Next Article in Journal
Metagenomic Insights into the Taxonomic and Functional Features of Traditional Fermented Milk Products from Russia
Next Article in Special Issue
Chip-Based Molecular Evaluation of a DNA Extraction Protocol for Candida Species from Positive Blood Cultures
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Assessing the Clinical Implications of Epstein-Barr Virus Infection and Their Application to the Diagnosis and Treatment of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Previous Article in Special Issue
Epidemiological and Molecular Investigation of the Heater–Cooler Unit (HCU)-Related Outbreak of Invasive Mycobacterium chimaera Infection Occurred in Italy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Intersociety Position Statement on the Prevention of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Italy

by
Chryssoula Tzialla
1,
Cinzia Auriti
2,3,*,
Salvatore Aversa
4,
Daniele Merazzi
5,
Stefano Martinelli
6,
Gabriella Araimo
7,
Luca Massenzi
8,
Giacomo Cavallaro
7,
Luigi Gagliardi
9,
Mario Giuffrè
10,
Fabio Mosca
7,11,
Irene Cetin
12,13,
Vito Trojano
14,
Herbert Valensise
15,16,
Nicola Colacurci
17,
Luigi Orfeo
18,
Vito Mondì
19 and
on behalf of their respective Scientific Societies
1
Neonatal and Pediatric Unit, Polo Ospedaliero Oltrepò, ASST Pavia, Via Volturno 14, 27058 Voghera, Italy
2
Faculty of Medicine, UniCamillus-Saint Camillus International University of Health Sciences, Via di Sant’Alessandro 8, 00131 Rome, Italy
3
Neonatologic Unit, Villa Margherita Private Clinic, Viale di Villa Massimo 48, 00161 Rome, Italy
4
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Children’s Hospital, ASST Spedali Civili, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25123 Brescia, Italy
5
Division of Neonatology, ‘Valduce’ Hospital, Via Dante Alighieri 11, 22100 Como, Italy
6
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza dell’Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162 Milan, Italy
7
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 28, 20122 Milan, Italy
8
Division of Neonatology, Central Teaching Hospital of Bolzano, Via Lorenz Böhler 5, 39100 Bolzano, Italy
9
Department of Mother and Child Health, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Via A. Cocchi, 7/9, 56121 Pisa, Italy
10
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, A.U.O.Policlinico ‘Paolo Giaccone’, Department of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties ‘G. D’Alessandro’, University of Palermo, Via del Vespro 129, 90126 Palermo, Italy
11
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Via della Commenda 19, 20122 Milan, Italy
12
Department of BioMedical and Clinical Sciences, University of Milan, Via Gian Battista Grassi 74, 20122 Milan, Italy
13
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital V. Buzzi, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Via Lodovico Castelvetro 32, 20154 Milan, Italy
14
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Dei Hospital, Via Samuel F. Hahnemann 10, 70125 Bari, Italy
15
Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Via Montpellier, 1, 00133 Rome, Italy
16
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, 00169 Rome, Italy
17
Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Via Luigi De Crecchio 2, 80138 Naples, Italy
18
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, Via di Ponte Quattro Capi 39, 00186 Rome, Italy
19
Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Policlinico Casilino, Via Casilina 1049, 00169 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Italian Society of Neonatolgy (Società Italiana di Neonatologia), Italian Society of Gynecology and Obstetrician (Società Italiana di Ginecologia ed Ostetricia) and Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine (Società Italiana di Medicina Perinatale).
Microorganisms 2024, 12(1), 15; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010015
Submission received: 26 October 2023 / Revised: 11 December 2023 / Accepted: 19 December 2023 / Published: 21 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Medical Microbiology in Italy (2023, 2024))

Abstract

:
There is currently no worldwide agreement on the real need to administer conjunctival antibiotics to neonates at birth to prevent neonatal conjunctivitis (usually defined as ophthalmia neonatorum) by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Therefore, there is wide variability in antibiotic administration, conditioned mainly by the social and health context. In Italy, a law enacted in 1940 required doctors and midwives to administer ophthalmic prophylaxis with 2% silver nitrate to all newborns at birth. This law was repealed in 1975 and since then there has been no clear guidance on the use of ophthalmia neonatorum prophylaxis at birth. Since neonatal conjunctivitis caused by C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae is not reported, we carried out a nationwide survey of 1,041,384 neonates across all Italian birth centers to evaluate the incidence of ophthalmia neonatorum and the current practice of prophylaxis. After analyzing the results, we formulated an intersociety position statement on the prevention of ophthalmia neonatorum to update and standardize this prevention strategy in Italy.

1. Introduction

Ophthalmia neonatorum (ON) is an acute conjunctival infection that occurs within the first month of life [1]. The infection, usually contracted from the mother’s infected birth canal during vaginal delivery, can cause corneal damage and vision loss. In the past, the term mainly defined conjunctival infections caused by Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea, which are the pathogens most frequently responsible for permanent ocular damage [1,2]; currently, ON also defines neonatal conjunctivitis caused by other bacteria [3]. The incidence of ON by N. gonorrhoeae has significantly decreased with the widespread use of conjunctival antibacterial prophylaxis with 2% silver nitrate, introduced by Karl Franz Credè in Germany at the end of the 19th century [2,4,5]. While the updated incidence of ON by C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae reported in the literature is 1.6–23%, the real incidence is unknown [6,7].
The main pathogen for ON varies between countries and depends on the socio-medical context of the observed population. In the United States, C. trachomatis is responsible for 2–40% of reported cases; N. gonorrhoeae is rare, accounting for less than 1% of cases, while other bacteria species account for 30–50% of cases [1,8]. N. gonorrhoeae is no longer the most common bacterial agent of ON across many countries, regardless of income [1,6]. Data from a survey conducted among 449 ophthalmologists from around the world, members of the American Association of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, report that 176 of 291 responders (60.69%) experienced 0–5 cases of ON per year, with C. trachomatis accounting for up to 35.4% of cases and N. gonorrhoeae for 10% of cases [6]. Other bacteria, such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus and Haemophilus, were responsible for almost 50% of cases, while 7% of infections were due to viral agents such as adenovirus and herpes simplex virus [6].
Recent data from Ireland show that over a 5-year period, the most frequent etiologic agent of ON was C. trachomatis, accounting for 20.4% of all reported cases, while no cases of gonococcal infection were reported [9]. In case series from Hong Kong, Iran, Norway and Ghana, the most frequent isolates were Staphylococcus aureus [10,11,12] or Staphylococcus spp. [7], while C. trachomatis accounted for 21% in Hong Kong, 2% in Iran and 0% in Norway and Ghana, and N. gonorrhoeae was uncommon (1–3%) or absent [7,8,11,12]. In Argentina, 56 out of 332 identified cases (16.8%) were due to H. influenzae and only 25 (7.8%) to C. trachomatis [13].
The rate of gonococcal or chlamydial conjunctivitis in neonates is related to the maternal infection rate. Gonococcal or chlamydial infection in women, even during pregnancy, is often asymptomatic and, as such, remains undiagnosed [14]. Transmission rates of gonococcal infection from mother to newborn, in the absence of maternal treatment and neonatal ocular prophylaxis, are 30–50% [2,15,16]. It is estimated that almost 20% of untreated, or inappropriately treated, gonococcal conjunctivitis can result in corneal damage [16,17].
The risk of C. trachomatis transmission from an untreated infected mother to newborn is 50%, with a 25–50% risk of developing conjunctivitis; the risk of developing pneumonia requiring systemic therapy is 5–20% [1,2,15]. Untreated chlamydial conjunctivitis can be associated with corneal and conjunctival scarring, hemorrhagic conjunctivitis and, rarely when compared with gonococcal conjunctivitis and loss of vision [10,18,19]. Topical eye prophylaxis does not prevent transmission from mother to newborn and does not prevent neonatal conjunctivitis and pneumonia [1,15,20].
Since Italy lacks specific regulations on the use of ocular prophylaxis for the prevention of ON, as well as data on the incidence of conjunctivitis caused by C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae, we carried out a nationwide survey to evaluate the incidence of ON and the current use of prophylaxis. After the analysis of survey results, an intersociety position statement on the prevention of ON was formulated to update and standardize the use of ocular prophylaxis for ON in Italy.

2. Strategies for the Prevention of Ophthalmia Neonatorum and Current Guidelines

The interruption of maternal–neonatal infection transmission is the mainstay approach for the prevention of ON [1,2]; this can be achieved by:
  • Screening pregnant women for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and giving appropriate treatment as necessary; treated patients and those with persistent risk factors for STI should be regularly followed up with and re-tested.
  • Ocular prophylaxis, with antiseptic or antibiotic medication, of the neonate after birth.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine screening for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae at the first prenatal visit for all high-risk women. The latter are defined as those being younger than 25 years of age, or older women at increased risk of infection (e.g., new or multiple sex partners, or a sex partner with concurrent partners or with an STI [21,22]) or living in an area in which the prevalence of C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae is high. Women who remain at increased risk of STI should be rescreened during the third trimester of pregnancy; pregnant women identified as positive for C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae should be treated immediately and re-tested 3 months after treatment, as well as in the third trimester [14,23].
The guidelines of the Italian Ministry of Health [24] recommend that screening for gonococcal and chlamydial infection should be offered to pregnant women at risk for STI (i.e., those under 25 years of age and sexually active, or with multiple sexual partners, or with previous episodes of STI and from areas with high disease prevalence) during the first prenatal assessment and third trimester.
The nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) is the most sensitive and specific diagnostic test for the identification of C. trachomatis approved by the CDC, United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [22]. The CDC and USPSTF also support the use of NAAT for the detection of gonococcal infections, while the FDA approves its use for the diagnosis of genitourinary gonococcal infections; N. gonorrhoeae can also be detected by culture or Gram stain of male urethral swabs but, due to the lower sensitivity of Gram staining compared with NAAT, a negative result cannot rule out a gonococcal infection in an asymptomatic male [22].
The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines [25] recommend ophthalmic prophylaxis for all newborns at birth by the administration of one of the following drugs into both eyes:
  • Tetracycline hydrochloride 1% eye ointment;
  • Erythromycin 0.5% eye ointment;
  • Povidone iodine 2.5% solution (water based);
  • Silver nitrate 1% solution;
  • Chloramphenicol 1% eye ointment.
The choice of drug depends on the local availability of the molecule and cost.
According to the WHO, the benefits of the above intervention outweigh the potential risk of chemical conjunctivitis; silver nitrate effectively prevents gonococcal ON, but its use has been restricted because it causes transient chemical conjunctivitis [2,26].
Currently, there is no universal agreement on the need for conjunctival prophylaxis at birth, and practice varies widely around the world in relation to the social and health context. Taking into account WHO recommendations, each nation has issued specific guidelines based on its own profile. Countries that perform ON prophylaxis to all neonates at birth include Brazil [27], USA [16,28], Spain [29], Slovenia [30], Turkey [31], Ghana [7] and Chile [32]; prophylaxis is also undertaken in certain areas of Central America, some countries in Africa, parts of the Far East, areas of the Middle East and parts of Central Asia [6]. Conversely, other countries with well-organized systems of prenatal care, such as Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, France, Belgium, the UK, Canada and Australia, recommended the discontinuation of ocular prophylaxis several years ago [4,13,15]. Despite the withdrawal of the practice, the resurgence of gonococcal ON or associated blindness has not been reported [33,34].
In Italy, despite the 1940 law rendering prophylaxis compulsory [35] being repealed in 1975 [36], the administration of conjunctival antibiotics to newborns is still routinely carried out.

3. Incidence of Gonorrhea and C. trachomatis Infections in Italy

Data from the Italian Institute of Health (Istituto Superiore di Sanità [ISS]) report 10,597 new cases of gonorrhea in Italy between 1991 and 2021, with a three-fold increase between 2010 and 2021, mostly between homosexual males [37]. A higher frequency of gonococcal infection was observed in males (94.1% vs. 5.9% among females), individuals aged between 15 and 24 years, foreign nationals and those with more than one sexual partner [37]. In the latest report from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, 117,881 cases of gonorrhea with an incidence of 31.6 cases per 100,000 population were reported in Europe in 2019; 813 cases were reported in Italy, equal to an incidence of 1.3 cases per 100,000 inhabitants, among the lowest in Europe [38].
Regarding C. trachomatis infections, data from the ISS report 11,383 new cases from 1 January 1991 to 31 December 2021 [37]; the majority of cases were diagnosed in men (69.4% vs. 30.6% in women). Approximately one fifth of cases (20.3%) were foreign nationals, mainly from other European countries and Africa (48.7% and 28.5%, respectively); over half of subjects (55.6%) reported having had two to five sexual partners in the previous six months, and 15.5% had six or more. Regarding the mode of transmission, 51.4% of cases were reported in heterosexual males, 16.4% in homosexual males and 32.2% in females [37]. Unfortunately, cases of neonatal conjunctivitis due to N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis are not subjected to specific surveillance and notification in Italy and therefore remain unreported [39].
Therefore, given that there is no legislation in force or national guidelines from Italian scientific societies [40], we conducted a nationwide questionnaire survey to collect data regarding the incidence of gonococcal and chlamydial conjunctivitis in neonates in addition to the type of medication used for ON prophylaxis (i.e., type of molecule, the concentration of active ingredient, composition and packaging of the drug) compared with WHO recommendations.
The questionnaire, in electronic format, was sent to all Italian birth centers and the data were collected over a three-year period (2018–2020). Three hundred and two of the 419 centers (72%) replied to the survey, which included details of 1,041,384 neonates, corresponding to 82.3% of those born in Italy during the period of the study (Table 1). In those three years, all newborns born in the participating centers underwent ocular prophylaxis with antibiotics in the first hours of life. Among them, 99.6% did not receive prophylaxis according to the WHO recommendations, both in terms of type of molecule, concentration of active ingredient, preparation and composition (multiple or single active ingredients) (Table 2). Chloramphenicol and tetracycline were administered to 3.6% and 4.4% of newborns, respectively, but with a different preparation (eye drops) and composition (a combination of more than one active drug) compared with WHO recommendations (Table 2). A single-dose package, strongly recommended to prevent cross-infections, was used only in 54% of newborns. Concerning the incidence and etiology of conjunctivitis during the period of the study, 12 cases of conjunctivitis caused by C. trachomatis were observed, giving an incidence of 0.001%, while no cases of gonococcal conjunctivitis were reported.
A detailed description of the survey methodology, including questionnaire composition, identification of participants and data collection and analysis, is part of a previous publication [40].

4. Intersociety Recommendations on Ophthalmia Neonatorum Prophylaxis in Italy

Considering the results of the survey, which highlighted a low incidence of neonatal conjunctivitis from C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in Italy, and, given the lack of local legislation on ocular prophylaxis for all neonates at birth, the Italian Society of Neonatology, of Gynecology and Obstetrician and Perinatal Medicine formulated an intersociety position statement.
The goal of that document is to provide guidance towards an optimized prevention strategy for ON that avoids unnecessary antibiotic administration.
The boards of the respective societies designated expert members from each specialist area to develop the policy statement. The expert panel undertook a literature search and identified current published recommendations, using the findings to inform the first version of the intersociety statement. The initial draft statement was then circulated among the board members of the three scientific societies to elicit individual comments for improvement. A final Italian-language version of the policy statement, addressing all comments and inclusive of proposed modifications, was endorsed by the respective board members. The final document was published on the scientific society websites.
Recommendations (Figure 1):
  • Do not give conjunctival antibiotic prophylaxis against ON indiscriminately to all infants at birth.
  • Ophthalmic prophylaxis with 1.5% azithromycin eye drops or 1% chloramphenicol ophthalmic ointment [25,28,42] should be administered immediately after birth exclusively to neonates born from unattended pregnancies (defined as fewer than three prenatal visits throughout the pregnancy); mothers at risk of sexually transmitted diseases, or coming from areas with a high prevalence of gonococcal infections and with no access to care; and when it is assumed that no primary prevention of STI has taken place before, and during, pregnancy. Maternal screening for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis at delivery, or immediately postpartum, should be performed.
  • Screening of women at risk of STI should be performed at the first prenatal care visit by a vulvovaginal swab for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis [22,23]. Swabs should be repeated in the third trimester in the case of ongoing exposure to risk (i.e., women with multiple sexual partners, previous STI, or coming from areas with a high prevalence of the disease such as Eastern Europe, South East Asia, Africa and Latin American countries). Women without risk factors who have not been swabbed during pregnancy and who have been regularly followed-up with by the obstetrician are to be considered negative.
  • Screening for N. gonorrhoeae and C. trachomatis at delivery, or immediately postpartum, should be performed in women with risk factors for STI who, despite having access to care and being followed-up with during pregnancy, have not been screened, to ensure appropriate management of the mother–neonate in the event of a positive test [28]. Pending the result of the maternal swab, the asymptomatic newborn can be routinely discharged from the birthplace without receiving conjunctival antibiotics. The mother should be recalled to communicate the result of the vaginal swab. Neonates, even if asymptomatic, born to mothers with a vulvovaginal swab positive for N. gonorrheae, or those with conjunctival and/or respiratory symptoms born to mothers with a swab positive for C. trachomatis, must be re-evaluated by the pediatrician to ensure appropriate therapy (see recommendation numbers 7–9).
  • Neonates born to women at risk for STI who were not screened during pregnancy, or to those positive for C. trachomatis, even untreated, in the absence of clinical symptoms of conjunctivitis, should not undergo an ocular swab.
  • In the absence of conjunctival and/or respiratory symptoms, neonates born to women infected by C. trachomatis should not undergo ophthalmic prophylaxis or systemic therapy; instead, they should be subject to pediatrician follow-up to recognize early on any signs of conjunctivitis, which usually occurs between 5 and 14 days of life, or pneumonia, which has a later onset of between 4 and 12 weeks [28].
  • Symptomatic neonates with conjunctival and/or respiratory signs born to mothers with untreated chlamydial infection should be treated with oral azithromycin at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day, once a day, for 3 days [42,43,44,45]. Follow-up is recommended to determine the effectiveness of the initial treatment because data on the efficacy of azithromycin for eye or lung disease are limited [43,44].
  • Asymptomatic neonates born to women with untreated or inadequately treated N. gonorrhoeae infection [45] should be evaluated by swab (e.g., ocular, rectal, vaginal and oropharyngeal). Treatment should start immediately with 25–50 mg/kg of ceftriaxone intramuscularly (IM) or intravenously (IV), up to a maximum of 250 mg total, or cefotaxime 100 mg/kg IM or IV in a single dose when ceftriaxone is contraindicated (i.e., concomitant treatment with calcium-containing IV fluids), pending the results of the swabs [23,46,47].
  • Symptomatic neonates with:
    • Uncomplicated gonococcal conjunctivitis should be evaluated to rule out disseminated gonococcal infection and treated with a single dose of ceftriaxone, 25–50 mg/kg IM or IV, or a single dose of cefotaxime 100 mg/kg, IM or IV, when ceftriaxone is contraindicated (i.e., concomitant treatment with calcium-containing IV fluids) [23,46,47].
    • Disseminated gonococcal infection should be hospitalized and receive IV therapy with ceftriaxone 50 mg/kg every 24 h (or cefotaxime 25 mg/kg every 12 h) for 7 days, or for 10–14 days in the case of documented meningitis [23,46,47].

5. Conclusions

Given the low incidence of conjunctival infections from C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in the newborns observed in Italy throughout the survey conducted between 2018 and 2020, and in the absence of current legislation determining the prophylaxis of ON, the Italian societies SIN, SIGO and SIMP have drawn up a position statement that eliminates the obligatory administration of conjunctival antibiotics in Italy to all neonates at birth. Instead, the position statement recommends starting therapy in newborns in which conjunctival and/or respiratory, and/or systemic symptoms, suggestive of C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae infection occur. Simultaneously, it is necessary to implement prenatal screening for STIs in pregnant women at their first prenatal visit. This approach enables the treatment of infected mothers while avoiding the inappropriate administration of antibiotics to neonates at birth.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.A., V.M. and C.T.; writing—original draft preparation, C.T., V.M., C.A. and S.A.; writing—review and editing, S.A., S.M., G.A., G.C., I.C., V.T., L.G., M.G., L.M. and D.M.; supervision, F.M., L.O., N.C. and H.V. On behalf of their respective Scientific Societies, C.A., V.M., C.T, S.A., S.M., G.A., G.C., I.C., V.T., L.G., M.G., L.M., D.M., F.M., L.O., N.C. and H.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Cinzia Auriti upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Infectious Diseases. Neonatal ophthalmia. In Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed.; Kimberlin, D.W., Barnett, E.D., Lynfield, R., Sawyer, M.H., Eds.; American Academy of Pediatrics: Itasca, IL, USA, 2021; pp. 1023–1026. [Google Scholar]
  2. Kapoor, V.S.; Evans, J.R.; Vedula, S.S. Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020, 9, CD001862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Nolt, D.; O’Leary, S.T.; Aucott, S.W. Risks of infectious diseases in newborns exposed to alternative perinatal practices. AAP Committee on Infectious Diseases, AAP Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Pediatrics 2022, 149, e2021055554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Credé, C.S. Ophthalmia neonatorum in newborn children [Die verhub rtung der augenentzub ndung der neugeborenen]. Archiv. Gynaekol. 1881, 17, 50–53. [Google Scholar]
  5. Forbes, G.B.; Forbes, G.M. Silver nitrate and the eye of the newborn. Credé’s contribution to preventive medicine. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1971, 121, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zloto, O.; Gharaibeh, A.; Mezer, E.; Stankovic, B.; Isenberg, S.; Wygnanski-Jaffe, T. Ophthalmia neonatorum treatment and prophylaxis: IPOSC global study. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2016, 254, 577–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Boadi-Kusi, S.B.; Kyei, S.; Holdbrook, S.; Abu, E.K.; Ntow, J.; Ateko, A.M. A study of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in the Central Reion of Ghana: Causative Agents and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns. Glob. Pediatr. Health 2021, 8, 2333794X211019700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Guirguis-Blake, J.M.; Evans, C.V.; Rushkin, M. Ocular Prophylaxis for Gonococcal Ophthalmia Neonatorum: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2019, 321, 404–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gildea, D.; Goetz, R.; Drew, R.; Chamney, S. Ophthalmia neonatorum in a tertiary referral children’s hospital: A retrospective study. Eur. J. Opthalmol. 2022, 32, 587–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chang, K.; Cheng, V.Y.W.; Kwong, N.S. Neonatal haemorrhagic conjunctivitis: A specific sign of chlamydial infection. Hong Kong Med. J. 2006, 12, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
  11. Amini, E.; Ghasemi, M.; Daneshjou, K. A five-year study in Iran of ophthalmia neonatorum: Prevalence and etiology. Med. Sci. Monit. 2008, 14, CR90–CR96. [Google Scholar]
  12. Normann, E.K.; Bakken, O.; Peltola, J.; Andréasson, B.; Buhl, S.; Sigg, P.; Nilesen, K. Treatment of acute neonatal bacterial conjunctivitis: A comparison of fucidic acid to chloramphenicol eye drops. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2002, 80, 183–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Di Bartolomeo, S.; Mirta, D.H.; Janer, M.; Rodríguez Fermepin, M.R.; Sauka, D.; Magariños, F.; de Torres, R.A. Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis and other potential pathogens in neonatal conjunctivitis. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2001, 5, 139–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI). Treatment Guidelines Update Webinar, CDC 2021. Available online: https://npin.cdc.gov/sites/default/files/CDC_STI_Transcript_FINAL_0114.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  15. Moore, D.L.; MacDonald, N.E. Canadian Paediatric Society, Infectious Diseases and Immunization Committee. Preventing ophthalmia neonatorum. Paediatr. Child. Health 2015, 20, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. US Preventive Services Task Force; Curry, S.J.; Krist, A.H.; Owens, D.K.; Barry, M.J.; Caughey, A.B.; Davidson, K.W.; Doubeni, C.A.; Epling, J.W.; Kemper, A.R.; et al. Ocular Prophylaxis for gonococcal Ophthalmia Neonatorum: US preventive Services Task Force reaffirmation Recommendation statement. JAMA 2019, 321, 394–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Woods, C.R. Gonococcal infections in neonates and young children. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2005, 16, 258–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Darville, T. Chlamydia trachomatis infections in neonates and young children. Semin. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 2005, 16, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Whitcher, J.P.; Srinivasan, M.; Upadhyay, M.P. Corneal blindness: A global perspective. Bull. World Health Organ. 2001, 79, 214–221. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith-Norowitz, T.A.; Ukaegbu, C.; Kohlhoff, S.; Hammerschlag, M.R. Neonatal prophylaxis with antibiotic containing ointments does not reduce incidence of chlamydial conjunctivitis in newborns. BMC Infect. Dis. 2021, 21, 270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. LeFevre, M.L.; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for chlamydia and gonorrhea: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2014, 161, 902–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cantor, A.; Dana, T.; Griffin, J.C.; Nelson, H.D.; Atchison, C.; Winthrop, K.L.; Chou, R. Screening for Chlamydial and Gonococcal Infections: A Systematic Review Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; Evidence Synthesis No. 206; AHRQ Publication No. 21-05275-EF-1; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: Rockville, MD, USA, 2021.
  23. Workowski, K.A.; Bachmann, L.H.; Chan, P.A.; Johnston, C.M.; Muzny, C.A.; Park, I.; Reno, H.; Zenilman, J.M.; Bollan, G.A. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021. MMWR Recomm. Rep. 2021, 70, 1–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ministero Della Salute, Istituto Superiore di Sanità e Centro per la Valutazione Dell’efficacia Dell’assistenza Sanitaria. Linee Guida Gravidanza Fisiologica. 2011. Available online: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/itoss/pdf/gravidanza%20fisiologica_allegato.pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  25. WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Neisseria Gonorrhoeae; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016; (WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee). Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK379221/ (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  26. Nishida, H.; Risenberg, H.M. Silver nitrate ophthalmic solution and chemical conjunctivities. Pediatrics 1975, 56, 368–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Departamento Científico de Neonatologia—Sociedade Brasileira de Pediatria. Profilaxia da Oftalmia Neonatal por Transmissão Vertical. No 9, Dezembro de 2020. Available online: https://institutomacabi.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/22851d-DC-Profilaxia_da_Oftalmia_Neonatal_TransmVert.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  28. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 8th ed.; Kilpatrick, S., Papile, L., Macones, G., Watterberg, K., Eds.; American Academy of Pediatrics: Elk Grove Village, IL, USA; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ministerio De Sanidad, Servicios Sociales E Igualdad Spain. Guía de Práctica Clínica de Atención en el Embarazo y Puerperio. Available online: http://portal.guiasalud.es/completa-pdf/ (accessed on 23 October 2022).
  30. Jug Došler, A.; Petročnik, P.; Mivšek, A.P.; Zakšek, T.; Skubic, M. Neonatal prophylaxis: Prevention of Vitamin K deficiency haemorrhage and neonatal ophthalmia. Zdr. Varst. 2015, 54, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Celik, M.; Koroglu, O.A. Ocular prophylaxis in the newborn. Eur. Eye Res. 2022, 2, 80–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Consultivo de Infecciones Neonatales, Sociedad Chilena de Infectología. Rationale of ocular prophylaxis of neonatal ophtalmia in the newborn infant. Rev. Chil. Infectol. 2017, 34, 257–258. [Google Scholar]
  33. Wahlberg, V. Reconsideration of Crede´ prophylaxis. A study of maternity and neonatal care. Acta Paediatr. Scand. 1982, 295, 1–73. [Google Scholar]
  34. Darling, E.K.; McDonald, H. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of ocular prophylactic agents used for the prevention of gonococcal and chlamydial ophthalmia neonatorum. J. Midwifery Womens Health 2010, 55, 319–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gazzetta Ufficiale del Regno d’Italia, n. 249, 23-X-1940, XVIII, Decreto Ministeriale 11 Ottobre 1940-XVIII. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/1940/10/23/249/sg/pdf (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  36. Gazzetta Ufficiale Della Repubblica Italiana, n. 147, 6-VI-1975, Decreto del Presidente della Repubblica 7 Marzo 1975, n. 163. Available online: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/atto/serie_generale/caricaDettaglioAtto/originario?atto.dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=1975-06-06&atto.codiceRedazionale=075U0163&elenco30giorni=false (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  37. Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Le Infezioni sessualmente trasmesse: Aggiornamento dei dati dei due Sistemi di sorveglianza sentinella attivi in Italia al 31 dicembre 2021. Not. ISS 2023, 36, 1–39. Available online: https://www.iss.it/documents/20126/6683812/Vol.+36,+n.+5.pdf/c7178c1e-667a-a0f5-134ce22a1c30939d?t=1689688348936 (accessed on 1 June 2023).
  38. ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). Gonorrhoea. In ECDC; Annual Epidemiological Report for 2019; ECDC: Stockholm, Sweden, 2023; Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/GONO_AER_2019_Report.pdf (accessed on 29 November 2023).
  39. Camera dei Deputati; Parlamento Italiano. Interrogazione a Risposta Scritta 4/05397 Presentata da Valpiana Tiziana in Data 17/11/1994. Available online: http://documenti.camera.it/apps/commonServices/getDocumento.ashx?sezione=lavori&tipoDoc=sicross&idlegislatura=12&ramo=CAMERA&stile=9&idDocumento=4-05397 (accessed on 22 October 2022).
  40. Mondì, V.; Tzialla, C.; Aversa, S.; Merazzi, D.; Martinelli, S.; Araimo, G.; Massenzi, L.; Cavallaro, G.; Gagliardi, L.; Piersigilli, F.; et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for ophthalmia neonatorum in Italy: Results from a national survey and the Italian intersociety new position statements. Ital. J. Pediatr. 2023, 49, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tavole Certificato di Assistenza al Parto (CeDAP). Anno 2020. Available online: https://www.salute.gov.it/imgs/C_17_pubblicazioni_3149_0_alleg.xlsx (accessed on 22 September 2022).
  42. WHO. WHO Recommendations on Newborn Health: Guidelines Approved by the WHO. Guidelines Review Committee; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017; (WHO/MCA/17.07). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. [Google Scholar]
  43. American Academy of Pediatrics. Chlamydia trachomatis. In Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed.; Kimberlin, D.W., Barnett, E.D., Lynfield, R., Sawyer, M.H., Eds.; American Academy of Pediatrics: Itasca, IL, USA, 2021; pp. 260–266. [Google Scholar]
  44. Hammerschlag, M.R. Chlamydial and gonococcal infections in infants and children. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2011, 53 (Suppl. S3), S99–S102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Bolan, G.A.; Sparling, P.F.; Wasserheit, J.N. The emerging threat of untreatable gonococcal infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012, 366, 485–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Società Italiana di Neonatologia. Neofarm SIN, app di Farmacoterapia Neonatale. Available online: https://www.sin-neonatologia.it/app-neofarm-sin/ (accessed on 1 March 2023).
  47. American Academy of Pediatrics; Committee on Infectious Diseases. Gonococcal infections. In Red Book: 2021–2024 Report of the Committee on Infectious Diseases, 32nd ed.; Kimberlin, D.W., Barnett, E.D., Lynfield, R., Sawyer, M.H., Eds.; American Academy of Pediatrics: Itasca, IL, USA, 2021; pp. 338–340. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Recommendations flow chart [22,23,25,28,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Figure 1. Recommendations flow chart [22,23,25,28,42,43,44,45,46,47].
Microorganisms 12 00015 g001
Table 1. Geographical distribution of total respondent Italian birth centers, subdivided by the number of assisted births in 2020 [41].
Table 1. Geographical distribution of total respondent Italian birth centers, subdivided by the number of assisted births in 2020 [41].
Northern ItalyCentral ItalySouthern Italy and IslandsTotal
Birth centers17389 157419
Respondent centers (%)137 (79.2)63 (70.8)102 (65)302 (72.3)
N° of birth centers with
<500 births/year
382441103
N° of respondent centers with <500 births/year (%)19 (50)13 (54.2)18 (43.9)50 (48.5)
N° of birth centers with
500–999 births/year
673766170
N° of respondent centers with
500–999 births/year (%)
56 (83.6)26 (70.3)41 (62.1)123 (72.3)
N° of birth centers with
1000–2499 births/year
552349127
N° of respondent centers with 1000–2499 births/year (%)51 (92.7)19 (82.6)42 (85.7)112 (88.2)
N° of birth centers with
>2500 births/year
135119
N° of respondent centers with >2500 births/year (%)11 (84.6)5 (100)1 (100)17 (89.5)
Table 2. Comparison between WHO recommendations and ON prophylaxis medications used in the three years (2018–2020) of observation in Italy: type of active ingredient, multiple or single active ingredient, preparation, packaging.
Table 2. Comparison between WHO recommendations and ON prophylaxis medications used in the three years (2018–2020) of observation in Italy: type of active ingredient, multiple or single active ingredient, preparation, packaging.
% of NeonatesPreparationCompositionWHO Recommendations
Active ingredient
Tobramycin 0.3%45.6%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Gentamicin 0.3%19.5%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Netylmycine 0.3%11.3%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Ofloxacin 0.3%11%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Chloramphenicol3.6%Eye dropsCombination of active drugsRecommended ointment as single active drug
Tetracycline 1%4.4%OintmentCombination of active drugsRecommended as single active drug
Fusidic acid 1%3.1%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Povidone iodine 2.5%0.4%Water solutionSingle active drugRecommended
Auromycin 1%0.1%OintmentSingle active drugNot recommended
Pheniramine maleate 0.3% + tetrazoline hydrochloride 0.05%0.6%Eye dropsCombination of active drugsNot recommended
Azithromycin 1.5%0.4%Eye dropsSingle active drugNot recommended
Packaging
Single-use package54% of treated neonates
Multi-use package46% of treated neonates
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tzialla, C.; Auriti, C.; Aversa, S.; Merazzi, D.; Martinelli, S.; Araimo, G.; Massenzi, L.; Cavallaro, G.; Gagliardi, L.; Giuffrè, M.; et al. Intersociety Position Statement on the Prevention of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Italy. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010015

AMA Style

Tzialla C, Auriti C, Aversa S, Merazzi D, Martinelli S, Araimo G, Massenzi L, Cavallaro G, Gagliardi L, Giuffrè M, et al. Intersociety Position Statement on the Prevention of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Italy. Microorganisms. 2024; 12(1):15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010015

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tzialla, Chryssoula, Cinzia Auriti, Salvatore Aversa, Daniele Merazzi, Stefano Martinelli, Gabriella Araimo, Luca Massenzi, Giacomo Cavallaro, Luigi Gagliardi, Mario Giuffrè, and et al. 2024. "Intersociety Position Statement on the Prevention of Ophthalmia Neonatorum in Italy" Microorganisms 12, no. 1: 15. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12010015

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop