Next Article in Journal
Legionella in Hot Water Heat Pump (HWHP) Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Gut Microbiota and Lipid Metabolism in Bullfrog Tadpoles: A Comparative Study Across Nutritional Stages
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fecal Microbiota Transplantation as a Treatment for Granulomatous Colitis in a French Bulldog: A Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Challenges in Yersinia Diagnosis and Treatment

by
Bogna Grygiel-Górniak
Department of Rheumatology, Rehabilitation and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
Microorganisms 2025, 13(5), 1133; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051133
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 1 May 2025 / Accepted: 9 May 2025 / Published: 15 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Enteric Infections Research)

Abstract

:
Yersinia bacteria (Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis) are commonly found in nature in all climatic zones and are isolated from food (mainly raw pork, unpasteurized milk, or contaminated water), soil, and surface water, rarely from contaminated blood. Yersinia infection occurs through sick or asymptomatic carriers and contact with the feces of infected animals. The invasion of specific bacterial serotypes into the host cell is based on the type 3 secretion system (T3SS), which directly introduces many effector proteins (Yersinia outer proteins—Yops) into the host cell. The course of yersiniosis can be acute or chronic, with the predominant symptoms of acute enteritis (rarely pseudo-appendicitis or septicemia develops). Clinical and laboratory diagnosis of yersiniosis is difficult. The infection requires confirmation by isolating Yersinia bacteria from feces or other biological materials, including lymph nodes, synovial fluid, urine, bile, or blood. The detection of antibodies in blood serum or synovial fluid is useful in the diagnostic process. The treatment of yersiniosis is mainly symptomatic. Uncomplicated infections (diarrhea and abdominal pain) usually do not require antibiotic therapy, which is indicated in severe cases. Surgical intervention is undertaken in the situations of intestinal necrosis. Given the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties, this review discusses the prevalence of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis, their mechanisms of disease induction (virulence factors and host response), clinical manifestations, diagnostic and preventive methods, and treatment strategies in the context of current knowledge and available recommendations.

1. Introduction

Yersinia, along with Shigella and Salmonella, belong to the family Enterobacteriaceae. The genus Yersinia currently encompasses twenty-six species, three of which are pathogenic for humans: Y. pestis, Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis [1]. The infection of Y. enterocolitica causes yersiniosis in humans, Y. pseudotuberculosis is responsible for Far East scarlet-like feverdevelopment, and Y. pestis leads to plague [2]. Human yersinioses most often occur as sporadic cases, but clusters of cases or outbreaks have also been described [3,4,5,6,7].
Since the most common human enteropathogens are Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis, which both have a worldwide distribution [2], only these will be discussed in this article.
Bacilli from the genus Yersinia have enterobacterial common antigen (ECA) in their cell envelope, which allows them to be classified as Enterobacteriaceae. Both pathogens (Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis) are foodborne diseases transmitted by the fecal—oral route. Unfortunately, they have become more common in recent years due to transmission by humans and farm animals; however, Y. enterocolitica is detected more often than Y. pseudotuberculosis. Yersinia can grow over a wide range of temperatures (0–42 °C), which increases their virulence potential. Specifically, the nutritional infestation and infection development of Y. enterocolitica after serotype O3-contaminated blood was stored at 4 °C for transfusion has been described in the literature [8]. Typically, enteric bacteria cause self-limited acute infections that spread from the intestine to the mesenteric lymph nodes. They cause infections mainly in children; however, severe illnesses and chronic conditions can also occur, especially in immunocompromised individuals [9,10,11,12,13,14].
Recently, many studies have broadly discussed bacterial virulence, their rapid reproduction, and the possibility of various diagnostic methods allowing for faster bacteria detection and effective therapeutic management [15,16,17,18]. Unfortunately, such a management model is not always possible in clinical practice. The diagnosis is usually delayed due to late infection reporting by patients, a lack of access to appropriate diagnostic methods, and often excessive or too short treatment. Therefore, this review discusses the prevalence of Yersinia, pathomechanisms, different clinical variants of the disease, diagnostic and prophylactic methods, and current recommendations for treatment. The current status of the surveillance, detection, and prevention of yersiniosis is also described.

2. Materials and Methods

This review article was formed from a PubMed and Google Scholar literature search conducted until October 2024 that included meta-analyses, case reports, case studies, systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and prospective and retrospective cohorts. Out of these, a stark emphasis was placed on systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and cohorts, while individual case studies, case reports, and RCTs were mainly referred to.
The search words used to include the manuscripts were as follows: Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis, epidemiology, clinical symptoms, diagnosis, pathomechanism, reservoir, transmission, and treatment. Conjunction words such as AND and OR were also used to maximize the search further. From the manuscripts, only English manuscripts were included. The literature search included articles from 2014 onwards. Other relevant articles aligned with the authors’ aims for the review were included outside the established timeframe to include key information.

3. Historical Background

Yersinia causes intestinal and extraintestinal symptoms. The genus name Yersinia comes from the etiological agent of plague, related to its discovery in 1894 during the “Black Death” epidemic in Hong Kong, and was independently discovered by two researchers, French bacteriologist Alexander Yersin and Japanese physician Shibasaburo Kitasato. The isolated Gram-negative rod was named Yersinia pestis [19]. However, Y. pestis evolved from Y. pseudotuberculosis 1500–20,000 years ago, before the first known plague pandemics in humans [20]. Later, with the development of many microbiological methods, scientists noticed that similar Gram-negative rods (such as Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. enterocolitica) were isolated before Y. pestis was classified into the genus Yersinia [21]. However, the history of the discovery of individual Yersinia species and their taxonomy was long and convoluted. In 1939, at the New York State Department of Health, Schleifstein and Coleman identified a new species of bacteria from five bacterial isolates that they believed resembled Actinobacillus lignieri and Pasteurella pseudotuberculosis. The bacteria were highly virulent to mice, and because three strains originated from intestinal contents, they proposed the name Bacterium enterocoliticum [22]. In 1994, van Longhem proposed the genus name Yersinia (from the family Enterobacteriaceae), in honor of the French bacteriologist Alexander Yersin [23]. It was not until 20 years later that the Danish microbiologist Wilhelm Frederiksen established the taxonomy of Yersinia enterocolitica, classifying the discovered bacteria in the genus Yersinia and changing its name to Y. enterocolitica [24]. The DNA–DNA hybridization technique used by Brenner et al. in 1976 showed that both indole-positive and indole-negative strains of Y. enterocolitica are closely related (with a DNA hybridization relatedness of 79 to 100%) and can be considered as one species [25]. In 1981, three groups of bacteria were separated from Y. enterocolitica (Y. intermedia, Y. frederiksenii, Y. kristensenii) [26,27]. The biochemical heterogeneity observed by Nilehn in 1969 justified the creation of five biogroups (biotypes) [28]. The biogrouping described then was modified by Wauters et al. in 1987, who distinguished six biogroups of Y. enterocolitica [29]. Two of these biogroups (biogroups 3A and 3B) were subsequently determined to be speciated and designated as the species Y. bercovieri and Y. mollaretii (Wauters, 1988) [30].

4. Epidemiology of Yersinia Infection

The infections of Yersinia spp. have been reported from all continents but are most common in Europe [31]. In developed countries, Y. enterocolitica is a frequent cause of gastroenteritis. Interestingly, it is also the third most common bacterial cause of gastrointestinal infections in European populations [32].
The prevalence of yersiniosis is higher in northeastern Europe than in other European countries [33]. For example, the incidence rate of Y. enterocolitica in Sweden is 2.27–6.18 cases per 100,000 inhabitants [34]. Yersiniosis is also reported in Poland [35] and a decreasing trend in the incidence of yersiniosis has been observed since 2009. In 2018–2020, a total of 542 cases of yersiniosis were recorded (456 intestinal and 86 extraintestinal). In 2020, a sharp decrease in the number of yersiniosis infections was observed compared to previous years, resulting from the introduction of many restrictions to reduce the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which also affected the number of yersiniosis infections [36]. In the USA, Y. enterocolitica causes about 116,716 human infections annually [37]. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the USA assessed that Y. enterocolitica is responsible for 640 hospitalizations and 35 deaths yearly [38]. The incidence of yersiniosis is also monitored in developing countries; however, the exact prevalence of infections is unknown in Africa and the Middle East due to insufficient diagnostics [39].
The decreasing EU trend for confirmed yersiniosis cases since 2008 stabilized during 2013–2017. In 2017, yersiniosis was the third most reported zoonosis in the European Union (n = 6823 confirmed cases reported by twenty-six MS (member states); the notification rate was 1.77 cases per 100,000 population, which was 2.8% lower than in 2016). The highest country-specific notification rates were in northeastern Europe. The decreasing trend of human yersiniosis was observed in the EU/EEA from 2008 to 2017, but the trend did not show any significant increase or decrease in the past five years (2013–2017). The most common bioserotype was 4/O:3, followed by 2/O:9 and three fatal cases were reported among the 4467 confirmed yersiniosis cases for which this information was available. Of the 12 identified outbreaks, 11 were caused by Y. enterocolitica (the large outbreak consisted of 80 patients in Denmark) [40].
Currently, in the European Union, yersiniosis is the third most common foodborne zoonosis in humans (7919 confirmed cases of yersiniosis in humans in 2022 and 8738 in 2023). According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC, 2024), a stable trend in incidence was observed between 2018 and 2023. Most cases of yersiniosis are caused by Y. enterocolitica, although sporadic outbreaks caused by Y. pseudotuberculosis occur. For example, in 2022, Yersinia enterocolitica was the species reported in the majority (98.7%) of human cases, while Y. pseudotuberculosis was reported in only 1.3% of human cases [41]. The Y. pseudotuberculosis infection is rare, and usually, sporadic cases are reported. Nevertheless, outbreaks have been reported in Japan [42], Canada [43], Europe [6], Russia [3], and New Zealand [4]. In Europe, the disease is usually a self-limiting acute enteritis that spreads to the mesenteric lymph nodes [14,44,45]. However, outbreaks of Y. pseudotuberculosis infections can be severe and are characterized by systemic inflammatory symptoms called Far Eastern scarlet fever (FESLF), mainly reported in Russia and Japan [46]. FESLF is a rare, severe inflammatory disease that, unfortunately, is often lethal [46]. FESFL, also known as Izumi fever, has clinical features resembling those of Kawasaki disease and mainly develops among young children, adolescents, and young adults in Japan. The incidence of this disease has markedly decreased because of improved sanitation [47].

5. Pathomechanisms of Yersiniosis Infection

Enteric yersiniosis is a disease transmitted through the fecal–oral route [48]. Pathogenic strains are detected in the raw intestines of infected animals, unpasteurized milk, or contaminated water. Groups exposed to yersiniosis include butchers and farmers. Infections rarely occur through direct contact with animals or contaminated blood during a transfusion [49]. The predominant strain of Y. enterocolitica causing infections in humans is serogroup O:3; however, other serogroups (O:8 and O:9) are also responsible for clinical symptoms in European countries and the United States [50].
Y. pseudotuberculosis is classified into serotypes O1 to O14 [51]. Y. pseudotuberculosis O:1 was isolated from 39 stool specimens and five (42%) of twelve soil samples [52]. The European strains of Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype O1 usually exhibit a pathogenicity island called the high-pathogenicity island (HPI) on the chromosome of Yersinia spp. [53]. The Far Eastern strains of Y. pseudotuberculosis produce a superantigenic toxin called Y. pseudotuberculosis-derived mitogen (YPM) encoded by a gene on the chromosome [54]. Most serotypes O1 to O5 are pathogenic and have been detected in Europe and the Far East. Serotypes O6 to O14 have been isolated only from wild animals in the Far East (Russia, Korea, mainland China, and Japan) but never from clinical samples [55].

6. Animal Reservoirs of Yersinia

Yersinia spp. are foodborne pathogens [29,37]. The most common Yersinia species (Y. enterocolitica, Y. pseudotuberculosis) are transmitted via the fecal–oral route. Human infections most often occur after the consumption of contaminated food or water, and less frequently by direct contact with infected animals [14]. The main risk of Yersinia infection is associated with food sources of animal origin, particularly pigs and pork products [56,57,58,59]. In contrast, the main environments and reservoirs of Yersinia include soil, water, and various animals [14]. Pigs are asymptomatic carriers of the bacteria in their tonsils and gastrointestinal tract and excrete the enteropathogen into the environment via feces. Pork contamination often occurs during the evisceration of pigs during slaughter [60].

6.1. Reservoirs of Yersinia enterocolitica

Y. enterocolitica is a ubiquitous microorganism, but most isolates from asymptomatic carriers, food, and the environment are not pathogenic [48]. The meta-analysis from Guillier highlighted food exposures as the significant risk factors of yersiniosis. It confirmed that the predominant reservoirs are pigs (the consumption of raw or undercooked pork, occupational contact with pigs). Infection can also be caused by untreated drinking water. Thus, food and water are significantly associated with sporadic Y. enterocolitica infections [61].
Interestingly, Y. enterocolitica 4/O:3 is the most common cause of sporadic human yersiniosis caused by contaminated pork meat in Finland and Germany [56]. Italian data have shown that the pathogenic biotypes of Y. enterocolitica are uncommon in foods and are mainly isolated from animal sources (including pork and poultry meat and their derivatives) [57]. Chinese data indicated that domestic farm dogs can also transmit Yersinia infection [62]. Similarly, the suspected route of transmission is through contact with domestic animals (Sweden, Denmark, China) [59,63]. Y. enterocolitica has been detected in unpasteurized milk and cow feces in the United Kingdom and the United States. However, the prevalence in cows is lower than in pigs [62,64]. Pathogenetic serotypes have also been detected in sheep and goats [62,64]. A Swiss study showed that Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis are also commonly found in wild boars, with a higher incidence in younger individuals [65].
Yersiniosis can also be transmitted by wild animals such as brown hares, bats, and wild rodents [66,67,68] Y. enterocolitica has been isolated from the stool of wild boars, red deer, and roe deer (the Ail gene was isolated, suggesting a virulence gene for Y. enterocolitica) [69]. In Poland, Y. enterocolitica is frequently isolated from game animals, which poses a risk of spreading to other animal species and humans [70]. In Spain, wild boars are very common reservoirs of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis [71].

6.2. Reservoirs of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis

The main reservoirs of Y. pseudotuberculosis are wild mammals and birds, but the bacteria have also been detected in contaminated food such as iceberg lettuce [72], carrots [73], or raw milk [74].
Y. pseudotuberculosis infection (a foodborne pathogen) is not as common as Y. enterocolitica, and there are only limited data on its occurrence. This fact may be the reason for the poor awareness of Y. pseudotuberculosis as a causative agent of gastroenteritis. In addition, reservoirs of Y. pseudotuberculosis other than Y. enterocolitica have been reported. Many difficulties are also associated with the bacterial culture detection of this species, which may cause diagnostic difficulties. The reservoirs of Y. pseudotuberculosis are mainly wild mammals (especially rodents, lagomorphs, and wild boars) and birds (Table 1). The pathogen can enter the food chain, and the consumption of contaminated food causes disease outbreaks. Reported dietary sources include iceberg lettuce [72], carrots [73], and raw milk [74]. Y. pseudotuberculosis replicates in the intestinal lumen, invades the small intestine through Peyer’s patches to initiate dissemination, and spreads to mesenteric lymph nodes [75]. This pathogen has also been detected in the spleen and liver [76].
Y. pseudotuberculosis has a more diverse host spectrum, including human pathogens and infected farm, domestic, and wild animals [62,65,71,77,78,79]. Approximately 0.6 to 5 cases of Y. pseudotuberculosis per 100,000 inhabitants have been reported in humans (data from Finland) [77]. Y. pseudotuberculosis has been isolated from asymptomatic porcine tonsils and intestinal contents. Therefore, infected pigs could not be immediately identified during slaughter. The prevalence of Y. pseudotuberculosis in fattening pigs’ tonsils and intestinal contents ranged from 0.03% to 6% [77,80]. This pathogen has been isolated not only from pork but also from wild game meat [81,82]. Y. pseudotuberculosis occurs in 20% of wild boars in Sweden and Switzerland (isolates from tonsil tissue) [65,78]. Thus, both wild game meat (wild boars) and outdoor pig farming can be reservoirs for this pathogen (Spanish, Swedish, and German data) [71,78,79]. In Finland, outbreaks of Y. pseudotuberculosis were caused by consuming vegetables, such as carrots and iceberg lettuce [52,72]. However, other foods (milk, pork, and water) are suspected sources of Y. pseudotuberculosis infections [55]. A Y. pseudotuberculosis clonal outbreak in France occurred in 2020, which was caused by the consumption of tomatoes as the suspected source of infection [7]. Therefore, the occurrence of Y. pseudotuberculosis may be higher than statistics indicate, especially on organic vegetable and livestock farms where food and farm animals have contact with the outside environment.
Table 1. The possible sources and reservoirs of Yersinia.
Table 1. The possible sources and reservoirs of Yersinia.
Human ActivityAnimal and Plant Sources of Yersinia spp.
Food consumptionYersinia enterocolitica
  • Food prepared from raw pork products (the main food source), treated sausage, spinach [59,63];
  • Chicken [57];
  • Raw or medium-done pork [58];
  • Imported fruits and berries [58];
  • Iceberg lettuce, radicchio rosso [83];
  • Unpasteurized milk [62,64];
  • Raw minced pork (young children in Germany) or prepared minced pork in the household [84].
Risky behaviorYersinia enterocolitica
  • Eating in a canteen [58];
  • Playing in a sandbox [84];
  • Contact with birds [84].
Possible zoonotic exposure
  • Association with the backyard slaughter of pigs;
  • Flies carrying antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains of the bacteria (Libyan hospitals) [85].
Animal contactThe enteropathogenic serotypes of Yersinia include BT2, O:9; BT2 O:5.27; and BT4, O:3 isolated from various animal species.
  • Cattle (fattening pigs)—principal reservoir for human infection [61,86];
  • The feces of cows, sheep, and goats [62,64];
  • Red or roe deer, wild boars (isolated the Ail gene in rectal swabs—suggestive of virulence gene for Y. enterocolitica) [70,86];
  • Brown hares (European countries) [66];
  • Wild boars (Spain) [71];
  • Bats (Germany) [67];
  • Wild rodents (interspecies carriers between reservoirs in European pig farms) [68];
  • Flies carrying antibiotic-resistant Enterobacteriaceae strains of the bacteria (Libyan hospitals) [85].
Secondary sources
  • Contact with domestic animals [59,62,63].
Human-to-human transmission (possible route)
  • Rarely transmitted;
  • Y. enterocolitica transmitted by a food handler [87];
  • The nosocomial outbreak of Y. enterocolitica diarrheal infection.
Waterborne transmission
  • The consumption of untreated drinking water (an outbreak of Y. enterocolitica due to tap water from a small-scale water system in Japan) [88];
  • Environmental waters and sewage (pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in water sources and sewage in Brazil) [89];
  • Contact with untreated water, unreticulated sewerage;
  • Environmental water types (reservoirs and creeks).
Y. pseudotuberculosis
Food consumptionThis foodborne pathogen is rarely isolated from food.
  • Fresh produce;
  • Vegetable juice [42];
  • Untreated surface water [42];
  • Homogenized milk [43].
Outbreaks
  • Japan [42];
  • Canada [43];
  • Europe [6];
  • Russia [3];
  • New Zealand [4];
  • Iceberg lettuce [72];
  • Carrots [73];
  • Raw milk [74].

7. Yersinia Transmission

Both Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis are characterized by psychrophilicity—the ability to multiply and accumulate in the environment in low and variable temperatures (4–12 °C) while maintaining or increasing their virulence [3]. Adapting to low temperatures allows bacteria to initiate an infectious process. As a result, their increased motility, chemotaxis, adhesion, invasion, resistance to phagocytosis, and toxin formation are observed. All of them are key factors necessary for the development of an outbreak or an epidemic [3].
Yersinia species possess type II and type III secretion systems (T2SS and T3SS), which are involved in initiating host infection. The T2SS is present in all Yersinia species, both pathogenic (e.g., the T2SS of the human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strain 1b called Yts1) and nonpathogenic [90]. The T3SS is a hallmark of infection with pathogenic Yersinia species and induces Ysc (which forms a multimeric integral membrane complex in the membrane of eukaryotic cells to help Yop translocation) and the Ysa system (which controls Yop secretion in the early stages of infection and invasion of the epithelial M-cells in the Peyer’s patches) [91,92] (Table 2). System T3SSs are contact-activated secretion systems that allow bacteria to inject effector proteins across eukaryotic cell membranes. Upon contact, the secretion apparatus, called the injection complex, exports two types of hydrophobic proteins called translocators (YopB and YopD in Y. enterocolitica) and effectors [91].
A crucial role in the pathogenicity of Y. enterocolitica is played by chromosomally transferred virulence genes, including Ail (attachment invasion locus), Inv (invasin), and Yet (Yersinia stable toxin) [93,94,95]. The adhesin of Y. enterocolitica with pleiotropic virulence effects predominantly expressed by Y. enterocolitica is Yersinia adhesin A (YadA). This protein enables bacterial attachment to host cells and the extracellular matrix (YadA mediates cell adhesion and bacterial translocation to M cells and the colonization of Peyer’s patches) [94]. The major invasion factor of Y. enterocolitica is the invasion protein InvA, which induces proinflammatory host cell responses. InvA induces IL-8 synthesis in epithelial cells by engaging beta1 integrins. Inv-induced beta1 integrin signaling involves the small GTPase Rac; the activation of MAP kinases such as p38, MEK1, and JNK; and activation of the transcription factor NF-κB [95]. The attachment and invasion locus (Ail) cooperates with YadA to ensure high serum resistance to Y. enterocolitica [93].
Y. enterocolitica is divided into six biotypes. Biotype 1A is nonpathogenic, while five other biotypes (1B, 2–5) cause infections in humans and/or animals. Pigs are the main reservoir of bio-serotype 4/O:3 strains. Biotype 4 is most frequently responsible for human infections worldwide. It is usually associated with the serotype O:3 (4/O:3), occurring in pigs that are asymptomatic carriers. The contamination of pork meat often occurs during the evisceration of pigs at slaughter [96]. Most reported cases of yersiniosis in Poland are caused by serotypes 4/O:3, 2/O:9, and 1B/O:8 [69].
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is the major component of the outer leaflet of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, including the genus Yersinia. It is responsible for the activation of the host’s innate immune system. The variability of the LPS structure used by Gram-negative bacteria promotes survival, providing resistance to innate immune system components and preventing recognition by TLR4 [97].
LPS’s lipid moiety, called lipid A, is localized in the membrane and serves as an anchor for the rest of the LPS molecule. LPS in the S (smooth) form consists of an external repeating glycan region called the O-specific polysaccharide (OPS), which is often called the O-antigen [8]. The OPS defines the bacteria’s serospecificity and protects bacteria from host defense mechanisms (phagocytosis and complement-mediated killing) [97].
Y. enterocolitica O:3 (YeO3) is considered the most common arthritogenic agent that can cause reactive arthritis (ReA) [98]. Bacteria may gain access to blood circulation, grow in the Peyer’s tissue, and be transferred to the joint via plasma or within lymphatic cells [99]. As a result, Yersinia infection can cause reactive arthritis, which is associated with the synthesis of specific antibodies.
Unfortunately, some cellular components, such as LPS or endotoxin, persist in the joint (even after bacterial elimination), and they initiate the clinical symptoms [97]. Therefore, the Yersinia antigens (including LPS) are detected in synovial fluid cells [99]. In addition to LPS, the complement system is also detected in synovial fluids and plays a significant role in the induction of Yersinia inflammation [100]. Interestingly, complement inhibition is associated with a less severe form of the disease [101]. For example, mice deficient in complement components were found to be resistant to arthritis [100].
Table 2. Characteristics of the Yersinia outer proteins (Yops) and their possible use in clinical practice.
Table 2. Characteristics of the Yersinia outer proteins (Yops) and their possible use in clinical practice.
General CharacteristicsCrucial Yop FunctionMechanismTherapeutic Use of the Recombinant Form
YopM
  • Molecular weight 41–55 kDa [102];
  • Connects with PRK and RSK and regulates pro- and anti-inflammatory gene transcription [103];
  • Colonizes spleen, liver, and lungs [104];
  • Causes disruption of inflammasome formation [105];
  • Depletes NK cells [106];
  • Induces caspase 3-mediated apoptosis [107];
  • Inhibits apoptosis and migration [108];
  • ↑ anti-inflammatory IL-10 concentration [109].
  • A cell-penetrating scaffold protein;
  • An important virulence factor with anti-inflammatory activities.
  • ↓ secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines: IL-1β, IL-12, IL-15, IL-18, IFγ, and TNF-α.
Involved in the treatment of auto-inflammatory diseases, e.g.,
  • Psoriasis;
  • RA;
  • IBD.
  • Interacts with mature α-thrombin.
  • ↓ ability of α-thrombin to induce platelet aggregation.
YopE
  • A GTPase-activating protein for Rac1 and RhoA;
  • Inhibits the activities of RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 (the small GTPase signaling molecules) [110];
  • Diminishes phagocytosis and Yop translocation;
  • Inhibits IL-8 synthesis, which is an important chemoattractant and activator for neutrophils [111];
  • ↓ IL-1β maturation [112];
  • ↓ ROS levels in macrophages—pre-requisite cells during splenic colonization by Yersinia [110];
  • ↓ neutrophil migration, which mainly depends on Rho-mediated signaling [113].
  • GTPase-activating protein;
  • Plays a major role in the initial bacterial defense against phagocytes [114].
  • YopE, together with YopT, are inhibitors of caspase-1 activation.
Involved in the treatment of the following caspase-1-related diseases:
  • IBD;
  • Crohn’s disease;
  • RA.
YopT
  • A 36 kDa cysteine protease;
  • Induces a phenotype similar to YopE;
  • Cleaves RhoA in vivo [115].
An irreversible inhibitor of Rho-GTPases↓ inflammation in synovial tissues (through ROK inhibition) [116]RA—also as a local treatment for inflamed synovial tissues.
↓ inflammation
  • Arteriosclerosis;
  • Erectile dysfunction;
  • Neurologic disorders.
YopO
  • The anti-phagocytic effector of Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis;
  • A protein-kinase-A-secreting virulence factor [117];
  • Targets Rho-GTPases and Gαq;
  • Prevents phagocytosis of the invading bacteria of host cells;
  • Comprises of three domains (GDI domain, Ser/Thr kinase, membrane localization) [117];
  • Causes actin depolymerization [118].
  • Intervenes with the regulation of actin polymerization => disruption of the actin cytoskeleton => impaired bacterial phagocytosis by macrophages [119].
  • Treatment of diseases associated with hyperactivated Rho-GTPases.
  • IBD;
  • RA.
  • Gαq impairment.
  • ↓ differentiation of Th17 cells and ↑ IBD progression [120].
YopJ/P
  • Called YopJ in Y. pestis and Y. pseudotuberculosis and YopP in Y. enterocolitica;
  • Various YopJ/P isoforms responsible for different translocation, substrate binding efficiencies, and virulence [121];
  • Prevents NF-κB and MAPK activation, inhibition of the inflammatory response, and apoptosis in macrophages and dendritic cells [122].
Has strong anti-inflammatory effects:
  • Induces cell death in macrophages and dendritic cells (only YopP) but not in epithelial or natural killer cells [123];
  • Inhibits IL-8 and IL-6 [124];
  • ↓TNF-α signaling and secretion (animal model) [125].
  • Impacts signaling cascade
  • Used in psoriasis, RA, IBD, and cancer treatment
  • Option for a treatment with bacteria-derived cell-penetrating proteins and topical application
  • Cell-penetrating proteins used in RA and topical application in psoriasis
  • Cell-penetrating YopP has anti-inflammatory effect
  • ↓ TNF-α-induced signaling and secretion triggers apoptosis in activated macrophages synthesizing TNF-α [126]
YopH
  • Causes disruption of peripheral focal complexes [127];
  • YopH has protein tyrosine phosphatase activity with a key function in the blocking of phagocytosis by the pathogen [117];
  • Impairs T and B cell activation;
  • YopH of Y. enterocolitica (but not Y. pseudotuberculosis) causes ↓ phagocytosis in murine dendritic cells [127,128];
  • Inhibits ROS synthesis and the inflammatory response [127]
  • Enables secretion of a highly potent and versatile phosphotyrosine phosphatase and causes the following:
  • IL-2 secretion and proliferation [129];
  • IL-8 secretion;
  • Phagocytosis.
  • Blocks tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)
  • Used in RA (↓ bone erosion, but not inflammation) [126,130]
  • Targets p130cas (essential for the actin remodeling of osteoclasts)
  • ↑ osteoclast activity [131]
  • ↓ activation of the Akt pathway in macrophages (animal models)
  • Potential use in psoriatic arthritis [132]
  • Activates T-cells by monocytes
  • Causes a persistent inflammatory state in RA [126]
  • Injected directly into the tumor
  • ↓ tumor mass or its progression (dose-dependent effect) [133]
  • Small molecule inhibitors of YopH
  • Possible use in the treatment of Y. pestis infections [134]
YopQ
  • Inhibits detection of the T3SS by the innate immune system and/or by regulating the rate of Yops translocation [135]
  • The anti-inflammatory effect might also have an impact on host cell proteins like Rac1 [136]
  • Regulates the translocation rate of Yop effectors into eukaryotic cells [135]
  • Prevents inflammasome activation.
GDI—guanosine dissociation inhibitors (constitute a family of small GTPases that serve a regulatory role in vesicular membrane traffic); Gαq—heterotrimeric G protein complex; IBD—inflammatory bowel disease; IFγ—interferon-γ; NK—natural killer; PRK or PKN—the serine/threonine protein kinase C-related kinases; RA—rheumatoid arthritis; Rac1—a member of the Rho family of GTPases (intracellular transducers of multiple signaling pathways); Rho family proteins—members of a major branch of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases [a family of small (~21 kDa) signaling G proteins]; ROK—Rho-kinase; ROS—reactive oxygen species; RSK—ribosomal S6 kinase; Ser/Thr—serine/threonine protein kinase; T3SS—type 3 secretion system; TLRs—Toll-like receptors; TNF-α—tumor necrosis factor; Yop—Yersinia outer protein.

8. Clinical Symptoms

The course of acute infection is usually self-limiting, starting in the intestine and spreading to the mesenteric lymph nodes. However, serious complications are also observed, especially in immunocompromised individuals and elderly patients with multiple comorbidities [84]. Yersiniosis is usually asymptomatic but can cause severe gastrointestinal symptoms (Table 3). Sepsis develops very rarely, especially in people with severe comorbidities, such as immunodeficiencies, diabetes, severe malnutrition, or alcoholism. Sepsis can be complicated by organ abscesses. In patients with genetic predispositions (e.g., HLA-B27 positive), pain in the knee, ankle, and wrist joints may develop a month after the onset of diarrhea. Arthralgia usually spontaneously resolves within six months; however, chronic reactive arthritis may also develop [35]. Incidentally, in people with genetic predispositions, myocarditis or glomerulonephritis may develop. In addition, the asymptomatic carriage of Y. enterocolitica is also possible [97,99].

8.1. Gastrointestinal Symptoms

Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis are enteropathogenic species that commonly cause mild and self-limiting gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients usually report fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and occasionally vomiting; rarely, mesenteric lymphadenitis develops [84]. Both infections occur primarily in children but are also reported in adults [13]. Risk factors that increase the likelihood of chronic gastrointestinal symptoms include irritable bowel syndrome, functional constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux disease preceding Y. enterocolitica infections [137].
Y. pseudotuberculosis can cause severe symptoms, such as fever and acute abdominal pain, which result from inflammation of the mesenteric lymph nodes, and are difficult to distinguish from acute appendicitis [52,72]. Y. pseudotuberculosis, being an enteric pathogen, causes gastrointestinal infections mainly in children (usually mild enteritis); however, in the elderly, it can cause severe symptoms leading to septicemia [13]. Both enteropathogenic species can cause serious complications, mainly pseudo-appendicular syndromes, liver or spleen abscesses, and sepsis [9,10,138,139]. Pseudo-appendicular syndromes mimic typical appendicitis [50] and are reported mainly in children [139], whereas sepsis is described in elderly patients [9]. Severe symptoms are observed in adults with multiple comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, cirrhosis) and the geriatric population [13].

8.2. Musculoskeletal Symptoms

Extraintestinal complications caused by Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis are similar and include symptoms such as reactive arthritis (ReA), erythema nodosum (EN), and conjunctivitis [84]. However, reactive arthritis and erythema nodosum are diagnosed more frequently in Y. pseudotuberculosis infections (mainly serotypes O:3) than in Y. enterocolitica infections [52,140]. In contrast, infections caused by Y. pseudotuberculosis are much less common than intestinal infections and are mainly reported during outbreaks [52,140,141]. ReA is an aseptic and asymmetric arthritis, mainly affecting the joints of the lower limbs, which is usually a self-limiting infection, mainly in susceptible individuals with a positive HLA-B27 antigen [142].
The titer of antibodies against Y. enterocolitica detected in synovial fluid correlates with serum concentrations [143]. One useful prognostic marker of ReA is the HLA-B27 antigen. It has been shown that patients with a positive HLA-B27 antigen test result are more likely to develop chronic or severe arthritis than those with a negative antigen test result [144]. Furthermore, the presence of this antigen results in a lower efficacy in eliminating yersiniosis compared to those with a negative HLA-B27 antigen test result [145].
Genetic analyses have shown that Y. pseudotuberculosis, which causes FESLF, is the genetic precursor of the plague pathogen Y. pestis. The transition of Y. pseudotuberculosis to Y. pestis is associated with the acquisition of several genes responsible for the pathogenic properties of this species [46]. FESLF is an acute generalized manifestation of an infectious disease characterized by severe toxic-allergic syndrome caused by repeated bacteremia with relapses and exacerbations of the infection. Predominant damage occurs in the gastrointestinal tract (gastroenteritis, lymphadenitis, appendicitis), liver (hepatitis), and joints [3].
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of Yersinia spp. infections.
Table 3. Clinical characteristics of Yersinia spp. infections.
Type of InfectionMild and Self-LimitingSevere
Primary (gastrointestinal)
  • Diarrhea;
  • Abdominal pain in the lower right quadrant (usually in children 5–14 years old);
  • Vomiting [84];
  • Fever;
  • Conjunctivitis [146].
Pseudo-appendicular syndromes
  • Mimicking appendicitis with a normal appendix in the T1 projection of MRI [138];
  • Predominantly in older children and young adults [139].
Septicemia
  • Mainly in elderly patients with co-morbidities (hypersideremia, diabetes) [9].
Other
  • Liver or spleen abscesses [10];
  • Septic arthritis [11];
  • Cutaneous aseptic abscesses [12].
SecondaryReactive arthritis
  • Mainly in patients with Y. enterocolitica (O:3 and O:9 serotypes);
  • Antibodies against Y. enterocolitica detected in synovial fluids [143];
  • Usually self-limiting polyarthritis;
  • Mostly in susceptible HLA-B27-positive individuals [142].
Erythema nodosum
  • Rarely chronic reactive arthritis;
  • Mostly in susceptible HLA-B27-positive individuals [142].
Y. pseudotuberculosis
Primary (gastrointestinal)Mild enteritis
  • Fever;
  • Abdominal pain;
  • Diarrhea;
  • Mainly in children [13].
Acute infection
  • Self-limited;
  • Starts in the intestine (enteritis/gastroenteritis) and spreads to the mesenteric lymph nodes;
  • Acute enteritis/gastroenteritis, mesenteric lymphadenitis [44];
  • Diarrhea;
  • Fever and abdominal pain [147];
  • May resemble acute appendicitis [14,44,45].
  • Acute abdominal pain;
  • Painful pseudo-appendicitis caused by mesenteric lymphadenitis [52,72].
Acute infection or septicemia in the following risk groups
  • The elderly;
  • Patients with multiple co-morbidities such as diabetes and liver diseases (cirrhosis), iron overload [13].
SecondaryReactive arthritis
  • With polyarticular involvement after an outbreak (caused by Y. pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3);
  • Enthesopathy;
  • Mainly in HLA-B27-positive disease (sacroiliitis, painful Achilles tendon, and heel pain) [140].
Non-articular involvement
  • Erythema nodosum;
  • Desquamation;
  • Pneumonia;
  • Nephritis [6].
  • Recurrent ReA.
FESLF
  • Severe toxic-allergic syndrome, repeated cyclically (a cyclic course);
  • Gastroenteritis, mesadenitis, appendicitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis;
  • Pneumonia, myocarditis, meningoencephalitis, nephritis;
  • Scarlet-like form and nodular erythema;
  • Arthralgia;
  • Septicemia (lethal outcomes) [3].
  • Recurrent FESLF [3,46];
  • Mainly in Russia and Japan [46].
ReA—reactive arthritis; FESLF—severe systemic inflammatory symptoms called Far Eastern scarlet fever.

9. Diagnosis

The diagnostic process should be based on clinical evaluation of the current symptoms. It is worth noting that some symptoms are age-specific. For example, gastrointestinal symptoms usually predominate in children, while in adults, in addition to abdominal symptoms, articular symptoms may predominate. However, yersiniosis can occur in different age groups of patients and is detected both in childhood and in old age.
In most cases of infectious diarrhea, Y. enterocolitica is not suspected as a potential source of infection. Therefore, the incidence of yersiniosis is largely underestimated, and the difficulty in isolating these pathogens from polycontaminated samples delays the diagnosis [148].
Detection of the organism in a clinical sample is necessary to make a definitive diagnosis of yersiniosis. In clinical practice, isolation of the bacteria from stool, blood, wounds, throat swabs, bile, mesenteric lymph nodes, and cerebrospinal fluid allows for confirmation of the diagnosis [16]. Stool culture is the most readily available method of confirming the diagnosis of Y. enterocolitica; however, it should be performed within the first fourteen days of illness. If it is positive, it confirms the infection. Unfortunately, standard stool cultures (without a specific Y. enterocolitica incubation growth medium) do not detect the bacilli of Y. enterocolitica and are laborious [18].
The most sensitive method is a prolonged low-temperature culture on a selective growth medium [148]. Since Y. enterocolitica does not ferment lactose, and is oxidase negative and urease positive, some data suggest direct plating on cefsulodin–irgasan–novobiocin (CIN) agar followed by enrichment procedures according to the reference method ISO 10273:2003 [149]. Unfortunately, even on such a specific medium, Y. enterocolitica is rarely detected. For example, in the analysis of 3622 stool samples, a positive test result was observed in seven samples from five patients [150]. Therefore, culturing on CIN or on other specific media that allow for growth at 25 degrees Celsius is not a cost-effective procedure and should therefore not be routinely used.
Another recently described method for detecting Yersinia is the Statens Serum Institut enteric medium (SSI), which allows for the growth of Yersinia at 37 °C. SSI should not be used to detect Y. pseudotuberculosis because the growth of this bacterium at 37 °C is inhibited. It is a good method for detecting the pathogenic strains of Y. enterocolitica (most nonpathogenic Yersinia species are inhibited on SSI). However, in contaminated human stool, the recovery of Y. enterocolitica colonies on SSI at 37 °C is difficult and less sensitive than on CIN at 28 °C. Therefore, despite its limitations, CIN incubated at 28 °C is still required for the successful isolation of enteropathogenic Yersinia from stool [148].
The course of the disease varies from mild to aggressive. If the prodromal symptoms predominate, specific serological tests can help to confirm Yersinia infection. These tests are commonly used to detect IgG, IgA, and IgM [151]. Specific antibodies are usually detected in the serum or synovial fluid of patients with the clinical symptoms of yersiniosis using ELISA or immunoblotting. These tests allow for the detection of antibodies against Yersinia LPS, ECA-specific antibodies, and Yersinia-specific immune complexes [152].
IgM antibodies are markers of the acute phase of yersiniosis, which are synthesized within the first week of infection and reach peak levels in the second week (Table 4). They decline to normal levels within 3–6 months. In rare cases, such as IgM deficiency, antibodies against Yersinia in this class are not synthesized [153]. The lack of IgM synthesis is rare (less than 300 cases described in the literature) and is defined as an IgM concentration level lower than 0.40 g/L [154]. Selective IgM deficiency (sIGMD) results from immune deregulation associated with a severe lack of B cell differentiation [155].
IgA antibodies are the most important markers of reactive arthritis. They increase at the onset of yersiniosis and decrease after infection [151]. However, they may persist for 14 to 16 months after the first symptoms, especially in the cases where development of reactive arthritis or chronic enteritis occurs. If the course of yersiniosis is typical (uncomplicated), they can be detected up to five months after infection. IgA is synthesized in the intestine at a rate of 3–5 g/day and initially appears in the blood at a concentration of 2 to 3 mg/mL [121,156]. IgA is essential for the immunological protection of mucosal surfaces in the respiratory and gastrointestinal tract [157]. IgA antibodies to YOPE (23 kDa), YOPD (35 kDa), and YOPB (41 kDa) occur in chronic enteritis, whereas antibodies to YOPD develop in 90% of cases of reactive arthritis. IgA is not synthesized in selective IgA deficiency, the most common type of primary immunodeficiency [158]. However, reduced or absent IgA in the blood may accompany normal levels of IgM and IgG, especially in children over four years of age [158]. IgA antibodies are most important in diagnosing reactive arthritis [151].
In chronic yersiniosis, elevated IgA levels persist with increasing IgG. Interestingly, all patients with positive IgG and IgA against two or more YOPs develop chronic symptoms, often leading to persistent Yersinia infection [159]. Analysis of the IgG subclasses (IgG1, IgG2, IgG3, IgG4) in patients with arthritis (n = 35) and uncomplicated yersiniosis (n = 49) showed that in patients with gastritis, the prevalence of IgG2 antibodies to Yersinia Yop proteins increased with age and was the highest after the age of 40. The IgG1 corresponding to Yop proteins and IgG3 to LPS were diagnosed more frequently in children than adults [160].
It is worth emphasizing that any antibody analysis should be interpreted cautiously, as cross-reactivity has been observed between Yersinia and Borrelia burgdorferi, Brucella, Chlamydia pneumoniae, Bartonella, and Rickettsia. In addition to reactivity with specific pathogens, they may cross-react with thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin (TSH) [161].
Serological tests are usually performed in most laboratories, but the presence of antibodies is not part of the diagnostic criteria for yersiniosis. Antibody testing can be used as a screening tool to detect the current infection, but further confirmation is required by another test, most often by stool culture.
Unfortunately, the commonly used procedures are expensive and time-consuming, and therefore are rarely used in standard microbiological laboratories [148]. Therefore, scientists and technologists are looking for procedures that will allow for more accessible isolation of these bacterial enteropathogens. Recently, several multiplex molecular tests have been developed that combine various methods (microscopy, antigen testing, culture, and real-time PCR) and detect Yersinia and other gastrointestinal pathogens (up to 20) directly from clinical stool samples within one hour.
One of the useful tools for rapid and sensitive diagnosis, distinguishing three pathogenic Yersinia groups, is the multiplex PCR method. It enables the differentiation of three pathogenic Yersinia groups: highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica (including serotype O8), low pathogenic Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis, due to the unique band patterns for each species from the fecal samples. To establish specific species, four primer pairs are chosen to detect the genes that are responsible for the virulence in pathogenic Yersinia species. These genes include Ail (attachment invasion locus, present on the chromosome of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains), gen FyuA (ferric yersiniabactin uptake receptor A, present on the chromosomal DNA of highly pathogenic Y. enterocolitica), Inv (invasion, present on the chromosome of pathogenic Y. pseudotuberculosis), and VirF (virulence regulon transcriptional activator, encoded on a plasmid of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis), which are responsible for the virulence in pathogenic Yersinia species [15]
Since traditional stool cultures are insufficient, many laboratories have recently adopted PCR-based gastrointestinal pathogen panels (GIPP) to increase the speed and efficiency of pathogen detection; for example, commercial multiplex assays such as Verigene EP, FilmArray GI, xTAG GPP, Go-GutDx®, and BD MAXTM GIPP have been adopted [16,17,18]. For example, Go-GutDx® is the DNA stool testing kit used for the confirmation of infectious diarrhea, including not only Yersinia, but also other pathogens such as Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter jejuni, Salmonella enterica Typhimurium, Shigella spp., STEC (stx1, stx2), Vibrio spp., and Yersinia enterocolitica [17]. In contrast, the BD MAXTM GIPP system detects significantly more Yersinia enterocolitica than traditional cultures, with most of these positive results not recoverable by culture. Interestingly, irregular PCR amplification curves occurred if the viable organisms were not recovered in culture, but still yielded positive automated interpretations [18]. The results of nucleic acid amplification interpretation tests for many pathogens must be related to the clinical picture because these tests detect DNA and do not necessarily involve living organisms.
Clinical isolates from Yersinia-infected patients have recently been characterized at the molecular subtyping level using whole genome sequencing (WGS). WGS is a powerful tool for subtyping Yersinia enterocolitica. It showed that Y. enterocolitica BT 1A strains and BT 4/O:3 strains are genetically diverse, while BT 2/O:3 strains are all ST12 strains and clustered closely [162]. WSG also allows the comparison of the “New World” 8081 strain (1B/O:8), which predominates in the United States (1B/O:8), to the epidemiological pattern in Europe, Japan, and China [biotype 3 strain, 105.5R (r) (O:9) are representatives of the Old World biogroup]. The comparison of the sequenced genome of the mentioned biotypes shows that both strains have more than 14% conservation of specific genes. Many of the loci representing ancestral clusters contributing to enteric survival and pathogenesis are present in strain 105.5R (r) but are lost in strain 8081. The comparative genome analysis indicated that these two strains [biotype 3 strain, 105.5R (r) (O:9) and strain 8081—91B/O:8)] may have attained their pathogenicity by completely separate evolutionary events [163].
The WGS can also be used for food analysis. For example, the study by Stevens et al. shows that the pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains were isolated from 32 of 100 pork samples, from 25 of 100 chicken meat samples, and 22 of 97 produce samples (fresh herbs and salads), all collected at the retail level in Switzerland in 2024. The whole-genome sequencing (WGS) results revealed that three strains belonged to biotype 4 (from pork) and each of them carried a pYV-like plasmid harboring 44 virulence factors. The other 86 strains belonged to biotype 1A, and all isolates belonged to 45 sequence types. Interestingly, plasmids from the same type were identified in different sequence types, showing that genetic exchange between them does occur. Fortunately, none of the isolates harbored plasmid-mediated antimicrobial resistance genes. The Y. enterocolitica biotype 4 (n = 3) and biotype 1A (n = 3) were clonal to the Y. enterocolitica previously isolated from patients. Thus, Y. enterocolitica in food is related to human strains, and the genomic sequences have been adapted to food matrices [162].
The presence of characteristic ultrasonographic findings for Y. enteritis may be helpful in diagnosing Y. enteritis infection. Ultrasonographic findings such as enlarged ileocecal lymph nodes, greater wall thickness of the terminal ileum, and presence of a pericecal hyperechoic region are present during infection. The combined presence of a mean ileocecal lymph node major–minor axis ratio < 1.51 and a pericecal hyperechoic region offers 100% sensitivity for Y. enteritis compared to other bacterial enteritis [164].
Endoscopy is not warranted in the diagnosis of yersiniosis but is used in the cases of diagnostic uncertainty in which a biopsy may resolve clinical doubts. The Y. enterocolitica infection clinically and histopathologically resembles Crohn’s disease (mimicry phenomenon).
Both entities have similar clinical features, often involving the ileocecal region, and histopathological examination may reveal granulomas. However, in the cases of YE infection, central necrosis of the granulomas and a perigranulomatous lymphoid cuff are seen in intestinal biopsy material [165]. Endoscopic findings include round or oval protrusions and shallow and irregular ulcerations scattered in the edematous mucosa in the terminal ileum, without abnormalities in the colon. Ileal ulceration usually appears 4–5 weeks after the onset of symptoms, with ileal perforation occurring five weeks later [166]. Large intestine involvement is rarely reported [167].
Table 4. Diagnostic tests used in Yersinia infection.
Table 4. Diagnostic tests used in Yersinia infection.
Diagnostic TestCharacteristicsClinical Meaning
ELISA
  • Commonly used to detect IgG, IgA, and IgM [151];
  • Allows for the detection of antibodies against Yersinia LPS, ECA-specific antibodies [160], and Yersinia-specific immune complexes [152].
  • Confirms the infection;
  • Useful in final diagnosis, particularly in ReA [151].
Western blot
  • More sensitive and specific than ELISA;
  • Utilizes YOPs for the detection of Yersinia antibodies against Y. enterocolitica, Y. enterocolitica, and Y. pseudotuberculosis [151].
Allows for the differentiation of specific antibody isotypes:
  • Enables differentiation between IgG and IgA antibodies (acute vs. chronic infection) [151];
  • Enables IgG and IgA detection in patients with IgM deficiency [153].
Endoscopy
  • Detects changes in terminal inflammation of the ileum, ileocecal valve, and cecum (sometimes ascending colon) [168].
  • Enables taking a biopsy with an assessment of the degree and type of inflammation [168].
The histological findings of Yersinia infection
  • Not pathognomonic;
  • Patchy villous atrophy and crypt hyperplasia;
  • Mixed acute and chronic inflammation;
  • Focal neutrophilic cryptitis [169];
  • Epithelial cell granulomas composed of histiocytes, small T-lymphocytes, and plasma monocytes with suppuration of the centers [151].
  • Histological findings are relatively nonspecific [168];
  • Usually reflects mixed acute and chronic inflammation with focal neutrophilic cryptitis [169].
ReA—reactive arthritis; SpA—spondyloarthropathy; RA—rheumatoid arthritis; ELISA—enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; LPS—lipopolysaccharide, ECA—enterobacterial common antigen; GI—gastrointestinal; ReA—reactive arthritis.

10. Treatment of Yersinia Infection

10.1. Treatment of Intestinal Yersiniosis

Mild intestinal ischemia usually resolves spontaneously. Diarrhea requires adequate hydration, electrolytes, and nutrient supplementation (Table 5). Severe and prolonged disease may require antibiotics, primarily quinolones; however, aminoglycosides or tetracyclines in combination with trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) have also been used [151,170,171,172]. Most organisms are sensitive to aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones [173].
However, antibiotic treatment is recommended only in severe or complicated diarrheal infections, especially in the case of concomitant or suspected bacteremia or in immunocompromised individuals [171,172]. In specific populations, such as the elderly; diabetics; or those with iron overload, alcoholism, or chronic diseases, treatment should be considered [173]. An example is the use of antibiotics in patients with predominant extramesenteric symptoms such as lymphadenopathy with high fever, weight loss, septic syndrome, and hepatitis. Tetracycline is also used in the treatment of human yersiniosis [170]. Although antimicrobial therapy alleviates symptoms, it does not affect the course of the disease. This fact is confirmed by studies that could not link the duration of symptoms of the enteritis caused by Y. enterocolitica infections with antimicrobial treatment [174].
Unfortunately, there are little data on the efficacy of Y. enterocolitica treatment; however, available data show that ciprofloxacin has a beneficial influence and causes the disappearance of bacteria from the gut-associated lymphoid tissue compared with placebo. Conversely, patients receiving a placebo have a higher amount of circulating IgA antibodies against YOPs, which are detected for a long time, than patients treated with ciprofloxacin [175]. Similar serologic changes were observed in the case of Y. enterocolitica-induced reactive arthritis, which is characterized by persistent serum IgA antibodies against YOPs compared to patients with uncomplicated infections. Therefore, it is suspected that prolonged antibiotic administration could eliminate persistent bacilli from the gut, thus eliminating the circulating IgA antibodies from the serum [151]. Moreover, successful ciprofloxacin monotherapy resulted in a serologic switch, causing the prolonged presence of IgG antibodies against YopD in serum (rarely, antibodies against YopH and YOPM are observed). Due to the elimination of the infection trigger by ciprofloxacin, antibody synthesis is stopped, preventing the development of chronic infection. Unfortunately, the high levels of antibiotic resistance in Y. enterocolitica may result in ineffective prevention and treatment of this disease in humans and animals, which may lead to serious threats to public health [176].
Table 5. Treatment of yersiniosis.
Table 5. Treatment of yersiniosis.
Management
Stage of the DiseaseManagementCharacteristics
acute severe YersiniosisSupportive care
  • Fluids;
  • Electrolytes;
  • Nutritional restoration.
Hospital admission and antibiotics
  • Elderly people;
  • Immunocompromised patients;
  • Diabetic patients;
  • Patients with iron metabolism disorders: iron overload, deferoxamine therapy (used in iron overload therapy);
  • Alcohol addicts;
  • Patients on chronic hemodialysis;
  • Patients undergoing deferoxamine therapy;
  • Chronically ill patients with many co-morbidities.
Abdominal abscess
  • Surgical draining
Appendicitis suspicions
  • Surgical exploration (appendicitis and pseudoappendicitis are difficult to distinguish based on clinical symptoms or imaging studies)
  • If the appendix is normal, lymph nodes should be removed for histological examination
Antibiotics
  • Quinolones [175];
  • Aminoglycosides;
  • Tetracyclines +/− TMP-SMX;
  • Third-generation cephalosporins +/− TMP-SMX [177].
The acute phase of ReA
  • Ciprofloxacin 500 mg twice daily orally compared with placebo for three months causes faster remission and pain relief compared with the group without antibiotics [177].
Chronic infectionIntestinal infection
  • Mild to severe infection;
  • Abdominal pain located on the right side of the abdomen and fever, diarrhea, and vomiting, rarely acute inflammation of the intestinal lymph nodes in adults [84];
  • Low-grade fever, crampy abdominal pain, loose stool with mucus or blood, and vomiting in acute enteritis in young children (with the risk of dehydration);
  • Symptoms usually appear four to seven days after infection and last from one week to three weeks or longer [84].
ReA
  • Rarely synthesized antibodies to YopH and no occurrences of antibodies to YopM (YopH and YopM are produced at the late stage of the disease and reflect the more chronic phase);
  • The disappearance of IgA associated with the disappearance of Yersinia from intestinal biopsies in Yersinia-associated SpA [177];
  • The prolonged administration of antibiotics could eliminate persistent bacilli from the gut, thus eliminating the circulating IgA antibodies from the serum [177].
Preventive measuresEducation and healthy behavior
  • Hand washing;
  • Meticulous food handling;
  • Education, especially for patients who have experienced previous infections of Y. enterocolitica [178];
  • The elimination of contact between food handlers, healthcare workers, or childcare workers and healthy people until they are symptom-free for 48 h [5];
  • Information about the possibility of bacteria in fresh vegetables (e.g., lettuce) after seven days of refrigerated storage (4 °C), which cannot be disinfected by washing with tap water or water with 60 ppm chlorine added [178].
TMP-SMX—trimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole; SpA—spondyloarthropathy.

10.2. Treatment of Skin and Mucous Membrane Lesions

Mild skin lesions usually do not require treatment. In more severe lesions, keratinolytic agents (e.g., topical salicylic preparations), glucocorticosteroids(GCSs), or calcipotriol in the form of a cream or ointment can be used. In severe skin lesions, methotrexate or retinoids are usually necessary. In the case of balanitis cricoid, topical treatment with a weak GCS (e.g., topical hydrocortisone cream) is used. The treatment of uveitis requires the use of mydriatics and steroids in the form of eye drops. In severe cases, if the lesions do not resolve, an oral GCS may be necessary.

10.3. Treatment of Reactive Arthritis

Since ReA is an aseptic arthritis, it does not require antibiotic treatment and is usually self-limiting. Recent data show that antibiotic therapy is indicated only if there is a documented active infection, mainly in chlamydial infection. However, in active yersiniosis, the implementation of ciprofloxacin results in the shortening of symptoms [175]. Joint pain may well respond to NSAIDs or glucocorticosteroids, but chronic ReA may require the introduction of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). The drug used as the first choice is sulfasalazine [179,180].

11. Prevention

For many years, the factors that have the greatest impact on public health have been analyzed in order to develop control strategies. Unfortunately, the quality of available information on the risks of Yersinia spp. is low. Implementation of good practice guidelines throughout the vegetable production chain could prevent the presence of identified risks. Solid epidemiological studies on foodborne illnesses potentially associated with vegetable consumption are necessary [181].
An effective approach to this zoonosis prevention and control that integrates animal, human, and environmental ecological principles is required [182]. Risk analysis uses predictive models, which are powerful tools for public health and epidemiology, predicting the spread and spillover of pathogenic bacteria based on external environmental factors like temperature, precipitation, altitude, and vegetation distribution, as well as the characteristics of isolates like serotypes and biotypes, and the monitoring and alerting of relevant zoonotic diseases. In the case of Yersinia, the unifactor and multifactor analyses performed by Liang et al. showed that the distribution of Y. enterocolitica in animals is influenced by environmental factors such as altitude, mean temperature, and precipitation [183]. The temperature (12.70 °C) and precipitation (1.34 mm) of the collection locations were closely related to the pathogenic isolates [184].
The preventive measures should include handwashing after exposure to an infected animal and safe food processing (both domestic and industrial) [185]. It is advisable to avoid the consumption of raw pork and its products [186]. Routine water treatment and disinfection are obligatory. Since Yersinia can be preserved in blood, the screening for this pathogen in blood and blood products is obligatory [187]. Considering the numerous factors related to food processing as well as environmental factors, it is necessary to develop new food safety strategies to prevent and control Y. enterocolitica infections [188].

12. Conclusions

Yersinia infections are widespread in most countries with a cold climate and are considered an important causative agent of sporadic and epidemic human enteric disease, less frequently ReA. The complex mechanisms involved in the initiation and transmission of the infection in host cells, such as T3SS, LPS, endotoxin, and Yop proteins, initiate host infection, leading to human gastroenteritis. Bacteria are transmitted via the fecal–oral route, most often after consuming contaminated animal products (e.g., raw pork, unpasteurized milk). Diagnosis is often difficult and requires confirmation of the infection by various bacteriological (the isolation of Yersinia from biological samples) and serological methods (e.g., the detection of antibodies in blood serum or synovial fluid). Ultrasound or CT might be necessary in the case of pseudoappendicitis, and colonoscopy in the suspicion of ulcerative colitis. Yersiniosis is usually mild and self-limiting, but in elderly and immunocompromised patients, it can be a cause of severe sepsis or pseudo-appendicular syndromes. Y. pseudotuberculosis infection is rare, and mainly sporadic cases are reported, but it can also cause epidemic outbreaks.
Although recent data on Yersinia infections are published every year, there are areas that require further analysis and development. First, the available data on Yersinia food poisoning are usually underestimated. Therefore, the meticulous reporting of infections will enable the development of accurate epidemiological data. Secondly, uniform standards of pathogen identification are still lacking, and data on the effectiveness of treatments are very limited. Therefore, more effective screening of infections and analysis of currently available antimicrobial therapies for their efficacy is advisable. Thirdly, it is also important to understand the precise mechanisms and complications associated with chronic infection, which allows for better adjustment of treatment. Fourthly, it is crucial to educate patients and food handlers, report infections, and implement risk assessments through hazard analysis. Fifthly, the development of vaccines will facilitate the elimination of the disease in the most prevalent regions.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

Ailattachment invasion locus
ECAenterobacterial common antigen
FESLFFar Eastern scarlet fever
GDIguanosine dissociation inhibitors (which constitute a family of small GTPases that serve a regulatory role in vesicular membrane traffic)
Gαq heterotrimeric G protein complex
IBDinflammatory bowel disease
HPIhigh-pathogenicity island
IFγinterferon-γ
invinvasin
LPSlipopolysaccharide
NKnatural killer
OPSO-specific polysaccharide
PRK (PKN)the serine/threonine protein kinase C-related kinases
RArheumatoid arthritis
Rac1A specific member of the Rho family of GTPases (intracellular transducer of multiple signaling pathways)
Rho family proteinsA member of a major branch of the Ras superfamily of small GTPases [a family of small (~21 kDa) signaling G proteins]
RCTsrandomized control trials
ReAreactive arthritis
ROKRho-kinase
ROSreactive oxygen species
RSKribosomal S6 kinase
Ser/Thrserine/threonine protein kinase
sIGMDselective IgM deficiency
T3SStype 3 secretion system
TLRs Toll-like receptors
TMP-SMXtrimethoprim–sulfamethoxazole
TNF-αtumor necrosis factor
TSHthyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin
yetYersinia stable toxin
YopYersinia outer protein
YPMY. pseudotuberculosis-derived mitogen

References

  1. Le Guern, A.S.; Savin, C.; Angermeier, H.; Brémont, S.; Clermont, D.; Mühle, E.; Orozova, P.; Najdenski, H.; Pizarro-Cerdá, J. Yersinia artesiana sp. nov., Yersinia proxima sp. nov., Yersinia alsatica sp. nov., Yersina vastinensis sp. nov., Yersinia thracica sp. nov. and Yersinia occitanica sp. nov., isolated from humans and animals. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 2020, 70, 5363–5372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Verhaegen, J.; Dancsa, L.; Lemmens, P.; Janssens, M.; Verbist, L.; Vandepitte, J.; Wauters, G. Yersinia enterocolitica surveillance in Belgium (1979–1989). Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 1991, 12, 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  3. Somova, L.M.; Antonenko, F.F.; Timchenko, N.F.; Lyapun, I.N. Far Eastern Scarlet-Like Fever is a Special Clinical and Epidemic Manifestation of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Infection in Russia. Pathogens 2020, 9, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Williamson, D.A.; Baines, S.L.; Carter, G.P.; da Silva, A.G.; Ren, X.; Sherwood, J.; Dufour, M.; Schultz, M.B.; French, N.P.; Seemann, T.; et al. Genomic Insights into a Sustained National Outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Genome Biol. Evol. 2016, 8, 3806–3814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rivas, L.; Strydom, H.; Paine, S.; Wang, J.; Wright, J. Yersiniosis in New Zealand. Pathogens 2021, 10, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jalava, K.; Hallanvuo, S.; Nakari, U.M.; Ruutu, P.; Kela, E.; Heinasmaki, T.; Siitonen, A.; Nuorti, J.P. Multiple Outbreaks of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Infections in Finland. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 2789–2791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Savin, C.; Le Guern, A.S.; Chereau, F.; Guglielmini, J.; Heuzé, G.; Demeure, C.; Pizarro-Cerdá, J. First Description of a Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Clonal Outbreak in France, Confirmed Using a New Core Genome Multilocus Sequence Typing Method. Microbiol. Spectr. 2022, 10, e01145-22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Noszczyńska, M.; Kasperkiewicz, K.; Duda, K.A.; Podhorodecka, J.; Rabsztyn, K.; Gwizdała, K.; Świerzko, A.S.; Radziejewska-Lebrecht, J.; Holst, O.; Skurnik, M. Serological characterization of the enterobacterial common antigen substitution of the lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3. Microbiology 2015, 161, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ljungberg, P.; Valtonen, M.; Harjola, V.P.; Kaukoranta-Tolvanen, S.S.; Vaara, M. Report of four cases of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis septicemia and a literature review. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 1995, 14, 804–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Mert, M.; Kocabay, G.; Ozülker, T.; Temizel, M.; Yanar, H.; Uygun, O.; Ozülker, F.; Arman, Y.; Cevizci, E.; Olek, A.C. Liver abscess due to Yersinia bacteremia in a well-controlled type I diabetic patient. Endokrynol. Pol. 2011, 62, 357–360. [Google Scholar]
  11. Kaasch, A.J.; Dinter, J.; Goeser, T.; Plum, G.; Seifert, H. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis bloodstream infection and septic arthritis: Case report and review of the literature. Infection 2012, 40, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Safa, G.; Loppin, M.; Tisseau, L.; Lamoril, J. Cutaneous aseptic neutrophilic abscesses and Yersinia enterocolitica infection in a case subsequently diagnosed as Crohn’s disease. Dermatology 2008, 217, 340–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Vincent, P.; Leclercq, A.; Martin, L.; Network, Y.S.; Duez, J.-M.; Simonet, M.; Carniel, E. Sudden onset of pseudotuberculosis in humans, France, 2004–2005. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008, 14, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Galindo, C.L.; Rosenzweig, J.A.; Kirtley, M.L.; Chopra, A.K. Pathogenesis of Y. enterocolitica and Y. pseudotuberculosis in Human Yersiniosis. J. Pathog. 2011, 2011, 182051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bui, T.H.; Ikeuchi, S.; O’Brien, Y.S.; Niwa, T.; Hara-Kudo, Y.; Taniguchi, T.; Hayashidani, H. Multiplex PCR method for differentiating highly pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and low pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2021, 83, 1982–1987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Binnicker, M.J. Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2015, 53, 3723–3728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Glover, Q.; Jiang, X.; Onderak, A.M.; Mapes, A.; Hollnagel, F.; Buckley, J.; Kim, C.H.; Siraj, D. Comparison between Go-GutDx, a novel diagnostic stool test kit with potential impact in low-income countries, and BioFire test. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0319145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Freeman, C.N.; Mehta, N.; Rabari, J.; Kosar, J.; Blondeau, J.M.; Hamula, C.L. Retrospective analysis and clinical performance of BD MAX enteric pathogen testing with a focus on reliable identification of vibrio species in stool samples. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2025, 111, 116715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Mollaret, H.H. Fifteen centuries of Yersiniosis. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 1994, 13, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Achtman, M.; Zurth, K.; Morelli, G.; Torrea, G.; Guiyoule, A.; Carniel, E. Yersinia pestis, the cause of plague, is a recently emerged clone of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 14043–14048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ostroff, S. Yersinia as an emerging infection: Epidemiologic aspects of Yersiniosis. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 1995, 13, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  22. Schleifstein, J.; Coleman, M.B. An unidentified microorganism resembling B. lignieri and Past. pseudotuberculosis and pathogenic for man. N. Y. State J. Med. 1939, 39, 1749–1753. [Google Scholar]
  23. vanLoghem, J.J. The classification of plaque-bacillus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1944, 10, 15–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Frederiksen, W. A study of some Yersinia pseudotuberculosis-like bacteria (‘Bacterium enterocoliticum’ and Pasteurella X). In Proceedings of the 14th Scandinavian Congress on Pathology and Microbiology, Oslo, Norway, 25–27 June 1964; pp. 103–104. [Google Scholar]
  25. Brenner, D.J.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Falxo, D.P.; Weaver, R.E.; Fanning, G.R. Characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis by deoxyribonucleic acid hybridization and by biochemical reactions. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1976, 26, 180–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brenner, D.J.; Bercovier, H.; Ursing, J.; Alonso, J.M.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Fanning, G.R.; Carter, G.P.; Mollaret, H.H. Yersinia intermedia: A new species of Enterobacteriaceae composed of rhamnose-positive, melibiose positive raffinose-positive strains (formerly called atypical Yersinia enterocolitica or Yersinia enterocolitica-like). Curr. Microbiol. 1980, 4, 207–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bercovier, H.; Ursing, J.; Brenner, D.J.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Fanning, G.R.; Carter, G.P.; Mollaret, H.H. Yersinia kristensenii: A new species of Enterobacteriaceae composed of sucrose-negative strains (formerly called atypical Yersinia enterocolitica or Yersinia enterocolitica-like). Curr. Microbiol. 1980, 4, 219–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Nilehn, B. Studies on Yersinia enterocolitica with special reference to bacterial diagnosis and occurrence in human acute enteric disease. Acta. Pathol. Microbiol. Scand. 1969, 206, 1. [Google Scholar]
  29. Wauters, G.; Kandolo, K.; Janssens, M. Revised biogrouping scheme of Yersinia enterocolitica. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 1987, 9, 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  30. Wauters, G.; Janssens, M.; Steigerwalt, A.G.; Brenner, D.J. Yersinia mollareti sp., nov., Yersinia bercovieri sp. nov., formerly called Yersinia enterocolitica biogroups 3A and 3B. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 1988, 4, 424–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bottone, E.J. Yersinia enterocolitica: Overview and epidemiologic correlates. Microbes Infect. 1999, 1, 323–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Eurosurveillance-Editorial-Team. The 2013 joint ECDC/EFSA report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks published. Eurosurveillance 2015, 20, 6. [Google Scholar]
  33. EFSA. ECDC The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2015. EFSA J. 2016, 14, e04634. [Google Scholar]
  34. SVA. Surveillance of Infectious Diseases in Animals and Humans in Sweden 2015; National Veterinary Institute (SVA): Uppsala, Sweden, 2016; ISSN 1654-7098. [Google Scholar]
  35. Kasperkiewicz, K.; Świerzko, A.S.; Przybyła, M.; Szemraj, J.; Barski, J.; Skurnik, M.; Kałużyński, A.; Cedzyński, M. The Role of Yersinia enterocolitica O:3 Lipopolysaccharide in Collagen-Induced Arthritis. J. Immunol. Res. 2020, 2020, 7439506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Nowacka, Z.; Kosyra, M.; Sadkowska-Todys, M. Yersiniosis in Poland in 2018–2020. Przegl. Epidemiol. 2022, 76, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Scallan, E.; Hoekstra, R.M.; Angulo, F.J.; Tauxe, R.V.; Widdowson, M.A.; Roy, S.L.; Jones, J.L.; Griffin, P.M. Foodborne illness acquired in the United States--major pathogens. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011, 17, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prevention Centers for Disease Control and Yersinia enterocolitica (Yersiniosis). 2016. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/yersinia/ (accessed on 23 February 2023).
  39. Nesbakken, T. Surveillance and Control of Enteric Yersinioses. In Yersinia: System Biology and Control; Carniel, E., Hinnebusch, B.J., Eds.; Caister Academic Press: Norfolk, UK, 2012; pp. 217–238. [Google Scholar]
  40. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2017. EFSA J. 2018, 16, e05500. [Google Scholar]
  41. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The European Union One Health 2023 Zoonoses report. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e9106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Inoue, M.; Nakashima, H.; Ueba, O.; Ishida, T.; Date, H.; Kobashi, S.; Takagi, K.; Nishu, T.; Tsubokura, M. Community outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Microbiol. Immunol. 1984, 28, 883–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Nowgesic, E.; Fyfe, M.; Hockin, J.; King, A.; Ng, H.; Paccagnella, A.; Trinidad, A.; Wilcott, L.; Smith, R.; Denney, A.; et al. Outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in British Columbia—November 1998. Can. Commun. Dis. Rep. 1999, 25, 97–100. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zganjer, M.; Roic, G.; Cizmic, A.; Pajic, A. Infectious ileocecitis—Appendicitis mimicking syndrome. Bratisl. Lek. Listy 2005, 106, 201–202. [Google Scholar]
  45. Grant, H.; Rode, H.; Cywes, S. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis affecting the appendix. J. Pediatr. Surg. 1994, 29, 1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Amphlett, A. Far East Scarlet-Like Fever: A Review of the Epidemiology, Symptomatology, and Role of Superantigenic Toxin: Yersinia pseudotuberculosis-Derived Mitogen A. Open Forum Infect. Dis. 2015, 3, ofv202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Suzuki, S.; Suzuki, K.; Furukawa, T.; Nakajima, M.; Sakai, H. Past Endemic Izumi Fever or Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Infection Reappears Sporadically. Intern. Med. 2024, 63, 1317–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Korkeala, H. Molecular epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003, 529, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Guinet, F.; Carniel, E.; Leclercq, A. Transfusion-transmitted Yersinia enterocolitica sepsis. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ackers, M.L.; Schoenfeld, S.; Markman, J.; Smith, M.G.; Nicholson, M.A.; DeWitt, W.; Cameron, D.N.; Griffin, P.M.; Slutsker, L. An outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica O:8 infections associated with pasteurized milk. J. Infect. Dis. 2000, 181, 1834–1837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Tsubokura, M.; Aleksić, S. A simplified antigenic scheme for serotyping of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis: Phenotypic characterization of reference strains and preparation of O and H factor sera. Contrib. Microbiol. Immunol. 1995, 13, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Jalava, K.; Hakkinen, M.; Valkonen, M.; Nakari, U.M.; Palo, T.; Hallanvuo, S.; Ollgren, J.; Siitonen, A.; Nuorti, J.P. An outbreak of gastrointestinal illness and erythema nodosum from grated carrots contaminated with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. J. Infect. Dis. 2006, 194, 1209–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Carniel, E. The Yersinia high-pathogenicity island. Int. Microbiol. 1999, 2, 161–167. [Google Scholar]
  54. Uchiyama, T.; Miyoshi-Akiyama, T.; Kato, H.; Fujimaki, W.; Imanishi, K.; Yan, X.J. Superantigenic properties of a novel mitogenic substance produced by Yersinia pseudotuberculosis isolated from patients manifesting acute and systemic symptoms. J. Immunol. 1993, 151, 4407–4413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fukushima, H.; Matsuda, Y.; Seki, R.; Tsubokura, M.; Takeda, N.; Shubin, F.N.; Paik, I.K.; Zheng, X.B. Geographical heterogeneity between Far Eastern and Western countries in prevalence of the virulence plasmid, the superantigen Yersinia pseudotuberculosis-derived mitogen, and the high-pathogenicity island among Yersinia pseudotuberculosis strains. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2001, 39, 3541–3547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Stolle, A.; Siitonen, A.; Korkeala, H. Sporadic human Yersinia enterocolitica infections caused by bioserotype 4/O:3 originate mainly from pigs. J. Med. Microbiol. 2006, 55, 747–749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bonardi, S.; Paris, A.; Bassi, L.; Salmi, F.; Bacci, C.; Riboldi, E.; Boni, E.; D’Incau, M.; Tagliabue, S.; Brindani, F. Detection, semiquantitative enumeration, and antimicrobial susceptibility of Yersinia enterocolitica in pork and chicken meats in Italy. J. Food Prot. 2010, 73, 1785–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huovinen, E.; Sihvonen, L.M.; Virtanen, M.J.; Haukka, K.; Siitonen, A.; Kuusi, M. Symptoms and sources of Yersinia enterocolitica-infection: A case-control study. BMC Infect. Dis. 2010, 10, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Boqvist, S.; Pettersson, H.; Svensson, A.; Andersson, Y. Sources of sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infection in children in Sweden, 2004: A case-control study. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 897–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Raymond, P.; Houard, E.; Denis, M.; Esnault, E. Diversity of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from pigs in a French slaughterhouse over 2 years. Microbiologyopen 2019, 8, e00751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Guillier, L.; Fravalo, P.; Leclercq, A.; Thébault, A.; Kooh, P.; Cadavez, V.; Gonzales-Barron, U. Risk factors for sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Microbial. Risk Anal. 2021, 17, 100141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, X.; Cui, Z.; Wang, H.; Tang, L.; Yang, J.; Gu, L.; Jin, D.; Luo, L.; Qiu, H.; Xiao, Y.; et al. Pathogenic strains of Yersinia enterocolitica isolated from domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) belonging to farmers are of the same subtype as pathogenic Y. enterocolitica strains isolated from humans and may be a source of human infection in Jiangsu Province, China. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2010, 48, 1604–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Espenhain, L.; Riess, M.; Müller, L.; Colombe, S.; Ethelberg, S.; Litrup, E.; Jernberg, C.; Kühlmann-Berenzon, S.; Lindblad, M.; Hove, N.K.; et al. Cross-border outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica O3 associated with imported fresh spinach, Sweden and Denmark, March 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019, 24, 1900368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jayarao, B.M.; Donaldson, S.C.; Straley, B.A.; Sawant, A.A.; Hegde, N.V.; Brown, J.L. A survey of foodborne pathogens in bulk tank milk and raw milk consumption among farm families in Pennsylvania. J. Dairy Sci. 2006, 89, 2451–2458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Wacheck, S.; Koenig, M.; Stolle, A.; Stephan, R. Prevalence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in wild boars in Switzerland. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2009, 135, 199–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Frölich, K.; Wisser, J.; Schmüser, H.; Fehlberg, U.; Neubauer, H.; Grunow, R.; Nikolaou, K.; Priemer, J.; Thiede, S.; Streich, W.J.; et al. Epizootiologic and ecologic investigations of European brown hares (Lepus europaeus) in selected populations from Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. J. Wildl. Dis. 2003, 39, 751–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Muhldorfer, K.; Wibbelt, G.; Haensel, J.; Riehm, J.; Speck, S. Yersinia species isolated from bats, Germany. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2010, 16, 578–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Backhans, A.; Fellström, C.; Lambertz, S.T. Occurrence of pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in small wild rodents. Epidemiol. Infect. 2011, 139, 1230–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Bancerz-Kisiel, A.; Platt-Samoraj, A.; Szczerba-Turek, A.; Syczyło, K.; Szweda, W. The first pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica bioserotype 4/O:3 strain isolated from a hunted wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Poland. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015, 143, 2758–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Syczyło, K.; Platt-Samoraj, A.; Bancerz-Kisiel, A.; Szczerba-Turek, A.; Pajdak-Czaus, J.; Łabuć, S.; Procajło, Z.; Socha, P.; Chuzhebayeva, G.; Szweda, W. The prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica in game animals in Poland. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0195136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Arrausi-Subiza, M.; Gerrikagoitia, X.; Alvarez, V.; Ibabe, J.C.; Barral, M. Prevalence of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in wild boars in the Basque Country, northern Spain. Acta Vet. Scand. 2016, 58, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Nuorti, J.P.; Niskanen, T.; Hallanvuo, S.; Mikkola, J.; Kela, E.; Hatakka, M.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Lyytikainen, O.; Siitonen, A.; Korkeala, H.; et al. A widespread outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O:3 infection from iceberg lettuce. J. Infect. Dis. 2004, 189, 766–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rimhanen-Finne, R.; Niskanen, T.; Hallanvuo, S.; Makary, P.; Haukka, K.; Pajunen, S.; Siitonen, A.; Ristolainen, R.; Pöyry, H.; Ollgren, J.; et al. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis causing a large outbreak associated with carrots in Finland, 2006. Epidemiol. Infect. 2009, 137, 342–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Pärn, T.; Hallanvuo, S.; Salmenlinna, S.; Pihlajasaari, A.; Heikkinen, S.; Telkki-Nykänen, H.; Hakkinen, M.; Ollgren, J.; Huusko, S.; Rimhanen-Finne, R. Outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis O:1 infection associated with raw milk consumption, Finland, spring 2014. Euro Surveill. 2015, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Barnes, P.D.; Bergman, M.A.; Mecsas, J.; Isberg, R.R. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis disseminates directly from a replicating bacterial pool in the intestine. J. Exp. Med. 2006, 203, 1591–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. He, Y.X.; Ye, C.L.; Zhang, P.; Li, Q.; Park, C.G.; Yang, K.; Jiang, L.Y.; Lv, Y.; Ying, X.L.; Ding, H.H.; et al. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Exploits CD209 Receptors for Promoting Host Dissemination and Infection. Infect. Immun. 2018, 87, e00654-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Laukkanen, R.; Martínez, P.O.; Siekkinen, K.M.; Ranta, J.; Maijala, R.; Korkeala, H. Transmission of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in the pork production chain from farm to slaughterhouse. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 5444–5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Sannö, A.; Aspán, A.; Hestvik, G.; Jacobson, M. Presence of Salmonella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Escherichia coli O157:H7 in wild boars. Epidemiol. Infect. 2014, 142, 2542–2547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Al Dahouk, S.; Nöckler, K.; Tomaso, H.; Splettstoesser, W.D.; Jungersen, G.; Riber, U.; Petry, T.; Hoffmann, D.; Scholz, H.C.; Hensel, A.; et al. Seroprevalence of brucellosis, tularemia, and yersiniosis in wild boars (Sus scrofa) from north-eastern Germany. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2005, 52, 444–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Niskanen, T.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Korkeala, H. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis with limited genetic diversity is a common finding in tonsils of fattening pigs. J. Food Prot. 2002, 65, 540–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Nikolova, S.; Tzvetkov, Y.; Najdenski, H.; Vesselinova, A. Isolation of pathogenic Yersiniae from wild animals in Bulgaria. J. Vet. Med. B Infect. Dis. Vet. Public Health 2001, 48, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Niskanen, T.; Waldenström, J.; Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Olsen, B.; Korkeala, H. virF-positive Yersinia pseudotuberculosis and Yersinia enterocolitica found in migratory birds in Sweden. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 4670–4675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. MacDonald, E.; Einöder-Moreno, M.; Borgen, K.; Thorstensen Brandal, L.; Diab, L.; Fossli, Ø.; Guzman Herrador, B.; Hassan, A.A.; Johannessen, G.S.; Johansen, E.J.; et al. National outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in military and civilian populations associated with consumption of mixed salad, Norway, 2014. Euro Surveill. 2016, 21, 30321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Rosner, B.M.; Stark, K.; Höhle, M.; Werber, D. Risk factors for sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infections, Germany 2009–2010. Epidemiol. Infect. 2012, 140, 1738–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rahuma, N.; Ghenghesh, K.S.; Ben Aissa, R.; Elamaari, A. Carriage by the housefly (Musca domestica) of multiple-antibiotic-resistant bacteria that are potentially pathogenic to humans, in hospital and other urban environments in Misurata, Libya. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2005, 99, 795–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Fredriksson-Ahomaa, M.; Wacheck, S.; Bonke, R.; Stephan, R. Different enteropathogenic Yersinia strains found in wild boars and domestic pigs. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2011, 8, 733–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Moriki, S.; Nobata, A.; Shibata, H.; Nagai, A.; Minami, N.; Taketani, T.; Fukushima, H.; Fukushima, H. Familial outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O9 biotype 2. J. Infect. Chemther. 2010, 16, 56–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Isobe, J.; Kimata, K.; Shimizu, M.; Kanatani, J.; Sata, T.; Watahiki, M. Water-borne outbreak of Yersinia enterocolitica O8 due to a small scale water system. Kansenshogaku Zasshi. J. Jpn. Assoc. Infect. Dis. 2014, 88, 827–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Falcão, J.P.; Brocchi, M.; Proença-Módena, J.L.; Acrani, G.O.; Corrêa, E.F.; Falcão, D.P. Virulence characteristics and epidemiology of Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersiniae other than Y. pseudotuberculosis and Y. pestis isolated from water and sewage. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2004, 96, 1230–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. von Tils, D.; Blädel, I.; Schmidt, M.A.; Heusipp, G. Type II secretion in Yersinia—A secretion system for pathogenicity and environmental fitness. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2012, 2, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Montagner, C.; Arquint, C.; Cornelis, G.R. Translocators YopB and YopD from Yersinia enterocolitica form a multimeric integral membrane complex in eukaryotic cell membranes. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 6923–6928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Venecia, K.; Young, G.M. Environmental regulation and virulence attributes of the Ysa type III secretion system of Yersinia enterocolitica biovar 1B. Infect. Immun. 2005, 73, 5961–5977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Dhar, M.S.; Virdi, J.S. Strategies used by Yersinia enterocolitica to evade killing by the host: Thinking beyond Yops. Microbes Infect. 2014, 16, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mühlenkamp, M.C.; Hallström, T.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Bohn, E.; Linke, D.; Rinker, J.; Riesbeck, K.; Singh, B.; Leo, J.C.; Hammerschmidt, S.; et al. Vitronectin Binds to a Specific Stretch within the Head Region of Yersinia Adhesin A and Thereby Modulates Yersinia enterocolitica Host Interaction. J. Innate Immun. 2017, 9, 33–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Schmid, Y.; Grassl, G.A.; Bühler, O.T.; Skurnik, M.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Bohn, E. Yersinia enterocolitica adhesin A induces production of interleukin-8 in epithelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 6780–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Drummond, N.; Murphy, B.P.; Ringwood, T.; Prentice, M.B.; Buckley, J.F.; Fanning, S. Yersinia enterocolitica: A Brief Review of the Issues Relating to the Zoonotic Pathogen, Public Health Challenges, and the Pork Production Chain. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2012, 9, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Knirel, Y.A.; Anisimov, A.P.; Kislichkina, A.A.; Kondakova, A.N.; Bystrova, O.V.; Vagaiskaya, A.S.; Shatalin, K.Y.; Shashkov, A.S.; Dentovskaya, S.V. Lipopolysaccharide of the Yersinia pseudotuberculosis Complex. Biomolecules 2021, 11, 1410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ravelli, A.; Martini, A. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Lancet 2007, 369, 767–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Saraka, D.; Savin, C.; Kouassi, S.; Cissé, B.; Koffi, E.; Cabanel, N.; Brémont, S.; Faye-Kette, H.; Dosso, M.; Carniel, E. Yersinia enterocolitica, a Neglected Cause of Human Enteric Infections in Côte d’Ivoire. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2017, 11, e0005216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Hietala, M.A.; Nandakumar, K.S.; Persson, L.; Fahlén, S.; Holmdahl, R.; Pekna, M. Complement activation by both classical and alternative pathways is critical for the effector phase of arthritis. Eur. J. Immunol. 2004, 34, 1208–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Banda, N.K.; Kraus, D.; Vondracek, A.; Huynh, L.H.; Bendele, A.; Holers, V.M.; Arend, W.P. Mechanisms of effects of complement inhibition in murine collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2002, 46, 3065–3075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Benabdillah, R.; Mota, L.J.; Lützelschwab, S.; Demoinet, E.; Cornelis, G.R. Identification of a nuclear targeting signal in YopM from Yersinia spp. Microb. Pathog. 2004, 36, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cheng, L.W.; Schneewind, O. Yersinia enterocolitica TyeA, an intracellular regulator of the type III machinery, is required for specific targeting of YopE, YopH, YopM, and YopN into the cytosol of eukaryotic cells. J. Bacteriol. 2000, 182, 3183–3190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. McCoy, M.W.; Marré, M.L.; Lesser, C.F.; Mecsas, J. The C-terminal tail of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis YopM is critical for interacting with RSK1 and for virulence. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 2584–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. LaRock, C.N.; Cookson, B.T. The Yersinia virulence effector YopM binds caspase-1 to arrest inflammasome assembly and processing. Cell Host Microbe 2012, 12, 799–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Kerschen, E.J.; Cohen, D.A.; Kaplan, A.M.; Straley, S.C. The plague virulence protein YopM targets the innate immune response by causing a global depletion of NK cells. Infect. Immun. 2004, 72, 4589–4602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ye, Z.; Gorman, A.A.; Uittenbogaard, A.M.; Myers-Morales, T.; Kaplan, A.M.; Cohen, D.A.; Straley, S.C. Caspase-3 mediates the pathogenic effect of Yersinia pestis YopM in liver of C57BL/6 mice and contributes to YopM’s function in spleen. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Stasulli, N.M.; Eichelberger, K.R.; Price, P.A.; Pechous, R.D.; Montgomery, S.A.; Parker, J.S.; Goldman, W.E. Spatially distinct neutrophil responses within the inflammatory lesions of pneumonic plague. mBio 2015, 6, e01530-15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. McPhee, J.B.; Mena, P.; Bliska, J.B. Delineation of regions of the Yersinia YopM protein required for interaction with the RSK1 and PRK2 host kinases and their requirement for interleukin-10 production and virulence. Infect. Immun. 2010, 78, 3529–3539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Songsungthong, W.; Higgins, M.C.; Rolán, H.G.; Murphy, J.L.; Mecsas, J. ROS-inhibitory activity of YopE is required for full virulence of Yersinia in mice. Cell Microbiol. 2010, 12, 988–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Viboud, G.I.; Mejía, E.; Bliska, J.B. Comparison of YopE and YopT activities in counteracting host signalling responses to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis infection. Cell Microbiol. 2006, 8, 1504–1515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Schotte, P.; Denecker, G.; Van Den Broeke, A.; Vandenabeele, P.; Cornelis, G.R.; Beyaert, R. Targeting Rac1 by the Yersinia effector protein YopE inhibits caspase-1-mediated maturation and release of interleukin-1beta. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 25134–25142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Biro, M.; Munoz, M.A.; Weninger, W. Targeting Rho-GTPases in immune cell migration and inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2014, 171, 5491–5506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Mohammadi, S.; Isberg, R.R. Yersinia pseudotuberculosis virulence determinants invasin, YopE, and YopT modulate RhoG activity and localization. Infect. Immun. 2009, 77, 4771–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Aepfelbacher, M.; Trasak, C.; Wilharm, G.; Wiedemann, A.; Trulzsch, K.; Krauss, K.; Gierschik, P.; Heesemann, J. Characterization of YopT effects on Rho GTPases in Yersinia enterocolitica-infected cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 33217–33223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. He, Y.; Xu, H.; Liang, L.; Zhan, Z.; Yang, X.; Yu, X.; Ye, Y.; Sun, L. Antiinflammatory effect of Rho kinase blockade via inhibition of NF-kappaB activation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008, 58, 3366–3376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lee, W.L.; Singaravelu, P.; Wee, S.; Xue, B.; Ang, K.C.; Gunaratne, J.; Grimes, J.M.; Swaminathan, K.; Robinson, R.C. Mechanisms of Yersinia YopO kinase substrate specificity. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 39998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Park, H.; Teja, K.; O’Shea, J.J.; Siegel, R.M. The Yersinia effector protein YpkA induces apoptosis independently of actin depolymerization. J. Immunol. 2007, 178, 6426–6434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Prehna, G.; Ivanov, M.I.; Bliska, J.B.; Stebbins, C.E. Yersinia virulence depends on mimicry of host Rho-family nucleotide dissociation inhibitors. Cell 2006, 126, 869–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Gálvez, J. Role of Th17 Cells in the Pathogenesis of Human IBD. ISRN Inflamm. 2014, 2014, 928461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Zheng, Y.; Lilo, S.; Mena, P.; Bliska, J.B. YopJ-induced caspase-1 activation in Yersinia-infected macrophages: Independent of apoptosis, linked to necrosis, dispensable for innate host defense. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e36019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Ruckdeschel, K.; Deuretzbacher, A.; Haase, R. Crosstalk of signalling processes of innate immunity with Yersinia Yop effector functions. Immunobiology 2008, 213, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Denecker, G.; Declercq, W.; Geuijen, C.A.; Boland, A.; Benabdillah, R.; van Gurp, M.; Sory, M.P.; Vandenabeele, P.; Cornelis, G.R. Yersinia enterocolitica YopP-induced apoptosis of macrophages involves the apoptotic signaling cascade upstream of bid. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 19706–19714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Sweet, C.R.; Conlon, J.; Golenbock, D.T.; Goguen, J.; Silverman, N. YopJ targets TRAF proteins to inhibit TLR-mediated NF-kappaB, MAPK and IRF3 signal transduction. Cell Microbiol. 2007, 9, 2700–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Denecker, G.; Tötemeyer, S.; Mota, L.J.; Troisfontaines, P.; Lambermont, I.; Youta, C.; Stainier, I.; Ackermann, M.; Cornelis, G.R. Effect of low- and high-virulence Yersinia enterocolitica strains on the inflammatory response of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 3510–3520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Davignon, J.L.; Hayder, M.; Baron, M.; Boyer, J.F.; Constantin, A.; Apparailly, F.; Poupot, R.; Cantagrel, A. Targeting monocytes/macrophages in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology 2013, 52, 590–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Adkins, I.; Köberle, M.; Gröbner, S.; Bohn, E.; Autenrieth, I.B.; Borgmann, S. Yersinia outer proteins E, H, P, and T differentially target the cytoskeleton and inhibit phagocytic capacity of dendritic cells. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 2007, 297, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Fahlgren, A.; Westermark, L.; Akopyan, K.; Fällman, M. Cell type-specific effects of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis virulence effectors. Cell Microbiol. 2009, 11, 1750–1767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Sauvonnet, N.; Lambermont, I.; van der Bruggen, P.; Cornelis, G.R. YopH prevents monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 expression in macrophages and T-cell proliferation through inactivation of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 45, 805–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Binder, N.B.; Puchner, A.; Niederreiter, B.; Hayer, S.; Leiss, H.; Blüml, S.; Kreindl, R.; Smolen, J.S.; Redlich, K. Tumor necrosis factor-inhibiting therapy preferentially targets bone destruction but not synovial inflammation in a tumor necrosis factor-driven model of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2013, 65, 608–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Goldring, S.R.; Purdue, P.E.; Crotti, T.N.; Shen, Z.; Flannery, M.R.; Binder, N.B.; Ross, F.P.; McHugh, K.P. Bone remodelling in inflammatory arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2013, 72, ii52-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Malemud, C.J. The PI3K/Akt/PTEN/mTOR pathway: A fruitful target for inducing cell death in rheumatoid arthritis? Future Med. Chem. 2015, 7, 1137–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yu, P.; Fu, Y.X. Tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes: Friends or foes? Lab. Investig. 2006, 86, 231–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Paudyal, M.P.; Wu, L.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Spilling, C.D.; Wong, C.F. A new class of salicylic acid derivatives for inhibiting YopH of Yersinia pestis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014, 22, 6781–6788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Brodsky, I.E.; Palm, N.W.; Sadanand, S.; Ryndak, M.B.; Sutterwala, F.S.; Flavell, R.A.; Bliska, J.B.; Medzhitov, R. A Yersinia effector protein promotes virulence by preventing inflammasome recognition of the type III secretion system. Cell Host Microbe 2010, 7, 376–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Dewoody, R.; Merritt, P.M.; Marketon, M.M.; Dewoody, R.; Merritt, P.M.; Marketon, M.M. YopK controls both rate and fidelity of Yop translocation. Mol. Microbiol. 2013, 87, 301–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Porter, C.K.; Choi, D.; Cash, B.; Pimentel, M.; Murray, J.; May, L.; Riddle, M.S. Pathogen-specific risk of chronic gastrointestinal disorders following bacterial causes of foodborne illness. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013, 13, 46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Perdikogianni, C.; Galanakis, E.; Michalakis, M.; Giannoussi, E.; Maraki, S.; Tselentis, Y.; Charissis, G. Yersinia enterocolitica infection mimicking surgical conditions. Pediatr. Surg. Int. 2006, 22, 589–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Laji, N.; Bowyer, R.; Jeyaratnam, D.; Zuckerman, M. Another mistaken case of appendicitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2015, 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Hannu, T.; Mattila, L.; Nuorti, J.P.; Ruutu, P.; Mikkola, J.; Siitonen, A.; Leirisalo-Repo, M. Reactive arthritis after an outbreak of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis serotype O:3 infection. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2003, 62, 866–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Rees, J.R.; Pannier, M.A.; McNees, A.; Shallow, S.; Angulo, F.J.; Vugia, D.J. Persistent diarrhea, arthritis, and other complications of enteric infections: A pilot survey based on California FoodNet surveillance, 1998–1999. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2004, 38, S311–S317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wuorela, M.; Jalkanen, S.; Toivanen, P.; Granfors, K. Yersinia lipopolysaccharide is modified by human monocytes. Infect. Immun. 1993, 61, 5261–5270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Fotis, L.; Shaikh, N.; Baszis, K.W.; Samson, C.M.; Lev-Tzion, R.; French, A.R.; Tarr, P.I. Serologic Evidence of Gut-driven Systemic Inflammation in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis. J. Rheumatol. 2017, 44, 1624–1631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Yu, J.G.; Kuipers, D. Role of bacteria and HLA-B27 in the pathogenesis of reactive arthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2003, 29, 21–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Rihl, M.; Klos, A.; Köhler, L.; Kuipers, J.G. Infection and musculoskeletal conditions: Reactive arthritis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol. 2006, 20, 1119–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rosner, B.M.; Werber, D.; Höhle, M.; Stark, K. Clinical aspects and self-reported symptoms of sequelae of Yersinia enterocolitica infections in a population-based study, Germany 2009–2010. BMC Infect. Dis. 2013, 13, 236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Hallanvuo, S.; Nuorti, P.; Nakari, U.M.; Siitonen, A. Molecular epidemiology of the five recent outbreaks of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in Finland. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2003, 529, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Savin, C.; Leclercq, A.; Carniel, E. Evaluation of a single procedure allowing the isolation of enteropathogenic Yersinia along with other bacterial enteropathogens from human stools. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e41176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Bonardi, S.; Alpigiani, I.; Pongolini, S.; Morganti, M.; Tagliabue, S.; Bacci, C.; Brindani, F. Detection, enumeration and characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica 4/O:3 in pig tonsils at slaughter in Northern Italy. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2014, 177, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Kachoris, M.; Ruoff, K.L.; Welch, K.; Kallas, W.; Ferraro, M.J. Routine culture of stool specimens for Yersinia enterocolitica is not a cost-effective procedure. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1988, 26, 582–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Triantafillidis, J.K.; Thomaidis, T.; Papalois, A. Terminal Ileitis due to Yersinia Infection: An Underdiagnosed Situation. Biomed. Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 1240626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Lahesmaa-Rantala, R.; Granfors, K.; Isomäki, H.; Toivanen, A. Yersinia specific immune complexes in the synovial fluid of patients with yersinia triggered reactive arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1987, 46, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Spyropoulos, C. Selective immunoglobulin M deficiency and terminal ileitis due to Yersinia enterocolitica infection: A clinically interesting coexistence. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Open Access 2015, 2, 00036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Montenegro, L.; Piscitelli, D.; Giorgio, F.; Covelli, C.; Fiore, M.G.; Losurdo, G.; Iannone, A.; Ierardi, E.; Di Leo, A.; Principi, M. Reversal of IgM deficiency following a gluten-free diet in seronegative celiac disease. World J. Gastroenterol. 2014, 20, 17686–17689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Biagi, F.; Bianchi, P.I.; Zilli, A.; Marchese, A.; Luinetti, O.; Lougaris, V.; Plebani, A.; Villanacci, V.; Corazza, G.R. The significance of duodenal mucosal atrophy in patients with common variable immunodeficiency: A clinical and histopathologic study. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 2012, 138, 185–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Yel, L. Selective IgA Deficiency. J. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 30, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Vo Ngoc, D.T.L.; Krist, L.; van Overveld, F.J.; Rijkers, G.T. The Long and Winding Road to IgA Deficiency: Causes and Consequences. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2017, 13, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhang, J.; van Oostrom, D.; Li, J.; Savelkoul, H.F.J. Innate Mechanisms in Selective IgA Deficiency. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 649112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Swanink, C.M.; Stolk-Engelaar, V.M.; van der Meer, J.W.; Vercoulen, J.H.; Bleijenberg, G.; Fennis, J.F.; Galama, J.M.; Hoogkamp-Korstanje, J.A. Yersinia enterocolitica and the chronic fatigue syndrome. J. Infect. 1998, 36, 269–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Rastawicki, W.; Jakubczak, A. Serum immunoglobulin IgG subclass distribution of antibody responses to Yop proteins and lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica in patients with yersiniosis. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2007, 56, 233–238. [Google Scholar]
  161. Wunderink, H.F.; Oostvogel, P.M.; Frénay, I.H.; Notermans, D.W.; Fruth, A.; Kuijper, E.J. Difficulties in diagnosing terminal ileitis due to Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2014, 33, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Stevens, M.J.A.; Barmettler, K.; Kelbert, L.; Stephan, R.; Nüesch-Inderbinen, M. Genome based characterization of Yersinia enterocolitica from different food matrices in Switzerland in 2024. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2025, 128, 105719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Jing, H.; Ren, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Wang, S.; Kan, B.; Xu, J.; Wang, L. Complete genome sequence of a Yersinia enterocolitica “Old World” (3/O:9) strain and comparison with the “New World” (1B/O:8) strain. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2011, 49, 1251–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Miyata, E.; Jimbo, K.; Kyodo, R.; Suzuki, M.; Kudo, T.; Shimizu, T. Differentiation of Yersinia enterocolitica enteritis from other bacterial enteritides by ultrasonography: A single-center case-control study. Pediatr. Neonatol. 2022, 63, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Feakins, R.; Torres, J.; Borralho-Nunes, P.; Burisch, J.; Cúrdia Gonçalves, T.; De Ridder, L.; Driessen, A.; Lobatón, T.; Menchén, L.; Mookhoek, A.; et al. ECCO Topical Review on Clinicopathological Spectrum and Differential Diagnosis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. J. Crohn′s Colitis 2022, 16, 343–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Revés, J.; Frias-Gomes, C.; Ramos, L.R.; Glória, L. Positive Yersinia Serology and Colonic Cobblestone Pattern: A Diversion or Main Culprit? GE Port. J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 32, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Marubashi, K.; Takagi, H.; Wakagi, T.; Takakusagi, S.; Yokoyama, Y.; Kizawa, K.; Kosone, T.; Uraoka, T. Endoscopic and video capsule endoscopic observation of Yersinia enterocolitis. DEN Open 2023, 3, e242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Matsumoto, T.; Iida, M.; Matsui, T.; Sakamoto, K.; Fuchigami, T.; Haraguchi, Y.; Fujishima, M. Endoscopic findings in Yersinia enterocolitica enterocolitis. Gastrointest. Endosc. 1990, 36, 583–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Sorobetea, D.; Matsuda, R.; Peterson, S.T.; Grayczyk, J.P.; Rao, I.; Krespan, E.; Lanza, M.; Assenmacher, C.A.; Mack, M.; Beiting, D.P.; et al. Inflammatory monocytes promote granuloma control of Yersinia infection. Nat. Microbiol. 2023, 8, 666–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Fàbrega, A.; Ballesté-Delpierre, C.; Vila, J. Antimicrobial resistance in Yersinia enterocolitica. Antimicrob. Resist. Food Saf. Methods Tech. 2015, 9, 77–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Manatsathit, S.; Dupont, H.L.; Farthing, M.; Kositchaiwat, C.; Leelakusolvong, S.; Ramakrishna, B.S.; Sabra, A.; Speelman, P.; Surangsrirat, S. Working Party of the Program Committ of the Bangkok World Congress of Gastroenterology 2002. Guideline for the management of acute diarrhea in adults. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2002, 17, S54–S71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Guarino, A.; Albano, F.; Ashkenazi, S.; Gendrel, D.; Hoekstra, J.H.; Shamir, R.; Szajewska, H. The ESPGHAN/ESPID Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of Acute Gastroenteritis in Children in Europe Expert Working Group. European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition/European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute gastroenteritis in children in Europe: Executive summary. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2008, 46, 619–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Richardson, T.; Jones, M.; Akhtar, Y.; Pollard, J. Suspicious Yersinia granulomatous enterocolitis mimicking appendicitis. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr-2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ostroff, S.M.; Kapperud, G.; Lassen, J.; Aasen, S.; Tauxe, R.V. Clinical features of sporadic Yersinia enterocolitica infections in Norway. J. Infect. Dis. 1992, 166, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Hoogkamp-Korstanje, J.A.; Moesker, H.; Bruyn, G.A. Ciprofloxacin v placebo for treatment of Yersinia enterocolitica triggered reactive arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2000, 59, 914–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Sotohy, S.A.; Diab, M.S.; Ewida, R.M.; Aballah, A.; Eldin, N.K.A. An investigative study on Yersinia enterocolitica in animals, humans and dried milk in New Valley Governorate, Egypt. BMC Microbiol. 2024, 24, 395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Hoogkamp-Korstanje, J.A.; de Koning, J.; Heesemann, J.; Festen, J.J.; Houtman, P.M.; van Oyen, P.L. Influence of antibiotics on IgA and IgG response and persistence of Yersinia enterocolitica in patients with Yersinia-associated spondylarthropathy. Infection 1992, 20, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Delibato, E.; Luzzi, I.; Pucci, E.; Proroga, Y.T.R.; Capuano, F.; De Medici, D. Fresh produce and microbial contamination: Persistence during the shelf life and efficacy of domestic washing methods. Ann. Dell’istituto Super. Sanità 2018, 54, 358–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Palazzi, C.; Olivieri, I.; D’Amico, E.; Pennese, E.; Petricca, A. Management of reactive arthritis. Expert. Opin. Pharmacother. 2004, 5, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Honda, K.; Iwanaga, N.; Izumi, Y.; Tsuji, Y.; Kawahara, C.; Michitsuji, T.; Higashi, S.; Kawakami, A.; Migita, K. Reactive Arthritis Caused by Yersinia enterocolitica Enteritis. Intern. Med. 2017, 56, 1239–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Brusa, V.; Costa, M.; Oteiza, J.M.; Galli, L.; Barril, P.A.; Leotta, G.A.; Signorini, M. Prioritization of vegetable-borne biological hazards in Argentina using a multicriteria decision analysis tool. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2024, 30, 680–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Johnson, P.T.; de Roode, J.C.; Fenton, A.; Fenton, A. Why infectious disease research needs community ecology. Science 2015, 349, 1259504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Liang, J.; Duan, R.; Xia, S.; Hao, Q.; Yang, J.; Xiao, Y.; Qiu, H.; Shi, G.; Wang, S.; Gu, W.; et al. Ecology and geographic distribution of Yersinia enterocolitica among livestock and wildlife in China. Vet. Microbiol. 2015, 178, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Yue, Y.; Zheng, J.; Sheng, M.; Liu, X.; Hao, Q.; Zhang, S.; Xu, S.; Liu, Z.; Hou, X.; Jing, H.; et al. Public health implications of Yersinia enterocolitica investigation: An ecological modeling and molecular epidemiology study. Infect. Dis. Poverty 2023, 12, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Martins, B.T.F.; Camargo, A.C.; Tavares, R.M.; Nero, L.A. Relevant foodborne bacteria associated to pork production chain. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2025, 113, 181–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ); Koutsoumanis, K.; Allende, A.; Alvarez-Ordóñez, A.; Bover-Cid, S.; Chemaly, M.; De Cesare, A.; Herman, L.; Hilbert, F.; Lindqvist, R.; et al. Microbiological safety of aged meat. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e07745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Gravemann, U.; Handke, W.; Schulze, T.J.; Seltsam, A. Growth and Distribution of Bacteria in Contaminated Whole Blood and Derived Blood Components. Transfus. Med. Hemother. 2024, 51, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Wu, F.; Ren, F.; Xie, X.; Meng, J.; Wu, X. The implication of viability and pathogenicity by truncated lipopolysaccharide in Yersinia enterocolitica. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2023, 107, 7165–7180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Grygiel-Górniak, B. Current Challenges in Yersinia Diagnosis and Treatment. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051133

AMA Style

Grygiel-Górniak B. Current Challenges in Yersinia Diagnosis and Treatment. Microorganisms. 2025; 13(5):1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051133

Chicago/Turabian Style

Grygiel-Górniak, Bogna. 2025. "Current Challenges in Yersinia Diagnosis and Treatment" Microorganisms 13, no. 5: 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051133

APA Style

Grygiel-Górniak, B. (2025). Current Challenges in Yersinia Diagnosis and Treatment. Microorganisms, 13(5), 1133. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13051133

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop