1. Introduction
Soil microorganisms possess remarkable biosynthetic capabilities [
1,
2] and have evolved diverse ecological adaptation strategies to survive under multiple environmental stresses. The unique physiological adaptation mechanisms of soil microorganisms make them an important group of organisms in deserts, playing a significant role in the geochemical cycles of elements such as carbon and nitrogen [
3,
4,
5]. Actinomycetes are core members of the primary microbial community in soil. They not only participate in the decomposition of organic matter and complex polymers in soil, promoting global carbon cycling, but also enhance plant productivity and stress resistance [
6,
7]. In addition, actinomycetes are best known for their ability to produce large quantities of biologically active compounds with important applications [
8,
9,
10]. Recent studies have revealed that in extreme environments such as polar and arid deserts, the abundance of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), particularly those encoding non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) and polyketide synthases (PKS) [
11], is often negatively correlated with environmental factors such as moisture, carbon, and nitrogen availability [
12]. Furthermore, several bioactive natural products have been isolated from desert-derived actinobacteria, including antifungal compounds from
Saccharothrix SA198 in the Sahara Desert [
13], abenquines from
Streptomyces DB634 in the Atacama Desert [
14], and multiple translation-inhibiting compounds from strains isolated from the Taklamakan Desert, such as adamycin derivatives and acetylated griseoviridin analogs [
15,
16]. These findings highlight the untapped biosynthetic potential of desert-dwelling microbes and the urgent need to explore them for novel bioactive molecules.
The genus
Lentzea, belonging to the family Pseudonocardiaceae within the order Actinomycetales, comprises Gram-positive, aerobic, and non-motile actinobacteria with well-developed branched mycelia and rod-shaped elements. Initially proposed by Yassin et al. in 1995 [
17], it was reclassified by Labeda et al. in 2001 [
18] based on chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic data. Members of
Lentzea have been isolated from diverse ecological habitats including desert soils [
19,
20], sediments of the Coal Basin [
21] and Tibetan Plateau [
22], Guizhou karst limestone [
23], and so on. These bacteria are often oligotrophic and are presumed to contribute to organic matter decomposition and biogeochemical cycling [
24]. Owing to their ecological resilience and metabolic potential,
Lentzea species have been reported to produce several noteworthy bioactive compounds, including the following: (i) lentzeosides with anti-HIV-1 integrase activity from
Lentzea sp. H45 [
25]; (ii) antimicrobial [
22,
25]; (iii) other biological functional activities [
26,
27,
28].
Despite these promising discoveries, systematic studies of Lentzea species derived from desert environments remain scarce. Their adaptive evolution under extreme arid conditions and associated metabolic diversity remain poorly understood. In this study, we report the isolation and polyphasic taxonomic characterization of a novel Lentzea species, strain E54T, from the Kumtagh Desert in northwestern China. Using whole-genome sequencing and phylogenomic analysis, we elucidate the taxonomic status of E54T and place it within a genus-wide, high-resolution phylogenetic framework constructed from all publicly available Lentzea genomes. Furthermore, we perform comparative genomic and biosynthetic potential analyzes to assess secondary metabolite diversity across the genus. Our findings expand the current understanding of Lentzea species in extreme environments and provide valuable genomic resources for future drug discovery and ecological studies.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Isolation and Culture Maintenance
Strain E54T was isolated in August 2022 from a surface soil sample collected in the hyper-arid Kumtagh Desert near Dunhuang City, Gansu Province, Northwest China (39.6656° N, 94.3773° E; elevation 1596.6 m). Approximately 1 g of soil was suspended in sterile distilled water, shaken vigorously for 5 min, and serially diluted up to 10−5. Aliquots of each dilution were spread onto R2A agar plates and incubated aerobically at 25 °C for 15 days. Distinct colonies were repeatedly streaked on fresh R2A plates to obtain a pure culture. The purified isolate was preserved in 20% (v/v) glycerol at −80 °C for long-term storage. For phylogenetic and phenotypic comparisons, two closely related type strains—Lentzea flaviverrucosa CGMCC 4.578T and Lentzea albidocapillata subsp. violacea CGMCC 4.2093T—were selected based on 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity and obtained from China General Microbiological Culture Collection Center (CGMCC).
Morphological characteristics of strain E54
T and the reference strains were examined after growth on a variety of media, including ISP media [
29], nutrient agar, Bennett’s agar [
30], and Czapek’s Dox agar [
31]. Following 2 weeks incubation at 30 °C, all culture media refer to the composition provided by DSMZ (
https://www.bacmedia.dsmz.de/medium, accessed on 6 July 2023). Strain was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) by first growing the strain on ISP2 for 28 °C, pH 7.0 for 14 days.
2.2. Phylogenetic Analysis Based on 16S rRNA Gene Sequences
Genomic DNA extraction was carried out according to previously established protocols [
32,
33]. The full-length 16S rRNA gene sequence was retrieved from the annotated genome. Sequence similarity searches conducted using the EzBioCloud database [
34] revealed that strain E54
T exhibited the highest sequence similarity to
Lentzea flaviverrucosa (98.56%) and
Lentzea albidocapillata subsp.
violacea (98.34%), indicating its classification within the genus
Lentzea. Phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum-likelihood method in MEGA7 software (
https://www.megasoftware.net/older_versions/ 7.0 (CC for 64-bit Windows)) [
35]. Sequence alignments were performed with ClustalW [
36], followed by manual refinement to ensure consistent alignment. A distance matrix was calculated using the p-distance method [
37], and the robustness of the tree was assessed with bootstrap analysis using 1000 replicates [
38].
2.3. Genome Sequencing and Annotation
Strain E54 cells were collected after shaking in R
2A medium at 30 °C for 2 days, with centrifugation to remove the supernatant. Genomic DNA extraction was performed using the OMEGA Bacterial DNA Kit (Norcross, GA, USA, D3350-02), in accordance with the manufacturer’s guidelines. Whole-genome sequencing for strain E54
T was performed on the Pacific Biosciences Sequel II platform. De novo assembly of the genome was carried out using the HGAP4 pipeline integrated in SMRT Link v8.0 [
39]. Genome annotation was performed with Prokka v1.13.4 [
40], and secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were identified using antiSMASH v7.0 under the default parameters [
41]. For statistical analysis, repeated calculations were performed on composite secondary metabolite gene cluster. To compare the genomes, average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated with FastANI v1.34 [
42], and digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were estimated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC) v3.0 (
https://ggdc.dsmz.de/ggdc.php, accessed on 8 May 2024) [
43]. The assembled genome of strain E54
T has been deposited in the NCBI GenBank under the BioProject accession number PRJNA1272222.
To further clarify the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships, genomes of 37 strains showing the highest 16S rRNA gene similarity to strain E54T were retrieved from public databases. For strains without available genome sequences, lyophilized cultures were obtained from culture collections and subjected to whole-genome sequencing as described above.
2.4. Physiological and Chemotaxonomic Characterization
2.4.1. Cultural and Phenotypic Characteristics
Strain E54
T was cultured on various standard media, including ISP 2–7, nutrient agar, Czapek’s agar, and Bennett’s agar, and was incubated at 28 °C for 14 days. Morphological features such as colony color, aerial and substrate mycelium pigmentation, diffusible pigments, and melanin production were recorded. Growth temperature range was tested on R
2A agar at intervals of 5 °C from 5 to 50 °C. The pH growth range (4.0–13.0, interval 1.0) was evaluated in R
2A broth adjusted with appropriate buffer systems (KH
2PO
4/HCl, KH
2PO
4/K
2HPO
4, K
2HPO
4/NaOH). Salt tolerance was determined using R
2A agar supplemented with 1–15% (
w/
v) NaCl at 1% intervals. Physiological and biochemical features including utilization of single-carbon and -nitrogen sources, gelatin liquefaction, starch hydrolysis, and urea degradation were assessed using established protocols. Cultural characteristics are provided in
Table S1.
2.4.2. Chemotaxonomic Analyses
Biomass for chemotaxonomic analysis was obtained by growing strain E54
T in ISP 2 broth at 28 °C, 300 rpm for 4 days. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, washed with distilled water, and freeze-dried. The diaminopimelic acid (DAP) in the cell wall was determined using the method of Staneck and Roberts [
44]. Whole-cell sugars and DAP were examined by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using established protocols. Cellular fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were extracted according to Sasser’s method [
45] and subsequently analyzed with the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (MIDI) [
46]. Menaquinones were isolated from freeze-dried cells, purified as outlined by Collins [
47], and analyzed via HPLC with UV detection [
48]. Polar lipids were extracted and identified using two-dimensional TLC, following the procedure described by Minnikin et al. [
49].
3. Results
3.1. Morphological, Physiological, and Chemotaxonomic Characteristics of Strain E54T
After 14 days of cultivation on ISP2 medium at 28 °C, strain E54
T formed compact, circular colonies with well-developed substrate mycelia. The aerial mycelia were irregularly branched, wrinkled, and light brown in color, but no spore formation was observed. Scanning electron microscopy revealed abundant aerial hyphae, which were rod-like, smooth-surfaced, and moderately flexuous (
Figure 1).
Strain E54
T exhibited good growth on nutrient agar, ISP1, ISP2, ISP3, ISP5, and Czapek’s agar, while weaker growth was observed on ISP4, ISP6, and ISP7. No sporulation was detected on any of the tested media. Both substrate and aerial mycelia were formed on most media. Soluble pigments were yellow on ISP2, ISP3, ISP4, ISP5, and ISP6; brownish yellow on ISP7 and Bennett’s agar; and absent (white substrate mycelia) on nutrient agar and Czapek’s agar (
Table S1). The optimal growth conditions for strain E54
T were 30 °C and pH 7.0, with growth occurring in the ranges of 20–40 °C and pH 6.0–10.0. It tolerated NaCl concentrations of 0–5%, with optimal growth at 0–2%. In comparison,
L. flaviverrucosa CGMCC 4.578
T failed to grow above 3% NaCl, and
L. albidocapillata subsp.
violacea CGMCC 4.2093
T tolerated up to 4% NaCl.
A comparison of phenotypic traits among strain E54
T and its closest relatives,
L. flaviverrucosa CGMCC 4.578
T and
L. albidocapillata subsp.
violacea CGMCC 4.2093
T, revealed several distinguishing features (
Table 1). While the three strains showed similar utilization profiles for arabinose, lactose, maltose, and fructose, strain E54
T demonstrated a notably higher capacity for galactose utilization. In contrast, the reference strains showed greater ability to metabolize raffinose, mannitol, sucrose, inositol, and sorbitol.
Strain E54T could utilize several amino acids—including L-histidine, L-proline, L-alanine, L-serine, L-phenylalanine, and L-asparagine—as sole nitrogen sources, but could not grow with L-glutamate alone. It showed robust growth on media containing alanine, glycine, lysine, tyrosine, proline, serine, aspartate, or histidine as sole nitrogen sources. Notably, it exhibited stronger growth on tyrosine-containing media compared to the two reference strains.
Chemotaxonomic analysis revealed that the peptidoglycan of strain E54T contained meso-diaminopimelic acid (meso-DAP), which is a characteristic feature of the Lentzea genus. The diagnostic whole-cell sugars identified were ribose and galactose. The predominant menaquinone detected was MK-9(H4). Major polar lipids included diphosphatidyl glycerol (DPG), phosphatidyl ethanolamine (PE), phosphatidyl inositol (PI), and hydroxyphosphatidyl ethanolamine (OH-PE). The major fatty acid was iso-C16:0 (33.97%). For comparison, L. flaviverrucosa CGMCC 4.578T primarily contained summed feature 7 (32.3%) and iso-C16:0 (20.98%), whereas L. albidocapillata subsp. violacea CGMCC 4.2093T predominantly contained iso-C16:0 (32.5%). The characteristic amino acid type of the cell wall was meso-DAP. Whole-cell hydrolysis experiments revealed the characteristic cell wall sugar fractions: ribose and galactose.
3.2. Phylogenetic Analysis
The analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequence showed that strain E54
T shared the greatest similarity with
Lentzea flaviverrucosa AS4.0578
T (98.56%) and
Lentzea albidocapillata subsp.
violacea IMSNU 50388T (98.34%). Phylogenetic analysis using 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain E54T clustered with
Lentzea flaviverrucosa AS4.0578
T in the maximum-likelihood tree (
Figure 2), indicating its novel taxonomic position within the
Lentzea genus.
The complete genome of Lentzea sp. E54T was sequenced and annotated to elucidate its genetic composition and taxonomic position. The genome of strain E54T is composed of 1 contig with a total length of 9,043,573 bp and a GC content of 69.38%. A total of 8602 coding DNA sequences (CDS) were identified. Notably, strain E54T harbored one of the highest rRNA and tRNA gene counts among all analyzed Lentzea strains, suggesting potential for enhanced translational capacity and adaptive versatility.
To place strain E54T in context, genome features of 37 publicly available
Lentzea genomes were examined. Genome sizes among the
Lentzea species ranged from 7.7 Mb to 10.8 Mb, with CDS numbers varying from 7789 to 12,448, and tRNA counts spanning 2 to 15 copies. The largest genome was observed in
Lentzea aerocolonigenes NRRLB-16138 (12,448 CDS across 10,637,170 bp), while the smallest belonged to
Lentzea sp. CMU235 (8154 CDS; 7.7 Mb). A summary of genome assembly metrics across all strains is provided in
Supplementary Table S2.
To further clarify the phylogenetic position of strain E54
T, we retrieved genome sequences of 37 closely related strains with publicly available data from the 50 top BLAST (
https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PROGRAM=blastn&PAGE_TYPE=BlastSearch&LINK_LOC=blasthome (accessed on 8 March 2024)) hits based on 16S rRNA similarity. A whole-genome phylogenetic tree was reconstructed using the UBCG pipeline, and pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated. Consistent with the 16S rRNA tree, strain E54
T formed a separate clade in the genome-based phylogeny (
Figure 3).
The ANI values between strain E54 and its closest type strains,
L. flaviverrucosa AS4.0578
T and
L. albidocapillata subsp.
violacea IMSNU 50388
T, were 89.86% and 90.09%, respectively (
Table 2), which are well below the commonly accepted species delineation threshold of 95–96%. Digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH) values were 37.2% and 37.7%, also lower than the 70% threshold for species demarcation. These results collectively support that strain E54 represents a novel species within the genus
Lentzea.
3.3. Assessment of the Secondary Metabolic Potential of the Genus Lentzea
The antiSMASH-based genomic analysis of 38
Lentzea strains revealed a broad diversity of biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs), indicating the genus’ considerable potential for producing bioactive secondary metabolites (
Figure 4; the order of the legends is from right to left, with “others” being the last one). The most common BGC types identified were NRPS (non-ribosomal peptide synthetase) and T1PKS (type I polyketide synthase), with
Lentzea sp. NBRC105346 having the highest number of clusters (18 NRPS and 7 T1PKS), suggesting a strong capacity for synthesizing complex peptides and polyketides. Terpenes were consistently present (5–13 clusters per genome), while NRPS-like, PKS-like, and transAT-PKS clusters further indicated diverse biosynthetic capabilities. Notably,
Lentzea aerocolonigenes NRRLB-16140 contained a high number of T1PKS clusters (19), and
Lentzea tibetensis FXJ1.1311 harbored multiple transAT-PKS clusters, both of which are associated with the production of structurally complex and potentially pharmacologically relevant metabolites. In addition, rare and specialized BGCs were detected in specific strains, including lanthipeptides (e.g.,
Lentzea sp. CMU181), betalactones, phosphonates, and thiopeptides, which could be indicative of niche adaptations and unexplored antibiotic potential. The presence of siderophores, ectoine, and redox cofactor clusters further suggests ecological adaptations to stress conditions.
While these results are promising, the bioactive potential of these BGCs requires experimental validation, including heterologous expression and metabolomic profiling, to fully assess their pharmacological and biotechnological applications. Overall, Lentzea exhibits a rich secondary metabolome with strain-specific specializations, positioning it as a promising source for future drug discovery and biotechnological applications.
4. Conclusions
A novel actinobacterial strain, designated E54T, was isolated from hyper-arid desert soil collected from the Kumtagh Desert in northwestern China. Polyphasic taxonomic analysis, including phylogenomic inference, ANI, dDDH, phenotypic characterization, and chemotaxonomic profiling, clearly demonstrated that strain E54T represents a novel species within the genus Lentzea. Strain E54T displays several phenotypic features adapted to arid environments, including high salt and pH tolerance. It also exhibits a unique polar lipid profile and produces multiple secondary metabolites with low similarity to known gene clusters. On the basis of these data, strain E54T is proposed as the type strain of a novel species, for which the name Lentzea xerophila sp. nov. is proposed.
5. Description of Lentzea xerophila sp. nov.
Lentzea xerophila (Etymology: xe.ro’phi.la. Gr. masc. adj. xêros, dry; N.L. masc. adj. suff. -philus, loving; N.L. fem. adj. xerophila, dry-loving, occurring in dry, xeric habitat. Kumtagh desert in Northwest China, the source of the type strain).
Gram-stain-positive, aerobic, and non-motile actinobacterium that forms extensively branched substrate and aerial mycelia. Aerial mycelium forms long chains of rod-shaped or short cylindrical structures with a wrinkled surface. Growth occurs on ISP 2–ISP 7 and Bennett’s agar. Good growth is observed at 28–37 °C (optimum, 28–30 °C), pH 6.0–10.0 (optimum, 7.0–9.0), and in the presence of up to 10% (w/v) NaCl. The strain can hydrolyze starch, casein, and cellulose. It produces acid from D-glucose, D-fructose, sucrose, raffinose, and maltose. Nitrate is not reduced. The predominant menaquinone is MK-9(H4). The major fatty acid was iso-C16:0. The polar lipid profile includes diphosphatidyl glycerol, phosphatidyl ethanolamine, phosphatidyl inositol (PI), hydroxyphosphatidyl ethanolamine, and an unidentified lipid. The characteristic amino acid type of the cell wall was meso-DAP. Whole-cell hydrolysis experiments revealed the characteristic cell wall sugar fractions: ribose and galactose. The DNA G+C content is 69.38 mol%. The genome size is approximately 8.0 Mb and harbors biosynthetic gene clusters encoding non-ribosomal peptides, polyketides, terpenes, and lanthipeptides, most of which show low similarity to known clusters, suggesting untapped secondary metabolic potential.
The type strain E54T (=JCM 37543T = GDMCC 4.414T) was isolated from surface soil collected in August 2023 from the hyper-arid Kumtagh Desert, China. Based on whole-genome phylogenomic and chemotaxonomic analyses, the strain belongs to the genus Lentzea but represents a novel species. GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the genome and 16S rRNA gene sequence of strain E54T are PRJNA1272222 and PP694170.1, respectively.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at:
https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms13071628/s1. Table S1: Cultural characteristics of strain E54 and the type strains of the most closely related species; Table S2: Genomic characteristics of
Lentzea species used for comparison. Figure S1. GO annotation results of the
Lentzea sp. E54
T genome; Figure S2. KEGG annotation results of the
Lentzea sp. E54
T genome.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.W. and W.Z.; methodology, Y.W.; software, Y.W.; validation, W.Z., T.C., and G.L.; formal analysis, J.L. and F.Q.; investigation, Y.W., J.L. and W.L.; resources, Y.W., J.L., and F.Q.; data curation, W.L., J.L., and Y.W.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, Y.W.; visualization, Y.W.; supervision, W.Z., T.C., and G.L.; project administration, W.Z., T.C., and G.L.; funding acquisition, W.Z., G.L., and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20451), West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences (xbzg-zdsys-202105), Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA26010101), and the Scientific Project of Gansu Province (23JRRA574).
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
The GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ accession number for the 16S rRNA gene sequence and genome of strain E54T are PP694170.1 and PRJNA1272222, respectively. The data can be accessed at
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Abbreviations
The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
ANI | Average nucleotide identity |
dDDH | Digital DNA–DNA hybridization |
ISP | International Streptomyces Project |
ML | Maximum-likelihood |
References
- O’Donnell, A.G.; Young, I.M.; Rushton, S.P.; Shirley, M.D.; Crawford, J.W. Visualization, modelling and prediction in soil microbiology. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5, 689–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, B.; Lu, C.; Wang, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhao, K.; Xue, R.; Ren, H.; Lv, X.; Pan, R.; Zhang, J.; et al. A genomic catalogue of soil microbiomes boosts mining of biodiversity and genetic resources. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shu, W.S.; Huang, L.N. Microbial diversity in extreme environments. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2022, 20, 219–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Schulze-Makuch, D.; Wagner, D.; Kounaves, S.P.; Mangelsdorf, K.; Devine, K.G.; de Vera, J.P.; Schmitt-Kopplin, P.; Grossart, H.P.; Parro, V.; Kaupenjohann, M.; et al. Transitory microbial habitat in the hyperarid Atacama Desert. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 2670–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jansson, J.K.; Hofmockel, K.S. Soil microbiomes and climate change. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2020, 18, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kim, Y.H.; Park, B.S.; Bhatia, S.K.; Seo, H.M.; Jeon, J.M.; Kim, H.J.; Yi, D.H.; Lee, J.H.; Choi, K.Y.; Park, H.Y.; et al. Production of rapamycin in Streptomyces hygroscopicus from glycerol-based media optimized by systemic methodology. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 24, 1319–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vurukonda, S.; Giovanardi, D.; Stefani, E. Plant Growth Promoting and Biocontrol Activity of Streptomyces spp. as Endophytes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Araujo, R.; Gupta, V.V.S.R.; Reith, F.; Bissett, A.; Mele, P.; Franco, C.M.M. Biogeography and emerging significance of Actinobacteria in Australia and Northern Antarctica soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2020, 146, 107805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Placella, S.A.; Brodie, E.L.; Firestone, M.K. Rainfall-induced carbon dioxide pulses result from sequential resuscitation of phylogenetically clustered microbial groups. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 10931–10936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallenstein, M.D.; Weintraub, M.N. Emerging tools for measuring and modeling the in situ activity of soil extracellular enzymes. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 2098–2106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andreani-Gerard, C.M.; Cambiazo, V.; González, M. Biosynthetic gene clusters from uncultivated soil bacteria of the Atacama Desert. mSphere 2024, 9, e0019224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Benaud, N.; Zhang, E.; van Dorst, J.; Brown, M.V.; Kalaitzis, J.A.; Neilan, B.A.; Ferrari, B.C. Harnessing long-read amplicon sequencing to uncover NRPS and Type I PKS gene sequence diversity in polar desert soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2019, 95, fiz031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boubetra, D.; Sabaou, N.; Zitouni, A.; Bijani, C.; Lebrihi, A.; Mathieu, F. Taxonomy and chemical characterization of new antibiotics produced by Saccharothrix SA198 isolated from a Saharan soil. Microbiol. Res. 2013, 168, 223–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schulz, D.; Beese, P.; Ohlendorf, B.; Erhard, A.; Zinecker, H.; Dorador, C.; Imhoff, J.F. Abenquines A–D: Aminoquinone derivatives produced by Streptomyces sp. strain DB634. J. Antibiot. 2011, 64, 763–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Wang, T.; Lu, Q.; Li, F.; Wu, G.; Jiang, Z.; Habden, X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, X.; Lukianov, D.A.; et al. Bioprospecting of Soil-Derived Actinobacteria Along the Alar-Hotan Desert Highway in the Taklamakan Desert. Front. Microbiol. 2021, 12, 604999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, T.; Li, F.; Lu, Q.; Wu, G.; Jiang, Z.; Liu, S.; Habden, X.; Razumova, E.A.; Osterman, I.A.; Sergiev, P.V.; et al. Diversity, novelty, antimicrobial activity, and new antibiotics of cultivable endophytic actinobacteria isolated from psammophytes collected from Taklamakan Desert. J. Pharm. Anal. 2021, 11, 241–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yassin, A.F.; Rainey, F.A.; Brzezinka, H.; Jahnke, K.D.; Weissbrodt, H.; Budzikiewicz, H.; Stackebrandt, E.; Schaal, K.P. Lentzea gen. nov., a new genus of the order Actinomycetales. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 1995, 45, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Labeda, D.P.; Hatano, K.; Kroppenstedt, R.M.; Tamura, T. Revival of the genus Lentzea and proposal for Lechevalieria gen. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2001, 51, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wichner, D.; Idris, H.; Houssen, W.E.; McEwan, A.R.; Bull, A.T.; Asenjo, J.A.; Goodfellow, M.; Jaspars, M.; Ebel, R.; Rateb, M.E. Isolation and anti-HIV-1 integrase activity of lentzeosides A–F from extremotolerant Lentzea sp. H45, a strain isolated from a high-altitude Atacama Desert soil. J. Antibiot. 2017, 70, 448–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Li, Y.; Li, Y. Lentzea isolaginshaensis sp. nov., an actinomycete isolated from desert soil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 2019, 112, 633–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lara, A.C.; Kotrbova, L.; Keller, M.; Nouioui, I.; Neumann-Schaal, M.; Mast, Y.; Chronakova, A. Lentzea sokolovensis sp. nov., Lentzea kristufekii sp. nov. and Lentzea miocenica sp. nov., rare actinobacteria from Miocene lacustrine sediment of the Sokolov Coal Basin, Czech Republic. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2024, 74, 006335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, J.; Huang, Y. Lentzea tibetensis sp. nov., a novel Actinobacterium with antimicrobial activity isolated from soil of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2021, 71, 004976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fang, B.-Z.; Han, M.-X.; Liu, L.; Zhang, Z.-T.; Liu, W.-L.; Shen, J.-T.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, W.-Q.; Wei, D.-Q.; Li, W.-J. Lentzea cavernae sp nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a karst cave sample, and emended description of the genus Lentzea. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 2357–2362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Maiti, P.K.; Mandal, S. Comprehensive genome analysis of Lentzea reveals repertoire of polymer-degrading enzymes and bioactive compounds with clinical relevance. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 8409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, A.; Rather, M.A.; Shah, A.M.; Bhat, Z.S.; Shah, A.; Ahmad, Z.; Parvaiz Hassan, Q. Antituberculotic activity of actinobacteria isolated from the rare habitats. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2017, 65, 256–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakano, H.; Ōmura, S. Chemical biology of natural indolocarbazole products: 30 years since the discovery of staurosporine. J. Antibiot. 2009, 62, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Q.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Ba, F.; Liu, Z. Description of Lentzea flaviverrucosa sp. nov. and transfer of the type strain of Saccharothrix aerocolonigenes subsp. staurosporea to Lentzea albida. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2002, 52, 1815–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selvin, J.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Gandhimathi, R.; Seghal Kiran, G.; Rajeetha Ravji, T.; Natarajaseenivasan, K.; Hema, T.A. Optimization and production of novel antimicrobial agents from sponge associated marine actinomycetes Nocardiopsis dassonvillei MAD08. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 83, 435–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shirling, E.B.; Gottlieb, D. Methods for characterization of Streptomyces species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1966, 16, 313–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jones, K.L. Fresh isolates of actinomycetes in which the presence of sporogenous aerial mycelia is a fluctuating characteristic. J. Bacteriol. 1949, 57, 141–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atlas, R.M. Handbook of Microbiological Media; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Yang, R.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, W.; Chen, T.; Liu, G. Characteristics of Planococcus antioxidans sp. nov., an antioxidant-producing strain isolated from the desert soil in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Microbiologyopen 2020, 9, 1183–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, Y.; Zhang, G.; Bahadur, A.; Xu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Tian, M.; Ding, W.; Chen, T.; Zhang, W.; Liu, G. Genomic Investigation of Desert Streptomyces huasconensis D23 Reveals Its Environmental Adaptability and Antimicrobial Activity. Microorganisms 2022, 10, 2408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yoon, S.-H.; Ha, S.-M.; Kwon, S.; Lim, J.; Kim, Y.; Seo, H.; Chun, J. Introducing EzBioCloud: A taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA gene sequences and whole-genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2017, 67, 1613–1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2016, 33, 1870–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Larkin, M.A.; Blackshields, G.; Brown, N.P.; Chenna, R.; McGettigan, P.A.; McWilliam, H.; Valentin, F.; Wallace, I.M.; Wilm, A.; Lopez, R.; et al. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 2007, 23, 2947–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Felsenstein, J. Confidence-limits on phylogenies–An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 1985, 39, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nei, M.; Kumar, S. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Chin, C.-S.; Alexander, D.H.; Marks, P.; Klammer, A.A.; Drake, J.; Heiner, C.; Clum, A.; Copeland, A.; Huddleston, J.; Eichler, E.E.; et al. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat. Methods 2013, 10, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seemann, T. Prokka: Rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 2014, 30, 2068–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blin, K.; Shaw, S.; Kloosterman, A.M.; Charlop-Powers, Z.; van Wezel, G.P.; Medema, M.H.; Weber, T. antiSMASH 6.0: Improving cluster detection and comparison capabilities. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, W29–W35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, C.; Rodriguez-R, L.M.; Phillippy, A.M.; Konstantinidis, K.T.; Aluru, S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meier-Kolthoff, J.P.; Carbasse, J.S.; Peinado-Olarte, R.L.; Göker, M. TYGS and LPSN: A database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 50, D801–D807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Staneck, J.L.; Roberts, G.D. Simplified approach to identification of aerobic actinomycetes by thin-layer chromatography. Appl. Microbiol. 1974, 28, 226–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sasser, M. MIDI technical note 101. In Identification of Bacteria by Gas Chromatography of Cellular Fatty Acids; MIDI: Newark, DE, USA, 1990; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Kampfer, P.; Kroppenstedt, R.M. Numerical analysis of fatty acid patterns of coryneform bacteria and related taxa. Can. J. Microbiol. 1996, 42, 989–1005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collins, M.D. Isoprenoid quinone analyses in bacterial classification and identification. Soc. Appl. Bacteriol. Tech. 1985, 20, 267–287. [Google Scholar]
- Collins, M. Distrbution of menaquinone in actinomycetes and corynebacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1977, 100, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Minnikin, D.E.; O’Donnell, A.G.; Goodfellow, M.; Alderson, G.; Athalye, M.; Schaal, A.; Parlett, J.H. An integrated procedure for the extraction of bacterial isoprenoid quinones and polar lipids. J. Microbiol. Methods 1984, 2, 233–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
| Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).