indirect modulation and substrate dynamics | [10,20] |
| Structure-guided synthetic inhibitors | Ag85 family (A/B/C) | Binding to surface regions or allosteric sites | Partial inhibition; altered enzyme dynamics | Structural studies reveal non-catalytic binding sites | Reinforces concept of allosteric vulnerability exploitable by nanobodies | [11,19] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Smekenov, I.; Tleumbetova, N.; Bektassov, S.; Bissenbaev, A. Revisiting the Antigen 85 Complex as a Target for Functional Antibody-Based Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms 2026, 14, 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040863
Smekenov I, Tleumbetova N, Bektassov S, Bissenbaev A. Revisiting the Antigen 85 Complex as a Target for Functional Antibody-Based Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms. 2026; 14(4):863. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040863
Chicago/Turabian StyleSmekenov, Izat, Nazym Tleumbetova, Sagit Bektassov, and Amangeldy Bissenbaev. 2026. "Revisiting the Antigen 85 Complex as a Target for Functional Antibody-Based Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis" Microorganisms 14, no. 4: 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040863
APA StyleSmekenov, I., Tleumbetova, N., Bektassov, S., & Bissenbaev, A. (2026). Revisiting the Antigen 85 Complex as a Target for Functional Antibody-Based Strategies Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Microorganisms, 14(4), 863. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms14040863

