Next Article in Journal
Quorum Sensing as a Trigger That Improves Characteristics of Microbial Biocatalysts
Previous Article in Journal
GAPDH Released from Lactobacillus johnsonii MG Enhances Barrier Function by Upregulating Genes Associated with Tight Junctions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Microorganisms
Volume 11
Issue 6
10.3390/microorganisms11061394
microorganisms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Shifts of Leaf Litter-Induced Plant-Soil Feedback from Negative to Positive Driven by Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Quercus ilex and Pisolithus arrhizus

by
Maurizio Zotti
1,*,
Giuliano Bonanomi
1,2,
Luigi Saulino
1,
Emilia Allevato
1,
Antonio Saracino
1,
Stefano Mazzoleni
1 and
Mohamed Idbella
1
1
Department of Agricultural Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Via Università, 100, 80055 Portici, Italy
2
Task Force on Microbiome Studies, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Microorganisms 2023, 11(6), 1394; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061394
Submission received: 2 May 2023 / Revised: 18 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 25 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Ectomycorrhizas (ECM) are a common symbiotic association between fungi and various plant species in forest ecosystems, affecting community assemblages at the landscape level. ECMs benefit host plants by increasing the surface area for nutrient uptake, defending against pathogens, and decomposing organic matter in the soil. ECM-symbiotic seedlings are also known to perform better in conspecific soils than other species unable to carry the symbiosis, in a process referred to as plant-soil feedback (PSF). In this study, we tested the effects of different leaf litter amendments on ECM and non-ECM seedlings of Quercus ilex inoculated with Pisolithus arrhizus and how they altered the litter-induced PSF. Our experiment showed that the ECM symbiont induced a shift from negative PSF to positive PSF in Q. ilex seedlings by analysing plant and root growth parameters. However, non-ECM seedlings performed better than ECM seedlings in a no-litter condition, indicating an autotoxic effect when litter is present without ECM symbionts. Conversely, ECM seedlings with litter performed better at different decomposition stages, suggesting a possible role of the symbiosis of P. arrhizus and Q. ilex in recycling autotoxic compounds released from conspecific litter, transforming them into nutrients that are transferred to the plant host.

1. Introduction

Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) symbiosis is one of the most extensive symbiotic relationships in terrestrial ecosystems [1]. The ECM relationship is formed by basidiomycetes, fungi, ascomycetes, and mucoromycetes. Plant species that form ECM symbioses usually belong to the Fagaceae, Betulaceae, Pinaceae, and Salicaceae families in temperate climates [2], while ECM symbioses are less common in tropical environments and are formed with plant species of Dipterocarpaceae and Caesalpinioideae in well-drained soils [2,3]. For plants, the advantages of ECM symbiosis involve improved nutrient acquisition from the soil and increased defences against soil-borne pathogens [4,5]. Consequently, such symbiosis modifies plant-plant competitive interactions, favouring those forming ECMs. At the landscape level, it is more common to find monodominant plant communities associated with ECM symbiosis [6]. The monospecific composition of plant communities is also described as an effect of positive plant-soil feedback (PF) [7]. In the case of PF, a plant species conditions its soil to increase the probability of successful conspecific recruitment and competitively exclude heterospecific recruitment. The opposite condition is described as plant-soil negative feedback (NF), in which conspecific recruitment is disfavoured while heterospecific recruitment is more likely to take place. Consequently, the PF favours the establishment of monodominated communities, while the NF triggers the formation of more diverse plant communities [8]. Vegetation patterns formed by NF are more common than those formed by PF [9,10]. For example, at the individual level, rings of clonal plants migrate outward from the negatively conditioned centre [11,12]. In grassland species, plant turnover is driven by NF [13,14]. Furthermore, in the successional process of vegetation, NF conditions in the soil may favour the shift from one plant community to another [15,16,17].
Several pieces of evidence supported different hypotheses regarding the biological mechanisms leading to a plant-soil feedback response. Plant pathogen accumulation beneath parent plants [18], depletion of nutrients [19,20], and the autotoxic effect caused by negative products of organic matter decomposition [21,22,23]. In the case of ECM forests, a non-fingo hypothesis suggests that the symbiosis between the plant and the fungus acts in the way in which one or all the NF mechanisms are transmuted in PF. The probability that a seedling will be inoculated by a suitable ectomycorrhizal fungus is higher near a conspecific tree. Accordingly, an evident advantage is provided to ECM seedlings to avoid the consequences of NF [7,24]. ECMs were documented to increase plant defences against pathogens by establishing a selective mycorrhizosphere. Additionally, the mycelium of EMC fungi extends the nutrient adsorption surface for the plant host, so that the plant benefits from the degradation activity of soil organic and inorganic matter by the fungus [25,26,27,28,29]. Moreover, seedlings growing in the proximity of mother plants have a higher probability of being integrated into the common mycorrhizal network and receiving an advantage through resource trading between adult trees [6,30]. Conversely, few studies have focused on the ability of ECM symbiosis to eliminate the autotoxic effect derived from the decomposition of conspecific organic matter. Several studies showed that seedling growth and survival were reduced in soils with high inputs of leaf litter [31,32,33]. However, during leaf litter decomposition, the effect becomes species-specific, with impaired growth of conspecific seedlings and a shift in effect from phytotoxicity to autotoxicity [23,34]. Litter decomposition patterns and associated autotoxicity offer new insights into plant-soil interaction studies and have the potential to explain plant community patterns at inter-ecosystemic levels, such as grasslands, forests [17,34,35,36], and stream ecosystems [37]. A wide and detailed assessment of the effects of autotoxicity was proposed by Mazzoleni et al. in 2015 [22], indicating that the process is triggered by the release of autotoxic self-DNA. Among the plants tested in their work, they described a self-inhibitory effect also for plants capable of forming ECM symbioses, such as Quercus ilex and Quercus pubescens, with a NF effect observed in ECM plants despite their monodominant distribution, indicating a PF effect in natural environments. Thus, the theory of leaf litter autotoxicity needs to be verified, including the presence of symbioses that may influence the natural distribution of plants. Evidence suggests that ECM symbiosis promotes the exploitation of leaf litter for the plant through the saprobic activity of the fungus [38,39,40], hypothetically shifting the effect described by Mazzoleni et al. [22,41] into a nutritive advantage for the plant bearing the symbiosis. However, knowledge on the ability of ECM symbiosis to reduce or eliminate the detrimental effects of litter is lacking in the literature. Moreover, most of the works studied this effect as plant-soil interaction rather than symbiotic system-soil, which is a consistent bias considering that plants should be studied as holobionts [42].
From this point of view, we consider the different responses in morphometrics and plant growth as important indicators of the relationship between the symbiotic system and environmental conditions in the soil. This is particularly true for the enrichment with conspecific leaf litter at different ages of decomposition. In this context, we hypothesise that the ECM symbiosis can convert NF to PF due to plant litter. To test this hypothesis, we used a symbiotic system composed of Q. ilex seedlings and Pisolithus arrhizus, considering it a natural and widespread association in Mediterranean regions [43,44,45]. Previous studies demonstrated that conspecific litter inhibits Q. ilex seed germination and root growth in the early stage [41,46], but no studies have investigated the litter impact on seedling growth and root structure. The specific aims of the study were:
  • Assess the effect of litter-induced plant-soil feedback across different decomposition stages in seedlings with and without ECM symbiosis of P. arrhizus.
  • Connect the effect of litter-induced plant-soil feedback response with changes in the root system growth and structure upon addition of ECM inoculum.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Production of Mycorrhized and Non-Mycorrhized Quercus ilex Seedlings

All materials were collected in the evergreen holm oak urban forest of Parco Gussone (40°48′40.3″ N, 14°20′33.8″ E, 75 m a.s.l.; about 1 km from the coast) in the Bourbonic royal palace of Portici. The site is an old-growth evergreen Quercus ilex forest established on the lava field approximately 300 years ago. The overstory tree layer is dominated by Q. ilex with an average stand height of 16 m, while the understory is mainly composed of shade-tolerant deciduous Fraxinus ornus and evergreen Laurus nobilis species [47].
The soil is shallow with andic properties and overlies pyroclastic deposits from the eruptions of Vesuvius in 1631 CE. The climate is Mediterranean, with humid winters and dry summers, total annual rainfall of 929 mm (290, 200, 89, and 348 mm in winter, spring, summer, and fall, respectively), and monthly average temperatures ranging from 11 °C (January) to 26 °C (August) [48].
The fungal material for inoculation was provided by ID Forest laboratories (http://idforest.es/, accessed on 15 June 2018, Spain) and consisted of certified spores of Pisolithus arrhizus. Acorns of Q. ilex were collected from plants on which the presence of sporophores of Pisolithus spp. was observed. Acorns were selected, and those that showed damage, lesions, or structural defects were discarded. Seeds were dried for several days and then stored at a temperature of 4°C for vernalization. Given the nondormant nature of Q. ilex acorns, a period of one week was considered sufficient to achieve their simultaneous germination. Prior to germination, seeds were sterilised for 5 min in sodium hypochlorite at a concentration of 1% (v/v). After sterilisation, seeds destined for inoculation were separated from those not destined to form ECM symbiosis to produce groups of mycorrhized and non-mycorrhized Q. ilex seedlings. For each group, acorns were germinated in separate plastic boxes 60 × 40 × 40 cm. A sterilised mixture of peat and vermiculite in a 3:1 ratio was used as the substrate for germination. The germination of the oak acorns occurred above ground and uniformly 5 days after they were placed in plastic boxes. Seeds that had not germinated after ten days were discarded. The inoculation phase consisted of the addition of 5 g of P. arrhizus spores to the water used for irrigation. The inoculum was sprayed on the germinated seedlings, and the inoculation was repeated every 4 days for a total of three times. After one month of growth in lab conditions, seedlings were transplanted under experimental conditions. For ECM seedlings, only those showing ectomycorrhizal root tips were included in the experiments. Q. ilex seedlings were checked for successful formation of ECM root tips by inspecting them under a dissection microscope at 4× magnification. Seedlings in the range of 15 to 30% ECM root tip colonisation (based on the total number of root tips in the root system) were included in the experiment and compared with non-inoculated seedlings. Seedlings falling below or exceeding the colonisation threshold were not included in the experiment.

2.2. Rhizotron Experiment

A rhizotron experiment was conducted to investigate the impact of conspecific litter and the presence of ECM fungi on the development of Q. ilex root systems. The rhizotrons were composed of modules measuring 100 cm in depth, 25 cm in width, and 5 cm thick. One side of the rhizotron was covered in transparent polyethylene material, while the other side was covered in a rigid, opaque polycarbonate layer. The narrower side consisted of foam bands (Figure 1). The rhizotron modules were sterilised by washing with 1% sodium hypochlorite and rinsed with water twice. Autoclaved soil was used to fill the rhizotrons, and 2% litter was added to the total soil amount (~2 kg). Fresh and aged conspecific litter (decomposed for 0 and 120 days, respectively) were added to investigate the impact of litter age. Control groups without litter were also prepared. The three litter treatments were applied to both ECM and non-ECM plants (Figure 1). The 120-day decomposed litter was produced under laboratory conditions in 50 × 30 × 30 cm plastic trays that were periodically watered at a temperature of 20°C. To promote decomposition of the leaf litter, a soil sample was collected in correspondence with the leaf litter sampling site. Soil inoculum was added using the slurry method, according to Bonanomi et al. in 2019 [49]. After litter addition, Q. ilex seedlings with and without ECM symbiosis were transplanted and covered for three days to avoid hydric stress during transplantation. The rhizotrons were placed at an inclination of approximately 60° to promote roots’ gravitropic growth towards the transparent plastic layer, and roots were traced using different coloured indelible pencils for each sampling date (Figure 1). The experiment lasted for two months (the period required for the roots to reach the base of the mesocosm), after which parameters requiring destructive sampling were collected. A total of 18 rhizotrons were prepared according to the experimental design. Data on root system depth and width, area, total root length, total length of fine roots, and number of fine roots were collected every 15 days. At the end of the experiment, shoot, root, and total biomass were measured by destructive sampling. Additionally, the ratio between root and shoot biomass, depth and width of the root system, root density as the number of fine roots per unit area, the ratio between root width and biomass, and the ratio between DW and biomass were calculated (Table S2).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The significant changes in plant and root growth parameters of Q. ilex seedlings were tested with and without ECM symbiosis using three different litter decomposition regimes (no litter, 0 days, and 120 days). GLM and the specific significant differences between experimental groups were assessed using Duncan’s test at α = 0.05.
To observe the effect of conspecific litter on root system proliferation with or without ECM symbionts, the effect size was calculated by subtracting the value of Q. ilex seedlings growing in the presence of conspecific litter from the corresponding value observed in the no litter treatment and dividing by the standard deviation of the data population [50]. Effect size values were calculated for each of the variables used in the experiment. The effect size values were first used to observe the ordination of seedlings according to the effect of litter on root systems with or without ectomycorrhizal symbionts using principal component analysis (PCA). Later, data for ECM and non-ECM seedlings of Q. ilex were separately observed through heatplots with variables ordered by hierarchical clustering of Euclidean distance of effect size values for seedlings growing in soil amended with fresh (0 days) and aged (120 days) litter.
The increase rate in total length, total length of fine roots, and number of fine roots were analysed to examine the effects of the presence of symbionts, the presence and absence and duration of decomposition of self-litter added, and the timing of sampling. Other parameters explaining root proliferation and the trajectory assumed across the dates of sampling were analysed using principal component analysis (PCA). All statistical analyses and plots were performed using Primer 7 and Statistica 10 software.

3. Results

Digital imaging of Q. ilex seedlings showed generalised changes in root structure among treatments and the presence/absence of ECM symbiosis (Figure 2). In detail, seedlings growing with ECM symbionts had higher root growth compared to non-ECM seedlings when growing with conspecific litter compared to the corresponding treatment of non-ECM seedlings. Among these, ECM seedlings growing with fresh litter (0 days) showed the highest root biomass, followed by seedlings growing in decomposed litter (120 days). For non-ECM seedlings, lower root biomass was recorded for those growing in decomposed litter (120 days), with similar values at 0 days of decomposition. In the absence of litter, higher root biomass was produced in non-ECM seedlings (Figure 3a).
The treatments used in the experiment showed a similar effect on total root length, the number of fine roots, and the total length of fine roots. The highest values of total root length, number of fine roots, and total length of fine roots were observed for ECM seedlings growing in the conspecific litter, both fresh and decomposed. Meanwhile, non-ECM seedlings growing in conspecific litter showed a lower level of total root length, the number of fine roots, and the total length of fine roots. Among seedlings growing without litter, higher total root length, the number of fine roots, and the total length of fine roots were observed for non-ECM seedlings when compared to the ECM (Figure 3b–d). ECM plants developed a larger area of the root system compared to non-ECM seedlings. The only exception is made for non-ECM seedlings that develop similar area values to the ECM ones (Figure 3e).
The density of fine roots was similar between ECM seedlings; meanwhile, variation was observed for the non-ECM plants. The lowest level of fine root density was observed in the non-ECM seedlings growing in the decomposed litter, while the highest level was recorded in the same group of seedlings growing in the absence of litter (Figure 3f).
PCA of the effect sizes measured as the difference in root development parameters from the seedlings growing in fresh and decomposed litter against values of those in the absence of litter showed an inverse response to litter supplement between ECM and non-ECM seedlings (Figure 4).
Commonly, ECM plants growing in litter developed higher values for density of the root system, total length and number of fine roots, total root length, area of the root system, and the ratio between root length and area compared to plants without litter. Inversely, the DW/RB ratio was lower compared to plants growing without litter. Specifically, for how the decomposition stage of litter affects the development of the root system in ECM seedlings, we observed that ECM seedlings in fresh litter developed root systems with a lower width/root biomass ratio. Inversely, seedlings in decomposed litter developed a higher width of the root system and R/S and a lower depth of the root system and D/W ratio (Figure S1).
For non-ECM plants, we observed that seedlings growing in conspecific litter developed a lower depth of the root system, the ratio between root length and area, the density of fine roots, the number of fine roots, the root biomass, the DW/RB ratio, the total length of fine roots, the DW ratio, and the total root length. Decomposition stages of litter produced a higher area and width of the root system and a higher width/biomass of the root system ratio in seedlings growing with decomposed litter. Inversely, seedlings growing in fresh litter developed a higher ratio of root biomass, root depth, and R/S ratios.
Moreover, nine parameters were measured to obtain information on the shape of the root system and its strategy of proliferation in the soil over time. The data was reduced using Principal component analysis (PCA), explaining around 99.6% of the total variance in the data (PCI: 61.3% and PCII: 29.3%). The multivariate analysis showed that ECM plants are generally more correlated with the development of a wider root apparatus and a larger area of the root system. The same strategy is assumed by litter-enriched non-ECM plants that develop a wider root apparatus but have a lower correlation because of the scant growth. A complete inverse strategy is developed in non-ECM plants growing without litter, which have a higher depth-width ratio, a higher density of fine roots, and a deeper root system (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

In the present experiment, we demonstrated the positive relationship between Q. ilex seedlings and P. arrhizus, one of its elective fungal symbionts. We observed that seedlings growing without the ECM symbiont showed lower growth rates and root proliferation in the litter compared to seedlings growing without the symbiont and without conspecific litter. Differently, when P. arrhizus was present, seedlings of Q. ilex benefited from the presence of conspecific litter. Overall, the results support our hypothesis that the presence of the ECM symbiont promotes a shift in NF produced by conspecific litter in PF. The findings are consistent with previous research highlighting the positive impact of ECM symbiosis on plant establishment in soil conditioned by conspecifics [7,51].
Regarding the effects of ECM symbiosis on the structure of the root system of Q. ilex, our analysis revealed that the roots of ECM seedlings proliferated more widely and extensively in the soil compared to non-ECM seedlings. The difference in root system structure was particularly noticeable when observing ECM plants growing with conspecific litter and non-ECM plants growing without litter, which prefer to grow in a deeper soil layer without the lateral ramification of lateral leading roots that over-expand in a bifid herringbone structure. This root structural change may have arisen due to the proliferation of ECM plants in environments where disturbance or changing factors in root structure are minimised. In ECM plants, symbiosis may have acted as an enhancer of root ramification [52,53]. As a result, the higher number of root tips in ECM plants triggered a cascade mechanism where intraindividual competition between root tips led to a wider root system due to a self-repulsive arrangement [54]. ECM plants likely have an advantage in resource acquisition due to their larger adsorption surface, but only in the presence of conspecific litter.
In estimating the effects of litter decomposition, we observed few changes in ECM plants growing in fresh or decomposed litter, suggesting that litter may have a positive effect on the symbiotic system between Q. ilex and P. arrhizus regardless of the decomposition stage. Our observation is not consistent with previous findings on the natural feeding strategy of ectomycorrhizal fungi, which preferentially scavenge resources in the soil layer below fresh litter on more decomposed materials [28]. In contrast, fresh litter is dominated by saprotrophic fungi [55]. It could be that the lack of a saprobic community in our experimental system allowed ECM plants to also benefit from fresh litter in the soil. Another explanation for this phenomenon could be based on a specific ability of P. arrhizus, as most ECM fungi still have obscure mechanisms of action [56,57]. Notably, ECM seedlings growing with conspecific litter developed deeper root systems compared to non-ECM plants. The presence of litter with an autotoxic effect can impair the exploration of soil horizons with higher water availability, exposing plants to possible hydric stresses. This effect should be investigated in a natural environment, as in our experimental system, water availability does not constitute a limiting factor.
In contrast, we observed variable trends in root proliferation over time in non-ECM plants when amended with fresh or decomposed litter. Although the structure and biomass of the root system at the end of the experiment were similar between seedlings in decomposed and fresh litter, the former had a higher proliferation of the root system during the first 15 days of growth, followed by a lower ability to form new root parts on the following sampling date. Conversely, fresh litter exhibited lower proliferation of the root system in the first 15 days, followed by a net increase in the ability to produce new root parts on subsequent sampling dates. Generally, these trends indicate that the root system loses the ability to proliferate in some portions of the roots during the experiment, suggesting that the factor causing this effect is persistent over time. Conversely, in fresh litter, the effect on root system proliferation is ephemeral during the first 15 days. This finding is consistent with the results of Mazzoleni et al. [22,41], who suggested a negative species-specific effect of decomposed litter on the growth of conspecific seedlings. Interestingly, the long-lasting negative effect of decomposed litter on seedling growth suggests the presence of a stable factor affecting root proliferation, which could be autotoxic self-DNA. Further research, including testing a higher number of plants and the addition of heterospecific litter, which is lacking in the present experiment, is necessary to clarify this effect.
Finally, we can draw some conclusions from our experiment about the mechanisms by which ECM symbiosis shifts an NF to a PF generated by conspecific litter. We suspect that litter may become a nutrient resource for the fungus involved in the symbiosis, as has been observed in the symbiosis between Paxillus involutus and Betula pendula [39,40], for the ECM fungus Cortinarius glaucopus [58], and at the ectomycorrhizal community level [28]. Additionally, the presence of the fungal symbiont, which envelops the fine root tips with a dense hyphal mantle, may protect against a potential autotoxic effect of leaf litter [59,60]. We mainly support the nutrient source hypothesis, where the fungus can use the nutrient immobilised in leaf litter to degrade potential autotoxic compounds. The last is supported by the assumption that we observed increased root proliferation in ECM seedlings with conspecific litter. Conversely, if the fungal symbiont acts only as a protective layer surrounding root tips, it should not affect plant growth compared to ECM seedlings growing without litter. The presence of the basidiomycetous symbiont may prevent the decomposition of conspecific litter by releasing its complex enzymatic arsenal [61,62]. Furthermore, the oxidative ability of basidiomycetous fungi from Fenton chemistry can contribute to the degradation and destabilisation of a wide range of molecules in organic matter [28,63], including long-lasting autotoxic compounds that act at a species-specific level such as self-DNA. In agreement with the literature, the ECM fungal community is more abundant in the intermediate layer of the forest floor, where there is a concomitant increase in recalcitrant compounds, but also in self-DNA. Consequently, it could be suggested that the ability of the plant to support the symbiosis is the result of an evolutionary adaptation to NF. The function of an associated ECM community shifts from NF to PF, allowing the formation of monodominant stands of the plant species in question.
In addition, it would be interesting to verify in future studies whether the effect observed in the present work is maintained when a different combination of ECM symbiosis and amendment of conspecific and heterospecific litter is used, as well as whether the effect is the same in ECM plant species that form monodominant or mixed stands. Furthermore, it would be worthwhile to investigate whether the addition of conspecific litter can induce stress in plants and thus promote the formation of ECM symbiosis.

5. Conclusions

In our experiment, we observed that the presence of the ECM symbiont P. arrhizus in Q. ilex resulted in a shift in NF to PF from non-ECM to ECM fungi generated by conspecific litter. We speculate that this effect is likely due to the increased ability of ECM plants to scavenge resources in the soil due to their broader and more extensive root systems, but also to the capability of their root systems to explore deeper root layers when the effect of litter is minimised by ECM symbiosis or is absent. We also observed that non-ECM seedlings had reduced growth and root proliferation compared to non-ECM seedlings growing without litter, indicating an autotoxic effect of conspecific litter. In these plants, the addition of litter produces similar results but with a different temporal pattern depending on the degree of decomposition of the litter material. It could be suggested that the ECM symbiosis between P. arrhizus and Q. ilex plays a role in recycling autotoxic compounds released from conspecific litter by converting them into nutrients that are passed on to the plant partner.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/microorganisms11061394/s1, Figure S1: Heatmaps of effect size from Q. ilex seedling biometric variables, Figure S2: Cumulative root length of Q. ilex seedlings, Figure S3: Appearance of root tips of Q. ilex after inoculation of P. arrhizus, Table S1: GLM testing significant variations for all the parameters measured and estimated for Q. ilex seedlings growing in the presence of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis with P. arrhizus and litter age, Table S2: GLM (generalised linear model) testing significant variations in the total length of fine roots, number of fine roots, and total root length of Q. ilex seedlings during two months in the presence of ectomycorrhizal symbiosis with P. arrhizus and conspecific litter at different stages of decomposition.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.Z., G.B. and S.M.; methodology, M.Z. and G.B.; M.Z. and M.I. investigation, S.M., M.Z., and L.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.Z.; writing—review and editing, E.A., L.S. and A.S.; visualisation, A.S. and G.B.; supervision, S.M., A.S. and G.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available upon request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Brundrett, M. Mycorrhizas in natural ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 1991, 21, 171–313. [Google Scholar]
  2. Brundrett, M. Diversity and classification of mycorrhizal associations. Biol. Rev. 2004, 79, 473–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Corrales, A.; Henkel, T.W.; Smith, M.E. Ectomycorrhizal associations in the tropics–biogeography, diversity patterns and ecosystem roles. New Phytol. 2018, 220, 1076–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Van der Heijden, M.G.; Boller, T.; Wiemken, A.; Sanders, I.R. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology 1998, 79, 2082–2091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Klironomos, J.; Zobel, M.; Tibbett, M.; Stock, W.D.; Rillig, M.C.; Parrent, J.L.; Moora, M.; Koch, A.M.; Facelli, J.M.; Facelli, E. Forces that structure plant communities: Quantifying the importance of the mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2011, 189, 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. McGuire, K.L. Common ectomycorrhizal networks may maintain monodominance in a tropical rain forest. Ecology 2007, 88, 567–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Bennett, J.A.; Maherali, H.; Reinhart, K.O.; Lekberg, Y.; Hart, M.M.; Klironomos, J. Plant-soil feedbacks and mycorrhizal type influence temperate forest population dynamics. Science 2017, 355, 181–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Van der Putten, W.H.; Bardgett, R.D.; Bever, J.D.; Bezemer, T.M.; Casper, B.B.; Fukami, T.; Kardol, P.; Klironomos, J.N.; Kulmatiski, A.; Schweitzer, J.A. Plant–soil feedbacks: The past, the present and future challenges. J. Ecol. 2013, 101, 265–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kulmatiski, A.; Beard, K.H.; Stevens, J.R.; Cobbold, S.M. Plant–soil feedbacks: A meta-analytical review. Ecol. Lett. 2008, 11, 980–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Cesarano, G.; Zotti, M.; Antignani, V.; Marra, R.; Scala, F.; Bonanomi, G. Soil sickness and negative plant-soil feedback: A reappraisal of hypotheses. J. Plant Pathol. 2017, 99, 545–570. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bonanomi, G.; Incerti, G.; Stinca, A.; Cartenì, F.; Giannino, F.; Mazzoleni, S. Ring formation in clonal plants. Commun. Ecol. 2014, 15, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cartenì, F.; Marasco, A.; Bonanomi, G.; Mazzoleni, S.; Rietkerk, M.; Giannino, F. Negative plant soil feedback explaining ring formation in clonal plants. J. Theor. Biol. 2012, 313, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bonanomi, G.; Rietkerk, M.; Dekker, S.C.; Mazzoleni, S. Negative plant–soil feedback and positive species interaction in a herbaceous plant community. Plant Ecol. 2005, 181, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kardol, P.; Cornips, N.J.; van Kempen, M.M.; Bakx-Schotman, J.T.; van der Putten, W.H. Microbe-mediated plant–soil feedback causes historical contingency effects in plant community assembly. Ecol. Monogr. 2007, 77, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kardol, P.; Martijn Bezemer, T.; Van Der Putten, W.H. Temporal variation in plant–soil feedback controls succession. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9, 1080–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reinhart, K.O. The organization of plant communities: Negative plant–soil feedbacks and semiarid grasslands. Ecology 2012, 93, 2377–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bonanomi, G.; Giannino, F.; Mazzoleni, S. Negative plant–soil feedback and species coexistence. Oikos 2005, 111, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Packer, A.; Clay, K. Soil pathogens and spatial patterns of seedling mortality in a temperate tree. Nature 2000, 404, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Smith-Ramesh, L.M.; Reynolds, H.L. The next frontier of plant–soil feedback research: Unraveling context dependence across biotic and abiotic gradients. J. Veg. Sci. 2017, 28, 484–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bonanomi, G.; Rietkerk, M.; Dekker, S.C.; Mazzoleni, S. Islands of fertility induce co-occurring negative and positive plant-soil feedbacks promoting coexistence. Plant Ecol. 2008, 197, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bonanomi, G.; Sicurezza, M.G.; Caporaso, S.; Esposito, A.; Mazzoleni, S. Phytotoxicity dynamics of decaying plant materials. New Phytol. 2006, 169, 571–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mazzoleni, S.; Bonanomi, G.; Incerti, G.; Chiusano, M.L.; Termolino, P.; Mingo, A.; Senatore, M.; Giannino, F.; Cartenì, F.; Rietkerk, M. Inhibitory and toxic effects of extracellular self-DNA in litter: A mechanism for negative plant–soil feedbacks? New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1195–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Mazzoleni, S.; Bonanomi, G.; Giannino, F.; Rietkerk, M.; Dekker, S.; Zucconi, F. Is plant biodiversity driven by decomposition processes? An emerging new theory on plant diversity. Commun. Ecol. 2007, 8, 103–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Brundrett, M.C. Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytol. 2002, 154, 275–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. ZengPu, L.; JunRan, J.; Changwen, W. Antagonism between Ectomycorrhizal fungi and plant pathogens. In Mycorrhizas for Plantation Forestry in Asia; Brundett, M., Dell, B., Malajczuk, N., Mingqin, G., Eds.; Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR): Canberra, Australia, 1994; pp. 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  26. Van der Heijden, M.G.; Sanders, I.R. Mycorrhizal ecology: Synthesis and perspectives. In Mycorrhizal Ecology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002; pp. 441–456. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tuomi, J.; Kytöviita, M.M.; Härdling, R. Cost efficiency of nutrient acquisition and the advantage of mycorrhizal symbiosis for the host plant. Oikos 2001, 92, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lindahl, B.D.; Tunlid, A. Ectomycorrhizal fungi–potential organic matter decomposers, yet not saprotrophs. New Phytol. 2015, 205, 1443–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bödeker, I.T.; Clemmensen, K.E.; de Boer, W.; Martin, F.; Olson, Å.; Lindahl, B.D. Ectomycorrhizal Cortinarius species participate in enzymatic oxidation of humus in northern forest ecosystems. New Phytol. 2014, 203, 245–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Booth, M.G.; Hoeksema, J.D. Mycorrhizal networks counteract competitive effects of canopy trees on seedling survival. Ecology 2010, 91, 2294–2302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Singh, H.; Batish, D.R.; Kohli, R. Autotoxicity: Concept, organisms, and ecological significance. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1999, 18, 757–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. An, M.; Pratley, J.; Haig, T. Phytotoxicity of Vulpia residues: IV. Dynamics of allelochemicals during decomposition of Vulpia residues and their corresponding phytotoxicity. J. Chem. Ecol. 2001, 27, 395–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Trifonova, R.; Postma, J.; Verstappen, F.W.; Bouwmeester, H.J.; Ketelaars, J.J.; van Elsas, J.-D. Removal of phytotoxic compounds from torrefied grass fibres by plant-beneficial microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2008, 66, 158–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Mazzoleni, S.; Bonanomi, G.; Giannino, F.; Incerti, G.; Dekker, S.C.; Rietkerk, M. Modelling the effects of litter decomposition on tree diversity patterns. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221, 2784–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Cartenì, F.; Bonanomi, G.; Giannino, F.; Incerti, G.; Vincenot, C.E.; Chiusano, M.L.; Mazzoleni, S. Self-DNA inhibitory effects: Underlying mechanisms and ecological implications. Plant Signal. Behav. 2016, 11, e1158381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Vincenot, C.E.; Cartenì, F.; Bonanomi, G.; Mazzoleni, S.; Giannino, F. Plant–soil negative feedback explains vegetation dynamics and patterns at multiple scales. Oikos 2017, 126, 1319–1328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bonanomi, G.; Zotti, M.; Idbella, M.; Termolino, P.; De Micco, V.; Mazzoleni, S. Field evidence for litter and self-DNA inhibitory effects on Alnus glutinosa roots. New Phytol. 2022, 236, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wurst, S.; Kaiser, N.; Nitzsche, S.; Haase, J.; Auge, H.; Rillig, M.C.; Powell, J.R. Tree diversity modifies distance-dependent effects on seedling emergence but not plant–soil feedbacks of temperate trees. Ecology 2015, 96, 1529–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Read, D.; Perez-Moreno, J. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems—A journey towards relevance? New Phytol. 2003, 157, 475–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Perez-Moreno, J.; Read, D. Mobilization and transfer of nutrients from litter to tree seedlings via the vegetative mycelium of ectomycorrhizal plants. New Phytol. 2000, 145, 301–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mazzoleni, S.; Cartenì, F.; Bonanomi, G.; Senatore, M.; Termolino, P.; Giannino, F.; Incerti, G.; Rietkerk, M.; Lanzotti, V.; Chiusano, M.L. Inhibitory effects of extracellular self-DNA: A general biological process? New Phytol. 2015, 206, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Molter, D.J. On mycorrhizal individuality. Biol. Philos. 2019, 34, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Calogne, F. Les gastéromycètes d’Espagne. Bull Soc. Mycol. Fr. 1975, 91, 247–292. [Google Scholar]
  44. Marx, D.H. Tree host range and world distribution of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Pisolithus tinctorius. Can. J. Microbiol. 1977, 23, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Cairney, J.; Chambers, S. Interactions between Pisolithus tinctorius and its hosts: A review of current knowledge. Mycorrhiza 1997, 7, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Li, J.; Romane, F.J. Effects of germination inhibition on the dynamics of Quercus ilex stands. J. Veg. Sci. 1997, 8, 287–294. [Google Scholar]
  47. Teobaldelli, M.; Cona, F.; Stinca, A.; Saulino, L.; Anzano, E.; Giordano, D.; Migliozzi, A.; Bonanomi, G.; D’Urso, G.; Mazzoleni, S. Improving resilience of an old-growth urban forest in Southern Italy: Lesson(s) from a stand-replacing windstorm. Urban For. Urban Green. 2020, 47, 126521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bonanomi, G.; Incerti, G.; Abd El-Gawad, A.M.; Sarker, T.C.; Stinca, A.; Motti, R.; Cesarano, G.; Teobaldelli, M.; Saulino, L.; Cona, F. Windstorm disturbance triggers multiple species invasion in an urban Mediterranean forest. Iforest-Biogeosci. For. 2018, 11, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Bonanomi, G.; Sarker, T.C.; Zotti, M.; Cesarano, G.; Allevato, E.; Mazzoleni, S. Predicting nitrogen mineralization from organic amendments: Beyond C/N ratio by 13C-CPMAS NMR approach. Plant Soil 2019, 441, 129–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cohen, J. The effect size index: D. Stat. Power Anal. Behav. Sci. 1988, 2. [Google Scholar]
  51. Teste, F.P.; Kardol, P.; Turner, B.L.; Wardle, D.A.; Zemunik, G.; Renton, M.; Laliberté, E. Plant-soil feedback and the maintenance of diversity in Mediterranean-climate shrublands. Science 2017, 355, 173–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ditengou, F.A.; Müller, A.; Rosenkranz, M.; Felten, J.; Lasok, H.; Van Doorn, M.M.; Legué, V.; Palme, K.; Schnitzler, J.-P.; Polle, A. Volatile signalling by sesquiterpenes from ectomycorrhizal fungi reprogrammes root architecture. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Diaz, E.C.; Martin, F.; Tagu, D. Eucalypt α-tubulin: cDNA cloning and increased level of transcripts in ectomycorrhizal root system. Plant Mol. Biol. 1996, 31, 905–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Pedersen, C.T.; Sylvia, D.M.; Shilling, D.G. Pisolithus arhizus ectomycorrhiza affects plant competition for phosphorus between Pinus elliottii and Panicum chamaelonche. Mycorrhiza 1999, 9, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Carteron, A.; Beigas, M.; Joly, S.; Turner, B.L.; Laliberté, E. Temperate forests dominated by arbuscular or ectomycorrhizal fungi are characterized by strong shifts from saprotrophic to mycorrhizal fungi with increasing soil depth. Microb. Ecol. 2021, 82, 377–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Sugawara, R.; Sotome, K.; Maekawa, N.; Nakagiri, A.; Endo, N. Mycorrhizal synthesis, morpho-anatomical characterization of mycorrhizae, and evaluation of mycorrhiza-forming ability of Hydnum albidum–like species using monokaryotic and dikaryotic cultures. Mycorrhiza 2021, 31, 349–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Koide, R.T.; Fernandez, C.; Petprakob, K. General principles in the community ecology of ectomycorrhizal fungi. Ann. For. Sci. 2011, 68, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Lindahl, B.D.; Ihrmark, K.; Boberg, J.; Trumbore, S.E.; Högberg, P.; Stenlid, J.; Finlay, R.D. Spatial separation of litter decomposition and mycorrhizal nitrogen uptake in a boreal forest. New Phytol. 2007, 173, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. DeBell, D.S. Phytotoxic effects of cherrybark oak. For. Sci. 1971, 17, 180–185. [Google Scholar]
  60. Dabral, A.; Butola, B.; Khanduri, V.; Sharma, C.; Dhanush, C. Autotoxicity against seed germination, seedling emergence of Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus Ex. Bahadur. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem. 2018, 7, 1813–1816. [Google Scholar]
  61. Rytioja, J.; Hildén, K.; Yuzon, J.; Hatakka, A.; de Vries, R.P.; Mäkelä, M.R. Plant-polysaccharide-degrading enzymes from basidiomycetes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2014, 78, 614–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Baldrian, P. Enzymes of saprotrophic basidiomycetes. In Proceedings of the British Mycological Society Symposia Series; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008; pp. 19–41. [Google Scholar]
  63. Op De Beeck, M.; Troein, C.; Peterson, C.; Persson, P.; Tunlid, A. Fenton reaction facilitates organic nitrogen acquisition by an ectomycorrhizal fungus. New Phytol. 2018, 218, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Microorganisms 11 01394 g001 550
Figure 1. Representation of the rhizotron experiment. (a) Module structure; (b) experimental design and combination of soil litter amendments used in the experiment on Q. ilex seedlings with or without ectomycorrhizae of P. arrhizus. (c) In this example of the root system of a Q. ilex seedling growing in the rhizotron, roots were marked with differently coloured indelible pencils. Different colours represent the root visible after 15 days (yellow), 30 days (red), 45 days (violet), and 60 days (orange).
Figure 1. Representation of the rhizotron experiment. (a) Module structure; (b) experimental design and combination of soil litter amendments used in the experiment on Q. ilex seedlings with or without ectomycorrhizae of P. arrhizus. (c) In this example of the root system of a Q. ilex seedling growing in the rhizotron, roots were marked with differently coloured indelible pencils. Different colours represent the root visible after 15 days (yellow), 30 days (red), 45 days (violet), and 60 days (orange).
Microorganisms 11 01394 g001
Microorganisms 11 01394 g002 550
Figure 2. Scan of root systems of Q. ilex seedlings growing in the presence (up) and absence (down) of the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis of P. arrhizus with three different types of litter regimes: fresh litter (0 days of decomposition), aged litter (120 days of decomposition), and without litter.
Figure 2. Scan of root systems of Q. ilex seedlings growing in the presence (up) and absence (down) of the ectomycorrhizal symbiosis of P. arrhizus with three different types of litter regimes: fresh litter (0 days of decomposition), aged litter (120 days of decomposition), and without litter.
Microorganisms 11 01394 g002
Microorganisms 11 01394 g003 550
Figure 3. Barplot showing root biomass (a), total root length (b), number of fine roots (c), total length of fine roots (d), area of the root system (e), and density of fine roots (roots/cm2) (f). Lecter indicates significant differences between each experimental unit. Significance was assigned according to the Duncan post-hoc test for p-values < 0.05. A statistical test was conducted on 18 Q. ilex seedlings with three replicates for each treatment. Letters on each bar indicate significant statistical differences between treatment.
Figure 3. Barplot showing root biomass (a), total root length (b), number of fine roots (c), total length of fine roots (d), area of the root system (e), and density of fine roots (roots/cm2) (f). Lecter indicates significant differences between each experimental unit. Significance was assigned according to the Duncan post-hoc test for p-values < 0.05. A statistical test was conducted on 18 Q. ilex seedlings with three replicates for each treatment. Letters on each bar indicate significant statistical differences between treatment.
Microorganisms 11 01394 g003
Microorganisms 11 01394 g004 550
Figure 4. PCA of effect size from Q. ilex seedling biometric variables of the root system. Each of the variables was rescaled according to its effect on litter treatment in both ECM and non-ECM conditions for soils enriched with fresh (0 d) and aged (120 d) conspecific litters. Variables abbreviations refer to: width of the root system (cm) WRS; depth of the root system (cm) DRS; area of the root system (cm2) ARS; total length of fine roots (cm) TLFR; number of fine roots NFR; total root length (cm) TRL; root biomass (g) RB; root length/area TLFR/ARS; root biomass/root depth RB/DRS; root width/root biomass WRS/RB; density N° root/area NFR/ARS; root biomass/shoot biomass R/S; depth/width of the root system D/W; depth/width/root biomass DW/RB.
Figure 4. PCA of effect size from Q. ilex seedling biometric variables of the root system. Each of the variables was rescaled according to its effect on litter treatment in both ECM and non-ECM conditions for soils enriched with fresh (0 d) and aged (120 d) conspecific litters. Variables abbreviations refer to: width of the root system (cm) WRS; depth of the root system (cm) DRS; area of the root system (cm2) ARS; total length of fine roots (cm) TLFR; number of fine roots NFR; total root length (cm) TRL; root biomass (g) RB; root length/area TLFR/ARS; root biomass/root depth RB/DRS; root width/root biomass WRS/RB; density N° root/area NFR/ARS; root biomass/shoot biomass R/S; depth/width of the root system D/W; depth/width/root biomass DW/RB.
Microorganisms 11 01394 g004
Microorganisms 11 01394 g005 550
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) explains variation in root system associated with ectomycorrhizal and non-ectomycorrhizal Q. ilex seedlings growing with different litter regimes. In the plot, the trajectories of associated loadings are shown for each sampling date.
Figure 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) explains variation in root system associated with ectomycorrhizal and non-ectomycorrhizal Q. ilex seedlings growing with different litter regimes. In the plot, the trajectories of associated loadings are shown for each sampling date.
Microorganisms 11 01394 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zotti, M.; Bonanomi, G.; Saulino, L.; Allevato, E.; Saracino, A.; Mazzoleni, S.; Idbella, M. Shifts of Leaf Litter-Induced Plant-Soil Feedback from Negative to Positive Driven by Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Quercus ilex and Pisolithus arrhizus. Microorganisms 2023, 11, 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061394

AMA Style

Zotti M, Bonanomi G, Saulino L, Allevato E, Saracino A, Mazzoleni S, Idbella M. Shifts of Leaf Litter-Induced Plant-Soil Feedback from Negative to Positive Driven by Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Quercus ilex and Pisolithus arrhizus. Microorganisms. 2023; 11(6):1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061394

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zotti, Maurizio, Giuliano Bonanomi, Luigi Saulino, Emilia Allevato, Antonio Saracino, Stefano Mazzoleni, and Mohamed Idbella. 2023. "Shifts of Leaf Litter-Induced Plant-Soil Feedback from Negative to Positive Driven by Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Quercus ilex and Pisolithus arrhizus" Microorganisms 11, no. 6: 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061394

APA Style

Zotti, M., Bonanomi, G., Saulino, L., Allevato, E., Saracino, A., Mazzoleni, S., & Idbella, M. (2023). Shifts of Leaf Litter-Induced Plant-Soil Feedback from Negative to Positive Driven by Ectomycorrhizal Symbiosis between Quercus ilex and Pisolithus arrhizus. Microorganisms, 11(6), 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms11061394

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop