Next Article in Journal
Genomic Insights into Selenate Reduction by Anaerobacillus Species
Next Article in Special Issue
Genome-Informed Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma Prunorum,’ Which Is Associated with European Stone Fruit Yellows
Previous Article in Journal
Nitrogen Fertilization Alleviates Microplastic Effects on Soil Protist Communities and Rape (Brassica napus L.) Growth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Phytoplasma-Associated Diseases in South America: Thirty Years of Research
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Infection with Jujube Witches’ Broom Phytoplasma Alters the Expression Pattern of the Argonaute Gene Family in Ziziphus jujuba

Microorganisms 2025, 13(3), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030658
by Jia Yao 1,†, Zesen Qiao 1,†, Ziming Jiang 1, Xueru Zhao 1, Ziyang You 1, Wenzhe Zhang 1, Jiancan Feng 2, Chenrui Gong 1,* and Jidong Li 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Microorganisms 2025, 13(3), 658; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13030658
Submission received: 11 February 2025 / Revised: 1 March 2025 / Accepted: 11 March 2025 / Published: 14 March 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors
  • Line 51: fruits
  • Line 64: phytoplasma elimination? Please, clarify.
  • Line 85: Transcriptome
  • Line 87: during phytoplasma elimination? Please, clarify.
  • Lines 95-101: did you include healthy plants treated with tetracycline as control? You evaluated the differentially expressed genes in phytoplasma-infected plants versus plants treated with tetracycline for phytoplasma elimination. In my opinion, it is necessary to include healthy plants treated with tetracycline to correlate if expression differences are due effectively to phytoplasma elimination or to tetracycline effect. Moreover, two-year-old plants were used to evaluate phytoplasma infection while jujube plantlets maintained in vitro were utilized to evaluate phytoplasma elimination. Did you evaluate transcriptome differences in healthy plants grown in these different conditions? Phytoplasmas were transmitted to two-year-old plants by grafting, compared with healthy ungrafted control plants: to eliminate the possible grafting effect on plant gene expression, did you consider making grafting with healthy plant tissue on control plants?
  • Line 113: How did you isolate phloem and xylem tissues?
  • Lines 299-324: Discussion at point 4.3 and Conclusions, concerning differential expression of ZjAGOs, can be acceptable if authors address properly the comment at lines 95-101.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The Authors studied genes AGO expression and function in response of ´phytoplasma infection, which is a disease of jujube tree. The manuscript sounds good, the introduction is ok as well as M&M, results and discussion. The results will high contribute in the knowledge of how AGO genes works in Arabdopisis and jujuba during infection. Nine different AGO  genes were identified, and only two ZjAGO1  and ZjAGO 9 play important function in the response of JWB phytoplasma infection. These results sounds very good.

Author Response

Thank you very much for taking time to review this manuscript. We really apprciate your positive comments and feedback regarding our paper. 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I would like to thank the authors for their reply and for the text modifications. 

Back to TopTop