Next Article in Journal
Effects of Bacterial Metabolites on the Wnt4 Protein in Dental-Pulp-Stem-Cells-Based Endodontic Pulpitis Treatment
Next Article in Special Issue
Physiological and Transcriptomic Analyses of Escherichia coli Serotype O157:H7 in Response to Rhamnolipid Treatment
Previous Article in Journal
Altitudinal Gradient and Soil Depth as Sources of Variations in Fungal Communities Revealed by Culture-Dependent and Culture-Independent Methods in the Negev Desert, Israel
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 7
10.3390/microorganisms11071762
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation

by
Flore Caudal
1,2,
Sophie Rodrigues
1,
Alain Dufour
1,
Sébastien Artigaud
2,
Gwenaelle Le Blay
2,
Sylvain Petek
2 and
Alexis Bazire
1,*
1
Laboratoire de Biotechnologie et Chimie Marines, Université Bretagne Sud, EMR CNRS 6076, IUEM, 56100 Lorient, France
2
IRD, Univ Brest, CNRS, Ifremer, LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzane, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(7), 1762; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071762
Submission received: 9 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 4 July 2023 / Published: 6 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance Research on Bacterial Biofilm)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

Pathogenic bacteria and their biofilms are involved in many human and animal diseases and are a major public health problem with, among other things, the development of antibiotic resistance. These biofilms are known to induce chronic infections for which classical treatments using antibiotic therapy are often ineffective. Sponges are sessile filter-feeding marine organisms known for their dynamic symbiotic partnerships with diverse microorganisms and their production of numerous metabolites of interest. In this study, we investigated the antibiofilm efficacy of different extracts from sponges, isolated in Wallis, without biocidal activity. Out of the 47 tested extracts, from 28 different genera, 11 showed a strong activity against Vibrio harveyi biofilm formation. Moreover, one of these extracts also inhibited two quorum-sensing pathways of V. harveyi.

1. Introduction

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considered one of the leading public health threats, as more and more pathogenic bacteria are resistant to multiple antibiotics, thus limiting therapeutic strategies. The World Health Organization has listed this theme as a priority, as it is estimated that drug-resistant infections contributed to nearly 5 million deaths in 2019 [1].
The situation could turn out to be worse and underestimated since most studies concerning AMR are carried out on free-living cells, while bacteria are mainly organized as biofilms in their environment. Bacterial biofilms are communities of cells located at interfaces, embedded in a self-produced matrix, composed of exopolysaccharides, proteins, lipids, and extracellular DNA. The matrix contributes to protection from the environment through providing a relatively impermeable physical barrier to toxic substances, including antibiotics [2]. The multi-layer organization of cells enhances this protection, as usually only peripheral cells are exposed to external agents [3]. Dormant bacteria are also found in the deeper layers of the biofilm and are therefore less sensitive to antibiotics that generally target actively growing bacteria [4]. The overuse of antibiotics leads to an increase in their concentration in areas of human activity. Their increasing concentration is problematic because they have been shown to induce biofilm formation, leading to an adaptive response of bacteria [5,6,7] and potentially to gene transfers from animal to human pathogens [8].
Cell proximity in the structure of biofilm indeed allows two types of communication between bacteria: (i) genetical, through horizontal gene transfer, which favors the exchange of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs), especially in seawater environments [9], and (ii) chemical, through the perception of small molecules allowing an estimation of the population density to carry out joint actions, this phenomenon being known as quorum sensing (QS) [10]. QS-controlled phenotypes include notably bacterial virulence and the regulation of biofilm formation; it is therefore an interesting therapeutic target because short-circuiting it (quorum quenching) can impair biofilm formation and/or reduce virulence mechanisms [11].
Therapeutic approaches combining conventional antibiotics and antibiofilm agents are considered promising [12,13]. Finding new molecules specifically targeting bacterial biofilm is therefore crucial, and the marine environment is a fabulous field of exploration for that. It is an extraordinary place of interactions between organisms, whether cooperative or antagonistic, and their studies allowed the discovery of various molecules with multiple applications, including antibiofilm [14,15]. Sponges, in particular, are sessile marine filter-feeding organisms colonized by a very wide variety of microorganisms [16]. There, microorganisms find ecological niches rich in nutrients and various molecules [17], and in return they provide sponges with metabolites involved in the defense against predators and pathogens [18,19] or antibiofilm molecules. Oluwabusola et al. described, for example, in 2022 [20], psammaplin A and bisaprasin, which inhibit both the production of the virulence factor elastase and biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
This mutual cooperation illustrates the notion of holobiont, a superorganism composed of the sponge and its microbiota [21], and in which chemical mediations allow interaction between individuals. Bacterial communities are generally resistant to antibacterials produced by the host, allowing the selection of colonizers [22]. The origin of circulating molecules is difficult to determine, since they can be produced by the sponge or by its associated microorganisms. It is therefore better to speak of the holobiont as a potential source of metabolite-controlling pathogenic bacteria.
In the present study, we screened 47 different holobiont extracts from 28 genera of sponge from Wallis through testing their potential activity against biofilm formation by 3 pathogenic strains: Vibrio harveyi ORM4, P. aeruginosa MUC-N1, and Tenacibaculum maritimum DSM 17995. We further analyzed more precisely the effect of nine of these extracts against V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm and quorum sensing.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Antibiofilm Activity of Sponge Extracts

2.1.1. Antibiofilm Activity Screening on Microtiter Plate

In order to find sponge extracts (SEs) with antibiofilm activity but without biocidal activity, we first used a 96-well polystyrene microtiter plate screening assay to rapidly test our collection of 47 SEs from 28 different genera. After 24 h of growth of P. aeruginosa MUC-N1, or 48 h for V. Harveyi ORM4 and T. maritimum, with 10 µg/mL of SE, the OD600 of each well were measured and compared to the SE-free control to check the absence of biocidal activity. Under these conditions, none of the 47 SEs altered the growth of the three target bacteria, suggesting the absence of biocidal activity (data not shown). Antibiogram-like filter diffusion was also used. After 24 h of growth for P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 and 48 h for V. harveyi ORM4 and T. maritimum DSM 17995, the three bacteria all grew without an inhibition halo around the SE-containing filters, confirming the absence of biocidal activity.
From the same 96-well microtiter plates as above, each well was emptied, rinsed, and stained with crystal violet to quantify the biofilm formed on the polystyrene after bacterial growth. The results of antibiofilm activity towards V. harveyi ORM4 were analyzed first. V. harveyi ORM4 is as pathogen of European abalone in Brittany and Normandy [23,24]. We arbitrarily distinguished four SEs groups regarding their activities against V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm formation (Figure 1, zones separated by dotted lines): (group 1) probiofilm SEs that caused a significant increase in biofilm, the only representative of which is E559; (group 2) neutral SEs with low activity, allowing biofilm formation between 75 and 100% compared to the SE-free controls; (group 3) moderate antibiofilm SEs, with a biofilm equivalent to between 25% and 70% of control biofilms; and finally, (group 4) strong antibiofilm SEs that allowed the inhibition of at least 75% of the biofilm, which is constituted of 11 SEs.
In addition, the genera of the sponges from which the extractions were performed are indicated in Figure 1. The 47 extracts were obtained from 28 genera, with a maximum of 4 representatives per genus (Figure 1). It is interesting to note that some of the most active extracts were obtained from specimens of the same sponge genus. The most compelling example corresponds to the extracts E581 (81.42%), E587 (84.56%), E594 (92.95%), and E595 (93.61%), all isolated from different specimens of the genus Hyrtios in different locations of Wallis. These four extracts are among the most active ones, with up to 93.61% inhibition of biofilm formation. Isolated molecules or extracts from species belonging to this genus and their cytotoxic, antimicrobial, antifungal, or antioxidant activities have already been well described in the literature, but to our knowledge, they were not from the same localization, nor in the same condition of extraction, and their antibiofilm activity had not been described until now. Molecules belonging to diverse chemical classes, such as alkaloids or terpenes, are produced by these organisms [25]. Although some genera are well described in the literature for their production of biochemically diverse molecules, there are also other genera, such as Astrosclera which produce metabolites that are not well described in the literature. Furthermore, the antibiofilm activity of this genus showed more than 75% inhibition in biofilm formation in microtiter plates.
SEs were also tested on two other pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, P. aeruginosa MUC-N1, an opportunistic human pathogen, and T. maritimum DSM 17995, a marine pathogen found mainly in fish farming in different parts of the world [26,27]. Very few extracts showed antibiofilm activities against these two strains, and neither was significant (Figure A1 and Figure A2). Therefore, we suggest that there might be a potential specificity of SE activity limited to certain endogenous microorganisms such as V. harveyi.

2.1.2. Antibiofilm Activity of Selected SEs against V. harveyi ORM4 in a Dynamic Condition of Growth

We then selected the most active extracts of the SE group 4 from seven different sponge genera (E572, E587, E588, E590, E593, E595, E616, and E621) and the unique members of the probiofilm SE group (E559) to further visualize their effects on bacterial adhesion, which is the first step of biofilm formation. Bacteria were allowed to attach for 2 h on glass slides within flow-cell chambers in the presence of the extracts at 10 µg/mL diluted in DMSO. After a 15 min rinse step with LBS medium, bacteria were observed via optical microscopy, and the percentage of surface covered by attached bacteria was compared to an SE-free control in the presence of DMSO, which is the solvent used to suspend the sponge extracts. In order to compare the results, the percentage of surface covered by the bacteria in the presence of the extract was calculated and reported as a relative percentage compared to the control (Figure 2).
Comparing the relative percentage of surface covered in the presence of the extracts to the SE-free control showed that most of the extracts induced no modification of adhesion or had only moderate pro-adhesive activity. Only the E621 extract decreased the adhesion of V. harveyi ORM4.
It is interesting to note here that, for half of the extracts, the percentage of covered surface is higher than the control, suggesting potentially larger biofilms after 24 h of growth.
In addition to the relative percentage of covered surface, we investigated potential changes in the organization of bacteria during this attachment phase. For this purpose, the most representative light microscopy images of the attached bacteria were analyzed and compared with each other (Figure 3).
No effect was observed using E559, E590, or E593. The other extracts led to a change in the organization of bacteria on the surface with two main phenomena: cell aggregation and/or altered adhesion. Using E587 and E595, bacteria seemed to get closer, as if they were attracted to each other, and to form small aggregates in some places. Use of E572, E588, E616, or E621 decreased bacterial adhesion to the surface. These images corroborate the results obtained in Figure 2, except for E616.
Attached bacteria were fed with a flow of medium to estimate the consequence of the sponge extracts on bacterial biofilms subsequently formed in dynamic conditions. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) was used to observe biofilm architectures (Figure 4), and images analyses allowed us to calculate the biovolumes (µm2/µm3), the maximum thicknesses (µm), and the average thicknesses (µm) (Table 1).
When biofilms were formed in flow cell chambers under these dynamic conditions, V. harveyi ORM4 colonized the whole surface and formed a dense and rough biofilm with significant topographical disparities. Since the extracts were only present during the attachment step, less inhibition was expected than in the microplate assays. Despite this contact of only 2 h with the bacteria, it was possible to show a significant effect on the biofilms formed.
The addition of SE during the adhesion step primarily resulted in a decrease in the biovolume, meaning that there were fewer bacterial cells in the biofilm formed after 24 h. This effect was followed by a reduction in the mean thickness and, to a lesser extent, in the maximum thickness. The V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm was thus less dense; its topography remained globally the same with few decreases in maximum thickness, but we observed an area without any bacteria, like a hole in the biofilm. We thus defined three groups: strong biovolume inhibitors, between −30 and −40% (E559, E590, E616, and E621); moderate biovolume inhibitors, around −20% (E572, E587, and E595); and an extract without effect (E588).
Surprisingly, E559 was the extract with the maximum inhibitory activity, while we had chosen it as a control from the probiofilm group defined during the microplate experiment. E559 showed more than 40% inhibition in the biovolume of the biofilm, and approximately 30% inhibition in its average thickness but also in its maximum thickness. Without questioning the classical approach used by many teams, which consists of using microplates to screen for antibiofilm activity, since we observed mostly the same effects between the two experiments, we must, however, remain cautious regarding this screening. Indeed, the conditions in microplates are different at several levels compared to the experiments in flow cells. In microplates, the extracts are constantly present in the medium whereas they are evacuated by the flow in the flow cell; moreover, the culture medium is not continuously renewed in microplates and the attachment surface is also different: polystyrene for microplates and glass in the flow cell chamber.
A second example, E621, from a sponge belonging to the same genus as E559, Petrosia, also showed a significant decrease in V. harveyi ORM4 biovolume (34.65%) and average thickness (28.83%), suggesting that this genus could be a good producer of antibiofilm metabolites. Other sponge genera showed high activities in flow-cell chambers, such as Leiosella (E593) or Astrosclera (E616). The two extracts from sponges of the genus Hyrtios, E587 and E595, showed similar activities on the three biofilm parameters evaluated, with a more important decrease in the biovolume and then in the average thickness.
In the adhesion results presented above (Figure 2 and Figure 3), it was sometimes possible to highlight a greater surface covered by the bacteria in the presence of the extracts, suggesting that we should expect increased biofilm formation. However, as it can be seen in Table 1, all the extracts had an inhibitory effect on at least one parameter of the V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm, except for extract E588. This suggests that the effect of the extracts may not be due to an effect on adhesion. Since the extract was present only during the adhesion step, various scenarios can explain these biofilm impairments. The extract could have been adsorbed on some places of the surface, explaining the holes, or released during the biofilm formation phase, or it could have modified the biology or chemistry of the cell, leading to long-term effects that could have reduced biofilm production or a caused a decrease in its stability. Dheilly et al. [14] observed similar results with alterocin, an antibiofilm protein which reduced biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa when applied during the attachment step only [28].

2.2. Extracts and Quorum Sensing

Since some steps in bacterial biofilm formation are regulated via quorum sensing [29,30], we investigated whether the most active extracts influenced it. We used the V. harveyi BB120 bioreporter, which produces luminescence in response to QS [31]. For this purpose, V. harveyi BB120 was grown with or without sponge extracts at 10 µg/mL and a luminescence kinetics analysis was performed in Erlenmeyer flasks over 10 h with a sample collected every hour. The kinetics of bacterial luminescence in the presence of each extract were compared to the control.
The nine most active extracts previously studied were therefore all tested for their effects on both growth (Figure 5B) and luminescence (Figure 5A) kinetics of V. harveyi BB120. Seven extracts, including E590, did not show any modification of the luminescence kinetics, but two extracts, E559 and E616, modulated these kinetics in terms of the maximum luminescence expressed but also the temporality.
Using E559, peak luminescence was reached two hours earlier than the control, and with a decrease in the global luminescence of 21%. Activity was also observed for the E616 extract, with a slight delay of the luminescence peak and a decrease in its maximum luminescence.
The growth kinetics of V. harveyi BB120 (Figure 5B), were not altered regardless of the extract used, suggesting that luminescence modifications came from an alteration of part of the QS system.
Since the QS of V. harveyi is composed of three interdependent systems, Lux PQ, Lux N, and CqsS, three double mutants (JMH 597, JMH 612, and JAF 375) [32] were used to identify which system was impacted by the extracts. Each mutant showed two out of three inactivated QS pathways, so they allowed us to distinguish precisely which pathway the extracts impaired. The JAF375 mutant showed activity depending on the CqsS pathway, JMH597 depending on the LuxPQ pathway, and JMH 612 on the LuxN pathway.
As performed previously on BB120, luminescence kinetics were followed on each of the three mutants with or without E559 and E616. Unfortunately, the previously reported effects of E616 extract on BB120 were not found in these different mutants, suggesting that E616 probably had no effect on QS; or in a different manner which does not involve CqsS, LuxPQ, or LuxN; or directly on luciferase. In fact, the V. harveyi QS system is made up of these three interdependent pathways (LuxN, LuxPQ, and CqsS), which all converge on a cytoplasmic protein, LuxU, leading to a regulatory protein, LuxO, which in turn leads to the response regulator, LuxR [32].
However, extract 559 decreased the maximum luminescence of JMH597 (B) and JMH612 (C) mutants (Figure 6); indeed, in both cases, the effect led to a decrease in the maximum luminescence by about one third. For JAF375, maximum luminescence was not reduced, but as for the JMH597 mutant, maximum luminescence was observed earlier with a shift of nearly 4 h. The variations described in this luminescence kinetics analysis suggest that extract 559 influences all three CqsS, LuxPQ, and LuxN pathways of V. harveryi QS, suggesting that a common actor of the phosphorelay cascade could be impacted, such as LuxU and LuxO or small RNA [29,31,33].
Altogether, our results suggest that Wallis sponges are able to produce various metabolites that prevent the formation of V. harveyi biofilms, presumably to avoid colonization and subsequent disease induced by this pathogen. This discovery could lead to biotechnology applications to safeguard other marine organisms susceptible to V. harveyi, such as oysters or abalone, for example, through implanting sponges in the same area. This defense mechanism appears to be specific to certain species such as V. harveyi since the biofilm of P. aeruginosa and T. maritimum, two other pathogens, are not altered. The SEs seems to target different steps or regulators of biofilm formation, since we identified that the QS was altered for only two of the nine most active extracts. The identification, purification, and characterization of active metabolites as well as the search for the exact target remain to be performed.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Biological Material

Sponges were collected by hand using SCUBA in Wallis and Futuna during the sampling cruise Wallis 2018 aboard the R/V Alis, off the coast of Wallis Island (18–31 July 2018, 13°16.367′ S; 176°12.283′ W) between 6 and 50 m deep [34]. Voucher samples were deposited at the Queensland Museum (Brisbane, Australia) and identified by Dr. Merrick Ekins; accession numbers available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S1). Sponges were deep-frozen onboard until work. They were then freeze-dried, grounded, and extracted.
V. harveyi ORM4 is a pathogen of the European abalone Haliotis tuberculata, a marine gastropod. This bacterium was isolated during a severe epidemic resulting in the mortality of more than half of the natural stock of European abalone in Brittany and Normandy (France) in the late 1990s [23,24]. Unless otherwise stated, V. harveyi ORM4 was routinely grown at 20 °C in saline Luria-Bertani (SLB) medium (NaCl 20 g/L, tryptone 10 g/L and yeast extract 5 g/L) under orbital shaking (125 rpm).
V. harveyi BB120 [31] wild type and its derived double mutants, V. harveyi JAF 375, JMH 597, and JMH 912 [32,35], were used as models for quorum sensing studies. They were cultivated at 28 °C in autoinducer bioassay (AB) medium (0.3 M NaCl, 0.05 M MgSO4, 0.2% vitamin-free casamino acids (Difco) adjusted to pH 7.5 and sterilized via autoclaving; to 970 mL of this mix, 10 mL of sterile 1 M potassium phosphate (pH 7.0), 10 mL of 0.1 M L-arginine (free-base), and 20 mL of sterile 50% glycerol was added) [36].
P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 is a mucoid clinical isolated from a cystic fibrosis patient at the Nantes teaching hospital [28,37]. P. aeruginosa MUC N1 was grown at 37 °C in Luria-Bertani medium (NaCl 10 g/L, tryptone 10 g/L, and yeast extract 5 g/L) under orbital shaking (125 rpm).
T. maritimum DSM 17995, a marine pathogenic bacterium, was grown at 28 °C in Marine Broth (Difco) under orbital shaking (125 rpm) [38].

3.2. Sponge Extraction

The lyophilized samples were extracted using the following pressurized liquid extraction process. PLE experiments were performed using an accelerated solvent extractor system (ASE 150, Dionex Corporation, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The following solvents were used: methylene chloride, ethanol, and methanol (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint-Quentin Fallavier, France).
A mixture of 8 g of freeze-dried powder of sponge and 8 g of sand of Fontainebleau was poured into a 34 mL stainless steel extraction cell, fitted with glass fiber filters at its ends. The extraction was performed with a mixture of CH2Cl2/MeOH (50/50) at 45 °C under 100 bar during 5 static cycles of 5 min. A second extraction was performed with the same parameters after the cell was turned upside down, rinsed with solvents, and flushed with nitrogen. The combined organic extracts were filtered on glass wool before being concentrated under reduced pressure. The dry extract was desalted using absolute EtOH via resuspension, centrifugation, and collection of the supernatant, 3 times successively. The combined supernatants were concentrated under reduced pressure to provide the dry crude extract which was finally stored at 4 °C, prior to analysis and bioassay.

3.3. Antibiofilm Assays

3.3.1. Microtiter Plate Assay (Static Conditions/Polystyrene Surface)

V. harveyi ORM4 biofilms were formed at 20 °C under static conditions in sterile 96-well microtiter plates (Thermo Scientific™ Nunc™ MicroWell™ 96-Well) for 48 h as described in the protocol of Coffey and Anderson [39]. Briefly, 200 µL of V. harveyi ORM4 suspension, diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in LBS medium, were inoculated in each well except for the blank, where non-inoculated LBS medium was used. Peripheral wells contained 200 µL of autoclaved distilled water to reduce the risk of evaporation. The different extracts were added to the 200 µL of Vibrio suspension to a final concentration of 10 µg/mL (1% DMSO), and DMSO was used as a control. For each condition, technical duplicates and biological triplicates were performed.
After 48 h of growth, OD600 of each well was measured. Staining and quantification of biofilms were performed according to Coffey and Anderson’s protocol. Finally, the absorbance of each well was measured to quantify biofilm formation under static conditions.

3.3.2. Anti-Adhesion Assay (Static Conditions/Glass Surface)

Sponge extract’s effects on the attachment of bacteria were evaluated using a three-channel flow cell chamber (channel dimensions 1 by 4 by 40 mm, Technical University of Denmark Systems Biology, Lyngby, Denmark). The flow cell system was assembled, prepared, and sterilized as described by Tolker-Nielsen and Stenberg [40,41]. Each channel was inoculated with 300 µL of an overnight V. harveyi ORM4 culture diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in sterile ASW (Artificial Sea Water) to which was added either 1% DMSO (SE-free control) or an extract diluted in DMSO at a final concentration of 10 µg/mL. Bacteria were allowed to attach for 2 h to the glass surface. After 10 min of rinsing, adhered cells were observed in light transmission with the CLSM. Bacterial adhesion was evaluated via determining the percentage of glass covered by cells through image analysis using ImageJ. For each tested condition, at least four images of three independent experiments were analyzed.

3.3.3. Impact on Biofilm Formation in Flow Cell Chamber Assay (Dynamic Conditions/Glass Surface)

After the attachment step, biofilms were grown under hydrodynamic conditions with a constant flow (2.5 mL/h) of LBS medium SE-free for 24 h at 20 °C. Biofilms were then observed via CLSM as described below.

3.3.4. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM)

Biofilms formed by V. harveyi ORM4 were stained through injecting each channel with 300 µL of 5 µM of SYTOTM 9 Green (Invitrogen, Carlslab, CA, USA) prepared in sterile ASW, without flow, at room temperature, in the dark for 15 min. A 10 min wash with a flow of medium at 2.5 mL/h was then performed, which was immediately followed by CLSM observations performed with an LSM 710 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a 40× oil immersion objective. SYTO 9 dye was excited at 488 nm and fluorescence emission was detected between 500 and 550 nm. For the three-dimensional (3D) visualization, images were taken every micrometer throughout the whole biofilm depth. The biofilm stacks were analyzed using COMSTAT v.1 2000 software [42] to estimate the biovolume (µm3/µm2), average thickness (µm), and maximum thickness (µm). For each tested condition, at least three image stacks of three independent experiments were analyzed.

3.4. Antibacterial Assays

To assess the antibacterial activity of the different extracts, filter diffusion assays were realized [43]. Solid LBS plates were inoculated with overnight bacteria preculture and 5 µL of extract (10 µg/mL). Plates were then incubated at 20 °C for marine isolates and 37 °C for P. aeruginosa during 48 h or 24 h, respectively. The growth inhibition zones were then measured.

3.5. Anti-Quorum Sensing Assays

V. harveyi BB120 was grown overnight in Zobell medium (yeast extract 1 g/L, tryptone 4 g/L and sea salts 30 g/L), diluted to an OD600 of 0.1 in AB medium for the bioluminescence kinetic. Mutants were grown under same conditions with kanamycin 100 mg/L for JAF 375 and chloramphenicol 10 mg/L for JMH 597 and JMH 612. Growth and bioluminescence were monitored every hour with an infinite M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). For each extract, luminescence kinetics were performed in triplicates.
Bioluminescence kinetics analysis was performed in 96-well plates (Thermo ScientificTM Flat Bottom White Plates, Waltham, MA, USA) using an infinite M200 PRO plate reader (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland). Bioluminescence was expressed in relative light units (RLU).

3.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were conducted in triplicate and the software R-4.2.2 was used for statistical analysis using the Kruskal test followed by a Dunn test. A p value of <0.05 was taken as significant.

4. Conclusions

Based on a screening of 47 sponge extracts isolated in Wallis, this study demonstrated the very strong antibiofilm activity of 9 of these extracts against the marine pathogen V. harveyi ORM4. The effects of these different extracts on biofilm architecture were observed via confocal laser scanning microscopy. In addition, these extracts had no biocidal activity against the target pathogen, limiting the associated risks of resistance. The next steps will be to identify, purify, and characterize the active metabolites and then find the exact target. This study is one of the first to report on the antibiofilm activity of sponge extracts isolated from Wallis.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11071762/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B., F.C., S.R., S.A., S.P. and G.L.B.; methodology, A.B., S.R., F.C. and S.P.; validation, A.B., S.R., S.P. and A.D.; data analysis and curation, F.C.; investigation, F.C.; images preparation, F.C.; writing—original draft preparation, F.C., A.B. and S.R.; writing—review and editing, all authors.; supervision, A.B., S.R. and S.P.; project administration, A.B.; funding acquisition, A.B. and S.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Wallis 2018 oceanographic cruise was funded by the French Oceanographic Fleet, IRD, MNHN, Labex Mer and the Wallis and Futuna Environment Service. This work is part of the FC’s PhD and Master 2 thesis. This work was supported by ISblue project, Interdisciplinary graduate school for the blue planet (ANR-17-EURE-0015) and co-funded by a grant from the French government under the program “Investissements d’Avenir” embedded in France 2030 (Master 2 WAQS project, MARESISTOME project). FC is the recipient of a doctoral fellowship (PhD SPOQS project) co-funded by the Université de Bretagne Sud (UBS) and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD). We acknowledge ISblue, UBS and IRD for their financial support.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Wallis and Futuna authorities, as well as the communities, for allowing us to collect in their country. We acknowledge the crew of the R/V ALIS and IRD’s diving team (SEOH IRD Noumea, New Caledonia) for their essential contribution to the field trip. We thank Merrick Ekins for the identification of the sponges.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

Appendix A

Microorganisms 11 01762 g0a1
Figure A1. Inhibition of P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to form biofilms. Sponge extracts have been grouped by genus. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates, and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Figure A1. Inhibition of P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. P. aeruginosa MUC-N1 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h to form biofilms. Sponge extracts have been grouped by genus. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates, and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g0a1
Microorganisms 11 01762 g0a2
Figure A2. Inhibition of T. maritimum biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. T. maritimum was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h to form biofilms. Sponge extracts have been grouped by genus. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates, and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Figure A2. Inhibition of T. maritimum biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. T. maritimum was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 28 °C for 24 h to form biofilms. Sponge extracts have been grouped by genus. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates, and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g0a2

References

  1. Murray, C.J.; Ikuta, K.S.; Sharara, F.; Swetschinski, L.; Robles Aguilar, G.; Gray, A.; Han, C.; Bisignano, C.; Rao, P.; Wool, E.; et al. Global Burden of Bacterial Antimicrobial Resistance in 2019: A Systematic Analysis. Lancet 2022, 399, 629–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Yin, W.; Wang, Y.; Liu, L.; He, J. Biofilms: The Microbial “Protective Clothing” in Extreme Environments. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Stewart, P.S. Mechanisms of Antibiotic Resistance in Bacterial Biofilms. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. IJMM 2002, 292, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Funari, R.; Shen, A.Q. Detection and Characterization of Bacterial Biofilms and Biofilm-Based Sensors. ACS Sens. 2022, 7, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Anderl, J.N.; Franklin, M.J.; Stewart, P.S. Role of Antibiotic Penetration Limitation in Klebsiella Pneumoniae Biofilm Resistance to Ampicillin and Ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2000, 44, 1818–1824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hoffman, L.R.; D’Argenio, D.A.; MacCoss, M.J.; Zhang, Z.; Jones, R.A.; Miller, S.I. Aminoglycoside Antibiotics Induce Bacterial Biofilm Formation. Nature 2005, 436, 1171–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Salcedo, D.E.; Lee, J.H.; Ha, U.H.; Kim, S.P. The Effects of Antibiotics on the Biofilm Formation and Antibiotic Resistance Gene Transfer. Desalination Water Treat. 2015, 54, 3582–3588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Baquero, F.; Martínez, J.-L.; Cantón, R. Antibiotics and Antibiotic Resistance in Water Environments. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2008, 19, 260–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Abe, K.; Nomura, N.; Suzuki, S. Biofilms: Hot Spots of Horizontal Gene Transfer (HGT) in Aquatic Environments, with a Focus on a New HGT Mechanism. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2020, 96, fiaa031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Irie, Y.; Parsek, M.R. Quorum Sensing and Microbial Biofilms. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2008, 322, 67–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paluch, E.; Rewak-Soroczyńska, J.; Jędrusik, I.; Mazurkiewicz, E.; Jermakow, K. Prevention of Biofilm Formation by Quorum Quenching. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1871–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Taylor, P.K.; Yeung, A.T.Y.; Hancock, R.E.W. Antibiotic Resistance in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Biofilms: Towards the Development of Novel Anti-Biofilm Therapies. J. Biotechnol. 2014, 191, 121–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pletzer, D.; Hancock, R.E.W. Antibiofilm Peptides: Potential as Broad-Spectrum Agents. J. Bacteriol. 2016, 198, 2572–2578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dheilly, A.; Soum-Soutéra, E.; Klein, G.L.; Bazire, A.; Compère, C.; Haras, D.; Dufour, A. Antibiofilm Activity of the Marine Bacterium Pseudoalteromonas Sp. Strain 3J6. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010, 76, 3452–3461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Sayem, S.A.; Manzo, E.; Ciavatta, L.; Tramice, A.; Cordone, A.; Zanfardino, A.; Felice, M.D.; Varcamonti, M. Anti-Biofilm Activity of an Exopolysaccharide from a Sponge-Associated Strain of Bacillus Licheniformis. Microb. Cell Factories 2011, 10, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Slaby, B.M.; Hackl, T.; Horn, H.; Bayer, K.; Hentschel, U. Metagenomic Binning of a Marine Sponge Microbiome Reveals Unity in Defense but Metabolic Specialization. ISME J. 2017, 11, 2465–2478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Hentschel, U.; Usher, K.M.; Taylor, M.W. Marine Sponges as Microbial Fermenters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2006, 55, 167–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bakus, G.J.; Targett, N.M.; Schulte, B. Chemical Ecology of Marine Organisms: An Overview. J. Chem. Ecol. 1986, 12, 951–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Proksch, P. Defensive Roles for Secondary Metabolites from Marine Sponges and Sponge-Feeding Nudibranchs. Toxicon 1994, 32, 639–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oluwabusola, E.T.; Katermeran, N.P.; Poh, W.H.; Goh, T.M.B.; Tan, L.T.; Diyaolu, O.; Tabudravu, J.; Ebel, R.; Rice, S.A.; Jaspars, M. Inhibition of the Quorum Sensing System, Elastase Production and Biofilm Formation in Pseudomonas Aeruginosa by Psammaplin A and Bisaprasin. Molecules 2022, 27, 1721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Moitinho-Silva, L.; Bayer, K.; Cannistraci, C.V.; Giles, E.C.; Ryu, T.; Seridi, L.; Ravasi, T.; Hentschel, U. Specificity and Transcriptional Activity of Microbiota Associated with Low and High Microbial Abundance Sponges from the Red Sea. Mol. Ecol. 2014, 23, 1348–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Taylor, M.W.; Radax, R.; Steger, D.; Wagner, M. Sponge-Associated Microorganisms: Evolution, Ecology, and Biotechnological Potential. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2007, 71, 295–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Nicolas, J.; Basuyaux, O.; Mazurié, J.; Thébault, A. Vibrio Carchariae, a Pathogen of the Abalone Haliotis Tuberculata. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2002, 50, 35–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Morot, A.; El Fekih, S.; Bidault, A.; Le Ferrand, A.; Jouault, A.; Kavousi, J.; Bazire, A.; Pichereau, V.; Dufour, A.; Paillard, C.; et al. Virulence of Vibrio Harveyi ORM4 towards the European Abalone Haliotis Tuberculata Involves Both Quorum Sensing and a Type III Secretion System. Environ. Microbiol. 2021, 23, 5273–5288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shady, N.H.; El-Hossary, E.M.; Fouad, M.A.; Gulder, T.A.M.; Kamel, M.S.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Bioactive Natural Products of Marine Sponges from the Genus Hyrtios. Molecules 2017, 22, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Småge, S.B.; Frisch, K.; Brevik, Ø.J.; Watanabe, K.; Nylund, A. First Isolation, Identification and Characterisation of Tenacibaculum Maritimum in Norway, Isolated from Diseased Farmed Sea Lice Cleaner Fish Cyclopterus Lumpus L. Aquaculture 2016, 464, 178–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. ICES. Tenacibaculum Maritimum, Causal Agent of Tenacibaculosis in Marine Fish. 2019. Available online: https://doi.org/10.17895/ICES.PUB.4681 (accessed on 16 May 2021).
  28. Jouault, A.; Gobet, A.; Simon, M.; Portier, E.; Perennou, M.; Corre, E.; Gaillard, F.; Vallenet, D.; Michel, G.; Fleury, Y.; et al. Alterocin, an Antibiofilm Protein Secreted by Pseudoalteromonas Sp. Strain 3J6. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2020, 86, e00893-20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Waters, C.M.; Bassler, B.L. The Vibrio Harveyi Quorum-Sensing System Uses Shared Regulatory Components to Discriminate between Multiple Autoinducers. Genes Dev. 2006, 20, 2754–2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hammer, B.K.; Bassler, B.L. Quorum Sensing Controls Biofilm Formation in Vibrio Cholerae. Mol. Microbiol. 2003, 50, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Bassler, B.L.; Greenberg, E.P.; Stevens, A.M. Cross-Species Induction of Luminescence in the Quorum-Sensing Bacterium Vibrio Harveyi. J. Bacteriol. 1997, 179, 4043–4045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Henke, J.M.; Bassler, B.L. Three Parallel Quorum-Sensing Systems Regulate Gene Expression in Vibrio Harveyi. J. Bacteriol. 2004, 186, 6902–6914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tu, K.C.; Waters, C.M.; Svenningsen, S.L.; Bassler, B.L. A Small-RNA-Mediated Negative Feedback Loop Controls Quorum-Sensing Dynamics in Vibrio Harveyi. Mol. Microbiol. 2008, 70, 896–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Petek, S. WALLIS 2018 Cruise, Alis R/V. 2018. Available online: https://doi.org/10.17600/18000524 (accessed on 7 June 2022).
  35. Freeman, J.A.; Bassler, B.L. A Genetic Analysis of the Function of LuxO, a Two-Component Response Regulator Involved in Quorum Sensing in Vibrio Harveyi. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31, 665–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Greenberg, E.P.; Hastings, J.W.; Ulitzur, S. Induction of Luciferase Synthesis in Beneckea Harveyi by Other Marine Bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 1979, 120, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Boukerb, A.M.; Simon, M.; Pernet, E.; Jouault, A.; Portier, E.; Persyn, E.; Bouffartigues, E.; Bazire, A.; Chevalier, S.; Feuilloley, M.G.J.; et al. Draft Genome Sequences of Four Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Clinical Strains with Various Biofilm Phenotypes. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2020, 9, e01286-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures GmbH: Details. Available online: https://www.dsmz.de/collection/catalogue/details/culture/DSM-17995 (accessed on 7 June 2023).
  39. Coffey, B.M.; Anderson, G.G. Biofilm Formation in the 96-Well Microtiter Plate. Methods Mol. Biol. 2014, 1149, 631–641. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tolker-Nielsen, T.; Sternberg, C. Methods for Studying Biofilm Formation: Flow Cells and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. In Pseudomonas Methods and Protocols; Filloux, A., Ramos, J.-L., Eds.; Methods in Molecular Biology; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Volume 1149, pp. 615–629. ISBN 978-1-4939-0472-3. [Google Scholar]
  41. Pamp, S.J.; Sternberg, C.; Tolker-Nielsen, T. Insight into the Microbial Multicellular Lifestyle via Flow-Cell Technology and Confocal Microscopy. Cytometry A 2009, 75A, 90–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Heydorn, A.; Nielsen, A.T.; Hentzer, M.; Sternberg, C.; Givskov, M.; Ersbøll, B.K.; Molin, S. Quantification of Biofilm Structures by the Novel Computer Program Comstat. Microbiology 2000, 146, 2395–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Balouiri, M.; Sadiki, M.; Ibnsouda, S.K. Methods for in Vitro Evaluating Antimicrobial Activity: A Review. J. Pharm. Anal. 2016, 6, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Microorganisms 11 01762 g001
Figure 1. Inhibition of V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with SE (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 20 °C for 48 h to form biofilms. The dotted lines delimitate four groups of SEs, which have been distinguished according to their activity levels. The sponge genera are indicated. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates and the 100% dotted line corresponds to the DMSO SE-free control. * p < 0.05.
Figure 1. Inhibition of V. harveyi ORM4 biofilm formation by different sponge extracts in microtiter plates. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with SE (10 µg/mL) in 96-well microplates and incubated at 20 °C for 48 h to form biofilms. The dotted lines delimitate four groups of SEs, which have been distinguished according to their activity levels. The sponge genera are indicated. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates and the 100% dotted line corresponds to the DMSO SE-free control. * p < 0.05.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g001
Microorganisms 11 01762 g002
Figure 2. Percentage of glass surface covered by bacteria in the presence of sponge extracts compared to the SE-free control. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in flow-cell chambers and bacteria were allowed to attach at 20 °C for 2 h. The sponge genera are indicated. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Figure 2. Percentage of glass surface covered by bacteria in the presence of sponge extracts compared to the SE-free control. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in flow-cell chambers and bacteria were allowed to attach at 20 °C for 2 h. The sponge genera are indicated. Bars represent means ± standard error of the mean for three replicates and the dotted line corresponds to the DMSO control.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g002
Microorganisms 11 01762 g003
Figure 3. Light microscopic observation of the effect of nine sponge extracts on the adhesion of V. harveyi ORM4. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in flow-cell chambers and allowed to attach on a glass surface at 20 °C for 2 h prior to observe them at 40× magnification. Images shown are representative of four images per condition from three independent experiments.
Figure 3. Light microscopic observation of the effect of nine sponge extracts on the adhesion of V. harveyi ORM4. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with sponge extracts (10 µg/mL) in flow-cell chambers and allowed to attach on a glass surface at 20 °C for 2 h prior to observe them at 40× magnification. Images shown are representative of four images per condition from three independent experiments.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g003
Microorganisms 11 01762 g004
Figure 4. V. harveyi ORM4 biofilms formed in flow-cell chambers after incubation with different sponge extracts during the attachment step. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with SEs (10 µg/mL) in flow cell chambers and biofilms were then grown at 20 °C for 24 h. Confocal laser microscopy observations with or without the addition of extracts are in 3D: top and side views are shown here.
Figure 4. V. harveyi ORM4 biofilms formed in flow-cell chambers after incubation with different sponge extracts during the attachment step. V. harveyi ORM4 was inoculated with SEs (10 µg/mL) in flow cell chambers and biofilms were then grown at 20 °C for 24 h. Confocal laser microscopy observations with or without the addition of extracts are in 3D: top and side views are shown here.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g004
Microorganisms 11 01762 g005
Figure 5. Effect of sponge extracts on V. harveyi BB120 quorum sensing. (A) Luminescence of V. harveyi BB120 in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or with DMSO as control. Luminescence is counted in relative light units. (B) Kinetic growth of V. harveyi BB120 in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or SE-free DMSO as control; growth is shown as optical density at 600 nm.
Figure 5. Effect of sponge extracts on V. harveyi BB120 quorum sensing. (A) Luminescence of V. harveyi BB120 in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or with DMSO as control. Luminescence is counted in relative light units. (B) Kinetic growth of V. harveyi BB120 in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or SE-free DMSO as control; growth is shown as optical density at 600 nm.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g005
Microorganisms 11 01762 g006
Figure 6. Effect of sponge extracts on V. harveyi JAF375 (A), JMH597 (B), and JMH612 (C) quorum sensing. Luminescence of V. harveyi JAF375 (A), JMH597 (B), and JMH612 (C) in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or with DMSO as control. Luminescence is shown as RLU.
Figure 6. Effect of sponge extracts on V. harveyi JAF375 (A), JMH597 (B), and JMH612 (C) quorum sensing. Luminescence of V. harveyi JAF375 (A), JMH597 (B), and JMH612 (C) in the presence of 10 µg/mL extract or with DMSO as control. Luminescence is shown as RLU.
Microorganisms 11 01762 g006
Table 1. Comparison of percentage of inhibition in biovolume and average and maximum thickness of V. harveyi ORM4 biofilms in the presence of sponge extracts. The results are presented as the average inhibition of three replicates ± standard error of the mean.
Table 1. Comparison of percentage of inhibition in biovolume and average and maximum thickness of V. harveyi ORM4 biofilms in the presence of sponge extracts. The results are presented as the average inhibition of three replicates ± standard error of the mean.
E559E590E616E621E572E587E593E595E588
% Inhibition in
biovolume		41.76 ± 10.0133.20 ± 6.6137.91 ± 3.8734.65 ± 6.3226.41 ± 16.0130.35 ± 12.9028.21 ± 14.3926.86 ± 7.750.72 ± 17.41
% Inhibition in average thickness30.59 ± 6.3721.38 ± 4.5313.49 ± 5.1728.83 ± 6.8616.85 ± 12.9717.49 ± 16.3715.31 ± 10.4221.71 ± 5.711.59 ± 8.78
% Inhibition in
maximum thickness		28.75 ± 0.9715.18 ± 3.218.71 ± 5.5611.81 ± 6.505.54 ± 6.196.35 ± 7.878.68 ± 5.3119.94 ± 5.330.51 ± 3.45
Strong inhibitor groupModerate inhibitor groupNo effect
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Caudal, F.; Rodrigues, S.; Dufour, A.; Artigaud, S.; Le Blay, G.; Petek, S.; Bazire, A. Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071762

AMA Style

Caudal F, Rodrigues S, Dufour A, Artigaud S, Le Blay G, Petek S, Bazire A. Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(7):1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071762

Chicago/Turabian Style

Caudal, Flore, Sophie Rodrigues, Alain Dufour, Sébastien Artigaud, Gwenaelle Le Blay, Sylvain Petek, and Alexis Bazire. 2023. "Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation" Microorganisms 11, no. 7: 1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071762

APA Style

Caudal, F., Rodrigues, S., Dufour, A., Artigaud, S., Le Blay, G., Petek, S., & Bazire, A. (2023). Extracts from Wallis Sponges Inhibit Vibrio harveyi Biofilm Formation. Microorganisms, 11(7), 1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11071762

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop