A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Participants
2.2. Procedures
2.2.1. Nugent Score and Microbiological Culture
2.2.2. Real-Time PCR Test (Flora SelectTM)
2.3. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hillier, S.L.; Nugent, R.P.; Eschenbach, D.A.; Krohn, M.A.; Gibbs, R.S.; Martin, D.H.; Cotch, M.F.; Edelman, R.; Pastorek, J.G., 2nd; Rao, A.V.; et al. The Vaginal Infections and Prematurity Study Group. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995, 333, 1737–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Amsel, R.; Totten, P.A.; Spiegel, C.A.; Chen, K.C.S.; Eschenbach, D.; Holmes, K.K. Nonspecific vaginitis. Diagnostic criteria and microbial and epidemiologic associations. Am. J. Med. 1983, 74, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nugent, R.P.; Krohn, M.A.; Hillier, S.L. Reliability of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis is improved by a standardized method of gram stain interpretation. J. Clin. Microbiol. 1991, 29, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Muzny, C.A.; Cerca, N.; Elnaggar, J.H.; Taylor, C.M.; Sobel, J.D.; van der Pol, B. State of the art for diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2023, 61, e0083722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Witkin, S.S. The vaginal microbiome, vaginal anti-microbial defence mechanisms and the clinical challenge of reducing infection-related preterm birth. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2015, 122, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Serrano, M.G.; Parikh, H.I.; Brooks, J.P.; Edwards, D.J.; Tom, J.; Edupuganti, L.; Huang, B.; Girerd, P.H.; Bokhari, Y.; Bradley, S.P.; et al. Racioethnic diversity in the dynamics of the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. Nat. Med. 2019, 25, 1001–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Goldenberg, R.L.; Culhane, J.F.; Iams, J.D.; Romero, R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 2008, 371, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Deng, T.; Shang, A.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, L.; Sun, H.; Wang, W. Log (Lactobacillus crispatus/Gardnerella vaginalis): A new indicator of diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. Bioengineered 2022, 13, 2981–2991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Huang, C.; Gin, C.; Fettweis, J.; Foxman, B.; Gelaye, B.; MacIntyre, D.A.; Subramaniam, A.; Fraser, W.; Tabatabaei, N.; Callahan, B. Meta-analysis reveals the vaginal microbiome is a better predictor of earlier than later preterm birth. BMC Biol. 2023, 21, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bretelle, F.; Loubière, S.; Desbriere, R.; Loundou, A.; Blanc, J.; Heckenroth, H.; Schmitz, T.; Benachi, A.; Haddad, B.; Mauviel, F.; et al. Groupe de Recherche en Obstetrique et Gynécologie (GROG) Investigators. Effectiveness and costs of molecular screening and treatment for bacterial vaginosis to prevent preterm birth: The AuTop Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2023, 177, 894–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brookheart, R.T.; Lewis, W.G.; Peipert, J.F.; Lewis, A.L.; Allsworth, J.E. Association between obesity and bacterial vaginosis as assessed by Nugent score. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 220, 476.e1–476.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin No. 130: Prediction and prevention of preterm birth. Obstet. Gynecol. 2012, 120, 964–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sangkomkamhang, U.S.; Lumbiganon, P.; Prasertcharoensuk, W.; Laopaiboon, M. Antenatal lower genital tract infection screening and treatment programs for preventing preterm delivery. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015, 2015, CD006178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kiss, H.; Petricevic, L.; Husslein, P. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an infection screening programme to reduce the rate of preterm delivery. BMJ 2004, 329, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sweeney, E.L.; Dando, S.J.; Kallapur, S.G.; Knox, C.L. The human Ureaplasma species as causative agents of chorioamnionitis. Clinl. Microbiol. Rev. 2017, 30, 349–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kataoka, S.; Yamada, T.; Chou, K.; Nishida, R.; Morikawa, M.; Minami, M.; Yamada, H.; Sakuragi, N.; Minakami, H. Association between preterm birth and vaginal colonization by mycoplasmas in early pregnancy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006, 44, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Tanimura, K.; Sasagawa, Y.; Yamada, H. Vaginal microbiota associated with preterm delivery. J. Infect. Chemother. 2020, 26, 1134–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shi, Y.; Yamada, H.; Sasagawa, Y.; Tanimura, K.; Deguchi, M. Uterine endometrium microbiota and pregnancy outcome in women with recurrent pregnancy loss. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 152, 103653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Characteristics of Participants n = 556 | Median | Range |
---|---|---|
Age, years | 31 | 16–45 |
Body mass index, kg/m2 | 21.3 | 15.4–37.8 |
Gravidity | 2 | 1–8 |
Parity | 1 | 0–6 |
Number of previous miscarriages | 0 | 0–4 |
Number of previous preterm births | 0 | 0–1 |
Gestational week (w) and day (d) of examinations | 10w4d | 8w0d–12w6d |
Number | % | |
Number of women with a history of miscarriage | 119 | 21.4 |
Number of women with a history of preterm birth | 19 | 3.4 |
Nugent score | Number | % |
0–3 | 468 | 84.2 |
4–6 | 41 | 7.4 |
≥7 | 47 | 8.5 |
Flora select™ | Number | % |
Relative dominance rate of Lactobacillus species | ||
High (≥80%) | 350 | 63.0 |
Medium (50%≤, <80%) | 49 | 8.8 |
Low (0.1≤, <50%) | 95 | 17.1 |
No detection (<0.1%) | 62 | 11.2 |
Presence of BV-associated bacteria species | ||
Gardnerella | 133 | 23.9 |
Prevotella | 98 | 17.6 |
Atopobium | 95 | 17.1 |
Streptococcus | 39 | 7.0 |
Miscarriage/preterm birth-associated bacteria species | ||
Ureaplasma | 128 | 23.0 |
Mycoplasma | 27 | 4.9 |
Nugent Score | Number | Lactobacillus Species <50% (%) | Presence of BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | Presence of ≥Two BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | BV-Associated Bacteria Species | Miscarriage/Preterm Birth-Associated Bacteria Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gardnerella (%) | Prevotella (%) | Atopobium (%) | Streptococcus (%) | Ureaplasma (%) | Mycoplasma (%) | |||||
0–3 | 468 | 16.9 | 16.7 | 10.7 | 13.7 | 7.9 | 6.6 | 4.7 | 21.2 | 2.6 |
4–6 | 41 | 78.0 | 70.7 | 61.0 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 53.7 | 17.1 | 24.4 | 9.8 |
≥7 | 47 | 97.9 | 100.0 | 95.7 | 100.0 | 83.0 | 89.4 | 21.3 | 40.4 | 23.4 |
Fisher’s exact test | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p = 0.014 | p < 0.01 |
Relative Dominance Rate of Lactobacillus Species | Number | Nugent Scores ≥7/Nugent Scores ≥4 (%) | Presence of BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | Presence of ≥Two BV-Associated Bacteria Species (%) | BV-Associated Bacteria Species | Miscarriage/Preterm Birth-Associated Bacteria Species | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gardnerella (%) | Prevotella (%) | Atopobium (%) | Streptococcus (%) | Ureaplasma (%) | Mycoplasma (%) | |||||
High (≥80%) | 350 | 0.0/2.0 | 3.1 | 2.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 18.3 | 1.4 |
Medium (50%≤, <80%) | 49 | 2.0/6.1 | 44.9 | 22.5 | 36.7 | 20.4 | 18.4 | 8.2 | 28.6 | 10.2 |
Low (0.1≤, <50%) | 95 | 30.5/45.3 | 84.2 | 72.6 | 76.8 | 57.9 | 63.2 | 17.9 | 33.7 | 13.7 |
No detection (<0.1%) | 62 | 27.4/56.5 | 66.1 | 53.2 | 54.8 | 43.6 | 33.9 | 24.2 | 29.0 | 6.5 |
Fisher’s exact test | p < 0.01/p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 | p < 0.01 |
Gardnerella Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | Prevotella Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||
Flora select™ | Flora select™ | ||||||
Positive | 46 | 87 | 133 | Positive | 4 | 94 | 98 |
Negative | 5 | 418 | 423 | Negative | 0 | 458 | 458 |
Total | 51 | 505 | 556 | Total | 4 | 552 | 556 |
Atopobium Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | Streptococcus Species | Bacterial Culture | Total | ||
Positive | Negative | Positive | Negative | ||||
Flora select™ | Flora select™ | ||||||
Positive | 0 | 95 | 95 | Positive | 16 | 23 | 39 |
Negative | 0 | 461 | 461 | Negative | 55 | 462 | 517 |
Total | 0 | 556 | 556 | Total | 71 | 485 | 556 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Yamada, H.; Shimada, S.; Ota, H.; Kobayashi, Y.; Fukushi, Y.; Wada, S.; Kataoka, S. A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
Yamada H, Shimada S, Ota H, Kobayashi Y, Fukushi Y, Wada S, Kataoka S. A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10):2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
Chicago/Turabian StyleYamada, Hideto, Shigeki Shimada, Hajime Ota, Yuta Kobayashi, Yoshiyuki Fukushi, Shinichiro Wada, and Soromon Kataoka. 2024. "A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy" Microorganisms 12, no. 10: 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110
APA StyleYamada, H., Shimada, S., Ota, H., Kobayashi, Y., Fukushi, Y., Wada, S., & Kataoka, S. (2024). A New Real-Time PCR Test (Flora Select™) and Nugent Score for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis During Pregnancy. Microorganisms, 12(10), 2110. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12102110